The David Knight Show - Wed Episode #2332: The Cop Who Exposed Flock Was Blackballed

Episode Date: August 19, 2026

────────────────────────────────────────[00:00:54]Randy Fine Won His Florida Primary — He Gave Netanyahu the Pen When He Flew to Israel to Sign an Anti-Free-Speech BillBilzerian claims something was fishy with late votes; Fine previously said Gaza should be nuked like Japan.────────────────────────────────────────[00:02:07]Rhode Island Cop Noel Picardo Blew the Whistle on Flock — Blackballed From Every Security Job in the StatePawtucket PD secretly signed a $128K Flock contract; when Picardo spoke to a reporter, investigators accused him of violating the public's trust.────────────────────────────────────────[00:13:40]Police Claim Not Every Tactic Is the Public's Business — Picardo: The Department Violated the Public's TrustTwo years of contrived harassment; he resigned; no police department or security firm would hire him; told directly: you are blackballed.────────────────────────────────────────[00:19:58]Sam Altman Describes His "Dystopia" — Free From Cancer and Want, Zero Freedom, Zero Agency, No PrivacyHe frames it as a concern; Knight: OpenAI has the government contracts; he is the one who will build the perfect surveillance state, not someone else.────────────────────────────────────────[00:23:06]The USA Is Now the United Surveillance State — Criticizing Israel Gets You Blackballed Like Criticizing FlockPicardo's first disciplinary offense was refusing to wear a mask; that was the first thing the police chief reached for.────────────────────────────────────────[01:00:41]Mark Levin Is Pushing Trump to Use Nuclear Weapons Against Iran — and He Has Trump's EarLevin praised Truman's Hiroshima decision and said "maybe that's the way you end this thing"; Marjorie Taylor Greene says strategy meetings are discussing it — pure evil.────────────────────────────────────────[01:20:00]Mark Levin and FDD's Dubowitz Were Sent to Advise CENTCOM Admiral Cooper — Fight Them to the Last AmericanFoundation for Defense of Democracy heavily funded by Zionist billionaires; these neocons are giving military advice to the region's top commander.────────────────────────────────────────[01:20:00]Pentagon Evaluating a Smaller Presence in the Gulf — Iran's Debasification Campaign Is WorkingIran wiped out US forward bases; forces likely incapable of generating the same combat power; retreat framed as strategic repositioning.────────────────────────────────────────[01:53:25]Goldman Sachs Published a 2026 Report on Securing and Financing the Future of Water — Tokenization of EverythingTrack water everywhere; data centers process all digital currency transactions; mark of the beast requires this computing infrastructure.────────────────────────────────────────[01:56:37]United Airlines Vaccine Mandate Case Going to the Supreme Court — 44% of Measles Cases Are in Vaccinated PeopleAirlines think they can mandate injections as a condition of employment; nearly half of measles cases involve vaccinated individuals by their own records. ──────────────────────────────────────── Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

in a world of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 19th of August. Here are our Lord, 2006. Well, today we're going to begin with a story of a cop who took on flock. That's right, it doesn't turn out too well, or does it? He doesn't seem to be discouraged, even though whistleblowers

get purged. This is what we see happening across the board, this idea of national security, where everything must be kept secret from you. This has metastasized this cancer has metastasized to every level of government. This is just the most recent example of it. And this is a guy who took the Constitution seriously, unlike his superiors. People who stand up for the Constitution, who stand up for individual liberty, who have integrity, are purged from the system. Just the way it works. Meanwhile, people are raising concerns that Mark Levin and other Zionists are pushing Trump to consider using nuclear weapons against Iran.

Of course, I'll probably wait until after the election. We'll be right back. Well, I want to begin today with a story. This is from Wired Magazine. When I first saw this, I was like, I've got to get this guy on. but he's got reasons that he doesn't want to be interviewed. We'll talk about that coming up. He's not a lot of interviews, but he's kind of stepping back from it now.

I tried for years to find Adrian Schoolcraft. He was a guy who was a New York City police officer. His father had been a cop. And he really wanted to be a cop. He really wanted to help the community. And he really wanted to make things safer. And yet the police department there was... to just contrive crimes.

This is at the time when they had just passed the, you know, no smoking in any buildings. And if you had a barbershop, for example, if you owned it or if you're working there as a barber and you step outside on the street and you light up a cigarette because you're not allowed to smoke in there. Well, now you're loitering outside. We'll arrest you for that.

He said one Halloween, they told the officers, just go out and grab people and bring them in. We'll figure out what the crimes are later. He was not happy with that at all. So he started wearing a conceiving. a concealed camera to show how the police were abusing their authority, the stop and frisk and all the rest of the stuff they were doing. And eventually they found out that he was wearing that.

Well, before they found out he was wearing it, let me back track a little bit. Because he complained about some of this stuff, they thought they would punish him and make him walk a beat. He was never happier in his life. That's the way policing began in the early 20th century. I mean, you go back and you look at, you know, musicals or whatever, we see the cop on the beat, walking on good a day and so and so, you know,

sees the person who's the grocer or the baker or whatever. He knows all the people that are there. He knows the people who are in that community. So he knows when somebody that's not from that community is there and he kind of keeps an eye on them. You know, we don't have anything like that anymore. Now they ride around in police cars. They're disconnected from everybody.

They don't know the people on their own beat. But he loved that. He said they thought it was punishment, but that's exactly what. what I wanted to do as a cop. Well, they eventually figured out that he was taping them, and so they went to his apartment, and it was, I think it was the guy that was like one step below the police chief and another guy, and they confronted him,

and they drug him off and put him in a mental institution. He just disappeared. And his father, who's a cop, started looking for him. He went to his apartment, and he realized that Adrian had put a camera up on the bookshelf behind the books, concealed it. And he got that camera, and he went through the footage. He saw what was happening.

He got him out. But it was so bad with the New York Police Department after he went public with what they did, not only what they did to him, but what they were doing to other people. It got so bad that he didn't want to talk to anybody. He and his father just got out of there. Well, that brings us to the story of Noel Picardo, was working in a medium-sized Rhode Island town of Pawtucket, I think is the name of the town here. We've got it here.

He was 28 years old, had been a cop for five years, and he's on patrol one day, and he sees one of these flock devices. And he'd seen them before. Two years earlier, they'd had a meeting where they brought the police in, and flock did their presentation, telling them, oh, this is going to be a great tool, you should all have it. And he thought about it for a second. He thought, well, you know, that could be abused in many different ways. But the town didn't have the money that flock wanted at the time. So it didn't happen.

It didn't go anywhere. He kind of forgot about it. It came up again. And the, the flock cameras were put out as a free trial. And they put a few of them up. And Amanda's a free trial. They stopped it in May of 2023. Then in September of 2023,

they actually signed, secretly signed a contract for Flock. $128,000 a year. I'm sorry, $128,000 for two years. So it's about $60,000 a year. That seems to be what their standard contract is. And that was only for like about 20 cameras. Think about how much money Flock is making. They've gone from 400 cameras installed three years ago to

120,000 of them installed. Think about what they're making on a regular basis in terms of management for all this stuff. And think how much money taxpayers are being fleeced to pay for their own surveillance. You know, I look at this as truly is like Terry Gilliam's Brazil again. They come in, they bust through the ceiling and the doors on the walls and a no-knock raid, which when Terry Gilliam, Monty Python, did that in 1984 when he put out Brazil. It was his dark comedy version of Orwell's big brother, 1984, and he did it in 1984. And at that point in time, that was so over the top. And yet they do that now.

They do that on a regular basis, so it's not over the top. And so they spring in this guy, just sitting there with his family just before Christmas quietly. And they had a case of mistaken identity. They tie him up and they put a bag over him. like a giant mail bag or something, right? Put it over his head and then another strap around that. And then the officious little guy in a suit comes in and he hands the wife a piece of paper and says, have signed this here, you know, blah, and then he goes, here's your receipt for my receipt and so forth. They wind up charging this poor family for his interrogation. And they've

got the wrong guy all along. So we are being charged for our surveillance. They can't spend that $128,000 on fixing potholes or bridges. No, it is about watching us to try to find a crime. And so he saw these things up. So I know what these things are, but there wasn't any information about it. So he calls the local city council rep. He said, had these cameras been approved? He didn't really get an answer from him.

So he realized there was no public vote before the camera. were installed. He keeps looking around. Finally, he finds some information in the paper, a little bit of information in the paper. And he contacts them with his concerns. He said he was always inspired by whistleblowers like Frank Serpico and Ed Snowden, men of conviction who broke with powerful institutions. And he should stop and think about what did Frank Serpico say? Of course, his story about Frank Serpico was he refused to go on the take for drugs, right? And again, the drug war has been lost for 50 years. Let's hope that we're not in Iran for 50 years.

It's been 73 years that we've been after Iran, isn't it? That's when we overthrew their government and put in an authoritarian Shah, a king, and then had his ruthless secret police trained by the CIA Mossad. Let's hope that this Iran war is not going to drag on for 50 years. We get somebody else in there besides Trump. Maybe we can end it. But who knows? nevertheless, when you look at the war on drugs, it hasn't done anything to stop addiction,

hasn't. We all understand it's not working. What is their answer? Well, we just do more of the same thing. That by definition is insanity. They just double down on the authoritarian actions. And now Trump wants to go to a literal hot war with the drug cartels. That's going to backfire in a big way. It's going to make things much worse. But what they've done over a half a century is to give a very lucrative monopoly to the worst people. It'll never be solved by law enforcement, by force. It is a spiritual issue. That is the only way you're going to stop people from using drugs. And they don't realize that alcohol prohibition failed. We've had drug prohibition that has failed us with the Constitution. They didn't even bother to amend the Constitution like they did with

alcohol provision. And so this defiance of the law that was the hallmark of our drug war, this bureaucracy that's been created, the DEA and on and on, this has corrupted law enforcement, it has corrupted government. It has corrupted individuals and it's given a monopoly to the worst people who continue to make more and more intense forms of whatever it is that they're trying to prohibit. Nevertheless, when we look at Frank Sierpico, he was not interested in taking money from the drug people look the other way. He said, I'm not going to report any of you for taking money. That's your own issue, but they were uncomfortable with him being there.

