The David Knight Show - Wed 6Nov24 Trump ELECTED! Now What? And what else happened on other issues?

Episode Date: November 6, 2024

Trump ELECTED!  Now what?Will CBDC tyranny be outsourced to Musk?We can NULLIFY UN AGENDAS (enacted via federal government) at the state level, this shows howWhat happened with other ballot issues - changing voting, requiring citizenship, abortion, and more marijuana legalizationLarry Fink, CEO Blackrock on what the election changesNJ legalizes porn for children — call them Pubic schools(2:00) Trump ELECTED! Now what?Last minute surprise moves to each candidate from pollsters & politiciansNewsweek does a last minute "Dewey Beats Truman" headlineDrudge in shockPelosi re-elected - will she become Speaker for a re-match?Newsweek does a last minute "Dewey Beats Truman" headlineLala LOL - fake until the very end(:44:59) WikiLeaks - 5 questions for a NEW President Trump (1:03:18) We can NULLIFY UN AGENDAS (enacted via federal government) at the state level, this shows how.  Want to know how we stop prohibition of meat & dairy?  Like this… (1:13:44) 10 States had Abortion on the ballot — in Florida it was Trump vs DeSantis on abortion (1:27:47) PUBIC SCHOOLS — NJ legislature legalizes adults giving kids porn & obscene material (1:40:50) Ballot Measures on Non-Citizen Voting, Ranked Choice, Open Primaries, and others (1:51:04) A word to the DERANGED and DELUSIONAL of BOTH PARTIES - whether or not their candidate won — this timeLarry Fink, Blackrock CEO, says this election "over time doesn't matter" — why?(1:55:38) Elon Musk and CBDCMusk, Trump's new BFF and new idol of conservativesWill CBDC tyranny be OUTSOURCED to him?WATCH What are his plans for X and global financial domination?Is THAT why Musk jumped in?(2:01:35) A look at how we should respond to the VITAL issues that BOTH candidates were on the WRONG SIDE of…and what should we do about it? (2:18:50) MAHA, RFKj, and fluoride — is there hope for real change? (2:44:55) What can we expect fiscally…Debt & deficitInflationTaxesUBIGoldFourth Turning - how will Trump accelerate it?If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. But MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 6th of November, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, the day after the election, they have called it for Trump. We'll see if that sticks or if they're going to change anything.

We're also going to take a look at what has happened in some of the referenda. A lot of different referenda that tell us about things. And I think that those are perhaps a bit more honestly counted than the votes. We'll talk about the implications. What does a Trump presidency mean? And we'll be right back. Stay with us. © transcript Emily Beynon They're back! Yeah, that's right, they're back. that's right they're back i know none of the covers oh we've got trump back

we've got pelosi back will she become the speaker of the house you know they're calling this as a a flip for democrats to be back in charge i mean they had a razor thin majority with mike johnson and if nancy pelosi is coming back it might be deja vu all over again pelosi in the house trump in the white house republicans in the senate and by the way that heather o'rourke poltergeist you know she died shortly after that movie was done allegations of pedophiles on the cover-up and of course we have the epstein sex cult still firmly in place and back in the white house as well they are back and so now maga can go to sleep it's all taken care of any betrayal that happens just before d chest don't worry about it uh so the big pacifier

in everybody's mouth and i was leaning toward this happening. I honestly, though, did not think that we would have some kind of result this soon. I figured that they would run this up and drag this out. But it looks like they are going to call it for Trump. They have called it, actually, most of them. And so unless they go back on this, that would be something that would cause a great deal of unrest, wouldn't it? You know, we had Nick Gillespie of Reason said the day before the election, he said, don't blame me for not voting for your unbelievably rotten candidate. He said, there's a reason why presidential contests have been as tight as they have been for a while.

And why control of Congress flips back and forth, back and forth so much of the time? It's not because of voters like me who just want to vote for politicians and policies that won't bankrupt the country or rob me of the ability to make decisions in my life. Is it too much to ask for candidates to allow that, to follow the constitution well he says um you're not going to win elections easily until you stand for something consistent productive respectful the people you seek to govern i remain unconvinced of trump i will be opposing and watching uh not necessarily but hopefully he'll do the right thing and and like i told alex before the 2016 election he said what are we going to do if he wins because they wanted to lose they this really throws the monkey wrench in his stop the steel plans all these people banned and all these people wanted to fight uh so if they uh move this

way that takes pulls rug out from underneath him and i told alex i said well we support him when he does the right thing we oppose him when he does the wrong thing same thing we do the democrats except i can't imagine the democrats ever doing anything right uh and i have hard time imagining after 2020 trump ever doing anything right either uh so he says uh trump la la they're arguing about which one of them is going to add four trillion dollars in new debt right and they're both talking about how they're going to hand out favors and tax breaks and so forth to their special interest groups and to industries and to individuals who have given them lots of money and stood with them we've got elon musk went to flew to mar-a-Lago so he could have an election watch party with Donald Trump yesterday. But I tell you, it's about the cheapest anybody's ever bought the White House for, isn't it?

$75 million and he's in. Of course, $70 million was the entire budget of Al Gore in the 2000 campaign. He accused George W. Bush of buying the election because he spent $100 million. But, you know, we got the Adelsons give Trump $100 million. And we've got Elon Musk giving him $75. And those are pretty big chunks because Lala had a lot of billionaires giving her money, not as much as

these individuals did. She got, what was it I talked about the other day? I can't remember. Was it like three, four times the amount of money that Trump got? But it was spread out over more billionaires. I mean, we're past the point of looking at people who give uh what is it twenty dollars or two hundred dollars or whatever uh we're now looking at um you know the number of million dollar contributions that they get uh so like i said the conservatives can go to sleep trump will be the pacifier in their mouth no matter what happens they won't complain about it they'll be told that it's just it's his plan as nick Nick Gillespie said, we know what a Trump presidency will look like because he served already. It wasn't great

considering that most of the new debt he added to the nation came before. And he says before COVID tanked the economy. COVID didn't tank the economy. Trump's lockdown tanked the economy. It was not a Wu flu. It wasn't a Chinese flu. He wasn't forced to do any of this. He willingly did it for his masters at Davos and the UN. And he'll do it again, folks, if you don't hold him to it. But Nick Gillespie says, well, he pushed to shut the country down. And he put together the very team of awful public health bureaucrats that he spends a lot of time railing against now, as if they showed up in the Oval Office on day one. They handed them medals as well.

So it'll be interesting to see what happens. Is Redfield going to come back as well? Trump back? Redfield back? Pelosi's definitely back. Deja vu all over again. New Hampshire Libertarians got in at the last minute and endorsed Donald Trump. And there were some hopeful signs at the very beginning of this for Trump in a place called Dixville Notch.

I know people don't really pay much attention to that, but this is a very, very, very small town. They have, this time around, I think they had like six voters or something. It was three for Trump and three against, and that was a little bit better than he had done the previous two times. But they're the first in the nation to vote. They get together at midnight, and they cast their votes, the entire town. So they've got their, and they do like paper ballots, right? No Dominion voting machines, no Smartmatic. They do it the old-fashioned way. And I always think about Dixville Notch, each one of these elections.

It was back in 1992. We were just talking about Nick Gillespie, the editor of Reason, some people in the 1992 election decided that they would target Dixville Notch as an experiment. And what they did was they gave every person there a subscription to Reason Magazine, which would talk about issues from a liberty perspective at the time. and that year in 1992 after these people had read uh reason magazine for a year uh andre maru won the libertarian candidate i'll never forget we're looking at the election returns or we're looking at news late at night and uh this guy goes on and the winner of dicksville nights the first one was andre maru. Who? Who is the TV anchor? But it shows, here's what's important about that, right? It wasn't important, but what it shows is the power of truth. It shows the power of the idea of liberty. It shows how important it is

that we have an open and free press, and it shows why they are so adamant to shut down and censor, why they want to put out propaganda, why they want to censor speech and all the rest of this stuff. Folks, ideas have consequences. Ideas can change the world. And that didn't change the world there at Dixville Notch, but they do have consequences. So you had Darren Beattattie perhaps the biggest trump

sycophant anywhere revolver news uh cheering the fact that new hampshire libertarians endorsed donald trump look at this the lp of new hampshire libertarian party of new hampshire endorsed donald trump for president trump is officially endorsed by the libertarian party of New Hampshire endorsed Donald Trump for president. Trump is officially endorsed by the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire for president. And just like Andre Maru winning Dixville Notch in 1992, it made absolutely no difference. Trump lost New Hampshire. There you go. But they said, here's why we support him. And they gave, what is it, about 10 reasons or something.

First one, he promised to free ross albrecht well we'll see that's an easy one for him to do but um i don't trust him to do anything he says he's going to do we'll see about that number two he started no new wars a first in over three decades well i guess he didn't notice what happened in syria you know trump said uh we should take the oil and he puts troops in the oil fields there in Syria. Now, we're not in a full on war. This is just kind of like sideline piracy. You know, we're acting like pirates.

We're stealing the oil in Syria. And occasionally somebody fires a missile or something and we have some troops get killed. Because Trump sends them in like pirates. And they're still there, of course. And he didn't end any wars, right? He didn't end Afghanistan. And by the way, neither did Biden. The U.S. was thrown out.

Thrown out in defeat. So indicated he'll appoint Elon Musk, Ron Paul, and Vivek Ramaswamy to shrink the federal government. And if you believe that, I've got a brain chip I want to sell you. Elon Musk is excited. Elon Musk tweeted out this picture of, you know, superimposed of him carrying a sink into the Oval Office, referring to when he bought Twitter. And he showed up carrying a sink to symbolically tell them that, you know, he said, let this sink in. But to symbolically tell them that he was changing everything including the kitchen sink and he proceeded to do that now the question is what will happen with a vivek ramaswamy a big tech biopharma uh pal of martin squarelli

co-investor with him i don't trust that snake at all. He is Vivek the snake. Shiva got that right for sure. And he weaseled his way into Mike DeWine, the Republican governor, who's one of the worst governors, Republican or Democrat. He was the one who came up with the million dollar lottery for people to take the vaccine. Ramaswamy also wanted to get in on the contact tracing and surveillance stuff. And of course, Elon Musk bought himself a place in the Oval Office, for sure.

And then Ron Paul. What is Ron Paul doing there, other than besmirching his reputation with those people? I mean, it's just, we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens. Maybe they'll do some good things. But at least two of the three of these are laughable if you want to talk about shrinking government elon musk became the world's richest man ever ever how'd he do it uh by grabbing government waste you know by by uh he became a billionaire multi-billionaire's richest man, by cashing in on the green steel.

So he received, continuing on the Libertarian Party north of New Hampshire, he received endorsements from the greatest libertarians in America, including Thomas Massey. Well, he's starting to go a bit wobbly as well because he's not doing anything to push back against the shot. You know, he was just complaining about the distribution of it. So the, and I think that that endorsement was looking forward to running as a replacement for Mitch McConnell. He certainly would be a lot better than Mitch McConnell. Look, I agree with almost everything with Thomas Massey. I'm very disappointed, though, about this vaccine thing.

He has tried to pull that back then by pulling up the old news about transgenic vaccines and MRA being put into our food. That's pretty old news. We had earlier this year, we had the Tennessee legislature with a law to block that because that was happening. But, you know, it's good that he's talking about it. Committed to ending the Department of Education,

Trump is, says the New Hampshire Libertarians. Well, you know what? Every GOP candidate has said that they're going to do that since it was created in 1980 reagan ran on that and yet he grew it number seven trump endorsed bitcoin and cryptocurrency well give him that and when you look at what is happening i think he will further that. Now, the question is, is that a Trojan horse to get people into CBDC by default? Right?

They've got a big problem with the five I nations, you know, the five English-speaking countries that have now essentially unified their government through the intelligence agencies, which are the ones that really run these countries, right? And so it's the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. They've got a bit of a problem, a PR problem with CBDC. So they will do it some other way. They'll do it through the corporations. They will outsource that tyranny to the corporations until people get adjusted to it. And then at some point in the future, they'll pull it together. Part of the adjustment to this, I think, is cryptocurrency.

So, but again, the Democrats were full on at war with it. And it might have been better for us to have, as I talk about this all the time, is it better for us to have four columns outside the city that are coming, flying their flag, wearing their uniform? We know what their intentions are. And they galvanize people to resist. Or is it more dangerous to have the fifth column inside the city that are going to be there to sabotage things, to stab you in the back?

That's always the question. And then their final one that they put up here is that he flirted with ending the income tax entirely. Emphasis on flirting, it should be, right? You should talk about it. He's flirted with a lot of stuff. Just like women, he flirts with issues. And no, he's not going to get rid of the income tax that was the hope that other people had out there he's going to keep it there and he's going to use it to hand out favors that's one of the

reasons that they have it there the income tax is there for control and for observation you control people by handing them out uh exemptions and handing out special favors to different groups, as he's talked about. And then you can use it to weaponize it against your political enemies. It's always been used that way. That's why it's not going to go away. That's why he's going to add massive tariffs, most likely, to it. And again, to do anything that big to change the tax structure, he's going to have to have the cooperation now

of the House, which he doesn't have. So now he's got an excuse to do nothing. He's got a reason that he'll do it, except Nancy Pelosi won't let me do it. Democrat alternatives, they said. This is New Hampshire Li libertarian party still democrat alternatives are censorship taxes authoritarianism and um trump is different from all that stuff trump's not authoritarian he didn't lock us down you He didn't say, fortunately, I can get rid of the Second Amendment. I can do that myself.

He's not about censorship. Did he defend any of it, or was he outsourcing the censorship in 2018? And then when it comes to taxes, there's going to be a slight difference probably between the two of them. There is technically a libertarian on the ballot, said the libertarians. The libertarian spends his time supporting tax-funded trans surgery for prisoners, advocating for literal murderers, and trying to kick our members out of the Libertarian Party. The guy's name even escapes me now. I'm so disinterested in the Libertarian Party.

Chase Oliver, something like that. The LP is totally irrelevant. It has totally abandoned its principles and common sense and its judgment, as you can see from those eight items that I just read you. And it has been that way since they sold out to establishment politicians like Gary Johnson and William Wald. William Wald, what a statist this guy was. This Republican governor of Massachusetts. It's just ridiculous.

