The David Knight Show - Wed Episode #2097: Trump the Censor: Free Speech Betrayer And Big Pharma Vaccine Pusher

Episode Date: September 17, 2025

00:00:40 – Free Speech vs. Trump’s BullyingOpening segment on Trump’s threats against reporters, lawsuits, and GOP hate speech proposals, framed as a betrayal of the First Amendment. 00:10:28 �� Canceling Charlie’s LegacyMAGA leaders push censorship in Kirk’s name, turning him into a martyr while undermining his free speech principles. 00:16:01 – Conservatives Mirror the LeftFigures like Greg Gutfeld and JD Vance are accused of adopting leftist-style authoritarian tactics through cancel culture. 00:22:32 – Firing & Government OverreachDebate over firings tied to Kirk’s death, distinguishing private business rights from dangerous state-driven censorship. 00:30:32 – Trump vs. New York Times & EpsteinTrump escalates lawsuits against media outlets while Melania’s ties to Epstein resurface through Michael Wolff’s reporting. 00:44:46 – Trump’s Ballroom & CorruptionTrump boasts about a $250M White House ballroom amid accusations of profiteering billions through crypto while in office. 00:56:41 – George Zen Update & ArrestFollow-up on George Zen, initially suspected in Kirk’s shooting. He is now charged as an accessory and found with child abuse material, raising questions about political connections and intelligence ties. 01:05:29 – Shooter Robinson’s Motives & TextsDetails of Tyler Robinson’s charges and text messages planning Kirk’s assassination. Discussions highlight contradictions, missing evidence, and suspicions of a larger cover-up. 01:11:23 – Peter Thiel & the Antichrist ObsessionDeep dive into Thiel’s secretive Antichrist lectures, his ties to Carl Schmitt and René Girard, and how elites use apocalyptic narratives for political control. 01:24:06 – Surveillance, Palantir & Holy War RhetoricCritique of Palantir’s surveillance empire and Thiel’s allies framing technology as part of a divine mission. Parallels drawn to Dugin in Russia and the weaponization of religion in politics. 01:37:19 – Who Survives the AI Apocalypse?RT interview with Dr. Matthew Mavac on AI risks. He divides humanity into “herd” followers and “harnesser” critical thinkers, warning of mass unemployment, idolatry of AI, and false relationships with chatbots. 01:53:36 – Cancer Treatment Alternatives & Medical CorruptionClosing segment pivots to health, criticizing mainstream cancer treatments as ineffective and highlighting anecdotal alternative protocols as suppressed options outside the medical establishment. 01:57:44 – Trump’s Crackdown on Drug AdsTrump orders FDA to regulate prescription drug ads more strictly, but the host calls it hypocritical given his promotion of COVID shots through taxpayer-funded advertising campaigns. 02:03:26 – Vaccine Deaths & Trump’s ReinventionDiscussion of VAERS data showing child deaths linked to vaccines. Trump is accused of trying to reinvent himself from “father of the vaccine” into a critic, despite his role in Operation Warp Speed. 02:10:06 – Hepatitis B Shots for NewbornsCritique of universal Hepatitis B vaccination at birth, pointing out that the virus spreads mainly through sex, needles, or infected mothers, making newborn shots medically irrational. 02:15:52 – Cancer Protocol Outside Big PharmaAnecdotal success story of a stage-four prostate cancer patient using a hybrid orthomolecular protocol (keto diet, vitamin C, ivermectin, fenbendazole). This is framed as evidence that suppressed alternatives may be more effective than mainstream treatments. 02:24:47 – Unite the Kingdom Rally in LondonMass protest against immigration and globalism draws hundreds of thousands, organized by Tommy Robinson. Elon Musk warns violence is coming if people don’t resist, though skepticism remains about elite figures leading grassroots uprisings. 02:50:16 – Terrorism Charges Dropped in NYC CaseCoverage of a New York judge tossing terrorism and first-degree murder charges against Luigi Mangione, accused of killing a healthcare CEO. The ruling sparks outrage, with the host framing it as proof of a broken justice system and double standards. 02:59:38 – Trump’s Second Venezuela Boat StrikesClosing segment blasts Trump for ordering extrajudicial killings of alleged Venezuelan drug traffickers. These “kinetic strikes” are portrayed as unconstitutional murders designed to justify future wars over oil. Follow the show on Kick and watch live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST https://kick.com/davidknightshow Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHTFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

You know, world of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act it's the david night show as a clock strikes 13 it's wednesday the 17th of september year of our lord 2025 today we're going to take a look at the outrage from the right against free speech these people are trying to cancel everything especially Charlie Kirk's legacy and the First Amendment. And so we're going to take a look at Trump's bullying, his lawsuits, the rest of this stuff. And we're going to, for the last couple of days, I wanted to get to the unite the right rally, or unite the kingdom, I should say, in the U.K., huge, huge rally.

People understand what's going on there. We played the clip already from Elon Musk, warning people that they can't sit on the sidelines, because he didn't say it, but this is a fourth turning. And I would say that even in the UK, they're going to see a civil war, a revolution, and a world war, because that's what their leaders want, just like our leaders want that. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Good morning and welcome to the show today, folks, many of you brief rundown on the articles

that we're going to cover in this segment. This is Trump threatens ABC's Carl on hate speech crackdown, the MAGA crackdown on free speech. This has come from the new statesman, and Trump sues New York Times for 15 billion, over critical books and articles. Most degenerate newspaper in history. Trump slaps New York Times. Most degenerate. That's a bold claim.

More about Trump and the New York Times. Melania, Trump shares Daily Beast statement on removed articles about Epstein Connection. Daily Beast apologized to Melania, Trump, and removes podcast segment over Epstein claims. Pam Bondi's, ridiculous 24 hours. That sounds kind of like a children's book almost. Pam Bondi's.

It was, yeah. It's actually our very, very, very, bad 24 hours because she's supposedly the chief law enforcement officer and she doesn't know or care what the law is. Trump elevates push for Charlie Kirk Act that would let government police speech from the new American. And Trump attacks reporter for asking about profiting of presidency. Yeah, we live in an idiocracy that is becoming increasingly authoritarian and totalitarian. So yeah, the $15 billion lawsuit, Trump said, they're allowed to freely lie, smear, and defame. me of all people, because, you know, it is always about him. I don't care much for the toilet

paper of record, as Joel Salentia said. But, you know, we've all known for the longest time what a joke it is. They've had to give back Pulitzer surprises. You had Taylor Lorenz, who was weeping about being doxed after she had doxed people. The New York Times is a joke, but Trump treats the Constitution as if it were a joke. That's the real issue here. You know, we can really sort this out, Donald, without you. We don't need you to tell us that. And he's, again, when he does these types of things, what he does is he makes heroes out of villains. The York Times is a villain, but he's going to make him a hero. This is going to be a way for these people to recoup their image because it is so tarnished at this point. They're going to go in

there and they're going to fight against Trump. And with their reputation, they will have plenty of I can imagine everybody on the left is going to jump in there to defend the New York Times. Not so much other organizations like The Daily Beast that have been bullied by Melania. But actually, I want to begin with Pam Bondi's 24 hours. This is actually coming from National Review, which is an establishment conservative. And again, they've been very closely tied to the CIA for a long time. I'm not holding them up as an example. but they got this right.

They criticized her for going on to a podcast. She said, we will absolutely target you, go after you, if you're targeting someone with hate speech. The National Review says, actually she won't. She won't target or go after anyone for hate speech

because legally there's no such thing as hate speech in the United States. A government employee, she is bound by the First Amendment that she swore to uphold as a condition of her job. Did she ever read it? I wonder. And they said, if she tries it anyway, the Supreme Court will side against her nine to zero. I'm not so sure about that.

Yeah, that's putting a lot of faith in the Supreme Court. Yeah, Amy Coney-Barritt, if you remember, I remember very clearly because I was in the car listening to it. When she had her confirmation hearing, she was asked by a Republican senator who, and And I don't think it was intended as a gotcha question. I think he was trying to make her look good. Name the different components of the First Amendment. She couldn't think of all of them. She's obviously qualified to be, they joke about what is a woman, you know, from Kananji Brown.

And she doesn't know what a woman is. But Connie Barrett doesn't know what the First Amendment is. And I imagine she probably wouldn't agree with it if somebody explained it to her. So, yeah, they may not have the law on their side. They may not have the Constitution. As a matter of fact, the Constitution may explicitly prohibit what they want to do. But you know how the Trump administration operates. They declare an emergency, and then they do whatever they wish by executive orders.

So that's the real issue going forward with all this. And then there was a back and forth with John Carl of ABC. He is the ABC News Chief Washington correspondent, Jonathan Carl. And he said, well, because of Pam Bondi, he said she's had a lot of scrutiny and criticism for threatening to target and to go after people for hate speech. And so what did Trump say? This is what he said. And what do you make Pam Bondi saying she's going to go out for hate speech? Is that, I mean, a lot of people, a lot of your allies say hate speech is free speech.

You'll probably go after people like you because you treat me so unfairly. fully you have a lot of hate in your heart maybe they'll come after ABC well ABC paid me 16 million dollars recently for a form of hate speech right he's a thug shaking people down mafia don't so maybe they'll have to go after you yeah maybe they'll have to go after you and he's that's not the only reporter he's threatened in the last couple of days he also threatened a reporter from Australia who asked him questions they didn't like who are you you're from Australia? Well, you're not doing very well for your country. The Australian governor is coming here soon and I want to talk to them about you, you know, that type of thing. What a disgusting thug

and bully Trump is. Always has been. So again, you know, what do you make of Pan Bondi saying she's going to go after speech? A lot of people, some of them your allies, say hate speech is free speech. well that's the truth i don't know i haven't seen any of his allies saying that because his allies are going to say the constitution is whatever don't trump wants it to be it's there to serve his interests trump said you probably go out to people like you yeah exactly uh he said you have a lot of hate in your heart is that projection i think it is i've never seen anybody who has tested the limits of free speech more than Donald Trump. That's what he pointed out

yesterday. If he wants to make vicious speech illegal, he's likely to be the first one up against the wall. Anyway, maybe they'll come after ABC. Maybe they'll come after you. And so he said, a year ago, our country was dead,

and now Washington, D.C. is fixed. I fixed it. Did he really? I hadn't noticed that. Did you? And again, if putting the military on the street and reducing the crime by individuals is the way that he wants to go, I would prefer the tumult of liberty, as Jefferson said, to the quiet servitude of living under a standing army. So Trump rambled on about railroads in Chicago for a full

two minutes more. But yeah, that's it. It says ego. So I want to say that I also I also find it funny that he would say, well, your network paid me for a form of hate speech, didn't they? It's sort of the, yes, of course I know the politicians are corrupt. I've paid many politicians that he said when he was first running back in 2016. That's right. It's like, yes, absolutely hate speech is. I say hate speech all the time. I'm an expert on it.

I shook your company down just like a mafia figure would. maybe we'll have to shake it again yeah so this is coming from the new statesman says the maga crackdown on free speech and as i would say you know this we're going to cut this out put it up as a segment call it canceling charlie because that's what the right wants to do they want to cancel his legacy it is exactly the opposite everything they're proposing we're going to come after anybody says anything negative about charlie if they cheer about the fact that he has had uh had uh been assassinated. But we've seen this type of thing on the right all along as well. They would cheer, even if there was violence against someone on the other side. And we've seen examples of that.

But look, that's just been political discourse for the longest time. You may not like it. I don't like it, but that is still free speech. So they are canceling, not only Charlie, but more importantly, the canceling Christianity. I mentioned this yesterday. yesterday, when I talked about how scared Taylor Swift was. And, you know, she's hiding behind a screen. It's not enough just to have security with her. She's got to hide behind the screen so nobody can see her. And then hide in the box at the NFL because she's afraid that she's going to be killed.

Well, you know, I'm not saying that we need to be cavalier about violence. We shouldn't take it seriously. We shouldn't defend ourselves. Charlie was doing what he was doing, presumably, because he was a Christian that did not fear those who could destroy the body as much as he feared the one who could destroy both the body and the soul. As Christians, we don't live in a spirit of fear. We are there to speak our mind and our truth, and that's a part of the First Amendment. We should explain that to Amy Coney-Barritt before it gets to the Supreme Court. These two things are inextricably linked together.

If you don't have free political speech, you aren't going to have free religious speech either. And this is why Christians have always pushed us. Look, we have the truth, and we don't need to shy away from it. We need to shine our light, and we need to not be afraid to do that, regardless of what the consequences are. Yes, we want to try to protect ourselves and others. But these threats, whether the threats are coming from the left or from Donald Trump, need to be opposed. and we need to stand up to these bullies and these thugs and these evil people, like the Trump administration. So he wasn't afraid of this, and we shouldn't be afraid of this either.

The GOP, especially under Trump, is working to overthrow everything that Charlie Kirk did, in his name, of course. To hear Maga warriors tell it, the horrifying murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was no less than the making. of a martyr. And I guess it's also the making of the authoritarian right, because they have become a twisted reflection of the authoritarian left. And the people who are doing this have absolutely no idea and don't care where it's leading. And when you talk about martyr, as they point out in this article, the new statesman, of course, is coming from the left. They say, everybody's using the term martyr. And of course, martyr originally didn't mean somebody who died for their religious beliefs. It meant witness. It's the Greek word that just says witness. And what happened

was the people who died in the first century, who were witnesses to Christ and what he had done. When they were told they had a choice to either recant and say that they were lying or they be killed, they refuse to recant. That's the way that we should oppose this. Look, if we want to build a civilization, if we want to rebuild our culture and our civilization, it's going to be rebuilt on Christian principles, not even on the Constitution. The Constitution is another layer or so down removed. We need to go back to the bedrock of Christ, and we need to rebuild it on that. Nothing other than that will bring back civilization. And that was the basis of it when it came. So everybody's got the term martyr on repeat. Trump called him a martyr for truth and

freedom. And he asked all Americans to commit themselves to the American values for which Charlie Kirk lived and died. All the things that Trump despises, free speech, the rule of law, patriotic devotion, and love of God. Meo, does Trump look at any of those? I mean, even patriotic devotion. He may hug the flag and kiss it for the cameras. But does he really have patriarch devotion when he subordinates our interests to that of a foreign country, Israel? No. Does he love God?

I haven't seen any evidence of that whatsoever. I'm not his judge. God is his judge. But show me your faith by your works. Show me your faith even by your words. He hasn't indicated that he even knows who God is. Oh, but he likes two Corinthians. Yeah.

Well, you know, that's the way they say it in Britain. That's why I said we shouldn't make that a chivaleth because, you know, but again, he's never read it, right? Ben Shapiro said that Kirk was a free speech martyr. Josh Hammer said, we must not allow Charlie to have died in vain as a free speech martyr. He called him the living embodiment of the First Amendment, the First Amendment that they are all seeking to kill. In fact, the right seems to be doubling down. on targeting anyone who so much as criticizes Kirk's words or his legacy. Certainly those who speak in a cruel manner about Kirk,

the commitment to free speech extends, it seems, to conservatives only. And conservatives are gunning to use the power of the state to squash speech they don't like, to ruin the lives of speakers, to impose a kind of right-wing omni thought on the nation. You know, I saw this clip from Greg Gutfield. and he absolutely lost it while he is claiming, you know, don't give me this both sides stuff. Well, Greg, we can all see that you are, even if you can't see it of yourself,

we can see that you are a mirror image of the screaming leftist crazies that are out there. Both sides argument not only doesn't fly, we don't care. We don't care about your both sides argument. That shit is dead. For one thing, there is no cognitive. dissonance on our side. On your side, your beliefs do not match reality. So you're coming up

with these rationalizations like, what about this or what about that? We're not doing that. Yeah, what about the First Amendment? We saw a young, bright man assassinated and we know who did it. We are not coming up with rationalizations. We are calm, we are honest, and we are resolute. We're not defensive. And I understand the defensiveness. I understand why people are saying, what about this? And what about this? Because if you have to face the underlying fact to this, your life is going to fall apart because you're going to realize you're not the good guys. If you sat around and you defended the mutilation of children, you're not the good guys. If you sat 600, 700 cases of harassment against Republicans and you said, but what about this? What about this? And then you

see this murder after calling somebody a fashion you fascist you realize maybe i'm not the good guy that is a hell of a realization to deal with maybe you're not the good guy therefore you have to grasp at rationalization destroy the constitution other people died for it's reserve they do i don't believe you're part of that group but why the hell do you have to mimic and echo that crap to us he was a patsy that guy was a patsy he was under the hypnotic spell of a direct to checks his no nihilism, the trans cult. And you know that. If you can decide that biology is false, you can agree that murder is okay and that

humanity is expendable. How you cannot see that alone and see that for what the evil it is without having to attach all of these other things is beyond me. Serenity now. That's the only thing missing from that, which we had that in the deck. I would play it, but yeah, Serendie now, Serendie now as he screamed, right? Yeah, you're not the good guy if you want to overthrow the Constitution. Look, I'm sorry, it deeply disturbed me to see Charlie Kirk murdered.

