The David Knight Show - Tue 24Sep24 David Knight UNABRIDGED - UN Fake Treaty to Steal Our Money, Land, and Liberties

Episode Date: September 24, 2024

(2:00) The UN Beast is Growing in PowerThe "silent" assent of governments was part of the formal process.  And the silence assent of a distracted public is also essentialTo accelerate the Paris Climate Accord (another fake "treaty" that both USA political parties pretend is law)Consolidation of "global governance"Remember when globalists said "unilateral" was an evil thing?  Now having multiple sovereign nations is denounced as "multilateral"All power is to be consolidated not merely into the UN but to the UN Secretary General as global dictatorMassive transference of wealth in the name of "equity"The Debt/Land Swap — Crushing debt of countries robbed by the Green Grifters will be traded for land(32:09) Billionaire "Saviors" of Free Speech CAVE to GovernmentsDurov at Telegram and Musk at Twitter have caved to governments and obey their commands.  Did you really think they wouldn't?  Why do conservatives continue to want to portray billionaires as the good guys?"Free" Speech that doesn't cost anything is — CHEAP (and worthless)(49:43) Ireland, Australia and the Aspen InstituteA victory in Ireland? Or did Ireland's tyrants realize they were moving too fast to extend speech prohibitions?  Either way, they've ramped up the PRISON sentences for "bad" speech to insane levels for hated speech and mere possession, not publication, of content they hate.  Will it be like North Korea, jailing people over possessing the Bible?The Aspen Institute and other liberal/statist organization have a hand in Australian government's horrible misinformation bill.  Small world, right?(1:09:51) Post-Christian LifeDisgraced Mega "Church" Leader Slanders Street Preachers. Hillsong's Carl Lentz, fired for adultery and other things, says street preachers are lazy.   Presumably they should invest in the hard work of hanging out with celebrities like Justin Bieber as Carl did"Safeguarding Minister" takes even more steps to protect child sacrifice in the UKSurvivor of an abortion (attempted at 31 weeks) talks about meeting his birth mother(1:31:54) Twisting the ScripturesPresbyterian pastor reinterprets Prodigal Son parable to condemn — the FatherChristian Zionists think the pager attacks were inspired and justified by THIS story from the Old Testament. Maybe it says just the OPPOSITETeen leaves school and blasts school board for having pornographic, INCESTUOUS, material pushed on her in high school(1:52:03) Listeners — nuclear reactor risk, cover up, wasted opportunities to do something about nuclear waste, and Roku (2:02:16) INTERVIEW What You MUST Know About MEDICAL MURDER Scott Schara, OurAmazingGrace.net)Scott's daughter was murdered by the pandemic protocols and he's fighting back in an unprecedented lawsuit where the judge will allow allegations of abuses that do not fall under malpractice insurance.But Scott also talks about the REAL solutions that lie outside of our corrupt judicial system, BigPharma, and BigGovt. How did we get to this point and how do we stop it?(2:56:11) WATCH Russian simulation of London hit with a single nuclear bomb.  And remember OccupyPeace.com rally this weekendFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy. I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough.

You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 24th of September, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, we're going to take a look today at the uh un pact of the beast yeah it's uh where they're accelerating global governance that's what they call it uh and that's an accurate term they're accelerating it they're looking at debt uh swapped out for land as they're telling us we're going to have to accelerate the financing of this green new steel and they get us trillions of dollars in a debt. Well, I guess then what they'll just have to do is swap it out for land. We're also going to take a look at free speech and how the billionaires have caved from Elon Musk to Pavel Durov. They're all caving. They are not going

to defend your free speech. They're going to defend their addiction to money and power. And we're also going to take a look, I mentioned it briefly yesterday, at the very end of the show, we didn't have time to get to it, we're going to get to it earlier today. Thousands of dollars in fines assessed against homeowners because of misconduct of teachers.

Yeah. That's the next one. We've got to defund these schools. We'll be right back. Well, Representative Bob Good said this is the most important issue and it's getting the least amount of attention and he's absolutely right what is he talking about he's talking about the un pact for the future it is a satanic pact a pact of lies it is uh it was a must said about artificial intelligence for summoning the demons yeah we're doing it with this as well who is bob good you may, if his name sounds familiar to you,

he is the House Freedom Caucus Chair. He's somebody who is focused on the right issues. Somebody who actually talks about issues. And he's just been pushed out of his position. He just lost, got primaried out because of Trump's vengeance. Trump decided that because Bob Good had endorsed DeSantis, and then later on when DeSantis dropped out, Bob Good said, well, I endorse Trump now. That wasn't good enough. You got to kiss the ring.

And of course, we don't really want to have people who are going to oppose the UN around if Trump gets elected either, right? Because he didn't oppose the UN. He did not oppose it. He trimmed the budgets a little bit of a couple of their agendas. He should have shut this thing down. And nothing less than that is going to be acceptable. Because anything less than that, folks folks this is where the heart of global governance is coming from we pay 18 billion dollars a year for the u.n one-third of their

budget that continued through trump we continued to be the elephant in the room and yet we exert absolutely no influence over them. Or do we? Or do we? Is this agenda really coming from Washington? You know, when you look at it, if we're funding it, don't we control it? If we're the major funder of the UN, we can't control what they're doing? Come on, let's get real about this stuff. This is a pet peeve of mine that people can't understand how political control works, especially how Washington exerts political control.

Washington exerts political control with their fiat money that they just conjure out of thin air. They bribe governors. They bribe and blackmail people all over the place on every issue. And Trump is aware of this. He said, by the way, if you do these things in these schools that I don't like, I'm going to cut your funding. Well, that's exactly what Obama said. And that was what I was saying all through 2020. That's what I've said for the last four years.

Trump knew exactly what he was doing when he funded all this stuff. So when we look at that and we see uh who's doing the funding uh the united states is doing the funding of the un the united states controls the un and so what you see happening here is what the u.s wants to happen one of the reasons that they're putting together this pact for the future why they're concentrating so much power they said that the uh they have to do it for the paris climate accord and for the un 2030 agenda for sustainable development right both of those came out in 2015 they picked 2030 as the target date and now the un is saying we're not on schedule right we we got to speed this up we're getting close to the same we got to accelerate this we got to accelerate the

transfer of money we got to celebrate accelerate the imposition of dictates from us to make all this stuff happen and so that's what this is really about. It's also about consolidating power away from things like the National Security Council. And they said it's outdated. All power must be concentrated. Excuse me, had to sneeze there. All power must be concentrated

into the office of the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres. And of UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres. And of course, that was Antonio Guterres' idea. These people are so incredibly transparent. The little petty, foggy bureaucrats who want to be king of the world. I'm going to be king of the world. All power to me. Give me the ring of power, says Boromir.

Except this guy was never a boromir he never had any good intentions to be corrupted so um that's what this is really about and it's also about the uh debt for uh the the swapping out debt for land and countries. That is extremely disturbing. But I find it disturbing that the people who pushed back against this, all of them from the House Freedom Caucus, essentially. Nobody else cares in Congress. And, of course, Trump doesn't care. The only thing that matters to Trump is your personal loyalty to him

because he's the only thing that matters. Folks, it's not America first. It's Trump first. Trump first, second, third, fourth, fifth, Trump only. Okay? That's what this is about. So the U.N. is planning to become an international governing body. And Congressman Bob Good, at a press conference that he organized along with Congressman Ralph Norman

said this. He said, the most important issue that's getting the least amount of attention relative to its importance to our country. And like many other issues, we're going to be deciding on November the 5th, what kind of country we're going to be. And it applies to this issue as well. Later this week, the UN is going to hold a, quote, summit for the future, unquote, and subordinate agency the who the un is seeking even broader and more powerful authority the biden harris administration apparently intends to fully support the surrender and the compliance of the u.s to the un and these endeavors are aligned with the international globalists that hate america that hate constitution that hate our founders that hate our founders,

that hate our founding Judeo-Christian principles, and they want America to become like the rest of the world. They don't want us to be subordinate to or governed by our Constitution. No, they want America to be subordinate to and governed by the UN, the World Health Assembly, the WHO. And in fact, they intend to join with others at the UN summit this week to vote to award additional powers to the UN secretary general. They seek to facilitate the evolution of the UN from an international

cooperative body. It was never that. To an international governing body. That was always the purpose. But look, you know, you got to get people like good and nicely out because you got to put in bad and evil. You know, that's what's going on everywhere.

Yeah, it's a good and nicely out bad and evil. Congressman Newman, very clear about this as well. He said the agency is, quote, owned by the Chinese. Oh, that's not the real issue here. He says the summit of the future will happen on September the 22nd, 23rd. And folks, what they will likely do is cede America's authority, America's sovereignty, basically to China. China is defined as a developing country.

It is the number two economy behind America. It's not developing. It will cede our decision-making ability to China, and that's what you need to know. Look, what you need to know is China has been picked to supersede the United States, and that's been in the works for a very long time, going back to Henry Kissinger,

going back to the treaties to bring China into the world trade thing. But all of these treaties, and you can see it in 2015, when they created the UN Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, they also created the Paris Climate Accord. China can do whatever they want. They're free to do whatever they want. They can build as many power plants, and they're building a tremendous number of power plants. They can use coal.

They can do it cheap, dirty. dirty don't have to clean anything it doesn't matter if the pollution comes from china they're not concerned about global man-made warming uh if it's coming from china anybody else well you got to reduce it right now but china can do whatever they wish and so and this has been the case for quite some time uh and what and that's one of the other things that concerns me when you look at the paris climate accord as i've said for the longest time it is a treaty it is a treaty treaties must be ratified by the senate that never happened you had had John Kerry say, I ratified it and Obama's ratified it.

You know, we self-ratified this treaty. You can't do that. That's not in the Constitution. Why didn't anyone call BS on that? Why doesn't the mainstream media call BS on that? Why doesn't the MAGA media call BS on that? Well, because they're in bed with the two parties. And both of the two parties are in bed with this globalist agenda for the most

part. There were just a few people speaking out against it that are in the Freedom Caucus. But you don't have any of the so-called conservative senators, people like Ted Cruz is up for re-election this year. If you live in Texas, you need to send a letter to Ted Cruz and say, hey, Ted, why don't you talk about the Paris Climate Accord? Why don't you talk about the fact that it was never ratified?

Why don't you talk about the fact that we're not bound to it? And of course, when you look at the Paris Climate Accord, the confusion that people had was, they said, well, Trump got us out of it. No, he didn't. No, he didn't. He dithered around because people in his administration, like Rex Tillerson and his daughter-in-law, Ivanka, that he takes advice from, like his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, said, you don't need to get out of it. Besides, it's such a good thing.

We don't want to get out of it. But there were wiser people, at least at the beginning. Scott Pruitt at the EPA, they drove him out of town. Trump didn't defend him, protect him. He was actually getting some things reversed, so they drove him out of town. Trump allowed that to happen. But when you look at what was happening in the Paris Climate Accord, for the first few months, well, I don't know. People tell me that we're not really in it, but then other people say we really are in it, and we've got to get out of it, and so forth.

I'll tell you what I'll do. We'll get out of it. Oh, but wait. It says in this agreement, which we're not in, this agreement that we're not ratified, this agreement says that we can't get out of it for four years after we decide to get out of it. If we say we're going to get out of it, we've got to give them four years before we actually exit the thing. Now, why do you think they came up with that number? That just so happens to be the interval that we have our presidents in, right?

That's to make sure that nobody gets out of it. That's to make sure that no president exits it. That clause was put in there specifically to supposedly hamstring the president. But the president didn't need to be hamstrung by that. He had advisors who told him we're not officially in it, but you've got to shut it down. You've got to make that declaration that we're not in it. And so what he did was he made a declaration that we're in it, but we're going to get out of it. And so he said, well, we'll get out of it because we're going to wait for the four years.

We'll get out of it right after the election. And he did that. We were out of it for maybe about six weeks maybe as much as eight weeks before biden took office and we're back into it again again following this idea that this accord this treaty can be done without congress and that's what they're doing with this pact of the future you understand the pact of the future is being done without congress being involved without the constitution being involved and at some point we're going to have to call bs on this and say we're not in this we're not playing this

game you never follow the constitution oh by way, you don't have any authority either because you violated your oath to the Constitution. You don't care what the Constitution says, and yet you took office under the assumption that you were under the oath that you were going to follow the Constitution. You've lost your authority. These people should lose their office.

And so when we look at how this is going to move forward it's going to move forward in the same way they're all going to pretend that it's the law of the land and it's not the law of the land but they will pretend that it is and they will continue down this path so what is in it well uh some very concerning things actually um. We have, it's going to bring global governance, they said, back from the brink. More accurately, what they're going to do is double down on global governance and accelerate it. And they have to do that

because they're in the home stretch of the fourth turning. And they have to do that because people are starting to awaken to what this stuff is. In their own words, they said, we're deeply concerned by the growing sustainable development goal financing gap. Financing gap. And we've got to close this gap because we have widening inequality within and between countries. Now, the people who are concerned about equality of results

we have a word for that it's called communists jefferson his people had a word for it it was called levelers they wanted everybody at the same level you had to have the same results everyone had to have the same results and what we want is equality of opportunity not equality of results if you have equality of results. If you have equality of results, you have the French Revolution, you have communism, you have those types of things. And so they say, though, that there is a financing gap for what they want to do. In other words,

they've got to grift us more. They need tens of trillions of dollars to be transferred from the many to the few. That's what this green grift is about. So the rich can get everything. So that you will own nothing. That's what this is about.

A financing gap. It's about turbocharging the sustainable development goals and the Paris Agreement. That's their words. That's their words. Actually, it was Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary General, who said that on Sunday morning.

Now, they have passed this agreement. Very interesting the way this thing operated. They went through four drafts of this. And the way the process operates is that they, well, put the draft agreement out there, send it to all the different countries, and there'll be up to a 72-hour period of silence. You silently assent to this. You assent to it by not saying anything. And if somebody says something, they go back to the drawing board and they come up with

the next draft. So if in that 72-hour period, anybody had objected to this, they would have gone back to the drawing board and they would have gone back to the drawing board and they would have created a new one and come back again. Isn't that a picture of how this whole thing operates? They give us the Paris Climate Accord, they give us the Pact for the Future, whatever, and what we get is silence from Trump,

silence from Biden, silence from La La, silence from the media, silence from Congress largely, the governors, the people, everyone, the media, whether it's the MAGA media or the mainstream media, silence. Silence is consent in their world. Now, if you oppose it, and if you push back on this, what are they going to do? Well, they'll start all over again and come back again. It's relentless and of course the defense of liberty is relentless as well the price of liberty is

eternal vigilance eternal vigilance against these people who keep coming and coming and coming they'll reformulate it they'll come back they'll name it something else they'll give it a different spin but they'll keep coming back and so it is by silence that we assent to this and that was the approval mechanism for this thing is why they ran it through so quickly they had already agreed to all this stuff by silent consent and then they agreed with the consensus there was only a handful of countries that pushed back against it pretty much all of them opposed to the u.s. and its hegemony. People like Russia leading it, right? Why? Well, because the U.N. is controlled by the U.S. We

control it with the money. In the same way that our politicians are controlled by the people who give them hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars in each election cycle now. Billions of dollars given to each of these, you know, over a billion dollars probably for both of these presidential candidates this cycle. Think about it in 20 years. You know, we've gone from Al Gore accusing George W. Bush of trying to buy the election because he spent a hundred million dollars collectively between his campaign and the Republican National Committee and the PACs. Al Gore had $70 million. The two of them combined, $170 million.

La La in her second month just picked up twice that, $350 million. In her first month, she got $500 million. And they're like a Trump getting $100 million from the widow of Sheldon Adelson to support Israel and all the rest of the stuff. They're buying influence. An election is an advanced auction of stolen goods. And these people get it for pennies on the dollar.

