The Dr. Hyman Show - The Science Of Plant-Based Meat vs Grass-Fed Meat with Stephan van Vliet

Episode Date: February 15, 2023

This episode is brought to you by Rupa Health, Cozy Earth, BON CHARGE, and Mitopure. If you’ve ever wondered if plant-based meat alternatives are nutritionally equal to real, pasture-raised meats, or if they are truly better for issues like inflammation and cardiovascular health, this is the episode for you. Meat has become such a monolithic topic when, in fact, it’s extremely complex and nuanced. We can’t just say all meat is good or no meat is good, it’s a matter of what types and sources of proteins you’re eating and what the rest of your diet looks like, too.  I’m excited to dive into all those complexities today with Dr. Stephan van Vliet, who is a nutrition scientist with metabolomics expertise in the Center for Human Nutrition Studies at Utah State University. Dr. van Vliet’s research is performed at the nexus of agricultural and human health. He routinely collaborates with farmers, ecologists, and agricultural scientists to study critical linkages between agricultural production methods, the nutrient density of food, and human health. His work has been published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Scientific Reports, the Journal of Nutrition, and the Journal of Physiology. This episode is brought to you by Rupa Health, Cozy Earth, BON CHARGE, and Mitopure. Rupa Health is a place where Functional Medicine practitioners can access more than 2,000 specialty lab tests from over 35 labs. You can check out a free, live demo with a Q&A or create an account at RupaHealth.com. Right now, get 40% off your Cozy Earth sheets. Just head over to cozyearth.com and use code MARK40. My community can go to boncharge.com/HYMAN and use coupon code HYMAN to save 20% at BON CHARGE. Mitopure is the first and only clinically tested pure form of a natural gut metabolite called urolithin A that clears damaged mitochondria away from our cells and supports the growth of new, healthy mitochondria. Get 10% off at timelinenutrition.com/drhyman and use code DRHYMAN10 at checkout. Here are more details from our interview (audio version / Apple Subscriber version): Plant-based meat vs grass-fed meat (7:06 / 3:55) How the diet of livestock affects the flavor and phytochemical composition of their meat and milk (22:14 / 16:23) Why the overall composition of your diet matters (29:13 / 23:57) Research looking at grass-fed vs grain-fed bison (33:23 / 27:34)  How humans can get unique plant compounds through animal consumption (42:07 / 36:22) Why not all feed-lot feed is equal (44:53 / 38:55)  Why cardiac risk from meat consumption may vary depending on the type of meat (48:14 / 42:26)  The metabolic health of pasture-raised bison vs feed-lot bison (49:09 / 43:12)  Assessing the health of lab-grown meat (57:38 / 53:20)  Honoring the wisdom of farmers and indigenous people (1:06:21 / 1:00:30)  Please visit the Show Notes section for this episode at drhyman.com.

Hi, Doctors Pharmacy listeners, it's Dr. Mark here. If you've been following me, you know that I'm obsessed with understanding the latest research on longevity and how we can apply it to our daily lives. So I wrote a book about it. Think of it as a roadmap to optimal aging. It's called Young Forever, and it comes out February 21st, 2023. It's never too early or too late to take control of your health, and this book will show you how.

Visit youngforeverbook.com to learn more and pre-order now. Coming up on this episode of The Doctor's Pharmacy. Plant-based meal alternatives can be part of a healthy diet, I think. I also think meat can be part of a healthy diet, but the background diet in which you consume these foods are ultimately going to be the main dictator. And I think that's so important to remember when we have these discussions about single foods that make up just a small portion of our diet. Hey everyone, it's Dr. Mark. I know a lot of you out there are practitioners like me helping patients heal using real food and functional medicine as your framework for getting to the root cause. What's critical to understanding what each individual person and body needs is testing,

which is why I'm excited to tell you about Rupa Health. Looking at hormones, organic acids, nutrient levels, inflammatory factors, gut bacteria, and so many other internal variables can help us find the most effective path to optimize health and reverse disease. But up till now, that meant you were usually ordering tests for one patient from multiple labs. And I'm sure many of you can relate how time-consuming this process was, and then it could all feel like a lot of work to keep track of. Now there's Rupa Health, a place for functional medicine practitioners to access more than 2,000 specialty labs from over 20 labs like Dutch, Fibrin America, Genova, Great Plains, and more. Rupa Health helps provide a significantly better

patient experience and it's 90% faster, letting you simplify the entire process of getting the functional medicine lab tests you need and giving you more time to focus on patients. This is really a much needed option in functional medicine space and I'm so excited about it. It means better service for you and your patients. You can check it out and look at a free live demo with a Q&A or create an account at rupahealth.com. That's R-U-P-A health.com. I don't think there's anything better than waking up feeling super rested, relaxed, and energized. When we get high quality sleep, that's the norm. Without it, our simple day-to-day tasks can seem impossible and our health suffers. That's why I'm always looking for ways to upgrade my sleep routine and bamboo sheet sets from Cozy Earth is my new favorite way to get an amazing night's rest. You might be surprised to learn that many types of

bedding out there contain toxins that can off-gas into your air and absorb into your skin. Do you want to sleep on formaldehyde? I don't either. So I know that Cozy Earth's products are certified to be free from harmful chemicals, and that's why I love them. Sleep actually impacts every part of our health. It helps us maintain a healthy weight by balancing hormones and blood sugar, provides time to detox our brains, lets our muscles and organs rest and repair. But so many of us don't get enough sleep or the right quality of sleep to allow the body to do all these important things. Better sleep is the cornerstone of better health and is something we all have the power to work on. I know nice bedding can feel like a big investment, so Cozy Earth makes it super easy to try out their products with a 30-day free trial and a 10-year

warranty. Plus, right now they're offering the best sale price ever with 40% off. Just go to CozyEarth.com, use the code MARK40 at checkout. And that's CozyEarth, C-O-Z-Y-E-A-R-T-H.com with the code MARK40 and check out. And I know you'll love these sheets as much as I do. Now let's get back to this week's episode of The Doctor's Pharmacy. Welcome to The Doctor's Pharmacy. I'm Dr. Mark Hyman. That's pharmacy with an F, a place for conversations that matter. And today, if you're confused about whether to eat meat or not, and what meat is good and what meat is bad, or is all meat bad, or are there actually benefits to meat that you can't get anywhere else or that you might not get anywhere else, this is going to be a very interesting conversation to listen to

because it's with a professor, Dr. Stephen VanVellette, who's a nutrition scientist with metabolomics expertise. He works at the Center for Human Nutrition Studies at Utah State University. He's earned his PhD in kinesiology at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign. And he's also worked at WashU in St. Louis School of Medicine, which is one of the best nutrition schools in the world, medical schools as well, and also has worked at Duke University School of Medicine. So his credentials are solid. He's published the papers. He knows what he's talking about.

And this research is really interesting because it's really at the nexus between agriculture and the health of our agricultural systems and ecosystems and human health. And he talks about how to reimagine our thinking about meat and milk that's raised in a way that actually supports the health of the planet, the health of the animal, and the health of humans. He works with farmers, ecologists, agricultural scientists, and he studies the links between agricultural production, how we grow food and raise animals, the nutrient density of the food, and human health. He's published in major medical journals, and I'm super happy to have him on here. Thank you so much, Mark. Thank you so much for that lovely introduction. That was very kind.