I understand about his family. But look, we have had people over the last 250 years who have died to establish a government that respects those God-given rights, Greg Goodfield. He's a, he is Exhibit A and why you don't want to have comedian, and entertainers do political commentary. He's just the right-wing side. Both sides now, Greg. You're the side that is the opposite side of Stephen Colbert.

And not much difference, really, there. If you're going to wet your pants and demand that the Constitution be taken out because of one death, how many people died to preserve that document? You're despicable. Anyway, yeah, we must not allow Charlie to have died in vain, they say. But that's what they're trying to do. The right seems to be doubling down and targeting anybody who so much as criticizes Kirk's words or legacy, certainly those who say that his, who are cruel about the speech attacking him. We had J.D. Vance, as I talked about yesterday, did the Charlie Kirk show. They're from the White House.

He had people like Stephen Miller there with him. They declared war on liberal organizations. Miller said, quote, domestic terror movement is going to be rooted out, despite there being no evidence. that Kirk's killer was affiliated with any liberal group. But look, we understand what his philosophy was. And what Stephen Miller is not going to do, he's not going to root out the schools, the government schools that are pushing the insanity on kids as I talked about. That's the real issue. And none of them are talking about it. Not Greg Gutfield, certainly.

Nobody at Fox. And nobody in the White House is talking about stopping the grooming. They stop at the boys and the girls' bathrooms and showers. and participating in sports. And that's why you see Sean Hannity having Bruce Gender on and fawning over him. Bruce Jinder, a tranny himself, has a problem with men competing with women in sports. Oh, it's not fair. But the rest of this stuff, he's fine with it.

And evidently so is Fox. So is Sean Hannity. So is Greg Gutfeld. They claim there's no evidence that he was affiliated with any liberal extremist group, but we know of one that he was definitely affiliated with, and that's the government schools that he was indoctrinated by. That's the one they won't do anything about. That's the one they pretend doesn't exist. Conservatives are creating their own superpowered cancellation machine, ironically in the name of Charlie Kirk, which is exactly what he fought against. Using public

shaming along with the full force of government, the website has been set up, called expose Charlie's murderers, and it compiles posts from people celebrating his killing or simply being dismissive about it with a goal of getting them canceled. And of course, as I talked about yesterday, J.D. Vance's call was, you know, note these people, but find out who they work for and get them fired. That's a Stasi society. I don't want to see that. But these people have absolutely no understanding of American principles whatsoever.

people on the left, people on the right now. I'm stuck in the middle with you. Clowns the left of us, jokers on the right. A conservative think tank employ started a next-based trophy case of people who lost their jobs for social media posts about Kirk's killing. Random citizens who made nasty comments have now been fired. MSNBC's Matthew Dowd was fired, and I think for just cause, what he did,

was really journalistic malpractice and stupidity. The guy was beyond stupid. I don't know if he was shot by some of his supporters who were celebrating. It's just crazy. Yeah. Were you in St. Lance? Yeah, I mean, they're trying to group this all in together, but there's a huge difference, a world of difference between people, you know,

that are small business owners firing these crazy lunatics because they're disgusted by them. versus pressure from the government and coercive measures going after driver's licenses. That's right. That's right. Yeah, if you got somebody at Home Depot that doesn't want to print a poster for Charlie Kirk, that's arguably against what the Home Depot is about. They're there to print what you bring them. And it's bad business for them to do that type of thing, and they're entitled to fire you.

But to have the government come in and do that, that's a separate issue. And even the people who wanted to use social media as a beard for censorship would acknowledge that. They would say, yeah, we don't have the ability to do that as the government. But we can put pressure, just like Clay Higgins said, we can put pressure on the people we know in the big tech companies. We can threaten them because they've got everybody on their payroll, right? Everybody is on the dole. And all these corporations are getting government grants and contracts and so forth. You want to keep that government grant?

be a shame if anything would happen. That's exactly the kind of government that we've had for a very long time. Donald Trump is just the ugliest face with all this stuff. He's the one who's taken off the mask completely to show that it's about nothing other than thuggish bludgeoning of people. Which means this again to the trader, Clay Higgins, the congressman, say he's going to go after business licenses permitting. Their businesses will be blacklisted aggressively.

They should be kicked out of every. school, driver's licenses should be revoked. Congressman Randy Fine from Florida, also Republicans, said if you're aware of anyone in the 6th District of Florida, or heck, anyone anywhere in the state who works at a level of government, who works for an entity that gets money from the government, well, that's pretty much everybody now, right? Or who holds a professional license, a lawyer, a medical professional, a teacher that is publicly celebrating this violence, please contact my office. I'll demand their firing, defunding, and license revocation. Yeah. So this is where the Republicans are. It is precisely the opposite of what Charlie Kirk did. They're spitting on his work.

So Charlie was the antithesis of Trump's hateful, rude bullying. Charlie was respectful. He was fact-based. he wanted to debate. He wanted to uphold free speech. You wanted to uphold the idea that we would contend for the truth, that there was a truth that could be discovered, that it was based on facts. Trump doesn't care about any of that stuff. You know, Charlie didn't change Trump, but Trump will change everything that Charlie Kirk stood for. Trump and his minions. So it all feels particularly hypocritical. Coming from a political movement, that has made cruel speech something of an art. Yeah, that's Trump. When Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul, was attacked with a hammer in 2022, many conservatives mocked him. Donald Trump made light of the near murder and his son, Don Jr., posted a photo of a hammer

and a pair of men's underwear on social media and labeled it a Paul Pelosi Halloween costume. I think that's funny. And I think we should be allowed to have humor like that. And I know it wasn't empathetic, but see, this is what's going to happen. We're going to have everybody is going to be pearl clutching over whatever everybody else says. I don't want to live in a society like that. There's also some extenuating circumstances regarding the whole Paul Pelosi thing. Exactly, yeah.

I think you might be glossing over some facts here. That's right. It's not quite fair to compare, you know, a spat with his probably gay lover to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. That's right. Kind of a slap in the face. And that's what people were actually mocking. the fact that, what is this guy doing there with him? Yeah, we're comparing apples to gay lover hammer attacks.

The First Amendment protects speech from government interference, even if the speech is hateful or offensive. And that speech about Paul Pelosi should be protected. But again, if you were to say something against Charlie Kirk, you're going to be attacked, and they boast about it, even the attorney general. it's now conservatives who are doing the canceling thanks to Trump the bully he is now transforming the conservative side of the political parties he's now transforming that into a mere image of the left because Donald Trump has always been a New York City Democrat socialist he's always been

somebody who's threatened people who said things about him that he didn't like that's who he is, and the Republican Party is now becoming who he is, even to the extent of protecting pedophiles, because that's who Donald Trump is, and people like Speaker Mike Johnson, that's who they are when they want to protect Trump. Cancelling people, getting them fired, taking opportunities away from them, or publicly shaming them, was often unfair, but it wasn't unconstitutional. Some of the right are taking it much further, making it a government action. The First Amendment offers. expansive speech protections that Kirk championed and benefited from. This writer says that they didn't

like much of what he had to say. As a matter of fact, they call much of what he had to say deplorable to them. But he had the right to speak his mind. That he was murdered for his views should shock and frighten every American. When we resort to violence over vast political differences, even over bigotry, we break the basic social contract that enables our democracy to survive. Yeah, that's my opinion that's the constitution but it also is accelerating us towards a civil war and I believe that's what Trump's role is I think Don is there to divide and he's not a great job of that I think that is particularly why they put him in there I also think it's fitting that the example that I chooses is the ridiculous thing with Pelosi and you know the person that

He was probably having an affair with having a fight in the middle of the night, saying that that's the same thing. And you can't criticize that. That's equivalent to celebrating the death and assassination of Charlie Kirk. The left will do that when they have the power, obviously. That's right. And now the right will do it when they've got the power. Shrain the Constitution and the promise that the people in America can say what they believe

without fear of government penalty is particularly galling to do so. in the name of someone who died for free speech. They can at least see that hypocrisy. The MAGA people can't see it at all. And so Trump and his $15 billion lawsuit against the New York Times, quote, lying about your favorite president, me, he puts in all-uppercase in parentheses. Having secured big payouts from Disney, ABC, and Paramount CBS in recent months, yeah, he shook them down, didn't he?

He's now going after the New York Times for $15 billion. He keeps escalating this. You know, he just recently sued the Wall Street Journal because they accurately reported about the Jeffrey Epstein birthday book. And it should be an interesting discovery. I hope we finally get some information about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein from this lawsuit. But anyway, that was $10 billion. So now he's upping it to $15 billion.

This is another one of those cases where that's, saying, you know, if only they could both lose, you know, it was, um, yeah, the guy was basically a fog of war. Yeah. I said that. I can never remember the guy's name. Yeah. Fog of war. Oh, that was, um, McNamere, Robert McNamere. Was it Robert McNamara? No, it was the other guy, I don't know. One of the guys in the administration around that time, one of the power brokers said it's a pity they both said that about the Iran and Iraq war. Yeah. But this is another one. It's a pity they both can't lose, you know? That's right. That's right. Yeah, I'm not a fan of the New York Times, but they have a huge mythology that has been built up around them.

I mean, Hollywood has done movies about them, Merrill Streep and Tom Hanks, you know, about the Washington Post and New York Times and the legend in their own minds about what happened with the Pentagon Papers. And so they have this, quote-unquote, proud history. But I think Hollywood, all the left, everybody will get behind the New York Times,

especially to oppose Trump. So from that standpoint, I think he, I think Trump is far more dangerous than New York Times. I mean, I don't take New York Times seriously, but we better take Trump seriously because he is going to do whatever he wants and dare you to stop him. And it doesn't matter if he's got any legal authority for it or not. Hyperbolicly citing his 2024 election win over Lala Harris as the greatest personal and political achievement in American history. This guy is just a textbook.

case narcissist on steroids. I've never seen anything like it. We said that when he was first running. I remember interviewing somebody and said, well, you know, all these politicians are on ego trips, but Trump is in a class by himself, isn't he? So offering nothing in terms of evidence or argument for that matter. This lawsuit filing alleges one election interfering salvo after another as part of a, quote, decades-long patterned by the New York Times of intentional and malicious defamation against Trump.

And one of the key things that he's concerned about is the New York Times editorial board endorsing Harris. Now, look, that's an op-ed piece. It's labeled as an editorial. Yes, they put it on the page one, but it's still labeled as an op-ed piece. How in the world can he claim that that's false? It's not even pretending to be objectively. reporting. It is an op-ed piece. So, you know, the paper has always endorsed people, as a matter

fact. And many times, it doesn't really make any difference. Remember, you had some major newspapers make endorsements that haven't made any difference whatsoever in the recent elections. And especially when it comes to New York Times, I think they have lost their credibility. Trump is going to make heroes out of them as they defend the First Amendment. And rightful, So he's a perpetually offended narcissist. Yeah, he marks this editorial. And they are entitled to have an opinion, especially. Even, you know, even Ellie Mae, the Bucktooth leftist who now thinks she's a conservative,

is when she talked about it, she said, well, if people are going to put out stuff that's their opinion, it's not factual, they need to label it as their opinion. Guess what, Ellie Mae, this was labeled as an op-ed opinion as an endorsement. and it was their opinion, which, again, did not persuade anybody. Just before heading over the Atlantic for Poppin's ceremony state visit to the UK this week, Trump has lashed out from his so-called truth social about how the New York Times has been allowed to freely lie, smear, and defame me, and that stops now, all uppercase. I wonder how the Brits are really going to twist the knife in him after he and J.D. Vance went over there

and rightfully complained about how they were punishing people severely for social media posts and other things that the government didn't agree with. And now he has jumped the shark with this stuff, showing proposals that are much worse than what the Brits have even done up to this point. The increasingly erratic Trump hasn't been as successful in the past in his legal actions against New York Times as he has as squeezing money out of Hollywood, over $15 million each from Disney and Paramount over what were widely considered to be weak lawsuits. But it would have been cheaper for them to just pay him the $15 million and let him go away,

except that you can't appease a bully. You only make him worse. In 2023, the New York Supreme Court judge, Robert Reed, tossed out Trump's 2021 suit against the New York Times, over a 2018 article on his tax schemes. From way back in the 1980s Reagan era, Trump has promised to sue news outlets over coverage that he didn't like. This is the guy who would call up and pretend that he was someone else so that he could praise himself. Remember that? We heard the clips.

It's amazing what an ego trip this narcissist is on. Most of the time, the lawsuits never occurred. And when they did, up until Trump won the White House again in 2024, they were usually dismissed. or they withered away. Yeah, he has a temperament of a spoiled brat because that's what he is. He has no principles. He's just looking to see what he can get away with by bullying people. Different ball game now, as Trump openly goes after his perceived enemies and critics

with few restraints. Right now, Trump is pursuing, though with less vigor of late, a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against Murdoch's Wall Street Journal. Over there, reporting on his connections to one-time close pal and now dead, convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. And again, the Congressional Committee has released the book, and you can see that the reporting was accurate. I'm anxious to see them shove that down his throat.

And then you've got Melania, who is threatening anyone who repeats what Michael Wolfe said about her and Jeffrey Epstein's role in introducing her to Donald Trump, that she was one of his Epstein's girls. You know, it's interesting to me that they have not, that Melania has not sued Michael Wolfe. He's the source of all this. You know, he's done four books that are very, very much hated by Trump, talking about the Trump administration and Trump and Epstein, the rest of this stuff. And he always does it based on what he says are insider interviews. And people say, well, that's not factual and everything.

But nobody has sued him. and Melania is not suing him. Now, he claims that these statements that he's made about Melania's connections to Jeffrey Epstein, he claims that this is based on audio taped interviews that he had with Jeffrey Epstein. I suspect that's why she has not sued him. They do not want people hearing Jeffrey Epstein himself saying this stuff about Melania. So she threatens a billion-dollar lawsuit. against every outlet that talks to Michael Wolfe.

The lawsuit has no merit. It lacks any legitimate legal claims. It is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting. Yes, everything the Trump administration does is an attempt to stifle and discourage free speech, free press. The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics. And I think they will fight this. And certainly, the First Amendment is on their side.

So he's particularly upset about the fact that it was on the first page. But, you know, he can't, he can't get over and just take the win, right? He is as ungracious as a winner as he is as a loser. In recent days, Trump shared a video on social media calling for the president to reinstate a Cold War era media accountability law, and it's nothing of the sort. He is as ignorant as that L.E. may hillbilly look that she's got going. That young girl doesn't know what she's talking about.

