The David Knight Show - Wed 13Nov24 David Knight UNABRIDGED CDC Concentration Camp Plans; Nanny State Goes Wild in Rural GA; Trump's Israel First Cabinet

Episode Date: November 13, 2024

(2:00) Remember the CDC's "Quarantine" Concentration Camps?A look back at the plans for  military-uniformed enforcers of medical martial law — under TrumpWill Trump take his TrumpShot off the vaccine schedule FOR KIDS?  Hope springs eternal for MAGABritish doctor asking vaccine question flagged for "hate speech" - STILL.  How is science "hate"?Autism explosion can't be hidden by government & media — so they misdirect, claiming it's caused by…automobiles!The story of a teen fighting for his life with "bird flu" falls apart under scrutiny(43:39) LIVE comments (51:28) Mom handcuffed and jailed because her 11 yr old walk less than a mile alone in small town of just over 300 — yet FIVE people are part of this NANNY STATE persecution and it's not over yet (1:00:37) Public (aka, Pubic) SchoolsSchools spent BILLIONS fighting parents says study as they blame "conflict" on parents, community, school boards — anyone BUT teachers & administratorsTHIS is who could teach YOUR kids — teacher says she refuses to have kids while Trump is presidentVoddie Baucham warns America is ALREADY under God's judgment, get ready for persecution(1:31:58) LIVE comments & questions (1:43:33) Personnel IS Policy and Trump's Policy is Shaping Up for WarYou thought Pompeo, Bolton, and Nikki Haley were bad?  There's plenty more where they came from and the Trump administration is filling upWill Trump be another "Peace President" like Woodrow Wilson & FDR who got us into two World Wars?  Will Trump get us into a third?WATCH Hegseth, Waltz, Ratcliffe on War and Israel FirstMiriam Adelson's $100M bought an entire White House full of Zionists who put political Israel ahead of America's interestsWhat will Musk's $130M buy?  Will the world's richest man become the first TRILLIONAIRE?The cynical DOGE joke of putting the "King of Crony Capitalism" in charge of "Government Efficiency" — or is that "Exploitation"(2:04:48) LIVE comments (2:06:42) Is THIS how Kristi Noem got her appointment as top cop at DHS? (2:10:42) What is "1789 Capital" and how does it bring CFR, Trump Jr, and Tucker Carlson together? (2:13:59) Will Soros' man Scott Bessent be Treasury Secretary? The guy who masterminded "Breaking the Bank of England"?  Listen to MAGA media twist itself into pretzels trying to tell you Soros' guy is a "good" thing (2:20:15) Fed Reserve's Powell Says He WILL NOT LEAVE Even if Trump Says Go — Here's what COULD be doneIs an "Independent Fed" in the Constitution or even in the Fed Reserve Act?Trump wants a bigger say in economic manipulation.  Is there a precedent for that?What could be done by Congress and/or President?(2:25:48) Bitcoin and GoldBitcoin is going straight up like a rocket.  Will it go to $150k without a correction?The world's oldest and most stable asset, gold, is ON SALE.  It's Black Friday come early(2:46:41) Letters, comments (2:50:24) Is Biden's Open Border Chaos and Trump Biometric Police/Surveillance State a ONE/TWO Hegelian Set Up?If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7 Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. But MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 13th of November, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, today we're going to begin with a tale of quarantine camps and the role of the CDC in running medical martial law.

But we're also going to talk about the likelihood of war abroad. We're going to take a look at personnel because personnel is policy. And folks, we can learn a lot about what is going to be happening with Trump. If we look at his picks in terms of foreign policy and war, in terms of domestic stuff, as well as financial stuff. Nothing that's really a surprise, actually. But unfortunately, it's all coming together just as we thought. We'll be right back. Well, the CDC planned quarantine camps nationwide. This is an article from Jeffrey Tucker.

He does careful, conservative work. He doesn't go out on a limb. And he was absolutely appalled to see these quarantine camps. But of course, we had talked about this back when it was happening. But there was so much stuff that was already happening. We didn't focus on this. But it is time for us to go back and take a look at it. And it truly is amazing when you stop and think about this. An anonymous report, he said, who out of the tens of thousands of people that work for the CDC wrote this? Well, we don't know. He said, no matter how bad you think the COVID policies were, they were intended to be worse. Now, let me just say, before we get into the politics and before we start looking at domestic policies and before we start looking at the boasting, strutting, thuggish behavior of Homan, who has been picked for the border stuff.

I'm very concerned that this has been prepared. We had Biden, everybody, including Democrats. What's going on with the border? I mean, you have this in-your-face chaos that was created. And guess what the solution is that all the conservatives are so excited about? Well, we got to deport them. We got to do this. We got to do that.

Trump has already talked about how he's going to go full on board with biometric surveillance and all the rest of the stuff. If you don't think that this guy is 100% authoritarian, look, the left calls him Hitler and all the rest of the stuff, but he has authoritarian instincts. He loves law enforcement. He wants cops to be able to pull you over and come up to your car with the gun drawn. What do you think he's going to tell Holman to do? What does Holman want to do? He's out there with his foul mouth boasting and disgust me he's he's one of these uh he's a stereotypical thuggish cop drunk with power and so is trump and so just keep this in mind

that this all happened under donald trump now je Now, Jeffrey Tucker doesn't say that anywhere. He doesn't want to burn his bridges to people. He can read the room. I can read the room. And I'm not going to shy away from calling out who was responsible for this. This was the CDC. And Trump was president. And we knew this when it was happening.

Wasn't it enough to have everybody doing this Simon Says nonsense? You can't go in this door at the grocery store. You got to go in that one and you got to walk in one direction and we got stuff on the floor and all the rest of the stuff. Simon Says, Fauci Says, Trump Says, Trump put him up there. He owned all of this nonsense. If they would do that, if they would hector you for not wearing, you know, a toy store, a toy story bandana like Woody has around his neck, that's going to shield me from the most dangerous disease ever known to mankind. What insanity this was.

And the hectoring and the scolding and the fines and the lockdowns and the jail terms and the destruction of people's lives what do you think trump's going to do now that he's got everybody fired up boy that the right was never fully on board with this pandemic stuff but they did it anyway because hey hey, it's Trump. Okay. Don't worry. It's 4D chess. Go back to sleep. What do you think they're going to do with this? They are loaded for bear after four years of Biden flaunting open borders in people's faces.

Oh, they just can't wait to pour on all the law enforcement and surveillance they can think of. Militarized police, a surveillance state, all the rest of stuff. We have been primed for this stuff, folks. And we're going to take a look at some of these people that he's bringing in now to sweep up. This is the left-right march of tyranny that we always talk about. They tag-teamed this stuff up. They war-gamed this stuff up. None of this stuff is happening by coincidence. But let's go back to what happened with the quarantine camps, the concentration camps. You can call it, if it's medical martial law, you call it a quarantine camp.

Except quarantine, Jeffrey Tucker doesn't mention this, quarantine is for people who are sick. It's not for people who are sick. People who are sick don't get taken to the camps. People who were in contact maybe with somebody that was sick, the sick people get taken to the hospital and killed with ventilators, with remdesivir, with midazolam. So it just got you warehoused here. If we can come up with an excuse,

like this kid that supposedly has bird flu in Canada. Consider the vaccine passports alone. Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. These cities were New York, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle. the plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport but it broke once the news leaked that the shot didn't stop infection or transmission the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed you know more accurately once people got tired of this stuff they just kind of walked away and And that's the unfortunate thing, actually. Yeah, not complying with this stuff, that's one way to shut it down. But it's not enough.

You know, Trump is out there saying, hey, there needs to be some consequences for people who have abused their office in this lawfare. And he's right about that. Except he's not doing it in the name of reform. He's not doing it to reestablish the rule of law. He's doing it to show, don't mess with me. I'll take you down. That's why he's doing it. He's doing it for his own personal reasons. But we should be locking these people up to reestablish the rule of law, to make sure this kind of stuff never happens again.

He's not talking about that. Neither are we. He said it was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide, if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialed back. But let's understand that even though he doesn't talk about this, it is planned to be permanent. It is planned to be not just nationwide, but it's planned to be global. And they're planning to have it come back. That's all this WHO pandemic treaty stuff is all

about features of the cdc's edicts did incredible damage it imposed a rent moratorium yeah and i actually saw uh so much of the conservative the conservative press has just lost its credibility 100 in my eyes oh look at biden he did that moratorium he extended that moratorium they said they extended he extended the moratorium and so i said well that begs the question then if he extended it who did it to start with and who was it that extended it the first time did it and extended it the first time under trump and trump's uh supreme court picks, Brett Kavanaugh, along with Roberts, said, well, they said they're going to take it off, so we'll let them keep it on there until they can take it off.

Why would you do that? Why would you defer to them? And then when they didn't take it off, when they said they were going to take it off, then they got angry. They, oh, you lied to us. Okay, so now we're going to tell you you can't do it. What kind of power trip is this? Constitutional rule of law, nowhere in sight, never to be considered, even by the Supreme Court. The ridiculous six feet apart, the mask mandates a forced plexiglass as an interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in

balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. Of course it did. And we knew that. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. And it was sadistic. It was. It was. It was sadistic.

It was stupid. Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps. People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. Banned from participating in religious services. It included contingencies for preventing suicide. And there were no provisions made for any

legal appeals or even the right to have legal counsel they just imprison you and one of the reasons that we didn't talk about this so much i mean we mentioned it when it came out but it was already happening in the uk and other places and then we subsequently get the text messages they were going back and forth between matt hancock and other people laughing about putting people in quarantine well we can imagine the look on their faces when they come back to the country and find out that they're carted off to a quarantine area while he was sneaking around having adulterous affairs he was locking people up who came back into the country who were not even say as sick

and so that was the sickness behind all this stuff and we said look at what is happening and we focused on what was happening another it was already being rolled out to one degree the other in other countries so we said it was coming here uh the plans authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on March 26, 2023. During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC's public site with very little public notice or controversy. It was called the Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approing approach to prevent COVID-19 infections in humanitarian settings.

The document presents considerations from the perspective of the CDC. This is from the document itself. For implementing a shielding approach in humanitarian settings is outlined in guidance focused on camps, displaced populations, and low-resource settings. This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges from the CDC's perspective. Poor CDC. How are we going to lock everybody up, and are they going to react and what do we do about that?

And they said, you know, we're thinking about implementing this in the absence of any empirical data. In other words, we've never done anything like this before. Well, of course, nothing had ever been done before like anything that was done in 2020 under Trump. That's why i will never support the man never support him i will never forget that he did that if he did that in 2020 he's capable of doing anything to us now and in the future and so are the people around him so all the republicans

in congress who i mean the democrats are cheering this stuff on they are they want to embrace this nanny state stuff for sure but trump was there to keep the other people who would normally rebel against this in line tell miss 40 chess go back to sleep here's a pacifier for your mouth by absence of empirical data the meaning is nothing like this has ever been tried before the document was to map out how it could be possible and to alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided. Temporarily relocating to safe or green zones established at the household, neighborhood, camp sector, or community level, depending on the content and the setting. And I remember this very well, talking about the green zones four years ago, nearly five

years ago. He says, this is what used to be called concentration camps. Who are these people who would be rounded up? Well, they're older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions, says the CDC. So Jeffrey Tucker asks, who determines this? Public health authorities. What's their purpose? Yeah, what is their purpose? This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them. Well, Jeffrey Tucker should see what Trump was paying the hospitals to do.

He was paying them to kill people and to use it to push the idea that there was a pandemic. And so I say, when you look at that case of that single teenager and how they are pushing to say, look, we got bird flu, and this guy's in really bad shape.

He's got severe lung damage now that he's been in the hospital. What'd they do to him in the hospital? What do you think? I have seen so many stories of the hospitals being paid to kill people by Donald J. Trump. I am sick of this stuff.

I know exactly what they were doing. It was murder for hire. It wasn't financially incentivized medical malpractice, as I said at the beginning. They knew what they were doing, and they killed people deliberately. It was murder. Yeah, I know. I get kicked off for doing that kind of stuff. You know what really annoyed me yesterday?

I'll get to that later. The model establishes three levels. First is a household level. Here, high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members. Jeffrey Tucker says, well, that alone is objectionable, right? A group of shelters, such as schools, community buildings within a camp sector, a maximum of 50 high- risk individuals per single green zone where high risk individuals are physically isolated together. There'll be no movement into or outside of the green zone.

He said, yeah, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick and anyone that they deem to be in danger medically significant consequences of infection so you don't have to be sick you just have to be a high-risk individual you know if you're elderly you could pick this up somewhere so for your own good we're going to isolate you in a quarantine camp a concentration. The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, quote, currently we do not know if prior infection confers immunity. Folks, there is no medical science at all at the CDC, none whatsoever. Throughout the book on immunity on contagious diseases and on the rest of all this stuff on your immune system being learning after it has gotten sick these camps require a dedicated staff to monitor each green zone people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why

they are denied even basic religious freedom, says the report. The failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence. Yeah, they might push back against this stuff. I just saw a video of a guy who was an SS guard. And he was being interviewed shortly before he died. And they asked him, you know, he was one of the people who they would line people up in a ditch, walk up and shoot him in the back of the head. And as they're showing the video of that happening, they asked him, they said, what did you feel when you did that? He said nothing.

What were you thinking? I was thinking I have to aim well. Right. So, you know, and I looked at it. I was thinking I have to aim well. Right? So, you know, and I looked at it. The reason I mentioned that, the reason it came back to mind, was because I saw these people just passively lined up and everything, walking up there, waiting their turn to be shot in the head and fall in the ditch. And I thought, why in the world wouldn't they fight back why would they pass i mean they're going to shoot you anyway right yeah it's kind of like the mentality of uh played the

clip many times at the very end of psycho where norman bates is sitting there and he's and you hear uh his um his mind and you hear his mother's voice saying, I'll show them how harmless I am. I wouldn't even harm that fly that just landed on my hand. You know, that type of thing. If I'm really good, if I'm really good, maybe they'll have a change of heart. And maybe they won't shoot me in the head like they have the five people in front of me. At what point do you fight back? No, we just go to sleep it's 4d chess it's trump don't say anything if you play along you can get rich there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide they said well we know we lock people

away like this we're going to have anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse. Where are they going to get substance? Oh, that's right. The war on drugs has never worked, so I'm assuming that they figured that they'll be able to get any drugs to abuse that they want, even in a concentration camp. You know, that's probably true. We have hundreds of people a year who die in federal prison from drug overdose. People who were sent there because they were using illegal drugs. As a matter of fact, I've covered many times the story of a mother who turned in her son because she couldn't stop him from using illegal drugs. He was addicted. She thought, well, I'll turn him in. They'll send him to prison and he won't be able to get the drugs and that'll get him off of it he died of an overdose in prison no problem getting drugs so yeah substance abuse inside the concentration camps

thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should never be left alone but wait a minute wasn't the whole purpose of this isolation oh well we never leave them alone we are constantly watching them and around them and they said the biggest risk is that it may be misunderstood that we're trying to force people it's kind of like this we didn't force anybody we didn't force anybody in 2020 and we didn't force anybody in 2021 you had a choice jab or job you know it wasn't nobody forced you and um alan dershowitz big fan of trump alan dershowitz said well we're not forcing anybody but i wouldn't have any problem if

they do that i wish they would and he said and i would defend uh the government sending people to your house dragging you out of the house and forcefully injecting you. I would defend that all the way to the Supreme Court, he said, and I would win. I said, I have no doubt of that. I have no doubt that he's that disgusting. And I have no doubt that the Supreme Court is that disgusting. That it would defend and allow that. In four years of research and encountering truly shocking documents

and evidence of what happened during the COVID years, let's talk about this as the Trump-Biden years, okay? The Trump-Biden years. Just for the historical record, okay? This one certainly ranks at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated. It's mind-blowing that people would vote for the people who did this

and go back to sleep. So who wrote it, he said? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enables this to even be contemplated? The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and has a budget of $11.5 billion. It was about as big as the IRS before Mike Johnson and these other people

gave them $80 billion more. IRS had a budget of $13 billion. They gave them another $80 billion. So hire 80,000 people and get a lot of AI so that you can spy on people. Now, that's your uniparty at work for the uninations, which is what's coming as a global agenda. In light of this report and everything else that has gone on there for four years, there should be zero budget and zero employees. But don't look, don't expect that to happen on Trump's watch.

