The DeVory Darkins Show - Walz goes silent after FBI RAIDS Minneapolis Daycare for FRAUD

Episode Date: April 29, 2026

Walz goes silent after FBI RAIDS Minneapolis Daycare for FRAUD. This comes as FBI raided more than 20 different daycare centers in Minneapolis. Also, Trump administration gets a big win after announcing 4 million Americans have been removed from snap due to fraud.EPISODE SPONSOR: See the full picture by going to https://ground.news/devory and get 40% off the vantage plan.FOLLOW ME:⁠https://www.x.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://www.rumble.com/c/devorydarkins⁠⁠https://devory.wtf.tv⁠BUY ME A COFFEE:⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/devorydarkins⁠SHOP OUR MERCH STORE:⁠https://store.devorydarkins.com⁠BUSINESS INQUIRIES:⁠[e-mail]⁠

Amazon presents Laura versus Fruitflies. Swarming your fruit and terrorizing your kitchen. These little freaks multiply at a rate that would make a rabbit say, yo. Chill. But Laura shopped on Amazon and saved on cleaning spray, countertop wipes, and fly traps. Hey, fruit flies, your baby boom ends here. Save the Everyday with Amazon. In today's video, we have breaking news coming out of Minneapolis.

The FBI just raided 20 different daycare centers. Also, SNAP benefits. The Trump administration gets a huge win regarding that program. And political violence, is it really justified? Well, you'll be able to hear from Americans. Let's start with this raid by the FBI and what happened. Take a look. We are following breaking news this morning as federal agents are conducting several search warrants across the Twin Cities.

Yeah, we're going to go out lines. It's our Bill Keller, who is following this closely for us this morning. He's in Minneapolis with the very latest. Good morning, Bill. Good morning, guys. Well, this has been developing for the past several hours. Unlike some of these high-risk warrants, this seems to be a very methodical investigation that they are doing. We're going to give you an idea of what's going on.

They're inside there. We saw our first look at a couple of tactical SWAT, or I should say FBI agents, Homeland Security. They're inside that building right now. This is the Somali Senior Center. We're in the West Phillips neighborhood. There's also a child care center here, so we're unsure which or both of these businesses is involved. Now, this is one of nearly two dozen spots

where we are told that federal agents are stopping today. This is what I would call great news, because it demonstrates that the FBI is doing exactly what the American people want to root out the fraud, the crimes that are happening against, day Americans. And we already know, based on Nick Shirley's work, how bad it really is in Minnesota, particularly Minneapolis. A couple of things you should be aware of. One, they exercise these search warrants at about 20 different child care centers. Two, you should read this

headline that demonstrates exactly the way the media sees it. Months after Operation Metro Search, federal agents returned to Minneapolis to target daycares for suspected fraud. I'm They have an interesting way of putting it, right? As if it's the administration doing something wrong. But okay, fine. And as it was stated as well, there was no arrest. But what's funny is one of these learning centers or layering centers, as they call them, when the officers showed up to actually conduct the raid, protesters got a whiff of it and showed up and mistaken them for ICE agents.

Take a look. Our photographer tells us that some protesters showed up to one of the ones. of those daycares, they thought that our cameramen were with ICE. And again, the DOJ says this has nothing to do with immigration. This is about the DOJ's fraud investigation. And just checking my emails now, it looks like we got a statement from DHS sharing, quote, Homeland Security investigations in cooperation with our law enforcement partners executed criminal search warrants in Minneapolis relating to the rampant fraud of U.S. taxpayers' dollars. And as you could see, their federal agents still outside one of those daycare centers where they have been the last few hours.

And all of this comes as Governor Tim Walts is expected to deliver his state of the state address tonight. And it obviously comes with a lot of questions over oversight. Now, this news is starting to form a narrative that Todd Blanche is moving forward with investigations that Pam Bondi was slow walking or refused to. I mean, that's what people are speculating in the media. We have no way to verify that. But we can look at the results. I mean, these places were rated, obviously, when she was still the Attorney General. Bottom line is, a lot of these fraud and investigations are going forward. And if you don't support them, or you're particularly from Minneapolis, and you happen to be a part of the Somalian community, you would think you're under attack, essentially, because in your

mind, and this is all coming from the governor himself, Somalians is who built Minnesota, particularly Minneapolis. Listen to this. So, Minnesota, I mean, not Minnesota, Somalis brought more than just, more than just built the economy, but we contribute to the soul of this great state. And I want to remind you that no human is illegal ever. You are not illegal. Our neighbors are not illegal. And Yeah, thank you. Yeah, that's really good. So I guess we could say some people are here unlawfully, you know, you're not authorized, you're illegal.

