The David Pakman Show - The war that ended is very much happening again
Episode Date: June 11, 2026-- On the Show: -- Donald Trump announces the resumption of air strikes against Iran while openly admitting to the seizure of millions of barrels of Iranian oil -- Rising consumer prices push inflat...ion back above 4 percent as Trump struggles to fulfill his core campaign promise of making life affordable -- A leaked medical report reveals that Donald Trump underwent an extensive evaluation during a recent unannounced White House physical -- Donald Trump explicitly states that he loves inflation during a press interaction before ranting about the height of the reflecting pool -- Rep. Mike Flood (R) gets booed by his own working-class constituents after stating that the US cannot afford universal healthcare -- Donald Trump derails a televised phone interview about Iran attacks into a monologue about his local political endorsements -- Fox host Emily Compagno fails to counter a direct question from co-host Jessica Tarlov regarding Trump's insults againt John McCain -- Leaked documents expose a dispute over whether the DOJ should release files containing sexual misconduct allegations against Trump -- On the Bonus Show: The Trump "anti-weaponization" slush fund is back, Trump's arch will require 3 years of 20-hour-a-day construction, Alabama's nitrogen gas executions ruled cruel and unusual, and much more... 💳 PDS Debt: Get your free assessment & find the best option for you at https://pdsdebt.com/pakman 🩳 SHEATH Underwear: Code PAKMAN for 20% OFF at https://sheathunderwear.com/pakman 🧠 Try Brain.fm totally free for a month at https://brain.fm/pakman ⚠️ Ground News: Get 40% OFF their unlimited access Vantage plan at https://ground.news/pakman -- Become a Member: https://davidpakman.com/membership -- Subscribe to our (FREE) Substack newsletter: https://davidpakman.substack.com -- Get David's Books: https://davidpakman.com/echo -- TDPS Subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow -- David on Bluesky: https://davidpakman.com/bluesky -- David on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow (00:00) Start (01:32) Trump ramps up the Iran war (09:05) The right panics over Trump's inflation (20:57) Trump was examined by 22 doctors (26:06) Trump says he loves inflation (38:30) Republican demands healthcare (45:20) Trump derails Fox News interview (54:25) Liberal silences Fox News panel (1:00:34) White House buried Trump allegations Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive.
The Price is Right Fortune Pick.
BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.
19 plus to wager.
Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,
free of charge.
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario.
This spring, Denham gets a softer, lighter,
update. Introducing Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg, a new fit that moves with you. It's everything
you want denim to feel like for summer. Easy, breathable, and effortlessly cool. With a fit that creates
natural movement and a wide leg that feels modern, not overwhelming. Plus, that signature, wait, for this
price, moment. Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg. This father's day start with a question. Like,
where did Dad's story begin? Ancestry Dio.
DNA now has up to $75 off on our father's day sale.
So dad can explore his roots across more than 3,600 regions
and discover the places and cultures that shaped his story.
Save now, give Ancestry DNA from only $69.
Offer ends June 21st.
Visit Ancestry.ca for details.
Terms apply.
The most ended war in American history,
Donald Trump's war with Iran,
is now fully back again.
We have bombing. They're talking about taking control of Iran's oil infrastructure.
Trump says he's been stealing Iranian oil. I guess it's just not quite over.
In the midst of this very obvious stress on Trump, he suffers another public glitch telling
reporters, I love the inflation as inflation is crushing Americans and may indeed crush Republicans
at the ballot box in November. We also see a Republican congressman booed at a mostly
Republican Town Hall when he says, we just can't afford to give everybody health care, which raises
a very interesting question about where even Republican voters are moving on that issue.
Plus, a Fox host's defense of Trump instantly collapses when Jessica Tarlov asks a single
question about John McCain.
And a bombshell report reveals that Donald Trump was seen by 22 medical specialists.
during his recent physical, the White House won't say why, they won't say who, and they
won't report out their findings.
A very strange thing.
And also a weird report involving nipples.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
It's just what it is.
All of that and more today.
Well, it's ended nine or ten times already, but the Iran war seems to be ramping up again.
Markets collapsing yesterday and it is fully back on.
And I've got to tell you, I don't know whether this is one of those examples where we need to assume
stupidity or we need to assume malice.
There's that phrase don't attribute to malice that which can be just as easily attributed to stupidity.
And that's a very highly salient and relevant phrase in the Trump administration.
But I'll be honest, I don't really know what's going on right now.
Donald Trump has said that the Iran war is over and is ending so many times.
We've got a deal in principle.
We're about to sign it.
It's hours away. It's days away. And then all of a sudden, the Iranians shoot down an American
Apache helicopter. And as I told you yesterday, Donald Trump took the troth sensual and said,
we are going to be hitting them and hitting them hard. And then once again, almost verbatim,
Donald Trump's saying the same thing in the Oval Office yesterday.
I posted this morning about Iran. You said that they've taken too long into a deal. I want to make sure
I quote you correctly. You said that now they will have to pay the price. What did you mean by
that specifically? Well, we're going to be attacking them and attacking them very hard.
You're resuming bomb? Yeah, well, we are. Based on the helicopter, I guess we have the right to do that.
I guess, I don't know, I'm just the president after all.
He shot down a very, very incredible, actually an incredible machine. And at first they said they didn't do it.
Then they admitted they did it. It was sort of easy because we have the, we had the bomb. We actually have the bomb.
They're very lucky that bomb didn't explode. That bomb was lodged.
in a helicopter didn't explode.
Yeah.
So we are 15 and a half weeks into Donald Trump's three to four week war, which has ended many
times.
And we are going to be bombing.
In addition to that, a remarkable moment where the orange president said that the United
States has been secretly stealing millions of barrels of Iran's oil.
Trump goes, I guess I can kind of tell you now, but we have been doing that.
The inflation to come down between that.
Oh, when the war is over?
It's coming down.
I know you can't.
It's going to come down like a rock.
And again, we're taking out millions, which I'm just announcing today for the first time.
But we've been taking out millions of barrels of oil.
You have.
Millions of barrels.
Every night, we took out oil.
But now I'm going to.
Every night when I'm on Troth Central on my phone, we're just very quietly taking out oil.
Because they just figured it out. So now that they figured it out, I can tell you. It was very hard for me. I wanted to say it so
badly, I didn't want to ruin it. But it was very hard. But millions of barrels of oil has come out.
And despite that, we still have high oil prices, high gas prices, high prices on just about everything.
But Trump just casually dropping that one in there. By the way, in addition to everything else we've been doing, we've been taking millions of barrels of oils, barrels of oil.
from Iran.
As the night went on, it was indeed confirmed that the United States has escalated strikes.
This is a war.
Here is a Fox report about it.
Jennifer, can give us an update?
Yes.
Hi, Dana.
We have reports we've just confirmed with U.S. officials that air strikes have begun
against Iranian targets.
Iranian state media is reporting that those strikes are being, you know,
carried out on Keshem Island. We heard those strikes yesterday at about this time.
