The David Knight Show - Thr 9May24 Bloodlines of the Technocracy

Episode Date: May 9, 2024

(2:00) Bloodlines of the TechnocracyBezos grandfather's DARPA connectionSpies, Venture Capital, and tech billionsDARPA's internet & social media was/is a trap, a psy-war(10:54) Trump's CIAWas Trump a victim of Gina Haspel?Were they out to get him? Who was running the CIA?Who was running the government?(21:42) DeSantis & FL go to war against lab meat — other states have legislation pending (41:27) Boy Scouts remove toxically masculine "boys" from name"Trustworthy, honest, and brave" goes the way of "duty, honor, country"You won't believe the merit badge you MUST have in order to become an Eagle Scout nowRex Tillerson — the "Boy Scout" conservative media doesn't want to talk aboutInstead of tranny-games, what is China training its kids to do from elementary up?(53:47) Will history rise again in the south? Reclaiming our history, one school name at a time. Overwhelming opposition to the memory-holing and renaming that happened without public input (57:28) FreedomWorks closes, a victim of Trump's triumph of personality over principle (1:05:14) Retroactive Law, Pre-Crime Hate Speech, Bounties Paid to Anonymous Accusers What happens in Canada won't stay in Canada but will be used elsewhere by the globalist Details from Canada's new censorship law keep astounding — worse than any dystopian science fiction, seriously. (1:33:27) INTERVIEW Golden Beans:  China, a Nation of Bean-Counters Even though the Federal Reserve is keeping interest rates high, gold continues strong on retail demand and Central Bank demand, especially in China (a "torrent").   What are our options in smaller quantity gold & silver which are useful in a medium of exchange as the rush to "cashless" societies and CBDC accelerates? Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.gold, joins (2:14:05) Campus Agitators — More Antics.  Will conservative destroy free speech to stop them?Protestors go full French Revolution Jacobins with mock trial & guillotine for the Robespierre-like administratorsGeorge Washington University flies the Palestinian, not American, flagWhen protestors refuse to move, painters paint right over them and their graffiti wall(2:26:56)Pfizer stock takes a hit when their genetic drug trial kills a boyHow Insurance Companies Bankrupt Doctors That Don't Vaccinate KidsJapanese study shows cancer rates soar after 3rd TrumpShotEven European countries with high uptake are now very skeptical of both government and "public health"(2:56:12) Vote to remove "Machiavellian Mike" Johnson as speaker fails and conservative media talks of the Uniparty, Pelosi's endorsement of him, and his rule with Democrats.  But what did Trump do?Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy. I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough. You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 9th of May, year of our Lord 2024.

Well, today we're going to begin by going back and looking at how we got here. There's been some interesting connections to some of our tech oligarchs and to the foundation of the Internet and these families. People talk about the bloodlines of Illuminati. How about the bloodlines of the technocracy? We're going to take a look at that today to begin with. And we're going to take a deeper look at this amazing power grab going on in Canada, put forward by Justin Castro, the spawn of Fidel. It's absolutely amazing. We have retroactivity there. We have pre-crime. We have life sentences for speech. Folks, we're losing Western civilization very rapidly.

We'll be right back. Yeah, I guess we could call this the bloodlines of the technocracy. FBI file on Jeff Bezos' grandfather showing that he was a DARPA co-founder, that's now evidently been destroyed. No longer exists. There are newspaper clippings that talk about it. But of course, if you file a freedom of information request as the individual who runs the Black Vault run by John Greenwald Jr. He runs that, and so he looks into the history of this dark government that we have here.

Folks, the pageant that you see out there, the trials and tribulations of Trump, I mean, literally, as well as the CIA moves to take him out of anything, that's all just for show. There's real competition in this Game of Thrones, and there's real competition within the intelligence community. But the elections at the federal level don't make a dime's worth of difference. And we'll talk about that as well today

when we take a look at the efforts to get rid of Machiavelli and Mike. It's interesting to see how all of the conservative press, Breitbart, WND, all of them, how they come after Machiavelli and Mike and say, hey, this guy, the Democrats love him. Nancy Pelosi supported him, endorsed him for this. You know, keep him in there, keep him in there. He works with him multiple times. And with a minority of Republicans and all of the Democrats, he gets these things through.

And so people are rightfully upset with him. And talk about the uni party. You know what they don't talk about? The fact that Trump supported him. It wouldn't have lasted a minute if Trump had opposed him. Because we have a party that's been reduced to a cult of personality, and it is a sham. It is shadowboxing what has happened in Washington. But let's focus on the bloodlines of the technocracy here what's not widely known is that amazon founder jeff bazis's grandfather

lawrence preston guys helped form the pentagon's super secret advanced research projects agency arpa was renamed darpa later on and that goes back to 1958 there's an interesting book by annie jacobson about DARPA. She really starts to focus not so much on the, you know, she focuses on it after this similar time. She starts to focus on the Jason scientists who the Defense Department came to during Vietnam. And so they wanted to use Vietnam as a test bed for their wars and their equipment and that's one of the reasons why we have a major reason why we have these unending wars when we are not attacked they are test beds for their equipment and so um years later of course he says uh describes it this way darpa developed the internet um internet search voice recognition high speed networking that type of

thing interesting that they leave out social media that is the most important thing because if you look at the beginning of the internet, as I've said many times, anybody that listens to this program knows how often I talk about J.C.R. Licklider and DARPA, and he was there at this time. As a matter of fact, he overlapped with the time that Bezos' grandfather was there. J.C.R. Licklider was a psychologist, and he proposed what he called the Intergalactic Computer Network. And it was the internet. Now, they didn't have the technology at the time to do it. They didn't have the hardware to do it. But he designed it.

It was designed by a psychologist at DARPA. It was designed as a psychological weapon, as a weapon of psych warfare. And as soon as the equipment started to catch up in the nineties, you had all these organizations jump in big time into these venture capital firms. It's a matter of record. You can go look at how many of the intelligence community executives were on the boards of these venture capital firms. And the CIA even went public with their own In-Q-Tel. They do talk about In-Q-Tel in here. But it was social media more than anything. Social media and the internet, that was the key part of it.

Those are the two components that had to be there for psychological warfare and control. And of course, they throw it out there for free. Because they're funding it. Because you're the product. Because it was always about geospatial intelligence. All these things that they don't want.. Because it was always about geospatial intelligence. All these things that they don't want. And they also don't mention geospatial intelligence in here either. One year before his grandfather died, Bezos' grandfather died in 1995,

Bezos founded Amazon in the garage of his Bellevue, Washington home. And they say on Zero Hedge, or so we're told. And they show the picture of a young Jeff Bezos setting at a very simple desk, pull that up, Travis. Uh, and, um, on the wall is something that looks almost handwritten amazon.com. Yeah. That's the legend that's there. Now I've talked many times about how Bezos is so obsessed with space.

And he talks about the fact that he read Gerard K. O'Neill's book, High Frontiers, and how that was, you know, the idea that he wanted to put these rotating colonies in space. You saw it. If you saw Elysium, you saw Gerard K. O'Neill's ideas of rotating toroids. There it it. If you saw Elysium, you saw, um, Gerard K O'Neill's ideas, uh, rotating, uh, toroids. There it is.

There's a picture of, uh, Bezos setting in his, um, the, the legend, uh, there we go.

And his garage with the Amazon sign there. Uh, but anyway, um, he was also extremely wealthy. He had all these connections with his, but Hey, that was

all just a coincidence and he also wanted to um he also wanted to set up these space stations and so that's why he's got his uh um what was it called blue origin yeah blue origin is the name of his company there uh but uh that's what his grandfather was into as well. Space technology, ballistic missile defense, 1958 to 1961. Again, it was about early 60s. I think it was publicly, well, released by J.C.R. Lickliner, I believe, in 62. But he was working on it while his father was there, grandfather was there. And so, again, the information has been scrubbed but there are snapshots of these documents as well as a snapshot of the FOIA request where they said i can't find it or it's

been destroyed and so uh as many people point out well we know that facebook is also based on a canceled dod program you know the canceled life log, part of the total awareness. I think, well, we're going to keep a log of everybody's entire life, everything they got there. Well, it's even better after people reacted to it. They said that they shut that down. The very next day you have Facebook.

But of course, Facebook, the advantage of that is that they don't have to hire an army of people to do data entry. You enter your own information in there for them so they can see all that stuff. One person commented on this. There's long time been speculation that DARPA has been involved in the creation of many popular big tech companies using front men for the illusion of a startup led by outsiders well first of all that's not speculation it's fact as i've said over and over again and um yeah it is an illusion and it is bigger than uh just the internet it's social media it's geospatial intelligence, especially. And so another person said, we know Facebook is a canceled program of the DOD.

If you look at the Bill Gates family, you find similar stuff, and you find connections to Planned Parenthood as well with the Gates family. He's always been about killing people. Now, we got these three factors up here. We got to get one of them down to zero, right? Let's get the people down to zero. Always been about that.

Bill Gates is as much of a humanity hater as Paul Ehrlich. Can we do it with disease? Can we do it with war? Can we do it with vaccines? Always about that stuff and so um there's also an article that i saw yesterday about gina haspel and uh greg rubini did this on his sub stack now it's interesting to me that everything that he talks about with gina haspel who again you know if you watch this program i've talked about her frequently uh but everything that he does that he talks about with gina haspel who again you know if you watch this program i've talked about her frequently uh but everything that he does that he talks about is to defend trump and yet he

scratches his head he says does trump not know this that's a rhetorical question is it i mean the question is is trump a fool or a tool everything you want to know about gina haspel he talks begins by talking about james o'keefe's sting um ambushing a cia officer amjad besisi if i pronounce his name correctly he titled it cia project manager says execs and directors of cia withheld information from trump see it's all we don't care if there's a secret government we don't care if there's a secret government. We don't care if there's a secret government that starts wars, that gets us involved, gets our soldiers killed. We don't care about that.

We don't care if they do a coup of our own government. We don't care if they assassinate our own people. We don't care if they're blackmailing politicians. We don't care if they're involved in the demonic occult stuff that we know they're involved in. We don't care about any of that stuff. What they do to Trump. That's what I want to know.

That's all I care about is Trump. This, this cult of personality drives me nuts. As a matter of fact, it just took down a freedom works. They admitted it. They said, well, you know, it was, um, Dick army who was a, who was the majority leader. Excuse me. The number two position when Gingrich was speaker. Yeah, Dick Armey was the leader.

And he was a... Sorry, coughing here. He was an economics professor of the Austrian school, Ludwig von Mises, and solid guy. Anyway, that was the basis of FreedomWorks. And then Trump came. And we don't care about principles anymore. We don't care about economic principles.

We don't care about principles of Liberty or any of that stuff. All we care about is Donald Trump. So how did Gina Haspel affect Donald Trump? Why did he put her in the position that he did? As I've said many times. So, um, Greg Rabini says, we learned some interesting stuff from this O'Keefe expose, especially regarding Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, he says. Well, I don't know, because I think he omitted from this thing some of the most interesting

stuff that we always knew about Gina Haspel. How she illegally tortured people, how she covered that up, how she used the lies to lie us the lies from torture, use that to lie us into the Iraq war or the knowing politicians used what she presented them to how I didn't know she was lying to me, they use that to give themselves plausible deniability to get us involved in the Iraq war. Now, Donald Trump says, Oh, we got into the Iraq war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction. He said that as a candidate.

And yet, as president, he takes the woman who did that, and first he put her into the number two slot right underneath Pompeo. Then he moved Pompeo the secretary of state. And he moved Gina Haspel to CIA director from deputy director to full director. And so, um, that's, this guy's looking at it. So, so what are these people do?

They were involved in all this skullduggery and framing of Trump. Gina Haspel withheld information from Trump. Really? Wow. You think it's on on a need-to-know basis, and he doesn't need to know everything. He's just the president. She's running the government if she's in the CIA, right? James O'Keefe adds that Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that was exposing herself and the CIA and the fabricated Russian collusion hoax. You see, the Russian collusion hoax and her role in that

is more important to these Trump suckers than it is to the fact that she lied us into the Iraq war and then covered up the torture and the rest of this stuff. Where was Gina Haspel in 2016 when all the spy operations on Trump took place? Well, she was in London, and she was a CIA station chief in London, and we know that all, you know, it was the London Langley Axis, as I've said many times.

She was the London side of the Langley Axis, and on the Langley side was John Brennan. He was CIA director in 2016. And he says, this is really important. It connects these dots. This means that Gina Haspel was reporting directly to John Brennan, who directed all the spy operations against Trump. All we care about is Trump. These people can start World War III, a nuclear war.

They can have a revolution here in America. They can destroy our country, assassinate our presidents, blackmail every one of these politicians. But what did they do to Trump? These people. These people. It's just amazing. The countries which helped John Brennan, Obama, and Hillary Clinton in the spy operations on Trump are England, Austria, Italy.

Gina Haspel was the liaison to John Brennan and Obama for all of these spy operations. So why then would Trump hire Gina Haspel as CIA director? He didn't know? Three question marks. He didn't know that the British were spying on him. He didn't know that Gina Haspel was CIA station chief in London in 2016. Did he not watch my show? Because I talked about it all that time. This is public knowledge. He knew. He knew. Do you know who endorsed Gina Haspel when Trump nominated her as CIA director? John Brennan and James Clapper.

Who we all know were after Trump, right? Yes, the Obama guys. Brennan and Clapper endorsed Gina Haspel. And some more deep state actors endorsed Gina Haspel too. So again, the question is, and he doesn't really get close trump didn't know that's as close as it comes no the question is this we know that trump knew uh the question is was he blackmailed what they have on him was it epstein other things that he did? He knew. He absolutely knew. And so, was Gina Haspel involved in the planning of the January 6th operation?

Let's ask you this. Was she involved in the lockdown? Was she involved in Dark Winter 2? When they finally activated what they'd been practicing since two months before 9-11? The other shoe to drop from 9-11. See, all this stuff was an inside job. January the 6th was an inside job. It was an inside job, not just from Gina Haspel.

