The DeVory Darkins Show - Democrats dealt POLITICAL BLOW after stunning mental health survey

Episode Date: June 4, 2025

Nate Silver just EXPOSED the Democrat Party with a stunning Mental Healthy Survey. Also, Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley exposes the Judicial Tyranny that is plaguing the Trump administration. And, Lindsey Graham spent how much on Hotel and lodging in Ukraine.FOLLOW ME:https://www.twitter.com/devorydarkinshttps://www.instagram.com/devorydarkinshttps://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkinshttps://devory.wtf.tvBUY ME A COFFEE:https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkinsSHOP OUR MERCH STORE:https://store.devorydarkins.comBUSINESS INQUIRIES:[e-mail]

So it's another day and another blow to Democrats as a new survey from Nate Silver is exposing the mental health ratings of liberals versus conservatives. I want to talk about this because I think it speaks to the heart of the issue and why the left has become so violent. Take a listen. Nate Silver, who does a lot of political analysis, he had this out. This is the chart call for four. Higher soft report in mental health correlates with conservative political views. 51 to 45% when it comes to excellent versus poor. And I don't think the Democrats would have expected that.

I don't know, man. I didn't need a poll to know they were unwell. Just drive around and see someone wearing a mask in their car. And you know who they're voting for and you know they're not okay. And again, the Republican argument gravitates towards success. The Democrat argument gravitates towards it's never going to work and it wasn't your fault anyway. And I think that conditions you to be a grievance-minded person. And that's their biggest turnoff.

Boys, when we talk about the country, is you're never going to be at the party and be like, oh, I can't wait until the guy who gets offended at everything shows up. But that's what the Democrats created. So the Republicans are going in that other direction. It's the right direction because it's more appealing to people. It's like every single day there's some study, a poll, a survey, research report that continues to show that Democrats, they're done. You know, it's going to take a long time before they can actually come back.

Now, it might be shorter because Republicans are incompetent as I continue to bring up in all on my videos, because they have been dragging their feet on passing common sense pieces of legislation. But hey, let's see what ends up happening in the midterms. Now, a Democrat from New York, a representative by the name of Richie Torres, here's what he says about his own party. Take a look. I feel like there is a recognition that we went too far left on immigration. But, you know, I feel there needs to be a fundamental restructuring within the Democratic Party or return to a rational center. But, you know, I worry that, I mean, Donald Trump is so aggressive that he is provoking

a response. Yeah. That is, you know, there's a divide between what I would say, two teams in the Democratic Party. There's team restraint and team resistance, right? There are those in team resistance who feel like we should react hysterically to everything that Donald Trump says or does. And then there are those who feel like we should pay.

and choose our battles and be strategic. But I worry that the momentum is on the side of hysterical, hyperbolic resistance. And the enormous expenditure of time and energy and resistance might crowd out the restructuring and moderation that needs to happen within the Democratic Party. Now, I'm sure some of you guys would agree. That's one of the biggest life lessons, okay? If you continue to obsess over the thing you hate, that's who you become. That's point number one.

Point number two, if you're always in reaction mode, that means you're never. in control. That's why there's a thing called respond, not react. You respond by thinking through exactly what you're going to do next, not react emotionally, because at that point, that means whatever you're reacting to controls you. But hey, that's a mindset lesson, and I'm sure people in Congress won't appreciate it. Now, why don't we look at more confirmation that things are just so bad for them? So they held this town hall in California. Some of you guys might know this already. But the attorney general showed up to speak, and let's just say, nobody really wanted to hear what he had to say. Take a look at this really quick.

The reality is he's saying that to maybe 23 times. The reality is he's saying that to maybe 23 people who happen to be in the crowd and no more. So listen, we already know what the problem is. Democrats probably better than they do themselves. They're still stuck in denial mode. You heard the other representative who said there's really two factions, one who's all about resistance and one who's all about restraint, seems to me majority of the parties stuck in resistance because that's what they know. Donald Trump is the son in their universe. They can't survive without him. Now, let's circle back on that survey from Nate Silver because this graph right here represents the biggest problem of them all.

you see democrats claim they are the party of minority groups people who are oppressed to disenfranchise but those same people are no longer supporting the party so how do you reconcile that just look at this if you look at black people they're negative eight when it comes to men Latino men they're negative 12 when it comes to Latino women negative seven Asian women negative three, Asian men, negative six. That's not good. It's not good whatsoever. Now, let's go to our next one. When this is huge, what happened today on Capitol Hill.

