The DeVory Darkins Show - Democrats HUMILIATE themselves on LIVE TV over DHS funding as Trump rebukes IRAN

Episode Date: March 20, 2026

Democrats HUMILIATE themselves on LIVE TV over DHS funding as Trump rebukes IRAN. EPISODE SPONSORS: Go to ⁠http://ninelineapparel.com⁠ and use code DEVORY to save 15%. Nine Line Apparel – by patriots, for patriots. Download Rumble Wallet now—now with USA₮—and step away from the big banks --- for good! ⁠https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/...FOLLOW ME:⁠⁠https://www.x.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkins⁠⁠⁠⁠https://devory.wtf.tv⁠⁠BUY ME A COFFEE:⁠⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠SHOP OUR MERCH STORE:⁠⁠https://store.devorydarkins.com⁠⁠BUSINESS INQUIRIES:⁠⁠[e-mail]⁠⁠

When West Jet first took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion, inline skates were everywhere, and two out of three women rocked, the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJet welcomes you on board. Here's to Westjetting since 96. Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years. In today's video, we're breaking news. According to the president, he has declined a ceasefire proposal from the country of Iran.

and Democrats are continuing to gaslight the American public overfunding DHS as the drama continues. But let's start with TSA in particular. Here's the latest excuse from Democrats. This is Representative Roe Kana from California. Watch. You've got airports soliciting donations for TSA employees. Denver Airport writes donations needed support the dedicated TSA employees working without pay by donating $10 and $20 grocery store and gas gift cards.

Same things happening at Seattle. They write, if you'd like to help. donations of non-perishable food, hygiene items, and diapers can be dropped off at the Seattle Conference Center from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. That's tough business. Is this a tenable position for Democrats right now? Jack, I don't view this as politics. I view this about the national security of the country. First of all, we've gone into an illegal war in Iran. The president promised no more wars. He's now engaged in a regime change war in Iran that's failed, that has Khamenei replaced by his son. who's 56 years old, and now we have more retaliation on the homeland.

All right, so I have to pause it because the number one question that pops up in my mind when I hear him speaking is what makes what happening in Iran illegal. What is the actual illegal action from the president? What law did he specifically break? They can't answer those questions, even when they do. They're lying to the American people about what the law actually says and how it's applied or enforced. It's the fascinating part about all this. They're choosing the wrong argument against the president here. That's why this is a lose-lose for the Democrats, in my opinion.

In fact, what they should be doing instead is rooting for the president to wrap this up as quickly as possible and ultimately be successful in the process, not look to undermine what he's doing here. Let's continue. This is exactly what he campaigned against. It's a betrayal of his fundamental promise. He's made America less safe. Over 13 Americans have lost their lives. This war needs to end.

That's the biggest thing we can do to restore our security and making sure. that we're focused on home, at home. And then, of course, we need to fund the TSA, and we need to fund security. But what we can't do is be giving a rogue ICE agency more funding to conduct mass raids like they did in Minneapolis. And even Republicans acknowledge that went too far. And all Democrats are saying is don't link beefing up ice raids against Americans. Don't link that funding with funding TSA.

Yeah, see, this video is really going to point out the severe. hypocrisy that we continue to witness with these stories. Now, I just want to say there's nothing hypocritical about wearing the shirt that I'm wearing right now, which I just love. Nine Line Apparel. What you say says a lot about you, obviously, right? But also what you wear. And I love the company because they're based out of Savannah, Georgia. They represent our men and women in the armed forces. They're behind a lot of the causes out there. And they're dedicating their time to honoring our nation. So if that's part of your mindset, your mission, your values, shop nine line apparel. Link is in the description below. And what Republicans are saying is don't sabotage

a funding for TSA and FEMA because of your beef with ice agents. And here's the bottom line to it. And I'm explaining this so many times. They're under the same department, Department of Homeland Security. I mean, at this point, they are playing games by saying, well, only fund 80%, the other 20%, we got to figure that out on another day. Again, I totally believe that these government shutdowns should be illegal, and the people who should be penalized first if a shutdown occurs like this one should be the people of Congress. Now, let's go to Senator Adam Schiff. Here he is also gaslighting the American public about why he refuses to fund DHS. I do have to ask you just finally about this partial government shutdown DHS not being funded for a month now. Just this week, we saw

terror attacks in West Bloomfield, Michigan in Norfolk, Virginia. This morning. This morning. the CEOs of the nation's major airlines and cargo carriers have written a letter to Congress, calling for them to end the shutdown, talking about the importance of American security in the airways. Is it responsible for Democrats to hold up DHS funding with the threat of terror attacks looming during this conflict? No, Kristen, as you know, we offered vote after vote, resolution after resolution, even as recently as this week, to reopen those. agencies to fund them and the Republicans voted it down. Now, this is the new talking point in case you haven't noticed.