Less than pennies on the dollar. They get thousands of percent return on their investment if they're corporations. If they're foreign governments, they get exactly what they want. And it's probably even worse if you look at the dollar and cents amount of it. Because not only do they get treasure, they get blood. They get exactly what they want. And it's probably even worse if you look at the dollar and cents amount of it. Because not only do they get treasure, they get blood. They get our blood. As we get tangled in these wars. So, in the words of the UN Secretary General,

they're turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. And they are going to be turbocharging it and dumping massive amounts of money into it. And then also concentrating political power into the office of the UN Secretary General. He says the UN Security Council is outdated. Its authority is eroding. And so we need to concentrate all this stuff into an executive order. Because he has a plan. He wants to impose public health emergencies. Does that sound familiar?

Granting the Secretary General increased decision-making abilities during public health emergencies and also to be able to impose these. World Health Organization or or the UN, halfway through the 2030 agenda, they say the world is not on track. But it's not too late to change course. It's not too late to rethink, to refocus, to recharge. Well, it's not too late for us to shut this down either. That's the key thing.

So when you look at the articles from the maga press then the next that you'll see a headline like this within our subsection trump threatens the un's future not at all not at all this is professional wrestling. He fully funded them. He reduced a little bit of money to a couple of different departments. He gave them Nikki Haley to cheer them on. And again, still pay $18 billion, a third of their funding. They talk about it, you know, what Trump did, just like Jim Jordan. He holds hearings. He holds court.

He talks about it. Jim Jordan does. He does nothing. He holds court. He talks about it. Jim Jordan does. He does nothing. And Jim Jordan doesn't cut the funding to any of these. Sorry. He doesn't cut the funding to any of these organizations. Same thing about Trump. He holds court.

He does press conferences. He talks about it. And he keeps funding these horrific organizations that he's just said are horrific. Almost six years ago, 2018, Trump addressed the UN Assembly, said America will always choose independence and cooperation over global governance, control, and domination. Talk, talk, talk. Empty talk.

So, the public still has not seen the final draft of this but we have seen some previous drafts of this and as i said before one of the things that's very concerning is the uh debt for land swap that is out there um and uh that is as they pile up all this debt for all these green projects, and it's not just the green projects. They want us to send money to all the third world so they can buy green projects from the multinational corporations that back all this stuff. And so as a part of that,

they want to remake the international financial architecture. They want to be able to directly tax us because you can't have a government without taxation, right? They have to be able to raise money. You know, the army will come later. First, they work on the finances. That's when they got smart about all this stuff. You know, you've had situations where people, you know, Napoleon tried to rule the world. Hitler tried to rule the world.

They tried to do it militarily. No, they should have done it like the Rothschilds did. They should have done it through financial stuff. And they got smart. That's why they call it the World Economic Forum. And that's why Bilderberg has always been focused on economic issues. Rather than going out and raising an army and conquering the other people, you do it subversively through economics.

And so they want to remake the international financial architecture. Stated goal is to restructure this for sustainable development goals, for Agenda 2030, for the green grift. And as I reported recently, Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary General, this megalomaniac communist, has called for a new Bretton Woods moment. And that was a moment right after World War II, where we established the dollar as the international reserve currency.

And so, in other words, he wants to reestablish the global economic structure. And also financing and pouring money into quote unquote developing countries, piling on the debt and then comes the debt for nature swap. So they get us in debt by trillions of dollars with this stuff. Then they do a debt for nature swap. Well, you know,

you got a lot of debt there. So let's see, what kind of assets do you have there? Okay. Well, you know, we can take all that farmland over there. We can shut it down for Bill Gates so that you have to eat out of his Frankenstein lab and all the rest of this stuff.

Action 42 of the pact says they need to promote greater use of debt swaps, including debt swaps for climate or nature to developing countries as appropriate. So they can come in and purchase a country. This is, by the way, the last American vagabond talking about this, and they've been really good about focusing on this. The swaps are going to be financial agreements in which a conservation organization or a government reduces, restructures, or purchases a country's debt at a discount in exchange for investments in conservation of land. Promoted by the World Economic Forum as recently as April of 2024.

But before that, if you remember, Senator Nicely, when he came in, he was talking about the fact, he said, be careful. All you farmers out there who are getting conservation easements and he's like okay yeah that's fine i'll just you know uh put this kind of over here not not use it and get a reduction on my taxes or whatever or you got other land you put it in a conservation easement for tax abatement he said this is where the end game is coming in when you have it in these uh situation the government can then come in and say well you know this is a conservation easement so we're going to give it over to Wall Street and they're going to do these derivative financial instruments that's what this is all about this is a big scheme with the banks and with Wall Street

to reset everything all right just like the documentary that's out there, The Great Taking. It's these debt-for-land swaps. There's a big part of that. So they said they view the natural world as financial commodity. Foreign intervention and national sovereignty will return to the colonial system, they said,

as some critics have said. Well, of course. They are colonizing our countries. And they are also bringing in settlers to colonize us as well from the third world. And then we have to send our money to the third world in order to get into debt to these people. So they can take our land as well as colonizing us with settlers. The great replacement meets the great taking. Participating in a debt swat agreement immediately results in a loss of autonomy and sovereignty.

Of course it does. And that's the whole point. So what comes next? Well, perhaps with an election year, maybe you ought to ask before you vote for any of these clowns, what do they think about the Paris Agreement? What do they think about the Pact for the Future? Do they think they're binding on us?

If they do, don't vote for them. Overall, the Pact for the Future is yet another globalist document being negotiated behind closed doors with no public input, very little awareness. Who granted the UN authority over our lives in the first place? Why does the UN negotiate documents on our behalf while never consulting the people? What happens if we choose to reject the UN's edicts and to carve out our own path?

Why don't we shut down a third of their funding why don't we evict them out of New York is that beyond the realm of possibility of course not of course it isn't it is something that must be done frankly and so I want to begin with that. We're also going to talk about war today, as we've got a lot of serious issues on the plate. But we also, when we come back, we're going to talk about censorship and how these billionaires cannot be trusted to hold the line on free speech. What a vain idea it was. Well, Elon Musk, he spent 40 billion dollars to help us to defend free speech and he just caved what about this brave guy with telegram he just caved as well

and so we're going to talk about what the state of free speech is and we're going to talk about how stupid it is to put our trust in billionaires and billionaire politicians and any politicians, as a matter of fact. We're going to take a break and we'll be right back. Thank you. Succes! Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, I was up pretty late last night. night i did uh clyde lewis's uh program and um it airs at like nine o'clock or in uh uh the west coast and so that's like midnight to one o'clock our time so i got like three hours of sleep last night so if i fall asleep in the program somebody uh wake me up uh i hope i don't put you to sleep uh today if he falls asleep i'll take over and we'll talk about.

Lord of the Rings. Yeah, Lord of the Rings, video games, all fun stuff that none of you care about. It'll be utterly pointless. Yeah, that's right. Fun and games while the world is sparkling. I was thinking we could rearrange some deck chairs. Yeah, there you go. That's right. Well, speaking of deck chairs um telegram is now going

to provide the governments with all the stuff that they wanted gonna surrender all the users data going to censor people and all the rest of this stuff uh and elon musk is also kate you had all these people in brazil you had bolsonaro others by the way, every time I talk about Bolsonaro, the transcription program changes it into bows and arrows. So he had bows and arrows. It's time we grab our bows and arrows. We're going to be down to that. But Bolsonaro and a bunch of Brazilian politicians rallied behind Musk. That's right.

He's going to lead us out of this thing. There's a lesson in that, isn't there, for conservatives in this country? Stop putting your trust in these billionaires. They are a cane that when you lean on it will break and pierce your hand, as Musk has done and as this guy, Durov, has done. And why would we be surprised about that? Why would we be surprised these guys will sell out? Is he going to go to prison to defend your free speech?

No, he's not. Are they going to have their companies fined or shut down to defend your free speech? Of course not. These people love money. That's how come they get so rich. Love of money is the root of all evil um the wise man said that right i think jesus knew what he was talking he knew he knew the nature of mankind he knew what an important and seductive and addictive thing money is money sex power right these things um are going to control

them along with the rest of their self-interest and they're going to sell the public out for their monetary interest no surprise there so we're seeing it happening now and so um uh durov And so, um, uh, Durov has, um, changed while he's been on bail. As Zero Hedge said, it's been one month since he was arrested. Uh, the billionaire co-founder, CEO of Telegram, uh, on charges of allegedly failing to act against criminals who are using his platform. He's still in France after being released on a 5 million euro bail and must check in with police twice a week. They've got him on a leash. He very quickly began cooperating with the French government, it appears.

Though his lawyers said the charges were absurd. And Telegram supporters and free speech advocates blasted the efforts at state censorship. I criticize it. I mean, it's absolutely wrong what France did. And it was surprising to see them do that. But it's not surprising to see him cave. And as Zero Hedge says, he very quickly began cooperating.

On Monday, he made a significant announcement, which is clearly the result of his ongoing legal ordeal in France. He said Telegram has removed problematic content. Problematic content. Folks, there is no problematic content if you have free speech. There's stuff that people say that is wrong, false, hateful. And the best way to counteract that is not with government censorship and control. Not with government deciding what is true and nice. But with other free speech.

The way that you come after bad free speech is with more free speech. It's the same as it is with the Second Amendment. The way you stop bad people with the guns is good people with guns the way you stop bad people with speech is good people with speech it's just that simple it's that simple and if you're going to say well because there's bad people in the world you can't have any freedom just get rid of the bill of rights as our two political parties wish to do over the past few weeks his staff has been carefully searching through the platform using artificial intelligence to ensure all of the problematic content

we identified in the search is no longer accessible, he explained. Person is spokesperson. Now, there's a couple of very troubling things in there. Staff has been carefully searching it using artificial intelligence because that's the way the censorship is going to operate. They'll use artificial intelligence to find each and every person who see artificial intelligence can do this diligently. It can do it. The scope of the surveillance is something that we've never seen before. But it's going to be brought by artificial intelligence.

And, of course, they will do it through these corporations, using them as a beard, using them so they can have plausible deniability. We all knew that the censorship was coming from the U.S. government during Trump and during Biden. And then we got the documents that showed, yeah, it was. It was organizations within those that were demanding censorship. But even with the evidence, even with what we knew was true, and even with the documents, no one's going to stop it. They're not going to stop it. It just continues on.

And as the people are silent about it and put up with it, that is seen as consent, just like the consensus confirmation of the UN pact for the future. So he's now making it clear that suspected criminals and policy violators can now have their personal details handed over to authorities, including internet IP addresses, phone numbers, so forth, in response to valid legal requests. We won't let bad actors jeopardize integrity of our platform for almost a billion users. Well, I think you might include the bad actor would be this CEO, Durov.

He refuses to support free speech. Look, folks, extremism in defense of free speech is no vice. Nothing to be ashamed of. And moderation of content is not any virtue. The United Arab Emirate-based platform boasts nearly a billion monthly active users that could change, of course, with this new policy update. DeRov is essentially still a hostage of the French state. And then,

um, as, uh, Brian shall hobby of a vaccine impact, health impact.com also says, he said, you know, he said,

uh, think about the difference between a free speech and forbidden or banned speech. So we're talking about free speech. We're talking about, uh, free speech is cheap he said and by that what he means is allowed speech in other words uh allowed speech oh yeah it's free right if you want to be free and loud that's cheap but um forbidden, speech that is banned, is expensive.

It may cost you your life. It might cost you your livelihood or your job, right? Might get you in prison now, as we see. People have made jokes in the UK. People who've talked about their religious beliefs going to jail. But free speech is cheap in the sense that he's talking about. Allowed speech is cheap. That's why I'm not interested

in playing the game of being on YouTube. I'm not interested at all in being on YouTube. The only thing I could say on YouTube would be cheap speech. Stuff of no value. There's not, anything that you can say on YouTube is not really worth saying when you're talking about politics.

We're talking about what this agenda is. Remember, I got kicked off in January 2021 when I said that 2020 was the year the world became China. They agreed with that. And they acted like they were Chinese dictators in terms of kicking me off for saying that. But that's the reality. If you tell people the harsh truth about our masters, our masters will kick you off. And I'm not interested in censoring myself.

I'm not interested in living by their lies at all. Or any lies. A quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson says, Brian, is this. Listen to what he said. This is from 1829. It's taken from his memoirs, correspondence, and miscellanies from the papers of Thomas Jefferson.

You know, I've been to Monticello years and years ago. And we go around and look at his office he had a way to make copies of all the letters that he wrote to people he was constantly corresponding people they would write him letters he had returned that and uh when he would write it down he had it hooked up to a thing that was mechanical and it made a copy of his letter you know as he's writing it down and uh this is what he had to say the most effectual engines for pacifying a nation are the public papers uh the newspapers in other words a press a despotic government always keeps a kind of standing army of newswriters. This is true in the 1700s.

Keeps a standing army of newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, invent and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with a mass of people who have no means of distinguishing the faults from the true paragraphs of a newspaper now that was um again from that book 1829 they put together his memoirs that was published four years after he died uh he knew exactly what was happening you know the nature of man doesn't change the tools change you know he had this elaborate gearing thing to make copies as he's writing. Yeah, now we have other ways to make pictures and photocopies and facsimiles and stuff like that.

That's very, very cheap, very free, pretty much. The technology changes, but the nature of man, even as the technology changes, does not change. The nature of government does not change you know one of the things that um you and secretary general antonio guterres uh the communist commissar said he said we can't be governed by things that our grandfathers wrote oh really human nature doesn't change i i wish we were governed by the kinds of things that our great great great great great great great, great, great, great, great grandfathers wrote, like Thomas Jefferson or whoever it was, how many generations back you go. They were wise. And they understood human nature.

And nothing has changed except the technology. And the technology has been wedded to people of an evil nature. We don't have the character to govern. Except that they've been put in place to govern us as a judgment from God. He says, Brian says, I've observed the same thing through my own publishing career, especially in regards to government published facts on the injuries and dangers caused by vaccines that i frequently wrote about before covid were the only narrative allowed by the government on both sides of the political divide folks that's the gop that's the democrats that's cnn that's fox news the only thing allowed was, quote, the science on vaccines is settled. Vaccines are safe and effective.

End of story. And you can't sue them. They need to have special liability protection because the vaccines are so safe and effective. That's why they've got to have special liability protection. That in and of itself. Just, you know, once I learned of the 1986 agreement to protect the vaccine companies it's like okay we're done yeah it's it's nuts if you gotta have that it's not safe and effective but yeah brian was there long before this so was i i was anti-vax before

anti-vax was cool i guess you could say um so he says using the corporate media silence people then later using social media to silence dissenters he says they banned me on all the major social media platforms yeah me too in 2013 for example popular daytime talk show host katie couric dared to interview a mother who lost her daughter to the Gardasil HPV vaccine. You know, that was the first one they tried to mandate as a condition of attending school. Guess where that was done? Texas. Guess who did it?

Rick Perry. Guess what the connections were? Well, Rick Perry had somebody who used to work for him who went to work for the pharmaceutical company, lobbied Rick Perry. Rick Perry said, yeah, let's have everybody get the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. That's how it works. The revolving doors, the corruption, the stupid and corrupt politicians like Rick Perry, Donald Trump, just because they got an R after their name doesn't mean that they aren't as evil and as stupid and as compromised as the Democrats.

And so Katie Couric has a mother on who lost her daughter. Her daughter died from the Gardasil vaccine. Everything that Couric published was true. It was all protected by the First Amendment. She even stated publicly that she was pro-vaccine and that she and her daughters were both vaccinated by Gardasil. And she interviewed pro-vaccine doctors who stated that Gardasil was perfectly safe and effective.

