The Dividend Cafe - A Mid-Year Check-In
Episode Date: July 3, 2024Today's Post - https://bahnsen.co/3XNIiUU Mid-Year Market Report: In this special Dividend Cafe episode, released ahead of the 4th of July weekend, David delivers a comprehensive mid-year market upda...te. Key points include strong performance in major indices such as the S&P 500 and NASDAQ, uneven sector returns led by technology, and resilience in international markets. The episode also discusses the minimal impact of Fed policies on market momentum, the complexities of de-globalization and its economic impact, and the significant themes for 2024. Volatility has been low despite predictions, and the episode concludes with a reflection on the diverse economic indicators, housing market anomalies, and anticipation of future market dynamics. 00:00 Welcome and Mid-Year Check-In 01:10 Market Performance Overview 02:26 Sector and International Market Analysis 03:40 Bond and Commodity Market Insights 05:20 Volatility and Market Breadth 07:38 Economic Indicators and Mixed Signals 10:35 Credit Market and Forecast Review 11:44 Key Themes and Predictions for 2024 20:19 Final Thoughts and 4th of July Message Links mentioned in this episode: DividendCafe.com TheBahnsenGroup.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Dividend Cafe, weekly market commentary focused on dividends in your portfolio and dividends in your understanding of economic life.
Well, hello and welcome to this very special Dividend Cafe special because it is coming to you on a Wednesday.
Tomorrow, of course, is July the 4th. The markets are closed on Thursday. And even though
markets will be open on Friday the 5th, we thought it'd be better to get this mid-year report out to
you going into the long weekend. Surely Friday is going to be pretty muted work activity for a lot
of people. So we're giving you a dividend cafe a couple of days early
and to add to the specialness of it, we want to really do a sort of mid-year check-in. We closed
out the second quarter at the end of last week. We are now just a couple of days into the second
half of 2024. And I don't believe I've ever done this
before, but I thought I would take the year ahead projections that we did at the beginning of the
year. Those are things we've done every year now for well over 10 years, but provide a kind of
check-in as to where some of those things stand. We'll start with just a little bit of an update
as to where things are in the markets through the first half of the year. It's not a big surprise
that most investment assets are in positive territory on the year. The Dow was up 4.7%
in the first half. Even the Russell 2000, which is the small cap index, was technically up about 1%,
and yet the S&P was up 15%. The NASDAQ, even a little bit more than that, close to 17%.
So you can call it a risk on rally if you want, but it was really not one in which the rally was
evenly distributed. And I've talked so much about the
kind of top heavy nature of the market right now, but I'm going to get back to that in a moment.
There's other things that I think are more peculiar and more interesting about the market
in which we find ourselves. Generally, you wouldn't look at risk on rally and see small cap basically flat or see an almost thousand basis point difference from one major market index to another.
It really does speak to the unique concentration of a couple sectors.
For example, technology is the highest performing sector of the year on the year.
Communication services, which is a cousin to technology, is in second place behind it.
And the only negative sector is real estate.
So it would almost appear everything else is really rallied.
But well over half of the returns in the index have come from just two sectors,
even though in between there are eight sectors
in positive territory. They're just because of the market cap weighting not contributing
that much mathematically to the returns of the index. International markets are mostly positive.
When I say that international markets are up, emerging markets as an index is
up about 9%. Japan was up over 20% in the first quarter alone. It was more flat in the second
quarter. I don't want to give the wrong impression. Europe is up to some degree. I don't want to say
that everything is up though, because that's a blended aggregate for international markets,
where there are some international markets that are down,
but across an index of diversified countries, whether it's emerging markets or developed,
those are up as well. To really find negative territory in an asset class, you have to get
to bonds. And even then you're talking about negative 0.7% through the first half of the year.
That's basically true in both taxables and tax-frees.
