The David Knight Show - Thu Episode #2093: Charlie Kirk Assassinated: America Pushed Toward Civil War

Episode Date: September 11, 2025

01:00:42 – Opening & 9/11 UpdatesThe show opens by marking September 11, 2025, with reflections on 9/11 anniversaries and pivots immediately to breaking news: the assassination of Charlie Kirk and NATO’s escalations in Europe. 01:02:09 – Charlie Kirk’s Murder & Free SpeechDiscussion on the killing of Charlie Kirk, focusing on his young family, his role in encouraging open debate on campuses, and how his assassination reflects the dangers of a violent culture that equates speech with violence. 01:17:00 – Media’s Reaction to Kirk ShootingAnalysis of MSNBC’s coverage, accused of exploiting Kirk’s assassination for partisan narratives, contrasted with CNN and Fox News’ restrained reporting. Media bias and political exploitation of violence are central themes. 01:27:00 – Rising Political ViolenceA segment on the “Fourth Turning” cycle: five assassination attempts within a year, including Kirk, Trump, and others. The speakers warn this trend reflects America’s descent into normalized political violence and deepening civil conflict. 01:50:07 – NATO Drone Crisis & War PushFocus shifts to Poland and NATO, with claims that Prime Minister Donald Tusk is using stray Russian drones as a pretext to escalate toward World War III. Parallels are drawn to Syria and false-flag provocations. 02:08:45 – New World Order & Health CrisisEuropean Commission’s Ursula von der Leyen is quoted warning of a looming global health crisis, framed as another opportunity to centralize power. The hosts tie this rhetoric to broader themes of globalism, technocracy, and “New World Order” ambitions. 02:14:17 – Shooter Linked to Radical LeftReports suggest the Charlie Kirk assassin was a college-aged radical, with universities described as “Marxist seminaries” fueling violent ideology. 02:18:41 – Civil War TrapWarnings that both parties are pushing Americans toward a civil war, which would bring mass death and government crackdowns, just as after the first Civil War. 02:24:24 – Tucker Carlson’s 9/11 Cover-UpCarlson’s upcoming 9/11 documentary is blasted as controlled opposition. He’s accused of hiding Building 7 evidence and running CIA-style propaganda. 02:29:23 – Israeli Foreknowledge of 9/11FBI reports of “Israeli art students” surveilling U.S. sites and filming the attacks are examined, with claims U.S. intelligence may have used Israel as cover. 02:35:14 – Gold vs. Fake EconomyTony Arterburn joins to show how gold is the “real stablecoin” amid fake job reports, manipulated markets, and central bank hoarding. 02:56:48 – CBDC Trojan Horse: The GENIUS ActThe new Genius Act is framed as a backdoor to eliminate cash, wipe out small banks, and impose full surveillance through stablecoins. 03:17:29 – Trump’s Tariff DelusionTariffs are framed as taxes that make nations poorer, not richer. Trump is blasted for adopting economic policies resembling “third world” countries while claiming they’ll bring investment. 03:23:01 – America’s Declining Trade FreedomDiscussion of how the U.S. fell from 8th to 53rd place in global trade freedom rankings. Tariffs and capital controls are shown as barriers that punish Americans while eroding prosperity. 03:27:33 – Tariffs Destroying Small BusinessReal-world examples highlight how tariffs cripple industries like guitar-making and surfboards by driving up costs of foreign materials. Trump and Peter Navarro are ridiculed for boneheaded, short-sighted trade policy. 03:32:01 – Trump Hypocrisy on Free SpeechTrump is accused of hollow rhetoric after praising Charlie Kirk’s “free speech,” while simultaneously cracking down on students protesting Gaza. His response to the shooting is dismissed as political theater. 03:34:27 – Mossad & 9/11 OperationsConversation shifts to Israeli involvement in 9/11, citing “Israeli art students,” Mossad-linked moving companies, and Marvin Bush’s security contracts at the Trade Towers. The U.S.-Israel connection is framed as deep and corrupt. 03:52:36 – Epstein, Banks & the GOP Cover-UpThe Epstein scandal is revisited, with J.P. Morgan, Ken Starr, and Bill Gates implicated in protecting pedophiles. Trump, Mike Johnson, and the GOP are accused of aiding cover-ups to protect elites. Follow the show on Kick and watch live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST https://kick.com/davidknightshow Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHTFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

You know, world of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act it's the david night show as a clock strikes 13 it's thursday september 11th year of our lord 2025 24 years after and we do have some updates about 9-11 but we're going to focus to begin with on the horrific murder of charlie kirk and At the same time that was happening, we have Donald Tusk, the prime minister, Poland, is doing everything he can to drag us into World War III through NATO. It is a very dangerous time that we live in. One of the things that I tweeted, well, I'll talk about what I said yesterday on Twitter, but we're at the middle of a fourth turning, aren't we? We'll be right back.

Thank you. Well, I think the best response that I've seen from anybody about Charlie Cook and I know everybody has already heard the news. I hope you've not seen the shooting. I'm afraid I did. It bothered me. This is what was put out. On LifeSight News. Yeah.

The thing to take away, really, is that there are two young children that are going to grow up without their father now. Yes. This is what John Henry Weston. And he said, to focus your prayers. That's what you should be thinking about. That's what you should be thinking about. Yeah, that's what a lot of people don't think about murder, which is, and we look at and we casually blow people up because they are foreigners or because they're on a

suspected boat or whatever. They have families, too. And this violent culture that we live in is truly the amazing thing here. You see, this is a medley here where they have his children that he's

interacting with. Very young children. He himself is very young. The murderer is still at large. Cash Vettel first announcing that they had apprehended him and then saying they didn't. So they had gotten somebody right away who had been shouting abuse at Charlie Kirk. Here's the thing. You know if you've watched this program, you know that I have big differences with Charlie Kirk.

He has been a huge cheerleader for the Trump family. And so it's not about that. It is about the fact that we need to be able to speak. And that was one of the things that Charlie Kirk did that was right. He would go to places where they disagreed with him, and he would try to openly debate people in college, which colleges are trained not to do that. They keep saying speech is violence. What they mean by that is that if you say something, they don't like, they'll get violent. The same way that when they talk about hate speech, they really mean they hate speech.

speech. They hate free speech. And so he went to the places where they were being trained to hate speech. And he put up a sign, you know, prove me wrong. And he would debate them on various issues, political, religious, you name it. And that's the way that it should be done. You know, Charlie would have as guests, people that he disagreed with, and he would let them speak. He didn't just scream at them. He didn't call them terrorists or this or that. He just, he let them speak and he, he interviewed him with that. And I would disagree with him on a lot of issues, a lot of issues. But again, because, you know, he put himself in the position to be an

apologist for Trump. But, you know, he went on Gavin Newsom's first podcast and the two of them had a civil discussion. Gavin Newsom. That tells you that he really did believe in debate. I mean, if ever those going to be somebody, it should be tempted. to have an ad hominem attack against, it would be Gavin Newsom. But that was good, and that was the right thing to do.

And I think that it shows us just how dangerous things are. And yes, it is where the left is coming from. However, let's understand, let's not feed this left-right hatred and civil war. Let's understand that the right is equally capable of trying to cancel the other side. And they've shown this time and again. They don't like what somebody says. They will seek to cancel them to get them in trouble as well. And this censorship has been marching left, right, left, right.

It doesn't matter whether it's Republican or Democrat in control of Congress and the presidency. They all are still pushing speech control. Have you ever heard? Can you remember ever hearing in recent memory, any politician pushing back in general against hate speech rules? No, they just keep extending it. And they have different things that they hate. That's what the different parties are about. But they all hate speech, and that's where Charlie Kirk is a bit different.

So, ironically, as he was speaking, he was being asked about the shooting violence. And he says, do you mean gang-related or whatever? And at that point, he was killed. But there was another shooting yesterday in Colorado. uh the school two killed plus the killer was killed and the school again this killer is free and as greg gutfield said it had a professional feel to it that was a very very long shot it was um an error by some um outlets as 200 feet but it was 200 yards and i think if you look at the shooting map you can see just how far that was um

It was, I think, 200 yards. So, yeah, it had a very, very professional feel to it. But here is Charlie Kirk talking about what he did on campus. I go around universities and have challenging conversations because that's what is so important to our country is to find our disagreements respectfully. Because when people stop talking, that's when violence happens. I've never seen someone do it.

Well, it's a growing trend because people like me are facing violence, assaults, the left. Yes, the campus, Antifa. I've been stormed out of restaurants. I've been assaulted publicly, multiple death threats. Okay, so what's your goal in this? There's more people that agree with me than some people would actually believe, and they come out of the woodwork when I do stuff like this. We record all of it so that we put on the internet so people can see these ideas collide. When people stop talking, that's when you get violence. That's when civil war happens, because you start to think the other side is so evil and they lose their Yeah, and so, as I pointed out yesterday, there have been five assassinations or assassination

attempts in the last year or so. And so it is, we are at a fourth turning. And as he pointed out, you know, you make, it's kind of a paraphrase of what someone said, accurately said that when you make, was it J. O.K. said when you make peaceful change impossible, you make a violent change inevitable. I think I'm paraphrasing it. And I don't remember it was a good. It was JFK, yeah. Yeah, that's the general idea. So this is Jason Chaffez, who actually represented this area in Congress before he retired. And he talked a little bit about the shooting on Fox News.

Fox News contributor. Jason, you were there. I could hear how upset you are in your voice. And I think we all are feeling it. And I just, but you were there. So tell us what happened. Yeah, that happened like 35 minutes ago. I was there.

I was up kind of on the second level because I wanted to be in the shade. But our daughter was there, son-in-law was there, my wife was there, friends, this is our community. And, you know, there's 2,000 or so people. The Utah Valley Universities are largest university, 40,000 students. And people came out to hear the dialogue, the back and forth, ask them anything. That's what Turning Point Charlie Kirk's all about. Ask them anything. First question was about religion.

He went on for about 15, 20 minutes. Second question, interestingly, was about transgender shooters, mass shooters. And in the midst of that, the shot rang out. Now, I happen to be watching Charlie. I can't say I saw blood. I can't say I saw him get shot. But as soon as that shot went out, he fell back into his left. And everybody hit the first.

everybody hit the deck everybody's a lot of people started screaming um and then everybody started running as you might expect yeah that's the thing i think that's why you know gutfeld said it had a professional feel to it uh this is not somebody who's just angry in general and want to shoot up the place and kill everybody that was there it was very focused very targeted and very accurate. But there's a sick censorship mentality behind all of this. You know, for the longest time, when I was growing up in college, the left was all about free speech. And that's, like I said before, both sides can censor what they don't like. And so at that point in time, you had the conservatives run the Vietnam War. You had most of free speech was protest about that. And

they were being pushed pretty hard by the college administrations to shut up. and to shut down the protests. And so, you know, they hid behind the First Amendment. As soon as they got in power, they got much worse than the right had been. And so, you know, he says they put out a petition. As he pointed out, this was the largest Utah University, I believe, 40,000 students. A head of the tour, a petition was created August 29th by students who did not want Kirk to visit the university.

Utah State University has consistently worked towards fostering an inclusive space for all of its students and family. So they want to exclude him. This is the blatant hypocrisy of these people. They want to exclude people that they disagree with. We must not be like that. Letting a figurehead whose speeches often seem to undermine

the essence of inclusivity. Now, he would allow everybody there. he didn't agree with and you know they could ask their questions they can make their statements and let people decide what they agreed with do they even know the meaning of hypocrisy if they taught them that at that university out of 40,000 students there they had in a short period of time 6,000 of them signed the petition before it was closed the day before the event so that's about 15% of the students immediately signed up to say we don't want to hear anything I want to close our ears, close our minds, and shut your mouth. And this is what I've seen from the very beginning,

when Karen and my daughter were protesting at an abortion clinic in Austin, they had signs that said abortion is black genocide. And they were there for a short period of time. And then these antifar radicals showed up. And they didn't have anything to say. They didn't want to argue, oh no, it isn't genocide. It's not murder. As a matter of fact, Karen got a viral clip of one woman looking right in the camera saying, I kill my kids. I'm proud of that. But there was a guy that was focused on Karen and we were covering it live at Info Wars and he comes there with just a black sign. A black sign said nothing on it and he put that sign in front of Karen's sign and she moved her signed down and so then he moved to sign down she moved her sign up and two other were

going up and down up and down and that but that was the whole point he just didn't want her to say anything he had no argument he had no ideas he just wanted to silence the other side that is reprehensible and that's the kind of person that does this type of shooting except like I said it certainly looked professional so you can ask yourself is this going to be used as an opportunity to increase the police and surveillance state, and I think it will be. He founded Turning Point in 2012, when he was only 18, he dropped out of college to do so, and he was an early supporter and a key supporter of Trump's presidential campaigns all the way through this.

As I said, I strongly disagree with him on that. I thought it was counterintuitive to all of the policies that he would argue. eloquently for. Turning Point's USA mission was to counter what Kirk and his allies saw as liberal dominance on American College campuses. He cultivated a style of political engagement, heavily reliant on confrontational public appearances. That's what we used to just call debate. Oh, it's confrontational. Oh, he is pushing the buttons of these people, right? Again, he was the one who was truly inclusive, not like the left. He promoted traditional values, often encouraging young women to prioritize becoming homemakers and mothers over professional careers.

But he would also, and this is one of the things that criticized him for, he would also virtue signal by bringing in homosexual activists and defending them as conservative and as Christian even. And so there was this contradiction that was there, but, you know, probably all of us have contradictions in our lives. Kirk often openly criticized programs laid to diversity, equity, and inclusion, as they call it, D-E-I, a major proponent of Christian nationalism arguing that there is no true separation of church and state in the United States. And again, he was right about that. Somebody's religion is going to prevail. Somebody's religion is going to be the basis of our laws. The question is whose religion is that going to be?

And so he was right to oppose that, I think, the separation of church and state. And we don't want to establish a religion, but we want to have the free exercise of it, which is where the left was. At the same time that they were radically out there promoting the idea of free speech for their protests, they were also trying to shut down the free exercise of religion. And back in the 60s, and we've seen what's happened with that. so the shooter is still on the loose even as of this morning there was an elderly man that was there hectoring him and people thought that he was the shooter they took him away there

were pictures of that but he was not the one they all agree that there was a shooter about 200 yards away on a roof and the interesting thing is some of the reactions like MSNBC this This is even from Mediaite, which is a left-wing anti-Trump publication. The headline is, MSNBC failed the moment after Charlie Kirk's assassinations, says Mediaite. His killing is never a political story first. It is a human one. And in the moments after the news broke, the country needed sober coverage in space to absorb the shot. But what he got from MSNBC was something else entirely.

The aggressively progressive network reported the news of a conservative thought leader being shot, an apparent victim of political violence. How MSNBC treated this news was a massive test that they sadly failed. Everybody is talking about it. Within seconds, a reporting that he had been shot, anchor Katie Turr, speculated about whether Trump might use the Charlie Kirk shooting as justification for something bad. her guest MSNBC contributor Matthew Dowd suggested Kirk's own rhetoric bore responsibility hateful thoughts lead to hateful actions well there you go see speech is violence and so it

justifies our violence against somebody Alan Smith wondered if conservatives might now do something similar to taking over Washington all of this as viewers are just learning that Kirk had been assassinated mediaite says the instinct to immediately translate like grief and a partisan analysis wasn't just jarring. It revealed how MSNBC, and by extension, much of the left-leaning media ecosystem has lost its ability to see political violence as anything other than fodder for partisan storylines already in place. And again, mediaite, if anybody, is part of the left-leaning media ecosystem.

