The DeVory Darkins Show - Chuck Schumer SUFFERS HUMILIATION after Morning Joe Interview goes SIDEWAYS

Episode Date: March 23, 2026

Chuck Schumer SUFFERS HUMILIATION after Morning Joe Interview goes SIDEWAYS. This comes after Schumer couldn't answer simple questions regarding the Iranian Regime. Also, President Trump is celebrating ICE Agents at airports and signals he could deploy the National Guard next if DHS is not reopened.EPISODE SPONSOR: Call Lear at 800-920-8388 or go to http://LearDevory.com to learn more.FOLLOW ME:⁠⁠https://www.x.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠https://devory.wtf.tv⁠⁠BUY ME A COFFEE:⁠⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠SHOP OUR MERCH STORE:⁠⁠https://store.devorydarkins.com⁠⁠BUSINESS INQUIRIES:⁠⁠[e-mail]⁠⁠

In today's video, Chuck Schumer humiliated himself, as he could not answer simple questions regarding Iran. The president is touting the success of ICE being at these airports and a new update in the heartbreaking story regarding Sheridan Gorman, the American citizen who was killed by an illegal alien in Chicago. Let's start with this interview with Chuck Schumer, particularly what the president just said about Iran as well. Take a list. We have a nuclear weapon. So we are now having really good discussions. They started. last night, a little bit, the night before that. And I think they're, you know, I think they're very good. They want to, they want peace.

They've agreed they will not have a nuclear weapon, you know, et cetera, et cetera. But we'll see. You have to get it done. But I would say there's a very good chance. And it began when I said that I won't be, we were planning tomorrow on shooting down some of their power plants. and we're not going to hold that up. Hopefully we won't have to do it.

And hopefully we can make a deal that's good for all of us, including the Middle Eastern allies that have been very good to us, including Israel. That's been a great partner in this fight. They've really been a good partner in the fight. They fought hard. But we'll see what happens. I think there's a very good chance we're going to end up in a deal.

And so we're giving it five days, and then we're going to see where that takes us. And I would say at the end of the spirit, I think it could very well end up being a very good deal for everybody. As good as if we went all the way and just literally annihilated the place, which if we don't have to do that, that would be a good thing, not a bad thing. In addition, okay, so that was the president just moments ago at this Memphis Task Force to celebrate the good work men and women of law enforcement have done in that city to crack down on crime. Now, obviously, he's given us this major update regarding the state of, of this conflict with Iran and could potentially be an off-ramp that the media has been crying about up to this point, of course. But again, this could be literally just rhetoric. We'd have to

actually see this play out for real, meaning the other side's going to have to acknowledge that this is a real thing, that this is going to happen. And there has been some level of agreement that is not taking place whatsoever at this point. Also, the president isn't even speaking to the second Supreme Leader. No one knows where he is. So I find that to be interesting. And really, the whole point here of this first story is just to show you how bad Democrats are. They backed themselves in the corner with this stuff. Here's Chuck Schumerer, Morning Joe, struggling to really answer clear questions about this conflict. Take a listen. First, yeah. Is it a good thing that Iran, and I think you'd agree with me at the center of terrorism in the world since 1979? Is it good

that their military infrastructure is being degraded to the degree that it is? Yes or no? You can't because it's a premature question. What is going to happen in the next several No, no, I can ask that question. Well, you can't separate. No, no, no, I can't. So you have a military side, but I can show you my chart, but I think it's there to wait. You have the military side and you have the political side. I'm simply asking on the military side, is it good, regardless of whether we agree with going in or not, is it good that Iran's military infrastructure has been seriously degraded?

And again, I have to tell you, Joe, first, you can't, what's going to happen? three months from now. Is it worth it? What's going to happen? Will the world economy collapse? Will something happen even worse? Will the whole energy infrastructure of the world go up and smoke? So you have to, when they do it without planning, when they do it without understanding where they're going. Senator, Senator. Where they're going. I don't think it's fair. It's a trick question. It's a trick question. No, it's not. If you do not strategize the consequences of the action, the military action, if you will obliterate and do all these things, but you don't actually play out in your minds and have strategy for the consequences.

