The Deck - Rachael Runyan (5 of Clubs, Utah)

Episode Date: August 3, 2022

Our card this week is Rachael Runyan the 5 of Clubs from Utah. When Elaine Runyan called her three children in for lunch on August 26, 1982, only two came running. Her youngest, 3-year-old Rachael wa...s missing. One month later, in a discovery that shook the Sunset, UT community to its core, little Rachael Runyan’s body was found. Despite witnesses, an extensive investigation, and relentless efforts by the family, the case went cold and has stayed that way for over 40 years. That is, until recently. If you have any information about the 1982 abduction and murder of Rachael Runyan please call the Sunset Police Department at (801) 825-1620.  To learn more about The Deck, visit www.thedeckpodcast.com. To apply for the Cold Case Playing Cards grant through Season of Justice, visit www.seasonofjustice.org

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Our card this week is Rachel Runyon, the five of clubs from Utah. In the early 80s, a small town's illusion of safety was shattered when one of its youngest residents was kidnapped just steps away from her backyard, and her abduction, along with some strange happenings that unfolded after, has haunted the residents of Sunset Utah for the last 40 years. I'm Ashley Flowers, and this is The Deck. It was lunchtime on Thursday, August 26, 1982. Elaine Runyon had just finished cooking sloppy joes for her three young children. Their yard had a gate with direct access to a playground, and for the first time ever,
Starting point is 00:01:15 she'd let them go by themselves while she cooked. I mean, she could see almost the whole thing from her window, so now that the food was ready, she called out that very window, letting them know that it was time for them to come in for lunch. That was the deal they'd made. You can go to the playground, but you have to come home as soon as I call for lunch. So when she called their names, she expected to see her three kids running to the house, five-year-old Justin, three-year-old Rachel, and one-and-a-half-year-old Nathan. But there were no kids running toward the house when she called. So she stepped outside to see where they were. To her surprise, they were much farther away than they were supposed to be.
Starting point is 00:01:53 They were all the way across the big field next to the playground. Elaine shouted again for the three to come eat lunch, and this time they heard her. But as they were running back to the house, Elaine noticed it was only Justin and Nathan responding to her shouts. Elaine vividly remembers that day and that very moment because that was when her life changed forever. When her two sons made it back to their yard, Justin's eyes were wide with fear. He goes, Mommy, I was in real bad news. He never said those words in his life. Like, he was just quiet. And he just, he didn't talk like that. So it was strange to hear that being said.
Starting point is 00:02:39 Justin told his mom that Rachel was in a blue car with a man they didn't know. Hurt racing, Elaine dropped to her knees to be face-to-face with the five-year-old Justin. Elaine pressed her son for more information and Justin said all three of them were playing at the playground, building sandcastles, when a man approached them and asked if they wanted to go get ice cream at Bobcoase, which is a local store. Justin said Rachel goes, I like bubble gum. He goes, well, I've got some of my car following me.
Starting point is 00:03:08 And he didn't grab her at that point. He started walking. And so then she's following. And then Justin's following her. And then Nathan is behind hers. As they followed the man to his car, they were getting farther and farther from the playground and their backyard and Justin started to get a bad feeling. And moments later, his fear was
Starting point is 00:03:32 realized when the man did something unexpected. He turned around and he grabbed Rachel and put her over his shoulder and he said to the boys, we'll be right back. And they're like, that doesn't sound right, you know? And by now she's screaming. And the guy put her in the car and she was having her hands on the window screaming, she did not want to go. By now, Elaine was in a complete panic. She rushed into the house and frantically
Starting point is 00:04:06 called her husband Jeff, who was at work. She told him that Rachel had been kidnapped. Jeff told her to call the police while he made his way back home. Once Elaine called 911, officers were on the scene within minutes, swarming her living room and backyard. Elaine grabbed a picture of Rachel off the fridge and handed it to police. A visual guy to help them find a little girl with curly blonde hair and blue eyes. Elaine also described to police what her daughter was wearing when she was taken, and outfit she'll never forget. It was a little sudden dress with matching bloomers, shed tennis shoes and yellow smiley shoe laces.
Starting point is 00:04:45 And the floral pattern was like little green and white and flowers. It was blue trim right here. The police department in sunset Utah was small, but several officers were there and ready to help find Rachel. The first thing they did was try and get a description of the man and his car from 5-year-old Justin. They also tracked down a 10-year-old boy who said he'd been at the playground and saw the man and his car as well.
