The Deck Investigates - 15 of 15: Next in the Investigation

Episode Date: March 9, 2023

In the season one finale of Darlene Hulse’s case, we lay out next steps for officials, fill you in on three other loose ends we’re continuing to work, and ask you to do your part to get justice fo...r Darlene.  Click HERE to sign the petition and demand justice for Darlene Hulse.If you believe you have information about Darlene Hulse’s 1984 abduction and murder in Argos, Indiana, please email thedeck@audiochuck.com.To view information and photos referenced in this episode, visit https://thedeckpodcast.com/next-in-the-investigation/Brought to you by CarMax. Car buying reimagined. Find a car you’ll love at CarMax.com. Find more of The Deck Investigates on social media.Instagram: @thedeckpodcast | @audiochuckTwitter: @thedeckpodcast_ | @audiochuckFacebook: /TheDeckPodcast | /audiochuckllcThe Deck Investigates is hosted by Ashley Flowers. Instagram: @ashleyflowersTikTok: @ashleyflowerscrimejunkieTwitter: @Ash_FlowersFacebook: /AshleyFlowers.AFText Ashley at +1 (317) 733-7485 to share your thoughts about the case, discuss all things true crime, get behind the scenes updates, and more!

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 As of last summer, authorities have Ron Hulse's DNA swab. They agreed to do a direct comparison test against the partial male profile found on Darlene's blouse. Not because Ron is a suspect, but because he's her husband. If that DNA belongs to Ron, then it actually means the profile is kind of useless. Maybe it was from their hug goodbye that morning when he went to work, in which case it means that we need to start testing other items while we still can to get a suspect sample. And that sample might be right there in the slides from her autopsy if they still have them.
Starting point is 00:00:38 If they did a comparison between Ron's swab and the semen, they could figure out pretty quickly if it did in fact belong to Ron. But we asked Prosecutor Chipman if that has been done yet, and he said no. It was the first of many no's that we'd hear. This is Episode 15, next in the investigation. We also asked Chipman if there were any immediate plans to get a swab from Kenneth McCune Jr. And he said he still needed to write an affidavit to get a court order to do so.
Starting point is 00:01:24 So what are you waiting for? I'm not waiting for, I'm waiting for my people. I, I, I gotta do, I got work to cut out. I mean, I got work to do. Maybe you're too early. It's been almost 40 years. I feel like you could put that clip on repeat, and it was every conversation we had with Nelson.
Starting point is 00:01:46 When Emily met with him in August, the plan was to get some comparison testing done in October. Then the goal was by Thanksgiving, then by the end of the year for sure. We haven't gotten any updates since then. When we push, Nelson gives us the same story he's always given Kristen. They're busy. New cases come in every day. No doubt. I don't think he's bluffing, but I also don't think that's an excuse. What keeps you motivated in wanting to solve this case? Justice. That's the romantic way of saying it, but it's also there's ego.
Starting point is 00:02:20 You know, I want to win, but I want to, you know, I want that family to have some kind of closure. I never liked that term or that concept. I don't even understand what it means. Justice, ego, and closure for the family. If his ego wants a win, it seems like a softball. We're at the point where the only thing that's left to do is test the freaking evidence. It's the only thing I personally can't do. Nelson's lack of urgency around this
Starting point is 00:02:52 has been driving us bonkers for the last year. And please keep in mind, the frustration that we've felt is just a fraction of what Darlene's family has lived with for nearly four decades. If I put myself in their shoes and we're talking to the state police, what I want to say is, I get that new crimes are popping up every day, but if we've got something so viable, and we've been waiting 38 years,
Starting point is 00:03:19 when do we get to cut to the front of the line? And I understand the frustration. I understand the frustration. I understand the frustration. Right, and I'm not saying there's like an easy fix or something. It's just heartening. Nelson said he's never thought about it that way. About Darlene's case, getting to cut the line because she and her family have already waited so long. I mean, it seems like the most natural conclusion to me.