Well, listen, you know, I read a lot of your papers and they're really exciting because they challenge the orthodoxy. And they kind of blew my mind, just to be straight up, because through very sophisticated metabolomic science, stuff that wasn't even possible until very recently, you've been able to look at the biology and the biochemistry and the nutrient density and the phytochemical richness, which doesn't even make sense when you're talking about animals. Phytochemicals come from plants, but they're in animals, and we'll talk about how. You've really looked at that in a very in-depth way that has challenged a lot of the orthodoxy about what's good for you and what's not good for you. And you've published some really interesting studies.

One of them is titled Health Promoting Nutrients, Phytonutrients from Plants are Higher in Grass-Fed Milk and Meat. You published a study, Metabolomic Analysis of Plant-Based Meats versus Grass-Fed Meats, which is interesting because this whole craze of plant-based meats is really blowing up and people aren't really talking about whether it's healthy or not for you. They're just seeming to believe it's healthy, but it turns out it may not be in many ways. And so I'm super excited to dive into all these topics and more with you and talk about a new study you just about published about buffalo or bison who are raised in feedlots

versus pasture-raised and have a wide variety of compounds. And you just did, you know, looked at over 1,500 compounds through metabolomic analysis, and we're able to really map out the benefits and the lacks in these different ways of raising animals. So I'm super excited to talk about all these things with you. So let's start out by talking about this whole idea that plant-based meats are good. And everybody seems to think they're good because the global plant-based meat sector is growing at a rapid rate. It's projected to increase from $11.6 billion in 2019 to over 30 billion by 2026.

That's from Nature. And you studied really whether these plant-based meat alternatives actually are the right nutritional replacement for animal meat. And even though it may look exactly the same on the Nutrition Facts label, they may be quite different and have very different functions in your body. Because through the lens of functional medicine, food is medicine. And if food is medicine, it works through informational molecules in the food. And what you're eating contains an array of things that are far beyond protein, fat, carbohydrates,

and there are very different types of each one. And they contain compounds that have enormous impact on your biology for good or bad. So I'm super excited to dive into this. So let's talk about whether or not these are the same or different and how they're different. So when you do this paper that you published about the metabolomics of plant-based meats. I don't even know what we should call them meat. I have a friend who doesn't like to talk about nut milks. He doesn't like to talk about nut milks. He likes to talk about nut juice. I'm like, okay. And what did you learn about the different metabolomic profiles? And by the way, people, metabolomics is just a study of all the metabolites in a food or a compound compared to grass-fed meat.

So plant-based meat, grass-fed meat, what's the down low on the difference and the risks and benefits and the compounds in them? Well, the headline is that plant-based meat alternatives and meat differ a lot in terms of their nutritional composition when you actually go beyond just the nutrition facts panel so on other nutrition facts panels say you're a consumer right and you pick up a package of the plant-based meat alternatives or meat then there's about 13 nutrients that routinely appear on nutrition facts panels these are things such as protein fat saturated fat and a handful of vitamins and minerals so So there's a risk in that. Of course, this is good to give us an overview of what the food contains, but there's a risk in that in the sense that we can convince ourselves that that's all that food contains.

But we know that foods in their natural state and the food matrix contain thousands of compounds that can potentially impact our metabolism and human health. So what we were interested in in that work where we compared grass-fed beef and a popular plant-based meat alternative, the reason we chose grass-fed beef and a popular plant-based meat alternative is because they're both touted as more environmentally friendly and healthier. So when we did that comparison, we looked at 200 metabolites. And it is important to note, as you mentioned, Mark, metabolites are end products or intermediates in metabolism. We're being at the metabolism of plants, the metabolism of animals or humans. And many in the context of plants and animal sourced foods, many of these metabolites within the plant or the animal can serve as nutrient sauce. So not all metabolites are nutrients, but all nutrients are certainly metabolites. So we studied that, we looked at about 200 compounds in that. So it's a large number of compounds. And what we found was, is that there was a 90% difference in abundance of these compounds. So what that means was that

of those 200 compounds, about 176 or so, they were either higher in the plant-based meat alternative or higher in the grass-fed beef. And in about a third of all these compounds, we could only detect them in either source. So they were only found in the grass-fed beef or the plant-based meat alternative. So what that study suggests is that when you take sort of a more in-depth or holistic approach to food, then meat and plant-based meat alternative are as different as you expect perhaps a plant and animal source food to be. So, you know, what I found striking was that, you know, even though they kind of seem nutritionally equivalent, they were quite different in their metabolites.

And for example, some of them in the plant-based meats were not in the animal meats, like some of the soy, for example, derivatives and phytonutrients. So I mean, but sort of in a comparison way, were you finding that one was nutritionally superior to the other or were they kind of not the same at all? Yeah, that's indeed. I wouldn't say that one is nutritionally superior to the other. I mean, they both contain a similar amount of protein and we have this hyper focus of protein. Protein is important, of course, the building blocks of ourselves. But foods contain much more than protein.

And what we basically found in the study was that we couldn't really say if one is better than the other. It would just mean that if you eat a plant-based meat alternative or if you eat meat, you get, at least on a sort of a bigger scale of nutrients, you get a very much different nutritional profile and you ingest different nutrients. And we know that the beef contains various beneficial nutrients such as taurine and anserine and creatine, which are important for our muscles, for our brain to function well. Then on the other hand, the plant-based meal alternative contained, as you described, a lot of phenolics, soy isoflavones, which could potentially

lower our risk of chronic diseases as well, at least in what animal waters would suggest and associative data would suggest. So there could be beneficial compounds found in both, but they were just different compounds. It was interesting because you think on the nutrition facts label looks the same, but on a metabolomic level which is really the food is information idea they differed by 90 percent which is kind of striking and there were many things that are really essential for human health that aren't in plant-based meats like dha which is a key omega-3 acid higher levels of vitamin b3 uh certain amino acids like hydroxyproline antioxidants um um, that are really important. Um,

and I think they're only found in beef. And when you looked at the plants, they also had some things that are not found to be, for example, phytosterols and other antioxidants. So, um, you know, people think they're eating the equivalent of meat, I think, but it really may not be the same. And, and the question really is, uh really is, you know, what were the differences in terms of the anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating compounds that were there? Was one more or less inflammatory than the other? Yeah, we could not per se say this from this study, Mark, but there have been some randomized controlled trials done on comparing meat and plant based meat alternative one one that pops the mind is from uh dr chris gardner out of stanford

so he did a randomized control trial where he compared beyond beef and its products to grass-fed beef and organic pork and what he found was is that in the group consuming the plant-based meat alternatives as part of an omnivorous diet for, I believe it was about eight weeks, they had a slight reduction in weight and a slight reduction in LDL cholesterol. He also measured 90 inflammatory markers and he found no difference between the two so in terms of uh information at least in sort of a randomized controlled trial it was suggested there's no strong health benefit over the other apart from the reduction in cholesterol with plant-based meat alternatives so what that tells me marcus is that plant-based meat alternatives can be part of a healthy diet

i think i also think meat can be part of a healthy diet, I think. I also think meat can be part of a healthy diet, but the background diet in which you consume these foods are ultimately going to be the main dictator. And I think that's so important to remember when we have these discussions about single foods that make up just a small portion of our diet. Yeah, I think that's a really important thing to think about. It's really what is the overall composition of your diet and what are you eating it with? And, you know, a lot of the meat studies that show meat can be harmful are often done in population studies where people who are eating meat have generally bad habits because they think, you know, the culture around us tells us that meat is unhealthy.