Starting point is 00:05:15 Both young boys described him as a tall black man, maybe 38-35, with a mustache driving a blue-fort pinto with wood grain paneling down the sides. Within 20 minutes, police had blocked roads in the area and were screening cars. Officers were hopeful they'd find her. It had only been about a half hour since Rachel was taken and they were quick to take action and were pulling out all the stops to get her back. While police were out looking for Rachel, Elaine was conducting her own search. She rushed to Bob Coase, the store that the man had said he would take the kids to for ice cream,
Starting point is 00:05:48 hoping that maybe by some stroke of luck the man had actually taken Rachel there. The panicked mom asked employees if they'd seen a little girl with a man, but no one had. Police were also hitting a wall. The minutes had turned to hours, and there was no sign of Rachel, her kidnapper, or the blue car. It was late that night when police accepted also hitting a wall. The minutes had turned to hours, and there was no sign of Rachel, her kidnapper, or the blue car. It was late that night when police accepted the fact that the kidnapper had somehow gotten out of town before the roadblocks were in place, so they made plans to launch a full-scale investigation the next morning. Jeff and Elaine Rungan knew that they should try to go to sleep that night, but they couldn't stop thinking about all the horrible things that man might be doing to their daughter.
Starting point is 00:06:29 The first thing officers did the next morning was to have a sketch artist work with Justin and the 10 year old witness to create a composite sketch of the kidnapper. You can actually see that sketch on our website, thedeckpodcast.com. And while police worked, Elaine and Jeff were doing anything they could think of to bring their daughter home. They held fundraisers to raise the reward for Rachel's return. They hung up flyers. And the Sunset community really rallied around them. A local grocery store printed thousands and thousands of flyers for their run-ins to distribute.
Starting point is 00:06:58 And a nearby KFC even put pictures of Rachel on their buckets of chicken. Everybody was trying so hard to think of what they could do to help, to make it better, to bring her home. As Rachel's abduction started to hit the news in Northern Utah, the city of sunset announced that it would offer a $20,000 reward for Rachel's safe return, and the money the Rungans raised was enough to double it.
Starting point is 00:07:21 At the time, the Sunset Police Department was a seven-person agency, so even with officers' best efforts, their investigation wasn't thorough enough to satisfy the Run-In family. So Jeff rented a plane to fly over the area and search for his daughter himself. When nothing turned up with that search,
Starting point is 00:07:39 he took his shotgun and combed through the hills on foot, but still, there was no trace of Rachel or her kidnapper. By Monday, August 30, four days after Rachel's kidnapping, the Rungen started to doubt that they would ever see their daughter again. An article ran on the front page of the Daily Herald that said the family feared the worst. Friends were quoted in that same article and recalled that Jeff and Elaine still weren't eating or sleeping because they were so distraught and they were so focused on finding their daughter. They didn't think that Rachel was being held for ransom because they hadn't received a
Starting point is 00:08:14 ransom note of any kind and B, they weren't rich by any means. Jeff told the Bellingham Herald that they were quote, �Every day ordinary people living paycheck to paycheck. The Runeans started to develop a new theory about what could have happened to their daughter and it broadened their search area to the entire country. They worried that perhaps Rachel had been taken and sold in an illegal adoption or human trafficking ring. As the days dragged by, investigators were also becoming more convinced that Rachel's kidnapper had taken her out of state.
Starting point is 00:08:54 Now, it's not clear where the adoption or out-of-state travel theories came from, but the runeans set out to get national attention for their daughter's case because of this. Eleven days after Rachel was taken, Jeff and Elaine appeared on NBC's The Today Show, begging anyone with information about their daughter's disappearance to come forward. They also issued a nationwide plea for anyone adopting a young girl in the next year or anyone who so much has saw a new girl in the neighborhood to be certain that she was not their little Rachel. saw a new girl in the neighborhood to be certain that she was not their little Rachel. In an interview with the Kansas City Times, Elaine said, quote, �Somebody knows this man.
Starting point is 00:09:30 Somebody knows this girl. If you see anyone pulling a child or fighting with a child, ask her, are you Rachel Runyon? Who is your mommy? For weeks, this is all the Runyon's could do. Plead with the public, hang up flyers, and get as much media attention as possible. Then, late in the evening on September 19, almost a month after Rachel's disappearance,
Starting point is 00:09:55 a phone call came in that would end the search for Rachel and begin a whole new nightmare for the family. It was their bishop on the other end. Key and the mayor of sunset wanted to drop by the house because they had an update on the investigation. Now, the runeans knew a house call. That late at night meant it had to be significant news in Rachel's case. They said, you know, we found Rachel and I'm like, and you know, I'm still hanging on to home. She's alive.