Starting point is 00:03:44 Which is why I think bringing in fresh perspectives can be good sometimes. So what now? The to-do list for authorities is short and simple. Number one, compare the unknown sample to Ron. If it ends up being his DNA, go back to the underwear, to the sexual assault kit, other pieces of evidence, and do more retesting to get a new sample. Number two, if it's not Ron, or once another sample is obtained, start going down the list and testing it against people known in the investigation, both then and now. Now, for me and Emily, our to-do list is a little less straightforward. I mean, really, our to-do list comes to a grinding halt. The second comparison testing is done and Darlene's killer is identified.
Starting point is 00:04:32 But until then, we want to keep looking at all the things that still don't make sense. And we want to keep pulling at little threads that unravel into something bigger. And there are all of these little threads, some that lead nowhere, some that might mean nothing, but we don't know unless we pick and pull them apart. Here's an example. Back around the holidays,
Starting point is 00:04:56 as Emily and I were in the thick of writing this series, we kept going back through old reports to fact-check and also to make sure that we hadn't missed anything. And almost every time we did, we came up with another person worth investigating. Like, do you remember the Argus appliance guy, Lee? I told you about him back in episode six. Ron Hulse said that he was going to do a house call on the day that Darlene was abducted. Ron told police in one of his original interviews that Lee was supposed to stop by that morning to check out a faulty refrigerator light. We called him and he was supposed to come down shortly then and fix it. As it turned out, he was on his way at 9 30 that
Starting point is 00:05:35 morning, drove by the road and said, well, I promised I'd call first. So he kept driving and went into Rochester. Police didn't pose any follow-up questions about this, but I have a few. First, we know Darlene was about to head out the door that morning with all three girls for Kristen's doctor appointment, which was at 10 o'clock in Plymouth. So she wasn't even planning on being home at 9.30 that morning to meet a fridge repairman.
Starting point is 00:06:02 So was it an unplanned spontaneous house call? I mean, you have a man who says that he's gonna stop by the Hulse house on the day and the exact time a murder is going down and you don't interview him? We asked Sergeant Yoculet about this and he said that he remembered this lead about Lee Chisholm, but he doesn't remember anything coming from it.
Starting point is 00:06:23 I gather that Lee was older and didn't quite fit the physical description of the suspect, so it was discounted quickly. But after doing a little digging ourselves, we found out that Lee has a son who was within the suspect's age range, who is a convicted sex offender. Sergeant Yoculet didn't remember anything about the son,
Starting point is 00:06:42 and the son didn't return our calls, so it's hard to say if he even worked for his dad back in the mid-80s or would have known about the Holst's refrigerator problems. But again, this is another question worth getting answers to in this case. Another name that sometimes gets tossed around in Darlene's case is Ray Oviatt, a former Baptist pastor from Argus who was arrested for child molestation in 1986. That would have been two years after Darlene's murder. He was head of the First Baptist Church in Argus in the 80s, which is one of the churches that the Holces attended for a bit while they were kind of church hopping.
