The David Pakman Show - Texas collapse and health collapse in the same day
Episode Date: May 27, 2026-- On the Show: -- Donald Trump attacks James Talarico as a vegan and plans rallies for Ken Paxton while Republicans reveal growing fear about holding Texas -- A Texas Republican voter says Donald T...rump controls the Republican Party and refuses to support Ken Paxton in the general election -- Donald Trump declares “perfect” health after another medical exam, while the White House turns medical updates into a publicity campaign -- White House social media accounts flood the internet with energetic Trump photos as videos of him appearing asleep spread online -- Dr. Jonathan Reiner warns that Donald Trump’s repeated daytime sleeping and insomnia could signal serious health concerns -- Videos show Donald Trump swaying while saluting, fueling debate about age, fatigue, balance issues, or shoe lifts -- Jessica Tarlov criticizes Donald Trump’s Iran policy on Fox News and leaves the rest of the panel visibly speechless -- JD Vance stumbles through grammar comments and welfare claims during an awkward public appearance -- On the Bonus Show: Biden sues DOJ to stop audio release, California's public universities embrace AI, construction begins on the White House UFC cage for Trump's birthday party, and much more... 💳 PDS Debt: Get your free assessment & find the best option for you at https://pdsdebt.com/pakman 🤖 Sponsored by Venice: Use code PAKMAN for 20% off a Pro Account at https://venice.ai/pakman 🍓 Strawberry.me: Get a $50 credit when you sign up for coaching at https://strawberry.me/pakman 🧠 Try Brain.fm totally free for a month at https://brain.fm/pakman 🥄 Magic Spoon: Use code PAKMAN for $5 off at https://magicspoon.com/pakman 💻 Sponsored by Private Internet Access: 83% OFF + 4 months free at https://www.piavpn.com/DavidP -- Become a Member: https://davidpakman.com/membership -- Subscribe to our (FREE) Substack newsletter: https://davidpakman.substack.com -- Get David's Books: https://davidpakman.com/echo -- TDPS Subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow -- David on Bluesky: https://davidpakman.com/bluesky -- David on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow (00:00) Start (01:24) Paxton defeats Cornyn in Texas Senate runoff (12:19) Texas Republican turns on Trump (20:50) Trump claims perfect health another physical (27:57) Trump social media accounts flood the zone (35:28) Doctors warns about Trump's lack of sleep (43:32) Trump struggles to keep his balance (51:11) Fox News liberal silences the panel (58:27) JD Vance stumbles through speech Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Republicans are suddenly terrified that they could lose Texas.
Trump is jumping in.
Ken Paxton won his primary will face off against Tala Rico.
The best they've got against Tala Rico is he's vegan, even though he's not vegan.
And even if you were, who cares?
And then Donald Trump says he has a perfect bill of health.
He had his third annual physical in 13 months yesterday, came out of Walter Reed Hospital,
and says, it's all perfect when you are bragging about.
passing a physical, it starts to get a little bit weird. We will also hear from an actual
doctor weighing in on Trump's behavior, Trump's physical characteristics, his sleep cognition,
and why getting exams every what, four and a half months is a little bit strange. And then our
friend Jessica Tarlov silences her Fox News co-hosts whose brains are filled with mayonnaise during a
segment about Iran. And then J.D. Vance reminds everybody, he's usually not the sharpest guy in
the room, even when he's the only guy in the room. We'll have the videos. We'll discuss all of that
and more coming up today. If I have anything to say about it. Republicans are now panicking that
they could lose Texas and that Texas could send its first Democratic senator to Washington, D.C. in
decades, Trump losing it, they're attacking Tala Rico, but why? Well, last night was the runoff
for the Texas Republican primary. When they had the primaries some months ago, on the Democratic side,
James Talariko won. He won clearly. He won dominantly. On the Republican side, nobody got to
50%. The incumbent Senator James Cornyn, who's running for reelection, failed to get to 50% in a
multi-way race and the attorney general Ken Paxton, who's challenging Cornyn, failed to get to 50%.
So yesterday they had a little thing we call a runoff.
Trump waited, waited, waited until it was clear who was going to win and then said,
I endorse Ken Paxton.
And indeed, no surprise to anybody.
Ken Paxton did win.
And he won easily, basically by a two to one margin, if you can believe it.
Another, if you believe it, anti-Maga, I'm sorry, pro-Maga.
result, anti-ocational critics of MAGA result, where Ken Paxton secured about 64% of the vote
and John Cornyn secured 36% of the vote.
By a roughly 2 to 1 margin, the incumbent Republican senator is out and the challenger will now
face Tala Rico in November.
Donald Trump jumping out there with a truth social post, self-congratulatory of
course.
And he says, quote, congratulations to Ken Paxton on such a tremendous win and to John Cornyn for
having run a strong and powerful race.
And more importantly, having had a truly great career.
John will remain, my friend, for a long time to come as we both watch Ken become a fantastic
common sense senator, one who is respected by all.
His opponent, Alfred E. Newman, referring to Tala Rico, may be the worst Texas candidate I have
ever seen. A strong open borders advocate, he's weak on crime, believes there are six genders,
is insulting to Jesus Christ, will never support the military, was a big mask wearer until recently,
and is a vegan. That's how Trump used to pronounce it until someone corrected him, and is a
vegan who dislikes meat. Not exactly a good way to be if you're wanting to win an election
in Texas. Jasmine Crockett, a very low IQ individual who is no
relation to the legendary frontiersman Davy Crockett would have been a far better choice for the
Duma-Krats, Democrats. I will do some nice, big, beautiful rallies for Ken. Texas, this will be fun.
God bless America, President Donald J. Trump. I like that Trump goes, he's a vegan who dislikes
meat rather than a vegan who likes meat. By the way, Tala Rico is not vegan. He says he loves Texas
barbecue. I don't know why this vegan thing is really a big deal. But, but I'm not,
I want to explain why this is so huge for Donald Trump.
First of all, Trump likes to pick winners.
And what I mean by that is Trump likes to attach his name to people who are already likely
to win so that he doesn't have to do anything and so that he doesn't get embarrassed.
That's what he did with Paxton.
The issue if Paxton were to lose to Tala Rico is not only that it would be one of Trump's
picks losing.
That's bad enough for Donald Trump.
But it would be that it would, it would be a loss in.
