The David Knight Show - Tue Episode # 1,931: Tulsi PsyOp, JD vs J6ers, Cancer Cure, Toothpaste Lawsuits, and AI DeFi & Tokenization

Episode Date: January 14, 2025

(2:00) Budget Games by GOP Congress$5.7 TRILLION in spending cuts (but over 10 YEARS) and none of it is likely to happen.  But it DOES SHOW their priorities and they’re not good10:21(10:21) Tulsi Gabbard Lt Col in Psyops just flip-flopped like Lala Harris to violate the Constitution and do warrantless searches on Americans in order to get the job.  And Trump won’t get rid of her.  They call it “winning”(26:40) Will Trump Betray J6ers — YET AGAIN? What’s this nonsense about “violent” protestors?  Biden just pardoned most of the federal prisoners on death row.  Nothing on J6 rises to that level.  How about “cruel & unusual punishment” and “excessive” punishment?  Does ANY of that apply? (40:41) JD Vance can’t answer a simple question from FOX about the economy(44:37) Now Trump’s Waltz Wants MORE Ukrainians Fed Into “Meat Grinder”Incoming National Security Advisor, Waltz, is on the same page as his Biden predecessor, Jake Sullivan.  “We need” hundreds of thousands of more Ukrainian lives sacrificed, so lower the draft age in Ukraine.(52:34) NATO Escalation ContinuesDisgraced Mark Rutte, thrown out of his government after he tried to starve his own people by shutting down farms is demanding more money for NATO.  Trump was never about “getting out of NATO” as his cheerleaders said.  Is Trump the “Peace” President?  Like Woodrow Wilson or FDR?(1:02:46) LIVE comments from listeners (1:17:25) “Just Oil” useful idiots desecrate Charles Darwin’s grave Wait, they’re DESCENDED from Darwin (not apes).  Why I say that…..(1:23:47) Saving the Kids…from hospitals and schoolsCanadian hospital tries to euthanize young boy and harvest his organs.  Dad escapes to USA “new” approach to education?  A school in TX adopts the tried and true solution of John Taylor Gatto, teacher of the year 3 times in NYC and once for NY state, a pioneer in the fight against the “factory” approach of schools, and homeschool advocate(1:35:05) Flag Wars & False FlagsTrump and Gov Abbott refuse to follow flag protocol for death of a former presidentPoilievre claims US benefits from discounted oil which is contrary to Trump claims as he threatens 25% tariffsGreenlanders want to join US.  How much will US taxpayers give them and who will benefit?What will Trump ACTUALLY DO with crypto vs promises and expectationsWill Trump and CIA maneuver US into another MidEast War?Bannon vows to stop “evil guy” Elon Musk.  What was the ONE thing, of all the evil issues of Musk, that Bannon cannot tolerate?(2:05:12) LIVE comments from listeners (2:08:21) “2025, The Year of AI, DeFi, Stablecoins, and De-Regulation”Bitcoin dip in January is expected - what usually happens next in “post-halving years”?What happened to gold during the 3 most recent economic crises?(2:23:59) LIVE comments from listeners(2:29:42) Why Are We Afraid to Talk About a Cancer Cure?Pharma ads tell us “ask your doctor”.  How about doing your own research instead of blindly following the herd, especially in matters of life and death.  Here’s what BigCancer doesn’t want you to know(2:43:00) Six Lawsuits Against Makers of Kids’ ToothpasteAs the label says — the fluoride is “toxic and contact poison control if you swallow it”.  Yet these manufacturers make it look and taste like candy.  How much is dangerous for young children?(2:50:30) Trump on what he expects RFKj to doHINT: Trump thinks vaccines are wonderful (2:54:05) LIVE comments from listenersIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7 Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

La probabilité d'être frappé par la foudre est inférieure à 1 sur 1 million. Mais quand vous entendez ce bruit, vous pourrez probablement vous mettre à l'abri. Saviez-vous que la probabilité de contracter le zona est de 1 sur 3 si vous avez déjà été atteint de varicelle? Pourquoi courir le risque? Consultez votre médecin pour savoir comment Shingrix peut aider à prévenir le zona. Le vaccin Shingrix aide à protéger les adultes contre le zona.

Une protection totale n'est pas garantie. Des effets indésirables peuvent survenir. Visitez SHINGRIX.ca. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's The David Knight Show. It's Tuesday, the 14th of January, year of our Lord 2025. Today we're going to take a look, because we're less than one week away from Trump's day one What is he going to do on day one? Well, this week we've got 13 cabinet confirmations coming up Tulsi Gabbard has already done a la la hilarious flip-flop

A complete betrayal of what she has said she stood for for the last several years But it's not just a betrayal by her It's also a betrayal by her it's also a betrayal by donald trump who will not replace her because you know this is about winning and then we'll take a look at the j6ers will they be pardoned we have one person who has spoken out about what jd vance had to say very angry about hints that they might walk away again will it be peace in ukraine or will there be an escalation of war will there be peace at home or do we have these cia shows like sarah adams

preparing us for terrorism at home as well as war abroad with iran and then of course what is going to happen with the economy we'll take a look at that will trump's terrace scratch the economy. We'll take a look at that. Will Trump's tariffs crash the economy? Will he burst the crypto bubble? And they're also going to take a look at cancer. That's gotten a lot of attention after Mel Gibson went on with Joe Rogan, but there's better remedies than what they're talking about. We'll be right back. Let's begin with politics. We've got House Republicans say that they're weighing $5.7 trillion in spending cuts to fund Trump's domestic agenda. Wait a minute. We're just going to move this around, or are we actually going to save $6 trillion?

I mean, he could add that in one year, but they're not even talking about getting rid of this at all. They're talking about switching it from one agenda to another. They talk a little bit about what they want to cut. They don't want to say that much about what they're going to spend it on, except increased border security. They're going to turn America into an open-air prison, folks. But more importantly, this reduction that we talk about so much. Doge says, we're going to get rid of $2 trillion.

Well, this $5.7 trillion in spending cuts, that would be over 10 years. Do you take any of this stuff seriously? When you hear Congress talking about a 10-year cut, that's even more ludicrous than a communist five-year plan. Communists are always making their five-year plans. And Congress is always making its 10-year plan. Communists are always making their five-year plans. And Congress is always making its 10-year cuts. They will not be there probably in 10 years, but who knows?

They do have tenure. Over the next decade, $5.7 trillion, they say, Trump's ambitious priorities, including tax cuts and increased border security. You know, we talk about tax cuts. Oh, this is, you notice the way this is couched, even by Zero Hedge. His domestic agenda, okay, is going to be spending cuts, things like that. You know, tax cuts, all these people become budget hawks when they start talking about tax cuts.

Money for Ukraine? I don't care. You know, money for the people in western North Carolina? Well, I don't know. We'll see. We can't do anything about that right now, says Mike Johnson, GOP Speaker of the House. We can't do anything about that right now. It'll be a couple of months before we can get around to that. They still haven't done anything to fix interstate 40 that got wiped out and no they're they're talking about it maybe someday doing something about it

how long does it take to do that they don't care and when it comes to tax cuts these people really dig in their heels and And why is that? Why is that? You know, Trump just said he wanted to get rid of the debt ceiling for two years. The Democrats have been saying all along when they did the Inflation Reduction Act, right? That was a massive spending bill. They're not going to reduce inflation. They're not going to reduce spending. The Democrats believe in MMT, modern monetary theory.

I call it the magic money tree. The deficits don't matter. We can just spend as much as we wish. Doesn't matter at all. And of course, Trump agrees with him. Let's just raise the deficit. He spent his businesses into oblivion. He bankrupted six casinos.

Give me a break. What do you expect this guy to do? And yet, with all of that disregard for the debt, all that disregard for the deficits, they got to have their income tax. Why is that? The income tax isn't even what pays for the government. It's less than half of the government's revenue. And yet they've got to have it. Because it's about taking from us. It's about keeping us powerless. And that's what the green agenda is really about.

Now, in this, they float the idea that they're going to take some money from the green boondoggles that are out there, but then they immediately pour cold water on that saying no there's there's like you know nearly uh 20 uh republicans who aren't going to go along with that because this money is coming into their district and they don't really care about what happens to the deficit it's just how much money can i get they're all there at the feeding trough republicans as well as democrats the menu includes slashing welfare programs, revising the Affordable Care Act subsidies, and rolling back green energy tax credits. And then the rest of the article is how this isn't really going to happen. They could end welfare for foreigners. Before we give them the vote, they wouldn't be offending any constituents, would they?

But they're not going to do that. Welfare magnet, nobody's talking about doing anything about the welfare magnet. The overall savings add up to as much as $5.7 trillion over 10 years. Highly ambitious and as close to the truth as a jobs report from the Biden administration. All this stuff is cooked the information they give you about inflation rate that's a lie the jobs numbers that's a lie cutting 5.7 trillion dollars in 10 years that's a big lie that's a really big lie uh they say it's unlikely to become law says politico yeah that's right uh one GOP lawmaker, a senior GOP lawmaker, said, well, all these supposed cuts feel pretty controversial. I'm telling you there's not

going to be any cuts. They'll cut some things like subsidies to Musk's competitors. Now that he has maxed out his EV credits, he doesn't want his competitors to have them. That kind of stuff will go through. They can do that in the name, they can do that crony capitalism in the name of fiscal conservatism. So it'll go through. One of the most contentious components of the plan, however, is targeting Medicaid. The list suggests imposing work requirements for medicaid recipients a move that was projected to save 690 billion dollars we don't want anybody working that's

on welfare do we i mean you know to give them more welfare anyway the affordable care act another significant topic republicans are eyeing 46 billion dollars in savings how much was it that we sent to ukraine again uh-huh Another significant topic. Republicans are eyeing $46 billion in savings. How much was it that we sent to Ukraine again? Perhaps the most politically delicate area involves green energy and climate initiatives. The proposal identifies up to $468 billion. Nearly half a trillion right there. and green garbage and watermelon projects. Thin veneer green on the outside and completely red Marxist on the inside.

468 billion in savings by repealing provisions from Biden's climate policies. The very first one they mention is that subsidy for Elon Musk's competitors, now that he has maxed out his available subsidy. Yet not all Republicans are aligned on this front. 18 House Republicans, many of them representing districts that are benefiting from clean energy projects. Now, clean energy projects can be anything. It needs to work. You can clean up a coal plant. Coal is not dirty.

They just want to make it seem like that. So 18 House Republicans have warned Speaker Johnson against prematurely dismantling green energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act. They like that. What does it mean prematurely? How long are these things supposed to go? Well, you know, if we leave them there, then what happens is it sets a precedent. You know, they kind of harden in place. Think of these projects as cement that is drying around your feet.

Even proposed cuts to green energy tax credits worth as much as $500 billion could be tricky. They depend on political viability, and the 18 House Republicans are warning about prematurely repealing these things. Let's not do that. That'd be premature. This is why we have the Paris Climate Accord.

This is why these people pretend that we're in a treaty that we're not in. It's just a grift, folks. What a crew of liars and con men and con artists. It's amazing. And speaking of that, at the top of the list is Tulsi Gabbard, who now supports warrantless search of people, the FISA 702. She has opposed this, all of her term as a congresswoman. She offered a bill to stop it.

Folks, if we go back to the 1970s, I'll just remind you again, the CIA hearings were, and NSA as soon as they were created, they had immediately started surveilling American citizens. And that's why what came out of the church committee hearings and in the House of Representatives, the Pike committee hearings, both of them were having hearings at the same time. What came out of that wasn't any prohibition against coups and assassinations, unfortunately. What came out of that was a prohibition against them snooping and spying on us without a search warrant. And that was what FISA was about, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. You can surveil foreigners in foreign countries without a search warrant, but you can't legally surveil foreigners in foreign countries without a search warrant. But you can't legally surveil Americans in a foreign country without a search warrant. And you can't legally surveil foreigners in America without a search warrant. But they got ways to get around it.

First thing they did was they put in this FISA 702 to start to give them legal cover. But for anything that seems to be a gray area, they have their Five Eyes collaboration. We have the five English-speaking countries and their intelligence agencies. You know, they spell the five I's as E-Y-E-S. Maybe it should be the five capital letter I, the five intelligence agencies of the U.S., U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Australia. And what they do is if they're not allowed to spy on somebody legally in their own country, they ask one of their buddies, hey, would you do that for us? And then they give them the information.

Or they ask a large corporation like AT&T or like Facebook or like Twitter. Would you spy on them for us, please? And, you know, if you get that information, you know, you don't have any prohibitions against looking at people. And if you get that information because they're your customer, you can voluntarily turn that over to us and everything's good. So they can partner with corporations. They can partner with foreign intelligence agencies to get this stuff, but they like the Pfizer 702.

And now Tulsi Gabbard does because she likes the idea that she's going to get power. And just remember where she came from. And I've talked about this many times. I've shown you all of these things about Tulsi Gabbard in the past. She has made a point of being in the Illuminati. There she is doing her little Illuminati thing. She has, during COVID, put on a face shield and a paper mask. I am sadly getting a lot of compliments on my face shield. Thanks, Corona. Yeah, see, it was all Corona that did it to everybody. It wasn't Trump. And why would she do something like that? Well, because her military service in the army, and she's a lieutenant colonel, is in PSYOPs.

She works in PSYOPs campaign. What do you think? What do you think she wants? She works in PSYOP. And then, of course, we also know that she works with the World Economic Forum people. There she is. Her picture there, the young global leader, right between Alex Soros, George Soros' son,

and Dan Crenshaw, and right above Mark Zuckerberg, Megan Rapinoe, the rabble-rousing lesbian soccer player. And it's just, it's really pretty amazing that people are surprised that she would betray them i said that when she was picked i said let's take a look at her standing in front of congress and doing the illuminati uh triangle thing with her hands what was that about is that for your masters what were you doing trump doesn't know that you doing? Trump doesn't know that, though, right? Oh, he doesn't know. Is he going to get rid of her now? Now that she says that she likes FISA 702? Apparently, the FISA process and the 702 aspect, which is specific to American citizens, you can spy on them without a search warrant.

It's the line in the sand that the Senate Select Intelligence Committee has drawn. So think about that. That's even worse. This is a committee of Republican senators, and they made that the condition. You know when they would bring in Supreme Court justices and remember the litmus test of Roe v. Wade? Well, this is their litmus test. Will you spy on American citizens? Think about that.

For years, we had confirmation hearings of our Supreme Court justices for over half a century. And the litmus test was, will you support the killing of innocent babies? Now the litmus test is, will you spy on American citizens and kill the Bill of Rights? That's what we have in Washington. It's a bipartisan thing. And power, she wants it. She wants that power. Give me that ring of power.

I'll do anything you say. Just like Trump. She's reportedly reversed her position, and now she supports it. It should be remembered, in the latest reauthorization of FISA 702, Congress exempted themselves from warrantless search and surveillance systems, but not you. And that's what really changed about it. Now, her story is that now that they've had the reforms, she can support it.