They don't expect that to happen, even if by some fluke or, you know, if the universe shifts and RFK Jr. somehow gets in charge of HHS. Don't expect any of this stuff to be done. I mean, he's not even talking about it. He said, well, you know, there's a couple of programs and a few people need to be fired a couple of programs should go a couple of divisions maybe should go but no no no we're going to leave all this stuff pretty much in there uh so he said um they won't even talk about abolishing this standing army

that we call the cdc and i call it a standing army because they parade around in uniforms they parade around in uniforms you've seen them it's an army and what we had was medical martial law by this bureaucratic military uniformed bureaucracy at the CDC. It's medical martial law. Look, folks, the pandemic was always political. And the science, the science was always psychological. The pandemic was political and the science was psychological. And it still is. It still is. Nothing has changed. The pandemic was political and the science was psychological.

And it still is. It still is. Nothing has changed. So LifeSite News says, here's an easy one day victory for Trump. Take COVID shots off the schedule for kids. Well, go ahead and dream on again. You know, it's 40 chests. Come back to sleep and dream that Trump is going to do this.

He's never going to do this. He's never going to do this. He's bragged about it being his vaccine. He's the father of the vaccine. You think he's going to abort that child? He's probably aborted a lot of kids in the past, considering how he hung around with Jeffrey Epstein and considering what he brags openly brags about. I'm sure he's had a lot of women's abortions that a lot of his kids aborted, paid women to do that. I'm sure. I have no doubt about that. But do you think that he would remove his great and wonderful jab that saved the world? He fathered that thing. He fathered that monstrous depopulation shot. Do you think he would abort that? No. He'll abort his kids,

but not his depopulation shot. Despite the medical establishment getting behind the push for pediatric COVID shots and millions of taxpayers' dollars spent on boosting them, the vast majority of parents are rejecting them, says LifeSite. According to a pro-vaccine Kaiser Family Foundation, only 15% of eligible children in the U.S. get a shot, even though the government is pushing it, paying for it. And of course, if you think that Trump is going to get rid of this, perhaps you need to remember that he gave $250 million to the Ad Council, the biggest ad buy that they had ever had. And these are the people who brought us all of these stupid and annoying commercials like, this is your brain on drugs, and only you can prevent forest fires.

This is bigger than Smokey the Bear campaign. Smokey Bear. I don't know if it's Smokey the Bear, Smokey Bear. Anyway, bigger than that, $250 million to convince people to get the shot. The CDC currently recommends about 28 different jabs in the first two years of life. Well, I guess if we get RFK Jr. in there, that'll all change, right? Well, RFK Jr. said, we're not going to take vaccines away from anybody. We just want to explain to them, you know, do some science and tell them what's safe and what isn't safe. See, nobody's going to take, nobody's going to save you.

You have to take responsibility for your own health just like you have to take responsibility for your own life. And you have to take responsibility to stop this globalist agenda in your local community. Every time I put something up that's a criticism of trump and his appointments or whatever i get people well what did you want to do do you want to vote for her you know and and i get somebody yesterday was seriously um asking questions so really i'm not trying to troll you what should we do i said i say it all the time. Look at the local level. They've told us that they think globally, they plan globally, they act locally. Well, we can act locally to stop them. And if we know what their plans are, we better act locally to stop them. Instead, what we do is we get distracted

with this big presidential pageant. We think it's going to change things depending on who's in Washington. And I'm not talking about just the White House. I'm talking about the Senate and the House of Representatives as well. Look at this fight that's going on over these three people as to who's going to be the Senate majority leader. You realize how bad all three of them are? It's like if you took Mitch McConnell and cloned him three times. They're all bad. They're all bad. There's nobody, there's no dog in that fight that you should be concerned. But just like the presidential race,

now they've got everybody all fighting within the Republican Party as to who it's going to be there. Who cares? I don't care. I know they're going to do the bidding of the establishment and all. It doesn't really matter.

You need to work at the local level. I know that's not exciting. i know that's hard work and i know that it's a lot easier to sit on the couch and vicariously think about what's going on in washington rather than doing something in your local area but you know that's the only thing that's going to change anything so um he said we're going to make sure that americans have good information right now So they can tell you about the Trump shot, but they're not going to stop the poison from going out to people. Right. And you just go, well, everybody knows this. Be the same thing that Laura Loomer said.

Well, hey, if you took shots on you, I knew better. I didn't take the shot. Is that what RFK Jr. is going to say? I told you so. Told you I'd take this stuff. But hey, if you're stupid enough to do it, I'm going to let Pfizer and Moderna poison you. I'm going to let them kill your family members. Is that what government is supposed to do? All of this bureaucracy that we got, health and human services and the FDA and all, aren't they supposed to do some oversight? Aren't they supposed to stop

dangerous things? We stop a crib. If one, a crib. They pull a crib off the market. If one baby dies, they don't just put out a warning and say, you know what? We've had some babies who've died with this crib. But hey, if you want to buy it, go ahead. That's what he's talking about. That's why I can't get real excited about RFK Jr. Look, he identifies some problems. And he talks about problems that the other people don't

even talk about but he doesn't have any solutions the solutions are going to be at the local level rfk jr's um uh contribution would have could have been made in the debate and he's made a contribution in terms of things that he's talked about. He talks about them in an erudite way and explains what is going on with those. But it's still kind of a limited hangout. And he's still going to leave these same measures in place, even if he were to get the levers of power. We have a British doctor who asked on LinkedIn

what autopsies of vaccinated people might reveal. Then his post was flagged as hateful speech. Dr. Philip McMillan posted a question on LinkedIn. And of course, this LinkedIn CEO, Reid Hoffman, a multi-billionaire. He's got his own podcast. I saw a thing the other day where he was, he's like this Java the Hut billionaire. They're talking to Bill Gates, the two of them, what they're going to do with us in the future.

I mean, it's, and, um, and so this is LinkedIn. This is his platform. No, not a surprise that people get kicked off of it. Uh, but he posed a question. He says, suppose autopsies showed vasculitis as the most common pathology in vaccinated deaths. Would we be concerned? And LinkedIn flagged his post as hate speech. He said, the censorship isn't just about me.

It's about preventing the public from asking critical questions and demanding accountability. And so, you know, I talked about this yesterday. I put some stuff up and I put up a clip that somebody had posted of, I retweeted it with a comment. Somebody had put up a clip of Alex Jones confronting Marco Rubio in August of 2018. And it was just a couple of weeks after everybody at InfoWars had been deplatformed everywhere. And, well, not everybody. I mean, Paul Joseph Watson didn't get deplatformed anywhere. I was still on Twitter, but then they shadow banned me, and I remain shadow banned ever since. But, and there were some exceptions like that. but for the most part, it was like everything all at once within a 12 hour period. And so they were having hearings about censorship and Rubio was chairing it. And so Alex encountered him in the hall and started trolling him about it

and, you know, interrupting him in a way that only Alex can do with his loud voice. And Rubio's stopping. He says, I don't know who you are. Go to your website. And it's like, if you don't know who he is, how do you know he's got a website? And then later on, he said something else about it. He said that he knew exactly who he was.

I mean, he's such a little troll. Rubio is disgusting. And so, but I put that up. And I said, so Rubio as secretary of state that that brings up some interesting questions for alex how does he handle this uh does he tell people that trump is playing 4d chess by putting in a little marco there what does he do does he criticize marco does he suck it up and swallow hard because it's trump that's doing it i said well of course you can look at his past lies about the vaccine the lockdown the elections

all kind of figure out what's going on and i said of course the the maga people and the jonestown cult will never uh you know ask any questions about this stuff and so the jonestown cult came out in force after me one guy puts down there um so um uh how come you're not censored on social media i was like wait a minute uh alex was censored but then he got brought back by elon musk and now he's got millions of people following him bigger than he ever was because of all this stuff uh you know i get a couple hundred people who see a post that i put up even though supposedly got 137 000 people and uh so it's like yeah i'm not censored on social media

yeah i've been censored on social media that that troll that's never even heard of that's how bad it is uh they're just it is a jonestown cult and the trump people are the same way it's truly amazing in 2022 says the doctor i was removed from linkedin for 18 months how do you get back on that's what i want to know i mean once i get kicked off of these places linkedin facebook youtube i can't get back on i can't even get on YouTube to put up music. He says, I was removed from LinkedIn for 18 months for challenging the narrative. My questions and observations rooted in science and logic apparently cross an invisible line. Now that I've returned, I see the same patterns of suppression emerging. Why? Because I dare to ask a critical question. What do autopsies reveal about the pathology in vaccinated people who have died?

He said, suppose autopsies showed vasculitis as a common pathology in vaccinated deaths. Would we be concerned? He said, my post is flagged for hateful speech. He said, how can a scientific question rooted in histological evidence, how can that be considered hateful? Well, here's the thing. It was never about hateful speech. It was always about speech that they hate. And why do they hate the speech? Well, because it gets in the way of their agenda. Here's the CEO of NPR. Oh, sorry, that's the wrong one. Let's see, where is it? Where did we get that?

Okay, is that the wrong thing in there? Well, we got the wrong thing there. Well, anyway, we have the CEO of NPR who says that she doesn't, he said, we get so upset about the truth, the truth really doesn't matter. We've got an agenda to push here, right? And so that's the reality. You know, and if this woman had to compete in the real world,

she's like some 30-something, I wanted you to hear it, but something happened to the clip, I don't know. If this woman had to compete in the real world, she wouldn't last a second. It'd be like dropping a pampered poodle with a pedicure into the jungle. She would be devoured in the real world. But of course, she excels in this type of thing because she's willing to jettison the truth. And here's an example of this as the truth about autism and the fact that it is now about one, about three out of every 100 kids has an autism, part of the autism spectrum.

They can't hide that anymore. So they've got to come up with explanations for it, just like all the heart disease from the vaccines and everything. So rather than changing anything, because it was always designed to harm us, they're not going to change anything. They're not going to admit that they did anything wrong, and Trump is not going to admit that there's anything wrong with his vaccine ever. Instead, what they do is they fabricate another cover story

because we're onto them. They have to explain it. It's gotten so big. Again, going back to was it 1979 we had rain man they had to explain to the audience what autism was it was absolutely unheard of in my lifetime as a matter of fact i didn't hear about it until the early 2000s we started having friends who had kids with autism and it's horrific but this is what is being put out by the daily mail and it's being put out this is research coming from the hebrew university of jerusalem and they said

well what we have determined is that it's caused by air pollution specifically nitrous oxide that comes out of cars are you are you serious uh you know we grew up in a world where car exhaust was really bad compared to what it is today i mean you talk about one of the you know they should declare victory and leave us alone and let us have our cars now yeah they're a lot more expensive and uh complicated than they were but uh it's good enough and there's no exhaust and i know this because i drive around in a convertible and um when somebody has an old car that's not uh it's in front of us boy you can really tell otherwise we never smell anything and um so the idea that we need this is coming from cars we need to ban cars is really where they're headed. They've always got a solution that they want.

And they'll come up with, they'll take any real problem, especially problems that they caused, and they will direct us over to what they want to do, which is we've got to get rid of cars. And when you think about the way the cars were in the 50s, the 60s, the 70s, and how bad the pollution was and autism was unheard of. Then we clean up the cars and we start injecting the kids with vaccines and now autism is all over the place. I wonder what the cause could be. I just don't have any idea.

Maybe we should ask these eminent scientists in medicine at the hebrew university of jerusalem i'm sure they can come up with a plausible lie and it's not even plausible come on guys you can do better than that you've trained you're trained to lie talk to pompeo maybe somebody the cia or massad can help you come up with a lie come on if you're going to lie to people you can come up with something that's more believable than this. This is just ridiculous. And so he says, whatever the cause, Dr. Amal, the guy who did the study, said he's proud of his research team, which is one of the first to link air pollutants to the autism spectrum.

When asked what his greatest achievement was, Dr. Amal said, quote, discovering that nitric oxide plays a key role in autism. What a wasted life then. Well, you got some money, got 30 pieces of silver to do that. That's great. That's great. You're going to stand before God one day. Healthy teenager fights for life in the hospital after catching bird flu from an unknown source in Canada.

If you look at the details of this story, it's pure lies, speculation. None of this makes any sense. They're all preparing you. This is psychological. This is also coming from the Daily Mail. Potentially alarming development. Almost all of the U.Ss cases were farm workers with direct contact with infected cattle or bird notice how they put cattle first okay a year or two ago

they're killing millions tens of millions of chickens all the time now we got to get rid of dairy and raw milk especially so they focus on cattle they said but the case in canada is different this teen had not visited a farm but had been exposed to dogs cats and reptiles reptiles i don't know anyway uh but look nobody else got it none of his friends got it none of his family got it so much for this contagion nonsense right i mean just logically just logically they're worried about all the animals he's been in contact but they're not worried about all the humans that have been in contact with him why haven't they gotten sick if their contagion stuff isn't a full-on lie and of course the idea that he was sick that they show a picture show the picture on the article there. So what do they do as an example of this?

Oh, there we go. Pink eye. Pink eye is back. Oh, the H5N1 virus causes eye inflammation as seen in a dairy farmer in Texas. Okay. Yeah. These people got pink eye. One of the most common things out there.

About the only thing more common than pink eye is a common cold so we can lock everybody down for a respiratory pandemic right and if you're working on a farm as i said many times you don't wash your hands guess what you you rub your eyes you get pink eye you used to get it all the time like i said when i was a kid um pink eye is not the dreaded scourge of mankind that they want you to believe that it is. And all these other people that they brought in, none of them had fever. None of them had respiratory issues. The teen who is in Canada and is Canada's first bird flu victim

and the latest outbreak, this is how they're hyping this stuff, he began suffering a fever, a cough, and then pink eye. Well, you know, I've had pink eye. I've had irritated, itchy eyes when I've had a cold or something. So they admitted him to the hospital. They tested him for a genetic sequence that they have declared to be bird flu. Where did that genetic sequence come from? Was it isolated?

No. They fabricated it in a computer model, and then they sent it out to people. That's the way it always works. That's the way it worked with COVID. It was a fabricated model of a DNA sequence. They look for it. They ramp it up by a factor of 1.1 trillion with a PCR. They can find anything, said Kerry Mullis, the inventor of the PCR. Patient is now, though, after he's been under the care of the people in the hospital, and they don't say what they did.