Texas specifically, which hasn't had Democratic senators for decades. And so if it came to be,
and we will do what we can to make it come to be, if it came to be in November, that James
Talariko, the vaguen, um, destroys or even just defeats Ken Paxton, it will be terrible
for Trump in that he will have been part of a decade spanning loss for Republicans.
in Texas and they are very scared of that. Now, they are panicking on all fronts. Here's R&C Chair
Joe Gruders, who refers to the Democratic candidate as Talafrico and again brings up this whole
vegan thing. Because Tala Frico is a creep and he thinks he's a vegan. He thinks God is non-binary.
He wants to mutilate children. He wants to put boys and girls locker rooms. People are done with that.
That's if you looked at the autopsy of the Democrats put out, it's simple.
All those things and the fact that they are openly supporting communists and socialist.
People don't want the United States Senate.
Certainly the voters in Texas don't want that.
We think Paxton will win.
We'll think it's, we think it's a red seat.
Hands down, we're not going to have any issues heading into November.
We're happy with Paxton and we're going to do everything we can to make sure he's successful.
Tala Freeco the vegan.
Man, that is not sounding very policy-based to me.
guys, I don't think so. And so the fact that they're immediately assailing the calendar,
a character, the calendar, they don't like his calendar. It's too busy. They're assailing the character
of James Talariko. They're going after things like he's vegan. And Trump plans to do rallies.
All of that together signals major concern. Now, as far as Ken Paxton is concerned, an interesting
little detail. This is an article from last year from the New York Times. Ken Paxton claimed three houses
as his primary residence records show, he could have secured favorable mortgage rates and may have
violated the law if he knowingly falsified loan documents.
Now, what's funny about that is that this is way worse than what Trump wants Adam Schiff thrown
in jail for.
And there, you may or may not recall Trump is targeting Senator Adam Schiff over essentially
the same thing.
And I don't want to make this show only about mortgages because it's, you know, it should be about bonds,
not mortgages, if it's going to be about a financial instrument.
But there's this thing with mortgages where there's a lot of programs to get favorable
rates when you are getting a mortgage for your primary residence.
If you go to the bank and you say, hey, I want to buy this house and live in it, you get one set
of rates.
If you go to the bank and say, I want to buy this house, not live in it and rent it out or
it's a vacation home.
It's a second property.
Usually the mortgage rates aren't as favorable.
And what Trump wants Schiff investigated for is that Schiff got one mortgage on the basis that it would be his primary residence.
And then years later, he got a different mortgage on the basis that it would be his primary residence.
Now, as I've explained before, there's not necessarily anything wrong with that.
If he's lying at any point, that would be a problem.
But it is common that people go, I'm buying a house.
It's my primary residence.
Give me those rates.
Cool.
And then they say, I'm going to buy a different house.
They might be selling the first house.
So the new one will become their primary residence.
Or they might be keeping the first house and saying this, I'm going to primarily live somewhere
else.
All of that is completely legal.
Your first mortgage might require that you call and say, hey, I'm, this will no longer
be my primary residence.
The mortgage may be subject to a rate revision or not.
But the question is, do you intend it to be your primary residence at the time that you close
on it?
And if the answer is yes, does not a problem.
said when shifted that it's a crime, absent any evidence, Paxton's accused of doing the same thing
three times. So if we care about this mortgage provision, which is so pedantic and anodyne,
but Trump claims to, why don't you care about it when it's a Republican? We all know the answer.
Now, Ken Paxton is coming out swinging and saying that Tala Rico is a threat to our way of life.
And finally, he's a threat to our very way of life and our values. I mean, he's a threat to our very way of life
and our values. I mean, he's a vegan who thinks God is non-binary and that there's actually six
biological sexes. Big, strong Republicans are threatened by a vegan. Remember, he's not a vegan.
But is it alpha to be threatened by a vegan or veganism? I got to tell you, I've been out to eat
with plenty of vegans in my day. I have never felt threatened in any way when they say, could I get an
impossible burger patty on my burger instead of a beef patty and I go, what are we doing after
dinner? That's it. It's not threatening in any way. It was fine, but they are very scared. They're
scared of veganism. They're scared of all of it. Check out the impossible promises, by the way,
that Ken Paxton made last night. Listen to what he's going to be able to do, supposedly.
But I truly believe that together, not only will we win this race, but we can ensure that
America's best days are ahead of us.
You see, I'm not just running against the Democrats.
I'm running to deliver for you just as I have as Attorney General.
You can tell he really means it.
I'm running to lower your cost of living because you deserve to be able to buy a home,
afford groceries, and have a high quality of health care without being forced to stay up
at night, worrying about how you're going to pay your monthly premium or pay off your debt.
How is he going to achieve that? He's going to lower cost of living and allow you to buy a home.
a home, groceries, and pay for healthcare with zero concern for what the health care costs or
for the fact that you might have to go into debt.
Those are some big promises, I have to tell you.
And I struggle to think about how they're going to do that.
Maybe the funniest moment of the night, Texas Republican Congressman Brandon Gill says,
thanks to this victory for Ken Paxton, they are going to take their country back.
Now, think about that for a moment.
No back, aren't we?
And you know what that means?
That means that we are finally going to take our country back, aren't we?
So Texas has had Republican senators for decades.
Republicans right now control the White House, the House, and the Senate.
How would a Republican replacing another Republican in the Senate when they already control
everything be taking back the country?
It's a reminder that these bullet points are persistent.
It doesn't matter whether they're in or out of power.
We need to make America great again.
Well, you're in power.
Why didn't you do it?
Now, we're going to make America great again.
We're going to take our country back.
You control everything.
Who are you going to take it back from?
No, we're going to.
It's these victimhood grievance politics, scapegoats.
You must have scapegoats.
These are always in place with this authoritarian version.
of the Republican Party, even if they're in power, someone else is hurting us and we need to stop that.
We have incredible video of a Texas Republican voter saying, hell no, I am not voting for the person
Trump endorsed.
Now, we already know that Ken Paxton won his primary last night.
Senator John Cornyn will be removed from the Senate at the end of his term.
the next senator in that seat will be either the Republican nominee, Ken Paxton, Attorney General,
or Democratic candidate James Talariko.
Amanu Raju from CNN was at a polling place in Texas yesterday, and he caught up with a Republican voter.
And they had a very interesting conversation.
Take a listen to this.
Who did you vote for?
Cornyn.
Why'd you vote for coronet?
Because Trump did not endorse him.
That was a big fact.
It makes me sick that the Republican Party is completely controlled by one man.
Trump.
If Paxton wins a nomination, could you vote for him in the general election?
Hell no.
Hell no.