Now that they don't spy on Congress, she can support it. What? That's even worse. That's even worse that they would exempt themselves. So Congress forbids the FBI, CIA, any U.S. intelligence apparatus or any entity with access to the NSA database, Congress prohibits them being allowed to use, to search them or their staff or their staff. This is like the insider trading thing, right? When I get into Congress, you know,

I can do insider trading and so can my staff. I know Pelosi, they took, CBS made an issue of it, especially pointing to Pelosi. They called it the Pelosi Act as a nickname, but she put out what was called the STOCK Act. It was an acronym. I don't remember what it was. But that lasted all of about four or five months before they amended it so much that they eviscerated it. That was going to prohibit members of Congress or their staff from doing insider trading, and it just lasted as long as the media attention was on them. And then when the media attention went somewhere else, they completely eviscerated that.

And so what they have done is they have completely exempted themselves from insider trading. They've exempted themselves from being looked at by the FBI or the NSA or any of these intelligence agencies. Let me tell you something. The people who need to be looked at the most closely are these people because they have the most power. And because we've seen over and over again how corrupt they are and how corrupted they are by that power and that money.

They are the ones who should be scrutinized the most. And yet they have exempted themselves, proving that they are a threat, proving that they are by that power and that money. They are the ones who should be scrutinized the most, and yet they have exempted themselves, proving that they are a threat, proving that they are criminals. What have you got to hide? Remember that when CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, said, well, you shouldn't be worried about people spying on you. Well, she's got something to hide, so what has Congress got to hide?

A lot more than you or I. After spending years asking every representative of consequence why they support the fisa 702 process uh this is the article is by sundance at the conservative treehouse he says i can tell you every one of them says that they believe it is needed because the intelligence community tells them that there are just too many domestic terror threats that need to be monitored. Well, I think the Congress is the biggest terrorist threat to Americans, and I mean that. Quite literally.

Look at the definition of terrorism. It is the use of force or the threat of violence to achieve political goals. Doesn't that define everything that our government does? Everything is done under threat of violence to achieve their political goals. It is impossible to find a person, he says, in D.C. who will forcefully try to stop FISA 702 reauthorization.

If you ask me why, in hindsight, I now take the position that FISA 702 is the gateway, the gateway to the massive surveillance system currently being put into place using RealID, AI facial recognition software provided by Palantir. This is the money that they scrape, if they do scrape any money from any of the programs. It's going to be put into domestic surveillance. That's what's going to happen in the Trump administration. In essence, the gateway that allows full-scale surveillance state that will be ushered in by Donald Trump. And we'll all just trust him, right? Because he's all about America first.

What, are you crazy? Donald Trump, an enemy of the people? It's opened by the prior authorization of FISA 702 that negates any Fourth Amendment protections whatsoever. Because, you know, fortunately, Trump can do whatever he wishes. Second Amendment, that's not a prohibition. And, of course, Biden can do whatever he wishes as well. They all believe that, these congressional and executive office terrorists.

James Lankford, a Republican senator from Oklahoma, member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, suggested on a Wall Street Journal podcast Wednesday, last Wednesday, that Gabbard should disavow her previous opposition to the 702 program. Then the Senate Intelligence Committee chair. So he's just a member. Lankford is a member. The chair of the committee is Tom Cotton, Republican, Arkansas. Also sent out a statement the next night, Thursday night.

He supported her 702 stance. But he said, Tulsi Gabbard has assured me in our conversations that she supports 702, as recently amended, you know, to exclude Congress, and that she will follow the law and will support its reauthorization as DNI. Now, follow the law means you follow the Constitution, means you follow the Fourth Amendment. This is also a big part of the reason why the D.C. deep state, he says, will easily confirm Kash Patel to be Trump's FBI director. Kash Patel is a big believer in the value of FISA 702 as well.

These heroes. How do they get to be heroes? Oh, that's people like Alex Jones and Breitbart and other people talking about what heroes they are. They're the ones who sold you these backstabbing traitors who want to betray you and the constitution of the bill rights so she now supports section of 702 that gives the u.s government the power to surveil americans warrantlessly she says if confirmed as dni i'll uphold americans fourth amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like section 702 okay liar uh this is like somebody getting up who let's say you've got somebody who has spent well i don't know last five or six years working for a pro-life

organization and opposing abortion and then when offered a high-paying job as ceo of planned parenthood they tell you well i'm going to be pro-life even though i'm going to be the ceo of planned parenthood you buy that that's um she made that faustian bargain a while ago quite frankly even about abortion now she was pro-life and then in order to get elected in democrat hawaii she threw the babies under the bus now she's throwing the constitution and you under the bus and so it's trump who picked her who stands by her who will push for her confirmation during her time as a member of the house representative she branded herself as a stalwart opponent of mass surveillance rights the libertarian institute in 2020 she introduced a

bill that would have repealed 702 well just four years ago five years ago now uh gabbert says she is now convinced that reforms to the fisa act implemented by congress have alleviated her concern over civil liberties because now we protect the privacy of members of Congress. Isn't that nice? But only them. Only them. You know, so this is perfectly plausible, right? Isn't it?

Because, you know, we know that Donald Trump was anti-globalist. And they continue to tell you that he was anti-globalist, even as he took the lead in the global lockdown. Took the lead in all of it and took the lead in the global vaccine to depopulate people. But he's still he's anti-globalist. He's anti-world economic form. He's all this other stuff. No, no. Judge them by what they say, by they do not what they say anybody can say anything take a look at what they do

gabard uh thinks that now it's all been fixed right nothing has been changed except for congress it's unclear what reforms gabard is referring referring to in fisa says the libertarian institute since it was previously used to target the 2016 trump campaign at one point trump was a staunch opponent of repealing section 702 killed FISA already. He doesn't even know how to communicate it. FISA was there to stop them from doing this. The 702 amendment was to let them get around FISA. What he meant was kill 702. Anyway, but that was before. That was before he got the ring of power. Now, Boromir is going to take office in six days.

So Republican Senator James Lankford questioned Gabby's reversal after meeting with her. He said she voted against what's called 702 authority every time that she was in congress and voted against it well now she's going to be a spokesman for 702 authority that's a legitimate question to ask how you're going to handle this and what does that mean yeah what does it mean so he he doesn't trust that she's going to be honest. I don't trust that this Lieutenant Colonel of PSYOPs is going to do anything except betray us in the Constitution. But now she's going to be, notice, she's going to be a spokesman for it. After opposing it

for years, she's now going to be a surveillance evangelist. She now going to be a surveillance evangelist she's going to be telling everybody what we got to have and then we moved to jd vance and he had the i didn't talk about it yesterday except briefly mentioned it referenced i want to play you uh the clip he went on sund Sunday and he said, well, obviously, any pardons for J6ers, it should obviously not be anybody who was engaged in violence. And I said that too. But do you think that they really had a fair trial? Number one. Number two.

What about excessive punishment, right? If somebody got violent there, what is it? Like life in prison, is that reasonable? Isn't excessive punishment and a prejudice system of justice there in Washington, D.C., isn't that enough for you? And then, of course, that all ignores the issue of agent provocateurs and who got violent first. If, I just asked J.D. Vance, if you've got people who come up with shields and armor and they start shooting you and they start beating you,

are you supposed to just lay down at their feet? Is that what you're supposed to do? You're not supposed to defend yourself or other people. Is that right? Is that right? I don't like war, folks, and you know that. But I'm not a pacifist when it comes to self-defense and defense of others. In an aggressive situation.

When you look at the pardons that Biden has done and is talking about doing, did anybody there on January the 6th, and I mean anybody, anybody, I haven't seen anybody, any pictures of anybody, even the people who are violent, that did anything worse than Joe Biden and especially his son hunter right and um yet joe biden pardoned them joe biden pardoned 1500 people joe biden pardoned people who have been convicted of murder and other capital crimes and we're on death row but jd vance isn't going to um is going to throw under the bus people who were there on january the 6th to support trump because they naively believed that was the thing that they could do and then get caught in a melee

uh again biden has gotten rid of all the people on death row federal death row except for two or three and um yet jd vance just can't bring himself to have the guts to pardon people that's why i said when people got very upset about hunter when people got upset about these other pardons i said don't scream about it too much because it puts pressure on Trump to do what Trump is not inclined to do, which is the right thing. So yeah, those who protested peacefully on January 6th should receive a pardon. If you peacefully protest, that's specifically protected on the First Amendment. But we're post-constitutional America.

Fourth Amendment doesn't apply. First Amendment doesn't apply. If you've got somebody, Joe Biden really should do some preemptive pardons if he wants to protect his friends, because his friends were the ones who broke the law when they violated the First Amendment and locked people up for exercising their First Amendment rights. People who were there, and I'll just, if you're even at the Capitol and you are protesting peacefully at the Capitol, let's just leave it the peaceful stuff right now. If you're peacefully protesting and redressing your grievances, as the First Amendment says, and somebody locks you up, they're the criminal. That would be like them going to somebody who is

engaging in their religious freedom and locking them up. Oh, that's right. I guess difference between lock up and lock down, I get confused, between Trump and Biden, right? Yeah. After everything that Trump did, I'll just say this again. I still don't understand the mindset of people on January the 6th. There was nothing that could be done, and there was nothing, in my opinion, that should be done. Trump deserved to be thrown out. Not to Biden.

I wouldn't see Biden in there either. But Trump, after the betrayal of what he had done starting in March, the lockdowns, the vaccines, the rest of the stuff, the face masks, the medals for Fauci and all the rest of this. And you're going to not protest any of that in Washington, but you're going to protest when he gets thrown out. Why did he get thrown out? Well, because he played the game of lockdown because he played the game of, well, it's all vote by mail. And we knew what that was going to be. And quite frankly, I believe the whole thing was a plan. I think the real plan, the real sting, was to make sure that they handed it over to Biden and then handed it back to Trump.

I think the whole thing was planned from the beginning. He said, if you protest a peaceful on January 6th, and you got Merrick Garland's Department of Justice treating you like a gang member, you should be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn't be pardoned. And then he later came back after he got a lot of pushback about that. And he said, well, President's saying that he'll look at each and every one of these cases

and me saying the same is not some walk back. I assure you, we care about the people who have been unjustly locked up. Do you really? Do you really? Yes, that includes people provoked. And it includes people who got a garbage trial. Well, I hope that's true. It's hard to tell.

You know, again, we'll have to wait and see. Six days from now. They're very concerned about Hamas hostages. And they're not saying that we shouldn't be concerned about that. But it's not about America first. We don't come first in this. Not even his supporters. So, again, that will, you know, continuing violence by Netanyahu will not disqualify him from getting tens of billions of dollars. Right.

But if, you know, you get into a melee with the police, depending on who started it, now you go to jail for life. But Netanyahu will keep giving him tens of billions of dollars as he continues to kill scores of children every day in Gaza. That comment came in response to a prominent conservative social media account's statement. By the way, this is the Hodge twins. I don't know who they are but they put this up and um let's see where is it um this is the j6 thing i wonder if we would not have that in there um we don't have that in there so um let's I'm gonna just wait here a second because I wanted you to see this here it is here it is the j6 the cops shoot first

people not violent but up there on the top you see some cops and you'll see them start to shoot into the crowd. You'll hear them shooting. Well, I certainly agree with that. That's what the criminals are. They're inside the house. And this is what one Jay Sixer said. This is Luke. Luke Lentz, I think think he served four months in jail he got 32 months of probation after that but it has turned his life upside down his bank accounts his job aspects all the rest of this stuff and he had this to say i don't know

about you but uh the last four years have been absolute hell for me. I've been hunted down. I've dealt with PTSD from January 6th. I was where the worst of the violence was that day. I saved people's lives while I was there from the Capitol Police. Yeah, I grabbed a riot shield and then used it to defend other people's lives. And then you get people grifting on the movement.

Okay, alright, you know. Everybody's got to make their buck, I guess, off me. And then you get people like J.D. Vance. He wasn't there. He doesn't know what happened. President Trump telling people to be nonviolent. I'm going to say this once, okay? You expect us to believe that they stole the election, okay?

Which is against the law and then you want us to peacefully and patriotically go there okay so we did and then we get attacked by these stupid motherfuckers and now you're not willing to stand with us

after we went through four years of hell hell we were locked up our bank accounts were drained. Life ended. The world stood still for us. I want to make sure the innocent men and women who were locked up for doing nothing wrong get a pardon. That's what I want now I might look like a fool right now but I've dealt with four years of being called

a fucking insurrectionist four years La probabilité d'être frappé par la foudre est inférieure à 1 sur 1 million. Mais quand vous entendez ce bruit, vous pourrez probablement vous mettre à l'abri. Saviez-vous que la probabilité de contracter le zona est de 1 sur 3 si vous avez déjà été atteint de varicelle? Pourquoi courir le risque? Consultez votre médecin pour savoir comment Shingrix peut aider à prévenir le zona.

Le vaccin Shingrix aide à protéger les adultes contre le zona. Une protection totale n'est pas garantie. Des effets indésirables peuvent survenir. Visitez Singrix.ca. deserve this we should be a hundred percent assured instead you mother are still playing politics with people's lives yeah well they were playing politics with people's lives all along January the 6th was the very worst cause you can have the very worst place you could fight for that cause. And they were led there by Trump and by Alex Jones.

He said, yeah, everybody's got to make their buck grifting off me. I get it. He says, finally, he gets it. And that's what it was. And I wasn't going to be quiet about this stuff. I opposed it from the very beginning. When I called it a grift, I got fired. When I called it a grift on air, but I opposed it.

I told Alex Jones, do not come on my show pushing this stuff. I'm not going to be a part of this lie. And then it got really bad. And I told people up to that very day, do not go. It is a trap. It was a trap laid for them by trump by stop the steel and alex jones and the rest of the stuff and then trump had two weeks two weeks to pardon these people and he didn't do it why because he was worried about himself

as i've said before we've had people who have been pardoned preemptively the insurrection law itself andrew johnson pardoned everybody preemptively gerald ford pardoned richard nixon preemptively now we've got joe biden doing it preemptively for a lot of people but not that traitor trump that backstabbing traitor Donald Trump, will not do that for his own people. He uses them. He plays politics with their lives. Some people will never learn. I'm just hoping this isn't the kind of regret that each and every American is going to have in this coming Trump administration that starts in six days. You know, when you look at this, like I said, Biden has pardoned 1500 people.

He's pardoned people who committed crimes worthy of death. Got them off of death row. And they're going to play this number. Well, maybe it's just a J.D. Vance, as articulate as he sounds, doesn't really know what he believes. And so he was also on one of these talk shows where they talked to him about the economy. And he wasn't sure what to believe there either.

