The David Pakman Show - 6/7/24: Bannon told to go to prison, Trump makes major mistake

Episode Date: June 7, 2024

-- On the Show: -- A judge says it's finally time for Steve Bannon to report to prison, and directs him to do so on July 1 -- MAGA voters drop like flies as failed former President and convicted felon Donald Trump holds a rally in 108 degree Phoenix, Arizona -- A new poll finds that 49% of the country believes Donald Trump should drop out of the presidential race on the basis of his criminal conviction -- On the basis of being a convicted felon, Donald Trump faces a travel ban in 37 countries -- Former FBI Director James Comey explains the logistics of how a former president could be "locked up" in a regular prison -- One in three Republicans now say that Donald Trump is the wrong candidate to be their nominee in 2024 -- Russell Brand finalizes his total conversion to Trump flunky, telling his followers that if one supports democracy, they should vote Trump in November -- Reader mail and more in Friday Feedback ⚠️ Try Ground News and get 40% OFF the Vantage plan at https://ground.news/pakman 🛡️ Incogni lets you control your personal data! Get 60% off their annual plan: http://incogni.com/pakman 🔊 Babbel language learning: Get up to 60% OFF at https://babbel.com/pakman 💪 Athletic Greens is offering FREE year-supply of Vitamin D at https://athleticgreens.com/pakman -- On the Bonus Show: The Friday Bonus Show with Producer Pat -- Become a Member: https://www.davidpakman.com/membership -- Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/davidpakmanshow -- TDPS Subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/ -- Pakman Discord: https://www.davidpakman.com/discord -- David on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow -- Leave a Voicemail: (219)-2DAVIDP

Speaker 1 Welcome, my friends. It seems as though we are getting to the end of the road for former Trump propagandist Steve Bannon, who, after being sentenced to four months in jail, has been out pending appeal. But it seems as though the party will end on July 1st. As Bannon has been told, it is time to report to prison and it really couldn't happen to a nicer propagandist. NBC News reports Judge orders Steve Bannon to report to prison on July one for contempt

of Congress sentence. The former Trump adviser was sentenced to four months for refusing to comply with the January six committee subpoenas, but it had been put on hold while he appealed. Here is Bannon ranting. One might even say raving, more ranting than raving, I would say, but a little bit of both. And let's just listen to what he had to say. This is really wild. Legal issues that have to be addressed.

All of this is about one thing. This is about shutting down the MAGA movement, shutting down grassroots conservatives, shutting down President Trump. Not only are we winning, we are going to prevail in every number and every poll shows that there's nothing that can shut me up and nothing that will shut me up. You're going to jail. It's not a prison bill or jail bill that will ever shut me up. All victory to MAGA.

We're going to win this. More importantly, we're going to win on November 5th. So as you can hear an antagonist, they're screaming in the background. The House and also Donald Trump back as president. Thanks. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank, they're screaming in the background. The House and also Donald Trump back is president. I think they need very much. Lock him up. Lock him up.

You know, it's it's not usually a good idea after a judge has made a decision to start screaming this way right outside the courtroom. It's just it's not usually what's recommended by counsel. And they are trying to make this all about how the judge is biased and the system and all this stuff. I want to remind you that the judge that ordered Steve Bannon to start his prison sentence on July 1st is not some liberal right left wing extremist. It is a judge appointed by the failed former president and now a convicted felon himself,

Donald Trump. So I don't know what to tell you as far as the judge is concerned, but this is the direction that it is going. Other interesting notes here. Bannon was found guilty on two counts of contempt of Congress in July 2022. So it's been almost two years since he's been found guilty. It is time to go to prison, my friend. Let's just do it.

Bannon's sentence was on hold pending appeal. Lawyers made their case in November. Appeals court upheld the conviction in May. Federal prosecutors filed a motion saying it's time to report to prison. Federal prosecutors argued there's no legal basis to continue staying the sentence. It's just like it's just time to go to prison. That's it. And Bannon's lawyers say, no, no, no. You need to stay this until we go through the full appeals process, maybe even the Supreme Court. And of course, the goal being if Donald Trump gets himself elected president during all

of this mishegas, maybe then Trump is able to keep Bannon out of prison, period. It doesn't appear it doesn't appear as though that is going to happen. And that is good news. Donald Trump held a rally in Phoenix, Arizona yesterday. That was an atrocity in many ways. The content was atrocious, all meant to go to Phoenix, a place that is central to the debate about immigration and and border crossings and so on and rile up the most horrifying elements of his base. That was atrocious. But it was one hundred and eight degrees in Phoenix, Arizona, yesterday. They had people waiting outside in the heat for hours. They were dropping like flies. I have video here

where people are being taken out on stretchers because of the heat. Several people ended up in the hospital. Can you imagine ending up in the hospital because Trump has you out in one hundred and eight by some reports at one point, even one hundred and ten degree heat. And why did Trump hold this event at the hottest time of day? Two p.m. I've spent time in Arizona. Two p.m. No, no, no.