Starting point is 00:07:16 Now there's a rumor around Argus that because Darlene played piano for the church, that she was there during a weekday and maybe walked in on the pastor molesting a young boy, and that her murder was a silencing tactic. But according to Darlene's family, Darlene did not play piano at First Baptist and wouldn't have ever had a reason to go there for anything besides Sunday service. And by the time Darlene died, the Holces were attending a completely different church, Liberty Baptist. We've already talked about why, but nothing about Darlene's case says it was a hit job. And her family feels like the pastor theory is just a baseless rumor. But do you want to hear about the little thread that really keeps me up at night. There's another man that police questioned briefly back in 1984 because of something an officer found in the Hulse's yard after the murder. It was this torn piece of a
Starting point is 00:08:13 prescription paper with the name Robert Ewing on it. Now, that alone is not all that suspicious until you look at the date. There is something scribbled out, and written in its place is August 17, 1984, the day Darlene was abducted. According to old reports, Robert told police that he didn't know the Hulses, but he thought that maybe he had been at their house for a yard sale a few weeks prior. We asked Darlene's family,
Starting point is 00:08:42 but they don't remember there ever being any yard sales at their house. I even had Emily check old newspaper ads for yard sales at the Hulse home from that summer, and there weren't any. We even had Darlene's daughters ask their dad, Ron. Nobody remembers hosting yard sales there. Now, Sergeant Yoculet told us that he remembers this lead, and he remembers following up on it because he said there was a valid reason for that paper to be there. He just doesn't remember what it was. Nelson suggested that maybe the piece of paper flew over into the Hulses' yard from the nearby
Starting point is 00:09:17 landfill, which we found so weird. Why even suggest a thing unless it had any merit? I mean, there is a landfill about a half a mile south of where the Hulses lived, so his suggestion wasn't totally random. But it's not like trash from there is constantly blowing into people's yards. And that logic doesn't even make sense. Again, it was dated 817. Then you're saying it made it to the landfill on 8-17 and then blew into Darlene's yard that same day? I don't think so. Old reports are vague. They don't say exactly where or what day the paper was found. Though the way that the reports are written makes us think that this piece of paper was found pretty soon after Darlene's body was found.
Starting point is 00:10:02 Like when police were all over the property looking for evidence. It seems like police just took Robert's word for it, because in the report, the officer wrote that there was no need to follow up. We tried to reach Robert Ewing, but we got a family member instead who said that Robert wasn't in good enough health to speak with us. We're also actively trying to track down this guy, or pretty much a kid at the time, who was in the woods hunting the day Darlene's body was found. He claimed to be just 20 feet from where the body was discovered, but said that he never saw anything. It's particularly interesting to me because there were reports from other Hulse women, Ron's mom and sister, about someone who was lurking around their properties and peeping into the window months or even years before Darlene's death.
Starting point is 00:10:53 And the officer who interviewed this young man mentioned that there were rumors that he was that peeping Tom, which he denied. But I'd still love to talk to him. And then there are all these other rapes and murders at the time. First and foremost, I think the Brandy Peltz case needs a second look, specifically in comparison to Darlene's case. For years, Marshall County authorities have discounted a connection between Brandy and Darlene's case because of the different causes of death.
Starting point is 00:11:24 But now we have an expert saying that Darlene was likely sexually assaulted and strangled, just like Brandy two years later and just less than two miles up the road. The big difference between the cases was the fact that Darlene was taken from her home and Brandy was placed in the bathtub and her killer lit a fire inside the house. But even those details make the Holst her killer lit a fire inside the house. But even those details make the Holst daughters wonder about a connection. You can't tell me all those are not related. Right there. But why did he set that house on fire? Well, think about it, though. He's trying to cover it up. He's like, OK, I jacked up moms like I took her somewhere and they found her body.
Starting point is 00:12:01 How am I going to get rid of this one? I mean, honestly, what would you do? What would get rid of all the evidence? You would set something on fire. I mean, also seeing us coming out of the bathtub, that sparked his imagination of, oh, a bathtub. I don't know, I know that sounds weird, but he's reviewing everything in his head and he's like, yeah, water. Fire.
Starting point is 00:12:21 Brandy's not the only case I'm interested in giving a closer look. There was a string of rapes across northern Indiana at the time Brandy's not the only case I'm interested in giving a closer look. There was a string of rapes across northern Indiana at the time that I find particularly interesting. And a weird tip I've never been able to shake suggests that Darlene's case could be connected to the murders of other Indiana housewives in the surrounding years. Is there a season two of Darlene's case up our sleeve? I don't know. Honestly, I hope not. Because that would mean the authorities did the testing and we don't have to keep digging.
Starting point is 00:12:53 It means Marie, Melissa, and Kristen finally have the answers after all of these years. And you know what? Answers is all they want. Not justice or vengeance. Just answers. It's the why. What did you think you were going to accomplish?
Starting point is 00:13:10 But now that we know more about it, I feel like that answers some of the why. But like, why her? Why that time of day? I selfishly want to be like, you saw us. You saw us. You saw us. You knew what you were taking away from three young girls. You saw us all. You saw her.