It is mediaite. And even they call that what MSNBC did. They said, contrast that with how CNN and Foxx. news handled the moment. Both networks largely stuck to the facts, emphasizing the shocking nature of the act, confirming details as they came in, leaving space for the human toll. Fox anchors went further, condemning political violence outright while steering clear of speculation. CNN, not usually shy about analyzing politics, showed entirely appropriate restraint. They treated Kirk's killing first as news, then as a strong argument against political violence of any stripe.

You know, I include political violence in that. I include war. And sadly, we don't. It's amazing because when you start these wars, just because of somebody's geopolitical ambitions, because they want their name on a country, or because they want the oil that some country has, it's eventually going to come back

and you're going to have people dying who have young children and families just like Charlie Kirk. They might be wearing a uniform when they die, but that's still what's going to happen. At a time when Americans might reasonably expect a moment of civic pause, a suspension of the endless partisan frame, MSNBC defaulted to reflexive politics. As did many figures in alt-medears, I call it, the Nudge News, screaming Democrats or terrorists. It's just, you know, let's not feed this partisan. partisan divide. Again, you know, as I said, even though I disagreed with Charlie Kirk on many issues,

he was there to make a statement and to argue and to debate these issues. And the issues are what is important, more so than the people. And MSNBC delivered knee-jerk politics. And doing so revealed just how low the bar for journalism has fallen, says Mediaite. And it's a lot. And They're absolutely right. One of the things that they said, which was truly amazing, they said, well, we don't know if maybe he was shot by one of his own people in celebration, as if that is something that ever happens in any conservative rallies. I've seen it happen at Muslim weddings. That's right. That's right.

This is the only place I've seen it. So Afghanistan or Iraq where they have a wedding and they're shooting guns off in the air. Those bullets are going to come down somewhere. and they're just shooting them straight up in the air. Well, if they shoot a bullet straight up in the air, it falls at the terminal velocity of the bullet, which typically isn't enough to kill someone. But they typically are doing a lot more dangerous things than that.

Yeah, that's right. So we don't know if this is a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration. Isn't that ridiculous? That's MSNBC. So we have no idea about this. But following up with what was just said, he's been one of the most devices,

especially divisive young graphics. figures, constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech. It always goes back to hateful thoughts that lead to hateful words, which lead to hateful actions. In other words, it was his fault. He shouldn't have just shut up and let them change everything. Charlie Kirk was an extreme moderate. He said nothing was controversial. It's stuff that would have been the standard Republican party line from 10 to 15 years ago. I've never once heard a position from Charlie Kirk that I thought was in any way. stream. It all sounded very much boilerplate to me.

Yeah, it's very moderated. Yeah. Yeah. And that's one of the reasons why he was able to grow his organization. That's part of the reason. I didn't listen to him. I thought he was too milk toast. I didn't think he went far enough. Yeah. You are the hate, said Anna, Polina Luna, unloading on liberals after the Charlie Kirk shooting. So again, we don't want to fall into this either. She screams at the Congress. Every one of you who called us fascists did this. And again, the article that I tweeted out about it, I said, yes, he would debate people, which is what we need,

and that's why he was hated. Just having debating ideas is enough to get you killed, evidently. Did you notice that America's had five assassination attempts in a year, said RT. The U.S. is bearing witness to an alarming trend, a politically motivated violence and high-profile assassination attempts. And they say the U.S. is an inter-day disturbing cycle of political violence. It's called the fourth turning. In the past year alone, multiple high-profile assassination attempts have shaken the country.

And so they include, of course, Charlie and the shot at Trump, which, I don't know, whether it was real or not. It was political. Minnesota House Speaker assassination, a guy went to their house and shot them dead. They were not out speaking or doing anything, and they were Democrats. And then in Illinois, Nick Fuentes on December 18th, this last December, guy showed up armed with a pistol crossbow and an incendiary device at his house, or I guess his parents' house. while he was live streaming.

Actually, Nick doesn't live with his parents. Oh, he doesn't? No. The individual turned out to be a triple homicide suspect who was shot and killed by police following a chase shortly after the encounter with Fuentes. So that's kind of interesting, triple homicide suspects. This guy was serious. Yeah.

You know, when you first look at this, it's like a crossbow and incendiary device. That sounds kind of cartoonish, but he was, I guess, going to blow the house up after he killed him. So Cash Patel jumped in and was saying that the subject had been arrested, but then he walked that back and said the subject in custody, I think he meant to say suspect, but has been released after interrogation by law enforcement, so they don't have anyone yet. They said on the radio traffic, they were looking for someone who was dressed all in black with a black bag, sunglasses, and a lot. long gun so i don't know if they had any there hasn't been any surveillance footage released i don't know if they had surveillance footage on the roof or whatever but there were a lot of people who had caught some figure moving on the roof at a distance but you couldn't see anything yeah yeah after the manhut was underway jesse waters expressed doubt that the assailant

was being captured says if you look at the geography around the area you can just walk down from building, get in your vehicle, and be in the mountains in 10 minutes. You could be at the airport in Provo in five minutes. I'm a little worried that this manhut is going to go on a long time, because if they don't have this guy now, there's no telling where he could be. And as one of them said, Kennedy said, as they were talking about on Fox, it is a message meant to silence people, an act of terrorism, because although Kirk was not a politician, he was political, and he was powerful. His power came from joy and igniting a movement and being really, really convincing. That person intended for this assassination to silence everyone who agrees with him, and to silence

everyone who wants to go out on a limb and make their case and refute so much of what especially younger people are being fed. And I think that is absolutely true. You know, we must not be cowed down by these types of threats. Did you want to say anything? What do you think? I'm very upset by this. I've seen hundreds and thousands of leftists online celebrating this. Really? Just reveling in the fact that Charlie Kirk is dead. And so I understand not wanting to create more divide, but to put it bluntly, there is no real accord with these people. You want to try to reach them, but you have to treat them like a dangerous animal.

Yeah. They will turn on you. They will sell you out. They will do everything in their power to harm you and your family. They have no compassion. They have no mercy. They hate you. The anti-farm, LGBT, and everything, we've seen that.

Just your standard, everyday average liberal. The wine mom down the street, the woman that works the counter at the bakery at your local grocery store, these are the people that are celebrating. It has spread everywhere. It is not just Antifa. anymore. We saw those articles about how, you know, 55% of liberals think that violence is acceptable, that murder of a political opponent is fine. It is gone mainstream. The majority, or at least 50% of liberals now think that this is an acceptable form of political dialogue.

You shoot the guy. That's what they believe. And again, you want to continue to reach out to people. You don't want to give up on that. But you have to be careful. You cannot assume that these are going, they're going to engage with you in good faith are in the same way. I agree. They're not all going to try to shoot you, but they will probably do what they can to make your life miserable, whether it's called CPS on you or anything like that. There was a video not that long ago of one of these, you know, liberal debaters that's popular on TikTok who had a disagreement with some guy, and because he disagreed them,

said, well, I'm going to call CPS on you, and maybe some of people in our audience can docks you. These are the type of people, and this is the type of tactics that they use. It has become commonplace. Yeah, I agree. The colleges have seized on this and have done their best to amplify the worst aspects of human nature. Lance?

It's a sort of total war mindset for speech and debate. It's, well, if you say something that I disagree with, then I am justified in doing whatever I want. It's the equating speech to violence. And all the hate speech, and all the propaganda is all just a part of that push. I agree. And I want to be clear.

It's just I know that I know liberals that are saddened by this that are wounded. They hate this. They hate to see this. And I know there are a lot of people that still on the left that don't believe this way. But there are a lot who do. So you have to be careful. Don't just assume that they're one way or the other, but guard yourself as well. you cannot give up on dialogueing with people again it's important to try to reach out and to have

conversations and to reach these people in a you know cordial manner it's you know we don't want violence we don't want to devolve into that because once it starts it's not going to stop until it has become a mass scale tragedy you know once a revolution starts it plays itself out one way or the other yes and you don't want that I agree However, you need to be careful. You need to understand where a lot of people on the left are coming from. And to ignore that is to put yourself in danger. It is to put yourself at risk.

Yeah, it is far more prevalent on the left than it is on the right. It does exist on the right. I mean, we're talking about the Minnesota Speaker of the House, a leftist who was, I haven't looked into that much. I don't know if the other guy was a hardcore right-winger or whatever who shot her. But the bottom line is that unless we have, have you seen anybody in any political party stand up for free speech lately? I haven't.

I mean, I see, it's like if you criticize what they hold dear. If you criticize the Gaza war, right? What does Trump want to do? He wants to deport you. I mean, they come up, they're exactly the mere image of the left, except that they haven't started the kind of violent acts that we're seeing on the left now so often. It's like every week another leftist political shooting, a tranny or this or whatever. And so, yes, they are getting violent with that.

But we need to not get drawn in, I think, into the partisan left, right, Higelian dialectic that they want to do. Because that's also a part of their Marxist philosophy. And that's why this is coming from, Marxism. Eric Peters had an excellent op-ed piece talking about that, how this is a hallmark of leftist Marxist totalitarianism. But remember that it can be done by the right as well. And you already played it once today, but that clip of Charlie Kirk on campus,

I think, is going to become iconic in context of this. I can play it just the beginning of that again, if you want to. Yeah, let's play it again. We'll take a break and we'll come back and we'll take some of your comments. I go around universities and have challenging conversations because that's what is so important to our country is to find our disagreements respectfully

because when people stop talking, that's when violence happens. I've never seen someone do this. Well, it's a growing trend because people like me are facing violence, assault, the left. Yes, the campus, Antifa. I've been stormed out of restaurants, I've been assaulted publicly, multiple death threats.

Okay, so what's your goal in this? There's more people that agree with me than, some people would actually believe and they come out of the woodwork when I do stuff like this. We record all of it so that we put on the internet so people can see these ideas collide. When people stop talking, that's when you get violence. That's when civil war happens, because you start to think the other side is so evil and they lose their humanity. You know, I'm going to

I'm going to I'm going to I'm I'm going to be. I'm going to I'm going to I'm I'm

I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be. I don't know. I'm going to be able to

I don't know. I don't know. I know. I don't know. I'm sorry. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know.

I know. I know. Ina, I know. I know. I know. I know. I know.

You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back, folks. We've got a lot of comments to get through. We've got Radisbro. Thank you very much, Radisbrough. That's very generous. He says, in my opinion, I think they used a drone. The description of the suspect could be anyone, and I think that's the point. I haven't even seen a description of the suspect. I have no clue. Marky Mark and Jay, thank you for the tip. He says, David, we must follow the Old Testament commands to eliminate the heathen. There's no peaceful coexistence with these people. There's no coexistence with them. It's either them or us, period. I think this one, the reason is why we create government, that is to protect our lives and liberty. But an important part of that, so it doesn't become just total anarchy, and so that we don't fall under a totalitarian government that seeks out any of us, is that we have to follow a rule of law. And unfortunately, all those things are broken now.

That's the whole point for these fourth turnings. We got B.L. Houghton, on a better note, Charlie was worth $12 million, so his wife and kids are taken care of. Well, I'm glad that they will have money enough to be comfortable. However, I'm sure that all of them would say they would give up all of that to have him back in their life. That is, it's very sad for the children. And the fact that this video, the videos of him being shot exist means that most likely those children are going to encounter it at some point. They're going to live with the knowledge that that video is on the internet and they're going to eventually see it.

And knowing how awful and disgusting people on the internet are, people are going to send it to them once they're older. KWD68, why didn't Trump send in Bradley's in 2020 to stop BLM? Yeah, I think, again, I think that the powers that be, both Republican and Democrat, want this. And that's why we must not feed this left-right divide. Yes, go after the people, the violent groups on both sides who are doing this kind of stuff.

And we need to stand strongly with the rule of law and with local police forces. That's the key thing. We need to stand on the values. Always look at this, and when I try to stay within, it's very easy to just give yourself over to partisan politics or whatever, but I try to moderate that with the fact that I am a citizen of heaven, a disciple of Christ, and that is the point where we need to think about this. That's what's going to bring us back, folks. There's no salvation in any of these political philosophies or these political parties or these political prostitutes. Yona Eniwody, prayers for the bereaving, surviving family of Charlie Kirk.

Yeah, keep them in your prayers. Denver Adaway, good thing the cops tackled that old bald man with a little white hair and glasses because he looked like the suspect, a real Jason Bourne, you know, so the real perk could get away. And that video popped up immediately after these shooting. And I was, I couldn't believe it was him. The first time I thought it's like, there's no way. There's no way.

Yeah. Yona and I woe-to, to be fair and honest, I detested Kirk's opinions, especially his pro-Zionist, pro-genicidal stance. Yeah, I didn't mention that. And he is still my human brother, despite our differences. Rest in peace. Yes, yes. Yeah, we've made our differences clear with Charlie Kirk on those things.

we have made it clear that we do not agree and, in fact, vehemently oppose his stance on Zionism. But it's still, to me, it's heartbreaking to see a young father be taken from his family and upsets me greatly. And here's the elderly man. Yeah. It's just that's not, I mean, I don't really know what an assassin looks like, but to me, I don't think that's it. Yona Annie Wode went on FB this morning and all my liberal high school classmates

were high-fiving like dancing Israelis over Charlie Kirk And it's September 11th, but I'm telling you It is become mainstream. Yeah. It is... So I don't pay much attention to social media anymore.

I mean, I should because I'd comment about it, but it just disgusts me so much What has become? I was on Facebook and I have seen multiple posts with thousands upon thousands of likes celebrating and making fun of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Yeah, Twitter is bad enough, but, you know, they are X,

but I'm not even allowed on Facebook or YouTube. That's how badly they want me to figure they could get rid of me without a bullet. They could just cancel me off everywhere. So I guess I got off easy. And again, you don't want to give up on dialogue. You don't want to give up on trying to reach these people, but you need to understand how they feel about you. It does you no favors to go in blindly. Oh, yeah. I agree. Does you no favors to not understand that these people would turn on you in a

second? Yeah, don't be naive. You don't want to give in to hate. You don't want to treat them the way they would treat you, but you need to understand how they would treat you and comport yourself accordingly. Yeah, just like when we talk about government, you know, we say our politicians or whatever, We don't want to project our values on them of normality or whatever. You know, these are psychopaths. And so, as I've always said many, many times, we always underestimate the evil that these people are capable of doing. Just like, you know, we're talking about here on the anniversary of 9-11. We always underestimate how evil they are.

And we underestimate their technology as well. Yeah. A culty sim. I saw the Kirk footage before I knew the context. No fair. It made so many people throw up. They'd be very upset. I heard about it.

I saw the distant angle first, and you know, you can't see much from there, I think. And I thought, well, you know, maybe he's okay. Maybe, you know, he got gray's and it'll be right. And then I saw the other angle, and I immediately knew there was no way. It was too much blood. Yeah, you saw it first and told me, I looked at Drudge. And I followed the link there, and that was a close-up. And I was like, oh, man.

It was, um, graphic. It's very brutal. It's the type of. Yeah. We have, uh, dug log saying, I didn't see any witnesses. Uh, they spotted the shooter before the event on the roof. And Dougalug, thank you very much. That is very generous.

Says, thank you, David and Sons. Hit the like buttons and help spread the word. Yes, thank you. We don't, uh, tell you to do that enough. But thank you for reminding us, Dougalog, and thank you for the tip. And skunk hollow rose gardens. Thank you. for that as well. He says, make Doug's 10 at 20. Well, thank you very much.

