The Duran Podcast - Alexey Navalny Dies In Prison

Episode Date: February 16, 2024

Alexey Navalny Dies In Prison ...

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 All right, Alexander, we have some breaking news. We don't know much about the circumstances in and around this breaking news story. But let's discuss it. Alexei Navalny has died in prison, in a Russian prison. He was 47. And the reports are right now, and I stress this right now, the reports are, that he died of a blood clot. This could change with more with time and with more investigation.
Starting point is 00:00:40 But as of this moment that we're recording this video on a Friday afternoon, the cause of death appears to be a blood clot. Look, NATO is saying that they want answers to this question. I've already seen some tweets. they want answers to the circumstances around his death. I'm already seeing tweets from various European government officials saying that Russia is to blame and Putin killed Levani. We're going to get a lot of this now.
Starting point is 00:01:12 You've covered Navalny pretty extensively. What are your thoughts about this? What does this mean going forward? Your reaction. Of course, the first thing to say, when anybody dies, is that this is a tragedy for him and it's a tragedy for his family and you know one has to always remember that i mean this whatever your personal views about navarne i mean this is this is a tragedy for them and um one has to think about those people at this time but you know we are a geopolitical channel we have
Starting point is 00:01:49 to deal with the geopolitical and political implications of this the first thing to say is that Navalny has died and he's died young and there will be questions and, you know, logically there ought to be an autopsy and an investigation. But whatever that investigation produces, even if third parties were to participate in it, as night follows day, the narrative that we will be getting in the West is that he has been murdered by the Russian authorities on Putin's orders. I mean, that is going to be. what they're all going to say. And it's, I personally think unlikely to be true. Why would Putin want to murder Navalny now when he's in prison and a discredited figure in Russia itself? But, you know, that's my opinion. I can't, you know, disprove the fact that Putin murdered him. I don't believe it, but myself, but, you know, I can't disprove it. But the point is that that, That is what people are going to say. The problem the West has, they'll be talking about Navalny.
Starting point is 00:03:00 They'll be talking about Navalny continuously. But having made these claims about Putin, you know, the mass killer and mass murderer, to such an extent already, I doubt that it's going to have very much traction. Because by now, Putin has been bomb-proofed against all of this. I mean, they've made these claims about Putin so often. that ultimately it's not going to damage in politically in Russia, and it's not going to damage in politically in the West. What it does do is that it deprives the West, this death,
Starting point is 00:03:41 however it happened, deprives the West of the one figure who, entirely wrongly, in my opinion, but the one figure that they still imagined might one day take over from Putin, and lead Russia and lead Russia in a pro-Western direction. So in a sense, they will see it as a defeat for themselves, just as they saw the death of Pregoge last summer as a defeat for themselves. Because without Pregojin and without Navalny, of course, two completely different people, there is no one, no one, to change.
Starting point is 00:04:24 challenge Putin who might take Russia in a different direction. There is no one like that left. Well, I mean, to be accurate, the West may have had that perception about Navalny and other opposition figures as well, not only Navalny, but all the opposition figures that they like to promote. They may have that perception from the outside looking in, but inside of Russia. all of these figures, all of these people are polling anywhere between half a percent to maybe 1 percent or 2 percent at best. I mean, I'm being very optimistic here as far as they're polling numbers. I mean, the closest opposition to Putin, which does do very well in elections, is the,
Starting point is 00:05:15 I believe the former communist, what was the Communist Party. They are the number two party in Russia. and they are strong. They're a strong party in Russia with representation. But the death of Navalny most likely was or is related, at least the reports that we're getting is that it's related to the blood clot to a health issue. So I don't want to get into that.
Starting point is 00:05:46 But the timing of Navalny's death, a lot of stuff is going on. And I don't want to get it to conspic. conspiracy theory type of narratives, but, you know, we have to talk about this. You have Avdefka, the collapse of Avdefka. You just had this interview with Tucker Carlson, where I guess you could say, for lack of a better word, that Putin was presented in a favorable light to the Western audience. And you can make that argument. Putin has elections in a month. And there, you know, you can see that the West is scrambling to try and figure out a narrative. for these elections. That's anti-Putton there. They're trying to find figures. The BBC is really
Starting point is 00:06:31 trying hard to find various opposition figures to build up, but no one really resonates with a Western audience. They had this, Dubrovnik, I believe, this lady, and I forgot their names, but they're, they don't stick in the memory, and then they realize this. So what do you make of everything that has happened in the last week, which really has tilted to the benefit of Putin and Russia. Now you're going to have a story, which, as you rightly said in the beginning of the video, is a tragedy for his family and for his loved ones. But it is a story that's going to tilt in the West negatively for Russia and for Putin. It is going to tilt very negatively. I mean, over the next couple of days, we're going to have lots and lots of stories about Navalny.