Well, Lala Harris yesterday suddenly became a favorite twin, according to Newsweek. These are the people who, here, let me get the magazine here. Newsweek, the energy crisis and how we're going to be out of energy uh out of oil out of natural gas by 1986 this is newsweek and newsweek was telling us yesterday that lala was suddenly the favorite to win and um this is ought to be enshrined as another truman versus dewey thing uh but um it's also interesting because of nate silver now 538 is not owned by him anymore but um 538 is the one that predicted this and nate silver also personally predicted this now

he had a very interesting uh piece op-ed piece that i read parts of yesterday that that was very true he says you know when you got something uh when all of the polls are saying exactly the same thing and they got a margin of error of plus or minus three percent for each candidate so it's plus or minus six percent he said um. So it's plus or minus 6%. He said, it tells you that they're rigging their stuff to tell people what they want to hear. And I think he was absolutely right about that. But I think that just as he did in 2016,

Nate Silver had a pretty good record in terms of predicting this stuff until he got to 2016 and he predicted that hillary clinton was going to win and then he predicted lala was going to win yesterday he seems to have a trump blind spot uh there that seems to be affecting his objective analysis 538 has had former president trump as his favorite to win for around two weeks right up until Monday when it found that out of 100 simulations, Trump won 53 times, Harris won 47 times. But in an update on Election Day, Harris came out as a favorite, winning 50 times out of 100 over Trump, winning 49 times out of 100. The last time 538 had the vice president, Lala, as a favorite to win, based on this model, which uses polling, economics, and demographic data, was on October the 17th. Similarly, the founder of 538, Nate Silver, who no longer is associated with the site,

has technically called it for Harris. In his final election forecast with 538's direct descendant, the Silver Bulletin, he picked Harris as the favorite to win by razor thin edge. Well, that's not what they're saying. They gave Trump a pretty comfortable margin there. But we'll see if the Democrats will accept this or if they will challenge it and go back and try to backfill. Look, trying to determine who is going to win by taking a poll of we the people is a fool's errand. It really is. We the people do not elect the president. As I said last week, I said, take a look at what is happening with the CEOs who are backing Trump and with Musk and so many others who are turning at the last minute, especially looking at the Washington Post

and the LA Times, where you had the owners, also big tech guys, and the LA Times guy tied in with the biotech industry. At the last minute, they overruled their boards and created a real firestorm, said, no, you're not going to endorse her. They're weighing in on the side of Trump. So if you've got CEOs calling him like Tim Apple did, Tim Cook calls him up, let's be buddies again. And you've got these people, these big tech CEOs, as well as the owners of these big leftist papers. I mean, Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post because he wanted to have clout in Washington.

That's the whole reason he got it. And that's the reason why having understanding as these people had gotten the news that Trump was going to be the selection, they started making their moves. Now, one of the things that may have thrown Nate Silver off is one of the things that Drudge was desperately clinging to and hope. And this was the headline of the Drudge report today. Look at this. World in shock.

It should be Drudge in shock. If Drudge is still in the U.S., he may be looking to get out of the u.s he has run the most ridiculous reports attacking trump uh for the most minor things it was absolutely hilarious i enjoyed reading them quite a bit had absolutely no relation to the truth like bill ma said, don't lie to me about this stuff. He's not saying that we need to execute Liz Cheney at all. Come on. But they were clinging to the hope that, as I told you, you know, there was one article that was put up. And, of course, Drudge featured it and said, OK, everything is all these people are piling in and endorsing Trump at the last minute. That's a really bad sign.

Looks like they've made their selection. With one exception, and he says, if you look at the stock market, whenever there's a good stock market, it usually indicates that the investors, the investor class, and again, these are the people who are buying the presidency right they don't make donations they make investments elon musk made an investment so the investor class is looking at this and they don't like uncertainty and so usually said it's a sign that um the incumbent is going to win and i said well the problem is is that lala is going to win.

And I said, well, the problem is, is that Lala is not an incumbent. She has greater uncertainty for these people than Trump does. Trump is a known quantity to them. And when he locked the country down, he didn't lock down the Wall Street businesses. He let the big box retailers have a monopoly. So of course they like him.

And they don't mind all the rest of the stuff that he's done. These policies have been horrible for the we the people. It's been great for they the Wall Street. And so I thought at that time, I said, well, no, that's just actually another indicator that the selection is in. But to go out and take scientific polls of we the people is a fool's errand it's like trying to guess you know how many unicorn farts are going to heat up the planet uh out of your suv it's nonsense it's absolute nonsense they spend all this time and all this money on climate models and for no reason whatsoever uh well the um, we're going to take a quick break,

and we're going to come back and take a look at some of the other results and other things, as well as some of the last-minute shenanigans on Election Day. We got a little bit of a late start today. We had some technical issues. We also had some technical issues yesterday. In terms of Travis's wife is trying to deliver a baby. And so we would appreciate your prayers. It's been going on for quite some time. And if she doesn't deliver naturally, they may have to do a cesarean section. So we would pray that mother and baby would be

blessed and with good health. So I appreciate your prayers on that. But that has caused us yesterday to get the show up late and still is incomplete in terms of getting the time codes and topics and stuff like that. So we will get caught up on that hopefully today. But we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. And I'll read these comments and tips, I think, when we return. So stay with us.

We'll be right back. Thank you. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show welcome back radis bro thank you for the tip he says alex jones is back all over again same song and dance for the next four years yeah and atomic dog says well 4d chess was so last term it's now 5d chess that's right it's gonna be a new dimension we're going into and then i've got a couple of people who have contacted me uh marky mark um uh says right now the house has not been called it stands at 197 gop seats to 177 seats for the Dems. House control hasn't been decided yet. And House is not yet controlled. GOP has a 198 to 180 seat edge over the Democrats. 218 seats are needed for control.

Yeah, I'm aware of that. I'm aware that they the fact that for the last couple of days, they were predicting between 65 and 70 some odd percent certainty that Republicans would take the Senate and Democrats would take the House. And if you drill down into the data and look, you'll see that the places where they have not made any calls yet are almost all in California. They've got a lot of congressional seats there. So I think I could be wrong.

Who knows what they're going to do? But I think that I think that it's going to be Democrats in control. And I think that's very important for them. They've got to have a divided government so they can escape and have plausible deniability uh so they're not held accountable well we'll see what happens and we saw some interesting things yesterday oh wait i got some more comments here and tips thank you north american house hippo thank you very much good morning david sorry i can't watch live right now i'm at work we'll listen later thank you here. Prayers for you and your family, especially Whistler. Thank you very much. And we do have good news for Whistler. I want to

say he has been steadily improving and he is getting better. And he's still, you know, not to the extent that he can do anything. But as I said before, he has his condition got better. And this has been going on for several months in case people are just listening. He was damaged by chloroquine, levofloxacin and Cipro and all these other ones. They got so many of them because it's been a known dangerous drug

harming hundreds of thousands of people going back to the 1980s it had already racked up a quarter of a million injuries that were reported and we haven't even reported what happened to him and i imagine most people don't because we know that the fda doesn't care but um they put seven black box labels on this thing, but the physicians don't tell you, and the pharmacy doesn't tell you. And so they pulled one over on us with that one. And so it's been several months now. But as I reported before, the continuous pain had stopped. He had tremendous pain in his joints.

And some people were very worried about it. We asked everybody to pray about this because as I started looking up what had happened with people, I saw people that had been athletes that were taken out and had been a permanent thing. And doing something he struggled with for years and still were not able to get back to full flexibility. And so he was in severe pain doing nothing except laying in bed. And very careful because it's easy to have your tendons rupture with this. That's one of the key things. And so he was very cautious and careful about it, but in a lot of pain. And as he improved, the continuous pain stopped.

He continued to improve so that he could stand and walk short distances. But if he did too much, he would come back. And now he can go down the stairs like once a day. And we're not trying to press it too much. But thank you so much for your prayers many people have sent things that we've used from all kinds of detox stuff you know foot pads we've had zeolite i think is a detox thing vitamin c you know lipospheric large doses and i could go on and on so many things we don't know what did it we used everything and but we give god the glory god is the one who heals we treat and we do

everything in our that we can think of that's in our knowledge and we we use so much stuff and did so many things that we don't know if any of them were used, but we know that it is God who heals. And so we tried to focus on nutrition. We tried to focus on things at the very beginning. As soon as we realized what this was, the only thing that was on the bottle was to say, don't take magnesium. And it was a few other things that it said that'll interfere with the operations i said get mega doses of this right now he's been poisoned and so we did everything we could to try to block the absorption of that so um i just want to tell everybody that he is

improving and thank you so much for the prayers uh and for the things that people have sent which antibiotic was this says grammy for god it's's a general class of them called floxins. And the people who have been injured call themselves floxies. It's a large group of people who try to share what they have found helps and doesn't help. But this particular drug was levofloxacin. The general class of drugs is fluoroquinolone is what it is. Yeah, fluoroquinolone. And it goes back to Cipro was the first one. Got a really bad rap. So what they do is when they have these drugs, rather than get rid of them, they continually tweak them and give

them a new name and keep this going. This has been going on since the mid-1980s people have been injured by this stuff severely many of them lifetime uh stay away from it i mean as i was reading some of these things one doctor one person said um uh they did not take it they said and they were not injured by it but they said my doctor gave this to me when i was going to china and he said this is a very dangerous antibiotic. He says, I don't know what you're going to be exposed to there. But if you get really sick, he says, only use this as a last resort if you are deathly ill. But you've got doctors like the one in this emergency room

that just hand it out for nothing, right? Just casually throw it out. Junk Silver. hand it out for nothing right let's just casually throw it out uh junk silver i guess another news week madam president special edition is too much to hope for yeah that would that's right they missed that i forgot about that that's right madam president yeah talking about wish fulfillment there uh don't frag me bro trump is the POTUS to collapse the economy. That's right. Since he is the bankruptcy king, absolutely. He has no qualms at all about leveraging us into debt. And he knows the Rothschilds.

They know how to do that as well. Wilbur Ross, his first commerce secretary, saw him as his casinos are going bankrupt. And he said, he talked about it. He said, I called the people back there at the Rothschild Bank, and he said, I saw all these people gathered around him. He said, he's amazingly popular. We could use this. And they did. And that particular incident, what they did was they essentially took control of the Trump casinos.

And he proceeded to fully run them into bankruptcy. But his only condition was that he wanted to have his name still remain on the buildings. They will use that vanity of his, and they will use him to bankrupt us. And what they will do is they will exchange that debt for assets like land and things like that. That's what I think is going to happen this next time through.

I think that's going to be a big part of the plan. M. Seller, strangely happy that Trump won, even though I didn't vote for him. Now let's see what he's made of. That's right. And I am kind of happy about that as well, because now I can tell people I told you so. It would have been this thing well if trump had been president and if you hadn't opposed him as if i'm gonna keep him out of the presidency right but if she had won everybody would have been wagging their finger at

me so now i get to wag my finger at them and say i told you so uh one jaded view says people won't pay attention now that Trump is in. That's right. He'll put him back to sleep, pacifier in their mouth. I wonder if Biden is slightly happy. Oh, I know he is. And I know the Obamas are too. See, that was the other thing about it. I think the word went out and, you know, they were and I played the thing with Michelle Obama, and I really stand by my analysis of that.

I said, this is like straight out of Mark Anthony's speech, sticking the knife into Brutus, even as he was saying, and yet Brutus is an honorable man, right? And Julius Caesar. And Bill Clinton. yeah okay the economy was better under trump but you know you guys still gotta vote for a lot it's like this is the guy whose campaign manager famously said it's the economy stupid nothing else matters and so he said that and he said other things as well about the open borders and people that had been killed because of her open borders. I think the Democrat establishment wants to run Michelle Obama in the next election. And so I think that they wanted to make sure she was out of the way.

They want an open presidency because Trump is, he's now done two terms. He can't do it again again i think unless they want to try to reinterpret that as two consecutive terms uh but he's going to be so old he's not going to want to do that as a matter of fact you know he might bow out early as long as he's got a republican in there who's going to pardon him from any uh warfare from the democrats who knows we'll have to wait and see a lot of things are still to be determined. Let's talk a little bit about what Lala did on her last day in the spotlight. She did a photo op where she was talking on the phone to somebody and said,

Oh, did you vote? Have you voted already? Oh, good. You voted for me. And yet it was fake, just like everything else that she does uh here is the clip have you voted already oh great thank you and she holds her phone up you. And she holds her phone up. Look at that. She holds her phone up. Uh-huh. Yeah.

Yuck, yuck, yuck. Okay. So here she is. You know, this is what she looks like as she's, sorry, this is still shot. And we're on the phone, right? And then the next one here, she holds it up. And guess what? They show that she's on the camera app.

She's not actually talking to anybody. She's having a dialogue with herself, just like Saturday Night Live. And that was another indication, right? The very fact that the people there in Hollywood, they're all hearing bad stuff on the inside or maybe her internal polling is looking at things. And they all know which way everything is breaking, like I said. Who are the big people supporting? And so it was kind of a last-ditch effort to try to bring up her creds, I think.

She was on her way to a rally in Michigan. And said, how about you do Saturday Night Live tonight? And she turns the plane around, cancels the rally, and goes back and practices her fake appearance there for three hours. Trump then threatens them. And there's an FCC commissioner who said, I think they violated the equal time thing. And they had done the same thing for Trump back in 2015. Nevertheless, NBC gave him like a minute spot or

something like that for free in compensation for it. Another indication that the fix was already in, wasn't it? So she said, have you voted already? Oh, great. So she's pretending that everybody says everything about her is fake and staged. Her fake phone call, because, of course, she is phony, right? She got busted with a fake phone call. Some person said, well, that's not true. And people said, okay, you try it and see if that's the way your phone looks when you're on the phone. And all of a sudden it jumps over to camera.

And then she also did this. This also came out the last day. She faked a door-knocking thing. I'm going door-to-door here in Pennsylvania to talk to people. And so there was a photo op that went out about that. But then there was also a very high-resolution photo op where she had already met the people and said hey let's do this thing go back there and go into your house and i think staged it all okay i want a photo op i want to do a doorknob okay let's do that yeah everything about her is fake everything i mean if you didn't know that you know you've got a mob of people secret service agents cameras lights all this stuff

and you get a knock on the door i wonder who that could be oh i'm totally surprised you know and of course she had arranged that but they actually had the clip that showed her doing that uh yeah the whole thing actually is staged you know when i look at this election and i listened to as i was putting together the show last night i had uh some of the broadcasts in the background and they've got all of their video wall maps and everything and talking about, well, this is what's happening here and this is what is happening here. You know what it reminded me of? This. On Christmas Eve, NORAD has one additional special mission, tracking Santa as he makes his way across the globe. This is NORAD's 68th year conducting this important mission

and children and families worldwide will be able to call to ask NORAD's live operators about Santa's location on the 24th starting at 6 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Yeah I don't know what happened that video but there's actually a guy that we're having some technical issues here. There's actually a Pentagon spokesman saying that you know the Pentagon will lie to you about Santa Claus. Did you know that? What else are they lying to us about? What? They lied to us about Santa Claus?