First, it was, you know, ICE is rogue. It should be abolished. And we're not giving them one more dollar. And now they're finding out that rhetoric is a little too aggressive. So what they're doing now is, well, we're actually willing to fund TSA FEMA Coast Guard. And when we propose that to the Republicans, they rejected that offer. Now, it violates common sense, obviously, to only fund those particular agencies and not ICE and Border Patrol when they're sitting under the same department, obviously.

But again, that's the way they want to play it. Here's another example. Senator Cory Booker from New Jersey. Here's what he said. Isn't it time for Democrats to reopen and refund DHS? So, first of all, Democrats have tried multiple times to try to get TSA, SISA, the Coast Guard funded. Republicans have refused time and time again to fund.

Yeah, they want the whole agency fund. They want the whole agency. ICE is still out there doing reckless things in communities. ICE is still arresting and detaining American citizens. ICE is still having unmasked people jumped out of unmarked cars, abducting people from the streets, barreling into homes. Even Americans, even veterans are being swept up in ISIS chaos. I will not approve another dollar for ICE, given all that they're doing.

But we should be funding those TSA agents that keep us safe, SISA Coast Guard, and for Republicans to refuse to do it is unacceptable. You see that? It's the Republicans' fault on why TSA isn't funded. even though they've already proposed the bill and voted on it five times, and five times Democrats said no in the Senate. So again, I guess if you don't have two brain cells, you'll eat up exactly what they're saying and you'll believe that it's the Republicans' fault.

It really doesn't matter whose fault it is. It really just shows you the incompetence of Congress overall. I mean, this is way beyond a partisan issue. This is a breakdown regarding what they're sent to do in Washington, D.C. And they're not doing it whatsoever. All right, let's move on to the other side of this story. The actual TSA officers, here's what one of them had to say. We had a half of paycheck two weeks ago, and this weekend, when we get a pay, you're going to get a big fat zero.

So unfortunately, a lot of my colleagues bank accounts are already in the red. He says some of his coworkers haven't shown up to work because they can't afford gas while others are getting second jobs just to survive. Some of my colleagues donate in blood plasma, work in Uber Eats, delivering of Grubhub, working maybe even another job at the airport. Some people are sleeping in their cars so they can save gas. Are you seeing TSOs leave the job? I haven't seen that happen yet in Atlanta, but I do suspect that that will happen.

I mean, right now, officers are being faced with really life-for-death situations or am I going to survive or not. So they will at some point have to make a decision whether to stay on or, you know, go and find other ways to make ends meet. I take care of other family members within our family, and we support some of our other family members. And working such a stressful job and not receiving a paycheck, I had to finally make that decision to say, I need to find something that's stable that's going to help me take care of my family. And so I made that decision painfully.

I worked hard. I loved that job. It was a great job. I love my fellow coworkers. but when you're not getting paid, you have to make those difficult decisions. Now, those are three clips. Three members are part of the union that historically has supported the Democrat Party. This is a union that represents TSA officers.

They are coming out and speaking, obviously, against what Democrats really want the American public to believe. I mean, at the end of the day, these are just innocent people. They're not a part of the political process as far as bills or peace of legislation passing through Congress. Again, this is just games that continue to be played and only in the American people get hurt in the process. Members of Congress are just fine. They won't be hurt. They don't have to worry about whenever they're going to get a paycheck or not because even when the government shuts down, they get paid. Tell me why that's not a problem.

Of course it's a problem. This is why I don't have much respect for them because when it comes down to doing the right thing when it matters the most, they're nowhere to be found. All right. Let's go to our next story. This is about Iran. As you guys know, as I said earlier, they have proposed a ceasefire deal to the president. He says no go. He wouldn't even consider it at this point because the terms are not in alignment with what he wants to see.

