The David Knight Show - Wed Episode #1982: Humanoid Robots About to Have “iPhone Moment” as Apple Creates AI Agent ‘Doctor’; Musk $100M Green Prize to Grab CO2

Episode Date: April 2, 2025

Vaccines — 150 Years of Deadly “Medicine”     1875 postcard from the Society for Suppressing Compulsory Vaccination unearth the truth about vaccines then and now     Decades of NIH data and a buried 2005 study reveal flu vaccines don’t save seniors, they kill them      Catch-Up Shots Killing Kids with the One Year “Check-Up” the Deadliest     More evidence of turbo cancer in young children and the possibility of cancer transmission Trump’s Crypto Conflict of Interest and Cash Grab CorruptionGet ready for the ultimate betrayal—Trump’s World Liberty Financial raked in $550 million, with his family pocketing $400 million in fees! This crypto con, masked as “decentralized finance,” is a centralized scam to enrich the Trumps while they quietly push us to digital cash/ID Musk’s Dark MAGA AI Dictatorship — what they want and how they propose to get it Musk’s $100 Million CO2 Con: Green Grift Goes OnElon Musk’s dangling a $100 million prize to whoever can suck vast amounts of CO2 from the air, teaming up with Trump’s pipeline cronies to wreck the planet for profit! Set to crown winners on Earth Day, it isn’t saving the Earth—it’s a billionaire’s bonanza! Apple Readies “AI Agent Doctor” & Robotics is About to Have An “iPhone Moment”, Going ViralApple’s is nearing release of an AI agent to act as “doctor”, spy on your life, and dox you to whoever pays them.  But that’s just the start: AI agents and humanoid robots are exploding onto the scene, with NVIDIA’s CEO predicting streets swarming with bots by 2030 and the CEO of Figure says the 3 necessary tech hurdles to enable the trillion-dollar bot boom are here. It’s totalitarianism meets voyeuristic tech terror Huckabee Tosses Christ & the Trinity Aside for Zionism Politics    Mike Huckabee’s senate hearing stunner—calling Mormons, Jews, and Christians “people of the book”.  Which book?      The ex-pastor’s Zionist pandering uses Christ as a prop for political powerMonkey with a Grenade: Ukraine’s Nuclear Doomsday Plot The ousted Zelensky insider who predicted Russia’s invasion three years early and was fired for spilling the truth about a cruise missile blunder, warns America sees Ukraine as a “monkey with a grenade”—and for good reason based on the doomsday scenario of Ukraine’s military intelligence chief, BudanovIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTFor 10% off supplements and books, go to RNCstore.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Music In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 2nd of April, year of our Lord 2025. Well today is liberation day, except we don't exactly know how Trump is going to liberate us yet. They are still deliberating on the liberation. It will not be revealed until this afternoon, giving themselves as much time as possible to cram for this final exam here. But, um, we're going to be talking today about Trump and his defy scam.

Yeah. So you're not only defies the constitution, but he also has a decentralized financial scheme to make himself and his family very rich and to change regulations to enhance their chances of that happening. We're going to take a look at that as well as the absurd war against the Houthis. As David Stockman said, I don't give a hoot about the Houthis. So we'll see why we shouldn't care about that, but we should be concerned about our own government.

And we have another statement from Alexei Rustovitch, the guy that I've talked about in the past in Ukraine, saying that the U S government rightfully regards the Zelensky administration as a monkey with a hand grenade. What an appropriate description. I want to begin however today with health news because I think this is really at the center of this. The dog that did not bark and all of this maha stuff is the fact that we still have the vaccine there. Yeah, we can cheer the fact that Marx is now gone, Peter Marx, I think Peter was his first name, M-A-R-K-S, not M-A-R-X. And we can look at the horrific things

that he did during the pandemic scare, the fraud, under both Trump and Biden, but the vaccine is still there. This doctor may be gone from the FDA, but the vaccine remains. And I want to talk a little bit about vaccines in general. You know, 150 years ago in 1875, this is a real find, Dr. Tess Lorry found a postcard from the Society for Suppressing Compulsory Vaccination 150 years ago. They're concerned about that. That was well before the case in Massachusetts that went to the Supreme Court. People like Alan Dershowitz have inaccurately expressed that as the ability of the government to force you to get a vaccine.

That was not what happened in that particular case. It was going to be compulsory vaccines. And the person who fought and lost was fined, but he was never vaccinated. So Dr. Tess Laurie highlighted a postcard from the Society for Suppressing Compulsory Vaccination that some people were getting in 1875. It gave them four reasons not to get vaccinated and I said do not be deceived. Think for yourself. There is a long tradition of those who hold anti-vaccine views and I'm proud to say that I am an anti-vaxxer. Yeah, Travis pull that up. They got a picture of the postcard there. Number one, they said vaccination affords no protection against

fill in the blank. That's the common thing we see. In this particular case, they were saying smallpox. In Birmingham last year, nearly 600 persons mostly vaccinated died of smallpox. Although the public vaccinator received in 1873 in fees and awards for successful vaccinations 1173 pounds now that is a fortune i meant to look that up i know it's it's easier to look up the uh inflation effects on the dollar than it is the pound uh i forgot to go back and look that up but i can the dollar than it is the pound. I forgot to go back and look that up, but I can tell you that it is a fortune. If you go back and look at the dollar amounts that were bandied about in the Charles Dickens

novels, 1173 pounds, that is huge. So they afforded no protection against smallpox, but the person who was putting them out there made a lot of money. Hmm, sounds kind of like today. Number two, it so lowers the vitality that they are rendered more liable to other diseases. Oh, that also sounds familiar, doesn't it? So we've known this for a long time. I didn't know this all my life, unfortunately, but yeah, this has been known for 150 years. Number three, great risk is incurred of contaminating their blood with loathsome and incurable maladies. Yeah, back then they had issues with garbage in the vaccines as well,

just like we do with the Trump shots today. But of course, our regulatory agencies don't care about that. We don't care if there's all kinds of DNA trash and other things that are in there. Who knows what they put in there? Just take it. So they said in 1872, 73 and 74, they said, �1074 infants and children under the ages of 5 died of syphilis in London alone. Thousands of children were vaccinated and contaminated.� So they believe that their vaccines were contaminated with syphilis. Of course, we have SV40, many other things, junk DNA. And number four, death often follows. They sum it up by saying, be not deceived, think for yourself, the insertion of corrupt

diseased matter, falsely called vaccine, into the blood of healthy infants can produce nothing, but its legitimate fruit and that is corruption, disease and death. Well, nothing has really changed for 150 years. So the success, quote unquote, of the smallpox vaccination program is given as justification for the burgeoning vaccine industry. Yet clearly this was not the case. You know, they lied to us about smallpox. They lied to us about polio.

Those are not, and of course in the future, guess what? They're probably going to tell everybody, you know we had this horrific COVID pandemic and the thing that stopped it was Donald Trump's vaccine. He saved millions of lives, you know. Clearly this was not the case. The smallpox program was harmful. It caused more disease than it prevented. They finished the article, this is, you'll find this by the way, on ExposeNews.com.

They said, let's think for ourselves and let's stand firm in the protection of all children from the needle cult. That's it. Or we could say from those pricks. That's kind of inclusive. The people administering it as well as what they are administering. NIH has known for decades that flu vaccines do not reduce death among the elderly but instead increases death amongst the elderly. You know, the flu vaccines prior to COVID were by far and way ahead of all the other vaccines in terms of adverse effects

and VAERS. In 2006, CBS News reported that despite a significant increase in the percentage of seniors getting flu shots from 15 to 65 percent over two decades, the death rate among the elderly did not decrease as expected. Instead, the death rate amongst the elderly increased substantially. You know, this is something that Cheryl Atkinson was involved in. That's one of the reasons why they fired her. They didn't like her actually doing investigative journalism. Because, you know, by 2006, they had corporate sponsors with the pharmaceutical industry. That stuff began in the 1990s. I remember when it happened, when we first saw it.

We had moved to our home in North Carolina, was way out in the woods and it was really far away from – we couldn't get cable that was wired into us. We were not in the broadcast path of cellphones or TVs or anything so we couldn't get any I Didn't go to a whole lot of trouble trying to get rabbit ears or anything like that or a big antenna But we didn't get any reception of television We didn't have cable. We didn't have cell phone Barely kitty what didn't even have reliable pager service.

Kind of interesting. It was great being there actually. Probably a real healthy environment for the kids to go up in. But we were surprised when we traveled and checked into a hotel in the 90s. And I kept seeing one of these ask your doctor commercials after the other. I thought wow, they've really taken over the news and they have. And so 2005, they did 2006, actually the study was done in 2005, released and Cheryl Atkinson pushed it out in 2006 against the wishes of CBS.

It was the NIH that did the study, a definitive study that was intended to actually prove for the first time once and for all that flu vaccines were beneficial to the elderly. The study was published in JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association. It was then covered up. But Susan Atkinson at the time aired a report on it in 2006. In her report she interviewed Dr. Thomas Reichert, a co-author of the study. She had originally agreed to interview the lead author of the study, a person named Simonson, but Simonson's bosses at the NIH blocked the interview. The NIH didn't want you to know what this study was.

And so she found somebody who was an independent of the US government and was able to interview him. Atkinson said, here's what the scientists have found. Over 20 years, a percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from 15 to 65%. That stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip, but instead flu deaths amongst the elderly continued to climb. Dr. Reichert said, We realized that we had incendiary material. They not only checked the data to make sure that what they found was correct, we've looked

at other countries now and the same is true. Again, he was involved in the study but he didn't work for the NIH. The NIH was going to keep that study quiet. So is the Journal of American Medical Association. You see, they're not interested in your health, folks. As a matter of fact, they will do whatever they can to make money and they don't care one bit if they cripple or kill you. That's what the American Medical Association, that's what the US government's HHS is 100%

about and the pharmaceutical industry. Atkinson revisited her investigation on her blog in 2015. She emphasized how these vaccines might kill people instead of saving them. The researchers said they were surprised that the data did not support their assumption at all. The data actually shows the number of deaths increased after vaccination. 60% of the people aged 65 and over have an enormously increased risk of death if they get the flu shot.

So then last year, she again reminded her readers on her subtype page doing it about every 10 years She said an important and definitive mainstream government study done nearly two decades ago Got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side the wrong side financially Because these people don't care about your health. They have nothing but contempt for your health. They're mass murderers for hire. They found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly

in the mass vaccination program, increased substantially the number of deaths. Well, one of the things that I've talked about before is the catching up of vaccines on kids who are fortunate enough to have missed them. And this is one of the most dangerous things, really dangerous. They find out that a kid hasn't been vaccinated. Remember the case talked about a few months ago, I think it was last fall, situation where you have a couple who decided that they don't want to get their kids vaccinated.

They moved from Illinois, I think, to Tennessee because they wanted to have a conservative upbringing or whatever. But they fell out and they had a divorce. And the lawyer, her lawyer, got wind of the fact that the judge was a big, big vaccine advocate. And so he brought that up and the judge said, what, you haven't had these kids vaccinated? That's child abuse.

He said, whichever parent agrees to have these kids caught up, I'm going to give you custody right now. You walk out of here, well, she did it. She did it. And so they took the three children, the oldest one a girl, then two younger boys to a place where they decided they were going to catch them up on the vaccines. Gave them like a dozen vaccines, although they split it for the girl because they already knew that she had some allergy issues or something

like that. But the two boys got all of them all at once and they both immediately had to go into intensive care at the hospital. One of them came out and after several days the other one it took much, much longer. When he came out he has such severe autism that he doesn't know anything. His father, who now has custody because the mother abandoned them after she did that to them, the father has to take this previously healthy child for the rest of his life, change his diapers. He doesn't know what's going on.

That's what the mother, that's what the judge, that's what the pharmaceutical companies, that's what the lawyer all did to that child. It's just amazing when we look at this stuff. And we just ask God, why do the wicked prosper? And how long will it be before they're brought to judgment? We have another one now. This baby died after getting six shots for 12 vaccines.

The doctor said the catching up of kids on vaccines is very common, but it is also very dangerous. The nurse who administered the shots said the one-year-old needed them to catch up on her vaccinations that she had missed at her six-month appointment. I talked about this the other day. It's a couple of dozen that they want to give you in your first year. The first one they try to give you just hours after the child is vaccinated, you know, to protect you against hepatitis.

What's that for? How are you exposed to hepatitis at that point? Anyway, then they continue with this. The big ones are six months and the really big one, it's really dangerous, is at the one-year checkup. And so about 12 hours after the baby girl was given six shots for 12 vaccines during a wellness visit, she died. This is according to the baby's mother, Nelson, who is her last name.

Nelson said that she told the nurse that she was uncomfortable having the baby receive so many shots at once. According to others, the nurse became angry and told the mother, � needs these shots. You've got to give her these shots. Very similar to what happened in Samoa in 2018, where the mothers are lined up to give their kids two years old at that point in time, some MMR shots. And baby gets it and immediately dies. And the other mothers are, okay, we're leaving. No, we're leaving no no no no no that doesn't have anything to do with the vaccine come on in and they convinced him the next mother goes in her child gets the MMR shot dies immediately they brought all that stuff up again at the RFK jr.

confirmation hearing to try to blame RFK jr. for that these people in Samoa didn't need RFK jr. to tell them that the vaccines were dangerous. But yeah, she needs these shots. You've got to get her these shots. You can't leave, blah blah blah. We've had doctors like that. Within hours after receiving the shots, the baby girl's eyes rolled back and she began foaming at the mouth. The police ended up coming, said the mother. They told her it looked as if she had had small seizure, but she was breathing okay. The mother recalled the police saying, you guys don't have to take her to the hospital, but if you want to take her to the hospital to make sure that she's okay, then you could

do that. So she said, I looked at my baby and I said, no, my baby's not right. This is not my daughter. My daughter is active. As soon as she gets picked up, she's active." She said her eyes were just wandering around. She wasn't responding to me calling her name like she used to. So they got an ambulance that took her to the hospital in Pennsylvania where doctors started running tests on her. They told the mother that it appeared that

the daughter had had four seizures by the time she arrived at the hospital. The mother left the hospital room to bring in her husband and two older children. The parents and the older children hadn't been in the waiting room for more than two minutes when a nurse told them, �I'm sorry, but your daughter, she's very sick right now. She is in cardiac arrest.� Her heart wasn't responding to CPR and her blood sugar level was over 700. So she said, one person who was commenting on this, so said the American Academy of Pediatrics has quote encouraged clinicians to take every opportunity to catch babies up on vaccines.

Catch them up. Why? You know, for money. Some babies do not have the liver function or the detoxification capacity to handle a cumulative aluminum load. Hey it's basically sugar water said Alex Jones, right? For years. They have aluminum that mercury and other kind of stuff. You don't take that stuff, it'll kill you. Then it's like you can take that it's, you can take that, it's Trump. It's fine, it's Trump, it's 40 chess, it's sugar water. It's what he said, quote unquote, sugar water. Played that clip for you over and over again.