That may not be good. Let me answer the question for everybody in America. The answer, yes. It's fascinating, watching people who haven't served talk about military planning. And that's no dig on people who haven't, by the way. I find it interesting. Again, maybe this is the negative side of pundits and commentary. I'm sure I'm guilty of it at times.

where just because you're in front of a camera, it doesn't make you an expert. Okay, that's clear as day. That's number one. Number two, I made this point repeatedly, like a freaking record at this point. Military personnel, whether it's yesterday, last month, six months ago, 10 years ago, even probably 20 years ago, have already planned out every single strategy. Now, anybody who's been an entrepreneur in life who has actually accomplished anything knows, strategy is really a cheap talking point. every strategy in the book, it doesn't mean you're going to be able to execute it properly. You may actually execute everything that the strategy told you to do and still fail in the end.

I mean, strategy is always one thing. There's something called reality, all right? Of course, they're not going to give that any attention as well. And number three, why is it so difficult for Chuck Schumer to just admit that this regime being brought to its knees, its military capability, being obliterated is actually a positive thing for the world? Who knew it'd be so hard to agree to that particular question? it's good that the terrorist regime their military has been and capabilities have been degraded radically the question mike though is political it's the political question what is the political

impact what's the impact in the straits what's the impact in the region in all due respect if you ask the american people if you have the choice of degrading the military the military structure in iran but having gasoline be six dollars a gallon and our economy falling into a deep recession where millions lose their job. What do you think of America's saying? Senator, you're not listening to me. That's the political side of it. No, it's not political. It's a consequence, just like Mika said. Why don't we talk about the Yankees? Because you're not following me here. I am following you. I just don't agree with you. No, what you don't understand to me. There's a big difference. I would say that most Americans

would say it's a good thing that it's degraded. Would they agree that we should have gone to war, Mike? I think most Americans, you look at the polls. They don't want this. war. Okay. They don't want this war, but but there is, it's something that I think the Democrat should be, I think it's something with all due respect, Democrats should be clear about. Iran has tried to kill American since 1979. Two things,

hold on. I think two things could be true at the same time for someone who wants to exercise a little bit of intelligence here. On one hand, this regime needs to be a little bit just obliterated, no doubt about that. And it's also true that it needs to happen in a short period of time. This can't go past 60 days.

We don't need boots on ground. And this is a big risk for the president and his legacy, especially during election year. I think those two things are true at the same time. All right. One more for you. As Morting Joe has finally figured out that Chuck Schumer just does not understand him whatsoever. So now he's going to make it even easier for him and tell him, hey, it's okay to agree here. Because even if it's a good thing that this regime is eradicated, that good thing may not outweigh the consequences of the

president's decision to get involved in the first place. I know the mental gymnastics on this is crazy, but listen to it for yourself. Two things can be true at once. It can be good that Iran's killing machine has been degraded. At the same time, the consequences may outweigh the good that come from that. It's okay to say that. I don't disagree with you. You know, the fact that the leader, Khomeini, is gone. No one regrets that. The fact that Iran has less ability, to create military trouble is, no one disputes that. But you have to look, I don't think it's political, to be very honest with you. It's the consequences, the military, the geopolitical, the economic consequences.

I'm saying, geopolitical. You just said what I was saying, the geopolitical consequences. Right, it's not just the economic consequences. Again, let me ask the question. Again, if you ask the American people, and you had the package together, because we don't know how bad it's going to get, but we know it's pretty bad now.

I think most of them would have said, no, we shouldn't have gone to war. And by the way, most of them have said that. Yeah, we shouldn't have gone to war. And I'll tell you this, if they would have done it right. One of the promises from the president

was about protecting the value of the dollar. Let's just say that hasn't happened whatsoever, which is why gold and silver has been on a bull run for quite some time. It's been outperforming the S&P 500, as you guys know. I think it's safe to say that we told. you so because we've been talking about precious metals investing for quite some time. If you've been watching for at least a year now, I've been repeating myself constantly. And the reason why I have is because not only am I invested in precious metals assets, you should too. But before you can

even make a decision like that, you got to speak to people you can trust, including people who are known to be the experts, and that is Lair Capital. That's what Laird Capital is all about helping you understand exactly how you can leverage precious metals today, given where we're at in the market. So call them today. 1-800-920-8-388-8-8-8-8. Or go to Lear Devore.com to learn more. The link is in the description and also the chat. Again, if you mentioned my name, you could qualify for up to $20,000 in bonus gold or silver with a qualified purchase. So give them a call today. They see how much bonus medals you qualify for. All right. So let's go to our next update. This is TSA. Ice agents are definitely at these airports. They've been in.

assisting and travelers are definitely taking whatever they can get. Bodies need to be filled. I mean, over 400 TSA agents acquit. So this is a serious thing. The president's fed up, which is why he's taking this route. And so let's hear the update on this. And then I'm going to show you something despicable for mainstream media. Take a listen.

