The David Knight Show - Thr Episode #1,943: Gold Bars, Green Lies, and Crypto Dreams: Unpacking Corruption, Climate, and Catastrophe

Episode Date: January 30, 2025

Topics covered between 00:02:09 and 01:01:44Pfizer's Legal and Ethical Issues: Pfizer agrees to pay $60 million in a settlement for false claims related to drug kickbacks, highlighting a history of fines for similar misconduct. Impact of Covid-19 Policies: Criticism of the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, with personal stories of adverse effects including death, attributed to vaccines and treatments like remdesivir. Topics covered between 01:02:38 and 01:21:32RFK Jr.'s Stance on Health and Pharmaceuticals: RFK Jr. acknowledges that certain industries profit from illness rather than health, suggesting a critique of the pharmaceutical industry's motives. Political Influence and Financial Ties: RFK Jr.'s financial disclosures reveal investments in gene editing firms, which conflicts with his previous warnings about the dangers of such technologies. Topics covered between 01:23:07 and 01:33:53Disease and Public Health: Skepticism about the narrative around bird flu, suggesting it's used to justify mass culling of poultry and dairy cows, not based on actual widespread disease but to fit an agenda against meat and dairy. Topics covered between 01:35:37 and 02:13:02Gold Rush Chaos: Trump's Tariffs Threats Trigger Uncertainty  Economic warfare is the new battleground. Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.gold, exposes the hidden chaos in the financial markets triggered by Trump's aggressive tariff threats.With central banks scrambling to move their gold reserves to avoid potential taxes the financial landscape is anything but stable.Meanwhile, as Europe and the US play with derivatives and ETFs, the East amasses real commodities, setting the stage for a clash between digital and tangible wealth Topics covered between 02:13:51 and 02:37:12Live listener comments on Gold, Silver, and Bitcoin: Discussion on the tangible value of gold and silver versus the speculative nature of Bitcoin, emphasizing the physical assets' role in maintaining purchasing power against inflation.Political Corruption and Justice: Bob Menendez's corruption case, where he was sentenced for taking bribes in gold bars, highlighting systemic corruption in politics. However, Lindsey Graham, his defender in previous corruption charge, has NO sympathy for J6ers.Topics covered between 02:39:22 and end of the showParis Climate Agreement and Political Strategy: Critique of Trump's actions regarding the Paris Agreement, emphasizing that the U.S. was never officially in the agreement due to lack of Senate ratification, yet participated actively under his administration.Lithium Battery Fire Risks: Highlighting the global increase in lithium battery fires as a direct consequence of pushing for "green" energy solutions, leading to significant safety hazards. If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7 Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Did you know that if you're 50 or older, RSV may be serious for you? Help protect yourself with EREXV, Canada's first RSV vaccine. Ask your doctor or pharmacist about EREXV. EREXV is a vaccine that helps protect adults 50 to 59 years old at increased risk and adults 60 years and older from lower lung disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus, RSV. 100% protection not guaranteed. Adverse events may occur. Visit RxV.ca. At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away.

Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions 19 plus to wager ontario only please play responsibly if you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you please contact connex ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge but mgm operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

It's The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 30th of January, year of our Lord 2025. Well, today we're going to take a look at the RFK Jr. hearing yesterday on the Hill. We've got a lot of fools on the Hill. We've got a lot of people who are in the pay of big pharma. And what was going on was foolish on both sides, actually. So we're going to take a look at that as well as give us a little bit of context as to what's really going on with the vaccines. The information keeps coming out.

And we also have now the government repeatedly coming out and putting warnings on food, saying this contains a deadly ingredient. Milk. Milk. putting warnings on food saying this contains a deadly ingredient milk that's where the bill also can take a look at not just the fools on the hill but it's to be on the hill who's not gonna be behind bars for 11 years Bob Menendez and the reactions of people like his friends Lindsey Graham who is kept him out of jail the first time but now Lindsay wants all the j6 in jail very upset about that very upset Yeah, we have Pfizer is going to pay $60 million in false claim settlements over drug kickbacks, the Department of Justice announced. And this is something that's been going on for quite some time, isn't it? Fear of, you know, fear, fear.

So Pfizer has the biggest criminal crime in history. So how is it not anti-science to not trust them? If they're on record bribing physicians and fudging with test results, $2.3 billion crime. So how is it anti-science to simply question them? Can you explain that, please please so i appreciate your comment i'd like to finish my presentation and you can hold your questions i appreciate your comment yeah i have four i have four questions that oh my god this guy grabs and puts his hands around his neck he's much bigger than the guy that's gonna throw him

out he just throws the guy on the floor ring just rolled it's right here it's right here got it okay yeah they always go for the throat don't they you know the visor goes for the throat goes to the mouth they try to shut you up and she's got a presentation she's going to give you don't don't get in her way she's got some very she's going to give you. Don't get in her way. She's got some very important information about that. Well, you know, it's kind of interesting, isn't it? $60 million under Trump. They were given tens of billions of dollars, $20 billion right up front, and they made a lot more than that. Trump minted a lot of billionaires, individuals, not just the tens of billions that the companies got.

But it was so much money that the people running it became new billionaires. Isn't that the way that it works? I've talked about that for so long. You give millions of dollars to politicians and you get back billions of dollars. Or you give them thousands and you get back millions. dollars or you give them thousands and you get back millions it's almost like a thousand to one return yeah uh the return on investment it's just insane isn't it yeah uh and uh so we we saw this with elon musk he gives trump 250 million and boom his net worth goes up by 200 billion.

You give Pfizer, gives Trump a million. They did even better. They got tens of billions back. So they give millions and you get back billions. And then when you have caused billions of dollars worth of damage to people, you only have to pay millions in fines. That's the way this works. Now, this is a company that Pfizer acquired, just to be clear. Pfizer acquired them and inherited their criminal actions, kind of like Bayer bought Monsanto, said, oh yeah, they're poisoning the land and people with glyphosate, but that's okay. We'll pay $60 billion for them or whatever it was. We'll assume the legal liability of all these lawsuits about glyphosate roundup, stuff like that.

So that's the way these guys operate. They really didn't have a problem with it. And it was a company called Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. And so this was a practice that Biohaven Pharmaceuticals was doing. And when Pfizer bought them and took them over, it shut down this practice, but it also bought the liability for this. What I found most interesting about this was the fact that the Department of Justice said that this happened between March 2020. I said, what was it that happened in March 2020? It's so hard to remember, isn't it? It seems like there's not any Republicans that remember what happened in March 2020. I do. That's when he shut us down. That's when he

put out the executive order. Of course his pharmaceutical uh guy that he put in charge at uh hhs alex azar had already declared the emergency 10 days after trump spoke at davos but anyway um it was march 2020 they told everybody go ahead lock down two weeks to flatten the curve. But of course, two years later, they were still flattening people in September of 2022, two and a half years later. And through all of this time, this pharmaceutical company called Biohaven, that was then bought by Pfizer, Biohaven violated the Federal False Claims Act by providing speaker honoraria and meals at high-end restaurants to doctors. So wait a minute. March of 2020, we're all locked down.

And yet the doctors are being given honoraria, in other words, bribes, and meals at high- at high end restaurants, high end restaurants weren't shut down. You know, the places like the French Laundry that Gavin Newsom went to, those weren't locked down. Right. Got to have the, you know, with a deadly pandemic like that was six people, you know, in January the 31st, six people had been identified as having COVID. So all the rest of us need to lock down. But these guys are still getting bribed with honoraria and meals at expensive restaurants that are still open because it's just the little guys that have to shut down. You know, shut down your little pizza restaurant there. But the high-end restaurants for the politicians and the pharmaceutical companies will stay open and so these guys are still operating and they're still using that to

bribe people throughout all of this from march 2020 to september 2022 this pharmaceutical company is giving trips and meals and cash and all the rest of this stuff to doctors, to their families. And they said they realized that this was not just something that they're going to learn about because they attended multiple times. They said some speaker programs were attended multiple times by the same doctors, resulting in no educational benefit. Educational benefit. We need an education to stop this kind of stuff.

No educational benefit, or it was attended by the doctor's spouses, their family members, and their colleagues, who had no educational need to be there, said the department. In other words, it's just like, hey, we'll give you some money, free vacation, nice meals, all this kind of stuff, just prescribe our stuff. They do that all the time. That's the same game plan that Purdue Pharmaceutical

and the Sackler family was using to get doctors to prescribe opioids to people and get them addicted on painkillers. Inappropriate prescriptions. So these were not people looking to have a recreational high. They were in pain. And they were given enough of this opioid stuff to get them addicted. The False Claims Act is designed to make sure that the judgments made by health care

providers will not be quote compromised by improper financial incentives there we go can we get one of those for politicians and for media can we make sure that the politicians and the media are not compromised by improper financial incentives to push drugs you know people like trump for example uh maybe maybe and this is coming from medicare medicaid it's coming from cms and through this time from march 2022 on through uh i'm sorry march March 2020 on through September 2022, CMS, runs Medicare, Medicaid, was bribing hospitals under Trump, bribing hospitals to identify people, get a bonus if you identify them as COVID, put them on a ventilator, we'll give you even more money, we'll give you 20% for everything that you do till you kill them.

And then we'll pay off families. We'll give families some money too if they accept the diagnosis that their family members died from COVID. So all this time, it was the government itself who was also doing this. False claims. False claims and bribery. Compromise by improper financial incentives. Doesn't that describe everything that Trump did in 2020? He compromised the hospitals who are more than willing to be compromised and the physicians who are more than willing to take the money and kill people.

The entire time, that was what was happening. Patients deserve to know that their doctor is prescribing medications based on their doctor's medical judgment and not as a result of financial incentives from pharmaceutical companies, said the Department of Justice. And not based on financial incentives from Trump and Biden either. Right? Trump who kicked it off. Biden kept it going. So Pfizer bought them in October of 2022. They ended that program at that point in time. But we have seen this type of thing over and over again. From the pharmaceutical industry, that's one of the things that they do.

And it's not all that much different than how they own the media, is it? You know, they pay the people at Fox News or CNN. You know, they sponsor all their programs and just misunderstood that you don't attack them. You know, Tucker Carlson said, yeah, yeah. You talk about that kind of stuff, you get fired. So he didn't talk about it. A mother shares her heartbreaking story of a teen's grisly death after the jab and remdesivir. We should never forget this stuff. And of course, we have a regular listener who lost her husband to remdesivir and the jab.

Should never forget this. And this is the context, folks, for what happened at that hearing yesterday. The fools on the hill. A vibrant, healthy young woman who got the vaccine just so she could attend a school function. Weeks later, she was dead. It also brings Remdesivir into the picture and it's kind of interesting because i'm reading to you from one of the biggest trump suck up publications that are out there revolver darren beattie he is just you think alex is over the top this guy is right there with it and he is always cheerleading Trump. And yet he will never make a connection.

And he talks about what happens with the pharmaceutical products, Remdesivir, the vaccine, the rest of the stuff. But he won't draw any connections and he won't criticize the politicians who covered up, the politicians who are paid who keep this going on. He says, Remdesivirir this is a revolver remdesivir was a globally approved medicine for treating covid sold under the brand name veclary gilead sciences and has been covered in controversy and of course part of the controversy that revolver doesn't want to go near with a 10-foot pole. It's the fact that Rand Paul had his wife, his wife. It's a Pelosi move, okay?

Well, it's not me. It's my husband who's buying all the stock, says Pelosi, right? Rand Paul did a Pelosi move. He got his wife to buy stock, and Remdesivir, the stuff was rolling out. And he's not going to criticize that. No, not a Republican not a republican even so says revolver even so they're injecting remdesivir into infants does rampal have a problem with that no no uh he's been paid off did you know says revolver that uh intravenous remdesivir is approved for infants 28 days and older, and oral remdesivir for ages 12 and older.

Everybody knew this. The nurses who were administering it who saw this in the hospital, they gave it the nickname, run, death is near. They all knew that. We all know that. This is nothing new. And it's nothing new that darren beattie would not criticize trump for any of this he puts an all uppercase who is giving remdesivir

to a 28 day old infant how is this happening all uppercase all uppercase well it's your hero trump who paid for it it's your hero trump who incentivized's your hero, Trump, who paid for it. It's your hero, Trump, who incentivized this. Your hero, Trump, who not only paid the exorbitant prices of a course of remdesivir, thousands of dollars for a few days, and giving people a 20% bonus. It's your hero, Trump, who did it, Darren. So the mother takes baby to the hospital, says Darren Beattie. doctors think that it's covid because the mass hysteria around it who was it that sold the mass hysteria to everybody oh you're a hero that's right and they opt for a contrived test who put out that test and it's a positive one so then the hospital proceeds to do COVID treatment protocol. Who created that and funded it?

The Trump administration. And it gives a baby remdesivir. Well, again, revolver in their ilk. See all this stuff? They know it. And they won't hold the people responsible for it. The people who funded it. The people who pushed it.

The people who bribed hospitals to do it how is this any different than what pfizer was just convicted for and with the department of justice you see the problem is that trump has no convictions for real crimes and the problem is that the trump media has no convictions period none whatsoever and then this woman the teen says my daughter was 17 years old. She had been selected for a school trip that took place from July 9th to July 22nd. It was mandatory for her to be vaccinated. She was the only one in our household who got vaccinated, and we begged her not to do it. She got her vaccinations June 7th and June 28th, 2022.

I wonder if these people that were being brib know bribed by the pfizer company again that went all the way to october 2022 this this girl got jabbed in the summer in july in june the end of june uh so they were still requiring these jabs to do things and coercing people and um and yet i guess you know the family members and the doctors who are going to these soirees at the expensive restaurants that were still open um i wonder if they had to get any jabs to do that do you think what do you think maybe they gave themselves exemptions like the medical crews in new Zealand. Remember that? We got the paperwork for that, the receipts for that.

So she left for her trip on July the 9th, and on the 18th, she texted me to say that she was feeling sick. We drove from Michigan to New York to pick her up at the border near Niagara Falls in Toronto. We returned home on July 19th, the next day, which was our three-year-old's birthday party. We celebrated with cake and ice cream, but my daughter, which was our three-year-old's birthday party. We celebrated with cake and ice cream, but my daughter and I just had soup and then went to bed. On July 20th, I took her to urgent care. We waited in the lobby for four hours.

She sat up and she asked, did they call me back yet? Moments later, she collapsed and went into cardiac arrest. The medical team worked on her and then airlifted her to Children's Hospital, where she was placed on an ECMO machine. I'm not sure what that is. I should have looked it up. I forgot. She was treated with remdesivir. Oh, there you go. Let's treat the people who have a reaction to the vaccine. Let's treat them with remdesivir or ventilator. That'll finish the job. But her condition worsened and her limbs turned black from lack of blood flow. She was at risk of having them all amputated.

However, amputation wasn't an option because of the blood thinners that she was on. And she developed infections. Her kidneys failed. And on August the 6th, we had to make the heartbreaking decision to turn off the machine. That day, my daughter passed away. So she asked, what happened? Well, Darren Beatty doesn't have any answers for her, because he doesn't want to hold the people responsible for this. He doesn't want to hold them responsible. They're his buddies. They're his pals. They're the people that are his ticket to success just cozy up these politicians and the audience that wants to hear all the happy news about this stuff

sorry i'm mr bad news here for you guys there's people that are being killed and not being held accountable for it the groundbreaking study that has just come out from a UK medical doctor is using all government data, all government data. They looked at what's going on with vaccinations in general for 1.7 million children. The children were split into two groups, unvaccinated kids and those who received COVID vaccines. Not a single child groups, unvaccinated kids and those who received COVID vaccines. Not a single child in the unvaccinated group suffered from heart-related problems. Researchers noted that no children from the entire study that were vaccinated or unvaccinated died from COVID-19. But some died from the Trump shot.

