The DeVory Darkins Show - Bondi drops CHILLING WARNING on rioters Mexican President makes fatal mistake
Episode Date: June 10, 2025BREAKING NEWS - President of Mexico just called for individuals to protest in America. Pam Bondi issues a CHILLING WARNING to rioters who assault law enforcement. And President Trump travel Ban is now... in effect as Democrats are calling it racist.FOLLOW ME:https://www.twitter.com/devorydarkinshttps://www.instagram.com/devorydarkinshttps://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkinshttps://devory.wtf.tvBUY ME A COFFEE:https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkinsSHOP OUR MERCH STORE:https://store.devorydarkins.comBUSINESS INQUIRIES:truth@devorydarkins.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
All right, so we have other stories that have been flying under the radar due to what's happening in Los Angeles.
Number one, the president of Mexico has issued her own threat to the United States of America.
Number two, President Trump's travel ban has gone into effect.
And number three, the U.S. Marines have been deployed to Los Angeles and Pam Bonnie drops a stunning announcement.
Mexico's socialist president, Claudia Shimbabom over the weekend, called for protests in the U.S.
over a provision in the reconciliation bill that will tax remittances.
Remittances are payments from illegal aliens in America back to their families in their home
countries.
U.S. banks and foreign nations have profited handsomely off the harm caused by illegal immigration
to Americans.
Trump wants to take away that income stream by taxing the daylights out of it.
I agree.
All right.
All right.
We're going to show you exactly what the president of Mexico said, because she's losing
her mind over this idea that Congress wants to tax the money that is being sent on behalf of
migrants back to their home country. Now, I think you're going to really be stunned when I tell
you what that amount is, for the record. But before I say that, number two, she wants protest
to take place in our country. A reality check here, when the left starts to protest in 2025,
what happens? It turns violent. Now, let's get back to what that number would be,
according to the big beautiful bill ready for it it's 3.5% now unless you live in a state that
charges no tax i think you'll take 3.5% on mostly anything in our country now i'll show you the
clip from the president of mexico and how hypocritical she really is take a listen
we do not agree with this way of addressing the migration phenomenon it is not through raids or
violence that the migration phenomenon will be addressed it is by sitting down and working on the
comprehensive immigration reform that takes into account all Mexicans who are on the other side
of the border. That is our position, and we will always call for peace, for nonviolence,
for non-exacerbating any form of violent demonstration. None.
A few moments later, if necessary, we will mobilize because we do not want taxes on the remittances
sent by our fellow countrymen from the United States to Mexico. So in the beginning there,
she says she does not believe in mobilizing and trying to fight, and we should just sit down and
have a conversation.
But then in the second clip, she's talking about mobilizing.
So which one is it, President?
Now, we know she's a true socialist.
We know that we would never trust the president of Mexico.
That entire country is morally bankrupt as far as the federal government is concerned,
and they're controlled by the cartel.
So get real.
She has zero credibility on this issue.
She's even lucky that President Trump is as nice as he's been to Mexico.
I would argue, he's been nicer to Mexico than he has Canada.
Now, Congressman Eric Schmidt fired back at the President of Mexico by posting this.
The House's big, beautiful bill addressed the urgent need for a remittance tax, but we can go further.
I'm introducing legislation to quadruple the proposed remittance tax from 3.5% to 15%.
America is not the world's piggy bank, and we don't take kindly to threats.
So reports are that the President of Mexico Shinebomb is telling people here to go ahead and get
out there and protest. Is that how normal relations go between countries?
Harris, thanks for having me on. No, that's outrageous. If those reports are true,
no foreign leaders should tell their foreign nationals in another country to go protest that
other country. Indeed, Americans that are down in Mexico would not be permitted to protest
inside of Mexico. That is, both indecent and bad politics for her and bad for the Mexican
people. It's bad for all of the citizens of Southern California who are just trying to live a peaceful
life to encourage these protests, to encourage this violence, and to not support President Trump's
efforts to keep the place safe and secure seems inflammatory if indeed this is what the President
Mexico did. And now we go to our next story, which is also international news that is centered
around President Trump and his policy decisions. And we're talking about the travel ban that he announced
last week. It has now gone into effect. And yes, people are losing their
minds over it. Now, before I show you the reactions and the meltdowns, let's first understand
exactly what this order entails. Take a listen. There are actually many exemptions to this ban,
which make it distinctly different from the first iteration of the travel ban that we saw
during the first Trump administration. So what these exemptions include are dual citizens. So
citizens from these countries and the United States, they are not subject to this travel ban,
also people who are legal permanent residents in the United States or current visa whole.