Things have slowed down a little bit, I will say. And we've been seeing these ICE agents out here today, managing lines, helping with crowd control, just like borders are Tom Homan said they would. Here's a look at them this morning. And again, lines have been a little bit better the last few hours, but still unusually long as TSA workers continue to go without pay. Former DHS Secretary Chad Wolf said ICE is here because President Trump is frustrated like the millions of traveling Americans. Who's got two choices, which is the lines just continue to get longer as the Democrats continue to shut down DHS or we find a solution and we look for other options here. And so having ice or other elements of DHS surge into airports, it's really why the department was created so that you could have a flexible workforce.

But not everyone is on board as people like House Minority Leader, Hakeem Jeffrey, says this is the last thing Americans need. But many passengers tell us they'll take anything that will help with these lines. So this is a live look at lines here at Hartsville, Jackson, right now. Again, this is nothing compared to this morning's lines. If you can believe it, yesterday's lines that did not let up all day. people waiting for up to five hours until they finally get screened before their flight, if they even manage to make it. And we're seeing these types of lines in several other major airports,

as Congress still cannot come to an agreement to fund DHS. Surprisingly, travelers here have been in a decent mood. Pretty understanding of the current situation, but they're still extremely frustrated. Yeah, anytime you show up to the airport and you have to cancel your flight, not once but twice. You don't even know if you're going to fly out that day. It's a total inconvenience, as you guys know. and I'm still firm on what I believe should happen.

I just think, well, I guess at this point, the fact that ICE agents are at the airports and don't know how feasible this is, but I would just shut down these airports. I mean, I would really show Congress that the American people are not going to put up with your games. I don't care who you blame. Where you blame the right or you blame the left, it doesn't matter. What matters is Congress as a whole continues to fail the American people on just essential basic things, like making sure TSA is funded. That's a basic thing.

If you think about it. So I think instead of putting the pressure on TSA, the pressure should be on Congress. Now, let's go to something despicable. This is from CBS of all people now. Again, pushing fear. Watch. There, you see this morning in Atlanta, ICE agents are already on the scene. Our team on the ground says they've seen a handful of agents doing crowd control and one officer inside the checkpoint, but not doing any security screening.

From on this, we're joined by CBS News, Immigration correspondent Camillo, Montoya Gavrez, Camillo. I think there was a lot of shock when people saw the president's announcement about ICE agents. What does this policy really do? Do we know? Even if the work of ICE is limited in scope and nature, this assignment will likely still be polarizing as the agency, as you know, has become deeply controversial, especially under the second Trump administration, which has instructed ICE to go on a large, scale operations across the country to identify people who are suspected of being here illegally. Yeah, you can imagine how worried some people may be about this. You mentioned that ICE will not be doing immigration enforcement while at the airports. Is that the stated, is that a stated fact?

And do we expect that to really be the case? Well, that is still unclear, actually, because Tom Hillman and other administration officials say that the main objective here is to free up TSA agents and to cut down on the long lines of security tech points by, again, helping with security, but ICE agents have the legal power to arrest anyone. They suspect this here illegally, and that does not stop at an airport. In fact, Tom Homan says that ICE routinely arrest people at airports based on immigration concerns. So that is still a possibility, but it's not supposed to be their main line of work here

in this operation specifically. It sounds like he's making the case for why ICE should exist. I mean, if you're in the country unlawfully and you're flying and you're at the airport, yeah, I think you should probably get caught. I mean, kind of makes sense to me. Again, all of this really hinges on the debate on what we should be doing about people who are in the country unlawfully. I don't care if you cross the border illegally. I don't care if you're here because you're part of a gang. I don't care if you're here legally five years ago and then all of a sudden you stopped doing your paperwork. If you're in the country unlawfully, the law is clear. You're subject to deportation. And if we don't like it as Americans, then what we should be doing is marching down to Capitol Hill and protesting lawmakers to change the law. But they won't do that. They'll only protest the symptoms, not the root cause. That's what's going on here. And when the president decides to be a part of the solution because Congress can't get their act together, and now they want to spread fear over that, that just tells you how broken we are as a,

or as I would say, how broken the media is. Okay. All right, let's go to this particular reaction from the president where he says he wants to offer $10,000 bonus to the TSA employees who are continuing to show up. Watch. Last year you gave a $10,000 bonus to Tuesday workers who kept showing up for work during the shutdown. Will you do that again? Well, it could happen. It's amazing. There's such people that are really, really loyal and great, and it's not easy for them. And this is all caused by the Democrats. It said, just so you know, all this money was approved. Everything was approved. This is done.