So people who are focused on well-being and health tend to not eat so much meat. So it may not be the lack of meat that's the benefit, or the too much meat that's the harm. It's just what else they're doing. Are they exercising more? They're not smoking. They're eating more fruits and vegetables. Their weight is better. You know, so there's a lot of other factors in these nutritional studies that are done

epidemiologically. So I think the metabolomic analysis is very interesting. And then the question is, you know, how does this affect human health? And are you aware of any data that looks at how these different metabolomic things affect human health other than the ones you just talked about? At the moment, we don't have much data on that in the context of plant-based meat alternatives. So obviously in the randomized controlled trials of, you know, typically what they are anywhere from usually four to 12 weeks long. Sometimes you have major randomized controlled trials that maybe go on to a year. But presumably that is not really enough to cause micronutrient deficiencies, right?

Which could be of potential concern. Again, coming back to the background diet, you can can definitely if you are very cognizant and consuming plant-based meal alternatives as part of a vegan diet you you could obviously uh doesn't mean you develop nutrient deficiencies but um the point being here is is that we see some and we're doing actually a study now uh mark where we're comparing grass-fed beef grain-fed beef or an impossible burger and this is just an acute feeding trial post-prandial trial so it means that we just pull blood for six hours after after they eat that based on some previous studies that we've done in the past in my lab with different protein

sources you do see that so we we talk about the food metabolome right all these compounds that are in the food but we also talk about the human metabolome, right? All these compounds that are in the food, but we also talk about the human metabolome. This is all the compounds and metabolites that circulate in our body. So by pulling blood for six hours regularly afterwards, we're now trying to find out, okay, in a very acute setting, if you eat grass fed beef, grain fed beef, or an impossible burger, which are all three different in a nutritional composition, obviously the difference between an impossible burger and beef is larger.

But you can measure what your blood looks like post-meal. I mean, there have been studies done that suggest that about 50% of what circulates in our blood, 30% to 50%, is directly related to the foods that we eat. Yeah. And so what are they finding? I mean, is there things that they're discovering by comparing people eating an Impossible Burger versus a feedlot, you know, industrial factory farm burger versus a pasture-raised grass-fed burger? Well, we're about halfway through the study,

so we do not have final results yet. So it always takes a bit for the best ticket. It's top secret. Well, it's not top secret. If I have preliminary results, I would certainly tell you. But yeah, I don't have any results yet. Other than we ask people, what do you think you ate? And how did you like it?

And even those results, I cannot tell you off the top of my head. Other than just talking to our participants when they're in our clinical facility. But typically people can tell whether they're eating an impossible burger or beef. I'm sure they can, yeah. I think that this is going to be an exciting study. So we're going to make sure we link back to it in our newsletters and for sure put it in the show notes when it comes out. I think this is a very important study to be done because it's one thing to look in a labletters and for sure put it in the show notes when it comes out. I think this is a very important study to be done because it's one thing to look in a lab at all the metabolites.

It's another thing to see how it interacts with human health, how does it affect our microbiome, our immune markers, our hormones, our brain chemistry. I mean, this is really interesting stuff to me. I think really, you're saying they're not really nutritionally interchangeable. People shouldn't think of them if they're having plant-based chicken or meat. It shouldn't be thought of in the same way as eating meat. And the nutritional profiles are different, even though they may look like the same on the nutrition facts thing. Hey, everyone.

It's Dr. Mark here. There's so much technology in our lives today, and the benefits are amazing. We can video chat with anyone in the world at any time, and many of us can work completely from home thanks to the internet. But there are some serious drawbacks of this technology too. And one of those is that we're constantly exposed to artificial light. A certain amount of light exposure is good for us, especially when it's from the sun. But overexposure from these man-made sources disrupts our body's natural rhythms and can result in things like headaches and poor quality sleep. And some studies suggest even cancer. This is where Bunn Charge comes in. Bunn Charge is a holistic wellness brand with a huge range of evidence-based products to optimize

your life. I use their blue light blocking glasses to help filter out artificial light when I'm working throughout the day. And since I started wearing them, I've had fewer headaches and less eye strain. And I've noticed an improvement in my quality of sleep too. Bun Charge's glasses are stylish and come in non-prescription, prescription, and reading options. Whatever your needs, Bun Charge has a pair of glasses that will cut out excess light, keeping you happier and healthier. Right now, my community can go to buncharge.com forward slash hyman and use the coupon code hyman to save 20%. That's B-O-N-C-H-A-R-G-E.com slash hyman and use the coupon code hyman and save 20%. I've been working hard on my soon to be published book, Young Forever. I'm super excited and proud of this book because it takes my decades

of functional medicine experience and distills it into a program anyone can adopt to reverse the effects of aging. As I've dug into the research on aging while writing my book, one thing has become super clear. We need to take care of our mitochondria. These are our cellular energy factories. Now, as we age and we eat too much and we sit at our desks and are exposed to too many toxins, our mitochondria deteriorate and our bodies suffer. And that is why I'm happy to recommend MitoPure from Timeline Nutrition, a product that specifically regenerates mitochondria and supports cellular energy production. MitoPure clears away the damaged mitochondria from our cells and supports the growth of new healthy mitochondria. And as an added bonus, the latest research shows that

healthy mitochondria improves immune function too. Now, I've been using MitoPure for almost a year now, and at 63, I feel stronger and more energized than ever. Right now, Timeline Nutrition is offering my community 10% off MitoPure, which you can get in a capsule powder or protein blend at TimelineNutrition.com forward slash Dr. Hyman. That's D-R-H-Y-M-A-N. That's T-I-M-E-L-I-N-E.com slash Dr. Hyman, D-R-H-Y-M-A-N, and use the code Dr. Hyman10. And now let's get back to this episode of The Doctor's Pharmacy. So I want to talk about another study that you did that I thought was just so fascinating,

which was kind of blew my mind. And Fred Provenza has been on the podcast, who I know you've worked with and used to be at Utah State, is now retired, talks about the idea of the phytochemical richness of the animal's diet affecting the phytochemicals in the animal or in their milk. So a cow or a sheep or a goat or whatever eating a wider variety of different plant compounds, maybe over 100 different plants, sampling them, maybe some major ones as their main food source, but sampling a wide variety of plants has profound effects on the amounts of these physiologically active compounds that regulate our biology and our immune system. And basically, when we talk about food as medicine, this is what

we're talking about. We're talking about the phytochemicals, the 25,000 different compounds that are in plant foods, but now they're finding them in animal foods. And I wrote a book called Young Forever. It's just out about longevity. And I went to the blue zones in Sardinia. And it was fascinating to me because they knew that when they take their goats or their sheep and they graze them on this plant or this other plant at this time of year, that it actually makes their meat and milk taste better. And I think most people don't realize that the taste of our food is directly related to the phytochemical richness of the food. And so we now actually can start to study that in ways that we didn't know. I mean, those Sardinian and Korean farmers in Greece, they had no idea about phytochemicals.