You get out there first thing in the morning or you wait until the sun sets. But two p.m. Why? The reason is that after the event, Trump had to fly to Silicon Valley, where supposedly the elites never support Trump or any of it because he was holding an insanely high priced fundraiser hosted by David Sachs. So a disgusting event in every way. However, Trump's problems were bigger than even this. Trump glitching very badly. Tell me if you can make out what he's trying to say here. When I'm president, I will use Title 42 to end the truck and we have to do this. I will use Title 42 to end the truck and we have to do this. That's just one of his straight up malfunctions. He he he twitches and he just white flags and moves on. When I'm president, I will use Title 42 to end the trial.

We have to do this. We have to. Folks, we just have to do it. There's no way around it. On the topic of the death penalty, Trump using words that I recognize from the English language, but they're not in an order and in a syntax that makes any sense to me. And when I mentioned that and I do it, I do it purposely.

I mentioned the death penalty. And without it, you're never going to solve the problem. If you look at Singapore, if you look at other the only countries essentially that don't have a problem are people with either really strong crime prevention or countries with the death penalty. I think he's arguing for speedy and summary executions of people after kangaroo court trials doesn't exactly sound like due process to me. And Singapore is another one.

They don't even know what you're talking about when you say you have a drug problem. Do you have a drug problem? No, we don't have a drug. Why would we have a drug problem? We have an unbelievable drug problem. We lost last year, in my opinion, 300000 people. Trump has an opinion. I love that. You know, think about that. You know, I have a chapter in my forthcoming book, Echo Machine. I know that it used to. This is a whole other story, which I don't even want to bring people into right now. But the book was initially going to be called Echo. Then it was going to be called the Echo Machine. And then it was decided by by way above my pay grade that we really don't need the. So in my forthcoming book, Echo Machine, I outline in great detail how we got to a point where there isn't even agreement

about what are facts. Now, I'm not saying what the facts are. That's a different question. What the facts are means how many people died of drug overdoses last last year. Right. That's a question of what are the facts? What are facts is when Trump goes, I have an opinion about the number of people that died of drug overdoses. What are you talking about? That's a factual question. It's not an opinion. Do you like chocolate cake, as Trump likes to call it?

Or do you like vanilla or coconut? Those are matters of opinion. But Trump goes, I have an opinion about the number of people that died of a drug overdose. I have a this is it's an epidemic of non thinking. And it's fascinating that Trump even mentioned that yesterday at his rally. OK, Trump also calling in Phoenix, Arizona, for mass detention camps from which he plans to conduct mass deportations if he becomes president again. On day one, I will seal the border. I will stop the invasion and we will begin the largest domestic deportation operation

in the history of our country. And as he said before, the temporary place as the mass deportations ramp up will be government military run camps. It's funny. They told us it was what was that guy's name? I know. I never remember what the guy's name was. Oh, yes. Barack Obama, who supposedly was going to stuff everybody into so-called FEMA camps.

Never happened. Never was a plan for it. Never was an inkling of it. But Trump is telling us, oh, we're going to make camps in order to then be able to deport people in an expedited fashion. All right. Trump, again, talking about this whole language thing where there's languages Trump hasn't heard before. And so he says these are languages no one's ever heard of. The instructors talk in English and they have somebody speaking in some cases, languages that we'd never even heard of.

And by the way, not exactly with a great command of English language himself. Trump talking about people are talking languages. We would, of course, native English speakers, which I am not, would say people are speaking languages, people are speaking languages. But this is another one of Trump's xenophobic catcalls. These are whacked out languages. No one's ever heard of these language. They make no sense from the standpoint of more generic political lies. Trump also dropped in a few, including this doozy. We I funded the colleges and black colleges and universities. Nobody else did that. Nobody else even thought

of it. And what would that that is, of course, a lie. President Joe Biden now like it or not. Some people say I don't like the concept of a historically black college or university. OK, well, that's not what's at issue. What's at issue is, is it true that nobody but Trump has funded HBC use. It is not true. President Biden has invested more in HBC use than Donald Trump ever did because Trump is the candidate of law and order. Besides being a 34 count convicted felon, he also brought up on the stage Sheriff Joe Arpaio, himself a convicted criminal pardoned by Donald Trump. Joe Arpaio, known for racially profiling and even abusing immigrants. And Trump kisses him. Trump kissing Joe Arpaio convict to convict on the presidential stage. What a year it is to be alive in the United States.