So if you remember the story, he was shot in the face in a staged raid they had there. And he got out of town, but he also testified about it. He has spoken from, I don't think he's back in the United States. I don't know if he's still abroad in Switzerland or whatever. but one of the things that Frank Cepico has said, and this is true of any institution, he said, every institution is made up of people. And so as a result, you're going to have good and bad people in that institution. The question is, when the bad people are seen, is the institution going to cover them up and protect them

and fold around them, right, make them their own? If you do that, then the institution is corrupted. You have to purge the bad people out or the institution itself is corrupted. And yet we see just the opposite happening in our institutions everywhere. Whether you're talking about political institutions, even if you're talking about the Epstein stuff, right? What do we see? The corruption being embraced, being protected, being hidden. And so he said he saw these people who took on powerful institutions and they lived for years with the consequences.

He said he had a pronounced sense of right and wrong. He didn't say that, but the person writing the article for Wired who spent some time with him. He did this back in April, did the interviews. And he said, since I started interviewing him back in April, he said, this is really blown up, this resistance against flock. But he said, Picardo has a pronounced sense of right and wrong. And he has a tendency to treat compromise as betrayal because it is. He said, you should never.

sell your integrity. He's a Christian, so is his wife. So he was thinking, what should I do about this? You know, because it is, he knew that if he said anything about what the police are doing, they would regard it as a betrayal. And so his wife said, well, just do what you think is right and we'll live with the consequences. Both of them were on board with that. And so now he's living with the consequences.

But he did the right thing. So he talks to a reporter at the local paper. Their headline was, Pawtucket officer has a big problem with the new cameras. And so it was a pretty strong approach that they took. They took the angle that this guy is leading the charge against the police. So in the article, they have him saying that flock is a grave threat to privacy. It is.

And he warned that the system was ripe for abuse. And we've seen that over and over again. As I pointed out, we've had a lot of people who have vandalized or damaged or destroyed these things. They've had about in the low 30s, the number of people that have been arrested for that. But in the high 50s, the number of police officers, police chiefs, sheriffs, and so forth, who have abused this system, who have used it to track individuals. In one particular case in Florida in Key West, a guy had worked a security detail, and he saw a woman at this detail that was an actress,

and he was very taken with her. And he tried to pick her up. She was not interested. So he got her license plate, and he started following her everywhere. He nearly had a head-on collision with several vehicles, including a truck, because he tried to follow her and get closer to her to pull her over on the narrow bridge that's down in Key West. This is the kind of thing that we've seen.

So we've seen a lot more crime from the police. we have from the people who are cutting down these cameras. And wouldn't you think that if people are going to be cutting down cameras, that the cameras would be able to at least solve that problem? But of course, they don't do much for vehicle crime either, as they've seen in Atlanta, where they have a network of 5,000 of these cameras. And yet the crime rate, according to the FBI, has remained flat in some categories like vehicle crime. They didn't help at all with that. and it's actually gone up in some other areas, some other categories. So he said he had learned at the full deployment from the newspaper itself and not from his

own department. He said, if a patrol officer knew as little about these cameras going up around the city as I do, he asked, how much could the public possibly know? He said, this whole thing has kind of 1984 vibes. Well, you bet it has. And so I'm not going to go into all the details of what happened. Suffice it to say, as this Wired article, if you want to read it, the Wired article has all the details of how they kicked off a series of contrived investigations for the purpose of harassing him. Coming from the police chief himself, these investigations went nowhere.

And initially, he was defended by the police union, but after a while they started just saying, well, we're not going to get involved in that anymore. And so they kept harassing him. They made it clear that he was not welcome there. He got some short suspension out of some of these things. The only thing came out of it. Some short suspension without pay. And so again, he was not shot in the face like Serpico. He wasn't imprisoned in a mental institution like Adrian Schoolcraft.

But he paid for this nevertheless. And so eventually what he did was he resigned. But before he resigned, in the first, very first one of these cases, he's called to appear before the Office of Professional Standards. He said, sets at a table and across from him as a lieutenant and a sergeant. And then there's a union rep who's set beside him but didn't say anything. The cameras, he said, were tracking people across the city and the public had a right to know that they were being used.

He said, the lieutenant disagreed with him. He said, not every, listen to this, not every police tactic, he told him. Ricardo was the public's business. Oh, really? We're not supposed to look at it. Because national security, right? You're not supposed to know what they're doing. It's all to protect you, isn't it? No, national security is not about protecting us. The Pentagon is getting into one war after the other. They're creating enemies everywhere. We are very vulnerable here. And you should pay attention to what is happening in Ukraine and Russia, as I pointed out. And pay attention to how vulnerable our infrastructure is. Now, nevertheless, they're not protecting us, but they are

keeping things secret from us. They are stealing money from us to make us less safe. And so he said, the public doesn't need to, it's not their business of what the police department is doing. And we don't disclose every method that we use or every form of surveillance that we have. So the investigators accused Picardo of violating the public's trust by speaking to the press. Think about that. You violated the public's trust by speaking to the press? No. He said, he came back and he said, no, this department violated the public's trust.

He's absolutely right. So a long series of harassment is after seven years of being there. Again, this went on for two years of harassment. It's not going to get any better. he decided that he would resign. He wrote a brief letter. He said policing had meant a great deal to him and his family, but over the previous three years,

the department had made clear he was no longer welcome because of his philosophical convictions. He said remaining would only bring more grief to him and his family. He did not apologize for speaking out, and he should not have apologized. But after resigning, he said, well, he's going to get a job with another police department, or he'd get a job even working security, private security, campus cop, anything like that.

Nobody would give him a job. Many of them would not respond, the ones who responded after they gave him an interview, they would not hire him. And so he had a local college, when he went to a campus security local college, he asked around, and they gave him an explanation. They said, you are blackballed. Yeah, that's the purpose of this, isn't it? Isn't the purpose of it to identify people who aren't going to be compliant with the system?

You're going to criticize the system. You're going to criticize the vaccines or the mandates or the masks or the six-foot social distancing. You're going to criticize that kind of stuff? Well, you won't have a job. And once they get enough control, you won't have a place to live. That was what Solzhenitsyn said when he wrote his essay, Live not by lies. He said, yes, they'll take your job.

They'll kick you out of your home. You'll be on the street. They may even put you in prison like they did him. But he said, don't live by lies. But this is what these people want. And when you look at one of these heinous individuals who was at the top of this, Sam Altman, he describes what he thinks is the perfect surveillance state. One dystopia that I'm particularly nervous about 10 years from now is we overreact to AI safety.

And so we say, look, everyone, you're going to get a cure for cancer. You're going to have material abundance. But you will have no freedom. You will have no agency. It will be a perfect surveillance state. There will be no privacy. And that's what it you're going to get, you're going to get great comfort, but you will have, there will be nothing left in the world for you to really do.

Nothing that really matters. You'll just kind of live at the, you know, service of the AI giving you material wealth. Giving him material wealth. He's playing the same game that Elon Musk did. He's like, well, I'm sorry, not Elon. It's Peter Thiel. He says, yeah, it's going to usher in. If you're concerned about AI and if you put restrictions on AI, let me tell you, that's going to usher in the mark of the beast. It's going to usher in a dystopian surveillance state. They're not going to be the ones who do it, right? No, they are going to be the ones who do it. They've got the government contracts. They're the ones who are working on this. So he said,

the author of this Wired article said since I started speaking with him in April, the debate over flock has spread beyond him. It has, we had cities that are fighting over whether or not to keep the camera. Some jurisdictions have canceled contracts. And both Republican and

Democrat-led states. They push for new limits on how the systems can be used. So it is the biggest bipartisan issue that is out there right now. And yet the Republicans are running as rapidly as they can. to the corporate greed.

And they are pushing us by doing that. They are pushing us to socialism and to an authoritarian state. So the country has long attached freedom, dreams of freedom, and of self-determination to the car, says this author in Howe Wired, and he's absolutely right. He says it's a mythology that is reflected in the advertising and even in the names of the vehicles themselves. Think about it.

Explore, expedition, escape, Maverick, Liberty. Miata? Oh, wait, that's a... That's not... Anyway, my auto is a tiny auto. I guess is what that stands for.

Americans who agreed on little else could still recognize the promise of the open road. That for a little while, a person might simply leave and be left alone. This is a threat to that promise, at the very least. Remember, we used to have the commercials. I can't remember what her name was. The singer who see the USA in a Chevrolet, right?

Now the USA is the United Surveillance State, and it's watching you in the Chevrolet. Wherever you go, the USA is there. You're not going to go everywhere in the USA. They don't want you doing that. But they're going to be watching you. And any criticism of their methods or their policies or even a foreign government that is controlling and pulling the strings of our government, that foreign government being Israel, any of that will get you blackballed. Don't criticize the mask or the rest of the stuff.

But as a matter of fact, the first charge that they brought against him was to go back several years during the insanity. of the lockdowns. And he was working security at a musical that was there. And they wanted him to wear a mask. And he said he wasn't going to wear a mask. And they filed a complaint with him. And that was the very first thing that the police chief brought up. And they got that dismissed easily.

Nevertheless, he has deleted, as he points out, his social media accounts years ago. He has little interest in becoming a pundit. But he said there was a time where he was spending nearly 20 minutes a day discussing these license plate readers surveillance and the meaning of privacy. And so the podcasters reaching out to him in The Washington Post and many others. And many people were pushing him to start his own podcast because of the rampant buildup of resistance against fly cameras. But he said, I started thinking about this.

The only reason people know who I am, he said, is because I criticized something. but he was right to criticize this. As we all know, the old saying, and it's true. The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing, to not even say anything. How can you not speak out when you see this kind of evil being put in? And he said, I'm worried that you might begin with sincere convictions about serving the public. Then you begin tracking your audience.

And in time, he said, you become a parody of what you believe and what you were before. I've seen that. I've seen that in people who chase audience and people who chase money. It's one of the reasons why I just had somebody recently ask me, how big is your audience? And I said, I really don't know. I go out of my way not to look anymore. I don't post the stuff up.

I don't look to see if anybody's looking. and to me that's a trap. I saw that trap at Info Wars with Alex Jones. You get focused on audience and money. Forget about it. It's going to control what you have to say. So I don't want to look at that. I barely look at the money.

As you all know, I don't talk about that too much. But probably should talk about it more. But I definitely don't want to know, how's my audience doing from data? That is a trap. I've been in that. trap at Infor wars, and I don't want to be a part of that. And you do become a parody of what you were. So he said his mind returned to Matthew.

What profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world but loses his own soul? And that's how they end the article. It's a man of conviction, and he should not be ashamed of those convictions. I just have to say, you know, when we look at it, especially what happened through COVID, and all the people who were losing their jobs left and right because they wouldn't kowtow to the demands. You have United Airlines is now wants to take to the Supreme Court a case where employees were saying, we're not going to go with a mandate and say, okay, well, you're fired.

And one of the lawyers who was representing the employee said, well, we may lose on these other issues over here informed consent and all the rest of this stuff. But there is a rock solid case here, at least at this point in time in the U.S. for your religious convictions. And remember, we were told in the Bible, and I've seen it myself. I was young, now I'm old. I've never seen the righteous. Some translations will say the godly forsaken, nor are their children begging bread.

And I've got to say that what I saw after this nightmare that Trump kicked off for us and handed it over to Biden to finish it up, that should really concern you. When Trump is kicking off this militarized. police state ignoring posse comitatis. He's talking about putting killer robots at the border. I know that sounds crazy, but the company that wants to do that, that is putting out pressing leases saying, hey, we're talking to people in Homeland Security. That company is allied with Eric Trump.

So what do you think the chances are that they're going to actually buy a bunch of this stuff and do something like that? You should be very concerned about what Trump is prepared. He is precedent Trump. He prepares these things and he's going to be handing it off to leftist socialist because he is there to be as obnoxious and as chaotic as possible so they can offer you an alternative. Somebody like John Ossoff, very calm, very rational sounding about as hard left as you can find. as I said yesterday. He gets a five out of 100 in terms of the Freedom Index following the Constitution from the John Verst Society.

He's about his left wing as, and he was zero for his first couple of terms in Congress. All of that movement to get him up to 5% came from averaging in the last three years because he's made a big pivot to the center in terms of being able to run for president. So you need to think about that. You need to think about what you're going to do to stand up for liberty. We'll be right back, folks. Stay with us. Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.

It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the same. of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. You're listening to the David Night Show. And as one of our listeners has said,

this is the surveillance state of data centers and flot cameras and all many other aspects of it as well. This is our Boston Tea Party. Yeah, the hatred for the data centers are so powerful. We now have our first commercials bashing them, says Daily Caller.

This is a couple of companies. Liquid death, which makes canned water. And garage beer. Teams up with NFL legend. They say Jason Kelsey. He is the brother of the guy who married Taylor Swift, just for reference in case you're like me and you don't follow football.

They have launched a new ad campaign that spoofing the amount of water that AI data centers continue to keep, continue to use to keep their computers cool. The campaign is dubbed, We Want Your P. And they say this is a P-SA. Kelsey and the co-owner of Garage Beer put this thing together. He said AI data centers waste millions of gallons of water, says Kelsey, who is sitting on a toilet, filling up a bottle with his urine. He tells the camera, we want your pee. Please give us your pee.

And then he finishes up by saying, let's pee on a computer together to save humanity. Yeah, that might be what we actually need to do. Who knows? I like technology. I don't like the way technology is being used. Wall Street Journal says this pushback against police state tyranny is Luddites who don't like technology. I don't like technology being used as an instrument of tyranny. That's what I don't like.

And I have seen that many times in my career. I didn't want to participate in that. And I don't want to be a victim of that. that either. Americans are destroying license plate cameras as the surveillance backlash grows. They've been shot, spray painted, cut down, and how-to videos are spreading online, said one suspect, people are fed up. And yet, when you look at what is happening in Norman, Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, I guess, might be normal Oklahoma. The city council did not want to have flock cameras. Nevertheless, they got them because the police department wanted them.

They, I'm sorry, not the police department, but the sheriff did. They don't, they control the police department, but they don't control the sheriff's office. So the sheriff's office was the one that was the, uh, the offender in this particular case. And remember, though, that you can vote for sheriff. But the county commissioners were also for it. And then there are homeless associations. who want it. And this is one of the aspects of this that is the most uncontrollable. This is like the ring cameras. Anybody can put a ring camera on their front door. And Amazon got into a lot of hot water when they said they were going to connect these ring cameras to the police and sell them the data and that type of thing. But of course, a lot of people

are voluntarily giving that information to them. And same thing happens with private individuals. You can have in one of the instances where a guy who was a whistleblower who used to work as an installer for flock, he said the one that's here, he said, that's the first one that I put up. And it's in front of a mosque. And they wanted it there. They wanted it there. And then they do a deal with flock where flock can grab all the data. So when you have these individuals, it can be a homeowners association, or it could be a police department or a sheriff's department.

It could be the city council or it could be the commissioner. They go to any of these sources to get their cameras put up. That's how they've gone from 400, three years ago, to 120,000 now. They know that if they get the wrong answer, that if they get a no from somebody at one of these areas, they can go to all these other areas and still put together their surveillance network. We have to have some legislators who are going to ban the way this information is used. And I think a good way, I think the best approach.

The only thing that works is the bribery and blackmail out of Washington. Nobody cares about constitutional principles. Nobody cares about law. They find a workaround about any of that kind of stuff. So when Thomas Massey addressed this, what he had to say was, well, let's pass a bill saying that if you got a police department or a sheriff's office or a city council or a county commission, if they put these things in, they're going to lose some federal funding. that folks is really the only mechanism that is going to stop that at the local level because they are hell-bent to put this stuff in let's take a look at what is happening in terms of um in terms of Trump's war here um we have a situation where we got record

ground beef prices of course that happens and you start seeing the food prices go up nobody really is it the problem of the grocery stores is it the problem of the farmers no the farmers are going out of business left and right Trump has done many things in terms of raising the cost of fuel raising creating tariffs causing the farmers to lose business that they were selling to China and so forth and instead it goes to his Zionist ally in Argentina avi your mali it is a case-shaped economy and it is buckling, says zero hedge. With national average gas prices still above $4 a gallon, we got diesel headed to six,

nearly there in many places. Discretionary spending is weakening. Consumer stress is now surfacing in the grocery aisle. As beef prices hover near record highs, Americans are beginning to trade down to cheaper proteins. Beef sale volume declined during 13 weeks through mid-July. volumes had risen about 5% during the same period in each of the previous two years because this is peak grilling season. Yeah, that's right.

People are going out and buying hamburgers to grow, but now they can't because hamburgers are coming up to a record $7 a pound. Isn't that astounding? By the way, if you do want to grill, I would recommend that you get American Home Products, go to eBay, and we're going to put the link there since they, have moved their website completely under eBay. You can find things, but we love the mesquite that they have to start barbecue grills. Yeah, the tumbleweeds.

Yeah, sorry, I said mesquite, didn't I? Yes, tumbleweeds. Sorry, it's a big difference. It's another deserty plant. Big difference there, isn't it? But, yeah, it's the tumbleweeds, tumbling tumbleweeds. And they're a great fire starter. And he's got some real innovative uses for natural products that you'll find.

and you can find them at eBay now, American Home Products. And so when you look at what is happening, $7 a pound, a record high. That's what Trump has done. Thank you, Trump, for all of this. Yeah, America first? No, not really. And one of the reason that this is happening is because cattle herds are near the lowest level in more than five decades.

So, matter of fact, we've got meat processing plants. I saw a video of the massive number of people that were losing their jobs and meatpacking plant because it's just being shut down. They said, we don't have enough cattle to bring the meat in. So we're reducing our operation. All those people losing their jobs. But I didn't play the video for you because it's just a lot of people that are kind of angry and mulling around. There's nothing being said. No context for that.

But that is what's happening. They want to push us to soulent green food, don't they? And that is they want to push us to lab meat. that Bill Gates wants to sell. That's one way to do it to make sure you don't have the real stuff. Just in the same way that they're getting rid of the penny next, the nickel. So if you don't have cash, if they don't print the money, right? They don't coin the coins.

Then you are cashless by default, aren't you? Demand destruction levels for beef may finally be hitting as people stop buying at these record prices. Maybe they'll move to cheaper proteins like pork and chicken. Except they've done their best to try. try to raise the price of chicken, haven't they as well? With all the bird flu nonsense. Trump is playing a dangerous game of chicken, by the way. We can't eat that, but it's going to make things more expensive what we do eat.

Trump told his administration envoys to stop talks with Iran on Tuesday. CNN reported Trump officials have told allies they have shifted their strategy from hammer Iran as soon as possible to strangle them over time. And, of course, I played the clip for you yesterday where Trump says, well, I'm not in a hurry. I got plenty of time to do this. He also says, well, you know, these people in the USS Lincoln, they haven't been there long enough, even though it's record deployment. Not nearly long enough, he said. They should be staying there longer.

So we should all stay in this war for a very long time. Now we are going to strangle them economically. Who's strangling who? Right? Depends, I guess, on what your goals are. and where your loyalty lies, and we know where his loyalty lies. Yeah, he's in no hurry. By definition, folks, that's a quagmire, isn't it?

He doesn't have too many options except to just try to maintain the status quo as long as he can. And what's going to happen is a global depression. He may be stalling for time because he needs some more time to rebuild all the weapons that they have used. Who's going to pay for that? You and I will pay for that along with higher gas prices, higher food prices, you name it. Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat, said, Trump has reached a strategic dead end.

I think we all see that. He has involved this nation in a seemingly endless, costly war, just as the USS Abraham Lincoln is on an endless, seemingly indefinite deployment with no exit. The idea that he would strangle Iran seems like magical thinking. Yeah, he believes his own memes, doesn't he? He called out Trump for lack of strategy and for the cost of the war from gas and groceries to a worldwide economic backlash. Yeah, Trump is the guy to accelerate this fourth turning into a greater depression and a World War III.

So many people, as New American is pointing out, very concerned about how Mark Levin keeps pushing. for a nuclear war against Iran. A headline from New American Fox Talker Levin, again slyly suggests using nuclear weapons on Iran. And his proximity to Trump is a reason to be alarmed about this. Anybody could talk about this kind of stuff. We've seen a lot of people who have. Jonathan Pollard, for example, he has given one interview after the other inside of Israel to people and saying, yeah, we need to hit him first with an EMP, then we need to drop nuclear weapons on him.