He's now suffering from severe lung damage, making it hard to get oxygen around the body. They put him on a ventilator. They give him remdesivir. What did they give him, right? In Canada, British Columbia has identified at least 26 dairy farms across the province and numerous wild birds that have tested positive. And yet, they couldn't test positive, even magnifying it over a trillion times. They couldn't find any body that had tested positive, any people.

Canada has no cases reported in dairy cattle and no evidence of bird flu in samples of milk. And boy, they're testing everything. They're testing sewage, everything for this stuff. And they're ramping it up to laughably absurd levels of magnification. I've used the analogy in the past. It's like somebody taking a telescope and looking through it at a trillion times magnification. It's like, whoa, the moon's going to hit us. That's what this is.

The moon is right there. It's going to hit us any moment. Bird flu has infected nearly 450 dairy farms in 15 states since March, according to USDA data. And earlier this month, a pig tested positive. Well, there you go. No one, not even the farm animals, has died. Except for the animals that were killed by the government.

This is all a bunch of PCR garbage. Well, before we go to break, OctoSpook said, I think they're enslaving us under a medical government, much like the German Nazis used against filthy Jews and undesirable weak genes. Yeah. Handy says, hey, if we're going to go back to look at what they did to prep for the next round of tyranny, remember SB 2006 in Florida? It was put into play, but it was ignored.

You got to refresh my memory on that. I don't recall SB 2006 in Florida. Handy does. EMS, he's on it uh denver attaway trump transition co-chair howard lutnik got his new york city home from jeffrey epstein in 1985 i didn't know that for ten dollars and made them next door neighbors seemingly worked in cooperation and with ties with Wexner too. Lutnik also was a major Clinton backer in 2016. Well, I had not seen that. I'll look that up and see if it's, that would truly be amazing.

Truly be amazing. And I say I have to look it up because I see a lot of stuff that's on Twitter. And, but the home was given to him by Jeffrey Epstein. Guard Goldsmith, Jeffrey's piece reminds me that, and he's talking about Jeffrey Tucker here, Brownstone. Jeffrey's piece reminds me that a Massachusetts governor, Charlie Baker, originally said in public statements that he opposed jab tracking. And then he was caught working with a corporation university to make one for phones.

Yeah. You know, when we look at Texas, when Trump started showering cash on everybody and all the governors could do their own thing. Well, Governor Abbott gave three hundred million dollars to this company that was in Frisco, Texas. And all of a sudden, boom, people all over the place, both the conservatives and liberals in the media say, who is this? And there was some alternative media person who went to the address of this company that had been given 300 million. And was nobody there and they looked it up they could find like one person i mean it was an amazing case of corruption and all of a sudden

it just disappeared and everybody stopped talking about it the first thing that republican governor uh greg abbott wanted to do was contact tracing on everybody uh conservative think uh thank you very much for the tip says uh trump signs for trillions of dollars and new spending on his way out the door causing massive inflation he then points his finger and blames the new guy cool trick and now it's all loaded for bear and we're going to see what happens with all this stuff and of course one of the picks for Trump is somebody who worked for Soros. And he didn't just work for Soros, but he was the mastermind of the trades that broke the Bank of England. And now this guy is being pushed for Treasury Secretary. thing is to see how the conservative MAGA media, specifically Revolver and Darren Beattie,

one of the biggest Trump suck-ups anywhere in the media, how he then tries to explain how this is going to be great. We're going to make America richer again. It's even to the extent that when you've got a Soros banker, one of the worst people out there, it's good because it's Trump that's going to put him in place. These people know no bounds of sycophancy and what they will lie to you about. It's absolutely amazing. We'll be right back. Lepidoptera L'esprit de l'esprit Thank you. Making sense. Common again.

You're listening to The David Knight Show. Back. Yeah, I want to talk. I'm going to get to the personnel stuff. We got one person left to comment here. We must free ourselves. The Zionist control. How do we do it when everybody says we're under globalist control?

Well, the globalists are more than just the Zionists, but the Zionists are fully on board with the globalists. And I want to talk about personnel coming up here and what what we can see from this and what it means for us. And look, Netanyahu and his people have political Israel. Let's keep this, let's understand this for the Christians that are out there. We're talking about a political government and it's got an agenda. And we got politicians in our country like DeSantis and others who go there to collect money and to sign bills to limit our free speech they're going to sell out our free speech to a foreign government that demands censorship and they want to criminalize free speech in the U.S. and they do that like DeSantis did

and they get money and boy they're not even making a secret out of what they want to do. They have enacted controls. They are outlawing. You want to talk about the globalist agenda and how Israel is fully on board. They did it to their own people. And they were the first and hardest in terms of the vaccine mandates

and the passports and all the rest of this stuff on their own people. And they're telling their own people that you can't have cash now. And they're trying to outlaw gold. I mean, they're 100% on board with the globalist agenda. And it is a globalist agenda to have a global government. And they are antithetical to our constitution and they're not content to do their own thing they buy politicians because of course the best investment you can make in america is to buy a

politician any money that you get them is going to come back to you a thousand fold so let's talk though first about what is happening in our families, in our local communities. Then we'll get into the politics and we'll get into the personnel. This is unreason. A mom jailed for letting a 10-year-old walk alone to town. And I was surprised to see this was picked up by a couple of mainstream media things. I think it was even picked up by Drudge, this Reason article. And it truly is outrageous. And we've seen this happening for quite some time.

The mother said, I was not panicking as I know the roads and I know he's mature enough to walk there without incident. Where did he go? Well, on October the 30th, police handcuffed Brittany Patterson in front of three of her four children and drove her to the station in Fannin County, Georgia. She was then fingerprinted, photographed, and dressed in an orange jumpsuit. Hours earlier, around noon, she had driven her eldest son to a medical appointment. Her youngest son, 11 years old, intended to come along, but he wasn't around when it was time to leave.

She said, I figured he was in the woods or at grandma's house, you know, over the river and through the woods to grandma's house we go. Because the family all lives around. This is rural Georgia. They've got 16 acres. This family owns 16 acres. And they got family all over the place. Her husband works out of state, but there's no shortage of family in the vicinity.

Her mother and her sisters live just two minutes away. The 11-year-old boy, however, was not playing in the woods. He had decided to walk to downtown Mineral Bluff, a town of only 370 people. It's not quite a mile from his house. A woman who saw him walking alongside the road. And they said, and of course, this is not a busy road. Speed limit is 25 miles an hour. In some places, it gets actually up to 35 miles an hour.

So she stops. And she asks him if he's okay. He says, yeah, I'm fine. But she called the police. This busybody. Bus but she called the police this um busy body busy body calls the police and then she gets a hold of a female sheriff we're talking nanny state here the female sheriff picked up the boy called the mother she asked me if i knew that she was downtown i told her i said no she said but i wasn't panicking i know the roads i know he's mature enough to walk there without an incident but the sheriff disagreed she brings the kid home and um and lectures the mother said he could have been run over by somebody going 25 miles an hour he could have been kidnapped

anything could have happened anything could have happened well you know if i had a sheriff telling me that i would have said well if i left him, he could have had a tree fall on the house. Anything can happen. You know, he could drown in the bathtub. Anything can happen. Nevertheless, she comes back that evening about 630 with another cop. She tells the mom to turn around, put her hands behind her back. As three of her kids watch, the mother is handcuffed and the sheriff took her purse and her phone, put them in her cruiser

and hauled her off to jail. To Patterson, none of this made any sense. She had grown up in the area with plenty of unsupervised time to wander around to play. She raised her kids that way as well she says the mentality here is more free range uh she was soon released on 500 bail 500 why any money why arrested in the first place but you see the judge thinks that she needs bail the sheriff thinks she needs jail. And then the next day, you have Child Protective Services come out. Do a home visit. They even went to interview her oldest son at school. At school. A few days later, the Child, quote unquote, Protective Services,

we call it DFCS, presented the mother with a, quote-unquote, protective services, whatever they call it, they call it DFCS, presented the mother with a, quote, safety plan, unquote, for her to sign. And it would require her to delegate a safety person to be a, quote, knowing participant and guardian. She's got a parent, right? She's the parent. Why does the kid need a guardian?

And to watch over the children whenever she leaves home. The plan would also require Patterson to download an app onto her son's phone, allowing for his location to be monitored by CPS. How in the world does something like this happen in America? And it continues to go on. Because it was not just the busybody neighbor. It wasn't just the female sheriff. It wasn't just the judge. It wasn't just the child protective services. It was also the assistant district attorney because she got legal help an organization called parents usa she contacted them the attorney david delugas is part of this non-profit parents usa that provides pro bono

legal help to parents wrongly arrested and prosecuted for child neglect gofundme has been set up to help the legal expenses of parents usa as As Patterson's counsel, DeLugas called the assistant district attorney who recorded the conversation, which is legal to do in Georgia. The assistant district attorney told her lawyer that if Patterson would sign the safety plan, the criminal charges would be dropped. Well, he responded that if she had to sign a safety plan simply because her son walked someplace without her knowing his exact exact location it would stop him from visiting friends it would stop him from having any independence whatsoever but the ada maintained that soren had been in

danger and that a safety plan was necessary we're talking about like a mile or two i mean i used to range all over the place when i was his age on a bicycle just amazing just amazing to think what's happened to this country uh and this is a small town a really small town what was it a couple hundred people in that town they said um the safety plans the veiled threat is that if you don't sign your children can be taken away says the lawyer uh the unspoken deal seems to be sign it and the state won't prosecute and if the state does prosecute the mother could face a reckless conduct charge a one thousand dollar fine and a year in jail because 11-old son walked a mile or two into a town with 25 to 35 mile an hour speed limits. And, you know, what?

So she said, or rather the lawyer who's working with Parents USA, said he'd like to see Georgia pass a law that permits the authorities to check up on kids and then leave them alone if they're not hurt, if they're not in distress, if they're not in actual immediate danger from an identifiable source. You can conjure up all kinds of imaginary scenarios. I guess that's really kind of what happened when we all got locked down in 2020. It was an imaginary scenario that was conjured up by a bunch of bureaucrats and this kind of trading everything

off for the illusion of safety folks a government that can make you safe from everything is a government that you'll never be safe from just like a government that can give you everything is a government that can take everything that you've got and they promise to give you safety in return for everything that they're going to take from you you'll never get it as i said many times you know people are in prison uh you know they are in a security facility except they're not safe they don't certainly don't have any liberty anymore as this case could not get any weirder as if it couldn't get any weirder says uh reason you had um this bureaucrat at child protective services just mailed the boy a birthday card when he turned

11 over the weekend to me this looks like stalking to me this looks like the cps thing you're mine now yeah yeah you're my new little boy i'll be seeing you we've got some plans for you we've already contacted some people that you know know the people that epstein and trump knew whatever uh the patterson patterson the mother knows that refusing to sign the safety plan could get her in trouble but she is resolute she said i will not sign and just think about this other than the wild imagination of some women and a nanny state thing but look at how many people again are involved in this you know it starts with a nosy neighbor goes to the uh the nanny state female sheriff then it goes to the judge it goes to the assistant district attorney it goes to the judge. It goes to the assistant district attorney. It goes to the child protect.

We got five different people in a small town. I mean, what do we got? Like 10% of the population. It's a small rural Georgia town. This is insane. And this is where the work needs to be done at the local level. This is get that sheriff out of there in the first place she should run against this mother should run against that sheriff in the next election government schools spent billions of dollars fighting parents says alex newman government

school districts across america spent a staggering 3.2 billion dollars of taxpayer money to fight parents. Oh, this is a UN agenda going back a long time. Again, 15 years ago, I was doing commercials about the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Well, if children have rights, parents don't have rights. And that's what they want to do. They want to take your kids away from you. They want the kids to be wards of the state that's what all this cps stuff is about that's what the schools have become about they're there to attack the family so government school districts across america

spent a staggering 3.2 billion dollars of taxpayer money last year fighting against parents and against school board members that were concerned about what was happening in the schools they were concerned about indoctrination they were concerned about sexualization of kids that's why i don't call them public schools anymore i call them pubic schools that's all they're focused on uh this is a new study and the interesting thing is that this is an article by Alex Newman, who is excellent on the school issue. And as he points out, this study was done. It's called The Costs of Conflict, The Fiscal Impact of Culturally Divisive Conflict on Public Schools in the United States, pubic schools. And the study was done by left-wing researchers at the University of California and other academic institutions in California.

And the study shows parents and concerned community members, anybody who speaks out, any school board members who try to get this under control, they are all radical. And they're the people who are creating conflict. It's not these people who are trying their pedophile agenda on kids. No, it's the people who speak up about it. They're the ones who are responsible for the conflict. Heightened conflict over culturally divisive topics.

They're the ones who invented these topics in order to divide. Subjects include race-mongering as well as homosexual and transgender propaganda. Led by left-wing researchers at the University of California and other academic institutions, the final report suggested that it concerned parents who were to blame. Educators, quote-unquote, who were peddling racial hysteria and sexual deviancy were portrayed as innocent victims, merely facing an onslaught of attacks from unhinged parents.

The report demonizes parents, taxpayers, and even school board members. It uses an array of smears, including activists, agents of disruption, conflict entrepreneurs, and, of course, extremists. Their concerns are dismissed. Their concerns are belittled as disinformation or misinformation that is a threat to the pubic schools. This is, it is absolutely amazing.

Just think about the fact that if they were to do what the parents who pay for the schools wanted, and it's not just the parents, but it's taxpayers. Anybody should be able to go. You don't have to have a kid in school and complain about the pedophile agenda, complain about pornography being pushed to kids. Things being pushed to kids that if anybody outside, anybody other than a teacher in one of the pubic schools were to show this stuff to kids, they would get arrested.

And rightfully so. But hey, if it's done in the schools, that's fine. And so if you have a problem with that as a taxpayer, somebody who is compelled to support this filth, you should be quiet about that. And if you're a school board member, you should be quiet about it too. And if you're a parent, you should be quiet about it.

So where's the conflict coming from? If these people who are operating in the school, if they would just do what the people who pay them tell them to do, or if they would just do what the people who pay them tell them to do, or if they would just do what the people who are theoretically their supervisors would tell them to do, there wouldn't be any conflict. They're the ones who are creating the conflict in order to push their agenda. They don't care that you're paying for it. They don't care that that's your kids. They don't care what the school board says. They're going to do what they want to do. And that is at the classroom level, folks, at the classroom level.

It doesn't even matter if it's the principal is on board with the right stuff. It's at the classroom level. Among the alleged horrors perpetrated by these supposed evildoers are things like speaking out at a school board meeting, seeking public records, or publicly reading excerpts from obscene school books, promoting parental rights legislation, criticizing school administrators on social media, and much more. To get these results, academics surveyed hundreds of school superintendents from across the country, creating a quote-unquote conflict score. Two-thirds of the school superintendents reported moderate to high levels of conflict and division

in their districts over their racial and sexual indoctrination being foisted on students. That conflict resulted in spending billions on legal work to fight disinformation, security, and more. For a perspective, a district with 10,000 students and a moderate level conflict would spend about a half million dollars of taxpayer money to push their agenda against the people who don't want it, to push their agenda against the parents, against the taxpayers, against the school board members. They'll spend another half million dollars to do that. And as they were saying, two-thirds of the schools reported moderate to high levels of conflict. So at moderate level, they're saying it would be about a half a million.