How despicable to see somebody do that for money, just like these nurses and hospitals and pediatricians are doing it for money. Like the government is doing it for money, and of course the pharmaceutical companies, and then these media whores, like Alex Jones. Vaccines stress mitochondria, the powerhouse of the cell. Some babies do not have enough mitochondrial reserve to tolerate the oxidative stress of multiple vaccines on the same day. But insurance companies are bribing the

pediatricians. I've talked about that in the past as well. If the pediatricians don't get, this is where the mania comes in. Some money goes back to the money, follow the money. The pediatricians, if they don't have a certain percentage of the kids up to date on their vaccines, then the insurance company will cut what they pay them across the board on every service. You know, the same way that if you, like Biden said, if you don't get your nurses and doctors and hospital personnel mandated with this Trump shot, I'm going to cut your CMS. Not only is he going to cut the bonus that Trump gave them to vaccinate

people, the bonus he gave them to point a finger at somebody and say they had COVID, the bonus that Trump had given them to put them on ventilators and remdesivir and medazolam and all these things that would kill people, not only was he going to cut the Trump bonus, but he was going to cut out all Medicare and Medicaid funding. but he was going to cut out all Medicare and Medicaid funding. You should be very concerned about the person that Donald Trump has put in position at CMS, Dr. Oz. He has been on the wrong side of every medical issue. He's been one of the pioneers in pushing transgenderism for children. He's pushed vaccines. He's pushed the pandemic and all the rest of this stuff. He's pushed abortions. On every issue, Dr.

Oz has been wrong. Trump support him for Senate. Trump is putting him in charge of CMS where the financial purse strings are. And it is the purse strings that they use to kill us. And the person he puts in is Dr. Oz. How many times, how many data points do you need to see what Donald Trump is? So insurance companies offer pediatricians bonus payments if they do the right thing. Otherwise they can, if they don't have 80% of their patients fully vaccinated by the age of two, they start cutting their insurance stuff. Again, it's bribery and it's blackmail. Same thing presidents do.

Insurance companies do it as well. Seems like a wise man once said, the love of money is the root of all evil. Oh yeah, that was Jesus, wasn't it? People will sell you out. They will sell their soul to the devil. They will sell you and your family out if you let them. Do not take your kids and get them vaccinated. The one-year visit is the most dangerous visit of all.

It may well become the most dangerous visit of all, especially because pediatricians are now giving the COVID jab. As a matter of fact, I got a clip here I'm going to play for you of them talking about turbo cancer in very, very young children. The oncologist said, I've never seen these kinds of cancers in kids before. One of the robot comments there, and again you can see this is a person who's a bot, they've got no followers, they're gonna, and they put it on there, kids don't get the COVID shot. Wow, wow, I didn't even bother to respond

to that bot. So, the author of Vax Vax, What to Consider Before Vaccinating at All Ages and Stages of Life, this is one thing you consider. Just don't do it. I'm sure that it may be convincing to some other people, but if you look at the fact that they have no legal liability with 1986, that should be the thing right there that tells you. You don't have to look at the medical stuff. You don't need the doctors competing studies. You're not gonna understand all the stuff that they say about the body anyway. They don't understand it. If they can name it, they can claim it, right? You've got the prosperity gospel pastors like Paul White, the frauds out there, name it and claim it. Well these people in science do the same thing. You've got the prosperity gospel pastors like Paula White, the frauds out there, I'm naming and claiming it. Well these people in science do the

same thing. You've got a lot of scientists who are name it and claim it. I can put a name on this that you can't pronounce and pretend that I understand what it's about because I can pronounce that name that I gave it, right? It's the same kind of game that the left uses on debate. So we're going to call ourselves woke. Oh, okay. Well, we'll call you woke too. Well, anyway, he said in his chapter on sudden infant death syndrome or SIDS, that infant deaths are happening right after vaccines with 78.3% percent dying the first week after vaccines. So a close correlation of vaccines to SIDS with a kid who dies suddenly unexplained. They said, we don't know what causes it. Well, 78 percent of those kids who died had just had a vaccine less than a week before. I played

many times. The mother broke down in tears and said, I just realized I killed my child who died of SIDS. She realized that when they started talking about sudden adult death syndrome. It's like, wait a minute. That's the same, that's driven by the vaccine. But she did not kill her child. These people did. Vaccines are killing our children, said Thomas. There is data showing that for every vaccine on the childhood schedule, your child is more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease that the vaccine supposedly covers. But we got some, you know, well it was Peter Marks, I thought that

I couldn't remember his first name. it was Peter Marks. I thought that I couldn't remember his name first name Yeah, Peter Marks has now been forced out of the top vaccine Official position and a lot of people are cheering and rightfully so he should not have been there and what he did was absolutely Reprehensible the FDA has forced dr. Peter Marks to resign as the director for the Center for biologics evaluation research Marks played a key role in operation warp speed for the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Marx played a key role in Operation Warp Speed for the Trump mRNA vaccine. In a bitter resignation letter, he accused Robert Kennedy Jr. of misinformation. Well this is all good, but hey, why don't we stop the jab?

That would be the most important thing to do, would be to stop the jab. Well what I wanted to tell you about the childhood cancer, this is Dr. Patrick Soon-Shlong who said, �For the first time in my career I have seen an 8-year-old, 9-year-old, a 10-year-old with colon cancer.� This is something that usually happens with elderly people. And yet he is seeing it, he said, for the first time. Here's what he had to say. So this idea of the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines is real science. We need to talk about it. And guess what? Not only are we gonna have two big crises

about the recovery of California over the next decade, but we're gonna have to address the rising incidence of cancer for the first time in my career. I've seen an eight-year-old, nine-year-old, 10-year-old with colon cancer. The first time in my career, I've had a 13 year old child in our clinic

die of metastatic pancreatic cancer. We have to face this effectiveness and face reality. The good news is that we can do something about it. The good news now, there are effective therapies because we understand the science in such an immense way. Well, we understand the vaccine size, don't we? How could people not see this?

I said from the very beginning when Moderna said, we're going to turn your body into a vaccine manufacturing facility. They said that in the meeting that Trump set up. Go around the table, how long is it gonna take you? Too long, how about you? That's faster, but it's not fast enough. And of course he had them all in declining speed. He knew the answer.

Last one, Moderna said, we can do it right now because we're gonna turn your body into a vaccine manufacturing facility. So we can do it right now. Great, we're gonna go with you. So, oh, oh, we're gonna test any of this stuff and what is it if it turns your body into a manufacturing facility for spike proteins? What stops that? I asked at the very beginning. I said, where is the off switch? Well, turns out there isn't

an off switch. Played a clip for you last week of a nurse who said, 1500 days later and my body is still manufacturing the spike. Still, we're seeing people die horrific deaths from blood clots as Jack Lawson pointed out last week. By the way, his book is now back in stock and he's got a new website, jacklawsonbooks.com. So you can get civildefense manual dot com now is a good time to take a look at that he had some very incompetent people that that let his book run out so he's taken over the he had to find somebody else to print it and then he has taken over the distribution of that himself so you can

now find that at Jack LawawsonBooks.com. But the reason I bring him up is that horrific story about his mother-in-law, where they started with their toes, blood clots, and turning black. And they said, we're going to have to amputate them because we may have gangrene set in. The toes on one foot, then later the toes on the other foot, then the foot, then the other foot, then the leg, and the other leg, now up to the arm. And it's just amazing how horrific this is. But getting back to the spike and the tumors, this is Dr. Kevin McKiernan, who found the

colon cancer biopsy of a man who died after four Pfizer injections, found that he had the spike proteins in the tumors. We don't exactly know where this came from. We know he got four Pfizer vaccines. This is different than any other vaccine we've sequenced from them, but we've only sequenced two Pfizer lots to date ever. So they could have multiple versions out there. This could maybe be their first version of this that hit Germany early and they changed to get rid of the CMV promoter later. But if you want to line these up to other vaccines, so the one on the left is what is

actually BNT 162b2. This is something that's never been described before. It has that red box, that CMV promoter, but it is a backbone that's a commonly used plasmid in the field. When people want to study coronaviruses, they plug spike protein into this thing, or the sequence, to look for how the variants change. You may have heard alpha, delta, omega.

Well, they're always categorizing these variants of concern by taking the spike they find in nature, throwing it into that backbone, and saying, how does it behave differently in mammalian cells? So this PC, this little thing is known as PCDNA3. This plasmid is all over the country in terms of research laboratories.

So we can't entirely pin this on Pfizer, although that's probably the most likely place where it came from, he was injected. It could in fact have leaked from a laboratory doing that type of work. This just shows you the kind of the parts and the components that are the same and different between the two different flavors of these things that we have found.

But as I mentioned before, the first hypothesis that's going to come at us is saying, you guys contaminated this again, right? Well, the reason why that doesn't fit is we've never handled those plasmids in our life before. Neither lab has ever seen those. And you can't take a plasmid and put it onto formalin-fixed tissue and get it to make spike protein, because that formalin fixation is kind of like carbon freezing Han Solo. The cells just are not translationally active after you've done that, so you can't put a plasmid on formalin-fixed tissue and get spike to show up. This person has spike IHC, that means they were translationally competent. When the plasmid was there, they had to be alive. So I don't think that's the answer, but you'll see that in the next fact check, I'm sure.

So Pfizer could have more than one plasmid out in the marketplace. That would be a huge shock because they have never disclosed it to anybody. That'd be a problem. And they have one that's much more dangerous. This is being, we're finding this in a colon cancer sample and it's making spike protein. It's a very high copy number, which means it it is replication competent which means it could be transmissible Transmissible cancer is really not something we want in the world Transmissible cancer hmm you know when you look at this though

there's a lot of medical jargon and what he was saying and you don't really need to understand that you know they will sometimes talk about epigenetics and Disease and things like that. I think when we look at this disease of politics, we can look at the epi politics around this. Again, you get your understanding. I, my understanding comes from things like the 1986 vaccine protection law, dark winter associated with nine 1111, then running these false flag attacks

and then practicing dark winter for 20 years and then rolling it out exactly as practiced by Donald Trump. And again, it goes way, way, way before the final one that was done in the fall of 2019, the event 201 thing. It goes back to Dark Winter. It's even more damning in my opinion that they practiced it for 20 years and that they had had the foresight, used the false flag, the anthrax false flag the week after 9-11, used that to push out their legislation so that they could have the states do all of this stuff when given money by the presidency

So it runs out there for a long time, but you hear that I'm talking about a transmissible cancer One person commented and said here's a fact five years ago. You had to pay for a colonoscopy today They're pushing them and there are no costs involved Hmm. I didn't know that. Well, that's their experience. I don't know. But look, what are you going to do about it? Go to rncstore.com.

Again, I interviewed G. Edward Griffin. I interviewed the owner of RNC stores, both of them. And first I interviewed him about what he was doing there. When I found out the story about Jedwood Griffin's A World Without Cancer, folks, as bad as the cancer of the Federal Reserve is, I think Jedwood Griffin's big contribution was The World Without Cancer. And so you can get that book there at rnc.com. You can get apricot seeds, which I'm sure the Journal of the American Association, Medical Association, JAMA, and the AMA, and the FDA would love to be able to ban you from eating

apricot seeds, but they don't have that power yet. But there's a lot of evidence in that book that J. Edward Griffin put together, because he's fearless. He doesn't care if they come after him. He put together the evidence for the effectiveness of apricot seeds. And you can get them in pill form as well, if you need to get it in pill form. Again, you can go to RNCstore.com. You can save 10% off and help this show if you use the code NIGHT. But I'm not doing this for that. I'm doing this because we need to get the word out about how they're creating cancer,

about how they're not effectively treating cancer, and how they're blocking effective treatments of cancer at the same time. Well, the mRNA vaccines have been linked to genetic changes that cause not only cancer, but also autoimmune disorders. And that is something that all the vaccines have been doing for quite some time, especially in combination. They have linked the Trump shot, also known as the mRNA COVID vaccine. I always call it the Trump GCI genetic code injection. That's what I called it from the beginning. A study by 19 German scientists was published last week in molecular systems biology. The researcher said their findings may account for post-vaccination inflammatory

diseases which are occurring with people. Alex Berenson also covered that study. He said the mRNA vaccines according to the study train immune cells to sustain a pro-inflammatory immune response. Well, they also keep continually reproducing in many cases. They said serious concern about long-term immune homeostasis and the potential for chronic inflammatory disease, autoimmune and even cancer. They said that repeat injection leads to a boatload of immunological modifications and this is not new information and it's not surprising to me that they found it," said an immunologist and biochemist Jessica Rose.

If the systemic reach goes far enough, such as to stem cells, then repeated injection could potentially induce epigenetic changes in these cells, especially since hematopoietic stem cells are known to develop innate immune memory in response to certain stimuli like infections or other vaccines. Epigenetics refers to how human behavior and the environment can cause changes that affect how genes work. We shouldn't need to start talking about epipolitics. These are behaviors, human behaviors, and the political environment and programs that are really the tells as to what they are doing.

The researchers examined changes in the chromosomes of macrophages, that is, immune cells that circulate in the blood, amongst people who had received the Trump shots. The study found that the vaccines altered a key component of these chromosomes, the histones. If I'm saying that correctly. Sounds like a 50s group, the histones. It's a DNA-minding protein that gives DNA its 3D structure. Most scientific studies on the modification of histones primarily focuses on the manifestation

of disease. The familiar X and Y images of chromosomes are only possible because DNA wraps itself around histone proteins. That's kind of like the backbone of it, if you will. itself around histone proteins. Plants, animals, even fungi that attempt reproduction with a small random mutation that changes the histone protein will not survive. Probably not past this first cell's division. So according to Alex Berenson, this alteration, quote, is known to be found in several different

types of cancer and has attracted increasing scientific attention. And the findings mirror the outcomes of other recent peer-reviewed studies that are looking at these horrific Trump shots. Well, another vaccine injured person has, um, who was compensated. That's really rare, right? Denying these left and right. It's seeking to redact her name because she promotes vaccines. This is how deep the evil love of money is. They know that it hurts other people. They get hurt by themselves. They get compensated for it and it's like, don't tell other people, because I'm selling this stuff, don't tell everybody that it's bad.

So last year, Jessica Berthold applied for compensation from the National Injury Compensation Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for a shoulder injury after getting the flu shot. Again the flu shot. Prior to the Trump shot, the flu shot was the most dangerous out there. Her request was approved, making her one of the few vaccine victims compensated by the program. Approvals for vaccine injury compensation are typically published by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims website and remain publicly available. A claimant has 14 days to request a redaction of identifying information to avoid a quote

unwarranted invasion of privacy, but she missed the 14 days." And then she drew attention to it. I tried to get it removed. She works as the assistant director of public Affairs for Pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco. Her job requires her to advocate for childhood vaccines that injured her, for which she got compensated, for which she doesn't want you to know, because she's going to lie to your face for her job.

She was concerned that her employment might be affected. If it were to know. So she represents the medical center, which follows the academy, the American Academy of Pediatrics guidance on childhood vaccination. You know, get 76 shots. Often feels media queries concerning childhood vaccinations. That's the way that we can remember that.

Seventy-six shots. Seventy-six shots go in. Charmingly. However, she failed to file the request within 14 days. So now we know her name, we know where she works, and we know her lies. Meanwhile, she gets compensated, but I remember talking about this several times, his father is really fighting to get some compensation for his son and they're shutting him down everywhere. And it's not compensation for his son, his

son died. His son was an avid hockey player and the Ontario Hockey League was not going to let him play or any other student play if they didn't get vaccinated. And so he wanted to play hockey so badly that he got vaccinated and he died shortly after that. The father has been doing everything he can to bring some of these people to accountability for this. And now we've had a judge in Ontario shut down this lawsuit. And the reason that he gave is very interesting. This is the Ontario Superior Court. The judge's last name is Antoniani.