Trump on the topic of his conviction talks about how the courts need to be straightened out, which, of course, seems to me like Trump just wants to get out of jail free card from an appellate court. Now, it's never been nobody's ever seen because they know it was rigged. They know it's a corrupt system. They know all about it. But with your help, less than five months from now and we're going and I'll tell you what, we have to change the system. We have to straighten out what's going on in

these courts. We've got a rigged deal going this whole country and we've got to do it. And those appellate courts have to step up and straighten things out. So there's two interpretations here. More narrowly, it's the appellate court needs to straighten out my conviction. I need my conviction overturned. Bigger picture, it's the appellate court needs to straighten out my conviction. I need my conviction overturned. Bigger picture, it's we need to sick the courts on my political enemies, which, of course, Trump has admitted and conceded before Trump waxing poetic about authoritarian Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

In China, I was with President Xi, 1.4 billion people, strong guy, and we get along well. And as always, Trump touting his great relationship with the very strong Xi. A really strange moment, Trump asking if there were Venezuelan criminals at his rally, sort of taking a survey. And there may be is there any criminal from Venezuela in the room? Please raise your hand. There probably is. We just don't know about it. There you go. Sort of a strange, strange moment. And then Trump ending on a positive note where he's where he says, if I don't win, it's the end of the United States of America, really inspiring the crowd. If we don't win, it's we it's all of us. It's millions of people. If we don't win,

this country is finished. I really believe that. I think it's I think it's finished. There you go. In the reality, by the way. Oh, this is funny. Actually, we interviewed this former Trump supporter, Kyle Sweetser, not long ago. He tweeted in reaction to Trump saying this. If Trump loses, America will thrive. However, the un-America fake conservative MAGA scam will be finished. And that's really what's at stake in 2024. And I want people to understand it's not just about what Donald Trump will do in the four years between January 25 and January 29. If he lives that long, it's not just about that. It is about listen, since winning in 2016, they've lost just about everything. Twenty eighteen, twenty twenty, twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three abortion referenda. It's been bad. If we can stave off

this Trump in November, it could be the death knell of MAGA Trump ism as we know it. Now, you know, Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's in a very red district. Maybe she figures out a way to survive politically by kind of not being as Trumpy anymore or something like that. But we have the chance, the opportunity, better said, to really put out to pasture into the dustbin of history, as Ron DeSantis would say, MAGA Trumpism. And we should do it. All right. Real quick, before we go to a break, I do want to mention a new poll. I've been meaning to talk about this. It's gotten pushed back. I have a few minutes today. A new poll finds that nearly half of Americans believe that Donald Trump should drop out of the race after being convicted.

OK, we're going to link to this. You can check out the details of the poll. It's an ABC News Ipsos poll, and it finds that right at 50 percent, 49 percent of Americans believe Trump should end his campaign. Now, there's two ways to interpret these numbers, and this is why these headlines can be it's not that they're deceptive, but they can be misleading in some way. On the one hand, it's like, of course, Democrats think that Donald Trump should drop out. And then when you consider that roughly half of independents are left leaning, the 50 percent number becomes not that remarkable.

There are almost no Republicans who think Trump should drop out. I think it was like 15 percent or something along those lines. What would be more remarkable is if 60, 65, 70 percent of the country believed that Trump should end his campaign because then mathematically, inevitably, it includes a whole bunch of Republicans. I do also want to remind folks that it is not as though these Republican candidates of the last 20 years are popular with the general population. The last Republican to win the popular vote was George W. Bush in 2004. And before that.

So that's 20 years ago. Before that, you have to go back to 1988 to his dad, George H.W. Bush. Republicans don't win the popular vote even when they win electorally. They lose the popular vote as Trump did by millions. So the numbers would certainly be more remarkable at 60, 65 percent in general. The vast majority of the country doesn't vote for these Republican candidates. But Trump appears to be staying in, doesn't seem as though he's going to drop out. And so we've got to defeat him in November. It's

the only way. All right. Let's take a quick break here from a sponsor or two, and then we'll be back with more. Let's say you want to figure out if Trump did use a Nazi slogan in a campaign video or if it's just a misunderstanding. Ground News is an app and website that gathers news stories from across the world and political spectrum so you can decide for yourself. It's a great tool. I'm happy to be partnering with them for this video. Yes, Trump did, in fact, use a Nazi slogan in a campaign video he posted and then he

deleted it on ground news. I can access almost 200 articles covering the story and see that only 17 percent of those are right leaning. No surprise there. Comparing coverage is interesting. Some sources on the left references language comparing him to Hitler, while on the right, RT highlights his explanation of the video and Israel's are roots. Sheva highlights that he deleted it.

The ground news blind spots feature will highlight stories like this that are disproportionately covered by either political side. So you are guaranteed to see the full picture. Sign up through my link for 40 percent off their Vantage subscription, which gives you access to all of their features. Go to ground dot news slash Pacman. The link is in the podcast notes. The David Pakman Show David Pakman dot com. which have access to your social security number, login credentials, addresses, location history, even your online activity. But our sponsor, Incogni, is the service that will put your mind at ease. You just create an account, grant them the right to go to work for you, and then you sit back while Incogni has data broker sites, remove your personal data from their databases. And Incogni keeps you updated on the status of everything,

and they will handle any objections from those data brokers. This is often the reason people get robocalls, because their info is on one of these sites that Incogni will take you off of. Scammers use that information to commit fraud against you. Go to Incogni dot com slash Pacman and use the code Pacman to get 60 percent off an annual plan. That's I N C O G N I dot com slash Pacman for 60 percent off. The link is in the podcast notes. The David Pakman show does primarily depend on you to fund the show every day. The studio staff salaries, benefits, connectivity, all of it is primarily funded by people who say, Hey, I kind of like what you're doing. I think it's valuable enough that I want to see it continue. I understand that sometimes YouTube takes away your revenue. Facebook takes