I was determined I was not going to have my kids have that experience. So unlike NORAD, I never lied to them about Santa Claus. I tried to follow the opposite than the Pentagon does here. But here's five questions for Donald Trump if he wins that was written up a couple of days ago by WikiLeaks. And so they said, when in 2016 Trump defeated Hillary Clinton. Many among Trump's base and fiercest supporters had high hopes that he would truly drain the swamp while completely realigning U.S. foreign policy in opposition to the neocons, including ending the forever wars in the Middle East. That's when they talk about this, right?

His supporters will always say, well, he didn't start any new wars. Well, he didn't end the ones that had been started, did he? And yes, he did put troops in Syria to steal the oil. Anyway, he says, after all, he was the first GOP nominee in history to trash Republican George Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003. And later as president, he called the Iraq war, quote, the single worst decision ever made. And then Trump topped that decision by appointing Gina Haspel, who had run this lie through. He made her head of the CIA.

Is that not even a worse decision? He admits that the CIA lied us into the Iraq war and then he appoints the person who ran the torture the person who did the torture cover-up the person who destroyed the videotapes about the torture he makes her the head of the CIA and make no mistake about it she was the head of the CIA for all four years first two years supposedly uh it was Pompeo but she was the head of the cia for all four years first two years supposedly uh it was pompeo but she was the number two position and she's a professional she has been there she knows how to run it and then the last couple of years he moves pompeo to the state department and he officially makes her number one and i thought it was kind of interesting that

wiki leaks even as they go through all of the bad people that trump appointed they don't mention gina haspel how could they miss that these high hopes turned to disappointment says wiki leaks when trump willingly willingly brought into his administration some of the very neocons who have long been a part of the problem or arguably who are at the very heart of the swamp or of the washington blob or let's just get more specific the intelligence community okay let's call it what it is he put into powerful positions people like john bolton people like mike Pompeo, people like William Barr and Elliott Abrams. And again, they leave out Gina Haspel. Now, William Barr was the guy who

indicted Julian Assange. Mike Pompeo was the guy who wanted to assassinate Julian Assange. These are the kind of people we have in Washington. If you don't think that our government, our federal government, is thoroughly satanic under Trump as well, you're not paying attention. We got Mike Pompeo. Oh, I'm a Christian. He's plotting to assassinate Julian Assange. What did Julian Assange do? He told people the truth about Hillary Clinton. He told people the truth about Hillary Clinton.

He told people the truth about our wars. He told people the truth about our military wantonly killing innocent people. Remember the collateral murder? Remember that clip? We're at a distance. We can all see that these are journalists. They machine gun them. They wait for the ambulance to show up.

Clearly marked ambulance. You can see that as clear as day as well. And they're laughing about it. They wait for them to put the people in the ambulance and they shoot the ambulance up. That's our government. Hey, Hans, are we the bad guys? You bet we are. You bet we are. Trump's supporters also back in 2016 had high hopes that he would pardon Assange, Snowden,

also declassify all records related to the sham Russiagate drive concocted by the Clinton campaign. And yet Trump wouldn't even expose that. He wouldn't even expose the fake Russiagate stuff that was directed against him. That's how weak and how controlled, how impotent he is. He can't even protect himself as president against the Russiagate stuff. That's the bottom line. That's the takeaway about him in the first part of his administration. The second part of his administration is what he did to us. What he did to us. So he said, sadly, none of that happened no pardons the wrong people that he put in uh he said with all this in mind wiki leaks has publicly issued the following questions for trump anticipating his possible return to the white house number one how will you handle the so-called

deep state wolves and maga hats circlingling your transition team, posing as MAGA to obtain powerful positions in a prospective Trump administration. After all, personnel is policy. And that is the axiom. And it is true, especially when you have such a large, unwieldy thing. All right. You got to have you're only replacing the people at the very top and if you can't get people at the very top that again can affect change within that massive organization

nothing's going to happen and even if you got people at the top who are with you they may not have the organizational skills to change that but if you don't even put people in that want to change it, it ain't going to happen. So he says, in your previous administration, you appointed figures like Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, William Barr, Robert O'Brien, Nikki Haley, Elliot Abrams. And again, they leave out Gina Haspel, who often opposed your America First rhetoric, especially on foreign policy and on freedom of speech. If elected again, can you assure these individuals or others like Tom Cotton or Marco Rubio, both who are funded by arms companies, can you assure us that these types of people will not hold positions in your administration? Next question.

Many of the individuals, many of these individuals have not only opposed your policies, but have Next question. He also directed the CIA to draw up plans to assassinate Julian Assange. He also suppressed the release of JFK files at a request of the CIA. And he claimed, Pompeo said, Pompeo claimed, there is no deep state at the CIA. I was told, he said, when I was at West Point, we don't lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. And then he said, I went to the CIA, and we got classes on that. And I guess one of the first things they tell you in the classes to lie, cheat, steal, and assassinate, you say that there is no deep state at the CIA. That's probably the first thing that Mike Pompeo learned. So WikiLeaks says, so what is your stance towards those who merely feign support for MAGA? And look, folks, I don't care a flip

about MAGA. I don't care about the Tea Party. I don't care about any of these movements. I care about the Constitution. That's what they should care about. And if they've attached themselves to a politician or to a party and they don't care about the Constitution, I don't care about them. They don't even know what's in the Constitution because they're so apathetic. Many of these former officials have now cashed in and make substantial profits from lobbying for arms companies, for banks, for foreign corporations. For example, they go back to Pompeo again. Pompeo founded American Global Strategies, which advises arms companies. Pompeo joined the Israeli disinformation and censorship company, Syabra.

Pompeo took positions with Japanese steel firm, Nippon Steel, to lobby to increase foreign steel imports into the United States. And arms company, Dyn Maritime, seeking related contracts. He even launched his own military industrial investment bank called impact investments well that's a good one for people going to be launching bombs and missiles and stuff like impact impact industries bombs away right impact industries um he uh joined is like hunter biden pompeo joined the board of a uranian company kiev star kiev star um i guess i would pronounce it kiev star but now they go kiev star um despite lacking relevant experience while pompeo's case may be extreme others have similarly lucrative roles will you ban appointments for those who have financial incentives to start wars

or to increase mass surveillance and censorship well no we're gonna have ramaswamy and elon musk they're all about surveillance folks they're all about it uh anyway and then number five a growing faction within the republican party and among independents advocates for foreign policy that is less driven by cia influence in arms and industry profits figures like rfk jr and tulsi gabbard have called for increased oversight of the c CIA and reduced foreign interventions. However, policy personnel is policy. Will swamp insiders flatter their way into influential roles?

Well, again, I don't have unlike WikiLeaks or Julian Assange. I don't have any great hopes in Tulsi Gabbard or RFK Jr. She's got her own Davos connections. And even if RFK Jr. wants to do the right thing about some of these issues, even if he wants to move the needle in the right way, you know, I mean, it would be an improvement to stop some of these vaccines, I mean, what ultimately needs to be done is to get rid of the FDA, get rid of the CDC, get rid of the vaccines and things like that. But if he can expose some of these dangerous drugs, that would be a win. Just like if we can't get rid of the income

tax of the Federal Reserve, at least maybe we can lower taxes somewhat, that type of thing. So maybe he could do something like that. I just question as to whether or not the people with lots of money won't buy Donald Trump again. Because he's used RFK Jr. once before. And whether or not he puts RFK Jr. in, RFK Jr. may not last too long. Because when a better offer comes along, maybe a year maybe two years well he'll be out and there'll be somebody else like alex azar the ceo of eli lilly that he'll put in in charge of this stuff bethany free says i thought it was interesting the night before the election at a rally in pennsylvania trump called for a round of applause for pompeo i didn't see that i didn't see that thank you for letting us know

that i did not see it but there you go and let's have a round of applause for anthony fauci and robert redfield and dr burks as well couldn't have done it without them that's right uh guard goldsmith good to see you guard liberty conspiracy folks. You can find him on Twitter as well as on Rockfin in the evenings, Monday through Friday. He says, chatting with Joe Rogan, Tucker correctly slammed Pompeo. He said, quote, federal employees just can't assassinate people they don't like, which is precisely what Trump did with Soleimani and others. Yes. And I think that's going to be one of the big things coming out of this. I fully expect probably Trump will do something with Russia to de-escalate that for a win. Okay.

And because, you know, it's obvious that war is unwinnable. Zelensky is now the house guest who has stayed over time. He is routinely hated by everybody. That would be a big win for Trump to shut that down. But he is also going to do everything that he can for Israel. They own him, and the people around him have always wanted to go to war with Iran. So I expect a war with Iran rather than a war with Russia. And I expect that things will gradually, not at first,

but will gradually and continually escalate with China because Trump doesn't like China. So I think that's my immediate predictions as to what I think is going to happen. War with Iran for Israel, and he'll pull back on this war with Ukraine. AP Rumble Seat. Pompeo is almost as dangerous as fraud. She make no mistake. Oh yeah,

he is. He is a real snake. Miles Riley. JD Vance is a globalist plant. Too many close ties to Peter Thiel. Too many questionable things in JD's past. I questioned Trump's selection of people. He surrounds himself with.

J.D. Vance is very smart. When you look at, you know, of the four of them, you know, that Tim guy. Thinking back of that Saturday Night Live. This is the most important. Well, you said that four years ago. Do you know who this guy was? know tim kane nobody knows him uh but um yeah of of all these people he is very smart and articulate and he's able to handle the press he's able to turn their questions back around on he's an excellent debater uh and i've got friends who are very excited about J.D. Vance.

You know, his background, he's, you know, he came up from humble beginnings and all that kind of stuff. And I said, yeah, but that's not where he is now. He went to Yale and he's thrown his lot in with the big guys, especially the Silicon Valley people, the biotech people. He's a venture capitalist himself. He was at Yale, and when Peter Thiel came there, something about it. He was able to stand out and to get Peter Thiel's ear. And I don't know, is Peter Thiel doing a thing to the skull and bones people? I don't know.

Is he skull and bones? They don't tell you. I wouldn't be surprised. But that's the world that he lives in now and um i'm very concerned about the technocracy and about their influence i'm very concerned about the fact that elon musk is bragging about the fact that he's now bought the white house that's what he's doing with his holding a sink you know oh i'm coming in i'm going to be in charge here. Right. Uh, high boost says, uh, well, the deep state killed Trump to get Vance in there. That scares me even more.

Well, who knows what happens? Who knows what happens? Well, we're going to take a quick break folks and we'll be back. And, um, we're going to take a look at some of the other things that were on the ballot and some of these other things I can actually believe we do have an honest election on. I really don't think that your vote matters for president. I really don't. I think that's a selection. And I think that they pretty much got things rigged in all of the different branches of government in Washington. I think it's a lost cause. I think it is an enemy of America and Americans. It is there for our destruction. And so the only reason that we look at politics at the federal level is not in the vain hope that we can change anything, but so that we can try to discern where the threats are going

to be coming from. And that will change based on the personnel that they put in place. At the local level, though, I think we still do have some control in some areas. In some other areas, it's too corrupt to have any kind of control, and you need to get out of those areas and go to places where we can all start to try to work on something like the Free State Project or something. But still, we're going to take a look at some of these referenda and what does it tell us, really, about American society? Because I think that is something that we can discern from this other part of the election. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression,

in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. Hear, hear! It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. ¶¶ liberty it's your move you're listening to the david knight show all right let's uh take a look at some of the things that were on the ballot. We got porn, we got drugs, to have your attention, and we'll talk about some of the ballot initiatives that were about voting. We had voting about voting in a lot of different places.

But I want to talk first about the efforts to legalize marijuana recreationally. Long ago, we passed the point at which you had a majority of states, a large of like two-thirds of them, have legalized medical marijuana. And now several more of them had, actually it was, I think it's four states. I've got it here. Three states. Three states. Three states had referenda to go the next step and to make it recreational drugs.

And these were conservative Republican states. And it did not pass. But I think it's important for us to see what the bigger issue is here. I'm not a marijuana advocate. I don't want to, on the other hand, though, lock people up for using it. And I am opposed to prohibition as a way to help people. I, you know, when you look at what happened with alcohol, alcohol prohibition, we had the 18th Amendment, we had the 21st Amendment.

One of them was to make alcohol prohibition possible. They had to amend the Constitution to prohibition possible. They had to amend the Constitution to prohibit alcohol. Why don't we have that for marijuana or for any of the other drugs that they put in? Well, it's because we don't have any respect whatsoever for the Constitution anymore. And when you look at alcohol, it's a very dangerous drug. And I would have thought, well, let's give that a try. You know, they did it legally with respect for the Constitution, and I would have thought, let's give it a try. But it was an absolute failure. And what we see with prohibition always is that when you try to address something

that is a medical problem, but primarily a spiritual problem, and you try to use law enforcement against it, it fails. When your only tool is government, when your only tool is force, because that's what government is, government is force. It's not compassion. It's not persuasion. It's like a fire, right? The quote, whether or not that came from George Washington, government is like a fire. It's a force. And that's not how we help people. And so if you think that alcohol is bad and you want to get people away from that or marijuana or drugs or any of these drugs, the way that you do that is with persuasion. And you do that with spiritual issues. I had, when I was in engineering, I

had a lot of the guys that worked with me that did pot and other things like that as well. And I said, well, I said, no, I'm not interested. But I said, we were talking about the laws and stuff about that. And I said, I'm absolutely opposed to prohibition. I said, I've never needed laws to stop me from using it, and the laws don't stop you from using it. And I said, and I was always around it in college. I was in bands. I played nightclubs. I played parties.

I watched people get drunk, and it only reaffirmed my determination not to get that way when i saw it and so um i said i never needed any of that stuff i said and i interestingly enough i never had anybody offer me any when i was in college and one guy said they probably thought you were an arc i thought that was really funny probably true i mean's like, don't offer that to that guy. He'll turn you in. I wouldn't have turned them in because I don't believe in locking people up for that. But I would tell somebody that that's not what you want to do. But here's the important thing about this from a political standpoint.