Yeah, and yet now what do we see we see a full court press from trump's cia director in league with these the maga media trying to tell everybody that there was a lab leak and it came from china china's responsible we should go to war with them right you know who's killing you your own government yeah china was doing that to its own people. China was selling it and marketing it and locking people down for the longest amount of time. But you want the China disease? The China disease was caught by our politicians. It's called tyranny.

And now they're trying to sell the lab leak thing so that you believe that it was real. We did our best. and now they're trying to sell the lab leak thing so that you believe that it was real. We did our best. Mistakes were made, but hey, it was a real thing. It was going to kill everybody, and it's going to be a real thing again because we're going to continue to have these lab leaks because we just can't stop the scientists from doing the experiments. Just can't stop it. That's what's going on with all this stuff.

So nobody died from COVID-19. Nobody died from COVID-19. Nobody died from COVID-19. None of the kids. They said that from the very beginning. They said the only people who are at risk are the people who are past life expectancy and have two or three comorbidities, right? That's what we saw from Italy. That's what they were saying at the very beginning. People who were dying who would normally die from flu or from a lot of other things, they were

labeled COVID deaths. That was their pandemic. It was a lie. It was not a leak. It was not an intentional bioweapon leaked from them. The bioweapon came after the lie. The bioweapon was the Trump shot. Furthermore, the study found that COVID shots offered children no protection from the virus, many becoming infected after just 14 or 15 weeks of receiving an injection.

They got a cold. History shows that time and distance erase fear and allow truth to surface, but we can't wait that long. We need to fight now for the truth says darren beattie those words ring hollow will revolver will info wars will breitbart will they fight for the truth will they distance themselves from the guy who pulled the stuff off and started it handed it over to biden who continued it will they do that no of course they won't um so with all that as a context let's talk about the hypocrisy on the Hill. And Narrow Way, Narrow Gate says Trump is heavily invested in both Pfizer and Moderna with their mRNA projects, divested right before he became president the first time around. Well, he invested us in them, didn't he?

One way or the other. He took the money from them. He used RFK Jr. the first time around. He knew exactly what he was doing. In the same way that he says to people, hey, just as we were talking to David Bonson yesterday, he says, I think this is a terrorist. I don't know if he's really going to do the terrorist, but he's going to use that as a threat. That's exactly what Trump did with RFK Jr. the first time around. He brings him into Trump Towers, and he had said some things about how he was skeptical of vaccines and the rest of the stuff.

And he brings RFK Jr. in. Boom. Oh, they pony up just like big tech is ponying up now and buying him. And so the pharmaceutical companies gave him lots of money. Pfizer gave him a million for his inauguration party and all the rest of the stuff. And RFK Jr. never heard from him again until this time around. And this time around, he wanted to have this all this stuff happening. Do we not have the Pfizer thing in here? Yeah, we missed one of those.

Okay. Well, oh, here it is right here. Here it is right here. Yeah, so we got a lot of questions from a lot of senators. And let's start with the first one here. Elizabeth Warren. Sponsored by Pfizer. Yeah, she's sponsored by Pfizer. And she had, she lost it in a screaming match with RFK Jr.

As one headline puts it, a wild confirmation hearing. And it was. They really got angry at RFK Jr. And these senators, by the way, these senators on this committee, collectively over the last five years, have taken $7 million from big pharmaceutical companies, people like Elizabeth Warren. She's number two. Number one is Bernie Sanders. And they were two of the most hysterical, ludicrously hysterical people. And of course, what Elizabeth Warren always does is she positions herself as the champion of the little guy.

She's out there to save you, when in reality, she's the champion of big business and big banks. She's always put herself out there as, well, I'm going to stand against the banks, these big banks. And so she was one of two people who pushed through this Consumer Financial Protection Board. And the end result of Consumer Financial Protection Board was that it didn't protect consumers. It actually narrowed our choices. It created so many regulations for small and medium-sized banks, they couldn't comply with it. Only the big banks could comply with the

regulations that the CFPB put on them. And so what happened is you had a consolidation. She was actually the champion of the big banks. And she's doing the same thing with this as well. Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy. I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough. You can find Happy Enough wherever you Listen to podcasts.

And so, Elizabeth Warren, the big pharma shill. Profitable. In fact, he may have the opportunity to bankrupt the vaccine manufacturers, and then nobody gets vaccines. Oh, well, wouldn't that be a tragedy? He might bankrupt these vaccine manufacturers. You know, RFK Jr., when he was talking about the energy

companies that he didn't like as his stage when he went through radical environmentalism, and I think he's probably still there, but during his radical environmentalism activism, he said said a lot of these companies he said no no no i wasn't talking about locking up the people that i just mentioned i was talking about locking up their companies and giving their companies you know a hot meal and

a cot to sleep on you know three hots and a cot i was gonna but he said these corporations a lot of these bad corporations deserve the death penalty. And I agree with that. I would absolutely give the death penalty to these pharmaceutical companies that have been killing people. The company deserves a death penalty. Disband it. Don't give it some small fine. There isn't any fine that you can give them that's going to bring them to heel. The same type of stuff that we're seeing with Elon Musk in the area where I used to live in Texas. He comes in, he puts in SpaceX, and he puts in the Boring Company. And he says, well, I'm just going to dump this stuff

into the river. And they say, you can't dump that in the river. We got rules against that. Whatever. He says, well, I don't care. Hit me with a fine. I don't care. And he doesn't.

And so they hit him with all these fines, and it's like a penny or something. Here, take fine. I don't care. And he doesn't. And so they hit him with all these fines and it's like a penny or something. Here, take it. I don't care. And then he does the road in a different way than they told him, different way than the Department of Transportation told him. And he doesn't care about those fines either. Now, those may or may not be real issues. I think the water thing is. I don't know about the road. Who cares about that, really? I mean, they've got their safety rules that everybody else has to follow, but these people don't follow the rules. And if you hit them with a fine, they don't care.

If you hit Pfizer with a $20 million fine, they don't care. If you hit them with a few billion dollars, they don't care because they're making tens and hundreds of billions of dollars out of this stuff. They don't care. You've got to disband that company. In the same way that you've got to get rid of these regulatory agencies that don't have any constitutional authority and actually ally themselves with regulatory capture for these organizations. So, yeah, but Elizabeth Warren is worried that we might not be able to get our vaccines. She's on your side, you know.

And one person said, hey, Bernie, in 2019 and 2020, you took more money from Big Pharma than anybody else in Congress, and Warren was not far behind. You both should be ashamed of your behavior today. And so Elizabeth Warren, next thing she did was this interchange, arguing about who's going to take money from the pharmaceutical companies, and she's one of the biggest recipients of all this stuff. The hypocrisy on the Hill. Unbelievable hypocrisy.

I'll comply with all the ethical guidelines. That's not the question. You and I, you have said repeatedly. You're asking me, Senator, you're asking me not to sue vaccine pharmaceutical companies. No, I am not. Yeah, you are. That's exactly what you're doing. Look, no one should be fooled here.

As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy will have the power to undercut vaccines and vaccine manufacturing across our country. Let's hope he does it. I don't know if you will talk about follow the science and his promise that he won't interfere with those of us who want to vaccinate his kids the bottom line is the same kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it kids might die but robert kennedy can keep cashing in. Senator, I support vaccines. I support the childhood schedule. He supports 72 vaccines for kids.

The only thing I want is good science, and that's it. How about saying you don't make money off what you do as Secretary of HHS? I'm clear that Mr. Kennedy has gone through the same office of government ethics process as every single other nominee in the Finance Committee this year and in previous administrations. In addition to listing his assets, including the items that you've identified, he has signed an F. Well, look, yeah.

Who's making the money while kids die? It's people like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders who are taking money from pharmaceutical companies and not even bothering to care. They didn't even talk about the kids that are being killed. And then Kennedy comes back, oh, I fully support the childhood vaccine schedule. Seriously? 72 shots, you support that?

You don't need to even look at science. Common sense tells you that's insane. Look at the schedule. How did they get to 72? I was astounded. It was only just recently that I looked at what the 72 different things were. I mean, it's not like they got a list of every possible disease and combination they can think of. Let's see, did we cover beriberi?

I mean, they're hitting people. They're hitting these kids three, four, five times with the same shot over and over again. It's ludicrous. But he supports that. And he supports vaccines in general. We got one fool on the hill talking to another fool on the hill. And the question is, are you going to be fooled again? Seriously, make America healthy again. I support the vaccine schedule and the question is are you going to be fooled again seriously make america healthy

again i support the vaccine schedule and the vaccines uh warren says um you're not going to take money from drug companies in any way shape or form will you because she does she does he says who me she says yes she was like she said you're the one taking money from the vaccine companies you're telling me that I can't sue them? That I'm going to make money suing them for the damage that they do to other people? Yeah. Kill off access to vaccines and make millions. She pushes vaccines.

Mandates she pushes. Killing off kids and makes money. So she has received $748,000 from the health care industry, but she supposedly has no corporate donors that we know of, said Anna Mattson on Twitter. She said this made me dive deeper into some of the strange connections since she has been the most outspoken over kennedy uh so yeah let's take a look at what she's got there and uh the different um was it but of course you know it's all individual donors yeah she lies up one side and down the other always portraying herself as a champion of the consumer and of the little guy when she actually champions the big banks and the big pharmaceutical companies one of the worst of the worst eliz with warren she asked kennedy not to take any compensation

from lawsuits she says he said you're making me sound like a show after she brought up his legal work against drug makers you're asking me not to sue drug companies of course and then we have another person uh who was um another person who was uh there who was um brought by pfizer and uh that is tina smith tina smith uh came after him over ssris so do you believe as you said, that antidepressants cause school shootings? This should be a simple question. I don't think anybody can answer that question, and I didn't answer that question. I said it should be studied along with other potential culprits like social media. But I don't know.

I would never make, because there's no science on that, Senator. Well, there is, Senator. I mean, excuse me, there is. We have 7,000 people on SSRI stories. The science shows that there. Yeah. How many black box labels does it have, Senator Smith, Tina Smith? How many black box labels have been put on this?

How many times have I talked to people who have family members who committed suicide? And I've talked to the people who run a website, ssristories.net, if I remember correctly. But they've got over 7,000 stories. Not everybody gives them their story. Situations where people had reactions to this, they you know do murder suicide killing their own kids killing other people one kid who was having serious effects from the drug itself so he stopped it stop it cold turkey it's like getting the bins if you're a diver you got to get out of it gradually but you know he didn't take his dosage next thing you know he's got a rifle he to school, and he's pointing the rifle at the class, pointing it at himself, pointing it back at the class.

They got the rifle away from him before anybody got hurt. But that doesn't always happen. And he had no recollection of what was going on. And I've spoken to the woman whose husband was given it because he had a little bit of trouble sleeping. Very healthy. And he always, you know, was paying close attention to his body, trying to get sleep, and went to a doctor, and the doctor, here, have this stuff.

And he said it was like his body was on fire, and he was struggling with it. She had to go on a business trip, and while she was gone he hung himself and so she got attached to the fda with its um consumer safety board or something like that and she fought and fought and fought and got black labels put on it but tina smith says it's wonderful tina smith says to him she defended the ssris and said they're not related to school shootings we've seen over and over again that they are it's one of the factors that's usually present she says that she took ssris and had a good experience

well that's one of the most insidious things about these poisons, isn't it? You know, if it killed, if it interacted with everybody the same way, killed or crippled them, then people could see what's going on. You know, we might even have some people like Tina Smith who would let us shut it down or Elizabeth Warren. Who knows? They might still insist that they be allowed to give it it to people even if it was killing every single person but what it is is essentially a system of russian roulette they make these very very strong concentrated synthetic things and then when no matter how many people it affects it can affect hundreds of thousands it can affect millions and they'll always tell you it's rare i've heard that so much i want to punch a person the next person says that to me like that pharmacist who gave us that antibiotic oh it's rare it's like well i tell you what

just want to punch him in the face shut up um and then we have another senator warnock sponsored by pfizer yeah he says you've compared the cdc's work to nazi death camps you have compared it to sexual abusers in the catholic church do you stand by those statements rfk says i don't believe i ever compared the cdc to nazi death camps he's gonna leave in the sexual abuse stuff uh he may not want to talk about sexual abuse uh rfk jr that's not something that is there in the hearing evidently uh warnick says well i have a transcript we did compare them to nazi death camps and why wouldn't we it's an apt comparison it really is uh and then we have Senator Wyden. Sponsored by Pfizer.

And he says, and you know when I put this in here, sponsored by Pfizer. What I'm talking about is the same way CIA. I just talk about CIA for the intelligence community. So Pfizer is the placeholder for what they all do. Big pharma. Buying off the media. Buying off the politicians. And then giving a license to kill essentially and so um wyden uh senator wyden he had no criticism for big pharma abuses or the socialist health care programs that have exploded in costs

uh he says to rk jr uh he are you are disagreeing with the settled science those two words don't go together do they always be skeptical of science and always be cynical of these politicians quite frankly uh and so the question is though when we look at this and the big pharmaceutical abuses um does rfk jr have any criticism of this does he have any criticism of operation warp speed we're going to get to that in just a moment uh but then um this is uh ron wyden and uh he's talking about measles 21 in a book called the measasles Book, you wrote that parents had been, quote, misled into believing that measles is a deadly disease and that measles vaccines are necessary, safe, and effective.

The reality is measles are, in fact, deadly and highly contagious, something that you should have learned after your, contributed to the deaths of 83 people, most of them children, in a measles outbreak in Samoa. So my question here is, Mr. Kemp, is measles deadly, yes or no? The death rate from measles historically in this country in 1963, the year before the introduction of the vaccine, was 1 in 10,000. Let me explain what happened in Samoa. In Samoa in 2017 or 2015, there were two kids who died following the MMR vaccine.

And the vaccination rates in Samoa dropped precipitously from about 63% to the mid-30s, so they've never been very high. And in 2018, two more kids died following the MMR vaccine, and the government in Samoa banned the MMR vaccine. I arrived a year later when vaccination rates were already below any previous level. I went there, nothing to do with vaccines. I went there to introduce a medical informatics system. I would digitalize records in Samoa and make health delivery much more efficient. Oh, digitalize the what?

Any public statement about vaccines, you cannot find a single Samoan who will say I didn't get a vaccine because of Bobby Kennedy. I went in June of 2019. The measles house break started in August. Oh, clearly I had nothing to do with the measles. Not only that, Senator, not only that, if you let me finish, Senator, if you let me finish, Senator, if you let me finish, there are 83 people died when the tissue samples were sent to New Zealand. Not most of those people did not have measles. We don't know what was killing them. It's not a virus. It occurred in Tonga and Fiji and no extra people died.

There were seven measles outbreaks in the 13 years prior to my arrival. I would like to get my time back they have to yeah well there you go vaccinations are so important this is really going around now they have to get their shot yeah yeah on the same page as uh sheldon uh not sean of uh ron wyden well yeah let's recap what happened there i widely reported what happened in 2018 i had my show at that point in time uh the one that happened in 2015 that was before the time i had my show but um i talked about that in depth you had kids that were lined up to get their usual childhood shots and um a little two-year-old goes in there, gets a shot, and drops dead right there.

And the next mom says, we're leaving. I'm getting out of here. No, no, no, no. It doesn't have anything to do with the shot. It's not the shot at all. Not the shot at all. It's perfectly safe. You need to get this for your child.