He struck down the case without leave to amend, meaning that it has no reasonable prospect of success. The court determined that the government did not owe a private duty of care to this young boy they killed, and that public health decisions, including vaccine approval and promotion, were core policy matters that shielded them from liability. As I've said so many times, this whole idea of public health, public health folks is antithetical to your individual health.

Public education is antithetical to your education. Public transportation is antithetical to you and your private car and your private transportation. They, whenever you put public in front of it, think communist because one of the first public health, if not the first public health commission was done by the Russian communist at the very beginning, right after the revolution. But how do you have public health if you don't care about the health of individuals? Because the public is made up of individuals. Well, because this isn't about health at all. When they put public in front of it, it's not about health.

Public in front of education is not about education. Public in front of transportation is not about transportation. When they put public there, it's about their little communist power game, and that's all it's about. It's not about whatever else they lie to you about. And they have said this over and over again. We don't have a duty to care for you privately and individually, because we've got this nebulous thing called public health. We don't care about the health of any of the individuals inside of public health, but we care about public health, which means that they care about their institution,

they care about their jobs, they care about their bureaucracy, they don't care about health. Sean Hartman was a healthy active teenager from Ontario, passionate about hockey. In the 2021 season, the Ontario Minor Hockey Association imposed a vaccine mandate. Sean complied. He got his first and only dose of the Trump shot from Pfizer. On August 25, 2021, according to his father, he developed troubling symptoms within days of receiving the vaccine, including brown circles around his eyes, a rash, vomiting, and extremely sore shoulder, opposite to his injection shoulder. He was taken to the emergency department, but was reportedly sent home with pain medication.

Thirty-three days later, Sean was found dead beside his bed. A government autopsy said, well, we can't ascertain what it is. Because if we did, we'd, you we'd give a black eye to public health. So the father consulted US pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, who has been on this, folks, from the very beginning. He concluded that Sean's death was caused by spike proteins from the vaccine accumulating in his adrenal glands. The father initially filed a claim with the Canadian government's Vaccine Injury Support

Program but it was denied within a month due to what the government called insufficient evidence. These since have appealed. He has provided Dr. Cole's pathology report but has yet to receive a response. In his lawsuit against the government, Hartman alleged that Health Canada and the Minister of Health made false misleading representations about the vaccine's safety and efficacy, which we now know is true. Everybody knows that. Oh, it's 90% effective. It's 100% effective. Whatever. They failed to assess and to monitor risks in accordance with their own mandate,

and they did not properly warn the public about potential adverse effects including death and the judge says we don't have to do any of that we don't have to care about the safety the efficacy all we care about is our public institutions the judge's decision follows legal precedent shielding governments from liability over public health decisions again there is no health in public health except for the health of the government and its institutions. So James Bovard, in terms of talking about, going back to where we started with this, Peter Marks being sent out,

he says, are we gonna get truth and justice from Trump on the COVID vaccine? Well, I think we might get an answer for this if we understand that it's not a COVID vaccine, but it's a Trump shot. Health and Human Services Secretary R.F.K. Jay forced Peter Marx, the FDA top vaccine official, to resign on Friday. Washingtonians were horrified, says James Bovard, especially since Marx has played a

key role in enabling Biden's most oppressive COVID mandate, Thomas Massie responded to Marx's exit by tweeting out, quote, exposing COVID vaccine malfeasance led by Peter Marx at the FDA. Instead of verifying the safety and the efficacy of the shots, Marx swept things under the rug and became a cheerleader for the jab, like so many. Former FDA boss Scott Gottlieb gushed, says James Bovar, that Marx, quote, presided over an extraordinary period of medical progress, spearheading breakthroughs in numerous areas. The Washington Post touted that that quote,

but they failed to mention that Gottlieb now works for the Pfizer board of directors. He was Trump's FDA guy, and he took a job at the board of directors at Pfizer. Maybe that's where Marx can go. Just like Gottlieb, Trump's other guy. I've got somewhere they can go. Yeah, where they're ultimately gonna go. But anyway, Biden dictated the vaccine injections, but as James Bovard points

out, it goes back to December 2020 when the FDA approved this. Now, Marx's position, and so Bovine, James Bovard, talks about the role of Peter Marx, which really was part of the vaccine mandate. And so he spends a lot of time talking about Biden and the role that Marx had in pushing that mandate. But he finishes by saying the COVID vaccine was a political fix from the start. Absolutely agree. Americans deserve a full accounting of the risks behind the injection that Biden sought to compel. Hopefully the Trump administration

will open the files and disclose hard facts as soon as possible. Really? You think so? Will R.F.K. Jr. go against the father of the vaccine? And look, I guess in a certain way I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. I pushed the FDA Like they have never been pushed before I wouldn't exactly stay there US OB the vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of Mankind all of the countries of the world who are now getting the vaccine or soon will be getting it Yeah, all the countries that are getting it and you know, it wasn't just that it was the MMR shots

2019 Yeah, gotta get their shots Well, the four-year-old hospitalized after measles infection went home 36 hours after Boudezonide treatment. Now, this is something that is nebulized as a steroid. It's nebulized. It helps relieve the inflammation and the airwaves. And that was what was denied to that six-year-old girl who also got pneumonia following a measles

infection, and she died because they wouldn't give her anything. Now the interesting thing to me about this, and they don't really talk about it with children's health defense, they talk about how this is all following a measles infection. The six-year-old girl who died, as the doctor who was attending her pointed out, her measles rash disappeared. She had a respiratory infection, pneumonia, and they didn't give her appropriate antibiotics. They basically just didn't care. Even after they saw some other things, they waited for like 24, 36 hours, something like that.

It was ridiculous the amount of time they waited. And she died, and the family was begging them for some help, and they didn't do it. Now this was at the same hospital, and evidently they got the message and so they gave her a nebulized steroid. But here's my take on this and we're going to take a break after this and talk about the tariffs and other issues like that. We've had throughout this whole thing, did somebody die from COVID or did they die with a PCR result?

Right. Did they die from it or did they die with a diagnosis of it? That's what's involved here, but it's even worse. Think about this. Both of these kids, one of them was very sick and hospitalized following measles. The other one died following measles and not having any treatment because we know that was a big part of what was happening with all the COVID stuff as well. And so they want to say that these people who died with a diagnosis or died following a

disease died from the disease. No, no, no. Don't buy that kind of nonsense. These kinds of semantics, these kinds of headlines. Now the purpose of this article, Children's Health Defense, was to cheer R.F.K. Jr. who has talked about using this steroid, Budezonide. But regardless, let's not play these games about died with, died from, died following. They're not the same thing.

They're not at all the same thing. We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back. So You're listening to the David Knight Show. Let's talk a little bit about what's going to be happening later this afternoon. Now, Trump is not going to reveal his tariffs if he even knows them at this point. I don't know if he knows or that anybody in his administration knows what he's going to do. They're going, they set a deadline of three o'clock this afternoon Eastern Time, the three hours after this program, to tell people how

much they're going to raise taxes. But with all this uncertainty, oil and gold stocks have soared. The stock market has had its worst quarter in 23 years. Futures are sliding after the Washington Post reported that Trump is going to seek 20 percent tariffs on most imports. I mean, everybody's watching this like they're watching the secret revelations of the Federal Reserve chair. You know, what did he say? Did he give a clue in something that he said?

Is he going to raise rates or lower rates? White House proposal to impose tariffs around 20 percent on most imports. Futures were hit shortly after 6 a.m. yesterday after the Washington Post reported the White House aides had drafted a proposal to impose tariffs at around 20 percent of most imports to the United States. Assuming the permanent tariffs took effect on the current quarter and triggered robust retaliation by U.S. trading partners, the economy would almost immediately tumble into a recession that would last for more than a year, sending the jobless rate above 7 percent. Meanwhile, Trump has tout this announcement as liberation day.

Yesterday we talked about tariffs, and I thought it was very interesting, as you know, he made the case for tariffs. And I have said in the past before all this stuff with Trump began, that I think the tariffs would be a better way than income tax to fund the government. But of course, you're gonna have to reduce the government way below what it is right now, or watch the balloon deficit even faster than it's doing. And so we talked about that yesterday, but what we're winding up with is the terrorists in addition to the taxes that we've got, and even worse, is this vacillation.

Nobody whether they like terrorists or don't like terrorists, nobody likes the the vacillation the uncertainty that Trump is doing that is really what is right that is its own attack on the economy The very fact that he can't make a decision about this and he's been on and off Since he became since before he became president on and off with these tariffs And that was the end of January and here we are at the beginning of April and nobody knows what he's going to do it's on again it's off again it's on again and off again and there's been several articles put out there showing the timeline of

vacillation over and over again that's the worst aspect we can debate about forms of taxation and the economic effects and all the rest but it is that that is Really destroying the market. We're gonna have joining us later. We're gonna have a fellow from the He's a senior fellow He's a jolly good fellow from the Mises Institute and he's gonna be joining us to talk about the s-word stagflation and You know, so I'm gonna ask him about Gerald Sunti's D word.

Dragflation. Or the other D word. Depression. We'll see where this is all going to go. The reign of Trump tariff terror leads to total non-confidence. That's right. That's an article on Zero Edge. As a Trump tariffs loom, CBS is putting up a price tracker for cars, groceries and

more supplies. They are going to weaponize this against him, and appropriately so, I think. You know, they've not – have you ever seen them put up a tracker at CBS to track the budget deficit or the trade deficit or the price of eggs? Have you ever seen any of that stuff happening? Did they do that with Biden or anybody else? No, they're going to do it with Trump and they're going to do it with these terrorists and they're setting up a tracker.

I mean, Thomas Massey was handing out to incoming congresspeople, freshman congressmen, he was handing out his little cumulative deficit counter, you know, running around the numbers and everything. He said, here, here's one of these things, put that on your lapel like me, but they criticized him for doing that. But CBS is going to do that with the inflation of various other things are going to have a running table on that. One of the things that is certain to go up is going to be used car prices set to soar again. It wasn't long ago, the used car

prices are soaring as protection of new cars was cramped due to Trump supply line shortages when he messed up the supply line with his fake pandemic that they'd all agreed to at Davos in the UN. I can't remember that this was declared 10 days after he went to Davos by his head of HHS, Alex Azar, former CEO of Eli Lilly, declared there's a pandemic at that point in time. They could only imagine six cases of COVID in the United States. A pandemic, huh? Okay.

And then Trump threw the money at it on March the 13th, later on. But anyway, so that's that. And he shut everything down, create all kinds of supply chain problems And that's what he's going to do with this stuff as well This is also going to be the second Trump attack on supply lines So they said that happened with car prices they they the supply chain was messed up for cars like it was for toilet paper

And everything else since then used car prices have stabilized as the supply lines have healed. However, prices have not retreated to pre-pandemic levels. Part of that is because there's constantly more and more regulations that are on. The new 25% tariff on cars assembled outside the U.S. could raise new car prices. JPMorgan thinks the impact could be 10% or more if the tariffs are fully passed on to consumers. Consumers unable or unwilling to pay a higher price may resort to purchasing a used car. And while the supply lines are back to normal, the used car market is still short on supplies. Therefore, their prices are likely to rise.

But Breitbart, none of this is going to stop Breitbart. As much as we see CBS out there harping on this, focusing on it, creating a counter for it, we got Breitbart out there deliberately lying to your face in the most absurd ways in order to cheer on Trump. They have become some of the shameless apologists, and I would include Shapiro's organization with that, Alex Jones, WND, Gateway Pundit, you name it, all these people out there who are making every excuse that they can for Trump, no matter what, Breitbart Business Digest says the US auto stocks slide, therefore that proves that the tariff critics

are wrong, does it? No actually it proves that they're right. Why did they slide? I mentioned that in the very beginning. I said, well that seems counterintuitive to some people. And of course it completely escapes the grasp of John Carney, who is their economics guy at Breitbart. Well they understand there's a trade war coming, and that trade war is going to affect

them. And it also is something that is going to affect them because Trump and his previous administration proudly relabeled NAFTA, USMCA, and kept encouraging them to distribute their production over the US, Mexico, and Canada. And so all these things are going to hurt them. It doesn't prove that tariff critics are wrong. What they're saying is, well, why are U.S. automakers' stocks sliding? It says, shares of major U.S. automakers slid, but instead of confirming the standard critique

of tariffs, a sell-off does the opposite. It exposes just how outdated and off-base the old arguments against tariffs have become. Ford and GM stocks should be surging. They said, why? Why? They're going to get hit by these tariffs. Breitbart doesn't understand that. Today's corporate incumbents thrived under globalization.

They were chasing cheap labor. Well, again, it was Trump who was encouraging that in his first – it was Trump who came up with the North American Free Trade Agreement rebranding. And again, it was a free trade thing. And he encouraged them to distribute their supply chains over the three countries. Now he's all of a sudden changed his mind. So terrorists aren't just about prices and profits. They're about power, specifically the redistribution of power away from multinational executives

and toward American workers. This is naive demagoguery, folks. You understand what is going on with the quote unquote American workers. They're looking to cut our throats in a number of ways. We are looking at a robot explosion that is going to be...forget about bringing in cheap labor for the corporations. That's why the Republicans have always supported illegal immigration. They want cheap labor. And look, I'm fine with people who come in, work for a little I don't what I'm not fine with is people come in and go on the welfare role and

Most other countries are not fine with that either in New Zealand you got to have like five or ten million dollars in order to Have a citizenship there now Switzerland same type of things But here in America you can come in penniless and go on the dole. No problem at all. That is not the way that it should be. But for the people who are coming in, who want to work, they say the Republicans want to have it open, the Republicans want the cheap workers, the Democrats want the free voters. But they're really coming in because they want to divide and conquer. Because the workforce is going to be mechanical in just a few years.

In less than five years, we've got both the CEO of Nvidia as well as the CEO of the company that created the figure robot. Remember that? It had this talk like a California dude, you know? It put some stuff in front of him. He says, pull out the apple and do this, or put these things appropriate to where they are. You know, let's see, that's an apple. That needs to go over here, and this is something.

It needs to go in the refrigerator, you know? And he asks him some questions about it. He goes, yeah, man, like, yeah, okay. You know, the robot talks like a California surfer dude, right? And he asks him some questions about it, he goes, yeah, man, yeah, okay. The robot talks like a California surfer dude. And it would have like a hesitance in terms of it had to think about it for one or two seconds, but then it would always do the right thing and the movements were very fluid. I mean, it wasn't like Walt Disney's animatronics at Disney World.

I mean, it's very fluid. And so the CEO of that company, it's talking about how it's about ready to explode, he said, if we had the robots right now, I could sell, I've got just two companies, I could sell 100,000 of them too. And he said, you know, we could sell over a million of them and we're very close to getting that out.