away your revenue, Snapchat and tick tack, take away your revenue. I'm going to fund you directly. And that's what it means to get a membership at join Pacman dot com. I would love for you to do it. And you can use the coupon code Save Democracy 24 to get a sizable, a tidy little discount off of the cost of a membership. Here's a really interesting sort of consequence to the conviction of Donald Trump as a felon that I haven't had the opportunity to talk about so far this week. Donald Trump is facing a travel ban to 37 or potentially even 38 countries, depending on our latest interpretation of this. The reality is that even though it is Donald Trump who has favored and talked about banning this, that and the other person based on their country of origin or one characteristic, or are they coming from a supposed mental

institution for all sorts of different reasons? Donald Trump wants to ban people from coming to the United States. Newsweek now reports that former President Donald Trump, now a convicted felon, could face significant travel restrictions as many countries around the world enforce strict immigration policies against individuals with criminal records. And the article goes on to explain that based on a review on data from the World Population Review, the following countries don't allow convicted felons to enter. They are Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Cuba, India, Iran, Israel, Japan, Kenya,

Macau, New Zealand, South Africa, Taiwan, the UK, and yes, also the United States. There are further countries that Trump may now be denied entry to. Not all countries check criminal records, but if they discover, hey, we are aware of a convicted felon at our border, they could implement a rejection. And it is quite a list, including Brazil, Cambodia, Chile. You can check out the entire list going down to Turkey, Ukraine and the United United Arab Emirates. So a couple of different things here.

You know, I it is in a sense we continue to deal with the endless irony of everything that Trump stands for with regard to his personal life, with regard to his legal problems, with regard to the hypocrisies and double standards of the policies he claims to stand by and the principles he came claims to abide by all of these different things. There is an irony there. Of course, Trump had a travel ban. He may now be restricted from accessing other countries because of a travel ban. And you know, maybe he's not going to find Obama's birth certificate in Kenya since it's possible Kenya won't let the guy in.

OK, so we understand the ironic sort of part of it. There is another aspect to this, which is on the one hand, if Trump is president and he's really not allowed into some of these countries, it does make it much more difficult to carry out the job of president. Now, does he need to go to all of these countries? Does Trump need to go to? I don't know. Is Trump going to go to Iran as president? Probably not. But there are countries here, including the UK, of course, that are relatively close allies. And if we believe that those countries would reject Trump from entering, it is yet another reason why, hey, maybe we don't want to have a convicted felon as president of the United States. But there's another story to this here.

And it is the story about the two tiered justice system, which is not about Democrats and Republicans. It's really primarily about what is it about the elites and the rich that allows them to get around the letter of the law in so many cases. And if I'm honest in my prediction, I think the most likely outcome is that these countries just let Trump in anyway, if he is president of the United States or honestly, to some degree, even without being president of the United States, I think they might just let Trump in anyway. So it's certainly one of these stories that makes for an interesting headline. And it is fascinating to think about. And it is ironic. And there's this

incredible contrast between Trump wanting to prevent everybody else from coming here when they are either from an asshole country or from countries he associates with terrorism or whatever. And then now he's on the other side of that. But at the end of the day, we have to make a decision. Is this enough trouble to have a convicted felon as president that we just need to decide as a country, we're just not going to do it. And even Republicans saying, you know what, I'm going right back to voting for Republicans in twenty twenty eight once we get a reasonable candidate, but I can't vote for Trump this time. Hopefully Republicans will make that

decision. How would we lock up Donald Trump if Judge Juan Mershon decides that is going to be Donald Trump's sentence on July 11th? Many people have been saying there's no real way to make Trump serve time in a penitentiary. Practically speaking, you can't do it. Well, here's an interesting perspective. Former FBI director James Comey, who Trump fired, recently appeared on Jen Psaki's show on MSNBC, and he said it's not all that complicated. He says it is doable to imprison Donald Trump or any former president. Listen to what he had to say. So a lot of people have suggested that there are a range of factors that would make it

difficult to put a former. There's not the system has not been tested in this way. Do you agree with that? That would be difficult or nearly impossible for the law enforcement institutions to put him in an actual jail? No, they would just put him in a double wide somewhere out near the fence, out in the grass. And he would eat there. He'd shower there.

He'd exercise there. Trump doesn't exercise the away, as Donya Perry said, from general population. But it's obviously doable. So the idea here is this is actually much simpler. You don't need to build a facility just for Trump, as people were suggesting. You don't need to do a facility just for Trump, as people were suggesting. You don't need to do home confinement. You don't have to do, you know, just serve your sentence non concurrently, non consecutively by just doing weekends in some facility, low, low security facility.