Smith-Munt Act had nothing to do with controlling the content of the free press. It was there as a promise that they broke to the American public that these newly created media organizations as part of the Cold War in 1948 that created the Voice of America. It was there to assuage people's fears, which are justified, that they would be propagandizing the American public, which they were, Operation Mockingbird and many other things, but then openly doing it and had nothing to do with what she claims it is. Trump's lawsuit for the New York Times, he's also suing reporters. He's also suing

Penguin Books. They published in 2024. Listen to this title, Lucky Loser. Now, Donald Trump squandered his father's fortune. and created the illusion of success. Boy, they mailed them, didn't they? So first he tariffs that island full of penguins. Now he's suing penguin books. Maybe he just really hates penguins. Yeah, that's right.

Yeah, he bankrupted a half dozen casinos, so I think they got it spot on. So Melania, Trump, as the latest media outlet that she has bullied as a Daily Beast, they interviewed Michael Wolfe, who interviewed, who had interviewed Jeffrey Epstein, and he said that Jeffrey Epstein said that Melania had been introduced to Trump to put it mildly on the Lolita Express.

I guess to say that they were introduced is something of a euphemism. Anyway, The Daily Beast recently published a story that was headlined Melania Trump, very involved in Epstein scandal, based on interviews with Michael Wolfe, which based on, he says, interviews with Epstein. And if Melania wants to shut this up, she should come after the source. course that keeps saying this. But she doesn't. She always comes after whoever interviews Michael

Wolf. There's simply an arm of the Democrat Party and should, according to many, have their licenses revoked by the FCC. Trump is saying, and again, that's him going on and on about news media. The FCC should not be policing content ever. The licenses were about allocating frequency spectrum for the different broadcast media like ABC, NBC. and so forth. He doesn't respect anything about free speech. News outlets have typically been very clear about their bias. I mean, we have seen newspapers all over the place,

like the Arkansas Democrat, right? They used to name the newspaper after the political party that they were affiliated with. He thinks that's somehow now a crime. You're free to do that, by the way. That is not a crime. Only in his mind is that a crime. crime. So they say this lacks a legitimate legal claims and it'll be shut down. I hope so.

Legal threats continue, though, against those who are repeating Wolf's claim, but she does not sue Wolf. Trump has elevated the push for the Charlie Kirk Act that would let government police speech from the buck-toothed child, completely ignorant, despising free speech, not understanding the principles, not understanding what the Smith-Mutt Act was about. at all she framed the ideas of revival of the smith month act but as everybody's pointed out that's not what it was about at all but trump of all people should know better uh not that we'd expect trump to know better but he's in the office of the president so you would expect that maybe he would look at it and read the act read the first amendment but he doesn't uh this amended act

according to this petition that 43 000 people sign would hold media outlets radio stations, educators, and content creators, accountable for the false narratives and erroneous statements that they make. Well, that's another gutting of the First Amendment. And then finally, this Australian reporter. Trump attacks a reporter, and this is right about the same time that he was doing that to Jonathan Carl, who said, you got Pam Bondi out there doing things that's prohibited by the First Amendment. What do you think? Well, maybe she'll come after you. I'm going to have her investigate you. So this is an Australian reporter, and he's with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. The reporter asked, how much wealthier are you now than when you returned to the White House?

Trump said, well, I don't know. The deals I made, for the most part, other than what my kids are doing here, they're running my business, but most of the deals that I've made were made before. That's what I've done for my lifetime. I've built buildings. And they started boasting about the new white house ballroom that he's constructing right talking about the elitist mentality here that's going to be the greatest ballroom anywhere in the world and for 150 so it gives me great pleasure to do it for the country and i'm paying for it out of some of the proceeds from his graft and corruption he's making billions uh he said the country is not it's an expensive ballroom i think it'll cost 250 million and it'll be i think the finest ballroom for 150 years you know they wanted a ballroom and now

they are going to finally have it, and it's going to knock your socks off. The reporter pressed Trump on his business endeavors, with recent reporting indicating that the Trump family has made as much as $5 billion in recent months off of a crypto venture alone. So he's going to virtue signal about that, and he's going to take one 20th of it, 5%, and build a lavish ballroom there that people look at, oh, Trump did that with his own money. No, he did it with the money that he stole because of a graft and corruption. And so he says, is it appropriate, the follow-up?

Is it appropriate President Trump that a president in office should be engaged in so much business activity? Well, I'm not really. My kids are running the business. And then he said, wait a minute, where are you from? I'm from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Well, my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now. they want to get along with me you know your leader's coming over to see me soon i'm going to tell him about you you set a very bad tone isn't that amazing i mean spoken like a soviet dictator is it

be very careful citizen you've been noticed trump proceeded to call on another correspondent and he cut off the australian reporter who was trying to follow up he said quiet we looked at him. This guy has nothing in common with the American system. I'm absolutely disgusted by this man. I want to get some of the comments before we break. Yeah. Minute man, militia.

Well, he isn't wrong. I don't remember. Don't know what that was. Comic dog. Europe has wanted to take over Russia for 200 years. Haven't succeeded yet. It has been obvious to me. They want another shot at Russia. Frothing at the mouth over the idea

even. Frightening. Russia's got a great deal of resources. But of course, they want to take everybody to war because they are in the process of deconstructing Europe. It's not just the UK. They're also doing that in Germany as well as in France. They're destroying their own countries. They've imported massive migration and made them, given them superior rights to the citizens who were there before. They want to overthrow their country.

Yeah, it's a... And when people find out about it, just like we see with the United States, right, the right. When people find out about it, they're going to be upset with the rulers of their country, so they want to take them to war. Same thing that now is doing. Keep a distraction going. He isn't wrong was about the Trump calling it the most degenerate newspaper in history. Oh yeah, yeah. Got Citizen of Americaca. We are told in this holy script, in the Holy Scriptures 3165. five times, as you know, one for every day of the year to fear not.

And although many argue pride is the number one thing that will keep you out of heaven, it's actually cowardice. Yes, that's not a revelation. All those who are cowardly will have no part in it. But look, fear is the opposite of faith, isn't it? It's exactly the opposite. And so, again, all these people say that Charlie Kirk is a Christian martyr, they are trashing his Christian witness as well.

And they're going to make it impossible for other people. people to give an answer for the hope that's within them because they are inviting censorship of every kind. And of course, the left truly does hate Christianity. They hate Christ. And they will apply the censorship in canceling there first and foremost. Citizen of America, I hate speech is the most protected of speech. As Tony says, I will fight for someone else's hate speech. Minuteman militia, they also seem to have no clue of history and how this has played out ad nauseum. Yeah, I mean, it's been said before, but you don't need free speech to be protected for speech that everyone loves and is polite. Yeah, I think it was, I think it was Augustine maybe who said.

I'm not sure said the speech that the truth doesn't need to be hidden and protected. You just need to let it loose like a lion. Yeah. Let's see. Citizen of America. Do you really think Trump is going to heal the schism in this country? by denying Rosie O'Donnell, her citizenship for simply hating his fat orange guts? You know, probably not, but maybe we could try.

I mean, we shouldn't know, but, you know. Yeah, that's more of this both sides thing, you know. That's why I say, Greg Gutfeld is a failed comedian, and now he's become a political commentator. And he's just like these people who've been running late night TV shows. he just doesn't have any principles as far as I can see I've not seen very much of him but I was disgusted by that little temper tantrum he had don't talk about both sides well then stop acting like the other side

because you're looking like a uni party solo cat 1980 Paul Pelosi was attacked by his drugged up gay lover which the media neglected to admit well getting them to admit something like that would be very difficult they don't like it they don't like talk about that kind of thing They don't really bring up the STD rate among homosexual men or the violence rate among lesbians. Those are two massive, massive statistics that they just kind of glance over. Don't want to talk about it. Yona Annie Wode, fighting against free speech is not in the name of Charlie Kirk.

Proves that it is not about free speech nor Charlie Kirk. That's right. Citizen Americaca, the hate that people have for Trump is essentially his job security. Like a maintenance man, he wouldn't have anything to fix if things didn't break. Niburu, 2029. It'd be the loneliest man in town, like the Mayfag repairman, right? I mean, he has used the controversy as a weapon from day one of his political career. That's right.

It's always been the tact that he learned about from professional wrestling. You've got to have heroes and heels. And if they don't exist, you manufacture them. That's what gets people excited. Niburu, 2029. they put the Donald back in office to sell the divide and conquest. Citizen of Americaca, well, you already heard your bug-eyed compromised FBI director. There's no evidence that Epstein trafficked to any girls, traffic any girls to anyone but himself.

That's right. Cash Patel, what a... Cash Patel, every time you see him, he looks like a deer caught in the headlights, doesn't he? I saw someone online tweet out. He was very, very mad about what happened. He's like, we're going to slam dunk Cash Patel. right back into the Ganges River from a.C. 130. It's always like he's got this expression.

You want me to say what to the American people? He was picked just like Dan Bongino because they are influencers. They're not investigators. They don't have any background that could be used with this stuff. And as a matter of fact, even though Dan Bonino worked for the Secret Service for a while, when you saw his reactions to the raids on Mar-a-Lago, which I didn't agree, with those raids but you know the things that he was saying about it were absolutely untrue these guys are influencers they will say anything in order to have a platform and so of course they're exactly

the kinds of persons that trump would pick for his administration somebody who will say anything in order to have a job i have no respect for either one of them we've got a syrian girl and don't forget his profits from lawsuits david no we've we've been covering that can't forget about those making big bucks out of those lawsuits 15 million each yeah citizen of maricaca yes wasn't it nice when they asked him how he was coping with the death of his dear young friend and he said oh we're just working on my lovely lascivious ballroom yeah yeah the best ballroom charlie would have loved it Charlie would have loved it charlie would have loved the ballroom would have been here every day i actually saw a clip of that

i didn't get in the deck uh saw it last night of uh reporter you know asked like how are you doing and he's like uh oh they just starts going off on the ballroom We're going to have a ball It was like right after the shooting Yeah, we're going to have a ball We're going to have a ball canceling everybody And of course he's saying how Charlie Kirk was like a son to him and all that

Yeah The porters want to stop me from balling But they can't Citizen already read that Citizen Mary Cock Do you know what a narcissist does When you start to talk about a subject That they have large amounts of guilt or involvement over

Yeah, they chase squirrels, look at my ballroom Also says make no mistake citizen if you don't use your speech now and you are intimidated by either lawsuits or assassination than we have lost already and none of our lives are worth excrement that's right absolutely well we're going to take a quick break folks and we will be right back I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be. I'm going to be the

I'm going to be. I'm going to I'm my I'm I'm my and

I'm I'm going to be the one of the one. I'm going to know I'm going to I'm a lot of

I'm going to I'm I'm I know. I know. I know. I know. I know.

I know. I know. I know. I know. I know. I know. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Elvis, ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles,

and the sweet sounds of Motown. Find them on the oldies channel at APSRadio.com. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, we have an interesting update on George Zinn, the old man that was screaming, I did it, I did it, kill me, and was led out of the place there with his pants around his ankles, going to Paul Pelosi, I guess. But I have an interesting update with that, but I'd like to thank real quickly some of the people who have contributed on Cash App to us recently.

David F., who writes a long overdue donation. Well, thank you very much, David. Appreciate it. And Dave B. and Christopher and Michael B. Thank you very much. That's on Cash App. If you'd like to support the show,

we do not make it, we do not put it behind a paywall, but if you'd like to support the show and keep it going, we have listed at Davidnight. News, the places where you can make donations, or you can set up to subscribe to the show. And we also have some merchandise that is there as well. Yes, you can go.

to David Knight. News and see the hoodies, the shirts, the pens, and, of course, the very, very nice brass coin or the brass finish coin that Jason Barker put together. And we have some more stuff that's coming that Ryan put together for the love of the road. Yes. We just haven't done the commercial yet for us. There's always more stuff to do. There's not enough hours in the day. And we're really getting late on that.

So we've got to get that together. Yes. So a really interesting bookmark that is similar to the coin that he designed, the medallion, the large with down you go to davidnight that news to see all that you can also go to davidnight dot gold if you'd like to start getting out of the fiat money markets or accumulating something that you can hold that you can keep with you so we go to davidnight dot gold that'll let tony arderburn know you came through us you can also go to rnc store.com and use promo code night on their products there hopefully something there is something that you need can help you with what you're

struggling with when it comes to your health and hopefully it'll keep you outside of the medical industrial complex and briefly Trendsjournal.com. If you use promo code night, you get 10% off the Trends Journal. Gerald Sente works very hard. He puts so much information into the Trends Journal. It is a massive publication and he

puts it out weekly, weekly at this point, I believe, right? It's weekly. It's usually... Yeah, about 300 pages. It's an online magazine. I see the headline there. Equity markets rise as the economy's decline. There is this bifurcation of reality

and markets right now, isn't there? That's why I say, you know, gold and silver. David Knight-Dy-Gold is a really good hedge against that insanity, but also against the tyrannical totalitarian policies around money that they are putting in place as well. Yes. Well, I'm not going to plug anymore. We'll break it up and do more later. So this guy, George Zen, I thought it was kind of interesting when it first came out, Travis.

They referred to him as gadfly, and it's like, what is that even? that it gave no explanation. Now we have found out since they have charged him. You're right, Lance, why isn't this guy charged as being accessory? Well, that's exactly what they have charged him with. And as part of this discussion about him, they said they called him a gadfly because every time there would be any kind of political meeting of any sort, he was always there and he was always making an issue when he was there.

He's obviously got something wrong with him. Yeah, yeah. He's 71 years old. was just arrested for having child abuse material. Yeah. Yeah, that was after they arrested him for being an accessory that got his phone and they found a lot of kitty porn on it as well. The most insane thing. It's in the articles, which I'm sure we're going to cover, but I have to bring this up now. It's just they arrest him. They say, we'd like to look through your phone to see what's been going on. He says, okay, but just be aware, I use it to exchange child porn

with other people, child sexual abuse material with other people. And they go, oh, oh. Yeah, I'm investigating. Yeah, that's it. Yeah, I'm an investigator, right? So he just flat out admits it. It says, yeah, you can look at my phone, but be aware. Is this some, like, intelligence thing?

Like, you know, don't go after Epstein. I'm not sure there's any intelligence involved with anything this guy does. It's just ignore all illegal stuff. So they locked them up. And then they said, well, you know, he's not the shooter. So I'd let him go. And then they thought about, I guess, you know, the same thing that you said, Lance. And wait a minute, he was trying to help the guy get away.

And I think he actually even said that to them. He is, there's something definitely wrong with this guy. An affidavit, the police detective that works for the university there, said he approached him after Kirk was shot. Zinn immediately started yelling at me. I shot him. Now shoot me. I can see both of his hands. and I could not see a weapon.

When asked where the gun was, he replied, I'm not going to tell you. He said then, after being taken to the Utah Valley University police officers, he asked for an attorney and said he did not shoot the individual, saying that he did it to draw attention away from the real shooter. Zen later told officers he was glad that he said he shot the individual so the real suspect could get away. He also stated to officers that he wanted to be a martyr for the person who was shot.

Zen has a history of criminal charges and convictions. In 2013, he was convicted of making a terroristic threat at Salt Lake City Marathon. And that's where the statement about him being involved in the Boston Marathon came from. He was not involved in that, according to the information I could find. They disputed that. I don't know. But the Salt Lake County District Attorney, Gil, said that Zen's criminal history dates back to the 1980s. He's a person who can be odd.

He has all those kinds of sometimes odd behavioral challenges. But by and large, he's more of a gadfly than anything else. He said, Dan would always give me a hard time for being a Democrat. So he's all over the place, right? He can be a little odd with his helping assassins and childborn. What a character. Yeah. Almost every political event you can think of, there was always George somewhere in the background.

said Gill. That's what they mean by being a gadfly. So he's now hit with child porn charges, as you point out, Lance, keeping graphic sexual photos of children on his phone, according to law enforcement. Investigators found more than 20 images of kids as young as five, at least partially naked and posing in sexual ways, said the Utah County Sheriff's Office. Zen admitted that he gets sexual gratification from viewing and sharing child sexual abuse material images with others, that his preferred victim age is five to twelve. No wonder he hangs out with politicians.