The CEO of NVIDIA said, within five years, less than five years, you're going to see massive numbers of robots roaming the streets, he said. Not just in the factories, roaming the streets. The robots are going to be cheaper than the cars. The average price of the cars right now, before all this tariff insanity, the average price of a new car is $48,000. These robots are going to go, even the expensive Tesla ones are going to go for $20,000 to

$30,000. There will be cheaper ones out there. People will be buying robot assistants to help them at home. There will be robots to help people with health stuff. So why do we need the immigrant labor? They need the immigrant labor for votes. They need immigrants to come in in massive numbers so they don't culturally assimilate, so that it is a divide and conquer situation, especially because there's not going to be jobs for the

immigrants coming in, just like there's not going to be jobs for the Americans. So this is just naive demagoguery on the part of Breitbart to say, well, you know, we've got to look out for the workers. And that's what Trump is doing. Trump is raising our taxes to take care of the workers. Has Breitbart become part of the Democrat Party? I've said for the longest time. Republicans today, especially in this populist movement, are the Democrats of my youth. And the Democrats of my youth, the Democrats of today rather, are the Marxists of my youth. The Marxists of my youth. I even think as we look at how totally absurd and discredited the Democrat Party is, they've

got David Hogg as number two now at the DNC. You've got people like Occasional Cortex is now one of their heroes. There's been, I think, a deliberate effort to turn the Democrat Party into a bunch of clowns. And they want one party, and that party, run by former Democrat Trump, former Democrat Tulsi Gabbard, former Soros Democrat Scott Besant, former Democrat Lucky Leutnik, and on and on and on. What you've got there, the Republican Party has become the Uni Party and the Democrats

have become the clown show. So Besant is saying other countries will have a chance to lower their tariffs and other barriers. He said, April 2nd, we're going to disclose the reciprocal tariffs. I'm not going to get out ahead of President Trump. In other words, he doesn't know. He doesn't know. He's going to announce at 3 o'clock on Wednesday, we're going to set fair trade.

Everyone's going to have the opportunity to lower their tariffs, lower their non-tariff barriers, stop the currency manipulation, stop subsidizing labor, stop subsidizing and providing cheap loans, make the global trading system fair for American workers again. Or else the robots are going to start their own union and political party, right? Trump is developing, by the way, his own cryptocurrency financial network. Yeah, we're getting a glimpse, says Brian Shalhavi at, uh, health impact news. We're getting a glimpse of Trump's plan for his new world order beast financial system, which will be based on fully traceable cryptocurrencies.

And I've said for the longest time to make himself rich and his buddies rich. And here's how he's going to make the Trump family rich. He says this gives further credence to what Catherine Austin Fitz said a couple weeks ago that the Trump administration was not reducing spending at all but taking that spending out of the civil service sector and transferring those jobs to the private sector instead. And Brian links to my interview with Catherine Austin Fitz, I appreciate that. He pulled out a seven minute section from a longer interview but he's also got a link to the full one. But he says the Trump administration's spending is on track to surpass Biden's.

Actually, this is not him saying this. This is an article that was put out by mainstream media that I didn't get to the last couple of days. The US Treasury is on pace to spend 7 and a half percent more in 2025 than last year you see you can play all kinds of games with Doge and Musk is making all these claims. It can't be independently verified but When you look at the total amount of spending by looking at what the checks that the Treasury Department is actually cutting. You can see that in spite of all the PR, in spite of all the spend,

in spite of all the claims of massive fraud that he has now shut down, that can't be verified because Doge has covered that part of it up. So all those things can't be verified. Musk is constantly holding these PR things and yet if you look at the dispersal from the Treasury Department you see that expenditures have gone up 7.5%. Musk had claimed, for example, that there was $830 million cost to collect Americans' opinions on national parks. That sounds really ridiculous, right? Why would you pay a billion dollars nearly to find out what people thought of national parks?

You could just kind of look at attendance. Anyway, he said the same survey could have been done by another vendor for just $10,000 instead of nearly a billion. But Doge made it particularly challenging to fact check its assertions when it removed the federal ID numbers and its website's source code that could help other people to identify specifically what grants and what contracts Musk was referring to. It makes it difficult if not impossible to know the vendors that the government has contracted with and whether the government is actually saving the amount of money that Doge is asserting

that it has saved. The largest savings asserted by Doge is a cancelled $1.9 trillion contract for IT modernization. But the contractor awarded the money told the New York Times last month that the award was actually cancelled in November under President Biden. The Federal Procurement Data, a database of Federal Procurement projects, indicates that no money was ever spent on that grant, despite its authorization of the IRS to spend $1.9 billion over seven years. So a broader look at the federal spending data has appeared to counteract the claims. Again, you can get caught up in the spin and the PR of Musk, but the granularity and the

details are not there for you to see. What can we see? Well, we can look at the bigger picture, which is data from the daily treasury statements that are published by the government. These data show that the federal government has spent 1.893 trillion as in 2025 as of March 26th compared to 1.763 trillion the same date last year so it's gone up by seven and a half percent. So Brian says wow who would have thought that Musk would go on national TV and lie to the American people? Well, I guess he's had a lot of practice because he

has been lying to Tesla shareholders for over a decade now about the capabilities of Tesla cars. So where is all that money from the U.S. Treasury going then, after all these massive so-called cuts in spending under Musk, if those cuts are real, how does the spending go up by 7.5%? He points out, well, a lot of it is probably gone for war equipment, bombs to Israel, as well as supporting the massive U.S. Navy buildup in the Red Sea to bomb women and children in Yemen. And again, if we don't do anything about the warfare state, if we don't do anything about

the welfare state, nothing is going to change. And I said there wasn't a trillion dollars to cut outside of that. Even if you cut everything that was outside the welfare warfare state, even if you cut everything 100 percent, which they're not going to do, they still couldn't get to a trillion. But they're going to bail out the hedge funds this time around. They are now too big to fail. And this has been the case. This is an article from Zero Hedge going back to September 2019. Remember the repo market? And what a

lot of people are calling the repocalypse? They said there were some big hedge funds, some of them you have probably not heard of. I had not heard of them, and things were looking really dicey for them. Part of it was because the Federal Reserve had suddenly changed direction. So they'd had a double whammy. First of all, the Federal Reserve had done aggressive tightening suddenly, suddenly, just like Trump is suddenly changing his positions on tariffs. And then they got that, they did all of that help that they dumped massive amounts of money into the repo market. And then right after that came the COVID lockdown. See, both of these problems were created by the federal government.

If you include the federal reserve as part of the federal government, you know, these drastic changes, just as the feds drastic changes in interest rates cause big issues for some of those banks, this type of thing as well. Morgan Creek CEO said at the time too big to fail is back this time. It's not the banks, but it is the leveraged financial institutions. It is a bailout. And that is exactly what is happening.

So who owns the gold? Who owns the gold in Fort Knox? If Trump and Musk are going to go there and if they're going to have a photo op and if Musk is going to, as he's already done on social media, if he're going to have a photo op, and if Musk is going to, as he's already done on social media, if he's going to say, well, this is your gold. Well, who actually owns that? The couple of interesting quotes in this article from Alan Greenspan, who was part of Ayn Rand's Inner Circle.

There was a recent article, I didn't cover it. I thought it was interesting only from the standpoint because there's this whole cult of Ayn Rand and objectivism, which is an atheistic bunch of nonsense, philosophy of life. And I was never a big Ayn Rand fan because I talked about liberty and individual liberty and everything. My friend who worked for the government thought I was a Randian. It's like no, not at all. Not at all. But towards the end of her life, she was abandoned by everybody. She was living alone and other people had different changes, people like Alan Greenspan who had been part of her inner circle and abandoned her.

And so there was one guy who stayed close to her, he and his wife, and she left everything to him and he managed the estate for many, many years, but now he has just recently died. He lived up into his 90s and his daughter is now in a fight over the estate with somebody who, a nurse who found out that he had a lot of money and basically hooked him, married him, and got him to leave the money to her. So it's become a really complicated thing. But I looked at that and I thought, you know what? What a lonely, empty life Ayn Rand had in all this. And he did as well in that sense. But this is what Alan Greenspan, who used to be a part of Inner Circle, had said about the gold. He

said, in the two decades following the abandonment of the gold standard in 1933, the consumer price index in the US nearly doubled and in the four decades after that, prices quintupled. So in just 40 years, prices were five times as high. Greenspan said monetary policy unleashed from the constraint of domestic gold convertibility had allowed a persistent over-issuance of money. A lot of people thought, well, Alan Greenspan has been appointed by, I think it's Reagan. Oh, this is great.

He's going to fix everything. He's going to audit the Feds. He's going to end all this stuff. There's a lot of hopium about that. None of it came true. In a famous 1966 article, Greenspan had concluded with these words, slamming the government for spending wealth that it was stealing from future generations.

He said, deficit spending is simply a scheme for confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. And if one grasps this this one has no difficulty in understanding the statists antagonism toward the gold standard and So this person concludes by saying today the Fiat Federal Reserve note is worth about 3% of its value in 1913 While gold if you own some you might want to hang on to it, he said, has maintained its value. So, he said, if Trump and Musk go to Fort Knox, and they do a photo op, Musk has already

said on Twitter, he says, this is the American people's gold, right? Well, is it really your gold? Not folks, if you don't hold it yourself. Yeah, it's a great investment. And we look at the abstracts of this stuff, but a lot of people are going out and getting paper gold, paper silver, as they see the price of gold go up. They don't track the price of gold, and you don't own gold if you own GLD or SLV. If you go to DavidNight.Gold, you can own gold. Tony Aarderman will

help you. And you can get small or large amounts. You can start accumulating it on a regular basis and you can start getting some of your money out of these scams. And there are scams one after the other in every direction. Get something that's real. Hang on to it yourself. You don't trust these people with the custody of it. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back we're going to talk a little bit about the technocracy as well as the Trump DeFi that is coming. So we're going to take a quick break folks, we'll be right back. The You're listening to the David Knight Show. On Rumble, Sam Miller, 123, says, Let's remember so many of the PCR test swabs were tainted

with the Vax. Why would they not allow a spit test? They had to jab it up into your skull. I never got one, thankfully. Yeah, I didn't either. I talked about that that summer of 2020 at the Cannes Film Festival. You had all these jet-setting celebrities who were allowed to travel to Paris and everything and they were just livid.

They were disgusted that they had to spit and have a COVID test. I said, oh yeah, well you should see what they do to the rest of the people. They jam that thing up the nose. You're allowed to spit and have a COVID test. I said, oh yeah, we should see what they do to the rest of the people. They jam that thing up the nose. You're allowed to spit? Why don't they allow us to spit? It was a humiliation ritual. It absolutely was. And in many cases, I think it was Handy also talked about, he said they would, they had a nurse there who tested something that was right out of the package and it tested positive on the PCR test. Was it preloaded with anything? With whatever it was that they were testing? Or was the PCR test not working? Or could it find anything anywhere? Who knows? But it's nonsense. But it's a humiliation ritual. Remember the Chinese government insisted

that U.S. Embassy staff have a PCR test rectally. That tells you everything, doesn't it? And they got really upset when the higher-ups found out about it. They said, that is nothing but humiliation. I said, well, so is it when you ram it up somebody's nose that far? It's ridiculous. Anyway, on Rumble, Knights of the Storm, it says, my new craftsman mower proudly says assembled in the US with globally sourced parts All those parts will be subject to individual tears. That's right. They certainly will

Yeah, oh, yeah, that's great assembled in the US great sold in the US That'll be the next thing that they claim sold in the US On rumble don't frag me, bro Said if we had a strong manufacturing base then terrorists would have real power for us with a weak manufacturing base that is punishment for us. I agree and I think the key to all of that is really the regulations. If the regulations are going to sow off the lower rungs of the ladder then who can put together a business to start manufacturing

something? I've seen this in my own family. I go back to the Depression. My grandfather in the Depression was basically doing home remedy medicine that they were manufacturing that that stuff would have been shut down. He would have had a SWAT team raiding him. Nobody ever got harmed by any of it. And they would sell it door-to-door. Eventually started a mail order business and then my dad and his brother were doing a lot of manufacturing, and they did some private label manufacturing and stuff like that as well. But when I was looking at it as I was graduating from high school, so there's no way, because

I, every night with a dinner table, I'd hear my dad complaining about the new regulations that were coming out from the federal government, how they were going to shut them down. He was constantly going, look at this, this is what they're going to do now. And so I knew that there was handwriting was on the wall. Many many partisan tickle. You have been found by the federal government to be, you've been weighed in the scales and found wanting. We are going to shut you down."

And so I didn't want to go into that and I didn't want to continue with that. And that's the real thing. You know, they're putting people out of business and between, that was well before they started sending stuff offshore. It was our, before they offshored everything. This is decades before, this is 20 years before they started offshoring stuff to China. 20 years before that, the federal government was shutting down people with regulation. Excessive, unnecessary regulation.

And they just only accelerated it when they started doing it abroad. But let's not forget that the destruction of the manufacturing base began with our own Government and its own regulation and if they don't get rid of that regulation Then nobody's gonna be able to start any new businesses except for Trump and his friends. Oh That's right. They want to own everything and they've got all this money They're going to onshore everything and guess who's gonna be working in those factories robots onshore everything and guess who's going to be working in those factories? Robots. On rumble, Gard Goldsmith, good to see you Gard.

By the way, Knights of the Storm, Gard, you can find them on Twitter and go to their websites and see where they are. I don't know what is going on with Rockfin with anybody at this point in time. And I just remind people, are we still on Rockfin? Okay, we're still there but please don't tip us there. We can't get any money out. It's a crazy situation. I hope they right the ship.

I'd like to see them succeed. In the end, but I don't want people dropping money into a black hole there. In the end, most political systems, and again, Nights of the Storm, one of the things at Nights of the Storm, they'll tell you where you can find a lot of independent broadcasts that focus on the truth. That's good. And again, Gard Goldsmith, Liberty Conspiracy, he has a lot of things at his website, especially if you sign up on his sub stack, you can get a Sunday supplement that gives you a news

summary for the week, which is always he does a great job with that. He says, in the end, most political systems become run by an oligarchy. They apply names to them like communism or technocracy, but it is a small group in the end. Sometimes monarchs or emperors or dictators. Well, that is exactly or emperors or dictators. Well that is exactly right. And we're going to talk a little bit about that now because when you look at the technocracy that is being put together by Doge, it is something that has been wargamed by Curtis Yarvin for quite some time. And he's not convinced about Doge, as a matter of fact. This is a guy who is their intellectual guru, their philosophical guru, the guy that

is really there if you understand what dark maga is. He's the guy behind all of this stuff. And he's not impressed with Doge. He says, �Sorry, no one at Doge is within two orders of magnitude from understanding how grave the situation is. Saving a trillion bucks won't do anything to the tumor. It is pure malpractice. He wants radical, radical restructuring.� And there was an interesting article on technocracy news and I think it is still up there. I've had this for a while

It was put up last Thursday I've not covered it but it is very important to understand the background of this and the background of these people We've talked in the past about Howard Scott and his technocracy incorporated. It came up in the 1930s and that was connected with Musk's grandfather Joshua Haldane and Also with people like H.G. Wells and Shape of Things and Things to Come and so forth. You can see it enacted in a story line in that book and that movie. But during the campaign, what are these people looking for? He says, well, in this article at Technocracy News, they talk about how they want to set up a new world order. Novus Ordem Secularum was behind Tim Scott, the RNC.

Elon Musk has talked about this many times, captioning it. But this is what Curtis Sharvin was talking about, what he would like to see happening in the Trump administration. He said on his first day in office, he needs to start to be a dictator, essentially. And Trump said, �I�m going to be a dictator, but don�t worry, I�ll be a good dictator, and it won�t last too long.� This article points out on his first day in office, he issued a staggering 26 executive orders within his first 30 days. He had 73 executive orders. As of now, he has 92 executive orders. The Trump regime has been taken over by technocrats, just like the Carter presidency was overrun

with trilaterals, you know, people like Brzezinski who came up with the trilateral commission and so forth. And we've seen Trump posing at the inauguration with all of these CEOs from Silicon Valley. As he points out, four of the five wealthiest people in the world were there. Musk, Cook, Zuckerberg, Bezos, worth a total estimated $1.35 trillion. Then in addition, you got the other supporters people like Mark Andreessen, David Sachs, Doug Leone, John Lonsdale of Palantir.