I mean, from a moral standpoint, don't look to the government to fix people's lives. Every problem in society, we should not try to solve every problem by government, especially not by the federal government. But here's the bigger picture, folks, politically. What is going on with all of these referenda about medical marijuana and about recreational marijuana is nullification. Nullification.

We can stop this agenda. You need to understand that the war on drugs is not just a violation of the Constitution. The war on drugs was imposed by the UN. It's a UN agenda. The UN created these Schedule I, Schedule II, Schedule III, IV drugs. They created for drugs they created that regulatory structure i remember when the first talk was happening about um uh maybe it was california was first ones to talk about legalizing medical marijuana and the un was outraged they said you can't do that. And I thought, why are they getting involved in that? And when I looked it up, and then I talked to, it was, I can't remember the name of the organization. I talked to Jim Gearlock, a long time, police officers against prohibition, former police officers for the most part, because it's career suicide if you come out against it while you're there, and judges and prosecutors. And he confirmed that. He said, yeah, that is a UN agenda because they're the ones who created all those schedules

and they impose them worldwide. So, folks, what we have happening here, when we talk about medical marijuana or we talk about even recreational marijuana, what we have is state nullification of a UN agenda that is being imposed on us by the federal government, which is completely in bed with the UN. As a matter of fact, it's hard to tell where the UN starts and where the United States government, the federal government, they are intertwined far more than I think most people understand. And so it's a UN agenda that has been nullified, peacefully nullified. All the people who say, well, you can't stop the federal government from doing this or

doing that, that'd be civil war. And it's like, just point to them and say, look at what's going on with marijuana. Two-thirds of the states have said no and marijuana is still a schedule one drug and so when you're talking about medical marijuana it is a direct denial of this un scheduling because schedule one drugs are drugs that have no medical use and should be prohibited because they're dangerous and so on. But the key thing is that it has no medical use. And yet two thirds of the states have said that they're going to exempt it for medical use. So they have nullified this in a big way. And that's the key thing. Now, what happened with the recreational stuff it was in three states it was in florida south dakota and north dakota and it lost in all

three places but the very fact is that in all three of those places where they had recreational marijuana marijuana was already approved for medical use which was a repudiation of the UN Schedule I classification for marijuana. Even in those conservative states, they repudiated the no medical use thing. So that's a key thing. And so in Nebraska, they also had it on the ballot to remove penalties and to decriminalize it for medical marijuana. But again, as this article rightly points out, the very end, NPR even says,

this is at odds with the federal government's longstanding declaration that cannabis is illegal. Well, it's far worse than that. It's a UN agenda, and it is a repudiation of its Schedule 1 process. They do say in this NPR article, they say the Biden administration proposed reclassifying marijuana, a shift that would redefine it from being a Schedule 1 controlled substance and instead make it a Schedule 3 controlled substance, a category that acknowledges its medical benefits.

We don't need Washington to acknowledge its medical benefits. If we think it's got medical benefits, we can shut down their unconstitutional laws, and there's nothing they can do about it. Jeff Sessions hated marijuana with a passion, and he wanted to continue all the civil asset forfeiture and all these other abominations that have been brought in with drug prohibition. That has failed for 50- odd years as i was talking about the preppers yesterday some of the people there they said you know it's easier to get fentanyl than it is to get raw milk what does that tell you about our government first of all that the war on drugs has been a complete

failure but also that they're focused on our harm They're going to make it not so hard to find fentanyl. They'll make it real hard to get raw milk. But we don't need them to tell us what we can have. And folks, if you don't think that this is important as a principle, understand that if we accept that Washington wants to do this stuff, and if we don't push back against it, and if we don't uphold and understand the principles of nullification and how they can apply to other things, you do know that the UN wants to get rid of meat and dairy, right? They want to prohibit that. For them, that's more important than drugs. Because when they look at drugs, well, I don't know, that's not them that's more important than drugs because they're not when they look at drugs well i don't know that's not good for the individual or maybe it's not good for society but

for for their fantasy of climate they're saying if you eat meat and dairy you're going to kill us all you're going to destroy the planet and so there's a big push from the un and all these globalist organizations and they're going to push it through Washington eventually. And we need to understand that we can nullify their prohibition of meat, and we can nullify their prohibition of dairy, and that we've already done it with marijuana. And so don't lose hope. This is a very hopeful thing, that we can nullify what the UN wants to do. And so the other thing that was interesting, I thought about this, since it was in Florida, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

In Florida, you know, this was Donald Trump publicly backing recreational marijuana. DeSantis was publicly opposing it. And I thought that was interesting. DeSantis said, well, it'd be everywhere. The state would publicly opposing it. And I thought that was interesting. DeSantis said, well, it'd be everywhere. The state would smell like it. We don't need that in Florida, he said. Trump, however, signaled his support. He said, as a Floridian, I will be voting yes on Amendment 3 this November, they said.

And so then there was another issue on the ballot there in florida and that was about allowing abortion access and putting it in the um amending the state constitution and there were 10 states that had this kind of ballot measure there we'll tell you what happened with him but when trump went to vote he was confronted by a politician a politician by a member of the press trying to read this and find out where i put this uh and um let's see i can't find it here. They asked him. Oh, here we are. They asked him about how he had voted on this abortion amendment. And at first, he just kind of brushed it away. And they asked him a second time. And he got a little bit testy.

They should call a winner. They should. And they should call a winner. Yes. Just stop talking about that. Yeah, just stop talking about that. That's been the attitude of the Republican Party. It's been the attitude of Donald Trump.

You see, Donald Trump did not stop abortion. Donald Trump is not pro-life. He did what they always do. They appoint Supreme Court justices, and Supreme Court justices will always say, well, there's no litmus test on this, and I'm not going to say what I'm going to do about this. They expected, just like all of these presidents have expected since Ronald Reagan, that the Supreme Court justices weren't going to do anything about it. But you never know what they're going to do, as I've said over and over again. When you appoint these people in black robes, they're like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're going to do, as I said over and over again. When you appoint these people in black

robes, they're like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're going to get. And usually they drift to the left, even if you did do your vetting properly. And so he's very surprised by that. And he and the Republicans and people that he endorsed, like Blake Masters, who was also bankrolled by Peter Thiel, ran as fast as they could away from it as soon as Dobbs came out. Blake Masters scrubbed his website. So Donald Trump didn't know this would happen. Donald Trump did not want it to happen. And he has pushed back against it ever since.

He said, this is a big issue for us. It's a losing issue. And he doesn't want to talk about it. And that's too bad because it's pretty easy to talk about these same people who don't know what a woman is and want to play that ridiculous game you could nail them as well by just asking them the question what is a baby what is a baby what is an abortion and they could even show them what a baby is. They could show them what an abortion is.

And they could show them what Lala Harris did. And here, if they don't want to get into that decision, if that discussion, if that's too messy for them, well, they could at least talk to people about the horrific persecution that Lala has waged against David Daleiden, who is engaged in legitimate investigative journalism, free speech exercise. There was already talk about the fact that Planned Parenthood was trafficking in baby

parts. And he went through and he did these undercover investigations. And she didn't do anything about Planned Parenthood that was murdering babies for their parts and cutting them out while they are alive. That's the way it's done. That's the way it's done for adult organs as well. And we've had that discussion. That was just, we talked about that a couple of weeks ago. The guy who was moving and they almost cut his organs out. That happens in China as as well if you kill the patient things start to happen to the organs and so they always will remove the organs while the patient

is alive that's the dirty secret of not just the chinese communist but it's also the dirty secret of our organ donation system and it's also the dirty secret of what Planned Parenthood is doing they would arrange after they got a contract they would arrange for a baby at a particular level of you know they know they're going to have an abortion particular level of development of the baby and they would have it all ready to go I mean they as soon as they remove that organ, they've got to go. It's not like, well, okay, we've got a bunch of body parts around here, babies that we aborted in the last week or two. Anything that we can send up to Fauci so he can make humanized mice?

It doesn't work like that. Fauci says he wants the liver, or he wants some other part. And they arrange to have a baby at a certain level of maturity delivered and they cut the organs out while the baby is alive and ship them off right away right away that's the reality of this and yet lala harris has persecuted this journalist who exposed these heinous crimes and the gop won't even talk about it don't talk about that stop talking about it says trump so let's talk about what happened with the 10 states that had this and you can see that it is a real albatross around the neck of the Republicans because they don't want to show the truth of it, right?

They're going to allow other entities to lie about what abortion is, to lie about what a baby is. They will not defend babies. Used to be we had politicians who would kiss babies. These politicians won't defend their lives. They won't defend them from being ripped limb by limb apart as they are alive and so and when you look at it tells us something pretty scary about our society because if you will do this to the least among us they'll do it to you they'll do it to you when you get old they'll do it to you when you have a stroke or when you have some kind of a physical disability. The general sense of Americans is to kill the helpless. What does that

say about our society? What does it say about your future? So in Arizona, 62%. And these are all amendments to remove restrictions on abortion and to essentially encode it that there cannot be any limitation to abortion. In Arizona, 62%. Colorado, 62%. Florida, 57%. But that failed there because I think they've got to get to 60% to add it to the Constitution. In Missouri, 74% approved. I'm sorry, that's Maryland, 74%. In Missouri, 52%, and it wins.

In Montana, 57%, and it wins. Abortion wins. Nebraska, 55%, and abortion wins. South Dakota, 60% and abortion loses. In Nevada, 63% and abortion wins. New York, 62% and abortion wins. The GOP leaders don't want to talk about it. You better talk about it. You better talk about this issue. Look, the way that we get things changed is not with political parties and politicians. The way we get things changed is with issues.

Just take a look at what we're talking about with marijuana. Or take a look at what is going on with guns, for example. If you organize around a particular issue, you can have an effect. If you organize around a political party, you will never have any effect. Because the political party and the candidates are always this hodgepodge of different issues. Things that you agree with, things you don't agree with. You're not going to have an effect unless you focus on an issue.

Not a party, not a person. Focus on what is right right not who is right and you'll have less arguments with your friends and family all all these conservative friends and family who support trump it's like how could you do that i mean we're conservative right look at look what he did with the conservative issues instead of making it about him and arguing about what he's going to do or what he has done, just talk about the issues. And you'll have more areas of agreement with people. It's when you start talking about the faithless politicians who say one thing and do another that you start to have this, well, he's just playing 4D chess or 5D chess or we've got to win or that type of thing. Keep it on the issues.

And that's the way you're going to make change. Focus on the issue. And they're not going to be there on this issue. Republicans have made it clear. They're running away at the federal level. Now at the state level, some of them will, but they still won't show what is true. Now I said that, um, uh,braska the abortion thing uh uh won actually there was two different amendments one of them lost another one won so they wanted to um

have it at any time and that one lost uh so then they passed another one that had uh some uh availability and it was a mixed bag, as Trump would say. It's got the exceptions in it. So Nebraska, they had two of them. One of them lost, one of them won. The one that was going to be kill babies at any stage, that lost. And then in Nevada, even though it won, it has to pass a second time before it actually amends the Constitution. So they're going gonna have to put it

back on the ballot in 2026 there's still time for people to show what a baby is and what an abortion is if they wish to or maybe they'll just sit back and do nothing at all about it every single pro-abortion related ballot measure since the fall of roe v. Wade has been successful, except for South Dakota yesterday. And it was also in Florida. Sorry, Florida was there. Did I mention Florida when it was there? Yeah, it failed. But the thing about Florida was it got 57% of the vote.

It wasn't enough to amend the Constitution, but the majority still voted for it. So we've got a real problem. We've got a real problem with hearts and minds. And we've got a real problem with hearts and brains that they're murdering babies to achieve. So Kansans rejected a ballot measure that would have established that the state constitution does not include a right to abortion back in 2022. And during the same 2022 midterms, voters in California, Michigan, and Vermont codified abortion into their constitutions. At the same time, 2022 voters in Montana rejected a ballot measure

that would have given rights to babies that were born alive in a botched abortion. That's one of the most heinous things. They say, well, this baby survived the abortion, but we're going to still kill it. And the voters in Montana said, yes. So what does that tell you, folks? It tells you that they're going to do that to you, too. Either any one of us tomorrow could wind up like Terry Chauveau, and the people in Montana would kill you.

The vast majority. Voters in Kentucky also rejected an amendment similar to the one in Kansas. Last November, Ohioans also voted to codify the supposed right to abortion and their state constitution with issue one. So, again, it failed to reach the level to be put in the Constitution in Florida. But even in Florida, 57 percent voted for it. And in South Dakota, it was roundly rejected and so again as I said you know Trump just wants people to stop asking him these questions by the way did you notice that was really strange when he says stop with the questions he's standing there

sit Milani has got sunglasses on she wore sunglasses yesterday all day indoors you sell these pictures here's another one here's everybody there they're walking in melania's got sunglasses on yeah this future is so bright she's got to wear shades i guess i don't know what is up with that that's isn't that strange I thought it was really strange. So when he was pressed a second time, he said, you should stop talking about it, which is what he's been doing. He was never pro-life. And again, folks, just as a reminder, when we look at the future with this, give God

the glory. So many people have been praying for so long to overturn Roe v. Wade. Take it as answered prayer. Stop glorifying Trump. Glorify God for pulling that off in an improbable way, in spite of the politicians who didn't want to have anything to do with it, who wanted to stop talking about it as soon as it became real. Oh, they could talk about it as long as, hey, it's safe. They're never going to do anything about that. Supreme Court's never going to change anything.

Oh, no, they changed it. Give God the glory. Thank God for answering prayers about that. And you better be concerned that they'll do the same thing to you. New Jersey Democrats vote for porn. Porn for kids. P vote for porn. Porn for kids. Porn for kids.

New Jersey Democrats have protected the freedom to give obscene material to children. Now, this is not something that was on the ballot. This is something that was done by the elected Democrat state representatives.

Alex Newman has a story. He says, Democrat lawmakers in New Jersey just passed a bill granting government employees immunity from civil and criminal liability when giving children access to obscene materials at school or in libraries, sparking outrage amongst those who are seeking to protect minors. Why do we not defund these public schools and i'll tell you i'm going to start calling i've got a new name for public schools pubic schools that's all they're about they're about pubic schools they're so focused on that that's the only thing that we can really

describe that they're not they're not about education and and alex uh newman points out he said we just had the governor of new jersey uh just last year struck down the idea phil murphy the governor signed a law eliminating basic skills test to ensure that government school teachers know how to read write and do basic math and he's going he's expected to sign this new obscenity measure soon. They're not public schools, they're pubic schools. The so-called Freedom to Read Act, passed by the New Jersey State Senate on Monday, after it was approved in the House earlier this year, is being portrayed by Democrats and their far-left media allies as a measure aimed at limiting book banning.