The same sort of air strikes began. Keshem Island, Minab, Syrac, these are all port
and coastal areas where the U.S. was taking out air defenses and radar systems just yesterday.
Right now we can say that Pete Hegeseth, the defense secretary, was down at St.Com headquarters,
where he was being briefed by Admiral Brad Cooper this afternoon about potential targets.
Earlier in the day, the president indicated in telegraphed that the airstrikes were likely
to begin again tonight.
All right.
So this is war.
This is war reporting.
This is the type of specific information that we would normally receive when we are in the
middle of a war.
The most ended war in American history is back on.
And then in the evening, another Fox correspondent indicated.
that he spoke to Trump on the phone, and Trump says the Iranians are just desperate.
They're desperate for Trump to stop the bombing.
We're doing it.
Of the country close to the Persian Gulf, this is all taking place as the Iranians are trying
to get the United States to stop the bombing campaign.
President Trump told me that Iran called him tonight.
Top Iranian officials.
Called me very strongly.
And President Trump spoke directly, according to the commander in chief tonight,
as the president was sitting in the situation.
room and he told me that the Iranians asked them to stop bombing. And the president said to me,
the bombing will stop shortly of the country. Except the only problem with the bombing will stop
shortly is that this morning just hours ago, Donald Trump posted to truth social, quote,
the United States will be hitting Iran whose Navy Air Force radar, anti-aircraft and all other
forms of defense together with most of its offensive capability are gone very hard tonight.
At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Karg Island.
Now, understand, when Trump says tonight, that's a post from 8 a.m. this morning.
So that means tonight, not last night.
It's continuing, even though supposedly it was stopping.
And in addition to taking Karg Island, Trump says, we will take other oil infrastructure
points and assume total control of their oil and gas markets, much like.
we have with Venezuela, which is working out brilliantly for both Venezuela and the United States
of America. Not exactly. Not exactly. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ladies and
gentlemen, the war continues. The war does not seem to be anywhere near over. Now, if I'm totally
honest with you, I don't expect to be coming to you and saying, hey, we're in week 64 of Trump's
three to four week war. I do believe that at some point, there is going to be a deal.
made, even if just out of sheer exhaustion on either or both parties, I do expect at some point
that's going to happen.
But consider the manipulation of information, the hairbrained and misguided nature of even doing
this thing.
This was never in the interests of the average American to go in and do this to begin with.
This has been a disaster for the United States of America.
And there must be electoral accountability.
They're not going to tweet 25th amendment Donald Trump.
They're not going to impeach and convict Donald Trump.
It's not going to happen.
But electorally, there can be punishment for the very people who either support this war
in the Republican Party or just don't care enough about drawing attention.
Don't care enough about it that they are willing to draw attention to themselves to come
out on the record opposing it.
They can be punished in November and they should be punished in November.
I'll be one of the people voting to make that happen.
The economic story of the last few months has really been a pretty simple one, and we've
been covering it weekly, certainly, and sometimes almost daily.
The promise of this administration was elect me, elect us, and your prices are going to
come down.
Things will become more affordable.
Inflation during the Biden presidency was Biden's fault, even though it was high everywhere
during COVID and then came down very quickly under Joe Biden.
It was all Biden's fault and now I'm going to fix it.
Couple problems with that.
Trump said he had the solution, but the solutions aren't, don't put negative pressure on prices.
Solutions like blanket tariffs.
Solutions like an optional war with Iran.
That all generates inflation.
And now indeed, inflation is moving in the wrong direction.
I came to you yesterday with tears in my eyes on my knees and I said, audience, I'm so sorry,
but inflation has reached a three plus year high of 4.2 percent.
And excluding the COVID spike, inflation is higher than it has been in more than 10 years.
Now, just as a reminder, when Trump took office for the second time, inflation was 3%.
What Biden handed Trump was 3%.
We're now at 4.2%.
What is interesting, yesterday we talked about the number.
How did we get to that number?
What are the forces that have been acting on that inflation number?
And what are the potential political implications?
Cool. Today I want to look at who's talking about it and how. Now, it is important to consider
that CNN and Fox News are very different editorially. And in their reports on this inflation
number that I'm going to play for you, there are some key differences, but there are also some
key similarities. So let's start with the CNN report. There are other things like eggs up by
4% on a monthly basis and lettuce skyrocketing 16%. That's the biggest one month increase on
record. Now look, for consumers, if it feels like you can't keep up with these higher prices,
it's probably because you can't, right? Wages are still going up. Wages were up by about 3.4%
year over year in May. However, that's not even close to inflation. Look at this. Inflation,
4.2%. So that means if you adjust for inflation, real wages are actually shrinking, right? Paychecks
are just not going as far. And some consumers, they've had to dip into savings. They've had to
put some of their spending on credit cards and that's just not sustainable. It's not healthy.
My former colleague Heather Long, I think she summed it up best on X a few moments ago. She said,
this isn't just bad vibes about the economy. There is real pain, especially for the middle class
and lower income household. Now, nothing there is a shock. Like, there's no information being presented
there. It's like, oh my God, I never considered that. But what we're hearing is quite familiar.
But it's familiar because it's the stuff that Republicans were saying about the Biden economy, even though it was mostly untrue then.
Oh, you know, paychecks aren't keeping up.
Actually, they were.
We had long periods of time during the Biden presidency when wage growth was exceeding inflation.
Your groceries are costing more.
Your rent costs more.
Insurance costs more.
That was true.
I mean, inflation was not negative under Joe Biden.
And inflation tends not to be negative in the United States.
The question is how quickly, how much are prices going up.
But the political message from the MAGA people when Biden was still president was rent up,
groceries up, all this stuff is up.
It's the fault of the president.
The president controls this stuff.
The president, in that case, Biden must be punished because he hasn't fixed those problems.
But then now all of those things are happening under Donald Trump and a lot of his biggest
supporters simply don't want to acknowledge it.
Some do, some don't.
Now let's look at how Fox covered it.
Fox tried to put most of the inflation bump on what's happening.
in the Middle East sort of reinforcing the idea that as soon as this thing wraps up,
all these prices are going to come down. But they did at least acknowledge reality to a degree.
Take a look.
Every month, we got a jump of five-tenths of a percent. That was the expectation from ACPI.
That's the headline number, 4.2 percent year over year. The headline number that was in line.
That is a jump from last month's 3.8 percent. So it rose month to month, to be clear.
This year-over-year headline number is the highest number we've seen since April of 2023.
Core month-over-month, I will say, excuse me, not quite in line, 2 tenths of a percent, the expectation, 3-tenths of a percent, pretty close, core month-to-month,
and then 2.9 percent year-over-year for core May CPI. That was the expectation 2.9 percent.
Let me tell you what the government is saying, because, again, it was the energy story that we saw last month.
I will tell you the energy index did jump again month to month, 3.8%.