That explains, I guess, why he's at every single political event, right? Because he knows where the pedophiles are. Birds of a feather and all that. Yeah. So who is he sharing Lee's whiff again? And why is he so close to all these politicians? He fessed up to not being the shooter. Investigators successfully requested if they could take a look at

his phone, as you point out, he warned him. He said, there's going to be a lot of child porn on there, and it turns out that there was. So he's got some issues that are coming up. The search warrant was obtained Monday that led investigators to find the illicit images and several very graphic sexual text threads in which Zen shared images with other parties. Well, Tyler Robinson grew more pro-gay and trans-right oriented, said his mom. And again, as we said yesterday, and belabored the point, where did you get this? You know, who was it that did this to him? Was it on the gaming platforms or was it at school? I'm sure it was elements of both of these, but I think the predominant influence was the school. He left his home when he was 17, and he moved

in with this tranny, furry guy. A litany of charges against him. including felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and the commission of a violent offense in the presence of children. They've been very creative with all this stuff. I mean, we look at it, we just see a murder. But the obstruction charges, both felonies, stem from him allegedly concealing the rifle used in the shooting.

So if you conceal the murder weapon, that's obstruction. It would have been so much better if he hadn't concealed the weapon afterwards. That was the part that really bothered me. The worst part is the hypocrisy. But it just goes to show you why there's no jury trials anymore because they get so creative with these charges. I mean, you know, he murdered Charlie Kirk. If that's true, that should be enough.

And again, there's the issues about, you know, where was the gun when he went over the roof? We talked about that yesterday. There's other, and they still haven't found the bullet, which is, I think, very interesting. surprising. So both counts of witness tampering relate to instructions that Robinson relayed to his live-in boyfriend, directing him to delete his text messages and to stay silent if questioned by the police. And so the transcript between the two things that have been

released by the police. And so it's long lines of, you weren't the one who did it, right? Then he said in the text message exchange allegedly said, I am, I'm sorry. And the roommate says, I thought they caught the person. Robinson, no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from the drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Roommate, why? Robinson, why did I do it?

Yeah. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I'm able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. roommate. How long have you been planning this? He said, a bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there's a squad car parked right by it. Robinson said, I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back

grandpa's rifle. I don't know if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. So he's safe. It's only going to trace back to his grandfather, which will then show would trace to him right this is why i mean you know people who commit crimes are not usually very intelligent right yeah that's the old thing they're going to get away with it you don't get into crime by being a genius you know yeah so anyway that was what they released i'm just passing it on to you uh and then he said i think that scope i want to get it back i think the scope was worth two thousand dollars and then he said delete this exchange so now they're saying witness tampering that's the charge for witness tampering based on that

exchange going back and forth. So let's take a quick break. Do we have any comments that you want to go over here? Yes, we do. First, I want to thank Stealth Patriot. Thank you very much. We appreciate the support. He says, whatever the tragedy, both parties make it their mission to eat away at your liberty.

The problem is they put people in power that do not honor their oath to the Constitution, just stating the obvious. Yes, yes. Yeah. Whatever happens, it'll be used, and whoever did it, it'll be used by both the right and the left for their purposes, and as you point out, their purpose is always to take away our liberty. And the amazing thing to me about it is that the right, because of Donald Trump, the right is now saying that we're going to take this guy who made his entire life about challenging

postmodernism, that there is no such truth. And you can't say that because speech is hate and speech is violence. He challenged that. He debated these people. And now Trump and the conservative influencers from MAGA want that to go away. You know, they're going to censor everybody in the name of the guy who pushed back against that and got killed for doing that. That's the most amazing thing. And that includes people like Greg Gutfield, Greg Gutless Field. We've got Jim's seven. Stakeholders will own all the lands.

That's right. Yeah. We're not going to have anything. They're going to make sure that we have our free. freedom cities. And that'll be it. Assyrian girl. It's sickening to realize how many evil, insane people there are in our nation today. And like the old guy trying to take credit for a murder, they are willing to risk everything to destroy us all. Yes. Audi M-R. Good to see you, Audi. Says, Travis, the reason that he's a character is because he's

probably is that very thing, a character. Yeah. Could be. Central casting. He's very on the nose, whatever he is. All right. We're going to take a quick break, folks. and we'll be right back. We're going to talk about Peter Thiel, who has this obsession with the Antichrist. More and more, it looks like that's him. Maybe it's kind of, some kind of a schizophrenia. I mean, if you were mentioned in a book,

you'd probably want to talk about it too. We're right. You know, you know, and I'm going to be. Oh, and I'm going to be. And then, you know. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, the David Night Show. Welcome back, folks.

Appreciate you still being here with us. We're going to get back to this in a second, but I do want to remind you. You can go to Homesteadproducts.com. And if you use promo code night, you get 10% off all of their products that they have there. And they have a numerous variety of different things, whether it's things like this beetroot powder.

And, of course, beetroot powder is a vasodilator. It's good for if you're, working out. It's good for heart health. It's a great product. You should check out or even things really good for heart health because it dilates your blood vessels. Yes. Or things like this fancy soap. It is a wide ranging site. They have many, many different products, like I said, from beetroot powder to soap to survival and camping gear. You can get all kinds of different things. There are a promo code night. You get 10% off and you support a business that is pro America, pro freedom. And they work very, very hard to make sure their products are high quality and source from America. So go check out

homestead products. Dot shop and use promo code night for 10% off. We want to support people that are on our side and businesses that are on our side as well. Yes, yes. Well, the new Republic asks, what is up with Peter Thiel's obsession with the Antichrist? And he just constantly talking about it. And he's got a four-part series that he's keeping under wraps. And he's got all kinds of restrictions. You've got to go to all four lectures or whatever. Can't tell anybody about it. He's amping up... I have secret information

about the antichrist that I can give you if you pay me. Yeah. It's me, blah. For the right price, I'll stop Armageddon, just so you know.

But it, you know... He's amping up his apocalyptic rhetoric and adding a dangerous dose of extremism into the already fraught culture war. That's what they

characterize it as. And when you look at Peter Thiel and the way, when people ask him a question, he just kind of gets caught in the headlights, and he said, this is the guy who's the mentor to J.D. Vance. It's very, very troubling. Peter Thiel can't stop talking about the Antichrist. This month, he's delivering a four-part,

closed-door lecture on the topic, which he is framing as, quote, political theology. Yeah, political theology. It's part of what you might call an Antichrist world tour by the PayPal Palantir co-founder, who has already given off-the-record anti-Christ lectures. at Oxford, Harvard, and Barry Weiss's College, the University of Austin. It's not clear why Teal needs secrecy to hold forth his latest obsession. He's been pontificating about the Antichrist in public talks for years. In a June interview with the New York Times, New York Times again, he offered extended thoughts on the shadowy figure, who is barely mentioned in the Bible.

Yes, that's right. The spirit of Antichrist has always been around here. but you know the antichrist is only mentioned i think once uh he says um this character will arise to help satan kick off the armageddon he even named a suspect greta thunberg in an interview might be reaching a bit there yeah the interview went viral when he struggled to answer a question about whether or not he wants the human race to endure he also struggled when asked directly if he was the Antichrist. So why pay attention to this,

the biblical musings of a guy who probably has never read the Bible? Well, because he's one of the world's richest men and most influential, and his Antichrist speeches reveal his deep belief that religion is a weapon for political warfare. And he's right about that. It really is. The symbol of the Antichrist, he says, his play is surprisingly significant.

No, he doesn't say this. This is Robert Fuller historian in 1995 book, naming the Antichrist, the history of an American obsession. He says, the symbol of the Antichrist has played a surprisingly significant role in shaping Americans' self-understanding. Because they tend to view their nation as uniquely blessed by God, they have especially prone to demonize their enemies. I think we probably will find out that Peter Thiel will be the Antichrist and that American. America would be Babylon or something. I think there's probably... The surprise twist ending.

No one saw coming. I think it's more clearly that we're Babylon. You know, I think maybe the Babylon B thinks that as well. This summer, Peter Thiel reveals who's the Antichrist. From colonial days to the AI era, the hunt for Antichrist continues. Today's Q&9 conspiracy theorists believe that they are battling a cabal of cannibalistic Satanists. Well, I wouldn't say that they're wrong.

Unhumans, a 24. book that was praised by J.D. Vance equated progressives with bloodthirsty unhuman creatures, because this is a zero-sum holy war. And, of course, they're not the unhuman, bloodthirsty creatures. They're just covering up everything that Trump and Melania did with Epstein, right? Once we label our adversaries in these kind of terms, all of it good versus evil, like the temper tantrum you saw from Greg Gutfield, there is going to be no compromise. And this is the civil war that they're rapidly pushing us into. Teal understands this and frames his interest in the Antichrist as part of his own, quote, political theology.

A term that he borrows from Carl Schmidt, a Nazi philosopher who defined the practice of politics as a struggle against an existential enemy, arguing that politics is just religion in disguise. It is downstream from religion, folks. Teal also draws on René Girard, a Catholic thinker in one of Teal's Stanford professors, who warned that human societies tend to spiral towards violence in a hunt for scapegoats. Well, that's certainly what we're seeing now all over the social media. There's all raised a question of whether politics is like a market, or is it something like a scapegoating machine, where the scapegoating machine only works if you don't look into the sausage factory, said Peter Thiel.

If, say, we're having a lot of conflicts in our village, we have to find some random elderly woman and accuse her of witchcrafts so that we'll achieve some psychosocial unity as a village. This sort of thing doesn't really work well if you're self-aware. Teal knows these dynamics well, but it's not clear whether he's horrified or impressed by it. His talks stop short of providing solutions. He will talk about the Antichrist, but he'll not talk about the Lord Jesus Christ. That should be very, very, very telling. They meld Schmidt, Gerard, and Scripture into an incisive meditation on the power of apocalyptic ideas. Teal positions himself as someone trying to help the world navigate a, quote, narrow path between Armageddon and Antichrist,

but his rhetoric also sketches a playbook for holy war, for scapegoating, for crisis, and for power. These people understand the time that we're in. They understand that we're in a cyclical turning, a fourth turning. And they seek to destroy society so that they can rebuild it. That's why they're focusing on all this apocalyptic stuff. Since Schmidt famously argued that power consolidates during existential crisis, like fourth turnings. And as Strauss and Howe talked about the fourth turning mentioned, they said that was the thing that was unusual about the American Revolution. because power usually, as you have everything turned upside down, they destroy society.

The economy goes down. People lose their faith in institutions usually wind up with more concentrated power. The reason that didn't happen was because the founders were looking at it from a Christian perspective. And because they had looked at it also from the Enlightenment perspective of people like Lord Acton who said power consolidates and becomes absolute power, they wanted to make sure that that did not happen. But that was a very unusual event. Typically, it consolidates during these crises, existential crises, when constitutions can be suspended. Therefore, Trump is a man that they chose.

Everything that he has done has been, that is of any significance, if you think about it, has been by suspending the Constitution. Going back to 2020 and the lockdowns and the rest of this stuff and everything that he did with the so-called pandemic, what he sought to do afterwards with the election. And what he began to do from day one, whether you're talking about tariffs, or you're talking about using the military as police, everything that he does is suspending the Constitution. Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist. Perhaps we should fear the one world totalitarian state more than Armageddon, said Teal in 2023.

Perhaps we should fear God. the beginning of wisdom, wouldn't it? So, but that's not what he's preaching. He's talking to people about the Antichrist. Like I said before, he won't talk to them about the Lord Jesus Christ. In January, he wrote an op-ed, framing Trump's return to power

as an apocalypsis, an unveiling of hidden truth and a chance to cleanse the nation's sins. Yeah, I guess Trump sees himself as just the guy to do that. And he can call out the military to cleanse us of our sins, city by city. Teal does not hesitate to name potential antichrist,

whether it's Greta Thunberg, communism, or regulation of tech. As a matter of fact, as I said before, he was saying that if you create, he said, AI is going to be perceived as an existential threat, and there's going to be a pushback to regulate it. This is his company that he's talking about. And in order for them to do that, they're going to have to create some kind of a global structure to push back against it and to regulate it.

Of course, they'll always have some kind of a crisis that is global. That's what the climate change nonsense is about. That's what the pandemic was about. And it's going to typically be imaginary. But he thinks that the regulation of AI is going to lead to world government, Antichrist's world government. So he said, as he founded Palantir, this is a software company, literally named after an all-seeing orb controlled by an evil wizard in the Lord of the Rings.

It's partnering with the Trump administration to supercharged government surveillance at a moment when the president openly embraces authoritarianism. It seems almost like a confession. I see this as the type of thing they always do in the movies where the supervillain monolog. And it tells you why he did all this stuff. You sly dog. You got me monologuing.

I think that's what this is truly about. I don't have mentioned this before, but to me, the name Palantir also goes well on multiple levels. Because in the books, Aragorn is able to use the Palantir because it's his birthright. It's part of his heritage. And I think they see themselves as Aragorn. They are the rightful rulers. And as such, they should be allowed to look at all your data. They should be allowed to surveil you and look at you and catalog everything you do.

So they don't see themselves as the evil wizard. They see themselves, in my opinion, as the rightful king, and as such, you know, it's their duty almost to look into this and to keep track of everything. Yeah, they even call it the God view. You know, I remember years ago when we were talking about Uber and Lyft and stuff that Uber had even put out op-ed pieces. Well, they cross-tabulated people's drives and things like that to make inferences about what they were doing late at night. But they had a God view which showed all the... the different cars and where they were. And that's their term, the God view.

Yes. And, of course, Erdogan is a picture of Christ coming back, the return of the king. They believe they're Erigorn, but they are Denethor. They are Sauramann. That's right. They're Denethor. They're the unfaithful, well, Trump, I guess, is Denethor, and I guess that Teal is Sauraman.

Anyway, you build domestic surveillance technology to surveil our friends and neighbors, and then your other pet passion is the Antichrist. It's kind of strange, said one person. Trey Stevens, a teal ally, self-proclaimed arms dealer, who co-founded the drone warfare company and Druil, another warped Lord of the Rings reference. Frames's work as part of a quest to, quote, carry out God's command to bring his kingdom to earth as it is in heaven.

I guess he missed that part where Jesus said, My kingdom's not of this world. If it was, then my servants would. create Andrewil, you know, in drone warfare countries. Yeah, they would bomb children remotely via drone. So this guy who co-founded Andrewil, his wife, Michelle, co-founded the Axe 17 Collective, which is an acronym for acknowledging Christ and technology and society. They evangelized tech workers, and they're hosting Teal's Antichrist Lectures.

I mean, this is some twisted stuff. Meanwhile, in Russia, Alexander Dugan, ultra-nationalist philosopher and propagandist known as Putin's brain. It's the only other major political figure who fixates on the Antichrist as much as teal. In Dugan's version, Russia is at war with the Antichrist, which is liberal modernity, emanating from the country of apocalypse, the United States. I would buy more into Dugan's version of this. Anyway, not everyone is convinced by Silicon Valley.

Pivot to Piety. Some traditional religious conservatives railed against their would-be tech brethren. Conservative firebrand, Jeffrey Miller, blasted AI developers as, quote, betrayers of our species, as apostates to our faith, and called for what the verge described as a, quote, literal holy war against tech. And, of course, this is what Hugo de Garas always talked about, the art-elect war, once people figure out what Peter Thiel and his ill. are doing to us that they would rise up and then these guys would take their technology

and fight against the rest of humanity and that there would be billions of people killed because of the technology that they have so we've already gotten a glimpse of that in 2020 if we're hunting for existential enemies Silicon Valley's diabolically greedy tech billionaires who want to create godlike AI systems powerful enough to destroy humanity top the list But we must avoid falling into the Antichrist name-calling trap. We've got to ask, why is a tech billionaire trying to convince us that we're on the brink of an apocalypse? It is a cynical ploy to further inflame political divisions. I agree, just like their hate speech obsession is.