Thank you. Doug Lug said that they spotted the shooter before the event on the roof. Well, I know I saw a video of someone scurrying off the roof later. I didn't know he was spotted beforehand. Brit Belly. I did see a video of him prone, then moving on the roof. Zoxov-Ox-V-Ax-S put one step in front of the other and soon you'll be marching off to war. It's a dangerous business, Frodo, walking out your front door. dug a lug I know that shooter had to walk by at least 50 cameras let's see if cash can put his money

where his mouth is Franzen I kind of felt like 9-11 yesterday yeah there was a it's there's something happening people are upset well yeah and it is the time that we're in and there is

so I say we need to keep a lid on some of this rhetoric understand it's just like situational awareness you need to understand that there are threats out there to you personally, but we don't need to escalate. I think one politician said, let's dial the temperature down a little bit on some of this rhetoric. And so when people are out there saying,

you're the terrorists, you're the, you know, they're justifying, you know, shooting, killing people because they don't need much justification to do that, as we saw down in Venezuela, as we have seen in Gaza, as we have seen everywhere. Governments don't really need any justification to kill people. So we don't want to start a civil war. And as we look at that and we look at what happened in Charlotte, that horrific thing as well. The Trump administration is trying everything they can to try to get the federal government involved in that. And clearly, you know, the Soros prosecutors and people like that that are there in Charlotte cannot handle it, will not handle that type of thing. But that is a local problem and it has to be a local problem and locally solved or not solved.

I mean, one of the solutions to that is just to get out of the area if you live there and if you can't change it, just like Chicago, but to federalize it, and that's what they're doing, they're trying to find an excuse to get the Department of Justice in. You've got Duffy at the Department of Transportation is trying to say, well, that was a train. So that's our jurisdiction. No, it's not. And I don't want to have centralized policing. That is very dangerous. And I don't want to have a government that violates the Posse Comitatis law. at will because that's there for a very good reason.

The most dangerous gang out there is the government. So we have to be careful that they don't use these events. They could be very well, just like we see in 9-11. They could be the ones behind them for all we know. I've got a comment here from Think Eric, just for the record, as a hunter with a rifle, 200 yards is not professional distance. If your hand is steady, that could be anybody. Rifles are accurate at 300 yards plus.

Okay. So we're not hunters. do a little bit of, we do a little bit of shooting now and then, but, you know, we don't have the base of knowledge you do. Yeah. Yes. Let's see where I was. And neither does Greg Gutfield, but, you know, the guy had his, was able to escape.

So there's that aspect of it as well. You know, he wasn't, you know, just some angry person taking random pot shots at a crowd. Yeah, it was, he took that one shot, at least I believe it was only one shot. Yeah. He just left. Yeah. We've got Doug Lug. When they put Charlie in that SUV, he was definitely shot, not a fake blood bag.

You can see him without a shirt on. Lots of blood if you look closely. Yeah, I don't believe. Well, if you see that video that was linked at the top of Drudge Report, there's no question that that was a real shooting. That was not fake. I still don't believe the Trump thing. He needs to sell a product. Whatever he used to heal his ear, he needs to sell that as a treatment.

Trump miracle ear. You know, it's just grows the ear right back. But that was real. That was real. It was very sad to see. Yeah. Wes Robertson 448 says no one will ever know who assassinated Charlie. Well, I hope they do fine who did it.

And sadly, I think you might be right. Defy tyrant 1776. Trump will use this as excuse for bigger police state, gun control, or both. Yes. Government has purposely created all this hate and division, while every one of them are laughing behind close. doors. North American House Hippo.

Thank you very much. That is generous. I disagree with Dave's assertion that Hollywood will never show a realistic depiction of the FBI. It's already been done, The X-Files, nine seasons, and one movie of cover-ups, corruption, and deceit. X-Files, one of my favorite TV shows. I never saw Glenn Eastwood's movie about Jagger Hoover. Jagger, I think, is what he called it.

But I think he kind of showed Jagger for what he was. But certainly he did the Richard Jule's story. That was very, very effective and an important story. And boy, they work hard to take that down. It's amazing to me because I watched the movie because they were so adamantly opposed to it. And the way they took it down was they said, oh, well, you know, you implied that there was some kind of an affair between this reporter and an FBI agent. And that is a slander against her. shame on you, and they tried to me-to, Clint Eastwood over that, and made it a scandal to try

to keep people away from the movie. But that was a very important movie to show the FBI as it really is. Yeah. S.A. Miller, one, two, three. Charlie did believe that Christ was the way to salvation, and he was a great advocate for pro-life and also spoke against LGBTQ and transgender. Yes. I have seen a lot of different clips of him talking about Christ and salvation. And, well, again, I disagree with him on Zionism.

I think he, personally, I do think he may have actually been a Christian. I do think he believed, and I hope he did. Yes. You know, it's not on us to judge. That's right. We never know. And only God can see the heart. Yes.

We have another clip on the board of the guy talking about how Kirk was talking about his faith right before his death. Go ahead and play that. Sorry, I just need to find it. Oh, okay. Well, I'll tell you what we'll do. We'll come back to that because I want to talk about. I want his wife and the country to know that the last question he took, the last thing he talked about to people in Utah,

thousands of people that wanted to come hear him is that his message was one of love of Jesus Christ of his belief in prayer and he talked about that from his heart and you could feel it and he's done that multiple times before

but I consider an honor to be there it makes me mad I'm so mad that this happened in our backyard it's an embarrassment now I got to tell you

I used to be in Congress. I represented this area. We're better than this. But there's somebody out there who's evil, absolute, total, complete evil. And they need to be taken down. Our law enforcement, I love them. They've got to do a better job. There is no communication.

You have 100,000 students between BYU and the University of Utah. They say somebody's in custody, then they say, oh, well, it's not the shooter. Right now, police are still pouring in. It's almost three hours later. They've got to communicate with this. Is there a shooter that's still out there? And if so, what are we going to do to catch this evil person and make sure that he receives justice?

That's what we're feeling in this community right now. But his message of love of God of Jesus Christ is one that I hope is part of his lasting legacy. Yes, and that was something that he would debate people on and when he would go on to campus. Thank you, Lance. I forgot that. I thought I played that, but I forgot to play that. Let's talk about the attempts to get us involved into World War III that also happened yesterday.

NATO air defenses shoot down Russian drones over Poland for the first time. Oh, so Russia attacked Poland? Not so quick. That's not actually what happened at all. NATO airspace was violated by a huge number of Russian drones overnight, said the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk, who has been itching like Zelensky to start World War III. So he triggered NATO's Article 4, while the alliance militaries directly shot down Russian drones for the first time. This is an issue with drones, with autonomous killing machines, robots, and things like that.

you always have the issue that they can actually trigger a war. And what happened in this particular case, it was a massive attack by Russia into Ukraine with drones. And it's been going back and forth, both sides doing the same thing. They said last night, the Polish airspace was violated by a huge number of Russian drones. It was actually 19 of them. And Tusk said that three or four of the 19th, drones, which entered NATO airspace, posed a threat and were shot down.

The others came down by other causes, including running out of fuel. And the Polish military is now searching for remains and has asked the public to remain vigilant and report and to find wreckage immediately. So they don't have wreckage? And these things ran out of fuel? Does that sound like a military attack? Or does this sound like what I think it is, is some of these drones. going astray. And of course, part of what happens during one of these strikes is that they do use

jamming equipment to try to confuse the navigation of the drones as part of their defense. If you remember, Orestovich, the guy who said in 2019 that in three years in 2022, there would be direct war between Russia and Ukraine, he was kind of frank. And he got fired because he pointed out in one of these attacks when Russia sent end some cruise missiles. One of them hit a civilian building and, like an apartment building. And Zlonsky tried to parlay that into international outrage and trying to build the war off of that. And the rest of which said it hit that building because we shot it and damaged it and then it veered off and hit that building. And so the question is, if they are using jamming equipment to confuse these,

drones is that what happened with this there were 415 drones according to their count that were fired into the the area and 19 of them they said went astray that's a pretty low percentage I think is about 4% or something like that but in some cases the drones crossed into Polish airspace from Ukrainian airspace with the Ukrainian Air Force stating that it had detected eight drones overflying its territory, and heading toward Poland. Others flew directly into Poland from Russia's lockstep ally Belarus, which lies to its north and east, and occupies some historic Polish territory. There were no injuries or fatalities in Poland, but some property damage was recorded,

including a home, which local press said had its roof blown off. Four airports in Poland's east were closed overnight. Tusk told his parliament, this is not because a threat had been to the airports themselves. So this is not Russia taking on Poland as the prime minister tried to imply. And yet he wants to escalate this to NATO involvement. So clearly their own narrative to try to escalate this is contradicted by themselves. The military needed clear skies, he said, for intensive all-night operation. The airports reopened the next day. Tuss called the incursion into Polish airspace, an unprecedented violation, said most likely were witnesses to a large-scale provocation. I think that's what his speech was. This is the first time

Russian drones have been shot down over the territory of a NATO country. Well, do they actually have the drone wreckage? He said, before today, Article 4 has been activated seven times in the past. Most recently in 2022, at the beginning of Russia's renewed invasion of Ukraine, An emergency message sent to mobile phones, and Poland read, Attention informed services about drones and locations where they fall. Do not approach them. So again, they're still looking for them. It was the Ukraine Air Force said they shot down, otherwise down,

386 drones and 27 missiles out of the 42 missiles sent and the 450, 415 drones. Rogue drones and missiles have found their way into Poland in the past. over the course of the Ukraine war. So he's not telling the truth about that either. Such incidents accepted as accidental, but dangerous. Yeah, the incursions overnight were distinct for their increased number and the sustained duration. Zelensky made it clear that he views this as an attack on NATO, so he wants to escalate everything.

Testing the limits of what is possible. Well, this reminds me of the narrative that Zelensky and Donald Tusk, the Polish primaries, minister doing. Reminds me very much of what we saw during the Syrian war in Trump's first term, and I think actually into Obama's term, where as they would encircle an area that was, the Syrian forces were in a circle of town and heavily shell it, they were constantly trying to say that they had attacked them with gas, because that was the one thing that the West was aching for as an excuse to get involved. it never was true and it never would have made sense for Assad to do that now after years of this

they decided uh during the Biden administration to just go ahead and invade anyway and you saw that with the a 10 whartogs and that was the end of the Syrian war there but they were always looking for an excuse to put boots on the ground so he had the white hat helmets if you remember saying they cast everybody and it was a lie and so what Donald Tusk is doing as equivalent to the white helmet provocateurs shouting that everybody was gassed. That would be the one thing. Why in the world would Russia, what motivation could they possibly have? Or Belarus even, for that matter, to send drones into Poland. That would be the one thing that would invite a larger war in a NATO attack. And they made it very clear. And that's why it is so

important to them that Ukraine never have NATO membership because they don't want to have these tripwires for NATO involvement. So the Russians feel, must feel the consequences, they said. Russia must feel that the war cannot be expanded and must be ended, says Zelensky and NATO. They who do not want the war ended. They want it escalated. The BBC noted that Moscow media also promulgated the claim that far from being Russian drones over Poland, the aircraft were, in fact, a Ukrainian false flag attack intended to draw NATO into the conflict. Well, whether or not they were, the rhetoric of Zelensky and the Polish prime minister is intended to draw NATO into the conflict.

The Belarusian government, a full-throated ally of the Kremlin, which is in a nuclear weapon sharing agreement with Moscow, and which lets Russia use its territory. to launch attacks into Ukraine, put out a substantial statement on the incursions, claiming that the drones had gone into Poland by accident. Ukraine, of course, having launched its own drones against Russia as part of the proactive defense as it does every night, some drones lost their track as a result of the impact of the party's electronic warfare. It is certainly true that to save ammunition, Ukraine does attempt to redirect or to bring

down enemy drones by using electronic countermeasures to confuse the onboard flight systems, crashing them harmlessly away from built-up areas. Indeed, this has been cited as a reason behind the previous single case of drones and missiles crashing in Poland's borderlands in the past. Western capitals are unlikely to smile on the Belarusian suggestion that this was essentially Ukraine's fault, even if the drones were indeed Russian. But it does not give them. the rationale to draw NATO into the fight, which is what both Zelensky and Tusk would like to have. Belarus also claimed that it had proactively cooperated with the Polish government throughout the night, asserting that it had notified Warsaw of lost drones it was tracking

as they approached its airspace. Our forces and equipment on duty exchanged information on the air and radar situation with forces and equipment on duty in Poland and the Republic of Lithuania. In doing so, they alerted them to the approach of unknown aircraft to their country's territory. This allowed the Polish side to respond promptly to the actions of the drones by scrambling their forces on duty. In fairness, it should be noted that the Polish side also informed the Belarusian forces on duty about the approach of unidentified aircraft from the territory of Ukraine and to the border of the Republic of Belarus. And so, this is what happens when you have war.

You can have, not everything goes according to design, and the people who want the war are going to seize on it to escalate it. Zolenski urges joint air force, air defense with Europe after Russian drones downed in Poland.

I have no reason to claim that we're on the brink of war, but the line has been crossed, he told the Polish parliament. The situation brings us the closest we've been to open conflict since World War II. That was the prime minister. Belarus said that the drones had lost their way, also shot down over its own territory that were coming from Ukraine. Polish military operational command called the drones an act of aggression.

Tuss said he had activated Article 4 of NATO's treaty, under which alliance members can demand consultation with their allies, that he was in touch with NATO Secretary General Mark Ruta, who would dearly love to have a massive war. I mean, he tried to starve his own people when he was primarily. of Netherlands. That's why they put him in his backup position at NATO. Ruta called the incursion reckless behavior, irrespective of whether or not it was deliberate, because they know that it was not deliberate. So they've even calling us, well, okay, we're not going to be able to prove it was deliberate,

but we'll say it's reckless anyway. Article 4, the Washington Treaty, only eight times, this is the eighth time it's been used, does not trigger a military action, and it's only this is the eighth time, eighth time it's been used since NATO was established in 1949. As Patrick Buchanan used to say, we have set up these tripwires all over the world to drag us into every conflict.

But that's really not what's dragged us in these conflicts. I mean, we seem to start them on our own. We don't even need to wait for some kind of a tripwire. So again, we're in the position of NATO first, not America first. F-35 fighters helped to down Russian drones. over Poland, and we'll have to wait and see what happens with this, and the way this is reported by a National Security Journal, F-35s to the rescue. These people cannot see the bigger picture.

They're still playing war like their children. Trump's response on truth social was a terse statement for him, but one that no other leader but Trump would ever consider. He said, What's with Russia violating Poland's airspace with drones? Here we go.

Is that the way he's going to declare war? Here we go. Here we go, boys. Russian defense ministry said that it carried out attacks on Ukraine overnight, but that no targets in the territory of Poland were planned for destruction. The drones allegedly crossed into the Polish border did not exceed 700 kilometers into it. So that's, what, about 420 miles, I guess.

Plus suggested that the incident couldn't have been accidental since a significant number of drones entered Poland. Well, it was only, like I said before, 19 out of 415 by their own count, about 4%. And there's a lot of things that are happening in the midst of that. NATO Secretary General Mark Rood has said the alliance was assessing whether the incident was deliberate. Whether it was intentional or not, it was reckless. So they already know it was not intentional, but they are using this nevertheless. Article 4 calls from member states to consult whenever territorial integrity, political independence, or security of a member is threatened, and if it is, and they take it to Article 5, and that is the founding of the Treaty of NATO, that stipulates the parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. They agree that if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, an exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defense, will assist the party or parties so attacked by taking forthwith individually and in concert with the other parties, such action as is deemed necessary, including the use of armed force to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

This is why we should be out of NATO. We do not want to have legal obligations that drag us into this. But notice that the purpose of war was to restore and to maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. That's what wars used to be about before they became preemptive before somebody attacks us. That should be the way that it's done, but we should not be drawn into every kind of war with this. And invoking the Article 5 to attack is not. automatic. Following an attack on a member state, the other members come together to determine whether they agree to regard it as an Article 5 situation. This is not even really legitimately

an attack. You can make a stronger case that, you know, when you look at America and Iran, the accidental shooting down of that commercial airliner, that was clearly an accident. We have, though, done assassinations. We have done bombings. We have done bombings. of Iran and that type of thing. It's just, so who knows what these people are going to do. Kirstomber called for the drone incursions, called them an egregious, unprecedented violation of Polish and NATO airspace. So it's like we were attacked.