So the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing today to discuss district court judges versus President Trump. And Ted Cruz came out with a theory opening statement. Take a listen. This hearing is a joint undertaking by the subcommittee on the Constitution and the subcommittee on federal courts because our country is facing a constitutional crisis. a full-blown judicial assault on the separation of powers that strikes at the very foundation of the Republic. What we're witnessing is the rise of judicial lawfare from the bench. One unelected district judge sitting in a courtroom in San Francisco or Boston or Baltimore can now issue a nationwide injunction that ties the hands of the president of the president

the United States for all 330 million Americans. That's not law, that's judicial tyranny. President Donald Trump was elected by over 77 million Americans with a constitutional mandate to govern. These district judges, they were not elected. They were appointed by one individual and confirmed not to legislate, not to govern, but to apply the law. And yet, far too many of them have abandoned that role. They've stepped off the bench and into the political arena, issuing sweeping edicts that impose their policy preferences on 340 million Americans. Yeah, so you already know where he's going with this, okay?

It's very clear that at this point, one could argue two things. On the left, you would argue that President Trump is exceeding his authority, which is why the judicial branch is getting involved and can, continuing to issue these nationwide injunctions. However, on the right, you would argue that these judges are overreacting and exceeding their authority by issuing nationwide injunction. So ultimately, we're still waiting for the Supreme Court to provide clarity on this issue. Secondly, we know this is not what nationwide injunctions intended to be used for. They are supposed to be for emergency purposes only. So the question is, what classifies as an emergency?

Well, in today's political climate, everything is an emergency. Now, of course, Senator Josh Hawley confronts one of the professors who was a witness at this hearing. Because remember, for Democrats, they love it when they get the nationwide injunction. But when it happens against them, they cry about it. Here he is exposing her for that very thing. Take a look. When the Biden administration was subject to nationwide injunctions, you said that they were travesties for the principle of democracy. You didn't say the referral to Judge Casmeric was a travesty.

You said his injunction was a travesty for principles of democracy. In other words, the translation is just you didn't like the outcome. Is that right? No, Senator. Look, we're talking about, I don't think Article 3 precludes this form of relief. So we are talking about prudential considerations. Prudential meaning political? No.

Then give me, so far, I have yet to hear it. You've been questioned by multiple senators. I have yet to hear a principle other than the fact when you like the ruling. you think it's great to apply it nationally, including non-parties. When you don't like the ruling, it is a travesty for the principles of democracy, notions of judicial impartiality, and the rule of law.

Look, Senator, I'll say, I think I am self-aware enough to know that my view of the underlying legal question, I am sure colors my perception of the remedy. I think that we should all acknowledge that. And yet I do think that there... And why shouldn't we stop nationwide injunctions for everybody? That's what we're talking about today.

Because I'm not willing to leave without relief non-parties. No, you're not willing to leave without the ability to bind President Trump. No, I think that... I mean, when it's Biden, it's okay. When it's Biden, oh, it's a travesty. When it's Trump in office, it's, oh, no, holds barred, whatever it takes, right? I believe in a powerful...

What was it that President Biden's staff said? We've got to do undemocratic, unconstitutional things to save democracy. So this actually speaks to the core problem of Democrats. They have zero credibility. That's exactly what Senator Hawley is exposing here. If you're on the left or you're a Democrat and you continue to argue against what President Trump is doing, you have zero credibility. Now why do I say that? I say it because when it mattered most for you to speak up against Joe Biden, you never did.