It's porn for kids. Under current New Jersey law, giving obscene material to a minor is considered to be a felony of the third degree. Obscenity is described as any material that includes audio or visual picture or description of sexual intercourse, sex, acts, and more. And of course, the curriculum as well as the libraries are littered with this kind of stuff. He says as an example, in New Jersey, is a book that's called This Book is Gay. It has tips on how children can meet up with adults for homosexual encounters without letting their parents find out.

They wonder why we call them groomers and pedos. That's the very definition, folks. Here's how you can meet up with adults for homosexual sex and keep your parents from finding out. And they put that in the libraries, the school libraries. It also features detailed and extremely graphic instructions for sodomy and various other sex acts because of obscenity laws which exist nationwide to protect the innocence of children some librarians and teachers have hesitated before providing such material lawmakers in New Jersey think children need access to such material. In the pubic schools and the school libraries,

they've come under attack from a small number of individuals hoping to erase diverse materials, say the Democrats. Diverse materials. No, it's porn. It's grooming. It's pedophilia. And, it's porn. It's grooming. It's pedophilia. And we all know it. Why are we paying property taxes for this stuff?

Haven't you had enough? Through the Freedom to Read Act, local school boards still implement policies that ensure our libraries, they shall implement policies that ensure that our libraries still have an array of content, while including the pubic in that process. Because I'm not going to say public, it's all just about pubics. One leading opponent of the bill was Victoria Jekielski, director and founder of New Jersey parental rights, because you see, that's the other part that is in direct conflict. These people who want to groom the kids are always in opposition to the parents who do

not want to expose them to this stuff at this age. And so she's there with New Jersey parental rights. She read the legal description of obscenity and she warned that the quote so-called freedom legislation was aimed at stripping parents taxpayers and the community of the right and the duty to protect children she's been battling the indoctrination and sexualization of new Jersey children in public schools for years, says Alex Newman. She said, should employees of the New Jersey Department of Education not be held accountable if they commit a crime? If they commit a sexual crime, should we not hold them accountable?

If they groom kids, if they tell them how to have sexual encounters with adults without their parents knowing it, should we hold them accountable for that? GOP lawmakers also weighed in on the debate. One Republican, I actually have a Republican in New Jersey. From somewhere, I don't know. I had enough Republicans to send him to the New Jersey Senate. The guy's name is Michael Testa. And he said, how exactly does a person distribute obscene material to a child in good faith?

In good faith. I don't want adults promoting explicit stuff to children, he said. I also think it's incredibly telling that if some of these very same explicit materials were shown to a child by a neighbor, that individual would be charged with a Megan's Law offense, and rightfully so, he said. That Megan's Law was a law to protect children. It was named after a seven-year-old girl who was raped and then murdered by a predatory neighbor.

While the bill's sponsors and supporters claim that it was government officials corrupting minors who were being harassed and threatened, the reality is that it's just the opposite, says Alex Newman. In fact, the Newman Report documented last year parents who advocate for their children have been targeted by law enforcement, by lawfare, by unions, and even by the military. Children in New Jersey are sexualized and indoctrinated with LGBT ideology starting as soon as kindergarten. From being encouraged to experiment with sodomy and other perversions to being taught that they can pick new genders. Giving children grotesque and obscene sex materials is now a higher priority than teaching basic academics in New Jersey, as we

pointed out with Governor Murphy saying, we don't have to have basic skills tests anymore. That's not what the pubic schools are about. Let me tell you something. Trump is very proud of his LGBT credentials, and so is Melania, and you're not going to see anything done. And again, education should not be a federal issue, but it is a federal issue because and this is what so many people who wanted to excuse what trump did in 2020 just don't realize how the federal government gets around the 10th amendment they bribe states and state officials they give them massive amounts of money

and then later on they'll say well if you don't do that or if you you know do something else i'm gonna pull the funding away from you obama was doing that when people didn't states and local officials didn't want to put boys and the girls bathrooms and showers he said well i'm gonna take away your federal money trump has said just the opposite and so you know he will take a stand on some of these things and he will take away the money or give the money. That's the way the federal government operates. The federal government needs to get out of this, because that's where this stuff is really originating from. And Alex Newman says this at the very end, and he's absolutely right.

Civilized societies, civilized societies, have always used the law to protect children and to punish those who seek to corrupt them with obscene material that is absolutely true well speaking of porn we had Mark Robinson defeated in North Carolina this is somebody whose past porn addiction came out and had a kind of a – he was a very effective speaker. He made a speech, and that was the beginning of his political career. He became lieutenant governor. But then it's very interesting that CNN was somehow able – CNN is just not a very good investigative organization. Somebody gave them this information.

They're not saying where they got it. But everybody seemed to believe that what they had about Mark Robinson. And he, rather than owning up to his porn addiction, he said he was a Christian, you know doesn't want to say that's not me anymore or whatever he just denied it completely and his staff seemed to believe it all of his staff left all of them left and they stopped bringing him into the um campaign events that trump was running in north carolina trump won north carolina um they say, if you want to believe in the voting. Maybe he did. Maybe he didn't.

Whatever. But still, Mark Robinson did not. So they have a Democrat governor again there. The one network that we have here in the final hours of the election, MSNBC put out an op-ed piece saying that Trump wants to take away guns, but La La is a Second Amendment champion. That's the headline from WND. Well, the thing is, he did want to take away the guns. He wanted to do it and do the due process later. And he did do gun control by executive order. And then she immediately jumped in and said, that's what I'm going to do.

Right. Right after it. I remember when that happened. When he did that, I said, you're going to see the Democrats use this. And of course, Biden used it. La La, when she was running for president in 2020, threatened to use it. I'm going to give Congress 100 days if they don't do my gun control agenda, I'm going to do it by executive order. We played those clips for you this last week.

But again, she was both of them really don't respect the Constitution when it comes to this. But this person, of course, is twisting it to an absurd extreme. Nevertheless, you know what's going to happen now that Trump has been elected? You're going to see gun sales fall. You get Obama elected, it explodes. Trump gets elected, it goes down. Biden gets elected, it goes up again, right?

So now you're going to see everybody, that's part of it. Now we can all go to sleep again you know trump is in the white house he's in the lincoln bedroom uh we're all fine we don't have to worry about anything uh and guns are just one example of that but it happens to all these different issues oh we're safe the second amendment is safe is it is it safe under trump uh the guy who wrote this column was somebody named Jahan Jones, who frequently writes for MSNBC. He said, Trump is ending his campaign having never resolved his incoherent stance on access to guns. Well, he's right about that.

Trump is all over the place with that. He says, however, La La wants to confiscate guns harris has said no such thing they say right so he says so a lot of people think that lala wants to confiscate but she's never said that well actually she did uh she said she's going to run through her agenda in 100 days in response to what they said uh and then he throws this thing in there she's even discussed the fact that she's a legal gun owner which trump given his felony convictions is not come on give me a break yeah nobody buys any of those felony convictions uh but um we do understand that he did an executive order for gun control that was unprecedented but now the

precedent belongs to trump and it was followed up by the democrats and he said we'll do the due process later well on other issues that were before people i said you know there was a lot of voting about how we're going to vote you had a lot of different states had on the ballot it's kind of interesting somebody had this idea uh of putting having an open primary with all the candidates for all the parties on there and then the top four would move on from there or whatever right similar things to that and it was on the ballot in a lot of different states and it was pretty much rejected in all of them as well. So people like this two-party primary system. So you had Montana rejected that idea by 52%.

Nevada rejected it, 54%. Idaho rejected it, 69%. Alaska had had it, and they repealed it, 51%. Arizona rejected it, 59%. Colorado rejected it, 55%. Idaho rejected it, 69%. And South Dakota rejected it, 66%. Actually, Nevada, I think I said that wrong.

Nevada passed it, 54%. So they were kind of the outlier there. And then when it comes to non-citizens voting, that was on the ballot in a lot of different states. And it was rejected everywhere. In Kentucky, the idea that non-citizens would be allowed to vote was rejected by 62%. In North Carolina, by 78%. In Oklahoma, 81%. South Carolina, 86%.

Wisconsin, 71%. Iowa, 76%. Idaho, 65%. Missouri, 69%. And then in Nevada, 74% of the people approved the requirement to have a photo ID to vote. And then we talk about ranked choice voting. And again, I'm inclined to support it, but I have to see a little bit more detail about it and how it would work. And again, it's kind of a more complicated system, so you have to have a lot more trust in the tallying of votes and that type of thing.

It's kind of like the death penalty. In principle, I agree with it, but in practice, I'm very concerned about the honesty of courts. And so from that standpoint, I don't really support the death penalty, even though there are some cases that are very clear. And I had my aunt was murdered by someone that was very clear. I even confessed it. And they did not execute him. God did with cancer after a very, very long time. He was celebrated in Canada for writing poetry.

This guy who killed my aunt and uncle. Anyway, he excused it by saying he was on drugs. Well, I guess that makes it all okay, right? Anyway, in Missouri, ranked choice voting passed by 69%. In Oregon, it passed by 60%. In Washington, D.C., it passed by 73%. So we'll see how that works. The general idea is that you have multiple people on the ballot, all different parties,

and you put a first choice by somebody, second choice, third choice, fourth choice, that type of thing. If your first choice doesn't win enough votes, if your first choice rather is last, then they get eliminated, right? And then they tally it up again. And the lowest person each time through gets eliminated until they've got a winner. And that has been really fought against by Republicans because they want to keep this two-party system. I think it kind of opens it up to, if you trusted it, I think it's a good idea. Again, I just have an issue as to whether or not that can be done in a trustworthy way. When it comes to legalization of drugs, not just about marijuana, but when it comes to psychedelics, that was on the ballot in Massachusetts.

And even Massachusetts said no to that. 57% said no to legalizing psychedelics. And then in West Virginia, finally, there was a ballot issue to prohibit medical-assisted suicide. And that narrowly passed 50.5%. Isn't that amazing? That shows you how the pro-life issues are really hanging by a thread. And I really do think that's the case, because, you know, this is, well, it can be manipulated in a lot of different ways to take people's lives. Rudy Poo, if POT was not weaponized by Soros and China, it'd be fine. Oh, pot.

Okay. I'm thinking of POTUS, President of the U.S., and what is it? If pot wasn't weaponized by Soros and China, it'd be fine. The junk today isn't like the 80.S. and what is it? If pot wasn't weaponized by Soros and China, it'd be fine. The junk today isn't like the 80s dope. Well, that's one of the things in Florida, they legalize medical marijuana and even marijuana with THC, but the THC has to be below a certain concentration because they really have weaponized it. And that's one of the characteristics of prohibition. We had alcohol prohibition.

Most people, prior to alcohol prohibition, most of the alcohol consumed was beer and wine. When alcohol prohibition came along, it moved to hard liquor, which was actually much worse for people. And that is something that is a general thing that you see with prohibition. Number one, whatever it is that you're prohibiting, you get a more intensified form of it.

And so we're seeing that with weaponized pot, if you will, with fentanyl and all these other things. We're getting more and more intense drugs all the time because now this prohibition war on drugs has been going on for 53 years. Failure for 53 years. So you get more concentrated forms of it that's a standard thing that always happens with prohibition it also will corrupt the police and the courts we see that a lot as well gives organized crime a monopoly it has a lot of negative effects and it never works for the people that you're trying to help. Never works. What works? Even Alcoholics Anonymous, they talk vaguely about a higher power. It is a spiritual issue. Christ can free you from that kind of slavery, that slavery to porn, that slavery to to drug addiction or to something that you're trying to put in your life to fill that hole where God is not there.

And that's what you really need. And all these other things are just giving people fake pacifiers to try to help them. Whatever gets you through the night, said John Lennon, right? Well, you know whatever gets you through the night said John Lennon right well it doesn't get you through the night and it isn't going to get you away from an eternal night where you are separated from God that's what you want to avoid Trump burger forever let's get David to 300 likes today. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that. And please do like the program. That does help to get it out there. So we really do appreciate that.

AP Rumble Seat. Research Donald Marshall, the Black Eye Club Theory. About the sunglasses. I thought about that as well. That was out there a lot on Halloween. Jill Biden dresses up in a panda suit and they're all these horrific pictures of children of women who have been abducted and had double black eyes but anyway uh yeah there's a lot of different theories about the black eye club thing in any case whatever it's probably tied in

with uh mind k and control maybe mel didn't like didn't like the prospect of playing first lady again i think she's probably one of the most next to lala i think melania is probably one of the most unhappy people in the country today she doesn't want to have anything to do with this that is quite clear we'll be right back the common man they created common core to dumb down our children they created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image

of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Well, the election results are in, says Babylon B, and Christ is still on his throne.

You know, it's a lot of stuff that was written by people. Again, you had all of these pastors coming, you must vote and you can't vote for la-la. Let's see, what are my choices then, you know? Are you really endorsing somebody? That's why I said, talk about issues. Talk about what is right, not who is right. And if you want to vote, vote for whoever you wish. But don't devote yourself to them.

And don't devote yourself publicly to them. And that's especially true, I think, of Christian leaders. Wine Press News has it. It says, fear not, says the Lord. And it says, and yet Americans are hysterical over the election outcome but have no fear of God. And the CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, says this election doesn't matter. Not to him. He's going to make money either way. He's going to control what's happening either way.

They're going to fund both sides of this, just like the CIA funds both sides of the wars, right? So we got a conference hosted by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association two weeks ago. Financial Times reported Larry Fink's comments there. He said, looming U.S. election between La La and Donald really doesn't matter for financial markets, quote unquote. Really doesn't matter for financial markets, quote unquote. Really doesn't matter for financial markets. Who would have thought that Larry Fink would be more honest with us than the big media pastors? Isn't that amazing? And he said, I'm tired of hearing that this is the biggest election in your lifetime.

I agree with Larry Fink on something, finally. See, even Larry Fink can be right. It's such a joke. I played for you the clips from Saturday Night Live making fun of the Democrats who were saying, oh, this is the most important election of my lifetime. It's like, oh, please. He says the reality is this time it doesn't matter, said Larry Fink.

He said BlackRock works with both administrations and is having conversations with both Lala and Donnie. There you go. Either way, they're going to make money. Either way, they're going to own the occupant. Fink also said something similar about a month ago as well. He said both candidates have, in many ways, similar views on making the U.S. even stronger. Yeah, by going into more debt, right?