Talk about what he's left on the border. He wants to talk about what he's left to do on the economy. There was a robust report out of December on jobs. Unemployment down to 4.1%. President Biden says his policy decisions are finally paying off. Here's a bit of more he said on Friday. Sure. After decades of trickle-down economics that primarily benefited those at the very top,

the Kremlin and Iron Administration have written... Don't pee on me and tell me it's raining. It's growing the economy from the middle... It's trickled. ...and the bottom up that benefits everyone. The new playbook is working. Okay, so the December numbers were good. What kind of credit do you give him?

Well, look, first of all, I wish Joe Biden all the best, but the fact is he has left us a dumpster fire, not just at the border, but also with the economy. First of all, we know the prices are way too high for many Americans. We have to work every single day to stabilize prices for American families. But Shannon, everything that he's bragging about ignores the fact that he has added trillions and trillions of dollars to the federal debt during a time of peace. He has left us with bond yields, meaning how are we going to finance that debt? We have to sell treasury bonds. And the treasury bonds have gotten more expensive because of Joe Biden's policies. So you go issue after issue.

Oil prices are now shooting through the roof in the final two months of Joe Biden's administration, in part because of decisions that Joe Biden has made over the last few weeks. He actually hasn't left the American people in good economic condition. That's why they made Donald J. Trump the president-elect of the United States. So we've got a lot of work to do. I remain fundamentally, and you know this, Shannon, I'll always be an optimist about our country, but I think that that optimism has to start with a bit of realism. And the real truth is that Joe Biden has left us a dumpster fire. Donald Trump is going to have to put it out, but he's good at doing that. Okay, we're going to...

Okay, let me help you, J.D. That's a pretty long answer. You're all over the place. You could have answered it with six or seven words. Do you believe the government, or do you believe the people, Shannon? Shannon Breen at Fox News. People don't see the economy getting better. The people are looking at their food supply being destroyed with this nonsense about bird flu. And so, you know, the bureaucrats, we found them lying up. Oh, look, got this great jobs number. Where have you been, Shannon? Do you believe those? After we had nearly a million jobs that were faked?

And then when you dig down into when they pull back the fake job stuff, you see that almost all the jobs that were supposedly created were people getting jobs of the federal government? I don't know, but I think the american people saw something different and i think the american people don't believe the bureaucrats the question is why would you believe them shannon are you going to believe the bureaucrats who lie to you on a regular basis or are you going to believe the american people who said this uh this economy has got to go in a different direction. That's a simple answer. We've got Mike Waltz, who is now talking about what's coming up. You know, we had Trump as the peace president, right?

Just like Woodrow Wilson, who got us into World War I, was the peace president. And FDR, who got us into World War II, was the peace president. And now we've got Mike Waltz saying the Trump administration is going to ask, ask Ukraine to lower its conscription age. Right now, they can draft you at the age of 25, and they want it lowered to 18 like they do to their own slaves. Trump's incoming national security advisor, Mike Waltz, said the Trump administration will ask Ukraine to lower the age of conscription

so more troops can be sent to the front lines. The Biden administration has also been doing that. And let's take a look at them, just so that you see that there's no difference in this area yet again between Trump and Biden. You know, the other thing that we're going to need to see is really stabilizing things on the battlefield. And one of the things that we'll be asking of the Ukrainians is they have real manpower issues. You know, their draft age right now is 26 years old, not 18. I don't think a lot of people realize that they could generate hundreds of thousands of new soldiers.

So when we hear about morale problems, when we hear about issues on the front line, look, if the Ukrainians have asked the entire world to be all in for democracy, we need them to be all in for democracy. This is a Republican talk. And they certainly have fought bravely. They certainly have taken a very noble and tough stand. But we need to see those manpower shortages addressed. This isn't just about munitions, ammunition, or writing more checks. It's about seeing the front lines stabilized so that we can enter into some type of deal.

Yeah, we need, it's not just about money and weapons. We need right he says think about they could generate hundreds of thousands of new soldiers and feed them into the meat grinder for nato's geopolitical aspirations not another person needs to die for that not another person how despicable this guy is this republican congressman from florida mike waltz who is going to be the national security advisor is saying that the war in ukraine is about democracy it's not about democracy at all you idiot this is like what the people of the vietnamese said to um um mcnamara when he came back, they said, don't you, domino theory? Don't you realize we've been fighting the Chinese for a thousand years and they're still fighting. They're still fighting over territory and water now.

The Chinese and the Vietnamese. But it wasn't a domino theory. And this is not about democracy, folks. Russia has had control of the Ukraine. and I say it as the Ukraine. It's a region of Russia from 400 years ago until about 30 years ago. And then the U.S. and the CIA and these people split it off and then used it as a leverage to attack Russia. Why is it that so many people in Crimea, you had the UK defense minister said, well, we beat the Russians in Crimea once before. We'll beat them again there now.

That's right. That was the Crimean War back in the late 1800s. And you were fighting Russia and you were fighting them in Crimea because Crimea was Russia. Until you decided that you wanted to use it for your geopolitical ambitions, and now you want more people to go on the meat grinder. Whether it's Republican or Democrat, there's no difference. This is Jake Sullivan.

Their conscription age as of a year ago was 27. It's kind of remarkable compared to how we do things that from 18 to 27, you're exempt from the draft. They lowered it to 25. They made a series of other changes to their law to facilitate people under the age of 25 entering. But you have to recognize that the manpower issue in Ukraine is an issue that has evolved over time. It has become more acute over the course of the past year. And the need for Ukraine to be able to fully populate its brigades and battalions as we have flowed in a massive quantity of the munitions and military equipment they need, it has grown. And we've made no bones about that. And we have briefed the new

team on that. So let's see what happens now on a going forward basis. That's ultimately a sovereign decision. Anyway, whatever. I can't listen to these people anymore. When this whole thing kicked off, you had military analysts in India that were not allied with either side. And you had many others who were saying it. People like McGregor, Douglas McGregor, were saying they're going to fight them to the last ukrainian all right so we've exhausted those above 25 so let's get down to the ones that are 18 now right it's despicable by the way mike waltz doesn't even know what the age is he said it was 26 is 25 jake sullivan said well it was 27 and then we lowered it to 25 and um and then um mike waltz says uh 26 years old

they corrected that in the transcript they said well it's actually 2025 uh so yeah when we look at this we've got um you know when we talk about crimea just take a look at what Trump is talking about with his grandiose imperialistic vision of Greenland and Panama. Greenland and Panama were never a part of America, but Ukraine and Crimea, all that area, a part of Russia for as long as America has existed. And yet Panama and Greenland and Canada, you want to throw them into it? They were never a part of America. Where's the justification for that? There isn't.

At all. Waltz also said in the interview that a ceasefire would be a positive first step. He hoped it would happen soon, that it would allow us to enter into the framework of some type of negotiated solution there. We'll see how that works

you know trump is worse even than the imperialists you know teddy roosevelt said we're going to walk softly and carry a big stick well what trump does is he shouts loudly and he hopes that they don't call his bluff and i hope that they don't too we'll see what happens with it before we get to La probabilité d'être frappé par la foudre est inférieure à 1 sur 1 million. Mais quand vous entendez ce bruit, vous pourrez probablement vous mettre à l'abri. Saviez-vous que la probabilité de contracter le zona est de 1 sur 3 si vous avez déjà été atteint de varicelle? Pourquoi courir le risque? probabilité de contracter le Zona est de 1 sur 3 si vous avez déjà été atteint de varicelle. Pourquoi courir le risque? Consultez votre médecin pour savoir comment Shingrix peut aider à prévenir le Zona. Le vaccin Shingrix aide à protéger les adultes contre le Zona. Une protection totale n'est pas garantie. Des effets indésirables peuvent survenir.

Visitez Shingrix.ca. And we will be right back, folks. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky. I'm so tired of wearing these same T-shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better. And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue. But he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.

You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events. If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Yeah, best of Hussler right there. We were just talking, Karen and I were talking, and he said, yeah, it's got his facial expressions

because that's what he did. He recorded his facial expressions, reading it, and then transferred it into Zelensky's voice. Yeah, let's talk a little bit about that. NATO boss warns members to start learning Russian. Maybe you could sing the song I just played there. Where do you start with singing a song? Yeah, this globalist traitor, by the way, the NATO boss, this globalist traitor that was thrown out by his own country, the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, because he tried to destroy their food supply and make everybody dependent on synthetic food that was grown and then delivered, grown by Bill Gates and then delivered by Picnic, which was um this organization funded by gates but also with ties to his family as well so they voted him out and then he became head of nato and this is what

he's saying he says european members of nato need to drastically increase their military spending or they need to start studying russian the old domino conspiracy theory again here isn't it yeah yeah it's globalist traitor traitor to his own people depopulationist mark ruta his remarks came during a question answer period at the end of a joint meeting of the european parliament's committee on foreign affairs while two-thirds of nato members are now meeting the bloc's 2014 target of spending 2% of their gross domestic product on the military, that's not enough. Not enough to protect them from Moscow, said Ruta. Again, send me your money while I shut down farms as part of my globalist depopulation agenda. And look, remember that the MAGA crowd and the MAGA media were telling you Trump is talking about getting out of NATO.

No, he wasn't. No, he wasn't. He was talking about, you know, he mentioned that a couple of times. He wasn't serious about it what he wanted was uh for them he says if you guys don't pony up and pay your two percent of your gdp into war i'm going to get out of nato and so they did and what was the purpose of that that was to arm up for this war with russia trump was preparing them for that it's's a tag team match, folks. Just like professional wrestling. Goes over to the ropes, slaps out with Biden, and Biden comes in and takes over.

I mean, it's just professional wrestling. Left, right, left, right. The march of tyranny. Ruta said, I just want you to spend more money. That's a quote. You know, if you can't shut down the farms in your country, you can at least bankrupt the people there with war. And who knows? Maybe we'll get a war.

That'd be another depopulation. That'd be even faster than starving people by shutting down the food supply. He says, I've not committed to a new number. I'm just saying 2% is not nearly enough. So Trump has floated the idea of boosting the spending to 5% now. So he was selling 2% when he was president the first time. Now he wants it to go up to 5%. He's selling war, folks. That's what he's selling.

But no NATO member, washington included is anywhere near that number at present uh so uh you know trump was never forgetting out of nato he was never forgetting out of any war or war organization he didn't you know obama got us under ob, we had seven wars going. Seven wars. Trump didn't stop a single one. He kept them all going. And he didn't get out of NATO. He kept it going. As a matter of fact, he built it up.

The mission was to push the EU to arm. So they could have NATO aggression. Which is what this says. The U.S. currently accounts for 60% of NATO's military spending at the moment. Without Washington, the European NATO members would need to boost their expenditures up to 10% of their GDP. Now, Ruta is saying that Putin is spending 9% or Russia is spending nine percent of its GDP on the military. And he says it's easier for them because they don't have our bureaucracy. Isn't it nice, you know, when don't you like it when Ruta and Trudeau and these other World Economic Forum globalists like to say, well, you know, if only I could be like communist

China or our enemy, Putin, you know, who can do anything that they want because they're not constrained by a democracy or a rule of law or a constitution or a bureaucracy even. They can do whatever they want. Isn't that nice? Trudeau said that about China, and Ruta is saying that about Russia. Putin has put that number at 6.3% instead of 9%. But just think about this.

If the EU believes that Putin is really a threat, well, why wouldn't they spend that kind of money, right? And what they're looking at is trying to push this up to levels that Putin is doing, but they don't believe that Putin is the aggressor, so they're not matching even those funds. The EU, folks, is more dangerous to Europeans than Putin is, just like our government is more dangerous to us than any other foreign government, any other foreign government. Any other foreign government. German Chancellor Schulz has blocked a 3 billion euro arms package to Ukraine because he's got an election coming up.

And just like Trump, after the election, he'll betray these people if he wins, right? Just wait until after the election and see what this guy does. Their election is coming up February the 23rd. Chancellor Schultz has opposed the proposal over fears of further alienating disillusioned voters ahead of the vote. Got to deceive them. They're starting to figure out what's going on. So let's pretend that we're something that we're not. Schultz's Social Democrat Party has plummeted in the polls and is currently on a course to attain 14% in the election next month, down from 26% in the last vote. And again, they always, since they have multi-party elections instead of the duopoly that we have here. It's very rare for anybody to get 50% of the vote.

So they usually form a coalition with another party. The SPD has formed a coalition with the Greens. That's the governing people. Socialists and Greens. And so we'll see what happens to this. He's down to 14%. And their response to that kind of failure, their response to that kind of arrogant detachment

from what the people really want is to ban their political opposition that is soaring. The alternative for Deutschland. They is to ban their political opposition that is soaring. The alternative for Deutschland. They want to ban them and to punish their members everywhere. It confirms what they are. Tyrants. Tyrants. 59% of Germans support resuming direct communication between Schultz and putin hoping to advance peace

negotiation sounds like 60 of the germans don't want war imagine that but they're outvoted by a couple of politicians aren't they a couple political parties the german view is reflected across much of europe even amongst citizens in ukraine's most fervent allies. Last month, a new survey in Poland showed 55% of the Polish population now supports ending the war in Ukraine, even if it means that Ukraine loses territory to Moscow. So even in Poland, where there is a residual hatred of Russia

from the years of oppression, people don't want war, but the politicians do. And that's what we have in America as well. People don't want war, but the politicians do. China and Russia trade, by the way, when we talk about the economic warfare, we're losing that big time. That's pretty easy to see, as point out when when biden put in the sanctions a couple things happened first of all um they couldn't really enforce the sanctions and putin started paying in gold since they seized and sold a lot of their assets in the financial system they weaponized that financial system but they couldn't they could they could

grab their money that was in the banks and in the financial system, but they still had gold and they still had real assets to trade. That's a lesson for each and every one of us, isn't it? And so what Putin did was he gave a tremendous discount to people who would pay gold for oil. And he wound up making $300 billion more than he did under the previous system because the price of oil skyrocketed after Biden started throwing economic weight around. So we lost that in that regard. We also lose it in the sense that China and Russia are much closer together. Their trade together hit a record high last year. It only slightly went up from the previous year, but in 2023, year over year from 2022 to 2023, there was a 26% surge in trade between China

and Russia. Trade between China and the U.S. grew by 3.7% in 2024. But it is like a fire hose, what is going on between China and Russia. Spencer DeLong says, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Thank you. He said, good morning all. David, I missed the show live yesterday, but I wanted to wish you and Karen a happy belated anniversary. God bless. Thank you very much.

