The DeVory Darkins Show - CNN OBLITERATED by Kristi Noem after they painfully admit the truth

Episode Date: July 10, 2025

BREAKING NEWS CNN OBLITERATED by Kristi Noem after painfully admitted the truth about Texas floods. CNN gets caught lying about Kristi Noem delaying FEMA response. Also, the Jeffrey Epstein case still won’t go away as the backlash continues to increase.EPISODE SPONSOR: Go to our sponsor https://aura.com/devory to get a 14-day free trial and see if any of your data has been exposed.  FOLLOW ME:https://www.twitter.com/devorydarkinshttps://www.instagram.com/devorydarkinshttps://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkinshttps://devory.wtf.tvBUY ME A COFFEE:https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkinsSHOP OUR MERCH STORE:https://store.devorydarkins.comBUSINESS INQUIRIES:[e-mail]

All right, so in today's video, CNN is finally emitting the truth about the flash floods that occurred in Texas. And the second story is Jeffrey Epstein. It's now being reported that the Department of Justice just told the court they're still reviewing the files. What is going on? We're going to get to both of these stories in this video, show you what both sides are saying. And as always, give you the bottom line. And that's what this is about at this point. It's about the local officials. What did they do? Not the state, not the federal government.

Because on July 2nd, on July 2nd, two days before this, the state is already sending out press releases, saying, be careful. You've got this weather storm. You've got this storm coming through, raising the alarm bells. The alarm bells are starting on July 2nd. And the Texas Department of Emergency Management is moving in resources. They're moving the resources in. to the locals, we have things available for you. We have emergency response available for you. So get prepared. And this was a warning on July 2nd to this community. Now, what happens after that? Where do those warnings go? Starting on July 2nd, how does those warnings, how do they, did they ever get to the locals?

And I think that's the biggest question. And much like you, yesterday I had the opportunity. to head down towards the river and talk to people. And most of them, most of the people I talked to said they did get the alerts, but they didn't take them seriously. First of all, it was in the middle of the night. So most were sleeping. It was a beautiful day before the rain started on July 3rd. Okay, so let's make sure you guys understand exactly why I am saying that CNN is finally

admitting the truth. It's their MO. When a story first comes out, they go to blaming President Trump immediately, without any of the facts. It's all opinion-based and propaganda, okay? And they find their unique way of doing it. They try to bring on experts that will say whatever they want them to say pretty much. But if you just wait long enough, you'll see that they'll finally start telling the truth. And that's what you just heard in this clip. Now, just to make sure we understand this story and where we're at, July 2nd, the Texas Department of Emergency Management issue a warning.

So, yeah, what were the local officials doing? That is an appropriate question. But more importantly, there's something called reality. If people are not going to listen to the warnings, what else do you expect is going to happen? Down at the river, and keep in mind, so many people were in town for this. So many people came from outside this area in their RVs. How are they supposed to know that something could go wrong? And so that's the big question. What efforts did the locals make?

At this point, it doesn't appear to be that they were making any efforts. And we'll see if they ever answered those questions. At this point, they said they're focusing on. on the recovery efforts and the families and trying to give them some closure. Now, when it comes to CNN, it's not just that simple. Yes, they are shifting blame to local leaders. And yes, they are admitting that it really has nothing to do with what the state or the federal government has done.

However, they still find a way to slip in the blame when it comes to Christine Nellman, President Trump. And before we get to what she had to say about all this, let me play you this clip from Anderson Cooper, where they are alleging she personally. purposely delayed FEMA's response. Take a look. So according to four officials inside FEMA that federal response may not have been as fast as it might have been. They say that a new rule that any expenditure over $100,000 needed sign off from Secretary Nome slowed the federal response.

These sources tell us that FEMA's deployment of urban search and rescue teams, which are typically deployed in anticipation they might be needed, instead was delayed until Monday three days after the flood. Now, a source also tells us that are required. Texas made for FEMA aerial imagery to aid in the search was also delayed, waiting for Secretary Nome's approval. Additionally, multiple FEMA officials say that they were taken aback by the agency's relatively limited response in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. CNN has reached out to FEMA for comments. So far, no reply from the agency. However, a DHS spokeswoman more generally told CNN that FEMA is, in her words, quote, shifting from bloated DC-centric dead weight to a lean deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens.