They just know it tastes better. But what you're finding is that these compounds are in there. So can you talk about that study that you did and what you learned and the different kinds of things you found? Yeah, no, that's a good point, this is what kind of inspired us is those historical writings about especially French and Italian farmers that would herd their animals throughout these diverse landscapes. For instance, sheep farmers in Sardinia, and they were able to get different flavors in their milk and in their cheeses. And what they were really talking about there in that regard, they didn't know it was phytochemicals, but they just thought they tasted better, right? And what they're tasting is all these plant compounds that make their way into the meat and the milk of the animals. Now, when I started to look at this a few years ago, looking at some of that older work that was done in the 80s, 90s, early 2000s by a lot of Italian and French scientists. They were just figuring out how can we make this cheese better?

I'm looking at this as a human nutrition scientist and think to myself, hey, wait a minute. I know this from my biochemistry that these also have potent antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory effects, at least when looking at this in sort of a laboratory-based setting, right? Some of these compounds, when you put them on a cancer cell lining, they may have anti-tumor activities. Doesn't mean that per se the milk is anti-cancer. I want to make that very clear. But the compounds that are in there can have potential health benefits as part of an overall diet, right?

So we took that work and obviously fast forward 20, 30 years, we're able to look now at hundreds and thousands of compounds, or maybe in the past they looked at 10 compounds. But what we're seeing very clearly is that they have the saying, you are what you eat, while cows or sheep are what they eat as well. And probably even more so than humans because they're grazing on a pasture and they cannot go through the drive-through and get other food, right?

So we see this clear relationship between the phytochemicals in the forage on one hand and that are then being metabolized and transferred into the meat and milk. And what is particularly exciting and unique about this is that animals can consume plants and grasses that you and I cannot consume. But we know that these plants or these grasses, right,

they might have certain medicinal effects or anti-inflammatory effects. So this is a way of getting those compounds in there. And one example I really like to use is with a farmer up here in Idaho. His name is Glenn Alzinga. And he kind of does what the Sardinians do. He herds his cattle through the mountains and he moves them around on horseback.

And it's very, very exciting because you're there and within a brittle lands, right? Here out in the Western rangelands. And you stand there talking to them. And then a couple of minutes later, the cattle are already gone. They typically graze a given field for about two minutes and then they move on. So these are on public rangelands. But what's unique about that is that there are certain plants and and the farmer describes is much better than i do but we know there's certain plants that if you and i consumed them we'd get we get sick they're toxic to us we get gut issues but we also know these compounds

or these plants contain compounds that have certain medicinal properties so by cycling these through the animal this could be a way for us to get some of these compounds well that's fascinating so what you're saying is there are all these incredible plant compounds that have medicinal animal, this could be a way for us to get some of these compounds. Well, that's fascinating. So what you're saying is there are all these incredible plant compounds that have medicinal benefits, but our bodies can't digest them. We can't properly metabolize them, but the animals in a sense, upcycle them, process them for us. And there may be compounds that are not available to humans through eating their plant-based or plant-rich diet, but that can be obtained through these animals. And the question is, how significant is that?

And are the levels of these nutrients at a level that make a difference for us? Yeah, that's the million-dollar question right now. So we do have two randomized controlled trials going on in my lab. One is indeed looking at grass-fed beef and grain-fed beef. So the grass-fed beef is also very biodiverse from biodiverse forages. So we know they're rich in phytochemicals. So we're also working on a big profiling study, which we call the Beef Nutrient Density Project. And what that essentially does is we look at 250 farms over a couple of years

we collect three stakes from them and and we look at the the phytochemicals and other metabolites that are in there we link it back to their grazing practices so do uh grazing practices that are called quantico regenerative or agroecological is the term I prefer to use, which is farming more in harmony with nature. So if we move these animals through the landscape, we don't overgraze, they're on biodiverse forages. We see that this results in more phytochemicals in the meat. So if we test a rich piece of phytochemical meat to maybe a feedlot meat that is not as rich in these phytochemicals, because we we know that the total mixed rations which is corn and hay that the animals eat they don't contain a lot

of those phytochemicals so we are so on paper yes the diverse fat grass-fed beef looks very phytochemically rich about three to ten fold higher in these phytochemicals than feedlot beef but whether this has an appreciable health effect on humans we we don't know that yet that's what we're uh what we're trying to figure out in some randomized controlled trials and and and uh what's your gut feeling you've been doing this for quite a while what do you think we're going to see it's a good question mark my gut feeling tells me that maybe in a laboratory-based setting, we can measure that very acutely. But I'm also a realist. If every fast food chain tomorrow switched out their feedlot

beef with grass-fed beef, I don't think we'd get much healthier in society. So coming back to the overall diet. So you think because it's basically the overall diet so you oh you think because it's it's basically the overall diet it's not necessarily the meat so if you're trying to upgrade your diet you can do it by eating pasture-raised meat which has these phytochemicals and better fatty acid profiles and better amino acid profiles but you but you really uh what you're saying is you can't just eat that plus eat your processed food at the top of it and expect to be okay, which I think is obviously true for us to remember. Yeah. So we can maybe move the needle a bit.

But as you described, if we eat it as part of an ultra-processed standard American diet, then, yeah, it's not going to cure our ailments overnight. So that's how realistic we have to be. But on the other hand, hand you know it is another way of further increasing the the phytochemical origins of our diet right and uh increasing uh the potential help promoting compost that we get in now in humans it's notoriously hard to prove whether this is going to add x amount of of good years to your life and probably won't even be years. But, you know, we do know that, okay, if we see that you have more of these compounds in your body, then maybe over 30 years, it could slightly lower your risk of chronic disease.

It'd be hard to prove because we do a thousand other things, right, to our health that could benefit. It's true. Yeah, it's true. You know, I think with our sophistication analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome our dna methylation patterns biological age they won't be able to do intervention studies you know controlled feeding studies in humans that can actually look at what happens when you eat different diets and include things like maybe you control for everything but change from grass-fed to feedlot beef and see what

happens i remember one study i saw i mentioned a few times on the podcast that was in australia where they fed people either kangaroo meat or feedlot meat because in in australia you can buy like wild kangaroo meat in the grocery store i guess you have a lot of kangaroos and uh and uh they found profoundly different uh profiles of inflammation in the group that ate the feedlot meat. They had more inflammation than the ones who had the kangaroo meat, even though they were eating gram per gram, the same amount of protein. So I don't think it's insignificant. And I think, you know, in Sardinia, obviously, in Korea, and many of the blue zones, there are many, many variables. But, you know, they're eating, you're eating lots of dairy products that come from these animals or

having meat that comes from these animals. And I think that the quality of those nutrients are quite different. There's a very famous Spanish pig, the black-footed pig, which is raised in oak forests and all they eat is acorns. And the fatty acid profiles, their effect on our lipids are quite different. Even though you process meat and milk are very important. So I think we're gonna learn more and more about this. I think you're one of the leading researchers and thinkers about this.