It's always the tone police, right? The language police that you find on the left where they want to be politically correct and not actually address the real issue. Obviously, not every Somalian is in the country on Laughley. There's no doubt about that. But there are Somalians that are in this country lawfully who have committed crimes and they should be prosecuted. And if they are prosecuted or when they are prosecuted, we shouldn't be hearing people complain about that and scream racism. But that's what they do.

All right. So that point about Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche, well, here's Newsmax point of view on it. Take a look. Fraud against government programs is always a huge problem. But then you take a crisis like COVID, just multiply it by 10. seriously because you have tons and tons of new federal money, and you see the fraud ratchet up higher and higher and higher. So, but back to the core point you guys were making, I couldn't agree more. When Pam Bondi left DOJ, all of the prognosticators were saying, you know, she made mistakes with Epstein, but put that to the side.

She wasn't moving forward with these prosecutions. So now, as you guys said, it seems to be moving in a different direction. Yeah, and we haven't seen a lot of changes at the state level under the governor with the heads of the department. who are operating these, who didn't oversee it, who didn't double check, who didn't even take the time to walk into a daycare center, even after their own investigators told them there was something wrong going on. Yep. Ren, your thoughts? Great advancement. This means these cases are moving along. Search warrants that we probable

cause through magistrate, right, signed off on this. The evidence is going to start pouring in. We're going to get documents, hopefully see some arrests. This is a great sign that these cases are moving forward. It's about time, I think, more. We're going to see great more advancements. Now they're going to get real evidence from these search warrants. This is a great update. Okay. So if you guys watch my show, I'd like to believe you love when I get to the bottom line

and tell you exactly what both sides are saying. The way that we are able to accomplish that on the show at times is by using a tool like Ground News. And if you guys want to check it out for yourself, just go to ground. That news for slash Devore. You could see here on the screen exactly what Ground News will do for you. Not only does it show you which way. This story is being reported, whether it's more left-leaning or right-leaning, but you also can see blind spots.

These are stories that are not actually being covered properly by one side of the political spectrum. So this story that we were just talking about regarding Operation Metro Surge, months after it, that is, and federal agents are returning to, as they say, target daycares for suspected fraud. They'll give you bullet points that pretty much gives you the bottom line. I mean, this is essentially how I like to do the show. and this is why I love ground news because I'm always trying to figure out what are both sides saying and what is it I need to know so I can come up with my own conclusion. And if that is you, you should be using a tool like ground news. So head over to ground.

dot news, 4 slash devori, where you're going to be able to get the Vantage plan, where you will get 40% off by using my promo code of Vore or scan the QR code on the screen or click the link in the description below. All right. Let's go to our next story, which is also positive. The Trump administration, particularly Secretary Brooke Rawlins of agricultures, reporting that 4 million Americans have been removed off SNAP benefits due to fraud. Take a listen. Secretary, you've got some new news to break with us this morning.

You know, federal data revealing 4 million fewer Americans are receiving SNAP benefits in the first year of this president's second term. These numbers are coming from your department, enrollment falling 4.2 million people. And this is after the passage, of course, the big beautiful bill last year. July. What could you tell us? Well, it is a really big piece of news. And obviously, there's a lot going on in the world, but back here and in the homeland, what are we doing to make sure that the president's promise to return the power to the people to drain the swamp is really happening? Under Joe Biden, the SNAP program, the food stamp program grew by more than 40%. Of course, I believe they were buying votes for the election, putting as many people on as they could.