And really all you have there is something in the range of about 2% to 3% of negative price
appreciation, but with about 2% to 3% year-to-date of coupon income, of the interest from the bonds
basically offsetting each other. So the total return ends up being
right around the flat line mark year to date, despite interest rates being higher than they
were at the beginning of the year. Oil prices are up 16% on the year, but that's with a 21%
rally at the beginning of the year, then a 16% drop, and then a 13% rally. So there's been
bigger up and down moves. And that's just crude oil. Natural gas is far more pronounced. It was
basically down about 50%, and then basically up about 100%. And so you've had a pretty severe
volatility in natural gas prices as well. I've already talked about this in the
Monday Dividend Cafe a couple of days ago, but when you're talking about the oil and gas prices
on the year, and we're talking about equity market performance, midstream energy has certainly been
a standout up, let's call it 18%. There's a couple of different indexes that have slightly different compositions, but a median level return year to date, 18% in midstream and still offering very high yield.
The VIX, and I'm going to talk a bit about volatility year to date.
The VIX is basically flat on the year, the price that people are paying for protection in the S&P 500. It's had periods where it's moved
up higher. It's had periods where it's dropped, but not a lot of movement there reflecting
enhanced volatility, enhanced fear. The cost right now of buying downside protection for stocks
remains very low. The S&P 500 has had a max drawdown this year of 5.5%. And all of that
was within the month of April. So from its high level of the year to its low level of the year,
you had a 5.5% what we call drawdown. More interesting to the point I'm making about the volatility is you've had literally just seven days all year where the market was down 1% or more.
You've had 14 days where the market was up 1% or more.
So if you're going to have a little unevenness between the number of 1% up days and 1% down days, you'd rather be in the way it is more on the up days than down days,
but it's still not very many.
There's been a grand total of one day all year
where markets were up or down even 2%,
and that was an up day of 2%.
But that's very, very moderate day-by-day volatility.
So both in the max drawdown, the cost of downside protection,
the VIX, and the number of up or down 1% type days, it's been very low volatility.
The key issue that distorts a lot of how people feel about the market is certainly market breadth.
If you had higher participation and more democratized returns within the market, and you had a market that was up 15% after being up the way it was up last year, it would feel entirely different.
But it's a very thin market for those kind of superlative returns. And I think that adds to the feeling and it adds to the feeling of fragility justifiably. I think
it makes sense that it feels a lot different. In the economy, I think most people are aware
of this mixed bag of data, a mixed bag of sentiment, that the jobs number continues to be
reasonably benign and yet seemingly slowing a bit is not really up for debate.
That economic growth has been positive, but it's muting relative to how positive it had been last year.
The consumer continues to spend, but there have been an increase in delinquencies.
There is an increase in credit card debt.
delinquencies. There is an increase in credit card debt. On the corporate side, M&A activity has picked up, but nowhere near the level it had been just a few years ago. I think most elements of the
economy have shown a resilience to the impact of higher rates, but there is certainly pockets that
are suffering. When I talk about commercial real estate, when we talk about regional banks,
Blockets that are suffering.
When I talk about commercial real estate, when we talk about regional banks, nobody would call them immune from the impact of higher rates, even as other segments of the
economy have proven so far to be reasonably resilient.
Housing prices have not dropped.
I'm going to talk about this in a moment, but housing sales have totally collapsed.
Inflation is definitely lower, but there's still components,
whether it's the data on rent growth or auto insurance, housing insurance, there's components
that are staying stubbornly high. You don't normally see loan defaults start to pick up
when jobs and wages are growing, but that's happening.
Not only that, but wages are up and savings levels have come way down.
So you have people earning more and saving less.
It's definitely been a great time to own assets. It's not been a great time to owe money.
And so that may seem somewhat ambiguous and unclear, but I put a little link in
dividendcafe.com to a short little speech from Vice President Harris and a short speech from
former President Trump because I want to be very bipartisan. And I just want to show that sometimes
even very distinguished people in power can be somewhat unclear. And my intent in providing an economic
assessment that seems unclear from all the data points and categories I just went through
is on purpose. I'm giving an ambiguous picture of the economy because the picture of the economy
is ambiguous. This is not on one hand, on the other hand, economic cowardice thing. This is an
economic honesty and an economic humility thing. There is, to a large degree, tension points in the
data that make it very difficult to have high conviction as to where exactly some of these
things stand in the economy. And that comfort level with the ambiguity is very
important from our perspective. When you look into credit, I will say that because I am one
who's always believed credit is a leading indicator, that I don't believe there are
very many signs at all of an appetite for corporate credit declining. The cost that borrowers are willing to pay has been
very tight for both investment grade credit and meaning high quality and high yield riskier
corporate credit. Companies are just not having to pay a lot more relative to treasuries. For some of
these corporate borrowings, there's been ample demand to meet
the supply. I anticipate some of this changing in the second half of the year, where corporate debt
that is high grade, I think might stay in high demand and tight to treasuries in terms of
correlation. But I could see in high yield debt trading much more like stocks than like
investment grade debt. I think that will see a sort of divergence between the way investors in
credit are treating investment grade and high yield. So I'm going to quickly go through the
eight forecast perspectives themes that we had for 2024 at the beginning of the year,
and just tell you where I think the lay of the land is in some of these things.