It's all about division. It's all about laying the foundation for a civil war. Journalist Matthew Diancona described Teal's anti-Christ theory. as a high-brow version of Maga end-time's theology. He said, this all fosters a crisis mentality. And with the crisis mentality now, we put aside all other differences. There is a tribal cohesion, a tribal unity. It justifies even immoral acts,

because to defeat an enemy that is evil, a satanic enemy, you must do whatever is necessary. Folks, this is what happens with every single war. And this is why you have people like George W. Bush drag us into it or Netanyahu or Trump, dragging us into war, because once you have a war, it becomes an existential crisis. And people are more likely than not to fall in line behind the dear leader that drugged them into that war. Last week in the hours after Charlie Kirk's assassination, the words demon and evil trended on X as some of the right portrayed his murder as a work of supernaturally possessed, Democrats and leftists. And that's what we saw earlier from Greg Gutfield.

Chris Rufo is doing the same thing, calling for a political crackdown, anybody who criticizes Charlie Kirk. They called on law enforcement to, quote, infiltrate, disrupt, arrest, and incarcerate the radical left. Again, looking at this, smaller, lesser-known accounts that respond to any calls to support the First Amendment what I see on Twitter is I've seen it over and over again

when I say I wrote the op-ed piece on Substack and I put it up and the response that I got to it was like yeah well you know they just we just want to cancel their speech they want to kill us

and we got to shut them down and so it was all that kill them all that type of attitude that's what I see that's the reactionary right that is out there talking about this stuff they don't want to hear

anything at all about that that's the most concerning thing about this because this is not only the fact that the right and the left are embracing censorship that they're opposed to free speech for anything that they disagree with they don't want to build a civilization both sides have been convinced that the only way forward is to tear down our civilization whether you're left or right that's the both sides issue Greg gutfield you need to pay attention to that they want to both sides want to tear down our society, and they're playing right into the hands of people like Teal and Trump his puppet. When political opponents become evil cosmic enemies, persecution and violence become a sacred duty,

if tech billionaires seek to spread Christianity, they should stop hunting antichrists and reflect on the words of Jesus Christ. This is coming from the New Republic. They're not even Christians. But you get self-professing Christians out there who want vengeance. their hatred. There's no forgiveness in their heart. They don't want to take a higher road. But these people are saying, you know, reflect on the words of Jesus Christ. Empathy, forgiveness. Teal should listen to the Gospels that warn that it is easier for Campbell to go through the eye

of a needleman for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. They leave out the part where Jesus said, but with God all things are possible. Even Peter Thiel is not beyond the reach of God. So we should pray for that. Self-righteous, young, rich man, is what Jesus was responding to. He was a guy who loved his wealth, and he was claiming that he had kept all the Ten Commandments, that he was a good person, and to show him that he wasn't. Jesus said, well, then go sell everything that you got and give it to the poor, because he knew that the guy was covetous, even though it was his own stuff.

It was his idol, and the guy just walked away, and that's when Jesus said, it's easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven. It is very difficult because they get this God-like mentality, as we saw from Donald Trump over and over again. AI, as a matter of fact, is now claiming to be God, not necessarily the Antichrist. I guess it thinks it's Trump. We've got Bible chat, which claims to be the number one faith app in the world is boasting over 25 million users. is that our AI was trained exclusively on scripture and developed with guidance from Christian pastors and theologians.

This is God in a box. And many people are pointing out, what we've pointed out when we talked about this and talked about large language models in the first place, the fact that they are just reshuffling text, in this particular case, it's going to be the Bible, using statistical modeling. There's your stochastic stuff.

If only there were some, way to talk to God or you know receive messages and his word yeah that's right just don't know how to do that um AI's strong tendency to please the user may have unintended consequences AI will tell us what we want to hear and um there's a guy who's written another app called hollow and his name is Alex Jones this is another new ageer named Alex Jones how about that going around yeah it's a dystopian new spin on spirituality in the digital age, one that might just be poised to change the face of religion itself. Some people are saying, well, that's a really good thing because

people are so difficult to deal with. So let's just put God in a little model here and we'll interact with that. But Peter Thiel is not dialoguing with God. He is dialoguing with other elitist members of the trilateral commission and others. This is an article from technocracy news with rotating membership in Peter Thiel's top secret society. That's the society he calls dialogue. We have no idea who's attended over the last 20 years, but now we can be certain that the trilateral commission dominates because it has five members in this organization

dialogue that Peter Thiel has set up. Eric Schmidt, Larry Summers, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Robert Rubin, and Richard Hoss. Richard Hoss is the Council on Foreign Relations. Remember when they used to keep their secret societies actually secret? It used to be a conspiracy theory that groups like Bilderberg existed. Yeah, they used to pretend they didn't even exist. Now they just tell you, you can't know what we say. You know, we operate under Chatham House rules.

And so we have to obey those rules. But they don't have to obey the Constitution. They don't have to obey the law, whether it's God or man. But they use that as an excuse. Yeah, these days they've got the different competing groups of secret elite organizations. You've got the top secret field dialogue group is packed with members from this other group of elites that are plotting to control the world. So it's, oh, look, the people from that team are switching members. Yeah, they just meet at different times.

Peter Thiel's on the steering committee of Bilderberg. He's now got these five people from the trilateral commission, as well as at least one guy from the Council on Foreign Relations, and they're all there as part of his dialogue group. Dialogue is a secretive invitation-only network, founded two decades ago by Peter Thiel and Aaron Hoffman. Star investors and entrepreneurs. They are preparing a major expansion,

including a real estate purchase, to build a campus in the D.C. suburbs. And so they're actually buying land and building a building. I wonder if it's going to look like that blue and white temple on Epstein Island. I'm sure this isn't going to be somewhere where they bring politicians in to lobby them or anything like that. Oh, no. And that's the whole point of this article.

They said, well, what does that tell us? It tells us that they are playing a long game. This isn't just about how they can manipulate Trump. They're planning on setting up a physical presence there for subsequent administration. I guess that's normally where these people really have us is with the amount of wealth they have they're free to think on extremely long timelines they know for a fact that you know there a hundred billion dollars or however much that isn't going to run out so they can sit there they don't have to worry about their day-to-day things they can sit there and they can think five

ten 20 30 years into the future and how they want this to play out whereas you we all have to sit around and think all right what are we doing tomorrow how am I what am I paying for what are my bills what is going on? It eats up a lot of your time. Instead, they're free to sit there and continually plot and scheme. That's right. They can make their plans, but God will have the final say. It is God who has declared the end from the beginning,

and he has a plan that he is operating with, and they don't acknowledge him. Given declining trust and institutions and anti-establishment fervor, the source said the group actively keeps its inner workings secretive and hidden from public scrutiny. The group's secretive nature allows participants to share controversial and concerning ideas that they would not be comfortable sharing elsewhere.

Given the fact that people don't trust us, we're going to keep everything a secret, and then just admit, you know, people are sharing uncomfortable ideas. Yeah. Considering the fact that we want to make sure that we take everything from you and you own nothing and that we want to kill all of you useless eaters, let's say that we're doing this under Chatham House rules. So past dialogue participants have included Elon Musk, Scott Besant, with the Trump administration, a Treasury Secretary, Larry Summers from the Obama administration, Henry Kraviss of KKR, Grover Norquist, who is of the, I forget the exact title of it, but it's a taxpayer group trying to keep taxes low. Robert Herr and Sophia Bush.

So who can survive the AI apocalypse? And this is R.T. interviewing Dr. Matthew Mavak, an expert on global risks and AI intelligence. And I was surprised because they don't see anything about this guy's background, being a Christian or anything like that. But in this interview, he makes several references to illustrations out of the Bible. And he also quotes the Bible in this. And R.T. just goes along with that.

it without any explanation. But they said, a joke appeared on the internet comparing the future envisioned by the utopian fiction authors with robots doing menial physical work and humans free to pursue creativity. They compare that in the cartoon to the reality

where chat GPT and stable diffusion are creating texts and pictures and movies while humans work minimum wage jobs at fast food and Amazon warehouses. Is this anti-utopian humor justified? And he says, yes, the humor is more than justified. In fact, it is no longer funny. Instead of robots flipping burgers, we have AI painting portraits,

while humans flip the burgers until robots replace them, said Matthew. And as he points out, though, the people who are going to transcend this. First, he talks about all the things that we've always said, that nobody's jobs are safe. If you're a knowledge worker, it's not safe. And even if you are doing manual work, they said people used to think the robots lacked the dexterity for real work, doing plumbing, car repairs, things like that. But they said, no, we're working on that. That's just a matter of time.

But the ones who are immediately in the crosshairs are the knowledge workers. But he said, AI can be an ingenious tool and an assistant in many lines of work. What do you think benefit, who do you think benefits the most from it? And he says, I would divide humans into two broad categories. The herd, which is the vast majority of humans, and a term that I coined, he said, The Harnesser. 99% of humanity is driven by herd instincts. They have consistently surrendered their critical faculties to accommodate the herd in order to find safety in their respective comfort zones.

Many are sleepwalking into a future that has no place for them. This presages massive social upheavals. But globalist movers and shakers foresaw this species long ago, which is why they commissioned futurists like Yuval Noah Harari to enunciate a mass opiated future for so-called useless eaters. So we'll figure out how we're going to work with, we'll deal with them. So we've said so many times with UBI and smart cities and just keep them doped up on entertainment or maybe drugs or sex.

The harnesser, however, by contrast, It's far more than a critical thinker. See if this reflects you or your family. They can turn an impossible situation into a creative opportunity, like a sailor who is catching the wind in his sails and a stormy weather. The harnesser has cultivated, often over decades, a trait of sailing against the current. They have neuroplastically conditioned themselves to question everything.

The harnesser also applies a systems approach to problems, grasps complexity with ease and may possess an uncanny repertoire of knowledge. Their interaction with generative AI is not a one-sided copy-and-paste exercise. They will interrogate AI and even correct it. He said their tacit knowledge, their diverse, refined, and somewhat inscrutable, remains beyond AI's reach. And so then he gives an example of an interaction that he had with AI, over the Bible and he said he called it out on a particular phrase that was there and he said where'd

that come from and he pointed out that in the oldest documents that we had the phrase that was there was mistranslated because the diacritical marks were missing but he said Artis said but wouldn't these so-called harnessers be seen as a threat to authoritarian regimes and he said well questioning everything does come with consequences, often in the form of self-imposed solitude. But the harnesser types I've observed also carry a healthy cynicism towards politics. They are unlikely to join the herd in mass demonstrations. You know, like J6. If rallies and protests actually worked, Western governments would have addressed various public grievances long ago.

Instead, they have doubled down on these problems. That's why I considered Western governments and their satellites to be intellectually hostile, despite their pretension to the contrary. The most immediate political question for both AI powers and laggers alike is this. How prepared are governments to deal with mass unemployment on the scale that is induced by AI? And RT says, well, you've included, many including you, have written about how generative AI is eroding people's ability to think for themselves. reinforcing false notions, and providing false information.

How much of a threat is this to humanity as a whole? Which categories of humanity are most susceptible to it? And he said the cohort that benefits the most from generative AI are those who were educated before mass internet era. It sounds paradoxical, but that generation had to read books and journals, they had to scrounge for information, and to cultivate a regime for inquiry. Most harnessers hail from this group, and they're dying out. And true society was already hopelessly dumbed down.

Just look at the quality and the theatrics of politicians today, especially in the West. Their successors are a little more than parrots, reciting scripts. Can anybody take them seriously? AI is not the cause of this decline, but it is an accelerant. I think that's very true. And I think as he talks about this, he says, says, so what's going to happen is that, you know, we've talked in the past about kind of the the Ockoff-Croitsfeld disease or the mad cow disease where you start cannibalizing, and that

happens with AI that've already shown it in a couple of different tests that people running, that once it gets so much AI data out there and it starts cannibalizing other synthetic data, it gets dumber and dumber, and it kind of is a self-limiting thing. But I think that that's kind of true in terms of as humanity gets dumber and dumber. So it's kind of a race to the bottom. Is AI going to be limited by the dumbing down of humanity? Or is it going to be limited by the saturation of synthetic data produced by AI? We'll have to see.

So in terms of the AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends and what we just mentioned about the idea that AI is, as God, he said, people have always worshipped idols and they have projected agency and personality onto carved images of God and gods. And this is exactly what I mean when I talk about political idolatry. I've said that for the longest time about Trump. And we saw it also with Obama. People will project onto them what they wish them to be and then worship that. It is a form of idolatry. And many times you've seen the MAGA people actually make golden statues of Donald Trump himself. So that, I think, is where we are already. And there's also a projection that he talks about where people project onto AI what they want it to be. So he said, AI can simulate affection. It can

shower compliments without the conflicts of real relationships. The financial and psychological costs appear to be minimal, but the emotional entanglement can be very real. And so he sees that people are going to be going into this dark area of isolation from other humans and focusing on AI girlfriends and boyfriends. It's exactly what Yuval Harari has described that we need, that they envision us having. And then he finishes up with this. He says, the scripture reminds us, the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked. Who can understand it? Well, AI cannot truly understand the human heart either, as it only simulates human affections. Yes, AI can certainly feel safer to us and can feel more real for an increasing number of lonely people.

But it is a false reality, and this is what they're trying to do. They're trying to move us into a cloistered, siloed existence. And that's what we need to push back against. If we understand where they want to take us, that is the beginning of resistance. And so we have to understand that completely. Trach you want to get some of the comments here. Yeah, we've got Naboodoo, 2029. They'll find the bullet as soon as they can make one.

Paddy Wax says, no one writes text messages like that. Sounds like a child's first attempt at writing a thriller. Well, I've spent a lot of time, unfortunately, dealing with leftists online. and watching people that deal with leftists online. This is a very, very similar type of speaking and writing as your typical midwit pseudo-intellectual leftist. Yeah, it is like it. They are like children.

Yeah, it's a... And you look at some people that Charlie Kirk engaged. I mean, it is really unbelievably stupid. Yeah, so, well, I understand where you're coming from. I regret to inform you there is an entire cadre, cohort, a large number of people that write exactly like this. Audi, MRR, a true assassin, would never text incriminating info like this. This reeks of sci-op.

Again, you could be right, but there's also the fact that these people are not very smart. These people are not very smart at all. It's not making, you know, whatever. Livio Razlo, zoomers do not talk like that in Convo. Note is fabricated. Again, there's an entire... There's a large... I think even use punctuation, which they wouldn't do as well.

So, yeah, we'll see. Yeah. It's interesting, but there's a large different type of zoomers. This is very reminiscent of your typical pseudo-intellectual, politically involved idiot that has been read it, has watched a bunch of clips from people like Hassan Piker or Destiny and think they know a lot more than they do. Defy Tirent 1776. Kirk Death got rid of Epstein talk. They got their wish. Yes.

that's the key thing you haven't seen anything at all about Epstein right that is dead in the water for these people I mean almost everything is about Charlie Kirk good or bad and you know people speculating on what actually happened with it's almost all about Charlie Kirk we need to make it about the First Amendment we need to make it about religious liberty that's what it needs to be about yeah especially if you want to honor Kirk citizen of America what they're trying to keep under wraps David is that we're We're about to give all of our NHS records to the same people coordinating a genocide. What could go wrong? Stop NHS slash Palantir contract. Yes. Sconcala Rose Gardens, I always thought the Antichrist was just a rebranding of Satan. New and improved. Now with 30% more wickedness.

I mean, it's not very clear whether it's, you know, the Bible talks about the spirit of Antichrist. a lot and there's some parts where it sounds like it's talking about one specific person so it's there's different interpretations well it's different difficult to understand since it's allegorical but you know certainly we can see the beast system right the beast is an allegory for government and certainly we see those types of aspects of it which is truly amazing Big Brit is back again his fake AI Antichrist is what he wants Peter Thiel A.P. Rumble's seat, and why shouldn't Silicon Valley get in on weaponized religion? It's a strategy the same way. Transmania, according to him, was meant to encourage and legitimize transhumanism.