Put the fear of an imaginary virus in them. And so she says, okay. And they give her two-year-old the shot and her two-year-old drops dead instantly and the rest of the people are they're out of there and the government of samoa banned the shot and then what they did was they blamed it on the nurses who administered the shot not the pharmaceutical companies not the hospital but the nurses got the blame for it and um so then he says the 83 people that died a couple you know he said they looked at the tissue samples and guess what they found no virus they couldn't isolate anything does that sound familiar talk to christine massey i've talked to sam bailey and her

husband i keep forgetting his first name because sam is such an unusual name for a woman i get it's easy to remember but the baileys both of them doctors medical doctors and um you don't find any there's no science here you want to talk about settled science it's ron wyden talking about settled science let's talk about whether or not you can isolate it whether or not you can even find what you're looking for in the tissue you didn't find it and so what you did was these 83 kids that died you attribute it to some imaginary thing right let's just say they got the cooties they all died of the cooties they all died of bird flu that's what it is i know that's that's it they died of bird flu oh covid covid we didn't

isolate anything we're not testing for anything really uh but if somebody dies we've got this fraudulent um thing that we wave around this procedure. And we'll label it that. The whole thing was a lie. Everything that happened there in Samoa and all of this stuff is based on a lie. The question is, will RFK Jr. really expose this stuff? I mean, it was good what he had to say there about Samoa. He told the truth about what happened in Samoa. And that truth needs to be told these people lied about this stuff from one uh episode to the other

and then there's uh senator sheldon whitehouse sorry yeah sheldon whitehouse right here oh well anyway that's i'm hitting the wrong button. And he had he wanted to talk about the RFK mandate. Let me see if I can find that. Here it is. It's with you. So and I've got a lot of experience with CMS. So you're just going to have to listen. Yeah, just listen to me. I'm going to lecture you. If you want to move from advocacy to public responsibility, Americans are going to need to hear a clear and trustworthy recantation

of what you have said on vaccinations, including a promise from you never to say vaccines aren't medically safe when they in fact are all of them all of them are safe making in categorically clear that you liar port mandatory vaccinations against diseases where that will keep people safe oh Oh, he wants mandates too. You're in that hole pretty deep. We've just had a measles case in Rhode Island. Oh, first since 2013. And frankly, you frighten people. Two.

I think he's frightening people. A measles case. Didn't he die? From a remorseless, senseless CMS bureaucracy. CMS has for years maintained a reimbursement system that the bureaucracy could never explain, never justify. Is that about the 20% for killing people? It pays Rhode Island providers less. Oh, no, he wants more money.

Massachusetts and Connecticut providers. A differential of 23. Oh, okay. So he's like the American Hospital Association that in August of 2020 said, you told us you're going to give us a 20% bonus for labeling people as COVID. Where's that money? That's what he's doing. Pay me.

Come on. I'm doing this stuff for you i'm uh killing kids for you with vaccines and lies pay me up come on give us the money give us the same kind of money that the people in massachusetts get yeah he's absolutely by pfizer yeah i want to make sure the committee is cleared about a few things. News reports have claimed that I'm anti-vaccine or anti-industry, said RFK Jr. Well, I am neither. I'm pro-safety. Okay.

That's like somebody coming up in a hearing. They just always focus on Roe v. Wade and abortion with the Supreme Court hearings, I think. So that's like somebody who's a Supreme Court candidate coming in and saying, I'm not anti-planned parenthood. I'm just pro-life. Planned parenthood is fine. Pay them.

Let them kill people. That's okay. I'm pro-life. I'm not going to come against this big, powerful corporation. I don't want to defund Planned Parenthood. I don't want to stop the Planned Parenthood. I don't want to stop the vaccines from Pfizer and these other people. I just want to be safe. How does that strike you? That's what I think he's saying. It's like saying, well, I love children,

but I also love a woman's right to choose to kill her children. How does that work out? Maybe we could just stop the killing of chickens. How about that for the big agricultural companies? Of course, that's not under his purview, unfortunately. The USDA. I was surprised to see that the USDA is not under that. The USDA is not under HHS.

There's an agricultural secretary, which I guess kind of makes sense if there's going to be a secretary of agriculture. It has the Department of Agriculture there. The thing that I was surprised to see under the secretary of under the Agriculture Department was the forestry service. That is the reason that forests are burning down everywhere. Their policy of leaving deadwood, and they're prohibiting people from taking it out, as a matter of fact, of the public lands. I'd expected to see the forestry service under the Interior Department,

which has the BLM and other criminals there. But anyway, it's strange the way this stuff is set up. But I'm sorry, that RFK statement saying I'm not anti-vaccine or anti-big pharma, I'm pro-safety. I think that is like saying I'm not anti-planned parenthood. I'm pro-life. Kennedy is also expected to emphasize that he's not the enemy of food producers. I want to work with our farmers and food producers to remove burdensome regulations and unleash American ingenuity. Well, unfortunately, that is over in a different department. Well, I've been talking for a while.

We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and we're going to take a look at some of the things that a couple of other senators have said. Bernie Sanders is really amazingly entertaining. I'll just say this as he usually is um but we'll take a look at what rfk jr has said uh then and now as well uh dg8 says david unfortunately rfk jr is a part of the show yeah another fool on the hill uh nothing more than good cop bad cop and while trump and his technocratic shills are pushing frankenstein mrna jabs through the stargate this is all theater and he will stand aside i know he'll stand aside and we'll show you why he'll stand aside uh waking up ralph says

crazy how people still blame the scapegoat anthony fauci uh yeah he's um he's he's got a lot of uh skin in this game though uh he he's he's been there from the very beginning uh but uh trump is responsible for letting him stay in charge trump is responsible for giving him a medal on his last day i know wasn't a medal it was an award of some sort maybe he's got it framed in his office. I don't care. The bottom line is he left him in charge the entire time and put him up there as Mr. Science. And even had Fauci and Trump were kind of doing this Abbott and Costello routine where Fauci is the straight man and Trump was the buffoon. Milutin Milankovic,ic the kidney killer remdesivir

yeah that's right uh it also comes after the liver and um we get these things mixed up because it is so horrific for both kidney and liver uh we're all dead says my aunt was killed with that remdesivir i I'm so sorry. So sorry. Atomic dog. Remember when the medical experts are saying that if you survived, COVID was proof that the vaccine worked? People bought that line.

And then they made up every kind of thing you can imagine for all of the symptoms that were coming up for the vaccine, even heart attacks in children, and the fact that we've now got to have them get a heart test before they can participate in sports. Oh, that's fine. That's normal. That's the new normal. Let's not even ask why that's happening now for the first time ever in history. Jeff, can all the Democrats pretend that they're for the little guy? That's why the Democrat voters are loyal to them, the same way the Magatards are to Trump.

Yeah, yeah. So now we've got two groups of people thinking that these elitists who absolutely hate them and want to kill them are really on their side. And they should rule by executive order and all the rest of this stuff. They're going to fix all the problems for us. Right there in the Oval Office. 12 June 1776. RFK Jr. just claims that he can elevate vax science to a gold standard.

He is a vaxxer and only demands gold standard vaxxing. Yeah. Yeah. Well, let's just go back and say, why don't you prove? And he got kind of close to it when he said, you know, they looked at the measles, they looked at the tissues, they couldn't find measles there anywhere. Yeah, it's another one of these viruses that doesn't exist, that they've never isolated. You should be able to go in and see it and detect it in massive quantities in the people who die and see that it's not in other people.

It's not the way it works. They're not doing science with that. BusyB777. Pfizer Pocahontas is a hypocritical psycho. Yeah, Atomic Dog. I can only hope RFK returns some sanity to our health care. Well, we can hope, I guess. RFK Jr. is already self-censoring, though.

And the kind of response that he got, I don't know what's going to happen in the Senate. Look, there's a lot of Republicans that are on. When you look at this, I think he will cost the pharmaceutical company some money. Everybody believes that. We'll see. We'll see if that happens. But the pharmaceutical companies don't want him in for whatever reason. And it doesn't mean that he's a good guy, necessarily. But there's going to be a lot of republicans who are also on the dole that will vote the way their uh sponsors you know sponsored by pfizer yeah there's a lot of republicans like that too and they'll vote that way as well um don't frag me bro lying to get appointed seriously he's a pos like the rest of them yeah i agree guard goldsmith good to see you

guard liberty conspiracy one of the big troubles I see among conservatives right now is that they dislike Pfizer and Moderna so much that they want to ban free speech for advertising of those products. And people are citing the precedent of cigarette ads being banned. But if that precedent is acceptable to people, then ads for food and supplements could be banned well i agree except that um this is uh would we allow ads for people if it's obviously fraud and if they're obviously buying the media i think there's a different issue there so i support the ban uh for this stuff uh i understand what you're talking about with um cigarettes and with other things and of course that's they ban all kinds of speech and they ban the people who oppose them i know that firsthand but on the other hand if you're out there selling a product that's going

to kill people it's like what laura loomer did you know she's on with tim pool and luke kardowski and luke kardowski says why can't Trump just say this stuff is bad? Why can't he say that he made a mistake? Why can't he stop this? It's killing people. Everybody knows it's killing people. And Laura Loomer says, well, I didn't take it. If you took it, it's on you.

And see, that's the attitude that we cannot have towards these Pfizer ads. They completely own the politicians and they completely own the media. And we all know that it's killing people. And I'm not going to allow, I would never allow the people to advertise stuff that is proven fatal. And so I would shut down the ads for these pharmaceutical drugs are just too dangerous. And we know exactly what the purpose of it is. It's not to ask your doctor. No, it's so that the press doesn't ask questions of pharmaceutical companies.

They own them with this stuff and they're putting out stuff, product that kills people. Handy. Where I work, a positive PCR, one you, a five-day remdesivir infusion five infusions one per day thousands of dollars if you survive that long um a syrian girl all doctors and nurses who participate in these death protocols must lose their jobs for good i agree that's why they should be fired you see isn't it interesting that trump coerced them to and you know gave financial rewards he bribed them right and then biden came in and coerced them blackmailed them and blackmailed the hospitals and the hospital said are you going to take the

jab or are you going to lose your job that type of thing uh so yes they were complicit in all of this and it ought to be you gave the jab you lose your job instead of if you don't take the jab you lose your job they should be taking the jobs of the people who gave the jabs they're all still in place to call us when one one by one when we need medical help octo spook i just had to secure antibiotics from a friend who is a pharmaceutical sales rep because my doctor refused to prescribe them to me simply telling me you don't need them. A new doctor is on the horizon.

Yeah, ask your doctor. The problem is if you ask Google or if you ask ChatGPT, you're going to get the same kind of lies. Little Ford Schoolhouse. They tested my mom for COVID before they would treat her to really ridiculous. I'm so sorry. She just lost her mother. And Handy has talked about this for the longest time.

He said he had, you know, the guy came in, he's, you know, far along in a severe heart attack. And before they would do anything to him at the hospital, they tested him for COVID. Why? Well, because in everything they do, they get a 20% bonus. And it's all about the money.

That's all it's about. Zoxo Voxos says, lab leak is a deflection. Yes. And a euphemism for democide. I agree. It was on purpose. It was planned.

It was malicious. They planned it and practiced it for 20 years, going back to Dark Winter, and all tied together with 9-11 and Homeland Security and the PrEP Act and the states telling them, giving them model legislation

so they give themselves the power to do this stuff. Koalamos says, did they get the heater part installed yet? Hopefully today. It was supposed to be yesterday. Still not seeing it yet. Stephen Caspar, fortunately we've got heat in this room. It's just the rest of the main floor. And there's heat upstairs.

But that doesn't do us any good because the hot air rises. Stephen Caspar, the fake Indian is on the warpath. Pocahontas. I love that video that somebody did. I should have played that today. It was Betty Hutton. I am an Indian, too. You know, remember that?

And they put her face on with Betty Hutton. That was great. Dougalug. And how much did Warren make with insider trading? Yeah, that's right. Octo, maybe the way that she launders the money. Octo spook. I'm thinking the medical establishment might assassinate RFK.

Who knows? Yona Anawodi says thanks to Bernie. OctoSpook, I'm thinking the medical establishment might assassinate RFK. Who knows? Yona Anawodi says, thanks to Bernie, we now know onesies are clothing for babies. There's also Bernie's IQ. That's a onesie. Yeah, we're going to be putting Bernie in a diaper and onesies pretty soon uh that is rapidly approaching especially uh it might be coming sooner than we think after we saw his performance yesterday we'll look at that later karen carpenter these people are so self-righteous and certain

that they know the absolute truth is sickening they're closed mind minded and deadly for those who question it yeah yona says side effects mean it's working have another one yeah oh yeah you know i mean you got to take it it's just like sugar water we got to give you some of that aluminum mercury you know just so that you have a reaction to it you know but that's okay you know it's harmless it's like sugar water it's good for you karen carpenter good luck getting these self-righteous fools to take fluoride out of the toothpaste in the water well we fortunately can take it out ourselves shouldn't have to shouldn't have to pay to put it in and then pay to take it out and then worry that somebody's gonna that we're gonna get it when we're in public or something steven caspar the democrats

running for governor in virginia are running more on on more gun control to save the children while funding Planned Parenthood to murder babies in the womb. Yeah, that's right. So, young carpenter says, I've seen medical mistakes kill people all of my life. That's right. What is it? Iatotropic, Iatogenic or something like that. That's one word that I can't remember,

but it is one of the key causes of death. A death that began with physicians is what it means. It's more than 72 shots now. That's pre-COVID number. Add three more COVID shots and a couple others, and Yonah says, that's not what pharma can do for you. Ask your doctor what you can do for pharma.

That's right. Roll up your sleeve and do everything that they tell you to do. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Thank you. you're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, getting back to the hearings, one of the things that R.F.K. Jr. said, he said there's a series of industries that actually make money from keeping us sick. That's absolutely true. He said you would think that they would want us healthy, but they actually make more money if we get sicker.

And, of course, with the pharmaceutical companies, if you have a chronic illness, you are a lifetime patient. But here's the danger. That's all true. And it's truth that needs to be said. But it's truth that needs to be acted on. And if they don't act on it, as we've seen over and over again from Trump, they come out and tell you the truth about something and then do exactly the opposite. Telling people the truth and then not acting on it is just being a pacifier in people's mouths. They think, oh yeah, Trump's got it. RFK Jr.'s got it.

We don't have to worry about this anymore. And so that is the role that a lot of these people fill. And that is to put the public that is outraged about what has been done to assuage them, to put them back to sleep, to be a pacifier in their mouths. And that's perhaps the role that has been set up for him.

We'll see. I hope I'm wrong. And if I'm wrong, I'll give him credit for doing the right thing. The Federalist says, Kennedy said the diabetes drugzempic in particular is being relied on to induce weight loss for a nation where more than two-thirds are overweight 40 are obese in november the biden administration proposed an 11th hour rule to cover the medication under

federal insurance programs see this is the bureauc rules. Congress doesn't even get engaged in any of this stuff. And it's one of the reasons why you will never balance the budget. The bureaucracy can even then determine what you are entitled to. If confirmed as HHS, Secretary Kennedy would decide whether to approve the $35 billion handout for drug manufacturers or to terminate the proposal. Kennedy, however, has been a consistent critic of the medications that are now recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics for obese children as young as 12. Here, have some Gila monster poison, which is what it is. And we've seen over and over again that people have had their intestines

just stop working and not come back. Yeah, because that's one of the things that the gale monster poison does to you. And, but you know, hey, it's rare. Don't forget about it. Oh, kill that person, that person, that person. We don't care. You know, it's just rare.

Rare. A sick child said, Kennedy is the best thing for the pharmaceutical industry with American children or adults sick with a chronic condition. They're put on medication for their entire life. And so HHS that he would be put in charge of has nearly $2 trillion under it. Isn't that amazing? It's in charge of regulating the drug industry, which it doesn't do. And he would be over the NIH, the CDC, the FDA, the usual suspects.