Those were lies. But because she had one dissenting opinion, because she interviewed a mother who was put forth as a tragic case of a very rare vaccine side effect. I'm telling you what's very rare. These people never tell the truth. The reality is that when they tell you that something is safe and effective, what's the basis of that? Well, they went out and they did a,

maybe they did a double-blind test or something. Maybe. Maybe they just proclaimed it, as Fauci has been doing, as the FDA has been doing lately. But let's say they did a test when they get the test back what do they get well we had 20% fewer people who died after getting this from that condition that it's supposed to treat or whatever um it sounds to me like its success and its efficacy is rare if it only works like 20 of the time that's garbage

and then how much of the time does it harm people and then what you need to do is you need to look at not only the number of times that people are harmed but the extent of the harm does it kill people does it disable them Those things should be multiplied out by the number of occurrences, but they don't care about anything. So when Katie Couric has a mother on whose daughter died from the Gardasil vaccine, she was viciously attacked as

promoting conspiracy theories. She was forced to bring on her show the next week the Surgeon General of the United States who was dressed in her military uniform, because that's the way they all dress up in military uniform. Doesn't that seem strange to you? Doesn't it seem strange to these people who are supposedly out there to protect our health?

Operating like some kind of a military organization? Does it seem strange to you that DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration, is supposed to be about defense? Does it surprise you they got involved in vaccines and all this kind of stuff? That they're delivering these bioweapons that they inject into their own people? Yeah, it's a military operation. From its inception to its delivery, it was a military operation. And so, you know, in order to keep her job, she's got to have the Surgeon General come on,

dressed in military uniform, to tell the public that Gardasil is perfectly safe. Couric was even forced to issue an apology, even though she had published the truth. And, of course, this was to keep her job. This is the kind of coercion, kind of capitulation that people will engage in. And so when you look at what these people are doing, and as a matter of fact, we go back and we're gonna take a quick break and when we come back

we're going to look at what is happening and some of the well wait I've got it right here look at what has happened in in Ireland yeah we have supposedly a victory in Ireland, but I don't see a victory in anything that's happening in these places when it comes to free speech. And we'll talk about that when we return. Stay with us. We'll be right back. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. and so um the uh that's exactly it that's from the prisoner as a matter of fact i i ran i was making fun of the elections i love love to talk about, um, you know, the, the mock elections that they had in the prisoner series in the village where six ran for two, six for two, six for two, it's running for number two.

Of course, they don't tell you who number one is, uh, you know, and we kind of know that, but anyway, the, um, uh uh and one of the other things from that besides being declared a mutual when you did something that the uh the government there in the little town didn't like uh it was also the way that people would say see you later or whatever they would say be seeing you and they would make it like an okay sign up by the eye and put it out there like that so i finished the report like that be seeing you because what they're talking about that that was a play on the fact that everybody was being watched right i'll be seeing you you know that is very cynical uh

instead of see you later i'll be seeing you i'll be seeing you all the time i'm always watching you that type of thing which is a society that we now live in and when i did that whether be seeing you or the eye i got all these letters yeah he's illuminati look at this look what he did with his eyes they didn't get the reference whatsoever i don't know those people would have gotten the reference even if they'd watched the uh series i don't know but but the question is ireland Ireland. Ireland drops hate speech. Is it a victory for free speech? Well, I don't know.

What would Patrick McGowan say about his beloved Ireland, right? In a partial victory for free speech, the Irish government is going to drop controversial provisions contained within its new hate speech bill. This is from the Daily skeptic in the UK. Those provisions would have made communication and material deemed capable of inciting hatred punishable by up to five years in prison. And then if you had material that they thought could be interpreted by somebody,

if you had any material on your computers or anything on your phone, if that was something that somebody somewhere some snowflake or some government sensor could say was hateful let's just say unmutual right well then you could get two years in jail just for possessing that stuff even if you didn't do anything with it publicly you see they're going to be looking on our devices, in our devices, looking all the time. That's what the CCPA, the Chinese Communist Party of America,

no, it is the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authentication. This is a coalition that's being put together by Microsoft on behalf of the intelligence community to bring together the hardware CPU people, people like Intel, the ARM processor families and things like that, as well as software providers like Intel, a coalition for them to look at who created that meme. What is that meme?

And of course, part of the coalition is going to be the big government aligned media companies like the New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, things like that. They will determine what is true and false. They will give the veneer of legitimacy to these censorship things. And then the big tech people will stop you from even being able to publish it maybe even from being able to create it or maybe if they see that you're trying to create it or you have created this they'll stop you from uploading it and send the police to your house this is what these monsters of the technocracy have in mind for the future. Now they control this type of stuff. There's going to be ways for people to come up with tech,

not technology. That's going to be outside of their grasp. And so it's going to be a war back and forth, just like the last week I was talking to Aaron day. He was trying to find some way that he could work in the crypto space, constantly changing as they keep changing the rules, regulations and surveillance and everything. So you can try to dodge and weave within that,

or you can just opt out and do a different parallel system. But going back to Ireland, even the small improvement that they had in there is not enough. And it is a victory for the people there who didn't depend on billionaire saviors. They didn't look to Elon Musk or to Pavel Durov or to Donald Trump to save them. They took it upon themselves and pushed back against it, and they got some of the stuff pulled back. But I don't think that it's a real victory.

I think what they're doing is they're just going to boil the frogs a little bit more gradually because all these things roll out iteratively. You do it from the inside. You do it with disruption. And you do it iteratively, as Fauci said, right? That's the way it works. And so what they were doing in this bill they'd already put stuff in there and say well if you do hateful speech you're going to go to jail and so what

they're trying to do was to extend that and they decided that they're not going to do the extension and i think the real what is buried in this the real reason is that there's going to be an election in six months no later than march of next year they're going to have to stand for election and uh this was going to be a you know this is quite a bit of an extension of this stuff uh the amendments will remove sections seven through ten with a bill then proceeding only with elements that mandate tougher sentences for existing crimes. They're going to, you know, you got a crime. Well, it's not going to be a fine. You're going to go to jail if we don't like your speech.

And so they're going to toughen that up, but they're not going to add these new extensions. The perpetrator of an offense is motivated by hatred of the victim's protected characteristics, you know, like being a tranny or a settler or a squatter or something like that, some protected class, you know, a person of color or whatever, you know, a person who doesn't know what gender they are, you know, a protected class like that. Under the Prohibition of Incitement of hatred act 1989 prohibition of incitement to hatred it targets speech intended likely to cause physical violence you know quite frankly we've already had both presidential candidates jump in on that trump

was just out there saying you know know, they're, they're criticizing me and they're going to get me shot. They shouldn't be able to say things to criticize me, lock them up, take away their license. I don't like, I thought that ABC was unfair in the debate, take away their license. And Lala is saying the same thing about Twitter. Yeah. He's got a privilege.

That's a privilege that we gave him. We're going to take away that privilege. Trump says, take away their license. And they're both saying, well, you know, you said this and you said that, and now you incited this and we're going to treat that as if you were actually doing violence to people. There is no difference between Trump and Lala, the Republicans and Democrats on this issue.

Democrats are, have been doing this to people with January the 6th. Peaceful people who are protesters over there. And Trump is doing it saying, you know, these supposed assassination attempts on me. That's caused by your speech and your criticism of me. So you people need to be locked up. So you get up to five years in jail, if you say anything, online or offline, which anybody with a protected characteristic drawn from a long list of such characteristics of race, religion, national or ethnic origin gender including transgenderism

etc if any of those people perceive something to be hateful in other words you know uh bruce gender could bring a claim against me and this type of thing he thinks that that's hateful whatever uh but uh we're to the point the um the bill is an open invitation to every woke activist in Ireland to say that they perceived such and such a comment to be both subjectively offensive, quote-unquote. He says, every Christian street preacher will be accused of homophobia, and gender-critical feminists will be accused of homophobia and gender critical feminists will be accused of transphobia phobia you know people like jk rowling she's a turf so we're going to lock her up street preachers going to be locked up they're locking up street preachers and people praying silently in front

of abortion clinics and so forth uh this is kind of interesting going back to 1926 the history in ireland in a sinister echo of ireland's committee on evil literature that's cartoonish isn't it the committee on evil literature established 1926 and the censorship of publications act which followed and prohibited the Censorship of Publications Act, which followed, and prohibited the sale and distribution of unwholesome literature. The bill also contains provisions that make it a crime, punishable by up to two years in jail to prepare or to possess material likely to incite hatred. You see, if you create a government that trashes free speech in the name of decency and wholesomeness. You will eventually wind up 100 years later with what we have now, a government that trashes wholesomeness and decency.

That's what they're doing. Now that's what's being censored. The problem is the principle of censorship. We have to be able to work these things out. What is true and false? Again, just like a gun, the defense of free speech, the defense of one's person, is done by applying those First and Second Amendments. Possession in this context could simply mean having a dodgy meme or cartoon

that is saved on your phone or a copy of Mein Kampf on your laptop. Or let's say the Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Independence on your laptop. You know, those are hateful, right? They hate them. Or how about the Bible? You know, the Bible. Sodom and Gomorrah story in there. Leviticus, Romans, you know.

Wow, that says that homosexuality is a sin. Wow, yeah. So we've got to get rid of the Bible. Can't have that Bible. You possess that Bible, you're going to jail. Because it's hateful, we've been told many times. Legislation includes a provision that makes it a crime punishable by up to a fine of up to 5 000 euros or a year in jail if you refuse to give the police a password to any electronic device that you own

wow wow that's even worse than the um well, not just a year, the fine is actually higher than if they actually found something. So if you refuse to give them the password to unlock your device, a year in jail, 5,000 euros. Meanwhile, in Australia, the government there is rebooting the misinformation bill. This week, Australia's Labor Party reintroduced its misinformation disinformation bill. And this is from Brownstone, Andrew Lowenthal. And he said, you know, it's kind of troubling where this came from.

This bill in Australia came from the Aspen Institute. Where do we just see the Aspen Institute? Right here, involved in a local Tennessee election. Person heavily involved with the Aspen Institute. Person from the Walton family. Giving massive amounts of money to Jesse Seals to defeat Senator Nicely. Yeah, that Aspen Institute. That globalist organization.

And they're also now setting a pattern for Australia. And the interesting thing is that when you go back, the bill that they're putting in in Australia was actually co-written by participants in the Aspen Institute's first draft. And that was a coordinated effort to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before it happened, before it happened. They got together in August of 2020 because, you know, the one thing I would differ with Andrew Lowenthal on with this

is the fact that it wasn't known. He said, look at this. They did this. This wasn't look at this. You know, they did this. This wasn't released until October. I know. And I criticized the Republicans for doing it. I said, we had known about what was going on, of course, with Joe Biden's crimes in Ukraine and that type of thing.

We'd known about all that stuff. And we knew about Hunter Biden as well. I said, why are they not doing anything about this? Why are they not saying anything about this? Well, of course, the reason for that was the Republican Party decided that they would use that as an October surprise. They'd release it with the New York Post, and they released it late, and they got lots of opposition from the rest of the mainstream media.

And there wasn't enough time for people to process the information, and so it was basically shut down. But everybody knew about it months and months ahead of time. And so, yeah, when they got together in August 2020, they knew about it. I knew about it. But the Aspen Institute organized what they called a tabletop exercise with Twitter, Facebook, and First Draft, and a host of other media organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, and they conspired on how, with a day-by-day playbook,

they would respond to the Hunter Biden laptop story when it was released. And again, it was released then in October, as an October surprise by the New York Post. These people had already war-gamed this out. They had a plan for how they're going to deal with it. And on a day-by-day basis, they got rid of it. We all knew that this was coming. We all knew about the crimes of Hunter Biden. So bad, as he points out, Zuckerberg, you know, Facebook was a part of this.

Zuckerberg thought the suppression of the hunter biden laptop story was so egregious that he recently issued a sort of apology but be even more explicit the australian bill extends the code which is written in part by an organization that worked to suppress a true story of major historical significance this bill should be dead on arrival. And it tells you all you need to know about the real aims of the bill. But the Labor Party is adamant, the Labor Party of Australia is adamant that they want it passed, and they could likely count on the Greens,

because the Greens were also teamed up with Labor, to pass a new digital IED bill. Exactly right. Well, we're going to take a break, ID bill. Exactly right. Well, we're going to take a break. When we come back, yesterday, I told you about the liability that people in two different cities have now discovered as they had misconduct from teachers. And there was a multi-million dollar assessment.

These are small communities. And now these property owners are getting hit with thousands of dollars, the average property owner, which they can't afford, and property taxes because of the misconduct of the schools. And, of course, as we've said for the longest time, schools are there as the major part of your property taxes. And because of property taxes, you will never own your property in this country. But let's just cut to the chase. You'll never own your property in this country because of government schools. You'll never own your home because of the communist public education.'ll never own it but what you might

wind up with is a massive assessment of legal fees and of course this type of assessment is something that could be imposed if we're going to play along with the green globalist games that the un is putting out there uh with the paris climate accord or whatever they're going to assess penalties for climate violations or whatever well you might wind up having that type of thing but it's many any number of ways that they can all of a sudden hit you with a bogus fine so we're going to talk about that when we come back we'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we're going to talk about what's going on in public education, but before we do,

I thought it was absolutely amazing to see Carl Lentz, and if you don't know who this guy is, he was the senior pastor, lead pastor, whatever title you want to give this guy, but he was the head honcho at a very large, very financially successful organization called Hillsong church. I hesitate to call it a church. Um, and while he was there as senior pastor, lead pastor, whatever,

uh, he was the spiritual advisor to a lot of celebrities like Justin Bieber and, um, and others. And he was kicked out of leadership there because of leadership issues, they said, because of breaches of trust and because of adultery. Adultery. But now he has reemerged in a podcast alongside his wife,

who is there, his wife, Laura. And he had an interesting thing to say that was picked up by dissenter. He took aim at street preachers. He called them lazy. Now, we just talked about what was happening in the UK. Talked about, you know, the massive suppression. Anybody that has anything that they deem hateful are they going to arrest you or worse right but he said street preachers are lazy he said so you hop on

tip tick tock and you see a guy who you know might preach from the street corner and he gets persecuted and in his mind he's being bold okay he says I have respect for some people that do that. I'm not going to judge what they do, but to me, it always seems easy and even lazy. Wow. I'm not going to judge you, but you know, you seem to me like you're evil and lazy. Or easy, easy, easy and lazy, right? Easy and lazy. But I'm not judging you.

I'm not judging. And I have respect for some of the people who did this not for many of them he said gee thanks rich celebrity adulterer very cool i know yeah i don't know if i've got uh i don't know if i have any respect for people that run these mega churches at all i mean i just if you look closely at any of them you'll see people like this there and they're getting kicked out left and right of all kinds of moral failures, all kinds of corruption, ego trips where they abuse people. They abuse their staff.

They sexually abuse people and everything. This is rampant in these megachurches. Stephen Furtick, all these people. Anyway, he goes on to say, because what takes work and boldness is to show up in an industry like you're in every day for years and years and years and years and to love people to meet them where they're at to show them what you believe through your life and to do it again and again and again that's bold bold to me is not standing up in the middle of a mall where you haven't earned

a single relationship now notice that he calls his business an industry it is an industry it's an entertainment industry it's a money raising industry these mega churches it's an industry you show up day after day and you develop relationships with people well i mean you can say the same thing about politics right um and of course i had the story not too long ago about the guy who was shot in the head as a street preacher got in the head didn't really it's a horrific story uh the bullet didn't go all the way through his brain. It lodged in the side. He didn't even realize he'd been shot. And he starts to walk, and he falls to the ground.