If it is a high conflict, it would be 800,000. And your property taxes are paying for this. Your property tax is not only paying for them to miseducate your child and to sexualize your child and to turn them into racists and communists, but you then have to pay for them to defend themselves against you when you complain. Divisive conflicts in the nation's schools are generating fear, stress, and anxiety, says the report. The lead researcher leads UCLA's, quote, Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. And, of course, you know that he is opposed to democracy, education, and access.

Sadly, he said, the report, superintendents have told us the cost of these conflicts not only has a financial impact, but is also eroding teaching and learning and undermining the trust between schools and communities. Well, you want trust? Do what the community says. Instead of fighting for your agenda. You're the source of the conflict. You're the source of the division.

You're the thing that has changed. Fellow co-author of the study, also in California, blamed parents for hurting children by resisting this brainwashing. These conflicts come at a very real cost. Folks, we have to defund these schools, even if you don't have a kid in them, even if you take your children out. You're going to lose your home.

You can defund the schools, or you can own your own home. Which would you, you know, there's no other alternative to it. But I want to play for you this report that I did 15 years ago about some of this children's rights stuff and how it's being pushed by the UN. Certain truths are self-evident. We're endowed by our creator with rights. Certain relationships are also inalienable. Family was the first institution created by our creator, and the family is the fundamental building block of every healthy society, and every just government.

But government and family are two different authorities or spheres with different roles and different responsibilities. Each authority is uniquely suited for a particular task and doesn't do the task of the other well. Families have traditionally been assumed to be acting out of love and the best interest of its members, and have been left alone unless proven to be abusive. But a new attitude has been cultivated by those that believe children should be raised by the village and not by their family. This approach to children and their families has been spelled out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The UN Convention assumes government responsibility for all the needs of children and transfers responsibilities and rights from parents to government. Government is seen as capable of providing every want to the child and as responsible for instilling correct values, their values, into children. Parents are mentioned in the UN convention only as problems for children to be protected from, or as mere advisors to their children, so long as their advice is not too strong or coercive. Children are encouraged to form their values independent of their parents. But nowhere is there a sense that they would ever need protection from a government. This troubling document has been ratified as a treaty throughout the world, with the U.S. as virtually the only lone holdout. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is about 16 pages.

On the other hand, the Parental Rights Amendment is only three short paragraphs. It's a simple restatement of what has until recently been what every culture, every government except authoritarian governments saw as the rights of parents. The Parental Rights Amendment would strengthen the Constitution to protect the family by explicitly stating self-evident truths about an inalienable relationship. Find out what you can do at parentalrights.org. Yeah, yeah, that would stop some of that nonsense. But unfortunately, those simple things have never been picked up by any Republicans.

They don't care. Well, they're talking about family values, but they don't value the family. You see that in their private life, and you can see the fact that they will not grasp the obvious solution legally for all this stuff a report from ucla starts with the story of one anonymous midwestern superintendent after smearing school board members seeking to rein in woke indoctrination as extremist school board members the tax-funded educrat also slandered Moms for Liberty and other organizations advocating for parental rights as, quote, special interest groups. Again, this is an article from Alex Newman. The far-left superintendent complained that the new extremist, that's his term, school board members were using social media to, quote, challenge the district's LGBT policies. Apparently, school board members are just supposed to shut up and ignore the desperate pleas of parents and constituents

and then rubber-stamp perversion. Matt Staver, founder of Liberty Council, has argued that government schools were now fighting against families. The only way to keep children from becoming casualties of this well-funded war against families is to get them out of the government-run schools and then shut down these pubic schools, as Alex Newman has said in the past. It's like a burning school building.

What would you do? You'd get your kid out of that burning school building, and then you would work with other people in the community to put out the fire before it burns down everybody's homes. And that's what this is going to do. The longer people stay in this so-called educational system, the more radicalized they become. We have a friend who's a very good friend of Karen's in college, and she's just retired from being a teacher for, what, 30 years or something? Maybe 35.

And we have watched her go more and more radical as time has gone on in that environment. It radicalizes everybody, especially the kids, but the teachers even become radicalized in that environment. It is a cesspool, and it needs to be shut down. We need to stop feeding this monster, right? Many times people talk about the fight going on in each and every one of us. The good nature, the bad nature, that type of thing, right?

Which one's going to win? Well, the one that you feed, right? Why are we feeding our schools? Why are we feeding them? If the price was not so outrageous, if the stakes were not so high, the unhinged report might almost be funny. Portraying parents protecting their children as if they're bad, writes Alex Newman. The superintendents are supposed to be public servants and their salaries are paid by the public. So why then do they want to have conflict with the people that they work for that pay them, that hired them?

And why can't we fire them? Why can't we shut down these institutions that have become so broken beyond repair? It gets to the point where it's just like a building. You know, when a building has enough problems, you just knock it down and build a new one. That's what has to happen to our institutions now, especially the schools. Alex Newman wrote a book, I interviewed him on this book, Crimes of the Educators, How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America's Children. It's a great book, and it traces back throughout history this utopian ideal, this collectivist utopian ideal that has formed the basis for these corrupt, irredeemable institutions.

To give you an example of this, here is a teacher in South Carolina who's declared that she will not have children as long as Donald Trump is president. I will never have children because Trump is president. Yeah, it's coming from the Daily Mail. I think I saw this on the Drudge Report. He's actually a good source of outrageous garbage. It certainly is now.

Kate Medlin, 31, posted on TikTok last week after it appeared that Trump would win the election, saying that she and her fiance decided that they would not be having kids in the next four years, especially in the state that we're now in. But see, here's the problem. She's a teacher. She's a preschool teacher. And she has a classroom full of kids. And there are preschool teachers like her that want to lord it over your kids.

Would you want somebody like this teaching your kids? Would you hand them over to somebody like this for eight hours a day? I wouldn't. These are the kind of immature, mentally disturbed people that would be teaching your child if you were foolish enough to hand them over to a government school. Look, even if you're poor and a single parent, there are people out there who will help you. There are people out there who are willing to help you. The preschool teacher added that when Trump leaves office, she'll be nearly 36 years old, making her a high-risk geriatric pregnancy.

Karen was 39. I guess we-risk geriatric pregnancy. Karen was 39. I guess we were beyond geriatric when she had her first child. It was fine, you know. But, I mean, the sleep deprivation is pretty rough when you're nearly 40 years old. I mean, it's rough even on younger people. But we were nearly 40 when we had our two kids all at once. Adopted Travis and had Whistler. So anyway, she said, last night, the conversation my fiance and I had before we went to bed was,

if this happens, we won't be having kids, and at least not in the next four years. We definitely can't have them in the state that we live in now because she's in South Carolina. And abortions are illegal there. Well, again, this is her fiancé. They're talking about, I guess, having an abortion before they go to bed. They're not married yet. Yeah, so much for marriage as well. But, you know, there's always reproductive freedom to think about and to focus on and when

we think about that they've come up with so many different ways to kill babies you know we have the dnc which is not the democrat national committee but it is similar to that but no that dnc is d and c stands for dilation and courage basically cutting the baby to pieces right but isn't it interesting that it sounds like the democrat national convention our committee the dnc and then they have you know saline solutions and burning the child to death or you can poison them with a pill now they've come up with something called an ultrasound abortion where they use very intense sound waves to kill the baby i just saw this here's a clip of a baby ultrasound abortion Yeah, not your body. Bands off of our body, yeah.

Yeah. How about that? You want reproductive freedom to kill babies? She said, well, we may consider moving to Maine or Vermont or some other protected state where, you know, if I have a baby with my fiancé that we're not married, I can then kill it because Trump's president. This person is disturbed beyond belief.

In South Carolina, there's a ban on abortion after six weeks. But, you know, if she goes to one of these other places, there's no limits. Later in her TikTok, she also spoke about LGBT rights and gun violence in school. She said, I'm waking up to texts between myself and my female friends and my LGBT friends and not knowing what the world is going to look like for them either. What, you mean you're not going to be able to sexualize kids? Is that the end of the world for you? And then coming to school this morning and realizing that someone might want to put

a gun in my hand to protect students. I teach two and three-year-olds, and that's the world that they're growing up into. Now they're growing up, you're not going to protect them with a gun. You won't do anything to protect them. You'll murder your own baby, and you'll poison the minds and the spirit and the bodies of these young children, two to three years old, with your LGBT lies. I'm so disgusted with these schools uh this video has been viewed more than 337 000 times and women flocked to the comment section to express similar feelings see if you're on tiktok and you put

out stuff like this the chinese promote promote it. They promote all these mentally deranged teachers that are out there. And this is what the pubic schools are creating. Again, we've seen it with our friend and what happened to her years of teaching. TikTok said, I'm having exactly the same thoughts as one person said.'m just devastated can't have kids because of trump another one wrote i just broke down and cried in my husband's arms this morning telling him that we won't be having kids another one we're having the same conversation we've been trying for nearly two years and just started getting hopeful that ivf was an option and we don't feel safe trying it in florida she also fears climate change action is going to decrease

and progress made will be reversed, leaving behind an unsafe planet for future generations. So just kill them. The CO2 that's out there. And it's not just that. It's now the car exhaust is supposedly causing our autism. Yeah, right. I'm going to continue to hope that climate change

isn't going to be pushed back further than it has been so that the children I might possibly have might have a safer place to live. Well, Lottie Bonkham, I don't know if you've ever heard of him. He's an American pastor. He's been in Africa for the last 10 years. He set up a training seminary there, but a big advocate for homeschooling. He comes back to the U.S. and talks quite a bit.

And he said, you know, our culture is under divine judgment already, under divine judgment. Here are just Christians to be ready for persecution. He said, plead with God that not all would be lost. He said, how does he know that we are under judgment? Well, he said, just look at the pervasive sexual sins of the prevailing culture. That's a sign of divine judgment. If you believe the Bible, if you look at Romans 1, right? It says that at some point, God gives us over to this sin.

He said, I think we've reached that point as a culture. He said, the gospel, however, still offers hope that American Christians would plead with God for revival while we prepare for persecution. His book that he put out a couple of months ago, it's not like being black. He is black. He says, it's not like being black, how sexual activists hijacked the civil rights movement. He said, again, if you look at Romans, the wrath of God manifests itself in the world by giving mankind over to sexual depravity and a debased mind.

And he said, however, that lays the foundation for the gospel. He says, quoting Romans, he said, I'm not ashamed of the gospel. It's the power of God for salvation to everybody who believes. He said, we're living in a time, in an era, when there are people who are desperately wicked, in desperate need of repentance and faith, and in desperate need of the gospel. He said, at the end of the day, this is not just about laws that we don't like, or that we disagree with,

or laws that we want changed. Laws are important, but ultimately our golden rule is not just that people would be forbidden from certain things. Our goal is that they would be freed from them. Do you understand that? When you heard that story about that young teacher who is 32 now, she'll be 36 when Trump leaves office, and then she'll have to reconsider if she's going to have children or not.

Do you realize how enslaved she is? Not because of Trump or anything that she imagines that he's going to do, not because of climate change or the rest of the stuff. No, she is fearing things that are not a threat. And this fear has enslaved her. It's enslaved her, and it denies her the joy that she would have if she had children. See, that's why Vati says, we're not there just to forbid people from doing certain things. We're to free them from certain things. Slavery comes from fear. Slavery comes from sin. You know, they always promise you freedom.

And yet that sin is enslaving. And I hope you can see it in her maybe you can see it in yourself because we all struggle this with this on a regular basis we all do she's living with a man that she's not married with you know it's kind of if you go back and look at the woman at the well, she starts to engage Jesus. And this is a real strange cultural abridgment, the fact that he would talk to her because, yeah, she's not Jewish, she's Samaritan. And so she's kind of taken back. And so she starts to engage him in conversation. And he says, so go ask your husband. She goes, well, I'm not married.

And he goes, yeah, I know you are. You've had this many husbands, and you're not married to the man that you're living with now. And immediately she changes the topic to theology. Let's not talk about me. Let's not talk about my background. Isn't that what the church does today? We look at the church, we look at our society, we look at the sexual perversion that is pervasive everywhere. And rather than talk about that, just like at the woman at the well, we want to switch over to theology.

We want to argue about fine points of theology, especially eschatology and how that affects Israel. That's what we want to talk about. We don't want to talk about spiritual warfare. We don't want to talk about our sin. We don't want to talk about how we can get closer to God. No, let's talk about eschatology. Let's talk about the end of the world. That's what we focus on, just like the woman at the well.

And I've seen so many churches that that's what they're all about. They're all about the end of the world. They're all about Israel. They're all about eschatology. But they're completely blind to what is going on around us. Bauckham went on to expound on what he described as a four-stage devolution of an evil culture, as described in Romans 1. He said the destruction starts with the denial of God and his authority.

Well, we can check that off, right? We've done that box. As well as a desire to suppress the truth. Hmm, yeah. Matter of fact, if I had that clip from NPR, I'd play that again, but I don't have it. And then he noted that it's long been readily apparent, have all these things in modern culture.

He said the consequence of such a worldview is that it first leads to general sexual immorality, which he explained first manifested itself in the sexual revolution and in the separation of sex from marital commitment and family. He said, here's what's interesting. He said, we haven't even gotten to the alphabet yet. He's talking about the LGBT, the alphabet, and he calls it the alphabet mafia. He said, this is not about the alphabet. This is about the sexual revolution as a whole. Long before we got to the alphabet, we had a sexual revolution. He said this whole thing is broken, even without the alphabet mafia. Bauckham then explained the dishonorable passions that are the next stage of divine judgment

against a wicked culture, and he suggested that the scale at which modern society is subject to them is historically unprecedented. He said, so we've gone beyond natural passions, gone way astray to disordered and dishonorable passions, and it's like the law of diminishing returns, right? We always want more. We're never satisfied. You know, isn't that the thing? Talk about the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, the pride of life. sex, money, power, it's never enough. No matter how much you get, it's never enough. How much?

You're the richest man in the world, Rockefeller was asked. How much is enough? He said, just a little bit more. Whenever we are pursuing one of God's good gifts, outside of the boundaries where God gives that gift, it never brings us satisfaction that we crave. And on top of that, it always brings us guilt and shame. You can say that about sex. You can say that about the love of money. Sex is a good gift and the boundaries that God gives it to us. Money is a good gift and the boundaries that God gives it to us. But we tend to get out of those boundaries.

We go deeper and deeper and deeper into our sinfulness, and it just doesn't satisfy. Here's what's amazing. He said, we've got a generation today that has more sex and sexualized content available to them than anyone in history has ever had. Imagine that, he said. When I was a kid, you had to have an uncle or somebody

who had some stuff hidden in their room. You'd find stuff that was hidden somewhere in the uncle's room and somebody would tell you, guess what I saw? And he lifts up his phone and he said, but we're giving that to nine and ten-year-olds. Number one use of the internet is still pornography. And we're giving unlimited, unfettered access to some of the strongest pornography that's ever been created. We're giving that to nine and 10-year-olds in the palm of their hands. So we've got a generation of people who've been raised with sexual material, who've been raised with libertine views towards sex, who are engaging in sex younger and younger. And we've got young people entering into marriage

who can't even enjoy sex anymore because their ability to enjoy it has been destroyed. But God, right? But God can change all that. God can fix that in anybody's life. He can fix it in your life, my life. Our good news is, again, that we're not talking about prohibition. The good news is that we're talking about freedom from this stuff.