And in these interviews where he was trying to normalize the use of nuclear weapons, there's just another tool in our arsenal, right? Jonathan Pollard, the worst traitor to America. He was born American, but his identity was Jewish. He was a trans Jew, I guess. Again, I look at these people who they've created this horrific, genocidal, racist state. And it's all based on their ethnicity. And yet they aren't and can't prove that they are.

ethnic Jews. They are trans Jews. They identify as Jews, these Ashkenazi do. So, neoconservative podcaster Mark Levin, whom Trump has implicitly confessed, plays a major role in his decision-making, has again slyly suggested the U.S. should attack Iran with a nuclear weapon. Jonathan Pollard brags about how Israel blackmailed the U.S. with a threat of a nuclear attack on Egypt to get us to give them weapons for the 1973 war. We did that. We succumbed to that nuclear blackmail from our greatest ally. And what did we get?

Well, we got blessed with the 1973 oil embargo, which even though that was only directed against the United States. And even though the United States only got 15% of its oil from those Gulf states, that set off a worldwide economic issue in 1973. Now what Trump has done is with a Trump oil embargo, we have taken not 15% of the U.S.'s oil, but we've taken offline essentially 20% of the world's oil offline. Levin again cited high casualties during World War II and cheered the fact that Harry Truman vaporized Homo Shima and Nagasaki in early August 1945. Levin said Iran will not surrender to the United States. Then he obviously asked, remember Japan?

Levin's commentary would be meaningless if he didn't have the president's ear. But he thinks that that was necessary. And it was not necessary. Even if they were not on the verge of surrendering, which is what all of the high military officials, including President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was the, chief allied commander at the time.

He and many other generals, and I'll tell you here, their names here in just a minute, were saying that Japan was on the ropes. They were looking for a way to surrender, and it was absolutely unnecessary. And folks, it was illegal in terms of international law. It was immoral based on God's law to attack civilians. I've said many times, if you think it was necessary to end the world, war that way because you don't want to go from island to island having another Iwo Jima, then drop it on the soldiers that are fighting.

I mean, that's a war, right? But you don't attack civilians, especially with nuclear weapons. That's what Mark Levin wants to do. He said, Tojo was very stubborn. He was very headstrong. Unfortunately, we had to drop two atomic bombs until they would surrender. Now, obviously, we're not going to do that now. But then he said, maybe that's the way that you end this thing, right?

After America first podcaster Megan Kelly attacked Levin in March, Trump embarked on a jihad against the Israel first chicken hawks critics, writes the new American. Those who disagree with Levin have far less in like capability and love for our country, said Trump. And he's right. What he doesn't tell you is what our country is. Trump's country and Levin's country is Israel. not America. And so Levin ate up all the flattery. And yet the reality is that Dwight Eisenhower, the five-star Supreme Allied commander,

said, I was against it for two reasons. First, the Japanese were a raid to surrender, and it wasn't necessary to hit him with that awful thing. Second, I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon. He was a guy who seemed to have a moral character. He was the one who warned us about the military industrial complex as well. And then you had a war secretary, Henry Stimpson, wrote that he had grave misgivings,

first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary. Secondly, I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion. By the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought no longer mandatory as a measure to save a weapon. American lives. So Levin knows better. He knows better than Eisenhower, who was the commander.

He knows better than Secretary of War, Henry Stimson. He knows better than five-star Admiral William Leahy, who was the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during World War II. He said basically the same thing in his memoir. I was there. Hey, Levin, he was there. Maybe you should read what he had to say. He said, the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima,

and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. He added the Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender. We had adopted an ethical standard, common to the barbarians of the dark ages. Common to the barbarians of the state of Israel. That terrorist, genocidal, racist regime. He said that was not taught to make war in that kind of fashion. wars cannot be won by destroying women and children but Israel thinks it can and they are paying the price for that as a matter of fact Ram Emmanuel who's Jewish himself just went to Israel and he

spoke to a member of the press there and he explained to them why they are international pariahs now because their morality is so divorced from any quote unquote juda deo-Christian values. They don't value the values and the laws of Moses. They reject Christ. They're so morally cauterized. They don't even understand why people see their actions as abhorrent. Israel has a problem in America. And very specifically, a generational problem under 30. I don't know if you saw this, but there's a poll out today. Mandani is more popular with American Jews. your prime minister.

I want that to sink in and understand and get your head around where this is. This isn't, oh, we have a dispute. What has happened in the way the prime minister, in my view, has conducted Israel's both national security, not just this war, it's national security overall, has led Israel into a dead end and has put the alliance at a tipping point. Today, Israel is a pariah. Israel's lost the United States. It's lost Europe and you picked up Somaliland. As my mother would say, such a deal. You've lost your economic market.

You've lost your political patron. And you've picked up Somaliland. Yeah, but they own our politicians. They own the GOP, which I guess we should call it the ZOP, the Zionist-owned politicians. Yeah, they finished this by saying, this is New American. They've got the quotes again from Dwight Eisenhower, the commander, the war secretary, Henry Stimson,

five-star admiral who was chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all of them saying it was not necessary. They had lost the war. We didn't want to do something that was morally abhorrent. We did not want to destroy women and children. Even Admiral Bull Halsie said the first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment. And yet Mark Levin said, quote, we had to drop. two atomic bombs until they would surrender. That is a lie.

That is a lie that we have been taught in school by the people who want the national security state. But Marjorie Taylor Green was right when she said it is pure evil, the idea that the Trump administration is considering nuclear attacks on Iran. She made a dramatic accusation. This is a Lifesite News article over the weekend. The Trump administration is considering a pure evil decision to use nuclear weapons against Iran as the president struggles to disentangle the United States from his war on the Islamic terror regime. Let's understand what we need to disentangle ourselves from is this terrorist

state of Israel. There are discussions about using nuclear weapons on Iran and strategy meetings, said Marjorie Taylor Green on Sunday. Yes, you read that correctly. It's real. I'm not speculating, I know, and it is pure evil. She is absolutely right about that. It is pure evil. Her speculation about Trump using nuclear weapons against Iran has an error of plausibility because of his increasingly erratic behavior, says LifeSight News, and because of the things that he has threatened. Remember when he said, tonight, whole civilization will die if they don't do this. That was widely interpreted as a threat of using nuclear weapons. He also has been put up against the wall. We see him spinning left and right, trying to lie his way out of the quagmire

that he's put himself in. When this whole thing began, I did, if you remember, I did a Bear Rabbit cartoon with an AI that had Trump's face on it. And he was stuck with a tariff. baby. And that's exactly the way I saw this. Stuck with the tar baby. And at the very beginning, we had people like Colonel McGregor and Scott Ritter who were telling us exactly what was happening in terms of the Iranian strategy. They said, we look at what they're doing. And you look at what we're doing. They've got a strategy. We don't have a strategy. What we're doing makes absolutely no sense. So Trump using nuclear weapons does have an error of plausibility, unfortunately, because we're talking about Trump.

It wouldn't if you were talking about anybody else. Many noting that Trump has so far been unwilling to commit to fully eliminating the regime's current leaders appears fearful of escalating the conflict so close to midterm elections, so maybe he'll wait until after. For the time being, at least, shifting to a focus on economic pressure. Hoping that the economic pressure that Americans are feeling because of his idiotic actions isn't going to cause him and the Republican Party to lose big time. Again, when you look at all the different issues,

she broke with him over Epstein. She broke with him also over his Iran assassination strikes because I think that is also a reprehensible policy. He thinks it's reprehensible. He thinks that if anybody assassinations him, that we ought to wipe out that civilization. He said it more than once that Iran needs to be wiped out as a civilization. One reason would be if they kill him.

But it's okay for him to assassinate their top military leader, their top leader to try to eliminate all of them. And he did say, well, you know, when we eliminated the Ayatollah, we wanted regime change, but we don't really have many options because we killed all the other people that we would have wanted as well. How about that? So we have seen the Epstein cover up. We have seen gas prices skyrocket. we have seen tariff price inflation, food inflation, war, and now his open contempt for sailors on the USS Abraham Lincoln, what is it going to take for MAGA to finally wake up and look at this guy?

And they're the only ones who support him in any of this stuff. It's overwhelmingly 80% of the people in America are against what Trump is doing. It's only in self-identified MAGA people. These are people who still love this guy, who will still buy anything with his name or face on it, and they support anything that he does because they have nothing that they're looking at, no principle, no policy, nothing. They just idolize this reprehensible figure. Real clear politics polling shows the Iran war is deeply unpopular,

61% disapprove of it, but other polling shows that nearly 90% of self-identified MAGA supporters approve of the strikes. Again, it's just idolatry. And that brings us to Randy Fine. I've got a tip here from Stealth Patriot. Thank you so much for that. He says, and Randy Swine wins his primary. Voting is the equivalent of writing a letter to Santa.

Oh, that's a good analogy. I would just say, though, if you write a letter to Santa, you might actually get something, not from Santa, but from your parents. But you're not going to get anything. from these people. It'll all go to Israel. As a matter of fact, one of the interesting things that came up with Randy Fine in the very last day was the fact that as he was going around knocking on doors in his district, a ring camera caught him. Here's the video of it. TMZ got it. There he knocks on the door, rings the bell, and then he looks at the mailbox that's there.

And he starts rummaging through their mail. Isn't this an app? metaphor for the entire Zionist surveillance state that they want here? He doesn't have any reason to look through these people as male, but he's going to do it anyway and go through that. Yeah. So a lot of people say, that's a felony. That's a felony. Well, it's not a felony, I guess, because he didn't take anything out.

And it's not a crime because the homeowner doesn't want to go up against this guy who has a history of taking vengeance on anybody who comes against him. Again, remember, he has a problem. a Zionist and that is the way they operate. But what he is doing is basically the same thing that this official at Oracle was boasting about doing. I played this for you yesterday. It's worth it to take another look at this.

This is Oracle talking about the Zionist technocrats and how they want to examine everything that you do. And she was talking about how she was filled with pride when she was in Israel and saw these people in Israeli uniforms. She's Jewish herself. And she thinks that they're entitled to do whatever they wish to you. And she boasted about the fact, well, you know, we have some amazing technology. I can't tell you about it.