And he's able to drive in his car to where his wife and his brother-in-law are. Then he starts seizing, and they take him to the emergency room. After a while, the x-rays say, oh, he's been shot. And told his wife, well, we'll know more about it when we do the autopsy nobody expected him to live she started praying she had everybody praying giving updates anything for months and months and months and he's walking around fine now something of a miracle but that kind of hatred and persecution still exists for christians it still exists in the west and it's ramping up in the west people get killed all the time and foreign countries for this type of thing third world developing countries so um yeah uh here's this guy who um is a celebrity, commits adultery, and he's saying these people are just lazy.

And what they're doing is easy. And so he says, they haven't spent a day with anybody. How does he know that? Yeah, preaching on the street just might be the beginning of something but you think standing up and just speaking over people trying to eat their peaceful lunch speak over them who is jesus and nobody listens and you go away you know when i saw that i thought yeah you could say the same thing about jeremiah you know that jeremiah he was just so lazy he's so lazy this all smacks of jealousy to me says you open up tiktok and you see these guys he doesn't say it but you can tell he's like you see them getting millions of views

millions and i'm not getting what's real is me going in and you know having a relationship with these people because he's not as big as he was anymore i bet i bet oh yeah hurt him oh yeah i bet yeah yeah it's having a relationship people like uh Justin Bieber and P. Diddy and stuff like that. That's where the really hard work is, folks. Yeah, what an impact you've made on these people, on this industry. Good job, dude. We can really tell. You've done so much work.

He's reformed it, hasn't he? Well, you know, it's interesting. You know, we go back and look at the people in the Bible. Jeremiah, you know, I mean, he was arrested, thrown in a pit and pit and all the rest of stuff people didn't want to hear what he had to say why did he keep saying it why didn't he just you know go to the king and you know develop a relationship with him and you know we'll party and i'm not going to be judgmental about what you're doing you know he's not going to be judgmental about uh justin bieber or p diddy but he'll be judgmental about the street preachers

why does that tell you about what team he's playing on you know seriously uh and so he says but that's not bold bold to me is invading dark spaces every single day regardless of how you feel because people forget that well that's exactly what these street preachers are doing you see the whole idea people call themselves evangelicals, they don't even know what the word means. It just means a good message, right? You're proclaiming a message. You're not out there to debate somebody.

You're ready to give an answer if somebody wants to ask you why you have hope in this. You're ready to give that answer. But whether or not they ask you, you're there just to proclaim the truth. And if they're curious, if God is working in their life, they'll ask you, perhaps. Or they'll investigate further.

You never know what's going to happen. Your job is to broadcast the seed, right? That's what they call it when the farmers go out and throw the seed on the ground. They're broadcasting it. That's what these street pictures are doing. They're broadcasting it. They're broadcasting the news, the good news, right? He doesn't like that.

He doesn't think there's any power in the word of God. I've seen a lot of people like that. I had a pastor once who was very good in terms of apologetics for creation and Genesis and things like that. But he would always say, when I talk to people, I like to keep it on scientific terms. When I'm talking to unbelievers and everything, it's like, and then you've got people on the other side of things,

like Ken Ham with Answers in Genesis, and he says, I always bring the Bible in because the word of God is the power to believe for people to believe. So I have to throw that in there. It's not going to be my logic and my wisdom that's going to bring people to Christ. Christ is going to bring people in. God will bring them in. He'll open their heart.

Or it'll be perhaps he's ordained this as an act of judgment on them if they harden their heart and they refuse to listen. We don't know how it's going to be used. Just as Christians, we're just allowed, we are required to live our life and to talk about what we see as we go through our life. We talk about it with our children. We talk about it with our friends. That's what it's about. And in that sense, it is relational. You're relating everything really to God's word.

And so this guy in dysentery says, should anybody be shocked that a man who cheated on his wife dodged the abortion question on The View? I didn't know that. He actually got on The View. And they asked him about abortion. He doesn't want to talk about it. And he rarely quotes scripture.

Should anybody be surprised that he dislikes the open proclamation of the good news? He said, first, let's not claim that we won't judge others only to call them lazy. And the next sentence, or the same sentence, there's nothing more disingenuous than declaring that you won't do something and then doing just that. This reminds me of all the people who say, I love the second amendment, the Democrats, right? But we got to ban those assault rifles or people say, I love the first amendment,

but you know, these people have violated their privileges. Their licenses should be taken away because of what they said that I don't like. Well, they said about me that I don't like, we should take that away, but I love the first amendment.

I love the constitution of the bill of rights. No, you don't. What truly requires more boldness. He says, I love the First Amendment. I love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. No, you don't. What truly requires more boldness, he says, does it require more boldness to mingle with celebrities, to dress like them, to behave like them, to receive all the worldly acclaim while offering the gentlest Christian platitudes? Or is it more bold to stand outside an abortion clinic

and plead with men and women to embrace Christ and to choose life? Yeah, what do you think? What does it look like? This society, that's why I'm so sick of these people. You know, when you look at these mega churches, folks, what did Jesus say? He said, beware when all men speak well of you. If you look at the parable of the mustard seed. That's going to grow into this giant tree and all the birds of the air are going to fly and flock into this thing, which, you know, if you look at the parables, usually the, you know, the birds like the parable of the seed, the birds come in.

It's like Satan, you know, taking the word away, even gives you the commentary to tell you that's what I mean by the birds. Then he goes on to say, and the birds of the air are going to come in and nest in these mega churches they grew out of a small mustard seed i think it's also interesting that they refer to satan as the prince of the power of the air so yeah that's right birds of the air powers yeah the power of the air that's right yeah it goes on to say boldness is standing up for the unborn when millions were watching instead of dodging it like he did on the view by saying, well, I'm not the judge. I don't judge people have abortions. I judge street preachers. Street preachers are lazy and it's easy to do that.

Yeah, you go. You tried doing that. You tried doing that. Anyway, boldness is fidelity to your wife. He says this guy when you're tempted to stray. Boldness is found in those without a platform who faithfully proclaim the gospel, not just hoping that others will somehow grasp it through osmosis. Yeah, that's right.

I'll just hang with these celebrities and they're just going to, it's just going to somehow rub off on them. Because Carl Lentz is so godly uh so he says meanwhile don't let men like carl lentz deter you from your calling if you're preaching god's word with love on the street or if you're protecting innocent life you're bold more importantly god delights in it, he says. And so along those lines, the UK is threatening unlimited fines now for people who are trying to influence others near abortion centers. What do you think they'd do with some guy

who's boldly standing on the corner proclaiming the truth, right? Look at that picture there too, by the way. Zoom that in, scroll it up. Look at that. Now I find that to be incredibly disgusting. There's a young man there. He's got his cell phone and there's a cop. Excuse me, sir. Can I see your, oh, ever so polite as they are in the UK, the police, right? Excuse me, sir. I need to

see your device here. Could you unlock that device so I can scroll through it with my finger here and see if there's anything in here that I object to or that anybody else might object to? And, you know, that very act that you see right there in Ireland, if the man with the phone didn't open up his phone and let this Stasi cop scroll through it, he'd get a $5,000 euro fine just for denying to open up his device for it. The British government last week threatened unlimited fines for anyone who, quote, influences someone's decision to use abortion services. Well, good. That ought to shut down Planned Parenthood.

Oh, no. You can only influence in one way. You can influence minors to mutilate their bodies. That's okay. But you try to convince them that they don't want to do that, that's not okay. That's conversion therapy. Can't do that.

If you're trying to influence somebody to use abortion services, that's fine. If you're trying to influence them not to use abortion services, that's unlimited fines. Safe access buffer zones will make it illegal for anyone to do anything that intentionally or recklessly influences someone's decision to use abortion services, obstructs them, or causes harassment or distress to someone using or working at these premises, says the government. They announced that. The law will apply within a 150-meter radius of the abortion service provider because we do not want to have anybody deterring anybody from child sacrifice.

Child sacrifice must be unimpeded. The Home Office did not explain what constitutes influencing, but we have Jess Phillips, who has the title of safeguarding minister. Safeguarding minister. It's not enough that we have to throw away all of our liberty and our freedom

for the promise of safety. No, now we have a minister of safeguarding. Does this have an Orwellian ring to you as well? Claim that the new rule is necessary to protect abortion clinics because we're interested in protecting abortionists, the murderers, the high priests of this child sacrifice religion. We're not interested in protecting the children. For too long, says the safeguarding minister,

for too long abortion clinics have been without these vital protections and this government is determined to do all we can to make this country a safer place for baby sacrifice now if they haven't had these vital protections but they're still doing abortions right last week trial proceedings began for adam sm-Connor, a British veteran who was arrested in December 2022 for silently praying. You know, it wasn't just that lady who got arrested three different times. This is a man who is a veteran. I've also shown his video. He was silently praying in his mind near an abortion center.

Smith-Connor was quietly standing with his back to an abortion center in Bournemouth in January when he was approached by law enforcement officers who asked him what he was doing. Well, I'm praying, he said. An officer notified him that he was in an area that was governed by a public space protection order. You know, I've never seen such faith from statist police officers. Have you? I mean, imagine the faith that they have in this man's prayer. They believe that he can stop these abortions with his prayers.

They're people of faith, aren't they? It's called a safe zone, a censorship zone. It prohibits protesting, namely engaging in any act of approval or disapproval or attempted act of approval or disapproval with respect to issues related to abortion services by any means. Well, wait a minute. If it prohibits acts of approval, doesn't it prohibit what these police are doing? Aren't they approving of the abortion service by their actions? Of course they are. Hypocritical. This includes, but is not limited to graphic, verbal, or written means, prayer or counseling.

And so he says, can I ask what the nature of your prayer is today? Said the officer. 49-year-old responded that he was praying for his dead son who had been killed by an abortion. That he had arranged 20 years prior, the officer said, well, sorry, but I've just got to follow orders,

got to follow orders. See, this is why, you know, got to, that was the excuse at Nuremberg. And that is the bad understanding of Romans 13, that you just got to follow orders. No, no.

Not when the orders are evil. Romans 13 says a government is God's minister of good. A legitimate government is, right? In other words, that is descriptive of what a legitimate government is. Illegitimate governments, tyrants must be opposed. I think there's a moral imperative to oppose that kind of a government, not to bow down and to follow its orders.

And so he issued him a hundred pound fine for the quote, prayer that you have admitted to. He was also criminally charged with breaching a public spaces protection order. Well, there you go. That guy, he's so lazy, isn't he? Doing such easy work. Well, this is an abortion survivor who wrote an op-ed piece, and he said, we've now got 24 states with laws that protect unborn children at 15 weeks or

sooner. Should we throw all those out? Well, Lindsey Graham would like to do it. The people who want to nationalize this would like to do that. And I think it matters to save one child. You know, we look at the people who are at the abortion clinics.

Do they feel like they've done something good if they've discouraged one person from sacrificing their child? Yeah. So why don't we celebrate the fact that we've got 24 states that are doing this? Instead of saying, we're going to go all or nothing, because that's what it's going to be. If you nationalize this, it's going to be all or nothing. All the states will protect babies' lives,

or none of the states will protect babies' lives. This new era has unfortunately bred abortion extremism says this person who survived as a 31 week old baby many democrats have gone from pro-choice to pro abortion he says and the abortion lobby has ramped up aggressive campaigns to promote the procedure i'm not sure actually whether this is a male or female person. They don't have their name here. But they say, I was born alive after a failed abortion attempt. I lived when I was supposed to die as a 31-week-old baby. I grew up in Iowa in a loving home. Knowing that I had been adopted by parents who loved me, I had a happy, normal childhood. At the age of 14, I found out that I'd survived an abortion. What did that mean to survive something like this? Who was my birth mother? How could my birth mother give me up? These are only a few of

the questions I wrestled with for decades. When my birth mother was 31 weeks pregnant, her mother, a prominent nurse at a local hospital in Sioux City, Iowa, forced her to have a saline-induced abortion to end my life. For days, they injected a toxic solution into the amniotic fluid, a solution that was designed to poison and scald me until I was delivered dead. On the fifth day, I was born alive, but my birth mother was led to believe that the abortion was successful. I was rushed to the neonatal intensive care unit, where without my birth mother's knowledge, I survived and was later placed

for adoption you see what they didn't do was what the democrats love to do what ralph northam governor of virginia and a medical doctor said comfort care comfort care we're going to stick them over there on the on the side table and let them die of comfort, right? Yeah, just abandon these children to die of comfort. And here we can also see that nurses are every bit as bad as doctors. Yeah. Her mother is a prominent nurse. Some of them are, yeah, some of them are. As a general rule, they're just as egotistical,

and they probably know even less. I don't know, maybe something. I have zero respect for nurses or doctors if you're a nurse or a doctor go get a real job i have zero respect for the whole medical industry at this point we all do at this point my family no respect whatsoever they either should know better or they do know better there's no excuse for either one of those anyway Anyway, it says in 2016, I reunited with my birth mother, Ruth. I will never forget the pain in her eyes when we first met, pain that my survival helped to dull, but could never erase. Ruth was led to believe that her abortion had been a success for over 30 years and that I didn't exist. She was shocked to learn that I'd survived

the abortion. Ruth questioned how I could ever love her or forgive her. I'm grateful that I'd survived the abortion. Ruth questioned how I could ever love her or forgive her. I'm grateful that I've been able to offer her unconditional love. Yeah, God works in mysterious ways. This man or woman was raised in a Christian family. But we do get, one of the reasons, it's not just the megachurches. It can also be the little churches like this particular one. This is a Presbyterian pastor, Reginald Avant, the queer senior pastor of Madrona Grace Presbyterian Church in Seattle, Washington.

In a recent sermon, he claimed that the parable of the prodigal son, Luke 15, never set right with him. And while the prodigal should not have wasted his inheritance on prostitutes and wine, he said there was nothing wrong in asking for a share of the estate in the first place. The father, he says, shares some blame in how and why the prodigal son squandered his wealth. And for this reason, the father needs to repent as well. I read that and I thought, you know, that's kind of interesting.

I see so many people try to stand in judgment of God because that's really what this parable is about. You know, the father is representing God, God the father. And of course, sometimes we hear this so often, you know, the prodigal son and so forth. We don't really think about the meaning of it. You know, that was the way that it was referred to. In ancient English, it means, you know, like the same as prodigious, right? It really means the wasteful son. I'd like to see the headline start calling it the parable of the wasteful son. He wasted money.

He wasted years of his life. The father gave him the stuff. Yes, that's true. And there's a lesson there about God as well. God does let us make choices, doesn't he? See, the point is that God lets us make these choices. That's what this guy's missing. God lets us, gives us the ability to make these choices.

When we make the wrong choices, you know, just like this mother who had had the abortion, when we make the wrong choices, he also stands there willing to forgive us when we return to him. That's the point. But this guy, the queer senior pastor at this Presbyterian church, doesn't seem to understand. I think he's got some father issues. And that is male or female, whatever your sexual orientation is. There's a lot of people who have a real difficult time understanding what the Bible says about God our Father,

because they had fathers that they were not at all acting like God does toward us. That's one of the reasons why you have this parable. But anyway, he goes on to say, why was a father not more reluctant with his son? Why did he give in so easy and not hesitate about what he felt or thought in this situation? You know, it is kind of interesting, the parable of the talents. One of the three people gets a sum of money and you know then the master goes away for a time sees how they manage it the one who doesn't do anything with it the one that is called out for doing the wrong thing he blames the master he said i knew you were a harsh master i knew you were going to require things that you you know

that's kind of stuff that's basically what this guy is doing with the parable of the prodigal son or the wasteful son, right? I knew you were a bad guy. You're asking for stuff that you're not, you know, reasonable to have this. So it can be difficult for some people to see God because of the fathers that they've had, but, uh, you need to try. You need to try one more thing before we leave. This I thought was also an interesting biblical twist.