It was an inside job from Donald Trump making $250 million on his save america it was an inside job from alex jones another cia guy uh who uh again how many people just just ask yourself um you know you probably know a lot of people who have been injured with a vaccine but do you know anybody who is in the cia do you know anybody who has several family members in the cia and you know that's uh how many cia how many people that you know are involved in the cia who have multiple family members in the cia who talks about the fact that he has multiple family members and the CIA Alex does who uses CIA sources or intelligence community sources like Pachinik and others, uh, and uses it in Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaefer and others like that at that time to, to lie to people about the sting and to set this

up and to make unbelievable amounts of money as well and then still using the sandy hook stuff 1.4 billion dollar billion dollar judgment and he hasn't paid a penny how many people do you know like that that don't have to pay when they get a massive judgment against them how many people do you know that are protected by the deep state and the intelligence community well i know one personally anyway um when you look at all this was she involved in the planning of january 6th ask yourself if trump and alex and pachenik and roger stone and jack posobiet and all these other you know intelligence military intelligence typically these guys it's not monolithic, but they do work

together. We're supposed to believe that Gina Haspel was on one side and John Brenner and Clapper were on the other side. Trump supported Gina Haspel. Did she support Trump? Did she betray Trump? Did she direct Trump and tell him what to do? That's really the question. Strange that this author doesn't mention anything about Iraq or torture or any of that stuff. Strange that he won't offer an opinion as to whether or not he thinks Trump is a fool or a tool. So that's where we are. People won't go there, and for obvious reasons, isn't it? When Trump hired Mike Pompeo as CIA director in January of 2017, he appointed Gina Haspel as CIA deputy director. This means that Gina Haspel was the true boss of the CIA

for the entire four years of the Trump presidency. Because he later then moved her up to that. He sees Pompeo as just a placeholding idiot. But he doesn't see Trump as a placeholding idiot. Isn't that interesting yeah people like this all they see is trump trump trump and they can't see or they won't talk about the bigger picture the bigger picture of iraq bigger picture of 9 11 the bigger picture of 9-11, the bigger picture of the pandemic and global governance and moving the Overton window on global Mark of the Beast ID, moving the Overton window on universal basic income, moving the Overton window on everybody not having a job and all the rest

of this stuff. stuff uh so getting back to jeff bezos you know he um moved to florida and um got a 60 million dollar initial investment in uh lab meat and now it's interesting that ron desantis has just welcomed this new immigrant to florida by shutting down his lab meat effectively, say you are not going to sell this stuff here. I didn't know if he blocked the manufacturing of any of that stuff in the Sunshine State, but you're not going to sell it there. He signed the legislation into effect on May 1st, casting it as a bid to stop the World Economic Forum's goal of forcing the world to eat lab-grown meat and insects.

And I think it's good as far as it goes, but I think that he misses the key issue here. There's a lot of good stuff that DeSantis has done, a lot of stuff that nobody else has bothered to do. I mean, he tried to focus people on Big Brother digital money, but the press shut him down. All they wanted to do was talk about Trump and what's going on with Alvin Bragg and this trial that's happening, you know, uh, the hush money to hookers.

Uh, that's all they wanted to talk about. He does 20 minutes breaking down the problems of CBDC. And then all they want to do is talk about, uh, Trump and his hookers. And so with this, and then also with the vaccine, he's got his surgeon general talking about those DNA fragments. You know, the DNA fragments that are giving people cancer.

And, you know, and it's not even that it's just sloppy manufacturing and cutting corners on manufacturing. They've got the part of the SV 40 virus that gives you cancer. They left that in left all that stuff in and by the FDA's own definition, it's unfit to be sold, but they looked the other way. Canada looks the other way. And, um, but at least, um, Ron DeSantis and his, um, uh, attorney general said, we don't recommend it. They didn't ban it.

You see, that's what I'm saying. They speak out against it. They go a certain way, but they won't go all the way. It's kind of like what I talked about yesterday with Senator Ron Johnson and this pandemic treaty. He got all 49 Republican senators to say we don't support this, and they wrote a letter to Biden saying we don't support this. But in that letter, asked biden to please submit

this as a treaty so we can have a vote on it well it won't pass they need to have 60 votes they would only have 51 votes at most even if you know you might have more than that against it because some of the democrats might push back against it i don't know but um it is an election year but um they won't take the initiative to shut it down themselves they don't need to ask biden to submit it as a treaty they can say this is a treaty and you don't get to self-rightify treaties just like you should not have been given you know they but they took a pass on it with Mitch McConnell. They didn't do anything with the Paris climate accord. And so that looks like they're going to do that same type of thing again.

Again, they will go only so far in Florida. They will say, I don't recommend, I recommend that you don't take this vaccine because the contamination from DNA stuff, but they won't say it's banned. Why not? We had nine states ban a vaccine after a couple of people died a few decades ago. States can do that kind of thing. States must do that kind of thing. But all they'll do is say, well, I don't recommend, I recommend that you don't take it. But they won't ban the sale of something that can harm people. Why not? They do that all the time with other stuff.

And the Senate will not ban the presumption of this pandemic treaty. They'll speak out. They'll write a letter about how bad it is. But they won't do anything. You see this all the time. Jim Jordan always holding a hearing about this, holding a hearing about that, never doing anything that he actually has the power to do. Do these people even know what their job description is?

Have they ever read it? You know, what is the purpose of Congress? Well, it's to the House allocates funding, and that's their major power. A really strong power, said said Scalia rightfully so because everything that is done by the government is done with blackmail just like this anti-semitism awareness act well we're not going to give you money we'll give you money if you do what we like we won't give you money if you do what we don't want you to do so everything is about the money and congress has those purse strings but they won't use them the senate has the power to approve or disapprove

treaties but they won't pull a vote the state governor has the ability and the duty quite frankly to stop this poison but he won't do it well i wouldn't take that if i were you i don't recommend you take that. Anyway, so what are they doing with the meat? DeSantis says Florida is increasing meat production and encouraging residents to continue to consume and enjoy 100% real Florida beef. He previously blasted, quote, the global elite's plan to force the world to eat meat grown in a Petri dish or bugs to achieve their authoritarian goal. And, um, so I think the way to do this, that would be better. What is the goal? The goal is we can see where this bird flu stuff is to shut down local

production. It is to gain control of beef and chicken and all that kind of stuff. It is to vaccinate all of our food. Those are their goals in all this bird flu nonsense. So what do we do to stop that? They want to track and vaccinate every cow, every chicken, everywhere. Lots of money for big pharmaceutical companies. It pollutes the food supply, kills the population, makes us sick. That's their goal.

Depopulation for us, power and money for them. Attack our food supply. Starve us. Make it expensive. And that's the other part of this. They want to make, by culling herds, by culling chickens and things like that. We got one PCR test here. Kill all the cows on this ranch.

Kill all the chickens. Right? And we got one PCR test. Well, what's that going to do? That's going to raise the price of beef and chicken. And if they keep raising the price of beef and chicken, guess what? Now, they can't lower right now the price of this lab meat it's still extremely expensive besides being disgusting um you know instead of a tube

steak you want a tumor steak uh it's disgusting and and quite frankly has a lot of questions about whether or not it is helpful and healthy. But when you look at the economics, you can either lower your costs or you can use the government to force other people's costs up. Or you can use the government eventually to ban the other people. That's what they want to do. They want to make beef and chicken more expensive, more expensive, more expensive until a lot of people are not even getting it. And then they can ban it.

And people say, yeah, I haven't been able to afford beef or chicken for a long time. It's just those rich people that do it. So let's, let's get rid of it. So what should he do? Well, I think what you want to do is instead of even better than banning the lab meat. Sure. Fine. Ban the sale of it i'd like to see him ban the sale of these vaccines but he doesn't do that and i think it's important to do it at this point in time because if they wait until uh they are selling this stuff then it's going to be

harder to do it it's just like a nuclear warhead You want to get it in the launch phase. So you want to get this in the launch phase. I'm glad that he's banning it. Uh, but I think it's even better to allow alternatives that they want to shut down. And the alternative that they want to shut down is local processing of beef by the people who own it, shutting down this attempt. Cause this is another one of the goals of their bird flu stuff, and that is to centralize meat processing even more so. It's already highly centralized and under the thumb of the USDA. They want to make it even more so that way. And so what you do is you go the other way.

You go, everything that we do needs to be focused on decentralization and local. And so what do you do for the food supply? Well, you want to make it decentralized and local. You want to allow people to have farms and to grow whatever they wish. Leave them alone. If they want to drink raw milk, leave them alone. If they want to grow cows and slaughter the cattle on their own farm, leave them alone.

That would be the best thing that he could do. Uh, but, uh, I'm glad that he's calling attention to this. And, uh, so he, um, Bezos moved to Florida, the Bezos earth fund chaired by his girlfriend, Sanchez announced a hefty investment into sustainable protein, including plant-based fermented and cultivated meats. Part of the organization's larger $1 billion commitment to expanding food production.

Isn't it interesting how these megalomaniacal billionaires all want to kill us. We need to feed 10 billion people with healthy, sustainable food throughout this century while protecting our planet. We can do it and it will require a ton of innovation. Actually require a ton of cash. Sanchez wrote in a statement. She didn't even give the speech.

She had somebody else write it and put her name on it. Uh, so yeah, even Bill bill gates has said is it going to take a lot of innovation no even bill gates has said cattle are the most efficient way yeah but we just can't have that because of their farts so we're going to have to genetically modify them so they don't fart um coal is the most efficient way but we can't have that either because you know we got to pretend that we can't clean it up they know we know and we know that they know that we know but always come up with oh methane co2 lab-grown meat differs from its slaughter free counterparts like impossible foods and that lab meat is grown from real animal cells replicated scientifically you notice how the new york post slips that in there slaughter free

slaughter free cruelty free you know cosmetics this is slaughter. I prefer my meat slaughtered. I don't want it moving around while I'm trying to eat it. So yeah, slaughter free counterparts. We need to not be intimidated by their, you know, what they say with this stuff. But let's understand that what they're talking about here is eternal sale cell lines you know kind of like tumors and we need to talk about this you know you want uh would you prefer to have ground beef or ground tumors uh that's let's uh play their game back at them slaughter free i like my meat to be tumor free. I don't like to eat tumors.

What we are protecting here, says DeSantis, is the industry against acts of man, against an ideological agenda that wants to finger agriculture as the problem, that views things like raising cattle as destroying our climate. All this fear about man-made climate change. We should be afraid of man-made austerity and depopulation because that's what they're really about.

We should be afraid of man-made slavery. These will be people who will lecture the rest of us about things like global warming. They'll say that, you know, you can't drive an internal combustion engine vehicle. They'll say that agriculture is bad. Meanwhile, they're flying to Davos in their private jets.

So he says all this stuff. We all know this. So this is really a vision of imposing restrictions on freedoms of everyday people. While these elites are effectively pulling the strings, calling the shots, doing whatever the hell they want to do in their own lives. And we've said in Florida,

these folks like the World Economic Forum in Davos, that they meet, they scheme, those policies are dead on arrival in the state of Florida. They want to basically eliminate meat. They want to eliminate cattle. They want to eliminate chickens, all this stuff. They want to create protein in laboratories. So it's essentially lab created meat. And their goal is to get to a point where you will not be raising cattle.

You're not be developing meat like we're doing for hundreds and hundreds of years in the state of Florida. The elites know that if it was put out there to compete with normal beef, they would lose. And that's why they're trying to increase the cost by claiming that there's bird flu out there now. You see, they've got multiple MacGuffins they can use. They can use the pandemic, not just the climate MacGuffin, to destroy our meat and dairy. You know, they're already associated, meat and dairy, with the climate MacGuffin.

But hey, if they take meat and dairy away because it's the pandemic MacGuffin, oh well, it's not a plot at all, is it? He says, I think part of being a good steward of these industries, of the state of the public well-being, is to think forward and to head off the threats before they even come. Again,

what he needs to do is focus on local. He needs to focus on freedom. He needs to shut down and interpose against these captive agencies. The USDA is captive to these interests of this stuff, just like the FDA and CDC are captive to the pharmaceutical industry. He said, some people think that Florida is a theme park, South Beach, and maybe some oranges,

but they don't really understand that we have one of the top cattle industries in the country matter of fact my dad's cousins had a big cattle ranch in central florida before disney i don't know what happened after disney went in and maybe they sold it i lost contact with him but when i was a kid i remember going out there the cattle ranch and um but you know um, Disney is there now But they still have a lot of cattle that's down there Florida bill is similar to other legislation making its way through state legislatures In Arizona, Tennessee, and West Virginia All of it concerns an industry that at least to this point is commercially non-existent

With the exception of sales at a couple of high-end restaurants because it's so incredibly expensive. So they got to make our meat and dairy more expensive. A CEO of a company that produces lab-grown seafood says, I've got more than enough challenges. I don't also need Florida to ban it to make the market smaller. And so I'm glad that DeSantis did it, especially because there's plenty of seafood in Florida without having to go through the lab.

Meanwhile, going back to Zuckerberg and his fascist book, it comes out, and of course, this is all in the context of trying to rig the election against Trump because that's all we care about, right? DARPA Zuckerberg considered buying the Associated Press. Why should that be surprising? Because everything that AP, Associated Press, is about, and everything that Facebook is about, is about peddling propaganda. So they would be a natural match for each other frankly we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and cover some other news uh on rock fan eric thank

you very much for the tip i appreciate that he says finally got to see the movie brazil great movie yeah and uh i gotta thank guard again he found a book about it and sent it to me so thank you very much guard um uh i haven't had time to read it yet. Unfortunately, um, on rock vent Michelle Obama. Thank you also. He says Brazil was okay. Uh, yeah, it had, uh, you know, I mean, it's, uh, it's like everything else that Monty Python does.

It has brilliant moments and then it has, okay, this is kind of plotting here, but, um, uh, it here but it had I do every time I go back and see it unfortunately it looks more and more like reality today doesn't it Travis and they're shaking is my kids don't like it I mean it made himself we're watching it and we were fairly young and just being incredibly depressed when the movie ended the same thing with Dark Star. Yeah, yeah. It cured me of any interest in space travel or any of this stuff. No, I don't care about NASA.

I watch Dark Star. But you got to admit, you know, this talking bomb that was their smart bomb, he was way ahead of his time with Dark Star. Yeah, they got that one right. Yeah, and you got to look at Brazil. All the stuff, the SWAT raids and all the rest got to look at brazil all the stuff the swat raids and all the rest i mean you know predated all that stuff unfortunately very predictive just like um orwell and um hg wells and oh man uh the uh when we look at um whether we live in 1984 uh or whether we live in a brave new world,

Huxley stuff, Huxley's brother, the transhumanism. I mean, it's all there on a rock fan eco taxi. Thank you very much for the tip. I believe he said that everyone should listen to and preferably simultaneously watch some superset of this about 22 and a half minute AV and which the nest Dinesh D'Souza

schools, Michael Schirmer about what a Supreme force for good, including, but not obviously far from limited to scientific technological good. The Christianity generally has always been worldwide. And, uh, so, uh, well, I haven't seen that, uh, Travis says he's provided a link to the video, uh, on rock fan, Michelle Obama, and thank you very much again for another tip and writes a correction. Al Gore invented the internet. That's right.

Yeah. Yeah. Not a JCR, lick lighter or DARPA. It was Al Gore who did it. You're absolutely right. He took credit for it anyway, whether or not he invented it. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right.

Boy Scouts of America. No longer boys. They Scouts of America. No longer boys. They're not men either. You look at this. I mean, how could we have had for more than 100 years some organization that had the toxic masculinity to talk about boys? Because, you know, boys are so toxic and masculine. And this was the thing that was holding them back as an organization. So let's jettison all this male masculinity and toxicity and all the rest of the stuff.

And I think it's very interesting. I've seen every one of the conservative press rightfully complaining about this. But again, I've not seen anybody talk about the Trump connection with all this stuff. Rex Tillerson, Rex Tillerson, you know, besides being head of Exxon Rex Tillerson was, um,

head of the boy Scouts there for a while. And he ushered in a lot of this LGBT stuff while he was there. Uh, you know, they were, they were letting openly homosexual scoutmasters go camp with the boys in the woods. They were letting openly homosexual boys join. Various other things like that for quite some time. And he was involved in that.