All right. So bottom line to what CNN is saying, they're basically making the point that because Christyneum signed a policy when she assumed the position, that any disaster relief that supersedes $100,000 requires her personal signature, it delayed FEMA's response. Now, hold the thought, and then let's exercise some brain cells. did the people on the ground, did the victims need FEMA the morning of? FEMA is not responsible for rescuing people. You know who is?

The Coast Guard, the National Guard, and local first responders who all were there on July 4th in the morning. I believe the National Guard deployed the following date to be more accurate. So this is totally misleading by saying it. Now, I want you to hear Chrissy Nones' response. because she didn't even offer an explanation. She just called the network trash, which I do agree with her. Take a look. Do CNN is basically got a report accusing you of slowing the process?

Would you like to respond to that? Well, there you go. Fake news. CNN again is absolutely trash what they are doing by saying that. Because our Coast Guard, our Border Patrol, Bortak teams were there immediately. Every single thing I was on, they asked for, we were there. The governor and the emergency management director, NIMKID, fantastic and nobody there has said anything about that they didn't get everything that they wanted immediately or that they needed and i'm proud of the work that we've done to support that but you know

we've got flooding going on in new mexico as well right north carolina so i've been visiting with their leadership team and spent quite a bit of time on the phone yesterday with the new mexico governor getting them resources as well as well and that's what we do and you know the fact that CNN is continuing to be political and push out fake information and false and information and lies is not shocking, but it's a disservice to the country. It's a real disservice to the country because people start to mistrust anything that comes out then over the news. Start? And then, well, that's true. Yeah, but they just don't trust anybody anymore. Of course we don't trust what mainstream media is telling us, because I just showed you how

much they lie. You know, isn't it fascinating that if you just step back and observe CNN in their behavior, remember what happened when President Trump ordered the military airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities? What did they say in the beginning? Oh, was it accurate? Oh, did it really do damage? Oh, did they find the right place? Then as time went on, even the experts started to push back on CNN. I mean, this is just an utter embarrassment for all journalists out there. They claim to be in the news business, but they're in the propaganda business. And it's not just them. It's also Democrats.

Here is Chuck Schumer, who's supposed to be the top leader of the party saying this. It's essential for all New Yorkers who need to be protected against extreme weather like flooding. Who need the warning, which obviously didn't occur in Texas. That bad, bad, dangerous weather is coming. Okay, so just pathetic. Before I give you guys my reaction, I want you guys to hear a quick message from today's sponsor, ORA. Now, here's the interesting thing. Democrats still want you to panic about Doge having access to your personal data.

But let's be real, it's not the government you should be worried about. It's the professional hackers who have already stolen millions of identities and are weaponizing it. That's why I use ORA, a full security system for my digital life. VPN, credit monitoring, identity theft protection, and parental controls all in one. That's why when I signed up, I found my info, full name, email, even parts of my social security number already on the dark web. And ORA didn't just flag it, but they removed it. And that's why I've got 24-7 monitoring, fewer spam calls, and real-time alerts on my bank

accounts. Whether you're trying to stay anonymous or just protect what's yours, ORA has your back. So just go to ORA.com for a 14-day free trial and take back. your digital freedom today. Okay. So that's just a blatant lie. I know it. You know it. Everybody knows it. And I would imagine the families that are in that local area, what would they say to Chuck Schumer based on his response? Because what I don't hear from people who live in that area, from the interviews I've seen, I don't hear them blaming local officials. They understand what went on here. This is a natural disaster. There's only so much someone could have done. You've got all the

warnings one can get, except the siren. But again, a perfect storm. People are not familiar with the area in the middle of the night. And you have this fatigue from even local people where they receive the warnings all the time, but it never gets to this level. So they're like, we'll see what happens. But saying all that out loud as a Democrat would mean you'd be, I guess, agreeing with President Trump? I don't know. But one thing's for sure. Democrats are convinced this is the message to score political points. And just so, to show you an example that here is Gavin Newscum doing just that. Take a look.

After all, the natural disaster that occurred and it continues to occur and unfold in Texas may have humbled them. You know, that image you saw, I don't know if you woke up like I woke up, God is my witness. First image I saw this morning turned on MSNBC and it was a photograph of that beautiful 13-year-old girl and her 11-year-old sister. that were flat found clutching each other's hands. Lost down the river. I'm dead. Yep, that's Gavin Newscom, doing what he does best, which is playing politics and trying to capitalize on the moment.