And God has blessed us. You know, look, we don't take for granted or take it lightly that we've had 45 years together. So many different things can happen. And it's in this society, nobody really honors marriage. So we were both blessed to come from families that did and um we've both been blessed to be able to survive this long you know anything can happen and so we really are thankful to god for that it's really been a blessing and even more so than the 45 years we spent together is the fact that all but um seven years after we first got married and then the time that i spent at info wars with the rest of the time, the two of us have worked together

with each other all day, working on our own businesses and that type of thing. So that's really been a blessing. And we really want to thank all of you who support the program and support our family here working on this program. It's not just me that's doing this. I get a lot of support from the entire family. Karen, Travis, Whistler, all of them are helping with that. So thank you

very much for that. Psalm 144, thank you for the tip. That's very kind. At works, I can't listen live, but I was listening to yesterday's show and heard it was y'all's anniversary. So congrats, and I think it's cool that you guys get to do this together. May the Lord bless you with many more years. Thank you. Treat yourself to a nice meal of Z-Bugs. By the way, we didn't do anything at all for our anniversary. We tried to stay warm by the fire because we had a problem with our heating system and it was back in December we got it fixed and it's not even 30 days and it's out again so we got a fire and that's it for heat and we got it upstairs and the heat works up there too but there's

there's no heat on the main floor so there is some heat here in the studio. The studio has got a different system. And so we do have some heat in here. So we kind of hang in here to work. But hopefully they're going to be out pretty soon to fix that because it's been really cold here. But we couldn't get down the hill to go anywhere. And pretty much everything was closed anyway. We went down the hill to go anywhere. And pretty much everything was closed anyway. We went down the hill to make sure that the chickens were okay. And yeah, their water was frozen and everything. So we fixed them up and got back in the car.

And we couldn't make it back up the hill again. So we had to walk up the hill the other day in the snow, which was a bit dodgy. But we made it. Nothing happened. So we're grateful for that atomic dog david you might like this fun fact in january 2024 elon musk's net worth was 250 billion dollars today he's worth 424 billion dollars i know i've talked about that i mentioned the fact you know he gives uh what is it 200 250 He gives $250 million to Trump, and he gets a couple hundred billion more. And that's on par. Typically, people who buy favors from politicians have a tremendous return on investment. It's not uncommon to see people who give money to politicians get a thousand times their money back.

And that's what he got. They are a great investment. If only I could afford one. I'm not investing in Trump, though. Sprumford, they're trapped. They have to keep spinning, which is why the system will fail. And it's designed to fail. And it's a mathematical certainty.

That's right. And in Sprumford, it's not just system will fail. And it's designed to fail. And it's a mathematical certainty. That's right. And in Sprungford, it's not just America either, as we've talked about it. The debt, leveraged debt is global. And so what is coming is the great taking. And we're in the final stages of that, where they want to get control of your stuff with tokenization and securitization. They don't want to stop at real estate. That's how this fourth turning kicked off with an economic crisis that tokenized and securitized in a scam. Mortgages created a crisis.

Now they want to extend that to everything. Everything. And that's how they make sure that we own nothing. That's what's coming. Don't frag me, bro. Their game plan is old and predictable. Crash the economy, implement austerity and rationing, and offer war as the solution. Yep. They've done it all. And that's what generally

happens in these fourth turnings. As Strauss and Howe said, they saw this pattern of about every 80 years, about every four generations, you'd have major economic disruption, usually accompanied by war. And the institutions would get reset and everything. Then you go through, you know, another four generations and everybody's reaction just keeps repeating. They went back through 500 years of history.

And so that is exactly what they want to do with this. Matthew Ronson, Tulsi, lifelong ardent Marxist, jumps on the Trump train. Yeah, I don't know what her background was. I didn't know that she was a Marxist. I'll have to look into that. I know booty gay, big time, big time Marxist, and his father was as well. Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard. Liberty Conspiracy, the weeknights on Twitter as well as on Rockfin. He says, the Fourth Amendment does not distinguish between searches that the government wants to do so on people in the U.S. versus foreigners. The system requires warrants, real warrants, for all searches.

Good point. Good point. And so right there, it is. Inception is wrong. I remember reading a quote from a guy. Now, this is back at the beginning of the 20th was in Fleming's model for James Bond, because he in Fleming was in the intelligence agencies. And at the very beginning, and I forget now whether it was a U.S. or U.K. guy who was in the intelligence agency. And so they're talking about spying on people. And he stepped back and he said gentlemen do not read other

gentlemen's mail well we're not talking about gentlemen here and we're talking about oath breakers and law breakers and criminals and people who not only lie cheat steal kill commit assassinations and coups but we're talking about people who have classes on all of those things, as we were told. So DGA, thank you for the tip, says David. The Trump cult says they love the Constitution, and they have so much trust in Trump, even if it looks like a violation, they believe that he would never violate it. They forget COVID, the red flag laws. The Democrats are so organized during BLM and the anti-file riots that they made sure those lawbreakers never spent a day in jail yeah what's up with that republicans are leaving the j6ers to rot in prison cells see that's the other thing about it you know the democrats as much as i despise what they want to do and full-on marxist and you know lawbreakers all the rest of the stuff they do have they do do what they say that

they're going to do they tell you what they're going to do. They tell you what they're going to do, and then they try to do it. The Republicans will lie to you about what they want to do. They'll tell you one thing, and they'll do something else. And the Democrats will stick with their people and protect them. And the Republicans will stab them in the back. And I've said that all along. I said the difference between the Democrats, you think of them as an enemy army that is carrying a flag and wearing a uniform and coming at you, but the Republicans are the fifth column. They're the ones that are inside the city that are going to stab you in the back. That's why I don't like either party.

Somebody said something, it was a couple of months ago or something, some new person got on and said, well, David really doesn't like this person or something. Somebody else said he doesn't like anybody. Not in politics. I don't trust any of them. Sorry. Harps. Good to see you, Harps. Now in Australia. Amendment 8.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. That's right. And that's what's happening with a lot of this stuff. There's not anything in there, I guess you could say, cruel and unusual punishments that would cover the torture that was done to these people in the jails. We also have provisions for speedy trials. They kept people there waiting for quite some time

while they were abusing them in jail, punishing them in jail. And you know that this thing is a kangaroo court when there's not a single person. And we've got video of people who just walked in. Like I've talked about the two elderly men and one of them had a son. You know, they were like in their 70s or whatever. They needed to go to the bathroom. They asked the police who were standing by the open door either side. Yeah, sure, the bathroom's right in here.

They got charged. When they got out, there was a female officer who tried to direct them onto the floor of the Congress. And said, no, I don't want to go in. I just wanted to come in and use the bathroom. They left. They're looking at years in prison. Years in prison. Abandoned by Trump.

Abandoned by J.D. Vance, apparently. We'll see what happens. Again, we'll know.D. Vance, apparently. We'll see what happens. Again, we'll know. We'll know in six days. We're going to finally find out here. I hope I'm wrong. I don't want to see these people suffer anymore just to prove my point about Trump. My point about Trump has been proven because these people suffered for four years. I just hope that now he has been shamed into action by what Biden has done.

Established presence. Says, I went to keep others safe in case the Antifa types showed up. I didn't even step on the grass and I got arrested. Wow. Yeah. And how did that happen? A lot of these people got intercepted because Bank of America profiled what they were doing. You want to tell me we don't have CBDC now? That was the indication of what's going on with that stuff. They kept

records. They even said, oh, let's do something else. Let's look at all the people that were in Washington on January the 6th. We're going to track them. We'll use the phone companies. We'll also use the transactions that they've done. That's what Bank of America did. And then Bank of America goes back and said, and let's see if any of these people ever bought guns. Oh, yeah, let's turn all that information voluntarily over to the FBI.

DG8 says David Trump supports immunity for all law enforcement he loves civil asset forfeiture do these cops during j6 deserve immunity cops arresting moms taking their kids to the park during covid yeah he despises bill rights you know i always said that about Biden. Biden made it very clear all the way back to the confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas. But Trump made it pretty clear, didn't he, in his first term, even before 2020, how he despised the Constitution, the Second Amendment. Trev Long, smash that like button. Give DK the credit he deserves.

Thank you very much. I appreciate that. DG8 also thank you again he says david does jd vance not know that trump added eight trillion dollars to the national debt the repo market failure of 2019 do they forget that trump was already president how convenient yeah yeah major case of amnesia and you know look there's two kinds of never trumpers and they're just two faces of the trump coin on the one side you got the uh the people who have uh are absolutely deranged about trump's personality and they can never stand him that's the never trumpers that they always talk about but on the other side on the flip side of that trump, are the conservatives who love him so dearly that they'll make an excuse for anything that he does.

They are never Trumpers who are not deluded or not deranged, rather, but they are deluded. So you have the derangement on the one side, the Democrats. And then on the other side, you've got the MAGA people who are deluded, delusional. La probabilité d'être frappé par la foudre est inférieure à 1 sur 1 million. Mais quand vous entendez ce bruit, vous pourrez probablement vous mettre à l'abri. Saviez-vous que la probabilité de contracter le zona est de 1 sur 3 si vous avez déjà été atteint de varicelle? Pourquoi courir le risque? Consultez votre médecin pour savoir comment Shingrix peut aider à prévenir le zona. Le vaccin Shingrix aide à protéger les adultes contre le zona. Une protection totale n'est pas garantie. Des

effets indésirables peuvent survenir. Visitez Shingrix.ca. So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. Let's take a look at some of the just-stop oil radicals. They defaced Charles Darwin's grave in Westminster Abbey. Here's a video of what they were doing. And, of course, it's a shrine. It's kind of interesting, you know, they've got

some strong Christian leaders like They've already passed through the 1.5 degree that was supposed to keep us safe. Millions are being displaced. California is on fire. And three quarters of all wildlife has disappeared since the 1970s.

This is Darwin's grave. He would be turning in his grave. We're in the midst of the sixth great extinction. Our government plans will bring us to three degrees of wallowing. It will destroy everything we love. So, they're destroying what they love. We must stop burning oil, gas, and coal by 2030. Delusional, useful idiots, aren't they?

Absolutely amazing. You know, Darwin is really on their side. You know, these people are descendants of Darwin, not of apes, but of Darwin. These earth worshipers really came from him, you know, this whole idea. By the way, you know, 1.5 is dead. Okay, then why aren't we we that was the doomsday point they said and by their own metrics uh we have passed the doomsday point of no return already but of course that hasn't set california on fire as a matter of fact there's some real interesting um things that have surfaced about California being on fire. Here's a picture of simultaneous California fires starting.

Look at this. Popping up all at once, three of them. Starting all at once. Now, this is time lapsed, but they start about the same time, all three of them. Oh, isn't that interesting? Isn't it interesting how selective climate change is? It can focus on three spots and start fires simultaneously in those three spots. It's not about that at all.

It's not about that oil either. It's not about that oil. So the Just Stop Oil activists defaced Charles Darwin's grave. See, if they believed God's word, then they would understand that he'd created a symbiotic relationship with CO2 and animals and plants and all the rest of this stuff. But they don't understand symbiotic relationships because they are idiotic. They're just useful idiots. And, you know, they would not be panicked. Look, stewardship is a thing. You know, we need to exercise good stewardship and care of the land.

But it's not going to be the end of the world. It's not going to be the end of humanity. These people will be the end of humanity if they were to get their way. Not all of humanity, but they would end most of our lives because they're the ones who are the populationist so again 1.5 is dead they said well then your argument is dead and just like charles darwin the false prophets of their religion are essentially dead as well the radical group which often uses paintings to paint to vandalize great works of art and to bring attention to their cause by the way they just cut up a picture of lord balfour i mean they just cut it to pieces the guy who set up the you know kicked off this whole zionism thing at least they're picking the right targets here um darwin balfour all these different people

world leaders must stop burning oil gas and coal by 2030 they said really or else what or as thomas soul said uh so what and he also said prove it you know what else we've already passed one and a half degrees centigrade i mean just take the uh jimmy carter approach to adultery well hey we are we might as well just go for three degrees then right if you think that that is doing that didn't do it and it wasn't man-made uh but if you think that's the case we're're already done, you know. So let's just go for the full thing. Let's go full three degrees of whatever it is. Just Stop Oil is not the only leftist group to target the 19th century English naturalist in recent years, Charles Darwin. In 2020, for example, Britain's National History Museum got pressure from Black Lives Matter.

Well, now, they were right about that because Darwin was a racist eugenicist just look at what he says I mean it's absolutely amazing and all these people were you know the people who followed him uh people who you know that X Club which I really do think um that might explain uh Elonon musk's x fascination there was the x club and it was thomas huxley and you know following him his his grandkids aldous huxley and julian huxley aldous gave us the dystopian vision of brave new world and julian gave us the idea of transhumanism and all the rest of this stuff but they were were very associated with H.G. Wells, was a student of Thomas Huxley, and the X Club that was there.

All these people were eugenicists. They were transhumanists. They were technocrats. They and their followers. And racist as well. Real racist, I mean. Not the phony liberal stuff where everybody, racist, racist. No, I mean, these people are genuinely racist.

But that's where we are. So if you look at this story, though, this is a Canadian boy that doctors in Canada nearly killed him. They wanted to harvest his organs because he drowned and he was unconscious for quite some time and there was severe injury to him. His parents fought for him. But why would you, if you believe in Darwin and if you believe in survival of the fittest, you just throw people like this Canadian boy under the bus, right? As a matter of fact, Nishi despised pity.

That was his big gripe with Christianity, that Christians had pity. Now, shouldn't have any pity on anybody, right? This is a Quebec boy who suffered a drowning incident, was given up on by the Montreal Children's Hospital. He's now been given another chance at life by a children's hospital in Louisiana. The two and a half year old son of a New Orleans native drowned on October the 8th. He subsequently was revived with CPR, resuscitated. He was then moved to Montreal Children's Hospital where he received, quote, good service, unquote,

for about five to six weeks, after which doctors decided that he had no chance of survival or would remain in a vegetative state for years. The doctors said that they were going to remove him from life support November the 29th, stating that his organs were good for donation these ghouls this is you know again canada has jumped into euthanasia and uh organ donation unless you're talking about something like a kidney organ donation is um you know keeping the patient alive and then killing them by extracting the organs. They don't want to extract organs from a person who's just died or a person that they've just

killed. They want them fresh. So Nicholas claimed that his son was over drugged and he was told by the hospital that his son was, quote, good for garbage, unquote. But he did his own research. See, folks, you know, when you hear these ask your doctor commercials, don't ask your doctor. Don't ask your doctor. Don't ask your doctor for permission. Be your doctor. Don't ask your doctor.

Be your doctor. Don't ask your doctor. Be your doctor. We need to start taking control over our own research and over our own lives. I'm going to be talking about that coming up as well. So Nicholas the father did his own research and he contacted top doctors who then called Montreal Children's Hospital recommending that they increase Arthur's oxygen to 30% for about 45 minutes to an hour each day, and do that twice a day. This treatment has shown positive results, but the hospital refused. Oh, of course. Also recommended was hyperbaric oxygen, oxygen under pressure.