It's to be expected. Again, success here on the battlefield, if that makes sense, this entire regime should be eradicated. Nobody should be left. Their military capability, zero percent, not 2%, not 7%, 0%. If he could bring that home, major success. Let's hear more on this story now. President Trump is saying that Iran wants to make a deal to end the war, but he says the terms are not good enough. The president now threatening more strikes on Iran's key oil export hub and infrastructure,

while urging allies to send warships to secure shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The hills, Zach Schoenfeld, is live from Washington, D.C. So, Zach, why is the president saying that he's just not ready to make a deal with Iran? Hey, Jessica, even as the president expresses confidence, in the military progress so far. He says that the terms of any deal would have to be, quote, very solid before he is willing to negotiate. This is coming in a new interview that the president did with NBC. I just want to read you a little bit more of what the president said.

He said, quote, Iran wants to make a deal and I don't want to make it because the terms aren't good enough yet. Yeah, that's exactly what we want to see from our president, of course. And the interesting part about it all is the same mindset you should have about your money. Do not become victim to the terms that the banks have set out, which means they have the ability to cancel your accounts, take money out of your accounts, to bank you whenever they want, which is why what you see here on the screen might be a legitimate solution for you. It's called Rumble Wallet. Yes, you heard me correctly. Wallet.com. If you go to it, you'll be able to download the app.

It gives you the ability to not only buy crypto on your own terms, buy gold on your own terms, but you can tip your favorite creator with crypto. And guess what? It's your wallet. The government can't come after you. The banks can't come after you. So again, download the rumble wallet today. The link is in the description below. And remember, the public terms that the president has communicated is an unconditional surrender. Now, we know that's a non-starter for this Iranian regime. It's a different paradigm. Diplomacy is not on the table. Compromises not on the table. They will die over this. So essentially, I just think it's only a matter of time. Military capability is still intact to some degree, maybe. Maybe it's at 30% right now. I'm talking about Iran's because they continue to launch ballistic missiles at Israel just this morning. But it's only a matter of time until they're unable to do that any further. Let's continue. The president did acknowledge that ensuring that Iran gives up a capability to develop a nuclear weapon, that'll have to be part of it.

But beyond that, the president is declining, at least at this juncture, to provide more specifics. So that leaves us here on the 16th day of this conflict with fighting still going, even escalating following those major strikes on Karg Island, as we've been talking about all morning. And as we've also been talking about, the president has made clear that it's only the military targets that have been targeted so far in the U.S. has yet to hit those oil facilities. But now the president is starting to use that as leverage against the Iranians, saying in this new interview that even as most of the island is, quote, totally demolished, President Trump saying that, quote, we may hit it a few more times just for fun.

Yeah, that's exactly what I'd expect from Donald J. Trump. I mean, he's very funny with his words at time, right? But on a more serious note, there are definitely some serious questions regarding U.S. military transport of oil tankers in the strait of Hermuz. I mean, that hasn't happened, could happen. There's definitely questions about crude oil. Will the other countries get involved here? Will they send their military to protect the strait of Hermose?

I mean, those questions are legitimate, obviously. But to question President Trump's plan on this is peak ignorance, in my opinion. Now, the Iranians are hoping that this war will hurt the United States of America economically, according to Kevin Hassett. Well, here's his reaction to that. Watch. First of all, you have to understand that America is not going to have its economy harmed by what the Iranians are doing. The bottom line is that in the 70s, we didn't produce much oil, but now we do.

And so America's in a very strong position. They think that they're going to harm the U.S. economy and get President Trump to back down. there couldn't be anything that was a stupider thing to say. Because the bottom line is that our economy has got all this momentum in the world, and we've got lots of lots of oil. We have lots of trading partners that are more on the hook from imported oil from these guys. And as we can see, it's completely unacceptable that a government that would murder 40,000 of their people just a few months ago would be blackmailing countries to let stuff through.