holders, they also are not subject to this travel ban. Another sect of people that aren't
applied are people for whom travel to the United States would serve U.S. national interest,
but national interest isn't actually defined. So we'll watch and see how that exemption
plays out. And then there are other groups of people, including people who are athletes and their
coaches coming to the United States for major sporting events. Of course, think the World Cup in
2026, the Olympics in 2028, Iranians who are traveling and fleeing persecution of religious
sort in their country. They are not subject to the ban. And then Afghans who could qualify or
already have special immigrant visas. Those are people who served alongside Americans during the
Afghan war. They are not subject to this ban. So there are many exemptions here, which make it
distinctly different from what we saw during the first travel ban. So no matter what mainstream
media wants you to believe, the fact remains is that President Trump is doing what he was elected
to do. Keep Americans safe. Now, he's doing this. Why? Because it's very clear after that attack
in Boulder, Colorado, that there are individuals who slip through the cracks during the Biden
administration who are looking to cause harm on our soil. So it's right for the president to make
this move. Now, if you listen to Democrats, they believe he is racist, and this is once again
him discriminating against innocent people. Now, I do have a clip to show you of them saying
just that. Take a listen. This discriminatory policy is just another attack on legal immigration
and family unity. And it will hurt, as you heard from my colleague, Rep. Omar, it will hurt
our economy, our communities that rely on immigrants, whether it's caring for our families,
teaching our kids, building our homes. And so it's an honor for me to co-sponsor yet again
representative choose no ban act. So the no ban act is Democrats' response to this. And it's more
contrarian than it is bipartisanship. And that's the issue with Democrats as a party. They can't
agree with President Trump on anything. They just can't do it. I don't think they can help themselves.
They're like an addict. Donald Trump is their drug of choice. And they want to see him fail.
And that's unfortunate. You don't want the president of the United States to fail. You want him to
succeed, regardless of your political affiliation. Now, I know that requires some emotional maturity,
which I think at this point Democrats lack, but that is a clear reality and the type of leadership
we need in our country. Now, here's MSDNC continuing to peddle the nonsense about the travel ban
and how it's really going to negatively impact people in so many different ways. Take a listen.
It's hating confusion across the board. This is not something that had to happen. The reasons
behind it are not substantiated. I think that the legal standing of this is,
a little bit stronger because we learned or the administration learned from its Supreme
Court's failures before and tailored this a little bit differently. But let's be specific
about what this travel ban speaks to. It speaks to African countries and the Middle Eastern
countries specifically. And then the seven other countries are in the Caribbean, which are also
mostly black immigrant countries. So it's a very focused sort of agenda here along with
ending TPS and the other. It's about harm to the world in a certain type of immigrant message
that it's sending that we don't want you to come here regardless of the disruption because
these individuals add the 300,000 that are probably impacted based on the American
Immigration Council's finding is about $2.5 billion with the income for the United States
that we're sort of turning away.
Okay, so here's my pushback to Democrats, if that's their thinking, we're going to lose
$2 billion.
So do you put a price on the lives that were impacted or a loss during the New Orleans
terror attack this year on January 1st?
What about the terrorist attack that just took place in Boulder, Colorado?
Do you put a price on that as well?
Who cares about $2 billion when we're talking about American citizen safety?
That is the number one job of the president of the United States.
Now, here is Tom Homan.
The Borders'ar also commenting on the travel ban.
Take a listen.
This is about protecting America, right?
We spent 40 years ago, two men, known gotaways.
How many of them came from a terrorist country that sponsors terrorism?
We don't know.
President Trump is taking every step possible to protect this nation from a terrorist attack
and from other criminal activity
that crosses our border
and comes into the visa program.
So this is that we're making these countries
step up and doing the right thing.
When you send someone
and give us some of that visa come
and they enter the United States,
we want proper vetting done before they come here.
That's what this is about.
It's really that simple.
And I think Democrats have a hard time
accepting it because that's not the way
they see the world.
They don't believe in law and order.
They don't believe in protecting American citizens.
And if they say they do,
they believe protecting American citizens
also involves protecting
illegal aliens even if they are committing crimes. Now, let's go to our next story, which I know
we've been talking about this at nausea, but this is a big update. So it is official 700 Marines
out of 29 Palms, the U.S. Marine Base, they have been activated and they're heading to Los Angeles
now. Tina Satasha Bertrand is live for us at the Pentagon. Natasha, what are you learning?