No, it's very simple. You identify where it is that he should be held. And then you very easily bring some trailers there. James Comey referring to a double wide, which means a trailer of some kind. You can set up trailers for Secret Service. You can set up a little perimeter or whatever, but he is within the walls, within the confines of the penitentiary, the jail, the prison that he is assigned to. It's a pretty straightforward solution for me. It's less about, you know, the reason I continue to say I don't think Trump is really going to see a day inside the walls of any kind of penitentiary is that there are so many steps that would need to first get through to even really consider that

first and foremost is, is such a sentence something that Juan Mershon would impose in from what I'm reading, 60, 70 percent of falsifying business records convictions in New York, 60, 70 percent. There is no jail time handed down. It's just probation and or fines. So right off the bat, we have the chance that there's not even anything imposed. Then we go to, OK, what if we're in that other 30% Trump hasn't shown remorse. Trump has not. Uh, Trump has 34 instances of falsifying business records, not just one. Maybe the judge says, I am going to impose a prison sentence.

Sometimes it is imposed, but it is suspended. Assuming Donald Trump is not convicted of or arrested or gets into other trouble. So you could get a sentence that is a suspended sentence, or you could get a sentence that is indeed served in home confinement or whatever the case may be. Or you could get a sentence that is then suspended pending appeal as Donald Trump intends to do and later thrown out either because the sentence is deemed inappropriate or the appeal succeeds or you have a sentence that is temporarily held during appeal and then Trump becomes president. And as a practical matter, it is determined.

And again, this is where it starts to get like, well, how is this going to happen? It's determined you can't have a sitting president behind bars and then it's pushed off until the end of Trump's term, at which time Trump would be in his eighties. And then who knows? So I don't think James Comey is wrong here, but I do still believe that the most likely outcome is whatever the sentence ultimately is in terms of Trump actually spending days and nights within the perimeter of a penitentiary, I'm still betting against it.

I want to hear from you. What do you expect? What do you think? What do you think of what James Comey is saying here? I love exploring new countries. If you follow me on Instagram, you see me in Italy or France or Denmark, Spain. I do speak English and Spanish fluently, but if I'm going somewhere where there is a different language spoken, I turn to an app called Babbel.

Our sponsor Babbel is the app that can help you start speaking a new language in as little as three weeks. I'm busy running a business. My daughter is running around. So Babbel's bite sized 10 minute lessons are just perfect for me. I can do it on the go, do it during a lunch break. It's only a little bit of a time commitment each time. And you end up with a surprising level of comfort with the language after just a few weeks, which was perfect before my recent trip to Italy. Studies from Yale, Michigan State University and others continue to to my apply. The link is in the podcast notes. Is there a sea change of sorts happening within the

Republican Party? Have the Republicans finally grown up enough to realize this entire Trump thing was a disaster? You know, I was recently on the Piers Morgan program and they had this right wing guy on Benny Johnson and he just comes out shot out of a cannon. He's attacking this and attacking that and calling me a Stalinist. And he's furious. And much of what these guys are furious about is that they've lost everything since 2016. Twenty eighteen was a disaster. Twenty twenty, twenty, twenty two, twenty, twenty three abortion related referenda. It's all been a disaster. And so they don't know what they can do in order to win again. Some Republicans are coming around to the idea that the problem is that they keep supporting Donald Trump and Trump like candidates and mega people.

And maybe it's turning around. There is new polling which finds that one in three Republicans now think Donald Trump was the wrong candidate choice. This is post conviction. Mind you, apparently the indictments alone weren't enough for them to think Trump's the wrong choice, but the something about the conviction seems to have convinced them. The article reads one in three Republican voters say they would have preferred a different candidate to Trump.

The former president won enough primary races already to secure the Republican nomination. But according to a survey of 1003 Americans, Trump does not command the full support of his base and 33% of this demographic would have preferred another politician. Meanwhile, this proportion is higher. Forty seven percent among Republican voters age 18 to 30 for the margin of error is plus or minus three point oh nine percent. And I apologize. This was pre conviction, pre conviction, post conviction. The numbers may have gotten even worse. I have to tell you that there's two things that can be true at the same time. And this is a classic corporate media headline.

One in three says Trump was the wrong candidate choice. You can interpret this however you want. On the one hand, we would say that's not news. Almost 40 percent of Republican voters in the primary voted for someone other than Trump. We don't need a new poll to tell us about a third of Republicans don't want Trump. A third or more already voted for someone different, mostly Nikki Haley in the Republican primary. So that's not a big deal. It doesn't really change anything. On the other hand, in an election that's expected to come down

to under half a million votes in three to five states, if one third of the voters of one of the two major political parties sending a candidate to the general election ballot, if almost one third of the voters for one of those parties says, I didn't want this guy, I don't want this guy. And 10 or 15 percent of that third says I'm either going to stay home or vote for Biden or vote for someone else. These elections are so, so close from an electoral standpoint that that's enough to flip the election and to make it so that Joe Biden wins.