within the first hour of me being sworn in last February, we sent a letter to every governor in the country saying, partner with us, let's make sure that this program is really working for those who need it the most. And as of just a couple of days ago, we now have moved 4.3 million Americans off of the food stamp program. You know, one of the easiest examples to see why this is so important to do with government programs is usually historically government programs has actually made the problem worse. Take your life as an example. Let's say you have three kids and you tell them all, we have a family debit card for buying groceries. Your first child follows your rules, only uses it when they absolutely need it. And, you know, the limit on it, let's say is 200 bucks. Maybe they get to 100. Sometimes they get the 150, but they're within the budget and they're responsible. The second child, not so much. They go over the limit. they buy snacks and candy, things you really don't need,

and is not really following your rules. The third child breaks all of them by not only going over the limit, but sharing the card with their friends to make money. Don't you think you're going to cut off the funds, if that is the case? Don't you think you would restrict your two other children from using that? That's what the government's doing here. But Democrats will claim that this is an attack on American families. just preparing you for the talking point, of course.

But this next update is really stunning. Watch. Previously, no data was shared. We had no idea where the taxpayer dollars were spent. Just one red state, the recent dump of data, we found SNAP recipients had more than 2,000 Tesla owners, 200 Alpha Romeo owners, more than 144 that were receiving food stamps were driving Porsches. Again, this is the data dumps we're getting because before we had no accountability

on any of these programs, we now are requiring accountability. The blue states are suing us. They don't want to share the data. And can you imagine this was a red state where there is actually some taxpayer accountability? Imagine what's happening in the blue states if that's happening in the red state. Well, again, don't you find it interesting that these blue states still refuse to exercise basic financial literacy principles? And there's a saying, if you don't take care of your money, someone else is. well. And the fact that they're refusing to ensure that these programs are not only viable,

but that the people who truly need them are getting what they need and that these programs are sustainable over the long stretch, it just goes to show that they do not deserve to be empowered in regards to our financial well-being as a country. I will always, at this point in time, the way things are constructed today, these political parties, Democrats are not interested in actually budgeting anything. They want to continue to create. government program after government program. We saw that under COVID, which led to massive fraud. And

the people who get the short end of the stick at the end of the day is the taxpayer. Here's Secretary Brooke Rollins post, three Bintleys, three Ferraris, 11 Lamarguineas, 59 Maseratis, 141 porches, 244 Alpha Rameros, 306 land rovers, and 2,000

Teslas. You just can't make it up. No sodas. You can't coffee creamer. You can't even get ice cream. That's, you know, that's wrong. What am I to do? You know, that's wrong. Somebody needs to do something about this. This, I know it's affecting everybody. You know, I eat healthy. I love my fruit. You know, I love my sweets too. Now, I'm glad I was able to play that clip for you because it shows the problem with the program as well from a health

perspective. Now, if I had the power, I would ensure that SNAP benefits only apply to whole foods, non-processed foods, things that are healthy for the body. I would prevent people from buying soda and ultra-processed foods. That's how extreme I am. Because we have to understand, once someone is struggling financially, okay, at that point, their mindset is everything. And what affects a person's mindset is, are they even taking care of their body? So if you're allowing people to eat crap every single day and expecting them to develop the thinking they'll need to get out of their particular situation, you'll be waiting for a long time. Yeah, so, you know, it's interesting that, you know, people want their ice cream.

I just don't think taxpayers should have to flip that. If you want extra sweets, pay for it yourself. I think that's fair. Here's another one. So I bought, like, 10 boxes of Debbie snacks, you know, because, um, as of tomorrow April 20th Florida will no longer

pay for them with the magic card aka eBT boob stamps snap so about like 10 boxes of them that's really like the only thing that we will

I don't know I guess be missing out on yeah see this is why I'm radical on this because we have individuals knowing what they're doing is wrong buying things they don't need, eating food that is damaging their health, and who's paying for that? Me and you. So it should be a strict program. It should also be a temporary program.

People are always going to fall on hard times. I mean, everybody goes to a rough stretch in their life sooner or later. So it makes sense that we'd have something like that, but it would be temporary. But if we left it up to Democrats, particularly progressives, it would be permanent, okay? And we know that to be true because just look at what we were just talking about, the Somalia community. I mean, almost 80% of them are on welfare and have been on welfare for more than two decades. That's a problem. That means they are living off the federal government.