I remember when the transition was happening for Trump. It was after the election. It was in December 2016. I took some time off after the election uh took it in in december as people are starting to take vacation breaks and uh alex was talking about how he would text and talk to trump all the time and so uh i saw the rumors which turned out to be true, that Rex Tillerson was going to be tapped for Secretary of State. And so I started tweeting to Alex. And that point in time, I had not been shadow banned on Twitter. So I had far less impressions than i i do now and um so i was tweeting at alex and i was tweeting at trump about rex tillerson do you realize this guy is a radical greenie and then i

got all these people saying you're nuts he was head of exxon it's like you don't understand that exxon is into the radical green agenda ever been as much as RFK Jr., for example? You know, you better wake up, folks. This is how they pull it off. But then I started talking about what he did with the Boy Scouts. Nobody pushed back on that except for Alex. And he told me to stop it.

Why are you texting this stuff at me? I was like, well, because I'm not there. And I thought you would want to know how naive I was at that time. Anyway, but it was a learning experience, just like what had happened just before the election. But yeah, Rex Tillerson was always there. The Trump transition team. Turned out that was right. And, you know, at the time, I didn't know that Trump had been trying to sell trainees as part of his beauty contest. He was all about that. He was one of the earliest adopters, just like General Flynn.

These guys have been on board with the training agenda from the very beginning. I saw that some conservative tweeted out and said, well, the clip that I played for you yesterday of RFK Jr. where the guy really pressured him about it. You're going to stop the mutilation of children if you're president. Well, I don't know. I can't make that decision. I really don't know what that's about. I really don't know. I don't know one way or the other.

I, you know, I can't. It's like, seriously, you't know. I don't know one way or the other. It's like, seriously? I'll leave it up to the parents. I don't want to get the government involved. I think people need to be able to decide what they want to do. But you're saying that these are children? That these children are going to decide what they do with their own body? Seriously?

I thought the guy did a great job of pressing him. The only thing I would have changed if I had the time to think about it, and I understand, you know, the Monday morning quarterback, this stuff. But I think the one thing that should have been said to RFK Jr. is, okay, so you say the parents can decide to mutilate the children. You know, I think in general, we ought to defer to the institution of the family. We should not try to undermine it. We should support parental rights, but we should also understand there's some horribly wicked parents out there. We have parents who will abuse their kids sexually, physically, all different kinds of abuse. And this is a kind of

sexual and physical abuse. We should recognize it as such. And so I would ask RFK Jr., so would you be okay if the parents wanted to get involved in incest with their minor children? Is that the parent's decision? Where do you draw the line and say this is not appropriate parental behavior? Right? And I'm not, again, CPS has been very abusive. However, you know, I don't think that we should be naive enough to think that there aren't parents out there that will abuse their kids for their own satisfaction. And a lot of this trans stuff is for their own satisfaction, for their own gratification, for their own social credit amongst their sick peers. Don't tell me you don't know what's going on. RFK junior, the most. And so I saw people put that up and say, well, you know, this, this should be the end of, um, RFK junior.

Well, it wasn't the end of Michael Flynn to push that kind of stuff. It wasn't the end of Donald Trump to push that kind of stuff. And there's still, you know, Donald Trump is still pushing it at Mar-a-Lago. So, um, anyway, um, they have a new name, not boy scouts of America, but scouting America, I think is the new name. And I thought it was kind of, I remember when I was a kid, I never became a boy scout or anything, but it was a pretty big footprint back in the 50s and 60s. And their motto was trustworthy, honest, and brave. Trustworthy, honest, and brave.

Yeah, and it's kind of gone the way of duty, honor, and country, hasn't it? That was the America that I grew up in, where people aspired to be trustworthy, honest, and country, hasn't it? That was the America that I grew up in, where people aspired to be trustworthy, honest, and brave. Where soldiers talked about duty, honor, and country. And now all that happens is people are, you know, should I wear, what kind of dress, says the man, should I wear with these red high heels, and what kind of makeup should I wear?

We have become so debauched. It's disgusting. And we've lost any aspiration to these ideals. Oh, yeah, that stuff's corny, isn't it? Is it? Is it corny? You're going to find out what kind of country we have when you remove these corny aspirations like being trustworthy honest and brave duty honor and country you remove that

stuff you find out what kind of country you're going to live in and you're going to wish that we went back to the corny stuff so um again you know why even bother to segregate our scouts by age? Why have Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts? You know, why segregate people by age when you're going out and camping in the woods? I mean, we're putting boys and girls together in the showers and in the dressing rooms and all the rest of the stuff. So why bother do that? The New York Times noted that the club dropped the word boy in 2018 from its namesake program to allow girls to join. Moreover, in 2020, the organization announced a diversity and inclusion merit badge, and they made earning it a requirement for becoming an Eagle Scout.

Isn't that amazing? In 2013, it ended its longstanding policy of barring openly gay youth from activity. This is probably all around the Tillerson regime here. The Boy Scouts became synonymous with the infamous for habitual cases of grooming and pedophilia. Lots of lawsuits, lots of cover-up. And I believe that also went back to the Tillerson regime. And so as Wine Press comments on it, they said, you shouldn't have been sending your boy there anyway,

as they continue to cover it up for years. It's been an open secret about what's been happening with that for quite some time. But there now, you have to do the diversity, inclusion stuff and everything in order to get your merit badges and become an Eagle Scout. They are trans-friendly. They want to push people into looking at their authentic self. Meanwhile, the country that our politicians want to have a war with, China, is training their young people militarily from elementary school on up, while our boys are preening around in their red high heels wondering what kind of makeup they should apply. How do we do a better job dressing in and drag these guys are militarized training for their

kids and especially when you consider the fact this huge imbalance of male to female that they created with their one child policy that in of itself would be something that would go the chinese into military action even if we didn't have the murder-suicide pill called the CIA that we have to swallow here in the United States. The Chinese communist regime has drafted a law that require military training for children all the way down to elementary school level. They noted on Tuesday, Nikkei Asia, that publication said some high schools in China and universities also already require students to participate in basic military drills, some of which involve tanks. That's where they have protesters standing in front of the tanks and they run them over as in Tiananmen Square.

Armored personnel carriers, hand grenades, rocket launchers, also China's conscription laws were amended in May of last year to make all university students eligible for the draft. It would be interesting to see some of these protesters drafted. It would almost be worth bringing it back, wouldn't it?

And so, before we take a break, restoring history. Movement to return Confederateederate linked names to schools garners traction and of course this is in the shenandoah area where um you had jackson and lee uh but uh during covid you had the local school board just decide to do it without any input from the public because, you know, Trump had locked everything down. We can, this is our opportunity. And I think it may be our opportunity to take a look at what these people are doing. We don't have to live by

their rules and we don't have to live by what they have done. That does not need to become the new normal. It does not need to become a precedent. And this applies to so many different things. We need to take back our history. We need to take back our culture. And so Stonewall Jackson High School was renamed Mountain View High School. Ashby Lee Elementary School was renamed Honey Run Elementary School. And the Shenandoah County School Board passed this resolution in July of 2020. They said, this is about racism. No, it's not. This is about Marxism.

This is about erasing a country, erasing our history. And, you know, I'm not going to defend everything that was done by any historical figure. Nobody is perfect. Everybody had their bad edges. So you take the good and leave the bad and speak out against the bad. That's fine. But we also, there's a reason that these people were honored.

Quite frankly, Stonewall Jackson is one of the worst examples. If you want to try to hold forth Southerners as racist. This is a guy who, when it was illegal to train, to school blacks and how to read at the time, he did it anyway. And when the churches would not allow the black people to attend, he set up his own Sunday school and church for black people there. And so is he perfect? Of course not. But he had monuments set up to him.

Not about that even, but because he was a military genius. I had a friend from high school who went to West Point. He said, you know, they still are teaching us Stonewall Jackson's Shenandoah Valley campaign. It was absolutely amazing. The guy was disciplined, focused, a genius. He had an iron will, and yet he was compassionate.

But see, we have to not allow that. We've got to create animosity. We've got to have these simplistic characterizations of everybody. You can't have somebody who resisted the invasion from Lincoln have any edges of compassion to him. You've got to reinvent him into a one-dimensional figure. Yeah, real history is a lot more interesting and a lot more complex than their lies, isn't it? So anyway, this decision was made during the COVID pandemic. There was no public input into it, but they have put out a survey, and that had some very interesting results. They surveyed more than 8,500 residents in this district.

And of those who responded, those 8,500, they had 91% of the people voted to go back to the names that were there. Now, you might say, well, this is 91% white. No, it is 85% white. And so there were non-white people who wanted to go back to those names as well. And so the one other on the other side, they put out a census and they only had, or they put out a signature thing on change.org. They only got 680 signatures.

So instead of 8,500 people, 680 people signed a signature that said the heart of the issue is what history do we remember and preserve and i think that is exactly right but they characterized it as a history of massive resistance to integration that was not what the history was about as As a matter of fact, Stonewall Jackson said, this is our second war of independence. That's what he called the Civil War. They were not trying to take over and rule the northern states. They wanted their independence. They saw themselves as fighting a defensive war after aggressive invasion by Lincoln. Lincoln, who had instituted for the first time a draft, an income tax, who had shut down habeas corpus, who had arrested politicians who disagreed with him.

Our reasoning is sound. Military leaders of the Confederate States of America took up arms against the United States of America and fought to preserve and expand this peculiar institution of slavery. Well, I guess it depends on what history you remember and what history you preserve. And so I think there's a different history that they don't want to acknowledge. The Council on American Islamic Relations, CARE, is on the side of surprise, surprise. The radicals pushing DEI and all the rest of this stuff. And finally, FreedomWorks, as I mentioned earlier. FreedomWorks is closing.

This is a think tank that was there. I had experience with them back in 2009. They had a contest that they put out and i was doing a lot of contest video contests in 2009 i won the contest it was about uh they needed like a two or three minute video talking about entrepreneurship so i talked about my family and history my uh father, both my grandfathers. And then we talked about what Karen and I had done with the video stores, put it in a video and we won.

So we got to go up to Chicago. We had a great time. Got to meet the people that were running FreedomWorks at the same time. The thing that we remember the most though, was that it was just a vacation with the two of us and uh we got to uh we we wanted i wanted to ride on a segue and we had a great time because it turns out that when we bought the tickets the guy did not have a typical segue tour instead he was showing uh somebody who was going to be a tour director, kind of showing

her the ropes. And so he was talking to her and taking her all the different places and taking extra time. Our tour was about three times as long as it would have normally been if we'd been with a regular tour. And it was just the two of them and the two of us. And while he was talking to her about other things, Karen and I were like doing loops around different things and stuff. We went all over the place in Chicago. We had a blast, um, looked really, really, you know, one of those things. Don't ever look at a picture of yourself on one of them, but, um, it looked really stupid, but it was a lot of fun.

Still remember that. And that's what I think about. Oh, I think about the freedom works. I think about the segue tours, but, was it was nice and um like i said they paid for the trip and you know we won some money off of it uh dick army was running it at the time he was the number two guy under newt gingrich and as i said earlier he was an economist to austrian school mises politico is covering the demise of FreedomWorks. They said, FreedomWorks, the once swaggering conservative organization that helped to turn

Tea Party protesters into national political force, is shutting down, according to its president, a casualty of the ideological split in the Republican Party dominated by Trump. We're dissolved, said the group's president, Adam Brandon. It's effective immediately. Why? Well, because principles don't matter. Because the GOP has become a cult of personality. And if you think principles matter, you're not paying attention to what Speaker Johnson is doing either.

FreedomWorks laid off about 40% of its staff last year. After Trump took control of the conservative movement, Brandon said, the CEO, president, after Trump took control of the conservative movement, a huge gap opened up between the libertarian principles of FreedomWorks leadership and the MAGA-style populism of its members. Yeah, I noticed. Yeah, I noticed.

Yeah, me too. Our staff became divided into MAGA and into Never Trump factions. Well, there you go. Mission accomplished by the Democrat Donald Trump, the New York liberal ally of the Clintons of Epstein, the tranny pushing tyranny, pushing gun, grabbing J six, baiting lockdown, loving gene, injecting Benedict Donald. And he is divided up this, the Republican party between people who don't care about principle anymore.

All that matters is winning. Winning. 4-D chess. Donors, he said, are saying, what are you doing for Trump today? And that's exactly what happens. I mean, I've had so many people contact me with hate about this stuff. I've had friends who say, yeah, you know, my mom, uh, really like, I'd recommended, uh, your show to my mom.

Who's older. He's my age. She really liked what you're doing, but she hated it when I started attacking Trump. It doesn't listen to it anymore. Yeah, I know. I know. Um, so, uh, we're not for or against Trump. He said we're for Trump.

If he's doing what we agree with and we're against him if he's not huh that's funny you've heard me say it that's exactly what i told alex in october of 2016 just before that first election and he said what do we do if trump wins i said well it's easy we support him when he does the right thing. We oppose him when he does the wrong thing. Alex looks at me for a second or two, and he goes, hmm, and he walks out. Yeah, that wasn't what Alex was going to do. Alex was going to support him regardless of what he did.

He could lock us down. He could roll out the FEMA camps. He could inject us to depopulate the country and the world, and he'd still support it. Why? Well, because he doesn't want to go the way of FreedomWorks. He knows what people want. He's going to give them what they want.

He knows what his handlers want him to push, and he'll do that as well. And so I think I've seen the erosion of conservative donors, said the person there at FreedomWorks on the board. Others called to complain that we weren't doing enough to help Trump. He said he resolved to keep a working relationship with the pro-Trump populists on issues that we agreed upon. But he said this, too, created conflicts. Why? Because the MAGA people don't care about issues. They're never going to make any changes.

They don't have any principles. What changes things? You know, the liberal anthropologists got it right. Things are changed by a small group of determined people who focus around principles. It's not changed by a mob that just floats around with whatever this grifting, opportunistic politician without any principles has to say at any given moment. Freedom Works employee claimed the organization under this leadership had turned its back on its values while Trump was in office.

You know, we talking about freedom works sometimes maybe what we should say is freedom matters here's a clip from a few years ago when the Canadian truckers were protesting what Trudeau was doing and you could look at this and say well you know they're doing this because they want to yeah you know keep their trucks and things like that and be able to go back and forth across the border and they're making it impossible to do that but they understood that they could lose everything uh they weren't doing this to protect their jobs they were doing it because freedom mattered not because freedom works

but because freedom matters here's what this trucker said. Are you prepared to lose your truck? Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Come take my truck, do whatever you got to do. That's fine. Well, because it's just a material possession, right? Freedom is something much more than that. So take my possessions, put me in jail, sue me, do whatever you gotta do. © transcript Emily Beynon © BF-WATCH TV 2021 Liberty. It's your move. And now, The David Knight Show. liberty it's your move and now the david knight show beach because uh that is the essence of our freedom and our liberty it is the first thing that they come after they don't shut down our stores first They don't come up with their injections first. No, the first thing they do is to take our free speech. And if we look at what is happening in Canada right now,

it is absolutely astounding. Never seen anything like this. Certainly not in modern times. We've seen some of these types of things that were done centuries ago in Western civilization. We had wars. A lot of people died to make sure we didn't have the kind of society that's going to be imposed if this thing passes, this pet project of Justin Castro, the commie censor.