From Canada, Mark Carney called Russia's incursion, reckless and escalatory in a post on X on Wednesday, adding that Canada stands a Poland and NATO allies. Well, the people who are trying to escalate, things are their Ukrainian and Polish allies. So, again, I've given you the case that Russia pointed out. And the 19 separate violations happened over a period of seven hours. And a lot of these fell to the ground because they ran out of gas. They were not shut down. And they were not necessarily in attack mode. It's just like they got sent off. They were lost, obviously.

So the Ukrainians are dreaming about dragging NATO in the conflict, says RT. And we have seen this for the longest time. They want to drag everybody in. They want to drag the entire world into a war there. Tucker Carlson exposed Mark Cuban's hypocrisy on Ukrainian aid. When asked about U.S. funding for Ukraine, Cuban voiced partial support saying, half of my family is Ukrainian.

so, you know, personally, I think we should help. But I don't have a studied answer for you. Well, Tucker Carlson was there at that program, and he said, how much money have you sent to Ukraine personally? And he said, none. Oh, so what do you mean by we then? You're the one whose family is from Ukraine. Why don't you send them a billion dollars, he said.

Cuban then tried to pivot, claiming that he was just trying to fix help. care. Carlson swiftly countered, well, why don't you fix their health care? If you're like so deep, if you think that we need to help, why don't you start with it? How about you first? I notice that's never even an option for anybody. It's like, we need to help. That's not what charity is. Forcing other people to help is not charity, said Carlson. And again, I agree with them on that. we'll talk about Carlson and 9-11 coming up here but the you know as many people said you want to fight this for go ahead and suit up Lindsay they don't do that and here's Mark Cuban multi-billionaire he's got half his family is Ukrainian and he wants taxpayers and Americans to get involved in the war and to send

he won't do anything to help a growing block of Republicans as opposed sending more money to Ukraine because of the long-standing corruption that is there. But Ursula, who is fond of lying, is hedging her bets, you know, even if they can't get a World War III there in Ukraine, she says, we are on the brink of a global health crisis. The battle lines are being drawn. Again, always a war stance with everything and their rhetoric. She is someone who has always in the past said, we have for. to go to war against speech.

Now she's looking at a global health crisis that maybe they can do it with that. If they can't get World War III, maybe they can do some kind of a pandemic that's fake and achieve the same type of thing. She warned that Europe is on the brink of multiple critical challenges, including a health crisis. We are on the brink, or even at the start, of another global health crisis, she said. And she declared that battle lines for the new world. world order based on power are being drawn right now it's kind of interesting used to be when one of

these people like george w bush would talk about a new world order new world order yeah i'm a new world order um when they would do that it would make a lot of headlines but now nobody even notices even when it's a status quo yeah even when it's somebody like ursula fond of lying but again it's all before we go real fast it seems uh the fbi has come out and said that they have found what they believe is the weapon that was used to shoot Charlie Kirk. And they said they found some shoes that were left and some imprints of different parts of his body. So we'll see.

Again, it's the FBI saying this. And we all know how trustworthy the FBI is. But that's what they're saying right now. Well, we're going to take a quick break. And we'll be right back. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, yeah, Claus. Your annual global risk. report makes for a stunning and sobering read. For the global business community, the top

concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight Show. I mean, I'm gonnae, you know, and

the You know, I'm going to be able to be. And... Thank you. I don't know I'm going to be able to I'm going to

I'm going to I'm I'm I'm going to I'm Thank you. I'm going to be able to be. Defending the American Dream.

You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back, folks. Yeah, we're still earning out some bugs in the studios. We had to change it around. Yeah, but welcome back. We've got a lot of different comments. I want to say thank you to Mike. Thank you very much.

that is generous. It's because of your support that we're able to keep this show up and running. So apparently Stephen Crowder had posted something about an hour ago with more information about the shooter, the gun and the potential motive. Well, maybe we'll have to check that out. Yeah, you were saying during the break that they thought that it was somebody of a school age. Yeah, college. He said the suspect appears to be of college age is what's appearing online. Drudge has it linked in red at the top left. See, that's the thing. These universities have become Marxist seminaries. I've said this for the longest time. They've been pushing and pushing and pushing hate for years.

We're now seeing this coming to fruition with Andy Faw and the rest of this stuff. And of course, there's a lot of different places where you can find a lot of very violent rhetoric coming from the trans community. You had those trans radicals that were up in Canada that killed several people a few months ago. I don't know if any of you heard about that, but that was something that was going on. So there's a lot of very violent people on that side of things, and they did not like Charlie Kirk. We've got S.A. Miller. Thank you very, very much. That is incredibly generous. Lance, are you able to scroll that? Thank you.

She said, God gives and takes away. We do not let Satan steal our joy, and we do not fear. We were made for such a time as this. Stay vigilant. Keep your eyes on the Lord. He will sustain. us. That's right. And, you know, I think if Charlie Kirk, as he was, as I said, you know, he was spending a lot of his time talking about Christ and he has that kind of perspective. And for somebody who has that perspective, you know, that this is not the end. And so we just hope that that is really the case with him. Yes. North American House Hippo. Thank you very much. It says, as Michael Rivero would say, here's your rifle, here's your parachute, here's your orange jumpsuit we have left over from Abu Ghraib. Watch your head climbing into that transport place.

Yeah. Yeah. Now, Epstein Island, a lot of chatters at Info Wars are screaming for a civil war. We don't want that. Yeah, see, that's the whole thing. That's, that's one of the reasons why Alex was not touched with any of this stop-the-steel stuff that he ran because he is useful for them. He is the right side equivalent of deranged antifah. That's what he's pushing. Civil war would mean mass death. It would mean atrocities that would be hard to imagine during the American Civil War. I forget what percentage of the American population was killed,

but it was a very substantial amount. It was huge for the South, especially because they didn't have that larger population to start with. It was a massive percentage. And you'll never know because they rigged the stats that we were supposed to believe. How many died for you? Oh, yeah, that's about same for us. Nice round number. 600,000 casualties for each side.

Do you really believe that? I mean, there's no way that it's going to be something like that. And that doesn't account for civilian casualties either. But there's no way that it was exactly even. They did that because they didn't want to, they were trying to tamp everything down and lower the temperature. People were tired of having war. And that's why the Insurrection Act that the Democrats wanted to use

against the January of six people, That was pushed by some Republican radicals in Congress after the war. But you had the president issued a blanket pardon to anybody that had been in the Confederacy because he did not want to continue the war. And I said when all that stuff happened, I said Trump could issue a blanket pardon to the people of January 6th. There's a precedent for it, number one, for that very act that they were coming against people for. And I said, the problem is, is that.

both Republicans and Democrats are trying to push us into a civil war at this point in time. They're not trying to tamp it down. Yeah, I mean, that's part of the reason that all the military bases that they put in the South to keep eyes and then were named after famous Southern generals. That's right. They're like, oh, look, see, we're going to name it after your guys. Isn't it great? I'm also reminded of the start of the Civil War.

People didn't think it was a very big deal back then either. A ton of people thought this was going to be a minor destroy. attraction, the first big battle, a huge crowd of spectators showed up with picnic. That's right. Yeah, first Manassas, yeah. They were, they showed up just to watch it. They thought it's going to be like a sporting event. They were quickly horrified at what happened and turned into a very large battle. But yeah, everybody thought their side was just going to walk away with it and it was going to be a short duration, not amount to much. No, not at all. war is never quick it is never easy it always spirals out of control nibaru

twenty nine today's division is a gleaming example of success obama's presidential legacy yona annie woe now is not a time for violence but peace and prayer must take precedence reject the devils and their paths yes don't frag me bro when you can get people to believe in absurdities atrocities aren't far behind oh that's good yeah i'm sellers he was definitely the young people. Yeah. I mean, there's a lot of people that are, actually. Kirk was one of them. There's others. Mama C. 1996. When we murder babies in the womb by the millions, why are we surprised when we start to murder for differing opinions? I agree. I fully agree with that. Yeah, we just don't get video of that. They assiduously try to keep that quiet. That's why that animated film, the procedure,

was so important because that was based on what the horrified ultrasound technicians saw. I didn't know that he was going to be part of an abortion, and he witnessed the reactions of the baby recoiling in pain and fear as it was being ripped apart limb by limb, yes. Jimmy Oakham won, 200 yards of the average deer rifle isn't sub-MOA, minute of angle for those that don't know that term. Two to three inch group is great. A head shot turning into a next shot could easily be out of a professional sniper's hands.

There we go. Man militia seems everyone is so tribal now. Yeah, I take back, you know, Greg Gutfield doesn't know enough about guns and neither do I to make that kind of a statement. So it's what you were saying as well exactly about that. That looks like they didn't adjust for drop enough and wound up with a next shot rather than a headshot. It's again, I don't know enough about. about guns either. I do a little bit of shooting, but not enough to definitively say

one way or the other. And there's just not enough information to make any definitive statements at this point. So I just, I refrain from it, and I suggest most people should as well until we have more information. We may never have more information. Big Brit is back again. I would have thought security cameras would have been inside and outside the school building. Well, I guess they just need to, they're working on retrieving information from flock cameras. I probably got flock cameras everywhere. Skonkalo, Rose Gardens,

drones flying around with countermeasures for RF attack are hazardous to wildlife and us. Yes. They're definitely hazardous to our freedoms. PX, smack. The left really went south after Obama got elected.

And things definitely got more tribal after Obama's election. That was the thing that bothered me so much. If you remember, they had those students, some black students that were dressed up in paramilitary gear. and they were marching around as Obama was campaigning in 2008. And there were a lot of people who were concerned about that.

And yet now you see that they're doing provocative things to get the left very concerned about that as well. It's what Trump is involved in. Both sides are trying to escalate this and trying to escalate the fear of the other side. We've got Wes Scuncala Rose Gardens, Looks like Poland will be back-to-back starters for the world wars. That's a rather ignoble award to win. West Robertson 448, the Ukraine War is driving competition between nations and the development of technology

that will ultimately be used against each nation's people. War generally does lead to technological leaps. It's just not technology that people generally want. And as Madison said, way back when? He said weapons, instruments of war abroad will be used as instruments of tyranny at home. And that's exactly what they intend to do. They've even talked about that with Ukraine 2030. Remember I played that video several times?

Well, in the future, we're going to be able to have everything that you interact with the government on. It's going to be part of this app that is going to control your life. Navy Doc, 04. Thank you very much. That's very generous. Yes, thank you. I wish I had more words to say, but what else can I say besides thank you and that it is because of you all that we're able to keep doing this? It says, thank you for the coverage.

It's quite a sobering day to be an American. It's been a sobering year, sobering few years to see what America and the people have devolved into and just how ready and willing they are to sell out everything that this country stood for to either score a point against the opposing. side or out of fear of what's happening. And it's truly sad. Skunkhalla Rose Gardens. Nepal falls weeks after they decided to join bricks. I guess they're going down like a sack of bricks. Yeah. They have been a totalitarian Marxist regime that's focused on censorship. And we could hope that maybe some of the other regimes like that, maybe the EU even, because learn a lesson, but no, they're not, they're going to push on because they would love to have an excuse to attack the population.

Well, speaking of attacking the population and the government doing it, Tucker Carlson claims that Israeli spies knew about 9-11 attacks. I think they probably did. They may have assisted the CIA, but I think that it was our own government that did it. And I think they have teamed up on a lot of things, including the Epstein stuff. The interesting thing I think about this, though, is that Tucker Carlson has a forthcoming documentary series on 9-11 attacks. You think he's going to walk back any of the lies and spin that he's been doing for a very, very long time? I mean, go back and think about what he did with Building 7. Remember this? Claims.

Do you have any of them told they were... 2005. Sure, sure. Let's start with the collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you? Yeah, this is an engineer with 9-11 Engineers for Truth. Maybe there's some kind of code. You just don't show the collapse of Building 7.

I don't know what it is. They don't care if you think the Earth is flat. It's not a threat to anyone. But if you say, like, what actually happened with Building 7? Like, that is weird, right? It doesn't, like, what is that? Right. If you were to say something like that on television, they slip out.

they would flip out so you'd like lose your job over that why? Why? Why? So he just admitted that's why he did that right? Just before it collapsed on September the 11th, 2001. It had not been hit by an aircraft. It had been damaged by falling debris and fire. But by 5.20 p.m., most of the fires

have been extinguished. Although the building was 47 stories high, it doesn't fall sideways, nor collapse unevenly. For this, to have happened all of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost exactly the same time just a coincidence emergency management agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire but what does it look like

to you yeah there it is again silently now Tucker Carlson had this a physics professor on PhD in physics and he came on to actually show that. And he asked Tucker several times, and Tucker absolutely refused. And then over the years, Tucker would mock people and say, whenever you talk these people about 9-11, they always ask you things like, you know, what's the melting point of steel and what's the burning temperature of airline fuel

and all the rest of stuff? These people are crazy. He's like, he knew completely, Tucker is such controlled opposition. It's disgusting. And so he's going to do a documentary series on 9-11. You think there's going to be any truth in that? Is he going to have interviews from his family in the CIA? Yeah, will he go back and give this guy a chance to talk again?

We'll have to see. Well, it was kind of interesting because the closest he's come to walking any of this stuff back is to admit it, admit that he lied in order to keep his job on network television. So he was complicit in the cover-up. Now he's going to produce a documentary, sure. Yeah, as you were introducing this. the guy saying that he was a engineer for architects and engineers, that was when Tucker was saying, oh, well, we can't play that, sorry.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, he absolutely refused to do it. Multiple times, the guy asked, can we just show people a building falling and free fall? I mean, it's right there. And so Tucker Carlson says, well, I didn't allege that Jews did it. I don't even know what that means. I think, in fact, saying things like that is a way to discredit real. questions. He would know because that's his job. He discredits real questions. That's what Alex Jones does. And his father, Tucker Carlson's father, worked for the CIA and the Voice of America

stuff. So they know how to do propaganda. They know how to nudge people. They're pros at it. And he's done that now for two decades. And so now he's going to flip the switch and turn 180 degrees and he's going to tell us the truth. Is he? Really? Is he going to go back? and admit that he lied to us? Is he going to admit that what he said was a lie, whether it was deliberate or not? No, he's not going to do any of that. As I said before, I think, yeah, there was a cross-pollination between our intelligence agencies and theirs, just like there was with Epstein. We know that a group of Israeli art students, who clearly were not art students, clearly some of them aligned with the Israeli intelligence, were arrested, held for some time

in the U.S. before being released without charges. We know that a group of them, I'm quoting from an FBI document, not the Internet, filmed the attacks on 9-11, and seemed to have foreknowledge of those attacks. This is at a time when not every person had a cell phone that you could just whip out and start videotaping, right? The first sightings of Israeli art students date back to the late 2000 when they began to show up at U.S. federal law enforcement and military agents. buildings, trying to peddle artworks and to socialize with agents. The quote-unquote students

repeatedly appeared at unmarked locations and hidden side entrances, even visited some agents at their homes. According to media reports at the time, at least 140 Israeli nationals engaged in such activities were arrested between early 2001 and 9-11 attacks, while a further 60 were detained shortly after. Moreover, some of the groups of the students, reportedly rented properties in close vicinity to the residences of the 9-11 attack perpetrators. I think it was the U.S. government. They probably worked with, maybe even exploited some of the Israelis. When I look at this kind of stuff, what Tucker is doing now, don't trust them.