All of those things need to be gone, quite frankly. You want to start cutting government? Start with those agencies. There is nothing, nothing in the Constitution for anything that I know of that HHS does. The federal government doesn't have those powers. And Congress delegated powers that they don't have to a bureaucracy that is not responsible or elected to anybody this is the mess that we have in washington kennedy will face questions from lawmakers on the senate finance committee who have received roughly seven million dollars from these drug companies in the last five years according to open secrets and of course um you

know that is um that is uh the the ridiculous aspect of it. His former running mate, billionaire Nicole Shanahan, has vowed to fund primary challenges to 13 U.S. senators who refuse to support Kennedy's confirmation and has called them out by name, said, I'll make it my personal mission that you lose your seats in the Senate if you vote against the future. And again, you know, I think that we should have the billionaires controlling

everything, don't you? And so Babylon Bee kind of sums it up and says, Senators, pause the RFK hearing to announce that the next round of questions is sponsored by Pfizer. Yeah, that's right. It's sponsored by Pfizer. The next round of questions, which will be centered on shielding vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, is brought to you by Pfizer, announced Elizabeth Warren. We're deeply thankful to Pfizer and all of our corporate sponsors who make this show happen.

Now, Mr. Kennedy, isn't it true that you would like to see vaccine manufacturers held liable if they create unsafe vaccines, which will cause everyone in the world to die of polio? And she says, it's clear you don't want Pfizer sponsoring the Senate. This is Sheldon Whitehouse, according to the Babylon Bee. Sheldon Whitehouse says, it's clear you don't want Pfizer sponsoring the Senate because you hate medicine and you want children to die. I think I've heard enough, says Sheldon whitehouse says it's clear you don't want pfizer sponsoring the senate because you hate medicine and you want children to die i think i've heard enough says the children well uh just remember that it was also trump who was sponsored by yeah and so uh question is is now is rfk jr sponsored by pfizer jane ruby put up on x uh some good posts showing the two faces of RFK Jr.

and asked, which RFK Jr. are we looking at here? So here is the first RFK Jr. from December of 2021. I'll just say about operational warp Speed, it was an extraordinary accomplishment, should demonstration of leadership by President Trump. I'm sorry, that was yesterday. Sure, and I'll just say about Operation Warp Speed, it was an extraordinary accomplishment, should demonstration of leadership by President Trump. Yeah, that was yesterday.

And that was Toll Road, Tom Tillis, the Republican shill, and a globalist nodding yes yes trump yes good trump good uh that was yesterday but what did he say back in december of 2021 this is the clip i meant to play look at their post licensing record it confirms that this is the deadliest vaccine ever made yeah so is it that or is it i'll just say about operational warp speed it was an extraordinary accomplishment should demonstration of leadership by president trump yeah he let it yeah he paid um you know put fauci in charge he paid the hospitals to kill people he gave the money to the companies to make the vaccine will the real rfk jr please stand up you know is it the rfk jr of four years ago or the one who is so anxious to get power which one is it and uh jane ruby also put up these two issues here this is um uh this is rfk jr

saying that gene editing is bad uh and this is three years ago uh complete with picture he said research on crisper gene editing for gene therapy applications show that it can lead to massive damage to chromosomes, known as chromothripsis, which can lead to cancer or to inherited disease in any children of the affected patient. That's what he said three years ago. But now what he is saying is, now what we see is that he's actually, as I look at his financial statements, we see that he owns stake in gene editing firms. Hmm. Well, that's interesting. This is on the Daily Caller. And they said ethics disclosures revealed that RFK Jr. owns stake in gene editing firm as Maha revolts over the new Trump backed MRNA project.

We kind of told the Trump voters before Trump got in that Rama Slimy and J.D. Vance were involved in MRNA stuff. Self amplifying, as a matter of fact, the worst, the newest, that Elon Musk had his CureVac a few years ago where he was pushing the mRNA stuff, all the people around Trump pushing that stuff. But when we go back and we look at the gene editing thing and the fact that you can damage the DNA, you can damage chromosomes. A lot of people have pointed out that this CRISPR tactic that is there, they love to talk about how something is like a scalpel.

It's very precise, surgical precision and everything. But the people who've been doing it for a while with livestock say, well, it's really more like a chainsaw than it is a scalpel. It does a lot of damage. And sometimes it modifies things in different places in ways that you had not intended. Isn't that the way everything is? They always sell us this stuff as perfect solutions that have no adverse effects. And when they do that, you know you're being had. So which is the real Kennedy? as perfect solutions that have no adverse effects.

And when they do that, you know you're being had. So which is the real Kennedy? Well, he said, you denied any vaccine stance in the confirmation hearing. He said, news reports have claimed that I'm anti-vaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. All of my kids are vaccinated, nor am I an enemy of the food producers yeah there we go okay well good um again uh try this with a pro-choice thing you know if people want to trust their doctors hey that's their choice i'm pro-choice on vaccines yeah praise pro-choice on abortions too isn't he uh he said

but you know um said something is poisoning the american people and he's referring to processed foods and chemicals but you know let's not talk anymore about the elephant in the room uh that all these people are sponsored by pfizer and that they're all on board with the pandemics, the vaccines, the rest of the stuff. One person said these sheer hazards associated with severe childhood disease is jaw-dropping. That is Carl Jablonowski, senior researcher at Children's Health Defense. You see, they will tell you the truth. And they have said a lot of truth about these vaccines. But childhood diseases?

How about the fact that, you know, we look at the sheer hazards of the vaccine that's associated with these childhood diseases. Do we want to talk about how many childhood diseases are caused by the vaccines? Childhood vaccinations associated with autism and neurodevelopmental disorders. This is, again, Jablonowski at Children's Health Defense. Increasing numbers of vaccinations lead to a higher risk of autism. Vaccinated preterm babies are at greater risk of neurodevelopmental disorders than unvaccinated babies. He said there's a study that was based solely on government data.

The government has had this data for decades, professing safety while simultaneously refusing to study safety. The facade of U.S. government public health is crumbling, revealing a culprit of chronic disease in this country and willful ignorance. And the willful ignorance is manifested in these partisan politics nobody wants to talk about. Democrats aren't going to talk about Biden. They'll talk about Trump. Republicans won't talk about Trump. They'll talk about Biden. Nobody's going to change anything because Republicans and Democrats are all in on the scandemic. They're all

in on the vaccine. Nothing is being talked about with any of this stuff. And so they summed it up here. This is all based on government data. Children with just one vaccination visit were 1.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with autism compared to those who were unvaccinated. Nearly two times more likely to have autism

with just one vaccination. If you get 11 or more vaccinations, and remember, the standard right now was 72. Now they've added the three COVID, so now we're up to 75 shots. But if you get 11 of the 75 recommended, you are 340% more likely, and that's about three and a half times more likely,

to be diagnosed with autism compared to unvaccinated children. You're 90% more likely to be diagnosed with autism compared to children with one vaccine visit. That nearly doubles your risk. Vaccinated children who were born preterm were 258% more likely to have neurodevelopmental disorder compared to children born preterm who remained unvaccinated. As a matter of fact, I talked to a nurse, interviewed her at one point in time.

She was a critical care nurse. She was in a prenatal intensive care unit. The kids who were born early, and they call it uh intensive care unit the kids who were um born early and they put them in intensive care and she said they keep to this vaccine schedule even though these kids are preemies okay well they were born even though they're premature they were born x number of days ago now we're going to get them with all the vaccine stuff and she said and they knew what they were going to do and i thought about this year this is about five years ago interviewed her and she said what they would do is these nurses in the um you know preemie intensive care would say we're going to do the vaccines um get the

emergency personnel ready you know we know these some of these kids are going to have severe reactions it's going to do it anyway. Do it anyway. See, this didn't all begin with Trump. He paid for them to do it. But these people have been doing this kind of stuff for a very long time. So, again, some of these children who were preemies, they have 258% more likely to be diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorder than the preemies who were not vaccinated. 40% of the vaccinated preterm children were diagnosed with such a disorder

compared to 15% of those who are unvaccinated. Vaccinated children are 419% more likely to be diagnosed with encephalopathy, brain inflammation, 525% more likely to develop a tick disorders, and 581% times more likely to have learning disability. Now, this is coming from a government database. So we saw that same kind of stuff from the Department of Defense database when the Trump shot was rolled out. You know, 500% more likely to have this condition and that condition, you know, 400%, 500%, some of them were thousands of percent. And, yeah, they covered that up as well.

The government knows. All these people know. And Children's Health Defense knows. And yet you've got RFK Jr. saying, well, I'm not anti-r saying well i'm not anti-vaccine you're not anti-vaccine those four bullet items from your own organization and you're not going to say that you're anti-vaccine i'm proud to say i am anti-vaccine i can't imagine not being anti-vaccine and certainly for the people who are not ignorant about this. This is his own organization. He knows this stuff as well. Why would he say he's not anti-vaccine?

Oh, he's playing 40 chess, is he? People who will commit evil, which lying is evil, people who participate in evil to achieve good, that never works out that way. It really doesn't. I've watched Supreme Court justices, and people would always say, well, you know, don't worry. That's just what they're saying to get confirmed.

Once they get confirmed, they're going to do this or that. Well, it just doesn't work that way. And then we've got Bernie Sanders. And he is, of all these people, the most ridiculous of them all. And here he is having a fit because Children's Health Defense is selling some onesies. No vax, no problem. You have started a group called the Children's Health Defense. You're the originator.

Right now, as I understand it, on their website, they are selling what's called onesies. These are little things, clothing for babies. One of them is titled Unfaxed Unafraid before this committee, and you say you're pro-vaccine. Just want to ask some questions. And yet your organization is making money selling a child's product to parents for $26, which casts fundamental doubt on the usefulness of vaccines. Can you tell us now? No, they kill kids. Bernie, they kill kids. Bernie, they kill kids. Vaccine that you're going to have your organization take these products off the market.

Senator, I have no power over that organization. I'm not part of it. I resigned from the board. That was just a few months ago. You founded that. You certainly have power. You can make that. Are you supportive of this? I've had nothing to do with you. Are you supportive of these onesies? I'm supportive of vaccines. Are you supportive of these this clothing, which is militantly anti vaccine? I am supportive of vaccines. Well, I want good science and I want to protect. But you will not tell the organization you founded not to continue selling that product. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yeah, they're both.

I find. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Just disgusting, isn't it? On both sides. Yeah. Give Bernie a diaper. Give Bernie a big onesie. They're looting the Treasury every time there's a tax break right uh he doesn't care about deficit

spending or any of that stuff but you know you give anybody a tax a break oh he has a fit about that we're gonna take a quick break and then we come back we're gonna talk about what's happening with uh chocolate yeah they're coming after our food supply everywhere about everything we'll be right back. S.A. ¶¶ © BF-WATCH TV 2021 You're listening to The David Knight Show. DG8, thank you. It says, David, the Trump cult always says their people lie to get approval david can i ask you a question why are we electing known liars the 3d chess keeping your enemies closer garbage needs to die it really does yeah let's do evil so the good may

come jason barker nights of the storm good to see you there um foxhole report uh healthy immune systems are not good for the industry's bottom line. That's right. They make money telling us. Opossum King says Bill Gates is working on lab-grown eggs. You know, God doesn't look at your bank account. He doesn't look at the outside of man. He looks at the heart. What do you think he sees when he looks at the heart of Bill Gates?

A hardened piece of stone. And dark as well. This guy has been so corrupted by his love of money. Just unbelievable. Bill Gates is not going to live forever. He will stand before God. And it is frightening to think about what these, just like Cecile Richards and of course, Bill Gates and his family always

big sponsors and approvers of um planned parenthood it's amazing to think about these people these unrepentant people who have so much blood on their hands standing before god uh voodoo 759 when i was in grade school if some kid had measles the rest of us would put in the same room so we get herd immunity no vaccines needed that's according to their you know that's certainly did happen and um that is uh the vaccine the virus paradigm you know the interesting thing is though as christine massey and the baileys have pointed out they did that type of thing with the cold house they called it as in catching a cold for 45 years in the uk they had a house that was set up they wanted to see how coals were transferred and they tried everything they could they would

they would take people who were sick with a cold and put them in the house for days would be like a little vacation and you'd volunteer for it and and they would try to transfer, see what they could do to transfer the cold to you. Is it touching things, you know, rags or whatever? Even putting mucus in other people's mouth or in their nose or whatever still could not find any mechanism of transference. Could it be that maybe the reason they haven't found a cure for the common cold is because it's not about a virus at all? Perhaps it's because you're cold and the way that your body reacts to being cold. We have done everything we can to stay, and we've been able to stay warm.

We just have to wear lots of coats and everything, this record cold that we've had here with no heater. Star Barkley, my sister was on those SSRIs, and her doctor husband brought her back to the doctor and said to him, this is not the woman I married. And you've got to be careful when you get off of it. Like I said, it's like the bends. You got to do it with a very gradual process. If you understand that it's doing

something to you, you got a loved one who's on it or you're on it and you've got a wide variety of side effects that it comes up with, then make sure that you get off of that very, very gradually because that's the thing that really triggers it don't frag me bro want to feel better raw milk fermented foods healthier food proper sleep stress management 12 essential tissue salts in my honest opinion he says and uh yeah soylent goy teach your children government and media lie all the. And let's talk about this food stuff. As we see now in Massachusetts, land of the Pocahontas, bird flu is widespread, they say. And this is coming from state officials there.

You have the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife and the Department of Agriculture Resources and the Department of Public Health all holding a press conference to tell people about a problem that the people themselves can't see. If this was a big problem, and if it was widespread, and if it was a pandemic, they wouldn't need to hold press conferences to tell people about it, right? As many people said, the Amish survived the pandemic because they don't have TV. So they have to hold a press conference to tell you about this pandemic that's out there. Do you see dead birds all over the ground?

No, no. You would if what they're saying is true, but it's not true. So they're scaring people about this, and you should be scared about what they are going to do. They said there's been a history of intermittent bird flu outbreaks in Massachusetts since early 2022. And this is what they've been saying. They said, well, it comes and goes since 2022. No, you know what comes and goes is the mass culling of birds.

And by the way, if it comes and goes, if it's intermittent, that means that it's disappearing on its own. How does that work? How is this a come-and-go pandemic? It comes and goes. But it's a pandemic? That doesn't fit into your virus paradigm, does it? So, again, it just comes and goes away,

but we still have birds that are out there. Even in spite of the fact that the government is trying to cull them all, kill them all, officials recommend not sharing equipment with other bird owners, except people did and it still disappeared, right? Over the last three years. Avoiding unnecessary movement of poultry. Isolating new birds for at least a month before adding them to pre-existing flock.

Now, here's what you do is you keep the public health officials away from your farm, if you can, if you can. And notice that it's all poultry. As many people have started to notice, why aren't they concerned about the migratory birds? Why are they concerned about wild birds? Why aren't they killing them no it's just the chickens that are isolated and we got to kill all of the chickens um so bird flu has been causing outbreaks and poultry and dairy cows they said see it's only poultry and dairy cows we've got to worry about why is that well you do know right that c, the thing that was put together by Sadiq Khan and Bloomberg and 40 other cities, now it's over 100 cities, saying that in their ideal society where they want to get us, there is no meat and no dairy.

So we've got to demonize that and kill it all. That's what this is about. This is not about H1N5 or whatever they call bird flu with their number no it's about c40 it's about c40 most human cases have been mild with patients recovering that's right pink eye and not having any of the symptoms that they have always identified as flu. No respiratory illness, no body aches, no respiratory issues. And they said, so far, just one death has been recorded in Louisiana in a patient over the age of 65 with multiple conditions. So prove it. Prove that this person died from this. But this is the same tactic that they've used before. But this time, the tactic is to call our food supply, to call the small producers.

