The Dividend Cafe - The DC Today - Tuesday September 27, 2022
Episode Date: September 27, 2022Markets took a decent lead at the open but couldn’t hold it, and there is some more to say about the bond market in today’s daily podcast! TheDCToday.com TheBahnsenGroup.com...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Dividend Cafe, weekly market commentary focused on dividends in your portfolio
and dividends in your understanding of economic life.
Well, hello and welcome to another DC Today, a daily synopsis for you of all the fun action
in the market.
We're getting even closer now, just three days to go now to the close of September in Q3,
likely a quarter and a month that a lot of people will want to leave in the rearview mirror.
The Dow ended up down 126 points today. It doesn't seem like that big of a deal these days, but
it was up over 300 early on. Right away, it was clear it wasn't going to hold its momentum. And so the Dow,
after a couple of hours, had gone from positive to negative. But even the high of the day was
reached very early on. And that upward momentum fizzled quite early on. The S&P was down 0.21%. The Dow was down, excuse me, 0.4%. The NASDAQ was up a tiny bit. So a little
bit of a mixed bag there. But the bigger story just by far, and it's driving everything else
going on right now, is the upward surge in bond yields. And the 10-year was up seven basis points
today. I want to give you, I know that the five-year closed at 4.2%,
but to give you an idea of some of the weird action in the bond market today,
you had the two-year down a couple of basis points. You had the six-month down six basis
points. And then you had the 10-year, like I say, up 7 basis points and the 30-year up 13.
That's quite a bit of steepening in the yield curve when yields in the low end were coming
down, the high end going up.
And it's just been so long since we've seen something like that.
So a little steepening in the curve.
But fundamentally, actually, let me get through the data and then I'm going to give you some
commentary on why this matters because it matters a lot. Energy was the top performing sector today. It was up about 1.2%. Consumer
staples were the worst performing sector. They were down about 1.7%. And it was kind of a mixed
bag among sectors in between. WTI was up. The crude oil was up 2.3%, but it's still sitting there just below $80.
So oil was up today, but it has been down quite a bit here over the last couple of months.
And there you go. That's kind of the summary of today's market. Look, the dollar strengthening
and what you've seen in the last week versus the sterling pound,
massive rally bringing the sterling down and the dollar up. Same thing with yen,
to a lesser degree with Chinese yuan. But the dollar strength is the story, and that is a correlated story to the surge in bond yields. When bond yields drop,
equities will go higher. When the dollar reverses, equities will go higher. Until those things
happen, I don't think they will. It's really that simple right now. So some kind of snapback in bond yields and the dollar could
happen in five minutes and it could happen in five weeks. I'm not offering you anything helpful
here about timing a trade, but I'm offering an indicator of what is a catalyst to seeing
some buyers come back into the equity space. And that's the huge issue.
Well, that gets to the heart of the matter on the bond side. And I want to think through this
more. And I'm in touch with several people that I talk to every day or very frequently macro
economically. I am increasingly of the opinion that the Fed may not touch the Fed funds rate as a means of
lightening up on monetary tightening, but that they will indeed be lightening up.
And so what do I mean by that? It's quantitative tightening. The issue of the Fed reducing their balance sheet,
I find it impossible to believe right now that it is not a major factor in the upward move in
the long end of the curve. And what the Fed has done is, just to use back-of-napkin math for you,
they added about $4 trillion to their balance sheet after financial crisis. They got a few hundred billion off when they were tightening before.
Eventually, they broke credit markets, and then they stopped. And then they just ran still. They
weren't easing, quantitative easing, QE. They weren't easing or tightening. Then COVID came and they added another $4 trillion.
It was a little more with some degree of mortgage-backed securities, Fannie and Freddie
bonds, and a much higher degree of treasury bonds. And so then they announced, okay, we're going to
start tightening up. We're going to start pulling liquidity out of the banking system. And we're going to do this by allowing $47.5
billion a month of government securities to mature and not be reinvested. And so essentially,
that was a way without selling bonds of reducing the balance sheet.
But they said in September, they were going to double
that amount up to $95 billion a month. So let's call it rounding up $100 billion a month that
they're going to be reducing the balance sheet. It appears to me that there are no buyers.