The Quebec doctor said they had no proof that it would work, and they weren't going to try it. Among the doctors contacted were Dr. Paul Hark, a Louisiana specialist on hyperbaric oxygen treatment, and a child rehabilitation specialist, Dr. Pierre Maroy, who had spoken together at a conference about hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Dr. Marcois visited Arthur at Montreal Children's and was surprised that they were considering removing him from life support at that point. Dr. Hart was not surprised at the hospital's reaction, however, stating that it is pretty typical for doctors to write off children with injuries as serious as arthur's and that parents suggesting an unconventional treatment like hyperbaric oxygen can result in a confrontational situation you know

how much does that cost them right uh that's not going to be nearly as expensive as pharmaceuticals and other things like that. So the father and mother cleared out their retirement account, took all the money out, and they flew their son by air ambulance to New Orleans. Now, here is where Canada is not as bad as the UK. We've had multiple stories of a child or adults in the UK under the bureaucratic government national health service that refused to allow people, you know, they found a specialist somewhere that offered them some help, had a treatment that had had some success for the particular condition. And we've had multiple stories that I reported on through the years where the UK government

health care system refused to allow them to leave and killed them. At least in Canada, they allowed the family to take their child out. So the father is very angry about it. He said he promised that he would conduct an investigation of what happened. He said, we have all names and everything. Just watch out the next month and the weeks to come and what's going to come. Just mark my words. We have all the names of the people.

We have everything telling you some heads are going to fall when I'm finished doing my investigation. Well, I hope so but i seriously doubt it they will cover for each other uh ben mulroney the son of the former canadian premier brian mulroney said the father went against the wishes of his son's canadian doctors sending him to the united states for treatment had he stayed in Canada, he would have died. But now, after 30 days in the U.S., he is out of the intensive care unit, and he is recovering well.

You see, it's parents and not bureaucrats that love their children. You need to be skeptical of these doctors. You need to stay away from public health, and you need to stay away from public education as well. They will come after your kids. This is a story about a new school that has an out-of-the-box approach. They say it could transform education in the United States. This is not actually a new idea.

It may be the first time it's been tried by a school. But this is something that was done by John Taylor Gatto. Gatto, I think is his name. Gatto. It's been a while. He won the Teacher of the Year Award at least once. I think it was twice. In New York.

He taught in New York City. And what he would do with kids in high school was he would arrange field trips and he was constantly taking them out of the class. He hated the classroom. He talked many times about how bad this whole idea of education by classroom is. He said, what is it that we're doing? You know, you tell these kids, you come in here and for 50 minutes, we're going to talk to you about something. Then we're going to ring the bell and you're going to go do something completely different. And you're always sitting there passively listening, never doing anything. He wanted to get the kids out, get them exposed to the real world, constantly taking them on field trips and everything. And the kids loved it. And they thrived under that. And then after a couple of these awards were given to him, big critic, and he resigned.

And he became a big advocate for homeschooling. Because, you see, this is not something that is new. That's what homeschooling is. And the idea, and this is being tried in Texas, just outside of Dallas, students not only learn in the classroom, but also learn on the job. And so Abbott is talking about it. Some others are saying, this is a testament to our mission of inspiring future generations through practical experiences that go beyond the traditional school setting. By working alongside professionals, students develop critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving skills that prepare them for both higher education and for the workforce.

And again, that's good. I think it's a very good thing. And if you think that schooling is about preparing people for college or the workforce, you're still missing the point. It's great to have a vocation. It's great to have a career. Those are not to be despised. Those are really good things to have. However, the purpose of moral education is moral, and that should come first. That's what real education is about. It's not about training somebody for a vocation or for a job. But those are good things.

And, you know, that is a nice move. But you don't have to necessarily go that way. And we have seen the same thing being done all the time by homeschooling parents. Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us.

Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com... Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show yeah and i thought i would just play that it's not uh it's not too christmasy it's a lot lot of snow scenes and things like that from the Christmas album. Octospoop says, J6ers need to be released and replaced with those who committed the crimes against them and against the Constitution and the American people, quite frankly. I agree.

Resha M. says, the eugenicists never want to start with themselves for some reason it's always somebody else it's always the the poor and the helpless uh and that they have absolutely no pity on uh let's talk a little bit about uh emperor trump and that's going to be coming up you know when i gave the history uh yesterday of this um martyrs day in panama and how that whole thing started oh well we're going to um fly both flags and everything and then these you know some kids at a high school american high school that were there no we're only going to put up the american flag we're not going to put up the panama flag and so that became a point bone of contention uh it resulted in riots he had people dying on both sides and

all the rest of the stuff all over a flag well now we've got with trump and biden we have fights over the flag again uh will you put up the american flag at full mast or will you do it at half mast right uh because and again it was it was Biden trolling Trump and saying, we're going to fly the flag at half-mast for Jimmy Carter for 30 days, and that includes the inauguration. Well, Trump is flying the U.S. flag at full height before the end of the 30-day mourning period following Carter's death. And then you also have, to virtue signal about this, you have Governor Abbott in Texas is also ordering flags raised for Trump's inauguration.

There you go. Virtue signaling for the MAGA people. It's great. It never ends ends does it and then in canada we have paliev pierre paliev a conservative um leader i guess claims the u.s benefits from massive price discount on canadian energy as tariffs are looming he's got a difficult uh row to hoe here because you know he doesn't want to offend conservatives many of them in canada are as enamored of trump as the maga people are i see this worldwide um i'm a man without a country here uh and so he can't really come out and criticize trump

for his threats about tariffs instead he has to say well you know we got a common cause here and we're actually your friends when it comes to canadian energy um trump has proposed a 25 tariff on all canadian goods um and um so pierre polyev says the that trump should remember that the u.S. benefits from cheap Canadian oil, which they've been selling at a, quote, massive price discount. Well, there's a reason for that, and I'll get into that. According to Polyev, this has allowed American refineries to have profited at Canada's expense, adding that tariffs on Canadian energy would mean many Americans would lose their

job and that both countries are better off without them so that the U.S. can continue to get, quote, low cost, totally reliable, 100% ally energy. That's the best kind of energy, isn't it? Ally energy. Well, the best kind is actually coal, but we can't talk about coal. I would remind our American friends that they benefit from our affordable, reliable energy, and the alternative is Venezuela, Iran, and other foreign dictatorships. Why would we not want to have a North American energy market that enriches us both.

The U.S. is the largest consumer of Canadian oil and gas, receiving 97% of the country's crude oil exports in 2023. The majority, 87%, is coming from Alberta, the country's largest oil-producing region. And it was Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta, that was just recently in Mar-a-lago to presumably kiss the ring adding that he would consider using economic force to merge the two companies two countries said trump i mean this is the point let's split everybody up let's get everybody fighting all right we're not going to work together cooperatively.

So, according to Trump, America instead is subsidizing Canada, he said. And the U.S. doesn't actually need the northern neighbor for things like lumber, dairy, or automobiles. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the U.S. trade deficit with Canada amounted to 68 billion U.S. dollars. Canada estimates that the surplus with the United States was 80 billion dollars. Officials in Alberta say the federal government's cancellation of pipeline projects to deliver Canadian oil and gas to other markets has meant that Canada has to sell its energy at a deeper discount to the United States. They're not doing it because they like us. But, you know, Trump says,

well, I might use economic force to merge the two countries. I don't think he's going to do that. I know a lot of people looking at it. Certainly, you know, what he's talking about looks like the North American Union or it looks like the you know region one of the new world order uh i don't think he's going to get into uh get that with canada but it is going to be disruptive and we're going to see what he does and i'm really concerned about how disruptive

trump is going to be but when it comes to Greenland, it's a different story. Oh, to look around at the patch of ground known as Mother Nature's sieve. Though it's horrible to visit, it's a miserable place to live. That's right. That's Greenland. That's the Greenland anthem right there or it will be uh if i have any say so uh more than half of greenlanders want to join the united

states this is um a question of do you want to be a millionaire i'm serious i mean that's what they're talking about doing buying the people off who knows how much money they're going to throw at them and of course the area mother nature's sieve is filled with all kinds of great stuff oil and all other things you know as i showed you the video that goat tree sent to me and some some guys walking around they're finding rubies on the ground there i mean it's amazing It's a vast area to look around. Maybe a horrible place to visit, but there's all kinds of natural resources there. And so you could look at this and say, well, that's a deal. Let's pay him a few billion dollars and look at all the wealth that we could get with that.

But that wealth is not going to be going to you and I. It's going to be going to Trump's pals. That's what this is about. that we could get with that. But that wealth is not going to be going to you and I. It's going to be going to Trump's pals. That's what this is about. It'll be private profits, and it'll be a public expenditure for that. 57% of Greenland's population supports Trump's proposal. Of course they have.

They've got dollar signs in their eyes. Who would blame them? Those rejecting Trump's proposal stands at only 37%, with 5% of the people undecided. And, of course, the president of Greenland has been saying that, prime minister, not a president, he stressed on Friday, we do not want to be Danish, and we don't want to be American. We want to be Greenlandic. And you have the Trump people are saying we need Greenland for national security purposes. No, that's an absolute lie. And their actions show that it's a lie. Before there were satellites, before there were long range weapons, as I pointed out yesterday, they had a massive military base that is still there. 10,000 people there. That's now

400. That was, you know, after World War II, they had 10,000 people, and that's 400. It's not a big security issue, not with the technology that is there now. That's a dodge. There's something else. I think that it is the resources grab for Trump's friends. But whatever it is, it's not about national security. These people, unfortunately, are stationed there in this air base getting DEI lessons when there's nobody around. Seriously are. Here's how you interact with the natives. And it's like, where are the natives natives i don't know where they are uh but the prime minister said well we want it not to be

american or danish but we want to be greenlandic but he said i'm ready to talk so he's open to making a deal right the island is rich in gold and silver and copper and uranium and deposits, believed to have vast oil reserves as well and territorial waters. And so that's, you know, that's one of the reasons why Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk are walking around and singing the praises of Greenland. In Canada, meanwhile, you have radical leftist Jagmeet Singh calls for aggressive response to Trump's proposed tariffs. But we'll have to see what happens. It's going to be an aggressive response in the economy, I think, that'll happen there. Crypto deregulation under Trump. The promises versus the reality.

The incoming U.S. president will have the authority to enact many policies favorable to crypto users after taking office next week with seven days now six until trump takes office many of the crypto industry have been monitoring his prospective staff picks and his policy announcements since shifting from calling bitcoin a scam in 2021 to claiming to embrace the technology during his 2024 presidential campaign. I think that's true. I think he, you know, when you look at all the money that he grifted off of people with the NFTs, I'll take a piece of artwork and I'll put it on the blockchain and I'll charge you confiscatory amounts. You know, he didn't shut down the scam.

He joined it. He's a scam artist uh trump made many promises to the digital asset industry that could affect regulation and enforcement and so it's going to be whipsawing everybody from the biden administration was trying to use every trick in the book to ban crypto by default you you know, through regulations and other things. And now he's going to deregulate. Trump promised to fire U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissioner Chair Gary Gensler on his first day in office. The first day in office.

That's what we're talking about right here. Other than making general promises to change the SEC's position on slandering, as he put it, the crypto industry and, quote, blocking ordinary Americans from all of this. We don't really know what he's going to do. We'll have to wait and see. Meanwhile, when we look at what's going to be happening in this next year with this administration, it's not just the fight over the flags being at full mast or half mast

but it's about the false flags and i've talked about this before when i first read that sarah adams a former cia targeting officer who now supposedly has left she's been sheep dipped and as she's going around all these different podcasts the first one that she went on which she broke all that information on was uh sean ryan's podcast the guy who was a navy seal but then he became uh cia and now he's supposedly gone as well but he has her on and she's saying well um this uh terrorist attack that happened in New Orleans is just the beginning. Al Qaeda has come across the border and there's thousands of them and they're going to be

attacking us. And that was pushed out there. I immediately called that out for what it was, just propaganda, laying the groundwork for them to do a false flag. And then when all this stuff with the manifesto gets sent to Sean Ryan as well via another person who goes to him. And then I went back and I looked at her interview. And it was even worse than what is said in the transcript. And she's doing it again, this CIA shill. And this is what she's still selling the idea that we're going to have massive terrorist events coming up this next year.

And they can make that happen. What do you anticipate these attacks looking like? Are we going to see these quote unquote one offs like in New Orleans just randomly and with more frequency? Do they have an October 7th style assault plan? What are you expecting? So we have both. So we're first going to see the one-offs and then we're probably going to see at least one U.S. embassy overseas targeted and then there is a large 9-11 style attack but it's more like the Hamas attacks or like the Mumbai plot, you know, for 15 years ago. And how the terrorists were trained, at least,

is they went through urban warfare training and they went through suicide bomber training. We believe about 10% of the attackers will be suicide bombers, but we also believe the suicide bombings aren't just going to occur on land. They're also going to occur in the air, on airplanes. Gosh, that is so freaky. Yeah, just like Operation Northwoods. Amazing, yeah. And she's got a very specific thing. Remember, we've had people come out and say, well, I think 52% of the people who get bird

flu are going to die. Where'd that come from, right? You're just making that up. Oh, no, they said 52 so they must have some data somewhere no they don't nobody's ever died from this and um you got somebody who died with a pcr test only one person after they claim uh that what is it five or six dozen have uh got bird flu which they identify as pink eye pink eye is now bird flu, which they identify as pink eye. Pink eye is now bird flu. Bird eye, we should call it. Bird's eye.

Frozen food. But she says, well, it's going to be 10% of these attacks are going to be suicide bombers. And we know they're going to use airplanes. Because the CIA has been talking about doing this kind of stuff since the 1960s. That's what Operation Northwoods was. And we look at 9-11 she's out there pushing all this stuff notice how she ties it into october the 7th style attacks and because what they want to use this for is to maneuver us into a war with iran

don't be fooled again come on we've been lied into one war after the other by the CIA, weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Remember that? Gina Haspel, who coincidentally, Trump made his CIA director for all four years, effectively. The first two years, she was supposedly under Pompeo. I think she was running the whole show. Then he moves on to his next plum

job at the state department and she continues to run it the cia has lied us into one war after the other as they commit false flag attacks against us so understand what's going to happen with this the life site news talks about why the radical zism of Trump and Musk should concern us all. Trump has been nominating and surrounding himself with people who are almost all pro-Zionist, some of them extremely so. The most notable of whom have been pointed out by LifeSite News. Many times they got links to it. The drawing development appears to be the litmus test for anyone who wants a top cabinet position or any other influential position in his administration

yeah we got a couple a couple of litmus tests first of all you need to jump on and be a hundred percent for surveillance of the american people in violation of the constitution in violation even of the foreign intelligence surveillance act and then of, you need to be fully on board with anything that the political leadership of Israel wants to do. No questions asked. This should deeply concern the American people, says LifeSite News, especially after the horrors that have occurred in Gaza and elsewhere, following the Hamas invasion last year, it gives the impression that Israel first has become Trump's main focus. Yeah.

And, you know, when somebody is attacked, even, you know, even if it is something of a false flag, even if you like with Pearl Harbor, even if you know that it's coming and you don't do anything to defend against it. It's still on those people and they need, you know, you're justified in terms of defending yourself against that. But the other part of a just war is that you stop when the threat stops. In the same way that if somebody invades your house, you are entitled to stand your ground and defend yourself by any means of violence possible, even including taking their life. But if they're not coming after you, if they're running away, if they've got your prized possession under their arm, you're not allowed to shoot them in the back. These are the same moral principles that should guide nations, not just individuals.