Starting point is 00:07:18 And the country where perhaps this is going to make the biggest impact, because they've made a big, big issue of him. There is Germany, by the way. Merkel went way out supporting Navalny, very much, by the way, to Putin's ultimate irritation. So it's going to be heavily played up and featured in the German media. But ultimately, as I said, in terms of its political consequences and even its, you know, if you like, media consequences. Well, maybe it will take away some attention from an, of D'EFCA. Maybe it will take away some attention from Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin. But in the fairly short run, it really won't matter because the West has, Western public has been told about Putin being this ruthless dictator who murders
Starting point is 00:08:18 his opponents for so long that this is just another example of this as far as they're concerned. I mean, it's not going to change perceptions of Putin radically in any way. And, you know, the Tucker Carlson interview was important. It shows him, as I said, rational and relaxed and in control. But those who choose to believe that Putin is this murderer would not have been persuaded by, Tucker Carlson that he is not. And those who were impressed by Putin in that interview, I doubt that they're going to allow an event like Navalny's death to worry them too much either.
Starting point is 00:09:04 I mean, you know, that sounds all very brutal and rather cynical, but I think this is the case. What I think it does do, and I come back to what I'm saying, is that ultimately it deprives the West of even a symbolic figure that they can latch on to and say that he's the true opposition to Putin in Russia. Navani was not the true opposition to Putin in Russia. You're absolutely correct. If you're talking about the true opposition to Putin
Starting point is 00:09:30 in Russia, mostly it comes to the Communist Party, possibly the right-wing liberal democratic party, which is not liberal or democratic, but he's not liberal in any conceivable shape or form, but they might you know, become
Starting point is 00:09:46 conceivable. a stronger political force. But Navalny, the only time he ever sort of achieved an impact in an election was when way back in, I think it was 2013, he stood against Sergei Sobjani as mayor of Moscow. and he got on a very low turnout, something like 29% of the vote in Moscow, which is far and away Russia's most liberal city. But even in Moscow, after that one sort of brief moment, when it looked as if he might achieve a breakthrough,
Starting point is 00:10:33 his support has steadily declined. And the reason for that is very simple, because he's come to be seen by more and more Russians. as ultimately aligned with the West. And given the way Russians feel about the West, a political leader who is aligned with the West and who is a liberal and who thinks that what happened or thought, Europe, who thinks that what happened in Russia
Starting point is 00:10:59 in the 1990s was an entirely good thing, he's not going to gain traction amongst most Russians. That is the political reality that most Westerners will always, I can just say one thing about Navalny's death, and I want to make it very clear. I'm not making any claims now. I mean, he is someone who apparently has had a record of health problems. Just say. So I'm not going to... But it's true. It's true. It is factually true. It is not disputed. Yeah. You called him a liberal.
Starting point is 00:11:41 he seems like he became a liberal but he was also in his early days he was very much a national would you describe him as a nationalist I mean there's many videos of of him in the early days where he was very anti-immigration very much so and anti-Muslim I guess you could say anti-immigration I mean this is a very good point
Starting point is 00:12:06 because of course he started the very start of his career he was part of Yabloko, which is Russia's biggest liberal party, everything that suggested that he was a liberal, with all the usual conventional liberal views. And then he became a blogger, making a big issue of corruption matters, except, of course, he didn't actually expose much real corruption in Russia. He raked up various scandals, which when you looked at them in detail,
Starting point is 00:12:39 tended not to be scandals at all and didn't touch the really important people who really mattered. But that's another story. And then he started to take an increasingly nationalist, anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim
Starting point is 00:12:57 line. And there are many views about this. One view is that he sincerely believes these things and that he is someone who really does, you know, have these opinions. They got him, by the way, expelled from Yabloko.
Starting point is 00:13:20 Grigori Yavlinsky, who's the president of the Yabloch party, has absolutely no truck with Navalny at all. He considers him, we considered him to be a nationalist xenophobe, and he felt that this was in no conceivable sense, a proper liberal position. And there are other people in Russian liberal politics who feel the same way. So there's some people who think
Starting point is 00:13:47 that he was sincere about these things. My own opinion actually is slightly different, which is that Navalny took this line because he thought that it was the one way that Russian liberals might win over support for patriotic, working-class Russians by playing up anti-immigrant feeling and that he wanted to somehow reach out to working-class Russians in that sort of way. And of course, what he discovered
Starting point is 00:14:25 is that working-class Russians had little difficulty figuring out that he was really a liberal all along and that all these anti-immigrant positions he was taking were. not really quite as strongly held as he pretended that they were. And I think also going beyond that, I'm not sure that anti-immigrant policies were quite as important for them as Navalny imagined they were, given that the government itself does have fairly strong policies about immigration. So in the end it failed.