President Trump thinks that is unacceptable, and for the global economy, we need to fix it, they were going to fix it fast. Now, the talking point from Democrats this week, the president has no plan. There's no end in sight. He doesn't know what he's doing. He only did it because he felt like he wanted to do it. Iran poses no threat, was never going to pose a threat, hasn't been a threat. That's what they're saying this week, even though if you go back a couple of years ago,

you know, they are so close to building a nuclear weapon. We need to stop them. You know, again, there's a huge hypocrisy on the, left regarding this entire conflict, of course, and they're just trying to obviously do these mental gymnastics to explain all of it. I'll give you an example. Listen to Roe Conner this morning tell Fox News this. Are you saying, though, that Iran should have just been allowed to continue enriching uranium? I mean, through their actions and even their statements in this negotiation, they were not going to give that up. Absolutely not. They should not be nuclear. But we had the

JCPOA that had their enrichment down to about 3.6 percent. We could have had. through Oman, tougher sanctions and negotiation, the Oman mediators were saying that was just putting off the eventuality of them getting a weapon, not blocking it entirely. I mean, Democrats have accepted that. Well, putting it off for 15 years. That's what the JCPO would have done. And then you could have had tougher negotiation in terms of making sure they didn't have missiles. But there was no imminent threat. Now there's a threat to the United States. We've created a threat. There were no ICBMs that Iran could launch here. I believe they said they had the material to make 11 bombs. Okay. So the thing, all right, the thing about Roe-Connor here and a lot of these politicians

overall is they could be in a classified briefing that clearly demonstrates that there was a threat. There was going to be a threat that Iran could never be trusted. They've never been a country that could be trusted. They've proven time and time again that they are not going to follow these agreements. That doesn't matter to him. He can go in front of the camera on the news and just lie to people and they'll believe it. That's what's going on here. And again, the train has left the station. What good does it do at this point? In terms of Republicans, what's clear is that from the very beginning of the Trump presidency, these extremists have functioned like wholly owned subsidiaries of the Trump cartel,

continuing to be nothing more than reckless rubber stamps for Donald Trump's extreme agenda, as opposed to functioning like a separate and co-equal branch of government. And what is clear to me is that Donald Trump's war of choice that Republicans are supporting was poorly planned. All right. Let's go back to it. So on one hand, this is a cartel headed up by President Trump himself. And Republicans are doing everything that he tells them to do. But these are the same Republicans who can't even pass the Save America Act.

I thought this was a cartel. I mean, if it's such a cartel, wouldn't Leader Thune just get rid of the filibuster and go ahead and get these pieces of legislation that the president promised that, what, 81% of America supports? Wouldn't that just have already been passed? Wouldn't DHS be funded at this point? There was no plan as it relates to dealing with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. There was no plan as it relates to evacuating thousands of Americans who for days after the conflict was stranded. There were no plans to deal with the fact that Iran was going to strike out at our allies in the Gulf states throughout the region. And now this war has intensified

so more than a dozen countries are actually involved. And there's no clear plan to end this conflict in a way that it knows to the benefit of the national security interests of the American people. Obviously, he's been practicing those lines. So let's listen to someone who really has it. And it's clearly articulating a high IQ point about what's really happening here. and what might be the goal for the president or the proper conditions for him to say, all right, that's enough from us. We will back away at this point. Listen to the former Undersecretary of Defense.

What would be the right circumstances from your perspective for the president to say, okay, we've got a deal? Well, I think the first thing is to completely destroy Iran's ability, not only to terrorize its own people, but to threaten the region and to threaten us. You know, the air campaigns that I've worked on both as a civilian and as an Air Force officer require an operation lasting months at a time. There's still a threat out there. And what the president, I believe, is setting up are the conditions for the people to say enough

and to go after what's left of the leadership. One thing I'm looking for is the same thing that happened in 1979 with the Shaw. Once the security forces stop firing, on their own people into that regime. So I'll be looking for that as well. You see, that's more of a particular analysis that kind of gets you to see under the surface what might be happening here, not these partisan talking points, which I have one more for you.

And this one that I saved for the end because you just can't make this up. Obviously, this comes from the worst network on the planet MS disinformation. Now, this particular guest or contributor, pundit, caller, what? whatever you want, claims that the way that the president is talking about this Iranian regime, the IRGC, is reminiscent of racism, essentially. Watch. Really disturbing in the messaging around the war recently. And I mean, I really want your thoughts on this in particular, is some of the language and the description of their opponent.

Sort of the way they seem to create this image of the Iranians and all of their sort of proxies or allies. the sort of imagery that they conjure up. And I think that it takes a certain amount of arrogance, and I'm also going to say it, a bit of racism, to constantly talk about people like they are savages. That is a word that we have heard,

Heg Seth use. I mean, you just can't make it up. I mean, the IRGC are a bunch of savages. Every fiber of their being represents the very definition of a savage. What are you talking about? I mean, everybody in the world knows that whatever you think of the cartels, They have nothing on the IRGC.