The big producers will survive by design. They can do it the way that they're doing this thing. And then the big producers will use mRNA vaccines on their surviving food stock to get us the mRNA GCI, the genetic code injection, to get it to us in our food supply. Because people wise up to this. We're not going to roll up our sleeve and take this stuff. So they got to give it to us in the food. Then finally this, and then we're going to go to Tony Arteman, who is there, a chocolate recall.

And I saw this headline. It says consumption, quote, could cause death. What in the world is in chocolate that could cause death? Federal officials have upgraded a chocolate recall to the highest risk level over fears that consuming the product. This is federal people, right? It's all coming from Washington. All this killing is coming from Washington. Fear that consuming this chocolate could, quote, cause serious adverse health consequences or death, unquote. So what is this deadly toxin?

Undeclared milk. Milk. Boy, you know, it's not just raw milk. It's not just as what they want to demonize milk, period. Because, again, C40, you know, the climate MacGuffin people, say that you will not have any milk or meat. So we've got to demonize it. We have to tell people that you're going to die from this. And I saw exactly the same thing with laced potato chips just a couple of weeks ago. And I saw the same thing.

Laced potato chips recalled over uh an ingredient that could cause instant death it's like wow what is that it was milk undeclared milk you see this is dark chocolate that doesn't have milk i have milk chocolate that's there uh and it is uh undeclared uh on some of these products uh dark chocolate almonds dark chocolate apricots dark chocolate walnut nuts and all the rest of this stuff and look i understand people have a milk allergy and this is something like autism that is new never saw this kind of stuff before but then some of our our son's friends had it the kids who were born in the early 90s and um um you know they had autism we started seeing that in their friends and they had um really severe milk allergies one of them did

so i've seen that i know that's a real thing and yes i know that it can kill somebody but they had undeclared milk in here and where did these things come from you know why do we have autism and all of these allergies now and it's even worse than this back in december this same farm had another issue because they not properly labeled yogurt as having milk this is the idiocracy that we live in that somebody would not know that yogurt products have milk in them. We're that stupid that we allow the government to rule over us. But the government wants to demonize and prohibit milk as a dangerous substance.

And they have made it dangerous to some people with the vaccines. This is the insanity that just keeps going around and around. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. Tony Arterman is going to be joining us. ¶¶ © transcriptF-WATCH TV 2021 Liberty. It's your move. now the david knight show joining us now is tony arteman of wise wolf gold of course you can find him if you go to david knight dot gold that'll let him know that you're coming through us and that'll take you right to his portal and we're going to talk about some new programs that he's got coming up he's

very innovative in terms of helping people to invest and to save and so we're going to talk about some new programs that he's got coming up. He's very innovative in terms of helping people to invest and to save. And so we're going to talk about that coming up. But let's begin, Tony, with this rapidly changing economic landscape that we're seeing here. I mean, the big changes in the volatility are just coming left and right over many different things. It's not just crypto because of Trump and his personnel that are policy, but it's also what we've seen happening to the stock market with the AI stuff as well. So thank you for joining us. How are you doing? I'm doing great. It's always fantastic to be here. I love the show. I was listening before we went live here. And I just, you know, again,

so many things to cover because the world is changing rapidly. We look at the proposals that Trump has made and the markets are adjusting to that. I did not ever think I would live to see this, David, where tariffs, literal tariffs and the modeling of the late 19th century. That's what Trump keeps saying. He keeps not only talking about tariffs as a as a weapon and something I disagree with in the weaponization of the dollar, putting 100 percent tariffs on countries that don't use the dollar. But he's actually citing history. And this is more than one occasion. The markets are starting to adjust to that. First of all, we're not going to be able to go back and have the cheapest goods made and ship that out to the world. The costs are too high. The regulation is too staunch. And again, it wouldn't work that way. So what you have to do is you have to adjust with a weaker dollar.

And I think that's what's happening right now is that markets are starting to adjust to what Trump is proposing. And interesting times, David. Another consequence of this, and I don't think there'sid another another consequence of this and i don't think there's many outlets that are covering this at all except the financial times put out something and i think it's the tip of the iceberg so you you heard it here first on the david knight show a lot of these uh european central banks and bank of england being one of them are starting to uh with withdraw gold. And a lot of entities are withdrawing gold out of these vaults because of the proposed tariffs that haven't even been put in place yet.

And they're shipping them to the United States to avoid tariffs. I think this could ultimately have a domino effect where a lot of the bullion houses that have these contracts that are written on physical bullion don't have that to show on their balance sheets anymore. It could cause a cascading effect of a repricing structure based on product that isn't there. This is something that long ago those of us in the gold and silver business have called foul on what these ETFs and some of these paper structured entities do with their gold bullion, because we don't think that supply is as deep as they say it is. And I think this is going to get exposed because I think unintended consequences of the

Trump tariffs, lots of lots to pay attention to here. Yeah. Instead of just auditing the Fed, maybe we need to audit Fort Knox as well. You guys got any of that stuff there? It looks pretty empty in there. It's a good start. Yeah. Well, one thing I don't understand, though, is why are the central banks, how is it shipping gold to the United States? How does that help them with tariffs when they come in? I don't understand that part of it.

Well, it's not been clarified whether or not gold or silver would be tariffed, would have a tax put on them, or they'd be treated as currency. That's not been established. And so it's not necessarily the banks themselves, but entities that hold the bullion at these central banks or in their periphery. And it's just enough, I think, to cause a real problem for those who have been relying on paper gold. Yeah, I see. Something interesting else that happened that I've been paying attention to. So when they have to settle that, they might incur a tariff, is what you're saying. So they want to make sure that it's over here so they can settle those debts on the ETF.

I follow you now. Okay. Right. Yeah, it's basically just hedging against, well, if there's going to be tariffs on that and it needs to be repatriated, they'll do it now. And maybe based off of debt or holdings or assets they already have here. And there might be just a need to do that before then there's a new financial structure put in place. It's chaos. He's just a chaos agent, isn't he? He's not working with control. Well, maybe he not working with control he's working well maybe he's

working with control and chaos maybe the two sides of the same coin right it's crazy i think it's an unintended consequence uh this could show and reveal the the rigged system uh stewart angler who's been on my show i wrote a book called rigged and uh it's deep into the how the the giant bullion houses uh and the central banks collude together to keep especially in the west and that really is the the federal reserve to keep the price of gold low as low as possible and not really truly reflect uh the weakness of the dollar i mean the the dollar lost 35 percent of value against gold this last year, David. And they're losing control of the narrative. It's one of the reasons why in the late 1970s, going into 80, gold hit $800 an ounce.

We just recently crossed the threshold where adjusted for inflation, that was the all-time high. So we just recently crossed that so back in the true high up until you know the last few months uh was in 1980 for gold against the dollar and i think that's that's something you need to truly watch because what they did they stepped in at the late 1970s 80s and they raised interest rates to the teens with paul volcker but they also went after the hunt family for exposing physical silver when you purchase physical silver how it drives the price up nobody ever did that again um and then and then gold went on a hiatus it went into kind of just being uh uh put into the carbonite like on star wars it was just like it was set set in place and it didn't really move

for a couple of decades because of the system that was rigged against it. All those wheels are coming off that financial system now. And that's that's something. Those are the stories in the headlines that pique my interest. It's not that it's going around and that's what, you know, is mainline right now, especially in the gold business. But I see things like, oh, these these vaults are clearing out and they're sending their gold back to the United United States to avoid any sort of tariffs or repatriation or whatever they need to do. If they're moving it back and forth, just doing it in one big swoop, that could cause, I think, a cascading effect of these prices being reset. So this is going to be interesting to watch, too.

Yeah, it's economic warfare. And it's different than the way Biden did it. But both of them were engaged in economic warfare. And it's different than the way Biden did it. But both of them were engaged in economic warfare. And both of them, in terms of doing warfare, they're suffering collateral damage to their own financial system, to their own dollar that's out there. But it's not just economic warfare. Trump really does want people to see him as some great turn of the 20th century leader, you know, like McKinley or like Teddy Roosevelt, who walked softly and carried a big stick. So Trump, though, screams loudly and he carries a big tariff. And that's what he's going to do.

The question is, is he really going to pull the trigger? Is he really going to pull the trigger? Is he really going to do this stuff? I talked to David Bonson yesterday, and he thought it was just bluff and manipulation, but he did not like the idea of tariffs, and I don't like the idea of keeping the income tax and adding another massive tax, and that's exactly what we're going to talk about. And I should have asked him yesterday what he thinks about inflation, and we got on some other about. And I should have asked him yesterday what he thinks about inflation. And we got on some other things and I didn't get his opinion about inflation. But I think when you look at all the stuff that they're doing, all of it is inflationary.

Can't help but be inflationary. It's around the world. The European Central Bank just cut interest rates by 25 basis points. The Bank of England, we're set to continue QE here. There's no way out for the fiat system that's put in place, and especially since if you want to model it after what happened in 1971, David, we're going all the way to the end, going all the way to the bottom with fiat currency,

and they're going to continue to do this. Now, it's not tomorrow that the system collapses, but the language that they use is a great reset. They have to reset their currencies against commodities eventually, and we're going to continue to play the game here. That's interesting info out of Davos. Something that I took, and again, this is something where my mind goes, but Larry Fink of BlackRock was telling the fellow lizard people at Don Post that he called a price prediction for Bitcoin, which he's never done. Now, he's the leader of the ETFs with BlackRock, and it's the most successful ETF of all time.

He called a $700,000 price prediction for Bitcoin. Well, if you adjust that, that's the market cap for gold, David. That's where it puts Bitcoin on parity with gold. Larry Fink and BlackRock are not necessarily pro-gold. As a matter of fact, he's criticized countries for trying to move away from the fiat dollar system or this fiat itself and central banking into gold or gold-backed currencies he doesn't like things like that so you're seeing like these two emerging competing systems where China is just hoarding all this gold uh I mean they got 60 000 gold mines they're they're a net importer not

exporter um there's a there's a lot of scholarship to show that they may actually have more gold in the united states and um they continue to buy that is a digital versus commodities based system that's the west versus the east because the east is moving into you know the belt and road initiative and rare earth minerals and other things this is going to this is going to be an interesting um you know i i think something to watch is everything starts to play out, David, where the West is accumulating digital and AI wars and the East is really going after commodities and rare earth minerals. And I don't know if the West is going to, the alarm bells are going to go off early enough for us to catch up. Yeah. Well, you know, it's very much like what

you just saw this last week. Now, you know. People come out and say, well, we think that the deep-seek people ripped off open AI and plagiarized it. Of course, they're known for intellectual property theft, so that's certainly a possibility. But the reality is that so much money has been thrown after AI, it really does make you scratch your head. But if you stop and think about it, that's really where the governments are focused, because they see us as their primary enemy. And they need defense against us. And their defense against us is going to be artificial intelligence. It's going to be able to identify us, surveil us, censor us, propagandize us, all of these different things. That's their defense against us. And so nothing stands in their way of putting money into that.

But it really is a kind of warfare. And when you look at Larry Fink and his saying, well, we think that it's going to go up to, you know, $700,000, you know, for Bitcoin, each coin. And he said it gets up to the market cap of gold. They've done everything they can to fight gold with fiat paper. They've done everything they can to fight gold now, they will, with a kind of paper Bitcoin, right? With an ETF of Bitcoin.

They don't want anybody to have even a real cryptocurrency. They want to get a derivative of all these different things because that's their game that's the way they can manipulate things is through derivatives uh through securitization through etfs through all those different things those are all just different variations of um how they can uh you know muddy the water for people and manipulate the markets well that's right and any somebody like Larry Fink, when he's saying that at Davos,

he's signaling to people to buy. And he's telling his friends, that's an overture. And that's probably, he's probably being very conservative if that's the simulations that they're running. And you're absolutely right. When BlackRock launched the ETF for Bitcoin,

it put them in a position to navigate the price control of Bitcoin. I'm not saying that they can. I think Bitcoin is much bigger than these financial institutions. But in its infancy, it still is a very young thing. It's still being adopted. There's still a lot of things being worked out on the Bitcoin network. So for them to get in that early and have these, you know, billions and billions of dollars of inflows and creating a price shock and a supply shock, I think that it puts them in a position to call things like that. Now, I do both and I like Bitcoin and I like gold and silver. I don't necessarily think they compete, but it is something interesting when they're using those things to and he hasn't outright said it, but like, you know, that Bitcoin is going to replace gold or something like that.

But when he's marked when he's signaling that these are going to be equal market caps, I start to pay, if they're running these sophisticated simulations on what happens in the in the end run here with with the worldwide debt and sovereign debt and what happens with currency creation and the money supply, they have to understand that that collapses eventually. Just mathematics. You can continue to inflate the money supply and the regular people. There's going to be so much political unheaval people, David, because of the lasting inflation. Inflation is not going away, folks. It's going to continue to get worse and worse and worse. And then the income disparity and the income and the wealth concentration is only going to get larger. So I know this is the order of the day. That's why we're talking, you know, right before the election. the day that's why we're talking you know right before the

election we keep going back to that is you know what's going to happen with the election well there's going to be short-term things one way or the other you know with harris there's going to be a rise in gold and silver with with trump when there's going to be a rise in bitcoin and lowering in gold and silver and that but the fundamentals of what drove all those things is still there so um i don't think you know again that inflation is not going away they're going to have to do something they're going to have to have some sort of plan in place uh to to withstand the you know the the crash of of these economic systems which are coming i mean there's just too much debt um and the too much uncertainty as you said the the Trump is as a chaos agent and certainly

not something I even would I advocated for tariffs and things but now that it's being done this way here's what I would add to the tariff argument I don't think that he can carry out this policy because the party in which he's the head of doesn't believe in them. I know that because I ran for Congress as a Republican. I've been in the primary process, and I know the voters. The voters like it, but I don't know any congressman. You can't name anybody that understands what economic nationalism is. So there's not the political will other than the top other than him saying this so i don't i find it to be less likely that any of these policies would be um truly implemented beyond four years uh so i don't i think we probably have a lot of like you said there's a lot of chaos

there's a lot of uh weaponization of the of the u.. financial system for political and geopolitical ends. And that's why I don't think I should. I'd be betting on the financial system changing, like us replacing the income tax, which I would love. But that's always been with all the different things that everybody has suggested. Everybody hates the income tax. And there's a lot of different ways that they could collect the tax, ways that they could collect it where it would not be so obvious. And I think that's one of the things about a tariff. It really kind of operates like a value-added tax in many regards.

As parts are going back and forth across the border, it keeps adding more and more taxes. So we're going to, you know, it can have a cumulative effect on it rather than just something that's at the tail end. So, you know, there's all these different aspects, ways that they could do it. And, you know, Europe would use VAT taxes and get more money from people, but would not make them give a financial report to the government and a signed confession. And so, you know, it was really, the American government was really more about trying to incriminate people and get leverage over their political enemies, over people that were interesting to them, in my opinion. And so there's a lot of different things that have come up over the years. But everybody would always say, whether it's a national sales tax or a fair tax or something like that, we're going to wind up with both of them.

And now here we've got a situation where we're going to wind up with both of them. And all the conservatives are just fine with that because it's Trump. They don't care they're going to wind up with both of them. And all the conservatives are just fine with that because it's Trump. They don't care. They're going to wind up with an additional tax. We'll have internal and external revenue agents that are going to be out there after us. I'm with the, what was it, the Beverly Hillbillies, I think you used to call them infernal revenue agents. Reveners. Yeah, reveners.