I saw this on a conservative website, which I got to say, I just don't agree with anything that I ever see on this website. I go there because same reasons I go to CNN or to, uh to some of these other places that I totally disagree with what they, I want to see what people are saying. And this headline popped out to me. Did the Bible inspire Israel's attack against Hezbollah? It's like, okay, let's see where they, I've got to see what this is about. This person says,

Using technical wizardry, Israel simultaneously detonated thousands of Hezbollah pagers in Lebanon and Syria, effectively castrating a bunch of fighters who subscribe to an ideology that views sadistic rape as a weapon of war. A short time later, after weathering 11 months of nonstop rocket fire from Hezbollah, Israel finally launched serious military strikes against Hezbollah outposts. I firmly believe that the Israeli Defense Force looked to the Bible for its inspiration. Do you think that they did? Do you think Mossad looks to the Bible for inspiration? Or the CIA?

Do you think any of those people? They're probably burning them. Israel and the Jews, known for their love of Christianity in the Bible. Yeah, well, this is actually an Old Testament passage that he goes into, right? From the Hebrew text. But I don't think any of them look to the Bible. They look to it as, well, you know, we're going to call these people Amalekites, and we're going to do whatever we want to do it. What they like about it is they can use it to manipulate a lot of Christians

into supporting whatever they do. That's what they like about the Bible. Yeah. Yeah. It's like Ben Shapiro who said, yeah, well, you know, I don't, I don't, you know, was it Joe Rogan, I think, asked him, so did Moses part of the Red Sea? No, Moses didn't part of the Red Sea. But, you know, that land that was on the other side of the sea, now that God gave, that's

true. God gave that to us. I'm going to take the the land but i'm not going to take the miracles i don't take the land but i don't want jehovah forget about that so i thought this is pretty amazing and so here's the story you know this goes back to genesis 34 this is situation you know jacob has the patriarch of later becomes, is renamed Israel. Jacob has 12 sons, become the 12 tribes of Israel. He has one daughter, Dinah. Dinah is raped by some of the people in the area, Hivites, right?

And then after the rape, this guy comes back and says, I love her, I want to marry her. And so the brothers, rather than punishing this guy for the rape, what the brothers decide to do was to say, well, if we're going to merge our families and everything, then all of the people in your family need to get circumcised. They said, okay, we'll do that. I can marry her. And so while they are incapacitated after the circumcision, the brothers come in and kill everybody. Now, this guy thought that was the inspiration for what happened with Hezbollah.

And he was getting high fives from everybody in the comment section. Yeah, it's like Hezbollah's underwear is fruit of the kaboom, you know, that type of thing. But not even joking like that. I mean, it was vicious, warmongering garbage. And, you know, yeah, 11 months of rockets well what happened to start off this 11 months of rockets october uh they what was happening in in gaza after the october 7th attack and so forth and so you can play this game of

hatfields and mccoy you know who did this and then who's reprieve you know we're reprieve we're we're taking reprisals against what they did and then they say well we're taking reprisals against what you did before that and we just keep going back and forth when we're going to talk about having peace never going to talk about that but i thought you know um he said um so he thought about this he thought that this was brilliant all All these people, yeah, kill them all and everything. But, you know, he didn't read to the end of the story. And as Paul Harvey said, and now for the rest of the story, right? Well, what happened at the end of the story?

Jacob says afterward, Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, the two guys, two brothers who organized this thing, listen to this. You have ruined me. You have made me stink among all the people of this land, among all the Canaanites and the Perizzites. We are so few that they will join forces and crush us. I'll be ruined and my entire household will be wiped out. And the brothers say, no, we've got an alliance with America. We'll be fine

i mean to me that is the lesson here you know you do look the brothers would have been within their rights to come in and punish or kill uh the rapist right most most of the punishments at that point in time were capital punishment so if they focused on the guy who had done the rape, that would have been legit. Instead, they decided that they were going to, by deception, kill everybody around him, right? And that's what Jacob, who was always, I mean, his name was Usurper, Trickster, and all the rest of the stuff. This guy, he himself thought that his sons had gone too far. See, the brothers then reply, but why should we let him treat our sister like a prostitute? They retorted angrily to their father.

But see, that problem is that that's not the only option. And it's not the only option that we have just to continue to escalate these wars, is it? You know, Israel is now in a situation where they've got war on five fronts. It's kind of like, you know, what happened where they're attacked by three different countries all simultaneously. But now they're the ones initiating this on five different fronts. I do not and will never support preemptive strikes. I do not and will never support escalation of this stuff. And people who have no interest in even talking about having peace or coming to a resolution.

And at some point saying, that's enough. Let's stop. Meanwhile, a North Carolina teen says that her class read about cousins having sex. And she went publicly in to rebuke the school board and said, and I'm out of here. I'm leaving. This happened. We used to live in Raleigh. This is the Karen is there. Karen, this is at Athens Drive High School in Wake County. A 15-year-old sophomore went to speak at a school board meeting and said that students in her English class were asked to read a story independently and then come together and discuss it in groups. She said the problem is, is that there was a part of the story that made me feel very uncomfortable.

I looked around and I saw the same expression on other students faces it was graphic it was pornographic and it was incestuous and they were supposed to discuss this it's very detailed she said this incident got me thinking in my helpful living honors class i am being taught about brain function and development i was taught that teenage brains like mine are not fully developed yet. That's right. That's why they shouldn't be doing this gender gaslighting. And yet, and we must be careful about what we engage in during these years. Based on this logic, I am a teenager. My brain is not fully developed and i should not have graphic incestual sexual content taught to me in my classes i'm deeply bothered and deeply disappointed she said well the um

it's not just in our classes uh the transgender ideology has gotten to the point that, now, I don't know if this is true. We see this in so many different areas. Everybody is talking about, you know, everything is going our way, right? If you look at the MAGA media, oh, Trump is kicking butt. You know, he's ahead in this state over here. Then you go to Drudge and the anti-Trump, um, you know,

left wing media. They say just the opposite. Oh, look at Lala is undefeatable. Look at how she's doing in this state and that state. So this is coming from world. And it says transgender ideology is driving long time Democrats away from the party.

They're changing sides of the refusing to vote. Well, I don't know if that is true or not. But I do know, and this is the story that I wanted to get to, this school district where everybody's getting these massive fines because of the actions of a school teacher. This is in Oklahoma, Neneca, Oklahoma. The school district had a $7.5 million settlement because of

misconduct by a teacher. And that's being passed on to the homeowners. Here's the local news report about that. ...paying the price for a former coach's criminal behavior. I am pissed. That should not be our responsibility of what happened. By no means.

Why some may be forced to foot the bill for a multi-million dollar settlement. A 7.5 million dollar settlement. That's right. One that could end up costing homeowners out in Ninnika the money going to the victims of former longtime basketball coach Ronald Atkins, who's in prison for grooming and sexually assaulting players.

The district accused of turning them blind eye. I'm pissed. Those who live in Ninnika are devastated. A settlement was reached in the case of former Ninnika coach Ronald Atkins. The settlement, $7.5 million paid to victims. 1.5 in the next 90 days, $6 million over the next three years. For now, insurance covering $1 million. The school will absorb a half million. The rest, more than likely, will land on school district property owners. In Nineveh, just about everyone, including the mayor, said reality hasn't sunk in yet. To compare, Kingfisher School, seeing the effects

of a suit this year, property owners in that district hit with a 12.5 percent increase in property taxes to pay off the five million dollar lawsuit after a case involving former coach Jeff Myers. The district wasn't insured, so with 5,000 property owners in that district split equally, it meant over $250 a year per owner for three years on average. This will be a precedent for more lawsuits. We are not liable for your mistakes. In Ninnika, the county assessor tells News 4 there are just over 2,000 property owners, so that $7.5 million could mean an average of $1,000 per owner each year for three years. I am pissed.

Why? That should not be our responsibility of what happened. By no means. What's your reaction to that, I guess? I don't understand why Ninnikaw has to pay for something that somebody else has done. For those still new to Ninnikaw, they wonder who would move in now. It kind of shocked us, because like I said, we were moving out here because it was quiet. And could anyone here already sell? Knowing what happened in Kingfisher and now hearing the settlement last night here,

I know that we're not flush with millions of dollars of cash. Now, the district does deny any liability, but the board released a statement saying this right here was the best option that would allow the district to still operate. Pretty amazing. And, of course, in that particular case, a $7.5 million settlement, that was about sexual abuse uh the five million dollar settlement they referred to in the other community kingfisher

school district um that was because of a hazing lawsuit that happened uh with a football team and so that was not sexual misconduct but the other one sexual misconduct they did a settlement of seven and a half million as you heard If they average that out over the small community, the insurance is going to only pay so much. They were underinsured, and so it went over a million, and they've got to take the excess out of the property owners. As I said, when we look at what is happening with the schools, it is destroying our society.

Public schools, like public health are marxist institutions they don't care public health doesn't care about individual health they will sacrifice the individual for the public health and it is about concentrating power into the government that's the purpose of the schools the purpose of the schools is to get people to accept that and to sexually groom the kids i mean when you look at uh these multi-million dollar settlements there and you think about the kind of stuff that is being done in our schools uh and the harm that is being done to people with the gender grooming not just with sexual uh rape and things like that which happens all the time uh in government schools uh but um you know when you look at that, which happens all the time in government schools.

But, you know, when you look at that and you look at the rest of the stuff, the people who have been gaslit, who take puberty blockers, who have surgery, whatever, as minors, can you imagine the liability that's going to be coming back in years on that? Why are we going through with this? It is so out of control and the school board and the principals and they have absolutely no accountability just like any of these other government actors that are out there they bear no responsibility for it nobody is going to say let's end the school and um you know they they need to have uh here's what I would do if I was elected official there. I'd say, we're going to defund the schools.

We don't have anything to do with the schools anymore. Bye. And then who are they going to sue after you dissolve the school board? And the school board deserves to be dissolved for this type of stuff. The small people in that town should come together. They should denounce the school system,

shut it down, and then say okay well if you want to sue each and every one of us personally for this stuff have at it we'll see you in court but we're not going to just quietly go by and be assessed for this folks we got to d fund the schools we must defund the schools there's no accountability for any of this with these people and it with having the schools means that first of all we will never own our property secondly look at the damage that they're doing to our children to our society it is a synagogue seminary of satan isn't it and the stuff that they teach people just unbelievable and what they do to people the civil lawsuit is one of a handful in the last year that relatively small rural

communities in oklahoma are having to pay everything that they do is should we say prodigal? Wasteful, right? Everything that they do. So we're going to take a quick break. Eric, thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin. And folks, I want to ask you, if you please will, like the stream wherever you're watching it. If you're watching it live or if you're watching it recorded, please like the stream there. We have, when I come back, we're going to talk. A listener who is watching on Rockfin said he had a little bit of a problem. So I'm going to tell you what that was and ask you that if you have that type of experience, give us some feedback. Let us know how that is working. We do want to know if it works or if it doesn't work for you.

And so we appreciate the people who have supported us. I just want to give you an update and i think we've updated the gas gauge it's been a crazy couple of weeks here we're spread very very thin uh but we are at about 65 percent and um so we got a little bit less than a week left we really do appreciate your support really do need your support. And so we'll get that gas gauge updated. We're going to come right back and we're going to take a look at some of the comments. Remember, guys, if we don't get enough support, I'm going to have to start up a new segment called I Have No Shame and I Must Grift. I'll let Travis do the ads there with that.

Yeah, he's going to make you listen to his pleas for money um but uh we're gonna take a quick break 30 minutes of me begging we'll take a quick break and we're gonna be right back stay with us they're doing what in the place they named after me good thing i have the david knight show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors making sense common again this is the david knight show Making sense common again. This is The David Knight Show. Well, we had a lot of people, a lot of people, had a couple of people who wrote us detailed letters about what is happening with the elites and their bespoke nuclear power plant, their own personal power grid, their own personal power trip i guess we'd say where they're not going to share anything with anybody but they're going to go back microsoft's going to open up three mile island and i said isn't that great don't you want to have the people

who brought you the blue screen of death operating three mile island i got this letter uh from john he said um the three mile island accident was a partial nuclear meltdown of Unit 2 reactor in Pennsylvania in 1979 during the presidency of Jimmy Carter. Prior to the accident in Pennsylvania, I did a study on nuclear power safety in 1974. I was selected from my peers to intern under then-Governor Jimmy Carter in an intern program in 1974.

My assignment was to do a study on nuclear power safety. The study was to address safety concerns and to look at current safety standards. My focus of the study was to look at the Hatch nuclear power plant located in the Altamaha River near Baxley, Georgia. I found during my studies that earthquake fault lines are primarily located on riverbeds. Interesting. And when we stop and think about it, California, they have absolutely no problem putting a

nuclear power plant right on a large earthquake fault line, the El Diablo nuclear power plant. You know, what could possibly go wrong with that? Let's build a large power plant on an earthquake fault line um um with the new small reactors coming online he says um there's a question about where's the waste going to go he said i investigated the nuclear industry for three months and met with many officials as well as nuclear power lobbyists he said the biggest unanswered question was the disposal of the waste. And again, as I said, what we're doing is we're kicking the nuclear waste can down the road. And where is it going to go?

Nobody wants to take it. They've got different areas out west, vast areas and underground caves and stuff. Nobody wants it in their state. And so what do we do with it? For the most part, it's being kept on site, which is what happened with Fukushima as well. He said, if you go to the governor, Jimmy Carter library index, you'll see my nuclear power safety study has disappeared. Based on my last look at the index, he said, do you know that the Savannah river has been

closed down to the supply of drinking water many times. Upstream in Augusta, Georgia from Savannah was the nuclear bomb plant that was run by DuPont. As one looked at a circle surrounding the bomb plant, leukemia was found at a higher proportion in the population closer to the plant, and it decreased as the circle got farther from the nuclear bomb plant. No wonder DuPont sold the plant to another company. My brother, a Vietnam combat veteran, was a pilot in the Army and flew around the bomb plant and saw many strange things, he said. P.S. Carter had Georgia over-sprayed by airplanes with poisonous fire ant spray.

During the spraying by air, I thought it was in Vietnam again, being sprayed by Agent Orange. Yeah, when we look at this, as a matter of fact, Tilly Blackwell, Blackwood, Tilly Blackwood, did an investigation out in California at an air force base and they had a massive amount of um the radium that they had dumped there a radium from things that they would use for instrument dials and things so they would glow in the dark and they had a tremendous amount of radium and they just put it on the military base and let it seep into the water there um this is your government. You know, that's the thing. Governments pretend they care about the environment so they can shut you down or whatever you're doing.

But they really don't. And then this also was sent by listener Adam. He said, I've been telling people for over a decade that a major goal of the Viridian Green Movement is nuclear power. Barack Obama was called Mr. Nuclear before Fukushima three mile Island. Isn't the major us nuclear disasters at Hanford, Washington state and SL one and Idaho were worse. I don't remember SL one people in the San Fernando Valley are still dying from the Santa Susanna field Lab meltdown in 1959.

We're within a few miles of where I worked for an aerospace contractor. Many more people have died from radioactive tailing disasters like the Four Corners National Sacrifice Area overflow into the Colorado River. There are many more. For example, the Las Vegas overflow, but I'll spare you the details. By the way, nuclear waste, he says says can be used over and over again physicist galene windsor exposed the nuclear waste burial scam in 1986 and there's youtube documentaries confirming his charges well you know look these people are all about environmentalism, right? They don't even bother to try to do recycle, reuse, reduce anymore.