Freedom from the slavery that comes with these obsessions and addictions, you know, just like drugs. And it's real liberty. It's real liberty that can't be taken away by government. What we've just read here, he says, is the wrath of God, and we're seeing it everywhere. The wrath of God is here. The judgment of God is here. If you believe Romans, it's here.

Just look at the fact that God has given us over to depravity in this culture. He said, plead with him for his mercy. Plead with him that all would not be lost. He said, if you're anything like me, it's hard to see a way in this culture. He said, plead with him for his mercy. Plead with him that all would not be lost. He said, if you're anything like me, it's hard to see a way out of this. It really is. It's hard to imagine how this would happen.

What would that look like? I have no idea. But God, but God can change anything. He can change you, me, our society. He can change our society one person at a time. And he can change just a few people, or he can change enough of them that it changes society. So pray, we hope, and we stand firm in what we cling to, the only thing that we know that can stem the tide. And we do it one at a time.

Yeah, they call us bitter clingers, don't they? We're better clingers i just had so many people anytime i criticized trump or alex you're a bitter old man i said no i'm better i'm better uh everything is better now and uh yeah that's uh we do cling to that make no apologies for that. Oh, Christianity is just a crutch. That's right. It is a crutch for people with broken legs. And it'll get you there.

We're going to take a break. I'll be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. A couple of comments here. Scott Helmer, thank you for the tip. He says, Greg Reese is really calling out Trump and Musk for the frauds that they are

and how they'll march us into the worst level of enslavement we've ever seen. In his personal weekly podcast, I guess he's not at InfoWars anymore. Do you all keep in touch with him? He would be a good guest to have on. I didn't really know Greg when he started after I had my show. I would get in at about 4 o'clock in the morning.

I was the only person there. I was the only kind of cool. The whole place to myself. But, you know, and then by the time everybody started coming in at 11, I was anxious my show had ended. And, of course, we're talking Central Time. My show had ended, and I was in a hurry to get the show. Things that I was going to tell people to cut out to come up with titles and stuff like that so I could get out of there.

Before things got really, the traffic started to accelerate in the afternoon there. So I didn't really ever get to know Greg. But I really would like to find Jakari Jackson. I don't know where Jakari is. Jakari, I do know. Jakari and I were there at the same time, and I don't know what Jakari is doing either. Jerry Saylor, what's your angle behind Trump wanting to end the Federal Education Board? I know there's some nefarious garbage going on here. I guess he's going to bring in something 10 times worse using Musk technology.

Well, that's a good point. I didn't talk about that. You know, I'm sure that with Musk and the technocrats, they're going to incentivize people to go electronic, right? Gates has pushed a lot of that kind of garbage and it is garbage um charlotte isabey who attacked the department of education she went there hoping that reagan was going to get rid of it and he didn't and so she left and other people left after they realized that he was going to take this thing that had just been created during the election year of 1980 and he ran against it said i'm going to shut it down but he didn't he grew it for the

next eight years and we've had every presidential candidate promise that they're going to do something about it it is unusual for trump to say he's going to get rid of the department of education in um after he's been elected so maybe he will do something about it. But I also said, again, just block granting money back to, and I talked about this yesterday, block granting money back to states. You're still talking about government education. I'm not looking for new and novel ways to fund education. Just taking one step backward. We've already taken too many steps forward for this thing to work. The problem is schools. And the problem is that government should not be involved in education in any way, shape, or form. If government is involved in education, they're going to destroy free speech.

They're going to destroy the free exercise of religion. They're going to teach you a religion. Secular humanism is a religion. It really is. It's a worldview. They've got their things that they demand that you must do, things that you must not do. They have their rituals. They have their gods, and they are fiercely worshipped. And so I don't support education by schools by any means whatsoever, unless those schools are small and under close parental control. That would be something like a homeschool cooperative. And you can do that. In homeschool cooperatives, you've got people who are teachers. Parents will take turns teaching different subjects for that type of thing.

And you get together once or twice a week or something. That's one way to do it. But if you're going to turn this over to people that you don't know, you're going to turn your kids over to people that you don't know, spend eight hours a day with them, what do you think is going to happen with that in today's society? We don't have a society anymore that supports that kind of trust. I just look around at what I was just talking about. The depravity of our society is such that I would never, in American society today, I would never entrust my child to a total stranger.

Why is it that the sheriff's deputy will pick up a child because they're just walking down the road and no danger at all? Oh, well, you know, we've got to keep the kids safe. Well, maybe you don't turn them over to institutions that are known for sexualizing kids and gender gaslighting them and giving them pornography and explicit material maybe that's where you start uh so i don't you know what trump is talking about and i mentioned it yesterday he's just talking about the money aspect of it but folks money is control that's what i keep hammering down to people the federal government doesn't have authority to do much

but the way that they do everything the way they insinuate themselves into every corner of our life is with money that's what maga can't understand well trump didn't do i say he paid them to do this he paid the hospitals he bribed the hospitals to point people and say they've got covet he gave them a% bonus if they had identified them as a COVID patient to everything that they did. He gave them bonuses to kill them on ventilators. It's all about incentivizing this through money. They say, well, one administration will say, we'll give you money if you put the boys and the girls bathrooms and showers. Next administration will say, we'll give you money. We'll take away the money if you put the boys and the girls bathrooms and showers. Next administration will say, we'll give you money.

We'll take away the money if you do that, or we'll give you money if you don't do that. It's always about the money, and they know that, and Trump knows that as well. He's not naive about that. His supporters are naive about that, but he knows that. He even talked about that when he said, well, you got to do something about the boys and the girls bathrooms, and I'm going to take away their money, which is exactly how it all works. That's what he was doing with the pandemic.

And of course, Obama said, I'm going to take away your money if you don't put them in there that type of thing it's always about the money and just let me say it doesn't take a lot of money to educate your child it takes time and it is time that you spend with your child that'll be the most precious. Most precious time you'll ever have. Guard. Trump plans to eliminate quote-unquote the department of education then create a system of grants under his control without any department title and to start his goofy university of america program

that's great yeah that's the whole point it's the way that the Department of, and you got it, Gard. Gard, liberty conspiracy. He nailed it. It's the money, right? What is it that makes the Department of Education dangerous? The money that they have, right? They could come up with all of their programs of what they want to do, but if they don't have money to bribe people to do it,

everybody would just ignore them. But they've got the money to make it happen. And so if Trump is going to grant the money, what difference does it make? It really doesn't. Scott Helmer, thank you again for the tip. He says that Chuck and Anita Untersee, I know them. Projects include the film revelation dawn of global government yes i know chuck a really nice guy he said they really warned us about what was coming

years ago yeah that was a good documentary as a matter of fact um through them i got to know mark collins who um is the spitting image of thomas je George Washington. He has played, he played George Washington. They suited him up. You know, they had him, you know, they filmed some scenes in that movie, Revelation. Mark Collins, it's amazing. He's got a business card and they have a detailed three-dimensional sculpture that you've seen it before.

It's in Washington somewhere. And on one side of the picture is George Washington's face, and on the other side is Mark Collins' face. I mean, you can't see the difference. It's amazing. And he's the same height as Washington. He's a tall guy. So he's been in several different movies. He's a pastor. And he lives in Yorktown, Texas. And he goes around to schools and he lectures about real history and things like that. And I got to know him through Chuck and Anita. Chuck, I didn't know Anita that much, but Chuck interviewed him several times. And I interviewed Mark Collins several times.

And Mark Collins was a pastor at that Springfield, Springfield, something, Sutherland Springs, I think it was, Sutherland Springs, Texas, that was shot up. He was a pastor there before that. And I had him on that day after it happened, that Monday after the Sunday it was shot up. He was a pastor there before that. And I had him on that day after it happened, that Monday after the Sunday, it was shot up. And, you know, he came on, he was debunking all the lies about what had happened, you know, and he knew the guy that took out the shooter. And they wanted to say, you know, what they were saying was that he had a shotgun. The other guy

had the AR-15. So we need to get rid of the AR-15. He says, no, he had an AR-15. He was an NRA instructor and all that kind of stuff. But yeah, Mark Collins, a great guy. I haven't talked to him for quite some time. I should try to find him again. Audi Modern Retro Radio says, I know two teachers who left the profession years ago because they saw what was coming. I know one who did. Started homeschooling our kids.

Parents, actually, even before we had kids, she left and said i don't have anything to do with this system anymore she did something completely different went into personnel management uh parents need to stop seeing school as a free babysitter that's it and they need to see it for what it really is indoctrination centers it It's a child care program. So the parents can go off and work, and they think that they're better off for doing that. That's why I talked about that TSMC project in Phoenix, Arizona. I said, look at how they want to take over your life. This is an extreme example.

And sometimes if we see the extreme example of what the Taiwanese do in terms of their total enslavement to the corporation, sometimes we can pull it back and say, am I like that in some ways? Ephesians 6.12 says, I read aloud to a local school board from the disgusting book, All Boys Aren't Blue. He says the school board is so uncomfortable as well as people in the crowd, but it's okay for a child to read it. It was so sad. Yeah, that's absolutely true. Well, let's talk a little bit about personnel. I think, Karen, did you have, I think Handy gave us a comment there about what he was referring to that I didn't know. Yeah, he was talking about the Florida bill.

And thank you, Handy, for getting back with that. He says, starting at line 1107, this is the bill that he was talking about in Florida. If the individual poses a danger to the public health, the state health officer may subject the individual to isolation or quarantine. If there's no practical method to isolate or quarantine the individual, the state health officer may use any means necessary to vaccinate or to treat the individual. He says, every time I try to tell people about it back then, I got to push back. They aren't rounding people up in Florida. No, not yet. That's true.

Yeah, no, not yet. They haven't done it yet. Well, let's take a look at what might be coming. Let's take a look at some of these personnel. You know, we talked about carbon capture the other day. We talked about Zeldin. You know, he's now at EPA. The only experience he's ever had with any environmental issues was he was part of a congressional group to push carbon capture.

One of the most inane, insane insane wasteful nonsense anybody's ever seen and we're gonna you know make the power plants more inefficient so that we can put this bag on the side or whatever and capture the carbon and then we're going to put it in a pipe and we're going to send it across the country to um you know christy gnome or to george bergman put it in the ground like a lot of people say oh we'll use it for fracking because now that's good to do that right it's insane and it is just a big green washed green grift that's his only experience and so that's zeldin who's going to be going to the epa and so we have a lot of uh wolves and sheep's's clothing that are going to be there.

And then we also have a lot of wolves and wolves clothing that Trump is putting out there. Mike Waltz, who Trump just picked as national security advisor, has explained what his vision is to end the Ukraine war. Let's play Mike Waltz here here if i can find that one um i'm having a hard time finding these things here um i don't know if that's in there or not yeah here it is um here he is talking to the atlantic council if you don't know who the atlantic council is uh they were heavily involved in censorship back in 2018. Heavily, heavily involved with it. Leading it. Because they're also part of NATO.

They're kind of a group around NATO. And NATO wants censorship just like our NATO European allies want censorship. But here's Mike Waltz, been tapped as national security advisor, who is a wolf in wolf's clothing, addressing the NATO think tank Atlantic Council. Look, we can be allies and friends and have tough conversations. I have written speeches for 20 years going back to Secretary Rumsfeld practically begging our NATO allies to share their defense burden. The 2% of GDP is not a distant goal. I think Canada has it as a goal in 2032. That's completely unacceptable.

And we can be friends and allies and have tough conversations. 2% is the minimum. We need to be celebrating those like poland and like the baltics who exceed that and my question is with with the worst uh and most uh destructive war on their doorstep uh in ukraine since world war ii if not now then when yeah we need to have some more wars matter of fact trump has nominated fox news host i thought the sign of what in the world he's nominating people from fox news pete hegseth i guess is how you pronounce his name i don't watch fox news but i've seen this guy also uh for secretary of defense he said pete has spent

his entire life as a warrior for the troops and for the country he said pete is tough smart and a true believer in america first well i don't know exactly what his service record is he's in the national guard um i don't i don't know if he's been involved in any of these wars i mean it is he okay he did serve in iraq and afghanistan unlike lindsey graham who is also in the national guard lindsey graham is high ranking in the national guard he's never gone anywhere. But this guy is kind of like Lindsey Graham. And the question is, he said, Pete is tough, he's smart,

and Trump says he is a true believer in America first. Is he really? Anyone that wants to take the stage and talk about dual loyalty is dead wrong. What this organization represents, what Western civilization represents today is an understanding that Zionism and Americanism are the front lines of Western civilization and freedom in our world today. And what better time for that relationship? From the scrapping of the terrible Iran deal to the embassy move,

the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state, and the recognition of the Golan Heights. This president is a true friend of the state of the Jewish state in the recognition of the Golan Heights this president is a true friend of the state of Israel why is that important why do we have to be a true friend of the state of Israel an unbreakable bond that represents faith and freedom and fidelity to historic religious and cultural traditions the opposite of secularism and Islamism and anti-Semitism. I don't want to be Jeb Bush, but it's okay to clap.

Yeah, well, you know, if you can't clap, just throw money at my campaign. Or just throw money at Trump and get him to hire me because I'm going to tell Israel that they can do whatever they want. Here he is talking about what Israel can learn from America. When I came here, a lot of people asked me, a couple people this morning in a press conference, what can Israel learn from America, was asked a couple of times. And each time I stopped and I said, you need to reverse that question. The question is, what can America learn from Israel? Yeah, what can we learn from Israel? Well, I guess we can learn that we can attack anybody that we wish preemptively, right? Because that's what we're going to do in Iran. As a matter of fact, you know, pushing into Iran is exactly what he's talking about. Here he is talking about

what he wants to do in Ukraine as well. One first big question. What's at stake? What's at stake is repelling an authoritarian who basically is saying, I want the Soviet Union back. I want Ukraine back. I want Kiev back. And then what's at stake is making sure we don't allow it to become an Article 5 larger, broader war than that. So equipping and supplying Ukraine with what it needs faster than we have. And we haven't been doing it. The Biden administration has not been doing it fast enough so that they can further bog Putin down and push him back. It's going to be long. It's going to be bloody.

But I think that's those are the stakes for the United States of America. I would encourage folks to go watch Who is Vladimir Putin on Fox Nation. It's great. It talks about how he views human nature. It's good. It's good. And it helps you get an understanding of how he views human nature and how he views his role in manipulating it and putting back the Soviet Union. When it comes to Ukraine, though, Harris, he's going to double down on the tactics he believes will bring civilians to their knees. You know why? He doesn't play by the rules of war.

We call him a war criminal, and we do, and rightfully so. He doesn't care. Russia's not a signatory to the International Criminal Court. He doesn't feel any threat that he'll be held accountable. Ceasefires, you know what ceasefires are for him? An opportunity to reload, an opportunity to pick more targets. And he's already said, I mean, this is a precarious part for Zelensky, too. Zelensky did the right thing in saying, hey, any man in this country, stay here, pick up a rifle and fight. But in the twisted mind of Vladimir Putin, you know what that says? Every man in the country who was a civilian is now a military target. That means any civilian target could be a military target. And women and children that are there are human shields for the men

who are carrying Kalashnikovs. Think about it through the psychology of him. So we talk about the targeting of civilians and rightfully so. He's saying those are now military targets and he hasn't done it to Kiev the way he's done it in other places like Mariupol. But I think we're going to see that coming because he's bogged down and is going to. Well, you know, the thing is, I had a clip here and I don't know what happened this morning, but I had a clip where he's talking about Iran. One of the things he was saying about Iran is like like you know well they say we're killing civilians out there but they're using civilians as shields and so um now uh what he's saying is that oh well putin is going to say that he can putin can kill and and putin is the aggressor putin has invaded ukraine and now he's saying

that if there's any men in there i can i can after those men, whether they're combatants or not. I can come after them and I can kill any women or children in the way. Isn't that the argument that Israel is making in terms of Gaza? And yet he's making that there. He's evil because he initiated war. That's right. It is evil to initiate war. But it's evil for Putin to do it.