They're not rising above their particular financial situation. So, yeah, it's an issue. Now, again, let me show you an example because this is how Democrats see it. In fact, they say cuttings, not benefits in this way, and having strict requirements is giving billionaires money in the end. Take a look. The billionaires, they made billions, and they're making more because of the big, beautiful bill, because Republicans chose to give them tax cuts and they're paying for it with hunger. And that's what we're talking about today. We're talking about hunger.

And it is immoral. It is immoral as a country to say we will give tax breaks to Trump's biggest corporate donors, not biggest donors like Tesla paid zero percent in taxes. Palantir paid zero percent in taxes because of the tax breaks given to them by Republicans. So that is immoral in my mind to take food out of those who are hungry to take it away from them in order to give these tax bark. Yeah, you see, those statements right there is also kind of what's wrong with society today where people can say things like that, but they don't have to actually back it up with verifiable data.

There is no data that shows that. That's a fascinating part about it all. There is no data that says Republicans are giving tax breaks to billionaires by cutting these government programs. No. What they're doing is lying by telling the truth. It is true that some of these government programs are getting cut. because they're rooting out fraud, but it's not true. It's because they're trying to benefit billionaires.

That's crazy. And the fascinating part is billionaires by default will benefit regardless of whoever's in the White House. That's why they're a billionaire. Okay. Let's move on to our next story because this is, I guess, more hypocrisy if you think about it. So on one hand, they were complaining, meaning the left, were complaining that the White House ballroom would be funded privately.

Now the White House ballroom could potentially. be funded by Congress, and they're complaining about that as well. Take a look. It's a group of Senate Republicans pushing to fund the construction of President Trump's 90,000 square foot ballroom using taxpayer money. Who would be surprised by this? The effort is being led by Senator and close Trump ally, Lindsay Graham, who said yesterday, he wants Congress to pass legislation that would provide $400 million for the ballroom's construction. citing security concerns in the wake of the White House Correspondence dinner shooting. So this whole ballroom story is really the example of how media, politicians are wasting the American people's time.

This should not even be a story. I mean, yes, I guess in a sense it should be a story as far as like there's new construction at the White House. Here's what it's going to look like. Yeah. But now it's turned into high school. So on one hand, private donors were putting up the money and they complained about it and said, oh, well, look at that. He's helping billionaires and billionaires are paying for this. So what are they getting in return?

Okay. And then they say, well, he needs to go to Congress. Okay. Then you have members of Congress now pushing for legislation to fund it and they're still going to complain. Knowing that the president will not benefit from this ballroom. By the time this thing is done, he'll be leaving. It's just, it's high school. Let's go here.

It makes sense to me to have a ballroom. Both parties have wanted it for a while. I don't know if that means that the White House correspondent's dinner is always going to be there. The president hasn't always gone. But clearly, this individual, the shooter, he saw that the president was going to be there. He decided to take his guns and his weapons, travel across the country, to try. try to get there to perpetrate a crime. He likely would never have been able to get into the White House.

Is that your point? Absolutely. You need to have a safe, secure facility on the White House grounds for these big events. Even with King Charles in town, if you're going to have more than, you know, a couple hundred people anywhere, it's very difficult to do it in the current configuration. This is something that's been talked about for a long time. But I think, Dana, it's also important to put this in perspective of why we're talking about it. Certainly we're reminded of it this weekend.

25% of those who describe themselves as very liberal believe that political violence is justified compared to 3% of those to describe themselves as very conservative. Okay, let me explain to you guys what's happening here. And again, this is why I like to show you guys both sides, because I want to be fair. The White House correspondence dinner has nothing to do with the White House ballroom, even though it sounds like that is the talking point, okay? It's just politics overall. They can't help themselves.

They will naturally conflate the two. It's just easier to do that. The hard thing to do is to say the following. The White House correspondent's dinner has nothing to do with the construction of the ballroom because the White House correspondent's dinner is not something owned by the White House. It is not led by the White House. The president, vice president has nothing to do with that dinner. They may attend it at times, but it is not in their will house.

That is led by journalists. So my recommendation as far as that is concerned is they should find a better location. And if the president is going to attend, then maybe they should have it in this new ballroom whenever it is built, of course. Which, again, that's a second issue. The construction of the ballroom is a separate issue, one regarding national security. And secondly, pending the lawsuits that have been trying to stop the president from building it because they say Congress needs to approve it. And that's why obviously Congress is now trying to get ahead of it. It looks like that is being led by Lensing Ram.