Starting point is 00:10:25 And they said, a small child's body has been found. And I'm like, body, I just can't compute. Like, does that mean she's dead or is a body? And she's OK, you know? Just hanging on to every last, you know, the hope that you could even have. The runeans were told that a family was out for a Sunday drive and a little hike up a mountain canyon about 20 miles from sunset when they got to a stream and they saw what they thought
Starting point is 00:10:59 was a doll in the water, covered partly by some brush. But it hadn't been a doll. It was a young girl whose hands and feet were bound with nylon rope, and it looked like she'd been there a while. As the bishop and mayor sat with the runeans, investigators were almost positive it was Rachel. But they needed to formally identify her before releasing the information to the public. But identifying the young girl proved to be challenging. She matched the basic description of Rachel, but she was so decomposed that many identifying markers were no longer there. And further complicating things was the fact that Rachel didn't have
Starting point is 00:11:33 any dental records for comparison. Authorities tried comparing fingerprints, but that also proved to be difficult because of the amount of time that the girl had been in the water. After a few days of trying fingerprinting and other tests, the examiner knew that there was only one other option. Having Rachel's parents make the identification. Police were hesitant to let them view her, but Elaine and Jeff wanted to bring an end to their waiting, so they braced themselves. And when they saw her, there was no doubt in their minds that it was their Rachel.
Starting point is 00:12:05 Elaine was heartbroken as she confirmed the clothing was her daughters, and though there were no dental records, a mother knows, she recognized Rachel's tooth that was pushed forward, and the other one that was chipped. It was her baby girl. Even though her identity was confirmed, her cause of death and date of death were proven to be even more difficult to determine. Investigators knew that she'd been in that creek for quite some time, perhaps even since August 26th the day she was kidnapped.
Starting point is 00:12:34 But pinpointing it exactly was something that they wouldn't know for sure until they caught her killer. There were no markings or wounds on Rachel to indicate that she'd been shot or stabbed, so many people assumed she'd been strangled or suffocated. But they could never prove that because of the state her body was in when she was found. It's also unclear if she'd been sexually assaulted. Newspapers at the time reported conflicting information, but Elaine told our reporting team that as far as she knows, police never said that Rachel had been sexually assaulted.
Starting point is 00:13:06 On September 23rd, four days after her body was found, Rachel was laid to rest. Hundreds attended her funeral and remembered the young life that was unfairly stolen from them, even though it had barely begun. Rachel was remembered as the sweetest little girl you'd ever meet, and just as cute as could be. She'd even recently won a beauty pageant and been crowned little Miss Sunset. She actually was a very quiet little girl. She wasn't one that ran around, bawling all the time.
Starting point is 00:13:41 She just was really an angel on earth. The runeans were ready to turn their grief into action immediately after identifying Rachel. At her daughter's funeral, Elaine told the crowd that Rachel didn't die for nothing. She said that she was determined to make sure something positive came out of her little girl's murder. And it didn't take long for Elaine's promise to come true. Rachel's case acted as a catalyst for change in the community. Parents across Utah started compiling identification packets for their children in case their kids ever went missing.
Starting point is 00:14:14 Within a month, the parents of more than 30,000 children had their fingerprints, blood type, and dental records recorded in case tragedy ever struck. Parent teacher association chapters across the state were reviving child protection programs, and almost every law enforcement agency in Utah introduced new school programs teaching kids not to trust strangers.
Starting point is 00:14:35 While Rachel's family was making a difference in Utah, police were knee deep in the dozens of tips that were pouring in. Even though Rachel's body had been found in neighboring Morgan County, the Sunset Police Department retained jurisdiction with Lieutenant Phil Olmstead spearheading the investigation. One of the tips that came in came from man
Starting point is 00:14:55 who said that he knew the motive behind Rachel's murder. He claimed that she'd been killed for a snuff film, which is a recording of an actual murder. The term was coined in the 70s following the Manson Family murders and the theory that those killings were recorded. But law enforcement investigating Rachel's case didn't think much of the claim and kind of brushed off the tip, but things just got more strange. Not long after Rachel's funeral, her father Jeff was visiting her grave site and saw something
Starting point is 00:15:26 that truly freaked him out. Laying on Rachel's headstone was a single, black rose. The rose hadn't been there on the day of the funeral and Jeff found it ominous. The Runean family thought if the flower wasn't left by someone who was mourning Rachel's loss, maybe it was put there by the killer. And a few days later, another black rose was mysteriously left on Rachel's gravestone. As suspicious as the roses were, police couldn't figure out who was leaving them. If it were me, I would have set up some kind of surveillance to stake out Rachel's grave and see who was leaving the flowers, but as far as we can tell, that never happened.