And so the dozens of people that are being killed each day still in Gaza when there is no threat coming from there, it's about something else. And many of those people, children. We won't know the answer about what is going to happen there until Trump is sworn in, but there's signals that he is going to give them carte blanche to do whatever they want, and that we will go to war for them in Iran. And I think that's what this CIA stuff is leading up to. Israel is consumed with efforts to lure the U.S. into joining it in a dangerous war against Iran that would be a lot more dangerous for American troops than the Netanyahu provoked

war against Iraq. It will almost certainly lead to a much wider war, possibly, as many of us have been quoting and warning, an Armageddon nuclear war between the great powers if this gets out of control. The more extreme messianic religious Zionists and their settlers, whom Netanyahu has allied with and given much more influence to keep himself out of jail, and has welcomed such a war as a necessary path to accelerate the coming of their earthly Messiah after they have built the third temple. And that would include many Christians as well, unfortunately, who have replaced Jesus with Israel in their worship. Bernie Sanders went on with Jon Stewart, talking about how AIPAC controls Congress and not the voters. But, you know, we have had Trump talk about this many times. I mean, this is not something that's just Bernie Sanders and Jon Stewart, both of whom

are Jewish, by the way, obviously, right? But Trump has said this as well. Well, you know, the biggest change I've seen in Congress is Israel literally owned Congress. You understand that 10 years ago, 15 years ago. And it was so powerful. It was so powerful. And today it's almost the opposite. You have between AOC and Omar and these people that hate Israel. They hate it with a passion.

They're controlling Congress. And Israel is not a force in Congress anymore. I mean, it's amazing. I've never seen such a change. And we're not talking about over a very long period of time, but I think you know exactly what I'm saying. They had such power, Israel had such power, and rightfully, over Congress, and now it doesn't. It's incredible, actually. Yeah, they control Congress, and rightfully so, he said. I remember when he said that, I remember playing that over and over again. It's like, so when is it right for a foreign country to control Congress? Never.

Unless you're Israel first, which is what Trump, he's not America first. He's not a populist. He's a globalist. This guy is completely different than what he pretends to be. So Bernie Sanders and Jon Stewart, senators who privately oppose Israel's brutal war in Gaza, will vote to advance Israel's interest over the will of their constituents because they know that AIPAC will destroy their political careers if they do otherwise, according to Bernie Sanders.

In an interview last month that is only just now going viral, Sanders told Jon Stewart that fear of having one's political career destroyed by the Israeli lobby is, quote, the root of everything, unquote, when it comes to the will of the public not being reflected by our representatives, only to catch himself and to walk it back a little. He said, I introduced legislation that would stop arms sales to Netanyahu. We 19 votes which observers thought was very significant so the american people do not believe that we should be supporting a government that is starving children right now as we speak but if you stand up you're going to find that apac and other billionaire funded super PACs are going to go to war against you putting huge

amounts of money in a primary in your general election. So it's not a question of not understanding, he said. There are many members of Senate who will come to you privately and say, what Netanyahu is doing is outrageous. I can't vote because money is going to come and destroy my political career. So you've got to get to the root of everything. He says, well, not of everything, but a key part of this whole discussion. That's where he walked it back. It really is the root of everything. He says, well, not of everything, but a key part of this whole discussion. That's where he walked it back. It really is the root of everything. Thomas Massey, who has been the target of this, told Tucker Carlson that every member of Congress, Senate,

and House member has got an AIPAC babysitter to ensure that you vote in the interests of Israel at all times. And he says, this is the only country that does this. He says, they ought to have to register as foreign agents under the FARA Act. And he's the only one that's got the guts to say that. And that's why they spent $300,000 and his race to try to shut him down. But fortunately, he won by a large margin because the people there understand what's going on so that but they continue to dump money in to smear him meanwhile we have steve bannon taking on elon musk calling him an evil guy i thought finally, Bannon and I agree on something here.

Except not for the same reasons. So he vows to stop Elon Musk's influence over Trump. Hey, Steve, Trump's for sale. Have you noticed that? Have you noticed that's simply about money and power? You didn't notice that? Really? Bannon said that Elon Musk is a, quote, truly evil guy.

And he vowed to, quote, take this guy down, he said in an interview. Look, he's just a rabble rouser who's trying to get attention. He's no different from Alex. It's just he's a truly. So what is it that he thinks is evil about Elon Musk? Is it the brain-computer interface that he's pushing? Is it the crony corruption and the crony capitalism of how he became the king of crony capitalism? That was what the LA Times talked about. You know, first time interviewed Eric Peters, it was about that.

They were talking about Elon Musk.k as about a decade ago as a matter of fact he's going to be our guest tomorrow right is he yeah i think we got him scheduled uh not elon musk but uh eric peters yeah that'd be interesting when i had if i had elon musk on uh but uh we could talk about video games as a matter of fact whistler toldler told me this whole thing about the video games. First it was Brian Schilhavi. He says, okay, something's going on. This guy's not really playing the video games or he's not really running the companies because you can't do both.

So he's basically a fraud. The Wall Street Journal is saying the same thing and they've got some investors who are worried that maybe he's just kicking back and smoking dope and taking ketamine for his depression. the world's richest man is so depressed he's got to take drugs and so uh they they uh looked at it said was he doing these games and everything and um whistler said um well they actually found that it's a another guy

uh that is just he's paying some guy to log in uh under his name so that he can look like he's a champion gamer as well which fine you know the guy's making a good living playing games i guess so whatever you know just for bragging rights for elon musk uh but you know what is it that makes him evil to steve bannon is it because he's playing this video game no no uh is it that makes him evil to Steve Bannon? Is it because he's playing this video game? No, no. Is it because the brain-computer interface? Well, no. Steve Bannon doesn't seem to have a problem with that. Doesn't have a problem with the crony capitalism and the crony corruption.

Steve Bannon doesn't seem to have a problem with Elon Musk's transhumanism. He and Peter Thiel have pushed the Singularity. As a matter of fact, Peter Thiel has given, I think he was one of the founders of the Singularity event. I forget what it's called. They have an annual event. I was going to see if Alex would fund me going to see it, but he didn't want to do that kind of stuff. I wanted to sit in on the Singularity Conference one year, but he didn't want to do that. Anyway, is it Elon Musk's global governance and the fact that he's cozy with the Chinese communists?

Not about that either. What about the universal basic income that was so important to elon musk no that doesn't make him evil in the sight of steve bannon either um what about you know again you know that vision the singularity he says we have to merge with computers or they'll kill us all so we've all got to become cyborgs we've got to merge with a machine is that the evil no no that's not it none of that no the thing that makes him this evil guy that has to be taken down is the h1b visas that's what does it for steve manning the h11B visa. But Bannon and MAGA and all the rest, they don't have a problem with all this transhumanist, satanic stuff.

They don't have a problem with that at all. They don't have a problem with Elon Musk dressing up in his Baphomet costume and his upside-down cross, his Antichrist cross. That's not a problem with these people. Bannon made the comments in an ongoing dispute over the H-1B visas. He said he should go back to South Africa. Well, I would tell Elon Musk you need to go back to your master, Lucifer, you know, the one that you signed your soul over to, that Faustian bargain. I always want to call it now a Faucian bargain because I've been calling it that for so long.

You got to be wary of people like Bannon. Just like you got to be wary of Elon Musk and for many of the same reasons. Because for both of them, everything is about money and it's about power. And that's all they care about we'll be right back © B Emily Beynon © BF-WATCH TV 2021 You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, Angry Tiger asking again. You're going to see Knights of the the storm and he's got the angry tiger report i think his name is a financial um uh thing that you'll find on rockfin and on twitter but angry tiger part of the nights of the storm with um jason barker says has anybody checked

the price of natural gas lately all energy prices are on the rise right now including crude oil i don't know yeah maybe that is an anticipation of this war in the middle east you know we look at it um interesting that even as they sell us net zero and say you're not going to be allowed to burn any of that stuff everybody is in a mad rush to acquire it and we have wars over the gas pipelines. You know, we've got to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline from Russia into Europe. And we've got to blow up the other pipeline that's going across Syria. I mean, that's what these wars are ultimately about.

It's about energy. It's still about energy, isn't it? And they're going to war with us over the energy that we use, aren't they? He kill us, that's the username, saying to timed non-tides, no one would have locked down for Hillary. Nobody would have taken the shots for Hillary. Nobody would have closed their businesses for Hillary. But they'll do it for MAGA.

That's right. That's absolutely right. That's why you got to do it left, right, left, right. Milton Milankovic says, Quebec health care is so bad that they go to Ontario for anything even remotely complicated. Wow.

Yeah. Yeah, that's amazing. And see, that's the problem. Is, you know, government health care is the big version of public health and we've seen how bad public health is like public schools uh right overture says finding a good doctor is a bit like finding a politician aritos says they are hiring psychopaths for leadership positions in government police and military that's the only people that will carry

out those evil orders yeah that's absolutely right as a matter of fact even you know when i interviewed um john kiryaku who was the whistleblower about the cia torture and they sent him to prison that's what he said he said uh well they're looking for sociopaths in the cia people who get right up to the line of psychopaths but hopefully they don't go over but he said yeah a lot of them do. It's like, yeah, we noticed, I think. Karen B. says, for any society to function and to prosper, it's absolutely fundamental that the means of exchange be issued free of debt and interest by the legal authority

of the state as representatives of the people. And that's why they put that in the Constitution, about coining gold and silver. Angry Tiger says the Constitution is a dilapidated document that has been ignored. It's also been cut up into pieces and burned. Unfortunately, it doesn't work anymore. Our country has been compromised for quite some time, and it's not just the Israel lobby. When you're hyper-focused on one group, you're missing the whole picture. I agree.

I agree. There's a lot of different groups and a lot of different interests, and we're not in that club. Not in that club. They have completely destroyed all of that. 2025, let's take a look at some of the money stuff. 2025 will be the year of AI, DeFi, stable coins, and regulatory progress in crypto.

And Bitcoin could break $ 200,000 by August, says an article from Ernest Hoffman at Kitco. Well, what is he talking about with AI and DeFi? DeFi is decentralized finance. Just think of it, I do, as the PPP version of CBDC, public-private partnership. And we see this is already functioning in many ways, just like we were talking about January 6th earlier. You've got a lot of different companies that are profiling you and reporting, but it's going to be more proactive about that. DeFi is kind of like a de facto CBDC.

And when they realized that everybody was onto them about CBDC, when it got associated with the Chinese social credit scores and got a really bad rap, they said, well, we're not going to call it that. We're not going to do that. We're going to do it in a different way. And this is what we're talking about here. I think the decentralized finance and what you're going to see with the Bitcoin and big tech people that are around Trump,

they will come in with a version of this that will make them very rich. And it won't have the in-your-face label that the Democrats would do it with. That's what I say. The Republicans are a lot more dangerous, really, than the Democrats. The Democrats will just come in with a big sign and scream at you, call you racist and tell you you got to lock everything down. You know, we're going to ban this. We're going to ban that.

We're going to do that. The Trump administration, what I expect they'll do is they'll say, look, we're all for choice and you can do anything that you want to with energy. It's just that you're going to pay my pals here some carbon taxes. And you're going to pay my pals to do carbon capture and carbon sequestration. But you'll be free to do whatever you want. It's just economic tax that we will apply to you. So what is the crypto outlook? Well, you can look at the functionality and not at the label.

CBDC, by any other name, is still going to have the same issues. So you have to look at the functionality of what they're doing. Does it destroy our privacy? Is it a way of tracking and surveilling everything that we do? That should be the metric that you should be worried about. But, of course, there's also the irresponsible indebtedness that's there bitcoin in january in a slump well this person here at coin telegraph says that's nothing new and the following years where bitcoin does a have having. They said, you know,

and of course it might be worse with the Trump euphoria over Bitcoin and crypto and all the rest of this stuff. But he says a major Bitcoin correction in the first month of a year after the blockchain sees a halving is historically not unusual,

according to analysts who have compared previous cycles. Bitcoin dumping in January has historically been a common occurrence in these years. Not unusual, according to analysts who have compared previous cycles. Bitcoin dumping in January has historically been a common occurrence in these years. And this is a person, crypto analyst that goes by the name Axel Bitblaze. Have you ever noticed how these people have got aliases? All of these people. He's got 123,000 followers on X, they said in this article. So you must know what he's talking about.

I can talk about whatever I want to talk about. Nobody will see it on X, they said in this article. So you must know what he's talking about. I can talk about whatever I want to talk about. Nobody will see it on X. I've got 138,000 followers and I've been stuck there for the last eight years. Anyway, you know, followers have pretty much been frozen. But his followers actually see what he posts, even though he's got 123,000. He said, we all know what happened after the 2017 and the 2021 dumps. So far, Bitcoin has lost 10% this month and a fall from its high of $102,000 on January the 7th to just below $92,000 before recovering slightly to now hover around $94,000. around 94 000 in january of 2021 the next most recent post-halving year bitcoin fell more than 25 percent from over 40 000 to just above 30 000 by the end of the month and then it skyrocketed 130 percent to a new all-time high of 69 000 by november of that year. In January 2017, the year after the halving in 2016, Bitcoin slumped 30%, falling from $1,100 to $784.

That was in 2017. Then it surged 2,400% that year, culminating in what was then an all-time high of $20,000 by December. Meanwhile, YouTuber and analyst CryptoRover, again, another guy like Axel Bitblaze, put your life savings bait, bet him on advice from people who don't want to use their real name. So CryptoRover observed that Bitcoin has consistently dropped in the first half of the month for the past year. So, you know, again, we don't know who these people are, but it says Bitcoin has not reached

the ultimate hype and pump phase. And that was another analyst. This one going by the name of Stock Money Lizards. There you go. I have this on good authority. QAnon is going to be the next one. It's going to be predicting what's going to happen with Bitcoin, isn't it? It says, with mass adoption and pro-crypto governments worldwide and ETFs, etc.,

I think it underlines our hypothesis. They see things like ETFs as a good thing. None of these things, I think, personally, are good. A 130% move similar to that in the peak year of the previous cycle could send Bitcoin prices from current levels to over $200,000 before the end of 2025. On the flip side, a pullback of the magnitude seen in January of the last two cycles could send prices below $70,000. So, look, who knows, right? Who knows? The other thing that's involved here is not just what usually happens at the beginning of the year or not what usually happens in January after Bitcoin has gone through its halving.