You were silent as night when it came to his mental decline. You were silent as night when it came to the 13 service members who lost their life. You were silent as night when it came to him looking to overturn the Supreme Court himself and pushed through student loan forgiveness. You had nothing to say. And you definitely didn't have anything to say about the mass invasion at the southern border. In fact, you gaslit America by saying the border was secure. Democrats. You have zero credibility. Let's see the chart, the Trump chart, which was done really only once Trump came into office for the first time. You don't think this is a little bit anomalous? You don't think that's a little bit... A very plausible explanation, Senator, you have to consider is that he is engaged in much more lawless activity than other presidents,

right? You don't think this was never used before the 1960s, and suddenly Democrat judges decide we love the nationwide injunction. And then when Biden comes office, no, no. It's Republican appointees as well, Senator. So long as it is a Democrat president in office, then we should have no nationwide injunctions. If it's a Republican president, then this is absolutely fine, warranted, and called for it. How can our system of law survive on those principles, professor? I think a system in which there is that meaningful constraints on the president is a very dangerous system of law. That's not what you thought when Joe Biden was president.

You said that is not what you said. You said it was a travesty for the principles of democracy. democracy, notions of judicial impartiality, and the rule of law. You also said when Joe Biden was president, wait a minute, wait a minute, you also said when Joe Biden was president, you said the idea that anyone would foreign shop to get a judge who would issue a nationwide injunction was just politicians, just judges looking like politicians in robes, again, it threatened the underlying legal system, people just trying to get the result they wanted, it was a travesty for the rule of law.

But you're fine with all of that if it's getting the result that you want. Yeah. So listen, the simple explanation here and why President Trump is experiencing so many nationwide injunctions is because they don't like him. It really is that simple. Go back to high school. You know what it's like when someone doesn't like another person. They will go to extreme levels to stop them, to humiliate them, to ridicule them. I mean, it's like high school all over again in Congress. Just because people are adults or they're 60 years old doesn't mean they're mature, especially when they're emotionally out of control. That's what's how to have. happen. President Trump has broken politics as we know it. They don't know how to handle themselves

anymore. So this is what they go to. And now it's not only in D.C., but it's in the judicial branch. And that right there is a sad thing, ladies and gentlemen. Now, let me tell you something that's also sad in my opinion. This story has been flying under the radar. It's about Senator Lindsey Graham. And how much the taxpayer put up for him to stay in Ukraine? Now, we know that he showed up to Ukraine 24 hours before that large drone attack that Ukraine executed in Russia. And so people are, you know, focusing on the attack and they're not really focusing on this interesting story. Well, potentially one of the biggest neocons, Senator Lindsey Grimm, Republican guy, okay?

We also, he goes over there with Dick Blumenthal and he was Zelensky over something on Friday. And their little getaway, just the hotels racked up $403,000. dollars. I mean, don't pay that. Yeah. Carl, those are Wolf of Wall Street hotel bill numbers, right? I mean, those are, that's Jordan Belfort's type in Vegas. Normally, hotel rooms get shattered, hotel floors get shattered for that type of price. What were they doing? You know, I hate to make a joke out of it, but does put the party and two-party system. I mean, there's no other way to put it, but it's disgusting. There needs to be accountability for this.

Sure. Like, look, in all honesty, I've been to Ukraine. I went there early when the war broke off, check out what was going on, couldn't find any of our stuff, any of our money anywhere on the battlefields. However, I didn't spend anything close to that. And we stayed, when we were in Kiev, we stayed in some really nice hotels. It was like pennies compared to that. Now, the question is, what costs $411,000 when it comes to hotels? Can you answer that question in the comment section, please? You see, this is the type of stuff that makes you scratch your head when it comes to Republicans. Again, they say they want to cut waste, but then they spend $411,000?

Now, this is nothing compared to the overall budget and deficit of our country. I know. But we're talking principle right now. 411,000. I just don't get it. And I think this next story, we just don't get either. So the autopin situation, we know this is a scandal, but not in the way that you think. The auto pin itself is not the scandal.

The scandal is that the president explicitly know when the auto pin was being used. especially when pardons were signed the day that he left office. And that's exactly what the DOJ has decided to investigate. Take a look. On the morning of inauguration day, the Biden family pardons were a surprise to us, but were they also a surprise to Joe Biden? That's what officials here want to know.