The Democrats went in, and they want to. to have radical left lunatics come into our country. They want to have drug dealers. They want to have murderers come into our country. They want to have open borders, and we're not letting it happen. That's what this is all about. They don't want voter ID. They don't want proof of citizenship. They don't want mail-in ballots. They're so corrupt. What they want, the only thing they want is mail-in ballots. So we also added, as you know, into the Save America Act. And it's called Save America. It's not the Save America. It's not the Save Act. But we added no transgender mutilization of our children and no men in women's sports. All sounds like common sense to me.

Now, let me show you this next clip. This comes from the view, similar to CBS. On one hand, they say that they don't have a problem with ICE being at the airports because they're getting all this money. So it only, it totally makes sense. But when you hear the excuse of why she says that, I think you're going to end up shaking your head. Listen to this. I was flying this weekend, too, and I commend everyone that's doing. I was in the Midwest and here, and everything went well. The travelers were great. I don't actually hate the idea of this right now.

ICE has gotten billions of dollars. They've almost doubled their budget. We're talking about TSA workers who aren't getting paid, and the ones that are making it there are having to pay for gas prices and riding buses. And so if you want to fill in bodies here, because their success rate at finding criminals has been 5%. these are 100% guaranteed travelers coming through there.

So I just feel like putting more people on the job. I don't see that as a bad thing. You mean you want to feel safe when you take your kids to the airport? Yeah. So the 5% I guess that's not good. It doesn't matter, right? Again, it goes back to the same talking point. Well, 70% that they have arrested do not have any crime.

So 30% do? So you're telling me that ICE has been arresting 30% worth of criminals that are in our country unlawfully sounds good to me, especially when we continue to hear about stories like, I don't know, Sharon and Gorman out of Chicago or Stephanie Menter out of Virginia, I mean, we can keep going down the line because it happens every single week where an American citizen is killed by someone in the country unlawfully. But to talk about all that, no one's interested, or they're not interested, should I say. I didn't sleep last night to get here to the airport. It's unfortunate, but hey, I got to do what I got to do. If I had the means,

I'd pay everyone right now. But I can't. can't. But I would. It's crazy. I don't blame it. It's unfortunate because they're hardworking individuals. It's been a long journey from start to where we are now. It's been crazy. We've been in a half. Yeah, pretty much. It's kind of uncomfortable, you know, the situation, but, you know, what can we do in this day and age? I expect anything. Now, if you thought deploying ICE agents was the story, no, there's a new one, just so you guys are clear, the president has now signaled the possibility of National Guard troops being deployed to airports. Take a listen.

And I want to thank ICE because they stepped in so strongly. They'll do great. And if that's not enough, I'll bring in the National Guard. We're not going to have the Democrats destroy our country. These people are the most destructive, sick people. the Democrat. Listen, that's one thing I definitely agree with the president on how destructive Democrat policies are to this country. I'm not saying Republicans are perfect. Not at all. But I'll tell you what, every time we have to do a story about the one I'm about to get into, it's a careful reminder of what

you're going to get when Democrats are in charge. Now we're going back to Sheridan Gorman, the latest American citizen killed by an illegal alien just for glazing at the stars. Well, there's new backlash because one of the alder women, people who are, I guess, elected in the city of Chicago for her particular district is saying somehow some way it must have been Sheridan's fault. Take a listen to this. ICE has now lodged an arrest attainer and asked the governor not to release the suspect who entered the U.S. under the Biden administration. Officials released him back in 2023 into the homeland.

He is facing six felony counts, including murder and is due in court next hour for a detention hearing. So lots of backlash, of course, after a Democratic Chicago alder woman seems to be. to downplay this murder. Listen. The kids were out doing normal, normal things people do in the neighborhood. And it sounds like this might have been a wrong place, wrong time, running into a person who had a gun. They might have startled this person at the end of the pier unintentionally.

Wrong place, wrong time, she says. Well, the victim's family says, don't you dare? They address that comment directly. Here's part of their heartbreaking statement. They write what Sheridan was doing that night, walking with friends near her campus was normal. It was safe. It is what students do every day. We will not allow this to be dismissed as wrong place, wrong time. This was not random misfortune. This was a violent and preventable act. And we are gravely disappointed by the policies and failures

that allow this individual to remain in a position to commit this crime. When systems fail, whether through release decisions, lack of coordination, or unwillingness to act, the consequences are not abstract. They are real. And in our case, they are permanent. Listen, it's not a partisan statement. All you have to do is listen to their rhetoric and how they handle these particular issues when American citizens are killed by illegal aliens. They don't want to hear it. They almost have contempt for the American citizen themselves. I mean, they give no attention to these stories whatsoever. You don't hear them actually recognizing these tragedies or even having some level of remorse.