Because what it looks like to me is what these people are doing with the so-called pandemic of COVID. They're trying to distract attention away from the real bioweapon, which was developed by our own government. by DARPA and by the Pentagon and distract attention away from Trump who deployed it. And so they're saying, oh, this was a lab leak out of China or something like that. Look, China was complicit, just like all these countries were, and selling the pandemic to the world. You know, they circulated all this information about how people were, and film of people falling down and collapsing in the streets, which I, that was the thing that convinced me that it was fake. But China was selling the pandemic, marketing it to people, just like Trump was.

Think about that. They're all on the same side. Who is it that's pulling the strings of all of these countries at the same time on both sides of every political divide? So, again, be very careful about Tucker Carlson's so-called documentary. It is going to be filled with disinformation and misdirection. So there's a little bit more info. So on the Gateway Pundit, this is from this morning, says breaking alleged leaked ATF doc, claims weapon near Charlie Kirk's assassination site had cartridges engraved with transgender and antifa phrases and symbols. Stephen Crowder posted this to Twitter.

I don't know if there's any providence given so far, but Stephen Crowder was the first person to get the leaked manifesto of the Nashville shooter as well. So maybe people do send him things. the government does again these influencers that are out there the nudge media you have to ask yourself what is it that they're going to do with this I said

before I think that the tranny people are crazy but let's understand how they got crazy they got crazy because of our school system it's our institutions our government institutions that are gendered gaslighting these kids and mutilating them among other

things they don't want talk about fixing that, do they? No, they want to use this for their own purposes, saying we can identify a group of people and call them dangerous and then take away their guns. And even if these people are dangerous and their guns are taken away, that is the precedent that they want to establish, just like Trump and Biden both work to try to establish gun control by executive order. We've got... He was taking a question about trans mass shooters when he was shot. That's right. That's interesting timing if it is true that there was a, you know, trans stuff on the shell casings might have been a case of waiting for a question like that.

Yes. Yeah, exactly. Well, who knows? All I can say is we have to stick to principles and we have to understand that don't let these people frame the problem because they're going to sell you a solution that is not a solution. and it's going to push you to what they wanted to happen all along. And so let's stick with the Second Amendment and let's fix the schools or end them. Instead of ending the Second Amendment, let's end the government schools. That's what I say.

Well, we're going to take a break and we're going to be joined by Tony Ardibund. And we're talking about the massive changes that are happening fiscally and economically. So stay with us. We'll be right back. We're going to be able to be. And so. We're going to be able to be. And so.

And so. We're going to be able to be. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back, folks. It is a time of rapid change, and one of the things that is rapidly changing is gold. So we have Tony Ardibund, of Wise, Wolf, Gold, and Silver joining us. And again, you can get to his site by using David Knight. Dot Gold.

Let him know that you came through us. And you can gradually start to accumulate gold. You can have a real savings program of something that, will preserve its value he's set up a wolf pack we can buy in at different levels and just do this on a monthly basis it's a great program something i don't know of anybody else doing thank you for joining us tony we've had it's always a pleasure to to be here i'm glad uh i get to talk to to Travis this week as well. Yeah, we can pull a double this time.

A dual mind. I get to answer some questions. You're right. There's a lot of changes going on. You know, I think I'd frame that maybe a little differently, David. There's a lot of changes going on with the fiat currency system and the monetary system of the United States and around the world. But I think gold and silver have basically remained the same.

I mean, they have. They're the stable coin. They're the real stable coin. The real stable coin. Yeah, well, there's a lot happening with gold in this monetary reset. And it is interesting to watch. Something I've been curious, you always followed the gold silver ratios. And today it's about, I think it's about 88 ounces of silver to make one ounce of gold.

But I started running the gold to Bitcoin ratios. And that's been an interesting metric. If you actually go back to the end of 2024, it took about 40 ounces of gold to make one Bitcoin, and now it takes 31.1. So there's been a bit of big leap in gold, even though Bitcoin was $100,000 in 2004 at the end of 24. It broke $100,000 and went to about $120,000, I believe, around the Trump inaugural. But it's been trading sideways and chopping sideways a lot, most likely through the last few months. And you see gold continuing to just rise, and it's rising on mostly uncertainty.

It's rising on central bank accumulation, and it's rising on the expected rate cut. Yes. And it's kind of interesting that even El Salvador, which had moved over strongly to Bitcoin, their central bank has started accumulating gold for the first time. So I guess the people that name the country after Jesus have decided to start saving some real money, gold. But it's kind of interesting to see that happening and see even some of the stablecoin people are talking about we're going to set up a fund here that's going to be Bitcoin,

but we're going to start accumulating gold for insurance. So you've got some Bitcoin people who are accumulating gold for insurance as well. That's correct. And Tether, I believe, has actually gone in to backing some of the gold mining operations. They're putting into the basis of infrastructure for gold. It's a really interesting time. I remember the interview I did with Alan Herrera,

and I mentioned this last week. He wrote a history of gold, but I was thinking about that this morning. There was 100,000 tons or so accumulated through all of history up until about 1990. And since that time, we've put another 100,000 tons into circulation of mining. We've mined that much more gold. And the price is where it is still.

So I think this is because we've got a lot of fiscal uncertainty. There's been so much debasement of fiat currency. It's hard to tell exactly what the true price of gold is, but I don't think we're anywhere near it right now, Dave. Yeah, yeah. And, of course, they just had the producer price index, come out and it showed inflation was higher than they had thought. But that didn't really move gold all that much a little bit. But the thing that really moved it this week was when they saw this

massive record fake jobs report. I guess, you know, along with their fiat currency, they have fiat jobs, things that don't really exist. They just make up out of thin air. And that had been happening throughout the Biden administration last year or so. And now they're having a reckoning as they start to try to backfill and remove these fake jobs that they put in there to try to pump him up and make him look good. And so that was one of the things that set gold off. But it's also, I think, the unrest that we're seeing, you know, the attempts, the escalated attempts to drag everybody into World War III that we see. It's always, all of these different things have always moved to help gold because gold can be simple. It can be something that you have.

have physical custody of. It doesn't even require for the infrastructure of the internet being there. Yeah, I think we make a mistake. We look at the price of commodities. We think that they're priced into the metrics of all things financial globally, and they're just not. I mean, if you look at the supposed wealth of the world and all the transaction is what's held, it's about $500 trillion. The market cap for gold, I believe, is about $20 trillion. I think silver is about, 2 trillion, something like that. And so it's relatively nothing compared to all of the financial products and all of the seeming, you know, what is, you know, presented as wealth or value around the world. I think we're just on the edge of something really historic, David.

And, you know, I'm sure, you know, we've heard this before because they call it a great reset. But financially, everything that in the United States, we just hear about these, you know, a few stocks. You hear about Navidia. You hear about things like that, the fang stock. But most of the stocks, they're just kind of dead to people. They chop, they move sideways. They don't go anywhere. Yeah. We have a different metric of wealth here. And I think this is because of the changes that are on the horizon, the monetary changes are so massive. I think that's what's happening, is seeing the prices of gold and silver. And for a lesser extent, Bitcoin right now, I think that has a lot to do with the uncertainty around the world in adoption. I think that's why Bitcoin's kind of just

sitting there not doing anything. Yeah, everybody is looking for something that is real and authentic. As you point out, you know, we have this paper wealth that is astronomical. And gold is a teeny tiny slice of that. And I think people are looking at all these fiat currencies and all these different manipulations that are being done by governments and they're looking to fall back on something that's real. And I think that's one of the reasons why this nonsense from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the BLS was such obvious BS. That's one of the things that really kicked off gold. It's like, you know, what is real out here?

Do we have anything that's real? Well, that's going to be the big question after all these years after 1971 is what is real. At the end of the day, we've had so much fake thrown at us. And, you know, we have these booms and busts, and a lot of them are manufactured. and now the bubble's gotten so big. If you go back through monetary history, like I like to do, if you go back to some of the earlier panics, like the panic of 1907 that we had,

natural market forces were allowed to come in and everything was corrected. So it was a longer period between boom and bus cycles and it wasn't as large. But when you artificially prop them up, like we did with the great financial crisis of 2008, 2009, which was really unprecedented. We never really done anything like that

before where the government, you know, putting pressure on the central bank created, you know, trillions out of thin air to prop up banks that were too big to fail or jail. And the consequences of that are still not felt.

Zombie corporations, I've talked about this many times, they still have zombie corporations that are in effect propped up. Well, it still may be in the back of a lot of people's minds. It certainly is in the back of my mind. I mean, if they can blow up real estate by using tokenization, securitization, and fake financial instruments, then, you know, you want to physically hold something that is real, like gold and silver. And I think that it's a lot of people have got to be thinking about it in the back of their mind, like, you know, hey, look at what they were able to do with real estate.

We need to get something that's real. Well, that's right. And then real estate in and of itself, I think, is. an open question of how secure that is how much how much of a bubble is that right now because of the interest rates and that's the attempt is going to be to cut it by 25 basis points coming up to see if it can fuel the economy because we're we need that that debt creation i mean as long as there's currency creation and debt creation then it seemingly is a healthy economy but that's a foundation built on sand as we know and um the the looming financial disaster i think that

it's out there. And I'm not just being pessimistic for the sake of it. I think that that's just the data. I mean, look at the debt, the explosion. We were talking about September 11th and I'm speaking today. By the way, I got my show next, but I'm going to, I got invited to speak at the Rotary club here in Dennis and Texas for about 30 minutes. I told my, can I talk about 9-11? And we're going to have, I think some people are going to, I'm not going to go full tilt on two of them, But we're going to talk about things like buildings, and we're going to talk about some of the mysteries of 9-11 and maybe even talk about some of the shorts that were put on to, you know, the short sales and the puts that were put on to airline stocks by affiliates of Deutsche Bank who had ties to intelligence. We'll talk a little bit about that today. But, yeah, it's, you know, since 2001, David, we've, I think that I looked up the debt of the U.S. in 2001 on September 11th.

It was around $5.5.5 trillion. And as we stand today, we're at $37 plus trillion. These are metrics that, you know, these are unsustainable things and, you know, the debt to GDP ratio. And now, clearly the answer here, I think, is to invade Venezuela. We have to do that because if we can invade Venezuela. Everything will be fine. It's a national security issue, ladies and gentlemen. No, it's really ridiculous.

Well, they're having to boil that they could set up their own petrodoller without Saudi Arabia if they went into Venezuela. They got more oil than Saudi Arabia. That's the issue with Venezuela is not, it's so ridiculous. It's not the cartels. It's not any of that. It's a grotesque version of the Monroe doctrine in some way. Yeah. Unfortunately.

But yeah, we're not working on any of the things that would actually make this economy healthy, David. I mean, we've seen some of these people, and I know you've played some of this, but some of these folks, these operators that are trying to figure out what to do about tariffs and how to get their products in and having to shut down and they're firing people and all the rest that's happening because of the tariffs and uncertainty. This is not a game that's going to turn out well for the people of the United States, unfortunately.

And the sad part about it is I agree with the concept of tariffs. up until now, probably. Yeah, it's the sort of thing where actually there was a good article on Mises and I'll cover it later where they said Trump is portraying tariffs as something that's going to make us wealthy. But they said, however, if you look at this historically, the countries that have high tariffs are the poorest in the world and the ones that had low tariffs or the richest in the world. And so it is not looking like it's going to build prosperity. And of course, then it also begs the question,

which they don't really address, and that is we've always been told by Democrats that we can tax and spend our way to prosperity. And that's basically what Trump, a Democrat, is telling us now that we can tax and spend our way to prosperity. And yet, that is not the case. It is exactly the opposite. But before we get away from the metals, silver you were talking about still has a ratio of about 80 or so to gold. And one of the interesting things, I think, thought was the fact that as everybody got concerned about Trump putting on tariffs with gold, especially because of his war with Switzerland that he wanted to get into, this is the capricious and arbitrary nature of what Trump is doing.

If he doesn't like a country, he threatens them with tariffs. And this is one of the reasons why he should not have that power. Hopefully the courts are going to take it away. He's already lost twice with that. But people are saying, well, if he's going to put a tariff on gold, they started getting concerned about that. He came out and explicitly said there will be no tariff on gold and a couple of other precious metals,

but he left out silver. Do you read anything into that? He didn't say they wouldn't tariff silver. That's interesting. And it may have to do somewhat with, maybe indirectly with what we saw Russia do, adding silver as a strategic reserve asset and accumulating silver.

other governments, I believe, under the radar are also doing that, maybe even in the bricks periphery. And I think that's what's driving price. I think a lot of the contracts and some of the other papered over silver markets are really getting strained right now. And I just did the calculation while you were talking. I just wanted to make sure that it's 88. It's 88 ounces of silver to make one ounce of gold. And it was interesting about as we've seen gold continues It's marched towards another all-time high, and we just hit another all-time high a few days ago. You wondered if silver was going to keep up with gold. I mean, if you go back to the first quarter of the pandemic after we had this massive stock market rally

and then had the lowest, you know, we had the lowest day on Wall Street biggest crash since 29. I remember the gold-silver ratio at one time, David, was 125 to 1. wow wow so that's because silver really crashed i mean it went down to i mean on the spot levels it was under $15 i think it was like around $13 an ounce at one time now you couldn't buy it anywhere for that no one's going to sell it at 13 but it was it had crashed that hard and we've slowly seen it build back but i think this is starting to break away and go back so Historically, it's been, you know, even as low as 10 to 1, but that's generally 20 to 1 to 40 to 1 somewhere in there. And we lost that balance post-1933.

I think those things are going to start resetting, especially as governments, like the government of Russia gets in on the silver game. Interesting enough, the Swiss were the last people to the last country to officially go into a fiat currency post-1971, that they went into a total fiat. in 2002, and at that time, they had a silver standard for their currency. That might also be an underlying issue with the Swiss and silver. Silver is still a monetary medal. It's just gold gets all the big headlines. It's easier to move. You know, I think at the end of the day, it's always known as money.

But silver does it just right there underneath it as a monetary metal, not just an industrial metal. And it probably will reclaim that. As a matter of fact, the word rupee for the Indian currency is from the word rupee, which means silver. Interesting. So as you're pointing out the ratio between gold and silver, gold is up like, what, 34, 37 percent or something this year? So has silver gone up that much? Yes, same. Yeah.

It's followed it. That's because that's what I was saying. The interesting thing is the gold, silver ratio. as we've been discussing, at one time, silver was $35 an ounce, and gold was $3,500. So it's 100 to 1, and that's been in the last 90 to 120 days, but we're starting to slowly see everything's starting to repurpose and reset itself back to that, you know, 80-something to one ratio, even as gold climbs. Interesting.

Well, it's, you know, when we look at this going forward, the war that Trump's got going with the Federal Reserve is another issue there. It looks like he's going to get his way, even though the court has blocked him being able to fire Lisa Cook as governor. I think what she did was wrong. It was criminal. But the other aspects of this that I thought were kind of alarming was how Pulte went through and did a Stalinesque investigation of her with artificial intelligence.

It's very much like, bring me the man and I'll find the crime. And so, you know, he's bragging about the fact that he's got artificial intelligence. They can go back and sort through somebody's economic history and find anything, any technicality that they can hit them on. And she did violate the law. She did lie on her on her mortgage applications. But the way that they caught her is very concerning because they will use it against other people, I think. But it's also the fact that it is a, whether or not he is able to get her out, he is deliberately trying to intimidate people to following his desired economic direction, lowering interest rates, which is going to help gold is going to hurt us with inflation, but it's going to help the price of gold significantly. Do you think they're going to do a, most of the people are saying 25 basis points, about a quarter of a point,

that they're going to lower rates. Some people are saying half a point. But the bottom line is, is that Trump is going to get his way. Gerald Sinty said Trump is great for gold, who was last time, because he pushes inflation and easy money policies. It looks like he's going to get his way with that as well. What do you think? I think he's going to get his way.