But what the government is saying is that the 3.9%, excuse me, jump for energy for the month of May, is a core piece.
And that is 60% of what we have seen in the increase that we're looking at.
And the markets, of course, are reacting.
Shelter also increased in May, 3 tenths of a percent.
And food increased as well in May, 2 tenths of a percent.
And the Food at Home Index rose, food away from.
index home roast. A lot of this, Maria, as I said it back to you, can be tied to the fertilizer
issues that we see coming out of the Middle East, those shipments, those prices, 10% of aluminum
comes out of the Middle East. There is a really interesting detail in there. Fertilizer prices
are upstream of food prices. What do I mean by that? Fertilizer prices go up,
meaning that the input costs go up for a lot of the food that we buy at the grocery store,
meaning that there are food price increases that are still in the pipeline that are not even
yet reflected.
We are now seeing American farmers and others pay more for fertilizer.
It's been happening for a few months, but it's starting to work its way through the food
system, meaning that the food being grown at higher cost, much of it, depending on the
cycle and the seasonality of it is not yet in the grocery stores, meaning food prices are
going to get even more expensive.
Now, it is interesting to see the different spin that Fox News puts on this, but they still
are acknowledging some of the basics here.
Highest inflation rate in more than three years.
They got that.
Food prices are up, not down under Donald Trump.
They got that.
These are the kinds of headlines that used to dominate conservative media when Biden was president,
but now they are sort of tucked under the rug, but they're still true.
They're still mentioning them.
Middle East shipping problems is also interesting because they present it as if that happened.
But what they really should be saying is it's only happening because of Trump's optional
war with Iran.
It didn't it didn't have to be this way.
Interestingly, under Biden, Fox News and right wing media presented relatively low inflation
as the fault of the president, even though Biden didn't take any of the steps like Trump
has that tend to spite gas and oil prices, et cetera. Gas prices went up. We were told it's Biden's
fault. Groceries up. We were told it's Biden's fault. Eggs up. We were told it was Biden's fault.
But Biden policy really didn't accelerate price increases in those areas. We now have inflation rising
under Donald Trump. And all of a sudden, they don't want to go. A lot of this is his tariffs and is
Iran war. They go, well, there's shipping routes that are disrupted and fertilizer costs and regional
conflicts. Shipping issues are coming up from the Middle East because of Trump is the
part that is missing there. And importantly, Trump ran on fixing this stuff and fixing it immediately.
Prices will come down. Life will be affordable again. A lot of people believed him. And that's why
they voted for them. Grocery store customers don't care about truth social posts. And the
electrical bill doesn't care who Maria Barteromo blames. People know what they're spending every week.
They know what rent costs. Housing hasn't come down. They know what food costs, all of these different things.
And we are going to see if there is a bona fide appetite for keeping Trump and Republicans accountable for the central promise.
I will make things cheaper.
Things are moving in the opposite direction and now at a faster rate than we have seen in three years.
My question to you, are there enough MAGA voters willing to hold their party accountable such that they will be?
taken out of power in November. Let me know what you think.
Debt has a way of getting out of control even when people are trying to manage it responsibly.
High interest rates, constant fees, compounding balances. This can all turn credit cards,
personal loans and medical bills into something much more difficult to escape. And the longer
it drags on, the more expensive it becomes. That's why I want to tell you about our sponsor,
PDS debt. PDS debt helps people with unsecured debt.
by creating a personalized plan based on their real financial situation.
There's not a minimum credit score required.
They just focus on reducing what you owe, paying it off faster, and stopping the waste of money
on interest and fees.
They are A plus rated by the Better Business Bureau.
They have thousands of five-star reviews and have already helped hundreds of thousands of people
get out of debt.
Every month you wait costs money.
The best time to start was yesterday.
The second best time is right now.
So don't wait another month.
Take back control in 30 seconds.
Get your free personalized assessment at PDSdebt.com slash Pacman.
The link is in the description.
When it comes to what you're getting dad for Father's Day, don't overthink it.
Get him something that'll keep him comfortable every day, something practical.
Sheath underwear delivers exactly that.
Our sponsor Sheath makes premium pouch underwear with a.
a smart front design that will separate and support and give everything room to breathe the room
everything deserves, which is very important during the hot summer months coming up.
Sheath's lineup includes soft bamboo and modal options along with different cuts and colors.
You can give them an everyday essential without being boring.
Sheath uses fabric that's lightweight, breathable, built for comfort through long days at the office,
work days or just lounging around the house.
For Father's Day, get Dad the underwear he would probably never think to buy for himself,
but we'll be glad he owns when he's got it.
Go to Sheathunderwear.com and use code Father for 30% off until June 21st.
The link is in the description.
The David Packman Show is, of course, an audience supported program.
Our primary funding source is our viewers, our listeners.
And I have to say a huge thank you to the more than five hundred hundred people.
hundred of you who took advantage of this week's one day membership drive. As many of you know,
the White House has put me on a list of media offenders. They don't like that I cover Trump and
that I'm critical of Trump. They put us on a list. These lists have ugly histories. So we did a
membership drive one day on Tuesday and over 500 people signed up at 50% off. If you missed it
and you want that discount and you're saying I am ready to support independent media, simply
send us an email, info at David Pakman.com. There's a backlog of 140 emails from people who want the code,
but we will get you the code. Info at David Pakman.com. David, get me that code, please. We are running
out of codes. Get them while they last. A massive medical bombshell about the oldest president ever.
He was seen by 22 medical specialists and the White House won't say who and they won't say why. And they
won't say what the findings were. Now, there are two interpretations to this bit of news. I'm happy to be
charitable and consider both, but first let's look at the facts. What is normal? Well, other presidents,
George H. W. Bush saw five specialists in 1989 for his physicals. George W. Bush saw 12 specialists
in his first presidential checkup. Trump saw 22. And Trump used to see a number more like what George
W. Bush had. Now, what has been revealed is that this happened, but the White House is simply saying,
we did this to be complete in our evaluation of Donald Trump. When the White House was asked,
well, what tests did these specialists do? What were their specialties? Who were they? What do they
specialize in? Why were they chosen? What was being evaluated? The White House is not commenting.
asked why Trump had a second physical last year.
The White House is not commenting.
Asked why Trump's use of the hair loss prevention drug finasteride is suddenly gone
from Trump's list of medications.
They didn't say why.
Asked whether Trump actually stopped taking the drug to prevent hair loss.
The White House has not commented.
So there's kind of two interpretations here.
One, Trump is seeing 22 specialists because something or many things are wrong with
Trump and the White House is covering it up. That's one interpretation of this. The other interpretation
is, listen, Trump is seeing 22 specialists to be thorough. Even though he's in great health,
he is the oldest president ever. And we have access to a lot more medical knowledge today than we
did in the past. And there is more value to bringing in 22 specialists. What makes me lean
towards the former explanation, the more sort of negative one, is that first of all, we have a
complete and total lack of medical transparency for over a decade from Donald Trump.