I can't tell you how we're using it. The same kind of reprehensible stuff we see from Jonathan Pollard, who even though he's talking about how they did nuclear blackmail to the United States threatening to nuke Egypt, he said, yeah, we just told them to look at this plane. There's some very special weapons on there. You know what I mean? Big weapons. wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

You hit our website in an Arab country, and you saw your entire screen filled with an Israeli flag, which said, not only we stand with Israel, we stand with our employees in Israel, we stand with the people of Israel, we stand with the military establishment of Israel. There's a few things that we did that I really can't talk about, to be honest, because to advance the agenda for the Israeli military. But our teams did a lot. We have some really profoundly scary technology at Oracle, and we wanted to make sure that it was available for the effort.

Let's just say that. Okay? I was in a curious. Disgusting. And I go in. This is the executive chair of Oracle. Imagine I meet with. Sarah Katz.

out, I run into, I don't know, five of my team who are all in uniform working. And to be honest with you, it's like my proudest moment. Yeah, your proudest moment. Do you be a part of the Israeli Defense Force? That's what Oracle is. It's reprehensible, I think, quite frankly. But, you know, we're going to take a look at what happened with the election. He got some really stiff opposition from Dan Bilzerian. And their accusations of voter rigging as well as accusations against both Belzarian and against Randy Fine. We're going to take a quick break, however, and we will be right back. Stay with us. Analyzing the globalist next move. Welcome back. Yes. Let's talk about the campaign between

these two guys. As I pointed out yesterday, Randy Swine, making an outrageous claim that his opponent was getting a million dollars from perhaps, we don't know, but perhaps it's from some foreign interference from another country. This is a guy who is one of the darlings of APEC and the Israelis. You want to talk about foreign interference. He is the poster child for that. And yet he tried to project that under Dan Bilzerian. He said he's been blatantly anti-Semitic.

Let me just say that you are allowed. to criticize a foreign government. You're allowed to criticize politicians who have been bought by a foreign government. What Randy Fine did was to try to inoculate himself against charges of being owned by a foreign government that everybody knows he is,

by claiming that his opponent was owned by a foreign government. And so we got a foreign government, by the way, that is not only looting America, but sending our sons to die in a war. This is a criticism of this racist genocidal government is not racism itself. And that's the way that they manipulate these contents. But of course, there were some things that, you know, you look at Dan Belzerian, as we pointed out. He was an influencer for a long time, you know, pretty women and bikinis on his yachts and a lot of these other things,

not somebody that I would necessarily support. he's also put out some things hinting that he supports Hitler, for example, which I think is over the top. I mean, you can certainly criticize Israel for the Zionist policies without embracing Hitler. Hitler was not a good guy. I criticize what Trump is doing with Iran.

I don't support any of the Ayatollahs or that government as well. There's no reason to go into that and to make champions out of them. Just criticize what is wrong. And so, again, the vile attack against Congressman Randy Fine in Florida are disgusting and should be condemned by all political leaders on the right and the left, said Mike Johnson. Mike Johnson, who just like the race mongers of the left, no debate on any of this stuff. You're not allowed to criticize Israel.

If you do, we're going to call you racist. Where do we see that tactic before? You know, over and over again, we've had situations. You go to one of these protests. What are the people on the left always do? They always call you racist because they are obsessed with race. That's what Israel does as well. And oh, by the way, I believe in the day, because they have told us that they did this.

They've bragged about the fact that they took over the institutions. The Jews have marched through the, not Jews, the Zionists, just let's say. The Zionists have marched through the institutions at the top. That is a Marxist tactic from Antonio Gramsie, the guy that Pete Buttigay's father made a career studying at Notre Dame. They understood that. They understood it was more effective to go through the institutions. And that's exactly what they have done.

They've taken over universities. They've taken over media and entertainment. They've taken over government. They bribed their way to controlling our Congress. And so you're not allowed to talk about any of that stuff. and yet what do they do when they got control of that? Well, they're the ones who came up with critical race theory, CRT stuff. The idea that anybody who opposes them is racist

or the transgender stuff. The other tactic that Randy Fine and these other people are saying is that if you criticize what Israel is doing, then you're criticizing all Jewish people and that kind of hate speech, they call it, is actually violence. That's the tactic that these same people instituted in the institutions at the top in terms of defending transgenders. So if somebody thinks, some male thinks that he's a woman, you have to play along with his fantasy.

If he thinks that he's Napoleon, you salute and you march to his orders, right? And if these people think that they are Jews, ethnic Jews, when they're not, then you have to play along with their transgender fantasy. because if you don't, your refusal to play along with that fantasy is now considered to be hate. And it is considered to be violence. So that is the rules that we see then. We see who are making those rules. And we see who made these rules for the LGBT, for the CRT stuff and all the rest of the stuff. It is a Marxist tactic.

It is a Bolshevik tactic. Let's understand that as well. So Randy Fine escapes criminal charges after rifle. through that voter's mailbox, the person did not want to press charges, and it's not a federal case because he didn't take anything from it. But he has triggered outrage in the past for saying that Gaza should be newked. Oh, here we are. Another Zionist calling for the use of nuclear weapons, whether it's Gaza or whether it's Iran. They need to be newt, just like Japan was in World War II. Mark Levin, Randy Fine, Jonathan Pollard.

They may not be ethnically related, but they are definitely politically related. They are wolves and sheep's clothing, not sheep, but in the clothing of the Republican Party. The Zionists are despicable criminals, folks. And when you look at this election that happened yesterday, Dan Balsarian is claiming that there was something fishy about this. When you look at the votes, the 730 vote, when they had the polls close, it shows that you have Randy Fine at a little bit small. I can't see it. Can you make that larger, Travis? He was under 50 percent, and Dan Bizarrian was pretty close to him at that point in time. But the key thing is that he had, he had 8,000 votes, over 8,000

votes and Randy Fine had 10,000. Then later, you see that when they get the final results in there, can you make that larger, Travis? I'm having trouble seeing that. When you get the results in, you see that Randy Fine goes over 50%. And the key thing is that he picked up apparently all of the remaining votes. And not only that, but he took some votes from Dan Belzerian as well. So at 730, Dan Dillarian is over 8,000 votes. And then when the thing ends, he is down to 6,600. Meanwhile, Randy Fine goes from about 10,000 votes, I'm sorry, 8,000 votes to 19,000 votes. So his vote total doubles, but Belzarians goes down by 25%.

That's kind of interesting. And this is all being channeled. These are screenshots from NBC News. they're not doing this information. They're getting it from the Board of Elections. So, yeah, it does look fishy. This is why the listener just said, you might as well write a letter to Santa Claus. I don't trust elections.

I've seen how many different ways they rigged this. So again, Fine was part of an unholy Trinity, by the way, to attack the First Amendment. When you go back to the episode of what DeSantis did, remember DeSantis took a law that was put together by these Republicans, Mike Caruso, Randy Fine, got this thing pushed through. And the three of them, this unholy Trinity, goes to Israel to sign a bill that would attack anybody who criticizes Israel in violation of the First Amendment that all these people swore to uphold as a condition of their office. And so he goes to Israel to sign a bill in Florida that is going to shut down the First Amendment for criticism of a foreign government. He goes to that foreign government. He signs it.

He gives the pen to Netanyahu. That's what Ron DeSantis did. Well, what did Mike Caruso do? Well, Mike Caruso was just arrested yesterday. He was the county clerk in Palm Beach. He also forced the Palm Beach residents to invest $1 billion in Israeli bonds. 18% of the countries of the county's total portfolio he put into Israel. I mean, you see one country after the other. If you want to do business with the state or Florida, if you want to do business with the state of Arkansas, where Mike Huckabee's daughter is governor,

you have to sign that you basically a loyalty oath with Israel, saying you don't criticize them, you don't boycott them and so forth. Or you won't be able to do any business. business with the state. That's how they have taken over our government. It is a Zionist-occupied government. But then turning to Mike Caruso, not only did he put in, you know, a fifth of the county's budget, or portfolio, I should say, invested into Israel, but then he was just accused of molesting two generations of his family members. Child molestation. And interestingly enough, he was a proponent of the new pedophile law in Florida.

He said, of course, under that pedophile law, he could face execution for these crimes if tried and convicted. But we all know what he'll do. He'll get on a plane and he'll fly to Israel because Israel welcomes Jewish pedophiles. What does that tell you about that state? the only country where pedophile can be welcomed openly is in Israel. And so that's what Caruso is all about. Yet, when we look at the censorship bill, when it first happened,

he was confronted on the censorship for the state of Israel. He was confronted by this reporter. Hello, I'm here with Representative Mike Caruso from Palm Beach. And where exactly in Palm Beach is it? But just for Gatty 7, I run from Manalapan all the way to Jupiter. All right, awesome. And Representative Peruso, you have introduced a bill. We're here at the Republican Jewish Coalition's DeSantis and Ben Shapiro event.

You have introduced a bill to fight anti-Semitism. Can you talk about that a little bit? Yes, it's HB269. What it does is it makes acts of anti-Semitism a hate crime. and it's something that, you know, we were called to speak out. We were called to stand up for the 6 million Jews that were murdered by Hitler's Nazi regime. Yeah, right. This is the guy just arrested for being a pedophile to his own family members.

672 generations of Jews that live in our state of Florida. And, you know, I won't sit still. I won't be a victim. I won't do nothing. If we do nothing about this acts of anti-Semitism that are all over, from, you know, projections on buildings of Nazi swastikas to destruction of Jewish cemeteries to handing out pamphlets with hate messages on it, if we do nothing, we're going to have 1933s Nazi Germany all over again. And so you are the Nazis. It's not a SB 269. And what it does is it makes acts of anti-Semitism when, uh, when, when, you are the Nazis. It's an HB 269, and what it does is it makes acts of anti-Semitism when done in connection with another crime,

such as littering or projection on the buildings or defacement through graffiti cemeteries at all, makes it a third-degree felony punishable by five years of prison. You know, I agree with you on that, about how bad that anti-Semitism is. Some people have concerns about First Amendment, though, that does. that your bill talks about handing out flyers. And aren't these messages, even if they are hateful, horrible, horrific messages, don't we in America have a right to print out our opinion and to hand out flyers? Absolutely, absolutely.

We do. And, you know, the First Amendment concern was my number one concern. Yeah, right. And we've gone through the bill with Constitution attorneys. and we have an amendment that we're proposing to the bill. But understand, handing out flyers with a hateful message is First Amendment right to everybody. It's when you just go through neighborhoods and discard them on the ground. Okay?