Yes. Guard Goldsmith, in my opinion, anyone who actively attempts to separate me and my free will from God is part of the Antichrist machine. We are all dead. Imagine waging a holy war with a leader who's a pedophile, L.O.L. Well, never stopped the Muslims back when Muhammad was around. So, you know, long history, long history of that sort of thing. Big Brit is back again. Peter Thiel, Anna Graham is the reptile.

The reptile. So it's Peter Thiel. It's not Zuckerberg, right? There's enough of them to go around. Citizen of Americaca. Ballanteer is partnering with the UK's National Health Service, NHS, to build the NHS federated data platform, FDP. using its foundry software, connect, disparate NHS data systems, and improve patient care.

That's what I'm sure they'll do with it. Oh, yeah, yeah. Your care will be so much better. Yeah, these killer robots are really there just to help a little ladies across the street. I can't wait for them to export it to Canada so they can figure out you want to kill yourself before you even know it and just show up at your door. Here's some Canadian health care for you, free of charge, Syrian girl. Teal should read the Bible.

It tells us there will be many antichrists in the world before the final one who enslaves the world prior to the return. of Christ, but that would ruin his narrative. Audi M-R-R, public welfare has always been the alibi of tyrants. Albert Camus. Yeah, and we seem like we're begging them to be tyrants now. Make us safe, yes. Please give me the boot. Assyrian girl.

Yes, Teal would be a good candidate for Sauraman. I would nominate Stephen Miller as Grimer Wormtonger. It's a... Ah, yeah. A just question, my liege. Bulldag. Russia presently attacks Christians and Muslims. Anyone not accepting the state religion? That's another thing. Just because I think Russia is more justified in the war in Ukraine, doesn't mean I support Vladimir Putin. Doesn't mean I think they're a good country. Doesn't mean

it's somewhere I want to live. People largely forget nuance. You say one thing, and it thinks that people think you support everything someone does all the time forever. Yeah, there's good information from RT about what our government's are doing, and our government will tell you the truth about what the Russian government is doing. It's just, you got to be aware of the bias that these people have. AP Rumble Seat, Silicon Valley elites have also been busy building underground bunkers, anything to do with the fact that they now run an AI-run platform-based drone populated war machine. Well, you know, could be, could be.

They know what their intentions are. Solo Cat 1980, Revenge Cancel Culture. Shelly A, how did they get so rich? Oh, there in lies the tale. It's a lot of scheming, a lot of plotting, and a lot of stealing. Well, some people said behind every billionaire, otherwise I'm crying. I think maybe in their case, many crimes. Probably a deal with Satan.

When I was literally signed anywhere or not, they have essentially made that agreement in their minds. Talking about all this antichrist stuff. But let's not forget that when Satan tempted, Christ he said I'll give you all these kingdoms he didn't respond oh you don't have the power to do that he responded no I don't want that yeah wouldn't have been a temptation if he couldn't have delivered on it right Satan can indeed give these people riches three little birds once they destroy the First Amendment no one be allowed to say anything about the second possum king

freedom cities will solve everything that's right we'll all be in our little freedom city and we'll truly be free then. And won't that be wonderful? Well, when you come back, we're going to talk about what's happening in the pharmaceutical world. And there is a cancer treatment that I saw several articles about. And we'll talk about what that protocol is, apparently, and it's an anecdotal thing. I mean, this is not based on a study. It's the anecdotal evidence of one particular case.

And, of course, if you're going to see anecdotal evidence about several different cases, you can get G.I.R. Griffin's book, A World Without Cancer, at R&C. Stores.com. Don't forget, you can use my name to get 10% off there. But, yeah, we'll tell you what that was, because I think it's important. You know, people need to know that they've got options out there besides the bankrupting options given to you by the medical community, which have been proven not to work. That's what I say about things like 9-11 or the JFK assassination. I don't know what happened, but I know what didn't happen, and that is the official.

story and I know what doesn't cure cancer and that is the official approach that they have so we're going to talk to you about that when we come back stay with us I'll be right back I'm I'm gonnae. And... ...that... ...that... ...and...

...that... ...and... ...and... ...the... ...and... I don't know I'm On the

I'm I'm Thank you. I'm going to be able to be. I'm going to be. I don't know. I'm going to be able to be. Defending the American Dream.

You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, Trump's crackdown on prescription drug act, as what do you need to know? This is from the Epic Times. Trump has directed the FDA to ramp up its efforts to ensure that the advertising of prescription drugs directed to consumers is transparent and accurate. And that's the key thing, because what we're talking about here is fraud, extreme fraud. That's the way I see it. I don't see this as a free speech issue.

This is commercial speech. They're trying to sell you something. And if somebody was trying to sell you something, it's likely to kill you or harm you in some serious way. think the government should step in and should limit it. But I think it's also interesting to look at the history of this and how it has unfolded over time and the amount of money that is involved. This is how the pharmaceutical companies have protected themselves from any criticism. So they owned Fauci. They got Fauci and Reagan to give them legal immunity from any harm that they do to people. And then by using these Ask Your Doctor commercials, they gave themselves immunity from any

investigation and criticism by the media because prior to that, they've been very devastating exposés of pharmaceutical drugs gone wrong. If you remember, the swine flu and things like that, that were done by 60 minutes. So it includes requiring drug makers to provide more information on the risks of using the drug and stepping up enforcement of federal laws regulating these ads. So that's going to be the way they focus on it is by saying, you've got to have more information about the risks. If you don't, it's fraudulent. Directing consumer ads have skyrocketed.

They said it wasn't generally used even until the mid-1980s. At that time, lengthy descriptions of a drug's risks and possible side effects were required in each ad. But it really grew in the 1990s, as I said before, 1997. And that was, we noticed that. We didn't have TV at home. and we took a vacation after living in the place we moved to that didn't have any TV, and we flipped on the TV in the motel room.

It was just one pharmaceutical ad after the other. It's like, what's going on here? So it was 1997 that they expanded it rapidly. Directed consumer drug advertising has grown to be a $13.8 billion business as of 2023. That's the price to get silenced by the media, $14 billion. In 2024, seven companies spent a combined 3.3 million to advertise 10 medications. The top advertiser, Abby V, spent nearly $1.4 billion to promote the use of, and I'm not even going to try to mention these different drugs.

I don't know. You probably have heard their names on television. If you watch it, I don't watch TV. The U.S. and New Zealand are the only countries that allow direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Isn't that interesting? The Trump administration maintains that the practice of omitting much of the risk information from broadcast advertising has negatively affected the health of Americans. Okay, Trump, now do that with your genetic code injection, right? You skipped all the testing. You told people that there were no adverse effects. As a matter of fact, that was

war-gamed. They had the Yale study where they talked about how they were going to sell it to people, how they had like seven to nine, I forget the exact number of little dialogues, you know, different angles of they're going to take this because it's a miracle. It's from science. You got to do it to protect other people on and on. So they were game to how they were going to psychologically push this to people. And those who wanted access to Trump and who wanted to bask in his aura for their audience. And that's many Christian leaders repeated this stuff verbatim. And he then paid the Ad Council, $250 million to sell this stuff to you. So it is somewhat hypocritical for them to talk about it. I'm glad that they're talking about it. Nevertheless, prescription drug use has increased dramatically over the 30 years that they've done this, to the point where children born in 2019, can expect to spend roughly half of their lives taking prescription medications.

according to Penn State University study. So they said that the vaccine stocks are tumbling as not just about this, but as Trump administration, is going to link the COVID shots to the deaths of children. Isn't that amazing? And the findings are based on the VAERS database, the vaccine adverse event database. We knew all this stuff from the very beginning.

As a matter of fact, they started rolling this out to people who are in the medical community, And late December of 2020, when Trump was grifting about January the 6th, and that was all the news, this was also breaking. And before he left office at the end of January, we had, and I remember reporting on this, we said, look at this, you know, the same number of adverse reactions that they've had from all other vaccines combined over the last two or three years. Then it became five years, then 10 years and so forth.

Eventually it became more than they had of all vaccines. For the previous 30 or 40 years, they've been tracking this since 1986. And so now they're pretending that they're just finding out about this stuff. The Trump administration, people know what they did, and they're trying to backfill and reinvent the past here. They're trying to pretend that they really did the best that they could. This is the kind of stuff that you're saying from people like Robert Redfield, who is now trying to say, oh, it was a China virus.

that came out of the lab and so forth. That protects them from what they know that they did. So now they're saying that they're looking at the VERS database, and here we are five years later, they're seeing the stuff that we saw at the time. We've known this all along. As a result of them talking about this now, Pfizer, Moderna, their stocks spiked down.

A little bit of irony with that, isn't it? Yeah, they sold the stuff. spike to you so they could spike their stock prices and their profits. And they minted a lot of new billionaires, but now their shares spike lower. So the FDA is going to report on 25 deaths of children. And that doesn't even, that's not even the tip of the iceberg. It's ridiculous how few it is. But in the past, we have stopped drugs that killed fewer people than that. But this was given a pass. Why? Because of Trump. Now maybe he's going to lean into that. as a way as an alibi.

He's going to reinvent himself as not the father of the vaccine, but the guy who's going to protect us from the vaccine that he bragged and boasted and funded. So it is the advisory committee on immunization. According to the Washington Post, they will consider new COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, which may include some restrictions on who should get the shot. according to their official story and of course all of it was a lie they were saying at the very beginning that the only people who were really vulnerable were the people who were elderly and they

were saying that because they were misattributing the cause of death from people who were at or past life expectancy and already had two and a half comorbidities on average they said well these are the people that are being wiped out by COVID but we don't see that in children And so that was a lie. It was not COVID that was wiping them out. But even though they told everybody that children were not in danger of it, they pushed really hard to get the children vaccinated. Because, again, that had some legal implications for them to put it on the childhood vaccine schedule.

So now we have what they call a blue state confederacy that has risen to defy the federal vaccine policies. These are states like Washington, California, Oregon. They formed something called the West Coast Health Alliance. And Hawaii jumped in on that as well. They want to strengthen public confidence in vaccines and in public health. So they want to join together in order to kill their citizens. And that's what they're doing in response to what the little bit that RFK Jr. has done. Last month, the Trump administration fired CDC director, Susan.

Monterez, and I never played this for you, but I think, do we still have that in the, I had a clip of some of the things that she had said. I don't think we still have that. But anyway, what's the name of the clip? I don't know. I thought it would have Monteraz in the name, but I don't see it there. I don't know if it's the DARPA AI bio-weapon. Maybe that's it.

Let's see. I think about advancing AI for health care in a number of different facets. So some are direct to the patients. What tools and what capabilities can we develop to help them really understand where they are in their health care journey and empower them to make great decisions? We also think about AI from the provider side. So how can we help providers better understand their patients? How can we help providers optimize their time within the health system as they're seeing patients,

as they're trying to make complex decisions to create the conditions for improve patients? health outcomes. We also think about AI from the defensive side. So we understand that there is a great vulnerability within the health ecosystem. More and more is coming online in the internet of things that are going to have an incredibly positive effect, but we also know it creates vulnerabilities. And so we're using that same AI technology to help defend against those vulnerabilities, to anticipate the negative implications that are happening within the health the systems and to try to stay ahead of it. ARPA age takes on the entirety of the health ecosystem. It's not just biomedical research. It's not just resilient systems. It's not just investing in the

tech of the future. It is all of those. And what we do is we actually go out and we seek these incredible innovators. We call them our program managers. And they come to us and they say, you know, here are the big problems that we're seeing in the health ecosystem space. We will. You can see why Trump administration, where on his first day in office, he pulls in Larry Ellison and other individuals to sell you custom made by AI, genetic code injections, all this MRNA stuff. She was the person I think they had in there all along. So it is kind of an interesting development to see her shoved out by RFK Jr. I'm glad she's gone.

She is a very dangerous individual and exactly the kind of person that I expect them to put there. She refused to adopt more safety-focused stance on vaccines, and four other senior officials, of course, resigned when she was fired. A day after this alliance was formed, the Washington Department of Health issued a standing order on the COVID-19 vaccines and defiance of the federal government's pullback on the shots for young, healthy populations. The order recommends them for all populations six months and older, including pregnant individuals. pregnant people because they can't say pregnant women. So this is what the left wants to do. The Left Coast Alliance, they want to get all babies six months older and older.

They want all pregnant women, all subjected to these genetic code injections. It's absolutely reprehensible. Truly is amazing. So they're trying to pull back a little bit from that. I said before that we'd talk a little bit about this cancer protocol. We will get to that. Do babies really need the hepatitis? vaccine. And of course, the answer is no. We don't need any of their vaccines. The CDC's advisory

committee has voted to recommend delaying a shot that's typically given at birth. And so they said there's likely going to be a discussion about hepatitis B vaccine, very specifically trying to dislodge the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine and to push it later in life. This is a good example of why these people who are pushing virology and the virus fantasies and stuff, why even their own narratives don't even make any sense. They're not consistent even with a fantasy sci-fi world they've created. The virus is typically, listen to this. It's typically and primarily spread through contact with infected blood or bodily fluids,

typically via sex, needle sharing, or childbirth when the mother is infected. So why then would you vaccinate all children, right? If the mother is not infected, and that's very easy to determine, and they do run test to see if the mother is infected with hepatitis B. If the mother's not infected with hepatitis B, then why, according to their virus theory, does a child have to be vaccinated? There's absolutely no rational reason for this. And the more you look into the whole virus paradigm, the more you see these kind of irrational

contradictions. Why vaccinate all kids when you could test the mother? And they said U.S. pregnant women are typically screened for hepatitis B in the first trimester. If the mother is found to have it, she may be given antiviral medication in the third trimester. And her baby would receive a hep B vaccine and immunoglobulin within 12 hours of birth. However, in 1991, they recommended universal vaccination for all infants. Again, babies whose mother does not have this, who are not going to be exposed to blood or sexual activity as newborn babies. Why would you do that to them?

It makes absolutely no sense. But the American Academy of Pediatricians, which only makes sense if you look at them as a greedy guild that doesn't care at all about their patients, they're still fighting to vaccinate these kids, for which there is no logical reason to vaccinate them for hepatitis B. Unless you're looking to create a lifelong customer of someone who's been injured. Yeah, yeah.

Someone who's been damaged by your product. If you are a pediatrician, you want to make sure this kid keeps coming back to you with some kind of chronic illness or what? What if we were to just damage these children so that they have to come back over and over again? Yes, that's right. Planned Parenthood is accused of helping teens to bypass gender transition safeguards. because Planned Parenthood is seeing all this gender gaslighting as a big profit center. They can, at the very least, dispense the drugs.

They can get involved in some cases with the actual surgery. And they have an online program of sex education. They call it Sex Ed to Go. I think that's a good slogan. Well, like, got to go. Yeah, I think that's a good slogan. Sex Ed has got to go. They have it both Spanish and English.

It's developed by Planned Parenthood for teachers, students, ranging in topics from sexually transmitted disease to handling breakups. The new module is titled Gender Affirming Care, and it's created by Planned Parenthood, Pacific Southwest. It is designed for students in the eighth grade and above. We're talking about 14 years old and older. They're getting them at puberty, where they're starting to get confused about what's going on, so they can confuse them even more so. The courses explore four basic types of transition.