I encourage everybody to check out your work. And we're gonna post to all the scientific papers we've talked about so far in the podcast. But I wanna dig into another one. And I want to talk about not just the human health benefits, but the broader context of agroecological practices or regenerative farming or whatever you want to call it. And how those really are important too. So you're getting kind of, you know, we're going to get into that in a minute. But I want to talk about this study that you did looking at the bison. It's kind of surprising because you looked

at over 1,500 metabolites through very sophisticated analysis and found quite significant differences. This isn't looking at an impossible burger versus a cow burger that's pasture-raised. This is basically meat for meat. It's grass-fed versus feedlot. And so what did you find? And tell us about that study. Yeah. So that study on bison was very interesting. So that was work that we did with the Turner ranches. And what was particularly nice about that work is that it was a very controlled study and doing it on a commercial farm. So that was the nice part about it. So the bison, they were raised on McGinley Ranch in Nebraska, in the foothills. So it's a very biodiverse landscape. And then the bison are born there and they do all the cow-calfing there.

And then the animals were raised uh up until about 24 months so they were all raised on pasture for 24 months and then for 140 days or so the animals would just run through a chute if they walked left they walked back into the pasture if they walked right they walked into a feedlot essentially so so it was it was randomized and then we we uh the animals were finished for 140 days we got the meat the strip steaks and we analyzed those for metabolomics analysis to look at okay does this alter the nutritional profile and what is really nice about the metabolomics analysis mark remember that i said earlier that not all nutrients are metabolites, but all metabolites tell us something about metabolism, right? So studying this, a bison is a mammal, just like you and I are.

And you can find a lot of parallels between the metabolic health of a bison and a human, this pathway. So let's talk a little bit later on the metabolic health of the animal because that I can say something pretty definitively about. But if we looked at the nutritional profile, we found that the phytochemicals were about three times higher in the animals that stayed on pasture for 140 days. One important thing to note, though, is that the Turner ranches, they, yes, finish the animals in a feedlot. At least half of their operation is that. But their feedlot is not your typical feedlot. Because the animals there, they have more space. They're in loose confinement.

So they have about four times more space than typical. And normally animals are fed a total mixed ration. It means that everyone gets the same thing. It's like a military ration or a ration in prison, right? You can't choose. But what the animals got, they could choose from hay, alfalfa hay, meadow hay, which was the hay from the pasture, or corn. And they could choose that in alfalfa hay meadow hay which was the hay from the pasture or corn and they could choose that in sort of a buffet style so they could regulate how much they eat of all of those a buffalo buffet yes i mean it's uh and and a surprising mark is that they went for the

corn quite a bit like about half of their intake came from corn. But corn to an animal is kind of like candy, right? Yeah, of course. If we go to the buffet, we also, if we have a bunch of ultra-processed foods and peas, then we might select, even though the peas are better for us, we might select the french fries, right, to a large extent. But we did find differences. So three times more phytochemicals on the grass-fed animals. Also, a few B vitamins such as vitamin B5 and B6 that we know are in grains were actually higher in the feedlot-finished animals. Vitamin B3 was a little bit higher in the grass-fed animals because we know fresh forages provide those precursors. But what was particularly interesting, if we look at an omega-6 to 3 ratio,

so omega-3s are fatty acids that we know have various health benefits. This ratio of omega-6 to 3 tells us something typically about the nutritional quality of the animal-sourced foods or the healthfulness. I think it's a solid relatively solid biomarker of that yeah so closer to what was the difference was it was it like a significant difference or was there some slight difference it it was a significant difference but it was slight so the feedlot bison had an omega-63 ratio of 4. The pasture finished bison had an omega-6 to 3 ratio of about 1.5, so it contained more omega-3s. And typically, those are amongst the best ratios

that you see. Yeah, so from 4 to 1 to 1.5 to 1, that's pretty significant. Yeah, so from 4, indeed. But here's sort of the bigger picture of that. We've also tested a lot of grass fed beef, about 60 to 100 farms. The average in the grass fed beef industry is three. So the bison were only one point worse than that. And I would still consider an omega six to three ratio of four to one, which was in the feedlot bison to be very good, because we know that probably our historical intakes in humans was about four to one, which was in the feedlot bison, to be very good. Because we know that probably our historical intakes in humans was about four to one, five to one. And feedlot beef typically has an omega-6 to three ratio of like 12 to one.

12 to one. Wow. So basically, feedlot cow eating corn and grains is 12 to one, omega-6 to three. That's significant. Yeah. So the bison, the feedlot bison, while they were different from the pasture-raised bison, if you look at it in the bigger picture, they still had a very favorable omega-6 to 3 ratio. And the difference were also not as large as we sometimes find with feedlot beef and pasture-raised beef. But we are finishing up the study or following up the study with multiple arms because even

in the bison industry, total mixed ration feeding is more common. So the turners, the way they finish in their feedlot, it's a little bit different from what the rest of the industry does. So my hypothesis would be for the next study that if we feed the bison total mixed ration, that the difference is going to be bigger. You mean so that the way the turner ranch does it is better yeah if that's in that indeed i would argue that what they do is uh it results in a better nutritional profile than uh than what would typically happen in a feedlot and you talk about the phytochemicals because i think that's really important and are these meaningful levels of phytochemicals that are in the grass-fed bison is but we do find certain

compounds like catechins ferulic acid which are major polyphenols hyporic acid in a relatively high quantity so we've for instance did some comparisons also looking at, well, let's say we have catechins that are in green tea, for instance, which we think are part of the health benefits of green tea. If you study that in milk from very biodiverse animals, then about a cup of milk and a cup of green tea. I must say this, the green tea that's at the lower end of the spectrum, they can start approaching each other. Wait, wait, you just said that basically if animals are eating the right plants, they can have as high levels of these protective phytochemicals we find in green tea called catechins as green tea itself that's a big that's a big worst green tea in in the worst green tea well it's a big statement that's why i i try

to bring it carefully but uh because we know that probably the overfine overall phytochemical ratio of green tea i think is going to be a lot higher so uh but certain individual compounds can be found in meaningful amounts. That's my point here. But as I said, eating, you know, quercetin from onions is probably better. It's a better source of quercetin than maybe the grass-fed beef. But the point is, is that it is a way of further increasing the overall phytochemical riches of our diet. So You said something really interesting before, so I don't interrupt, but you said that there are certain compounds that we can't get from plants

because our bodies can't process them that we do get from animals. And we're still learning what those do and how beneficial they are. But it's very likely that there are compounds that are in meat, for example, that are eating a wide variety of plants, from animals that are eating a wide variety of plants, that actually have higher levels of compounds, or levels of compounds we can't actually get from plants. Yeah, I think that's the best way to describe it, the best way to summarize it, Marcus, is that some of these compounds, we know certain terpenes that we may not per se get in our diet that are found maybe like sagebrush and