And number two, that there is nothing in the medical report that substantiates what these
individuals did or what they found.
In other words, we've learned that 22 specialists were involved.
But if they wanted to be transparent, the medical report they put out could have said,
here's the specialist that saw Trump.
Here's why.
Here's the conditions they evaluated.
Here's the test they did.
Here's the results.
They didn't do any of that.
So even their characterization of the news of 22 medical specialists is not transparent.
Now, we can also get really, really conspiratorial here.
Just for fun, let's do it, okay.
Ha!
Ha!
Ah!
Exactly.
R. Trump is angry about that.
Could they be choosing to stuff Trump's physical with 22 doctors to ensure that there is
a variety of opinion on any particular thing that's going wrong with Trump's health. What would the,
what would the point of that be? If you get 22 people in the room and 21 go, hey, this thing is
bad. It should be disclosed to the American people. And one of the 22 goes, yeah, I'm not so sure
that this is that relevant for the American people to know. You can theoretically hide stuff and go,
listen, there wasn't medical consensus in the room that this needed to be disclosed. So we didn't
discuss it. Now, that is very conspiratorial. I acknowledge.
how conspiratorial that is. What I can tell you is that it is really hard to say requiring assessment
from 22 specialists at your third annual physical in 13 months is a sign of the healthiest person ever.
That's tough. I struggle to believe that 22 specialists are brought in for the healthiest
person ever unless you believe that Donald Trump is a nearly godlike figure whose health is so
incredible that it needs to be studied by 22 specialists. I struggle to believe that one. I've seen
Trump struggle to walk around. If all of their findings were benign, release them, but they didn't
disclose the specialties. They didn't disclose the tests. They didn't disclose the findings. They
didn't disclose the explanation for the second physical and no explanation for what apparently
are medical changes for Donald Trump. It doesn't strike me as 22 individuals interested in getting
a look at the healthiest man on earth. Struggle to believe that.
Now, as far as the cognitive stuff, the cognitive test, the Montreal cognitive assessment and
all of that, the same questions remain.
If Trump is indeed so healthy cognitively, why is he getting tested so often?
And that is a question we haven't gotten a good answer to.
Dr. Oz has said, well, Trump loves the results.
That's actually a test he can pass.
That's my characterization.
So Trump wants to keep getting tested cognitively, but I don't know.
I'm struggling to believe that.
And especially after Donald Trump confusedly says he loves the new record high inflation rate,
more questions are coming up about his big a brain.
And I think that we should talk about that next.
Yesterday, Donald Trump was asked about the new three plus year high inflation rate under
his administration, 4.2%.
Trump ran on inflation will be low.
It will be lower than under Biden.
It will drop like a rock.
The opposite happened.
Yesterday, we learned that inflation has spiked to its highest level since early 2023.
It is the highest inflation level in years.
And in fact, if you excuse the COVID spike, this is the highest inflation rate in the
United States of more than a decade.
Trump is asked, are you worried about this?
I mean, after all, you said inflation under Biden of 2.8% was a disaster.
You said you'd bring it down.
You must be worried.
And Trump glitches or not.
And he goes, no, I love it.
I love the inflation.
Making some ask, was this a brain event that he just had?
Sir, Mr. President, about the latest inflation number which came out this morning.
Could that be a negative?
No, I love it.
The numbers were great.
You know what I really love?
I love the inflation.
You know why?
Why?
Because as soon as this war is over, you know, I can say it now.
something you didn't know.
You know, we've been taking out millions of barrels of oil.
Nobody knows it.
You know who doesn't know about it?
Iran until right now.
We took out the other night, 22 ships.
Late night with no lights because they don't have any radar because we blasted the crap out of it.
So he loves the inflation.
Couple possibilities.
Number one, Trump doesn't understand inflation.
Maybe he thinks, is it possible?
Trump thinks a higher number is good, sort of like a score. The best you can do is you get a 10.
Well, Biden only had a three and I just got a 4.2. Is it possible Trump doesn't understand
inflation? Is it possible that Trump simply doesn't care about Americans? And he goes, listen,
I'm getting to do a war and inflation only went up to 4.2%. I don't know. But this has to be
made into a campaign ad. You now can combine. No, I don't think about Americans financial situations
when I make these foreign policy decisions. The gas prices are peanuts. Gas prices are low relatively.
No, I love the inflation. That would be a great approach, I believe. Now, remember that in January of
2025, Donald Trump was handed an economy with 3% inflation. And that actually continued to drop for a
few months as Donald Trump's economic impacts took place. In April, Donald Trump placed black
blanket tariffs on everybody. And we saw inflation go from 2.3 to 2.4 to 2.7 to 2.9 to 3.
In October, they simply didn't put out an inflation report. Trump didn't like the direction it was
going. He's like, no more reports. And then as the reports came back, we saw that in March,
inflation had spiked to 3.3 in April 3.8. And the latest number from May, 4.2%. You have to go all
the way back to May of 2023 for a number that is even close and you have to go back even further
to March of 2023 for a higher number of 5%. Oh, in April 4.9%. That's part of the COVID inflation
spike. You can go all the way back to June of 2016. And other than the COVID spike in the middle
of the screen here, inflation is higher today under scrumps, President Prump.
than it was at any point in the last 10 years other than that COVID inflation spike.
That is not so good.
Trump's answer, I love the inflation.
At another moment during this event, Donald Trump completely glitches out and spits out
random words about elections being rigged in California.
Dear God.
And it's so bad for the country.
You'd almost think they hate the country because they can't.
They're not stupid people.
You can't cheat like they did.
And look at the election.
in California, as an example.
After a week, they determined that the kid who's leading
and had all the mojo, all of a sudden he doesn't make the runoff.
And then I hit them hard on that,
but I started talking about Steve Hilton, who's a fantastic guy.
And I saw them say it was going to be two weeks before they knew.
And I started hitting him.
It's going to happen to Steve Hilton, too.
It's watch. You've got to watch.
And they approve Steve Hilton very quickly.
They didn't want to do it.
That was Trump seems to be suggesting that based on threats he made, Steve Hilton was given
votes.
I mean, think about what Trump is suggesting here.
Trump suggests without evidence that the reason a Republican wasn't doing so well in a California
primary was because of cheating.
And then he goes, but as soon as I pointed it out, suddenly Steve Hilton does make
the runoff general election.
So that would actually be evidence of rigging.
The idea that Trump speaking changed the vote count is mind-blowingly corrupt.
But Trump says it like it's something to cheer about, really bizarre stuff.
Then Trump really melts down and goes, they rig the 2020 election.
Remember, it's been six years and we still have no evidence.
But soon Trump says they're going to have the files.
It's only taken six years, but soon we're finally going to have those files.
When I was president, so now it made it so that I wouldn't be president.
And because they rigged the election, the second election, as you probably hear and probably
now, most of you know that happened.
And now it's been proven.
It has not been proven.
It will be proven as time goes by even more so.