The five-year auction today finally got filled three basis points higher than where they came out at and when issued.
And so you're talking about a 4.2 yield on the five-year.
There's still inversion between the middle of that curve and when you get out to 10 and 30.
10 and 30. I just simply believe that it is a plausible theory that the Fed can keep talking the way they're talking and allow the Fed funds rate to go in the direction they're referring to,
but then on the other side, which would not be as subject to political backlash or some of the same accusatory environment they would
inherit if they reverse direction on rates, soften up on the quantitative tightening.
And I wouldn't be acting on this theory, but I would put it out there as a not small chance
of something that could play out in the weeks and months to come,
which could be relevant to investors when they think about how markets are presently
responding to liquidity conditions. So if this seems a bit confusing, you have to let me know,
but I don't think it is. I'm effectively saying that there's two ways the Fed can keep tightening
and they've committed to doing both. And there's two ways the Fed can keep tightening, and they've committed to
doing both. And there's two ways they can go about trying to accommodate or introduce more loose and
easy monetary policy. And one of those two ways is going to be very tricky to maintaining
credibility. And that would be to all of a sudden start cutting rates.
But perhaps what they could do
is reverse their commitment to quantitative tightening
in a way that allows the long end to kind of come back in.
And it would probably bring in the mid-range belly
of the yield curve as well.
That adds financial, it improves financial conditions.
It adds liquidity in the banking system.
It de-thaws some of what is starting to get frozen up in credit markets and then allows
the Fed to say, oh, yeah, we're really out fighting inflation and we're raising rates
and all those things.
I'm throwing that out there as a working theory, and I have
more research and thoughts to do as to where I may be missing, what I may be wrong about,
but I wanted to share it real time with you. Economic data, and then I'll let you go.
Consumer confidence came in higher than expected today, 108 versus 104. Some of that probably correlated to gas prices having dropped.
Core durable goods were up 1.3% in the month.
Really solid new orders on electronics, computers, auto parts, components.
Good data on the durable goods, core durable goods today.
House prices, not as much. The S&P CoreLogic that follows some
of the major markets of the country, still up 15.8% versus a year ago. But you had month over
month decline in prices. Here in Orange County, California, you reported a monthly decline in
average prices. People always say Orange County can't go down. They shall find
out. But we were at 18.1% year over year in this CoreLogic S&P index, and now it came to 15.8%.
So you're seeing some disinflation in that insane price inflation that was taking place in house
prices. The best performing markets, if you will, meaning where house price appreciation was
highest on the month was still Tampa, Miami, Dallas, and Charlotte.
I can't even imagine what is the aspects driving home price appreciation there.
And then the worst performing of major metropolitan areas were Minneapolis, Washington, D.C.,
and San
Francisco.
And again, I'm just at a total loss to figure out what that may be about.
I'm not going to say that I'm being sarcastic.
I'm just going to expect you to follow me.
That's the scoop here.
Futures haven't opened up yet, so I can't dig in to where we are pre-market.
We'll see where things go the next three days.
Bottom line, I want to reiterate this.
Markets go up and down.
Dividends go up.
Keep that in mind.
Thanks for listening to and watching the DC Today.
The Bonson Group is a group of investment professionals
registered with Hightower Securities LLC,
member FINRA and SIPC,
with Hightower Advisors LLC,
a registered investment advisor with the SEC. Securities are offered through Hightower Securities LLC. Thank you. Past performance is not indicative of current or future performance and is not a guarantee.
The investment opportunities referenced herein may not be suitable for all investors.
All data and information referenced herein are from sources believed to be reliable.
Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices, or other information contained in this research is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice.
The Bonser Group and Hightower shall not in any way be liable for claims and make no Thank you. Such data and information are subject to change without notice. This document was created for informational purposes only.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the Bonson Group and do not represent those of Hightower Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates.
Hightower Advisors do not provide tax or legal advice.
This material was not intended or written to be used or presented to any entity as tax advice or tax information.
Tax laws vary based on the client's individual circumstances and can change at any time without notice. Clients are urged to consult their tax or legal advisor for any
related questions.