That's a crime. That's a littering crime. Okay? And that won't be tolerated, especially if it involves a ant-a- Well, they have littered Gaza with bodies, haven't they? bodies of children. You just had Ben Gavere, talked about it yesterday. 30 to 40 people a day need to be assassinated in Gaza, he said.

How many times have we talked about the children that were targeted? As many of the doctors who were treating them said, it's like they're playing a game. All the kids are shot on the left shoulder today. So they're deliberately playing with these people. They're assassinating children. And if you're wondering why this is all happening, you might want to talk to Ram Emmanuel. He's Jewish. He says, Israel is a pariah now because we see what

you're doing. That's why people are putting these hateful messages out there. You're not going to change what you're doing, though, are you? You're going to double down, triple down. Now you want to go to nuclear weapons as well. Just amazing. Meanwhile, this guy who is so concerned about doing the right thing is raping his own children, two generations of them. Dispicable. But, of course, Israel will take him in. They like people like that. Somebody they can use. The Pentagon is weighing a permanent, smaller U.S. presence in the Gulf. Just don't call it a retreat, says Zero Hedge. The Washington Post reviews the damage control underway as Pentagon evaluates its future military footprint. They framed it as if Washington has a choice and can take, has full control over the matter. Yet, Trump is woefully

underestimating what Iranian response would look like. Clearly, what is going to happen with this is they're going to pull back. They can't defend themselves from Iran. This is something, as I pointed out at the very beginning. Yeah, people like retired Colonel McGregor, as well as Scott Ritter talking about the fact that they had very effectively targeted bases and radar installations and the U.S. bases had to be abandoned because they were no longer defensible. Where are they going to go? Well, most likely they will go to Israel. That's the only country that we're interested in defending anyway, right?

This is a once-in-a-generation chance for the Pentagon to alter its presence in the region, said one analyst. The whole thing is being reported as if the smart people are in the room and in control, as if the U.S. hegemon in the region didn't already take a massive reputational hit following their forever wars and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan. After 20 years of invasions, the Taliban remains in firm control of Kabul and Afghanistan. And Shiite, that is, pro-Iranian politicians, are running Baghdad. So now a half year into this war where the response should have been entirely anticipated,

having been predicted by years and decades of Persian Gulf War gaming and intelligence papers, this is where things stand. The war really did highlight the vulnerability of U.S. forces in the region, said one analyst. Moving troops and equipment further west to Jordan, Israel, or the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia could help alleviate some of the pressure. Yet Iran has already demonstrated that it can strike faraway targets in Jordan and Israel. Last month, an Iranian attack in Jordan killed for U.S. service members. For smarter and more legitimate analysis, one can turn to Americanettes,

which one month ago was chronicling Tehran's successful campaign of what they called debasification. The broad picture of the Iranian war in this phase has been a steady wave of concentrated missile and drugs, drone strikes, sweeping its way across the region, in contrast to the previous hot phase of the war in which Iran targeted bases across the entire theater simultaneously, this wave started with the targets close to Iranian shores and has progressed steadily to the Israeli border. After destroying much of the radar network protecting regional U.S. axis bases in the previous hot phase of the war, Iran's planners have prioritized targeting fuel storage, drone hangers, refueling tankers and barracks. If the American response has been to pull assets back even

further from Iran to bases in Israel and Jordan will call this process debasification. Iran's debasification strategy takes advantage of the inherent asymmetry between these widely different military forces. By all available evidence, the Iranian debasification campaign appears to be working. The U.S. forces in this region are likely incapable of generating the same combat power and its air operations against Iran as it could when the war started. Things are trending even further in a negative direction. There is no clear solution on the horizon, which is another reason why we should be concerned about this erratic, uncontrollable temper of Trump and the people who control him,

the people who constantly push for nuclear war. The most obvious lover for American planners to pull is to accept more casualty, and losses of personnel and airframes, but this is an unprecedented step that the modern incarnation of the U.S. military has never faced before. The Iranians know all this, full well, and probably earlier than the Western public dead.

Again, it was McGregor and Scott Ritter who said this one week after this all began. And so this is where we are today, as a matter of fact. This is Karl McGregor today. But apparently Mark Levin and, uh, This Van Dubowitz, who leads the foundation for the defense of democracy, which many of us used to refer to as the foundation for the destruction of everything. They're heavily funded by wealthy Jewish Zionists who are also, you know, affronting for Israel and their own, you know, what they call community interests. I don't know why they just don't change their name to something like Leraza, you know, but pretty obvious, says, we're about the.

race, might as well say the same thing about these organizations. But the point I'm trying to make is what are people like Mark Levin and Dubovitz talking to Admiral Cooper, the commander of Sentcom? What role do they have? Well, I'm being told, or Tucker says, they've been sent down there to advise the Admiral. Now, unless the president of the United States personally called me, this is why we have problems. I want you to talk to.

And that happens. During World War II, McArthur was asked as a personal favor by FDR to meet with LBJ, who later became president. LBJ was a congressman. There's more to the story, but the bottom line is McArthur said, yes, absolutely, Mr. President. Now, maybe the president called Cooper and said, I would like you to talk to these two people. But barring that, I wouldn't let them on base.

it's absurd. Who are these people? And they're being sent to advise the admiral. I think the admiral should pay more attention to what's happening aboard ship right now in the Indian Ocean. So, I mean, this kind of thing tells me we're worse than bankrupt. We've lost our balance, our sense of understanding. We are not fighting the Imperial Japanese Navy. This is not an existential fight.

We're simply doing this because wealthy Jews in the United States. the states to support Israel have managed to get control of our government. And it said, we want the U.S. armed forces to fight for Israel. That's what we're doing. That's right. And I can imagine, you know, when Mark Levin, who is so impressive, I mean, we see people like this sex toy merchant, Rabbi Shumley Boutich, he gets an audience with the Vatican. What is going on with that, right?

And so that Mark Levin goes to give military advice to some, people? We're in big trouble, aren't we? And I can imagine what Mark Levin said to him. I'll fight them to the last American. Die for Israel. Yeah, that's Mark Levin's advice. So yeah, go die for Israel. So will the U.S. rebuild bases battered by the Iranian strikes? Well, Tehran is now saying, in essence, it won't let that happen. The Washington Post article operates under the illusory assumption that U.S. planners have some big array of options. are set before them, when increasingly American forces are an obvious retreat, and no one can do anything about it. Also, whatever happened to War Pete's rah-rah epic fury press briefings on all the

winning and all the chest thumping? It's been a while since we've seen that, hasn't it? Says Zero Hedge. Yeah, this high school football coach routine going through this at a pep rally is gotten kind of difficult to sustain versus reality, hasn't it? Let's talk about the reality of what Trump is doing in economic warfare. Again, we don't have geopolitics, we've got ego politics, we don't have economics, we have egonomics. And here's Exhibit A. You've got U.S. and Canadian officials are holding last-minute talks to try to stop

Trump's 50% tariffs on Canada. Yeah, his tariff tantrums. That's what he did. Trump did this. This is absolutely insane. This is yet another tax. You know, when I look at this, Trump is, he spent this last weekend putting out memes of himself with George Washington, walking around with George Washington on a ballroom, riding on horses with George Washington.

You think Trump's ever been on a horse? You think he could ever get on a horse? No, he's on his high horse, but that's about it. but he is about as antithetical to George Washington as somebody could ever come up with. Remember, he keeps trolling everybody saying he's going to run for president a fourth time or whatever. This is a guy who he is the antithesis of George Washington who voluntarily stepped down after two terms. He wanted to set a precedent, a good precedent, unlike the bad precedents that we get from Trump all the time. He wanted to set a precedent that I'm not a king.

I'm not going to stay in office until I die. And so he returned back to the farm like Cincinnati. And King George III said he is the greatest man alive because he left that ring of power to set a good precedent. It was George Washington who said, we don't want to have entangling alliances. And look at how Trump is entangling us with Israel. I mean, an unprecedented way.

It's been bad enough in the past, but he has escalated this. Instead, George Washington said, we want to have peaceful relations and trade with other countries. Trump doesn't want that. He wants a 50% tariff with a country that we've never had a problem with on the border. We've never had to patrol the border. It's absolutely insane. He is as far from George Washington as anybody could possibly be. He's not the father of the country.

He's the father of the vaccine. He's our Vax daddy that is there. And don't ever forget it. Canadian soldiers fought alongside Americans in Afghanistan after 9-11. The 5,525-mile U.S. Canada border is undefended. Nearly $330,000 people and $2 billion worth of goods cross that border every day. 800,000 Canadians live in the United States. And yet Trump's approach

has been to repeatedly make inflammatory statements about Canada and making it America's 51st state to the extent that now in these hockey games you have Canadian players booing the American anthem when it's played. That's what Trump has brought. The Canadian public is fed up. A petition to expel the U.S. ambassador has collected nearly 218,000 signatures

since July 21st. It accuses ambassador Huckstra of having, quote, normalized, unquote, Trump's talk of annexing Canada, among many other complaints about the Trump regime. I guess they're fed up. I guess the question is, why aren't we? As the saying goes, Trump is revolting. Why aren't we revolting? Why aren't we? I don't understand why people still defend this guy. I don't think either side really wants these tariffs to come in effect, said a partner at a former U.S. trade official, a partner at a law firm that does the negotiations between the terrorists and other things, says there's a pretty strong push on both

sides to try to find an off-ramp. How do we get an off-ramp? How do we get Trump to exit? I mean, everybody's talking about an off-ramp here, an off-ramp there. That's an admission that its policies are wrong. We're looking for an off-ramp for the Iran war. We're looking at an off-ramp from his tariff wars. looking at an off ramp from one thing after the other from Trump.

So we just can't get away from him. You know, the GOP blocking all the off ramps from Trump. He doesn't have the authority for this stuff. And no single person should ever have the authority for that. The Canadians would like to have relief from U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum. And we would like for them to have that as well. Because if we could get steel and aluminum at lower prices, we could manufacture things at lower prices and have an opportunity to

compete in the global marketplace. But not if you're going to block the raw materials under some foolish, petulant nationalism that Trump has got. There is no protectionism involved in it. There is no real revenue involved in it. It is just his ego. And so now he is turning to the Smoot-Hawley Act. I should have put in the clip from Ferris Bueller where they had, they got Ben,

what was his name? Anybody? Bueller, Bueller, the Smoot-Hawley-Belie-Bel. Should I put that in the deck, but I didn't. Anyway, Trump has made tariffs the centerpiece of his second term economic agenda. Think about that. His economic agenda is to increase taxes. That's what this is.