Starting point is 00:13:31 Crawling around. You saw her. You chased. Like, what? How did you think it was going to turn out? If you get the chance to, you know, ask this person any questions or anything you'd want to say to him. What did you hope to accomplish?
Starting point is 00:13:49 And please tell me that you took her life and she was not aware of it, that she didn't suffer. Do you ever think about us? Did you follow any of us? I've had that question asked to me a lot. Like, when people find out, they're like, is that why you moved? And I was like, it's actually not why we moved, even though it seems that way. There's a lot of questions.
Starting point is 00:14:12 Did you follow her? Did you stalk her? When did you see her? How did you get over that and then live a normal life? What did you do after you dumped her? What was your day like? What did you do the following weeks? Where'd you go? I'm not all about him getting punished, but just the fact that we could go on and never, never know anything. Just, I don't know. I mean, once upon a time I would have been a
Starting point is 00:14:41 lot harsher, but now I just want closure. I just want, I feel like time is running out for my dad. He told me yesterday when we were in the kitchen, and I was asking him all those questions, he's like, I've just, oh, Kristen, I've just resorted and told myself that this is never going to get solved. We'll never know. The Hulse family deserves those answers, and they do deserve justice.
Starting point is 00:15:09 Something that has been so remarkable about working on this project has been seeing that despite the awful tragedy that happened to their family, they all have so much happiness and love in their lives. I mean, in half the audio from our interviews with them, you can hear it. Babies cooing, kids interrupting to ask their moms for snacks, and teenagers running through the house. The first time I heard it, the audio producer in me was like, crap, we can't use any of this. But then I listened close. I listened as a mom. You hungry, baby? Yeah. Okay, get you some food.
Starting point is 00:15:47 She eats french fries at the fort. What kind of crazy is she? Love and laughter fill their houses, and it's comforting knowing that whoever did this to Darlene couldn't take that away from her family. And I hope Darlene can hear all of it. Darlene will always be their mom. She's not the body in the woods or the homicide victim. She is the woman who made all of their own bedding and clothes
Starting point is 00:16:16 and lived frugally to make sure she could send all three of them to college. She would try and make a meal, like a dollar a meal. You know, that's what she wanted to spend because she was trying to save for our college. Even when I was little, that was something that she was already saying, you know, we're going to save for your college. You girls are going to college. When the girls were little, Darlene would do these audio diaries with them, and she would ask them questions and help them practice pronouncing words. It's now March 29, 1980. Marie is three and a half. Melissa is 27 months old.
Starting point is 00:16:55 They're taking their bath now. We're going to be talking. Okay. Marie, say your ABCs. K-L-O-P-Q-R-S She did these to document what her kids sounded like at different ages, not knowing that they would grow up to cherish the recordings to remember her voice. Today is December 17th, 1980. Marie is four years old and Melissa will be three on December 29th in a couple weeks. And here is what they sound like at this age. Marie, what would you like for Christmas this year? Tinkerbell. Tinkerbell what?
Starting point is 00:17:49 What's that? What kind of Tinkerbell? Lipstick. What do you want, Melissa? Candy cane. Candy cane? Did you see Santa last week? Yeah, we did.
Starting point is 00:18:01 What did he say? He said, you want some Tinkerbell? Yeah, I want to. Did you think you were a good girl or a bad girl? Good girl. He thought you were a good girl. What did you say, Melissa? Did you like Santa?
Starting point is 00:18:15 Yeah. You did? How come you went to the lab? Because I don't want to. Well, maybe next time, huh? Darlene was also the kind of mom who would just choke around with her kids. She was silly, and she wasn't afraid to go outside and play with them. She had on a Playboy Bunny shirt. Do you remember that?
Starting point is 00:18:36 You probably don't remember that. Vaguely remember the stupid shirt. Yeah. We were like, you can't run. You can't run as fast as we can. And it's the stretch of ride between our house and our grandparents. And she's like, I can too. I remember her running and me thinking, you don't have the right bra on. Darlene also made everything homemade.
