The DeVory Darkins Show - Melania Trump drops BRUTAL REBUKE for Kimmel as Shooting ROCKS THE NATION

Episode Date: April 27, 2026

Melania Trump drops BRUTAL REBUKE of Kimmel as Shooting ROCKS THE NATION. This comes after the First Lady responded to Jimmy Kimmel making a widow joke. Also, the debate surrounding political violence heats up, and DOJ issues a scathing letter to the attorneys who are suing Trump over the White House ballroom construction.EPISODE SPONSOR: Call 866-890-9392 or visit ⁠http://www.AmericanFinancing.net/DeVory⁠ FOLLOW ME:⁠https://www.x.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://devory.wtf.tv⁠BUY ME A COFFEE:⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkins⁠SHOP OUR MERCH STORE:⁠https://store.devorydarkins.com⁠BUSINESS INQUIRIES:⁠[e-mail]⁠

In today's video, Jimmy Kimball gets ripped by the First Lady Melania Trump for his disgusting comments. Also, more debate is happening regarding political violence in America. And the bar room construction is now a main talking point this time coming from the DOJ themselves. Let's start with what Melania Trump had to say about Jimmy Kimmel. Take a look. Got some more breaking news right now. The First Lady Melania Trump apparently calling on ABC to fire Jimmy Kimmel. This appears to be.

in response to a segment that Kimmel aired days before the White House correspondence dinner. In that segment, Kimmel said the First Lady had the glow of a, quote, expectant widow. And now we have this response, the First Lady writing on X the following, quote. Kimmel's hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country. His monologue about my family is not comedy, his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America. It is time for ABC to take a stand. How many times will ABC's leadership enable Kimmel's atrocious behavior at the expense of our community?

End quote. For the second time now in the past two weeks, the first lady taking a public stand. A few weeks back, she made a statement asserting that the rumors about Jeffrey Epstein and connections to her were baseless. And now we have this response to Jimmy Kimmel, just in. So we literally are picking up where we left off yesterday as the reactions are continuing to roll in. after this failed assassination attempt. Some experts or authorities are saying that they believe the shooter was trying to target everyone in a mass shooting effort. And some believe it was actually directed towards the president.

And a lot of this obviously comes from the manifesto, which takes me to kind of the first point I want to say here right up front, is this is a real time example of how the media does subtle things to manipulate the population. In most of the front page news and rhetoric, you do not see the words assassination attempt. You do not see words the president was targeted. You just hear chaos and things like, like they downplay it almost. So at any rate, this is where we're at. And so what I want to do first is take you to kind of the example of them downplaying it. Watch this. Happened if the White House was supposed to. Yeah, there was a shooting or something. So everybody kind of gets shuffled out, and I think it's kind of crazy that they were able to get let in.

Like, they didn't have good enough enough. Are you on social media? No. A lot of people are saying they believe it's staged. Stage by food, though. I guess, like, I would want to see a good, convincing story about who would be? Probably by the other stage. In order to, like, kind of strike the war of screen.

I feel like I wouldn't put it past them, you know. No evidence of this. So far. But I don't know. I feel like sometimes I see the way the administration acts on social media and I'm like if they're kind of just like a little bit out of pocket. So I feel like it's like up their alley, you know? So what you just saw there was Don Lemon.

And the reason why I showed you the clip was not to annoy you is to show you the clip of how some people out there already believe this was staged. You now have people obviously suggesting those ideas. And then at the end they say, well, there's no actual proof. But it doesn't matter at that point because the seed has already been planted. Let me go one step further to bolster my case. Here is the former president number 44 saying, although we don't know yet the details about the motives behind last night's shooting at the White House correspondent's dinner, it's incumbent upon

all of us to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy. Now, he obviously wrote this post, I have it here for you, 4.15 p.m. This is the following day after the manifesto was clearly recognized by the media. Matter of fact, the manifesto was released, I think it was three to six hours somewhere in that range, before the shooting took place. So the bottom line here is that post from Obama proves once again how divided we are as a country. Now, before I show you this next clip, please do me a favor. Like this video, share this video, leave your thoughts in the comment section below.

And if you aren't subscribe, hit that subscribe button. I appreciate you guys for watching the show today. Let's continue. What's happening right now is you're seeing the New York Times, President Obama, acting like we don't know what motivated the shooter. The president literally tweeting. We don't know yet what motivated the shooter six hours after his manifesto was made public in which he literally explained why he did it. He did it because he hates Donald Trump. And the thing about his manifestor, Natasha, is that it is indistinguishable from the rhetoric you routinely hear on the left from the president's opposition.