We have things that you won't believe.
When we release the full files, you're not going to believe how crooked the second.
the 2020 election was. But I have. This is just a little question. It's just little old me. I know I don't
understand anything. And, you know, I'm a leftist lunatic according to the White House website and all
of this stuff. But if they have all of this information that without a doubt proves that Joe Biden
didn't really win in 2020 and Trump won. And like Trump says, he won all states. If the states had all
counted fairly, he would have won Connecticut. He would have won New York. He would have won California.
If they have that proof and they've had it for 60s.
years. Why won't they release it? I know it's a crazy question. I know it's a crazy question.
Wouldn't you benefit from releasing that information right away? Asked about people afraid
that it will be tough to get visas for the World Cup to come and play. There was a referee
that was sent back to, I believe, Somalia. There's all these instances. I believe the Iranian
team can't overnight in the U.S. They have to stay in Mexico and fly in and out for games.
Trump goes, no, no, no, no, no, the right people are going to be coming in.
Yeah.
Soccer, World Cup, football.
Most successful World Cup they've ever had.
Exactly.
They've never sold tickets at that level.
Ticket sales are actually kind of slow.
Hotel bookings are low.
They've never sold that many tickets so quickly.
It's amazing because you don't think of soccer.
We use the word football soccer, right?
But you don't think of soccer in this country.
Because, I mean, listen, they use the foot.
Why isn't it called football? I don't know.
Most success, I spoke to Johnny this morning. He's fantastic and he's the boss. He said,
there's never been anything close to what's happening.
But because of the success, some people are afraid that it's going to be harder and harder
to get visas to come from outside. Can you-
We're working on very closely to make sure the right people come into our country.
Maybe Trump means they're working hard to make sure the white people come into our country.
our country. He said right, but maybe he meant white. I don't know. And then finally on the reflecting
pool, a real big brain moment. Trump says the reflecting pool is taller than any building in the world.
What Trump means is that the reflecting pool is longer than a lot of buildings are tall. Why you
compare the length of something versus the height of something else? I have no idea. But the one that
they're all talking about is the almost 2,500 foot long.
That's taller than any building in the world, actually.
There's no building that's 2,500 feet tall, I don't think.
But it's like twice the high.
That's like going, hey, I've got a six pound hammer.
There is not a single aunt that weighs six pounds.
Okay, yeah, but like what?
Who cares?
The Empire State Building is an example, much wider.
So we just got that open last night.
We went to do it before July 4th.
And it is incredible.
It's called, it was originally called 1922, is
built. It was called the reflecting pond or the reflecting lake. Some people called it. But it was supposed
to be reflection. It never worked from 1922 because it was. Can someone please tell me what is the
relevance of the length of the pool compared to the height of the Empire State Building? I just don't
understand it. And no matter how long or wide or girthy it is, why does it justify a $13 million no
contract to do that job under the guise that it was urgent and an emergency.
We are in corruption hell, folks.
A lot of people put on music while they work, assuming it helps them concentrate,
but in practice, familiar songs, lyrics, or constantly changing tracks often will take attention
away from what you're working on rather than supporting attention.
And that's where Brain FM comes in.
Our sponsor, Brain FM, is a music app designed to support focus.
designed to support focus, relaxation, or sleep with music created by human musicians working
alongside neuroscientists. Instead of generic playlists, Brain FM offers task-specific modes
like deep work, creative, and motivation, depending on what you're trying to do. What makes
Brain FM different is the science behind it, because it's the only music app funded by the National
Science Foundation, based on their unique audio technology, designed to influence brain activity,
associated with focus. Brain FM also has published peer-reviewed research showing their technology
supports attentional performance. They even have an optional ADHD mode for people who benefit
from additional stimulation, but the app really is built for anybody looking to reduce distractions
and stay engaged with their work. You can try Brain FM totally free for 30 days by going to
Brain.fm slash Pacman. 30 days is a long free trial. Go check it out. The
The link is in the description.
One thing that drives me nuts about political media is how two outlets can cover the same
story and make it feel like two different events took place, not because any of the facts
have changed, but because the emphasis of the stories is different.
This is why I use ground news, because ground news pulls together reporting from across
the political spectrum, and you can compare the headlines side by side and see how different
outlets are framing the exact same issue. You can look at the bias distribution. You can look at
factuality ratings. You can see who owns the outlets behind the reporting, which makes it easier
to separate the substance from the spin. For example, Trump's EPA recently decided to remove
limits on those forever chemicals in drinking water. Ground news shows how outlets like PBS and
Raw Story are getting it right and right-wing outlets put this anti-Biden spin on it or they just
stay very vague to avoid implicating Donald Trump. Ground News also has a blind spot feed. This is for
stories that are underreported by one side. And you can also get a personalized feed based on your
interests. Go to ground.news slash Pacman or scan my QR code to get 40% off the ground.
news vantage plan. The link is in the description. A Republican congressman was brutally booed for saying,
hey, listen, we can't afford to give health care to everybody in this country. This is only about
a 30 second long clip, but it really is a sign of where the country is right now. A guy at a
mostly Republican town hall stands up and says something that to most people sounds increasingly
reasonable. In the United States, increasingly people agree with the statement.
Everybody should have some health care regardless of ability to pay.
Now, people often quibble about the details when they say, oh, well, we support single payer.
What do we mean by single payer?
Medicare for all, universal access.
There's all these different configurations.
But the question is, should everybody have some health care?
And the Republican Congressman Mike Flood says we can't afford that.
And the crowd immediately starts to boo.
This is significant.
Take a listen.
Every working and retired Americans should be entitled to healthcare.
Would you, would you sign on or write up a bill for Medicare for all?
We've got Medicare now.
We can start rolling back the age, five, 10 years at a time.
Would you support that?
We can't afford that.
Yes, you can.
Now, let me throw in a little detail.
The guy's idea isn't even
even that progressive. Because if you listen carefully to how he said, every working and retired
American should be entitled. Every working and retired American. Well, what if you're not working?
What if you're not retired? This is actually not even that progressive. There's a lot of people
who go, just start lowering the age for Medicare eligibility two, three, five years at a time and include
everybody. Doesn't matter if you're working. Doesn't mean if you're retired. Doesn't mean, just give it to
everybody. But still, Mike Flood goes, we can't afford that. And the audience boosts. Not an
audience that's mostly Democrats. I believe anyone can sign up to go to the town hall. I don't know for
sure. But I would imagine it's mostly Republicans. These are not, you know, Bernie cracks or
activists or whatever. These are voters disproportionately Republican voters in a red district.
And I think that that part is key to understanding what's going on.
A lot of politicians spend so much time arguing about labels.
Is it universal health care or is it Medicare for all?
Is it a government takeover of health care?
Have we socialized medicine?
If you strip it all down and just like get rid of the branding and just go, hey, listen,
should everybody have some health care?
Period.
Doesn't matter your situation.
Doesn't matter ability to pay.