Reveners. Yeah, up in the hills. So we're going to have more infernal revenue agents than they're going to be internal and external. Why? Because we won't control the spending. When Jefferson said that he had eliminated useless offices, so therefore he was able to cut all internal taxes, and they only had tariffs, but they're not going to do any of that. They're not going to cut any spending, and so what they're going to do is they're not going to do any of that they're not going to cut any spending and so what they're going to do is they're going to add another method of collecting taxes to us that's all it is and it's just a stealth head fake and i i think that he's really going to do it i you know

we just had scott besant this hedge fund manager get uh confirmed and it's part of the confirmation thing he went back he was opposing all of this stuff a year ago he's got a newsletter and he was opposing it all then when he gets confirmed he says uh we'll do it gradually we'll add two and a half percent per month until we get up to 20 so you know bring that in over an eight month period is that just to ramp things up so people don't really understand where it's coming from you So it's not an immediate shock, but it's still going to be a pretty big shock if they add it 2.5% more every month until they get to 20% over an eighth-month period. But that's the way they're looking at this stuff. I think that they're serious about it.

I don't think it's simply a bluff. Well, it's going to be interesting. You mentioned the income tax. The 16th Amendment um a lot of people didn't think that would pass i don't you know there's evidence people say it didn't truly it wasn't truly ratified to begin with 1913 is that the curse of that you know you had the federal reserve uh the 17th amendment to the direct election of senators of course the income tax and that was uh woodrow wil Wilson's banner year to implement the first

bit of free trade policies. That was really when we started to rapidly depart from the founding principles of this country. And all those decisions have lasting implications today, and that's why we have a deep state, it's why we have an American empire, it's why we're so far away from where we're supposed to be as a country, what our founding principles were. So you'd have to do something about the 16th Amendment. You'd have to put something in place. I just don't know that there's the political will or the understanding of that.

I mean, think about this, David. this david if you if you really wanted to expose the game here if you were thinking just a little bit above uh you know partisan politics what you could say is um for all the left all the progressives and all the people out there that think the the rich uh oppose the income tax and i'm talking about the super rich if you're if they you think that then put it out there and say we want to have a vote on an amendment see who backs that to get to withdraw the 16th amendment or to abolish it or to ratify it or to take away the income tax the super wealthy would not oppose that they would not they would not come in and say we're we're going to uh to back a new uh tax system they're not going to do that they love the current tax system it exposes so much there and no one's going to do that. That's why we don't have that's why we continue to have an income tax in this country that's crazy and and used as a political weapon. That's all it is. It's making sure that people can't compete with the ultra wealthy and they can't compete politically. It's just to make sure that everybody's in check. I mean, look at, I mean, even the Kennedys had Richard Nixon's mother audited while she was in the nursing home. You know, I mean, while they were in office and then Nixon had people audited, you know, it's used as a weapon.

That's right. Always has been. Just like the FBI. And, you know, you still got conservatives cheering the FBI. What happened to the FBI? They were so good when Efren Zimbalist Jr. ran it, you know, with a TV show. But when you talk about the big corporations, everybody knows that they're not paying their taxes. And, you know, it's a common thing, even to the extent that with the G7 just a couple of years ago, the Biden administration, Janet Yellen,

said we've all got an agreement that we're going to have a minimum tax on corporations of 15%. And if we think that you're not paying that 15%, because you're using loopholes and stuff like that, then we'll feel free to put surcharges on the big companies like Big Tech and Big Pharma, things like that.

And so Germany and France could put a surcharge on if they see that the corporate tax rate, because they're using loopholes, is less than 15%. Now, the first thing the Trump administration did was they came out and said, we'll lower our taxes down to 15%. Where'd that number come from? Well, it came from that. It came from the globalist agreement that he's going to maintain. We're not going to go below 15%. But then he put the caveat in there, and that is that if you put a surcharge on American headquartered corporations that are multinationals, if you put a surcharge on them because they're not really paying that 15%, wink, wink,

then we will double your taxes or whatever in this country. So that's the game because they're not really paying that 15%, wink, wink, then we will double your taxes or whatever in this country. So that's the game that they're playing back and forth. And we all know that they're not paying that, but he's going to go to the mat for the American multinational corporations, the big tech, big pharma primarily. He's going to go to the mat for them. He's going to obey the minimum that was agreed upon by the globalists. He's not going to go to 12% or 13%. He'll keep it there at 15%. Do exactly as he's told.

I guess the key thing when we look at it, though, are the Bitcoin reserve talk that is happening out there. We have in Czechoslovakia, the head of the central bank there is talking about not a Bitcoin reserve, but getting a percentage. I think the number that he talked about was something like 5% in Bitcoin. You've got Texas talking about a bill, in fact, Texas talking about doing some of that. And I was surprised to see the other day that Bitcoin is only, if they're honest, I don't know who did these figures or checked it, but they said that only 2.2% of it is institutionally owned. And so a big part of what the people who are bullish on Bitcoin are saying is that we turn the corner when governments start accumulating it and so now we got talk from you know state governments accumulating it as well as european governments starting to accumulate it what do you think about that that's something known as in the bitcoin space is game theory that's where it goes from uh those who are loyal in the bitcoin space and what called

hodlers it's uh it's a misspelling of holding. Somebody who had a little too much to drink on a forum years and years and years ago when Bitcoin was rollercoastering around. He said, I'm just going to be hodling for the rest. I'm going to hodl. And so people use that, and that's where you get the term hodling. Game theory is where the governments realize that the fiat system and that continued devaluate that they don't hoard their own currencies by the way the dollar has been rapidly dumped in the last

four years and the euro got supplanted by gold as the second most held reserve asset after the bank of international settlements made gold a tier one back in 2021. So game theory appears to be correct, where these governments start using it and putting on the central banks, put it on their balance sheet to hedge against a fiat system in which they created. So it's like a way for them to go back to normal digitally. These other countries, the BRICS nations, David, are already doing this in commodities, gold, silver, platinum, rare earth minerals, oil, other things. I mean, the Saudis are massively investing in infrastructure for mining around the world and other things for rare earth. That's where you see a lot of those who are rich in fiat right now, not the United States. That's where they're pouring all their funds into. So Bitcoin gives them a digital way to do that. And so I think that is a very likely scenario.

I felt this way after I left the Bitcoin conference in Nashville, seeing RFK Jr. speak and, of course, Trump, how how far we had come i got into the space in 2016 and uh bought my first bitcoin atm and i didn't even know it i just i just got level i thought it was i saw the the activity there and i thought this i i didn't ever you know loathe the the dollar i ran against the federal reserve when i ran for congress but i didn't understand bitcoin and maybe i still don't understand it today but i work it with it every day and I've learned a lot. So I think that this is something that we're going to see. Governments are going to put Bitcoin on their balance sheets, states, corporations. This will be a thing. And how long will it last or will it go far beyond what Larry Fink thinks is 700,000 price i i don't know uh i just i just know that

the fiat system of which it is the antithesis is melting down and uh i mean that's why i'm in i'm in the the business of real and i would put bitcoin for for all of its uh its drawbacks electronically or you know being you know relying on the internet and other things uh being real, along with gold and silver. Not quite in the third dimension where you can hold it in your hand, but real enough. Well, the central bank chair of the governor, that's what they call him, told the Financial Times, the governor of the central bank in Czechoslovakia, he said, well, I like profitability for the diversification of our assets. Bitcoin seems good, he said. But he had a caveat there, which DG8 has a question

about, and that is, you know, the Trump meme coins and things like that. But even beyond that, this is what the governor of the Czech National Bank said. He said those Trump guys can now kind of create some bubble for bitcoin but i think the trend would be an increase without those guys as well because it's an alternative investment for more people uh dg8 asks says can you ask tony if trump's grift on the trump coin which last i saw was down 64 percent uh trump meme coin and melania coin, if that hurt people's faith in crypto. I know a lot of people who rushed to buy them and lost a lot of money because the guys, they put this thing together, they make their profit, and then they put it out there for

the public, and it's a pump, and then it's a dump, isn't it? I've said that from the beginning. You can make a fortune getting into some of these meme coins and i follow the crypto space pretty closely uh i would never ever advocate nor launch if you ever see me launching a meme coin uh that is not tony i've been replaced i'm ai or i've got a neural link uh something's happened uh i would never ever advocate that um and the reason is because what does it do what's its functionality what does it do? What's its functionality? What does it serve? I have all these questions about the crypto space. And that's really unfortunate because it's going to cause some sort of bubble or crash. People are going to lose so much because of this. And meanwhile, you have, you know, again, good technology like Bitcoin and decentralized. It's a gift that was put in place by a lot of people all around the world keeping this network up that aren't run by the same company think about that yeah this is something that never has happened before um so i would you know i applaud things like that but i yes it is it does hurt and that

is that leaves a big that's my question mark that hangs over all of the crypto space is will greed will intervention is this is this a sabotage you know when they put something just uh you know you always talk about putting the the roach inside the loaf of bread you know it's like hey they got this great thing but there's a roach in there and that's what you know these meme coins and other things that you know i know people have gotten very wealthy with them i applaud that if you can if you're smart enough to get in and out, but what is the value there? You didn't create anything.

You're not serving a function. What function does it serve other than just housing temporary fiat dollars to make somebody rich? I'm very skeptical about that. I do think that that is a danger. It could cause an implosion.

I agree. You know, I saw right after it happened, even before it fell as bad as this, they had an interview with a guy with a coin bank, and he doesn't want to burn his bridges with Trump because Trump is doing things with him. But he was like, well, I don't know. This is really good. He's trying to say everything.

He could, like, stay, I don't know. This is really good. He was trying to say everything. He could stay away from this stuff. It could really blow back and give all of crypto a bad reputation. But he's not going to directly challenge him on it. And we talk about using this stuff as a reserve. I brought that up to David Bonson yesterday. And he said, ooh, it's just too volatile for a reserve. He says, hey, I tell people you want to get into this. It's very volatile.

It's speculative. And you maybe can make a lot of money. You maybe can lose a lot of money in it. But he goes, do you really want to do that with the nation's reserve? It doesn't really seem to fit as part of a reserve. That's something that is more solid like gold. I see that the Swiss, for their pension fund, their number two investment is gold. So they're going very conservative, and that is something that is going to be a reserve. And when you look at what gold

has done over the last year, it has kind of weathered the storm. It's weathered direct attacks on it, as you've pointed out many times it lost a little bit with a stock market volatility but I mean even the stock market is a gigantic bubble and it got really volatile this week and you know Nvidia went had like a dead cat bounce and then lost money the next day I don't know where they are today but um you know when you look at all the stuff that is highly overvalued with that and highly volatile uh it's good to have something that is a mixture of that but let's talk a little bit about and i've got a couple of comments here as well um uh audi modern retro radio says he thinks that trump's tariffs are just rhetoric

that his own party will oppose him on it as you said um you know he thinks that uh that Trump's tariffs are just rhetoric that his own party will oppose him on it, as you said. He thinks that it's not going to go through. We'll see what happens with all this stuff. But that's one of the reasons why when we have so much uncertainty, so much chaos, much of it by design, that's why I like the stability of gold. And it's been able to, you know, had good returns, amazing returns when you compare it to what they pay you on a savings account in a bank, which is nothing. It's a tiny fraction of 1%. And so by any standard, gold has always, you know, gold that we saw this last year, I don't know what it was, a 25, 30% increase or something like that.

That would be considered to be phenomenal at any other time. But it's only because we're seeing all of these really volatile bubbles all around the place that it looks kind of boring. But people, I think, need to be careful. But whichever way they want to go, you've got the new product now up and running, right, where people can switch out of Bitcoin and into gold or vice versa, right? Tell us a little bit about that. That's right. You can go to david9.gold when you go to the Join Wolfpack. So everything that I'm doing e-commerce wise is on that network. We were

able to implement that. I had to have it coded into the site. So you have to go through, like when you go through the checkout, if you have Bitcoin, and I put out a press release for this too, we're the first in the nation to take Bitcoin at no fee. We treat Bitcoin as cash. So if you have Bitcoin, it's just like you having a stack full of US fiat dollars in cash. And that's the way that we're going to move forward with the symbiotic relationship that we have with Wisewolf Bitcoin and Wisewolf Gold and Silver. And a lot of this stuff is still in its infancy. But if you have Bitcoin and you want to turn it into precious metals, you can just either go through the site, through the checkout,

and you can do a one-time purchase. We can't do the subscription service with it because that's not how crypto, I can't do an automatic with crypto. But I can take one-time payments and I can do it via the site. You can contact us. We can send you a Bitcoin wallet and then you can trade that in for gold and silver, same as cash. And the reason we're doing that is we're going to use the Bitcoin network. And I would flip that on its head, too. If you want to buy Bitcoin and you don't know what

to do, we have a white glove service for that. You can go through DavidKnight.gold and we're going to put a tab on there very soon. It'll buy bitcoin it'll take you to our landing page for that and myself and my brother who's been in the bitcoin space again since 2016 he had a very large bitcoin atm company he's helping me with the crypto infrastructure and we have all the safety nets and protocols and all the stuff that has taken me forever i feel like i've been on a slow modemoving train. Things take longer than they used to for me, for whatever reason. It's like, let's get this, this, and this done. And it's like, wow, it's January of 2025? Why did this take so long? But we're there. So pretty much without the sites going live for Wisewill Bitcoin in the next couple of three weeks,

that way the landing page will be up. But we're we're ready to go now so if you you know want to invest in bitcoin just reach out go through david knight dot gold david gets credit for that as well that's great and so yeah if somebody doesn't know how this is working you'll hold their hand and you'll use a white glove as you do it right yes and walk them through all of this stuff all right so david knight dot gold will take you there and you can take a look at these new product offerings and i really like what you do tony in terms of innovation uh your way you know may have taken you a long time but you're still the first one to do it so that's uh that's a great thing that you've got going there and it gives people that opportunity to switch back and forth with a couple of things that are outside

of the u.s dollar and uh so um it's going to be interesting to see what happens this next year as the Chinese curse says may live in interesting times. Well, I think that's where we are. And so things are going to be moving really, really quickly and moving up and down. And that's how these other guys make their money. That's why they want volatility, because they don't make money when things go sideways. They make money when it goes up and down. And, um, so, uh, you know, if, uh, somebody is making a ton of money, that means that, uh, you know, and a lot of these things are somebody lost, there's zero sum games, so somebody else is losing it.

Rich. You start buying when there's blood in the streets, you know, but there's that, that balls, that, uh, uh, quote about behind each great fortune lies a crime. Uh, that's probably true. Maybe not for everything. It's probably true to some extent. Most places are super rich, and you've got to watch what they do,

not what they say. There's so much to watch out there, and I think those who are totally invested in this, they're going to start moving into things that are finite in an infinite fiat world. And that's what we have to remember. These markets are that there's so much that it's an illusion that I want people to be aware of. So we'll never, we're not going to run out of things to talk about, David, let's put it that way.

I'm sure next week is different. Yeah. People, people need to stay frosty and cynical about all this stuff and not become cheerleaders for any politicians or any particular financial instrument anything except you know gold is still the gold standard but uh and you got a program that's going to be following immediately after this today is that correct yes sir uh 11 a.m central time just uh here on the uh waterburn radio transmission on on the america unplugged channel over on Rockfin rumble and my Twitter at Tony Arterburn, go find us and we'll be live. Come join the conversation.

That's great. Well, thank you so much for joining and thank you so much for all the support that you give us. Thank you, Tony. Appreciate it. Thank you, sir. All right. We're going to take a quick break folks. We'll be right back. Here's some advice from a Yukon Cornelius. Maybe he's up in Greenland now. I don't know. That's right. boys and girls. There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.

Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold. It's time to buy some metals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense. Go to DavidKnight.go to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn. He knows where to look to find silver and gold. York! Be out! Fifteen billion dollars in gold bullion weighs 10,500 tons. Sixty men would take 12 days to load it onto 200 trucks.

Now, at the most, you're going to have two hours before the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines move in and make you put it back. Who mentioned anything about removing it? Yeah, we'll just do ETFs. Did you lip-tie enough for you? You plan to break into the world's largest bank, but not to steal anything. Why?