He called him a rapist, a pedophile, and a traitor, which you can turn on CNN or MSNBC any hour of any day and hear them talking about the president that way. This is why I've said quite often, definitely recently, is that judgment is weakness and observation is power. Whenever a crisis happens, assassination attempt for an example, I don't usually react within the first hour. I kind of sit back and wait and just to see what everyone is saying before I come up with my own opinion on the matter. Because as you guys witnessed in the first hour, there was a lot of conflicting information. First they said the shooter was dead, then they say it wasn't. Anyway, point is what? when we start to observe how mainstream media reacts to a story like this, you start to see why they can't be trusted.

That's the point of the matter. Then you go one step further and then you see how people react on social media. They can't be trusted either. So that's why I said we have to continue to reinforce the habit of observing when things like this happen before rendering our conclusion. Because a lot of the information is false in the beginning. Okay, let's go here, speaking of focusing on the facts. And here's just a little history of our political violence. I think Fox News did a great job of this.

And I find it to be interesting. But think about what has happened. Just look back in 2024. Assassination attempt on President Trump, that, of course, happened at Butler. A little bit later, the second assassination attempt by President Trump, while he is golfing. If he makes the turn, he gets shot at a guy lying in wait. This guy ends up in jail and he's convicted. Then, of course, you have two blocks away.

the execution of Brian Thompson by Luigi Mangione. And guess what? Mangione gets two rows full of fans every time he shows up on trial. He's looked at as a rock star. You don't think other 20-somethings looking for some meaning in life will try to have the status that he has? Sadly, they're misinterpreting this murderer. By the way, that Hassan Piker is also saluting Luigi. On the 13th, the Josh Shapiro Mansion.

Have you seen some of this video? They burned it to the ground. Anti-Semitism raging a Democrat in Pennsylvania. And then followed by the assassination over in Minnesota, the chaos there. We think about what happened with ICE and everything that happened with the fraud. But remember, they were killing people back in June of 2025, which brings us over here to the Minnesota Senator John Hoffman being shot. And then we'll never forget September 10th when Charlie Kirk giving a speech, asking people for questions,

ends up assassinated by a guy that has that smug look on his face as he sits on trial. He thinks he's a hero. I'm not going to mention his name. Then an armed suspect attempts to enter at Mar-a-Lago, that was stopped. Remember, they got stopped because the perimeter is secure because he's president. As Lawrence and I were talking about, I'm worried about when the president's not president, because is he going to have this level of security? He's certainly got a lot of psychos that want to target him.

And then a Molotov cocktail thrown at Open AI CEO Altman. He's sitting there. All he's trying to do is move AI forward, looked at as a target and a problem by some 20-somethings. He ends up being somebody that could have been targeted. He's also worried about his family. He works a lot. Sometimes they're left at home. He could afford security. But what if he didn't have it?

And finally, the gunman tries to shoot his way into the White House, the White House correspondence dinner. All right. And let's add a few more on there. The Tesla fire bombs. Okay. That was a big thing, in my opinion. You can also throw on the attacking of the ICE detention facilities and also the individuals who were murdered in D.C. in front of the embassy. I mean, those are all politically motivated attacks and they were definitely violent.

So we can add that. I think at this point a lot of people still have questions and we want answers. And hopefully the FBI director can shed some light on that because he was on Fox News earlier today answering probably the most important question regarding this. security of it all. Take a look. They did a great job on the ground, but they remain reactive. The proactive approach is still under great scrutiny. The President of the United States is averaging an assassination attempt once a year, and there's still protocols. So who's going to do the investigating of the procedures? Secret Service can't investigate themselves, because there's still people in leadership at the Secret Service that were responsible for Butler. How does that happen? It was a

failure. Right. I can't speak to Butler, and I agree it was a total failure. Absolutely. But I have full confidence in Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen. He oversees the United States Secret Service. I've talked to him repeatedly over the weekend, and I've asked, I've spoken with him and said, whatever you need from the FBI, whatever we can assist in, and however we can better prepare to protect our protectees going forward with the United States Secret Service, this FBI stands ready to do, and we're going to improve that process under Mark Wayne's leadership and oversight of the Secret Service. Okay, so you guys let me know how you feel about that explanation from the FBI director. I think the American people have definitely been stonewalled as it relates to the Butler assassination attempt. It's just a whole interesting thing and another conversation for another day. Let's segue into this other update that's also related. So the essentially the group that's been suing the administration for trying to build a new ballroom is getting heat. In fact, the DOJ sent a scaling letter to these attorneys today asking them to drop their lawsuit so we can move forward with the