Trump gained the support of dozens of key figures in tech and finance including Palmer Luckey, co-founder of Andrew L and Oculus. Watts App, founder. Hedge Fund manager Bill Ackman. The Winklevoss twins, co-founders of the Gemini Cricut crypto exchange. Gemini crypto, it's like a Gemini cricket. Anyway, that's what we should do. The name is already taken. We could do a Gemini crypto. Let your conscience be your guide. How about that? Or if you wish upon a bit, maybe all your wishes will come true. The collusion between big tech and Trump administration is meant to carry out a specific agenda, one that removes pesky regulations and paves the way for lucrative contracts to develop massive

AI data centers and computer chips and avoid the cost of social tariffs and many other things. They want to turn the table over. They want to do a reset folks in the same way that Klaus Schwab wants to do it. And guess what? They're gonna reset this back to make sure that you own nothing, that they own the means of production. Yeah, they're gonna onshore it. They're not only gonna on, they're not only gonna bring all the manufacturing and thing back to America, but he's gonna bring it back to his buddies, exclusively to his buddies. So in his cabinet, 13 billionaires in Trump's cabinet with net worth totaling at least $460

billion have been appointed by him. People like Besant, Lutnik, McMahon, JD Vance, completely owned by Peter Thiel. He got his start, meeting Peter Thiel at Yale. Peter Thiel brings him on with his venture capital firm. Then Peter Thiel sets him up in his own venture capital firm. Then Peter Thiel gives JD Vance the money to run for Senate. And then Peter Thiel talks to Trump about making him the vice president. Are you starting to see a pattern here?

He was a partner with Thiel at Mithril Capital. It's interesting, all the Mithril, Palantir, Andrewil, all of these Lord of the Rings things. Are these people, are they Nazgul or are they Senoran? I'm not sure which ones they are. But anyway, yeah, the venture capital firm that JD Vance did not only had Teal, Mark Andreessen, but also had Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google. You think these people are on your side? I had a good friend say, well, I'm glad to see that, you know, JD Vance, he'd watched the film, what was that, some hillbilly thing, hillbillyology or something, right? So he'd seen the film multiple times.

He really liked that film. I said, well, that's not who he is if he ever was that. I said, he's now a Yale teal guy. He's a venture capitalist. He's now somebody who is out there pushing self amplifying mRNA with his companies. I said, that's not who he is. He may have been that at one point in time, but that's not who he is now.

In addition to Vance, Teal has several affiliates who are now part of Trump's government, David Sachs, who worked with Teal at PayPal is now the white house AI and crypto czar. Jim O'Neill was the managing director of Teal at PayPal is now the White House AI and Crypto Czar. Jim O'Neill was the Managing Director of Teal's Mythril Capital, now the Deputy Secretary of HHS. Mark Crassios, current Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology was Teal's CFO at Clarion Capital and a principal at Teal Capital. PayPal alumni Ken Howrey now serves a Trump ambassador

to Denmark and on and on. So what is it that these guys want? Teal and its cohorts believe that government should be replaced by technology, that the dollar must be replaced with digital currency, that corporate monopolies are desirable for the good. Teal is a Bilderberg Steering Committee member along with Alex Karp, the guy who co-founded Palantir with him.

And so again, it's going right down the path of Bilderberg. So when you look at the statements from people like Peter Thiel, he said, we could never win an election, but maybe you could unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you. Maybe you could change the world using technology. He says, this is why I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics. Technology we're going to force you to do this. We're going to make it easy for you to do this. Once a libertarian, Keel later abandoned this ideology stating in 2009 that he no longer

believed that freedom and democracy are compatible. His views over time have evolved from the fringes of conservatism to what is known as dark enlightenment. And again, as part of this dark enlightenment, what is dark about it? Well again, they don't believe that you're going to get to a libertarian state unless you've got a dictator. Hmm, I wonder who that dictator would be in their mind. In 2014, Justine Tunney, Occupy Wall Street Activist and Google Software Engineer, petitioned

the White House in 2014 to arrange for the retirement of all government employees. Does that sound familiar? To give the tech industry all administrative authority, and then to appoint then Google CEO Eric Schmidt as the CEO of America. "'The tech industry can offer us good governance and can prevent further American decline,' she said." Does this sound familiar?

Does this sound like she's reading off the script of Elon Musk? That's why their philosophical approach, if you understand what these people have been writing about and openly and publicly saying, then you understand where this charade that is being played out with the Trump administration, you understand where this is all going. And you understand how it is an oligarchy of corrupt billionaires that are ready to loot this country and to put us into a dictatorship for their own good, not ours. Curtis Yarvin used to write with a pseudonym called Mencius Mulberg, and he said at the time, he was quoted by Justine Tunney.

See, he's the intellectual center of these people. She sounds like Elon Musk because both of them are looking at Curtis Yarvin who said, �Disbelieving in democracy in 2008 is a lot like disbelieving in God in 1758.� But of course, they also disbelieve in God. They believe they are going to be God. In his world, feudalism is good while democracy is vilified. Human rights aren't actually rights but services. You see? I mean, why would you have human rights if we don't have a God?

The position of the founders was that because we were created in the image of God at some level, common humanity, we were all created equal. And to them, the purpose of government was to secure those God-given liberties, which are the essence of humanity. But now we have these people, you have people like B.F. Skinner, who wrote his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity. You are not created in the image of God. You're nothing but an animal, and we're going to control you in the same way that I would click or train an animal and I came across that because when Karen was getting her master's degree in education She was given that book to read

That's the way they're Teaching the teachers to treat your children if you're foolish enough to put them under these teachers Corporations he said mirror kingdoms, but we have a high IQ CEO functioning as the sovereign. Corporate power, a society is organizing for us rather than the power of the people. During his 2012 presentation on rebooting the US government, he blurted out, if Americans want to change their government, they're going have to get their dick get over their dictator phobia How many times do we hear Trump say he's gonna be a dictator oh he's just joking no, he's not joking folks. He's not joking He even talked about how Trump should be like the chairman of the board and

How he should appoint a CEO who's going to do everything for him. They said once the universe of democratic corruption is converted into a freely transferable shareholders in GovCorp, that's what they call their new technocracy, a combination of government and corporation. What do we call a merger of government and corporation? Fascism. It's fascism. These people are dictators.

They want a totalitarian society where they order you around and where they can control you through their technology. We don't need politics. We don't need elections. We've got technology and we will control you through technology. We will control you through information. Sounds very much like stakeholder capitalism, doesn't it? Shareholding in GovCorp. GovCorp would concentrate upon running an efficient, attractive, vital, clean and secure

country, said Yarvin. I'm sorry, that was Nick Land, who is also known for popularizing the concept of accelerationism. We need to move fast and break things. He says accelerationists favor automation, and it's going to be coming out as really fast with these robots. You just wait and see. Yarvin's concept of patchworks suggests that the federal government, or as he calls it, the cathedral, should be broken up into smaller entities controlled by tech corporations governed by sovereign joint stock companies given carte blanche to wield complete authority. Yarvin's ideas on deposing democracy are ruthless and at times Machiavellian.

His lack of regard for philosophical opponents has led to repeated calls for the removal from government and from positions of authority and has influenced on Teel and on Musk and therefore on Trump are undeniable. So many of Trump's policies are an overall vision for making America great again, aligned with the tenets of the Dark Enlightenment were also published on the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 Transition Plan. Trump's power doesn't derive from MAGA supporters and flyover states, but it's from these multi-billionaires. From Silicon Valley, Wall Street billionaires who want to dismantle the current bureaucracy in favor of a CEO-led corporate government that is going to personally enrich them. Yarvin calls this role the delegate of the sovereign corporation who exercises undivided

sovereign authority as a divine right monarchy." That's interesting you put that in, since they don't believe in God. In 2022, in the butterfly revolution, Yarvin wrote about Trump's role if re-elected, predicting. And remember, this is 2022. Yarvin is saying this about Trump. He said, Trump himself will not be the brain of this butterfly. He will not be the CEO. He will be the chairman of the board. He will select the CEO who will be an experienced executive. This process, which obviously has to be televised, will be completed by his inauguration, at which point the transition to the next regime will start immediately. In other words, before the inauguration, it will be complete. For Trump, and again, this

is Curtis Jarvin, for Trump being president will be exactly like it was. He'll have all the photo ops and more without any papers to sign or decisions to make. As CEO, he will pick, rather the CEO he picks will run the executive branch without any interference from Congress or courts. Probably also taking over state and local governments. Most existing important institutions, public and private, will be shut down and replaced with new and efficient systems. It seems as if Elon Musk is playing the role of CEO that Yarvin discussed. Now Yarvin is not happy with a pace. I hope he doesn't get what he wants, but it certainly is lining up very much like that. Perhaps this is why Elon Musk changed his official title to Techno King,

mirroring Howard Scott's dreams of a Continental Director for the North American Tech Mate. As Trump's senior advisor and leader of Doge, Musk is firing federal employees at will, attempting to shut down entire agencies, installing Yarvind's new and efficient systems in the form of AI and potentially blockchain technology to run most government functions. It's hard to tell the difference between Musk's dark MAGA and Nick Land's dark enlightenment. Look, I've applauded all the efforts to shut down all these different bureaucracies, which don't have any authority under the Constitution to exist, which from a pragmatic standpoint have been incredibly harmful and wasteful and corrupt and fraudulent.

I agree with all that stuff. However, you have to ask yourself what comes next. They want to minimize government, in other words the government that we see, the government of bureaucrats and so forth that is there now. But in so doing, they're going to maximize governance of us, to know everything about us. What they want to replace, what we don't like is there. We don't like what they're destroying, but what they intend to replace it with is going to be far worse. I think what Trump should do, said

this is Jarvin again, I think what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice, again he said this in 2022, fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people. And when the courts stop you, stand before the country and say the Chief Justice has made his ruling, now let him enforce it. How many times have I said that about the judicial supremacy of the Supreme Court? I said we have a separation of powers and people need to understand that. And that's actually, he's quoting Andrew Jackson. And so it's important that we understand that when they overlap with some of the things

that we don't like and when they don't like the things that we don't like and when they say some of the stuff that we agree with That we need to understand they're not really on our side They're on their side and that what they have in mind with maximized governance is not what we have in mind at all They may they completely understand liberty libertarian ideas Things like that, but they want a dictatorship. They understand libertarian ideas because they used to be there, but they don't support

individual liberty. They want to be a ruling oligarchy, and it is nothing but tyranny. Later in the butterfly revolution, Jarvin mentions that Trump acting as an American Caesar must construct an alternate regime to replace the current one that must appeal to all populations in the country. Well he's not doing too good a job of that. He is actually setting things, people against each other. He said the energy of the alternate regime must be unlimited. In power it must be ready to reorganize all of public life.� But look folks, all of

this back and forth chaos is really there to distract people from what they�re really doing, which is this. And it is also an effective engine of destruction, of annihilation, of acceleration to that kind of annihilation. So he said the only form of government that can operate in the next regime before Trump came in, he said, he argued that the US Constitution allows presidential dictators. And he urged Trump to be truthful. Well Trump was. He said, I'm going to be a dictator, but don't worry, I'll be a good dictator.

You'll love that. He said, imagine giving the president power to hire or fire or fund or defund or organize or reorganize any department. He said, what's cool is that we can have a dictator. He says, this is actually completely legal. Even if it wasn't, we could do it at any time. Politically, democracy is required because only democracy has a political power to put a monarchy in place. That is, winning an election with a mandate to truly rule. But we can set up a US monarchy. So Trump is acting like a CEO.

He is acting like a dictator. He's acting like an American Caesar, and he has crossed one Rubicon after the other, hasn't he? Trump is barely two months into his second term in the Republican think tank, called for the third term project, seeking ways to have him remain in office beyond his current stint, which expires in 2028. Their promotional items even depicted Trump as a Roman Caesar. Musk has posted that America is the new Rome.

Trump's forays into limiting free speech for criticizing Israel, labeling Tesla vandals as domestic terrorists are clues as to where we are headed. Well, we can see many clues with all of this stuff, but I'm going to speed up because I want to get to what Trump is doing with his DeFi stuff. Because I said this is for the enrichment of him and his billionaire cabinet. And here's how this works. We've got a lot of new crypto legislation. I talked about the Genius Act that's being put through.

There's actually another one. Both of them want to establish stable coins that are going to be able to be used to not only track everything that you do, but to stop anything that you do. To be able to be used to not only track everything that you do, but to stop anything that you do, to be able to instantly seize any wealth that you've got into that system. Trump said he wanted stablecoin rules to be the first crypto legislation of his administration.

Banks got caught off guard with this genius act and other stuff, and they have been intensely lobbying for sweeping changes. Banks and crypto companies are fighting to influence the rules. And meanwhile, the president has launched his own stablecoin, just like, you know, Lootnik is heavily involved in Tether. They manage the purchasing of T-bills and stuff for them. And he also owns a great deal of it, but Trump is not content with that. He has created his own crypto company.

Stablecoins they said don't fluctuate in price are typically pegged to the dollar. Well, they may not fluctuate in price, but they certainly fluctuate in value, don't they? It's guaranteed to go down. Anyway, the latest entrance into the Trump is the Trump family itself. World Liberty Financial, a crypto project started by Trump and his sons. By the way, this is from healthimpact.com as well. You'll find this there. It raises a prospect that Trump could pass legislation that would benefit his own venture and his own family. It is a conflict of interest. And we have seen this kind of conflict of interest paraded and put out in front of you with Howard Ludnick and Tether.

And now Trump is doing this, but Trump is doing it in a more hidden way. So stablecoins are backed by fiat currency and government treasuries. Stablecoin issuers rely heavily on traditional banks behind the scenes both to store the cash and for government debt to handle customer funds to buy or to sell stablecoins. But it's going to be just a few big banks that are going to be there. For the most part the banks are concerned about this because just like with CBDC or any digital currency, the intention is to cut banks out of the loop. And you may say, well, that's not any problem.

I'd love to see the banks go away. Except what we're talking about, by eliminating the small and medium-sized banks, you'll still have the big banks. And you're going to be concentrating financial power in the hands of fewer people. That's the issue. So they want to buy US government debt,

sell it to you, the American public, through stable coins. That's what Brian Schilhabe says, and he got that exactly right. What are they going to do with the money that you give them? And you may not willingly give them money, but it will happen through your retirement fund, through your 401k, through social security funds, other things like that. He says, well, the planning on purchasing Greenland, Canada, Gaza, as well as 50% of Ukraine, real assets. But it's also, I think, about collapsing the US and then being able to buy up these

assets themselves or to sell them to other people and make a commission on it. The assets of the US government, that's why you've got Besant and Lutnik and Doug Burgum talking about how we've got 100 trillion, 200 trillion dollars worth of natural assets. I mean that's even things like our water supply. This is exactly what Catherine Austin Fitz has been warning about. He says that Tether is currently the largest stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market with a value of $145 billion out of the $230 billion market. And that's Leutnick's power play, who is now the Commerce Secretary.