I guess that's what you say, halving, being cut in half, you know. Anyway, it's not about any of that kind of stuff even necessarily it's also about the expectations of um you know what trump's going to do regardless of what he does or doesn't do markets get themselves worked up into expectations just go back and take a look at the dot-com bust that happened now there was a lot of speculation that was into things like pet.com and things like that. Some people put money on Amazon. But even the companies that made the picks and the axes of the internet gold rush, the people like Cisco or even Intel

and others, who were making real stuff that was going to be used and the internet was a real thing and it was going to be big and everything even they took a bath and all this stuff you know when the market goes down and you get caught because you got to take some money out you know it's just like what happened in real estate you know you got to get your money out you got to move we got to do this You take a bath and all that kind of stuff. You get upside down. You're underwater with these things. And so the concern about all this stuff is that nobody really knows what's going to happen. Not even these anonymous people like stock money lizards. Anything could happen.

And this whole thing with Trump is another wild card that's going in. But Tony's going to be on tomorrow and he's going to talk about a way that you can go from gold to gambling. If you want to do that, you can do it without fees. But he's got something unique that's going to let people,

if they want to invest some money into Bitcoin, let them do that or go vice versa. Go from Bitcoin into gold one way or the other. So he's going to be talking about that tomorrow when he joins us. And no, it's not tomorrow. It's Thursday. Yeah, I don't know what day of the week it is. Meanwhile, the clash of the titans weighing gold and silver.

This is from Epoch Times. Gold and silver as investments have both stood tall against high inflation and other periods of economic uncertainty. You think we're headed for economic uncertainty? I do. When it comes to weathering financial storms, gold has shined in the darkest markets. So while the other people are making a case that, you know, we've seen this cyclical thing going on with Bitcoin. It drops down, then it explodes towards the end of the year. He points out during the recession of 1980 to 82, the S&P 500 index plunged 27% while gold increased by 46%.

Fast forward to the dot-com crash of 2000 to 2002, gold rose 12% while the S&P 500 dipped 49%. And again, you know, when we look at the dot-com crash to me it looks very much like ai you know um it isn't about whether or not something is going to be real or not right but it's about whether or not people's expectations get ahead of the reality people's expectations got ahead the reality with the dot com crash even to the extent as i pointed out you got companies like cisco and intel and others that took a bath as well as pet.com uh so people's expectations get hyped up and people's in the stock market has been hyped up over the last year predominantly with ai and predominantly with

nvidia and so who knows what's going to happen? Again, the stock market is very unpredictable because of the erratic behavior of humans, and because that has been magnified by the reactions of computer trading. It magnifies and intensifies those human reactions to things. And so who knows what's going to happen with this stuff? And it's a great deal of uncertainty that is coming up. During the Great Recession of 2008-2009, the average annual percent change in the producer price index for gold rose 12.8%. It rose 27.4% in 2010 and 32.8% in 2011. While silver has also seen monumental highs during tough times,

it may not perform as consistently as gold, he says. During the 1980 recession, the price of silver reached a record high of about $49 per ounce, but during the Great Recession, silver prices swung from a high of around $16 an ounce in 2007 to a low of $8 per ounce in 2008. The spot gold price has dropped this year

to around $26.30, they said, but now it's at $26.83 this morning. For its record high of $27.90 per troy ounce in October 2024. But analysts at Goldman Stacks still expect to see gold close out at about $3,000 per ounce at mid-2026 amid larger purchases from central banks and geopolitical tension. And so the question is, real assets versus the dollar. This is from Kitco. They said, the Great Reserve shift in 2025, sovereigns are ditching fiat. And that's something that these central banks have in common with gold bugs and

with Bitcoiners, right? They all agree that fiat is perhaps the worst investment of all. So the question is going to be, what is Trump going to do? Is he going to have a, as I say, a reserve shift? Is he going to shift the reserve into Bitcoin as he promised? A lot of the expectations were based upon that. Biden tried to do the best that he could to dump the money that the Department of Justice had stolen from people and make sure that couldn't be used as the start of a reserve. So we'll have to see what is happening with it. But even Zero Hedge says it's still a very goal-friendly world. Goals' remarkable few years may have more to go as government profligacy raises structural inflation risks and increases the likelihood that sovereigns are tempted to switch the proverbial printing

presses back on. Central banks have been a pivotal driver of gold's recent rally as stubborn inflation and the weaponization of the dollar against those who incur America's displeasure. It all encourages diversification away from the dollar. The metal is overbought, however, and could face a correction in the near term. So again, nobody knows. Don't know with any certainty what's going to happen with these two things. Just look at the long-term issues and what we have seen in the past. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. That's right, boys and girls.

There's a post-election sale on silver and gold. Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold. It's time to buy some metals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense. Go to DavidKnight.go to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.

He knows where to look to find silver and gold. Woo-hoo! Jag vill vara sällan Jag vill vara sällan Terima kasih telah menonton! Thank you. I know. You're listening to The David Knight Show. A couple of comments here. Three Little Birds says, We're already seeing new methods of war, such as directed energy weapons, drones, and mostly the information wars.

I agree. And we're talking about the information war. That's a key part of why they're so manic about artificial intelligence. That's going to be huge. The ability to analyze us. They've been collecting this data for quite some time. It's all there. For them to be able to analyze us individually and collectively. They can go through and they can immediately find out what the reaction of the public is to their narrative

or whatever MacGuffin they're trying to scare us with. They can immediately find that out. They can see if people are buying into it or not. That's one of the reasons why they moved away from CBDC so quickly. They could look at social media and they could see how adamant people were about stopping that and see that they had been exposed. So they pivot to something else. They can pivot to a new narrative.

They can pivot to a new tactic. That's the power that it has. And of course, they can do that with us individually as well. Johnny Gospelseed says, people reacting in chaos are easily controlled. Take the fires now or the bioweapon that we had before more is coming as the inauguration starts up i agree yeah that's the key thing fear not i need to go back and look and see how many times that's mentioned in the bible you know that's a constant theme fear not you don't need to be afraid of that stuff. Now you go to Pilgrim's Progress, the whole idea, you know, that's one spot he's trying to go into in his path.

There's a couple of lions that are there. They're going to devour me if I go that way. And as he sums up the courage to go through it, he finds out that these lions are on a chain. Boy, if that isn't a metaphor for what our life is like. Constantly see these lions, but we don't realize that God's got them on a chain. That's the way you ought to proceed with this stuff. Johnny Gospel Seed, I just did that one. Don't frag me, bro. Said the battlefield is the human mind more than anything else absolutely is uh we don't wrestle with flesh and blood but it is with the uh the the uh the lies that they tell us um right overture says 1865 was the end of states rights well i like to talk about it as states' powers, right?

And I say that because I think labels matter a great deal. And when we talk about rights, that is something that is endowed by our creator into us, right? We created, however, the states, just as the corporations have been created. So corporations have privileges. States have powers. And that's the way they talked about it in the Constitution. You know, they said the powers that are not delegated specifically to the federal government are retained by the individual states. So powers that were retained, sovereignty that was retained by the states and by the people. So the people had powers and the people had rights but the states had powers but nevertheless i agree

with them the fact the north punished the south for their uprising now the same people are moving here and about as welcome as fleas on your favorite hound dog i would always i would take the position that it was north that did a rebellion it was lincoln who rebelled against the constitution it was lincoln who called for 75 000 troops to invade the south and it was lincoln who called it an insurrection when people stood for their right of self-governance. Look, the whole Declaration of Independence was about the fact that if you've got grievances with another, you know, political bonds should not be lightly dissolved. But there are times when it should be dissolved. If you cannot agree on the direction that you're going to go, then people should be

able to peacefully go their own way. Or they have the right to fight their way out if necessary. And that was what the Revolutionary out if necessary and that was what the revolutionary war was about that was what the founding of america was about that's what the declaration of independence was about lincoln on the other hand brought us a centralized government it used to be the united states are and then became the united states is and uh what he did was antithetical to the constitution um three little birds says to he kill us today people aren't fully aware of the war against them and are ignorant participants in their own demise and the bureau 20 agreed 2029 says the founders of the u.s constitution

were the aristocracy of that era not much has changed in 250 years. And as Wright Overture says, true, but it was the church that had the greatest influence on our Constitution and our rights. I agree. And the thing, it was because of the influence of the church, because of the influence, I would say not just of the church, but just the influence of Christ, not even Christianity. The influence of Christ on the American people meant that the American Revolution was one of the few revolutions where they didn't try to grab as much power as they could after the Revolution was over. Look at every other revolution. What do they do?

They want to take everything, right? They argue that they're having a revolution in order to empower the people, but then they take all the power from the people. That was not the case then, because it was a country that was organized along the principles that Jesus gave us. Let's talk about this Mel Gibson appearance with Joe Rogan. And one of the things that they talked about was cancer. I'll tell you a good story. Okay.

I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. I'll tell you a good story. Okay. I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all. And they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Jesus. I can't tell you. They took some what you've heard they've taken.

Ivermectin. Phenbendazole. Phenbendazole, yeah. Yeah, I'm hearing that a lot. They drank hydrochloride something or other. There's studies on that now where people have proven that they've... People drinking methylene blue and stuff like that. Yeah, methylene blue, which was a fabric dye.

Yeah. Yeah, it was a textile dye. You find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah, it's a textile dye. You know, you find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange because, again, it's profit. We're only supposed to buy it from big pharma.

When you hear things that are demonized and that turn out to be effective, you effective you always wonder well what is going on here how is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable that they can't control it they don't have a patent on it whether it's vitamin d k2 and magnesium you know well yeah i'm zinc and quercetin i do all that stuff yeah again well you know i'm glad they talked about it and and um to his credit joe rogan was the one that dropped the uh things that must not be named ivermectin finbendazole or whatever uh i'm not familiar with um finbendazole a little bit with ivermectin. A lot of people have taken it. And as we pointed out, it's got a very long history.

People know some of the side effects. Some stuff has surfaced that ivermectin is perhaps deleterious to fertility, the ability to have children, and some other things like that. We don't know. Again, the problem with these is that you don't know what the side effects are. But, of course, you don't know what the side effects are of the pharmaceutical drugs either, do you? Because they lie to you about it and they hide it. Oh, it's rare, right? It's rare.

Well, it's rare that they do anything that's in your favor. But it is sad that we live in a time where people are afraid to say things, right? And I guess that was the thing that really struck me about that interview. It really disturbed me. You see, the good news is I've got three friends that had stage four cancer and they all got rid of it. Oh, what'd they take? I can't tell you, you know, that type of thing. You know, that was the key thing.

Rod Dreyer, when he wrote his book, Live Not by Lies, and of course, that was based on an essay by Solzhenitsyn, you know, he says, we can't fear these people. We can't fear telling the truth. And even if you're afraid, don't lie to yourself about that kind of stuff. Look, I, you know, I just, that's not the way I'm going

to live my life. I don't care what happens. I'm not going to back off, especially if it's something I think saves somebody's life. And, you know, that's why I wanted to talk to G. Edward Griffin. I didn't really want to talk to him so much about, you know, the beast from Jekyll Island or whatever, the Federal Reserve. Yeah, that's something to talk to him about. That's what he's famous for. But far more important is the fact that G. Edward Griffin was not afraid to tell people when he saw something that cured people of cancer. I mean, if we're going to be silent about something that people are dying from in such large numbers, what is the matter with our numbers. What is the matter with our society?

What is the matter with our government? And if the government and society is going to punish us for that, then that government and society needs to be confronted directly over that. And so, you know, the story that G. Edward Griffin told when he was on with me, he wrote the book, A World Without Cancer. Why did he write that book? Because he had a physician who came to him and said, all right, I had this situation. And I forget how the physician got into it. But there's apricot seeds that he gave to somebody who, oh, no, he gave some apricot seeds. And I don't know why he did it with his dog, but his dog had cancer.

His dog got better. And he had somebody that worked did it with his dog, but his dog had cancer. His dog got better. And he had somebody that worked for him in the office, and her husband got cancer. And so she pleaded with him, you know, help me with this stuff and everything. And so they did. She got better. And the word started getting around. And all these people were coming to him about these apricot seeds, about vitamin B17. And I forget why he did that in the first time,

but it was an anecdotal thing. But he said, I want people to know, but like Mel Gibson, he was afraid to say it because he was a doctor and he knew that they were going to take his license if he talked about B17, apricot seeds, laetrile, whatever you want to call it. And so he went to G. Edward Griffin because he knew G. Edward Griffin wasn't afraid.

And he wrote the book. And he's not afraid to say it then or now. That has been very effective and cured a lot of cancer cases. And it will never be investigated because of money and because they have no profit. They can't patent apricot seeds. And it's never be investigated because of money and because they have no profit. They can't patent apricot seeds. And it's a food. And so that's one of the things that makes it difficult for the FDA to come after people.

But they will come after you if you tell them that it cures cancer. But it has. And so that's why when you look at what RNncstores.com, I interviewed them as well. And his father, they came after his father for that stuff as well. But he's doing it. He's got books that you can read as well as you can get it in a pill form if you don't like the bitter apricot seeds. By the way, you can get 10% off if you go to rncstores.com and tell them night. And, uh, and so, uh, in this article here from expose news, they're saying Gibson dropped the bombshell revealing that three of his friends had stage four cancer.

Now, all three of them don't have cancer now at all. And then they go into this in some more detail they said dr william mancus who treated one of gibson's friends came out after that and posted that on x he said yeah one of those three people i treated he's rigorously researched the anti-cancer potential of ivermectin and finbenzol finbenzol over the past two years. During that time, Dr. Amekis discovered, quote, there are over 100 papers on the success of ivermectin in cancer. He says ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells, he explained.

It targets the cells that chemo can't kill, and it can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to certain types of chemotherapy. He says it also makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. So he said it is a kind of radio sensitizer, makes it more sensitive to being destroyed by radiation. Well, I don't know what the mechanism is for B17 or apricot seeds. I just know that there's a lot of anecdotal evidence, as they say. But I prefer anecdotal evidence to studies that lie, which is what we get from the pharmaceutical industry. And, you know, when you look at it, I'm just putting this information out there for you to investigate it and look into it yourself.

You know, when I look at pharmaceutical drugs, even something like ivermectin and fenbendazole, I'm concerned because it is fundamentally a pharmaceutical. I'm looking all the time, I'm looking more and more at natural things like apricot seeds. And if somebody's taking apricot seeds, the only side effect is that it tastes bad. But as some people who take it on a regular basis say, they get used to it. But if that's the only side effect, I can live with that. Dr. Makis said,

we must insist on having ivermectin, fenbendazole, and mebendazole made available over the counter to every American. Well, I think what we have to insist on is the general principle that we should have the freedom to choose whatever we wish and not be punished by the FDA or be punished by some politicized, you know, idiot like the New York State Attorney General. What is her name? She came after Alex for the silver stuff. Look, silver is a very effective antibiotic. They use it in burn units, and there's nothing to be afraid of with that.

Letitia James. What an abomination that woman is. And everybody's upset with her over Trump. I'm upset with her because she threatened people during all this COVID stuff about silver. And silver is very effective in terms of a lot of different things. But you should insist on your freedom to choose. Your freedom to choose the food that you eat, the drugs that you take, and that's the problem with the FDA. The FDA is about destroying our freedom on both of those areas. And as many people have said in the past, let food be your medicine. Well, that's what the FDA is there about.