Now there's a broader question that I want to deal with, which is what's been happening with the polling in general since Donald Trump was convicted? The answer is not very much. There is a slight, slight downtick here where if you go back to May 31st, Trump was plus 1.4 and he's now plus 1.3. That is essentially no change. So far in the polling we have, There has been essentially no change to the national popular vote polling as a result of the conviction. Now, let me give you both sides of this to really

be as thorough as possible. On the one hand, Trump gets convicted first time a former president has ever been criminally convicted and the polling doesn't move. That must mean that the conviction will have no effect. I think it's risky to make that assumption because this is an unprecedented event such that the weighting and the methodology applied to these polls probably needs to be modified to account for such an unprecedented event. So I continue to think this is either candidates race to win or to lose. There's this new report out from the Wall Street Journal talking about Biden's supposed confusion behind closed doors. It's conceivable that that's going to become a bigger story. And this really could go either way. So all we have left, all we really have that we can do is we can go out and vote and we can talk

to people we know and say, hey, you really need to go out and vote as well. There's really no other way around this at this point in time. I don't know if the convictions are really going to have any effect. I don't know what's going to happen with the narrative around Joe Biden behind the scenes and cognition based on that Wall Street Journal article effect. I don't know what's going to happen with the narrative around Joe Biden behind the scenes and cognition based on that Wall Street Journal article. I just don't know. And so, as I said on the Piers Morgan show, if you give me two candidates who are cognitively struggling, which is what some people believe we have, I want the people that Biden would

put around him running the country rather than the people that Trump would put around him on both sides. There are people talking about replacing their candidates. At this point, I do believe that it is too late. It's not too late in a literal sense. We haven't had the conventions yet, but I do believe that it is too late and that whichever party replaces their candidate is conceding its total chaos. We have no idea what we're doing.

And that would be an extraordinarily, extraordinarily damaging concession. So I believe that these are the candidates that the parties are going to have all the way through to November. And it's now a question of where in the balance are those quarter million to half a million votes in three to five states going to shake out such that one or the other gets to the 270 electoral votes. Now, in the meantime, arbiter of ideas and free thinker Russell Brand is making a very definitive choice about the forthcoming election. Let's talk about that next. Russell Brand bills himself as a critical thinker who will always tell us the real unvarnished truth. He is not a left winger. He is not a right winger. He just follows empiricism and facts. And those processes he now wants us to believe have led him to getting himself baptized as

a, I think, 40 something year old guy. Okay. And to voting for Donald Trump. If you believe in democracy in his latest direct to camera video, former actor Russell Brand, now podcast host, maybe sometimes comedian. I'm not sure. He says that if you really care about democracy, Trump is the person you would support. And of course, the fact that he tried to become president despite losing would seemingly directly contradict that claim. But let's not get ahead of ourselves. Here is what Russell Brand has

as a message to the voting public of the United States of America. What I feel now is that if you really care about democracy, you'd be better off supporting Trump than the neoliberal establishment, because I think they have much deeper, far more insidious ties to globalism, to the war machine, to authoritarian and manipulative media are more likely to deploy the judiciary, even than their arch nemesis, Donald Trump. But it's not up to me to decide, is it? I'm an English person. I don't vote in your country. It's up to you to decide. It's up to you to like and to subscribe and to support our channel so that we can continue to tell you the truth as best as we understand it. So the Donald Trump verdict, guilty, it's a greater indictment on the American judiciary than on the man himself, because we know that were it a different person, there would have been a different result. And we know that the primary motivation, and this is clear even from the celebrations of his detractors

and opponents, is not about bringing about justice. It's about bringing down a political opponent. The guy who says that he will tell us the unvarnished truth says that if you support democracy, it is Trump you should vote for because Biden is weaponizing the justice system against him. Now, I'm actually surprised that they're continuing to go with this line of how Biden is weaponizing the DOJ, because, yes, the DOJ has made the independent decision to indict and prosecute Donald Trump. But it has also made the independent decision to prosecute Hunter Biden and to prosecute Democratic Senator Bob Menendez and to investigate Cori Bush for campaign finance, something or other, and to go after Democratic

Congressman Henry Cuellar. So if the point of the Biden DOJ is that Biden is directing it to go and to say, go after this person and that person because they're my political enemies, it seems that mostly they are going after his political allies and Joe Biden's own family. So that argument is undercut very significantly. But there is a bit of. Don't believe what your eyes tell you. Don't believe what your ears are hearing going on here with the the candidate that supports

democracy is Trump. Trump has been hostile to a free and independent press since he even announced he was running in the 2016 election back in 2015. He doesn't like real hard interviews with serious questions. He talks about shutting down media outlets that he doesn't like. They took Jim Acosta's press pass for a while because he didn't like Jim Acosta's questions. There's all these other ways, smaller ways in which Trump has been hostile to democracy. He should be able to control the justice system. He should be immune and blah, blah, blah.

But how can you say that the guy who lost but still thought he should be president is the guy that is the pro democracy candidate? How can you say that the guy that waxes poetic about global dictators like Kim Jong Un and Putin and Duterte and she and Assad and actually maybe Assad. Maybe it's not Assad. I don't actually don't remember whether he's talked positively about Assad, but or Bon and others.

How can that be the guy who is for democracy while he alienated many of our actual Western Democratic allies while he was president? So this is another case of Russell Brand going with the the opposite is true. I'm going to tell you the opposite and you have to believe it and you have to like it. Don't fall for it. And by the way, I don't know why anyone's listening to Russell Brand anyway, given his long track record of pseudoscience and lies and deception or whatever. But if you saw past all that and you believe he's telling you some kind of unvarnished truth, at least with regard to politics, it is nonsense that the pro-democracy candidate here is Trump.