things that we we do not consume um then yeah we see those appearing so i think that that's the key part is is that okay we can get certain unique compounds and the compounds that we are getting in terms of certain phytochemicals, eating it as part of pasteurized meat is a further way of increasing it, right? Like one analogy I like to use, Mark, is that zinc from animal sourced foods, yes, they're more bioavailable. They're higher in zinc animal sourced foods. But plants can still make a meaningful contribution to our overall intake of things like zinc and iron, right? And if we think of it as the reverse with phytochemicals, of course, plant sources are going to be our primary source of phytochemicals, but animal source foods can add additional phytochemicals that we get to the plants,

plus likely add a few unique ones and i think that's that's the key message that's quite amazing and and um and what you were doing was comparing kind of bison to bison not like grass-fed bison and pasture-raised bison to feedlot cows which may even have a much bigger difference right yeah indeed i mean mean, we've done comparisons also, similar analysis on the bison and as we do on the cattle. So while, you know, they weren't in Nebraska per se raised, right, the cattle, but yeah, we can do some, if we do similar analysis, you can do some qualitative comparisons and some rough comparisons. And yeah yeah what we do see is is that you have pasture-raised bison here which is probably similar as the best pasture-raised beef

then you had the the turner ranch's feedlot bison that kind of falls in the middle and then you had the feedlot finished beef that was probably the least nutrient density phytochemicals. But I also want to say this, Mark, is that we're painting with broad strokes here, right? Feedlot beef isn't feedlot beef isn't feedlot beef. Even amongst the feedlot beef industry, we find a threefold difference. I mean, if you feed potato peels or almond hulls, we know those are rich in phytochemicals, these byproducts. So they can increase the amount of phytochemicals these byproducts so they can

increase the amount of phytochemical richness even in the feedlot and and we're doing some work yeah we're doing some work right now with chicken for instance where they feed a small amount of like grape hummus or or alfalfa and that does make a difference so yeah yeah that's true although i remember reading about this uh big truck that kind of had an accident on a major highway that was filled with expired Skittles. And they were on their way to feed the Skittles to cows. I thought, okay, well, those are colorful, but they I just want to bring it up because I sort of noticed it. There's a fatty acid called C15. And it's kind of emerging as a really important fatty acid. It comes from animal fat. It's a saturated fat from dairy and animals.

And it seems to be higher in grass-fed beef. And C15 has all sorts of health benefits. If people are wanting to learn more about it, they can go to discover C-15, the number 15, discoverc15.com and learn more and read about the science of this. But it's quite interesting. And I thought, wow, it seemed to be meaningfully more in the grass-fed bison, pasture-fed bison than the others. Can you talk about that a little bit?

Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, so C-15 is a dietary R--chain fatty acid that was mainly studied in the context of milk, but it also appears in ruminant meat. Say, for instance, with CLA, which has been studied in dairy and is another fatty acid with potential help-promoting compounds. So, yeah, we found higher amounts of those. I think it was about twofold higher by head. So we found higher amounts of C15 related, we think, to the forages. In the next study, we'll also be testing all the forages for the fatty acid profiles. And one other thing that we found, Marcus, very interesting, is that we think of saturated fat as sort of this category

that is all encompassing, right? And we think saturated fat is bad for us. And then it's, it's a, will be a long nuanced discussion, which maybe we won't get into. There's,

there's, but it's, it's a little bit more great than that, I'd say. But then usually a question I have is that, well, what type of saturated fat fatty acid, individual fatty acids are we talking about?

Because we know certain compounds are associated with, are more neutral for our risk of heart disease. And some of them might even be protective, which are the long chain saturated fatty acids. So this is bahenic acid, arachidic acid, nonodecanoic acid. So basically C20 and up. But C15 also seems to have some potential health benefits. But we know that people with higher amounts of these in their diet or circulating in their blood, that's associated with a decreased risk of heart disease. And I think this is also what was a key finding of our paper. And I think it's not as recognized as much is that you improve the saturated fatty acid profile too, even though the total amount of saturated fat between the two products is the same.

It's interesting. Yeah, you mentioned in your paper that the cardiac risk may be different because we think of all meat as being bad for your heart, which is not actually true. But in the grass-fed meat, you had higher levels of, we call fatty acid glycerol or fatty acylcarotene, which are actually metabolites that are reduced in grass-fed meat compared to feedlot meat. So that actually is a little technical, but it's a beneficial fatty acid profile of the meat that actually is more protective than a feedlot meat for your heart. Yeah, on paper, it certainly is more protective. And one thing we could say was certainly protective to the bison. Because while we do not know exactly what the effect was on the metabolic health of the human yet until we finish our nutritional studies. But what I can say, I feel comfortable in saying is that, yeah, the pasteurized bison look metabolically healthier.

To use an analogy, Mark, is that the pasteurized bison, they kind of more like a maybe a sedentary person that doesn't walk as much and maybe their their diet is also not as good and this is in comparison to each other it's not to say that the feedlot bison is unhealthy for you but if we compare the two on a on a relative skill to each other then yes yes, the pasteurized bison, they have a better athletic phenotype. They rely on mitochondrial metabolism instead of glycolysis. They also had lower amounts

of advanced glycation end products and lipoxidation end products. So 4-HNE is a compound that's been very well studied. And it is associated with a whole host of ailments, right? It's one of the reasons why red meat is considered a potential carcinogen. And we know these AGEs and ALEs, these advanced glycation and lipoxidation hand products, they're related to glycation sugars and they're related to lipid

peroxidation, so oxidation of lipids. So if we look at, for instance, the glycation, if an animal has a worsened glucose metabolic health, just like we see in humans that potentially have prediabetes, for instance, these glycation end products, they are related to the glycation of the sugar. So if the animal has more sugars in its body and does a poorer job of metabolizing them, we start to produce more of these glycated end products. So we can already see that this is animal health. The animal is healthier, but we also know that we are then exposed to lower quantities of these things in meat

that we think are bad for us. That's incredible. I want to break that down because it was a lot. I understood it because this is what I've been studying my whole life, but I don't want to have anybody else got it. But basically what you're saying is that these feedlot bison that are eating grain are pre-diabetic and they have more inflammation in their system. They have poor metabolism. They have more oxidative stress. They have like toxins like this for any, which is

this derivative of basically the oxidative stress by-product. They also have higher levels of what you call advanced glycation end products or AGEs or ages, which drive inflammation. It's what you see more in diabetics, why you get cataracts and heart disease and all kinds of stuff. So basically the animals eating the kind of diet that most of the meat in this country is fed, basically grain fed feedlot meat, are very poor in poor metabolic health. The question that comes up in my mind is, what happens when we eat a diabetic buffalo or a diabetic cow? Does that affect us? And I think what you're saying is it does. Ah, it could. I'm not 100% sure. I mean, two things. The animal doesn't get uh it's rare to see diabetes in in bison and cows

i also don't know what the sliding scale is here marcus because we know yeah i'm kind of being very generic but right yeah it's good it's good but because we don't know we don't have a hard kind of okay here is when an animal has pre-diabetes or something like that right we don't know that what would be interesting is to and i kind of want to do this in a study and i'm not sure what the you know we know across the marine species and this is something i've been pondering for a while and i think we just have to do it what if we take blood or muscle from from people that we know have diabetes or pre-diabetic and what if we take it from runners endurance strength athletes what is the difference are they threefold more metabolically healthy are they fourfold more

metabolically healthy and then do the same thing from feedlot animals and uh pasture-raised animals because then we can get a feel for what it means on a scale because it could just be that if you have on the other end of the spectrum you have, on the other end of the spectrum, you have diabetes, and the other end of the spectrum you have, like, great metabolic health, that the feedlot animals are still pretty good, right? And that I don't know yet at the moment. Yeah, but it's intuitively, it seems to make sense that if you're eating an animal that's not that healthy, it's going to affect your health, right? That's basically what you're finding, that these animals are less healthy.