They don't care about any of that stuff. They don't care about efficiencies. They don't care about reusing waste, nuclear waste, or any other waste. That's really where we are. It's just all of this stuff is just their way of gaining power. And then this was sent to me from Australia, an Australian listener. And I thought this was interesting because the link was to SMH, which stands for Sydney Morning Herald. But when I saw smh.com, I thought, shake my head, shake my head and discuss. Well, if you see this, you will shake your head and discuss well if you see this you will shake your head

and discuss this is coming from the sydney morning herald it says the next pandemic is inevitable and australia isn't ready yeah we gotta give more power to government people but yeah i guess um if you live in australia you should start referring to the sydney morning herald as shake my head we used to do that with the papers around us in Raleigh. They had the Raleigh News and Observer. We called it the Noise and Disturber. In Atlanta, they had the Journal and Constitution. We used to call it the Urinal and Constipation.

These papers deserve to be mocked. I had a friend of mine who the Rale raleigh paper the noise and disturber called him they wanted to sell him a uh newspaper subscription and he told the person on the phone he says no thanks i'm not training any pets right now the person didn't understand what he was talking about um but uh it just went right over her head uh and then this uh about um roku um this is from ron he says i'm watching a program on the roku channel about 51 minutes in there's some kind of distortion on the screen i hear the audio but there's a screen distortion half of it's pink and the other half is green it could be like, like you say, the environmentalists are green, but red and pink goes in the center. But I think it's my television, though.

I'd let you know about it. I thought I'd let you know about it in case you and your family and I hope you and your family are doing well. Praying for Whistler and his full recovery along with Travis's ailments. Well, thank you very much. And I just want to say, if any of you are having any problems with any of these platforms, Roku or any of them, please let us know. We'd like to know. Check in on that and see what's going on. It's most likely some kind of error in the way it's sending you the video. Okay. Yeah, could be, could be. Maybe some kind of, does it get encoded again on Roku? No, I use the same file. So that would be an issue on every single file if it was

something like that okay so yeah we'd like to know if it's some kind of an issue with roku but again um if you go to roku you can find uh uh what is it the david knight channel is that how it is set up the david knight show and uh you can find it there we're going to take a quick break do we have our guests ready yeah good okay uh we're going to take a quick break do we have our guests ready yeah good okay uh we're gonna take a quick break and we'll come back um uh let's see oh before we do on rumble stealth patriot thank you for the tip uh i don't know how many billions of dollars of taxpayer money was spent on updating coal-fired plants with scrubbers it's now all just a grift to separate us from our money and just to shut them down that's right we cleaned up all these plants and now we're going to just shut them down can't have anything this is the zero covid zero emissions zero co2 zero everything what they really want is zero freedom zero money

for you that's what this is all really about uh but we're going to come back in just a moment and we're going to talk about uh the father whose daughter was killed as part of this medical mass murder that we keep seeing whistleblowers coming out to talk about uh but um uh he's going to join us and talk scott sharer is going to talk about his daughter grace Grace. He's got a website set up called My Amazing Grace. He's got a podcast, and he's got a lawsuit, and we wanted to catch up with a lawsuit. We also wanted to go back and touch base with him and see what is happening with that lawsuit. For some of you who haven't heard the story, so we're going to go back and talk a little bit about, cover what happened to his daughter. We're now seeing this story repeated over and over again.

They kept the lid on everything with all the censorship and banning that they did. But the truth will eventually come out, especially when they kill our family members. So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 ORGAN PLAYS © BF-WATCH TV 2021 ¶¶ Defending the American Dream. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, and joining us now is somebody who is trying to defend Americans' lives. It is too late for him and for his daughter, who was murdered as part of this financially incentivized medical mass murder and martial law but he is trying to make a difference here with a lawsuit to explain to people what is happening he's now set up a

podcast he's got a website about his daughter and how they murdered her and we're starting to see the whistleblowers coming out you know when you come after our families, we're going to do something about it. And so joining us is Scott Schera. The website is OurAmazingGrace.com. Thank you for joining us, Scott. Well, thanks for having me, David. The website, by the way, is.net, but that's okay. If you go to.com, it'll end up going to.net because we also have that URL.

But thanks for having me on again. Oh, no, not at all. You know, since I last talked to you, my son has been injured. My other son, Travis here, my other son has been injured with an antibiotic. He hasn't been able to walk for nearly a month now. And so, you know, this type of thing is happening. It is rampant throughout the so-called medical community uh it's not medical at all it is just maniacal and um so um but tell people what

happened uh to your daughter grace you know it's good because some people have heard the story it's been a while uh so i think they would um be wellinformed to hear it again. But some people have not heard the story. So tell us what happened to Grace. What's interesting about what happened to Grace is God used the specific circumstance to open my eyes to show that this has nothing to do with COVID. This has been going on for a long time. And before I do that, I just want to tell you two days ago we celebrated grace's golden birthday she was 22 on september 22nd uh which was it was pretty awesome um you know you start remembering all those years she gave us and she was she was a gift from the lord david and

we just are we're blessed to have her so as you, we get into Grace's story. Grace just had a cold. And unfortunately, I was not awake then. Yeah, I was somewhat awake. You know, Grace was never vaccinated, but I was not awake that COVID was a psyop and this whole agenda to reduce the population and the government control. I just thought the government was not something that you submit to, but it certainly wasn't against us. Well, of course, I've gone completely opposite of that now, now that I'm woken up. But anyway, so I took Grace to the hospital with a cold. We had gotten into the fear porn relative to COVID, so we had done a home COVID test. Ultimately, the hospital emergency

room physician suggested checking in Grace into the hospital for three to four days as a preventative, put her on oxygen and a steroid. And if they would have only done that, if I would have never taken Grace to the hospital as another option, Grace would be alive today. But they didn't do that. And seven days later, she was dead. They euthanized her with a combination of Presidex, Lorazepam, and morphine, which that combination helped me to open my eyes to see, oh, this is much bigger. And ultimately, when it came time to revive her, my daughter, our daughter, Jessica, was in the room with Grace. I had been taken out by an armed guard three days earlier. She called us panicking because Grace, we didn't know they gave her this combination of meds. And her numbers started to crash. We started screaming through the FaceTime call to save our

daughter. And the nurses from outside the room with a guard hollered back, she's DNR, do not resuscitate. And of course we scream scream she's not dnr save our daughter but they refused the doctor had put an illegal do not resuscitate order on grace's chart and we watched her die on that facetime call uh the evening of october 13th of 2021 um it took a bit for for me to um start realizing what going on. But two months after that was my first opportunity. I was on national TV with Newsmax, and that started the whole process of jumping in. And now, you know, this is our full-time responsibility

to, you know, attempt to wake people up. Yes, yes. Well, you know, you talked about the beginning of it, and you said, well, you weren't awake, and you were concerned because you're getting fed misinformation and lies. That's not your responsibility. These people know what they're doing. They did this deliberately.

You know, they poison people. They kill people with their drugs, with their ventilators, with their midazolam. And that was the drug of choice for mass murder in the UK. And they're now finding that out. And you've got the whistleblowers, doctors and others saying we were told to to euthanize people. And we were told, especially people who had Down syndrome or elderly or whatever, we're told to euthanize them and claim that it was a covid death so we could get the statistics up. While all the while we had an empty hospital. This was just pure evil.

And, you know, it is not not your responsibility for this at all. It's the people who committed this murder, the people who financed it, who incentivized it, who demanded it eventually. And so you are now involved in a lawsuit and that is uh and you had a major um your lawsuit is very important because it's not just about medical malpractice tell people about the lawsuit yeah the lawsuit you know first of all i'll just frame the lawsuit and you reference i forgot to say grace at down syndrome and I have become convinced that is why she was taken out as part of this collectivism idea that we have too many people on Medicare and Medicaid. It's too expensive. And so Grace was on Medicaid.

The elderly are generally on Medicare. And that's the excuse they're using. Of course, it's much deeper than that. But people buy into that concept. We have too many. we got to ration care. We don't have enough care. My uncle, we just went to his funeral on Sunday. He was 84 years old.

He was doing fine, short of breath, and they killed him. The doctors literally told the family, we don't have enough resources. We have to ration care. It's a complete lie. Anyway, so you jump into the lawsuit. The lawsuit, as I have really studied now and become kind of the fifth attorney on the team, I guess you would call it. We have four attorneys on the legal team. The legal industrial complex is in bed with the medical industrial complex. So what we're using the lawsuit for is a platform. It gives

me an opportunity to share the truth, to shed light on the evil, both in the legal system and the medical system. So while we have a lawsuit, I'm not expecting justice through the lawsuit. That is not how you get justice, not using an antichrist legal system. Our claims are wrongful death. You asked about the detail, the wrongful death, medical malpractice, of course, and then lack of informed consent. That's a biggie. Interestingly, in Wisconsin, which is where I'm from, lack of informed consent has been put underneath medical malpractice by precedent. So, I mean, you can't make this up. So, what we ended up doing is getting a fourth claim, which is medical battery. So, to get around this idea that

lack of informed consent, which is a battery, is underneath medical malpractice, we have a separate claim for medical battery because we weren't told anything. And then our fifth claim is a declaratory judgment relative to the illegal do not resuscitate order. And all of those claims have survived. We've had multiple motions to dismiss last July, last October. We are in discovery right now. We finished the first round of depositions in May. Interestingly, we had two of the attorneys on the ground from Ohio. We had our family depositions, my wife and my daughter's depositions done and the defense had a discussion with us, me and the legal team and said we're not going to proceed with the doctor nurse's depositions unless Scott signs a gag order. And so we said, okay, we'll go under a gag order as long as you file

a motion with the court. So the court makes a decision on the gag order. And that decision was just happened July 29th, two months ago. And the judge released the gag order relative to the transcript and the audio. I'm still under a gag order relative to the video component of the depositions. You know, the idea, it's so crazy, David, but the idea is that, well, if I show these videos, so then a person has a picture of the person who did this to Grace, you know, that could put their life in jeopardy. So anyway, that was the message the judge gave us, but at least I can now release the details i have we're only a third done with the depositions but i would say i have roughly 50 lies reported under oath in the depositions i mean

you can't this stuff you know people would think that once somebody's under oath they're telling the truth um you know we had a doctor well a doctor who i never met they never met this doctor and he's talking about how he met me and i I told him how grace is a golfer. Well, grace is never picked up a club other than in mini golf. It's ridiculous. But that's what's going on. And you know, that's why, you know, the legal system, people are thinking, Oh, Scott, this is great. You know, it's great because we have an opportunity to have a platform to share the truth. But I wouldn't wish going through a lawsuit on people because it's a time-consuming process and your mindset has to get into standards of care, which, and that's the main thing I want to talk about today is standards of care, because, you know, just to give you just a blunt reference, David, you know, during give you a just a blunt reference david you know during covet they're pushing ventilators we we turned down the ventilator five different times grace was never on a ventilator and i believe because we rejected the ventilator which

was about a 300 000 payday that's why they euthanized grace to turn the bed yeah so ultimately if grace would have been put on a ventilator and died on the ventilator which would have been statistically what would have happened because nine nine out of ten people when they were put on a ventilator died on the ventilator we'd have no lawsuit because that was the standard of care doctors are immune from liability if they follow the standard of care to kill you that's just amazing and i've talked about the economics of this um and of course that number that you get typically i say well you know they were told if they pointed somebody say you got covid thirteen thousand dollars you put them on a ventilator

thirty nine thousand dollars the ventilators cost them fifty thousand they're already in the black with it and then they get to charge you for your daily use and then because it's a covid patient they get a twenty percent bonus for everything so what was that number that you came up with 300 the reason i say three 300 000 is because the government incentives weren't 300 000 but when you add when you look at statistically what was going on the average hospital stay with somebody on a vento there was 22 days that's right yeah the daily use and then they get 20 20 over what they would have normally charged from the government. So they're financially incentivized to kill these people on the ventilators.

That truly is amazing. And the standard of care, and of course, remdesivir, Fauci made that the standard of care when they had never done any. People who are pulmonologists, people who are respiratory technicians said, what is this about putting people who are having difficulty breathing, putting them on ventilators? Or people who are having difficulty breathing, giving them on ventilators or people who are having difficulty breathing, giving them a respiratory suppressant drugs like midazolam and things like that. You know, this absolutely makes no sense unless it is the purpose of the government to kill people. Now, part of a couple of things that stand out in your lawsuit. First

of all, uh, the idea that in Wisconsin informed consent is just, uh just ignoring that is just malpractice. It's not a crime. That's kind of interesting because that flies in the face of the Nuremberg Codes where you have to get an informed consent. But then also when you talk about the fact that the key thing in your lawsuit was that you were able to get this medical battery charge, which is outside of malpractice. Because always in malpractice, they like to just have the insurance companies paper this over with a lot of cash, and then it goes away.

But this is a medical battery charge, and that is very important because that does come down to the malicious murder of people. I had just this last week when I was talking about the information coming out of the UK. I had a listener who called and talked about how they had killed his wife, put her on a ventilator and then said, well, she can't handle the ventilator anymore. She's not going to survive.

Take her off the ventilator, give her this cocktail of midazolam and a couple of other things to suppress her respiratory system as well. He said she still survived 40 minutes, even though they wouldn't help her. You know, it's just amazing how criminal these people were. And they did it for money. That's the other thing.

They did it for money, didn't they? What's, you know, as I've studied this and you referenced my podcast, my podcast is called Deprogramming with grace's dad well the programming is so um it's by design these you know not just the population has been programmed but the medical profession has been programmed and you know they follow these standards of care like a religion and they they actually think a lot of them think they're doing society a favor by following standards of care they believe in rationing because they've been sold a lie over and over and over and it's become the truth to them that does not get them out of their choice

by the way but it is part of what i've seen with the banality of evil i mean you you i'm sure know of hannah er. She coined that phrase when she studied the Adolph Eichmann trial. And that is what's going on. The very few people who are truly awake see it, but otherwise they have everybody participating in this. Right down, my wife went to a Girl Scout camp a couple of weeks ago. And in the documentation for her to sign up for this, she was a former Girl Scout leader. And I mean, the Girl Scouts is another bought organization. I'm not going on that rabbit trail right now. But when you get into the minutiae, and they would not let her go to the camp unless she was vaccinated. And there's no religious

exemption. So of course, she just said, I'm not getting it. If you don't want me to come, I'm not coming. But, I mean, this is how they get everybody to participate. This vaccination agenda, I mean, the number of pediatricians and the people who believe that that is our way to save ourselves, it's hard. But they've been working on that vaccination psyop since the 1880s oh yeah yeah very long it's very ingrained in everybody's thinking and ingrained at a very early age and now pfizer's going around with a mobile school classroom uh propagandizing kids about the next lockdown and the next uh germ game and all the rest of

the stuff and how you're going to have to wait and we're going to be the ones who are going to come to the rescue with a rapidly created vaccine that's going to be required of everybody to get out of their homes. I mean, it's just, they used to be propagandizing the people in the medical community, the government and that type of thing for 20 years running these germ games. Now they're taking the germ games out to the young kids so they're going to have allies and true believers that grow up believing this stuff. It truly is amazing. You want to talk about standard of care.

Tell us a little bit about what you want to. Yeah, I do, because, you know, you start with just think through what we all believe relative to the Hippocratic Oath. And we believe if you want to bring up the first slide, Travis, you know, you'll see the title of this. I say standards of care, standards of death. And what we've been told regarding the Hippocratic Oath, if I just did a man on the street interview, it would, people would say, assuming they know what the Hippocratic Oath is, they would say, first, do no harm. That's what we've been programmed to believe. Well, the reality is that if you actually read the Hippocratic Oath, and this is why I try to take, every time I have a chance to talk,

I want to take it outside of COVID, to show people how long Satan has been playing this game and using the law of entropy to his advantage. Because the Hippocratic Oath, the first paragraph of the Hippocratic Oath, if you read it, it's an oath to four satanic gods. So you wonder, why are we in the trouble we're in? In 400 BC, the Hippocratic Oath was already written to four satanic gods, and that's been the acceptable standard. So for over 2,000 years already, that's what's going on.