But Reuters took a look at how the Trump family took over a crypto firm, and it's raising hundreds of millions of dollars. As World Liberty Financial raised more than half a billion dollars, Trump's family took control of the crypto venture, grabbed the lion's share of those funds aided by governance terms that industry experts say favor insiders. This is Reuters and this is all inside the health impact article launched

last fall world liberties goal is to allow people to access financial services using crypto currencies without intermediaries like banks that's what they call decentralized finance or defy as he defies the constitution but it is yet to launch a public platform and has reported only a small staff But it has yet to launch a public platform and has reported only a small staff.

Even so, World Liberty said in mid-March that it had raised $550 million selling so-called governance tokens. Boy, if that doesn't raise alarm, that term there. At least it's an honest label. World Liberty disclosed in January that the Trump family had taken control of the business. A review of changes and fine print on World Liberty's website shows two of its co-founders, crypto entrepreneurs Zach Folkman and Chase Harrow, were replaced as controlling parties of World Liberty by an entity in which the Trump family holds a 60% stake. The Trump family now has a claim on 75% of net revenue from

token sales and 60% from World Liberty operations once the core business gets going. This means that the Trump family is currently entitled to about $400 million in fees. The Trump family's largest share of the project's revenues and the non-tradable nature of the governance tokens make world liberty unusually centralized for the industry because we're talking about a DeFi industry a Decentralized finance industry and yet Trump's DeFi is completely centralized not decentralized and the decentralized, not decentralized. And the structure of the project pretty much excludes public investors or token holders from any meaningful financial participation, and they also hide who is really behind it.

You want to talk about dark? They've gone dark with all this stuff. Just a few days ago, the Trump family deepened its crypto interest as a company formed with the president's oldest sons Eric and Don Jr. took a minority stake in a newly formed Bitcoin producer called American Bitcoin. Trump and his family are benefiting from deregulation. There is a potential for conflicts of interest and for influence peddling. As Ross Dahlsten, a former US banking regulator said, the potential for people buying these world finance tokens to earn political favor, it would be the perfect vehicle to funnel

money to the president. World liberty has attracted a lot of very wealthy buyers. Almost 70% of the money raised came from wallets that spent at least $100,000. More than 50% was buys of $1 million or more. The identity of nearly all of those big spenders is hidden from public view by anonymous crypto wallets. World liberty's beginnings lie in the convergence of two obscure figures in this crypto scene, some of the most powerful people now in American politics. Folkman and Harrow entered the Trump circle via the family of Steve Witkoff, a longtime Trump friend and real estate developer in New York City, who now is his envoy to the

Mideast. Their business background includes a past instances of these two guys, these two younger guys that were brought into the Trump family orbit by Witkoff. They have a background that includes instances of dissolution, litigation, unpaid debts, according to corporate records, state filings, and US court documents where they were sued, early in his career, Folkman offered seminars on how to date hotter girls." So I guess he's kind of an Epstein kind of guy, right? Whitkoff said he was introduced to the pair by one of his sons when speaking about how the deal came together on a crypto podcast. And so, Witkoff is there trying to negotiate a ceasefire deal between Hamas and Netanyahu,

as Israeli press is talking about how Netanyahu has been funding Hamas. That's what Cuttergate is. And how he has openly spoken about the necessity to have Hamas, I mean, giving them money and saying they are going to be essentially their political catspaw to give them justification for taking over not just Gaza but much more than that. So again, when you speak against Netanyahu, however, now you're going to be labeled a Hamas terrorist, and yet it's Netanyahu himself who's funding the terrorists. So how is it that writing an op-ed piece will get you arrested on the street by half a dozen

agents, and whisked off to who knows where? But if you are Netanyahu, you can, and you're labeled a Hamas supporter, and therefore a terrorist because of that op-ed piece and that alone. And yet Netanyahu can put them in power and give them money. And don't you dare criticize Netanyahu because then you are anti-Semitic. I've had enough of this stuff. I'm not going to play this game anymore with these people. Before we have our guest join us, I'm not going to go to break here. He's going to be joining us in about five minutes.

And I've got some things that I want to say about what is happening with technology as well. Not just the digital currencies that are being set there. Not just the graft and corruption of the Trump family of his cabinet that is there and the rest of it. But take a look at this. Apple is quietly working on an AI agent to replicate a human doctor.

And of course, they're also working on incorporating this into their health app as well. I wonder if they're going to call this agent, Agent Smith. But again, the AI agents, as I was talking about this the other day, that's where there's going to be a lot of change. You're going to hear that a great deal. AI agents have a lot of autonomy. You can give them a task, and they can go out and do it.

And if you combine AI with robotics, that is going to be an incredibly powerful thing and those two technologies are converging very quickly. It's one of the reasons why the Nvidia CEO is saying that you're going to have all these robots walking the street because they will have more intelligence and more autonomy and independence than the chat bots do. But going back to Apple's secret health program here, they said the idea is to have a revamped health app that will collect all sorts of health metrics. And it'll have a major emphasis on tracking food.

Now we've seen that from all these different health apps. You know, we've had phone apps like that and watch apps like that that have been there for a long time. But the key thing about this is going to be just how much more information it gets from you. And so a lot of people say, well, the problem with using this for health is that it hallucinates and all the rest of the stuff. But that's not really the issue.

And when we look at how all these different things are coming together. You've got the, as I said before, the executive for Figure talking about how these AI robots driven by AI agents are about to hit us in a massive way. The way he described it, he said 2025 is going to be the iPhone moment said 2025 is going to be the iPhone moment for humanoid robots. Great. Great. A multi-trillion dollar market for humanoid robots. Robots to cook your meals, clean your house, do your laundry, tutor your kids, drive your car, cut your grass, take care of your elderly parents, repair the plumbing, it'll help you across the street and it'll shoot you in the head if they tell it to. Right? I mean seriously. You know, when we look at all this stuff, I've made that comment about all these DARPA projects for the longest time.

So, oh look, it's just here to help veterans who have PTSD or it's here to help a little old lady cross the street or we're going to put a chip in your brain so that you can see again or we're going to repair the paralysis or whatever. And then what? Then what are these people going to do with it? That's the question. So, Adcock, who is the founder of Figure, that's that robotic company that, you know, is very impressive, but talks with a California dude accent. So, there is an iPhone moment happening with humanoids right now. He said his robots are already working on the production line in BMW's Spartanburg factory.

He said to succeed at this you have to do three things that have never been done before. And you have to get all three of them right within the next five years or you are going to fail in the robotics industry. So they got a window and actually like I said before the Nvidia CEO said before five years is up streets are going to be filled with robots and so he said here's the three things that you're going to do. First thing you got to build hardware for humanoids that's incredibly complex that can never fail.

Oh that's good. I've seen a lot of technology that can never fail haven't you Travis? I've never seen any technology that doesn't fail. It's all fallible because it's made by fallible people. Okay, so I think we just, maybe that's good news. Maybe if these things do fail, maybe they will have kind of a segue moment, you know, like when George Bush fell off the segue. Everybody's like, I don't know.

Well, we'll see. It can never fail. And it's got to work at human speeds with human range of motion. The second thing you have is a neural net problem, not a control systems problem. You can't code your way out of this problem. You need to have a robot that can ingest human-like data through a neural net and has to be able to imitate what humans do. You know, these health watches and other things, that's going to be a big help, right? Because what Apple is talking about in their new app is having its AI monitoring what you're doing and watching everything, everything these people are about.

This is one of the things that is so creepy about it. Not only are they hell-bent on complete totalitarian control of us in our society. Not only do they want to own everything, but they're also kind of disgusting voyeurs, you know, who want to just watch everything they were doing just to learn from us. Isn't that creepy? So he said, so you need to have a robot that can ingest human-like data through a neural net and has the ability to imitate what humans do. Humanoid robots are not like arms bolted to a factory table. None of those robots have AI. And then finally the third problem. Third problem is that you have to generalize. He says this is the holy grail of

robotics. To have a robot look at something it's never seen before or heard through speech and to be able to tell a robot how to do it and then to have it be able to complete that task end to end with one neural net and that's kind of what they demonstrated when they gave those robots a task and put a bunch of stuff in them they hadn't identified before and have to figure out what they do with it he said if you can solve those three things then you're in the right decade and you're at the iPhone moment and we can confidently say that we have solved or are making major progress on all three problems. In other words, when

he talks about an iPhone moment, he's talking about this technology being ubiquitous everywhere we see it. He says if we had a hundred thousand robots a day that all worked, our two commercial customers would take them all. But he said, we're not able to do that because we haven't scaled up the supply chain yet and it's still early. He said, we could sign on 50 Fortune 100 companies by the weekend. We are bombarded by demand. Listen to what he had to say. Okay. So they got demand for robots. Why? Because he said the supply of humans is going down. They designed that as well, folks. Everything they did was a design for that. Socially, they've conditioned us to not want families and children. Physically, they have harmed our bodies

with the drugs and the food additives and other things like that. And they have engaged in mass culling of people as well with their wars and their vaccines. There is unbounded demand. We could ship one million robots this month if they were all ready to go. And this is why I say they don't need immigrants except for the divide and conquer aspect of it. It's the only reason they need them.

And I could go further into this. Big Tech has got designs on reading your mind, even talking about the fact that these earbuds, they're going to start using them to do that in the same way they monitor your health. And the real issue when we look at the health apps and things like that that are there to help you, they are grabbing your health data and who are they gonna sell it to who are they gonna give it to well they're gonna give it to the government they're gonna give it to insurance companies they're going to give it to lawyers and lawsuits and all the way it just it goes

on and on and that's part of their big data well we're out of time. We've got a guest who is ready to join us. Real quickly, I will... Oh, he won't... Let's see. Okay, he's not ready to come on. Okay. So we're going to continue with this. That's good. I'm going to continue with it. I'm going to read some of these comments as well. I saw the note up there and I thought he was ready to join us, but the note was that he's not going to be joining us just yet Knights of the storm Said on rumble the only legitimate purpose for our government is to organize defense against foreign invaders and to address grievances between States I agree. I agree. Yeah, you know, it's interesting The only regulation I would like to see for the government is the Bill of Rights the Bill of Rights If you stop and think about it is regulation for the government is the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights, if you stop and think about it, is regulation for the government.

That's why people like Obama talk about the Bill of Rights. Well, that's negative. That's negative. Yeah, it's negative because it tells you what you cannot do. It doesn't give us our rights. Our rights come from God. The Bill of Rights is a regulation of the government to tell it what they cannot do, what they cannot take

away from us that we already have. And they don't do anything about that. On Rumble, Timed Non-Tides says, libertarians will sell the roads like the internet to fascists, and fascists will force and coerce all manner of outrage on us. Well, yeah, I agree about that. Let me go back to this tech mate thing. Again, as I said, the real issue is going to be the privacy data. And the real issue is how they have an insatiable appetite for data. This is what's really behind all the TikTok stuff, right? Yeah, they use it to manipulate opinion.

They're not happy because TikTok opinions out there are against Israel and it's a Gaza genocide, but it's beyond that. They want to be able to form your opinions, and most importantly, they want to be able to observe and watch you and learn from you and feed that into their AI to make their AI healthier. It really is.

It's kind of like, I need brains. It's like the zombie AI out there. Feed it your brains. Well, the Rand Corporation has been talking about health monitoring and the Internet of bodies for quite some time as This article on technocracy news says due to participants of Apple's health studies Know that they may have their health and personal information shared with the government health agencies with law enforcement With you know for as part of subpoenas or litigation or part of insurance agencies or other

approved study researchers. They said on the one wrist you've got instead of on the one hand on the one wrist you have democratized data driven healthcare that sounds like a good thing but then on the other wrist you have a constant stream of health and lifestyle data that is transmitted to Apple and to government agencies and that sounds like a privacy nightmare. data that is transmitted to Apple and to government agencies. And that sounds like a privacy nightmare. And then there are the secret projects that Apple has been calling Moonshot Help Initiatives. Bloomberg learned about this secret project from anonymous sources within Apple.

The project was developed over 12 years. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent developing non-invasive Technology for example instead of measuring your blood directly they can use silicon photonics to shine a light off of your tissue and to Calculate the concentration of glucose. I mean wouldn't you want to do that instead of having to prick your fingers every day this project was so secret that it was housed under a cover company, a small startup that had no ties to Apple, including a separate office, branding key cards, the works that was eventually taken over

by Apple's elite exploratory design group. If successful in their efforts, Apple Watch would become the obvious choice for diabetics. But then of course, there is also iBrain that is coming. efforts, Apple Watch would become the obvious choice for diabetics. But then of course there is also iBrain that is coming. And they said in this article that Apple has made waves with their AirPods Pro. They can test your hearing, they can make adjustments for environmental noise. These AirPods are overloaded with different electrodes.

And so the concern is are they going to use this to monitor your brain? You know, you've got these beyond the brain-computer interface where they insert it, you know, do some screw top surgery as they do with the man with two brains, you know, screw the skull off and put it in. But no, seriously, instead of doing an actual implant like Muska's doing, you also have these things that people wear, that's just a bunch of sensor electrodes. Could they reduce that to just two that go into your ear? So while they're feeding you music, could they be listening to you, listening to your

brain while you listen to the music? So they might be able to visualize your thoughts, who knows. But that is really where the last frontier for these people is and that is your brain. And Technocracy News has got a conference coming up about that very thing. Katherine Austin Fitz is going to be moderating it. That'd be an interesting thing to check out. I don't have any connection with that. I'm just saying, just for your information. As they finished, they said this is just the beginning of the bio surveillance thing to check out. I don't have any connection with that. I'm just saying, just for your information. As they finished, they said this is just the beginning of the biosurveillance industry.

Apple has announced in late February 2025 it will spend a half a trillion dollars over the next four years to build data centers, AI control centers all across the U. And it ends with these wise words, do not fall for trends. Do not fall for trends. We can now clearly see the pathway. And this is going to be, you know, when the iPhone came out, yeah, that was cool. It really was. It was a neat thing, but now it has become your big brother device. Now that we are at the iPhone moment for humanoid robotics, now that we've seen that the iPhone has become big brother itself, what will the robotics become? On Rumble, DG8 says, David, under Trump, the stock market had its worst quarter in 23 years. Yeah, I talked about that earlier. Uncertainty with tariffs will put what's left of small businesses in America under.

It'll have higher unemployment. MAGA, we're tired of winning. I agree with that. We'll take a quick break. We'll be right back. One, two, three, four. One, one, one, two, three, four. One, one, two, three, four. One, one, one, two, three, four. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Good evening. Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow. Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.

Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat the menace is invisible silent yet deadly carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in jackboots and all with their solutions because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags. But one must wonder is this truly about saving the planet or are we simply being led to pasture? Is it merely a MacGuffin? The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that

truth can stand up to scrutiny. And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull. So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show. And now back to our regularly scheduled program. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, you know, EPA Chief Lee Zeldin has just announced that he is going to shut the EPA Museum. shut the EPA Museum. This museum is only one room because I guess really they haven't accomplished that much they really want to talk about. I mean they've had some environmental disasters that have been entirely the fault of the EPA.