Starting point is 00:16:04 It's also unclear if police ever checked with local flower shops to see if anyone had been purchasing single black roses multiple times. I mean, to be fair, maybe they thought it was just some kid playing a prank, or maybe they felt like they had bigger fish to fry in their investigation, because around the same time, officers were starting to consider a possible serial killer connection to Rachel's case. In 1983, a man named Arthur Gary Bishop confessed to several kidnappings and murders near Salt Lake City from 1979 to 1983. So officers in sunset couldn't help but wonder if he'd also targeted Rachel. Bishop was known to lure his young victims from public places before sexually assaulting and killing them.
Starting point is 00:16:50 The only difference was Bishop's other known victims were all boys between the ages of four and 13. Police still questioned him about Rachel, but he denied having any involvement in her murder. And after that, Rachel's case went cold. The tips that were once pouring in were now barely a trickle, and Rachel's name disappeared from the headlines. It seemed like Rachel's killer had vanished into thin air.
Starting point is 00:17:16 There was simply no trace of him. That is, until 1985, two and a half years after Rachel's death, when police got a strange call. Someone phoned in to tell police that they'd found a disturbing message scrolled across the men's restroom wall in a 24 hour laundromat that was just a few miles from the runnyans home.
Starting point is 00:17:39 Officers responded to the laundromat right away to see the message for themselves, and it made their skin crawl. The writing was in all caps and red quote, Beware. I'm still at large. I kill the little runyan girl. Remember, Beware.
Starting point is 00:18:04 And below those words was a drawing that made the message even creepier, an upside-down cross surrounded by three sixes. Police cut out the portion of the wall that contained the message to keep it for evidence, but there wasn't much they could do with it. It wasn't like someone was caught in the act of writing the message, and security cameras were nowhere near as prevalent as they are today, so it's likely that the writer of the message wasn't even caught on camera. So finding this didn't really get law enforcement that much closer to catching their killer. But it did give investigators another viable theory to work with. Lieutenant Almsted
Starting point is 00:18:41 discussed his theory on NBC's unsolved mysteries. with. Lieutenant Olmsted discussed his theory on NBC's Unsolved Mysteries. With the upside down cross in the triple six, it indicates to us that there could very well be a satanic called involved in the kidnapping of Rachel Runyon. Investigators held on to the theory of possible cult involvement, but it was just that, a theory. There was nothing else to go on. And by the way, if you research any murder from the early 80s, you're likely to find out that somewhere along the way, police considered satanic cult involvement. It was a popular vague and widespread theory for almost all homicides back then. Anyway, after the graffiti was found, things in Rachel's case went quiet again.
Starting point is 00:19:24 It wasn't until 1989 that things really started to pick back up. In April of that year, detectives got a tip from a woman who said that she knew who killed Rachel. In fact, she was related to the killer. This woman said that it was her brother who'd committed the murder, and what's more, the woman's story harkened back to a tip from six years earlier in the case. She claimed that Rachel's torture and murder had been videotaped and made into a snuff film.
Starting point is 00:19:55 Because this woman confirmed a story that they'd already heard, and one that they hadn't made public at that point, investigators thought that she seemed credible. So, they struck a deal with her. They would pay her as a confidential informant and she would arrange for their undercover agents to buy a copy of the alleged snuff film that her brother made. According to reporting by the Salt Lake Tribune, agents tried three separate times to purchase the film, but each time the deal fell through for one reason or another. With each failed attempt, police grew more suspicious of their informant,
Starting point is 00:20:29 and after the third try, authorities charged her with theft by deception and obstructing justice, both of which she ended up pleading guilty to. She also recanted most of the information she told police. But police still held on to the snuff film theory. When Rachel's case was featured on that episode of Unsolved Mysteries in 1989, it was the main theory discussed. The episode even showed the dress that Rachel would have likely been wearing in the film if anyone were to find it. And after that episode aired, the floodgates opened.