Go on, Mr. Bond. Mr. Ling, the red Chinese agent at the factory? He's a specialist in nuclear fission. But of course, his government's given you a bomb. I prefer to call it an atomic device. It's small, but particularly dirty. Cobalt and iodine? Precisely. Well, if you explode it in Fort Knox,

the entire gold supply of the United States will be radioactive for 57 years. 58, to be exact. I apologize, Goldfinger. It's an inspired deal. They get what they want. Economic chaos in the West, and the value of your gold increases many times. I conservatively estimate 10 times. Brilliant. Yeah, we got a lot of goldfingers now, don't we? Got a lot of goldfingers under the pie,

all these people looking how they can create economic chaos and profit from it kind of interesting i think that um the whole concept of a dirty bomb uh is as old as uh the james bond movie that goes back to the what was that 1964 65 something like that um i'll never forget i was at anybody's ever been in Tampa, there's a classic theater that was built there in the 20s. And they spent millions of dollars in the 1920s on this thing. So you can imagine how expensive it was. Very ornate. They did it to make it look like you were watching a movie out under the stars. So it had this Spanish architecture and it had stars up above and all this other kind of stuff and now i think they use it primarily for live performances or something

like that but they use it as a movie theater and uh i remember um saturday it was a saturday afternoon or sunday afternoon um that i got dropped off there to see a a double feature of james bond and it was dr no and from russia with love the first two because goldfinger was dropped off there to see a double feature of James Bond. And it was Dr. No and From Russia With Love, the first two, because Goldfinger was about to come out. So they had a back-to-back double feature. And in those days, you could just kind of hang around the movie theater and watch it. I watched those two movies, and I stayed, and I watched those two movies again.

And then I was primed to see Goldfinger when it came out a couple of weeks after that but um it was uh i'll always remember that and and that that movie theater saw psycho there when i was six years old my sister took me i've been so afraid of my life especially in that old theater i mean it was like we were in the movie as well look like we're in norman bates uh taxidermy uh office when we were watching that movie uh don't frag me bro their game plan is old and predictable crash the economy implement austerity and rationing and offer war as the solution and we're in the last you know these four years of trump are going to take us right up to the end of the fourth turning.

Brit 273674. Tariffs will make inflation worse, which devalues the dollar. Shadow Boxer. Silver jumped a buck or two. If it goes up a lot, some things that are going to use silver will get expensive. You know, the real world exists out there. The real world, ultimately, in spite of what big tech in Silicon Valley and the government increasingly want to tell you, things get real when you start talking about the real world. They want you to live in a virtual reality. They want you to, you know, with their digital world and their disposable, their planned obsolescence, like we were talking about the other day, this digital society that they want you to live in not only takes you out of the physical world so they can do what they want.

That's what Yuval Harari wants. And it is a very dangerous thing for us to get drawn into that deceptive hallucination that they're creating, this virtual reality that they're creating about everything. A literal virtual reality as well as a virtual reality about money and all of the rest of the stuff. I'm not a fan of technology and digital stuff anymore. I used to be. Not anymore. I used to watch James Bond. I don't like the CIA either now.

You get older, you learn a few things. S.A. Miller, one, two, three. Terrorists will only make the price of goods rise. It'll always fall back on the people as in a tax. That's exactly what inflation is, a tax, yeah. And again, the kind of rhetoric that we've heard from Trump is the same kind of stuff that you would expect to hear from a Democrat, which is why he is a New York Democrat. He's going to tell people, don't worry.

Other people are going to pay this tax, not you. And they deserve to be taxed because they're bad people. They didn't earn what they've got. So, yeah, the foreign companies and the foreign countries will pay the tax, but not the American. No, it's the American people will pay the tax on all this stuff. Jason Barker says, I think silver is going to spike by the end of the year. The disparity between paper, silver, and physical is many fold what it is for gold.

The irony here is that gold and silver are required to make the electronics that fuel the mining and the transacting of Bitcoin. Bitcoin would not exist without gold and silver. That's absolutely right. And the other side of

Knights of the Storm, Angry Tiger with Angry Tiger Reports says once the government gets their hands on the crypto market, they'll destroy it right and um the other side of uh nights of the storm angry tiger with angry tiger reports got says once the government gets their hands on the crypto market they'll destroy it like they destroy everything else and of course you know these goldfinger billionaires once they get their fingers into something they will twist it and destroy it if necessary for their own purposes as well i say miller one two three trump's shenanigans remind me of what Hawk to a girl. I think she's going to prison. Yeah.

Well, she will, but he won't. If he violated some law, he'll get the Congress to change the law. He owns the justice department now to Cecilia 14. David Knight, justice department now too uh cecilia 14 uh david and i please know that rfk is invested in three gene editing companies one of them is crisper three of them yeah that's the thing you

know these people are they going to save us from this stuff uh when they're actually investing in it tony garrett says an ounce of gold in the hand is worth two bitcoin in the bush uh gdp 330 bitcoin is hardly any better than the fiat it's a trade value it's purely based on speculation and demand and reputation right i mean that's the whole thing behind fiat it's like it's what is it worth well it's worth what it's worth because people think that it's worth what it's worth. It's worth less. It doesn't have anything there, but people buy into it that way. And so it's not a hard, tangible asset, which is where people should really be investing their money.

I agree with that. I mean, the one thing that's different about the fiat they tried to you know because of the algorithm they said uh you know you look at what they're doing the fiat currency uh there's just an infinite supply of it and so they said well we're going to make sure there's not an infinite supply of this of this thing that doesn't really exist anywhere. It's just a figment. So we have a limited supply of a digital token. Well, that's great. Digital supply of a limited token. The quote-unquote return on gold is based on fiat.

Well, the reality is that what we have seen is it's about saving your purchasing value. In other words, when we look at it, we say, well, gold went up by, let's say, 30% or something over the last year. It isn't that gold went up by 30%. It's that the dollar went down by 30%. And we've looked at this for the longest period of time. People have done it in different countries, value gold in terms of real world physical stuff and so you know when you when you look at you know what does it cost what did it cost 100 years ago in terms of gold to take a trip or to have a custom-made suit or this or that and when you look at that you see that gold is going to do as well or better in terms of what you can actually buy with it versus the dollar. You need an astronomically larger supply of these pieces of paper that they call dollars to buy the same stuff that you did before, but still ounce for ounce.

Gold held its value, and that's the point. It's not that it's holding its value. It's a hedge against the and that's the point it's not that it's holding its value it's a hedge against the inflation that's coming and um and it's about preserving the value of your labor and other things like that that's that's really what it's about and so things get kind of weird i think when you look at bitcoin which is highly volatile and the dollar which is highly volatile you start pricing one against the other you know you got a couple of um i guess we have to come up with some kind of a theory that incorporates einstein's relativity into it somehow

you start getting a fiat dilation when you start approaching the speed of light i don't know what happens with this one if they talk about the velocity of light. I don't know what happens with this one. They talk about the velocity of money, don't they? I don't know when it starts to get close to the speed of light. We're All Dead says the dollar is the least bad currency. They all suck. The dollar just sucks less than most. And it is a power play. It is there because of the power that is behind it with the American government.

But the problem is that the way that Biden and now Trump are using the financial power that they have, that was based on the free market and based on people being able to freely create and everything, that's what made America valuable. It wasn't our taxes. It wasn't tariffs. It was liberty and the lack of regulation really you know if trump wants to look at that um and so that was the thing that made america wealthy uh the mechanism by which it happened of course uh you know it was a blessing

from god and we've turned our back on god that's the real problem the real problem isn't fiat currency or gold or bitcoin the problem is we turned our back on god um let's see shadow boxer said look up the products that use silver there's a lot of them if silver really goes up these things will too unless they find a cheaper alternative i expect copper to rise with silver they're both conductors jason says gold is not volatile it's the u.s dollar that's valued yes etfs introduce more manipulation and more volatility and it's uh but it's the u.s dollar that's valuing yes etfs introduce more manipulation and more volatility and it's uh but it's more solid than the dollar guard goldsmith could see your guard says i think the terrorists will stick on piecemeal levels based on the location of the u.s

industry and the senate congressional state influence on trump and he says tony's idea is really good the technical side of getting crypto is a big hurdle and if they can facilitate that part of it with which is what tony was talking about with the you know hold your hand and the white glove service and that type of thing well then that would be very useful um so uh let's take a look here at um what's going on in the district of corruption we have former senator bob menendez who had been found guilty a few months ago he was now just sentenced to what is essentially at his age maybe a life sentence i don't know if he'd have to serve all of it 11 years in prison on corruption charges uh he looks older than he is, actually. I think he's 71. I was surprised. But, you know, he was found guilty of corruption and he was paid off in gold bars.

Chairman Bob Menendez has been sentenced to 11 years in prison. Remember the gold bars and the Mercedes? The Democrat from New Jersey was convicted of taking these bribes and acting as an agent of Egypt. Oh, Egypt. Oh, those are the people that Trump wants to give money to, to take the people out of Gaza off the hands of the Israelis, shut down all foreign aid except to Israel and Egypt. And so Menendez was taking money from Egypt. So we send the money to Egypt. They send it back to people like Bob Menendez. That's how it works. That's how they get their money.

You know, it's just like, you know, we send lots of money to Israel. Just like Egypt, they then buy politicians with it. And then they get even more money. It's just like the corporations, the companies, the countries and other areas, they're also playing that same game. You buy a politician, very easy to do. And of course, Israel owns all the politicians just like big pharma does. But at least he recognizes real value. He was paid off in gold bars but now he's going to be behind bars of steel for for a while um a luxury car and all the rest of this stuff the judge uh lectured him uh issuing the sentence and said you stood at the apex of our political system somewhere along the way you lost your way

found guilty on all 16 counts last year in his federal corruption trial became the first sitting member of congress to be convicted of acting as a foreign agent the fact that and you know an actuality um you know biden didn't pardon himself so maybe we'll have the first president be convicted of acting as a foreign agent for Ukraine. Who knows? In fact, he was a public office holder, said the judge, who held a position of great public trust. And that has to be taken into account in this sentencing. Where there's wrongdoing of this magnitude, there are serious consequences.

But, you know, there weren't any serious consequences for him the last time this happened. And he's a repeat offender. He had already had a corruption trial. There was a situation with a guy who was some kind of a doctor in Florida. And there was Medicare fraud or something like that. And he beat the rap with that. And so, you know, what happens is you get away with these crimes, like locking the country down and killing people with vaccines,

and you just do it again. Why wouldn't you, I guess? You know, if these people see they can get away with it, they do it again. And that's what he did. He did it again. And I thought it was interesting that in his former bribery and corruption trial, that the person who stood up for him and stood by him was none other than Ms. Lindsay.

To let the court know that of all the people I've dealt with in the Senate, Bob is a very honest, honorable guy. All my interactions with Bob have been on the up and up. He's the type of guy that if he gives you his word, he sticks with it no matter how much pressure is put on him to back off. Yeah, that's right. His word is like gold. And you can take that to the bank.

Oh, better not take it to the bank. Better put it in the closet there. Yeah, that's Lindsey Graham. You know, of all the people that he's worked with. And I cut that because it's a little bit longer. And what he does, he repeats in that aside where they ask him, you know, why didn't you come all the way up here to New Jersey or whatever? Why didn't you come up to this trial?

You're from South Carolina. You're a Republican. He's a Democrat. And he says, you know, of all the senators that I've worked with, Bob Menendez is honest and honorable. And he says that a second time, so I cut it because it's kind of redundant. He's honest and honorable. He's honest and honorable.

He really stressed that. Honest and honorable he's honest and honorable he really stressed that honest and honorable compared to the other senators compared to lindsey graham he's honest and honorable compared to the other senators that are up there he's honest and honorable and he's going to jail yeah but you know lindsey graham as much as he loves this honest and honorable Menendez and helped to get him helped him to get off the hook the first time he was caught on it as much as Lindsey Graham loves people like Bob Menendez who are part of the club you know it may be Republican versus Democrat but it's just like the Looney Tunes cartoon when you say at the beginning you got the sheepdog and the coyote uh you know hey how you doing this morning you got the sheepdog and the coyote, uh, you know,

Hey, how you doing this morning? You know, they click in for work and then they're fighting each other the rest of the time, you know, they punch the card and they go in and then, uh, the bell rings and they stop and they punch their car and they got their friends and they go out to get something to drink after the, after work. Well, Lindsey Graham likes those kinds of guys and they're honest and honorable, but you know, the people who ought to be in jail according to Lindsay those January the six people they need to be in jail he said it was a mistake pardoning the people who went into the Capitol and beat up a police officer violently I think that's a mistake well those are two different categories of people of course uh the police officer who you know got hit or whatever of course. The police officer who, you know, got hit or whatever.

Of course, there was a, you know, protester that they got killed. But the person who was attacked was not inside the Capitol. And so he thinks that people who went into the Capitol need to be in jail as well. Not just the people who got violent. Understand that. There's one standard for them. The congressional club. And there's one standard for them these uh the congressional club and there's another standard for the rest of us and um i don't know you know what about this hunter

biden pardon how does that work out well uh so you know did lindsey acknowledge the first amendment for peaceful protest no no how about the eighth amendment where you have excessive punishment cruel and unusual punishment no not for that you know and when you look at it even the people who were convicted of you know punching a cop yeah that would be something you put somebody in jail for absolutely but you know for decades and the people that they put in there for decades were not accused of violence either and so um you know even the people that were there for violence what they got was cruel unusual and excessive punishment but lindsey graham doesn't see it that way lindsey graham says you know biden pardoned half his family going out the door. I think most

Americans, if this continues, will visit the pardon power of the president if this continues as the pardon and violent people who are beat up cops. I think that's a mistake. What it says now to the Trump family and the Biden and the president Trump's family, he said, well, that is that they can engage in whatever kind of malfeasance and criminality and graft and whatever and they can expect a pardon on the way out the door that's not a message you want to send to his family or really any family occupying the white house the last part was actually schiff adam schiff oh okay because lindsey graham isn't going to say that is he he's not going to say it about Trump's kids. Schiff will talk about Trump. Graham will talk about Hunter.

But what they really hate and really see as the enemy is you. You are the enemy. And don't let that, you know, we don't want to have a constitution standing in the way of them punishing the people that they're afraid of. Because if we really knew what they did, the American people really knew what they did to us. There are a lot of people who supported President Trump. You know, Lindsey Graham said, law enforcement people, they didn't like this.

But he said during the campaign, he's not going to trick people. Well, I'll be consistent here, right? I don't like getting people out of jail, he said. Or pardoning people who burn down cities, who beat up cops, whether you're Republican or Democrat. Yeah, he'd just lock them all up. He's just like Biden in that regard. Biden wants to lock everybody up.

And then you got Chris Christie jumping in on these pardons, the January 6th pardons. He says Biden's pardons were, quote, disgraceful. Chris Christie said Trump's were even worse, even worse, adding that the two are the most selfish men to occupy the Oval Office. He said, look, I think the pardons by Joe Biden were disgraceful. I think Trump has taken it to another level as well. These are the two most selfish politicians in the presidency in my lifetime. Biden pardoning his family proves it. Trump whitewashing January the 6th proves it. This is Chris Christie, folks, who supports the war on drugs. And he supports all of its metastasized cancerous tumors.

Things like the SWAT team raids on us. Things like civil asset forfeiture where they take our property and never even charge us with a crime, let alone find us guilty. Chris Christie supports that. Lindsey Graham supports that. Joe Biden supported that. Donald Trump left it in place as well. So, yeah, they are really afraid of you of you and they stand together with their co-conspirators and their co-criminals that are there marky mark and new jersey thank you for tips as bob menendez was sentenced for what many of his

senate colleagues have done why he was too blatant and obvious with his corruption. He wasn't discreet enough to have plausible deniability. Yeah, he must have done something, too, in that club to get them to forsake him on this last time. I mean, the guy had been caught over and over again. And again, this rolled out under Biden, under the Democrats, as bad as it was. Don't frag me, bro. Any economy based in debt is a monetary policy that's going to be volatile, as intended. Yes.