Real big disasters but just a one-room museum for the EPA was going to cost $600,000 a year to run. Well, I'll tell you what, I think they should replace that one-room museum with the Hitchcock video that I just got there. They just put that in the lobby of the EPA and play it in a loop. I think Lee Zeldin would like that if he ever saw it. Who knows? He could use that instead of the one-room museum. And he might save more than $600,000. He might actually save us all from the insanity of net zero. But there is a lot of insanity that's going

around. We got 17 Teslas in Rome that were destroyed, and they're doing this even in Europe. And just a week or so ago, they had another 30 that were destroyed. Initially, they thought that was an accident, but now they're starting to investigate it based on arson. And the reality is that although Lee Zeldin may be doing this, and some hopeful signs there in the Trump administration, Elon Musk, however, is not on our side with this issue. He never was.

He bought 100% into all of this insanity. He was a hardcore leftist. This is where he made his money, selling green grifts and things like that. And just to give you an example, before he reinvented himself as the hero of conservatives, Musk has a foundation. He's got a Musk Foundation just like Gates has got a Gates Foundation. The Rockefellers have a Rockefeller Foundation. He's got a Musk Foundation.

And they have put up an award of $100 million for development of carbon dioxide removal technology. That dovetails really nicely, doesn't it, with what Doug Burgum, the governor of North Dakota and Kristi Noem, the governor of South Dakota, and this guy who was running the pipeline – I forget his name and the name of the pipeline, but the three of them went down to Mar-a-Lago. We're talking to Trump about all of this stuff and now Doug Burgum is Interior Secretary. They were going to build a pipeline that was going to go across the country and it was going to capture CO2 in other places and then pump it into the ground.

Well, you've got to be able to capture that carbon. And that's what Elon Musk set up a competitive contest with a prize of $100 million to grab CO2 out of the atmosphere. Basically mess up our atmosphere because we have plants who need that. It is touted as the largest incentive prize in history. $100 million. An extraordinary milestone and it is boasted about on Trump's XPrize.org. XPrize.org run by the Musk Foundation.

XPrize carbon removal is aimed at attacking the biggest threat facing humanity, fighting climate change, and rebalancing the Earth's carbon cycle. Messing it up, actually. But isn't that interesting, how this all converges? You got these two governors, North and South Dakota, now both of them in and the Trump administration.

You've got the CEO of the pipeline, and then you've got Musk working on how they're going to grab CO2 and stick it in the pipeline. Well, I tell you what, these griffs just keep coming together, just like that decentralized finance world liberty nonsense. So they're using so-called man-made climate change as a ruse to enslave people. By the way, this is coming from the New American. Excellent article. The X Prize Goals.

The planet is reaching, says the X Prize, the planet is reaching its highest temperatures in over three million years. They say that in a promotional video. Prove it. Prove it. You know, and so what if it's true, right? I don't believe that at all. It's false. It's absurd. Three million years they've done the data analysis on this. Have they really? So, neither XPRIZE nor the Musk Foundation offer any data to justify any of their fallacious claims says the New American. And that's probably because actual data proves otherwise time and time and time again.

They've got some links to studies that have disproven this nonsense. XPRIZE launched its carbon removal project in 2019 before Trump had, before Musk should say, had his come to Trump moment, his road to Damascus or his road to Washington DC experience, right? He has a sudden enlightenment that Trump is our Lord and Savior, right? So he was doing this, He started this back in 2019. They had 1300 teams from 88 countries are competing in this because this is a big prize, $100 million. Competitors were charged with removing carbon from air, from oceans, from land, and from rocks. In 2023, XPRIZE then selected 20 finalists out of these 1300 teams, or down to 20 in

2023, to win contestants have to remove and sequester 1,000 tons of CO2 per year and have to demonstrate the potential to scale to gigaton levels by 2050. Gigatons of CO2 removed. We've only got 0.04% of the atmosphere is CO2. They want to get rid of all of it, I guess. So we want to turn the world into Mars? Is that the objective here? Because you're going to be destroying the environment if you deplete the CO2.

We need the CO2. It's not an evil. It's not...CO2, carbon dioxide is not like carbon monoxide. It's not going to kill us all. It's not going to make the planet warmer. There's no connection between CO2 increase and temperature increase. It was supposed to...CO2 was supposed to drive the temperature increase. Remember that? That was the Michael Mann nonsense. And that has been completely debunked. It has been disproven by time. And not only time and time again, but all their predictions have been disproven. That was what was at the center of Climate Gate back in 2009. And yet here, you know,

a decade after Climate Gate, you've got Elon Musk setting up a hundred million dollar contest to get rid of CO2, which we already know by now, is not a problem. Why is he doing that? Well, because they want to make a lot of money with carbon sequestration and with pipelines and such like that. That's what this is truly about. It's not about the environment at all. It's about making Elon Musk more money. He's not going to invest a hundred million million out of the goodness of his heart.

This is an investment to make money. And we will soon know who the winners are. Elon Musk is going to announce the winners of his environmental destruction project on Earth Day this year, April the 22nd. You think this guy is on your side? Come on, MAGA, grow up. Take the idolatry glasses off. It's disgusting how stupid they are. The UK Labour Party has launched its own net zero crackdown, now on boats. You know, it's kind of a hobby that people have in the UK. They've got these little

channels. There's one right there. They've built these canals and they've got these boats that, you know, just kind of go up and down these canals. Some people live on these houseboats and stuff like that. Well, they don't want those things to exist anymore. Labor is implementing stricter net zero measures on fishing boats, canal barges, that's what that is, and pleasure craft. And so, maritime decarbonization strategy. Boat owners will be forced to swap out their diesel engines, their petrol generators, the gasoline, their wood fire stoves for electric motors, batteries, and extra shore power hookups. There will also be tax increases on marine fuel.

New boats will be required to be entirely electric. Maritime bosses are branding the government's plans completely and utterly impractical. And they are completely and utterly unnecessary as well. Just like Elon Musk's carbon sequestration is completely unnecessary. Anyone that thinks making thousands to millions of these giant batteries that you can never dispose of is more environmentally friendly than fuel is insane. They're just insane and so incredibly stupid. That's right and risky. So stupid and they just eat it up. It's incredibly expensive. So the people like Musk get really really rich off of this stuff and it creates a massive fire hazard force as well.

Uh, the technology for electric engines on small boats is not even there yet. The amount of diesel that a yacht burns in a year is negligible anyway, even if the diesel engines were replaced, it would still be offset by the making of electric batteries as you were just saying, Travis. They never, that doesn't count. The energy that we use to make an electric car, an electric battery, the resources, the materials, that doesn't count. We don't count that in our carbon stuff.

As we said many times, the EVs arrive at the dealer floor with a huge carbon footprint compared to an ordinary internal combustion engine car. Most barges, yachts and pleasure boats are hobbies, which means that they don't get a lot of use. It's just occasional use. But this labor government is going to shut down everything. This is how they get you to the point where you own nothing. Where on earth does the government think ordinary people who have skimped and scraped to renovate and maintain them will get the money to replace engines, batteries and the rest of this nonsense? They don't care. It's just like they're telling people you can't have gas heaters in cold and damp UK, and you certainly

can't do coal or wood or anything like that. You're going to have to have a heat pump. Well, they just don't work in that kind of a climate very well. And it's a gigantic expense to go back and to refit all of that stuff. But they want to rewild the UK. They want to take it back to feudal times. They're going to go back in. They are so intent on making sure that people don't have gas heat that the UK government is going in and ripping out the gas lines so that they can't connect, won't have anything that they connect up to in future administrations if they come

to their senses. As for fishermen, this mad crusade will end up destroying their livelihoods. Well, hey, the Labor government is fine with that. You can put them on the welfare doll. You can put them on universal basic income. That's one of the things that technocrats say. They view everything as a service. You know, you don't have a right to work, for example.

You have a right to universal basic income. We're going to serve you. Well, I would say it's like the twilight zone to serve mankind. Thirty-five years ago, NASA space scientist Dr. Roy Spencer got the climate stuff exactly right. He said, and again, this is a guy who was working for NASA, he was working on satellites and there's a clip of the article right there that you can see. He said, if someone is sure that there's greenhouse warming occurring, hey, you listen to this musk?

That's more emotional than scientific because the evidence has been questionable. Over the decades we've gone from questionable evidence to just plain hoax. And so this paper, this article here, was from the 30th of March, 1990. So you know, we're talking about 35 years ago. And 35 years ago, he said, satellite measurement shows no global warming. Computer models of the greenhouse effect predict an average global warming of nearly one half a degree per decade, said John Christie, a research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Instead, he said, in the northern hemisphere, there was no temperature trend at all.

Christie said, while in the southern hemisphereisphere temperatures were slightly down, a net effect to basically zero. There's your net zero. They've already got it. It's not net zero energy use. It's net zero climate change. And we have seen that now for 35 years. These people did this in 1990.

And that's well before you had Al Gore's convenient lie. That's well before, you know, when he was pushing Michael Mann's hockey stick nonsense and everything. It was well before climate gate, where they said, hey, our models don't work and we've got to figure out how we're going to hide the decline. So back in 1990, he said, this stuff is not working. He says, as a matter of fact, you know, it hasn't changed in the northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere. The temperatures have actually gone down.

But, you know, it's about zero, we'll say, net zero. Well, he said, Spencer and Christie spent two years studying data from a series of weather satellites, the first of which was launched in 1978. By the way, in 1978, they were still, that was about the time that they flipped the script from saying that we were going to go into global cooling. They flipped the script and said, no, we're going to have a global warming. You know, just We were all going to die because the planet was going to have a new ice age. Then we're all going to die because it's going to be too warm. So that was right about the time they put this up. They said, how do they measure the temperature with a satellite?

Well they measure the microwave heat emission that is given off by oxygen. Studying the measurements, the two scientists were surprised to see substantial changes in global temperature versus climate averages on a monthly and even weekly basis. They said we'd see 10 to 20 years worth of global warming and cooling in just a few months. In other words, the weather was changing. The weather was changing rapidly. What was not changing was climate. And this is why these people come up with all these alarmist things. Oh, look at this.

It's the warmest year we've ever had and so forth and so on. They said we would see, even with the satellite stuff, they would see very quick, massive changes, cooling, warming, but it would all average out to a net zero climate change. He says it is much more accurate than using thermometers. He said first of all, the data covers the whole globe without relying on weather stations that are unevenly distributed. And they interpolate, right? And a lot of these places, if they still have them, they're now in places that are kind of like heat islands, or they're

maybe now on an airport tarmac when before they were in a more rural setting, if they even have them. And then of course there's also the issue of the accuracy of these digital thermometers compared with the earlier readings if they have them. They were taken from analog thermometers. He said, �Secondly, the data measures temperatures high above the Earth�s surface where a greenhouse signal would be more apparent than at the surface.� So in other words, if you got greenhouse warming, you would see it at the high above the surface instead of more at the� So all of this stuff, folks, is based on a lie.

So again, that EPA museum was a pet project of the Biden administration, $600,000 a year just for a single room. And we've got something much better than that that we can share with people. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. So So So You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back. This is a great comment from Knights of the Storm on Rumble. An EV boat is a Viking burial waiting to happen. The battery catches fire. It wasn't that long ago that I went back and looked at the Vikings, that film that was

done by Kirk Douglas and had Tony Curtis in it as well. I enjoyed that film. I like the music. I like that theme. Over and over again and it just kind of drills it into your head. But yeah, they have that Viking funeral where they put the dead body on the Viking ship and all the guys shoot the flaming arrows onto it.

I love that comment. But it was he financed that whole thing and Ragnar who was the other guy that had in there. They said Tony Curtis's wife Jamie Lee not Jamie Lee Curtis, that's their daughter, Janet Lee. And Ernest Borgnein, Ernest Borgnein was Ragnar. And anyway, it was, I enjoyed that movie, I enjoyed the music, I should use that as a theme thing, and I thought, no, people get tired of that, it's too repetitive, that theme.

Anyway, Rumble, Bride B. Mack says max says can that hitchcock piece be a standalone clip that we can share yes and I've been asked that before huh Ernest Borgnein what did I say anyway yeah that was Karen I think she's got a little bit of a delay so does my brain I think I did come up with that. But anyway, yes, we will get that out. I wanted to pin that up on my Twitter account and we want to get a bug on it. So let's do that today. I keep forgetting to do that.

I had other people ask me to do that. So we'll do that. We'll put a bug on it. We'll put it up on Twitter and I'll pin it at the top. Rumble, Info Night. Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. It says I'm a day behind Spencer Morrison's views on tariffs was an interesting insight to the problems that we face with corporate status. I hope to see guard Goldsmith as a guest to have a balanced take. Yeah, we can

get guard on talk about that and to give his take on that.. My big thing is I want to minimize taxes, not double them up. I want to minimize government. I want to get it small enough to fit in the Constitution. And as Ron Paul has said, if we get government small enough, it doesn't matter how you pay your taxes. And I would only put the caveat in there that I would still want to get rid of the income tax no matter how small because it requires all this cumbersome self-incrimination reporting and all the rest of this stuff. It's a really, really the worst way to collect taxes. And so yeah, do it as a sales tax, do it as a tariffs. I don't care how you do it. Just it's got to, you got to make the government small or none of this stuff matters.

It's all just going to be, and they don't care about the deficit, as I said before. Why are they so hell bent on increasing tariffs and keeping the income tax and all the rest of the stuff when they don't care what the deficit is? Trump wanted to remove the debt ceiling for two years. The Democrats have their economic theory, which is absolute nonsense. It's the most ridiculous piece of economic sophistry. It's not even sophistry. They don't even try to come up with a rationale for the modern monetary theory. All they say is that deficits don't matter. And they know that government spending money creating it out of thin air creates inflation.

So they said, so if inflation gets out of control, we just raise taxes on our enemies. You know, that's the Democrat plan. Trump says, well, let's forget about it. Let's just get rid of the debt ceiling. So that's the reality. Well, we had Mike Huckabee, who has been chosen by Trump to be his U.S. ambassador to Israel. He had his confirmation hearing. And I've got to say that Mike Huckabee has just become an unbelievable embarrassment

to Christians. Just unbelievable. In this hearing, he calls Mormons, Christians, and Jews all people of the book. And I would say, what book are you reading, Huckabee? What book? They've all got a different book. So which book are you reading? This is... The other two are non-Trinitarian to start with. Mike Huckabee said this in the hearing, in the Congressional hearing, and of course he is a very outspoken Zionist. The exchange began when Republican Senator John Curtis of Utah said his home state quote has a very special relationship with Israel. Yeah, they both agree that they both agree on a lot of different things about works and

all the rest of the stuff from a Christian perspective. It says, �I like to tease my friends with ties to Israel, but until 18 I thought I grew up in Zion in Utah. We have Zion Park and we have Jordan River and there�s lots of ties.� Yeah, they tried to bring back kind of a works-based Jewish religion. But both of those deny the fundamental truths about the Lord Jesus Christ. But Huckabee's not going to say that.

A former Southern Baptist minister, you know the other day I talked about a guy who almost was president of the United States. He missed by one vote becoming Lincoln's running mate in 1864 and lost to Andrew Johnson from around this area. Andrew Johnson, of course, became president when Lincoln was assassinated. This guy could have become president, but he didn't. He lost that vote by one, and he got out of politics, and he became a pastor. And Huckabee went exactly the opposite direction. Anyway, so

the respect that I have for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is extraordinary because I respect so much of the commitment to family, to moral righteousness, to a sense of right and wrong. And I would agree with that. I think the Mormons have great families. They've been very much a focus on that, much more so than most of the society. Israel is said in many ways as a reflection of our own heritage and history. It is the Judeo-Christian law that there is right and there is wrong upon which all Western civilization is built, but certainly our system of government. But I think when

we talk about Judeo-Christian, I think we do a disservice to Christ. We really do. You know, there is a connection there in the fact that, as Augustine said, the old is revealed in the new, and the new is concealed in the old, concealed in types and pictures and prophecies and things like that. And that's the connection that is there. And there is a common morality that is there between the different groups to a large degree. But Huckabee appeared in the hearing to equate the religious beliefs of Mormonism with Protestant churches and with Jewish synagogues.