Well, Brianna, this is something that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegsev had previewed over the
weekend. He said that if necessary, he would deploy the Marines to Los Angeles to help a federal
agents with handling the protests there. And it appears now that these Marines, according to our
sources, they have been mobilized. These 500 Marines, a full Marine battalion based out of 29 Palms,
California, which is just outside San Bernardino, about an hour away from Los Angeles. They have
been mobilized and they are gearing up to go and help ICE agents as well as other federal officials
deal with these protests in Los Angeles.
Importantly, they're going to be bolstering as well,
the National Guard, guards men and women
who have been activated in Los Angeles
by President Trump.
But as you said, it is a significant escalation
of the president's use of the military
as a show of force against these protesters.
It's really not clear, you know,
the last time Marines were deployed
to help essentially with riot control,
though it's unclear at this point
just what their actual task
will be. Typically, if they are deployed to these situations, it is expected that they will
operate in much the same way that the National Guard does, doing things like perimeter
security, maybe some crowd control. Okay, here's what you need to know about what she just said,
and I think she's missing the point here. Factually, number one, May of 1992 was the last time
the U.S. Marines were called up in this same way. This was in response to the Rodney King riots
that were happening in Los Angeles. And number two, military personnel, particularly
military police, they are trained in riot control. But because they're being called up for
Title 10, which we talked about in the last video, they're only there for perimeter and to
protect federal assets, building, and personnel. And number three, ladies and gentlemen,
if you're not noticing by now, they continue to speak about the military as if they don't
know what they're doing, as if they just woke up today and all they know and all they've been
trained on is to put on their uniforms for Christ's sakes. Now, let's show you some updated footage on
why maybe the Marines need to be on the ground.
Take a look.
Taken off.
Is it because they're fighting?
Yeah.
So that's the guy.
Okay.
So the guy there on the left, a bald guy that is being hit, his, I don't know if he's
an agitator or exactly what happened, but whoever he is, the crowd is not fond of him.
And that was the same guy that they were just kind of fighting with earlier.
And now, for whatever reason, it's pushed over to this area here at Temple and Judge
John Aiso Street.
And it looks like they've got him pushed up against that kind of guns.
guard shack or that parking shack there
and I can't tell, but it looks like he's bleeding
from the head now. Oh, yeah, from the ear or something.
They're throwing things at him. We've seen people punch
him. So I don't know exactly what's going
on. You know, this happened once or twice
yesterday too where the crowd kind of
fought amongst themselves, but
really not, yeah.
Oh, no. We're
seeing them with these flagpoles
and we
know that those poles can
certainly be used as weapons. It looks like
some of the folks they are trying to protect that.
He seems to be trying to get away from the crowd, but there are some that seem to continue
to go after him.
Mike, in this ramp, where does this ramp leave into?
I believe this is a courthouse.
Judge John Issa, let me go look here on my map.
But yeah, I mean, this is kind of indicative of what's going on.
Okay, now that you've seen the footage, I think it supports the president's decision
to not only call up 700 Marines, but he's activated an additional 200,000 National Guard
troops.
And what does the governor have to say about this?
Well, let me read it to you.
I was just informed Trump is deploying another 2,000 guard troops to L.A.
The first 2,000, given no food or water, only approximately 300 are deployed.
The rest are just sitting, unused in federal buildings without orders.
This isn't about public safety.
It's about stroking and dangerous president's ego.
This is reckless, pointless, and disrespectful to our troops.
Now, I did respond because you guys know I like to stick to the facts that I did serve in the military.
Of course, the Governor Nuscombe is assuming you won't do your research.
Soldiers always deploy with enough food.
We're talking about MREs, meals ready to eat, water and ammunition that obviously will meet mission needs.
Now, strategically, you're not going to deploy everybody to the front lines.
You will send a certain amount, reassess after a while.
And if additional soldiers are needed, then you will send them.
And in most cases, you keep most of them in the rear for support reasons.
Third, National Guard troops are being used to protect federal buildings, not riot controlling the streets.
That's why President Trump used Title 10.
But Gavin Newsom wants you to believe that these troops are being used against
American citizens. No, they're protecting federal buildings. Now, here is what Hakeem Jeffrey
said earlier today about all of this, including President Trump's actions. Take a listen.