Syrian girl. Well, then they can confine Biden in an asylum and say that he's not guilty by reason of insanity. That's right. Chevkin. Joe Biggs is out of prison did he just get out i mean they did they keep him in there for this last week or something i don't know well i'm i'm glad that he's out he didn't deserve to be in there again as i said many times uh joe biggs they featured him in the January the 6th stuff, and they never showed him doing anything other than smiling and walking calmly. And if he had done anything other than smile and calmly walk through the area, they would have featured that. You would have seen that everywhere.

They would have played it over. They had a picture of Joe getting violent with a police officer. That would have been played on a loop on CNN. And it didn't happen. That's why you didn't see that happening there. Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. New World Order in music. One, two, three, four, five.

All the unvaccinated are still alive. A little bit of Pfizer in my arm. A little bit of BioNTech does no harm. A little Johnson & Johnson does the trick. A little AstraZeneca so you don't get sick. It's booster number five. They're doing what in the place they named after me? Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.

Making sense common again, this is The David Night Show. Good evening. Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow, or more specifically, what comes out the other end. Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat. The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.

Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in jackboots and all with their solutions because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags but one must wonder is this truly about saving the planet or are we simply being led to pasture? Is it merely a MacGuffin? The David Knight Show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny. And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull. So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show. And now back to our regularly scheduled program. Let's take a look at the Paris Agreement. This is an article

from the Daily Skeptic. This is out of the UK. And they said Trump dump at the Paris Agreement. This is an article from the Daily Skeptic. This is out of the UK. And they said, Trump dumps the Paris Agreement. Is it a big deal? Well, what does it matter? And I think it gives us an insight into, you know, the importance of staying in it for four years when we were never in it. And, of course, nowhere in this article from the Daily Skeptic do they point out the fact that it needs to be ratified by the Senate. It was in The Guardian, of all things. The Guardian, one of the biggest cheerleaders of the climate MacGuffin, that said it's kind of troublesome because, you know, with Trump getting out of this, it may require the Senate to get back into it.

Why didn't it require the Senate to get into it in the first place? You know, as we were talking about it yesterday, David Bonson said, yeah, the really troubling thing about it, one of the many troubling things about it, is the fact that we got into it by executive order. We got out of it by executive order. We got back into it by executive order. And now we're getting out of it again by executive order. And the Senate doesn't care. They don't want to do anything about it. They have abdicated their responsibility, just like all of Congress has abdicated its responsibility to other agencies.

Nobody wants the responsibility for doing any of this stuff. They'd rather hold show hearings. So according to the UK's Telegraph, just hours after Trump issued executive orders to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement, Ed Miliband, the British Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero. Yeah, this this guy is driving them nuts. Net zero. That means that you're going to have it's just insane. Why would anybody support these kind of absolutist pronouncements. It's just like, you know, COVID zero

and how they locked down Shanghai for that absurdity. And they're going to lock down everything for this net zero emissions stuff. So Ed Miliband warned Mr. Trump that the rise of net zero was unstoppable. And so it was right after he said, we're going to get out of it. But the Daily Skeptic says, just who is this mere department secretary to warn the chief executive of the world's leading economic and military power of anything? Evidently, the British secretary Miliband is deluded enough to take up the mantle of responsibility to warn

trump of ignorance and energy affairs but mr bill milliband has company ranging from leading academics to the senior global leaders conferring last week at the world economic forum in davos and i said simply dismissing his antics is another sign of mad ed milliband's silly climate posturing so that behooves us to take his warning at face value is the u.s withdrawal from the paris climate agreement really a big deal appearing before the house of lords environment day after trump's inauguration mr milliband sought to downplay the impact of america's planned withdrawal now the problem is they keep talking about a withdrawal of something that we were never in but he says i think the transition with the climate stuff he says is

unstoppable it's not fast enough, but it is unstoppable. And that's a big part of what happened when Trump refused to take us out of something that we were never legitimately in. What he did was he kept the momentum going. In 2017, when Trump gave first notice of withdrawal from it, the thing that we were never in, a statutory delay of four years from the date of the agreement for anybody that was really in it. And even though we weren't in it, he played by that game. This time around, the statutory delay is one year. Thus, from 2026 onwards, at least to the end of Trump's second term, the U.S. will not participate in any of the Paris Agreement commitments, including any financial obligations.

But we did the first time around. We stayed in it, pretending that we were in it. And there were financial obligations. U.S. remained a party to the Paris Agreement for almost the entirety of Trump's first term, during which its administrative staff continued participating in programs and initiatives that were pursued under the Obama presidency. You see, it's just a change of flag or whoever is there, but not really reversing the policies. He just continued along with the thing that Obama declared that we were in, that we were not in. The U.S. State Department continued to participate in ongoing negotiations, including co-chairing with China the Enhanced Transparency Framework.

That's why I say it was an absolute betrayal. They continued working with it, building it up, paying for the money the entire four years. Something that we were never in. And so he says the ESG movement, which is a crucial pillar in the business sector's buy-in of the Paris Agreement, has had a series of reversals recently. We see by staying in it, what we did was we built this ESG stuff, right? These actions or these inactions have consequences.

You can't just look the other way and say, well, yeah, he's pretending that we're in the Paris Climate Accord, which we're not in, and he's pretending that he's going to get out of it. They didn't get out of it. And so the State Department and all these bureaucracies were working in it. They were creating all of this ESG stuff. That was being incubated by the Trump administration. I've said many times, you know, when Reagan was running against

Jimmy Carter in 1980, Jimmy Carter created the Department of Education, and Reagan said, I'm going to get rid of that thing, and he should have. But instead, he nursed it to maturity. And that was what was happening with all this ESG stuff under the Paris Climate Accord. He's nursing it to maturity. The Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, the Climate Action 100 Plus, which pushed ESG goals and decarbonization of the American economy, has now suffered a flurry of high-profile exits by companies such as BlackRock, but these things came about because Trump stayed in it. Remember, we got into this thing, supposedly, by Obama's executive order in 2015. You know, we barely had gotten into it. And so what Trump did, he was, we were there for like one year, and then Trump comes in in 2017 and keeps it there for four years.

That's where these things grew. And then Obama, not Obama, Biden immediately says he's going to put us back in. So that's the second four years, right? The way that they should have done this, again again if we're going to do this by executive order even if trump had taken us out on day one unless he pulled back the curtain and exposed the fact that this is a treaty and that we were never legitimately in this treaty the senate didn't even bother to vote but see the uni party all of the Republican senators, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, all of these guys, no matter how conservative you think they are. Josh Hawley, let's go down the list.

All of these Republican senators pretended that we were in and still pretend that we're legitimately in the Paris Climate Accord. And they will not assert and say, wait a minute, I'm a senator. And the Senate has a particular power, and that is to ratify treaties. And I'm not going to allow that to be taken away from us. None of them would say that. I expected that betrayal from Mitch McConnell. But when we look at these so-called conservative senators, understand they're fully on board. And they played along with this scheme

just like ed milliband and the uk it is a uniparty approach for the united nations is what this is the net zero banking alliance was established in april of 2021 under the auspices of the un and of its champion mark carney this other guy who is going to be running for, you know, to take the place of Justin Trudeau up in Canada. The guy who was the head of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England at one point in time, right? Different times. But he is a dyed-in-the-wool globalist.

However, with the Uniparty, you see that Pierre Palliev says, I'm not going to get out of Paris. What's going on with that? You see? It's the same kind of thing. When it comes down to the big agenda, folks, there is no difference between these parties. They will fight over the other issues and their hot-button issues and their important issues that they'll fight over. But when it is the central plan for this fourth turning, and that is what the climate MacGuffin is, when it's that, when it's the pandemic stuff, they're not going to rock the boat.

They're going to be either side. We saw Trump, Trudeau during the lockdowns doing the same stuff, all on the same team. And when it comes to the climate stuff, all on the same team. So the Net Zero Banking Alliance was dedicated to helping lenders reduce their carbon footprints. The group has now been abandoned in quick succession by Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Citibank, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley. But understand that they are not giving up on this. They're changing their tactics and their strategies,

just like with the digital ID. They will change it from a digital ID to a biometric ID. The CBDC, they'll ban it at the state level. Trump issued a banning of it at the federal level. But they're going to bring it in. It's already in, as Aaron Day says. We've already got it to a large degree in terms of the cooperation between the financial sectors and the tech sectors. They're merging together to give us a digital monetary financial system.

And so they're still on the same path and you think that you're winning because they're not going to call it a cbdc uh you think that you're winning because they're not going to call it esg but it's going to be the same stuff in a different form trump's executive order for the u.s to exit something that we're not in the paris climate agreement is a huge deal not the least in saving the nation hundreds of millions of dollars which would have been spent on climate boondoggles and which were spent when we stayed in it and that's the key it was a big deal and we should get around so u.s climate policy is this turnaround time for trump writes what's up with that.com and quote here many full-time climate activists like mark trexler

need to get a real job in the private sector producing goods and services that people want rather than engaging in wealth redistribution and net resource loss. And that's what the whole climate thing is about. It's about wealth redistribution, and it is about resource loss. That's why I call them watermelon environmentalists. They have a thin veneer of green, but on the inside, it's all red communism marxism marx trexler of the climate risk red team has compiled a list of trump related action items for the consumer first america first approach to climate and energy policy he said while i'd heard a lot about the heritage foundation's project 2025 blueprint for a second trump administration i'd never seen a simple listing of specific things being proposed

and this is just a partial list he said said, that is limited to climate change. And so it's a long list that goes on for several pages. As a matter of fact, they listed in this article 47 items. The guy says, are there more? And it's things like this. Accelerate the review process for cross-border energy projects. Appoint more judges likely to be unfriendly to climate action. This is something that was in the Project 2025.

Cut funding for international climate organizations. Get out of the thing that we were never in. Delay stricter fuel economy standards. Why delay them? Just get rid of them. Eliminate. It didn't say eliminate fuel economy standards. It said delay them just get rid of them eliminate say it didn't say eliminate fuel economy standards it said delay them but does say eliminate climate change clauses and future trade agreements but again we're not going to call this a treaty eliminate climate resilience requirements for housing projects and on this is this This is the problem, though, with the conservative approach,

with the Republican approach. Well, let's delay the fuel economy stuff. Get rid of it. Support state rollback of zero emission vehicle mandates. Tweak IRS regulations. Keep the IRS there, but let's arrange the deck chairs here. To make access to the tax benefits that were put in as part of the so-called Inflation Reduction Act to make that more difficult. Withdraw from international climate agreements that we were never in.

OK, anyway, the guy says, well, there is I count 47 items. Are there more? Yeah, there's two of them missing in the EPA. No, that's not in there in the Department the EPA. No, that's not in there. In the Department of Energy. No, that's not in there either. You know, that would take care of most of these items. As a matter of fact, if the Congress had just repealed the authorization that they gave to the EPA to manage emissions, and if they would repeal the authorization that they gave to the Department of Energy to regulate efficiency, that would take the teeth right out of everything that they're doing to us out of this net zero thing. Meanwhile, as they're trying to burn the world down to net zero,

we are in a worldwide lithium battery fire epidemic. This is from Expose news in the UK climate science coalition of America. Executive director says this is a worldwide epidemic. It is a lithium fire epidemic. And his article, his name is Gorham explained that the increasing adoption of quote unquote green energy has led to a rise in lithium battery fires which are breaking out in various locations including highways factories home garages and storage rooms you know what he left out these battery energy storage sites which

they want to put here in tennessee that because the tva federal agency is so on board with all this esg and and solar and all the rest of the stuff that the non-reliables, let's call them. They don't want to call them renewables. No, they're non-reliables is what they are. But they want to put all that stuff in, and they want to shut down the reliable energy plants that are already built, already paid for. Let's buy some new stuff from elon musk you want to talk about planned

obsolescence as um charles hughes smith was talking about uh yeah you can talk about the computers and all the rest of the stuff but look let's talk about what they're doing to our cars to our our grid yeah not just to our appliances and our computers but it's what they're doing to the grid and to the infrastructure shut everything down and buy the new stuff from me. And that's a big part of what Gates is doing with all his mad scientist approach to our food supply. Let's burn down what we've got so you can buy it from me. But the problem with all this stuff is not just the ripoff of how expensive it is, but

these massive battery energy storage sites have already caught fire. And of course, they'll do it again because of the lithium. And when they catch fire, it is a massive fire. And the TVA wants to put this around homes. They want to put it in forests. A battery fire in South Korea last year killed 22 workers, with experts estimating that most of them were killed by toxic gases emitted by the burning batteries.

You want to talk about emissions? Let's not worry about CO2. Let's talk about the toxic gases that come out of this. Scotland experienced two major fires in battery recycling centers. The kill winning fire burned for several days with a Scottish fire and rescue service urging nearby residents to remain indoors with windows closed due to the hazardous conditions. And this is what we can all look forward to when they put in these massive and massively expensive battery energy storage sites that Musk is selling.

It's going to kill people with toxic emissions. it's going to kill people with toxic emissions it's going to kill people with fire the glasgow fire witnesses reported explosions noises like gunshots steel flying everywhere and a huge plume of black smoke 10 fire trucks were needed and the blaze lasted for four days e-bike battery battery fires in New York have become serious. In just New York City, causing 270 fires last year, killing 18 people. Similar issues reported in Australia, Canada, and other nations. A recent Tesla semi-truck crash in California required 50,000 gallons of water to extinguish the flames and of course we have seen batteries um battery operated buses in germany twice burned down two uh bus stations that had evs with them france uh stopped it a couple years ago i remember putting up the the picture one of them was pulled up next to a

curb and just spontaneously combusts just as we've seen parked EVs do the same thing. We've had in Canada, they took the EV stuff out and retrofitted it with a diesel engine. They want to burn down our society, literally and physically, as well as in every other way. Before we run out of time, George Magano, thank you very much for the tip. I really do appreciate that. And I just want to let people know that we looks like we've got things worked out

uh with rumble and um and with rock fans so i really do appreciate that uh um this whistler says under the green agenda if you want a breath of fresh air open a window and stick your head in a building i've heard that one yeah uh syrian girl burned down the city's last i knew dc is still standing unfortunately for us all yeah they that's what we need to do we need to put all the battery energy storage sites in washington dc and just wait it'll be worse for them than when the british attacked in 1812 angry tiger the great lie about the treaty gives him plenty of political hate to burn it does it does absolutely um some of the other people some people have earlier comments angry tiger said i don't trust rfk as far as i can throw him the only good thing coming out of this

is that some of the people are learning about vaccines. Yeah, that is good. And, you know, I do like what he had to say about Samoa. And I'm glad that he said that. I'm glad that, you know, he, when they tried to throw that at him, he was ready and he came back with the truth. And that really was the truth. And so he'll say the same kind of stuff that I've been saying for a very long time. And yet, we'll see. We'll see what happens if he gets approved.

But of course, some of the Democrat outlets were saying they didn't think he was going to make it. They said that about Hegseth, and it was really close with Hegseth. It was 50-50, and J.D. Vance cast the deciding vote. But in this particular case, I think it's going to be even more difficult because it's not just partisan. These people are owned by the pharmaceutical companies on both sides,

the Republicans and the Democrats. So I don't know. I would give him less than a 50% chance of winning, quite frankly. We'll see what happens. Thank you for joining us. Have a good day the common man they created common core to dumb down our children.

They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.