So a couple takeaways here.
First, if our number, we've really got a level set.
Our number one priority has to be not feeling good about clips on the internet,
but getting power back.
You get power back by winning seats and there's an opportunity here.
So like the big takeaway from this Republican going, I want to,
I wanted to do the opposite of what Trump endorsed. And in the general election, even as a Republican
primary voter, I'm not voting for Paxton. Cool. That points to huge opportunity for Tala Rico to win in
Texas. First would be the first Democratic senator from Texas in decades. We have a tangible goal now
of making that happen. There will be phone banking opportunities, door knocking
opportunities, the opportunity to donate. There's going to be all of it. So we're going to get
to that. That's the most important takeaway. And it remind it should remind us and them on the on the
Republican side. It's dangerous to turn your political party into a personality cult because it could
work for a while. But eventually some voters are going to stop feeling represented and they're going
to start feeling controlled. That's what happens with cult leaders. It feels as though they get you.
They represent you, et cetera.
But they are starting to feel controlled by Trump rather than represented.
And so for me, the key line isn't, I won't vote for Paxton, although that's very important
electorally.
It's it makes me sick that the Republican Party is controlled by one man.
That's the deeper dissatisfaction with the status quo of this Republican Party.
And what this does to Trump's endorsement power is totally destroy it.
It used to be that Trump's endorsement was almost like a superpower.
He really was raising up all of these new MAGA candidates, people who had no business being
in elected office, Marjorie Taylor Green and who the hell knows who else.
It's now becoming a liability.
There are there are Republican, not Democrats in Connecticut.
There are Republicans in Texas who here Trump endorsed this person.
I'll vote for the other one.
And if the Trump endorsie wins, then I'm not going to vote for them in the
the general. That's a disaster if you're the Republican Party. And this is the sort of difference
between the Republicans that genuinely love Trump, the people that leave me, uh, the comments about
how Trump's the best thing that ever happened to anybody and Trump invented sliced bread. And
Trump brought back the avocado from a bad reputation. He's achieved everything. And then you got
the Republicans who tolerated Trump. They were like, listen, I don't like Hillary. I don't like Biden.
I don't like Harris. I have fallen for the idea that Trump's conservative.
even though he's just an authoritarian nut.
That second group is very clearly fraying.
And this Republican voter that Manu Raju spoke to is a perfect example of that.
And listen, I don't want to assume too much about this guy.
This was Austin, Texas.
I can see the guy looks white.
And like me, he might be Hispanic white.
I don't know anything about him.
So I'm inferring some things.
But this guy is maybe in the ballpark of the prototypical suburban, colise.
educated, higher turnout Republican that goes and votes in the primaries and, right?
This is the sort of voter that Democrats need to crack Texas.
And I think if I'm if I'm honest and I always am with you, Texas is probably still leaning
Republican in this race nationally, statewide is what I mean.
If you look at the polling and the betting markets, it still looks better for.
Paxton, but not that much better. And we've got six, five and a half months until the election.
And the way that they're campaigning, the fact that Trump's going to be out campaigning and doing
rallies, they know this race could get very uncomfortable. And the more Republicans are framing
these elections as tests of loyalty to Trump, as Trump's approval goes lower, lower, lower,
the better the opportunity is to put a Democrat back in the Senate representing the state of
Texas. So we're going to do everything we can. I believe these are the most consequential
primaries I've ever been a part of. On June 9th, in order to fund another year of this show,
we are different than a lot of independent media shows. A lot of independent media shows rely on
contractors who get no benefits and get hourly wages and irregular work. I've decided we have
employees. They are real employees. They get benefits. They only work for this show.
They're not freelancing for a bunch of different shows.
That costs money.
And we are doing an important one day membership drive on June 9th to bolster the show and
to really secure the next year and beyond of independent media.
So if you'd like to be part of that, huge discount on annual memberships on June 9th,
just get on my substack newsletter at David packman.com slash substack.
And on the ninth, you'll get an email telling you what the deal is with this big discount
code.
The frustrating part about debt is that even if you're doing everything right, the system
is stacked against you.
Interest compounds, the fees pile up.
And you end up paying just to stay in the exact same place while the bank collects.
That's why I want to talk to you about PDS debt, which works with people dealing
with unsecured debt.
That means credit cards, personal loans, medical bills.
There's no one-size-fits-all approach.
They will evaluate your specific situation and make a plan that works for you.
There is no minimum credit score required.
PDS debt is A-plus rated by the Better Business Bureau.
They have thousands of five-star reviews and have already helped hundreds of thousands of people
get out of debt.
Every month you wait costs you more in interest and fees.
Don't wait another month.
Take back control in 30 seconds.
Get your free personalized assessment at PDSdebt.com.
slash Pacman. The link is in the description. Think of how much personal information you put into your
favorite AI chat bot. They track everything you say on the app. Many of them sell the data
to add companies and they use your personal info to train the AI so your personal life lives
inside the chat bot forever. Creepy stuff, which is why I recommend Venice. It's sort of like a VPN
for AI.
Our sponsor, Venice, gives you access to all the best and latest language models, chat
GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grock, deep seek, as well as leading image, video, and music generation
models all in one place, but you can use them privately and anonymously.
And it's completely uncensored.
On Venice, you can ask the AI for anything and it won't say no.
Nothing is tied to your identity because your prompts are encrypted.
They never even leave your device.
so no corporation or government can spy on you and those conversations.
Access the world's leading AI models privately.
You'll get 20% off any plan when you go to venice.a.i slash Pacman and use the code Pacman.
The link is in the description.
Donald Trump had his third annual physical in 13 months yesterday.
I know.
No one believes this crap.
Trust me.
I know. And of course, the results are that everything is perfect and he did so well. And he can keep
being president in case anybody was worried about that. Donald Trump posting about this to truth
social where he says, quote, just finished my six month physical. Now, we're going to, I'm going to get back
to that. Just finished my six month physical at Walter Reed military medical center. Everything checked out
perfectly. Thank you to the great doctors and staff heading back to the White House, President
Donald J. Trump. Now, we know there are untrue things here. It's not perfect when your ankles
are swollen to the size of tree trunks and your hands are so bruised that you need makeup and bandages
to cover it. And the reasons for why your hands are so bruised is never proper.
explained. We know that everything isn't perfect just by looking at Donald Trump and seeing
how often he falls asleep in public and how he walks unsteadily and all of it. So by definition,
we know that he's lying by saying everything's perfect. Now, may he be doing as expected for his
age and wait? All right. Well, but that's not that doesn't make him sound as hot as he wants to
sound. But there's another another interesting little thing that he slips in.