You might vote for Trump because you don't care about democracy, right? Just be upfront about that. There are Trump supporters who have said, I would rather dictator Trump than a democratically elected Biden. All right. I think that they're horribly misguided, but at least they're being honest. Be honest with yourselves. Maybe you don't really want democracy. You just want Trump instead. It's a possibility. It's important to me that any supplement I take is of the highest quality and freshness,

and that's why I've been turning to AG1 for years. Unlike other vitamin brands, AG1 conducts relentless testing for purity and potency. It's tested for nine hundred and fifty contaminants and banned substances, while the industry standard is usually to test for only 10. AG1 is NSF certified for sport, one of the most rigorous, independent quality and safety certifications out there. And the whole reason I drink AG1 is it just is simple. It simplifies everything. It's a scoop a day. I get my vitamins and my minerals and that's all I need. And the probiotics in AG1 are something I'm particularly glad is there. So AG1 just replaces the vitamin bottles, the digestive aids, all of the things that you might otherwise be taking individually. The David Pakman Show David Pakman dot com. Plus five free AG one travel packs. That's drink AG.

The number one dot com slash Pacman. The link is in the podcast notes. All right, let's get to Friday feedback for the week. You write to me. I read some of your emails, messages, comments, YouTube replies, whatever. Respond. And then we discuss. You can always email info at David Pakman dot com

if you have something to say. But comments on any of the platforms where we publish our videos might end up on Friday. Feedback. We start today with Ryan Carthan, who said Trump 2024. Let's go. Are you going to move out of the country after he Trump wins. L.O.L. You people are crazy. You know, the entire like, why are you going to move out people? It always has struck me as kind of interesting because, first of all, you often hear these right wingers, number one, laugh about left wingers who say, oh, this makes me want to leave the country. But also sometimes they themselves will say, I'm going to leave the country if my candidate doesn't win without acknowledging, number one, that most of the places they probably want to go to, it's not that easy to move to. And secondly, the places they would need to go to to find the true right wing

authoritarian government they want are not the sorts of countries they would likely want to live in. And many of them are overtly Islamic countries that I can't imagine they would actually enjoy living in to find the equivalent of what they want in these authoritarian, theocratic type regimes. So listen, the reality is people in the bluest of blue states have a standard of living that is similar to countries in northern Europe. If you look at the HDI Human Development Index by state, what you find is that states like Maryland, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, liberal states, they have standards of living that are similar to Norway and Denmark and Sweden, et cetera. So the sick reality is that it's the people in the red states that will really be hurt more. I don't want to diminish what happens in blue states, but it's the red staters that are really going to suffer

if there is a Trump presidency. Ghost wrote Democrats think they are entitled to our vote. They think they can sit there and do whatever they want. And we are supposed to vote blue no matter who. That's just insane. And it's why we're in this situation in the first place. They've done nothing to earn anyone's vote. Democrats will lose and they will have no one to blame but themselves. Yeah. You know, this there's this thing where, like Trump recently blamed Republican voters for something and there's this back and forth like, should elected officials blame themselves or should they blame voters or should they blame the opposition voters?

Who is to blame? I reject the notion of anybody, at least on this show, doing vote blue no matter who. I don't think that that's something I have ever even alluded to every election. I evaluate the choices. And when I look at Trump and Biden, RFK, I don't even remember whether Marianne Williamson is running at this point. Jill Stein, Cornel West. If I just zoom out and go, OK, who do I think here has the experience that's necessary? The positions I like. The shot at winning consensus building ability. What if I just look at everything together? Biden's my preference along those lines, and so I'm going to vote Biden. Where is the vote blue no matter who? And then for people who are writing to me saying, hey,

I'm unsure how I'm going to vote. I say to them, well, what matters to you? What are your principles? Which candidate is closest to that? What is the effect of your vote for one or the other or the other? I'm not hearing any vote blue, no matter whose stuff. I'm just not hearing it. If you are, then by all means, let me know, because I want to see examples of that. OK, here's another idea from the subreddit for Joe Biden from a bossy 81 who says next move politically psychedelics. David has was asked what Biden's next move will be. I believe Biden should start to make a lot of noise regarding healing veterans through guided psychedelic therapy. It's a bipartisan issue, but in rural USA is where one finds the most

veterans that need help. These therapies are being developed by companies like and name some companies. Not only do these treatments assist in PTSD, they are also evidence to be helpful in treating addiction, anxiety and such. So two reasons why I don't believe Biden is going to go after this. Number one, it is not nearly as popular compared to cannabis decriminalization, legalization. And number two, there is a bit of a scandal right now within the psychedelics for treatment world where there are allegations that some of the clinical trial results were falsified and we covered it on the bonus show. It is still being investigated.