Now, just wrestle with that in your mind for a second. If cartels are here, IRGC is way up there. I mean, don't you think Savages is probably an understatement? But this is what happens. They're so blinded by their TDS that cannot deliver objective analysis. Again, we're all biased. There's no question about it. Everybody's going to get something wrong, including myself.

But that's more than being wrong. more than just being ignorant. I mean, that is just downright evil, in my opinion. Now, a little update on the side here that I have to get to just briefly here is that the president, particularly the United States of America, they've had to back off a certain amount of sanctions regarding oil is concerned with the country of Russia. Now, obviously, Democrats have hopped on this decision and trying to tell the American people, here, here it is. The president is bending the knee to Russia. But what they won't tell people, it's a decision to help keep oil prices down. I want you to hear the reaction for managed ship when he's asked about this. Watch. Let me ask you about

these Russian sanctions. You obviously supported Russian sanctions. The administration has scaled some back, arguing we're moving them on Russian oil experts will ultimately help lower prices for consumers. My question for you, Senator, with Americans feeling pain at the pump, as you know, is easing pressure on Russia, which is temporary worth it? In communities across Canada, hourly Amazon employees earn an average of over $24.50 an hour. Employees also have the opportunity to grow their skills and their paycheck by enrolling in free skills training programs for in-demand fields like software development and information technology. Learn more at aboutamazon.ca. Getting ready for a game means being ready for anything, like packing a spare stick.

I like to be prepared. That's why I remember, 988, Canada's suicide crisis helpline. It's good to know, just in case. Anyone can call or text for free confidential support from a train responder anytime. 988 suicide crisis helpline is funded by the government in Canada. I think this is a terrible decision, but it is one of the things that comes about as a result of the unpredictability of war. We are now giving Russia essentially $140 million a day. by releasing these relish from these sanctions,

$140 million a day when Iran is providing intelligence to better, when Russia is providing intelligence to Iran to better attack and kill American troops. Okay, let's just dissect their logic. So on one hand, according to them, the president involved the United States of America in this conflict because troops were killed by the IRGC over the past few decades. but on the other hand, he's going to bend the need to Russia

to kill more American troops. I'm not understanding that logic. I just don't. Maybe you guys can help me figure it out. I can't. So I'll play you the opposing view. This is the Secretary of Energy. Chris Wright.

Here's his answer on the matter. Very, let's talk about Russia, the Treasury Department, temporarily lifting sanctions on Russian oil this week amid reports that Russia is giving Iran intelligence to target U.S. assets in the region. Why is the United States rewarding Russia? So this is not rewarding Russia. I understand that it can be seen that way. How else can it be seen? But Mr. Secretary,

how else can it be seen if the U.S. is lifting sanctions on Russia? Because the oil we're lifting sanction on is already on the water waiting to unload in a Chinese port. But it'll wait there for six or eight weeks. So instead of letting that oil sit there idly, we told the, the Indians and then the broader nations of Asia, go ahead and buy that oil, bring it into your port now and keep your refineries running. That oil was already exported, already going to be sold. We're just changing the destination of where to be sold. And by doing that, we're keeping a little bit of a lid on oil prices and helping our allies across Asia. All right. So I think that kind of sums up what's going on here. On one hand, we still have the

continuous talking points from Democrats that the president doesn't know what he's doing. He's just wing in this. I mean, that whole idea implies that a captain from a lieutenant colonel to a full bird colonel to a general, they all are making this up and winging it. And the military soldiers on the ground are winging it as well. And the fascinating part about these idiots who speak this way, they forget, it's not the president who came up with the plan here, okay? The military people came up with the plan. He just has to say yay or nay. But I guess that's their main talking point. And then you got TSA continuing to obviously struggle and it's going to continue to be a especially this upcoming week, but Democrats don't look like they're looking to solve that problem either.

Give you your thoughts about everything we discussed in this video in the comments section below. Now we go to our next video where Iran has promised to retaliate against America after we obliterate it, their military capabilities on an island called CARG. Now, in case you missed out on how important that island in and how big of a role it's playing in what's happening over there, all you have to do is click on that video because it's coming up right now.