That's a valid hypothesis. Yeah, yeah, interesting. Well, it's so interesting. I was thinking about the Plains, the Native Americans that lived in Lakota and a lot of the Plains Indians around the turn of the century. They had the highest levels of centenarians, of people who lived to be 100 at the time. And I thought that was interesting because their primary diet was grass-fed bison, basically free-roaming wild bison. And they were eating a huge variety of different plants and they were eating it from soils that were quite different

than the soils we're actually eating. So I wonder how much, not only what the animal's eating, but the agricultural land and how healthy that is, and the phytochemicals in the plants that actually are in higher amounts in land that's in better health. So basically, if you have healthy soil, healthy land, and plants grow in that soil, they're going to produce more of these phytochemicals. The animals are going to get more, and we're going to get more. Is that a valid way of thinking about it? I think so, Mark. I think that's a valid way of thinking about it. We do know that indeed from the soil to the plant to the animal, I think we are starting to well establish healthier soils that are more nutritious.

They result in more phytochemicals in the plants. And there's also a symbiotic relationship there, right? Because if you have healthier plants, is able to uh improve the soil health especially biodiversity seems to be important and then we also have the animal on the other side right that also plays a symbiotic role by consuming the plants it's a healthy stressor for the plant when it's not overgrazed so it renews itself it responds with these phytochemicals and things like, hey, wait a minute. I don't want to be consumed by this bison again. So I'm going to up these phytochemicals, right? And then so there's this whole sort of adaptive mechanism and this evolution that happened

over many years between herbivores and plants that could have benefited both. Then we get to the human. It becomes a little bit more tricky. We're the ones who usually take and don't give back as much, right? Because the animal puts urine and manure back into the soil and improves again, hopefully, the plant and the soil. But what we're seeing there is key is that, yes, if you get healthier soils, if you can grow more diverse and healthier plants, then yes, you'll end up with a healthier animal that is more nutrient dense. Yeah. I mean, you really are studying the intersection between soil health, animal health, and human health, right? They're inseparable. And the healthier the soil and our agricultural

lands, the healthier the animals, the healthier we are. And the healthier the soil and our agricultural lands, the healthier the animals, the healthier we are. And I think this is something we've kind of lost. And we think we can just have lab meat. I wonder what you think about the lab meat because it's really blowing up. And I think I want to talk about that in a minute. But this sort of intersection of how we grow food and how what basically the food our animals are eating or the plants are actually, the soil is giving them, that really drives our human health. And I think this phytochemical richness of our diet is really dependent on the health of the agricultural environment, which is really dependent on creating a healthy ecology,

not having these giant monocrop agricultural systems that are growing one crop, spraying with pesticides and herbicides, destroying the soil, and having to put fertilizer on to grow things. And kind of we're missing the boat on just the nature of nature, the nature of ecology, and how the ecosystem has to be healthy to create a healthy plant, to create a healthy human, to create a healthy animal, right? Yeah, no, it's so important, Mark. And I agree is that intuitively that relationship makes a lot of sense. And when we study this in our lab, then yeah, those things do become very clear. And to your point about the lab-grown meat as well as field-grown meat is that animals are what they eat.

That is very clear in what we're seeing. The lab-grown meat is also what it eats. In other words, what you throw in the growth media, right? So there may be advantages that we can, for instance, increase the amount of omega-3s in lab-grown meat. I'm just thinking sort of out of the box here. But we are scratching the surface on these phytochemicals. Yeah, we study maybe 100 or 500, but they probably contain 70,000 of them.

And we have no real clue exactly what they do so i think that part that incredible phytochemical richness that antioxidant richness will be hard to might be hard to replicate when we have lab-grown meat right in in uh cellular agriculture because how are we gonna we don't fully understand what's in the plant and how it ends up in the animal so provided provided that we, because we don't know that, right? What do we put in the cereal media and how do we know if it's being uptaken, right? But I think the main thing is we don't exactly know what to put in there to replicate all these flavors

and all these phytochemicals. Well, that's a whole fascinating idea. I mean, yes, you're feeding it the basic components to provide nutrition for the meat to grow. And by the way, much of that comes from industrial farming of soy and corn and other things that they're feeding the the lab-grown meat so that's a whole nother issue of where that the raw materials come from to feed it because you still have to feed it in order to grow it it's not just growing out in thin air but but it's what we don't know that's the problem. We don't know what we're not giving this lab meat in terms of the phytochemicals. And like you said, there are

tens of thousands of these things. What is their impact on human health? How do they play a role in our real well-being? And if they're missing, what do they do? Or what do they not do for us? So I think this is kind of really interesting stuff because the whole meat conversation is so monolithic. It's like meat is bad, plants are good, and it's just so much more nuanced than that. There's lab-based meat, there's feedlot meat, there's grass-fed meat, there's plant-based meat. There's a lot of different things going on. And there's a lot of different elements to each of these and what makes them good or not so good. So I think the work you're doing is so important to help us tease out these answers to these very complex questions. And I think they'll have a lot of

implications for how we shift our agricultural systems, for how we maybe create policies to support different ways of growing food, to policies of what's healthy for you, what's not healthy for you. So I think it's kind of exciting. And I wonder, you seem to be kind of one of the few people doing this. Are there other people working on this as well? Because I know Fred Provenza is retired now and he's great, but you're kind of in the trenches. Who's your colleagues out there and who should we be looking to for more information about this?

So certainly we're working with other groups as well who are doing this and I know other colleagues who are doing it in other countries as well. For instance, we've collaborated with a great scientist up in New Zealand. His name is Pablo Gregorini. And he's been doing this a lot in New Zealand. He has a big grass-fed industry, right? Grass-fed beef, grass-fed lamb. In New Zealand, yeah.

Yeah. So we have done some work with him, and he's also doing a lot of his sort of, you know, he's able to build that line of research up himself as well, comparing the phytochemicals in the forage to what ends up in the meat and milk in New Zealand. Then they're, like I said, they're French scientists within the USDA equivalent in France who are doing some of this work. And they've done it for many years in cheeses and are indeed doing more work into that area. So the phytochemicals in the cheeses, they usually look at this from a flavor standpoint. But flavor and health, the two are connected because these flavor compounds or the phytochemicals, they also have these health effects.