If he gets this stuff passed, we're going to see things that Western civilization has not seen for half a millennium or more. The Star Chamber things. if he gets this stuff passed, we're going to see things that Western civilization has not seen for, uh, half a millennium or more. The star chamber things, uh, uh, retroactive prosecutions, pre-crime,

even just raw tyranny folks. You can look at this. You started, you arrest somebody before they do a crime. You arrest somebody for something that wasn't illegal. When they did it, you shut down people's speech. You let people anonymously accuse them without penalty and don't let them confront their accusers.

You do all these things. This is just a campaign of political terror. That's all it is. And that's what is happening here with Justin Castro. The draconian fines, even worse for small startup companies than it is for established companies like Twitter and others. And so as people are looking at this, commenting on it on social media, one person says the investigatory powers are invasive. They are ripe, rife for abuse. The commission orders seem to carry the weight of courts without being banned by the usual process of the courts. In other words, there's no due process. As Benedict Donald said, you know, just take the gun and do the due process later.

Well, that's not due process and they won't do it later. And if they take the speech, you won't get due process later. Well, that's not due process, and they won't do it later. And if they take the speech, you won't get due process later either. Another person says, quotes, the maximum penalty for violation is not more than 6% of the gross global revenue of the person that is believed to have committed the violation, or $10 million. Here's the sticker. Whichever is greater.

So that means that if 6% of your gross global revenue does not come out to $10 million, they'll still charge you with $10 million. So what's this about? This is about shutting down any upstarts or startups, right? This is about stopping any small companies. If somebody thinks that they're going to go into competition with the big guys,

well, a $10 million fine about that. You got something like Gab started by one individual? No, no, we'll hit you with a $10 million fine. And because it's whichever is greater not smaller uh so um it's capped at 10 million dollars uh unless your revenue is greater then they'll go with a six percent figure and i think another aspect of that is perhaps maybe even to take away some of the opposition from the big guys because for two reasons number one it could um uh you know it would um uh shut down their competitors they're always worried about shutting down their competitors if they only said the cap was six

percent without the 10 million part then a small startup could probably survive that. But by making it the greater of 6% or $10 million, that'd kill a small startup. But it would remain capped in order to protect large companies. So these companies look at this and they say, well, first of all, it's going to cut down on my competition. We're not going to have to worry about somebody new coming in. That's what they're always worried about. That's why you have so many of the regulations,

even at the local level, uh, against starting up a restaurant or something like that, because the established restaurants will use a local government to keep competition out. It's the Genesis for many of the, uh, the regulations,

uh, about safety and emissions and all the rest of this stuff and a fuel economy that the big Detroit companies would whine about, but they could comply with it and they would work with the Congress to make sure that there was a time frame there that they could comply with it. And it would keep out other competition. And so they, same type of thing that we see here. An absolute legal abomination, said another, even before considering the insane punishments, it is at odds with liberal democratic foundational principle

that you cannot legislate things retroactively. Another says Canada might as well change its name to the People's republic of trudeau the way they're going down yeah some marx brothers farce is what it is they're going down the path of adopting people's republic of china inspired policies trudeau is known for admiring the power of chinese style dictatorship and they quote it when he says this is trudeau there known for admiring the power of Chinese-style dictatorship. And they quote it. He says, this is Trudeau. There is a level of admiration I actually have for China

because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime. Having a dictatorship where you can do whatever you wanted. I find that to be quite interesting, he said. And more than once he said that. Which country do you admire? I know other than Canada, which I know you're going to say. But other than Canada, which country do you most admire?

Well, China, because they can do whatever they want to save the environment. And they don't have to get tied up in all kinds of legal hassles and everything. So now he wants to shut down people's speech, and he has this bill that'll let him do that without getting tied up in all these kind of legal details and things like that. If you look at another aspect of this, house arrest for people who are deemed to be likely to commit hate crimes in the future. So they can get you for what you've done in the past before the law was written.

They can arrest you for not even having violated their law because they think that you might do it in the future. In other other words you're a political enemy uh yeah the people who are most likely to offend i guess you get voted you know who instead of who's most likely to uh succeed who is most likely to offend well maybe we should start saying uh who's most likely to secede is it alberta is it some other promises out there uh used to have a t-shirt said if at first you don't secede try try again hate speech yeah the end of western civilization a blank check for tyranny and so they want to crack down on cyber bullying they're talking about trans agenda there. And they're talking about religion with that as well.

And again, we should remember that speech is never a crime. If you have free speech, speech is never a crime. But censorship is always a crime. The legislation goes on to define harmful content as content that, quote, expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or a group of individuals based on their race, national, ethnic origin, color, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, and disability.

So you better just shut up. If they don't like your politics, they're going to put you in jail or put you under house arrest because you might say something about that. So I guess have house churches because everybody, all the Christians will be under house arrest, won't they? For greater certainty and for the purposes of defining, quote, content that ferments hatred unquote,

the bill says content does not express detestation or vilification solely because it expresses disdain or dislike or discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends. So it's even broader than that. Right. And, um,

so this snowflake tyranny, or if you hurt or offend somebody with what you have to say, well, now you go to jail. Now you get a massive fine. It's like what Alan Dershowitz, this tyrannical Harvard lawyer, hurt a Jew, we sue, right? You hurt my feelings. I'm going to sue you in court. I'm going to bankrupt you with legal fees and all this other kind of stuff because I don't like you. And this is what I say.

You're either going to have free speech. And if you have free speech, some people are going to be offended. Too bad. Too bad. I really don't care, frankly. We've got to get over this. They have intimidated us. And a lot of it it one of the worst is with Christians oh let's let's not offend anybody let's be winsome so that we can win some to Christ and all that I've heard all that stuff it's like no you need to focus on the

truth you need to focus on the free exercise of religion you need need to focus on, you know, do it as lovingly as you can, but never run away from the truth. Never. So the legislation doesn't explain how the words like offend or hurt or humiliate or discredit or dislike or disdain or detest or vilify. How are those to be interpreted? And are they embedded in some kind of a hierarchy of seriousness? In other words, is it more serious to discredit somebody

than it is to disdain somebody or to detest or vilify them? Which of those are more serious? Well, we'll just decide when we get to it. Creating a new standalone hate crime offense and granting judges the power to put someone under house arrest if they feel that they are likely to engage in hateful conduct. Now we've gone beyond Brazil and 1984 and Brave New World. In a novel take on dystopian science fiction concept of pre-crime, if a judge believes that there's reasonable grounds to fear a future hate crime may be committed, a judge, not a jury, by the way, the guilty until proven innocent party would be brought before a provincial court to determine whether they were a probable offender, likely at some

point in the unspecified future, whether they were likely to generate hate propaganda. That's what they taught, hate propaganda. An offending thought criminal would then have to wear an electronic monitoring device, return to and remain at their place of residence at specified times and would have to abstain from the consumption of drugs or alcohol or any other intoxicating substance the free speech union says presumably this is in case these substances might loosen their hateful mouths failure to comply with these restrictions would result in a present sentence of up to a year.

In a title, the Attorney General, Arif Varani of Canada, has now also been given an Orwellian title that George Orwell would be proud of, Justice Minister, Justice Minister. And in his capacity, Orwell would be proud of justice minister, justice minister. And in his capacity, uh, they described this measure of putting people under house arrest because they

might commit a hate crime in the future. Uh, he calls this a peace bond. Yeah. Total Orwellianism. He said it could prove to be very very important to restrain the behavior of somebody with a track record of hateful behavior he said if there's a genuine fear of escalation then an individual or group could come forward and seek a peace bond against them and prevent them from doing certain things, he said.

What is really critical here is that it gives the judge, not a jury, the judge, a wonderful range of sentences. This is the complete totalitarian mindset of these people. How can we give freedom to our prosecutors? Not how can we protect people from an activist tyrannical government. You see, everything has flipped. The mindset has flipped upside down, just as it has in the trade-off between security and liberty. There is no trade-off between security and safety on the one hand and liberty on the other. There isn't. There isn't. They can keep you safe in a jail cell, but they

don't have any liberty that's where you ultimately go every time you slice off some of your liberty for the promise of safety and security to that extent you become more and more of a slave of a prisoner to these people and so they want to have a wonderful range of things that a judge can do to people without a jury of their peers present. And you can have any individual come forward and essentially initiate an indictment, a prosecution against somebody. And there is no penalty for that if it is frivolous or false. They don't have to pay for the defendant's legal fees. I think they can even do it anonymously.

In addition to creating this new criminal category of pre hate crime, bill C 63 establishes the offense of communicating hate speech. It amends the Canadian human rights act because you know, we can't have any human rights in Canada. If Trudeau gets his way, making online hate speech, a discriminatory practice and establishing a tribunal to be known as the Canadian human rights tribunal, which will address complaints of online hate speech, as well as hate speech perpetrated by other means of telecommunication.

This part of the legislation appears to apply retroactively, meaning a person can be brought before the tribunal for any material posted online, regardless of its publication date. Anonymous accusations, secret testimony are also permitted at the tribunal's discretion. You, that's why, look, none of this stuff is new, folks. are also permitted at the tribunal's discretion. That's why, look, none of this stuff is new, folks. We're just being brought back to the days of the star chambers and the bridge of sighs and all these tyrannies that we have seen. We have the things that are in the Bill of Rights for a reason,

that you should be able to address the charges against you, confront your accusers, have a jury made up of your peers, not face excessive fines or punishment and all the rest of this stuff. And these people have been slicing this stuff away, and it's all gone now. It's all gone. And even worse than that that the mindset of most people is such that they don't even understand why we had those guardrails there and the importance of them but let me tell you

these people who are writing these laws these judges these ministers uh this uh Justin Castro they understand exactly what they're doing. Uh, so anonymous accusations, secret testimony, all the rest of this stuff permitted, uh, at the discretion of the tribunal and that's not their only discretion, you know, they have maximum fines, but then of course, you know, the tribunal can go beyond that if they wish. The national post points out, this is a process that, quote, financially incentivizes complaints at essentially zero cost to the other people. Complaints are free to file.

And at the conclusion of an inquisition, that's what it is, the panel, if they find you in relation to a discriminatory practice you can be ordered to pay compensation to the person who filed this accusation against you for free you can have to pay them twenty thousand dollars up to twenty thousand dollars to any victim identified in the communication that constituted the discriminatory practice. If that person created or developed in whole or in part the hate speech to which the complaint relates. If the panel considers it appropriate, they can increase that $20,000 fine to $50,000. Because there is no limit to the number of complaints that can be made against you, there is no cap to the compensation a person might be required to pay.

For example, if you've got a dozen online posts found by the tribunal to be hateful, you could get a fine of $600,000. Small wonder then, says a free speech union in the UK, small wonder then that Jordan Peterson, who is in Canada, psychologist and author, recently sanctioned by his professional regulator, the College of Psychologists of Ontario, for what it described as degrading online posts about Justin Castro, about climate change hysteria, about trans ideology, says that under Bill C- c63 his criminalization and presumably bankruptcy would be a certainty they could take all of his money throw him in jail for life jordan peterson they don't like him this is full-on tyranny this is medieval tyranny. Secret, anonymous accusers incentivized with cash to come after people. And, you know, this star chamber process.

The Canadian journalist and gender critical feminist Megan Murphy has also expressed concern about how the new tribunal system will affect somebody like her, whose criticisms of gender identity and ideology already are considered to be transphobic hate speech by the government-funded Canadian Anti-Hate Network. Last year, for instance, she had an event that she was booked to speak at, and it was canceled by the venue. They cited concerns that the purpose of this event is to promote or would have the effect of promoting discrimination or hatred for any group or person on the basis of sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor.

She said there had been no indication or evidence that there would be any discrimination or hatred expressed at the event. It was entitled Inclusivity, Gender Identity, and Women's Rights, yet I had essentially been accused of pre-crime because she was a feminist who was pushing back against the transgender agenda. But it will be especially effective at coming after Bible-believing churches. How's the rest? For even being a Christian,

preemptive gagging of a Christian pastor who is likely to offend somebody. Yes, Christ is an offense. We know that. Always has been. Imprison Christians for their hate speech. That will be one of the outcomes for certain of this. Expressions that vilify an individual or a group

based on prohibited grounds of discrimination or likely to foment detestation or vilification. This is not just an infringement of free speech. This is an assault on Christ and the church because they are not going to distinguish between the sinner and sin. They identify themselves by their sins. That's one of the reasons why we say,

look, we don't hate the sinner. We're trying to tell the sinner how they can find Christ. Grace is free. And we just tell people, don't turn your back on God. He's got a way here for you to remove this. God will remove this as far as the east is from the west. He'll never hold this against you. You can have a new life beginning now. You can have eternal life, but you have to turn from your sin. You have to reject. You have to hate your sin and turn from it.

So we're trying to save the sinner, but we're not going to embrace the sin. The problem is that the government and a lot of these people identify themselves by their sin. And that is their addiction. It is their idol. It is their God. They spend all their waking moments thinking about their drugs or their porn or their cross-dressing or whatever it is. That is their identity.

That is who they see themselves as being. So these people are going to take this as an attack upon them. This is about policing morality according to a secular progressive standard while silencing any objection to sexual immorality so that perverts can deaden their consciences against the pervasive call of repentance. And it threatens the very heart of religious expression and dialogue. It threatens the very heart of religious expression and dialogue that threatens the very heart of christianity as i said i felt sorry for trump because uh looking at these old clips when he was asked multiple times in multiple interviews the the people he would always avoid it they would come back and press him on the issue have you asked God for forgiveness? He doesn't think he needs it. That is the heart of the good news. You have to understand that you're a sinner in need of forgiveness,

but you're also, the good news is that there is complete forgiveness available to us for what Christ has done. But they're going to shut that down completely with these laws. This bill does nothing to protect people. It only harms people physically and spiritually. And, you know, it challenges all the principles of the free exercise of religion, all the principles of free speech. And, of course, it challenges all the principles of due process, a fair trial, resumption of innocence. All of this stuff is thrown out the door. And why is this important?

Well, because when you look at Europe and you look at Canada, you see that, first of all, they're coming after Elon Musk at this point is not on board with this. And so, you know, they're trying to shut him down. Anybody that doesn't do this is a part, this is a global governance move because the internet is global. So you've got Canada, you got EU, um, presumably after the election, uh, the United States will be coming after, uh, anybody who supports free speech on the internet. They'll use it as a weapon.

And when you see this happening, as bad as it is, this is not limited to Canada. Remember, Trudeau is one of their stars. Justin Trudeau is one of the people that they've chosen to carry the torch for them. He is the, you know, the shock troop going out there, taking this stuff out. And they will, whatever he gets through,

that's going to find its way to other places as well. So then it will eventually come to the United States as well because it is a global agenda. And they're just using Trudeau and Canada as a test case. They're using him to move the Overton window. They're moving him to shut down Westernton window they're moving him to shut down Western civilization we're gonna take a quick break and we're going to come back with Tony artaban and we're going to talk a little bit about what's

happening with gold we have some interesting things interesting phenomenon that are happening in China at the retail level we'll tell you about it when we come back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project, to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. All right.

