The David Pakman Show - BONUS SHOW: Walmart boycott, David Hogg exits DNC, Rand Paul uninvited to picnic

Episode Date: June 14, 2025

-- On the Bonus Show: MAGA boycotts Walmart over “No Kings” ad, David Hogg quits the DNC amid backlash, and Rand Paul whines about losing respect for Trump after being uninvited to a picnic, much more... -- Become a Member: https://www.davidpakman.com/membership  Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/davidpakmanshow Buy David's book: https://davidpakman.com/book  Book David Pakman: https://www.cameo.com/davidpakman 

Hey, everybody, David here. What you're about to hear is an episode of The Bonus Show. We do a bonus show every day for our members and for a limited time. We will release one of the week's bonus shows on Saturdays exclusively for our audio podcast listeners. If you'd like to get access to all of the bonus shows, simply sign up at Join Pakman dot com. Here is that bonus show episode. shows. this weekend's no king's protests. We are now seeing some Trump supporters call for a boycott of Wal-Mart after Christie Walton, the billionaire Wal-Mart heiress, paid for a full page ad in The New York Times promoting the protests. These are the protests that coincide with Donald Trump's military parade. And there was a very quick backlash from some.

Carrie Lake and other influencers said Walmart is now supporting anti Trump activism. Doesn't really seem to be true. Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna said that the reason Walmart is doing this, even though Walmart isn't doing anything, it's it's Christie Walton. The reason that this is happening is because Walmart doesn't like Trump's tariffs. So they're trying to screw him in that way. Trump aligned social media users said that this is a revolution against the American people.

Wal-Mart made clear we have nothing to do with this. This is Christie Walton. She's not involved in the company's leadership in any way. Yes. Familiar stockholder, but not involved in the company. So this is interesting because there's a culture war dynamic, which I know is obvious to our audience, which is I think, you know, there are Walmarts everywhere and there are Democrats who shop at Walmart.

The other day, I had no choice based on the time of day and rapidity with which I needed baby wipes for my daughter. I got a Walmart. OK, but I think on balance. It's more common that where Walmart is the only option, it's in red states, right, in blue states, especially the more densely populated ones. There's usually a target nearby and some local stores and supermarkets. And OK, so there's kind of like an implicit culture war dynamic where it's the people who most frequent Wal-Mart seem to be those from which the angry people are coming.

And I don't know what that means or what it suggests. Well, in a lot of these rural areas and suburban areas across the country, you'd be hard pressed to pull off a successful boycott of Wal-Mart because you would still have to buy your goods from somewhere. I suppose you could buy everything online and that would be an alternative for you, but it wouldn't be as easy as protesting say Bud Light or Nike, which conservatives have done in the past. If you want to boycott Bud Light, you can go buy Miller Lite or Coors Lite. If you want to boycott Nike, well, there's still Adidas or even Adidas. But when it comes to Walmart and so many of these areas across

the country, there really just is no alternative. And we've seen Walmart grow tremendously over the past few decades, especially and wipe out these smaller businesses. It's really a problem in and of itself. But the result at this point is that the only option is Walmart. So it's not going to be an easy boycott if they decide to call for it. But ultimately, I don't think that they're going to call for it. I think this also exposes the fragility of the Trump coalition, where, you know, you get minor dissent from an elite like a Walton and it's a betrayal and it's labeled a PR stunt. She's accused of being a left wing billionaire. To me, it just screams insecurity, even though we're supposed to believe that these are the toughest people around.

Well, also, she's just one of the heiresses. She has three siblings in law who I'm sure have very different politics, who are more in tune with the day to day of the company. So to blame Wal-Mart for the opinions of just one of the heiresses to me doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense. Like you should be able to express your opinion and say that you disagree with Christie Walton on this, but to call for a boycott of the company when so many other people are involved and she's not even really involved in the day to day, it doesn't seem to add up, doesn't seem to

make sense. No, it doesn't to some degree. And there's also the aspect of this where authoritarians want to project the idea that they are so feared, respected, whatever, reviled, that no one would dare. Confront or oppose in some way, something like their big military parade. And for Christie Walton to just go, I'll get a full page out of the New York Times. It sort of undercuts the idea that he needs to be respected or feared or bad things will happen. That's definitely true. But so many of this country,

so many people don't support what Trump is doing. They don't support the ice raids. They don't support the military parade. We're still very much a divided country on this. So they try to come down with these authoritarian decrees and these conservatives try to call for boycotts here and there. But at the end of the day, you're going after so many different people. If you try to boycott everything, because there are so many businesses who are not in line with what Trump is doing, there are so many people who are not in line with what Trump is doing. It really becomes unsustainable. You can't boycott everything.