Trump says just finished my six month physical.
This is the first time we've ever heard of this.
Always before it's Trump will be having his annual workup, his annual physical.
And then when he had two of these in less than a year, it was like, okay, that's sounding
a little strange.
Now we're at three of these in 13 months.
So what is Trump doing?
He's retroactively going, I do my six month physicals.
Even then it's weird because if you do them every six months, you'd expect to have three
in 18 months.
Trump's had three in 13 months.
But this is just something that legacy in corporate media isn't even touching.
The fact that with six month physicals, what do you mean?
These were annual.
Why is he going 13, three times and 13 months?
Well, now he's making it a little less bad, I guess, by saying that it's his six month
physical.
The White House then activating around it, screenshoting Trump's truth social post and posting
to Twitter, perfect bill of health.
Now, I want you to forget for a moment.
Put aside for a second whether we believe the the substance, perfect bill of health.
I don't believe it.
And I've already told you why.
Put that aside just for a second.
The weirdest part is the PR campaign around an annual physical.
Normal, healthy people don't usually need celebratory graphics announcing that they pass the physical.
It's just like you just go and you come out and that's kind of it.
You know, perfect bill of health.
that creates more suspicion because it feels theatrical.
It feels very defensive.
Why are you even posting about this?
Why are you officially signal boosting Trump saying he had a great physical?
And the reason is that we have some of the facts.
They're hiding a lot of the facts, but we have some of the facts.
Multiple major medical evaluations every four and a half months, four and a third months, when
these were annual physicals.
And now Trump's calling them six month physicals.
That raises questions, whether you're in politics or not.
If someone told you, I've had three big workups in the last 13 months, you would go,
oh, why, that's not typical.
What, what's the reason for that?
And if they go, no, nothing just because the doctors are so impressed with me.
We would all go, what the hell are you talking about?
The doctors are so impressed.
They want you coming in every four and four and a third months.
That doesn't make any sense.
Of course it doesn't.
But we're supposed to believe it when it's the president.
So there's a difference between we are being transparent.
And this is propaganda.
What they're putting out is propaganda.
It's not transparency.
It's image management.
And they're doing this.
And I am going to show you the evidence in a moment.
They're doing this because the White House knows there is concern and suspicion about
Trump's health, stamina, alertness.
He's falling asleep all the time.
The cognitive condition.
I have new video of Trump unable to stand straight.
He's trying to salute and swaying back and forth on Memorial Day.
All of this stuff is visible.
And the more visible the decline becomes, the more aggressively they're insisting that everything
is perfect and fine, which only makes people who are paying attention go, this is not the way
you talk about a guy who's firing on all cylinders.
It's overcompensation, to put it very simply.
And they feel a vulnerability.
And so they go maximalist in the opposite direction.
All caps, graphics, promotional language, best physical ever.
The irony of it.
I know where you know where I'm going with this and we'll deal with this more on Friday.
The irony of it is that Republicans spent years demanding transparency about Joe Biden's health
and his cognition and his medical condition.
And the broader issue is less about whether Trump is sick.
It's they aren't even living up to their standard for honest, normal, credible health information
about the most powerful person in the United States and one of the most powerful
powerful people in the world.
Most presidents release medical summaries.
They don't typically do social media victory lapse over a physical.
And perfect health about an obese 80 year old who looks visibly terrible and falls
asleep in public multiple times a week isn't really cutting it.
Now, Trump may be broadly functional, functional enough.
He may be healthy enough to last two more years as president.
He may not be.
But the propaganda language just weakens the credibility.
If they said, listen, Trump underwent a routine exam, he remains fit for duty and in good health
for his age and underlying health circumstances, I would go, that sounds about right.
That you're putting a positive spin, realistically positive spin on a guy who has some health
challenges.
There's also the kind of deeper phenomenon here, which I don't want to make the main topic
of the show where politics is operating like celebrity branding at the end of the day.
And that's part of why even a medical checkup, if that's what this was, becomes an image
management event of sorts.
But if you zoom all the way out from this, the greatest evidence that they know something
is wrong is the propaganda meltdown they had right after Trump left Walter Reed Hospital.
And that's what I want to talk about next.
The same Trump rapid response account that once went after your favorite podcaster,
me is now panicking and trying to do cleanup over the Trump health crisis.
Quite literally as Donald Trump was leaving Walter Reed Hospital from his third.
annual physical in 13 months, the rapid response account started putting out the following posts
on X. They put out a screenshot of Brianna Keeler clearly blinking. And they say, Brianna Keeler
says nap went perfectly after falling asleep live on air. Rumor is she also failed her cognitive
exam, unlike President Trump, whose was perfect. Then they put out a picture of Dana Bash. And they say,
Again, Dana Bash is looking down in this image.
Dana Bash falls asleep ahead of her 55th birthday next month.
What is going on?
Then they've got Jake Tapper clearly blinking.
Flashback, fake Tapper appears to doze off throughout his show.
And then they've got one of Dr. Jeremy Faust, who was commenting on Trump's medical exam.
He is clearly blinking.
And it says, is Dr. Jeremy Faust sundowning?
So a couple takeaways.
Number one, they are very aware of the concerns about Trump.
They know that doctors are saying, you know, Trump's worse at night.
Could it be sundowning?
They know that their defense of Trump as merely blinking isn't being bought by anybody.
And so what they want to do is make you think that just as easily as it looks like Trump
is sleeping, but he's really just blinking.
They can do the same thing with Dana Bebush.
or Jake Tapper or Brianna Keeler or the CNN guest.
But we're smart enough to know the difference.
We're smart enough to know that those CNN anchors genuinely were just blinking there and
they haven't fallen asleep on live TV.
But here is Trump.
And this is, I could have, I could show you one of 30 of these.
This is Trump actually asleep during a cabinet meeting.
He's not blinking.
From both Islamist ideology as well as.
and less terrorists, foreign terrorist organizations and those who seek to do harm to the American
people, many of whom were led in across our borders under the previous administration.
We are focused on these tasks and this imperative for the American people.
And just appreciate your leadership.
Mr. President.
Trump was out.
Trump is regularly out.
So two important stories here.
And I think it's important.