I mean, it seems to me they have more empathy for illegal aliens than they do for American citizens who turn out to be victims of illegal immigration. Sad state of affairs. Now, let's go to the actual Chicago reporter who was all over this, William J. Kelly. Here's what he had to say. Mayor Johnson has put illegal aliens over American citizens, Chicago citizens, real Chicagoans, whose hearts are broken for the Gorman family today, by the way, over again and again and again. Mayor Johnson has not even released a statement,

a statement offering his condolences. His apology would be more appropriate. And maybe it's a good thing, because knowing Mayor Johnson the way I know him, his statement would probably be accusing Sheridan of provoking this attack, this crime. You know, there was another young lady, beautiful young lady, just like Sheridan, who was set on fire on the CTA, on public transportation. Mayor Johnson said it was an isolated incident. That is either the coldest or most hateful response. I could ever imagine anyone giving, much less the mayor of the city of Chicago. Johnson and his policies have given these illegal aliens the idea that it's not the American dream that you and I were raised to believe, but it's a criminal dream of fraud and rape.

and robbery and murder. And this is Johnson's legacy. It's disgusting. Just imagine if your husband or daughter or son was killed by an illegal alien and the mayor or governor stated, this is an isolated event. I mean, you would probably be livid, no question. And this is the disconnect because of how they see illegal immigration in this country and their belief in sanctuary city policies, as you guys know.

Now, Mayor Johnson is the only one to behave this way and say comments. like this. Let's go to Zoroamandani, because over the weekend, instead of him actually recognizing victims to criminals that have happened or crimes that have happened in his own city, he wants to acknowledge the criminals themselves by visiting them at the end of Ramadan. Take a listen to this. And critics slamming the New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani for visiting inmates at Rikers Island to break fast in the celebration of Ramadan. Now remember, just a few weeks ago, he chose to dine with a known anti-Israel protester instead of a hero NYPD officer who stopped a bombing suspect. An anonymous NYPD officer telling the New York Post, quote,

he actually visited inmates on Rikers, but hasn't visited any victims of the heinous crimes. Some of these guys have committed. I think it's absolutely disgusting. But earlier in the week, Momdani called this the most meaningful evening telling NPR, quote, This is me just being a Muslim New Yorker, and I think there are some for whom that is a political act, and there are a million or so of us here in the city for whom it is simply a day, today existence. Yeah, it's really interesting because he's not doing a great job of trying to get American people to believe that Muslims aren't an issue, particularly in elected office.

I don't see why it's so hard for the New York City mayor to actually recognize victims, honor them in their sacrifice, respect the NYPD by honoring their sacrifice, especially when they put their lives on the line like we've seen with that failed terror attack. It just blows my mind that he still refuses to acknowledge them and continues to empathize with criminals. I think that tells you where the Democrat Party is, folks. Let's go to the president, because while all this nonsense is happening, all this gaslight is happening, here's what the president is focused on.

Watch. We want to have heart. We want to have fairness, but we have to be tough. because some of these people are bad people that should have never been allowed to be here. Since I took office, we have successfully arrested or removed from the country over 500,000 hard-line criminals.

And under our leadership, last year, the murder rate nationwide saw the single largest decline ever recorded to the lowest level in 125 years. That's something. That's something. And this is despite the fact

that they allowed 25 million people into our country, many of those people should never have been allowed into our country. All right. So give me your guys' thoughts in the comment section below. It's clear the president's been focused on getting results for the American people, whether it's the lowest crime rate in the last hundred years or the high deportation numbers that have occurred already in one and a half years of his administration. Or it's the cleaning up a Washington, D.C., or Memphis as an example. It just seems to me you'll probably never get credit on. it but the people of those areas probably recognize it let me know what you think about that

obviously tsa we got ice agents there at the airports do you support that do you see that as a positive uh and then finally what did you make up chuck schumers disastrous interview where he was humiliated give me your thoughts everything you got in the comments section below now let's go to our next video which is actually an interview that i did with lindy lee a former dnc fundraiser political commentator and author of her upcoming book on burden i think you're going to love this because she absolutely exposes the deep level of corruption of the Democrat Party. If you're interested, click on the video because it's coming up right now.