It's evil for Japan to attack us at Pearl Harbor, right? I know. I know it was set up by FDR. Don't write me about that. I've talked about it before. But even if he stands back and he lets the Japanese attack, they still did it. And even if Netanyahu stood back and let the Hamas people do it, they still did it. So Hamas is wrong.

Putin is wrong. However, it is also wrong to continue a war with no aim for peace whatsoever. And to continue to attack and deliberately attack civilians, which is what he's accusing Putin of doing in Ukraine. But it's precisely what Israel is continuing to do. You know, it is, when he talked about Iran, I don't have that clip, he said, well, you know, yeah, we assassinated their, essentially their vice president, Soleimani. But hey, he had it coming. You know, he would have done something to us if we hadn't killed him first.

That's the same kind of logic that Japan used. And that kind of preemptive strike mentality is what has kept us at war since the end of World War II. And we've not won any of these wars either. Perhaps that's why. But see, he says, when he's talking about Iran, he says, nothing is off limits. We can do preemptive attacks. We can do preemptive assassinations. Nothing is off limits.

Are we the bad guys here? I think we are. You know, all of my life, I heard about how Japan attacked us first, how it was a day of infamy. My father was married, had a child. He had a heart murmur, had a whole bunch of other stuff. But he signed up and they let him sign up, even with all those things that would have disqualified him, perhaps from the draft if he didn't want to get drafted. But he signed up. After Pearl Harbor, he signed up and joined the Navy.

When somebody attacks you, regardless of what the justification was, you're justified to do that. But you're also trying to stop the war. Hegseth thinks that Biden was too passive in Ukraine. He wants to be more aggressive. So I just have to ask, you know, we had Woodrow Wilson who ran for president. He was the peace president. He was not going to get us involved in World War I, but then he did. We had FDR saying he wasn't going to get

us involved in World War II, and then he did. We got Donald Trump who ran as the peace president. He's not going to get us involved in World War III well is he if you start to look at these people that he's put in place you look at mike waltz you look at um uh at this guy hegseth um an unhinged warmonger not much different from uh not much different from lindsey Lindsey Graham. As a matter of fact, speaking of Mike Waltz, here's what he said in 2017, if I can find that one. Yeah, here we are. This is Mike Waltz in 2017 talking about Afghanistan. He said, until you're prepared to commit your grandchildren, not your children, but your grandchildren to stand shoulder to shoulder with my grandchildren and fight Islamic extremism, then you will never be successful here. So are we 15 years in? Yes.

Yeah. Send your grandkids to war. lot more fighting and we do we need a long-term strategy to undermine the ideology of Islamic extremism just like we did fascism and just like we did communism yes we do and you know Gordon I think we're in for a long haul and I think our nation's leadership needs to begin telling the American people I'm sorry we don't have a choice. We are 15 years into what is going to be a multi-generational war because we're talking about defeating an idea. It's easy to bomb a tank, very difficult to defeat an idea, and that's exactly what we have to do. You can't defeat ideas when your ideas are corrupt. When you have an unjustified war,

when you lie to people, when you continue it forever, ever, right? No end to this. We're going to fight them forever. Your kids, your grandkids, your great-grandkids are going to be fighting these people, he says. Well, guess what? They kicked our butt. They kicked us out of Afghanistan. Biden didn't withdraw.

It was a disorganized retreat. Because we lost that war like we've lost all these other wars all these other asymmetric wars that were unjustified that we preemptively struck people on and um so yeah we're going to be there forever right that's why everybody said well you know trump didn't start any wars oh did he i think he escal. I think he got us into Syria, put troops there to steal the oil, left them there. But he didn't end any wars. I mean, Obama, he kept them going. If you're keeping the war going, that sometimes is even worse than how it starts.

You can argue about how a war starts, but if you want to keep a war going and you're not interested in talking about peace, and how can you defeat the ideas of islamic fascism with american fascism right you have to transcend that ideal and yet your very presence and the very way that you fight that war ensures that you will have no moral high ground and without moral high ground you are destined to lose. So then we have another one of the warmongers that is part of the new Trump cabal that's there. This is Ratcliffe, who's now going to be the head of CIA for Trump. It's no secret that the Democrats want to obtain a ceasefire in advance of the presidential election coming up to help Kamala Harris.

And in so doing, they're really willing to put politics above our national security. And it is troubling. National security is above everything. Because how far are they willing to go? Well, as you point out, they're willing to ignore acts of war. I mean, when our own intelligence community tells us that they're hacking into the Trump campaign to help Kamala Harris win the election, when they engage in an act of war of trying to assassinate President Trump, and perhaps most importantly, when they engage in the act of war of firing through its Houthi-controlled rebels ballistic

missiles at three U.S. warships, and there had been no actions and no consequences to those acts of war by Iran, it unfortunately tells you how far the Democrats are willing to go to stop Donald Trump. And, you know, I think larger at play here, Maria, is not just this short short term election, but that it really reveals the failed strategy of the Democrats over the last 10 years in dealing with Iran. You know, the famous Obama doctrine, which was that, look, we can deter Iran diplomatically and it won't come at the expense of Israel. Well, Barack Obama was wrong. He misunderstood the lethality and the evil nature of the Iranian regime. And what Israel has done is essentially employ the Trump doctrine, a pressure, maximum pressure campaign, understanding that the only way to deter terrorists like Iran and their proxies

is to put your foot on their throat. And Israel has done that. We should be assisting Israel in doing so. But again, political expediency and the quest for power by Kamala Harris and the Democrats is resulting in American national security taking a backseat, unfortunately. That's quite disturbing. quite disturbing yeah unfortunately we've got um we got people who are having america take a backseat to israel's interest people like ratcliffe people like mike waltz people like hegseth people like trump yeah we take a backseat to israel on all this. Put us into a war. Look, Mike Waltz is just another John Bolton without a mustache.

And Pete Hegseth is just like Lindsey Graham. And you heard how Ratcliffe is starting out here. Well, you know, we've got to talk about national security and all the rest of this stuff. By the way, Mike Waltz, the, I compared him to John Bolton. That was a position that Trump gave John Bolton in his first administration. Everybody knew that John Bolton was a warmonger, and he gave him that job. Mike Walters is as well.

National security advisor. But you heard this guy Ratcliffe, who's now going to be head of the CIA, he's saying, we've got to do something about national security. Well, why don't we do something about our national security rather than Israel's national security? They're not the same thing. They really aren't. If you get us drawn into a war, if we have to get drained of money and blood and we lose peace and we have a world war.

How is that in America's security interest? But, of course, it used to be said that patriotism was a refuge of a scoundrel. Now it is national security that is the refuge of all these scoundrels. Everything is about national security. You hear this from Homan at the border. Oh, well, national security, national security, national security. Well, national security is going to wind up getting you into an open-air prison where they're going to put biometric surveillance everywhere, ID everywhere.

Oh, that'll be done in the name of national security with these people. By the way, when we look at what's happening in Congress, Waltz is in a safe seat for Republicans on the Florida coast. But, you know, Trump is pulling a lot of Republicans out of Congress when they got a very slim margin of majority there. So a lot of people are saying, well, what's going to happen if he, you know, we got four to six seats,

perhaps says Scalise on Fox News. I think they got a majority there, four to six seats. So, you know, Trump has already pulled out to several of them. They're going to have to have replacement elections. I don't know. Take a look at Elise Stefanik. She's coming from New York. Boy, talk about somebody that is Israel first,

somebody that has courted Miriam. Maybe we could call, if we go to war with iran for israel's sake maybe you could call it miriam's war because she paid for it right uh she gets whatever she wants imagine if 100 million dollars can get you to get america to go to war for you 100 million dollars can buy trump by the entire cabinet of trump fill it with all of it with z Zionists who are going to do whatever Israel wants. Imagine what Musk is going to get for $130 million. Well, he's going to become the world's first trillionaire. That's what he's going to get for $130 million. Cheap investment. Like I said, thousands of times what you put in. Trump has announced, by the way, speaking of Musk, he's announced Musk and Vivek the Snake, Rama Smarmy, to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.

And again, this is a doge, right? This is such a joke. The foxes guarding the chicken coop. Elon Musk, who became the world's richest man by getting crony capitalist subsidies, green subsidies, greenwashed garbage. He became the world's richest man by grifting taxpayers and getting government contracts. And now Trump is going to put him in to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency. They can't even do this with a straight face right they call it doge doge like dogecoin because like dogecoin it is a con it's an absolute con i can't believe it's just

amazing to see what the manga people are getting into um dg8 thank you for the tip he says david had a trump cultist tell me i don't understand trump's brilliance trump nominating rubio is for trump to get him out of the senate and the santa's replacing him then trump will fire him 3d chess is back there we go yeah well i'm sure that anybody that trump gets in will be fired eventually uh before too much longer. Audi, Modern Retro Radio, thank you very much. I appreciate that. He said, we all saw how genuine your love for God is today, David. Thank you.

Well, thank you. Thank God. I mean, God has changed my life, and that's what I want to tell people. He can change your life as well. And by the way, Karen was telling me that y'all were having a discussion on the broadcast about how a lot of people were talking about how good the podcast was that Audi and Angry Tiger got together and talked about music this last weekend. It's on both of their sites.

A great interview about music. I've got to see it. I just haven't had time. But I'd love to see it. I just haven't had time. But I'd love to see it. Something that I'm interested in for sure. And again, Modern Retro Radio. Audi does a lot with independent music.

It's good to support people who are going to be there for independence. It really is. And he's got a lot of interesting stuff about independence. And S.A. Miller, 123, thank you very much. That's very generous. I appreciate that.

He said, David, thank you for keeping it real, keeping us in the loop. Blessings on you and your family. Well, that is a blessing on us. Thank you so much. Let's talk a little bit about Kristi Noem going to Department of Homeland Security. And I saw somebody saying, look, don't jump on me i'm not criticizing her i'm just wondering what qualifications what qualifications does she have to be head of homeland security good question good question i don't think she's got any qualifications the only thing i could come

up with as i thought about it was uh she didn't brag about murdering and shooting her dog and that should endear her to all the police uh everywhere because they're famous for doing that showing up at a house if the dog barks at them they just shoot the dog dead without thinking twice so the fact that christy gnome bragged about that i guess that's her qualification for being the top cop right right? Shooting dogs. Other than that, she's just a Trump suck-up as far as I'm concerned. And then we got Don Jr. People writing him and saying, hey, we're worried about these neocons,

these war hawks coming into the administration. There's been rumors that people like Mike Rogers are going to come. Don't worry about it. I got this. I'm 100% on 100 on it well i just played for you mike waltz radcliffe um and uh all these hegseth i mean uh they may not be pompeo but uh they are no different no different at all no different different from Nikki Haley either. So great job, Junior. You really protected us from the neocons and the war hawks, didn't you? Don't have to worry about that.

No, the acorn doesn't fall from the tree, does it? You lie just like your daddy does. And then Zero Hedge said this in response to all that that the new conservative era is off to a good start it appears that trump administration 2.0 is not messing around perhaps the biggest complaint about the 2016 trump administration was how quickly a nest of neocon swamp creatures slithered their way into his cabinet he didn't even wait a week to fill up his swamp creatures with a bunch of warmongering Zionists who are going to get us involved in a war in the Middle East

to the very least. But of course, they also want to escalate what's going on, not just with Ukraine, but with China as well. I think they will. I think a lot of the push, I think he will pull back and end the war in Ukraine. I think he'll give Putin an out. And I think Putin would like to stop that. You know, he'd better off more than he could chew. And so I think he'll take that. But of course,

the real issue for all of these war hawks and neocons in washington the real cold war is not with russia anymore the real cold war is with china and they're going to continue to push that and they're going to continue to do the types of things that will lead us into a kinetic war the kinds of sanctions and tariffs and economic competition all the kind of stuff that led us into uh world war ii uh he's going to do that as well with china as we come in so um you know you don't have to look too far to see the results of what's going to happen with this well this thing has frozen up so it's a good time i guess oh here we go one more and this is about trump jr he just joined something called 1789 Capitol. Well, I don't know, but I'm guessing that 1789 Capitol is referring somehow to the U.S. Constitution that was ratified then, right?

Was it the Constitution of Bill of Rights? I'm foggy on that. 1789. But I'm sure that my audience knows. Nevertheless, I think that's what that's a reference to, Because what they're trying to put themselves out is as conservative friendly. And they're going to, it's going to be a fund that is going to give money to a parallel economy of conservative friendly companies, I say. Well, Omid Malik, who once described himself as a run-of-the-mill corporate Democrat, is the one who launched the 1789 Capitol in 2023. And now Donald Trump Jr. is joining it. By the way, Malik is also on the board of PSQ Holdings. He's there at the Council on Foreign Relations. He's a member of the CFR.

And he is a Chairman Circle member at Milken Institute. Milken Institute. You know, we were just talking about that yesterday. The derivatives market, the financial scandals, all that kind of stuff connected to Milken and these people that are there at Milken Institute, connected in with all of this financial maneuvering to set up carbon credits to use the blockchain, to use satellite surveillance of people, to track them on the blockchain, and have us pay the billionaires for carbon taxes and things like that. And the carbon sequestration. Yeah, Milken is right in the center of all that but of course he's also there with the cfr the council on foreign relations this is a technocrat cartel

and that technocrat cartel besides israel has the greatest influence on trump and so you know donald trump jr is right there with him. 1789 Capitol has made one public investment, though, so far. $15 million to Tucker Carlson. The Council on Foreign Relations. The Milken Institute. Again, milking us for everything. They're still milking. They're still milking crony corruption and all the rest of this stuff.

And these people, this guy who's just, see, I'm a corporate Democrat. Now I'm going to reinvent myself as a conservative. And I'm going to have Tucker Carlson, who's now reinvented himself after leaving Fox News. And so we're going to give him $15 million. Their website says the fund invests in companies that are building the next era of American prosperity centered around these four areas. Number one, the parallel economy. Well, I think this is a bit of a beard here. Deglobalization.

Oh, you think somebody that's with the Council on Foreign Relations is about deglobalization? They don't know any. It's just amazing to see. Anti-g yeah anti-sg uh you know the more i look at this the more this looks like what i mentioned um last day or so the trust right where felix durzhinsky with the czech the predecessor to the kgb in russia he was working with the bolsheviks and they knew that england and other places were trying to get the communists and the Bolsheviks out of power. And so what they did was they created these opposition groups everywhere. They funded them. They ran them. They controlled them. And they used them to spy on their enemies, the anti-Bolsheviks. The more and more I see what is happening

with this Trump movement, with Trump Jr., with this guy, with the Tucker Carlson movement, the more and more I think that is the case here. And then just one last thing. I mentioned this earlier. Darren Beattie at Revolver, I said, one of the biggest Trump sycophants ever. He says, well, we're going to make america rich again one of the picks uh for uh treasury secretary the obvious case for

scott besant he says and uh so he says you got a lot of people and are cheering this and the rumors are that he's going to be the pick and And we've seen this kind of stuff happen before. You know, it was put out a long time, like a week or two before it happened. And it was much later. I mean, when Trump was putting together his cabinet, it was in December. It was in late December.