We don't want to overstate and we don't want to understand.
state. The fact that they are doing this doesn't mean necessarily that there is more wrong with
Trump than we know about, although we suspect there is. But it does the fact that they're doing
these propaganda things doesn't prove anything. But the fact that they're doing it does
confirm that they're worried about it. Because if this were a nothing narrative about Trump,
If they didn't realize, oh, a lot of people are worried about Trump's health, these videos
really don't look good.
They wouldn't be doing this.
They are suddenly very worried.
And of course, the timing is suspect as Donald Trump is quite literally driving back to the White
House from Walter Reed from his third annual physical in 13 months that they start publishing
this stuff.
Now, I think the miscalculation they're making is that nobody's going to fall for this crap.
It's very clear people.
One of the things that humans can do is recognize when basic bodily functions are happening
in other humans.
Is it possible to pretend to be asleep when you're not?
Yeah, you know, actors do it.
My toddler daughter has figured out sometimes it's funny to pretend to be asleep.
And sometimes they do it successfully.
And sometimes we go, I know you're not really sleeping.
But they are acting as though they can talk us out of believing that Trump is falling asleep
and that he's merely blinking.
He's deep in thought.
He's looking down.
This is how he processes information.
But we can tell when humans are sleeping.
We're pretty good at this.
This is something that's evolved over 250,000 years of modern humans.
And they're not going to trick us.
So the timing is very suspect.
They're worried.
They're panicked.
And they should be because this is looking worse and worse.
One of the most common career problems is not knowing how to make a change without blowing
up your life and everything you have going on.
A lot of people reach a point where they don't necessarily hate their job.
They want more direction, growth, or maybe confidence as far as what the next move is.
Even if on paper, everything is sort of okay, our sponsor, strawberry dot me, is.
is a career coaching platform built for this exact situation.
Success often does not happen on its own.
It takes clarity, strategy, execution, and most people who make meaningful progress are not doing
it all by themselves.
And that is where a coach at strawberry.me can really help.
A coach can help get you unstuck, uncover what you really want, identify obstacles that might
be holding you back, and really put together a practical step-by-step-step place.
plan for where you want to go.
Whether you are trying to grow in your current role, make a career change, turn a goal into
something real, having some outside perspective can make a really big difference.
So go to strawberry.me slash Pacman to find out if career coaching is right for you and get 50%
off your first session.
The link is in the description.
Some people assume focus is just about willpower.
if you've sat down to work and you're checking your phone, switching tabs in your browser,
getting pulled into distraction, you know it's not that simple. I want to tell you about our sponsor,
Brain FM. Brain FM is a music app designed to support focus. It's not the random
playlists or ambient videos that people often will put on. It's music built from the ground up
for cognitive performance. Brain.fm works with musicians.
and neuroscientists to create music that will interact with your brain's natural rhythms.
Their patented audio technology is designed to influence brain activity related to attention.
This is why Brain.fm is the only music app funded by the National Science Foundation.
The app includes a number of modes depending on what you're doing, deep work, creative motivation.
There's a dedicated ADHD mode for people whose brains may benefit from extra support.
There's also been peer-reviewed research published showing that their music increased activity
in attentional networks and also improved performance on attention-based tasks.
Try it yourself with 30 days free at brain.fm slash Pacman.
The link is in the description.
All right.
An actual doctor.
Not a commentator.
Not a chiropractor.
not a massage therapist, an actual physician went on CNN to address Donald Trump's third physical
in 13 months.
And I got to tell you, it's not good.
It's not good at all.
And this medical assessment was so concerning that Dr. Jonathan Reiner was immediately invited
back on to other shows to talk in more detail about what's going on.
So let's just play it.
Let's listen and then let's discuss.
I do want to see this, during this examination,
a credible explanation for his visible health concerns.
His bruising, which initially was described as due to his handshaking,
which is not credible.
His severe edema in his ankles,
which was described as chronic venous insufficiency,
when just three months before, one year ago,
his examination disclosed that he had no edema.
which would then make it acute chronic,
acute venous insufficiency,
which is an entirely different thing.
And finally, the president has severe daytime somalones.
He falls asleep very awful.
He's fallen asleep in the Oval Office on multiple occasions
with people talking to him in the cabinet room,
and was concerned yesterday that he might have fallen asleep
at Irwin to National Cemetery during Memorial Day Conservances.
And chronic insomnia is a severe illness.
it can result in an increase in the risk of dementia,
decrease in cognitive effects in older people.
It's equivalent to about increasing your age
by about three and a half years.
It increases your cardiac risk
of having a heart attack
or developing congestive heart failure.
And it can produce a decline in your sort of mental functions
like it can increase depression, anxiety.
So it's a real,
problem and the president appears to struggle to stay awake during the day. And I'd like to hear
what the White House has done to evaluate why the president has this increased daytime somnolence.
So listen, we didn't get any of those answers initially. And Dr. Reiner, an actual physician,
is laying it out, bruising with explanations that don't make sense, swollen ankles with
explanations that don't make sense, severe daytime daytime somnolence falling asleep in public all the time,
and chronic insomnia, Trump is known to when he sleeps well to sleep four to five hours a night.
And reportedly now, he's often getting two to three hours of sleep. That's all very bad.
So CNN brings Jonathan Reiner back on a little bit later in the day. And they want to dig more
deeply. And the more that Reiner weighs in on what we know and what we don't know, the worse
it seems about Donald Trump. So I want to zero in on something you said, which was excessive
daytime somnulence, which I'm assuming is the,
dozing off as we've the apparent dozing off I just want to be clear about what we've seen
because he has appeared to doze off in White House events and when asked about a December
cabinet meeting where the president's eyes were closed for a prolonged period of time
multiple times the press secretary maintained that Trump had been listening attentively
and running the entire three-hour marathon cabinet meeting talk to us about that I mean
I'm not a medical expert but when I'm thinking of
someone who's almost 80, I would think of a little dozing off here there to maybe be kind of normal.
Is that not normal?
Well, we've seen the president appear to rest his eyes when someone is talking directly to him.
And that is distinctly abnormal. It's unusual to be surrounded by people in the Oval Office and
you fall asleep. And you know who agrees with that? Trump. Trump made
this huge deal on the Andrew Schultz show and others going, this Biden, the situations he can fall
asleep in like he's at the beach. It's like, okay, the beach, a lot of people sleep at the beach.
Not that many people sleep in the Oval Office during meetings. We know the president is up late at
night using social media. That's not really in question. And it may be something as simple as he just
has poor sleep hygiene. And when we're trying to get people to sleep better, we tell them not to do any work,
in the bedroom to put down, put down their phones,
try and get a consistent time to go to sleep.