Increasingly, people say, yes, they should.
We have a very wealthy country here.
And even as things are a little shakier now, this is still a very wealthy country with an average,
very high standard of living, but there is significant inequality. We're not saying billionaires
become illegal. We're not saying every millionaire's salary gets donated to so. We're simply saying
there are some basics here that we should be able to come together and afford for everybody.
We don't need to have homelessness. We don't need to have hunger and we don't need to have people
without health insurance. That's it. It's very simple. And in fact, it wouldn't even be that expensive
because when people don't have a home or health insurance or are hungry, that has negative
externalities and it creates additional costs. Should people be able to get treatment for conditions
without being at risk of going bankrupt? Most people would say yes. And what Mike Flood goes is simply
like, ah, that wouldn't work. It might even make healthcare worse if we did that. It wasn't,
people should buy their own insurance or it's just we can't afford.
it. We can't afford it. I don't think voters believe that crap. And I think especially voters don't
believe it when they look around and they go 13 million for relining the reflecting pool. That's what Trump
13 million won't pay for that much health care, but 13 million for a pool, a war in Iran,
a ballroom that's 200 million, 400 million, a billion dollars, whatever. 250 million dollars worth of
bombs dropped on Iran in a couple of days. What do you mean we can't afford it? I don't think we can't
afford it is making sense to a lot of people anymore. And whatever pet project, Trump or Congress
decides to fund proves that there is money. It's just what are our priorities. So listen,
people are being told one of the richest countries in the world can't afford health care for
everybody. They're not buying it. And I think that that is a really important shift.
And it's a growing political problem for Republicans.
The coalition is increasingly working class.
And working class voters might agree with Republicans on immigration if they can be convinced
that immigrants are a good scapegoat for their problems.
They might go into, oh, on crime, I agree with Republicans.
And maybe even on cultural issues.
Republicans get sick. They need prescriptions. They get a flat tire that now they need to borrow
in order to fix. They get a surprise medical bill. Their parents need health care. Their kids need
health care. And so reality and ideology will crash. And my suspicion is that this is a really
important moment because even if Trump has convinced a bunch of these people around stuff like,
oh, we got to get men out of women's sports. This is one of the greatest threats to your kids.
When everything's going fine economically, maybe you go, yeah, I do need to get
men out of women's sports. That's important. All of a sudden, when you can't afford health care,
I think you're increasingly going to be willing to go with whoever has a path to getting people
health care and you'll put aside men and women's sports. I don't think that Republicans are going
to imminently lose all of their support. But the booing of Mike Flood when this, when he goes,
we just can't afford that should be an important warning sign to Republicans. Because when they start
booing their own elected officials for saying health care, giving health care to people would be
unaffordable. I believe that politics is changing. And as is almost always the case when we have
these conversations, are Democrats going to be ready to take advantage of this? Because a lot of the ones
I interview, they are not convincing too many people. They are dropping rehearsed talking points.
And many of you go, David, that really sucked. That guy or gal is horrible. Republicans are terrible,
but I would have trouble getting excited to vote for that.
So Democrats have to figure it out.
It's an opportunity.
It is not a guarantee.
Asked about bombing water facilities in Iran.
This morning on Fox and Friends, Donald Trump went on a bonkers rant about rigged elections.
Even the Fox hosts were visibly stunned.
Why can't Trump answer a question?
Why can't he stay on topic?
Why isn't his brain working?
And you're going to hear Trump go completely.
completely off track and Brian Kilmead tries to bring them back by going, but about Iran, I think
it's important to play this with its full context so that you understand how unable to focus on
any issue Donald Trump is, raising again concerns that something is simply not working cognitively
here.
You came to power because he said America wants to win and you win.
Even in 2020, more votes than anyone in the history of the republic.
and party. So when you look at this, this seems to be like an anaconda. You're saying the laying
the groundwork and just suddenly squeezing them more and more and more until they have no options.
One of the hits yesterday, as our audience probably knows, is on a water facility. They were
already running out of water. So if you can continue to blockade and now you're taking down their
eyes and ears, you're letting them know you're not playing games. And the rhetoric that's been
coming out of them for the last eight weeks really looks hollow today.
Well, Brian, if you can hear me, I think you can.
Yep.
I will say that, first of all, you mentioned 2020.
You're right in 2020.
I got more votes than anybody in it.
Oh, he's off the rails.
But just stick with it.
And you'll see how Brian Kilmeet is like, I got to save this guy.
... Republican Party and got more votes, but the election was rigged.
But in 2024, I really got it.
We made it too big to rig.
And so it's, but we did great in 2020.
I was a rigged election.
And you saw it in California, very interesting if I could just divert.
So the kid got, you know, the shaft.
And he did Spencer Pratt.
He did really pretty damn well.
And they threw them out.
And it was happening to see.
Remember the question was about bombing water facilities in Iran?
And I went on a tear.
And they said it was going to be two wings.
And they said it was going to be two weeks, and they'll know about Hilton whether or not he's going to make it.
I went on such a tear that they approved it immediately.
They approved Stephen.
It's such a rigged deal.
It's so crazy.
They approved him so fast because everybody was watching.
And he was leading, and it was leading by a lot.
And you saw his lead was dissipating rapidly.
They would take it away from him, just like they took it away from the kid.
And I went on a tear.
And by the way, we have the U.S. attorneys looking at it.
Understand that we are still totally off track.
He's almost two minutes in, and Brian Kilmead now is going to try to bring him back.
And the two weeks said all of a sudden is, oh, we have a surprise.
Steve Hilton won.
And he did win.
But they were going to take it away shortly.
They were going to take it away over a two-week period.
You know, they announced that they wouldn't have the results for a week to two weeks.
All of a sudden, they approved Steve Hill.
But Iran.
It's a rigged election.
Iran, but I shouldn't have brought that up.
But how do you feel better?
But let's get back.
Let's get back.
That was, I just want to say to the public, it's a rigged election.
We need to save America act, period.
Okay.
Let's get back to Iran, much simpler.
Yes, exactly.
Trump cannot focus.
He can't respond to questions.
He simply can't do it.
And it stunned the Fox hosts.
You could tell that they were doing everything they could to manage this interview and to
try to make Trump seem halfway reasonable and they couldn't do it.
Trump then pulls out this entire thing of we could solve this Iran thing overnight.
We're destroying them.
Think about how long it's been.
It's been months of Trump saying they have no Navy or Air Force.
And yet somehow they keep fighting.
They took down one of our Apache helicopters.
Does anyone believe this crap anymore?
Mr. President, so I get the impression that you're frustrated with Iran.
I'm not frustrated.
I don't get frustrated.
Well, I'll say this way, that it's almost an ultimatum now, that there's no more negotiation at this point.
You went back and forth with them.
You gave them two weeks.
and now they have to take the deal that you have offered them,
that you try to negotiate in good faith,
or everything goes, and the people can be liberated.
Is that what's happening right now?