The new scrutiny is on Biden-era pardon, so that would include preemptive pardons for his sister Valerie, his brother Frank, his brother James, and his wife, Sarah. and then also for Trump critics like Mark Millie, Anthony Fauci, and Liz Cheney. This is coming today from a Reuters report where it says, Ed Martin, the Justice Department's partner attorney, wrote in an email seen by Reuters that the investigation involves whether Biden was competent and whether others were taking advantage of him through use of auto pen or other means.

Now, on the long list of things that the DOJ could be investigating, again, this wouldn't be at the top of the list if it was up to me. Now, I understand why they're investigated it because at the end of the day, people deserve answers as it pertains to Joe Biden's mental decline. We know there was a cover-up. They have written books about it. CNN won't let it go. Jake Tapper's making money on it. I mean, what else do we need to know or what other proof is available out there to say otherwise? I mean, come on, let's get real here. So there needs to be an investigation. I'm shocked. There still hasn't been a hearing on it. And maybe this will actually get it going. We'll see.

Now, here's what Caroline Levitt had to say about this earlier today. Thank you, Caroline. When you look at these last minute, Biden pardons, the big ones, Biden's siblings, Fauci, January 6th committee. Most of the big ones have the same very neat signature. We would expect that probably to be the auto pen. There is one that looks different. It looks authentic. In fact, if you look at the last name, it almost looks like the president was having a hard time smelling his last name there. Is this White House of the opinion that the only pardon that would count is one that the president signed himself? It's very interesting. Very interesting props if you want to bring them to my office later so I can take a closer look. I would like to do that.

The president is making a good point when he discusses the usage of the auto pen. Who was running the country for the past four years? Perhaps those documents were signed with the auto pen, something that I believe the Department of Justice is looking into, as you saw Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice this morning to launch an investigation because the American people deserve answers. Yeah, listen, there's no question the American people deserve answers. Some Democrats are so boozy. They don't even think they deserve answers.

And some Democrats are just straight up delusional, like the former aide who worked for Joe Biden, who went on to Sean Hannity's show and continued to claim that he never saw any issues with Joe Biden's mental decline. Take a listen. assistant to President Biden and former chief spokesperson to the first lady, Jill Biden, Michael O'Rosa. Michael, you're going to come on this program and you're going to look America in the eye and you're going to tell us that you did not see any cognitive decline in Joe Biden because we saw it, we chronicled it starting in 2019. You're going to tell us that?

Well, I am because I've been very consistent about that, Sean, with all of your colleagues on all of the Fox News programming since I left the White House and at the end of 2022 that my three years in the white house michael yes yeah i don't believe you okay i think you're full of crap let me let me let me be honest let me be straight here we play we have tape after tape after tape i could spend the next hour we spent an hour on friday playing him struggling shaking air not knowing where to go talking to dead people uh he could barely utter a sentence he was a he was a He was a shell of his former self. Now, either you don't have eyes to see or ears to hear or you're just, you know, politically

blinded if I'm going to be charitable or just a political hack. But you can't say you didn't see it. I don't believe you. Well, Sean, he can say that he didn't see it because at the end of the day, anybody close to Joe Biden is not going to throw him under the bus. That's just the reality. They're not going to do it. And there's no reason for them to do it.

facing any prosecution. Their life is not going to get turned upside down because mainstream media is not even really pursuing this at some level of aggression. I still think CNN is quite passive on this. And they're only pursuing it because of money. So listen, the response is expected. And again, it highlights what's wrong with our country that people are stuck in denial, especially Democrats. And what's sad is their denial are usually in things that are destructive to this country, especially when you have a sitting president of the United States. United States who may not have known who were signing pardons. I think that's an issue. And that's why I want to get your guys' reaction in the comments section below to quite a few of these stories today. Let's start with

Lindsey Graham, okay? Going to Ukraine, $411,000 for hotels, would you approve of that? And what about Senator Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley highlighting the hypocrisy with the district court judges? And then ultimately, that terrible, terrible research poll once again showing Democrats are just in trouble and they can't help it. Let me know what your guys' thoughts are about all that in the comments section below. Now, Democrats are not the only one suffering from issues right now. I would say Republicans are in the same boat because Elon Musk just blew the lid off of the big, beautiful bill, and he slammed House Republicans. So if you miss that on that story, all you have to do is click on that video because it's coming up right now.

You know,