And it's just disgusting that these politicians are literally trying to weaponize to tragedy of what took place in Texas in order to smear conservatives and undermine the president of the U.S. United States, as I like to say. Now, let's go to our other story because this is truly starting to undermine President Trump and his accomplishments. And that is this continuous Jeffrey Epstein debacle where I just believe truly he and his team, they've handled this incorrectly. Now, listen to Charlie Kirk and Mark Halperin give you the bottom line on what should be done moving forward. Take a look. The fact that young people care about this more than older people

which you and I are hearing anecdotally all over the place. I'd love to give voice to that because that is the big issue. And again, I'm not minimizing the responsibility our society has to the victims at all. But the longer-term issue that runs parallel to that is trust in government. And it's a thing that needs to be put in sharper relief. Younger people really care about this more than older people in general. And the reasons for that relate, at least in part, to their incredulity that a government, particularly a government, if they're MAGA, who they voted for and trust, could so fundamentally betray what they thought was going to happen and should happen. So, well, the reason I want to do this so much is because it's crazy.

We live in a society with all this media, and you've not heard that a single place, right? Like one or two voices, maybe on your show, my show, somebody you and I've talked to. But the country needs to see 12 young Trump voters saying, Mr. President, this is wrong. And here's why. Here's why we feel so passionately about this. That voice needs to be put in sharp relief. It needs to be heard. And I'd like the president to hear it because I suspect he hasn't.

Yeah. So at this point, I'm totally convinced one or two things are true that President Trump is not getting the right information from the people he is surrounded by. That's number one. Or number two, he is aware of this, and what Bill O'Reilly is claiming, might actually be a true reality that he has to protect people that he knows that are not actually criminally a part of this whatsoever, but they are affiliated with Epstein in some capacity. And so it's guilt by association, which means their reputation would be on the line if these files were released. In case you didn't hear that from Bill O'Reilly, here it is. I talked to President Trump, man to man, eye to eye on St. Patrick's Day, about this and the Kennedy files and the King files.

It was all one conversation. And he said, and I agree, there are a lot of names associated with Epstein. It had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct. They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another. If that name gets out, those people are destroyed. Because it's not going to be any context. Media doesn't care about context. So you can't do that.

You can't destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be. But you certainly can have Attorney General Bondi say, this is what we know. And, you know, we're going to protect the innocent. And he's a heinous individual. Okay. But even if we follow that logic, if you guys recall, how many people were associated with Diddy and the stuff he was involved in? How many people were associated with R. Kelly? who did go to prison, and nothing happened to them.

And it's interesting that when you're this powerful, you can truly shut down a case like this, because that's what's unfolding in front of our eyes. And for the record, we want President Trump to be successful. But at the same time, we can't control who he is surrounded by who's consulting him or ultimately the decisions that he makes. and some decisions that this president is going to make, or his administration, will backfire. And that's exactly what's happening with this whole Jeffrey Epstein debacle. Does it pay the bills at the end of the day?

No. Is this the last thing people are thinking about before they fall asleep? Absolutely not. So in the end, 10 years from now, is this really going to matter? Probably not. But at this current time, when you ran on the promise of being transparent, you ran on holding people in the government accountable and prosecuting them for covering things like this up, and now you're not really going to do that?

It's a problem. And to make matters worse, Mr. Victor Davis Hansen came out on Glenn Beck's show and had this to say that really makes this entire thing troubling. Take a look. Well, you summed up exactly what Pam Bondi and the FBI and people said to us in February. That's exactly what they said. and then something has changed in their attitude once they got into the data, the material. And the conspiracies say, well, there's officials involved.

I don't know if it's, I think it's more maybe the donor class or people across the political spectrum that are very powerful and influential. And some of them were very terrified of Jeffrey Epstein. All right, so at this point, I don't think his explanation is anything new, but it continues to confirm that even some of the brightest minds in politics and history is even calling this out for what it really is. And whether or not President Trump believes this is the right thing to do, we can give him the benefit of the doubt.

But what's the explanation for the victims? What are we doing to prosecute people who are actually involved? Because it's one thing to protect people who we know have no criminal affiliation with what went on. But what about the people who did? Where are those prosecutions? Where are those investigations? Because if you're just going to shut it down and nothing else is going to happen from this day forward, yeah, I would probably say that's a bad look.