I remember it was around Christmas vacation when he was pushing Rex Tillerson. There are rumors about that. I started tweeting about that because I really, I knew who Rex Tillerson was. But now, you know, the word on the street and the rumors are that for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, B-E-S-S-E-N-T. I don't know if I'm pronouncing his name right. But, you know, this guy is a Soros crony.

Hey, Maga, don't worry. His 4D chest just goes back to sleep. Yeah. You know, we saw that Trump went through the Bill Gates vaccine and ID agenda. Right. All the world did with the vaccine passports and all stuff, you know, because Gates had the longest time ID 2020. We're going to start rolling out global ID in 2020. Well, they kind of did with the vaccine passport. They moved the Overton window quite a bit. They came up with a justification for doing

it to people. And a lot of that stuff has stuck in a lot of different areas. And then, of course, he's also got the immunization agenda 2030. Everyone, everywhere, every age vaccinated. And I would say implied with every vaccine that they tell you to get vaccinated so trump did a great job in terms of pushing the gates agendas uh in his first term maybe he can help with the soros agenda in his second term right and so here's what darren beattie Beatty at Revolver says. He says, well, okay, Scott Besant went to Yale, 1984. He worked for the who's who in global finance, including Jim Chanos and George Soros. He became a partner at the London office of the Quantum Fund, where he masterminded a legendary trade that netted over a billion dollars in 1992. Well, let's pause there for a second. What was this legendary trade that netted over a billion dollars in 1992.

Well, let's pause there for a second. What was this legendary trade? Well, this legendary trade was not a good thing, necessarily. It was when he broke the Bank of England, right? Soros did that. And this is the guy he said masterminded that. Breaking the Bank of England for his own personal benefit as a matter of fact um it's one of the reasons why soros is still uh hated in the uk when they did the james bond movies they kept talking about quantum this and quantum that they had the quantum of solace and so forth um the kind

of a reference to soros breaking the bank of england and it was this guy, Scott Bessant, working with Soros, who did it. They say he was a mastermind who did it in 1992. He made a number of spectacular and successful bets in the currency arena, and despite being groomed at Soros' successor, he parted ways with Soros in 2015 and started his own fund. Along the way, he taught economics and financial history at Yale. Those who might have concerns with besant's previous soros affiliation need not worry in our view says darren beattie part of the

here's where the 4d chess comes in uh we at revolver news have chronicled perhaps more than anyone soros is devastating political legacy in the world but that Besant has worked for Soros and several other top players in the financial, not political arena in the past simply confirms that Besant possesses a top-tier understanding of financial markets at the highest level. Yeah, Darren Beatty's just like Alex. And so, you know, nothing to worry about. Will this guy break America? He's coming in as we've got this debt crisis looming on the horizon. Oh, it's just great. It's going to be wonderful. We're going to put, Trump is going to put a Soros guy in, and then finally, Trump says he's going to go after the woke generals. He's going to create a warrior board, he calls it. It's going to be retired military

personnel who are going to do some kind of a review of these people. What's the basis for that? Look, certainly the military needs reform. And certainly it's just crazy what has happened to it. But is this going to be reform or is it going to be revenge? Like I said before, is Trump doing some of these things in order to reestablish the rule of law? Or is it to establish the fact that you don't mess with him? Is it about vengeance or is it about justice? Well, we'll have to wait and see. We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show

back and uh atomic dog thank you very much for the reminder he says uh help david knight expose government lies by liking the video sharing sharing on social media, and subscribing. It all helps. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. And I do second that. It doesn't take much time. It doesn't cost any money to like and to share the program.

And we really, in spite of what that troll said, we are heavily censored on social media. that really does help let's talk a little bit about money we have the federal reserve after they cut interest rates last week the federal reserve chair says he will not resign if trump asks him to leave fed chair drum powell said that even with this cut he said policy is restrictive and he made it known that he will keep reducing the key federal funds rates over the next two years eventually to neutralize it, as he called it. Powell was, of course, asked a number of questions relating to Trump. There's been a lot of murmuring that Trump might seek to have Powell replaced in his chief role. Powell was very adamant that he's not going anywhere and he will not resign. Oh, so excited aren't we that we have an independent fed

question is why should the fed be independent right why why is that a goal why is that something that you know this is one of these things like well roe v wade's the law of the land it's like no it isn't it's a supreme court decision there's nothing sacred about that uh What is so sacred about having an independent Fed? Why should the Fed not be held accountable? Why is it that we can't audit them? Why is it that they're unelected and they're not accountable even to our elected officials? No, they are above the law, just like Fauci. He said, a reporter asked him, said, some of the president-elect's advisors have suggested that you should resign. If he asked you to leave, would you go?

He said sternly, no. Then when asked, can you follow up on, do you think that legally you're not required to leave? Powell answered, no. So there you have it. The economy is to be manipulated by unelected, unaccountable technocrats who are above the law, just like Fauci. No problem.

That's the way it's going to be. Trump has also said he believes that he should have a seat at the Federal Open Market Committee board to have a say in policy decisions for the Fed when it comes to setting interest rates. And again, how quickly we lose sight of the constitution right i mean if the government's role in all of this is to coin gold and silver then what is all this stuff about setting interest rates and all the rest of the stuff and why should trump have a say so about it why i mean we do elect and we don't allow powell we don't elect powell but uh why should the government manipulate the economy in that way well trump it turns out of course as we all saw in the first time he's a big fan of low interest rates of cheap helicopter money

elon musk is uh putting up calls on social media to end the fed and we know what he wants out of all this stuff we know that he wants to make x a global payment system essentially if if done right the x would be would serve people's financial needs to such a degree that over time it would become i don't know maybe half of the global financial system. Wow. That's what he's going to get. I think he's going to get that out of this administration. So it would be by far the biggest sort of financial institution.

But like I said, not really in the way that people are used to thinking about banks. Just the most efficient database for the thing that is money. For a thing that is money. Least amount of fraud. It could be tokens. It could be carbon taxes. Whatever. Seamlessly on one location.

Yeah. Well, the U.S. dollar has lost approximately 96% of its value since the Federal Reserve was created. 1913. Actually, I think it's even more than that. That's what the Cointelegraph was saying. I think it's much more than 96%. Musk appears to support a call to end the Federal Reserve Bank in the U.S. after reposting a tweet from Utah Senator Mike Lee, who called for greater executive oversight over monetary policy and for abolishing the Federal Reserve.

It's kind of interesting, you know. Again, because we're at the fourth turning, people are looking at these institutions that don't serve us well. And because I remember, you know, 30 years ago, we'd talk about abolishing the Fed, or we'd talk about abolishing the income tax, and abolishing the IRS. And people, you people, you'll never be taken seriously if you keep talking like that.

You know, I don't care. It's the right thing to do. But now you got people who are talking like that here in the Senate. Now they're not doing it, but they're talking about it. Anyway, Lee argued that the Federal Reserve Chairman Powell's recent assertion that he would not resign from his post, even if asked to, by President Trump, represented an out-of-control system. He said on social media, he said the executive branch should be under the direction of the president. That's how the Constitution was designed.

The Federal Reserve is one of many examples of how we've deviated from the Constitution in that regard. Yet another reason why we should end the Fed. Well, again, it's not really, you know, it's independent. It really is independent. And so note that Rand Paul doesn't talk too much about Ron Paul's favorite topic, Federal Reserve. Isn't that interesting? You know, you got Mike Lee out there who's talking about it,

but I get crickets from Rand Paul. In July 2024, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Loomis, or is it Loomis? I don't know, introduced the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Bill in the Senate. She specifically cited rising inflation, the corresponding loss in purchasing power as the main impetus for the bill. Trump has talked about stockpiling Bitcoin in the conference this summer in Nashville, Tennessee. Talked about how he might use Bitcoin to pay off the national debts. One of the reasons why it is skyrocketing right now. And we'll talk a bit more about that.

But before we leave the Federal Reserve and the firing of Jerome Powell, there's an article at Mises.org. They said, again, going back to would you leave if Trump wanted to go? Said no. Followed by silence. And then he was asked by another reporter if it's lawful to remove him. Is it lawful to even demote you and powell responded with a forceful it is not permitted under law not permitted under law well you know the federal reserve act is something that could always be changed experts who spoke to abc news acknowledged that some

legal ambiguity looms over what type of conduct warrants sufficient cause for removal, but they said a policy dispute is unlikely to meet a standard. Still, Trump could attempt to push Powell out and to test how courts interpret the law, noting that the case could end up with a conservative majority Supreme Court. Trump could try, and he might try said alan blinder a professor of economics at princeton university former vice chair of the fed he says it's very unlikely that he has the authority but if he takes this to the supreme court i don't know what to think about the supreme court and what they'll do right yeah it's like a box of chocolates you never know what you're going to get from those nine black robedbed Nazgul in the Supreme Court.

Trump could leave Powell in his position on the seven-member border of governors, but he could demote him from his role as chair, says Blinder, the former vice chair of the Federal Reserve. He says, now that is a subtle question that has not been tested. We can't answer that quite as definitively. So in other words, he says, well, I don't think that he has the power to do it. But who knows? Maybe the Supreme Court would support him if he wanted to remove Powell. But he says if he wants to demote him, well, that's a very subtle difference.

I don't know what would happen with that, he said. Regardless of what Trump's legal powers may be, it's clear that Congress has the power to remove Powell, says Mises.org, just as Congress has the power to abolish the Federal Reserve altogether. The Federal Reserve was created by an act of Congress. The Federal Reserve can be ended by an act of Congress. And the Congress could remove him and keep the Federal Reserve. There's a lot of different possibilities, except Congress won't do anything. Congress does nothing but hold dog and pony show hearings and then kick money and responsibility over to the bureaucracy. But where is the constitutional authority for the Federal Reserve Act?

That's the other key, right? Congress ought to abolish the Federal Reserve entirely, of course, but if its members lack the stomach for that heroic act, then Congress can begin by amending the Federal Reserve Act to make it clear that the chairman of the Fed is not a holy person. Leave him alone. Again, start with an audit. If you start with an audit, which was a

smart strategy by Ron Paul when he started talking about that. We were all talking about abolish the Fed, abolish the Fed. He says, audit the Fed. And that was smart because if you did an audit and you saw what they're doing, then everybody in the country would be yelling, abolish the Fed. You just need to audit them. Just need to audit them. And they can't muster the courage to do even that. It goes on to say here at Mises.org, Congress could rewrite the law to allow Congress to remove the federal chair with a majority vote in either house. It doesn't really matter so long as the central bankers get the message that they are not special. Congress should prohibit the Fed from buying any asset of any kind.

This would end the Fed's habit of buying up mortgage-backed securities and government securities to prop up the banker class. And it would also end the Fed's ability to manipulate interest rates, since the Fed's main tool here is the open market operations. A second key change that is very necessary is to remove the Fed's so-called dual mandate. This is what allows them to do whatever they wish. The Fed says, we've got a dual mandate. We have to stabilize prices, and we have to maximize employment. Well, the maximizing employment is the excuse they have to increase the money supply.

And that's what they always fall back on. By the way, the Fed actually has a third mandate, that is to ensure moderate long-term interest rates. Getting rid of the Fed's power to purchase assets probably nullifies this mandate in any case, but Congress might as well remove any doubt and totally prohibit the Fed from manipulating interest rates of any kind. Of course, if Congress were to attempt any of this, Fed simps in the media and in Congress will talk about how such things are unprecedented and we have to respect the Fed's independence. Again, the question is why why why is an independent group of

people who can manipulate the economy and as i said before i had a friend i used to he'd heard me talk about this and uh his his brother was visiting and he said uh now my brother is a vice president of bank he was a bank branch manager that's frequently they give them the title vice president and he said uh i forget what his name was he says tell him fred tell tell david what the purpose of the fred really is he said well all they do is cash checks you know they process checks really you've never heard uh about the fed uh changing interest rates even uh you know anything about the money supply, any of that kind of stuff? You don't know what they're – do you think that affects the economy?

But I didn't want to argue with him. I was just, oh, well, thank you for explaining that to me. Anyway, the fantasy version of history. There is not now and there has never been any such thing as Fed independence because the Fed always willingly helps the regime get what it wants. Early on, Fed independence didn't even exist in theory, and it was explicitly limited in law. Prior to 1935, the comptroller of the currency and the secretary of the treasury sat on the Fed's board, ensuring a direct line from the White House to the Fed.

This is something that Trump, if he wanted to have a say, he could go back to that. By 1933, of course, Franklin Roosevelt issued an executive order abolishing the gold standard and ordering the Fed to turn over all of its gold to the Treasury. So much for Fed independence under the left's favorite 20th century president. So, yeah, so he's giving FDR gave orders to the Fed. Big things, you know, turn over your gold to the Treasury even. How are they independent then? During the Second World War, when the Fed essentially helped to launder funds for the war effort,

the Fed agreed in 1942 to peg interest rates on government securities. The Fed also engaged in a variety of price control measures and regulations designed to assist with World War II. According to its own historical narrative, the Fed has now allegedly been autonomous for 60 years or more. Okay, so how's that working out for us? How's inflation been over the last 60 years? You know, we go back to 1960, and certainly, you know, the corruption.

It's not just the, you know, inflation out of control because of their money printing, quantitative easing, and stuff like that. But it's also when you look at the whole banker class. As I've said before, I remember when interest rates had gone down to 5% a couple of years ago. And they were saying, well, look at this. This is down where interest rates for home mortgages were. And it's now going down below that. But, you know, I'm sorry, it was below that.

And as it went up, they said, well, it's still not too bad because, you know, in the 1960s, we had home mortgage rates that were around the 5% area. And so I looked that up and I looked to see what the banks were paying people who had savings accounts, individual savings accounts of the banks and interest. So they were charging like 5.5% for a home mortgage and they were paying like 4% interest to people who had their money on deposit as a savings account. Well, they pay us now. It's like 0.02% or something like that. It's ridiculous. It's criminal. It's criminal that they get their money for free for so many years from the Fed, from 2008 on, 0% interest rates from the Fed.

Of course, they were able to pay back the quote-unquote loans that were given to them. They had no interest on those loans, and they were given free money to pay the money back. And then what did they do? Well, after the Fed lost control of everything with their money printing in the late 1970s. And as interest rates started getting high, they took off all the usury laws. And now we've got credit card companies that charge 30%, 40%. We've got high mortgage rates. We have zero interest paid out by these people.

The banker class has completely taken over everything. You want to talk about you'll own nothing and you'll be happy? You'll earn nothing. They will make sure that you earn no savings interest whatsoever. So Congress, the House specifically, is tasked on spending. They can and could eliminate. They created the Federal Reserve with the Federal Reserve Act. Again, they could change any aspect of that that they wish.

They could also eliminate any agencies, not just the Fed. They could eliminate any agencies if they would do a non-omnibus bill. They could do that every time they want to. You know, we've had, as we look at gold, we've had spot gold now has dipped to a couple of days ago. This is on November 8th, so this was last Friday. It had dipped down to $26.84. At that point, it was still up higher for the year than Bitcoin has. But Bitcoin has continued to climb.