Welcome back. And joining us now is Tony Arterman of Wise Wolf Gold. And Tony has set up DavidKnightGold will take you to his company and let him know that you came through me. When you get there, you can buy gold or silver, large or small transactions. Tony can handle it. He also has a way for people to gradually save on a regular basis. It's a group buying program. He calls it Wolfpack.

And so you can get into that, have the, you know, just set aside a certain amount that you're going to accumulate each month, a great savings program to do that, as well as get the advantages of a group buy. So thank you for joining us, Tony. Good to see you again. Good to see you, David.

Thanks for having me back. You know, we were talking in the break about these gold beans in China. You've heard about that as well. And it's become, you know, part of that is the retail trade that they're talking about. But they've actually created a little instrument there. And, you know, people are getting, I think, a 13th of an ounce in the form of a gold bean. Very popular. Well, it's popular. It's convenient convenient it's affordable and uh the people of

china they're crazy about gold there's 60 000 gold mines in china china is breaking all kinds of records uh importing gold uh manufacturing and uh that's been the trend since the beginning of this century china's been buying and you know it's interesting China's been buying gold off the books which is an open question why? Why are they buying gold off it? Wouldn't they want the world to know what their gold reserves are? And Kitko's talked about this before. There's some journalism and some studies into China's gold reserves and no one really knows how much they have. It's an open question and they could actually have more gold than the United States, who hasn't been a buyer since the 1950s. We supposedly have something around 8,000 and a half tons or so.

It's estimated that China may, the government may have somewhere around 16,000. We don't know. This is, again, it's speculation why they would be buying off the books at the beginning of the century. But you go back to the people and using the small fractional gold, that's the only way you can use gold almost anymore. If you're a regular person, at close to $2,400 an ounce, David, it makes sense to have uh fractionalized tradable pieces yeah that you can use um we do that with with wolfpack uh i buy the large sheets of 100 gram bars and we break them apart do you have a gram bar of gold that's an easy easily weighable tradable uh fractionalized

piece of gold but um i think you're going to see more and more of this and you even do that with silver i've gotten some of the silver breakable um you know things that you can break them down into smaller quantities as well and and then you know we also have the uh the gold backs and things like that it's it's important because you know one of the things about these little gold beans that the that they wrote the article about uh it's about a 13th of an ounce. So right now it's about 80 bucks that these people are doing. So it's small incremental things. And, uh, sometimes you need to go even smaller than that. That's why you got the kind of a little chiclet break off things that are there. And it's one of the reasons why you would have

silver because one of the key things that we're looking at is the fact that we want to be able to survive when they crashed this financial system. You know, that's what, uh, the, the local Tennessee legislators, um, like Frank nicely are looking at when they say, well, you know, if they really screw this thing up, if they have an accident and they blow the system up or if they do it deliberately, uh, we need to have some way that we can continue the business of the state, you know, well, we need to have that at an individual level as well. We need to be able to, to continue. We have to have some medium of exchange. We have to have some wealth that has been retained and some liquidity. And so that that's what all this

stuff is about. So I think we're going to see more and more of this, of these small things showing up, I think. Well, I think that's the key is being able to have the actual physical gold in your hand when the system resets, because that's what they're doing. That's a great reset. They're telling you what they're doing. And countries around the world, the trend right now, it's absolutely amazing. If you look at the charts going back to 2009, David, there was almost no central bank buying, almost zero central bank buying of gold. Now it's off the charts. The IMF is warning that countries are getting off of the dollar for national security reasons.

This is the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, is talking about countries abandoning the dollar system for national security reasons. Saudi Arabia has put out a probe trying to figure out how they're going to decouple themselves from their Western holdings because of security reasons. They just recently joined BRICS, by the way. They're the extra S in BRICS. This is not good for our system. I think people have normalcy bias. They're very myopic. They're looking at the old systems and Wall Street and the way that it worked.

It's not going to work that way in the future, especially when of the all the de-dollarization around the world is happening david and that's why i mean 10 years ago uh five years ago the chinese people weren't buying massive amounts of fractionalized gold and trading in it the you know india always has been a gold buyer but not like it is now it's it's really a phenomenon. It's accelerating. I think what's happening is gold is retaining its natural place, supplanting the dollar as the world's reserve currency. And I think countries are figuring out how to do cross-border payments, and that's part of the new BRICS system. Zimbabwe is doing that. It's using a digitized, fractionalized gold system. They've also gone on the record. Now, this is government saying this. I don't believe them, but they're saying they're not going to create more digitized units than they have reserves in gold. learned since 1971, Nixon took us off the gold standard, all these, you know, most all other countries followed suit and went to a fiat currency. The last holdout was Switzerland in

2002 had a silver back currency. And then after that, it's a free fall. They we've had 50 times, 52 times more currency printed since 1980. It exists today. 52 times more currency on earth since 1980. So you have this, this fiat debt bomb that's going off and there's going to be a revaluation of everything, especially since the dollar is losing so much ground. It's kind of interesting to hear that from Zimbabwe. Yeah. We're not going to print more of these things when we got gold back. That was the lie from Bretton Woods 1, wasn't it?

They were recycling that thing. And then everybody realized they're bluffing. They do have gold in Fort Knox. We don't even know if there's any gold in Fort Knox anymore. Certainly don't know how much is there. Just like you were talking about China. Nobody knows. These countries keep everything secret.

That's their secret hand in this game of poker. How much gold do they really have? We're not allowed to see the chips that they got on the table because they're not on the table. They're under the table somewhere. You know? And then we've talked about this before, the secrecy of where their gold is held. And they don't make a big deal about it. And, of course, governments, you know, we always have these national ad campaigns.

The government never tells you, like, make sure you have a little bit of gold and silver on hand in case inflation really kicks in. What do they tell you? They tell you to feed the pig. They have feedthepig.org. They tell you to feed your piggy bank with fiat currency. They don't tell you to go get gold. And of course, the Federal Reserve and the central bank here, we don't buy gold. We don't do that here in the united states because again if

gold demand drives the price of gold up the dollar is at war with gold it's its natural enemy since becoming a fiat currency and i think that's what's happening around the world david the countries are moving away from the dollar uh they're getting into gold reserves they're looking at cross-border payment systems backed by something else. So the dollar's in real trouble. We're watching this in real time, and it is truly amazing. Yeah, you know, this article where they're talking about the little golden beans that are there, it's actually from the New York Times.

That's how mainstream this has all become. And we're not even talking about, this is not a buy gold publication type of thing. This is not even a financial publication. This is the New York Times talking about this. And one of the things that they said was, they said, you know, in the New York Times, they said there's been a 50% increase in the global price of gold since late 2022. And they said gold prices went even higher last month because people were concerned about what the Fed was doing. But they said now what's driving it is what's happening in China, what is happening with the central bank in China and what is happening with the people who are out there

buying the gold beans or whatever. They said the flow of gold into China has gone from solid to an absolute torrent. And that was the whole point of this article, to talk about that. And then to talk about, well, this is this person, this is what they do for a living. You know, they've got a kind of a middle-class job or whatever, and they're going down, um, and have been accumulating these little gold beans and all this kind of stuff. I guess, you know, we're, we're laughing about this during the break. I said, yeah, kind of, uh, they're bean counters. Now they're, they've got their own personal accounting system.

They're counting the little gold beans that they've been saving up, but it's literally bean counters that they've got now. Everything comes back around, doesn't it? It truly does. And if you watch the headlines, it's funny. We used to watch the Federal Reserve. You look at the Central Bank of the United States, look to see what they're doing with interest rates, what's going to happen to the market.

Are they going to lower? Are they going to stay this? Are they hawkish? Are they're doing with interest rates what's going to happen to the market are they going to lower are they going to stay this are they hawkish are they going to raise interest rates and then you look at the bank of england and about the bank of england the bank of europe central banks they they've kept rates the same so is the united states but gold moves on isn't that interesting they've kept rates the same and it it doesn't follow what they do anymore like it did i mean that was the big that was the big push to see what was going to happen with metals and david because of central bank gold demand and i think maybe uh finally the mainstream networks are catching on to this there's there's something happening outside of yeah of our own markets and it's

it's gonna it's macro it's huge the macro consequences and you mentioned uh why did it why did they all start uh buying gold at the end of 2022 well it's because of the invasion of ukraine by russia and then the massive sanctions uh by the united states and the swift system and all the the the punitive measures taken by our government in the west in general and i think a lot of these countries took notice they started abandoning the dollar they wanted to get off that they saw the vulnerability that they have if they have to deal with the dollar and so you see the the amount of of crude oil that russia is just going direct to China, going direct to India, moving around the sanctions. This is massive shifts geopolitically, David.

And I think we're only going to see more and more of it as the dollar declines. I agree. Yeah, this New York Times article, they mentioned both those things. They say, well, you know, the thing that really kind of kicked this off was when the United States had these sanctions. They don't say Biden. They're partisan. So they're not going to name him just like the conservatives won't name trump with any of this stuff but you know they won't name biden about that but they say yeah that that was kind of changed everybody's mind and started kicking this off and then another place

will say uh and since 2022 it's gone up by 50 percent the price of gold as you know you you get right to the point he said that's because those two things related they don't make that kind of connection there. But then elsewhere in the article, they talk about the fact that China is divesting itself of American dollars. They said what they're using, what they're doing now, they are buying their gold with American dollars to get out of it gradually. And the fact that China has reduced its treasury holdings for more than a decade, they said, as of March, China had about $775 billion worth of us debt down from 1.1 trillion and 20, 21.

So in three years, They've dropped it 30%. So they gradually, they can't sell everything off all at once because they'll crash their own investment in it, but they're getting rid of it at a pace about 10% a year. Yeah. in it but they're getting rid of it at a pace about 10 a year you know that's what they're trying to to mark it down with yeah at one time the chinese held about three trillion in treasuries and now they hold about 700 billion and are declining so if if nobody's taking part in this it's like tinkerbell right if you don't clap she dies this is the dollar if you don't use it if there's not money velocity it dies it goes away and that that's and I think that's what people don't understand here in this country is there's a reason why you haven't had

hyper hyperinflation even with all the stupidity and on purpose controlled demolition in Washington D.C it still survives it still continues because people around the world still have a demand for it even though it's fake. It's psychological. They use it. It's in circulation. It's something called money velocity. I don't understand it completely.

I don't pretend to. I just know that history teaches me that all paper currencies backed by nothing go to zero without an exception. So if I know this going into what everything else is window dressing, it's just like, you know, speculative what's going to happen in the interim. But we know that fiat currencies go to zero. And especially since the dollar has been so abused, we probably could have lasted a lot longer given the strength of our economy and our position in the world. But we just on purpose tanked everything, you know, geopolitically, economically, internally, the corruption levels off the charts, and even Biden's own economic advisors, David, one of them who wrote an article for the New York Times said that we should lose the world's reserve currency status to be better off for our economy. Who are these people? How would you get away with that? How would you have a massive loss of purchasing power and retain a

strong economy it's impossible so i i don't i don't know uh how this ends especially for you know our country but i do know that uh people that are reliant on the system and saving fiat currency i think it's michael saylor recently the bitcoin, he said, what do you call people who save fiat currency? We call them poor. Yeah, that's right. That's right. Yeah. When you look at the statement it just had there from the guy in the Biden

administration, it'd be better if we don't have the world's reserve currency status. It's like, how in the world could they even say that? Because that's really their superpower, right? That's the way they control everything, even internally, domestically. Joe, we'll just print some more money and we'll give it to to you if you do what we say we'll take it away from you if you don't do what we say but that has been their superpower to do whatever they wish as a government so you have to look at this and say are they really that stupid or are they really that

suicidal uh and both of those things are really frightening and it is something that is not limited just to the biden administration he got it a lot made it a lot worse and of course all the stuff about the sanctions that it kicked off on russia that's 100 on him but the foundation of this whether we're talking about the commercial real estate stuff or whether we're talking about bank collapses and stuff and of course the bank collapses are happening now because of the federal reserve rapidly raising the interest rate. Never seen it go that fast, uh,

that high, that fast and history. And so these banks could not, um, could not respond to it. So now we're looking at a lot of, uh, banks that are perhaps going to be failing very soon.

I got a management consulting firm warning that a half dozen banks would fail in just a few weeks. And he said that back on April the 30th. So, you know, we'll see if that happens, but he's got a proprietary way of looking at a lot of different metrics and balance sheets of these banks. And that's really what they do. And he made that statement at the bank holding company association spring seminar.

So we're in a really shaky position and the question is is it because they're so stupid or because they are really trying to execute their great reset on us and they don't care if it hurts their power as long as they can destroy the american middle class and amer America as a financial and a military stronghold? I think that's the proper question because the people that run this country hate this country. I think that's pretty apparent or that we'd be a lot better off. What was it? Strobe Talbot back in the nineties,

a secretary of state for Bill Clinton said the nation state was irrelevant. Now this is the secretary of state. The nation state is becoming irrelevant. They're one world government devotees for Davos. These are people that are working for the World Economic Forum. This is the elite. And, of course, they all run in the same circles. And Gore Vidal said it's not a conspiracy if they all think alike.

But it certainly is a conspiracy. The commercial that the World Economic Forum had in 2016 is like it was the what was the first opening phrase of that commercial? Imagine a world where the United States isn't the lone superpower anymore. Yeah. It had this plan and the calls are coming from inside the house. It's not that hard to figure out when you have so you can't be that monumental of an idiot and right and go rise to that high of like advising the president on economics and thinking that you can take away you know trillions in circulation and usability of a currency and dump it back into the United States

devalue it and still have a strong economy I think they've already built their lifeboats they have their golden parachutes. They know exactly where they're going. This is to take out and neutralize what was left of the strength, the heart and soul of the United States of America. And it started with de-industrializing the heartland, making it the Rust Belt, taking away our pride and making the ability to have living wage jobs and have families and all these things and stability, being able to be self-sufficient. It started with that. And again, you look at the last year we ran a trade surplus was 1973. It was the year that they created the Trilateral Commission.

We've not run a trade surplus since. And that was on the heels of not only taking us off the gold standard in 71, but the birth of the World Economic Forum, opening China. These things all go together. And you fast forward to 2001, David, 90 days after 9-11, on the anniversary of the day that Hitler declared war on the United States, George W. Bush gave China most favored trading status of any nation for the WTO. Declaring war on the United states declaring war right that was 60 years to the day that hitler that was december 11th i don't

know that's my where my mind goes i always yeah i'm a key in on dates and things i i know they traffic and that i kind of follow the elites that's well i think there's a lot to that you know you go back and look at the first bilderberg meeting it was 10 years to the day uh of the last victory of the nazis at the place where day of the last victory of the Nazis at the place where they had their last victory right there you know the Bilderberg hotel is right there where that bridge too far was and and it was um you know uh headed by uh a by the prince and and also by Lord Carrington who had been instrumental in causing that defeat of allied forces in that victory for the Nazis.