Now, here is Alan Dershowitz, who, as you know, is one of the best legal minds in our country, who was actually being sued over this whole Jeffrey Epstein situation. And he claims he's seen the names and he knows exactly what's going on. Take a look. This is not an opinion. This is a fact. I have seen. Remember, I was accused falsely. And they have seen. And ultimately, I was completely cleared. The woman admitted that she may have mistook me for somebody else and withdrew all of her lawsuits. And so from day one, from the day I was accused, I said, I want every document out because I knew every document would prove I was innocent. So let me tell you, I know for a fact documents are being suppressed. And they're being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names of the individuals. I know why they're being suppressed. I know who's suppressing them. But I'm bound by confidentiality from.

a judge and cases, and I can't disclose what I know. But I pan to God. I know. I know the names of people whose files are being suppressed in order to protect them. And that's wrong. Just out of curiosity without names, are these politicians, business leaders, both? They're everything. And let me tell you, a lot of them are, at least one of them is somebody who was accused. Others are accusers. So the most important question at this point is where does the administration go from here? Now, if I was advising President Trump and his team, which I'm in no position to do so, but if I was, I would tell him to just release everything that they have. And why is that? Because what makes this case so different than R. Kelly, then Diddy, then Harvey Weinstein, then all these other true crime, serial killers, all this information we have access to?

but we can't get access to Jeffrey Epstein, and the more you guys try to fight against that and hide it and shut it down, you will run the risk of killing your credibility when it comes to transparency. And I thought that's the whole point of this administration, or at least one of the core principles of this administration. So we'll see what happens. I mean, it's his decision, and ultimately we want the president to be successful. So we'll see what they decide to do. And if they hear or react to the backlash. We want total transparency on this. Every single document, no redaction. That's what I've said from day one. I waive any of my rights of privacy. Anything there is about me, I'm happy because it will be exculpatory, because I know I haven't

touched a woman other than my wife from the day I met Jeffrey F.C. I don't even hug people, but I was falsely accused and I was able to prove it. And I was able to prove it through documents. and I want other people to be able to disprove false accusations through documents, but these documents are being suppressed and with help. And then to add more to the drama, the Department of Justice and FBI, they were just in court this morning and they told the judge that they're still reviewing the records and files of Jeffrey Epstein because currently there's a lawsuit between judicial watch and the federal government because they have refused to release any documentation.

And matter of fact, the guy who runs Judicial Watch was on Fox News last night, and here's what he said. I think they decided, for political purposes, they didn't want to include the individuals who were on these lists and put them in the public domain. And they were concerned that some of them may not have done something warranting the disclosure. I mean, that's the most charitable interpretation. You know, but there is a list. There's no doubt. I mean, they talk about in the memo they wrote, well, there's a, there's a list. no incriminating client list. Well, what does that mean? I want the non-incriminating client

list. And of course, a client list is a term of art, right? Where are his associates? Where is the list of contacts? You know, when we asked under our FOIA lawsuit, Pam Bondi, give us the documents that you say you were looking at. Give us documents about the release of these documents. You said the FBI was obstructing the release. They came back to us that we have nothing. All right. So bottom line is, this isn't going to prevent President Trump from implementing his agenda over the next three and a half years. But it will make it almost near and possible for American people to trust the Department of Justice, let alone the FBI. And of course, that is something that he promised he would fix. And so this, in my opinion, is making it really

hard for him to do so, especially when I know that Dan Bongino is the guy that's not making the decisions. We know that it's not Cash Patel making the decisions on this. This is coming from Pam Bondi, President Trump, or his advisors. So it's not a good look at the end of the day. But I want to hear from you guys in the comments section as it relates to both of these stories, starting with CNN in their misleading ways. As you know, they try to lie about Chris you know and framing as a way of her purposely preventing disaster relief in regards to FEMA responding to Texas. And let's not even mention how they had to admit that it really had nothing to do with Christy Nome and President Trump as it relates to this disaster. So there's that. And then this entire

Jeffrey Epstein situation, let me know your thoughts so far in the comment section below. All right. So in our next video that you're going to want to watch, Democrats have suffered another major blow, particularly mainstream media experts and the economists who all claim that President Trump's tariffs was going to send this country into a recession. Well, guess what? New reports have come out yesterday and I've totally debunked that claim. So we got into that video and more stories. And if you're interested in watching it, all you have to do is click on that video because it's coming up right now.