It just touched $90,000 yesterday. You got a lot of people who are saying, well, we're not going to have any setbacks. It's going to be straight up and to the right until it gets up to $150,000. Well, you can make any kind of projection that you want, and that may happen. But we've seen you've got two different assets here. And so now it came down below $2,700. It had gone up above $2,700. It, I think, touched $2,800 or something like that. Then it fell down to about $2,700, fell below $2,700. Now it's fallen below $2,600.

And so the question is, is gold gone now or do you pile into um you know what is happening with um do you pile into what is happening with the the market with a crypto uh again uh bitcoin price gains see significant pullbacks ruled out before 150 000 that's what they're saying we're not going to see anything It's going to just go straight up to 150,000. This is coming from Cointelegraph.com. Participants appear to dismiss the odds of a major Bitcoin price capitulation. So is it going to be straight up and to the right? Well, we don't know. Nobody does, right?

There's a lot of positive news coming for crypto with Trump. He was very much against it until he got bought by Musk and his buddies. And now, as I pointed out yesterday, they're looking at even tying in carbon taxes to a Bitcoin side chain. A lot of tokenization, a lot of crypto stuff. There's talk about the fact that, you know, we've seen the Democrats, again, always come straight at you. Okay, we've got a mandate, we've got a ban, we're going to stop all of this stuff. We're going to ban every appliance that isn't electric. And we're going to ban all your heating and air conditioning that's not electric. And we're going to ban every car and every truck and every ambulance and every fire truck and everything that's not electric is going to be banned.

And everybody's like, they're crazy. And that prepares the way for the Republicans and the technocrats that are there with Trump to come in and say, well, we're going to let you use any kind of energy source that you want. Of course, we know that the plan that Lala and Biden had to, and all this net zero by 2030, we know that that's never going to work. There's absolutely no way that it can work. And if you had the CEO of Toyota say, I've not seen one argument for how any of this is plausible, it just can't work. We know, we don't have the capacity and you're shutting capacity down for the electrical grid. We don't have the charging stations. None of this stuff makes any sense. It is absolutely unworkable what they're trying to push on everybody. But what is the public seeing? The public has seen the push and the fear and the

mandates and the bans. And so the public is ready to, let's go back and let the market decide. And that's exactly what Musk and his pals are doing. They say, well, we're going to let the market decide. You can have any form of electricity that you want, but some of those you're going to have to pay us a special tax. And we've got a mechanism here that we can expedite this and make it work really well we can tie it into blockchain we can tie it into x we've got all these different things

that we can do and so you can have any kind of energy source that you want drive any kind of car that you want but you just pay an extra tax to us everybody's like yes in the same way that biden creates total border chaos and then everybody and then, hey, we're going to fix it. You're all going to get a biometric ID. It's amazing to me how this left-right, left-right thing works. It truly is, if it wasn't so devilish, you could also, you could kind of admire how clever it was. But when you look at this, that's the key thing for me when i look at it you know at this point do you want to get do you want to get gold which has been a you know yes if you evaluate it versus bitcoin you evaluate it versus a dollar

it's down now but maybe look at it think of it as on sale. A stable asset that has been around for centuries. Or do you want to jump into something that is highly volatile and jump on the roller coaster and hope that you're going to get out at the appropriate point? I don't know. And, of course, I don't give investment advice. You certainly don't want to take any investment advice from me. I'm just looking at this and saying um i i also see

the freedom issue involved in all this i absolutely hate this digital currency stuff as a matter of fact i just saw the headline of an article a guy 26 million dollar trade he messed up because he got a typo error when he was transferring this for a crypto for a bitcoin thing and the company he worked for lost 26 million dollars i guess he used to work for them so but the problem is is that with crypto stuff there's no pulling it back if you make a mistake right not not like anything else that we've seen there's no pulling it back if you make a mistake, right? Not like anything else that we've seen. There is no pulling it back if you make a mistake. I like to have something that's physical.

I like to have something that's outside the technocracy. I'm very suspicious of all of this stuff and how it's going to be put together and converged and used to control it. So, again, your choice is up to you. Tony doesn't have any problem with Bitcoin. He's used it in the past, and he would do it now, I guess, if the regulations weren't so bad. Maybe he'll get into it with, because that's one of the things that they're talking about. The SEC, along with the Democrats, they were trying to make it impossible

and prohibited for banks. They had at least one bank that was shut down. We talked about they were completely solvent. And yet it was because they were a main entry and exit ramp for crypto. They'd set themselves up to process crypto. The feds forced them out of business. And so that's one of the key things that's going to be happening. One of the big issues of optimism about Trump and crypto is the fact they're going to get rid of these prohibitive regulations.

You know, you can regulate something to death without doing an outright ban on it. And, of course, the EPA is famous for doing that with automobiles. So that's going to be reduced somewhat. Maybe Tony will get into it. But right now, if you want to get into gold and silver, if you want to get them on sale, big sale going on. I guess we could call it the Black Friday sale for gold is on right now. It was dipped just below $2,600 when I looked at it last night.

You can go to Tony Arbin, davidknight.gold to take you to Wise Wolf Gold. And Tony can help you with gold or silver. And you can buy it or you can sell it one way or the other. And Jason Barker says gold was $2,500-ish this morning. Order an extra wolf pack while the price is low. I agree with him. I mean, I'm looking at something. It's got a history of millennia behind it, and it's on sale now.

Or you can jump in at record highs on Bitcoin when it's at $90,000 or whatever it is today. It may be higher than that. And hope that you don't get burned on the roller coaster or puke or whatever, or have a heart attack when you're, when you see it going down so steep, cause it's been all over the place. It's amazing. It's gone up. It was down in the low sixties and now it's in the high eighties. And that was just a couple of months.

I mean, that's the kind of stuff I can't handle that. So again, if you want some wealth insurance, if you want something that's been around for centuries, millennia, you can get it on sale right now. David Knight.gold will take you to Tony Artaban. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 S.A. © transcript Emily Beynon you're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, in the time we have left, I want to talk a little bit about five things that Trump's going to do with executive orders. I also want to talk about what's going on with the border, with Homan. But before I do that, I want to thank some of the people who have sent us contributions by mail.

This is from Kurt and Karen. Thank you very much for your support. That was very kind, very generous. Said, I'm a long-time listener and a first-time contributor. Sorry that it took me so long. They really made up for it. So thank you so much. And they said that we're in their prayers. I really do appreciate that. And this is from Joy, who says, I love your guests. I had doubts about the existence of God, but over the past several years, it's plain to see that he does exist, and so does Satan. Yes, I'm glad that you see that.

Yeah, that's the issue. It really is clear, you know. All of creation speaks to that. Speaks without words, as the psalm says right day after day all of creation speaks about the existence of god about an intelligence and a book that i really liked was by werner get a german scientist who said in the beginning there was information that's very much what the bible says when it talks about logos. The idea that if you look at DNA or if you look at order in the universe, the early scientists

after we had the Enlightenment, people were looking at the scientific method and people like Isaac Newton that said, we're just trying to discover God's thoughts and discover what he did. Well, what would be the point of doing an investigation if everything had just come together by chance? How could that happen? And again, when you look at a building, you know that it has a builder. You look at a car, you know it has a builder. The question is then, who is the builder? And I think that the Bible does a great job of explaining, and I think there's many, many proofs that the Bible is where God spoke to us. This is from another listener, and we'll make this the last one. Listen to you since you're

on Alex Jones. Thank you for your open Christianity, information, humor, and integrity. Well, that's kind. Thank you. Thankfully, I attend a Baptist church where the pastor would be in agreement with your views. Well, that's good. I'm glad. And said, by the way, I listen to the podcast. Haven't figured out how to watch.

No excuse. And I'm older, but I do hate to have so much of this technology well i'll just say that if you go to your browser and if you go to the david knight show.com uh there will be and and it's part of it is our fault we haven't really got a a website that is easy to see stuff you have to scroll down uh quite a bit to see a lot of the links, I think. I'm not sure where it is right now if we've changed it. But some of the links to where you can support us, some of the links to where the videos are, you may have to scroll down to see them. But we have all the links to where you can watch the program are there. And if you're on social media, I'm sorry, but in case you're there on social media,

you can see the show on Twitter. You know, that's one of the things I thought was interesting. They stopped. I've seen when I go there and look, sometimes I see the show expanded and sometimes they just break it down and you just see like a little text link there and they don't show the video running. I don't know what that's about and they got uh is that something that they've changed the way the thing is i used to never do that is that being done just for me i don't i don't know what's

going on with that all right let's talk a little bit about what things are going to happen uh this is from mike shedlocklock on Zero Hedge. He says, well, here's the five things he thinks are going to happen. He says, number one, immigration. Number two, the wall. Okay, well, let's just stop with those two things right there and think a little bit about this. You know, we've got Tom Homan, who if you go back and you look at this picture from him

where he first began. Oh, sorry. It's this one right here. This one right here, right? Oh, he's a tough guy, isn't he? Seen a lot of cops like that. Not a fan. Not a fan of that kind of attitude.

But he hasn't really changed either. If you listen to him, he's still this belligerent thug. And I'm sick and tired of hearing about the family separation. And I'm still being sued over that. So come get me. I don't give a... Right? Bottom line is...

Yeah, MAGA loves that. Tough talk. American families, when I was a cop in New York, and I arrested a father for domestic violence or something for DUI, I separated that family. When you violate the law with a child, you're going to be separated. But you're right. 250,000 children have crossed this border since Joee biden's been president they chose to separate themselves

and the children are always children hey look they gave me five minutes to say a few things so if i offend anybody tonight i don't give it because i'm pissed off. I walk here tonight. And you should all be angry for what Biden has done. Take the I.D. Because I'm pissed off. We handed this administration the most secure border in my lifetime.

And they unsecured it on purpose. And that should piss you off. So somebody like him is going to come along. That's whysecured it on purpose and that should piss you off so somebody like him is going to come along that's why they did it on purpose every president i ever worked for took steps to secure the border because they understood you can't have strong national security if you don't have border security no one did it better than president trump what he did was unprecedented he happens to be the greatest president in my lifetime. In January of 25, the greatest president in my lifetime walking back in the White House. He tells me, you know, I say 120 days.

He said, no, you got 60 to lock the border down. Well, I'll tell you what. I'll tell you what I told the president. He comes back. I come back. We fix this shit. And you can take that to the bank. Yeah, he's the kind of guy that slam your head into the concrete just for

talking to him that's what kind of guy he is i hate cops like that i absolutely positively detest people like that um and you want to talk about reagan what did reagan do reagan put out amnesty. Do you remember that, Tom? Do you remember the Reagan amnesty? Millions of people can become citizens. Only half of them even applied. They didn't want to become citizens at that point in time. We didn't have the kind of welfare advantage for them. As a matter of fact, if you offered amnesty, I wonder how many of them would take it. Because as an illegal alien they get better welfare benefits than american citizens do why don't you fix that instead of your in your face bullying law enforcement aspect and and of course when we had the reagan amnesty and i think it was

like six million and only three million to get it was i forget what the exact numbers were but only half the people who were eligible to get citizenship with the amnesty only half of them decided to take it they didn't want it and so uh and but we were told that well that's it we're going to give amnesty to the people who were here we don't want to do deportations and now we're going to fix the border. And so Tom Holman was there. He didn't fix the border. Nobody fixed the border. And but now they want you to be really angry about it because they've got something else in mind. Again, it is problem solution.

The biometric entry exit visa tracking system, which we need desperately. problem solution and MAGA cheers we will ensure that this system is in place and I will tell you it will be on land it will be on sea it It will be in air. We will have a proper tracking system. Yeah. There you go. You want a global ID? Now we got an excuse to give you a global ID. And MAGA is just crazy. Oh, this is great.

This is great. No, it's the money, stupid. You go back to James Carville. That's the economy, stupid. They don't care about what's going on with Bill Clinton, what he's doing with that girl, whatever her name is. It's the economy, stupid. They're going to vote for him again because it's the economy. Well, you know, that's kind of what happened this time around.

But look, when it comes to the border, it's the money, stupid. It's the money that you're paying people when they come in. Stop that. It's just that simple. We don't need to escalate this into biometric surveillance state and slavery. it it's the money that you're paying people when they come in stop that it's just that simple we don't need to escalate this into biometric surveillance state and slavery just stop giving them money to come in that's the key thing and so then uh uh uh mishud shudlock or mish mishlock or whatever his name mike shudlock mlock. Mishtalk is the name of the thing.

So that was the first two things. Border and wall. And again, the wall isn't going to stop anybody. It's the money, stupid. You've got to stop that big magnet pulling people through the wall, over the wall, under the wall, around the wall, over the wall. So the next thing he says, well, he's going to have pardons. He's going to fire Jack Smith and pardon January the 6th offenders. What about the pro-life people?

What about Ross Elbrich and others? I hope he doesn't forget that. Climate. Trump has said that he will sign an executive order once again withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement. This is my pet peeve. Everybody's saying he took us out of the Paris. No, he didn't. No, he didn't.

And if that's what he's going to do, if he's not going to call the bluff, he's going to pretend that we can, that one person, that Obama can put us, Obama can self-ratify a treaty. Well, then of course,

Biden self-ratified it as well. If we're going to put this in, out, in, out game. And of course, when you get out, you got to wait a few years. That's built into there.

And I think they built it in specifically for the u.s he says transgender student protections is this what we can expect from him is this it is this all we get out of all this well uh that was a wall street journal article and then he commented as to whether or not uh he was in favor of those various things uh but of course it's going going to be perhaps we might expect maybe peace with Ukraine, but it's going to be war with Iran, war with China. It'll be economic war with China, if nothing else. Other people have come up with a 10-point plan. And actually, it was Trump who came up with this.

First, he said, I will reissue my 2020 executive order to remove rogue bureaucrats. Oh, great. We're going to have a rule by executive order. Then he says, second, I'm going to clean out all these corrupt actors, security and intelligence apparatus people. You remember Gina Haspel? He put her in charge of the CIA for his entire four years, frankly. She was the number two under Pompeo.

She ran everything. Then he made her number one. She was the one who tortured people, who covered up the torture, who then provided the lies that got us into the Iraq War, and he made her head of the CIA. But he's going to clean it all up. Third, we totally reform FISA courts. He says, we've got judges who don't seem to care when they're lied to

and warrant applications. Well, you didn't seem to care when Snowden exposed all this stuff. You didn't want to pardon him. He was sent to jail for exposing that. Just like John Kiriakou was sent to jail for exposing Gina Haspel and her lies. Trump didn't do anything for Snowden. He didn't do anything about fisa as a matter of fact um fisa was there uh to uh he says one number seven he says congress needs to establish an independent auditing system to

continually monitor our intelligence agencies to ensure they're not spying on our citizens that was what the church commission was about and that's what fisa was about when they created FISA and then they used FISA that they created they used it to give them legal cover to spy on Mr. and Mrs. Verizon everywhere he says we need to launch a major crackdown on government leakers yeah don't expose any crime or corruption in his regime he was all about it when WikiLeaks leaked the stuff. But then when he became president, no, I don't even know who WikiLeaks is. It is pretty amazing when you look at his 10 points that are there.

There's nothing at all, nothing at all that he's even focused on getting right. We got to move parts of the sprawling bureaucracy to new locations outside of washington swamp remove them permanently trash can send them to hell i don't care thanks for listening The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this

dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.