I would lean towards 25 basis points, at least. I don't think there's going to be a 50 basis points cut right off the bat. but I do think it'll be followed by several other cuts. I mean, and I think they'll go all the way into the midterms into next year. That'll be the trend. And you'll start to see some of the same language float around again. You know, the Wall Street will be back.

It'll look like everything's great for a while. And then you get into, every time we do this, every time we create these bubbles, we're just setting ourselves up for the bigger downturn. And as you've noticed throughout the years, there's not much room to run anymore. I mean, we've been able to bail ourselves out by currency creation and lower interest rates. But if you keep lowering, if you get them back down to the COVID-1984 levels, where do you go from there? And I think that's probably where we're headed is just massive currency printing, money printing, expansion of the dollar, the M2 supply.

I think we'll do that. inflation will continue to be a major issue, eating away at the savings of the American people and hurting the world. I think this is without sound money policies, we're just going to be continuing to debase and devalue our own financial system. And that's why things like gold are important, silver is important, and anything that cannot be reprinted, which is only a few things.

That's commodities, basically, at the end of the day. It's things that are rare and things that take work to get out of the earth. or to manufacturers. So I think we're the same policy, same things over and over again, cheap money is on the horizon, which means expensive gold. That's right. Yeah. What we're looking at, the fundamentals as you and I point out with this, this isn't about

trends that we're looking at in terms of, you know, past history of different things. As much as it is, we see the instability, geopolitically, financially, all these other things. And then this time there's something brand new on the horizon. And that is the desire of these people to have a CBDC, which now they are using the Trojan horse of the Genius Act to try to set up these stable coins, which will still give them complete ability to track and to prevent transactions from happening financially. And you've got a senator, Keith Kelly, of Alabama, is warning people that the Genius Act is going to harm small banks. I say it would be more than a harm. it's going to destroy them. Eric Trump has said, and he made this pronouncement at, I think maybe they were in Dubai or

something, and he was talking about how banks were going to go away within 10 years. And it was all going to be stable coins because that's what the Trump family is angling for with Lutnik and Tether and things like that. And what happens when we lose the small banks, Tony, seems to me like we lose cash. We will lose cash. Yeah. On a long enough timeline, I think you do lose cash. That is a big danger.

We're not there yet. I don't think, you know, we've, I think the success of pushing, pushing back against a central bank digital currency in the short term has been successful because they no longer have the same plans that they had, you know, five years ago for a central bank digital currency. But you're right, it's morphed. And what did Zig Dube Brzezynski say? They regroup. an in run around sovereignty. They're doing an in run around the pushback on

CBDC. They regrouped and I think that's the stable coin issue. Yeah, they regrouped and they rebranded it, called it the Genius Act. And also David, I think there's a, there's something to the stable coins and what happens to the dollar, like

the next iteration of the dollar. I think that's important with the stable coins because we all, all of us that watched things like the Petro Dollar died in the last year. That's been, that was a bizarre turn of events that, you know, we didn't even try to save. We didn't try to save the Petro Dollar, that 50-year agreement that we had with the Saudis. It just laughed in the summer of 2024.

And with that, without anything, and I thought, well, that's very strange. Yeah. Well, if you look at what they're trying to do with these off-ramps, on-ramps for stable coins, it makes it really easy to trade internationally with the dollar stable coins. It's another, it's like a rebirth of the dollar, a reimagining of the dollar itself. At least that's what I'm seeing kind of on the horizon for the future of the dollar in the monetary system. Yeah, I think they basically, you know, Lutnik can be the big customer of the Federal Reserve bonds and notes. And then they can, through the stable coin thing, they can go.

retail instead of trying to sell it to central banks who don't want to play that game anymore, they can offer the stable coin to individuals in other countries. And I think that's the direction that they're going to go. They're going to try to prop up the dollar with the stable coin. Yeah, I agree. I think that's the danger there is the dollar becomes stable coins or its purpose that way is that we become a digitized system on the blockchain. And that's where you get into the dangers of the surveillance state and, you know, the surveillance disguised as money, as Catherine Austin Fitz would say. I think a lot of people are sensing the threats that are out there to the dollar now. I mean, when you look at it, it seems like gold rose about

50% across all of Trump's previous four years. And right now, in the eight months since he's taken office, it's risen almost 40% already. So people are looking at this and saying, something's wrong with the dollar and anytime the dollar is unstable anytime it's weak gold goes through the roof and with the fact that we've already almost hit what he accomplished in his previous four years shows that there is a lot

of stuff happening. Yeah, he loves gold even wants everything made out of gold. Maybe that's why he's just buying it all up one day he's going to unveil the White House and it's just going to be gold-plated. We'll find he's the biggest customer not the central banks have brought in China or whatever The White House was nice, but now it's gold. It's better gold.

Actually, he's getting into crypto. That's where his family is becoming getting all their money into crypto. But, you know, this headline from the UK on Expoise, UK government's digital wallet plus a digital ID is the digital prison. And I think that's the bottom line. To me, you know, we've had situations in the past and people, you know, if you look at gold as an investment, you know, you can look at past history. and trends and things like that and try to buy it as a commodity, where people look at it as a

hedge against the collapse of the dollar. But I see it as a hedge against the collapse of civilization and privacy and all the rest of this stuff, because I know how they're going to use this Genius Act stable coin. They're going to use it exactly like a CBDC. It's got all the worst features of a CBDC, but they've rebranded it to make you think that it's fine. And they've rebranded it so that they make the money, not the federal resolution. You know, it's going to be the Trump family and Lucknick who's going to make the money over this kind of stuff.

It's not going to be Powell and company, I guess. Well, you're right. And is it possible that the Federal Reserve itself, or at least that the creature from Jekyll Island is on the chopping block in this fourth turning? Is it one of the institutions that gets repurposed? And is there some creative destruction that's going on right now? And, of course, it's a game that, you know, it's a big club and you ain't in it. It's not like we benefit at any level. but is there some warring faction of the banking houses or establishment or dynastic families

that decided to do something different and change the system itself, is it no longer suits them? I mean, somebody's going to have to pay the bill. Think about the damage that's been done by the Federal Reserve Bank. Think about what the central bank has done to the United States, to our monetary system, that we used to have a system as good as gold, and we used to be the world's greatest creditor. there's a the majority of the blame lies at the feet of the one institution that was supposed to regulate and control and and uh keep boom and bus cycles from happening they all that stuff happened on their watch as a matter of fact it's lost 99% of its purchasing power yeah uh since they assumed the helm of the in charge of the monetary policy so i i think that maybe that's just a way of of getting rid of it always need a crisis to precipitate the changes that they want. That's right.

And then what do we replace it with? To replace the Federal Reserve as bad as it is with one individual who's just going to dictate everything, you know, that's the key thing. We're going to have, you know, we've got a fiat currency, so I guess we should have a fiat dictator who's going to have a singular individual who's going to decide how everything, the monetary policy, how much is going to be there in interest rate. and all the rest of these things that Federal Reserve has been manipulating, would have central planning done by somebody who doesn't seem to plan anything economically.

It just reacts, as we've seen with the tariff stuff. I definitely think this is a blip, you know, obviously the Trump administration, this is already, you know, he can't run again. I don't think there will be a continuity of these same types of policies. So this is probably an anomaly somewhere, but it does fit into. to the larger plan, as you mentioned, you know, with Besson, the Treasury Secretary that ties to stable coins in the past. I think this is going to be something that stable coins, crypto, a lot of what's going to be put

on the table in the next three years, and it will be implemented and put into the infrastructure. And it's sad because we don't need, you know, at the end of the day, if people had a free market for money, you know, we mentioned the small bank. banks will be hurt by the stable coins. That's the exact entities we would need to step up and help us with the free market and have some real competition, you know, and I think create a better way. Decentralized currency is the answer to a centralized system that it's imploding. And that's unfortunate that people can't see it.

Everything is going to become more centralized. Instead of the Federal Reserve, you have one individual or a couple of people in his administration who can be making all the monetary policy. And then instead of a lot of smaller local banks and some of the competition that comes with that, you're going to have the too big to fail guys and too big to jail guys. They'll be the only ones that you'll be able to get loans from.

What's that going to be like? And then, of course, there's not going to be, there's not going to be the ability to, if you're a small business, assuming that there's any small businesses left, you're not going to be able to take the cash that you had at your business and take it down to the local bank.

to have it deposited you know that's that's going to be a thing of the past as well so it's all of it is about complete centralization and complete control and it's going to be the usual suspects the giant banks and the government they're going to exercise complete control over everything that's why i say we need to have something that we can have as a basis for setting up a parallel economic system that's going to be out of their system and that's where gold and silver i think come and that's a very important thing. I agree. And I think we're just at the beginning of the implementation of a lot of those policies

for people to get their hands on precious metals and start transacting in them. I think that they were just at the beginning. A lot of states have made it legal tender. Texas recently just did that. And they have some three-year plan or something to implement where they're going to, you'll be able to store gold and silver in the Texas depository. and then, you know, have a card against it and all that. That's fine.

But it's also the move there, I think, by the state itself to make gold and silver legal tender, as well as other states that are working on it. That's the future. The states and local governments are doing, I think, a good job at preparing for, you know, a future where the dollars a lot less stable. I got a question for you, Tony. from Wes Robertson 448 ask will silver hit

$150 to $200 an ounce in the next two to three years? I think two to three years is probably let's hope not because if it's hitting that if it's doing those kind of numbers we've got some real problems. I think that I think that we're really poised

in this last quarter of 2025 here to see silver break it's finally break. It's 45-year all-time high. I think that is a very good mathematical chance that we'll see silver do something like go to $60 an ounce. That's real possible. And then, you know, going into 2026 and beyond, you know, it's tough to say. I think $100 an ounce silver is definitely doable in this decade. And that just kind of depends on what happens geopolitically. if we're in if you know there's a lot of ifs there yeah there's a lot of ifs yeah as you said we'd be in really bad straits if it gets that high um so matter of fact there was something on kitko and it

was a quote from a company that is focused on silver silver stock investors and he said he thought that it could go to a hundred dollars an ounce this cycle so that's a real bullish projection and even he's going to a hundred dollars and not 200 or 300 I try to be as conservative as possible because a lot of people can misconstrue what I say is investment advice. But also I've found these silver bugs that are always going around the internet that have all these views that tell people that silver is going to be a thousand dollars an ounce and stuff. I don't know what they're basing that off of. And I think that people get excited and they run off and they buy whatever products, you know, that they think they're going to see this massive returns. But I do think that we're still in an era of cheap silver.

And I bring that up because of the gold silver ratio. And I think that the ratio is still skewed, even though silver is at almost $42 an ounce spot. So I still think we've got a long way to go where you can still accumulate. I mean, obviously, silver is going to do well all throughout the decade. So you're just kind of getting this. You're not late to the party at $42 an ounce silver, not even close. Yeah, what we're talking about if it goes to $200 an ounce, again, that things are really bad. That's real bad.

Because, you know, again, you know, where at least I look at this stuff when I look at gold and silver, I'm interested in it just as a store of value, not as playing a commodity market. You know, there's a lot of other commodities that you can play as well, I guess. You could go ahead, invest in tomatoes with Trump's erratic trail of policies. You know, you could probably get involved in tomato futures and either get burned or become really rich. But I look at it as a preservation tactic and not just a preservation of purchasing power, but as a preservation of privacy and of freedom. Because this other thing that's out there, besides the interplay between these fiat currencies and the traditional money of gold and silver, this is whole other thing out there of the stable coins or the CBDCs or whatever they want to label them. They're the same thing.

And that's what really has me concerned. Do you have any more questions here that you see, Lance for Tony? I don't see any there. Let me ask you what's going on with Wise Wolf. Well, we got the new old bank location. I took a branch bank, an old bank of America and repurposed it here in Denison, Texas. I'm getting my signs up in the next week or so. We got a banner up right now. We've been busy. I love it. It's a, it's a, it's a, still got the drive-thru, still says ATM on there. It's fun. That's cool. I got, I'm putting a new studio in there for podcasts, and we, we rebranded it, David. We did a, just for this location, we did Wise Wolf, Gold, Silver, Bitcoin. I changed the logo up a bit, so I'm the only drive-thru gold-silver Bitcoin place in the

world. I'm going to say in the world. I don't know that there's anybody competing with me in in that realm yet. But we're, we're really excited. excited about that. I've put in some work there. And I don't think I'll be doing any more physical locations. I have my two. You might have an opportunity if all these local banks start going out of business with stable coin. Yeah, I'll be the bank of choice. Yeah. We've definitely put in a lot of infrastructure into the two physical locations in the last year. I wanted to make sure that, you know, marketing was sound. People could physically bring us product. So if you just, I mean, this is what we do every week. But the intel that I

I'm seeing is that a lot of people are selling a lot of people are selling product and we're happy to be there for them but that ratio of buyers to sellers you know it's just so skewed right now and you wonder you see these prices that are rising somebody's buying and it's just not the everyday people are doing stuff like wolf pack they're you know they're budgeting out which is great and we we need every single Wolfpack membership to offset that because we're buying I bought like I bought like 600 ounces of silver yesterday and I got nowhere to put it. If you're interested in getting some great deals on silver, you should give me a call. But I got like two ounce, three ounce, five ounce rounds and bars from the Australian men.

I'm just buying, buying crazy amounts. It's like over $22,000. I think we bought between the two locations, probably like, you know, 1,000 ounces yesterday. We're buying ounces, a hand over fist and then have one one seller or was that just a lot of people that were selling silver it's it's that was one the six hundred ounces was one shot um but we just we are getting a lot of people selling of course gold urban gold mining is up that's a good that's a good thing i'd love to buy as much scrap gold as i can buy uh you know watches and chains and rings i love that i mean that helps that's uh that keeps the lights on

and teeth uh and that's really gone it's really been busy because of the price of gold. But yeah, now's a good time to get into this. I know it's people are skittish, but I would say it's a really good time, I think, to especially get into silver. And we've got a lot of great deals on that right now. Well, if it's being driven by instability, I don't see any stability on the horizon. That's the key thing. Well, it's always great talking to you, Tony. And your program is going to be immediately following this one on X and tell us where else they can find it. Yeah, on Rumble on the America Unplugged channel and on X at Tony Arterburn, you'll find me live there. I have a YouTube channel.

You might want to check it out before it goes away, but it's at Tony Arterburn. You can find me on YouTube there. And then I'll be going to speak to the Rotary Club. So if you're in Denison, go by because I'm going to be kind, but we're going to talk about some of the mysteries of 9-11. And people that leave there will not look at 9-11 again in the same. Well, they shouldn't. You know, I would just encourage them to get on YouTube and search for building demolitions. And they might get an idea of what a real building demolition looks like.

Yeah, it's a, you know, you can see failed. They could also take a look at all the different skyscraper fires, many of them that went for several days with steel skyscrapers. And they never fell. They might be twisted metal, but they never fell. Well, thank you for getting the. truth out there, Tony. And thank you for what you do. It's been great to have a good source for gold and silver. And I know that people love the ability to be able to gradually accumulate and save gold and silver on a regular basis. And that's what Wise Wolf has really been. So thank you

so much for what you do. Again, people can find Tony. They go to David Knight.orgold. They'll take you to wise wolf as well. Thank you, Tony. We'll talk to you later. Sir. See you soon. We're going to be able to be. We're going to be able to be. We're going to be able to be. Making sense. you're listening to the David Knight Show. Elvis.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles, and the sweet sounds of Motown. Find them on the oldies channel at APSRadio.com. All right, welcome back. And before we get into your comments and questions, I just want to say this real quickly because we were talking about this, but Tony.