You know, the president has incredible demands
on his time.
I mean, and you know, he's almost 80 years old
and even more reason for the president to get some rest.
Insomnia is a dangerous thing for an older person.
It increases the risk of cardiac events.
It increases hyper-attention.
It increases the risk of dementia and deprecise
depression. And often when an older person doesn't feel right, one of the first questions we
ask them is tell me about your sleep, how much sleep are you getting? And if you've ever seen
an older person in a hospital where it looks like they're losing it, it's often because
it's very hard to sleep in hospitals. So every American should want this president to work efficiently
and if I think everybody understands it. And then finally, and I found this very interesting,
Dr. Reiner does address this issue of, we've gone from annual physicals, which were happening
so often that now they're calling them six-month physicals. And that hasn't really been explained.
What's also interesting is that in many of these yearly physical exams, much of this
evaluation is done in advance of the day where the president actually goes to Walter Reed.
So we should have a read out about this pretty soon. Often his labs are, are,
are pre-tested. So the White House often can generate a readout very quickly. One other interesting
thing I noted was when the president, when he was leaving Walter Reed, posted on social media
that he had a perfect physical, he called it his six-month physical. So I guess, you know,
what we're changing now from as a routine yearly physical for a president to, I guess perhaps
as a nod to his age, it looks like this president will undergo a six-month cycle for evaluations.
And what's funny is even that doesn't really cover it.
Because again, I know you know these numbers by now.
It's been three and 13 months.
That's a physical every four and a third months plus three dental visits.
So Dr. Jonathan Reiner is a physician and he's alarmed by the very same things we're alarmed by.
I'm not a doctor. I speak to doctors. They go the hand bruising explanation doesn't make sense.
Jonathan Reiner agrees. They say the swollen ankles are chronic venous insufficiency. It's a benign
chronic condition. Dr. Jonathan Reiner goes, yeah, but he didn't have it as recently as a couple
physicals ago, which is not that much time because they're happening so frequently. That
suggests that this would be acute, acute tree trunk ankles, not chronic benign. That's a different
condition. And he's now going every six months. Wait a second. When was that change announced?
Why? Dr. Jonathan Reiner agrees. So the more physicals Trump seems to have to reduce concern,
it increases concern. And the more Trump says I passed the cognitive test, the more we go,
why is he getting cognitively tested so much? And on top of all of this, and this gets difficult now,
we have yet another symptom that dozens of you wrote to me about. I want to talk about that next.
There is disturbing video of Donald Trump visibly struggling to stand straight without swaying.
And this is barely 48 hours old.
Now, many of you wrote to me about this.
I wasn't going to cover it.
then in the context especially of these physicals and all of the results that are coming out
and so many of you writing to me about it, I do think it's worth looking up.
Now, many of you noticed that during the Memorial Day commemoration on Monday, Donald Trump
was swaying and seemingly constantly losing his balance and adjusting.
And I said, is this really going on?
And I looked at the video and it is.
So first I'm going to play the video in normal speed for you and you will see that everybody else is standing there saluting still.
And Trump is swaying.
He's swaying, swing, swing.
Let me play it first, but then I have a different way we're going to look at it.
Okay.
Now let me do something else with it.
If we remove the audio and we just scrub through, one of the things you notice is that everybody else is very still.
Trump is the one that is swaying back and forth to and fro.
J.D. Vance is still. Pete Hegseth is still.
But Trump is swaying back and forth, back and forth.
This coincides with Trump's increasing difficulty walking a straight line.
We have a number of videos now, including the one that's up on the screen of Trump walking
down a red carpet, for example.
We have another one from a helicopter.
This is Trump after, I guess, getting off a plane where he's attempting to walk a straight line.
And he's not.
He's going back and forth, back and forth.
So we now have multiple instances of Trump having more limited control over his body.
Now, there are a lot of medical explanations here.
One is just like sometimes this happens to older people.
And there's a number of reasons why that could be.
And there's a whole bunch of other underlying conditions that this could be related to.
Standing still is harder as you age.
If you're overweight sleeping two to three hours a night and not physically fit, it's hard to just stand there with a hand up on your head saluting.
It could be an inner ear or a balance issue.
It could be a vestibular issue that can cause that subtle rocking where you're constantly trying to catch yourself.
There are myriad neurological causes that can affect coordination in this way.
And it can be neuropathy, Parkinsonian symptoms.
That's a whole other category of neurology.
There can be musculoskeletal issues, back pain, hip problems, knee instability, arthritis,
weakness where you're constantly shifting weight and kind of going side to side.
It could be medications, everything from sedatives to blood pressure meds, alcohol,
THC, uppers, downers, anxiety medication, stimulants, they can affect steadiness.
Anxiety and adrenaline can do this.
Cardiovascular factors, orthostatic issues, dizziness, dehydration, reduced stamina.
And there can also be non-medical explanations.
And one of the ones that comes to mind to me is the fact that Donald Trump is widely believed
to wear lifts to make himself appear to be taller.
claims to be 6-3. We've got a lot of examples of Trump definitely not looking 6-3 and lifts.
It's almost like you're wearing an internal high heel. And I don't, you know, Trump may not be that
comfortable walking in the equivalent of high heels. And it may be that that slightly being pushed
forward by the lifts is causing Trump to be off balance and that he's trying to figure out,
do I use the ankle to hold myself rigid or do I use what do I, how do I shift my weight? All of these
are possible things. But the kind the the sort of contrast is third physical in 13 months,
perfect better than ever. And we have a new symptom or a new series of symptoms, which is Trump walking
in inability to walk in a straight line and standing at attention and having to catch himself
as he goes forward and back. We're definitely not getting the full story. What the full
story is we are left to speculate, but it's definitely not the story that we've been getting.
What do you think?
Leave a comment, send me an email, info at David Pakman.com, or is Trump healthier than ever?
And if I'm just getting it wrong, then let me know.
Most sweet snacks are either satisfying or sensible.
Our sponsor Magic Spoon is both.
Magic Spoon treats are crispy, airy snack.
bars with 12 grams of protein, 7 grams of fiber, 0 grams of added sugar, and 2 to 3 grams of net carbs.
They come in great flavors like marshmallow, chocolate, peanut butter, and double chocolate,
my favorite.
A perfect sweet, light snack I can throw in the bag and take on the go.
They remind me of cereal bars, same texture and flavor, but without the carbs and without the sugar.
Magic spoon is easy to find.
Just look for Magic Spoon at your local grocery store.