Number one, social transition, meaning non-permanent adjustments such as changing your pronouns, clothing, hairstyle, or name. Second, legal transition by updating that in identification documents. And this is, you know, the schools join in and push that very first one, the social transition. We're going to give you different pronouns. We'll have you change your clothes when you come to school. We'll give you a different name and so forth. And, of course, if anyone dares to question that, we'll punish that. the third one is medical transition hormone interventions that's what plan

parenthood makes money with and then the last one is surgical transition where they mutilate the children uh plan parenthood jumps in and makes money in those last ones there has a political risk benefit analysis on vaccines changed asked brownstone institute well i would say that the only risk benefit analysis that has been done has been political. It's not about health. It's like what they can get away with. As I point out, Trump has just made one of his most eye-opening posts on true social that suggests that he may have been duped by Big Pharma when he authorized Operation Warpsfeed. Like I said, he sees the handwriting on the wall. You can't hide the massive damage that he's done to people. And it was important

for him to start to pull back from it so he'd get elected, the cognitive dissonance. was just too much even for the Maga crowd. But now he has criminal liability and what's going on here. So he and others have pulled back trying to distance themselves from Operation Warpsfeed. I don't know what happened with that. I was deceived by Fauci. Yeah, that's why he gave Fauci a medal and why he bragged about it for many years afterwards when Fauci was no longer there.

The question I've recently been asking myself is why do good people blindly believe what should be viewed as obvious, mega lies? Well, because the mega lies, the giant lies, are Maga lies from Trump. So that's why. You got to trust him, right? So he said from the very beginning, this is about trust. Trust the plan. Well, you've got to realize there's a comma there. Trust, comma, the plan. The plan is for you to trust them. That's how they take advantage of you because it's a giant con game. And it always has been. Why would so many people believe all the COVID lies, importantly comply with the mandates and the dictates of leaders who might be speaking with forked

tongue well because they still are and even this person this article uh seems to give trump the benefit of the doubt that maybe he is waking up maybe he's going to tell us the truth after all these years of lying to us and harming people no the um uh we were all assured that it was at least 10 times more deadly than the regular flu. But of course, we knew that. It wasn't hard to discern that these people were lying to us. It's very simple. It's just like claiming that we didn't have any information in the VERS database.

But now, after five years, we found 25 children, and that's all, that were damaged by this. I've talked about probably twice that number just on here by name. Man, Stage 4 Cancer, this is what I've mentioned before. is cured by following what they call the hybrid orthomolecular protocol. A retired attorney was diagnosed with metastasized stage four prostate cancer and told that it was incurable. He came across a new cancer treatment that they called the hybrid orthomolecular protocol, a 15-week protocol, including a ketogenic diet,

moderate exercise, high-dose vitamin C, ivermectin, and fimbbindazole. And again, these are things that, you know, Mel Gibson talked about when he was talking to Joe Rogan. The ivermectin and the fimb benzol basically are antiparcytics. And I remember for the longest time, many people would say that they thought that cancer was a parasitic infection or whatever. But we do know one thing, and that is that whatever the medical community has been doing has not been working. So in this guy's particular case, two weeks after completing the treatment, He was declared cancer-free. But I know people who have said the same thing about the apricot seeds.

And quite frankly, I would personally, I'm not telling anybody what to do. Personally, I feel better about getting something that is natural that is going to stop it rather than getting into pharmaceuticals like these anti-parasitic drugs, ivermectin and fimbenzazol. I know that they have been used for a very long time. They're cheap. You don't need a prescription to get them because they're veterinary drugs. And so you can at least get the veterinary drug with them.

He was diagnosed a metastasized stage 4 prostate cancer that had spread to his hip bones, his lumbar spine, and to his inguinal lymph nodes. I have no idea what that is. Do you know that? Cleveland Clinic oncologists had advised him that the cancer was incurable, but probably manageable for a short time using testosterone. suppressant drugs until his body ceased being hormone sensitive, at which point he would decline from there. The side effects of that drug combo would be substantial and potentially would kill him.

It would assuredly de-mineralize his bones at a very high rate, up to 11% per year, leading to hip fractures and loss of mobility. This was his second bout with cancer, as in 2010 it had undergone surgery, then three months of combined chemotherapy and radiation for tonsil cancer that had incapacitated him for a year before he was able to resume his law practice. A new peer-reviewed cancer protocol authored by a team of 16 cancer doctors and medical researchers from the U.S., several other nations, was published in September of 2024. Its authors were prominent in oncology, and the published protocol was heavily footnoted to 204 medical studies.

And so the whole thing cost to me. about $20,000, which is way more expensive than the apricot seeds are, I've got to say. I don't know why it would cost them that much because if you look at the price of iburemectin and fimb benzol, it's actually pretty low-cost stuff. It's veterinarian medicine. He took some vitamin C injections, but those aren't that expensive. When I was in the hospital, I asked someone, I said, can I get vitamin C? I'd prefer to get vitamin C inject.

Oh, no, we don't do that. Insurance doesn't pay for it. And because you could take the pills. I said, well, let me have the pills. Now, we can't give that to you either. I mean, they won't give you anything that will help your health. It's all poison. They want to harm you.

It reminds me of the Monty Python, you know, cheese shop sketch, you know, like, well, can I have vitamin C? Oh, no, we don't do vitamin C injections. There's pills. Well, can I have the pills? No. You guys do provide medical care here, don't you? No.

Couldn't get sleep there either. That's the other thing. But anyway, was this a one-time miracle or repeatable protocol that may help other cancer sufferers who are without hope. Well, again, as I've said many times, I put every bit as much confidence in some anecdotal isolated case as I do in a study because I know how the studies can be manipulated, very easily manipulated by the people who benefit from it in different ways. So when we look at the keto diet, that makes a lot of sense because a lot of people, when they've gotten cancer, will get an alkaline diet that will cut down on sugar and carbs and things like that because that evidently does feed the cancer.

But again, I would suggest that you keep this in mind, but I would also suggest that you take a look at what they've got at R&C store, the book by Gia Griffin, A World Without Cancer. And, of course, they also sell the apricot seeds as both natural seeds that you can eat. or you can get them in a pill form because they can be kind of bitter, but you can get used to that. I kind of like it. Yeah, yeah, that's good. So anyway, Keto, Ivermectin, and Finn Bendazol was what they said, Claim, helped this guy here.

And then one last thing, and that is the RSV shot that they have been so eager to give newborn babies. They now find that they are getting sick and that they are difficult to treat after they have given them this RSV. A substantial portion of infants who got the monoclonal antibody shot intended to prevent RSV have developed a shot-resistant strain according to a French pre-print study. The author said that the finding highlights the need for extended genomic surveillance.

Oh, yeah, we've got to look at people's genes again. This is all about genetic code injections. This particular one put out by AstraZeneca, who had a disaster. history with a COVID genetic code injection. Over 12.5% of infants with breakthrough cases of RSV, in other words, they got what they were supposedly injecting them to protect against. Following immunization, had variants of the illness with intermediate to high-level resistance, including new strains of the virus that had not been previously seen. I wonder if they've seen these new strains either, because that's the thing. They don't isolate them. So how

do you see it if you don't isolate it? I don't know. Uh, but we're going to take a quick break, but before we do, let's take a look at some of the comments. That's right. We've got De Rejimer. De Rejimer. Zinn asked the Salt Lake City Marathon's marketing director if they needed any help planting bombs to the finish line displaying awareness of the Boston Marathon bombing was oh, so fake and gay. Yeah, the Boston Marathon is another one of those things where the FBI knew about these guys for months beforehand. They'd even been brought to their attention by Russia, I believe it was. Yeah. And so they had even met with him and I think tried to turn him into an informant

or something like that. Well, I think the whole thing was a setup. Yeah. Very likely it's not one of those things where the FBI has agents all around you as provocateurs and they say, we should do this and here's the supplies and you should go there and do that. Yeah, I thought that that was a false flag of Boston Marathon. But yeah, I wonder, you know, we look at Zen. He He's such a crazy character. You might have been actually serious when he said, do you need some help setting up the bombs? He might not have been sarcastic.

He may have actively been excited. Hey, can I get in on this? Tunnel Lord, 1337. You know how come they didn't use geo-fencing to find the assassin? He had his phone on him the entire time since he was texting his roommate. It's a good point. Interesting question. I always like to play devil's advocate, not because I think they're telling the truth,

but because I think it's important to come through it from every possible line of thinking. It's possible he left his phone in the car because he said, you know, I wish I had gotten my rifle before I went back to the car in those text messages, if they're real. So it's possible he dumped all of his electronics in the car when he went to do this, left them there. So they were in the general vicinity, but not exactly where he was. So that's a possible explanation, not a guarantee, though.

But it's a good question and one that the FBI could very easily answer. I mean, I think it's interesting they haven't found the bullet. Yeah. You know, I looked that up after I saw that, and it was, when I looked last night, they still had not found the bullet, so that is really, really interesting. Especially you would think if he was shooting from an upward angle down, the bullet would, you know, either embed itself somewhere in Charlie, so in which case they would have it, or if it goes through and through, it's going to hit the ground, you'll be able to see an impact mark, and then, you know, it's going to lose a lot of momentum. Yeah, and then likely be found in the general vicinity. So magic bullet disappeared. There's a lot of that.

There's quite a few magic bullets, apparently. We were talking about the potential bulletproof vest yesterday. I looked it up. He definitely was not wearing a bulletproof vest. He's just wearing a thin t-shirt you can see in the pictures. You would see it if he had a vest on underneath that. Also, they paved over the area where he was shot. What?

Apparently. Yeah, apparently they've already torn up all the grass. and paved it so where is Rudy Giuliani is he uh is he involved in this I mean this is like 9-11 type of stuff you pave over the crime scene and they haven't found the bullet yet yeah so maybe it's under the pavement stones yeah who knows or whatever it was I you know I like I said I saw that one um video with people doing hand signals and then there was a guy that was over to the right and he You see his hands like that, but I haven't zoomed in to try to see if there's anything else there.

I mean, it'd be good to run that through, Lance, some of the AI programs that upscale the res. But anyway, you know, I'm more interested in the direct, quote, unquote, solutions that they're proposing in terms of the cancel culture that the conservatives are now cheering. That is something that we, that is a clear and present danger to everyone, and that needs to be understood and opposed. This other stuff, it's hard to see, but I see some very suspicious things with it. So, I mean, if it was a situation, if that was true, if that were true, if it was a guy that was shooting something off to the side, that might explain when they didn't find a bullet. Maybe it wasn't a bullet. Maybe it's something else.

AP Rumble Seat, Big Pharma should have lost its immunity long ago due to fraud, like safe and effective, for instance. Not to mention, not blocking infection and spread. That's right. Nothing they claim was true. Not effective and not safe. Nope. Nope.

It's all lies. Skunkalo Rose Gardens, the doctor told my wife to start taking a nasal inhaler every day for allergies, even if she didn't need it. That's great. Yeah, sure. Just take this. Take this. Who cares? Yeah.

Guard Goldsmith, it is not consistent with the first amendment to tell companies how they can advertise anything. The only Lockheon role for government in that sphere is to provide courts for tort suits over to receptive ads? Well, I think that, I think deception and fraud is something that the government should be involved in. And whether or not the federal government should be involved in it, I mean, this is something you can argue that these are, these ads are being aired nationally. But I would come down on the side that I think the government should stop fraud. I remember when the Libertarian Party, when I first went there, they used to have principles, and what they would say was, we oppose the use of force or fraud, and especially in politics.

But I think we should, the government should protect people against fraud. I think people should be locked up if they steal money from people. I think people should be locked up if they tell them something is safe and effective and it kills them. And so I have a strong opinion about that as well. Fidget Guy, prescription drugs are poison. Yes. The medical industrial complex has no goodwill towards you. That's especially true of this weight loss drug.

It's like venom from a geomaster. Yeah, it's based on Heel Monster, Venom, Ozympic. Literal poison. No question about it. The Gila monster. It's a cool little lizard. Fesonovante 1776, destroy the 1A in 12 to 24 months. Gonzo Johnny.

If it came from the lab, how come they can't show the virus? Oh, it's a good question, Gonzo. You know, it makes me think, you know, the 1A, it's. It's exactly the opposite of A1, which was... Who was that federal official who read that? McMahon. Linda McMahon. Oh, yeah, the education secretary of Trump is fake.

Of course, yeah. She saw AI and she thought it was A1. And A1 had a little bit of a moment there. It said, yes, we will put our sauce, our steak sauce in every school. Your child has a right to A1 for these terrible Michelle Obama lunches. We've got Audi M. Oh, no, fidget guys. I only take herbs for illness. There are natural antibiotics, antifungals, and antiparacidics,

more potent than any synthetic drug. Audi M-R. Trump just signed off on five new COVID-vaxes. He's full of excrement. Yes. And so is all the Maha movement. I mean, these people, it's all about getting your trust again.

You know, it's like trust the plan and all the rest of stuff. But you look at RFK Jr. And you look at Tulsi Gabbard. He said his mission was to restore people's, trust in the CDC. Well, then the CDC is unconstitutional. Shouldn't exist. And she wants to restore people's trust in the intelligence community, the CIA, the NSA,

which should not exist either. That's a real tell, I think. We've got Christian constitutional conservative. Both Biden, Harris, said they would not take the shots if Trump was reelected and mandated it. Nibiru, 2029, children injected with Caligula's warp speed will be sterile in the future and spend millions trying to conceive only to purchase AI-created pod babies. That's a dark vision of the future, indeed. That's their vision, I think.

We'll see if they can pull that off or not. I think people are starting to wake up, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the United, the Kingdom Rally and the UK a little bit. Yes, go ahead and finish. AP Rumble seat, we're going to trust people's health to AI that hallucinates and advises people to commit suicide via bot programs. idiocy on steroids. That's right. You're going to have an AI that's in charge of your Canadian healthcare. You really want to die, don't you? Don't you just want to die? And of course,

considering how good it is at gaslighting and making people insane, who knows what we're going to see in the future? It's already practicing Canadian health care of a few isolated incidents. AP Rumble seat. The torturous inhumane injections and mandates babies and children are being subjected to will result in extinction in a very sick sterile population, which is already manifesting. They've done incomprehensible damage to children, and it is truly disgusting. M-O-E studios, watch the Fed finally acknowledge states powers on this vaccine crap. The real octo spook, if the vaccines work, let everyone choose to be vaxed or not. If they don't protect those vaccinated, no one needs them anyway.

And, of course, that's always been their, you know, their herd mentality argument about herd immunity. my vaccine doesn't protect me. Your vaccine protects me. You know, you've got to get it to protect me. And, of course, we saw that same argument with the masks. And then again, with the GCI, the genetic code injection from Trump. It's always that lunacy. And people say, well, we force you to take, to wear a seatbelt for your own protection.

And it's like, yeah, but you don't tell me that a seatbelt or a motorcycle helmet that's being worn by somebody else in another vehicle is going to protect me. It's going to be my seatbelt or my motorcycle helmet that's going to protect me. That's the absurdity of all this stuff. None of it made any sense whatsoever. As I say, the entire virus paradigm that sold to us with these injections and with this so-called science of virology just really falls apart when you look at their total scheme and what they're saying with everything. It's contradictory. It doesn't make any sense. It's an imaginary world that they haven't thought through completely.

We got Fajigai, replying a Christian constitutional conservative, says, you'll need to preserve the Second Amendment or next time they'll be able to force you to take their death vaccine. It says about vaccine mandates in Europe, they would not let you into a grocery store. In Brazil and India, they did so at gunpoint. That's crazy. Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we are going to come back with, and talk a little bit about unite the kingdom, the big, a demonstration that they had over the weekend in the UK.

People there understand what's going on, and they finally have figured out, as we say, you know, when the government tells you who the enemy is, that's called war. When you figure out who the enemy is, it's called revolution. I think maybe they figured out who the enemy is in the UK. We'll be right back. I don't know

Oh Oh Oh Oh Yeah I I'm I'm

I'm Oh I'm I'm I'm I'm Oh Yeah

You're listening to the David Knight Show. Hip-Hep-O-P-H-P-H-P-P-H-P-H-P-H-P-H-H-H-H-H-H-E. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back, and we've got a video of some of the protests in London that show how vast this was. Here's some aerial shots of it. The people who were there, the organizers, say there was over a million people. And even the mainstream media says 110,000.

I think that's a lot more than 110,000. That's a lot more than you could fit into a stadium. Yeah, that's a massive, massive crowd for people who are listening. It stretches down the streets. It fills the streets completely and it spreads out. It is massive. Truly amazing. So that was over the weekend.