We will not be lectured by Donald Trump and anyone in the Republican Party about issues of
law and order. Not a single one of them. You know what he did do on day one? He pardoned hundreds
of violent felons, criminals, who brutally assaulted police officers and attacked the Capitol
on January 6th. And so the notion that Donald Trump and his minions, his sycophants here in the
House of Representatives or in the Senate who are nothing more than a reckless rubber stamp for
Donald Trump's extreme agenda are going to lecture America about issues of law and order,
get lost when not feeling you at all. You have zero credibility.
All right. I know that might have been a little torture, but guys, come on. I think it's funny.
I think it's funny because at this point, we're in this reality TV show called Congress.
And I think Hakeem Jeffries plays this role very phenomenally. I mean, you can't take him seriously.
I hope you don't. And for the record, if we did take him seriously, the same could be said clearly about Democrats.
the former president pardoned his whole family when he walked out the door and didn't even
offer an explanation.
So I think that's a wash there, okay?
And for the record, when it came to the January 6th individuals who were pardoned, they
served jail time.
Okay.
So there's a difference there between that and the Biden crime family.
Now, let's get back to the facts here because, again, he doesn't want to acknowledge that
law and order is the thing that Republicans should be talking about.
But there's no question, law and order needs to be established.
pay attention to this next clip where riders are using innocent people and their vehicles to shield
themselves so they can assault police officers take a look at a woman in a minivan i don't know even
know how she got into this corner she's in the corner she's trying to get out of a car
protesters are trying are they trying to help her they're trying to help her but locked off
more yeah given them access safe passage yeah because if you've got they did now see we're
looking at these young people right now throwing whatever they're throwing out i'm hoping those
aren't rocks but we can see those being lobbed at police officers and we know that they didn't close
the downtown area today people went to work and people are probably just trying to leave work and there's
another smoke bomb going off obviously from law enforcement okay so in the context of law and order it's
very clear that they don't have things under control you got innocent people i don't know why they're
driving through that area. I mean, you're just asking for trouble. I think that's obvious.
But anyways, you got these riders hiding behind the vehicle, throwing rocks at police officers.
I hope they do find them and they prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.
And number two, what Democrats are continuing to get wrong is they can't just admit that two
things are true at the same time. We should allow people to peacefully protest. No issue there.
Go ahead. You don't like what President Trump is doing. Have at it. But once it turns violent and you start
to obstruct or attack federal authorities, you should be locked up immediately.
Now, speaking of federal authorities, the Department of Justice is now speaking out about
what they plan to do if they catch people committing crimes, especially attacking police
officers.
And it comes from the one and only, the Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Here's what she just said on Fox News.
What we're going to do is we are going to enforce the law regardless of what they do.
Look at it out there.
It looks like a third world country.
And it's not.
It's the United States of America.
We are not standing for it.
Donald Trump won't stand for it.
And something else tonight.
Look at all those great men and women in the LAPD.
We are going to protect them.
If they will not protect them and prosecute people that abuse the LAPD in terms during a civil unrest under 18 U.S.C. 231,
we can prosecute federally people who assault state law enforcement officers with a maximum of five years in prison.
we are going to do it. We are going to prosecute them federally. If California won't protect
their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there. Not only
that, we have nine open cases right now and more to come on assaulting federal officers.
The Molotov cocktail cases that you've seen, we've charged one. More to come. Three outstanding.
The looters, you know, you saw they began to loot last night, going into 7-Elevens, going into
drugstores. Typically, you don't charge those. We do under federal law now. Under the Hobbs Act,
we are charging robbery. You loot a business in California. You are looking at maximum of 20
years in prison. You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more. As President Trump said,
you spit, we hit. Get ready. Okay. And the vice president also put this message out. This
administration will not be intimidated by lawlessness. We will stand by the FBI agents,
backing down violent criminals by the guardsmen, local police, and Marines to store an order,
and by the ICE agents enforcing our immigration laws.
President Trump will not back down.
Now also in that interview, Pam Bondi announced that they have identified the individual
who was throwing cinder blocks at federal vehicles.
Take a listen.
Cinder block case, Sean.
Remember that case?
We have breaking news right now.
The case where the guy was breaking up the cinder blocks and he was throwing them at police
cars, the police officer, I'm sorry, the federal officer had injured his hand. He was wearing
a mask. The FBI has identified him. Bill Isaley, our incredible U.S. attorney out there,
working with ATF DEA, and the FBI have been doing a remarkable job. That guy has just been
identified, and they are doing a search warrant on his house as we speak. And he has been identified.
See his face. He is going to be on. His name is Reyes. He is he is.
is going to be on the most wanted list.
You have broken the news.