Both candidates and their interpretation of how that may happen may differ. Our job is to work with any political position. Our job is to be working with the U.S. government. Well, our job, you and I, our job is to oppose the U.S. government. The federal government is in opposition to the Constitution. It is in opposition to we, the people. And we must oppose it. And the question is, how are we going to do it?

And as I said, all politics is local. They always talk about it. Think globally. Act locally. Well, we need to understand the global agenda, and we need to block it locally. And we can nullify it we can just like we can nullify the un war on drugs and it came from the un it's a un agenda just like agenda 2030 and if we can't understand that the power that we have at the state and local level to nullify that then it can get us with the agenda 2030 we need to look

at this thing with marijuana state look we nullified that un agenda and we can nullify that, then get us with the agenda 2030. We need to look at this thing with marijuana and say, look, we nullified that UN agenda, and we can nullify the UN 2030 agenda in the same way. You want to stop the smart cities or the freedom cities that Trump talks about? Because it's still going to be coming, right? That's another area where there's not any real difference between them. You know, they can call it NAF an after they can call it the us mca u.s mexico and canada agreement whatever still the same he just rebrands this stuff but it's still the u.n agenda and you want to stop it you got to stop it at the state level

and you can stop it at the state level you can nullify it that's the lesson of those things and so um as the wine press news says you just heard it straight out of the horse's mouth it doesn't matter he quotes ecclesiastes a feast is made for laughter and also la la wine makes her merry but money answers all things especially does when it comes to washington uh and i keep thinking of that saturday night live clip they had of la la and especially does when it comes to Washington. And I keep thinking of that Saturday Night Live clip they had of Lala where he said, you've raised a billion dollars. Why aren't you leading? And she says, yeah, she laughs and she says,

I scream that into my pillow every morning. She made a lot more money than Trump did off of this thing. But when we talk about money uh just remember that Elon Musk who's putting out pictures of himself replacing the kitchen sink and even carrying that meme into the Oval Office had this to say essentially if if done right the X would be, would serve people's financial needs to such a degree that over time it would become, I don't know, maybe half of the global financial system. Wow.

Or some big number. I'm not sure what the number is, but pretty big. So it would be by far the biggest sort of financial institution. But like I said, not really in the way that people are used to thinking about banks. Just the most efficient database for the thing that is money. The thing that is money. The least amount of fraud.

Everything is real time. And if it involves money in any way way it can be dealt with seamlessly on one one location okay seamlessly in one location if done right right that's why i said they're going to outsource the tyranny of cbdc and things like that he's positioning himself um you know fink says it doesn't matter well Well, Elon Musk has positioned himself into a position where it really can work. And he wants to, that's his vision for X, to make it something like half of the world's global financial system. Something that's going to be online, instantaneous. Sounds exactly like what they were talking about with CBDC.

Something that would completely restructure the financial system. A way to outsource this. And boy, has he positioned himself in a way to do this. This is why I say we have to watch what happens in the Trump administration very, very carefully. Do not go to sleep. Do not think that Musk and Trump are your allies. Hold them up to the standard that you would hold up Lala or Biden. Be skeptical about what they do.

Don't trust them. Don't trust them. So, Wine Press News says, Americans are all in a tizzy right now, scared out of their minds, going hysterical, spiraling out of control with no hope in sight. Vote for this guy or this gal that you hate the least. That's all the election is. Sure, there might be some differences on social issues,

but really they're not all that far apart on everything else. Turn on the TV and listen to the totally not-controlled opposition pundits online and social media wink-wink, right? Oh, they are controlled. And, of course, he is now bragging about the fact that he's got access to the Oval Office. He went to Mar-a-Lago, watched the election returns with Donald Trump. He's got designs to completely redesign the world's financial system with him at the center. You know, Mark Zuckerberg did as well.

Mark Zuckerberg put out a white paper. He came up with the idea. He says, hey, let's do a global currency, worldwide currency. He called it Libra. And he was talking about all the different aspects of how, you know, it could process transactions instantaneously and all the stuff, like you just heard Elon Musk say. And in one line toward the end of the report, as an enticement to the governments to allow him to do it,

he said it could serve as a de facto global ID. But even Mark Zuckerberg couldn't pull that off. Elon Musk, I think, can. And so be very careful. Keep your eyes open. Watch out for your friend who sacrificed all this money to buy Twitter just for you,

just for your free speech. He just kept free speech alive. And he's going to try to turn that platform. First of all, he said, Twitter gives him a glimpse into a kind of hive mind. And of course, all these social media sites are there to feed information into artificial intelligence,

another area that he's very keen on. He wants to read your mind one way or the other. Well, if he can't get you a neural link, he can get you a Twitter, right? And he wants to turn it into a global financial system. Same types of aspiration that Zuckerberg did, but he's much better at it. That's why he's the wealthiest man on earth. Wine Press News says, I've never seen so much doubt, worry, anxiety, fear, and panic

as we approach a presidential election. People are freaking out right now. He says, I'm entirely convinced that we are entering a period of long-term chaos for the entire nation. Well, again, I think that Trump is their chaos for control. You know, it's kind of funny. The old, remember Don Adams, Get Smart? He had the shoe that he could, La La could use one of those, right?

He had a shoe that was a telephone, all the rest of that stuff. It was a lot of fun, very funny. It was Mel Brooks and what was the guy's name? Buck, I can't remember his name. Huh? Buck Henry, thank you. Yeah, Buck Henry and Mel Brooks did that.

And I always thought it was a very funny send-up of the spy movies. But the two competing things were chaos and control. Chaos and control. And it's kind of like a Hegelian thing there, right? And will we ever get smart? I don't think so. I don't think we'll ever get smart. They're to continue to fool us with this aegelian game and we don't know who the players are or who's on which team there so uh it's going to continue what should christians do if their

candidate loses well most of the candidates most of christians were supporting trump, I think. But this was, we did have, as I pointed out, that one guy, he's got a church, a black church of 3,000 people, Mark Disick or Kissick or something, Kissick, I think it was. And he was saying, yeah, I've always opposed abortion and marriage and all these other issues, and I've written articles about it, books about it, I've traveled with the Republicans, but I just, you know, I can't vote for Trump. I've got to vote for Lala.

And it's like, but she's antithetical to all these issues. I talked about it yesterday. It's a perfect example of somebody who's so caught up in identity politics, and they completely reject what is right and have to make this decision as to who is right. And they make it based on all the things that he accused Trump of in terms of moral issues. She was also guilty of. So it creates a kind of blindness for us, doesn't it? And so we also have, as part of this, we have pastors out there saying, if you are not voting, you have an inadequate understanding of the scriptures. Oh, really?

Okay, well, go ahead and lecture me about not voting while you twist the simple principles like the Ten Commandments like a pretzel in order to excuse what you're doing. That's what they're doing. It's crazy to me. And you can say that about the economic issues or the gun control issues or whatever else. Any of these principles, any of these issues, they just twist them, and they make it about party or politician. So a pastor of World Outreach Church in Nashville, Tennessee, organized a 48-hour prayer event over the weekend encouraging believers to lift America up to God for the election, not for conversion. Isn't that interesting? Does this not tell us why the church is having absolutely no impact? It's not even asking for the right thing. And it's not, and at the same time,

the gross hypocrisy of the church, it's just like what we saw with this black pastor who's saying, well, I've always been pro-life, that's why I got to vote for Lala Harris. Are you kidding me? You know, that kind of rank hypocrisy, they think that people don't see it, but they do. He said, we don't want to stand on the sidelines and watch what's happening. We want to be participants in what God is doing.

Well, God's work is to preach the gospel to everyone, not to support Nero or Caligula, right? And not to drag Jesus into the muck of this dirty business vote for whoever you want but don't try to devote yourself to them he says if i sit in my house and pray for food and i don't plant the garden i'm probably going to get hungry well what's going to happen if you send your kids to pubic school right that's what you should be focused on. Instead of Donnie versus Lala, you should be focused on what's going on with your kids and your family, what's going on with your relationship to God. But these pastors with these big churches, and of course, that's why they got big churches,

because they tell people what people want to hear. It's just like the big media. You tell people what they want to hear. It's not too hard, folks, to read the room, is it? We all know what everybody wants to hear. So you can tell people what they want to hear and forget about the truth. So he says, I think Christians need to vote. They must vote. No excuses. No, raise your child. Spread the good news about Christ. Pray for this country to turn with Christ, not for some person

to be in office. You know, many times we'll pray for something that we think is the best thing. I've been in situations in my life where we've faced economic hardship, things were collapsing with us, and so you're praying that that won't happen. Or you're praying that this disease or this condition won't happen. But sometimes God moves most powerfully, and this is what it's been in my life, and many other people have said that, God moves most powerfully in our lives when we come through difficult decisions. And that's when he shapes us. And that's when we learn to trust him.

And so don't worry about this situation. Don't worry about what might be coming. Focus on God and focus on your relationship with God. It's an opportunity. It's a blessing when we go through difficult times. It really is. So he says, this pastor says, well, what I would say to Christians is if you're disappointed by the outcome of the election, it's not time to panic. We've got to change some behaviors and change how we engage with the culture. Change your behavior? Is that the message of the gospel? Or is it asking for the mercy and forgiveness of God through our Lord Jesus Christ and then watching God change us after that.

It's that mercy. It's that forgiveness, that grace. You know, the old adage, this one person who did all these revivals that talk about it, he said, well, you know, you're out there playing baseball, and you hit the ball, and you run around all the different bases, and you come home, but you didn't touch first base, and the ref sees that, and you get home, and the other guy tags you,

and you're out. You didn't touch that first base. These people are not putting first principles first, and they've got people scared to death. You've got people like Jack Graham saying, pastors urging congregations not to vote have lost all credibility. Well, again, I don't tell people not to vote. I just say don't devote yourself.

And this guy, Jack Graham, is there with Prestonwood Baptist Church. And if I'm not mistaken, that is, oh yeah, it's a different one. First Baptist Dallas pastor, Robert Jeffress, is the guy that was pushing the vaccine so much. And it's amazing to me to see, if you look at these people who are out there, the big pastors who are gathered around Trump, who are taking selfies with him, you know, the selfie prayer. Did you realize that's a thing now? The selfie prayer. The selfie Bible, I guess we could come with. These guys could put out there.

But it's kind of like the prosperity gospel of Paula White, who is his key advisor. Trump said, Norman Vincent Peale, the power of positive thinking, not even Christian. That was his favorite pastor of all time. And so all these people, Paula White and all these other people who are out there doing the selfie prayers with Trump, look, I'm praying for Trump, and put it out on social media so everybody can see him doing it. And these people who are doing it, people like franklin graham people like robert jeffress people like paula white uh people like this guy uh graham uh they were also pushing the vaccine pretty much all the most i don't know

about graham uh but these other guys jeffress and franklin graham they were pushing the vaccine as well think about that it's not just trump who kept pushing the vaccine it's all of these guys and they were trained it was curtis chang who had been given a massive amount of money part of the 250 million dollars that trump put out in the ad Council funding to nudge people. And Curtis Chang had a website where he used Robert Jeffress and a lot of other megachurch pastors and said, here's the talking points, and they're talking points straight out of Yale. And I always said, there's no science in any of this except behavioral science. They would put that stuff out there. You had Al Mohler telling people, it's a moonshot. Science is a miracle. We need to thank God for the miracle. You need to love your neighbor.

You need to do this for your neighbor. All of these arguments that were coming from Yale. And now they're out there telling you, you got to vote for Trump again. Keep your powder dry, folks. It's going to be a tough four years. These four years are going to be bringing us right up to the tail end of the fourth turning. And we're going to talk about that when we come back. But post-election truths. This is from John Whitehead with the Rutherford Institute. Now, he's talking about things that, he's talking about secular things,

about political things. But again, truth doesn't change. Anything that's really true is not going to change. So he says, the things that won't change, no matter who wins, he says, after months of hand-wringing and mud-slinging and fear-mongering, the votes have finally been cast and the outcome has been decided.

The deep state has won. That's right. But still, remember, Christ is on the throne. And so he goes down. He says, so here's the outcome of this year's election. He says, take a look at the programs, the policies that will not be affected by this election. Number one, the undermining of the Constitution will continue unabated. Number two,

the government's war on the American people will continue unabated. The Fourth Amendment, which protects us from being bullied, badgered, beaten, broken, spied on by government agents, is being disemboweled. Consequently, you no longer have to be poor, black, or guilty to be treated like a criminal. all that is required is that you belong to the suspect class that is that you're a citizen in order to be the brunt of the american police state they're now extending that even to squirrels so it's uh it doesn't matter what ethnic group you are what economic class you are or even what species you are we've got the police state coming in with the goons and the SWAT team.

The shadow government, also known as a deep state, he says, also known as a police state, also known as the military industrial complex, also known as the surveillance state complex. That will all continue, unabated. The government's manipulation of national crises in order to expand its power. That will continue, unabated. Endless wars that enrich the military-industrial complex will continue unabated. Government corruption will continue unabated. Government tyranny under the reign of an imperial president will continue unabated.

That's right. But again, the good news is that we don't fear as Christians. You know, he who is in you, if you're a Christian, is greater than the world. And God laughs

when the nations rage against God and his Christ and when the people rage against God and his Christ and when the people plot in vain. So, you know, don't be afraid of this situation, but keep your eyes peeled, keep your powder dry, understand that there's, you know, each of these persons, as I said for the longest time, represents a greater danger to us in a different way.

And the danger that Trump represents to us is one of going to sleep and complacency. And you're going to see it in so many different ways. It's not just going to be in terms of people, I don't need to have guns anymore. It's not just going to be in that. It's going to be a lot of different things. We'll be in that. It's going to be on a lot of different things. We'll be right back. And be happy Ain't got no cash, ain't got no car But 24 booster shots in your arm Oh, nothing

Be happy You can't even buy shit in the store Because of your low social credit score Own nothing Be happy You'll own nothing And be happy Be happy and eat some bugs.

Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. George McDonough, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. And he did two. Thank you. I see both of those there. Thank you very much.

Johnny Gospelseed, God can use Trump just like he did Nebuchadnezzar, so what do you want to say? Like you said, you have to hold everybody to the fire. It doesn't matter who it is. That's right. And so we pray for, look, we don't just pray for spiritual things. We pray for secular things all the time. And I mean, and that is a real blessing to see things like that happen. I mean, go back and look at the diary of George Mueller.