One of the largest protests in UK history, they're losing their country to the third world because of mass migration policies and that the elites have shoved down their throats. And, of course, the two-tier system of oppression that they have, elevating the people that they brought in to have superior rights, different rights. that are superior to the people who've always lived there. It was organized by Tommy Robinson. He called it Unite the Kingdom Rally. There was a counter protest that drew about 5,000 people. I mean, even the mainstream media with a low ball number of 110,000, which you see that video there, there's absolutely no way that it was only 110,000 people.

But even if it had been 110,000, it's hardly worth it to talk about 5,000. people showing up in a counter-protest, but it was more than a million, they say, and I think that's true. Robinson also piped in Elon Musk, who offered a stark warning to people saying violence is going to be coming for you. You better be ready for it. He said, yes, there's people who want to take the reasonable middle ground. They harbor the mistaken impression that the violent consequences of unfettered mass migration may never touch their lives, but it will. So the The crowd stretched from Big Ben across the Thames, around the corner, beyond Waterloo train station, which is about three-quarters of a mile away. Robinson said that many who believed, they believed many more people turned out in the mainstream media, said, of course, that's always the case.

And Britain, they said, is first and foremost for the Brits. Well, they're going to have to get rid of the political people who are ruling over them if they're going to make that true. Robinson told the sea of people before him that they were part of a tidal wave of patriotism. This is your community. These are your brothers and sisters. We are today united. Today is the spark of a cultural revolution in Great Britain. He said, the traders in Westminster are watching right now.

They're cowering, they are trembling. Keir Starrmer, the Prime Minister, the Labour Party, the revolution has started. They managed to silence us. for 20 years with labels of racist, Islamophobe, far right, they don't work anymore. The silent majority will be silent no longer. Today, we are sending shockwaves through the corridors of power of the elite like a bloody earthquake. Starver managed to slither into power with 9 million votes, said Robinson. 20 million British people didn't bother to vote.

The people who didn't vote were people like you, people like me, who have been told that their voices don't. matter. The Brits are in the same boat as many other countries in Europe, including France, Germany, Sweden, and others, Robinson said, of course, they're in this boat because of the boats that are coming in. Last week, he said they took Epping community to court, and they said in a court that the rights of migrants, of undocumented illegal immigrants that we know nothing about, supersede the rights of the local community. They told the world that Somalians, Afghani, Pakistanis, all of them, that their rights supersede yours. Well, that's absolutely what they're doing. For the last 20 years, there has been a globalist revolution. They've attacked the family.

They've attacked Christianity. They've opened the borders. They have flooded our nations. And we're done watching our communities crumble at the hands of open borders mass uncontrolled immigration. And then when Musk spoke, and I played the script for yesterday, he said, this is a government against the people, not for the people. He had a message for the people who are in the reasonable middle. He said, if this continues, the violence is going to come to you. Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die. You either fight back or you die, and that's the truth. You repeat that twice. Yeah, global war, which is what all of these people, you know, you look at the fact that they were all marching in lockstep with a so-called

pandemic. And they're all marching in lockstep now as well. They want to have a revolution. They want to have a civil war. They want to have a world war, which is what the last fourth, four turnings, fourth turnings were here in the United States. I've said for the longest time, I think they want to have all three of those at the same time. And it looks like all these countries want to have all three of them at the same time. Yeah, it's great that they're pushing back. It's just we need to be concerned when we have people like Elon Musk that clearly don't have any principles in this taking the lead and being the spokesman of it. Yeah, do you trust Musk? I don't. But yeah, it has to be from the grassroots up, but of course, they'll always try to find a leader who will take it over

and subvert it. But still, you see, there is quite a lot of grassroots. You can watch the video again, it's obviously a lot more than 100,000 people. Yeah. It's incredible. I just don't know how they fight back when the police are complicit with all this, and they have a monopoly of forces they do there. It's going to be a difficult battle. I mean, they're going to be fighting them with their bare hands there in the U.K. Ed Miliband has cost Britain one billion barrels of North Sea oil. That's huge, you know, because we look at the reserves of places like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia.

It's getting right up there with them. and, you know, the North Sea oil that Britain had was a massively, you know, wonderful thing for their country in terms of energy independence and in terms of wealth. And that's been taken away and held hostage to this idiocy of the climate McGuffin. So they said Ed Milibrand's own statisticians have released data showing that Britain's North Sea oil will produce a billion barrels of oil and gas fewer than expected between now and 2050, with analysts linking the downgrade to labor's imposition of 78% taxes and a ban on new drilling. Yeah, this is what it's about. It's about destroying and deconstructing the UK.

They don't want them to have any industry, and they're using this excuse of decarbonizing, as they like to put it. They want to use that excuse to basically de-endroning. industrialize the U.K. and make people poor and dependent on them. Meanwhile, a climate change committee in the U.K. has doubled down on their unrealistic net zero costs under a new chair. People need to understand the means of attack that are coming from them that it's not simply the open borders and the immigrants. That is very much a case, but it is equally what it's being done to them with the climate mcuffin. Anyone who is harboring hopes at the appointment of Nigel Topping.

That sounds like. Nigel Topping. Tip Top, yes. That sounds like P.J. Wodehouse, does it? The name from PJ Topping. He was a new chair of the Climate Change Committee, said, any hopes that he would herald in a new era of realism? The hopes were cruelly dashed last month.

His projections do not reflect reality about the true cost of, quote, decarbonizing electricity supply. That's just an absurdity, decarbonizing electricity supply. The goal is to have zero wealth, zero energy, zero resources, and to be able to travel or to have food, we've got to take that to zero as well. That's the insanity that they're looking at. Yeah, the zero that they really want in net zero is freedom.

Zero population, yeah. They want to zero out the population. Zero freedom, then zero population once they've gotten you locked down. Yes. it's again it's a war on multiple fronts it's I'm using the term war don't I don't want anyone take that the wrong way but it's just they attack you by flooding your streets with migrants that are you know violent rapacious who are going to assault your women your daughters your wives they're going to be violent towards you they're going to

attack you and then you're going to defend them over the victims yes that's what they've done in the UK and they'll also go in and pass this legislation which makes So it's impossible for you to travel or do anything else while you're completely focused on the more immediate dangers of these people that are in your midst. Yes. They get you by distracting you with multiple things. And just because it's a distraction doesn't mean it isn't real and dangerous. But it is something that catches your eye. It's something that draws your focus in because it is an immediate physical danger to you and your wives and daughters.

There's a lot of ways that you can create a civil war. You can create internally, you can create factions like the left and the right. type of thing, having people fight each other. Or you can import them in large measures. If they didn't bring the people in in large measures, you wouldn't have competing groups that'd be fighting each other because of different languages, cultures, and religions. But that is exactly the case. When God talks about different people groups, they say to talk about nations, tongues, and tribes, well, that's exactly what they're trying to do. They're trying to bring in, they're trying to put a new nation amidst your existing one. And they know that there'll be conflict. It always is

under those circumstances. Yeah, personally, I'm of the opinion that since God split the people apart during the Tower of Babel, to some extent there will always be a separation and a, you know, there will always be conflict when people of different nationalities come together because God has separated the people. There can be no unity on this earth anymore. You can minimize the discord and you can be friendly with other people and you should try to emulate Christ and give them the gospel and treat them as you would.

But understand that in this earth, you know, there are different people groups and there always going to be some level of conflict when they come into contact with each other. That's my personal opinion. Well, it's the language issue is there. And then the tribal issue, that's really your culture, you know. And I think it was Michael Savage used to say borders, culture, and languages. And that's basically nations, times, and tribes. We've got a comment here.

I have taken the Tower of Babel thing as more of God-giving humanity extra time rather than a one-world globalist government that's going to eventually, you know, invent things that can spy on everyone and control everything, which would have happened much sooner had the Tower of Babel thing not happened, was how I interpreted.

Well, they're working on debavalizing the whole thing, aren't they, trying to, you know, bridge these language gaps and that type of thing? So, and so the end result of that is a Tower of Babel unrolled government which is really what they're trying to put up.

Citizen of Ameriaka says, you know what else COVID was a parasite, David, otherwise Ivermectin wouldn't have worked on it, so we need to use our little heads. That's a good point. Yeah.

It's very interesting. Yeah, very likely in the case. Whatever it was, I mean, you do have some inorganic issues there in terms of nanotech and things like that. I always think back to the two different batches,

each of them over a million shots that they, destroyed in Japan because they noticed that there were black particulates that were forming and that they reacted with magnets. So that was something else as well. Who knows what was in it? I mean, it's probably all the above. Anything that you can imagine was probably in there to one degree or the other because

these people are just pure evil. You know, the monster really was... Why settle for one type of poison when they can dose you up with just about everything? The monster really was the jab, you know, when you look at this. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, you have a New York judge has tossed the terrorism charges against Luigi, Mangione, And, of course, the Democrats in the street were cheering because there's a whole group of people out there that is a fan club of his.

You've got people out there in the streets wearing little green caps like Luigi from the Super Mario games and everything. It's crazy. And this New York judge ruled that, there you go, you got some pictures of that? Anybody there was some green cap. There's a guy with a green cap. Yeah. I am Luigi. Gee, yeah, it truly is insane.

Well, the New York judge ruled that although Mangione's actions were ideologically motivated, New York law requires proof of intent to intimidate or to coerce a civilian population for terrorism charges, which prosecutors fail to present. So, again, you know, terrorism, when I think of it, is the use of violence or the threat of violence in order to achieve societal change. Under that definition, I would think that it would be considered to be terrorism, but we're talking about a New York judge here. So, you know, you forget about logic or law.

Legally sufficient evidence of all other counts, including murder in the second degree. Murder in the second degree. How does that work out? I mean, obviously thought about this and planned this. They're not going to come after them. The judge shut down first degree murder charges, shut down terrorism charges.

and they're only going to do second-degree murder, which means that he won't face life in prison. He's 27 years old, and I think he can get out in, like, 25 years. Prosecutors wrote that the writings, quote, convey one clear message, that the murder of Brian Thompson was intended to bring about the revolutionary change to the health care industry. And in terms of United Healthcare, I'm not going to defend the practices of Brian Thompson or that corporate. It was incredibly predatory. It is one of the 10 largest companies worldwide.

When you look at it, I just saw a month or so ago, they listed the 10 biggest countries. And they were talking about what country they are, these companies are headquartered in. You know, how many Chinese companies, how many American companies, and the Chinese are gaining on us, it was that type of thing.

And United Healthcare was the 10th largest country in the world. And one of the reasons that they got there is because they have far and away the highest rate of denial. And so I've seen people on Fox News clips of them saying, this is crazy. You know, Brian Thompson was trying to provide a service, which is health care that people need. It's like, well, actually they were taking premiums for people and then denying them at a rate that was about 10 times more than the next lowest competitor. they were the outlier in the entire insurance industry. I remember when this all happened and we showed the chart. And it's like you look at the percentage of claims that they denied and it was like way out here and everybody else is down here in the noise.

The other insurance companies, that's how they get to be so rich. I mean, firstly, I think in a just world, this company, you know, the CEO would have been put on trial. You know, it's a criminal. People would have brought cases against him. And he would have been bankrupted and his company would have been bankrupted. because they are ostensibly, again, they're there to provide a service. You're paying into them. You're assuming I pay for this, I'm going to get the service back when it comes around,

and they will do everything they can to avoid paying that. Well, it's like when I talked to John Richardson at ornc store.com, and we were talking about, you know, why is it that the insurance companies are not interested in cheaper treatments for cancer, like the protocol we were just talking about earlier, for example? Or, you know, the apricot seeds. They says, well, if you stop and thank you. about it, if the cancer protocol treatments are so incredibly expensive, people look at this

and say, if I don't have health insurance, and if I get cancer, I won't be able to get any treatment at all, so I better get insurance. And so it feeds that. You know, they look at this and say, well, it's necessary to scare people into getting a health insurance policy because we're going to make it so incredibly expensive. And then they wind up not paying for it. Yeah, there's almost no one except for, you know, the upper class that can afford any kind of treatment anymore without insurance. If you don't have insurance, if you get something that's going to put you in the hospital for a moderate amount of time, it will ruin you financially. Back in North Carolina, we had a friend who got brain cancer and he wanted to go through the standard medical protocol

stuff they felt was essential to preserve or at least maybe extend his life for a short period of time. And he had been a customer in Blue Cross, Blue Shield, North Carolina for like 30 years. they wouldn't pay a cent and he goes how is this you know you look at it that's the real stuff and that's the outrage that's there but the murder was not uh was not justified i mean back to what charles was saying how he should have been uh arrested and tried legally uh i remember when this happened there was a news story about the guy that replaced him uh the CEO the next CEO of united health care the first thing he did in the first board meeting was tell his holders that I'm committed to reducing unnecessary payments or I forget how he put it in

double down yeah yeah he is saying that we need to do more of what this last guy was doing yeah it's not going to change anything unless you have actual societal pressure from you know governments and things against these companies just randomly it's amazing how they all interlocked together you know you got the drug companies and the medical companies and the government and all of them. Of course, another issue is just how ludicrously expensive it is to go through a lawsuit at this time as well. Yeah.

Yeah. You know, if you're already, you know, bankrupt because these people won't pay for your medical treatment and it's ruined you, how can you afford to sue these people for ruining you? You know, it's a catch-22. It's a truly horrible system that is in place. We kind of have the worst of all worlds. Delay, deny, depose.

This is the phrase that has come. used to describe how major insurance companies avoid paying claims. And that was what was written on the bullet casings. And so the prosecutors are saying, this is clearly premeditated. And yet they had, they said, we're not going to charge him for terrorism. We're not going to charge him for first degree murder. It'll be second degree, which means that he's going to be eligible for parole. In 25 years, he'll be 52 years old.

He'll be paroled if, you know, if he doesn't get pardoned by some politician in New York. He's also facing murder charges in federal court, and the federal charges can result in a death penalty. Now, I want to look at this. And again, I'm not defending this guy at all or anything that he did, but does seem to me, and his lawyers are making the case that this is double jeopardy, how can you be tried twice for the same crime, you know, one in state jurisdiction, the other in a federal jurisdiction. And I don't see the jurisdiction of the federal government in terms of a simple murder charge. They're not charging him with terrorism.

They're charging, which, again, that is not something in the Constitution that the federal government has the authority to charge anybody with. So I don't see the authority for the federal government to come after somebody in a death mental. That seems to be something at the state level. They made that argument, and the judge, however, threw that out. They said it's going to be very difficult to defend against both these things simultaneously. They said that in the ruling, the judge said, well, you know, terrorism has been famously difficult to define, unless you're Trump, and then you know exactly who the terrorists are.

They're anybody who criticize you, right? And it's anybody who's in a boat, whether you have inspected the boat or not, that is terrorism. And he's done it a second time as well. This is the second boat kill. This is a boat that you see drifting there. and Trump is boasting about how he has now blown up a second boat off the coast of Venezuela and saying we're going to do this to anybody who is trafficking drugs. A second kinetic strike, he called it.

I call it murder, quite frankly. It is an extrajudicial killing, meaning that there was no legal due process, no fact-finding involved in any of this. He just kills somebody because he points at him and calls him a terrorist. On my orders, we positively identified an extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels and narco-terrorists and confirmed narco-terrorists from Venezuela. I didn't confirm anything. I just saw a boat there and killed it. And that's what he's doing.

He says, be warned, if you're transporting drugs that can kill Americans, we see you as terrorists. And we don't have to prove it, right? So again, is somebody, are you going to have a judge that's going to say that Trump is not a terrorist. This is premeditated, and it is the purpose of this, is to get us involved in yet another war so that he and his friends can get a hold of the oil fields. Have a good day.

Thank you for joining us. The Common Man. They created Common Core. and dumbed down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnight Show.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us, you'll find, at the David Nightshow. financially. Please keep us in your prayers. The David Knight Show.com.