ballroom construction now uh there are a this whole talking point there's a trade off if you continue to talk about the ballroom repeatedly for the rest of this week there's just going to be people that are convinced that this whole thing was staged i don't believe that whatsoever i'm just telling you guys how some americans think out there and i showed you that actually at the beginning of this video but then on the other hand it shows you how ridiculous people are acting as it relates to this ballroom it should have already been, I mean, we should be seeing things go up right now. Okay, let's get to it. Here's CNN and how they are reporting on this. Watch. The Justice Department is now calling for the National Trust for Historic Preservation to drop its pending lawsuit because they have been seeking

to prevent the president from building this ballroom. And in a letter, the Justice Department's civil division head said that put simply, your lawsuit puts the lives of the president, his family, and his staff at grave risk. I hope yesterday's narrow miss will help you finally realize the folly of a lawsuit that literally serves no purpose except to stop President Trump no matter the cost. So the group chat is back. I wanted to talk about this because it is called the White House Correspondence Association, but it is not run by the White House. The dinner isn't run by the White House. There's not actually a scenario where this would have been hosted by the White House.

But we know that the president has moved from this is an aesthetic thing. This is a thing I need to entertain to talking about security. Cost of living isn't just high, thanks to Democrats. It could be exhausting, as you guys know. People still have PTSD from the previous administration. And there's a lot of Americans out there that have been leaning in on credit cards lately just to cover basic things like groceries, gas, and utility bills. You're essentially paying a survival tax of 20% interest or more.

Why keep handing your hard-earned paycheck to the big banks when you can keep it in your family? This is why if you're a homeowner out there, my friends at American financing, have a better way. They're helping homeowners tap into their equity to pay off high interest debt with mortgage rates currently in the fives. On average, American financing is saving their customers $800 a month. That's nearly $10,000 a year back in your pocket. It's not just a loan. It's a total financial reset. It only takes 10 minutes to speak to them and find out if this is something that fits for you and what you have going on.

So here's the bottom line. Start today. You could even delay two mortgage payments. Call American Financing 866-890-9392. That is 866-890-3-9-9-2 or go to Americanfinancing.net 4-slash-devorey or you can click the link in the description below. Okay, so before we go any further, we have to understand something. What the media is doing essentially is blaming the president first for this entire situation. Why? Well, bring to my second point. They want to be able to people to believe that the president of the United States never attends the White House Correspondence dinner, like this is a first, which it is not. And a third, the way that they do that is essentially justifying that the president's more obsessed with this ballroom than on what

happened. It's, I know, it doesn't make sense, as I say it out loud. But let me show you an example of it. Watch this. Right. And politics doesn't take very long to break out, even in the minutes after this, the president was quick to to pivot to say this is why we need the ballroom. There are a number of issues here. Obviously it's up to Congress if the money, public money at least, is appropriated to build

a ballroom for the federal government. If this dinner was at the White House, even Trump's most ambitious plans for about a thousand seats in a formal dinner, this would not be able to accommodate this massive dinner. And of course, if you hold

an event like this at the White House, Therefore, the press is visiting the president rather than the other way round on an official premises. That changes the complete character of what this is supposed to be about. Again, it seems like this whole video has been about exposing the media. But they do it to themselves. I mean, get this fact. At least 15 sitting U.S. presidents have attended the White House correspondence dinner at least once during their administration or during their presidency. and Joe Biden attended in 2022.

This would be the first time President Trump is attending. Now, he attended when Barack Obama went more as a guest, obviously not as the sitting president. Bush, Clinton, the first Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford. I mean, we can keep going. And so it's just interesting when they make that point. It's like you guys are making it sound like this has never happened before. I mean, presidents come all the time, not every single time. It is common.

Okay. If that doesn't do it for you, let me show you one more clip. This is now members of Congress saying that all of this is President Trump's fault. I understand that the oversight panel has requested a briefing with the Secret Service about Saturday shooting. Do you have any updates on that front? Yes, that's correct. The Oversight Committee is planning to convene a hearing similar to what happened right after Butler, Pennsylvania, with the Secret Service. And so I'm looking forward to that because there are a lot of questions unanswered here.

Thank God that people like Wolf Blitzer, the president, and other guests were unharmed. But there were definitely security lapses, and now we need to get answers as to how those are going to be prevented going forward. Do you have any idea of a timeline? Have you received a response back about this individual hearing actually happening? No, I have not. I expect it will be in a timely manner because because there's tremendous, as you can understand, concern given the threat levels that are going up in part because of the president and now three assassination attempts on him. His very low approval ratings, which unfortunately fuel a lot of disaffection. Okay, so just a couple things.