And then here we are working with various groups in Michigan State University. We have a collaboration with some folks in Cornell that are feeding different types of forages to dairy cows, I should say. And we're trying to figure out, OK, how does that impact the phytochemicals and the antioxidants and potentially these flavor compounds in the milk? So, yeah, it's certainly a very interesting time. And what it kind of reminds me of, Mark, I'm teaching a course now, micronutrient metabolism, and we dive a lot into sort of the history of vitamins

and how these were discovered, right? Ah, yeah, yeah. And we didn't know a lot of things. And what's interesting, a lot of sort of the history of vitamins and how these were discovered, right? Ah, yeah, yeah. And we didn't know a lot of things. And what's interesting, a lot of these things, and I see a lot of parallels with now with the phytochemicals and the vitamins 100 years ago, is that, yeah, we're kind of starting to discover it. We're kind of starting to learn what they do, but we don't fully understand yet. And then probably takes another 50 years to isolate all the structures of these, right?

Because people knew that if you had a thiamine deficiency in the 1800s, that you get beriberi, right? And that you get pellagra from vitamin B3 deficiencies. They saw that, but it took another 50 years to figure out which compound that was and was responsible for that. And I see a lot of parallels with that now where we think like, well, what do these phytochemicals do? They to be having health effects we don't fully understand them uh but they seem to be important so that's why i also always err on the safe side and i'm a little concerned

when people say like ah these are secondary metabolites uh they're not that important because i think that in 50 years you know i don't want to be the guy who said, ah, berry, berry, it has nothing to do with diet, right? And then 50 years later, everyone accepts it has to do with diet. So that's why also with phytochemicals, maybe sometimes now when people are a little bit skeptical, I'm always like, well, we'll see in 50 years. But it does seem that at least for animals,

it seems to have anti-inflammatory effects. And I think in humans, there's definitely some data now out there too that suggests that things like flavonols and polyphenols have anti-inflammatory effects for us. Yeah, you know, I think that's such an important comment you made. I want to kind of loop back on it because it's something I was thinking about as you were talking. I'm like, you know, when when we refined white flour we refined rice we thought this was a more refined way of eating but then all these serious very

serious often deadly diseases like berry berry pellagra um you know actually started to emerge because of vitamin deficiencies because we took away the whole grain we made it refined grain and then we had to add them back that's's why we call it enriched flour. It's only enriched because we impoverished it by refining it. And that's kind of an amazing thing. And we didn't even know these were important. And the same thing, I think, with these phytochemicals. I don't see these as sort of secondary anything. I think these are critically essential to thriving. And I just sort of finished writing my book, Young Forever, about longevity. And it just was amazing to me that the science of these phytochemicals and how they affect very many of the important pathways that regulate health and disease, particularly longevity.

And they bind to different receptors. They regulate our immune system. They regulate mitochondrial function. They regulate our ability to repair our DNA. And I could go on and on and on. So I think these are medicines, and they are part of our food, and they're probably just as important as vitamins and minerals. And maybe you won't get an acute deficiency if you don't have it, but you will get a chronic disease, and you'll die sooner for sure. I think that's a great way of summarizing it, Mark.

That's my hypothesis, too, about phytochemicals. Yes. Well, I'm glad you said that. I'm really glad to have you on the podcast. Your work is really, really important. You're one of the few out there doing this. I encourage everybody to check out his work. We're going to post all of the papers that we discussed and links to his work on our

show notes. I've learned so much from reading these papers. It just opened my eyes to a whole world that we really haven't thought about. And I think it's going to eventually seep its way into the common zeitgeist, into policy change. And I want to encourage you to keep on doing the work you're doing. Hopefully, you get more funding and get this answer to these really important scientific questions. And I don't know if you have any last thoughts or words for us, but I want to give you the last chance to have something to say about what you're doing and the importance of your work. Yeah, no, I appreciate all the kind words, Mark.

I enjoy the work very much. And I want to say this final piece is that I'm very grateful for the farmers that are doing these things on the ground because i i sometimes jokingly say is is that in our work what we're doing is we're verifying a lot of farmer knowledge what farmers already see right they they say well stefan when i do these grazing practices my forages look better and and i've noticed how healthy my animals look and then i'm just taking those forages into my lab. We're taking the meat or the milk into our lab and we're analyzing that. And I'd say almost always the farmer is right.

And they were like, yes, what you see day in and day out by just observing your wisdom, we see in our science as well. And I think that's so important always is that as a scientist, of course, I have scientific findings, you know, we put them on a pedestal, right? And I think that's very important. But I think we should also encourage and recognize what is wisdom and wisdom amongst the farmers and indigenous populations that have managed these lands well and are seeing these things. So I think that's such an important key part is also. And yeah, I always encourage people to get more connected to their farmer. If you can get some of you, at least, you know, some of your meat, milk, and eggs from your local farmer and become connected to them, learn how the food is grown,

I think that is valuable in so many ways. It's appreciating the food, appreciating the life of the animal that has provided you with this food, and to become really connected with it. And I think you also have a skin in the game, right? If your farmer a couple of miles from you is doing the right thing, is regenerating its ecosystem, it's also nice for you to see, right? Rather than having a slush pit down the street or something like that, right? So I think it's, yeah, it's, even if we don't, the health effects, we don't have all the data right now,

if it's truly healthier, but I think it does have the potential to be beneficial on so many levels. Well, it just makes sense. It's good for the planet. It's good for the animals. It's good for humans. And I think that's the bottom line.

We couldn't hope for more. Thanks so much for doing your work. Keep doing it. Everybody listen to this podcast. If you loved it, share with your friends and family on social media. Leave a comment. What have you learned about your diet and how it's affected you? And subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. And we'll see you next week on The Doctor's Pharmacy. If you like this conversation, I know you'll love my new book, Young Forever. If you pre-order this book now, you'll get access to my discount bundle with deals from all my favorite health and wellness brands. Visit youngforeverbook.com to order my book and get access to these deals.

I hope you're loving this podcast. It's one of my favorite things to do and introduce to you all the experts that I know and I love and that I've learned so much from. And I want to tell you about something else I'm doing, which is called Mark's Picks. It's my weekly newsletter. And in it, I share my favorite stuff from foods to supplements to gadgets

to tools to enhance your health. It's all the cool stuff that I use and that my team uses to optimize and enhance our health. And I'd love you to sign up for the weekly newsletter. I'll only send it to you once a week on Fridays. Nothing else, I promise.

And all you do is go to drhyman.com forward slash pics to sign up. That's drhyman.com forward slash pics, P-I-C-K-S, and sign up for the newsletter and I'll share with you my favorite

stuff that I use to enhance my health and get healthier and better and live younger longer. Hi, everyone. I hope you enjoyed this week's episode. Just a reminder that this podcast is for educational purposes only. This podcast is not a substitute for professional care by a doctor or other qualified medical professional. This podcast is provided on the understanding that it does not constitute medical or other professional advice or services. If you're looking for help in your journey, seek out a qualified medical practitioner. If you're looking for a functional medicine practitioner, you can visit ifm.org and search their find a practitioner database. It's important that you have someone in your corner who's trained,

who's a licensed healthcare practitioner, and can help you make changes, especially when it comes to your health.