So I want to get into, you know what, I do want to show a couple pictures of my beautiful daughter. Yes. If I can. That's the second slide. Okay. Yeah. So, Travis, if you want to bring up the second slide. There we go.

You can see some pictures of Grace. And I always tease with the second slide that the picture on the left is my hair color before I hired four attorneys. Anyway. You're lucky that you're able to find four attorneys that are going to go after the doctors in the medical system most of them are afraid to do that so that's good that you found somebody yeah well i agree with that i mean there's there's not enough attorneys for this but also what they have done is make it near impossible to win because the attorneys can only assuming that they're doing it on contingency we're not doing ours on contingency but if they're on

contingency our state statutes say they only can get a third. The maximum malpractice claim is by claim, not by individual you're suing, is $750,000. So our lawsuit is estimated to cost $800,000 in legal fees. So think it through. Attorneys aren't going to take these cases on yeah because there's no money in them that's right there are other people talking about the these types of you know antibiotics and other things uh somebody i read an article yesterday they said we talked to attorneys and i think it was um uh actually a listener said we talked to attorneys i said we can't take that it bankrupt us uh because they've made sure they they so

control the system and they have so much money. It's one of the reasons why they started with RICO statute to come after organized crime. And I don't agree with that. You know, just take the money first and then we can come after them. I don't agree with that principle. But that's why they were doing that, because they couldn't get convictions against organized crime. And they can't get convictions against pharmaceutical companies for the same reason. They're organized crime.

They got all the money you know so it's you're not going to be able to beat them in in this uh crooked uh system in most cases i agree yeah yeah i mean and these these laws i mean people think that the prep act is what we're fighting that that gave immunity for cold the prep act is child's play compared to the statutes that have been around since the 70s yes um yes you know even just just another quick one is because grace was a legal adult grace was 19 years old there is by statute no loss of companionship claim by statute i mean this is why you know you just you wrap your head around this and it's it's so evil and it's it's so many angles and that's why when i like i said when i get a chance to talk i'd like to zoom out and show okay this is this has been happening for six thousand

years yeah i've come to the conclusion we'll bring up slide three by the way david i don't see him on your screen but i have him on mine okay we got it we got it you got got it. You got it? Okay. On the third slide, what I'm first exposing, I've studied this quite a bit, the law of entropy. So the law of entropy says we go from freedom to control, from order to chaos. Well, God is a God of order. God is a God of freedom. So we don't, these things that are happening are not from God's system or God's way. So I've come to the conclusion that the law of entropy did not exist before the garden

until the first sin entered the world. And so then now Satan uses the law of entropy and the Hippocratic oath I already explained. Okay, well, the Hippocratic oath, you know, that is put in place in 400 BC and that gets repeated over and over and over and all of a sudden propagandize it to first do no harm and that's what people believe it's no wonder we trust the white coat and then you what i have also seen is that in genesis 18 17 this is when right before god destroyed sodom and gomorrah he said to Abraham, shall I withhold from Abraham what I'm about to do? And that is a principle.

That's a biblical principle. And Satan is under God, even though Satan is the prince of this world. He is under God, and he has a responsibility. Satan's also a legalist. So he legally, not lawfully, but legally exposes what he is going to do. The Hippocratic Oath becomes a big one. The virology vaccine agenda in the 1880s that we already referenced. Already in the early 1900s, doctors were using reason.

We can't fight Satan with reason, but they were using reason to speak out and say, listen, 100% of my patients who have cancer are vaccinated. I don't see cancer in any unvaccinated patients. This was already in the early 1900s, but nobody would listen because the propaganda was already starting way back then. Jacobson versus Massachusetts. This is huge. I'm going to read out of that decision because it's that big. This is how they pulled COVID off. Jacobson was a pastor. He didn't want to take the smallpox vaccine. His case went all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided 7-2

in favor of the state of Massachusetts. And what they did was put a stake in the ground that said collectivism is now legal. And here's what they said. In every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members, the rights of the individual in respect to his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint to be enforced by reasonable regulations as the safety of the general public may demand. So this is what they did with COVID. In 2012, it became legal to use propaganda against their own citizens. So then they can do a fake pandemic and use this spirit of collectivism, staking the ground from Jacobson versus Massachusetts to do lockdowns, masks,

forced vaccinations. All those things became legal. They not lawful and jacobson versus massachusetts started that process and of course let me point out to people you know he fought this they never vaccinated him but they did make him pay the fine and that and as you point out it was the beginning of this whole idea of public health being more important than the individual's health more important than the individual's consent and more important than the individual's consent. And that's why I say, you know, when you look at public health, you look at public education, they're not about health. They're not about education.

They're collectivist organizations. They're about subordinating the individual to the collective. And that's why they're fundamentally Marxist in their orientation. And you briefly mentioned 2012 when it became legal to propagandize the population smith month act was repealed by the obama administration saying we're going to now directly propagandize uh people in the united states they'd had that prohibition there when they created uh voice of america and radio free europe and other things like that said oh we'll only do that over there you know same type of thing we're seeing with the CIA, the NSA spying on Americans from their inception. Now, removing any legal penalties for them to lie and to propagandize us.

So, yeah, I just wanted to fill that in as well. Yeah, it's just fantastic. This is why when you asked me to come on, I would jump on it because you and I, it's just, you have such a, you've been doing this a lot longer than me. I'm a newbie on the flock. And you know, when I'm seeing this, it's like, oh my gosh, you know, and you fill in those gaps. It's just, it's fantastic. You know, the Flexner report in 1910, the Carnegie family hired at Abraham Flexner. This is where conventional medicine got started in 1910, allopathic conventional medicine and this report through all other modes under the bus chiropractic, naturopathic, osteopathic, everything else was labeled quackery.

And what I want to dive into a bit with the time we have left is Medicare, Medicaid was passed into law July 30, 1965 by President Johnson. And I believe by design, these laws that the government claims are to help the citizens. So this was to take care of the elderly and the disabled. I believe that was put in place by design. They were able then to pull it off through standards of care, which started in the early 1980s. And now the standards of care are literally designed to hasten our death. And I'm going to go through an example of that in just a little bit. Oh yeah, you're absolutely right.

You know, when you look at Medicare, Medicaid, CMS, that was how they pushed all this stuff through. They were the ones that are giving the standard of care as you, standard of care, as you point out,

they're also the ones who are giving the bonuses of 20% and that type of thing. And after getting these people hooked on that money, then the following year, when Biden comes around and says, now you're going to vaccinate all of the people in the hospital, all the doctors and nurses who had been partnering with them to do this to the rest of us, now you're going to vaccinate them.

And if you don't, we're going to cut off all of your Medicare and Medicaid, and you're going to go out of business because they've gotten so reliant upon that. That's what they do. They always throw the money out there. They get you addicted. It's like a drug dealer, right? Because that's the's what they do. They always throw the money out there. They get you addicted. It's like a drug dealer, right? Because that's the way these guys operate. They get you hooked on the money

and then you're theirs. And they can do to you whatever they wish. You're absolutely right. Medicare was a big part of it. I just mentioned this last week how everybody was so afraid of Hillary Clinton's health care, and rightfully so, that they're going to have death panels and they're going to decide what we can and cannot have in terms of health and they're going to ration care and all these other things.

Well, guess what? That all happened with the lockdowns in 2020. You know, we got we got all of that stuff that we were so worried about. They're able to run it through and they will run it through with a Republican. It's just just amazing. It's it's well, it's insane. And now that you mentioned CMS, um, Travis, if you can bring up the fourth slide, I referenced CMS here. So, you know, we, we get this idea. I think about the programming here. We're programmed. Hey, when you retire,

you can be, you know, you've got social security, you get free healthcare, um, blah, blah, blah. Well, you know, then a couple of times a year, they throw blah. Well, you know, then a couple times a year, they throw this out that, you know, Medicare is going to go bankrupt, Social Security is going to go bankrupt. That's all a lie to get us to fight for our own demise. So then we fight back. No, you can't take my Social Security away. You can't take my Medicare away. And those are designed to kill us. So we end up we end up participating in our own demise by them throwing out those lies so it's you know it's the ultimate bait and switch for our life cms is cms controlling standards of care are is illegal because that's the federal government but they have been able to pull it

off through the chevron doctrine from 1984 you know the che Chevron doctrine was now repealed three months ago, but you will see how that shakes out. I mean, that also could be another bone that they get us to chase because we're still in that system. All right. So then we'll go to slide five, Travis. I want to just show Satan's legalism in two very specific things relative to standards of care. So the first one is in Obamacare. Obamacare passed March 23rd of 2010. And Obamacare, we're the greatest country in the world, David, at projecting our sins. So we look at the Canadian-made medical assistance and dying program, all those naughty Canadians. Well, we invented it. Here you see right in Section 1555 that we're authorizing assisted suicide, euthanasia, and mercy killing right through

Obamacare. Then before that, President Reagan authorized vaccines to kill us with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, November 14th of 1986. So now we have the two major ways they kill us, vaccines, euthanizing, and they both were codified into law so this is satan's legal agenda and let me tell people who are listening because we do have some people listening on audio only uh this uh obamacare thing to referencing here which you've got underscored uh that these organizations um may not that they they're required to um uh says uh if the entity does not provide any health care item or service furnished for the purpose of causing or for the purpose of assisting and causing the death of an individual such as by assisted suicide euthanasia or mercy killing

and so um you know the um uh the issue is that they're they're laying the groundwork there for that as you point out exactly i mean this is why i say satan is the ultimate legalist so all these things are legal they're not lawful but they're all legal and that's that's why you know the the odds of holding anybody to account for covid and all the atrocities before covid is very low because they're operating with the legal authority. If we go to slide six, this is statistically what they're trying to do. And slide six, I call it the death funnel. And they want us all on Medicare. So you think, well, they're trying to get us off Medicare. It's just the opposite.

Because once you bought into medicare your supposed free health care which isn't free of course then you are subscribing to the standards of care and the standards of care are designed to kill you i'm going to give you a very specific example with the next slide and so the question becomes can you avoid signing up there's 135 million americans on medicare medicaid today that's over a third of our population the cost Can you avoid signing up? There's 135 million Americans on Medicare and Medicaid today. That's over a third of our population. The cost is approaching $5 trillion a year for those people when you include their Social Security. That's over 50% of the annual federal budget.

You can see why this spirit of collectivism was so important to implement because their goal was to get people on the programs. Why? So they can kill them. So can you avoid signing up and the answer is the only way you can avoid signing up is to not take your social security that's how they married those two things together because once you take your social security you are signed up that was by design all right so then i will go to slide seven i want to just what that cms does is that

financially incentivizes the doctors do even more to you right uh you know for the longest time we had um uh we were cash patients and we had uh you know one of these christian ministries and uh when you tell them that hey i'm a cash patient well we would normally do this this and this but we don't have to do that so we won't do that it well, great. Cause those types of tests and procedures could wind up killing you. So, you know, besides costing a lot of money, uh, but, but once they, once you've got that label there, now you're a cash cow and now they're going to do everything they can think of, uh, to, to get the money out of you. That's, that's the real danger of that.

Yeah. And, uh, the services they provide to get the money out of you are designed to kill you. That's right. One that just about everybody would be familiar with, and that's why I like to use this one, is cancer. So the standards of care for cancer have been around since the early 80s. Already in 1984, there were doctors speaking out, and that's the cover of this book, Dissent in Medicine, was written in 1984 by nine doctors.

They're speaking out against the cancer standards of care, which are the same then as they are now. Chemo, radiation, and cutting. Those were the standards of care in the early 80s. They're the standards of care now. They don't tell you that chemo has a 97.9% kill rate. They will not tell you most cancer has been cured. Why? Because they'll lose their licenses if they do. They'll lose their million-dollar mortgages if they do. They have to follow the standard of care to kill you. This is what these guys wrote in the book already in the 84, trying to warn people again by reason. This is a satanic agenda.

That's why reason didn't work they wrote the entire field of orthodox oncology will disappear as chemotherapy surgery and radiation for cancer are revealed as fundamentally irrational and scientifically insupportable so these mds already knew this was a lie and they just thought well we can just we want to warn our profession so we stop killing people you know ultimately they concluded a patient stands a better chance of recovering if he's never diagnosed so this is what's going on this is why i say the standards of care are really standards of death then relative to the vaccine agenda so that's the that's to euthanize somebody what about vaccines uh slide eight travis if you bring that up this is from a nurse david David she's a labor and delivery

nurse my daughter Jessica found this on Facebook about two months ago and you know she's proud of herself she put her picture and her name on this Facebook post she wrote as a labor and delivery nurse it was up to me to inject the newborn even back then over 30 years ago we had patients that would refuse i know that it is their right as parents to refuse but as not only a nurse but also a mother i just could not send a baby home defenseless i know what i did was not right but i would inform the parents i was taking the baby to weigh him or her on a more precise scale and then take them to the nursery and inject them just had to do it no baby was going to bleed out on my watch in spite of the parents stupidness wow wow so travis my son is um

they're just a couple months away from having their baby travis you better stay with that baby everywhere they gotta take him somewhere you're going with them as well i mean that's just absolutely oh man you cannot leave the baby at all you cannot uh you cannot fall trap um to their foolishness they're they're ratcheted it up so you know travis i know you're listening i would encourage you to not even go to the hospital to have the baby and the reason is is if you start rejecting the hospital protocols they can call c CMS on you or not CMS, CPS on you, child protective services. And they do it with legal authority because we are under medical military

control right now because we are still under a public health emergency. It's not a joke. So you literally cannot leave the baby and better yet is to have the baby outside of the hospital. Oh, I've covered so many stories about hospitals, kidnapping kids. I just,

just amazing. But yeah, that's another story. Uh, continue with yours. I'm sorry. I didn't mean it. Yeah.

All right. On slide nine, what I have documented, why did doctors follow this? If they know these standards of care are killing, why do they follow? Well, part of it is of of course, their program. But also, as I mentioned earlier, the state licensing boards, the state statutes. And it's so deep that we believe that we have informed consent. And yet informed consent is kind of a cursory thing. the cures act c-u-r-e-s in 2016 effectively removed informed consent so you've

got to be and you've got to have an advocate with you always never leaving your side if you're in a hospital stay the clip that i have underneath the training ai this is we we had an attorney involved to approach the district attorney in our county with a criminal case against the doctor who euthanized Grace and put the illegal DNR. And this is what she wrote back in response to the attorney. She wrote, a doctor is not required to administer treatment she or he believes is not medically effective. This includes authorizing a DNR. The parties clearly had a dispute about how Dr. Shokar should treat Grace. Dr. Shokar did not abide by the wishes of the family. However, there's no law in Wisconsin that requires him to do so.