He prayed for very practical things. He had no money. He had a lot of orphans that he was taking care of. He prays for it and all of a sudden he gets a knock on the door. I don't know what to do. Everybody's there to eat

and he's got no food to give them. And the guy says, my milk truck just broke down outside your door. You want some milk? And he had enough milk for everybody. And they're passing that around

and another guy knocks on the door. He goes, I've got extra bread. We had an order canceled or something like that. And He brings them a whole bunch of bread. George Mueller's diary, they went on for years and years. And he had the entire town of Bristol, England turned out when he died. It was very famous. People could see God answering his prayers and see that God is still active in our life. He's not, as some people would imagine him, the deists,

many of the founding fathers are deists. Yes, God created the world. He set it up like a clock, and then he went off, you know, just left this thing running. No, no. You could see in George Mueller's life that God was eminent and imminent, eminent with an eye,, imminent with a knee. He was above everything, and he was right there, and he was in tune to all of the ordinary needs, and that's why we don't need to fear. We don't need to fear about that, and we don't need to worry that things are going to have to, I don't think about trickle-down freedom.

We have trickle-down economics, right? But I don't think about trickle-down freedom. We have trickle-down economics, right? But I don't think about trickle-down freedom. I'm free in Christ. And no matter what these people do, I'm still free. I don't have to trickle it down. We build it up from the grassroots. And we build it up from our own personal relationship. It's not something that I'm hoping that Trump's going to get it right and it's going to filter

down to us. That might happen. That might be the way that it happens if God blesses us with that. But God can protect and provide for us regardless of what happens. But we do have a responsibility to keep an eye out for what is happening. And we do have a responsibility to get our kids out of these pubic schools. M. Sellers, we still need to pray for our new president as much as it pains me to say.

It makes me always think about, I mentioned it before. Fiddle on the roof. Is there a prayer for the czar? Yes, God bless and keep the czar far away from us. But yeah, pray for his conversion, as Hedge 88 says. God bless Donald Trump and make him change his ways. If God were to work in Trump's life, and it's going to take more than an alleged assassination attempt or whatever, it's like, hey, great, God thinks I'm special.

That's not the lesson. I think it's what happened. I don't think that's the lesson he wants you. I think the lesson that he wants you to take away from that is that we're all this close to eternity, right? Especially you. He's getting up there in age, but tomorrow's not guaranteed to any of us at any age. That's a lesson to take away from it, if that was real. But yes, can you imagine if Trump had a come-to-Jesus moment

and he started telling us the truth about the first term and about what's going on now and what's going on in government? Wouldn't that be interesting? Yeah, it would be very interesting, wouldn't it? But, you know, god knows what we need uh eric thank you very much for the tip i really appreciate that thank you well let's talk a little bit about uh we're talking about what might happen with this stuff and of course um robert redfield and the maha the maha people which uh sounds like a joke, doesn't it?

Make America healthy again. I think that they come up with some acronym that goes, ha ha. Here we go again. And so this is put out. This is sent to me by Harry Hound, a tweet from Sense Receptor. Many big accounts on here are pushing former CDC director robert redfield a darling of the mahas make america healthy again they're pushing him as a hero for saying the covet 19 jabs can cause injuries but he doesn't even say poem right it's a limited hangout and yet when he flatters

rfk jr rfk jr says wow i really nailed him in my books but now that he's saying nice things well i like him right he's trying to weave his way back into this uh click around donald trump uh but he should actually be tried for crimes against humanity says since receptor and i agree with. All of Trump's warp speed crew, including Trump and including Biden and including Lala, they all need to be tried for crimes against humanity. They are war criminals. They have released a bioweapon on us. I'm not talking about gain of function and Wuhan.

Talk about the bioweapon, the real bioweapon that is still gaining on the people who have taken the shot. It's still metastasizing like a cancer, turbo cancers, all other things that are happening with it. People have shown it's got nanotech in it. It's absolutely insane that this isn't pulled. And yet, we are supposed supposed to expect and a lot of people are hoping that fluoride is going to have a big move and as a matter of fact this cnn article is um really angry about this this was written a couple of days ago before the election and said do you realize that if trump gets elected that rfk jr says he's going to get fluoride out? He says it's an industrial waste. He says that it's linked to cancer, diseases, and disorders.

Well, all of that is true. RFK Jr. is telling you the truth about fluoride. Everything he said is true. Everything they had in there is true. But they're condescendingly saying, well, he's just, he doesn't know what's going on with this. RFK Jr. waded into another scientific debate see how they do that very condescending well he waded into a scientific debate but you know uh we at cnn uh know that he doesn't belong there well you don't

belong there then right i guess you shut up uh you're not allowed to say anything cnn you don't have any scientists is brian stelter did he when got kicked out, did he go get a degree in science or something? Kind of a postgraduate degree. He's got his BS and BS, I think. But anyway, Trump's administration would advise that fluoride be removed from the country's water supplies if the former president wins on tuesday they said well here's the deal in 37 countries uh 37 37 states uh and it's only you know a couple of countries that have fluoride in their water uh we're we're the one, the primary one. But in 37 states, local jurisdiction, it's a determination that's made by the local community as to whether or not they want fluoride in their water. This is a local issue.

Like most things, all politics is local, folks, and that includes fluoride. That's great if you've got somebody at the national level saying we shouldn't have it. But the EPA has fought like mad to keep fluoride in the water. While they try to shut down all cars, while the EPA has gone after power plants to shut them down, while the EPA is talking about shutting down farms, the EPA still wants fluoride in your water. Do you realize that they're your enemy? Do you realize how weaponized the federal government is against us? I don't think that's going to change with Trump or with RFK Jr., even if they mean well. We're going to have to stop these organizations. They're not capable of being reformed.

They have these people who remain there regardless of what happens with the so-called elections. On January the 20th, the Trump White House, says RFK Jr., will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer cancer iq loss neurodevelopmental disorders and thyroid disease he said well that is absolutely true and yet he doesn't speak for the president you know when people ask trump about this well we'll see yeah maybe i don't know whatever he doesn't care about this stuff it's going to be whoever pays him the most money and rfk jr is right it is industrial waste and these people who pushed this thing

through totally corrupt knew that it was harmful and they knew that they would have to dispose of this toxic waste and they would have to pay to dispose of it or they could get that they would have to dispose of this toxic waste, and they would have to pay to dispose of it. Or they could buy control of the Dental Association, American Dental Association, and tell everybody you need to have it to protect from tooth decay. And then they could, instead of having to pay to dispose of it, they could get the local communities to pay them to dump it in the water. But none of this, in this article, and not RFK Jr., nobody goes to the fundamental argument, I believe. The fundamental argument is, okay, let's say that it's safe, and let's say that it's effective. Then why would you medicate people in the water supply? Why would you ever put any medication, no matter how effective or safe it is, in the water supply? Because if it is effective, it is effective at

a certain dosage. And it's ineffective if it's lower. And if it's safe, it's only safe at a certain level. And it's unsafe if the dosage level is higher. How do you control the dosage when you dump it in the water supply? You can't. And even if you could ensure uniform distribution, and I don't think you can, even if you could do that, then what dosage are you supposed to give to an adult male versus a toddler? They're getting the same dosage are you supposed to give to an adult male versus a toddler they're getting the same dosage

so um cnn says so what is fluoride well it's found naturally in the environment they say you see how they're weaponized against this it's just amazing the lies that come out with this no common sense tells you that no matter what it is you don't want to medicate people through the through the water supply do you if you're dumping stuff what it is, you don't want to medicate people through the water supply, do you? If you're dumping stuff in the water supply, you've got a different agenda other than people's health. Why is fluoride controversial, says CNN? Well, a federal judge in September ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to take additional measures to regulate fluoride in drinking water because of a possible risk that higher levels of the mineral could affect children's intellectual development. So you see, possible, could, no.

They know that's the case. And they know that levels above what they just lowered it to. After this case began, they drug their feet on this case from the Fluoride Action Network. They drug it for about a decade. And as it was starting to come to a head, they said, we need to cover ourselves. We've got these studies that show, yes, it does significantly lower children's IQ at a certain level. So let's make sure that, and that level is lower than what we allow. So let's lower it to that level.

But they don't have any way to control that level if they're going to dump it into the water supply so experts agree that despite the politicization of the issue more research is needed yeah right now we've known about this since 1945 we've known about this we don't need more time we don't need more research we know what the issue is just like we know what the issue is on the trump shots uh so he had an assistant professor they quote from university of florida's college of public health protecting vulnerable populations from environmental toxicants is a non-partisan matter that should remain informed by the current state of the science and i would argue that more research is needed blah blah blah so when it comes to fluoride that they've been using for all this amount of time um well we got

to do the research right they didn't do the research on the warp speed stuff why don't we use that same standard when it comes to the trump shots uh we didn't go through 80 years of study and then say that we've got to do a little bit more research and go through 80 days of this stuff the nih also agrees that higher levels of fluoride lower iq every Everybody knows that. All the studies know that. Harvard said it. All of them did. 2019 study looking at Canadian mothers and children

found that for each additional one milligram per liter in concentration of fluoride in a mother's urine, there was a four and a half point drop in IQ in males. Oh, so keep it up. Because we want males dumbed down and helpless and again as you talk about changing the concentration so you're going to dump it into the water supply a cdc recommends community water fluoridation nevertheless that's just how reprehensible they are that's another argument for why they need to

be shut down uh and even cnn says well fluoride can result in skeletal fluorosis weaker bones joint pain too much fluoride can lead to dental fluorosis where you get white specks and and lines on your teeth instead of helping your teeth. But they don't care about the adult dosage. They don't care about the dosage. Just dump it in the water. If we got too much of it, it does all these things, but just dump it in the water.

So why is it in our water supply, they said. Well, this has been done, they said, since 1945, nearly three quarters of the U.S. population, about 209 million people. You wonder why we got such low IQ in the U.S. population, about 209 million people. You wonder why we've got such low IQ in the U.S.? It's by design, folks. Other countries don't poison their people with fluoride. Even CNN says, so if we've got fluoride in our toothpaste, why do we need it in our water?

As a matter of fact, if you think you need more of it, you can get pills. We had a pediatrician try to push that on us with a visit. We didn't know better at the time. We just took our boys in for a wellness visit. And he says, well, you're in well water? Well, let me prescribe some fluoride pills for you. And it's like, no, we don't need that. I always grew up on well water. I don't think my kids need fluoride. Oh, you need to have fluoride. And so we said, sure, give us a prescription. We threw it in the trash and never went back to this guy. Studies have determined that it does lead to a difference of decay, they said,

but only in about a quarter of a tooth on average. So there you go. Out of one, one out of every four people might save a cavity. It's definitely worth the chance that we're going to lower the kids IQ. Don't you think so? No, it's not about risk and benefit for you. It's about risk for you and dollars for them. And that's when they talk about risk and benefit.

That's always a trade-off, folks. Whether you're talking about the dangerous antibiotics like Cipro and all the rest of these things, or whether you're talking about the vaccines, it's always your risk and their benefit yeah it's just like a public cost and privatize the profits just like crony capitalism because it is crony capitalism um so they say if you're worried about fluoride intake says cnn the final message is if you're worried about it you can switch to bottled water you can look for water filters you can filter out the fluoride. You can make sure your kids don't swallow their toothpaste. Why is it, by the way, that we have that warning on any toothpaste that's got fluoride in it?

If you swallow this, call poison control. Oh, don't drink more water. And CNN's bottom line is, hey, if you don't like fluoride, then you filter it out yourself, but we're going to still dump it in the water because that's where the money is, right? You're still going to be taxed to put it inside the water, and then you'll have to pay to buy filters and other things like that or to buy water that somebody else has filtered. But we're going to keep dumping it in the water and so again one cavity out of four people is the best case that they can make for all this stuff um so when trump was asked about it uh he said well I haven't talked to RFK jr. about it yet but it sounds okay to

me yeah I guess it's possible RFK jr. has also said that we need to get big pharma ads off of TV Donald Trump to do in order to correct the chronic disease epidemic is to ban pharmaceutical advertising on TV. There's only two countries in the world that allow pharmaceutical advertising on the airwaves. One of them is New Zealand and the other is allow pharmaceutical advertising on the airwaves. One of them is New Zealand and the other is us. And we have the highest disease rate and we buy more drugs and they're more expensive than anywhere in the world.

Italy spends about one-sixth of what we spend. That's right. And the real purpose of the Ask Your Doctor ads is not to convince us. It's to own the media so the media doesn't do any of these troublesome investigations like 60 Minutes used to do. So they don't shove a microphone into Albert Borla's face and ask him some uncomfortable questions. Or Alex Azar. I don't know if he, I guess he's not and ask him some uncomfortable questions. Or Alex Azar. I don't know if he, I guess he's not the CEO of Eli Lilly anymore, but he was after he did the stint for Trump as HHS. The question is, are we going to end their influence?

Well, you know, these guys who have so much money that they can buy the media, they just might buy the president as well. Those are ideas coming from Kennedy. And Kennedy has served a very useful purpose for Trump in this election, to assuage the concerns of conservatives about how Trump turned us over to the pharmaceutical industry to be poisoned. Well, now we've got RFK Jr. coming in, and we're going to make America healthy again. Folks, keep your eyes open. I think that is a fraud.

Kennedy told supporters last week Trump had promised to give him control over several public health agencies like the Department of HHS. And he said fluoride is an industrial waste, as I pointed out before. CDC named nationwide fluoridation of drinking water one of the 10 greatest public health interventions of the 20th century. And this is an argument as to why we've got to get rid of public health. Think about public health. Think about public education. Public health doesn't care about the health of the individual public education doesn't care about the education of your child they're both there to dictate to you what you can and cannot do just like public education wants to sexually groom your kids and strip them away from the parents and that has been going on for a long time well you go back to the middle of the 20th century when i grew up well it's still about

getting the kids away from their parents now that was a net effect of government schools at the time and um and now they're doing it in a much more overt way much more direct way a much more pedophilic way but it was about creating creating, well, we've got this generation gap. All these kids are hanging together like Lord of the Flies, and they don't think that their parents know anything, and they're out of touch, and this and that. It was about creating a wedge. That was the thin end of the wedge that was happening when I was growing up, putting that wedge between kids and their parents.

And they've kept widening it and widening it until they've got now pretty much total separation. And now they come after the kids sexually. But when you look at public health, it's about total disregard for the health of the individual. And as I've said for the last four years, what does public health mean if it disregards the health of individuals? Because the public's health is really the collective health of a lot of individuals.