They also rolled out treats nationwide at 7-11.
And if you haven't tried them yet, check out MagicSpoon's new protein pastries, high-protein low-sugar takes on the classic toaster pastries I grew up with.
You can get $5 off your next order, including the protein pastries at magic spoon.com slash Pacman.
The link is in the description.
There are a lot of VPN companies out there and almost all of them make the exact same promise.
Trust us.
Your data safe.
Our sponsor, private internet access, you don't have to take their word for it because they've proven multiple times in court when authorities have asked for user logs.
They don't have them.
They don't have anything to hand over.
Their software is open source.
You do not have to trust anybody.
you can verify for yourself. They have a no log policy, which really matters because the whole point
of a VPN is to protect your privacy. Private internet access hides your IP address,
encrypts your connection, helps to protect your data when you're at home, on public Wi-Fi,
traveling. And it also lets you access content that might not be available in your region.
Just a single private internet access account you can use on unlimited devices,
with servers in 91 countries and all 50 states optimized for fast streaming and downloads
so you are not sacrificing performance for security or privacy.
It's one of those things you turn on once and just forget about it.
Get an exclusive, 83% off.
That is just 203 a month plus four months free at PIAVPN.com slash Pacman.
The link is in the description.
Well, our friend Jessica Tarlov has really outdone herself this time.
As some of you know, Jessica Tarlov is the lone left winger on Fox News is the five.
And she silenced her co-hosts whose brains at this point must be filled with diet mountain
do or something like that.
And she really conceptualized with a beautiful narrative arc, the embarrassing failures of the
Iran war and she does it so extensively and so irrefutably that her co-hosts, even Jesse Waters,
who seems to always have something to say, they all have nothing to say. I have a lot to say about the
substance here. Let's take a look at the video. It'll come down to the details of whatever this is.
You know, if they get a deal, is it going to be better the same or worse than the JCPOA?
That's what it's going to get compared to.
By the way, it'll almost certainly be worse.
I loved the cope from Jesse there about the money that would be released to the Iranians,
that denying the fact that it was their money that was being held in Katari bank accounts when Obama did it,
only $1.7 billion, not the huge numbers that people say versus what's going to happen this time
when Donald Trump has to give them some of their money in order to get them to take a deal.
And we'll see how it all unfolds.
I'm fascinated by Iran saying we might not toll the strait anymore.
There's just going to be a fee that you pay for quote-unquote environmental protection,
which sounds like you're continuing to toll the straight of Hormuz.
And nobody has yet mentioned the importance of the domestic pressure right now on Donald Trump.
The lack of fertilizer that is getting to our country,
turn on any channel you'll see interviews with farmers who are saying that it is complete,
dire streets at this point. We already have a record number of bankruptcies. And so it seems to me,
and we'll see what the deal looks like if there is one to be had, Donald Trump needs a midterms
deal more than he needs a nuclear deal at this point and is willing to make a deal and punt
some of the more complicated stuff down the road, continue the ceasefire in that respect so that we
can deal with $4.50 gas, approval ratings in the tank, minus 52 on inflation, minus 24 on foreign
policy. You want to say, oh, this is a great solution to all of this. There are a number of
conservative supporters of the war who feel like you did in your initial statements, Jesse,
that they want actually more firepower. They don't want us to walk away at this point and just
have a diplomatic solution. And I'm not sure at this point that Iran actually does think
that we are willing to come at them with missiles again, because we've been threatening,
you know, nuclear plant day, bridge day, tunnel day, whatever it is.
is for a long time at this point. And I'm not saying that I want them necessarily to call our bluff,
but I'm not sure that they're quaking in their proverbial booties as much as you might think.
Yeah, the Iranians. They go from smirking and interrupting. It's, it's, there's usually an
interruption every 20 seconds on that show when Jessica tries to talk. They go from smirking and
interrupting to staring straight ahead like their mics aren't working all of a sudden.
Jessica Tarloff increasingly plays a sort of strange role at Fox where I think Fox on one hand says,
well, she's there to provide balance.
But the way it ends up being is that sometimes she's the only person on that show who's willing
to acknowledge observable reality.
And you have four other people there who won't even concede what is real in the world.
And as soon as someone goes, well, hold on a second, here are the timelines, here are the
outcomes. Here were the the predictions and the promises, the contradictions, the consequences.
The vibe changes. I don't think they like it. And Jesse Waters has kind of perfected the cable
news smirk where it's like, I don't really have much to say, uh, but I'm going to just smirk and
hope that the audience sees that as you're not making any sense and I'm really smart. But the
problem is that that smirk only works when nobody pushes back effectively. And there's a broader media point.
here, I think, which is that modern political television is increasingly theatrical.
It has been for a while, but especially now.
And it's more of a role play.
You've got the person in the role of the patriot, the person in the role of the elite liberal
and then the common sense guy and the the concerned mom role.
And every once in a while, the theater, everybody steps out of their roles and you've got
a little bit of substance.
And that's what I think makes Jessica effective on that show to the extent that, remember,
it's an audience that to a great degree doesn't really want to hear from her.
She's effective on these panels, not so much because of ideology or principles, but she's
often calmer than everybody else.
And she's more grounded than everybody else.
And they're all trying to generate a particular type of outrage.
Now, notice also, and there's a lot of other clips we've looked at, typically, the other
hosts don't really respond to Jessica Tarlov directly in terms of addressing her understanding
her underlying points. Gutfeld, for example, who's a comedian and he says funny things. I know,
I know. Gutfeld often has paperwork where he just has his joke that he's going to tell.
And it doesn't even address the substance of what Jessica Tarlov is saying. It's like there's a pivot or
there's a terribly told joke or an interruption or maybe it's ad hominemes. And because if you address,
If they try to directly address what she says, it wouldn't work well because she's right on a lot of
the stuff.
And these moments can resonate online because there's a discomfort there that nobody else is even
on the same playing field with regard to an allegiance to the truth.
Now, let me get back to the thing I said before because I think this is also interesting
from a media literacy kind of standpoint.
I think it's ironic that Fox producers probably believe that having the
Jessica there proves we're fair and balanced, although they don't use that slogan anymore.
We're open ideologically.
But the reason that clips like this often go viral is viewers realize that the panel is actually
quite insulated from other ideas.
Jessica's there to hopefully provide some balance to the audience.
But it seems wasted on the other four hosts.
Final thought on this.