Yeah, just all a coincidence, I'm sure. They've spent decades, since the end of World War I, with the Council on Foreign Relations and the Cecil Rhodes Roundtable intervention into our system, they've slowly just whittled away at the power structures of the United States, which was supposed to be free markets sound money economic nationalism nationalism in general orders things like that and look at what we've become which is this flailing Empire that's schizophrenic you know we want to support and

prop up Taiwan after we've given we cut diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979 it doesn't even make any sense we don't have a border but we're going to guard the borders in Ukraine. This is all just to confuse us because it looks like it just doesn't make any sense anywhere on paper. It does, though, if you're trying to bring us down from the inside. And I think the lifeblood of our country, unfortunately, is fiat currency and it is our dollar and a lot of people are going to get hurt when i think they're just going to pull the rug out from i think that's right it may be david i don't want to be an alarmist but it may be what we're watching might be a gradually than suddenly it might just be that fast i don't know i'm hoping that it does i'm hoping we just kind

of get some more time and people can get acclimated because i think more people are starting to understand what fake money is because of inflation they're just got to get some more time and people can get acclimated because I think more people are starting to understand what fake money is because of inflation. They're just starting to ask questions they never asked before because it went to, they went too fast. You know, people would gradually go,

well, I remember when you could do such and such for $5 and you can't do that. Wasn't it, isn't it like a $5 sub at subway is like $13. Yeah. Something crazy. Oh yeah. Yeah yeah yeah you had uh as a matter of fact there's a viral um uh clip somebody reacting to jamie demon of jp morgan saying oh yeah middle class is fine they're still flush with all that covid cash and he's like really

twelve hundred dollars still living off that twelve hundred dollars that we got several years ago four four years ago. And I remember when Steve Mnuchin, the Goldman Sachs banker that Trump had, there's a treasury head. He said, well, I don't think people need another, you know, $1,200 check. One's enough. I think that's, we don't want to spoil them, you know, something like that. But I think last week when you were doing the show last Friday,

and thank you for doing that. Thank you for giving me some time off. But I heard you say you quoted somebody. I think if this was stupid, if it was a mistake, eventually they'd make a mistake in our favor, but they never do. And I think that's real.

It was the first secretary of defense who was pushed out of a window at Bethesda Naval hospital. He told that to Joe McCarthy, by the way. And then I think it was picked up later by Gary Allen. It wrote, none dare call it a conspiracy. Yeah. Yeah. So that's, I think that's a good metric.

I think that's a good description of both the Trump and the Biden administration. I think it's a good description of Congress under both Pelosi and Johnson. I think, you know, if, Hey, if this was not a plot against us, eventually they would do something in our favor just by accident, but they never do. They just never do. Yeah. Yeah. Statistically, it would happen that, oh, well, we actually, we really lucked out on that one, you know, high-fiving each other. Now we're doing much better. That never happens. It's just this gradual, you know, decline, watching the, you know the the republic pass away all that you know more freedoms the freedom of speech the bill of rights and then of course our economic power

hey i i was talking about politics i can't even follow politics anymore i only know what what are they doing is it just the trial of trump and then biden is incontinent yeah i don't know they had uh yeah the big news this week that everybody's focused on is uh stormy daniels uh describing their encounter but i was talking about that eventually to do something in your favor you're talking about you know eventually flip a heads or something like that and uh travis was laughing he said yeah the the play rosencrantz and guildenstern the guy's flipping a coin it just keeps coming up was a heads or something you know over oh heads again heads again i guess that's rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead and so is the united states government because they just keep flipping this coin it keeps coming

up heads so uh yeah it's uh they've suspended reality but we should believe it because it's the way it actually is right oh man absolutely it's it's the way it actually is and i think the more that you can internalize that and come to peace with it and then start figuring out what do you do next? I mean, we're at the next level very soon. And the world is changing rapidly. I don't think you're definitely not going to hear this kind of discussion on MSNBC or Fox or any kind of. They're just going to run that play all the way to the end. And it's going to be about the election. I don't even know what the election's about

anymore. Uh, well, we haven't had the debates. I mean, yeah, the issues don't matter because we don't have any debates. So if you, if the issues don't matter, you don't need to have debates. Uh, but you know, when we look at this, yeah, we've seen this kind of inflation before we've seen the inflation kicked off by attacking our energy supply and things like that and we know that results in kind of a a stagflation or maybe this time as cilenti has said a dragflation but um you know when so we've seen that type of stuff before we've seen our government destroy the currency what we haven't seen before is uh them destroying the um the reserve currency status of the dollar.

We've had that through the lifetime of pretty much everybody because even before the end of World War II, the United States was still kind of a de facto standard because its economy was so strong compared to everybody else even during the Depression. But then there's another factor that we haven't seen before, and that's the move to the digital cashless society. And one of the biggest banks in Australia is going to go 100%

cashless this month. And the country of Australia is set to be functionally cashless by next year, which is just a few months away. And what I thought was interesting about this, Tony, was the fact that in this article, they had a reprint of the different stages because the bank was going to do it gradually. And so they said, well, here's what's going to happen, you know, beginning at the end of May, May 20th, this month, you won't be able to access over-the-counter services at the banks. You won't be able to access over-the-counter services at the banks. You won't be able to deposit. This is one bank. It's called Macri, if I'm pronouncing that correctly. You won't be able

to deposit or collect checks. You can't order new checkbooks. And then by November the 1st, you won't be able to write or deposit any personal checks, deposit or request bank checks. You won't be able to deposit cash or checks over-the-counter. And you won't be able to deposit cash or checks over the counter. And you won't be able to make a contribution or payment via check. And so gradually they're going to pull this out. Now they left one little caveat there to say, but we'll still let you get cash at the ATMs. We're going to stop all these services.

We want cash checks. We want to accept checks. We want deposit checks. But we'll still let you take out cash. But then what is happening is throughout the country, you have all these retailers saying we're not going to take cash anymore. And so this is the kind of gradual, progressive, iterative process that I think we're going to see in every country, but running out in Australia. They're a little bit ahead of this, just like candidates taking the lead on shutting down all free speech.

Australia seems to be taking the lead on this cashless society aspect. Well, it's interesting, David. I bought the other day some collections in a state sale. This is a $1 note from 1917. They're a lot larger than the modern-day bills. And I think this would, I mean, the purchasing power of this to be about 200 today at least uh given our our gold price and what gold was in 1917 which is kind of interesting the evolution of cash you know first you get uh these are notes that are

backed by gold you can turn them in at the gold window and then it becomes a federal reserve note right and all that language goes away i had a20 bill in here recently that said, this is redeemable in lawful money. Not that the note itself was lawful money, but you can redeem it in lawful money with $19.50. And I think all that language goes away. So it's gradually, it's like a magic trick. They just start slowly taking away the props and slowly taking away everything until you're left holding nothing. And that's what the central bank digital currency is all about. You'll own nothing and you'll be happy.

You'll be happy with our control and we'll monitor everything that you do and we'll be able to contract and expand the money supply in real time. But you talked about the bank failures and what that stems from. And of course, they're predicting that. And we talk about how these economic advisors, how could they even think about us losing the world's reserve currency status? Well, let's think about what the end game here is. I mean, other than we're going to I think they want to neutralize the United States. They want to put it into a second rate, third rate power.

So it gets it off the world stage the way that we've been at least in in the last hundred years but the other aspect of that in my opinion is the ushering in of the central bank digital currency so the crisis precipitates and brings in uh the you have to ask for it you have to let the vampire into the house they have to you have to let evil in uh and uh that's they that's it's some kind of karmic rule and so we have to let it evil in and so we're going to ask for the central bank digital currency and we it's going to save us david that's what it's going to save us all and we just have to download this wallet but that is the trend you know the world economic forum put out a uh well a headline about a week ago saying they were celebrating and clapping uh

for 98 of countries around the world uh adopting a central bank digital currency blueprint and having a plan in place that's what davos celebrates that's that's their end game is to control everything you do through the money supply unfortunately for us and what i'm watching and i think you're watching too is that this isn't the same country and this isn't the same world uh that it was 10 years ago i think there's so many more people conscious of what this is what this plan is and maybe they don't have all the information all the pieces and they're they're not you know they're not uh tuned into the david night show but there's people that are absolutely aware that their money's fake and they're getting outside of the system and i think that's why crypto is popular decentralized crypto uh not fed coin

not fed now but you know the real uh free market stuff and of course uh gold and silver precious metals uh the demand around the world is up so they've got i don't think it's going to be an easy transition for them and they just may implement it and it might not be as effective as they thought it was going to be it's coming all all these countries are going to implement the central bank digital currency it's just what they do i mean this is what the bankster class does so we're going to have to put up with this and we're going to fight it uh the battle's far from over even if it's implemented it's far from over because we're building a different system. We're building a parallel system, and we're outside of it.

So I think regardless of these kind of headlines, and I know it's depressing, here's another headline for you. The debt of the United States. We pay $1 million or $2 million a minute. $2 million a minute on the debt. $2 million a minute. So that's the kind of headlines you see before they say, well, folks, we had a really good run. It's time for you to download and get your biometrics into the Fed coin and, uh, you know, send your regards to

Janet Yellen and, uh, you know, and, and Jerome Powell, cause they're going to control everything you do with your money at that point and so i think people i think people though are starting to understand that and that's the key thing and that's why they're so focused on speech because they don't want people to be aware as you point out a lot of people are becoming aware of it i began the program yesterday talking about a lot of these grandiose plans like the saudi prince's uh you know 105 mile long city in the desert, you know, that kind of stuff. But, you know, they've got these grandiose plans. Everybody's got a plan, as they all say, until you get punched in the face.

And sometimes we don't even have to punch them in the face. Sometimes their own plans punch them in the face. And so, you know, they're not the wisest people. They're not all powerful. God has a say for sure in all of this stuff. But I think it's one of the things that's so key for them is that they can keep people in the dark. And so if we can keep free speech alive, if we can get the messages out and get people to understand what their plans are, we have a very good chance of defeating them. I think we can even defeat them if people are slow to wake up because there are so many of us. And so I think

that, you know, the longer we wait to react, the longer we wait to wake up to what their plan is and start to do something on our own, then the tougher it gets for us. But I'm optimistic because I'm a Christian and I know that God is in control with all this stuff. But I think it's very important. I really do appreciate what you do. got a show that uh comes on follows this show immediately right today yes sir uh just uh right after your show on rockfin and freeworld.fm i have the artobern radio transmission which is once a week i still go out on some radio stations uh once a week and it's uh it's a hodgepodge precious metals prepping all that good stuff parapolitics good uh it's just a stream of conscious and we'll see what i'm going to talk i don't usually know

until about five minutes prior and we'll just we'll just go through some headlines but it's a lot of fun that's great i've got a comment here for you as well uh this is on rock fan from michelle obama and thank you for the tip it says uh i love the silver uh silver coins you send me tony they make me feel like a dwarf king lording over his treasure and Lord of the rings. I love it. Yeah. Yeah.

Cause you get more silver coins and you do that. That's the funny thing. That's what we used to do with the, with the kids when they were little, you know, it was like, uh, well, would you rather have one of these $5 bills or would you, would you rather have four of these ones, you know? Uh, so that's the kind of thing or five. Pretty meticulous on the, uh, on the invoices. And I should probably publish it sometime.

I work with, with Yeka. Yeka helps me and she's got her own show and she does shows on carnivore diet and other things, but she works for Wise Wolf and helps me put the invoices together. And we were just really meticulous. Like, what do we have? And what would look, you know, what would, what would I want? And then in that particular tier package, and we always do comparisons. We go to the other, like the big websites and we check out their prices. And I'm like, my goal is always to beat them. longer to go through all the invoices to see every tier for every week so it's uh we pay attention to it and when you're getting those coins like I thought about what coin you're going to get I

thought about how many goldbacks to put in I thought about that I thought about what products and of course a lot of products come through uh like yesterday I bought another you know close to 500 ounces of silver uh at the shop in Branson that immediately goes into wolfpack and uh like the wheat was some really nice one ounce silver rounds from the private mint and they are uh they're replicas of what a mercury dime would look like if it was that big so like it took the mercury dime lady and lady liberty or the goddess mercury and they put it on a silver round and that's just that's just some of the neat stuff that comes out of war yeah yeah so you that i mean that's a mind-boggling amount of work to have to decide on how many different tiers have you got with wolf pack that's a great question i i i'd have to like name them because we have the starts out with the kids

you know the wolf cub at 35 uh lone wolf warrior wolf alpha wise wolf and then uh the sage at a thousand and then we have different tiers of Zen. And I'm not doing any more. The next thing that we're going to do, we're going to do an ACH where you can put in an electronic check to save on fees. And we're also going to accept Bitcoin. I'm working on that.

I should have that done hopefully by next week. And I'll announce that maybe next week when I come on, we'll talk about that. But we're also going to add a few key things and I don't want to spoil it, but we're going to add some things where you can just buy direct at a certain type of product. And I'll try to do the lowest price that I can. So like, we just, we're going to change the price daily, like go in in the morning, look at how the trades are going.

If you want to get, you know, and you talked, we talked about the beans this morning. We're going to do something very similar to that with, with gram gram bars so like you can buy them one at a time and instead of having to get you know a whole wolf pack or something but uh i'm trying to make it more and more convenient and i'm learning as i go that's good that's good well yeah and it's going we're going to need something like that if we're going to be able to use the gold and silver for uh as katherine austin fits says uh privacy, uh, to be able to do that private. And that is a key thing about gold and silver as well as the fact that it's been around, there's a store of value. You know, it was interesting that the back and forth, uh,

the debate that was set up on, on zero hedge between, uh, Peter Schiff and Rubini on the one side for gold. And then on the other side, you had Scaramucci and somebody else. And so they're talking about, you know, debating gold versus Bitcoin. I think it's great that we've got multiple things that are out there. And, you know, the more things we've got that go against the fiat currencies and central banks,

I think the better, quite frankly, because there's more targets for them to go after. There's only one thing. It's pretty easy for them to try to shoot that thing down but the more things that there are out there then the better for us to uh counteract them so uh but absolutely it's an interesting back and forth with that but uh anything else you want to tell us about what's going on at uh wise wolf this week well it's just a busy time. And, uh, you know, we're, uh, we crossed over, I think we have a close to 1100 members of Wolfpack and we're just thankful for that. I'm, I'm looking to, uh, uh, to put different types of products in. So it's always staying on top

of the invoices. It's, it gets, it gets harder. The more people that join, I have to, I'm going to have to move faster on stuff. And I'm really watching the supply chain. I do think that it's weak. I do think that it could crack at any time. And I watch how overloaded the exchanges are. This is just some inside information. If you watch the exchanges, how the lag time and them paying me for products or them processing products, it's astounding. A lot of people, and I think a lot of that Gold's flowing out like we're you know some of the people are cashing in because of record prices of gold and that but the

demand is still up the demand is coming from somewhere it's coming from uh internationally it's coming from Central Bank so we're really watching everything uh close David but yeah you can go to David Knight dot gold uh you can look Wolfpack, any transaction, no matter how big or how small. And remember, the IRAs, 401ks, all that, we can roll that over into physical precious metals. So go to DavidKnight.Gold. And if you want to call and talk to me, you absolutely can. I answer the phone all the time. People are surprised I answer my phone.