He said the spiritual connections, this is where he goes, he's not just talking about okay, you know, we can be co-belligerents and we can stand for the protection of children in terms of transgender stuff and we can be co-belligerents in this war to abort children, to mutilate them and things like that. We can stand against the cultural decay and decline. Yes, you can do those types of things with people with whom you don't have religious agreement, but Huckabee goes further than that, which is really amazing since he used to be a pastor.

He said, �The spiritual connections between your church, mine, and many churches in America with Jewish congregations to the state of Israel is because we ultimately are people of the book. He said we believe the Bible. Well, do you? Huckabee, do you believe John 1, 1? And the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God and the Word was God? How do you explain that? Because that is not what the other people of the book believe. The Muslims don't believe it, the Mormons don't believe it, the Jews don't believe that. And that is the essence of our faith.

So it says the connection is not geopolitical, it is spiritual. No it is not. It is a political connection that we can have with people who do not agree with us. We can have a, we can work with atheists to protect the lives of children and things like that but it is not a spiritual connection that we have with unbelievers. Huckabee's response to Curtis's question was in stark contrast to his response with similar lines of questioning. During the 2008 presidential campaign, Huckabee asked former Utah Senator Mitt Romney at the

time, they were both running for president in 2008, don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers? And then he backpedaled when he was criticized for that. He says, I don't think that his being a Mormon or not being a Mormon has a thing to do with his being president. I wrote an op-ed piece at the time for WND and I didn't work for them. I wasn't a public figure or anything. I just wrote a letter to the editor and they put it out as an op-ed piece and said, here's a letter of the week thing talking about the importance of character in terms of a president and what a person believes and what we see about their character. And I said, we can see from Mitt Romney's character that he's severely lacking regardless of what his doctrinal beliefs are.

But anyway, Huckabee walked back against that. I doubled down on it, quite frankly. So what Huckabee said at the March 25th hearing, came under scrutiny from Democrat senators who are concerned about his opposition to the two-state solution and his past support for Israel's annexation of the West Bank. Huckabee said that he acknowledged that he previously had supported such a move. He distinguished between stealing land, he said, stealing land is a problem, but purchasing it, he said, is a legitimate transaction.

Okay, well how does this go? How about if you bomb and burn your neighbor's house and then you offer him at the point of a gun to buy it at a discounted price? What is that, Huckabee? I think that's what we see going on here. But you know, it's not just Huckabee that doesn't care about fundamental Christian doctrines about the Trinity. A survey shows � family feud here in time � only 16 percent professing Christians

believe in the Trinity. So there you go. Huckabee is in the majority position, 84%. If he believes in the Trinity, he doesn't think it's important, evidently. Only 11% of Americans and a humiliating 16% of self-identified Christians actually believe in the Trinity. That's not a minor doctrinal issue, nor is it merely mispronouncing �Nicene.� It doesn't come from Nicene. It comes from

the Apostles writings. And you can see it in the Old Testament as well. Trinity is concealed in the Old Testament, but it's revealed in the New, how it is there and it is also there in the writings of the Christians. And what do we mean for those of you who don't know what I'm talking about here? What we mean is that God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are all God, but they're not the same. Three persons, but all God. Not three different gods. It's not three different gods. It's one god, one godhead, but they're all individual persons. Now, that sounds like a contradiction, but it's, we would say that it is a mystery. And why would we think that God, the creator of the universe, would be like anything that we have seen as creatures. Well, I haven't seen anything.

How could something be three and one? I don't understand that. And when you look at what different people teach, different groups teach, they don't teach that same thing. And denying the nature of God Himself, which is central to the teachings of the New Testament. While still showing up to church potlucks, everything is fine, it's just like insisting you're vegan while simultaneously eating bacon-wrapped pork chops. This author is a dissenter.

He said, �Even among so-called born-again Christians, only one of four believe in the triune God. They're worshipping some do-it-yourself deity that has cobbled together from Instagram quotes and The Chosen. So how do we get here? According to researcher George Barna, it might be because America's theologians quote unquote, put theologian in air quotes, now include names like Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, and Russell Brand, or politicians like Mike Huckabee and Paula White. I consider her to be a politician, not a pastor.

I cannot believe the number of listeners Joe Rogan has. It blows my mind that millions of people tune in to listen to this idiot, this no-nothing simpleton. Yeah, and he's all over the place. His entire take always boils down to you should try some hallucinogens. It eventually always comes back to that. Yeah, the mushroom drug pusher. Don't worry, when it was Oliver Anthony, I had played that a couple of times. He goes on his program and somehow the subject of pornography came up and Oliver Anthony was like, you know, that's really bad. It's really bad for you. And Joe Rogan was like, well, it's like alcohol.

Some people can handle it and everything. I mean, he's literally the voice of Satan. Don't worry. You won't die. Eat of that fruit, you will surely not die. I mean, he's actually fulfilling the role of Satan there. I know it happens to some people. Don't worry, it won't happen to you. Indulge yourself in drugs and alcohol and mushrooms and pornography. You'll be just fine, says Joe Rogan. Apparently, it works for him. He gets paid a lot of money by Spotify, and they're the only podcast platform that won't allow me. They give him tens of millions of dollars every year.

10s of millions of dollars to effectively just say, whoa, that's crazy every once in a while. Yeah, that's right. He doesn't have any opinion on anything, really. And he doesn't stick to anything. Anyway, he says, let's not let Catholics off the hook. Only 9% of them believe in the Trinity, despite reciting the Nicene Creed every week when they go to church. And Gen Z millennials, a pitiful 7-8% are Trinitarian, generations that can identify every obscure Pokemon by silhouette but couldn't pick out the Holy Spirit out of a divine lineup.

I'm feeling a little bit hurt by that comment. Yeah, but you can't identify the Pokemon, right? That is the thing. He says, so this is the American church in 2025. Baptized, but biblically illiterate. Loud, but lost. Busy but barren. He says, we've got churches that are packed with people who don't know the God they claim

to worship, they don't fear the word that they've never read, and they don't feel the absence of a spirit that they never knew was there. And the pastors are too busy prepping their next seven-week Life Hacks from David series to notice that their congregation thinks that the Trinity is either a girled band or a yoga pose. But hey, at least the fog machine works. You guys went to, my sons went to a church and I said, so how was it? And he said, it's got a fog machine. The pastor was good, the theology was sound, but it still just does blow my mind that it's basically a light show.

There's a fog machine, they've got those laser things spinning around. Yeah, yeah. Well, you know, at least it's loud. You know, that's a great thing, isn't it? And then I'll finish up with this in this segment here. We'll take a quick break. I saw this on AmericanReformer.org, and of course they're big Trump supporters, I guess I shouldn't be surprised with this,

but the headline got me. Because we always talk about the doctrine of the lesser magistrate and how a lesser magistrate can stand in the gap if he is standing with the king or in this particular case in the United States, the Constitution, because the law is king here and they all swear allegiance to the Constitution just as you would swear allegiance to a king. Lex Rex was what the founders called it, people at the time of 1776, no king but Jesus, but we will have a rule of law. Anyway, you know, the doctrine of lesser magistrate, which is very, very important, not just in Christian societies, but also in pagan societies, the Doctor and the Lesser Magistrate.

And Matt Rojala has got an excellent book on that, a very small book, but thorough and a quick read, and I've had him on many times. Anyway, so I saw this headline, A Magistrate Who Protracts. Do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly. I was like, oh, good, all right. So I click on it to read it. And what are these people talking about? They're talking about Donald Trump. It's like, whoa, wait a minute.

Walk humbly? How in the world do you project that onto Donald Trump? Do justice, love mercy? I don't think so. I don't see any of that stuff there. And certainly he doesn't have any attachment whatsoever to the Constitution. back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. I get to some of the mail that I have received.

I've got some comments and I've got some questions. And actually, I've got a question for you, Travis. This is from a listener, Bob. It says, I never see any ads and I watch on Rumble. Do you have any idea why that is? I have no clue. Yeah, I don't know. Maybe you've got a really good ad blocker on the browser you're using.

Maybe you have a gifted membership, which could be preventing you from seeing ads. I don't really know how the rumble system works fully. I'd like to know more, but there's only so many hours in the day. Yeah, that's right. Well, and this was from a listener, Lorraine, I'm sorry, and I'm sorry I haven't replied to you yet via email.

I will do that in case you don't hear this because again, we do the program five days a week, three hours a day, and so she may not hear this. I'm going to, I'll reply to you by email because this is a question she had about the show on Roku. She said, I liked using the Roku app for the show, but I want to let you know that the app is not working. When I open the app, there is no content. Well that's because, and as I mentioned it before on the show, that's because we had

paid money to get on Roku with a company that set this up and it was supposed to be just a temporary measure to put this all on Vimeo. We knew that Vimeo would shut me down. They're one of the most politically correct out there. So they did in fact do that after a couple of months. They shut us down. However, if you got Roku, you can still watch our show. You just have to do it through the Rumble channel that's on Roku, right?

Or the Rumble app. Yeah. So if you have Roku, there is a Rumble app on Roku. So you can just search The David Knight Show on your Rumble app through Roku and we'll be there. You can watch everything. Good. Good.

Yes. That's very important. And so we need to make that clear. We should make that clear on the website as well, that people can watch on Roku via Rumble. Yeah we should also put together a commercial about that. Yeah. So many different things to do. Yeah that's right. Well this is from John he says as a former resident of Oklahoma I cannot access most news because he's now living abroad. And so he says, I can't access most news. I keep up on local events.

I like to back in the U S he says, I'm blocked by news channels that are complying with the EU's GDPR laws. Why are Oklahoma news stations submitting themselves to the EU? I can access news in many places like Texas and Nevada without hindrance despite my home state of Nevada having been overtaken by the California Collective in the last 30 years." I think that's kind of strange. Well, that was interesting that Oklahoma is complying with the EU, stuff when other states are not.

Anyway, from the Inflation Reduction Act, he said, which has showered Norway, where I live, with cash allowing me to live the dream for the last few years. He said, what was really getting people upset is the fact that anybody who had a Ukrainian ID would get free transit, free museum passes, you name it, in Norway due to the hardships and the horrors of war. He said, Norway is now a number one destination for Ukrainians because they can do it all for free.

He says, I live here, but I have to pay $15 to $30 for a museum ticket. I wonder how much it costs to get into the EPA museum. I mean if it costs $600,000 a year just to maintain that single room museum, I wonder what the charge we get. But anyway, don't get me started, he said, on public transit either. Well, that reminds me, we have an interesting revelation from Alexei Arestovich. Remember this guy? I've played, talked about him so many times. You know, he came in in 2019 with Zelensky. He in in 2019 with Zelensky. He was the peace envoy because at that time in 2019 this civil war had been going for five years. We had the Obama orchestrated coup

in Ukraine. They installed their people that were connected with, as Catherine Austen-Fitz has pointed out, it's kind of a rat line of corruption going into Ukraine. And so this had been going on for like five years. They had some peace talks and he came back. He was the envoy for the Zelensky government to the peace talks and they came back from an interview and they said, you know, the reporter said, what are the chances of us having peace? And he goes nothing. She goes, oh, that's bad. And he goes goes, oh it gets worse. He said in three years we're going to be invaded by Russia. How do you know that? And he said, and she said, oh that's horrible. He goes, yeah the country will be havoced. And she said, oh that's even worse, you know. He goes, but we'll get into NATO. Oh, okay. Well he has somebody who's no longer with

the government because he's a little bit too candid just like that. After the war began, that he had predicted three years before it began, Restovich and one of these attacks, they had some cruise missiles and they were firing at the cruise missiles as they were coming in because, you know, cruise missiles go relatively slow compared to missiles. And so they fired at this cruise missile and it creamed into an apartment building. Now the Ukrainian government, Zelensky, was saying that that apartment building had been targeted by the Russians because the cruise missiles are extremely accurate.

I had a friend who was in the military in the Pentagon. He said, yeah, back in the 80s, he said, we could pick out which window in the Kremlin we wanted to fly the cruise missile through. So when this cruise missile hits the apartment building, they say, wow, that was deliberate. Restovich came out and set the record straight. He said, no, it was actually hit by a defensive fire and then taken off course and creamed into that building. Well, because he was candid and told the truth, the Zelensky administration fired him. Now he's out talking again. This guy who said, we're going to have war in three years and we're going to do it so

we can get into NATO and the country will be destroyed, we don't care. The guy who said, no, that was, told people the truth about that cruise missile. He did an interview again in Ukraine. He claimed that Ukraine's current head of military intelligence, Kirol Budanov, has floated a plan to blow up all of Ukraine's nuclear power plants and possibly some of Russia's as well. He says, the Americans perceive us as a monkey with a grenade. I will not be able to get that image of Ukraine and Zelensky out of my head now. He literally is a monkey with a grenade and we just hope that he hasn't pulled the pin. He said the Americans

know about our plans to blow up nuclear power plants if Ukraine loses and they're not taking away our property but they want to control the things that are dangerous to humanity. He said that because Trump in this administration, Trump has openly said we got to take control of these nuclear reactors and actually the Biden administration knew about it as well and was already making some moves in that direction said Arestovich. Ukraine currently operates four nuclear power plants with a total of 15 reactors. One of them, the Zaporozhetsk nuclear power station, is the largest nuclear plant in Europe and has been under Russian occupation since March of 2022.

Russia for its part has 37 reactors divided among 11 power plants. If all or even some of these reactors were attacked and destroyed simultaneously, the destructive impact would be beyond calculation. The Chernobyl nuclear accident that occurred in Ukraine in 1986 remains the worst disaster involving nuclear energy in history. It killed dozens. It led to long-term health problems for thousands of others. The Chernobyl disaster required the combined resources of the Soviet Union as well as assistance

from other nations to get this under control. So imagine if they blew all these things up. Restovich said that America knows about our plans to blow up all the nuclear power plants if Ukraine starts losing. Budanov was running around with this idea a year and a half ago. He said we need to blow everything up, the Russian plants, if we can reach them as well as our own so that nobody gets them.

Which made me think about Rocky and Bullwinkle and Boris Batonov, this guy's Butonov. Think, darling, think. There must be something really rotten we can do today. I'm thinking, but the worst I come up with is helping to make Moose and Squirrel show one hour longer. Oh, just like you, darling. Always trying to help others get a little more pain out of life.

Yeah, and that's just like these monkeys with a hand grenade in Ukraine. They're always trying to find ways to get people to have a little bit more pain out of life. Boris Batonov, or Butinov in the case of Ukraine. He wants to blow up all the nuclear. These people are literally insane and now we've got German troops that have been moved into Ukraine. First time Germany has deployed troops like that since, well you know, since Hitler. Have a good day. Thank you for joining us. Hello it's me, Vladimir Zelensky.

I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better. And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue. But he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the David Knight Show dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing sand coloured microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. ["Skuttsi i nadezhda"]