Well, that could happen if we want to keep going,
and, you know, the deal is a very good deal.
The problem with the deal is that it could be the greatest deal in history.
They could wave the white flag of surrender.
They could say, we surrender, we surrender, we're finished,
we've had it, the United States is the greatest power.
praise me to Allah
and they could do all of this
they could say it
loud and clear
and the fake news would say
it was a great victory
for Iran
I mean it's the craziest thing
I've ever seen
we're killing them
they're killing them
they have no Navy
they have no air force
they have no anti-aircraft
you know we're flying planes
over the middle of Tehran
and they don't
have no idea what
we're there
we've knocked out
all of their radar
all of their anti-aircraft
much of their missiles
they have probably
less than 20%
about we think about 20%.
Most of their
launchers,
the missile launches,
which are quite important.
Their drone capacity
is way down.
You see it.
I mean,
it's way down.
Their attacks are very minor.
They're finished.
And yet,
the fake news,
just like with the election,
the fake news
is out there saying,
wow, Iran is doing
just so well.
Trump is doing terribly.
I watched it yesterday.
One of the shows
for five months.
as haven't seen the show in a long while, this fake Joe Scarborough talking about how well Iran is
doing. I'm saying, where do they come from? It's just the craziest thing.
Yeah, rambling. Rambling. Mr. President. Rambling. Rambling. This is the person who is making
decisions about who to go to war with and at least conceivably would have access to nuclear weapons.
Trump says that behind the scenes, Trump says that Iran is getting great press, but that they all
also are negotiating with us to make a deal.
Trump is presenting a completely unbelievable scenario.
Let me guess the Iranians have tears in their eyes, big, strong guys desperate to end the war
for the 12th time.
I will tell you, they won't even dispute it, although they probably would because it makes
sense.
They're very good.
Iran is very good at publicity, but they're not good at fighting.
Right.
I took a look.
That's Ainslie Earhart desperate to get this on track.
What a gong show of an interview.
I must tell you, they...
can't believe the press they're getting.
They can't even believe it.
And they told me, they said it's amazing how well we're doing in the papers.
We're not doing so well.
They're negotiating with us to make a deal.
Well, Mr. President.
It's hard for them.
Ainsley is not going to be able to do it, guys.
She can't do it.
Because they are proud.
They're very proud.
They've been the bully.
They've been the bully of the Middle East for 47 years.
Yeah, they have.
They've been ripping off our presidents and other countries for years.
They've been, they played Obama for a fool.
the JCPOA is the worst one of the worst deals I've ever seen other than NAFTA, the NAFTA trade deal,
which was made.
This is random words, free word association.
Be the worst deal ever made.
Mr. President.
But the JCPOA was a road to a nuclear weapon.
Mine is a road.
What's that seven times she tried to interject?
To no nuclear weapon.
Right.
They can't have a nuclear.
It says you cannot have a nuclear weapon.
We will not have.
And I didn't like it.
It wasn't strong enough because it said develop.
You cannot develop.
I said, no, I want buy also.
So they fought me on that for a day and then they agreed to it.
You cannot develop or purchase a nuclear weapon.
You know, so it's so we got everything.
But the press just covers it so crazily.
They don't worry about it.
No matter what I do, no matter what I do, the press will say it was a great victory for
a run.
Everybody's being so mean to me.
Ladies and gentlemen, Trump has stated over 40 times that he has, we basically won.
He has said over 40 times.
Trump has said over 30 times that Iran's military capabilities have been destroyed.
And yet two days ago, they took down an Apache helicopter.
Trump has said almost 40 times that a deal is imminent, either within hours or days.
And yet the three-week war is about to get into week 16.
And Fox hosts are desperate to save him and they can't do it.
The David Packman show is an audience supported program and the best most direct way to support
the show is by becoming a member at join packman.com.
You'll get the daily bonus show, the daily commercial free show, and plenty of other great
membership perks.
Get the full experience by signing up at join packman.com.
You know, it's pretty common for Jessica Tarlov on the Five to make one of her Mayo
Brained.
white wing co-hosts look kind of silly. But it's not common that the Mayo brain co-hosts will go,
you got me. And that is exactly what happened in this short clip that I'm going to play for you.
This is one of those moments on cable news where someone is so committed to defending Donald Trump
that they forget that a lot of things are public. And that is exactly what happened here.
Jessica Tarlov is talking about the way that Republicans describe Democrats versus the way that
they excuse everything that Donald Trump does. And she starts
listing all of the things that Republicans condemn in their political opponents. When an opponent
cheated on a spouse or lied or insulted a hero or whatever, they attack Democrats. But all of those
things apply to Donald Trump. And then Emily Compagno immediately jumps in and goes, no,
Trump didn't insult heroes. That's a hoax. And it's not, well, I don't know that that's what he meant.
It's exaggerated. She just goes, no, that's a hoax. And just,
Jessica Tarlov goes, oh, really? He never insulted John McCain. And the conversation is over because
everybody remembers when Trump went. I prefer my war heroes who didn't get captured. One of the most
vile lines a president has used about a veteran in the entire time I've been covering politics.
That's for sure. Take a look at this.
To buy a senator. That's what people are looking for. They want someone in office so they don't
can be bought off. And then about Collins pointing out the 95% voting with Trump. When you listen to
Republicans that are going after Graham Platner, they're doing the stuff that Jesse is saying.
Like I was listening to and I adore her. You know, Kelly Ann last night talking about his scandals,
cheated on his wife, he lied, insulted heroes. That's Donald Trump. No, he did not insult heroes.
Yes, he, that was the hoax when you're saying in France. Oh, I'm sorry. Oh, Donald Trump never
insulted John McCain?
Mm.
Oh, that's the best.
She just got, mm, mm, mm.
You're right, Jessica.
That's right.
I like people who weren't captured.
Not a secret recording that was surreptitiously leaked, not an anonymous source.
Trump said it in public on camera in front of reporters.
Millions of people saw it.
And the, the, there's no, there's no comeback to that.
There's no explanation to it.
There are sort of two different ways to defend Trump.
ways to defend Trump. And I think it's interesting to think about and understand this in the Trump
era of political media. One is to argue what he said wasn't that bad or he didn't mean it or it wasn't
in the context that you believe or the people people who asked him about it had the worst
intentions and tricked him or whatever. The other is just to go, he never said that. The second
strategy of he never said that is riskier because sometimes there's overwhelming evidence.
Now, let me point you to a different example.
You might remember the allegation that Trump said in private, the troops are suckers and losers.
That we have corroborating testimony for, but there's no recording of it.
So they can continue as Trump and the people around him have continued to do to say, that never really happened.
John Bolton is lying.
He's low energy and he's a bad, you know, I made a mistake in hiring him or you can.
can't believe him. He's disgruntled, whatever. But it's risky because sometimes the stuff is on
camera. And the McCain example is one of the worst possible ones to confront them with for them
because everybody knows that it happened. And in fact, a lot of Republicans who do revere and
respect in their own way, the service of troops and veterans, remember it because it was shocking
to a lot of them before they supported Donald Trump as well.
supporters know that it happened.