Wow. Wow. And this stuff is, you know, your brain should explode when you hear this and you think, oh gosh, this is really what is going on. And the answer is yes, this is really what's going on. We are involved with a hospital rescue right now. My wife is in a hospital with a lady in chippewa falls wisconsin trying to get her out uh she didn't have any paperwork or anything available ahead of time she didn't plan she has special needs so the state assigned a guardian she has become a ward of a state under a guardian and they're they're trying to kill her because she's on the system all right big picture and i just want to close out with a couple big picture things let's go to slide 10 and this is when i keep saying this is a satanic agenda the idea of public health

is a complete lie it's public death why because the globalists have been submitted to satan and they believe they're going to live forever with transhumanism we don't have enough resources people are too expensive and so they have all the money we have a fiat currency so they can buy off everybody who isn't one of gods and. And ultimately, big pharma, big corporations control our government, and the government just becomes a puppet implementing Satan's agenda. If you read Ephesians 6.12 in the Geneva Bible, because they've eliminated it in the translations most people read, you'll see that the government is a function of how

Satan operates. And then I do want to explain, God always warns us ahead of time, slide 11, Revelation 18, 23, for your merchants were the most important people of the earth, because with their sorceries or pharmakia, they deceived all nations. So that's what's going on we we see this big picture you know the medical industrial complex is the biggest one in the world on purpose because god said this is god prophesied this is how it's all going to come to a close all right so then i want to just close with one more big picture slide and then people obviously what are we going to do so i want to i do want to close with what we're going to do but one more big picture slide slide 12 um what i see happening david is we have this desire for security and comfort everybody want to get gets things back to normal gas two weeks ago in wisconsin dropped to 279 a gallon oh you know thank god everything's

back to normal well it's's back to normal. Well, it's not back to normal. And God warns us against delusions. In 2 Thessalonians 2, verses 10-12, he says, they perish because they refuse to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion, so they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned to have not believed the truth, but delighted in wickedness. So, you know, we see this over and over and over. We got this, you know, politics right now. Everybody is engulfed in politics.

I mean, it's a delusion. It's a delusion to get us to participate in our own demise. And I've done a lot of studying on this. You can see in the bottom right-hand corner, I did about a 500-hour research project called The Matrix Revealed, where I exposed this in a lot of detail. So then now what? Slide 13, Travis. Before we leave, I like the cartoon down at the bottom,

the illusion of free choice, and you've got the cow licking. And there's a left and a right there, and there's two different paths, but both those paths converge again after that that wall going back into the slaughterhouse. And that really is what these elections are. And I agree with you. You know, we need to understand that we're never going to break through with any of this stuff as long as we fight this simply as a, you know, try to rationalize this with people who have absolutely no reason to think that they need to do the right thing because they have rejected god and they've rejected morality you're not going to get anywhere with those people they're going to look at what is in the ultimately when push

comes to shove they're going to do what's in their best interest which is going to be money and power sometimes it also involves sex but when we're talking about the medical stuff it's money and power they're going to they're going to make those choices in what somebody would call enlightened self-interest. But they're not going to make these choices as someone who is responsible and accountable to God. And if we don't have that as a society, that's why our society is coming apart. That's why we're seeing the corruption that we see everywhere. That's correct. Yeah. our society is coming apart that's why we're seeing the corruption that we see everywhere that's correct yeah and what your bright light test you know when you start hearing the politicians

that are solving everything if they do not call for repentance uh they're lying so both sides lie you might as well get it through your head we're not going to elect our way out of this yeah they don't think that they need to apologize for anything they've done either they absolutely have no conscience on it yeah when you're talking about the bible we're just talking about this this weekend with my family how uh how negative the bible is about physicians yes you're going back to the old testament right king asa and and as he uh it says uh well he got an illness in his foot and he went to see a doctor so he died and just kind of leave it there you know it's like well we got to think about that and then coming forward you know at

the time of jesus this woman comes up to him and she's had this um this illness this um this bleeding whatever she's had for a very long time and the doctors haven't been able to heal her it says but they have taken all of her money it's like yeah okay uh over and over can you see the same thing and that that quote that you got there about the the merchants the great merchants of the world the pharmakia the sorcerers as it's usually translated but the farming i call them the pharmakia all the time that's exactly that that is so spot on as a description of these people and uh it's just as appropriate today as it was 2 000 years ago and of course you know they saw this coming to the extent that we've never seen it before we've never seen the

pharmacie this much power uh the we've never seen these merchants with this much money and with this much ruthlessness and this much um just just um you know not unrepentance about the murders that they do to people they really don't care i've never seen this type of thing ever before in humanity uh same humanity doesn't change in terms of it but the extent of it uh we have not seen to this extent partially we we see it because they have through the banality of evil dumbed down the population through the public fool system yeah that's right that that really helps them implement this agenda. The event that you referenced in Jesus' time, it comes out of Mark 5, and that's a great segue into slide 13, because the only, what the end of that story is, so the doctors took all that lady's

money and they didn't cure her, but the end of the story is she came to jesus and he said it's your faith that has healed you so once she had a repentant heart and realized i blew it she came to him and he did not hold that against her and that's the the jesus of uh the old testament the new testament and the jesus today never changes and, this slide 13, I put now what legislation, I've had several people come up to me, we should have Grace's Law so that we don't have DNR orders. Believe me, we cannot, we've never been able to legislate morality, so I'm not biting on that. The new administration, I mean, God warned us in 1 Samuel chapter 8, you know, Trump is not a savior, the desire for a king in 1 Samuel 8, God warned him, I'm the king. And so, then once he said to Samuel, give them their king, but

when they find out the king is going to enslave them, and when he does enslave them, when they come crying to me, I'm already done with them, I warned them. So, you know, a new king is not going to fix this. And you think, well, we don't have a king here. Yeah, well, we do. I mean, we live under that saying, because it's not a literal king with a crown on his head, but it's the idea that we want a king to fix everything for us instead of a king. Both conservatives and liberals want that. Let's send it to

washington that's going to fix everything for us right yeah so the courts you know we covered that enough so the the pharmaceutical that picture i have on the left or on the right is not meant to be a pharmaceutical when i did the matrix revealed series i did ended up doing an explainer video and i called it the you know the the solution to both the blue pill and the red pill those traps the matrix is the white pill and the white pill is our lord and savior jesus christ so he's always been in the solution that's good i like that as opposed to the black this without i agree i don't really like that exactly we have the red and the blue pill well we got the black pill people it's just i'm so um you know negative about everything well we got the blue pill. Well, we got the black pill. People are just, I'm so negative about everything.

Well, we got the white pill that we're offering. I like that a lot. I've not heard it before. I want to show on, you've already showed my website. So I want to just go to our latest billboard, slide 15. And we put this up the week after the gig order was lifted. Will you serve in the hospital? We have two of these up both about 25 minutes

away from the hospital that murdered Grace. Last time I was on, we talked about my medical murder series and this URL medicalburner.net links to my medical murder series, which is medical murder is the number one cause of death in the United States by design. And that's where that goes if people want to study more. And the last slide I have is outside the courthouse, slide 16, outside the courthouse, after our first victory, July 14th of 2023, the attorneys made me wear a suit. I don't normally wear a suit, but they said, you got to do it for the hearing. So I did. Our daughter, Jessica, is on my right, my beautiful wife cindy on my left and i am here because they messed with the wrong girl yes good for you good for you well we need to do what

we can to pursue justice and that always needs to be the case and as you pointed out you know politics having a grace's law or whatever we have a good uh constitutional system but we don't have people that will follow the Constitution. I've said this so many times when you have people say, let's have a constitutional convention and fix all this stuff. Mark Levin, you know, talking about doing it. It's like, no, no. Who's going to be writing the new Constitution? The people who won't follow the one that we've got right now.

And the problem is moral. It is not legal. We have a good legal system. The problem is we've got immoral people who won't follow that legal system. As John Adams said, this is, this form of government is not going to work for people that are not, if it's not a moral people,

if you don't have any self governance, if you are going to, if it's just going to be dog, eat dog, whatever anybody can get away with, they don't think they're ever going to be held accountable. Not in this world and not in the next world well then you're not going to have a society where anybody's going to be interested in following the law so you can pass all these

laws and all these prohibitions and they will just swipe them away i mean when we're talking earlier about what happened with the with the fisa act that was supposed to stop them from doing mass surveillance instead what they did was they turn it around and used that as a legal excuse legal permission for them to spy on everybody you know and actually ramped it up and did it in our face after they had the law to prohibit it and so that's when you have immoral people who are ruling your country uh no law is going to stop them it's just a piece of paper and they stop them. It's just a piece of paper. And they will tell you it's just a piece of paper. I don't care what it is.

You're going to have to have that white pill. And that's where our hope is. Our hope is not in enforcing these people, but our hope to be good. We can't do that. But it is showing them the God that can make them good and that can change their life. And that's really the key thing. Right on, David. Very well said.

Nice closing. Well, again, tell us a little bit more about your website. And, of course, people want to support you. You've got merchandise there and a lot of other things. I've got some printouts of your website here. Tell us a little bit about your website there and what is there. Yeah, so the website is ouramazinggrace.net. In the upper right-hand corner, you can subscribe to our sub stack.

That's the main tool I'm using to get the research out that I'm doing. If people want to contribute, you'll see we have a give, send, go. We do have merchandise now. We started some shirts. My daughter, Jessica, got this go. We do have merchandise now. We started some shirts. My daughter, Jessica, got this going. She did a great job. The goal with these shirts is to get the message out. We receive $5 a shirt.

You hire a vendor to do all this stuff. But what's cool about the shirts, I'm just actually going to grab a couple and show you so people can get a a grip on what what we're doing yeah and uh and that that's the key you know they they are trying to do this on their own and um and it is very important what he's doing in terms of educating people you know we don't know what it is they can really blindside us and they can blindside us with fear with ignorance uh they can get us redirected to the condition itself so we don't look at what it is that they're giving us it's very important very important what you're doing so when you wear these you just so i like to wear them in airports because you would you're going to strike up conversations there you go

that's great i like that yeah and then then we have one for the by the way where people can't see this unvaccinated lives matter in the form of Black Lives Matter. And this one, Will You Survive a Hospital Stay? Medicalmurder.net. That's certainly good. Yeah, I like that. So those are the type of shirts you're going to see on the website. We have some ones that are emphasizing our beautiful daughter, Grace, too. But I want people to wear these things because nobody is necessarily going to do what I'm doing.

I get that. You know, I was at retirement. So, I mean, I have the time and the resources to be able to do this. And also, God built me a certain way. He made me for a time such as this. But everybody can wear a shirt and then engage with the person in the grocery store. You know, it becomes our responsibility. We all have to do our part.

That's what the parable of the talents is about. And people may not even say anything to you about it they just may look at that website there and go that website and and look at it themselves that's absolutely right well that's very important and and again i'm so sorry for your loss but thank you so much for what you're doing it is very important in terms of educating people so that they're not taken advantage of by this system this horrible predatory system that's been put in place. It truly is evil, and it is satanic. Thank you so much, Scott Scherer. And sorry about your daughter.

Ouramazinggrace.net or you can go to.com. Either one of them takes you to the same place. Thank you so much, Scott. I appreciate it. Well, thank you. God bless you, David. Thank you. Folks, we've only got a couple minutes left and so i want to play this clip for you i was going to do a little bit more of an introduction to it but um uh i got busy on

some other things that this is i think very interesting because we had the russian government do a simulation to show people in the uk what a nuclear bomb was going to look like. And when I was on with Clyde Lewis last night, we talked briefly about this. We talked about the idea of mutual assured destruction that was always around during the Cold War. I remember growing up as a child and seeing all of these horrific pictures of the houses being blown apart and the mannequins that were there. And it really did put that concern and fear about nuclear war. And there should be a concern and fear about it.

And so a lot of people are just going to, in the West, are just going to look at this and say, well, that's the Russians and they're just trying to scare us. Yeah, they're trying to scare you back into reality. Take a look at this. Imagine for a moment that the unimaginable happens. A nuclear weapon explodes over London. In this documentary, we explore the devastating consequences of this catastrophe. They could have got a better narrator, but...

In simulation, we will use a warhead with a yield of 750 kilotons. That's a pretty powerful charge. Some US and Russian ballistic missiles are capable of carrying up to 10 charges in a single missile. Upon detonation, a fireball as hot as the sun rapidly expands, reaching a radius of 950 meters. Anything trapped inside this fireball is instantly vaporized. In our simulation, the epicenter of the explosion is at Westminster. People within that radius won't even feel anything,

because the nerve impulse transmission speed is slower. Within 5 kilometers of the epicenter, the blast radius. City of London, Camden Town, Kensington, Brixton. These areas will receive the most destruction. Buildings will be destroyed and debris will fill the streets, creating extremely dangerous conditions for everyone in the vicinity. Given the population density in central London, the initial death toll could exceed 250,000 people and around 600,000 injured.

Within a radius of 10 kilometers, the radiation will cause third-degree burns. Within that radius, anything that can burn will catch fire. Gas stations, autobiles, power substations, gas infrastructure. Explosive facilities will explode and amplify the effect of the devastation over a huge area, including areas from Camden to Greenwich and Islington to Wandsworth. According to various estimates, further 450,000 people will die from burns, debris injuries or radiation sickness, and over a million will be traumatized. Many of these injuries could prove fatal over the next days and weeks.

Radiation sickness in particular will take lives days and weeks later. In time, about 100,000 more will be added to the death toll. Within an 18-kilometer radius of the blast... So you get the idea. This is about a four-minute video, but it is time for us to think about the reality again blast of nuclear war and not just of nuclear war but about all war you know it isn't uh horrific if you're just blown up with a nuclear bomb it is also horrific if you're blown up with other bombs and why are we so cavalier and careless about this why are governments involved in this kind of brinksmanship? And again, I'll remind you that this weekend, Occupy Peace, you can find out about it. Gerald Salenti has the Occupy Peace rally there in Kingston.

Is it Kingston? I think Kingston. Anyway, you can find it at OccupyPeace.com. All the information about where it is and when it is. The people will be speaking. You know, it'll occupypeace.com all the information about where it is and when it is the people will be speaking uh you know you'll um it'll be entertaining it was a great time and we were there i mean a lot of things kind of a street festival that's going on there uh and great speakers but you'll be able to meet like-minded people we met guard goldsmith for the first time when we were there a few years ago three three four years ago and so again people are so uh

cavalier about this war and it's important for us to understand what this would be like if we continue to go down this reckless path that our leaders are pursuing uh and i also didn't get into it earlier today but you have the the Canadian government has said that they're not going to central bank said we're not going to pursue central bank digital currencies I don't believe that for a second folks because if you look at the guy that they're putting in touting as perhaps the next Prime Minister this is a guy who's Canadian but he was head of the Bank of England. This is the ultimate insider. This is the ultimate lay down your arms, we come in peace type of thing. I think

CBDC is on the way. I think we've got a lot of things headed towards. Again, if you want to protect your financial wealth with some wealth insurance, go toidknight.gold that'll take you to tony artaban his wise wolf gold and you can buy gold or silver from him and tony saw this coming it is um zero hedge has got several articles about it metal mania they said gold and even silver now are taking off because uh as all of these things are coming in line, all these things are lined up. The UN is coming with all of these measures to try to increase our debt, rapidly increase it, and then come in and steal from us the debt for land exchanges and things like that. People see this, see the war, see the loss of the dollar status and all the rest of these things. You need to do something to proactively for yourself.

Don't depend on the government to protect you. Don't believe their lies that, yeah, we're not going to do that anymore. You know, that thing we said we're going to do for 20 years. Well, we decided we're not going to do that anymore. I wouldn't buy that for a moment. Anyway, go to a David. I go, that'll take you to Tony Artaban. And before we terminate the program, I just want to thank people

who've left tips and comments on Rockfin, Andromeda1. Thank you very much for the tip. Said your explanation of the UN today was absolutely brilliant. Well, thank you. I appreciate that. And on Rockfin, Jason Barker.

Good to see you, Jason. And thank you for the tip. It says, once you realize that healthcare is a for-profit business, then you can see why we're all being made sick by our medical industry. That's right. A for-profit industry for which they have absolutely no liability for which the FDA exists to say that you are free to do anything. As long as you know,

you pay these people and give them jobs and give them royalties on the poisons that they inject into people you're free to do anything says the fda if you understand that then you're ahead of the game to some extent you can try to take preventative measures thank you for joining us have a good day The common man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening. Thank you.