Starting point is 00:21:02 Somewhere around 150 tips came pouring in from all over the country. It was exactly what law enforcement hoped would happen. Life was brought back into the heartbreaking case that had been sitting on their shelf unsolved for the past seven years. Every lead that came in police investigated as best they could, but as promising as some of the tips seemed, none of them panned out in the end. So investigators were once again back to the drawing board, and they were at that drawing board for decades.
Starting point is 00:21:34 While the investigation was stalled, Elaine was still hard at work fulfilling the promise that she made at Rachel's funeral, that something positive would come from her death. In 2002, the Rachel Alert was created, which was a child abduction alert system for Utah. It actually laid the groundwork for what would later be standardized across the nation as the Amber Alert system. For a long time, it seemed like the story ended there.
Starting point is 00:22:00 But thankfully, it didn't. 37 years after Rachel's kidnapping and murder, private investigator Jason Jensen started looking into her case, and what he unearthed shocked everyone, and it led police to their most promising suspect yet. In late 2019, Jason's wheels started turning. The Utah Cold Case Coalition, which he co-founded, had just helped solve a 1970s cold case in which police were looking for a black man as their suspect. But as it turned out, the actual killer was Hispanic.
Starting point is 00:22:37 This made Jason Wunder about another infamous Utah cold case, Rachel Runions. He wondered if investigators had gotten tunnel vision on her case as well and mistakenly assumed that their killer was a black man. So on Christmas Eve, Jason decided that he couldn't keep this theory to himself any longer. He reached out to Elaine and asked a question no one had asked before. I said, hey, Miss Runion, is there any possibility that your son may have witnessed a Hispanic male instead of an African American? And adjacent surprise, she got back to him the very same day.
Starting point is 00:23:16 After checking with her son Justin, Alain responded, saying that her son no longer thought the man was black, and just remembered him as having a dark complexion. When you think about it, he was five years old. He was Rachel's older brother and he witnessed her being abducted and he said to his mother that he was black. Well, you know, a five-year-old's experience with other ethnicities is going to be very limited because this is a Caucasian family in sunset Utah where other than at the Air Force Base, you know, we're talking a community where there's very little diversity in 1982. Well, in 2019, when I contacted him, he was 42. So his experience has completely altered and brought in in his life experience.
Starting point is 00:24:09 So he ended up saying to me that he was never happy with the composite sketch that was released. Not only was Justin unhappy with the person portrayed in the sketch, but he said a key facial feature wasn't drawn correctly, something that might have made all the difference in the sketch, but he said a key facial feature wasn't drawn correctly. Something that might have made all the difference in the investigation. He recalled vividly that the man who took his little sister had a very pronounced gap in his mustache. So Jason and the Rungian family had the composite sketch redrawn to better reflect the
Starting point is 00:24:40 man Justin saw on August 26, 1982. But for some reason, the new sketch still didn't include a gap in the mustache, so local news station ABC4 Utah took it upon themselves to make an alternate version of this composite, this time with the gap. You can actually see pictures of that sketch on our website as well. Now that they were armed with a more realistic composite of the killer, Jason and the Runions wasted no time. They made a post on the official Rachel Runion Facebook page showcasing the new sketch
Starting point is 00:25:12 and announcing that the suspect description had changed. They were now looking for a man with dark complexion and a mustache gap. As soon as that information got out there, it wasn't 15 minutes that a key witness came forward and said, hey, guess what? My parents talked about turning in my uncle because they thought that he killed Rachel, but my mom talked my dad out of it. The guy that this person is talking about is a convicted child molester who we're going to call Lane and then going
Starting point is 00:25:45 forward will bleep his name. And we're doing this because this theory isn't widely agreed upon by everyone involved in the case. She said that her dad was going to report as the possible suspect, but the mom talked him out of it saying, oh, you're just prejudiced because you don't like because he's a child molester. But then said, but they're looking for an African American anyway and not African American.
Starting point is 00:26:15 So she succeeded talking him out of reporting him. As promising as this lead seemed, there was a problem. Had died just two years before his relative came forward As promising as this lead seemed, there was a problem. Had died just two years before his relative came forward and reported her suspicions. But the more Jason looked into the more he became convinced of his involvement in Rachel's murder. He was in and out of prison his entire life with convictions for theft, aggravated battery, and possession of controlled substances.