Right winger have spent years.
mocking safe spaces. But a lot of these panels are really designed to be safe spaces. And as soon as
someone breaks the safe space with a different idea that's coherently and articulately placed forward,
they malfunction. They don't know what to say. They go to ad hominemes, insults, etc. And I think
Jessica's doing a really good job here. I don't know how many Fox News viewers are being convinced,
But it's certainly interesting to at least confront some of these mountain dewbrained hosts,
for lack of a better term.
Remember that J.D. Vance is not usually the smartest person in the room.
And this is even when there's very few people in the room, I must say.
J.D. Vance met with attorneys general yesterday.
And I can only imagine that even Donald Trump cringed when he saw this.
Here is, first of all, before we even get to the substance, here is J.D. Vance.
entering the room and the crowd goes mild. Just nobody really seems to like JD. And by the way,
there is audio playing here. It's just that this group of people is so quiet when Vance walks in
that you might think the audio isn't working. Everybody's standing. Thank you all for being here.
Please take a seat. All right. So the crowd goes absolutely mild for J.D. Vance and then listen,
And this is, this could be funny. J.D. sort of jokes about, is it attorneys general or attorney generals?
It could be funny in some setting. But he's just so painfully uncharismatic that it just bombed.
Kick it over to Andrew Ferguson. He's going to talk a little bit about how we're going to work with these state attorneys general.
And it's attorney's general, right? Not attorney generals.
That's, it's very counterintuitive. We got to change this. Maybe the group.
peer together. We've got enough of a critical mass of attorneys generals to change it. But Andrew,
attorneys general, I'm never going to be able to get that right. And the media, of course,
is going to make fun of me for it. Andrew, over to you. Well, it's more about your lack of charisma.
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Vice President. And welcome to all the state attorney. And look at the grin
on his face. The sort of, God, look at this look of the sort of, I just did a funny. Can we change
grammar arbitrarily to my liking. Now, I don't, I don't want to make this show primarily about grammar.
I'd rather make it about spelling if it were up to me. But here's the easy way to remember it.
Are they attorneys or are they are they generals? Well, they're attorneys. So therefore,
it's attorneys general. You might call it it. They, you think about it this way. They are general
attorneys for the states they represent. They're, they're the most general attorney there is.
They're the overarching attorney.
And there's many of these attorneys.
Okay.
Hey, I'm doing this not because I love grammar, but because the vice president is an embarrassment.
Then we get to the substance.
And this is where like, do they realize what they sound like?
Here is JD doing his sanctimonious rant about how fraud is bad and we should want to get
rid of it.
It's a little bit ironic coming from a guy in this administration.
And as I've said repeatedly, this is not need to be. This should not be a partisan effort. Everybody should care about fraud. Everybody should care about rooting out fraud. Everybody should care about saving the American taxpayers money. And importantly, everybody should care about actually protecting the programs that only work and are only properly funded if it's not, if the money funding those programs isn't being stolen by fraudsters. So, well, we do care about fraud. That's why we want you out. That's why we want Trump and J.D. Van's gone. We're against the ballroom.
because we care about fraud. We are against Doge because we care about fraud. We're against Trump's
cell phone scam because we care about fraud. We're against. And listen, we're even talking about
but the slush fund Trump's getting money from other countries, billions and trillions. We do care
about fraud. The problem is we have people in power who are perpetrating it rather than rooting
it out. Finally, uh, the Prince of Darkness, Stephen Miller was there.
and he makes completely unhinged claims about social welfare programs.
Now, let me concede something to you because this has a long, dark history in American politics.
This type of thing that he says goes back 40, 50 years.
If social welfare programs really did work the way he claims, it would make a lot more sense
to be against them.
Listen to what he says.
The points that Andrew hit on his remarks, all of the systems in our country,
whether you're talking about voting, whether you're talking about entitlements, whether you're talking about welfare benefits,
were set up based on the honor system. They're set up based on the idea that you could trust the average person through their own morality to abide by the rules and comply with the law.
And so the way most welfare works in most states and most places is we take your word for it.
If you thought a piece of paper and you say your kids are hungry, you are going to get food stamps.
We don't check as a country if you even have kids.
The fact as basic as that.
We don't even check if you even have children.
You will just start getting the checks.
And so what's happened to our country is we became a society, as you've seen with the Somali refugee problem in Minnesota, where you have a large number of people that are not following the honor system.
So this is completely untrue.
There is no honor system.
It's just that it's just not the case.
Now, he's talking about food stamps.
Food stamps require verifying household composition and the identities of the members.
You need to provide birth certificates, school records, social security cards, et cetera.
It's not the honor system.
None of what he's saying is true.
We recently with our kids, my partner takes the, has them as dependence and immediately,
upon filing her taxes, she got a thing saying, hey, we got to verify the identities of these kids.
We need social security cards, send in records if they are enrolled in any kind of daycare.
It is so untrue.
Now, if it were true that the way it worked is you sign up for whatever, food stamps, free health
insurance, but there's no verification, child tax credits, all of it.
And you just get, you just get the money.
it would make a lot more sense to go, man, I'm skeptical of this program.
I don't know if this is being run in the right way.
Should there be more oversight?
Sure.
I love more oversight.
With any program, you have a free rider program.
You have to free rider problem.
You've got to figure out what's the right amount of enforcement.
And this is not unique to the United States.
It's not unique to Somalis and whatever he's talking about in Minnesota with food stamps.
With any program, you need to find the right amount of enforcement that is going to get the
the largest number of people to be honest and do enough sort of trust but verify to catch people
that are not being honest. And this is, this is a global problem with any kind of social welfare
program and it's been figured out. But he wants you to believe it's just the honor system.
Everybody's lying about it, all this stuff. Well, I guess we should get rid of these programs
shouldn't we? Part of the lie is lying about what the programs even are to get people to be
opposed to them.
Part of why we're doing a one day membership drive on June 9 is because we must build
independent media to beat back and resist exactly these types of corrosive lies, which if believed,
get people to go, maybe we should get rid of food stamps.
That's dangerous.
So I would love for you to join us for this one day membership special on June 9th.
It'll be basically funding the David Packman show into and beyond the 2026 elections
and giving us a good start into 2028 on the 9th.
An email will go out explaining how to get the one day membership discount.
All you need to do today is get on my newsletter so that then you'll get that email on June 9.
Go to David Pakman.com slash substack. We've got a great bonus show for you today.
Joe Biden has filed a loss. Who is he suing and why? And so much more,
including the White House UFC fight. I know. I know.
All of that and more on today's bonus show.