His face is out there right now.
That's him.
He has been identified by great police work by the FBI.
So you can run, you can't hide.
We are coming after you federally.
If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store,
if you loot, if you spit on a police officer,
we're coming after you.
Now the FBI put up this flyer seeking information assault
on federal officer and damage to government property,
They have his face now here, and they're offering up a $50,000 reward.
Now, this obviously was posted earlier today because they did finally identify them,
just showing you what led to it.
And guys, I don't understand why people think it's worth it attacking law enforcement officials.
I mean, I get you hate President Trump, but do you hate him so much that you're willing
to throw your life away?
You know, are you willing to destroy what you have going on in your life?
Is it that serious for you?
I hope not. Now, here's President Trump and what he had to say earlier about Gavin Newsom during a roundtable at the White House.
Take a listen.
There's an incompetent governor. Look at the job he's doing in California. He's destroying one of our great states.
And if I didn't get involved, if we didn't bring the guard in, and we would bring more in if we needed it, because we have to make sure there's going to be law and order.
You had a disaster happening. And they now admit it was a disaster. I watched the chief yesterday.
a good man, by the way. And he said, well, we're lucky we did this because they were overwhelmed.
You saw what was happening. So we did the right thing. Everybody agrees to that. But you have
a governor who let the city burn down, didn't want water to be sent down to them. I sent
billions of gallons of water. I wanted to do it in the first term. He wouldn't do it over,
I don't know, they have environmental reasons, but there were no environmental reasons. I think
It's just a political philosophy.
But it's lucky for the people in Los Angeles and in California that we did what we did.
We got it just in time.
It's still simmering a little bit, but not very much.
Okay.
So am I allowed to disagree with the president here?
Is that okay with you guys?
Listen, he says it's simmering down.
I disagree.
If you look at the current footage that's out there right now, I'm about to show you a clip that was just posted five minutes ago.
These writers are now receiving supplies.
Somebody is funding this.
this operation. That's number one and two, delivering the supplies they need to keep this going.
We're talking earplugs, gloves, water bottles, face shields. And you kind of get to learn what the
agitators look like. And I'm seeing a decent amount of them out here right now. Always dressed in
black, always with face coverings, not holding any signs. And as I told you earlier, Sean,
a lot of people were showing up here. And they were being given earplugs, gas masks,
water bottles, not to drink.
A lot of those water bottles are being thrown.
So, you know, unfortunately, it looks like we might be heading for another night of
things crossing the line here in Los Angeles.
And as we're waiting for apparently more National Guard and more U.S. Marines to head
down here to Los Angeles.
We're not seeing any of them in the streets.
The National Guard, they're basically sitting around federal buildings, helping protect them.
They're not out in the streets pushing these protesters back.
This is all the locals.
Everything you're looking at in front of us right.
now is LAPD. It's not California Highway Patrol. The L.A. Sheriff's Department is behind us.
This is all LAPD. And we heard the chief of LAPD say last night, they're a bit overwhelmed.
And, you know, that's once these agitators come out in huge numbers and LAPD has to constantly
respond to different areas, they reported that some of these people were using radios to communicate
with each other last night to report law enforcement movements.
Yeah. And so that's the latest update there. And so if Democrats in Main Street Media
want to continue to downplay this blame it on president trump they're going to lose miserably
anybody with a brain understands that this thing is not under control uh that gavin newsome the
los angeles mayor they have not done a good job it took two days to finally start saying something
about this is as if they're okay with the little bit of protest they're okay if vehicles are being
burned they're okay if businesses are impacted they don't mind that because in their eyes it's all
about what stopping president trump and so now it's time to hear your guys's opinion in the
comment section below. We talked about multiple stories in this video, starting with the president of
Mexico issuing a threat to encourage people to protest on our soil because she disagrees with a 3.5%
tax on money that is being made here and being sent back to somebody's homeland. I think her efforts
are misplaced there. You let me know if I got that one right. Also, President Trump's tribal
ban is now in effect. Of course, Democrats are calling it racist. Do you agree? And finally, I've given you guys
the big update so far in regards to the riots that are happening in Los Angeles. Let's pray for our
country. So give me your thoughts and everything in the comments section below. Now, if you want to know
everything that took place in regards to these riots in Los Angeles this morning and what both sides
are saying, including fact-checking the claim that President Trump and his ordering of the
National Guard troops and the U.S. Marines as unconstitutional, I'm going to show you exactly what the law
says. All you have to do is click on that video because it's coming up right now.
You know,