And even many defenders of Trump admit that it did take place.
The debate could be over whether it mattered, whether he meant it, or something like that.
But there is no debate whatsoever as to whether that took place.
And that's what makes this brutal.
Let's just look again at the look on Emily Compagnos face when she got me.
She got me.
That's Donald Trump.
No, he did not insult heroes.
Yes, he'd that was the hoax.
And when you're saying in France.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Donald Trump never insulted John McCain.
Mm.
Mm.
That.
Mm.
That is remarkable.
Remarkable.
Remarkable.
If your argument depends on people forgetting things that they very clearly remember, it takes
one reminder and you've got nowhere to go.
And that's what happened here.
Now, by the way, just because we're talking about Jessica Tarlov, let me mention.
Jessica Tarlov blurbed my forthcoming book with.
the beautiful blurb. I'll just read it. This is on the Amazon page for my book. Pay, pay attention.
This is Jessica here. Quote, if I didn't know better, I'd think Pacman has been reading my mind
literally. Pay attention is a sharp unsettling look at our well-founded anxieties over how the
attention economy and AI-driven media are warping our politics, our psychology, and our sense of
reality and what it will take to reclaim them. Pacman is well positioned to take on this challenge.
His livelihood depends on understanding how algorithms reward outrage, punish nuance, and quietly
rewire our brains. I love that. Thank you so much to Jessica for blurbing the book.
We're going to officially launch the pre-order campaign in a couple of weeks, but you can pre-order
my forthcoming book at David Pakman.com slash attention and know that once we launch,
the pre-order goodies, you'll qualify.
Just keep your receipt and you'll qualify for whatever we set up.
And the book I'm seeing is now discounted, in fact, on Amazon audio book available, all of that good stuff.
All right.
I hate to do this to some of you.
Some of you, I'm glad I'm about with what I'm about to do.
But some of you, I do feel a little bad about it.
I've got to do a nipple story.
Nipple.
Don't spit out your coffee.
This is a bizarre story.
There's new reporting from the New York Times that there was a situation room meeting to go over how
to deal with the allegation that Donald Trump is obsessed with women's nipples.
This meeting happened in August.
It relates to the Epstein scandal.
What was happening was the DOJ was setting up this searchable database of the Epstein files.
And one of the things that people in Trump's inner circle were worried about was that it would
surface all of these embarrassing stories about Donald Trump.
They were testing the database and one of the first things that would come up when people would
search for Trump in the files was an allegation from Sarah Ransom, an Epstein accuser from a civil
settlement where she alleged that Epstein trafficked a girl known to Sarah as Jen.
Jen reportedly slept with Trump and said Trump was obsessed with nipples and was I and I apologize,
Okay. Trump was very rough with her nipples. This wildly triggered the people in the conversation. You had
J.D. Vance on one side. This is per Washington Post reporting. You had J.D. Vance on one side saying,
we've got to release all of it. Put everything out there. We can say, listen, we've gone above
and beyond. We've even put stuff out that makes Trump look bad. That was J.D.'s opinion.
Now, this is very interesting because you've got to wonder whether.
Vance saw an opportunity for himself there to help himself. The worst Trump looks, maybe the better
J.D. Vance looks by comparison. Imagine a scenario where Trump is ultimately removed. J.D. Vance
becomes president. It's a little conspiratorial, but it's interesting that J.D. Vance was the one saying
release everything, but not everybody agreed. Donald Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles,
said Trump would not want to release this stuff. And reportedly that ended the debate.
Susie Wiles presenting Trump's view, according to others in the room, basically shut the entire thing down.
Now, imagine the scene, the situation room where decisions are made and could be made up to
and including to nuke other countries, decisions about war and national security.
And the topic is Trump's alleged sexual preferences.
Now, I should mention that the nipple claims are disputed.
And I don't mean they're disputed in terms of ariola size or anything like that.
The accuser, Sarah Ransom, made some other claims that were walked back.
For example, she had said, I have sex tapes of powerful men.
And then she said, eh, I actually don't have sex tapes of powerful men.
Then she said, well, I only walked it back because of fears for my family getting harassed.
But regardless, she claimed to have these tapes.
The existence of those tapes has never materialized.
In the room, they were, I guess, acting as if the nipple claims were discredited.
But that may simply have been out of politeness to help Trump safe base, whatever.
It is an accusation that's not been independently verified.
Now, I have to tell you, whether Trump is obsessed with nipples, the real problem here is that Trump as president is obsessed with enriching himself and starting wars and paying to put his name on.
stuff, selling cheap crap to his followers, lying, corruption, nepotism.
That's the real problem.
If Trump are a good president, if I could look at Trump and go, listen, he's perfect on health
care, he's great on taxes, foreign policy is phenomenal.
I could go listen, let him have all the nipples he wants as long as it's consensual, as long
as it's consensual.
And it's unclear based on the allegations, whether this stuff, I think it's supposedly
allegations of consensual behavior. I don't know. That's a whole other problem. I'm not even
sure. I don't know whether the allegation is that this stuff was consensual. But assuming Trump
is is nipple obsessed and whatever, there's women who are okay with that. If he is getting
everybody health care and, you know, making the country respect again, I could look the other way.
The problem is Trump does have a reputation of being cruel to women.
He was found civilly liable of sexual assault against E. Jean Carroll meeting the definition
of rape according to a judge. He, according to one of his ex-wives, he sexually assaulted her.
So it all kind of tracks that maybe it's true and maybe it's not consensual, but it has not
been independently verified. It is simply an accusation. The biggest shock here is look at what has
happened to the centers of executive power in the United States. The White House in a physical sense
has been degraded with demolition to build a ballroom that we don't need and who knows if it'll
ever happen. It's gaudy. It's just vile. They've built a UFC arena for a
a fight on Sunday for Donald Trump's birthday. It's the physical degradation of the White House
and the White House has also been debased ideologically by the presence of Donald Trump.
And the situation room in and of itself now has completely incompetent people in it
participating in decisions. And some of the conversations are about Trump's predilection for
nipples. So we've we've gone downhill as a country is the big take away. Nipple.
Yes or nipples no, whatever.
On the bonus show today, we will be talking about payouts from Trump's anti-weaponization
fund.
But wait a second.
I thought that fund was dead.
It may not be dead after all.
We have learned that the construction of Donald Trump's arch will take three years with 20
hours of construction per day.
What do you think that's going to cost?
And we will also talk about Alabama's nitrogen executions being determined to be cruel and unusual
punishment according to a judge.
All of those stories and more at join packman.com.
If you missed the Tuesday membership drive and would like to sign up at 50% off, send
an email to info at david packman.com.
Say, David, give me that code.
I missed it.
And we'll get that code right out for you.
I'll see you on the bonus show.
I'll be back tomorrow.