I said it was Mises its reason, saying Trump says tariffs make us richer. So why the country is with high tariffs poor? Well, that's a really simple answer, isn't it? Because tariffs are taxes. They don't make us wealthier. That's the most amazing thing to me is that you've got these conservatives cheering Trump on new taxes because it's Trump. And it doesn't help us to be dumping money into the federal treasury.

Even if the money weren't coming from us, I wouldn't want the government being richer and more powerful, but their tax, and they restrict trade, they restrict efficiency, and it's a means of control and central planning. Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose high tariffs without congressional authorization, he complained that if the import taxes go away, the U.S. will become a third world nation. Reason says third world status might be America's future, but it's more likely to result from tariffs rather than from their absence. And so as he's got these courtroom fights that are going on, and so far he's zero and two on these things, his response was when this happened, he said more than $15 trillion will be invested in the USA, a record all uppercase. Much of this investment is because of tariffs. If the radical left court is allowed to terminate these tariffs, almost all of this investment and much more will be immediately canceled. In many ways, we would become a third world nation with no hope of greatness.

All uppercase again. Well, please define for us what greatness is because high tariff countries are poor, as Reason says. If tariffs are linked to prosperity, it is an inverse relationship. In other words, as one goes up, the other goes down. As tariffs go up, prosperity goes down. That has been the record everywhere, except, of course, you know, Trump can suspend reality, at least in the mind of MAGA.

According to a recent report on America's declining economic freedom from Canada's Frazier Institute, you guys remember the Frazier Institute. Indeed. It's really proud of the boys. We brag on them a couple of them. Well, we've had, when they were in high school, both Travis and Lance competed in a contest at the Fraser Institute, which is kind of a libertarian, free market, economic think tank that's up in Canada. They had a competition for high school students that was Canada and the U.S.

And they came in, both of them won first prizes in different years. one year they got first and second prize, so there were cash prizes, too, so I was really happy for them. Anyway, Fraser Institute's Matthew Mitchell said, quote, high tariff countries are generally low-income countries, while low-tariff countries are generally high-income countries. And the high-tariff countries, average GDP per capita is just $9,700 per year, while in low-tariff countries, it is $43,500 per year. other words, it's kind of a, I think, a general attitude of the government towards the free market is reflected in this. High tariff countries are going to be countries that have a lot of central

planning, a lot of government control, a lot of high taxes. In 2023, the U.S. had an average tariff rate of 3.3 percent, which put us in the company of such countries as Singapore and Hong Kong, that neither of them had any tariff. They were zero tariff. Israel was at one 1.3%, New Zealand, 1.9%, Australia, 2.4%, and Iceland, 3.3%. And we were at 3.3%. This year's tariff shift has been marked by wild fluctuations. But the average tariff rate on April 15th was 28%. And now it is around 19%. And of course, that in and of itself is a big problem, this fluctuation. But that puts the U.S. among the likes of Zimbabwe, 18%. Chad, 18%. The Republican Republic of Congo, 18%, Algeria, 18.9% and Egypt at 19%.

What glorious company we're keeping. Yeah, that's right. And so at 28%, average U.S. terrorists are higher than those in Djibouti, which is 21%. Why, they got a sheikh in Djibouti? That'd be a chic Djibouti. Anyway, Sudan, 21.6%. And exceeded only by the Bahamas, which has... 32 and a half percent.

And I guess, you know, if high tariffs create manufacturing jobs, I guess Bahamas is a real manufacturing powerhouse. The U.S. Manufacturing hubs like Zimbabwe and the Bahamas. Yeah. What they're manufacturing in Zimbabwe is Marxist government. Yeah, well, the Bahamas produces all those shirts, you know, so. The U.S. used to have sort of tariff rates that correlate with prosperity.

But the Trump administration is now emulating the trade policies of what he has termed in the past as shithole countries. Well, certainly the advice that he's getting from Navarro is pure excrement. So I guess that fits. Anyway, as of 2022, the U.S. stood at 53rd out of 165 countries for the freedom to trade in Fraser's Economic Freedom of the World Index, having fallen from eighth place in 1995. It was because of non-tariff barriers of the sort that Trump complains are imposed on Americans by the government, but which the U.S. has adopted to its own detriment in recent decades. U.S. trade freedom peaked in 1980 at 9.3 on the 10-point scale. It began to slide for the next two decades and then declined more precipitously in the last decade and a half.

Much of this decline was driven by controls on the movement of K. capital and people. In particular, the U.S. imposed steeper capital controls in 2009 and more stringent limits on the freedom of foreigners to visit in 2014. Despite relatively low tariffs before 2025, the U.S. wasn't as wide open as many people, Trump included, believe. With the exception of China, every country that Trump has singled out for treating America unfairly is more open to trade than the U.S. itself. Free trade doesn't just correlate with current prosperity, as seen from a list of which countries have high tariff rates

and which ones have low ones, it helps countries to become wealthier. Few propositions command as much consensus among professional economists as that open world trade increases economic growth and raises living standards. I'll give you an example of this. Now, that was from a Harvard economist, but many people understand that. that, anything that stands in the way of trade, whether it is high tariffs, controls on the movement of people in capital, or other barriers to investment in exchange, all of that deprives people of the freedom they need to start businesses, create jobs, and improve

their lives. High U.S. terrorists have a further perverse effect, rather, in that they tax Americans, effectively filling the government coffers by punishing our own people for seeking the goods that they want beyond the border. Eroading trade freedom reduces total economic freedom, of course. And the U.S. risked third world status, as the President warns, that dangers lie in adopting the illiberal trade policies of countries that remain poor, largely through their rulers' bad decisions. And just remember when we look at all this that Trump bankrupted half a dozen casinos.

He's not a genius businessman. man. He was born on third base. He was born as a millionaire. And then he bankrupted a half dozen casinos. Just let that sink in. He didn't care at all about profit. That was one of the things at Wilbur Ross when he was working for the Ross Childs. He saw that Donald Trump had this big entourage of people that were following him around and then he's getting a lot of media attention. And he got on the phone to the Ross Childs and he said, we can use this guy. And they did. But one of the things that they found was that he didn't really care about having essentially financial control of these bankrupt casinos. He just wanted to make

sure that he kept his name on them. It's all about him. It's all about narcissism. He didn't care about the bankruptcy. He didn't even care about making money of them. It was just the narcissism. The White House says that Trump's tariffs have raised $8 trillion in revenue. That's not even close, says reason. So he's going to make government richer again. That's what what he's really going to do, if that were true. But they're inflating those numbers. They're not true at all. The White House's claim is based on a misinterpretation of data

that the actual revenue generated by tariffs is slightly lower than the White House's claim. And as a matter of fact, most of these tariffs have not yet kicked in. And so this $8 trillion is coming from who? It's coming from Mr. and Mrs. America and the products that they buy being more expensive. it. So the, I'll just leave with this last thing. You know, we're talking about how free trade can help prosperity. Here's an example coming from the New York Times. Guitar nerds and surf bros didn't want to

get political. But then came the tariffs. And what is happening with this? They said, one guy had a, went on a program and talked, made a video. He said he'd probably, He promised himself that he would never get political on his channel. He just wanted to talk about making guitars. But he said the Trump tariffs will kill the guitar industry. Every American-made instrument, he pointed out, they all rely heavily on foreign materials, on woods that come from other places,

whose cost stood to skyrocket. Big manufacturers could be forced into unsustainable price hikes. well-loved boutique businesses that operate on small margins could be wiped out, especially because of the capricious and ever-changing rates that are there. He wasn't alone, in his opinion. Bob Chapman, the British founder of Chapman guitars and longtime YouTube mainstay, agreed that the tariffs would make many guitar businesses untenable, and so did many others in the guitar niche,

often with shul-like disclaimers attached. They weren't trying to get. political, they said. But their whole job was to discuss the sprawling global industry that produces music equipment. And terrorists were unavoidably relevant. This is like one of the businesses I talked about the other day where they had to get some components from abroad that they couldn't get here. He was making vintage computers of the 70s and 80s, and those parts were not available in the United States. So he was going to be put out of business by Trump's tariffs. Here, it's just basic guitars and also surfboards where they can't get the

materials here domestically, they have to get them from abroad, and Trump is going to make that impossible. That is the boneheaded and flexibility that is being done by Trump and the sack of bricks, Peter Navarro. But let's look at some of the comments that we had been here for a while. Yeah, we've got plenty. I had a comment about what you're just saying. It's funny how these big government of hortarians always think that there's some thing that the government can do, that will just create wealth, essentially. It's, you know, the modern monetary theorist, you can just print it, and now you'll be wealthy. And Trump says, oh, we'll just add these tariffs, and then all this money from all these

other countries are going to be here, and then we'll be wealthy. It's, if only these other governments had thought to do this one simple trick, then all poverty would be gone. And I think it has to do, not so much with ignorance as it has to do with the fact that he knows that he would make himself very rich by getting into crypto, and he has nothing but disdain. He's exactly like Hillary Clinton, who during her attempted takeover of health care at the very beginning of Bill's presidential term, she said, I can't be bothered with undercapitalized businesses. I don't really care what this is going to do to small businesses. We have seen

this over and over and over again with Donald Trump. And yet, who are the people that support him? Main Street, America. The people who are going to lose their businesses, lose their jobs. The delusion that comes with Trump is just unbelievable. It is a strong delusion, isn't it? Yes. I want to say, thank you to Cole 360, subscribed on kick. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Solo Cat, 1980, the FBI investigating. In other news, the Foxes still haven't found who broke into the henhouse. I'm sure they'll find it right around the same time OJ finds the real killers. M. Sellers, if I was a professional sniper, I would. would totally forget my gun. Well, part of that is he may have just, the shooter may have just ditched it to not be carrying it. You know, if you're trying to just make a getaway, not carrying around the weapon, keeps you from being spotted very easily. You know, rifles are, they're hard

to conceal. Yeah. Also, you know, if you've wiped it down, you're no longer going to have to worry about concealing the murder weapon. Yeah. It was apparently a Mouser 30-a-6, by the way. M. Sellers, yes, how appropriate for today, shooters passport found. It survived a tumble and a large fire. It just floated right down over the dais or the stage. Yeah, it fell off the roof and landed directly where everyone could see it. Guard Goldsmith, you know, hearing Trump praise Mr. Kirk for being involved in free speech and debate really rang hollow, considering Trump's attacks on students on campuses who call for peace in Gaza.

Yeah. Trump is no fan of free speech. Absolutely not. I watched his video. he referred to it several times as a quote hateist attack I've never heard that term before because it's total nonsense I mean obviously if you're shooting someone you aren't a big fan of them it is a hateist attack that's why you know I think his best defense for that Jeffrey Epstein birthday note is the fact that the word enigma was used as I said it was even spelled correctly

so that that could be his ace in the hole for saying that he had absolutely not nothing to do with it. I can't even spell it, Nickman. Never use the word. That's good to see a guard. Again, Guard Goldsmith, Liberty Conspiracy, every evening on Twitter and Rumble. And Rumble, yes. Three Little Birds. It's confirmed 30-O-6 rifle used, has inscriptions of trans anger towards Kirk on the casings. Yeah, Wall Street Journal is supporting that now as well. Audi M-R-R says, Tucker, Building 7 isn't weird, quote-unquote, it's criminal. Tucker Carlson's job is to not question, is to not question, but ask why questions can't be asked. Yeah. Why can't we talk about that? Yeah, because I'll lose my job, so I can't say anything

about that. I'll lie for 9-11 and I'll lie for the vaccine companies and all the rest of stuff. Yeah, whatever you need. Multi-purpose. It was so weird. Weird how they were all covering up, including me. Nathan Bedford Forest, 1865. The Israeli art students were all over the Twin Towers for months. Then there were the urban moving system slash Israeli with explosive residue in their van, Mossad was integral in that operation. Yeah, I mean, I'd be surprised if there are many operations

that go down of this sort that Mossad is not integral in. Our government and Israeli's government are tied at the hip, and I think the influence flows from Israel towards us and not the other way around, personally. They seem to be the ones calling the shots. And, you know, talking about the stuff

weird events preceding 9-11. Let's not forget that Marvin Bush was the head of the company that was doing security for the trade tower until shortly before the attacks. Yeah, shut down over the weekend. The one Bush that hasn't run for president. I still live in fear that they may eventually trot him out. And like, well, you know, Jeb didn't work. But George, he got in. Maybe you could try Marvin. Is Marvin like Marvin the Martian? Does he not have a nose in the mouth or something? Marvin found his kaboom.

narrow way narrow gate ministries civil war will be horrific these people who are calling for it to have no understanding of what they're asking for wanting or realizing the total aspect of destruction and pain they will cause yet we've been largely insulated from any conflict on the united states mainland just due to our geographical location we were separated from the two world wars by two oceans and the technology of the time didn't really allow people to reach out and touch us the way they could now. We are no longer protected by distance. And so if there is a world war, we're on the table. And if there's a civil war, it will even more brutal. Civil wars always are because the hate that it engenders is even worse. We have the real octo spook. Yes, 9-11 was an insane denial of

physics, math, science, physical properties of the material, etc. If morons are so easily fooled, when are we ever safe from lies and crimes right before our eyes? Well, that's why I say, you know, when you look at COVID, you could pretty much say the same thing about the pandemic narrative, you know, it basically was a denial of all science and reality as well, even their own science, so-called virology. One thing I really hate is when I go to see some kind of a sci-fi or superhero movie, and they just make up a universe that has its own rules of how it operates. And they need to, if you're going to have a good movie, they need to stay within those rules that they've imagined.

And it's a bad movie if they don't. That's why the COVID pandemic was such a bad movie. But everybody went with it. And of course, the two of those things were intricately tied together from the beginning. The first rehearsal of this plan that they operated and went with completely was dark winter, where they practiced locking everybody down and coming up with a vaccine that was going to be the key to getting. out and all the rest of stuff. That happened two months before 9-11, then one week after 9-11. We had the false flag attack of the anthrax attack, and I've talked to the people of 9-11 truth. They

understand how that was connected there as well. And they have reopened that investigation where even mainstream media, like New York Times, pointed out that it was a false flag. And we saw that they had fingered a suspect who worked at one of these labs, but it wasn't the lab that had that kind of anthrax or that kind of delivery capability, but they pointed to that guy and they implied that he was the one who did it, but they never charged him for a couple of decades. Then when he died, they announced that he was the one that did it when he couldn't defend himself. But two months after all of that happened, they put out all of the planned legislation that they wanted enacted at a state level so that they would have plausible

deniability so that all you would need is to have a present who's going to release the money and the states have already practiced and set up the legal framework for what was done to us in 2020. So it was a long-term plan and these things were in lockstep from the very beginning and it was the other shoe to drop and it was just as absurd if not even, well, I won't say more so, but equally absurd to all the stuff that happened with 9-11. Yeah. Nathan Bedford Forrest 1865. The whole thing was a Massad plan. Netanyahu mentioned a plane flying into the World Trade Center back in 1992.

That's a bit ominous. Those are some nice towers you got there. Be shame if a plane would have hit him. That'd be a real shame. Yona, Annie Woody, Audi. Well, of course, when we talk about that, there had been a plane that hit the...

They were specifically built to withstand that. So what are the changes that they made in the building code, right? And let's also not forget that while he's talking about that in the 90s, There were also the plans of Operation Northwoods and Gladiow where they were discussing false flags, including ones where they would fly planes into buildings. Yes, I was back in the 1960s. That was before even the Cuba Missile Crisis, I believe. Yeah, long before. Yeah, they wanted to use that.