He is a Democrat. He wants his economic plan is we're going to raise taxes. And we're going to do it against people that you don't like because I don't like them. And we are going to have prosperity. because of higher taxes. And don't worry, you're not going to pay that tax. Somebody else is going to pay it. I've said all along that Trump is a New York City Democrat.

That is the tactic that they always use. And yet, the taxes are not paid by other people. The taxes are paid by you. We'll be right back. Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky. I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America. I could dress better.

And I could, if only David Knight, would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue. But he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the David Knight Show.com. You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to, my various gala and social events.

If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Yeah, that's right. We still are operating under many different MacGuffins, even though Trump is saying the quiet part out loud, he still has a lot of things that are hiding as true agenda. And that's really what the McGuffin is about, right?

It's just about motivating people to go do something. It doesn't matter what it is, but you've got a set plan, and we've seen this for the longest time. The plan is to push us into a surveillance society, to push us to have a mark of the beast ID. You've got to have to have a mark of the beast ID in order to use the internet, in order to use an app. This is being done in the name of saving the kids. Or you've got to have a government issued ID in order to get a job. This is what Florida was doing with the mandatory E-Verify. E-Verify has been there on for quite a while.

Nevertheless, to make it mandatory is to make it mandatory to have a government ID to get a job. Where does that all end? Well, we know where that ends. We know what that McGuffin is. Sometimes it's climate change. Sometimes it's global warming. Sometimes it's global cooling. Sometimes it's just climate change.

Sometimes it's the pandemic. Sometimes it's the immigrants. And with the Republicans, that is the, the McGuffin that they prefer. Let's scare everybody with the immigrants, and then we'll be able to do whatever we want. Well, you know, when we look at Trump, we were just talking about the tariff regime. You know, it was always an apt characterization of the Democrats by Republicans to say, the Democrats, their plan is to tax our way to prosperity.

Quite literally, that's what this New York City Democrat Trump is doing. He's telling people we're going to tax our way to prosperity. The taxes are the tariffs. and although taxes are supposed to be enacted by Congress, they're setting by and doing nothing. As he takes this power from them, they willingly give it up. We don't want one man having the power to control the entire economy. One man, the power to create massive amounts of taxes,

and what do we see from him? Look at the boasting about how much money he collected with his usurpation of the, that power. Trump has made tax increases the centerpiece of his second economic second term economics. Last year he imposed double-digit import taxes on almost every country, even the ones that we had trade surpluses with. What sense does that make? Why are you going to anger your customers? The Supreme Court in February ruled that he had overstepped his authority, obviously, striking down those

tariffs and setting the stage for the federal government to have to pay refunds to importers. By the way, they're not paying any refunders to you, the consumer, are they? The people are going to win from this eventually after a big legal fight. You're going to get billions of dollars to the big retailers. When you look at the large retailers, when you look at people like Apple, they're going to get several billion dollars for each of those corporations. The Trump administration, even though they knew this was illegal, even though they tried to run the clock out on this stuff, and as they are fighting this stuff, losing case for which they have no case. Even as they're fighting that, they tell the court,

well, don't worry, let us continue to collect these tariffs and we'll give it all back. Then they fought them on that and they lost on that. But of course, it's not being given back. It's not being given back to the consumers who paid for that. This is all a windfall to the big corporations, which is everything that Trump does. Everything that he does is targeted towards helping Wall Street and shutting down consumers, average Americans, Main Street businesses, farms, that type of, they were the ones who took the hits for the tariffs. And we get no compensation, no refund from it. So when that was shut down, what did you do? He turned, immediately looked for other ways to rebuild his tariff wall. Last month, he imposed import taxes of 10 to 15% on 59 countries.

And he, in the European Union, which together account for 9, 9% percent. percent of U.S. imports. And the claim was that there was forced labor. Forced labor in the European Union? Come on. That's a reach, isn't it? And so this is basically, guys, just a scheming liar who breaks every single rule and defies you to stop him.

Then he reached back to the Great Depression to find something a cudgel with which could whack Canada. He went back to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. And that would allow 50% tariffs. Now, that was something that was enacted in 1930 as the Depression was kicking off and people were feeling the economic pressure of that. It was put in as a measure to protect the economy in general. They had tariffs up to 50%.

Most economists will say that its role was to make the great depression much worse by restricting trade. So nevertheless, that law, which is still on the books, authorizes the president to impose tariffs of up to 50 percent on imports from countries that have discriminated against U.S. businesses. No investigation is required. You just have to say, yeah, just like with an emergency. President Trump can declare an emergency and has done that on one issue after the other. Well, now we've got an emergency, so now I can do an executive order. I can have martial law. I can do whatever I want.

So now he claims that, well, we've got somebody who has discriminated against a U.S. business. Do you mean, like some of the states that require you to support Israel? That kind of discrimination? No. No investigation is required, nor is there any limit on how long the tariffs can stay in place. And, hey, you know, if it works against Canada, Trump can do this against the entire global economy. That's why I say. This guy is a one man for third.

turning. The last fourth turning we had, and again, every four generations, about every 80 years, we do have a major fourth turning. Now we are on a globally synchronized situation. And the last one we had was Great Depression in World War II. Before that, Civil War, before that, the American Revolution, as far as Americans are concerned. But Strauss and Howell traced it back 500 years in English history. But now we're all in the same cycle. And so what Trump is doing is he is accelerating us into this fourth turning, which they predicted back in early 90s, about 1992, they put the book out. They predicted that the fourth turning would begin sometime in the mid-2000s or the big economic issue, because fourth turnings always have a big economic issue.

Usually they have a war attached to them as well. They said it'll begin sometime in the mid-2000s. Well, we had that, didn't we? And they said it'll probably finish up about 20-29. So he is the guy to accelerate all this stuff to create a global depression and global war, Trump is your guy. Or maybe I should say Trump is the Rothschild's guy, because that's the kind of thing that they have always historically pulled. They always benefit when they take countries down, when they take countries to war. Trump is angry because Canada and China were the only countries that punched back with retaliatory tariffs of their own when he slapped levies on their products last year.

again. It is not economics. It is egotomics. That's the only thing that matters to him. Canada would retaliate again if they knew 50% tariffs take effect, potentially aggravating a trade fight. Making further concessions without getting something meaningfully in exchange would probably lead to a strong backlash, make Canada look weak. And as people see, the bullying on the part of Trump. So is Congress going to try to rein this guy in? This bull in the China shop, he is a BS in the China shop, isn't he? He's full of BS, but he is a destructive bull in the China shop. Is Congress going to try to rein him in? No.

Actually, reason points out that Congress is trying to give him even more tariff powers. And he wants even more than they're giving him. The bill to sanction Russia, this was the one that was named after Lindsey Graham. Lindsay Graham would be so happy, right? Because, again, sanctions are an act of war. It's the way wars typically start. So he'd be very happy to have this happen. And, of course, he's always been after Russia, six years before Russia invaded.

He was in Ukraine saying, next year, you guys going to go into Russia. You're going to get Putin next year. You're Ukrainians. And they're all looking at them like, come on, you know, we're going to die for your agenda. Yeah, they did. And so because it had his name attached, because this is a memorial to the revered warmonger, Lindsey Graham. This thing was a shoe-in in Congress that passed with only about a dozen people pushing back against it. And of course, when it goes to the house, you know it's going to get

rubber stamped there because it's what Trump wants. And Mike Johnson does whatever Trump wants. Trump has made a habit of recklessly overstepping the tariff powers that he has. He doesn't really have the power to do that. That is the Congress. The bipartisan bill that cleared the Senate earlier this month is meant to tighten sanctions against Russia and Iran, but it would also allow the president to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent, double the price on goods from five countries that import the most Russian crude oil or natural gas. And so we know that Mike Johnson will rubber stamp this. Ron Wyden said, this is extremely dangerous. to give Trump massive new tariff powers, particularly after we have seen the disastrous impacts

of his corrupt, chaotic, inflationary tariff sprees. We've seen his tariff tantrums, haven't we? Rand Paul offered an amendment in the Senate to remove the tariff provisions from the bill, but it was rejected. Rand Paul was the only Republican to vote against this Lindsey Graham bill. The bill is now in front of the House, and Trump, will, of course, sign it, but he wants even more. Because that's the way these guys are.

It's never enough money, never enough power, never enough corruption, never enough destruction of the Constitution and the rule of law. Tariffs are tax increases, folks. Tax increases paid by Americans. And when Trump boasts about, and he inflated the amount of money that he got from the tariffs, when he boasts about hundreds of billions of dollars that he's taken in, he stole that from you. Yes, the intention is to steer those countries away from using Russian fossil fuels,

but surely there are ways to do that without hiking taxes on Americans, says reason. And they're right. So the Senate-passed version gives the president unchecked authority to determine which countries should face tariffs. How high those tariffs will be? How long those tariffs will be in a force? The same sort of ambiguity that Trump and his allies have tried to exploit and other tariff overreaches. But Congress is now going to make that legal for him to do it.

Congress could add an expiration date to the tariff authority, or they could require a vote before the duties take effect, said one individual with the Cato Institute. But they don't want to do that. They want Trump to rule as a petulant dictator. And that's exactly what he's doing. So the past few years have shown that Congress made a terrible mistake in unloading so much of it.

constitutional authority over trade and tariffs to the executive branch. And it's not just to the office of the presidency. Congress has basically abdicated every one of their duties under the Constitution to bureaucracies. That is what we have been seeing. Now, as we see Trump ramping up war and these reckless policies, there was an article on the New York Times headline was, the blackout that could devastate America. And they're very right. And we've talked about this in the past. This is, if you remember, just a few years ago, we had a situation in 2013.

This was snipers that shot for 10 minutes before somebody called 9-11. They were not shooting at people in a crowded marketplace. This is not a mass murder. No, this is very targeted. They went to a switching station, an electrical substation. And what they did was they, it was very calculated what they did and very precise. They precisely took out some of the cooling fins on these transformers to make sure that they would lose them without a big explosion that would draw attention to it. They did this for about 20 minutes before the police showed up. And the witnesses said, yeah, they saw flashlight signaling these people.