Obviously, the White House ballroom will be something that other people after the president will benefit more than he ever will. So that's the first thing because when it's finally done, I mean, he'll probably be leaving office. Secondly, there's no guarantee that the White House correspondence dinner would be in the new ballroom. It makes sense that it would be. But at this time, that's not what's been happening because it's not the White House. Even though it's called White House, it's not actually the administration's responsibility to host this dinner. And third, the other interesting part about all of this is with a ballroom or not, it still doesn't. doesn't answer the question of how someone could travel from California, show up, and access that lobby.

Now, obviously, he didn't get into the room. So the security protocols, in a sense, were successful in that regard. But I think more people are still having questions about what can the Secret Service do to prevent someone from even accessing the property? And I think that is a fair question. But if you're the ladies on the view, you have no problem with this particular situation because you believe that this is a great experience for the president to get a taste of gun violence. I know. This is what they said. Take a look. But you know, now that, so that room was full of some of the most important political leaders in the country right now. Right. Now they know they've lived it in their own flesh, the fear that our school children go through.

Now they know what it's like to have to jump under a table the way that school children jump under a desk. And we are a country that is vulnerable to this. We have now seen shootings in malls and churches, in temples and Walmart. We signed. With the Republican. And so, you know, I still don't understand how Congress took no action after Sandy Hook, after 20 children between the ages of six and seven were killed. But maybe now that they have felt the fear themselves, they will do something on gun research.

That is a prime example of why some people just do not deserve to talk about politics at all. Because their analysis isn't actually rooted in a real conversation about this stuff. What do I mean by that? It's not the guns that are the problem here, people. It's people that are the problem. I'll give you a great example of this. Go back to last year. And I've said it throughout the show today.

Tesla fire bombing. So they were not using assault weapons as they like to call them. They were not using AR-15s and pistols. No, they made their own bombs. See, it's people who kill people. They'll just use their next choice of weapon to get it done. Okay. So that's the first thing.

Secondly, I guess one could argue that the security protocols worked. Yes. But let's just go back to first principles here as it relates to securing an event. Where is the event located? Why that location? That location is extremely vulnerable. Right. So, I mean, I think in the future, if you're going to have that amount of people who are in the highest positions of government in one central location, which is already a vulnerability technically, don't have it in a hotel banquet room. Okay. I mean, so maybe it makes sense why the president and the DOJ is pushing for this ballroom construction to wrap up.

The ride that steals the spotlight every time it hits the road. That's the Volkswagen TIG one. Its sleek exterior makes a first impression you can't ignore. Step inside to find available full leather seats and wood accents. Under the hood, the available 201 turbocharged horse power engine gives it a fun to drive edge. The refined Tiguan, you deserve more style. Visit vw.ca to learn more. SUV, German engineered for all. Amazon Presents Jeff versus Taco Truck Salsa.

Whether it's very much. Bairday, Roja, or the orange one. For Jeff, trying any salsa is like playing Russian roulette with a flamethrower. Luckily, Jeff saved with Amazon and stocked up on antacids, ginger tea, and milk. Habiniero? More like Habinier, yes. Save the everyday with Amazon. In fact, they've done the opposite.

They've incited violence, in my view. I mean, you have some of the most prominent figures in the house. and the Senate on the Democrat side, effectively calling for war. I mean, they use those kinds of metaphors. And it incites violence because there are crazy people in society. And they get radicalized online. And so we've got to recognize that. It's time to turn down the rhetoric.

We've been saying this over and over and not use that kind of language. I hope that this will be a sobering reminder for everybody about that very important cause. I'm grateful to Federman. He's right. The ballroom will be a solution. for this because it'll be on the most secure compound in the world. It won't have hotel rooms above it. And it'll have seven inch thick glass, for example, on the windows. So it'll be a very safe environment to do events like this. We need a place. We have needed a place like that. And the

president keeps pointing it out. So the bottom line here to this entire video today is that the gunman will be in court today. So expect to hear it update on that. The White House has moved forward with pushing to get the ballroom constructed. We've already explained the problem with that messaging at this point. I think it's a little too early to obsess over that, but that's just me personally. And then you have Democrats continuing to do the shameful things they've been doing, which is to not take any responsibility for the rhetoric, blame it all on Trump, and then go as far as to say, well, you know, maybe they essentially need a taste of this. You know, it's really interesting the way that they concoct things in their mind and then say that what they're saying

is not violent or, and it's not unfair, I guess. I don't know. But you guys make sense of it. in the comments section below to this particular update. Where are you at today with all of this? And do you trust that we're actually going to get a reasonable explanation of these assassination attempts overall? Give me your thoughts, everything you got in the comment section below.