They wanted to create a false flag, you know, flying planes into buildings so that they would have an excuse to invade Cuba. We have Yona, Annie Woody, saying Audi, because his brother. brother Marvin Bush is running security. That is why, as Lance pointed out, and as Yonam pointing out, Marvin Bush was running security for the world trade centers, which, huh,

makes you think, get your noggin jogging. Audi M-R-R, terms of going to use this, Kirk shooting as a ruse to get MAGA on board with more gun control via executive order. I hope they don't let him do that. They won't control the SSRIs and they won't control the educational institutions

that are manufacturing these insane trannies. And they're also manufacturing the radical leftists as well. But we're not going to change the institutions. These institutions are bankrupting us in terms of our property taxes, but they must be preserved because that is their tool of change. I really hope he isn't able to get them on board. As we've said, we didn't agree with Charlie Kirk on a lot of things. But he seemed to be very staunch about his Second Amendment support and that he would never yield on it as far as I could tell. I haven't seen any clips to the contrary. So I hope that people don't cave and give in to that sort of rhetoric. Especially with all the push to use trannyism as a lever for gun control.

It's, again, it's not going to stop anything there. If a tranny wants to commit murder, having a little bit harder access to a gun isn't going to prevent that. Obviously, you know, this person set everything up. planned an assassination escape route, does anyone think that a gun law would have stopped this? Well, to paraphrase what they always said, you know, if guns are outlawed, then only trainees will have guns. That's the true nightmare. Instead of criminals, right?

The darkest timeline. But, yeah, it's continuing to push the main thing that's causing the problem and then using the problem to push something that won't Fix it. And of course, Trump would love to virtue signal. I mean, they've already, these initial, the initial talk about taking guns away from trannies was coming from the Department of Justice, which is, you know, he was one who set that precedent with bump stocks. And he also did pistol brace bands. But then he walked that back. And then his successor, Biden, immediately brought back the pistol brace band. So they're going to do that. And you'll have the, the right is already cheering him on it. They don't understand the principles. Paul. Yeah, I've said this before. I'm not sure if it was on air, but it's like the mask mandate. It's a contrive solution that's not going to address any problems. I mean, this shooting obviously is a real problem, but it's just creating a new problem based off of it. That's right. Everything to do. Drug war included. Yeah. High boost says, did anyone look at the ammo prices today? Did they skyrocket? I did not. I'll have to do that. Maybe I can get you.

an answer by the end of the show. Maybe we'll be able to compare it. DGA. The unfortunate Kirk incident will be used for gun control and expansion of the police and surveillance state. Never let a good crisis go to waste. Now, I can definitely see the police state expanding and surveillance state expanding because of this. Well, you see, we need to be able to monitor social media posts that are going to probably find a bunch of different social media posts from whoever they end up saying did this. If they catch the real guy, I'm sure that they'll find some of us say, if we had just been able to tag and trace

everyone we would be able to stop this because that's the way they operate. It's again, sometimes to manufacture the crisis, sometimes things happen organically but they know how to utilize it for their own agenda no matter what. Don't frag me, bro. Massad couldn't do everything that happened on 9-11

without the help of the CIA military. I agree with that. It's a cabal of people. Lots of different factions are involved. There's a lot of wicked people across the globe. Yeah, if we're running down the list of 9-11 anomalies, another one to bring up is the way, how all the air defenses stood down and let the planes get right there. So obviously it's not just Mossad.

Yeah, that was Gore Bidal who talked about that. A very hardcore leftist, he said, wait, I had, I don't know, was his uncle or something, had designed NORAD, he goes, something's up with that. that would have never happened. Somebody made that stand down. Yeah, he also says that the object that happened to hit the pentagram, destroyed all audit records of the pentagram fraud. Yeah, trillions of dollars. And that was just announced by Rumsfeld, like a day or two earlier than that.

What is Israel's motive for doing that? You're exactly right. We need to look at Kuibono, right? Now, Israel had the motive, and these people were cheering because it's like, all right, good, this is going to get, you know, they're going to identify the Muslims, as the propagators of this, and that can be used to get them to attack our enemies. But, yeah, the Pentagon fraud and that suspicious attack at the Pentagon,

which reeked of nonsense, absolutely. We have, don't frag me, bro, the object that happened. I read that one, yeah. Skunkhalla Rose Gardens, Friends with cattle, is worth gold, too. That's right. You need to be able to feed yourself. We talk about gold and silver because it's a general. rule, I tend to feel that most people understand that they need food and water, and they may not

know where to get gold and silver even if they want it. Golden silver is a bit of a rarer commodity, but you need to be able to feed yourself. You need to be able to get water. If you don't have those things, no amount of gold or silver is going to do you any good at all. You'll simply be a well-dressed skeleton that someone gets to work. Do we have Jack Lawson coming on tomorrow, I think? I don't know about that. I think we do, yeah. We need to get them on pretty soon to talk about to talk about Civil Defense Manual. Civil Defense Manual volumes 1 and 2 and go to Jack Lawson, Books.com, and get that. You can learn how to protect yourself and your community, how to find food, how to forage for that sort of thing, find water.

It's a great resource because you do need to be able to get food and water. If you don't have that, as I said, nothing else matters. You won't make it long enough to be able to utilize the other things. And you don't want to be put in a situation where you are stealing and looting from other people. You don't want to have to make that decision. You just want to avoid it. You don't want to be that kind of person. It is, you don't want to give into wickedness.

We have Audi MRR, the Petro Dollars failure, is part of the agenda. It's a big agenda and you're not part of it. The real octo spook, governor billionaires will always be able to push a button, have whatever amount of money they choose and won't be bothered with printing fiat money. Yeah, it's a, they're able to basically do whatever they want with money. They have a basically unlimited supply of it. Defy a tyrant 1776, if gold is worth $3,500 an ounce, and the dollars crashes and is worth zero,

what will gold be worth, L.O.L. It'll still be worth one ounce of gold. That's the thing. You look at what it can buy. It's very... Gold has value apart from the fiat currencies, and that's one of the reasons why I don't really get too worried about tracking the price of it,

because it's there to preserve money. We've talked for a long... Many times, we've talked about how much gold would it take to do this or that or buy this or that 100 years ago. And if you look at it, it stays roughly the same over the centuries and just adjusting for the difference in the labor costs and things like that for something like a suit or travel or something. But gold retains its value and has retained its value. It's the dollar that you're seeing going up and down. It kind of reminds me of all the back and forth. about metric versus the English system.

You know, we're going to do this in inches. We're going to do it in centimeters. The metric system was a rational system in the sense that it was set up as, you know, everything was there as powers of 10. So it's a 10th or 100th or whatever, or 1,000 of this or that. Whereas, you know, gold, when you look at it,

it had all these different odd ratios of 12 inches to a foot and 3 feet to a yard. and so forth and so on. And it only got to be complicated when people wanted to convert the inches to the metric system. Within the metric system, it couldn't have been simpler. But it got complicated when people tried to convert from the English system to the metric system. And that's what got people confused about it. So, you know, it's only confusing when we look at,

we try to convert the value of gold into the value of a fiat currency, which is an irrational system. There's a lot that's irrational about our system. today. Nights of the storm, when a single-wide trailer is selling for half a million dollars, then silver will be at $100 an ounce. It may not be that far away. Depends on where you live. I bet you could probably find a single-wide trailer for half a million in places in California. Narrow-A. Narrowgate ministries. The tariffs of yesteryear

worked because the U.S. had the industrial production to use tariffs to protect its interests. Now the U.S. is Kmart, an importer of all, so tariffs don't protect, they steal. I agree. And when manufacturing is resured, as I've said for the longest time, it's going to be resured, not with human workers, but with automated or robotic workers. It's just going to be a deal for Trump's friends and his donors. Yeah, we've got Gene X, make Banana Republic manufacturing great again. Nibiru 2029 says,

USA equals triple the cost for the same disposable garbage. Yeah, to some extent, most of the stuff that people spend their money on these days are completely pointless frivolities that are just, as you said, garbage disposable, things that they'll use a couple times. That next one is interesting, Nadlander. Yeah, Nadlander says I do guitar repairs for a living. This is killing me too. Yeah, I'm sorry to hear that.

Again, just Trump runs roughshod over small, but he never looks. the broader implications of his actions. I won't even call them policies. They're not that well thought out from him or from Navarro. Yeah. Cole 360 says not true. I've seen some great cardboard bangos. Christian constitutional conservative tariffs are ultimately paid by we the consumer.

That's right. Companies just pass them on. Companies are about maximizing profit and whatever they have to do to get there, they will. Knights of the Storm, was there a serial number on the rifle? How's that gun control working? Gun control, as always, is working as well as it ever has, which is to say, not at all. DG8, the people on the right will demand gun control and expansion of the police surveillance state. I agree.

And I hope you're wrong, but I fear you're right. Don't frag me, bro. Learn more about the guerrilla tactics of the ACW, and you get a taste of what the unpopular part of Civil War looks like. Wow, absolutely true. Well, you want to see what Civil War looks like? We've got Parliament burning in Nepal. This is their Parliament building. They call it the Durbar Palace.

Oh, that's a bit more realistic than calling it Parliament because that's where our royalty meets as well. We should start calling it the Capitol Palace. A massive blaze engulfed it. It was an administrative complex. And it was part of the protest there. The palace was built in 1908. serves as a seat of Nepal's government, hosting several ministries and other key institutions. About 500 people were injured, including more than 100 police officers and several people died and all that.

That's what Civil War looks like. Before we run out of time, isn't there a special at R&C that's coming up tomorrow? Do you have that? Don't have that, but there is a sale going on at Homestead Products. Shop on their organic passion flower tea. Yes. They want you to go try it. They say people love it. They say it is delicious.

So go check out our homestead products.compe and use promo code night. Their organic passion flower tea is on sale. And again, they work very, very hard to make sure all their products are high quality. They're made in the USA. And it's by people that share our value. So you're supporting a good group of people. We need to try that. I bet that tastes really good.

And we're always looking for something to drink that isn't. going to be super high in calories and, you know, and full of chemical garbage. Yeah, full of chemicals and, you know, housed in plastic or aluminum or something like that. It's great to make your own tea, and that sounds like a great deal. And again, people can find that. They've got a sale that's going on right now with that. Homestead Products.shop, and it's the organic passion flour tea.

And you can also use promo code night for 10% off on the products on the website. And so go support Homestead Products. dot shop, they have a numerous amount of products of all different kinds. And again, it's a people who are of like mind and share our values and we want to support them. Well, Brian Shulhavi has a story headline, the Trump birthday letter to the Epstein is a distraction. The real story is the nonpartisan Epstein beast, the U.S. banking system. And again, he references the article that was on Zero Hedge. I talked about that yesterday. Jamie Demon and J.P. Morgan and Epstein's relationships with them. And, of course, the fact that he said there were

somebody there in legal was a little bit concerned about doing business with Jeffrey Epstein, three years after his conviction and non-punishment for pedophilia. And he said, well, go talk to Bill Gates about me, which I guess that worked because he's a friend of Bill Gates and all these people that are involved in that. The U.S. Virgin Islands sued Chase Bank. in 2022 for keeping bank accounts of Epstein, where money was used for child sex trafficking. It settled without a trial in 2023. None of the 50 U.S. state attorneys general could sue the bank over this issue, continuing to keep everyone's identity secret, because it has always been paramount to keep everyone's

identity secret. And the cover-up has always come from the federal government, shutting all this stuff down, even shutting down investigations by any state attorney general. No matter of the cost, even Trump's ego, they must keep these things secret because the GOP is about guarding our pedophiles. Now, the Democrats as well, I mean, they were, they had a lot of Democrats who are involved in this, but now they are taking the imaginary high ground on this, pretending that they would not cover this stuff up when they have for a long time as well.

they're going to leave this completely at the doorstep of Donald Trump. Epstein stepped into J.P. Morgan's Chase headquarters at Park Avenue and rode the elevator to the executive floors. Remember, I talked about that yesterday. And the fact that they also gave him, they also had his lawyer, Ken Starr, who came in and insisted that, quote, no crimes had been committed. Does that sound familiar? As I've said many times, Ken Starr said the same thing about Bill Clinton. He covered up. all of these crimes of Clinton. Then he went from there to cover up all the crimes of Epstein.

Then he became, and he was put out there as a straight arrow Christian attorney. Then he goes to Baylor University, which is supposed to be a Christian university. He became the president there. And as president there, what he did was he covered up a sexual scandal there with the football team. And that was the last one that he got a chance to do. It was three strikes. And I guess he was out at that point. They fired him from that.

But here's a guy. And again, this is the same type of thing that you're seeing on Mike Johnson. They put these people out and make a big deal about, oh, he's a Christian, this, a Christian and they are the ones that they use to cover up for this stuff. That's why they can get so many things done with a Republican president that they can't get done with a Democrat president because people look at these labels and they give people a pass. They don't look at what they're actually doing.

And so, again, the massive amount of money that was there. And it's not just that, but it's also the suspicious activity reports of massive funds that were being transferred to and from Epstein. That is also something that is being covered up by the federal government. And it was not part of any trial. So there was no judge that is sitting there on that information. It is the Department of Justice that is setting on that information. So again, Brian Shulhavi is exactly right. That is the key thing.

But it is interesting to see the Epstein. birthday book that was there and I'm gonna I don't know if I've got I do have time to play this one which I thought was pretty good this was a this was Moskowitz who's a Democrat and so he's making hay while the sun is shining on Trump and his cover-up of the of the pedophiles and as people said well that was not Trump's signature and he goes really so this morning our close personal friend Mr. Comer said that he was not going to look into the letter, or the doodle, the president's doodle. He's a decent doodler, by the way.

So he wasn't going to look into whether the signature was a forgery, and I'm concerned about that, because this is the president of the United States. If there are forgeries or forgers out there, I think we should investigate it. And in fact, this document is 22 years ago. He's got the automatic pen signer. Someone 22 years ago went back to the future and forged his, signature when he was a Democrat. And somehow this person was Nostradamus, knew he would become a Republican, become president 22 years later. So listen, I submit to you that we can solve this problem

for the American people. You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to take our dear personal friend, Mr. Comer's word for it. Let's bring in a signature expert. You guys pick the witnesses. Bring in your signature experts, swear them under oath, and let's have the signature examined. Is it his or it is not his? We don't have to play games or the president says it's not his. We say it's him. No, no. Let's bring in a signature expert, a referee, because we can't agree on anything, even when it's right in our face, of whether that is indeed the president's signature, or if it's a forgery, we should immediately open up an investigation into this forgery.

I think again, that's the key, isn't it? The key is that people are lying to your face about this and for what purpose that's the real issue that is there. And of course, Lance said that the other day as well about the signature.

That should be pretty easy to establish whether it is real or not. But yeah, we had a time traveler who went back 20 years ago, forged the signature while Trump was still a Democrat and not involved in politics. Because, you know, One day he was going to be the Republican president. It's very interesting to see the contortions that the Trump administration is going through, that Mike Johnson is going through, in order to cover up all this stuff.

And we have to ask why. And we have to ask also, what does it tell us about Trump? Because, again, you'll be known by your friends because they will make an effect on you. as real clear politics says, Melania, please talk to Donald about Epstein. I imagine they've had many conversations about Epstein, don't you? They seem to all have been good friends at one point. Yeah.

So they said, taking the position of just dismissing this as a Democrat hoax is absurd and nobody's going to buy it. And I think nobody's going to buy this signature stuff either. It is an act of desperation. and it's waking people up, I think, to the lies and the deception that he's been feeding them about so many different issues. So from that standpoint, I see it as a positive thing.

Don't trust anybody, especially a pal of Jeffrey Epstein. Especially a pal of Jeffrey Epstein. Exactly. I want to remind you to please all keep Jason Barker's wife in your prayers. You had to go to the emergency room yesterday and pray for Brandon Grateful Baptist as well. Yes. and Cecilia 14's mother as well. Pray for them.

Thank you all for watching. I have more for us to be again. Thank you. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project, to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.

They see the common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnight Show.com. You know,