And if you're doing things to harm individuals, you're not doing anything for the public health. So for the first time in more than 50 years, the federal government has lowered the recommended level of fluoride. And they did that during that trial and because of that trial. And so again, in 37 states, you can do something about this at the local level. And you don't need to get Washington to stop this. You can stop it yourself at the local level. So what should be done for the student victims of the Trump shots?

This is coming from Brownstone. A few weeks ago, I was contacted by Congressman Matt Rosendale of Montana. He asked if I would support his new proposed bill called the University Forced Vaccination Student Injury Mitigation Act. The bill would require higher education institutions to pay the medical expenses for any student who is required or is currently required to take a COVID-19 vaccine to attend classes and who then suffered a vaccine injury. Covered diseases would include myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and any other diseases the Secretary of Education determines to be associated with the COVID-19 vaccine.

Isn't it interesting? All these things like myocarditis and pericarditis now become a household word. But of course, we're supposed to pretend that it didn't have anything to do with Trump's shots. Colleges began having these vaccine mandates in April of 2021. By the summer of 2021, over a thousand colleges and universities had announced that students would be required to take these vaccines prior to fall enrollment. And I predicted that in December of 2020. I said they're going to start mandating this for school in the fall when it goes back. And that's going to be when they just wave their hands and say, we've approved it.

And I said, then they're going to mandate it for the military and all the rest of stuff. And of course, Trump already had his order in to mandate it for the military before he left office. He would have done the same thing with that. And most of the mandates were outsourced tyranny. They weren't direct mandates from the Biden administration. They were pressuring corporations that had contracts with the government, or they were pressuring universities that rely on money from the government. They were pressuring it to do it to their own people.

They pressured CMS, Medicare and Medicaid, said, you're going to vaccinate your doctors and nurses or we're going to cut you off of medicare medicaid and it wasn't just that which alone would bankrupt the hospitals but it was the fact that they had been conditioned by trump at that point in time for a year and a half to massive bonuses you point to somebody say they got covid you get thirteen thousand dollars you get a 20% bonus on everything that you do for them. They had become addicted to that money. As I said, it follows this two-step process, bribery and addiction to the money, and then blackmail. You do what I say, or I'm taking all that money that you're so addicted to away. It is the tag team professional wrestling that we see.

So again, there's now just a few colleges that are still requiring this. But looking back, we've had a lot of people who have been injured by it and something needs to be done about it. We have, as they point out, Tom Jefferson at a research institute talking about the flu shots and how our current policy is founded on distorted evidence. The COVID-19 vaccine was easily spotted by those of us who focused on politics

and who had been watching the pharmaceutical industry. Those of us who had seen Dark Winter in 2001 knew they were practicing for this very thing for 20 years. And again, if you know that, the doctors were late coming to this because they had to see people get injured first, I guess. I mean, it should have been a clue that you don't give people a radically different vaccine that's never been tested. mRNA had never been approved as effective or safe.

As a matter of fact, just the opposite. It was ineffective. It was unsafe. Moderna had been around for a decade, and they would constantly come out with a just-so story that they could sell to the people on Wall Street. They would pump their stock up. They would cash out and take the bonuses, and then they'd say, well, the test didn't for the most part. But the people who were looking at it from a political standpoint, who saw it from the governmental standpoint, saw dark winter that happened two months before 9-11, saw the 2005 PrEP Act and all the rest of the stuff, knew about the 1986 Act. We saw this flu thing going year after year. And here is this guy.

His name is this guy. His name is Tom Jefferson. He said, in 2008, we examined several policy documents that are written by influential organizations. No pun intended. Influential. From the WHO, from the UK, from the US, Germany, Australia, and Canada, the WHO estimated that vaccination of the elderly reduced the risk of

serious complications or death by 70 to 85 percent. But what they didn't point out was that this estimate was based on single studies. In the U.S., reductions in the cases, admissions, and mortality of grandma were central arguments for extending vaccination to healthy children aged 6 to 23 months. Therefore, we asked simple questions like who wrote the policy documents, whether there was any method chapter explaining how the bigwigs reached their conclusion. And they exposed that, and we won't go into the weeds of that because I want to move on to the next thing. But again, we knew as they were always talking about this, the Milken Institute,

October 2019, Fauci was asked, how do we get the entire world to take a new flu shot? That's totally different design. How do we do that? And he says, you do it from the inside. You do it with disruption and you do it iteratively. And that's what we have to watch out for with the Trump administration. Something from the inside that is done in a disruptive matter but is done incrementally. And we're not even looking

because now we know Trump is in office. We're safe. Liquid Spark says, fluoride is just another poison. Yep, chemtrails, sugar, et cetera, you poison people you want to kill. They're Satanists. They're ritually sacrificing Christianity. That was the plan for thousands of years.

I agree. Matthew Ronson, the added bonus is, fluoride is another item that ensures a pharmaceutical, chemical treadmill has as many people on it as possible. Yeah, it's about drumming up business. Get you on one drug, now you start getting some adverse effects. Oh, now you're going to need to have a drug for that and a drug for that,

and it's just the multiplying effect. I have seen it with elderly people in my family for a very long time. We'll be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Money and what's going to happen. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Wasn't that the character they played in David Copperfield? Anyway, he says, annual income, 20 pounds. Annual expenditure, 19, 19 and 6. Result, happiness.

Annual income, 20 pounds. Annual expenditure, 20 pounds ought and 6. Result, misery. And he says, well, you know, the problem that we've got with the American government is that we're way more than six pence of a deficit. And that's another thing that we think about as we look at a Trump presidency. You know, he kicked us on a completely new trajectory. He took that curve and just shot it straight up.

And Biden kept doing it, right? It's a tag team professional wrestling thing. He says in a recent article that was called The End of the U.S. Economic and Military Empire and the Rise of Gold, I said, unsustainable deficits, galloping debt levels combined with a crumbling military are the perfect recipe for the end of an empire. Does any of that change with Trump? So we're obviously not talking about a six pence deficit in the case of virtually bankrupt U.S. empire, but instead talking about a debt that is growing exponentially now by several trillions of dollars annually

at a much faster rate. History doesn't just rhyme. It repeats itself over and over and over again. Yeah, because people are fundamentally the same. And so is history then. It's just that the details vary a little bit. He points out that gold is up 78 times since Nixon closed the gold window in 1971. The next phase, he said, is going to be an acceleration.

As I explained in this article, gold will rise by multiples in the coming years, obviously with corrections from time to time. The Roman emperors who ruled the Roman Empire from 190 to 290 AD could argue the same, although the denarius silver coin went from almost 100% silver to zero. I'd say the same thing about our dimes, right? Friedrich Ebert, the president of the Weimar Republic in the early 1920s, would have argued that a Deutschmark is always a Deutschmark,

even after it's lost 100% of its purchasing power. But gold doesn't lie. Measured in real money, an ounce of gold in 1923 was worth 87 trillion Deutschmarks. And of course it was Voltaire who said in 1729 tony talks about all the time paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value zero alan greenspan yeah alan greenspan is an interesting character he was part of ayn rand's inner circle and then everybody

how did somebody who's part of ayn rand's circle, who is philosophically opposed to central planning. How does he become the chair of the Federal Reserve? What's going on here? Has he twisted? Is he our inside agent? Yeah, they would say the same stuff like Trump, you know. Well, he's just playing 4D chess, right? Don't worry, Alan Greenspan's going to come around to our side.

It's like, no, man, he just sold out. He just sold out. Anyway, Alan Greenspan, in 1967, said, In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves see that's why when you put things in like you lock people down you give them a stimulus check you

give them a you know unemployment benefits and all the rest of stuff that was training that was moving the Overton window for universal basic income, which is universal welfare, making us all wards of the state. And it is amazing to me to see people like Charles Murray, who wrote the book Losing Ground just before the Reagan administration. He was talking about how the welfare state had harmed the people who had gone out, for the most part, poor inner-city black people. And that was used as the basis for some Reagan policies,

and it became pretty famous, Charles Murray's thing. We've had Congressman Burgess, the NFL player, who just got reelected in Utah. And he talked about how when he was a young boy, how vibrant the black, he had a strong black family, even though they were not as wealthy. They had strong black families. They had independent businesses. They had entrepreneurs in their society and all the rest of this stuff. And he said, the welfare state has completely eviscerated them. And they

want to do that to everybody, right? And so that's what is so insidious about all of this stuff and it was what was so insidious about the um the lockdown and the stimulus check that was not compassion at all that was like here i'm going to take away your job i'm going to shut down the business that you built with your blood sweat and tears and i'm going to give you a little pittance here to keep you happy bloomberg said we got we're going to take everybody's jobs and we've got to figure out how we're going to keep them from coming after us with guillotines and the way we're going to give you a little pittance here to keep you happy. Bloomberg said, we're going to take everybody's jobs, and we've got to figure out how we're going to keep them from coming after us with guillotines. And the way we're going to do it is with universal basic income, he said. And it was Trump who did it.

And you can expect more of this from J.D. Vance and the technocrats, because universal basic income is a central tenet of the technocracy. If you recall in 2020, you had a guy, let's see if I can recall his name, Yang was his last name. And was it Andrew Yang? I think, anyway, I had set up an interview with him because his central issue, when he started running, he was running on a single issue, and that was universal basic income. And I'd been talking about that for quite some time. And so I really wanted to get him on. I was loaded. I don't typically invite guests on that I want to debate. Usually I'll bring somebody on, and even if I don't agree with them, I'll let them talk because I want people to hear

what they have to say. And then I talk about it it later or whatever but i don't typically debate a guest but i wanted to debate him and at the last minute he canceled because i guess he found out that i really hated universal basic income i didn't say i'm gonna get this chain guy on and yang guy on and i'm gonna uh yank his chain on universal basic i didn't say anything about that just kept quiet about it but i guess they went back and looked at some of the previous stuff that I'd done. But the reason I bring it up is because Elon Musk was the first person to give him money and gave him a tremendous amount of money, like a million dollars or something, which is nothing to him. As I pointed out, Elon Musk has so much money. His net worth, 260260-something billion, and the median net worth of Americans is like $190 or something like that, $1,000. And so he's got more than a million times as much money as the median American.

And so if he gives somebody a million dollars, that'd be like you or me giving somebody a dollar. But he gave Yang a million dollars or more because of universal basic income. Universal basic income is central to the technocracy. And it's another indication that Elon Musk is not who MAGA thinks he is. He's not. So getting back to this and Alan Greenspan,

who was not what people thought he was either. He says, this is the shabby secret of the welfare status tirades against gold, that the welfare state requires there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. You understand the purpose of gold is wealth protection. It's wealth insurance. He said deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth.

In light of that, we've never seen them scheming harder, right? We're told, Alex told people, vote harder. Well, these people are spending harder all the time, and they're spinning us into oblivion. And they are confiscating our wealth by their spending. He said, Alan Greenspan said, gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights if one grasps this one has no difficulty in understanding the status antagonism toward the gold standard well that was when he was still on the right side of the issues that he said that uh he's still

right about that by the way if you want to have some wealth insurance go to david knight dot gold it's great having a website david knight dot gold i think tony arteman set that up for us, if you want to have some wealth insurance, go to davidknight.gold. It's great having a website, davidknight.gold. I think Tony Arterman set that up for us. And if you go there, that will take you to Tony Arterman's Wise Wolf Gold. I've known Tony for a very long time. He's a regular on the show with interviews, and I've known him for a very long time. I trust him. I have used him. I've bought gold from him in the past. And people on this show have never had any complaints from people who – the only complaints I've had is sometimes it's really busy. He's really busy. Sometimes it's hard to get a hold of him. But I think he's – I've not heard anything like that for quite some time.

But I've never heard anybody say that he did the wrong thing. And he's always made everything right with everybody. I really do trust tony and um you know it's uh this is going to be a time when things are going to change very very rapidly and so um again if you want to try make sure that you have got some uh essentially gold uh some wealth insurance uh take a look at davidknight.gold. I'll take it, Tony. He can help you to accumulate gold gradually through Wolfpack. He can set you up on a savings program that is very effective.

And we are closing in on the, I guess we could say the fourth turning. We're coming into the very, very ending of the fourth turning. And I had, here it is, here it is. I was looking for an article from Burning Platform. And Quinn was talking about the fourth turning. He talks about it frequently. And why it is something that people need to understand. If you look at the early 90s, Strauss and Howe predicted a pattern about every 80 years,

we have massive societal upheaval. Always it's financial. Frequently it is accompanied by war. And they said, you know, the last one we had was World War II and the the great depression prior to that we had the civil war prior to that we had the american revolution they went back and they saw an 80-year cycle through american and english history and they pointed out that everybody is on the same cycle now we pretty much synced up everyone worldwide on all of this. And he said that, you know, about the mid-2000s, as they were writing in the early 90s, they put their book out, I think, 92, 93, they coined the term millennial. And they said sometime in the mid-2000s, there'll be a global

financial crisis. We saw that 2007, 2008, that'll kick off the fourth turning. And it should finish by sometime around 2029. When does this next presidential term finish? Right about that time. It's going to be a very dangerous time. I think things are going to accelerate quickly. Make sure that you have taken preparations. We talked yesterday about prepping and the different things that can be done with that. But also make sure that you have made some financial preparations in terms of having some backdrop for your wealth. And I'm trying to find this article about the fourth turning, and I can't find it on here. But nevertheless, that is the time that we are in. And so don't go to sleep.

Don't allow this to be a pacifier, this Trump presidency. Don't make that a pacifier in your mouth. It is a very dangerous time where things are going to happen very, very suddenly. And all of these things have been put into place. As many people are talking about it, one of the possibilities of them putting Trump in, and again, I think I'm not somebody that subscribes to the theory of elections putting trump in and again i think i'm i'm not somebody that subscribes to the theory of elections for presidents uh not anymore i've been looking at this stuff too too closely one of the theories about that is that they've uh set up this uh janga game so that it's about ready to fall on the table and they can put it in the laps of the people that they don't want to, of their enemies, so they can blame them.

That is quite possibly what we're looking at here. And so, again, thank you for tuning in today. And I would like to say before we close out, please keep Travis and his wife and their young baby in your prayers. We appreciate your prayers. We don't know what is happening with them for the last three hours. We've not been updated with that. But she's having difficulty delivering, and they may have to do a cesarean. So we ask you to pray for God to protect both the baby and the mother in that.

Thank you very much. And we'll talk more about what is happening and whether or not the House turns Democrat or not. We'll talk about that tomorrow. Thank you for listening. I am the man in the baby. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show,

please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds.

It's the David Knight Show.