And singling out Walmart to me in particular doesn't seem to make any sense because again, the connection between Christie Walton in and Wal-Mart. Yes, she is an heiress to the fortune, but because she doesn't represent the company directly, it just doesn't seem like it's a close enough tie to be able to go after Wal-Mart over her over her comments. Hey, listen to this. David Hogg, who we recently interviewed on the show, he had been elected a vice chair.

It's it's important to say a vice chair, not the vice chair, a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee. He's announced that he's going to step down. Now it's clear he has been pushed out. He has been pushed out. There was an internal party vote to redo the February vice chair election in which he won. And I think he correctly interpreted that as an effort to remove him. It's likely that he would have been removed when that if that election had been redone.

So he says that he is stepping down. He, I mean, listen, what he was doing was polarizing. We interviewed him on the show. Um, he, my opinion, having spoken to him on the show was he's not being haphazard here. He told me, Pat, I understand that going, for example, if it were Joe Manchin, but it's not, but going and trying to defeat a Joe Manchin so that a Republican will win and then Democrats lose a seat. That's stupid.

That doesn't make any sense. And David Hogg said to us during the interview, that's not what I'm trying to do. There are specific stale corporate centrist Democrats who I think are vulnerable where primaring them doesn't mean Democrats lose the seat. That's what he's doing. So on that he did seem like he wasn't doing it irresponsibly. I also, because I see the democratic National Committee as nothing more than a corporate entity that seeks to justify its own existence and to maintain a grip on power.

Of course they're not going to like someone coming in and saying, Hey, I'm going to not respect Democrats in power and I'm going to do something the DNC doesn't typically do, which is try to push out certain Democrats that are in power. So it, I think that his motivations as far as my conversation with him, were what he said they are. I don't think there was subterfuge. And I also understand why the DNC doesn't want it. Yeah, I understand it, too, because I support what David Hogg is doing.

I support what his group leaders we deserve is doing. I think we do need more progressive representation. I think we do need younger representation. I don't like how there are so many politicians who stay in office for 20, 30, 40 years when we could have other people entering the fold. So it makes sense that David Hogg was taking this approach and that a lot of people got behind him with the approach. But the issue is that as a vice chair of the DNC, he's supposed to remain neutral.

He's not supposed to get involved in favoring specific candidates over other candidates. There are going to be a whole bunch of incumbent Democrats who feel like the DNC is no longer supporting them when they're supposed to be supporting them because they're in the same party after all. So I think that David Hogg can still continue doing his good work and we can still support him. He doesn't have to be a member, a leading member of the DNC in order to do that work. And maybe this is just ultimately a better fit for everyone.

And it does signal the kind of generational rift inside the Democratic Party. Twenty five year old rising activist sees primary challenges as a really legitimate path to achieve structural change. The establishment sees that very same idea as divisive, especially when the stakes are so high in Donald Trump's second term. And so it's not. I mean, listen, this is a fair disagreement. I'm with Pat's analysis of what we need.

It's not about ageism or pushing people out just based on age. It's that we do need some new ideas and demographically, we want to see the general population better represented in age is sort of one part of that. I have I don't envy Democrats in the position that they're in. And even when we interview Democrats on the show, they do have some ideas as to what needs to happen. But it's not like there's some brilliant and obvious plan destined for success. So I don't envy Democrats the position they're in right now.

Yeah, absolutely. Democrats really are not on the same page at this point. We haven't been on the same page at least since the election. And you can probably go back further than that. So we're definitely in a transition period where we're trying to calculate what the best moves are going forward. To me, that means that everything's up in the air and it creates this uncertainty. And that's exactly how we have a situation where David Hogg thought he was going to be

able to create change from within the Democratic Party. But because we're seeing these potential arguments about conflict of interest, maybe it is best that he just sticks with that leadership group that he's involved in. And hopefully he's able to do even better working with just that group than if he was also a member of the DNC. We will see what his future holds. But I think this is obviously not the last we're going to hear from David Hogg. Senator Rand Paul is in kind of a funny situation, even though I'll be honest, Pat, I don't really know the truth of what's going on.

Senator Rand Paul yesterday said that Trump uninvited him from the White House picnic. He said it's petty and immature. And of course, the implication is Rand Paul has been one of the few Republicans forcefully saying I don't like the looks of this big, beautiful bill. And next thing you know, he's uninvited. However, this morning, Donald Trump put out a troth saying, of course, Rand Paul is invited and sort of seeming to deny the entire thing. So I don't even really know the truth of the situation, Pat. What I can tell you is that this Senate coalition that Trump needs to pass this bill seems pretty fragile and they can't afford to lose more than three.