I'm like, well, why wouldn't I? That's my business. That's great. I know you're really busy, it's a it's going to be more and more challenging as our financial system gets more and more challenging it's always great to talk to you tony thank you so much thank you for doing the show last week always interesting when you do the show i think and again his show is going to be immediately following this one today uh his weekly radio show and you have a regular uh adburn transmission that you do on a daily basis as well, but there's one that's going to follow this show immediately afterwards.

Thank you so much for joining us, Tony. Thank you, David. Thank you. All right, folks, we'll be right back. Thank you. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, welcome back. And I want to talk a little bit about what is happening on the various campuses. And I think it's interesting because, you know, whenever they want to run through their program of censorship, they've got the liberals all on board, don't they?

And now how do we get the conservatives on board so that we can do censorship. Well, uh, cue the, uh, pro-Palestinian, uh, Marxist mob on these different campuses, uh, and at George Washington university. I remember last week I showed you how they had,

um, the face and graffitied and put stickers and everything on, uh, the George Washington statue there at George Washington university, uh, George Washington, the colonizer, uh at George Washington university, George Washington, the colonizer and how evil he was. And now you've got these people out there,

campus leaders running a, a little show trial here. And it's a bunch of women wearing their little masks from the pandemic. In this particular case, as an act of rebellion and to anonymize them. But they're out there calling for the campus leaders to be beheaded. And by leaders, what we mean are the administration, the president, the provost, the board. They want them to be executed. They want them to be executed. They want them to be beheaded.

Guillotine. You know, they're out there doing their little thing. Here's the charges against so-and-so and, you know, the person's name. What do you say? Guilty. Guillotine. Guillotine. Are they consciously going through the Jacobin revolution?

I said this at the very beginning. I said, you know, why are these people, these elite universities and other universities that are not particularly elite, why are they surprised about this? I mean, these people are Marxists, they're Jacobins. And I said this about the people who had been funding these universities. Fine with what they were doing as long as they were coming after white people for example or any and and uh that was okay until they eventually come for the people that organize them right the jacobins and so you got here you've got the uh the people's tribunal being live streamed and they're calling for the president the provost the school board and all the rest of these people who have been training them uh they call for them to go to the guillotine.

Here's a little sample of it. We won't play the full thing because it really is annoying. Can people find you? Guillotine! Guillotine! Guillotine! Guillotine! Guillotine!

Guillotine! So there's the Palestinian flag. Guillotine! Guillotine! Bring up the next person. Bracey! Bracey! We see you! Bracey! Bracey! We see you! flag and guillotine guillotine bring up the next person this is amazing how juvenile these people are these kids

youthful idiots marxist idiots jacobin idiots on the charges of having a vested interest in the genocide of Palestinian people as they profit off of Zionist weapons and purchases that he refused to divest from apartheid as they lie in their pockets.

Yeah, you get the idea. I won't subject you to any more of that. But yeah, the mob coming after the people who have organized the mob if the students hurt any of these people in any way the university will be completely at fault said one person uh who who um saw the stream and recorded stew that you saw his information there on that uh but no actually if the students hurt any of these people these people will be completely at fault the president the provost the board they were the ones who were doing all this

dei crt uh weaponizing this group for hatred and then they just came after a group that they had not thought that they would hate. You're supposed to just hate the white people. The crowd shouts guilty, then guillotine, guillotine, guillotine. By the way, when you see this, all women, all women, future Congress is right there. Future Congress will be all women. What was it? John Knox, who wrote a time in English history where you had a couple of bloody queen marys and a queen elizabeth and he wrote something about the monstrous regiment of

women talking about how uh he didn't want to be ruled by these uh women queens because they were maybe more ruthless even than the kings were uh no they're just too pathetic the thing is i was kind of when i saw that i thought well let's see what they do with a guillotine all they did was shout guillotine guillotine guillotine uh they did not actually have the ability they're just too pathetic to actually build a mock guillotine and do a mock execution aren't they i mean that would take a little bit of skills. They don't have any skills. They don't know anything. They can't even build a fake guillotine and do a fake execution.

That's how pathetic they are. The crowd calls out for the president, Granberg as well, on the charges of using our tuition dollars to fund genocide and sell out students to Zionist interests. The people find you guilty. Guillotine, guillotine. So there you go.

Uh, that's, um, and, and what is even more pathetic than that is the fact that that would scare conservatives into attacking the first amendment with the anti-Semitism awareness act and with other things. Uh, every day it comes out, with the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, and with other things.

Every day it comes out, you've got another idea from Alan Dershowitz as to how he's going to punish the speech of idiots like that that he doesn't agree with. Isn't that pathetic? That we can easily be controlled through reactionary means like that to those Marxists? And of course, that's how they're really being used, still being used, by the people who have run these institutions for so long. The president, the provost, the board of directors, and the department of education that has been

funding all this. We want to run this stuff. We want to have these radicals out there so we can use them to get your consent to shut this down. In the same way that when you have all of the open borders, what is the big solution that we keep seeing over and over again from so many conservatives? Well, we just need to have an ID for everybody so that these people who sneak into our country can't participate in the economy,

so they can't participate in voting and all the rest of the stuff. We don't want them voting, and I don't have any problem with having an ID for voting, but they want to make this about making a mandatory approval from the federal government to get a job. That's what mandatory e-verify is. Another example, you know, scaring the parents about pornography, and you should be scared of pornography. I'm not saying that the open border is not a problem. It is a problem.

They do create problems. These people are a problem, but they always want you to accept their solution. There's only one solution, and that means that you're going to have to give up some of your freedom. We got artificial intelligence out there, and it's making fake stuff, so you're going to have to prove that you are real we don't have to have the artificial intelligence identified so no you will have to do it oh we got porn sites that kids can go to so now everybody needs to have an ID in order to use the internet all the rest of this stuff uh so uh one more clip I'll show you of these people on George Washington University campus. Here they are doing their daily flag ceremony.

Oh, wait, that's not the American flag. Allahu Akbar. Yeah, that's right. And we got Trader Machiavelli and Mike giving $3. billion dollars, not to protect our border, but to bring more people like that to the United States. People who hate this country. Well, I said we had one more, but actually there's still one more video I want to show you.

This is at a different university. This is a Case Western Reserve campus in Cleveland. And these are some protesters who have sprayed graffiti all over a wall where they are standing still still standing i should say well they're standing still as well they're not moving but they are standing in front of their wall that has graffiti on it and the university has called for some contractors to come and paint over it and um these uh painted uh protesters uh refuse to move and so the guy is doing his work he says i need to move or you're going to get sprayed well they decide they're going to stay there and so he's got a job to do and he just sprays right over them this person

puts a shield on they still got all their uh protective uh masks and face shields and everything left over from covid wasn't that convenient you know we had all that stuff with covid and so he's just painting over them right now and he's going to paint over the next person in line it says students assaulted by contractors uh, they're not being assaulted by contractors. They've made the conscious choice to get in the way. He says, you know, move. I'm going to paint this. If you decide that you're going to refuse to move, well, then you decide that you want to get painted.

It's just that simple. One person said, we knew heroes didn't all wear capes. We weren't aware that some of them carried spray guns. Whoever makes this paint or this primer should add a new feature to the can. This covers stains, fading, water damage, and whiny dweebs in just a single coat. We're just here. That's the cops.

We're just here. We're just here. There's no assault here they you know you've chosen to stand there and try to cover the wall with your body so you'll get your body covered with paint that's right and i think this is an appropriate response to these spoiled brats you know not attacks on free speech just paint them you know paint over them take them off or whatever i think if they're because so much of what they're doing is not speech you know paint over them take them off or whatever i think if they're because so much of what they're doing is not speech you know when they start blocking people

from going into classes when they vandalize property or whatever we're not talking about free speech so why would mike johnson and mark levin and people of that ilk why would they come after our free speech as a matter of fact why why would a foreign government like Israel do that to us? Our friend, our best friend in the world, Israel, wants to take away our First Amendment. What does that tell you? These attacks on free speech in order to pander to a foreign government. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and take a look at an update to the pandemic and pharmaceutical news as well.

So I want all those people watching me at Vimeo to take me down. I've got a segment coming up just for you. So stay with us. We'll be right back to offend you. Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.

The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. ¶¶ Liberty. It's your move you're listening to the david knight show well we have uh pfizer stock got hit after a boy dies of cardiac arrest during a gene therapy trial. I was really surprised by this. Not that Pfizer would kill somebody, but that they would actually do a test and then admit that somebody died. That, I guess, is the unusual thing about all this. Just like it was very interesting and surprising that AstraZeneca admitted that people were dying from their jab and took it off

the market the same people that i was talking a week ago about and i got my video taken off the market so to speak uh by vimeo after young receiving young men receiving experimental gene therapy for a form of muscular dystrophy died during this trial, according to Stat News. Stat News, by the way, is a pharmaceutical publication. And they seem to be pretty objective, actually. I've seen some interesting things come out of Stat News. First of all, they're talking about this trial where someone died. But they were also the source for that information about how Pfizer was blackmailing Brazil and Argentina and a third unnamed South American country that wanted to be anonymous because they eventually succumbed to the blackmail of Pfizer. The fact that this was a global agenda, that nobody's going to go in or out of your country allowed this multinational corporation, Pfizer, to blackmail governments and to say, you're

going to hold us harmless not only for the design of our vaccine, but even for any negligence that we have in terms of manufacturing or shipping or whatever, nothing that we do will we be held responsible or liable for. And you will protect us and you'll even protect us with assets outside of your country. And so that was picked up by Stat News. Again, a pharmaceutical trade publication. And it was reported in a lot of places outside of the United States. Where I saw it picked up was when it was echoed by some Indian press.

But anyway, Stat News says Pfizer has confirmed the boy suffered cardiac arrest. And they are pausing, crossing over patients in its randomized phase three trial of the treatment. So I wasn't surprised that they killed somebody with their genetic treatments. I was just surprised that they were still doing tests because now the FDA is so totally captured, it just rubber stamps everything they want to do anymore. Notable that we had the first time a person was publicly identified as having died during a clinical trial for gene therapy was back in 1999. Jesse Gelsinger. And it caused the FDA to shutter human genetic research at Penn's Institute for Gene Therapy. Well, that was then.

However, this is now and they won't do anything about it, but the stock market will react to it. Perhaps the people in the stock market thought that the FDA might actually regulate them. Not going to happen. I mean, this is not like, you know, building jets that fall apart or crash and kill people. If you're doing that with a vaccine, that's just fine. Well, we'll just move along. One of the things that I thought was really interesting out of a children's health defense

was an article talking in detail about how pediatricians are paid to vaccinate children. And the thing that I thought was most interesting about this was, you know, you look at this and the guy said, well, we get kickbacks of up to $240 per visit. Well, I don't know how much the vaccines are, but the kickbacks, the incentives, as well as the disincentives, the punishments for not getting kids vaccinated, a lot of those are running through the insurance company. And I didn't realize that. He said, this is Dr. Paul Thomas, a Dartmouth-trained pediatrician. And the question is, asked by the defender of Children's Health Defense, that's what they call the publication, they said, can pediatricians afford to even run

their medical practices without the kickbacks that they get for vaccinating every child well dr paul thomas said you can't stay in business if you're not giving pretty close to the cdc's vaccination schedule he ran a general pediatric practice he had,000 patients and he had 33 staff members. And so he knows what he's talking about. He actually wrote a book, The Vaccine Friendly Plan, Dr. Paul's safe and effective approach to immunity and health from pregnancy through your child's teen year. And he gave this to parents in his practice, and he said he gave them a choice.

He said they could vaccinate their children on the CDC schedule. They could vaccinate them more slowly, not giving them a bunch of a cluster of vaccines all at once to challenge their immune system, but stage it out. Do it when their body is a little bit more mature, the immune system is a little bit more mature. And they started vaccinating newborn babies who don't even have an immune system that could respond to that. If you agree with the their theory of vaccines, which I don't. But he said so he gave him a choice.

You can use the CDC schedule and give them all the vaccines at the time. The CDC says, or you can do it more slowly waiting for the child's immune system to develop, or you can not vaccinate at all. If you don't want to do it at my practice, he said, but then when he found out was that more and more patients decided that they didn't want the vaccines when it wasn't being pushed on them by a pediatrician. We had that, uh, done with us, with our kids. Fortunately, we didn't get our kids vaccinated until they were much older.

We didn't take them to the doctor unless they were sick. And then when one of them got sick, we took both of them in, and the doctor just had a fit that we weren't on fluorinated water. I said, we're not going to do that because I knew better than that. I'd grown up not being on fluoride. So And so we're not going to do that. Uh, cause I knew better than that. I'd, I'd grown up not being on fluoride. So I knew about fluoride. I didn't at the time know about the vaccine stuff.

And they were, um, I guess, uh, about four or five years old. You know, one of them's four. The other one was five.

They're eight months apart. So, um, the, um, uh, anyway, the,

um, he had a fit that they weren't vaccinated. And so he did some vaccines and, the, um, uh, anyway, the, um, he had a fit that they weren't vaccinated. And so he did some vaccines and, uh, Travis has always had reactions to the vaccine. So it got worse. You know, we did them again when we traveled and that was really bad. I had really bad reaction to it then. And I think it's manifested itself now with, uh, some autoimmune disease that he's suffering with. But anyway, they gave parents the option to not do that.

And since some of them were not doing it, he said as they started refusing vaccines, he said starting to have a big financial impact on his practice. He and his staff conducted a thorough analysis of their billing records to examine the income generated from vaccine administration fees, markups, and quality bonuses. This is from the insurance companies, the quality bonus tied to vaccination rates. He said, we were losing over a million dollars in vaccines that were refused. Isn't that amazing? Again, he had, what was it, 33, he had 15,000 patients.

He said it's very expensive to run a pediatric office. You need multiple nurses. He had 33 staff, multiple nurses, multiple receptionists, multiple billing people, medical records. It's a huge operation. And, of course, a big part of the expense is trying to keep up with the insurance companies, dragging their feet, trying to get them to pay you and all the rest of that stuff. So I've seen, we found a couple of physicians that will not handle insurance at all. They operate on a cash basis.

And when you look at what this guy says the insurance companies are doing about the vaccination stuff, you may want to look to find a physician who operates on a cash basis so that he doesn't, because they have a lot of losses from these insurance companies and stuff. And it's a big hassle and it requires a lot of staff to constantly keep up with us. And then the insurance companies financially push them to do certain things like vaccinate kids. He said,

pediatricians receive several types of financial incentives for administering the vaccines. He said, the first one of course is an administrative fee. He said, that is a thank you for giving the shot. He said physicians typically receive about $40 for the first vaccine they give, and then $20 for each subsequent antigen.

He said, let's just say a two-month well-baby visit. There is a DPT. He says that's three shots, three antigens. And then we give them some other things, Hep B, Prevnar, polio, Rota. He says that's about $240. The second way that a pediatrician profits is through a small markup on the cost of the vaccines themselves. But he said that's minuscule. Then the third and most substantial financial incentive is the one that I never knew about. And that is what they call a quality bonus.