The first one is that Fed particulars would be overrated. And this I have said throughout the
year already, including a plethora of media appearances because they'll ask me in media interviews all
the time, oh, what if the Fed, what will the market do if the Fed doesn't cut rates here?
What will they do if the Fed cuts less than expected? And I say it's no longer a what if.
This has happened. We came into the year with priced into markets an expectation of six rate
cuts, some indication it can be as much as 200 basis points that would
come out of the Fed funds rate this year. We're now looking at maybe 25 or 50. And they were
expecting the first rate cut of March. We're now looking at maybe September, but much more likely
November, December, if that. And markets are up 15%. So that the Fed particulars would be overrated is already been true far more than anyone
could have predicted, including the person who was predicting it, yours truly.
Don't worry, I'm getting to a point where I have a few things not lining up here in
a moment.
The second theme was the cost of deglobalization being in a potential
economic tension with the opportunity for enhanced productivity with CapEx, with manufacturing,
with onshoring, things like that. And without getting into the weeds of all of it here,
I'll just say that I think that tension persists. I don't think that the first half of the year gave
us any clarity as to which side of the tug of war is prevailing.
I think the tension continues to exist.
I don't know that there's going to be a lot of resolution in the second half of the year.
If deglobalization is real, which I think it is both real but also quite slow, if manufacturing continues to be weak, then it doesn't appear to me the productivity boom is going to offset.
If you're going to get enhanced manufacturing, enhanced employment at factories, enhanced
CapEx and commitment from business towards productive business investment, I think that
that could end up becoming a boost in economic growth. There's a lot of different factors that
are sorting themselves out in real time. And that a lot of different factors that are sorting themselves
out in real time. And that continues to be a big theme of ours, not one that I think the first half
of the year gave a lot of clarity on. Number three, quantitative tightening would be an
underrated story. The Fed has gotten $2 trillion off of its balance sheet. I think they're near
the end of the rope as to how much they can get done in extracting
liquidity from the financial system without doing damage.
And on May 1st, you had April 30th, the market dropped five and a half percent.
May 1st, they say, well, we're slowing the pace of our tightening.
Still tightening, but instead of $80 billion a month, it went down to $25 billion a month.
That's a very big drop. Lo and behold,
markets start rallying immediately. I think there's already been vindication on this, but I am
expecting it to be more pronounced and eventually very possibly getting from a quantitative tightening
to a quantitative easing scenario, but at the very least, a cessation of quantitative tightening as the Fed begins to
think they overstayed their welcome. I love this one. China to split the baby on Japanification.
Very much they have leaned into fiscal policy, subsidies, spending, policies, targeting,
but very much so leaned away from Japan and US.S.-like monetary policy. So in both cases,
the Chinification has thus far been a split baby of what Japan's playbook has been.
The one in which we're so far away from a full-year prediction that I continue to believe
is still very likely to play in by the end of the year. But nevertheless, first half of the
year didn't do anything to vindicate that is my forecast of broader market participation in 2024
than we had in 2023. And thus far, of course, has been the exact opposite. So we shall see what
happens for the second half of the year. Number six, earnings for 2025, forecast for earnings in 2025,
that earnings outlook will dictate 2024 performance. It's already played in. You were
getting about 10 to 11% earnings growth expectation for 2025 at the beginning of the year. Now they're
expecting as much as 14% earnings growth, which would come in at $279 a share of earnings in the S&P.
And that earnings growth expectation, for right or for wrong, is behind much of why the market is up 15% on the year.