So I want to make sure you guys had that particular information. So let's go to more morning, Joe. Here's what they had to say. All right, this preposterous. First of all, a federal judge has stopped construction of the ballroom, but has allowed them to move forward with the underground secure location. So to make sure that there are no questions about whether stopping the Marie Antoinette Memorial Ballroom has anything to do with national security, it will not. That's the first thing.

The second thing that is preposterous is the fact that they're saying, oh, well, you know, we need this ballroom because things have gotten so dangerous out there. They have. I've expressed concerns. Mika and I have said time and time again. It's preposterous and they can never again have so many cabinet members and the president, the vice president of the United States in one place that is not as secured as the United States Capitol. As decided by the Trump White House. And the Hilton is not secure.

It's just not secure. I'm not going to go into the details of all the things that Iran could have done to push back. It doesn't take an imagination to figure that out. But it would have been very easy to do. What's funny is they don't know if they want to be mad or happy. They don't know if they want to support this or not. And that's why I had to explain to you guys. actually two separate issues. Now, let's go back to a point that he did make that I would actually

echo here is if you're going to have that amount of high-ranking people in the federal government in one location, particularly the executive branch, the Hilton is not the place for it. I mean, I don't know who made the decision on that. But again, that is an example where the ballroom in the future could be a viable solution because of who's attending. The years where you're not going to have the president, the vice president, or a great deal amount of people from the cabinet. Yeah, you don't need to have it in the ballroom. That totally makes sense. But I think they are struggling because they don't know if they want to be upset or not. Okay. Let's go to New Yorkers because they were asked about political violence. I actually want to

cover this briefly here. Is political violence justified when trying to get what you want to be changed in our country, essentially? And so the free press showed up to New York and asked a few people. Listen to their answers. Do you think that political violence is ever justified? Yes, especially when the systems we have in place are not serving the people. I do think that a lot of times their thought process to get to this type of violence is really justified and that they just need to maybe express it better than killing people. I think if an oppressed people are trying to escape that oppression, then I think that would be a situation where it's justified. Yeah.

When you hear these answers, you have to ask the question. Are these people actually learning political science? Do they understand our country? Do they understand the way things work? Let's just cover a few of them. Saying that institutions don't serve the people does not justify violence. Okay? Because, again, here's the question.

Who decides when the system has failed? And who gets to decide that violence is justified? Who makes that determination? And if that choice that is made ends up being wrong in the end, who's held liable for that? It's a moral shortcut, I suppose. Here's the other thing. By thinking this way, you essentially don't respect the rule of law. It's something else here now.

Something new. From exclusively on Paramount Plus, it's the series Stephen King calls Scarious Hell. Everything here. is impossible, but it's also real. Sci-fi vision calls it the best show streaming right now. We're running out of time and we still don't know the rules. Don't miss what the movie blog calls something you need to watch. Saving those children is how we all go home.

From Binge All Episodes exclusively on Paramount Plus. I personally would not do it, but I do think, again, there's a lot of medical violence, there's a lot of political violence, there's a lot of institutional violence that's occurring amongst people that live in America today. So I think there's just a lot of anger. Yeah, based on that logic alone, I could say the way they're talking right now is violence against me. That's speech violence.

See, this is why we have to have a construct. We have to have the rule of law. We have to set the game board with rules and standards. Without it, we have chaos. This is the problem with progressives. They're looking to dismantle that by just claiming that anything is racism, anything is violence. Anything is anything. Well, what is the point of the dictionary if we're not going to listen or recognize the definitions and use these words properly? Listen, I'm not the grammar police.

You guys know that if you watch my show, I mess up plenty of times. But I'm also not an idiot, folks. You just can't keep labeling everything violence because you disagree with it. So when you're looking at what's happening in D.C., and then you zoom into what's happening on the universities, I've said this. I think the core problem of our society is on these universities. People are being given destructive ideas about our country, and it's not healthy. And I think it's leading to disastrous results. But that's the story today.

Why don't you guys give me your thoughts in the comments section below? What do you make of that interview the free press did and what they had to say? What do you make of the Minneapolis Lairing Centers being rated once again due to fraud? Let me know your thoughts about everything in this video in the comments section below.