It's tied to vaccination rates on a per physician basis. The insurance companies offer pediatricians bonus payments for meeting certain benchmarks. Typically about 80% of patients being fully vaccinated by age two so this is a push coming from the insurance companies and so when i saw that i thought ah that makes sense that's one of the reasons why that executive from the big insurance company won america that was in indiana that's why he said you know we've we we got, as he's explaining to his publicly traded company, he's got to explain it to the investors. Yeah, we've had a rough time here because we've had more insurance claims in the third and fourth quarter of 2021 when the vaccines rolled out. We've had more insurance claims in that amount of time than we would ever expect statistically.

This is more than three standard deviations away from the mean. And he said, this is not something that you expect at all. It's unprecedented. And he goes, and these are people that are not dying from COVID. And so he goes on to say, though, he says, however, we know they have to be dying from COVID. And we further know that anybody that's vaccinated is not going to die from COVID. Therefore, these are unvaccinated people who are dying from COVID.

And we're going to charge unvaccinated people more. Now, somehow, the pharmaceutical industry and the government has got its hooks into these insurance companies because they are telling these pediatricians, you get 80% of your patients fully vaccinated by age two, and we'll give you a quality bonus, and that's a big dollar contribution to them. So, those insurance companies are in on this scam. They're in on a, it's a payoff to kill people. With his practices, vaccination rate only at 1%, not 80%. He was giving people a choice. He wasn't pushing it to them. He only had 1% of the people getting vaccinated instead of the 80%.

He said he was at risk of losing up to 15% of his overall revenue. And anybody who's been in business knows that if you lose 15% of your revenue, it's going to be pretty hard to even stay in business. You lose 25, 30%. That's what I was saying when they did the lockdowns. I said, all right, well, we'll let you open up, you know, a little bit, you know, one day a week or something like that. It's like, that's not going to do it for anybody.

He said, really, it effectively means that a pediatric practice cannot survive using insurance without doing most of the vaccines, if not all of them, said the doctor. I think that explains the blinders. This is why doctors just won't go there. Why doctors won't look at the fact that these vaccines are causing a lot of harm. The money, the love of money, the root of all evil.

Follow the money, Jerry. Yeah, that's what this is really about. Um, and then, the interviewer with children's health defense asked him about sudden infant death syndrome. And before I play that for you, I just want to play again that clip.

Because, you know, they started talking about sudden adult death syndrome with these vaccines. And this is a mother who, when they started talking about SADS, it clicked as to why her baby died with sudden infant death syndrome. You know, because something that's been going on for over 40 years just hit me. I had a child that died of SIDS in 1984. For people that don't know what SIDS is, it's called Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, or crib death was another one. I've been saying this for 40 years, over 40 years.

I don't understand this. He was just at the doctor's two weeks before, got his shots, he had the perfect health. Everything was great. And then last night, I watched, have you ever watched Mrs. G, the medical examiner?

I can't say it now. Anyway, I watched her show. And she says, what's at rise right now is the adult, sudden adult syndrome. Same thing as SIDS, but it's for adults. What happened lately that was forced upon people that they had to have and all of a sudden the rise of these adults dying for no reason is happening and it dawned on that I poisoned my kid two weeks before with a vaccine that I was told was safe. What if that's the cause of sudden death syndrome and they've been lying to us all this time and they've been experimenting on our babies since 1984 and before and it's just come to light because we get more education now we can

get reached education we're not just told whatever they want us to tell we can look research online what if that's the cause of SIDS what if me doing what I thought was good killed my baby. And it's just hitting me right now because I never put two to two together until now. Tell me what you guys think. Do you think I'm kind of off my rocker? No, she's not off her rocker. Unfortunately, as this doctor pointed out, you've got to get 80% of those kids 100% vaccinated, or you're going to lose about 15% of your practices revenue. This is why the doctors don't want to look at it. But when they asked him about

SIDS, he says, when you hear the word syndrome, as in sudden infant death syndrome, when you hear the word syndrome, it means we don't know what it is or what causes it. But we actually have a pretty good clue. He said six studies examined the correlation between SIDS cases and vaccines. And one data set, 97% were in the first 10 days after the vaccine. Just like her son. Only 3% were in the subsequent 10 days. That is amazing. When you've got a 97% correlation with something, it looks like a cause to me.

Other studies showed similar patterns with 75% to 90% of SIDS deaths occurring within the first week after vaccination. He also highlighted the increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, allergies, autoimmune diseases, and vaccinated kids. But again, it's the insurance companies bribing the doctors to vaccinate all the kids. He said, we know without a doubt that things like neurodevelopmental concerns, learning disabilities, ADD, ADHD, autism, these are clearly linked to vaccines. He said, the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to have these problems. The Amish don't vaccinate. The Amish don't have autism. Vaccinated children are more prone to infections and illness compared to their unvaccinated peers. It's the vaccinated who

get more ear infections, more sinus infections, more lung infections, any kind of infection you look at. The vaccinated get more. Why? Well, their immune system has been attacked. The risks associated with vaccines extend beyond childhood. He said, we have the sudden adult death syndrome now because of the COVID vaccine rollout. He said, we see it on the news. We see it in the ball fields.

We see healthy adults, boom, dropping dead. And that has all happened since the Trump shots. He says COVID jabs. They're Trump shots. Trump wants the credit. Give him the credit. He pointed out that despite decades of research, mRNA vaccines have never been proven safe or effective.

He cited previous attempts to develop MRNA vaccines for RSV, which consistently failed in animal trials. And we've talked about this before when they did the animal trials for MRNA versions of an RSV, he said they would vaccinate the rats. And then when they re-exposed those rats in one study, a hundred percent of them died. He also shared a personal story about his mother's experiences with pulmonary fibrosis after receiving three COVID vaccines.

After her third COVID shot, she started really running out of energy and then getting short of breath. Within a month, her lungs had the appearance of ground glass. And so he was also asked about the risk of vaccine shedding. He said, shedding seems to be happening and it's been documented in studies. He said, vaccinated individuals can expose others to spike proteins through body fluids and secretions. He said, we can no longer go to our doctor and just say, fix me. Yeah, that was my cardiologist. I said, well, I need to know more about this.

And I think this other thing over here, there's some issues with, oh, you've been talking to Dr. Google. And I just said, yeah, but in my mind, what I said, well, one of us needs to understand and care about what's going on. If you don't care to do the research, I need to do the research. I should have said it to his face, but I just, oh, yeah, you know, and I never went back. Anyway, Pfizer alone made over $100 billion, he said, with this. So the power that the public health machinery got to themselves with COVID has to be intoxicating to them.

I can no longer trust the CDC, the FDA, the NIH. He said, this is the doctor. Some good people work in these institutions, but these institutions themselves have been captured. He said, when it comes to vaccines or when it comes to new pandemic illnesses, they are the last people you want to trust. And so when we look at cancer mortality, again, after the third vaccine dose,

as we said, his mom had the pulmonary fibrosis. Her lungs looked like ground glass. All these health effects go up exponentially with each successive dose. A new study out of Japan found a significant increase in cancer deaths after taking a third Trump shot. Once we got to the third Trump shot, cancers started to go up, said Dr. Peter McCullough. Again, nobody calls him a Trump shot except for me and donald trump that's one thing that we have in common i trump and i want you to know that these are the trump shots nobody else wants to talk about him being trump's shots dr peter mccullough said it's very disturbing

and the japanese data has shown that the mrna vaccine could cause cancer through multiple mechanisms as we sit here today all the evidence suggests that covet 19 vaccines actually cause could cause cancer through multiple mechanisms. As we sit here today, all the evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines actually cause cancer, he said. Every cancer registry in the world is up right now. As I've said many times, Trump shots were the shots sent around the world. He is guilty of crimes against humanity for funding this, for protecting it, for propagandizing for them. He is just as guilty as Pfizer, Moderna, and these other companies.

He says there's roughly 4,000 papers showing vaccine complications and deaths. What we're seeing is just the tip of the iceberg. This is a giant human experiment oh i got the fda so mad at me i just told me run you do this we don't have time to wait for this stuff yeah warp speed was a giant human experiment we can't possibly know what is going to happen because things were not properly researched ahead of time in japan 86 and a half percent of the people took a third covid jab compared to only 15 of the people here in the united states well i hope we've had some effect now even though vimeo and youtube and people of that ilk will kick off the program. I hope that you will push this out.

I hope that you will use this information to tell other people, tell family members. We need to get this information out. People are dying because of the lies and the disinformation. That's one thing they're right about. What they don't say is that they are the ones giving us the disinformation the mal information uh that is out that the majority of people are vaccine hesitant says daily skeptic and this is looking at france uh they said um it's kind of interesting that uh um you know 40 percent said 15 of the survey respondents strongly agreed with view

that in the event of a new epidemic mrna vaccines will be useful only 15 percent 31 percent uh agreed of 35 percent don't know 10 percent disagreeing so you had 46 percent of the people agreeing with it or strongly agreeing with it uh you've got um uh 35 percent that don't know and then you got nine 19 percent who disagree or strongly disagree we got to get those numbers up these people really don't understand what is happening with this and the dire consequences of it on rock fan thank you very much fran edwards thank you and also on rock fan karen carpenter says my mom has never been the same since one uh since one covid legs went she was doing great before

uh got one covid shot is what she's saying there. I'm so sorry to hear that. Again, the best thing that we can do is to make sure that they don't fool us again. In this particular study in France, they said 62% of the people agreed with the statement, there is a lot we don't know about the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines. Among those respondents, the 63% of the people said, there's a lot we don't know. Of course, we knew nothing at all about them before, right? Except what we did know was extremely frightening. This is going to reprogram your body,

and it's going to then replicate itself, and on and on. It's like, well, when does a replication stop, and when does it stop hijacking my cells and reproducing itself? It sounds like the way they describe cancer or a virus or something like that. How does that stop? Well, it turns out it doesn't seem to be stopping. Among these respondents that said that there's still a lot we don't know about mRNA. 15% were unvaccinated. 50% had doubts despite being vaccinated.

35% were vaccinated and comfortable with it. See, that's the other aspect. A lot of people really regret having had the vaccine. One person that we know through my brother-in-law, Keith, and I've heard a lot of people say this, as soon as I got it, I could feel something happening, and she's now struggling with cancer. She said, I immediately regretted it.

I wouldn't take the second one. We have to head this thing off before they pull any of this stuff again. It's one of the reasons why I really think it's important for people to think about the lies and the propaganda and the fear that is being pushed out there about this bird flu stuff. Because what they want to do is they want to put the, you know, they have burned themselves badly on this thing, as you can see from these surveys.

So they're going to come at us from a different way. What's this way going to be? They're going to vaccinate our food. And they're going to use the threat of bird flu to kill vast amounts of cattle and chicken. And all of this is to attack our food, to ban indirectly meat and dairy, to push us towards our lab meat and all the rest of this stuff.

But the other thing that we should be concerned about is them vaccinating our food. We've got to push back against this. And I think the most effective thing that could be done is to try to get state legislators to push back against the USDA and even against these state departments of agriculture. It was a state department of agriculture up in Pennsylvania that went after Amos Miller. It wasn't even the USDA. It was Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. And so we need to get them in line and we need to get them to back off from people who are raising their own food and not require them to vaccinate, not require them to send them to a central processing factory,

because that central processing factory is going to require vaccinations. That's what the USDA is doing right now. We're going to track and vax all of the cattle. And if you don't have all your, you know, we're going to put an RFID tag on all the animals, and you're going to have to send them to our centrally controlled processing factories. And if they come in and there's something that we don't like about their travel history or their vaccination history, we're not going to process the animals.

We'll just kill them and bury them or something. You know, just like we'll put the CO2 in the ground or something like that. And so 78% of these respondents supported vaccination overall and trusted science and doctors, similar to the general population. However, they've lost their confidence in government and health agencies and pharmaceutical industry. This group representing nearly two thirds of the French population displayed skepticism toward political and economic influences on science during the pandemic. And this is one of the reasons why we have to get people to understand how the money is being used to influence all this stuff. Trump bribed the governors. The governors then bribed the local public health things you've got the insurance companies bribing pediatricians to vaccinate the kids you had trump and biden

bribing the hospitals to put people on ventilators and remdesivir and then threatening them blackmailing them that if you take if you don't have your nurses vaccinated and your doctors vaccinated at the hospital, we're going to take away all that money that we were giving you as bonuses. Let's talk in a little bit of time we've got here, the 11 Republican heroes who stood up against the swamp. This is the title from Breitbart. Only 11 Republicans, including Marjorie Taylor Greene, supported her in this resolution to remove

Machiavellian Mike Johnson. And their names are Andy Biggs from Arizona, Eric Burlinson of Missouri, Eli Crane, Arizona, Warren Davidson, Ohio, Paul Gozar, Arizona, Arizona. Good. gozar arizona arizona good uh thomas massey kentucky alex mooney west virginia barry moore alabama chip roy texas victoria sparts indiana and marjorie taylor green georgia these are the republicans who voted uh to against tabling the motion in other words setting aside this motion motion to have Machiavelli and Mike vacate. So he had 11 of the GOP, only 32 Democrats to oust Machiavelli and Mike. And interesting, you know, it's always about the money, isn't it? The guy gets $20 million in three months.

His first full quarter as a Speaker of the House. He calls himself a wartime speaker. He broke the Hastert rule of going against the majority of his own party, working with the opposition party to get his agenda through. And so then we see these kinds of headlines coming from Breitbart, for example. The swamp always wins. Mike Johnson expects to lead the House Republicans even after the election. And and of course you know they they call him controlled opposition and it's not just breitbart it's many of all the conservative publications call him can uh controlled opposition uh the swamp is winning the democrats are

supporting him he's working with the democrats he's part of the uni party these are the headlines that i see everywhere and then there's this headline. Trump rebukes Marjorie Taylor Greene for trying to throw him out. Now, wait a minute. Is Trump part of the swamp? Is Trump part of the Uniparty? You better believe he is. You better understand that he is.

Trump is a Democrat rhino just like Machiavelli and Mike Johnson. If Trump had called for him to be removed, you better believe that all the GOP would have voted against him and they would have removed him. Nobody's going to go against Trump because the GOP is no longer about principle. It's about, it's a cult personality around Donald Trump. The GOP has become greed outside of principle. That's what it stands for now. It's all about the money. It's all about following Trump and doing whatever he wants.

And he wanted Mike Johnson there. Why do you think he wanted him there? Is it going to help him politically? Or is it something that the CIA masters of these two guys? And look, both of them you know he's the wartime speaker donald trump you know he puts in gina haspel uh who is uh working hand in glove with the arch enemies of trump brennan and clapper all these people do you understand how this is professional wrestling?

And how the people who are really running the speaker, the people who are running Trump, and the two of them defending each other, you understand that this is a control game here? I hope you do. But if you don't, at least get the stuff about the vaccines out. Thank you for joining us.

Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now. Yeah. Good job. And you want to know something else?

You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David night show.com. That's a website.