They're there to corrupt our food and to prohibit medication. So do your own research. As I said before, don't ask your doctor, be your doctor. I did that with the cardiologist. I want to put me on statins. I said, I'm not going to get on statins. Oh, you've been looking, you've been asking Dr. Google? I didn't say it to him because I knew I wasn't going to come back.

Why have a fight with him over this stuff? I'm just going to walk away. We walked out and I said to Karen, I said, well, one of us has to be concerned about my health and it's not going to be him. So, yeah, I will ask Dr. Google. And I'll ask Dr. Bing and I'll ask Dr. Chat AI or Chat GPT or any source. I'll ask any of them and then I'll check it out. So after Dr. Makis put this out, and if I remember correctly, I've interviewed him, I believe. And if it's the guy I'm thinking, he's an oncologist.

Yeah. He's an oncologist there in Canada, an American biologist, chemist, biochemist, neuroscientist, and medical doctor, Andrew Zywecki. If I'm pronouncing his name correctly, I have no idea. He responded to the tweet, and he said, I treated a patient with a finbendazole and ivermectin protocol among additional therapies after reviewing the work of dr makus and others stage four prostate cancer metastasized into the lumbar spine and after he treated him with those things he said it was gone in six months

gone in six months a twitter user said he didn't believe dr zway uh zoek and he asked for a peer reviewed for peer-reviewed studies to support his claims and so the doctor obliged and he provided some studies for the challenger to consider as a matter of fact he gave him seven studies and he said here is enough literature on bendazol drugs and ivermectin for you to review he said don't message me for at least seven days otherwise i will know that you didn't read or review any of it so i gave him seven studies and it's kind of interesting when you look at these seven studies i just looked at the dates of the studies. I didn't read them. But these are studies that had one in 2016, one in 2017, one in 2018.

There were two of them in 2021 and one in 2024. And when you look at these, and then they said to which we would add another study, an eighth one that was about breast cancer. These other ones, just looking at them real quickly, one of them was breast cancer and melanoma. Another one was, this was prostate cancer and another one of the studies. Another one was about colon cancer and so forth. So neck squamous cell cancer and so forth. So it's been a lot of things like this. They said Dr. Makus publishes articles on a Substack page. The Substack page is called COVID Intel.

His articles are behind a paywall. However, at the beginning of an article last year, he published a table summarizing dosages and reports of success stories using ivermectin to treat cancer. And I reported on that as well when he did that. Let's move to fluoride. Six lawsuits were filed yesterday accusing toothpaste manufacturers, manufacturers of children's toothpaste, accusing them of violating federal law because of fluoride. Now, the thing that surprised me was not that you have Procter & Gamble brands like Crest and Colgate, but that Tom's of Maine was in there. And we used to get Tom's of Maine that specifically said no fluoride. But maybe they have some non-fluoride Tom's toothpaste, and maybe they've got a kid's toothpaste that does have fluoride, because a kid's toothpaste does have fluoride in it.

So Tom's of Maine, Firefly, and Hello, also in addition to Crest and Colgate, that they deceptively market their products, which contain fluoride, as, quote, extra safe for children, according to six class action lawsuits that were filed in California and Illinois, accusing major dental products manufacturers of deceptively marketing products containing fluoride to young children. You know, when you look at the standard toothpaste stuff that has fluoride in it, it says if you ingest any of this stuff, if you swallow any of it, call poison control. And we've talked about that for the longest time in terms of, well, yeah, of course, fluoride is not good for you. The issue is dosage, right? How do you control the dosage? If you dump it into the water.

If it's something that in the small quantities that you're going to get in toothpaste, if you swallow it, you should call poison control. And they've got that label on there. They know it's poison. So why are the dentists pushing it on you? According to the complaints,

the plaintiffs were misled by the product marketing and as a result, they didn't follow public health guidelines when using the products, especially for children. Because if you put all kinds of candy flavor sweet stuff in it, fruit flavors and things, the kids are going Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and others recommend that children under age three should use no more than a smear of fluoride toothpaste. And the children between the ages of three and six should use no more than a pea-sized amount. So, wait a minute. You mean dosage is important? Well, of course it is with anything, right?

You've had situations, and I talk about this every time I talk about fluoride and fluoride in water. I said, you know, we've had situations where people have died from drinking too much water over a short period of time. One of them, notably, was a joke contest that was being done on live radio. They had a lot of contestants, and, you know, they would have them do something. They'd have to drink water, I guess, if and they would have them do something. They'd have to drink water, I guess, if they got the answer wrong or something. But the bottom line is that they weren't letting them go to the bathroom. And the smallest person that was there was a woman and she died from just drinking too much water. It killed her and not going to the bathroom.

And so dosage is important. Dosage is important with water and it's important with fluoride. And it's important with the fluoride in the water. And it's important with the fluoride in the toothpaste. How do you control fluoride dosage when you dump it into the water? You don't know how much somebody is going to beginning and you don't. And what is the dosage that you should be dumping in for a child or for a male adult? Are you going to get too little of it? And it won't be effective.

You get too much of it. You get an overdose and that's always a bad thing. Whatever it is. Two of the complaints alleged that Procter and Gamble, the maker of Crest Kids and Colgate Palmolive, maker of Colgate, and Toms of Maine, that they understand that encouraging caregivers to use the safe recommended amount of toothpaste, quote, is bad for their bottom line, unquote, said the lawsuit. As a result, they use, quote, misleading and aggressive tactics, says the lawsuit, to prompt parents to use far more than is safe,

a practice that researchers have linked to toothpaste overconsumption by children. Both companies' packaging, as well as pictures on their website, show images of a toothbrush with a full strip of toothpaste, not a pea-sized amount or a smear. It is 8 to 10 times more if you put a full strip on your toothbrush. That's eight to ten times more than the recommended amount for a child under three. Even the organizations that recommend that they have fluoride toothpaste, like the American Dental Association or the CDC. This is eight to ten times more than even they recommend. And it is three to four times the recommended amount for

a child that is ages three through six. Colgate uses pictures of fruit with matching flavors and names like watermelon burst, which sounds like a candy product or a juice drink. And it's a common signal to children that toothpaste is intended to be consumed as if it were food, they say. Colgate Kids' natural product, marketed as Silly Strawberry by Toms of Maine, also features the word natural, implying that the product is free from toxic ingredients, which it isn't, and that there is no need to limit how much toothpaste goes onto the brush. Maybe it's kind of like these corporations telling the kids, hey, it's just sugar water. It's fine.

You can take it, you know, like the vaccine that Alex was telling everybody about, Alex Jones. It's just sugar water. And then we've got some, you know, aluminum and mercury thrown in, but that's not a problem. After he told people for 20 years that that would give people autism when he was telling them the truth and getting their trust. The CDC reports that 35% of children frequently eat toothpaste. An additional 22% have tried eating it. Some children under the age of six swallow substantial amounts of mouth rinse. And that's one of the reasons why they say call poison control if you swallow this stuff.

Since the introduction of candy-like fluoride products in the 1980s, the rate of dental fluorosis among U.S. schoolchildren has skyrocketed. That's when you get too much fluoride, it discolors your teeth. It amazes me why the dentists are so, why they've dug in their heels on this issue of fluoride. It just makes no sense to me. I don't know why they're getting paid to do this. Because the science doesn't make any sense. Rates rose from 23% of children in 1986 to 87 to a staggering 68% of children with fluorosis by 2015 and 16. Ingesting too much fluoride can cause acute toxicity with flu-like symptoms such as nausea, stomach upset, and vomiting,

symptoms that parents may not recognize as being related to fluoride. They might think it's bird flu or something, right? Put it in your eye, probably give you a pink eye, I guess. I don't know. Probably turn your eye red, that's for sure. They also allege that a third of a tube of kids' fluoride toothpaste contains enough fluoride to kill a toddler. Wow. Each year, Poison Control receives between 10,000 and 15,000 calls due to excess

consumption of fluoride toothpaste, most of which involves young children. Well, that brings us to RFK Jr. and how Trump is using him for political purposes. It's going to be interesting to see what happens. Again, this week, we're going to have all these confirmation hearings for 13 cabinet members and things like that. As people talk to Trump about RFK Jr. and about vaccines, you're going to hear Trump pivot away from vaccines. First of all, he becomes a big vaccine salesperson as always but he pivots away from it to pesticides and then he comes back to vaccines and how wonderful they are you know

because uh polio that type of thing on vaccines do you want rfk jr to revoke any vaccines no i want him to come back with a report as to what he thinks. We're going to find out a lot. We're doing two things. We're going to have tremendous cost savings that will come out of this. That's a minimum. And we're also going to have,

and I think very serious discussions about certain things, whether it's pesticides. You know, Europe doesn't use pesticides, and yet they have a better mortality rate than we do. They don't use pesticides. In fact, they use it as an excuse not to take our farm product. We spend billions and billions of dollars on pesticides.

And something bad's happening. Again, you take a look at autism today versus 20, 25 years ago. It's, like, not even believable. So we're going to have reports. No, nothing's going to happen very quickly. I think you're going to find that Bobby is much, he's a very rational guy. I found him to be very rational. No, nothing. You're not going to lose the, the polio vaccine. That's not going to happen. I saw what happened with the polio. I have friends that were very much affected by that. I have friends from many years ago, and they have obviously, they're still in not such good shape. This is

a guy who told you you got to get the measles vaccine too. And the moment they took that vaccine, it ended. Dr. Jonas Salk did a great job. So I don't anticipate. Yeah, you should go back and look at some of the other things that these guys talked about with the polio vaccine the autism rate so much higher than it was 20 25 30 years ago I mean it's like it's a hundred times higher there's something wrong and we're going to try finding that we're also going to find out why are we paying more than other countries and we were in the process of doing that through transparency and other things. We were doing a good job in that first term and we brought it down. We got the $35

all of the different things we got. You know, we were the ones that got all of that done. Every every one of those things we got them done. I said, you know, I hope I win because otherwise somebody is going to take a lot of credit for what we did. But now what happens is we're going to we're going to have a big conversation on price. Why is it that Germany and UK and other countries are paying so much more for the same box of medicine made in the same plant? Why is it that we're paying many times more? And I know politicians like you our government didn't do what they were supposed to do and what i put in place was terminated unexpectedly by the

biden administration and they shouldn't have terminated it would have yeah right okay so you get the idea we've heard all this stuff before yeah why does it cost us so much and why did we give tens of billions of dollars to pfizer they gave a million dollars to Trump. That's why. It's just that simple. So we'll see what happens with this. Audi, Modern Retro Radio. Good to see you there. It says, many people don't realize the Bill of Rights was a result of concerns regarding government overreach.

That's right. It is all about prohibitions on government. You know, the Bill of Rights, as Obama correctly pointed out, he said, yeah, I used to teach constitutional law to somebody somewhere, whatever. And he said, we have positive rights, we have negative rights. He says, I don't like the Bill of Rights because it's negative. It prohibits the government from doing certain things. It's like, that's right. Because the real rights are the things that come from God, and the Bill of Rights is prohibition on government in terms of interfering with those God-given rights.

Because I like positive rights, you know, things like the right to this and the right to that to be given to you. That's not a right. So they, again, they subvert the meaning of the word right. But, yeah, James Madison looked at the Constitution. He said, this is very worrying. I can see here where people might use something like, you know, the Commerce Clause as it's being abused today or this or that. And so that's why they had the Bill of Rights, except they just ignore the Bill of Rights and they go back to these initial flaws

and say, well, we've got the General Welfare Clause. That means we can do anything we want to and call it support of the welfare of the people. We've got a commerce clause. It was supposed to stop the interference of commerce by one state interfering with the commerce of another state when it's crossing state lines. They turn around and try to use that to justify drug prohibition when that was always there. And they understood that they needed a separate amendment amendment an 18th amendment to prohibit alcohol and a 21st amendment to overturn that it wasn't people who had respect for the constitution at that point in time and they don't have it now

reverend bill 1960 look into the connection between vitamin d and cancer um yeah i'm not sure um i'll look into it uh high boost dentist push fluoride just like in your human conditioning video that you showed yesterday david that could be the case yeah where they uh they hear everybody else doing it and they go along with the crowd you know the video that showed yesterday, there's a young woman who was the test subject, and they had probably about 10 or 12 people that were in the room with her. And when the bell rings, they all stand up. She looks around. The next time, after a couple of times, she's standing up every time.

And then one by one, they keep doing this. And one by one, they're taking people out. And then everybody's gone, and it's just her. And she still does it. And then they start bringing in people who don't know anything about this. And because she's doing it, the other guy does it. And then they bring in several people, and they all are doing it, all at the same time. That might be why the dentists are doing it. Zio Zogslave says,

fluoride is industrial waste, one of many of our foods and water, cheaper to feed us industrial waste than to dispose it. And you're absolutely right. When they started doing that, it's industrial waste from a byproduct from the production of aluminum

as well as the nuclear industry. And it is a type of fluoride. That type of fluoride is actually an industrial waste, and it's actually used in China as rat poison. And they would have had to pay a lot of money to dispose of it. Instead, what they did was they convinced local governments by doing this nonsense to the dentists and things like that. They convinced them that it was something that was healthy and got them to pay for it

rather than having to pay to dispose of this toxic waste themselves. Shadow Boxer, people who work in hot places take in far more fluoride because they have to stay hydrated. Again, if you're going to medicate people through the water supply, that's a non-starter right there. That's absolute nonsense. Soylent Goy says, The dentist told me that cooking and showering in fluoridated water

eventually runs through your system and protects your teeth. Well, speaking of showering, you know, if you've got heavily chlorinated water, you can breathe in the chlorine if you don't filter that out in your shower head. Matthew Ronson says it's uses rat poison that's right and he says in numerous studies iodine supplementation has been found to significantly increase urinary detoxification of both fluoride and bromide that's right um and we need to do that i mean you know whistler is still having issues and

we appreciate your prayers but and that's a fluoride-based thing. Fluorochloroquine, you know, Cipro and all its derivatives, that's also – just fluoride is not something that you need to be taking for anything. And, of course, one of the reasons that they use it as an antibiotic is because antibiotics are to kill living things. That's what it means, the very definition of it. You know, bio and biotic means a living thing and if it's going to kill the attack the fundamental basis of life of the bacteria guess what it does the same thing to you be very careful of antibiotics you know we're looking more

and more into things like honey and garlic and other things like that. Grammy for God. Please do this section as a clip, David. A lady I know was just diagnosed with cancer at 35 years old. I want to send it to her. I will. I will. I don't care. I said, you know, Pfizer and vaccine people were killing people and knowing it. I got punished for that, but I don't care. Well, thanks for listening. Have a good day. black t-shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue but he told me to get lost maybe one of you american suckers can buy me some at the david knight show dot com you should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful i'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events. If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles

coming from the USA.