It is still being explored. I can't imagine that it makes sense for Joe Biden to stick his finger into this at a time when, again, it's allegedly it's still being investigated when allegedly there were falsifications that took place with regard to some of the efficacy of some of those interventions. So need more information legally. I'm for it. Medically, we're still gathering data. This is this is a depressing one. Someone canceled their membership to the show, which is fine. OK, I mean, listen, that's how we make. Oh, you want to make money.

That's how we make money. But it's fine for people to cancel. But the reason here doesn't make sense. This is attack comes 50 to 20 on the subreddit. I am canceling my subscription to The David Pakman Show. The refusal of people on this subreddit to call out left wing shows for their obvious biased coverage of Russia seeking ways to blame Ukraine for this war taking place and siding with the GOP preventing Ukraine from getting military aid has me disgusted.

I made a post here calling out the young Turks on their garbage coverage of Russia, Ukraine, and my post got deleted because I couldn't find a recording of a snippet from a stream in 2022...... . . . . . .

. . . . . . . .

. . . . . ..... league players as incels. This was upvoted and the moderator had no issue. I don't want to be part of this toxic community. I do like David Pakman. I think he is the last and only genuinely non-biased neutral person willing to call it as it is. But I simply cannot be giving my money to

support the community he attracts. I've canceled my subscription to Sam Seder already due to his coverage of the Ukraine war. It pains me to do this to David. But the thought that I'm supporting this type of community horrifies me. Listen, it's it's Reddit, OK? This would be like saying, hey, I'm not going to in 2020. Do you remember all the crazy stuff happening on Twitter related to Bernie? And it would be like, hold on, OK, I like Bernie. I like his policies. I'm going to donate to Bernie. No, I'm not going to donate to Bernie because of what's being said by random people on Twitter and on Reddit about Bernie. It doesn't make any sense. So listen, it bums me out. I hate to see it. I wish people wouldn't cancel because of what random people on the subreddit are saying. But it is what it is. It is what it is. You go to air with the audience you have.

And that's that's what we're doing today. OK, fun comparison asks, is anyone else worried about the street flooding from all the Maga tears? I think we're going to need an umbrella to overcome the Maga tears being made from them today after dear leader became a convicted felon. Yeah. You know, they already seem to be over the mega people that were sobbing about Trump's conviction. They've already moved on to it was rigged. It's meaningless. I'm voting for him anyway. It was Biden who went after him. They already seem to have gotten over it and they are they are no longer they are no longer crying. We put a poll up on our community tab on the YouTube channel asking what you believe the effect of the presidential debates will be.

A hundred and twenty nine thousand of you voted. Fifty two percent of you believe that the debates will help Biden and hurt Trump. That's a majority. Fifteen percent believe that the debate will debates will help Trump and hurt Biden. Eighteen percent believe that it will hurt both candidates by depressing turnout, I guess by just making people depressed about who the candidates are. And 15 percent of you believe that the debates will have no effect whatsoever. Very interesting numbers, I must say. And we got in. There was a post about the debate on the subreddit from Tripwire who says, is the microphone thing really meaningful in a. And what they're referring to is that when the candidates time is up during the debates, their mic will be muted and they go on to

write in a broadcast context. The function of mics is to deliver audio to the electronic audience. They're not used for in-studio amplification. Trump's game of interrupting and keeping his opponent off balance may may not be much changed by the mic cut rule. So as long as he and Biden are in the same physical space, the Mike cut assures only that Trump won't be well heard by the audience. His shouting will be heard by Biden and his voice might get into Biden's mic. Yeah. You know, I'm mixed about the cutting of mics automatically when the time is up for the speakers during the debates. And part of it has to do with how far

apart they are on the stage. This this person is absolutely correct that if they're standing close to each other, if you cut Trump's mic and he keeps yelling, Biden's mic might actually pick it up and it will distract Biden. And so Biden could end up distracted. You'll kind of still hear Trump talking, but you might not clearly be able to say the triggered things that he is saying. In that context, I'd rather hear Trump. I'd rather just hear what he says and say, hey, this guy won't stop interrupting. That might hurt him.

On the other hand, if by muting his mic. They are far enough apart that it won't be distracting to Biden, that it won't be picked up by Biden's microphone and Biden can just address the camera, the moderator, that it won't be distracting to Biden, that it won't be picked up by Biden's microphone and Biden can just address the camera, the moderator, and it angers Trump, then maybe it is a good tool. So I don't know. I'm mixed about to be totally honest. I'm mixed about the cutting of mics.

All right. And then Richard Lowther says anybody voting blue is in a cult. How else can you explain wanting high crime taxes, inflation, transgender gone crazy? No, thanks. I'll stay with Trump. Classic example. This is bonkers stuff. You can't talk this person out of these beliefs, I don't believe we the way we fight people like Richard Lowther is we just have to find two people who already agree with us and make sure that they decide to vote. That's the way forward. I don't think at least not in the months between now and the election. I don't think we change this guy's mind. If you're this far gone, if you disagree

with me, let me know. Info at David Pakman dot com. Let me know your thoughts on anything covered in the show or not covered that you want covered. We've got a great bonus show coming up for you today. Sign up at join Pacman dot com to get instant access.