And they had snipers who started shooting. Then just before the police arrived, there was another flashlight signal. and these guys stopped shooting. And what happened was they took out a massive number of transformers. This type of thing, not even going to the approach that's being taken in the Ukraine-Russian war, both Ukraine and Russia are attacking with drones, the infrastructure of the other country, the grid especially. But, of course, we just saw this last week,

that Ukraine has been attacking the major retail distributor in Russia. employs about 8% of all Russians, and it is a huge part of their GDP. It is the version of their Amazon, and Ukraine has been taking out one massive warehouse after the other with drone strikes. But this example shows just how easy it is for these guys to take out, even in a kind of surreptitious way. They started doing this at 1.30 in the morning, and they targeted the radiators, so that they would keep it away from the electrical core,

have it drain out slowly without raising an alarm with an explosion. So they just took their time, pinging away at these things. That's why I say you need to think about what you're going to do because this type of thing is going to be coming to the United States because of the policies of Trump. You need one of the best things that you can do is educate yourself. And again, if you look at Jack Lawson's book, go to jack lawson's books.com.

and you'll see Civil Defense Manual. It talks about how to prepare for natural or for Trump-initiated disasters, I should say, right? We don't know exactly what's going to happen or when it's going to happen, but the kind of advice that you get there is going to help you throughout every kind of disaster. Again, you can go to jack blossombooks.com. He also has a substack with some very useful articles, and I would highly recommend that you start to prepare for that. When we talk about economics, just look at how these people are rolling these things out.

You know, we had that event that kicked off this fourth turning, the big mortgage collapse that was caused by securitization, right? Again, a scheme, a bluff, garbage. When you think about securitization, they're not going to call it that anymore. They're not going to run exactly the same thing again. They've got a different game that they're going to run. I think that is exactly what we're seeing with tokenization. And now you have major companies are talking about, openly talking about the tokenization of water. That's right, water.

That is essential for life. The elites are claiming that the world's water supply is going to belong to them. And they've got a plan on how they're going to take control of it and how they're going to trade it. This is from Patty Johnson. She said, yeah, you heard me right. This is not a joke. It's not an exaggeration. It is the tokenization of nature.

This is the very thing that at the beginning of the Trump regime, we had Doug Bergam from South Carolina, as well as Scott Bessent, Howard Lutnik. They're all talking about how they could tokenize their way out of this massive debt hole that they have created. They said, yeah, we got a deficit of $40 trillion, and as Gerald Slylinty will always point out, no, the unfunded mandates take that deficit

it up to like 160, but they said, oh, we got at least $200 trillion worth of government land that we own and other natural resources. And we can just tokenize that out and get out of all this. This is the way they're going to take control of everything. You heard Klaus Schwab for the longest time saying, you will own nothing and be happy. Well, this is the way they do it. tokenization means turning something that is real, you know, like a house, for example, or something like a share of water rights, or a measured volume of water from a river or an aquifer, or even credits for water that was saved or recycled, turning that into a digital token, a unique digital certificate that lives on the blockchain. Yeah, just remember what they did with the mortgage fraud, with the securitization fraud. Just remember that. That's how this is going to work out.

These people always have a scam. You know, when you look at the stock market, for example, I've said many times that the stock market is to corporations, what the Federal Reserve's money printing is to the federal government. You've had people, and again, we had six video stores. We competed with Blockbuster for a long time. After Blockbuster was bought by Viacom, the parent company of Paramount and CBS, after it was bought by Viacom, they never turned to profit.

I mean, when it was run, they had a couple of guys who came up with the idea of a large store of about 6,000 square feet. And that was very profitable for them. It was bought by Wayne Hizenga of waste management industries. He had a big garbage collection business. They'd become very wealthy. They operated under a profit as well. but when Paramount or Viacom got it, they never operated under a profit. Nevertheless, they continued to run for about 20-some-odd years, losing money every single year.

How did they do that? How do you lose money for that long a period of time? Well, Wall Street was the answer. It wasn't deep pockets from Paramount. It was the fact that they had a happy story. Same thing happened with Moderna. Look at Moderna. They were in existence for 10 years.

making tens of millions of dollars. What did they do? They pumped out a story about the latest miracle MRI vaccine that they had. And then people found that that didn't work. And it was very, had a lot of adverse health effects. And so then, you know, the stock would go down and then they would come out with another happy story.

They played that game for 10 years until Fauci set them up in business and Trump. And so that's the way that Wall Street operates. You don't have to take a look at the AI bubble. That's the most obvious example right now. These people come out with happy stories. And as many people have pointed out, there just isn't enough money to capitalize what they're saying they're going to do with the capitalization expenditures for artificial intelligence and data centers and things like that. They don't have that kind of money. Nobody does.

Not even the people in Silicon Valley can fund that. And so it is a scam. And that's the way these people run this. And that's what they're going to do when they tokenize water. The tokens can be bought, sold, or traded on markets the same way that people trade stocks or other assets. Instead of water simply belonging to the land or to the local community or to the people who rely on it or the people whose land it falls on, we've already seen this happening in Oregon and California. The financial product that large investors, corporations, institutions can own fractions of it. and can exchange it for a profit.

And so what they'll do is they'll start to tokenize the right to use, to claim, to offset, or to trade the water that becomes the commodity. This is something we should all be very concerned about. Water is a foundation of life itself, of course. Every human, every animal, every plant depends on it. Yet the same elites who lecture the public about scarcity and about climate are building the machinery to turn every last drop into a trade. asset that they can profit from while ordinary people face rationing and surveillance.

You know, we talk about the data centers. It's not just the surveillance state that is an issue as well. It is also, I mean, first of all, we look at this and say, well, look at the hypocrisy that they're going to go out and control water when these are the people who are consuming more water than anybody else does. But it's also the surveillance and it is also the fact they need these data centers in order to process all the transactions when they go to a full digital currency globally when they fully enact the mark of the beast. So Goldman Sachs itself in

26 this year published a report securing and financing the future of water. This is what they're going to do. They're going to track water everywhere. They're going to track you everywhere. They are going to use their data centers to process all of that and to process all of the digital currency. You should be very concerned about this. Let me, before we run out of time, let me thank some of the people here who have contributed to the show and read their comments. IRS machine gun, thank you very much for the tip. He said, just a couple of gallons of gas. That's right.

That's what's happening to it now, isn't it? Gunnuts says, who needs enemies when you have Israel as your greatest ally? Yeah, I agree. You've got to get close to somebody in behind them before you can stab them in the back, don't you? AP Rumble seed. Unfortunately, once ground invasion and or tactical nuke, nukes. are deployed. The U.S. will be a perpetual terror and alleged false flag target for decades to come. I agree. All this stuff began with 9-11. Look at Israel's involvement in that as well.

A high boost says, honest question for David, is it legitimately time to vote for Democrats if it gets us away from the Israeli connection? And so would Dems overlook Israel and throw them to the wayside? It's not clear to me that they would. I mean, I don't think that the Democrats have the integrity that they would refuse money from Israel. I think they can be bought just like Republicans can be bought. I look at, when I look at Democrat versus Republican votes, I think it's a good thing to have divided government. So it vary depending on where you are.

You don't want to give one of these criminal gangs complete monopoly power wherever you are. And certainly here in Tennessee, I can't get behind Marsha Blackburn, for example. if she's going to push data centers and she's going to push flock cameras and all the rest of this stuff. She has been carrying the water for Trump in terms of setting up an ID to use everything on the internet. And I am adamantly against that. Now, some Democrats have spoken against that, but even if somebody speaks against something, it doesn't mean they'll follow through on it, does it? Just take a look at Donald Trump. And I just want to, before we run out of time, I just want to ask the listeners to pray for Lance's neck. He's had another injury that he got yesterday, and he's

in a lot of pain right now. So Travis is doing the board today, but if you could pray for Lance, we would really appreciate that. I know that he would as well. And so when we look at the future here, we don't know what it holds, but we know who holds the future. And just as I was talking about the cop who pushed back on the flock stuff because of his integrity. And just as we had a lot of people who refused to take the jab because of their integrity, remember the United is now fighting it all the way of the Supreme Court, the fact that they could fire people for not taking the jab. This employer thinks that they can mandate you to inject poison.

How absurd that is. And of course, there are many ethical issues with this. Jason Barker of Knights of the Storm wrote a... great template really for people to get religious exemptions for this. And that is something that has really worked. And it doesn't just work, I think, because of the First Amendment. I think it also works because God has promised us that he will honor those who honor him. And I have seen that over and over again. People who lost their jobs. As a matter of fact, the people who we get our health insurance from, the guy we get our health insurance from, we met him. He was talking about

the fact that he had a job that paid him $300,000 at a major health company, and he wasn't going to take the vaccine, and it was for religious reasons. He held firm on that. His parents said, you're crazy, but it was his religious conviction. He lost his $300,000 job, and then he started selling insurance on his own as an individual. He said, I'm making more than that now. And I said, you know, I've heard that story so many times from one person after the other. God, honors those who honor him. He is, he was faithful to that promise and I have seen that honored so many times. Well, you know, when we look at the vaccines, there was an interesting article, I'm not having time to get to it today, but when we look at the fact that by their own

records, 44% of diagnosed measles cases are from people who got the MMR vaccine. It's interesting. I remember years ago covering a so-called outbreak in New York. York, which involved four people. How is that an outbreak or an epidemic, right? All four people, in the measles case, every single one of them, they could verify that they had been vaccinated, many of them multiple times. Only one person, they couldn't verify it, but the person thought they'd had the vaccine and they were the right age to have been mandated to have that. And so I said at the time, why are people getting multiple shots with all this stuff? When you go back and you look at the number of shots that they give to kids in America,

we are the only country that requires the number of shots. Not Japan, not the UK, not in Europe, nowhere, not in Germany. Nobody requires this level of obedience to them. And we're not even allowed to ask why that is. Again, before we end, if you're concerned about tokenization, if you're concerned about being tracked and so forth. The answer to all of that is to get real, to get something that is in your possession,

and you can do that with gold and silver. Protect yourself against the inflationary policies of the U.S. government, against the devaluation of the currency, against the tokenization of everything. You can get physical gold and silver. Go to David Knight.org. I'll take you to Tony Arderman. Thank you so much for joining us.

The Common Man. They created Common Core at Dumbens. down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnight Show.com.