Well, I'll be honest, I didn't know about the update. I didn't know that Trump had said on Truth Social that Rand Paul is re-invited after. Well, let me read it. I'm sending the. Let me read it. What he the. Let me read it. What he posted was, OK, this was this morning. Of course, Senator Rand Paul and his beautiful wife and family are invited to the big White House party tonight.

He's the toughest vote in the history of the U.S. Senate. But why wouldn't he be? Besides, it gives me more time to get his vote on the great big, beautiful bill. One of the greatest and most important pieces of legislation. Blah, blah, blah. I look forward to seeing Rand. It's going to be a great party. He's kind of it seems like he's pretending it never happened.

Is this maybe a carrot stick approach where he was uninvited? That was the stick so that Rand Paul would get upset over the fact that he was the lone senator who wasn't invited to this thing. And then Trump is trying to bring him back within his good graces by offering him the carrot of saying, oh, you can come after all. But you know, you should really reconsider your vote on this big, beautiful bill. You're going to owe me something in return for being allowed to go to this event. That's exactly right.

And I think this is less about the picnic. Like, let's assume he wasn't uninvited or that he was re-invited or whatever. What is this really about? It's about power, loyalty and authoritarian reflexes. Rand Paul has been an irritating presence to Trump. And I think Trump recognizes, you know, I may actually need Rand's vote. And so even though Trump's instinct, his reflex is get this guy the hell out of here, he may actually be thinking, which Trump Trump rarely thinks longer term than just the next five

minutes. Trump may actually be thinking, I do kind of need him there because I probably will need his vote. Yeah, absolutely. If not on this, on something in the future. So I understand why Trump would backtrack on this, but it all just seems incredibly petty on both sides. It's petty to uninvite him if that's indeed what happened. It's also petty for Senator Rand Paul to go on this five minute rant about the topic like he did yesterday,

as if the American public cares about whether he gets invited to a picnic. He also was clutching his pearls talking about how he was so upset. Rand Paul was that his six month old grandson was one of the people who was uninvited to the party as if a six month old is going to have any idea what's going on and is going to be upset over the fact that they can't go to some events anymore. Like they have no idea what's going on. That's so funny. You know, my my girlfriend went to the White House and met Clinton in the 90s because her

grandmother was given the is which is the one that civilians get. Is it the president medal of I want to say freedom? Yeah. But is it the president? Is it presidential or presidential medal of freedom? Yeah. In any case, you know, she wasn't six months old. She barely has any memory of the entire thing.

But I will say, I will say the pictures do create interesting stories later. So I'm not going to fully dismiss. I know Grand Rand Paul's grandson wouldn't know what's going on right now, but it could be an interesting story and experience to have photographed for later on in life. So you're saying that Trump almost robbed Rand Paul's grandson of that experience. Yes. Why Rand Paul is so upset over it. Very much so. Very much so. Maybe even more upset over that than the time that Trump said that he has a bad hairdo, which was a pretty infamous moment during the 2016 presidential iconic moment.

Iconic moment. All right. So the no Kings protests this weekend. Pat, are you planning to attend? I think I am going to attend. Yes. Are you going to? Yeah, but as well.

I mean, this is a big event, historic occasion. I think we need people out there on the streets and I'm ready to give my support. Will you be bringing masks or weapons? No,. Will you be bringing masks or weapons? No, I will not be bringing masks or weapons. And if I was going to bring a mask or weapons, I certainly would not be disclosing that on this bonus show. And do you plan to get yourself arrested? No, I don't plan to get myself arrested.

But is that something that people are calling for, like mass civil unrest to the point where people are going to jail over civil obedience charges? No, no, I'm not hearing that at all. And Brian shots during the interview even said, we got to self-police. If you see people acting in that way, you got to say to them, hey, guys, what the hell are you doing? That's not what we're here for.

So if I see someone try to kick another person in the chest, I should break that up. OK, make sure that it doesn't escalate to the point where everyone's kicking each other in the chest and then everyone goes. That's my recommendation. That is what I would suggest you do. All right. So I'm going to try to make it out to the protests as well. Very, you know, you you start to get busy with toddler birthday parties at this point,

but I am going to try to take a break from toddler birthday parties to get out to some of the protests and we will we will see and report back. You could combine the events into one toddler birthday party at a protest. That would be there is an idea. That would be that would be a nice one. All right. We'll be back tomorrow. New show.

New bonus show. See you then.