Starting point is 00:18:55 Curtains, comforters, clothes. And she made her daughters and other family members dolls that they can't bear to display in their homes because they're so creepy, but that they can't get rid of because they represent how much their mom loved them. I literally have them in my attic and I try not to look at them. I have one in my closet. I think it's one that she was making for one of my cousins. Darlene Hulse spent one day of her life as a victim. But she had 28 years of being a friend and a sister and a daughter, a wife,
Starting point is 00:19:27 and a wonderful mom. She was a talented piano player, an intelligent, natural leader who graduated the top of her classes, and she was a woman who loved her kids so much that she spent her last living moments fighting like hell to protect her daughters. What else can we talk about? last living moments fighting like hell to protect her daughters. What else can we talk about? Want to talk about teddy bear? Who's teddy bear?
Starting point is 00:19:53 Teddy bear's my puppy. What color is he? White. What's he do? I don't want more people. Mommy said pick up your twin and she's a good mommy. I'll see you later. I love you, Mommy. This might be the end of our series for now,
Starting point is 00:20:13 but Darlene's story is far from over. We will keep investigating her murder, and we aren't done demanding action from investigators to solve it. And this is where you come in. We need each and every one of you to support Darlene's family by signing a petition to have her evidence tested and comparisons done in a timely manner. We have a link for that petition directly in the show notes, and you can also find the link on DarleneHulse.com. I also think there are some of you out there who can help us dig even deeper.
Starting point is 00:20:48 If the following people are listening, please reach out to us by emailing thedeck at audiochuck.com. Officer Fish, you were the first on the scene that day, and we have questions that the photos that we've been given just can't answer. We would love to talk to you. I want to talk to that young man who was hunting in the woods that day her body was found. Robert Ewing, I think you could quickly clear up the confusion we have about your prescription and how it got into the yard. If there's anyone who worked with Ron Hulse at Young Door in Plymouth who remembers the day Darlene was abducted, you might have valuable information. I'd also like to talk to the Hulce's dog breeder. Their dog Ling was with you at the time of
Starting point is 00:21:30 Darlene's attack, and we wonder if her killer knew that the dog wouldn't be home. So we're trying to find out who would have known their dog was with you. If there's anyone familiar with the people that we've discussed in detail, knowing more about their whereabouts and demeanors around the time of Darlene's murder could be critical information. We're also trying to get in touch with a former 911 dispatcher from Fulton County, Indiana named Stephanie Miller.
Starting point is 00:21:55 You took a call regarding Darlene's abduction in 1984 that we think could be important to her case, so we need to talk to you. We'd also be interested in talking to the people in the car that passed by six-year-old Melissa on August 17th, 1984, near the intersection of US 31 and 20B Road in Argus, Indiana. It would have been around 9.30 that morning. There's also the people in the black town car that were driving slow near Interstate 110 and Olive Trail on August 17th between 9 30 and 10. You likely saw the suspect vehicle along with Cindy Sellers and we'd love to see what you remember.
Starting point is 00:22:32 And we'd still love to talk to Dr. Rick Hoover. If nothing else, it's time to re-examine your 1984 findings regarding Darlene Hulse's autopsy. And we need to know if the slides from her sexual assault kit were preserved and can still be tested. And to the Indiana State Police, please expedite testing of blood and potential semen on Darlene's underwear. And finally, if anyone listening has any information about the August 17th, 1984 murder of Darlene Hulse in Argus, Indiana, even if I didn't mention you above, please reach out. Again, you can email us at thedeck at audiochuck.com. That email is also in the show notes. And please do not forget to sign the petition.
Starting point is 00:23:20 With your help, justice for Darlene could be right around the corner. The Deck Investigates is an AudioChuck production with theme music by Ryan Lewis. To learn more about The Deck Investigates, The Deck, and our advocacy work, visit thedeckpodcast.com. So, what do you think, Chuck? Do you approve?

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.