Starting point is 00:26:45 Run-ins with the law didn't stop there. In 1970, he was convicted of sexually assaulting his kid's babysitter. Also in 1970, he allegedly assaulted his neighbor, though it's not clear if there were charges ever filed for that assault. And then in 2005, was arrested again for sexual abuse of a minor. One of the things that struck me, given the fact that, you know, people will ask me, well, why do you think that he killed Rachel? Well, typically, specifically sex offenders, they will escalate their crime.
Starting point is 00:27:16 The next go around is like, okay, my mistake, my bad. My mistake was I left a witness when I raped before. So the next go around, they kill their victim because they don't want any witness. But oftentimes you see that escalation, where this first offense they went and did serve time because of the rape offense. The next time it's a murder charge. Jason did some digging and discovered that had been released from prison in 1981, and he didn't return to prison until 1986, which meant that he would have been a free man during Rachel's 1982 abduction and murder. And not only that, Jason said there's something else that makes a promising suspect in his
Starting point is 00:28:02 mind, something big. Had a blue Ford Pinto with wood grain paneling on the sides, the exact kind of car that Rachel was seen getting into with her kidnapper. According to the family, he kept that car behind his parents' home, which was a stoplight away from the police station and two stoplights away from the runnyens' home. When it wasn't in jail, he stayed in his parents' basement. The entrance was behind the home, so he would always park his pinto behind the house, so it makes sense that no authorities ever saw the car which matched the
Starting point is 00:28:37 descriptions of the kidnappers to a T. Also bore a striking resemblance to the updated composite. Jason said that the nose in particular was, quote, almost a perfect match. Even the movie Hair was spot on, and what's more, was also known to sport a mustache with a pronounced gap. And there was something else about that match the suspect profile Jason and the runeans had compiled. They were sure whoever killed Rachel was from the area.
Starting point is 00:29:07 And what makes them so sure is what the kidnapper said to the three kids before he abducted Rachel. The man told the Runion kids that he'd take them to Bobcoast to get ice cream. But Bobcoast was a locally owned grocery store. It wasn't like a chain or even a popular ice cream shop that lots of people knew about. It was just like a regular mom and pop grocery store that happened to have a little ice cream shop inside. Something an outsider wouldn't know. But even with all of these little details lining up and pointing to the killer, investigators needed more. All the evidence so far was purely circumstantial.
Starting point is 00:29:46 Criminal record, the kind of car he owned, where he lived, the fact that his family at one point seriously considered reporting him as the possible kidnapper, it couldn't have all just been coincidence. And Jason knew police would need something more concrete to be satisfied that was their guy and closed the case for good. Something like a confession, which again was impossible because their suspect was long gone, or maybe DNA.
Starting point is 00:30:10 Jason jumped on that idea and reached out right away to daughter who lived just 10 minutes southeast of sunset. I explained to her that we had a tip that matched, and that was saying that may it be responsible for the smirter and that a DNA sample would rule him out if there's not a match. So she agreed to submit to a DNA test for us.
Starting point is 00:30:36 Once Jason had the DNA from daughter, it was time to test her DNA against the DNA found at the crime scene. Now, it's not clear where that DNA came from, whether it was from clothing or swabs. It's also not clear how well preserved the DNA was, but regardless, in 2020, the sample Jason collected and the samples that law enforcement was holding on to were all sent to Intermountain Forensics,
Starting point is 00:31:03 a non-profit forensic DNA testing lab in Utah. And that is where the case stands today. The results of the tests are still pending and it's unknown how much longer it'll be till the Runeon family gets answers. For Elaine, the waiting game has been excruciating. We just like to have the closure. We deserve the closure. For 40 years, the Runean family has been waiting for the answers they deserve.
Starting point is 00:31:32 And although there seems to be some light at the end of the tunnel, they know that nothing is guaranteed. The DNA results from the lab could bring them right back to square one. And I can't imagine having to sit with that fear for years like the Runions have. Their family deserves closure and Rachel deserves justice. If you have any information about the 1982 Abduction and Murder of Rachel Runion, please Please speak up. Call the Sunset Police Department at 801-825-1620. The Deck is an audio chuck production with theme music by Ryan Lewis. To learn more about the Deck and our advocacy work, visit thedeafpodcast.com.
Starting point is 00:32:29 So, what do you think, Chuck? Do you approve?

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.