Second half of the year, if you start seeing earnings growth, expectations revised downward, I would expect
that to have a big impact on markets and not a good one in 2024. The election will not be as big
of a market story as it is a news story. This was hardly a prediction. It was me just repeating the
lesson of history. And I will say it continues to be our view, as well as the fact that we think it's going to be a reasonably unknown presidential election outcome.
Right now, we don't even know necessarily who the candidate is going to be.
And then, of course, the Senate and the House and some of the policy ramifications remain TBD.
We're going to write exhaustively about this in September's Special dividend cafe on the election. And then finally,
number eight, another one that is just thus far not been true at all is prepare for much more
volatility. And as I mentioned earlier, measured by VIX, by day-to-day up and down movements,
and by drawdown magnitude, it's actually been very low volatility on the year. Going forward, clarity around 2025
earnings, I think will be the big factor for 2024. I think Fed actions to begin cutting rates
will be discussed, but I think it's more likely to impact markets if they don't do it than if they do.
It'd be very hard for me to believe something the market is priced in happening could be
a further juice to markets.
But I do think it not happening could be disruptive or at least create timing volatility.
Number three, the opportunity for valuation to crack.
We know we're at very high multiples.
the opportunity for valuation to crack. We know we're at very high multiples. And I think that the asymmetry of this is the problem. At 25 times forward earnings, you could say, well, you know,
again, if you want to take the new earnings revisions and call it 22 times, I don't feel
comfortable saying 22 times is going up to 25 or 26, but could 22 times come down to 19 or 18?
Yes, it could very easily. And in fact, it could do so and still be well above historical averages.
So the valuation wall is an ongoing story we'll deal with for the end of the year.
And then, of course, the election itself, perhaps a very late year story.
year. And then, of course, the election itself, perhaps a very late year story. It's obviously going to be a lot of discussion. But by the end of the year, getting clarity on where the next
couple of years of agenda will be in a number of elements of policy, particularly in health care,
tax policy and energy. So to recap, I think you're looking at essentially earnings expectations for
next year, the Fed will they won't they,
the valuation story, and then the election. These become the kind of four major market
themes for the remainder of the year. There is a chart in the Dividend Cafe today showing over
history, I think goes back about 25 years, the total volume of existing home sales.
And you can see the unbelievably low level we are
in history, the lowest since we've been doing the charts, in a period where corporate profits are
growing or wages are growing, where jobs are plentiful. And you can see that it's now lower
than the last period where it got real low, where we were in a full-blown severe recession. It's surreal
what has happened in terms of volume in housing for all the reasons we talk about a lot.
I'm going to leave it there. I'm so grateful to be going into a 4th of July weekend. I'm grateful
for our country, and I know many of you are as well. The story of America's independence
does transcend some of the ways in which we'll
celebrate tomorrow. The barbecues and beach parties and hot dogs and sun and all that stuff
is fun and necessary, an important part of American life and culture. All made possible,
though, by a creator who endowed us with certain unalienable rights, amongst those include the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
I hope you're happy this 4th of July weekend.
God bless America.
Thanks for listening to, watching, and reading The Dividend Cafe.
The Bonson Group is a group of investment professionals
registered with Hightower Securities LLC, member FINRA and SIPC,
and with Hightower Advisors LLC, a registered investment advisor with the SEC.
Securities are offered through Hightower Securities LLC. Advisory services are offered through Hightower Advisors LLC, a registered investment advisor with the SEC. Securities are offered through Hightower Securities LLC.
Advisory services are offered through Hightower Advisors LLC.
This is not an offer to buy or sell securities.
No investment process is free of risk.
There is no guarantee that the investment process or investment opportunities referenced herein will be profitable.
Past performance is not indicative of current or future performance and is not a guarantee.
The investment opportunities referenced herein may not be suitable for all investors. Thank you. investment advice. The Bonson Group and Hightower shall not in any way be liable for claims and make no expressed or implied representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness
of the data and other information, or for statements or errors contained in or omissions
from the obtained data and information referenced herein. The data and information are provided as
of the date referenced. Such data and information are subject to change without notice. This document
was created for informational purposes only. The opinions expressed are solely those of the Bonson Thank you. Tax laws vary based on the client's individual circumstances and can change at any time without notice.
Clients are urged to consult their tax or legal advisor for any related questions.