Starting point is 00:15:12 and over time he gradually dropped those positions when he saw that they weren't working and drifted instead back towards more conventional liberal politics. So I think myself that it was more an episode in his career rather than a real sign of where his real ideas and positions were. Right. Let me ask you a final question. And I think we do have to explore this line of thought as well. Protests in Moscow, protests in St. Petersburg, do you think something has been activated in some sort of instability started in the two big liberal cities in Russia?
Starting point is 00:16:07 And do you think that the European Union, Germany, NATO, the Biden White House will use this in one form or another to escalate with Russia? Perhaps as a way to push for money to Ukraine, perhaps as a way to push for more weapons to Ukraine, perhaps as a way to push for more sanctions, or something, some sort of mechanism to escalate further with Russia. given the way they're going to position and report about Navalny's death. Absolutely. I mean, I think it is highly likely there will be attempts to organize protests in Moscow and St. Petersburg and perhaps even in other places. And I also think that they're going to use this fully to the extent that they can. But I don't think it's going to work.
Starting point is 00:17:04 I think at the end of the day, if there are protests, they'll be small and the authorities have shown that they have all the means need, that they need to control those protests. So I don't think that's going to make a big dent in Putin's position. That is one. And the second is obviously, as I said, they're going to use it to blacken Putin's name even further. But the problem they said they have is that they've demonized Putin already to such an extreme degree that I just don't really see how adding this one on
Starting point is 00:17:39 is going to add to the totality of what they've been doing for many years now. The one thing it could do, and this isn't to be completely discounted, is if we get a president in the future, say a president of Trump, just a second,
Starting point is 00:17:56 who does want to meet Putin tried to find some way forward to try to repair relations. That president might find that he has, you know, Navalny thrown into his face. What happened to Navalny thrown into his face? They'll say, how can you sit down with a murderer, someone who murders Navalny in the way that he has done?
Starting point is 00:18:20 And it might make any attempt to improve relations with the West even more difficult. So, you know, that's not to be discounted. Yeah, they're already saying that, Jaffe, they've already passed their judgment. They know nothing about what's going on, you already have a collective west leader saying that Pouda did it. Of course.
Starting point is 00:18:39 One final, final question. Yeah, and they will, you know, what, and whatever happens, as if we have an autopsy carried out by, say, doctors from South Africa and India and wherever, and they come up and say that there's absolutely no evidence of any foul play at all. They'll still insist that there is. So, I mean, you know, this is, this is the reality of it, because this has been, prepared for such a long time now. And, you know, I want to make it clear.
Starting point is 00:19:10 I don't know how Navalny died. He has many opponents in Russia, not the fact that people should forget. And, you know, he's got opponents not just within the government, which he does, but also within wider society and within some of the people he's come up against in and what has been a very complex political career. So I'm not making any judgment. about how this came about. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:19:40 I was going to say something, like your thoughts on how, if, because we know that the West is going to use this to damage Putin, I mean, is there the counter argument that can be made with what they're doing to Assange or what Ukraine has done to various journalists or other people that they have had in custody. I mean, we know who we're talking about. But I mean, is, I mean, does this, will the the statements about Putin kill Navalny, this judgment that they've already passed, will it carry the same weight given what we know about what the West has been doing to, to journalists that they've held in custody or that their allies have held in custody?
Starting point is 00:20:37 Well, I mean, absolutely. I mean, we know we know journalists. I mean, we've had, I mean, Gonzalo was killed or died. His father considers that he was killed. Nobody talks about him. In the West, there is so much control that, you know, this isn't probably going to penetrate and break through. But outside the collective West, I mean, they've worked this out now a long time ago. They know all about this. They know exactly what Kulilobudanav gets. up to. They know all about what, you know, the various assassinations that have taken place. They know all about, you know, Assange's case and all of those cases. In the wider world, this is all very well understood. But as I said, in the West, in the collective West, don't expect that alternative narrative to be granted much space and to gain any kind of traction. Okay, we will leave it there. I don't know if you have any other thoughts with this breaking news. Once again, we're reporting this news on Friday afternoon on February 16th, so things may change by this evening or by tomorrow over the weekend. Any other thoughts?
Starting point is 00:21:57 I have to say this again, and I want to repeat this. I don't think Navalny had any political traction in Russia. he did briefly have a certain amount of support in Moscow. But that has whittled away. And the reality about Navalny, which again, Westerners find very difficult to understand, or at least Western critics of Russia, find very difficult to understand, is that the more of Navalny that Russians saw,
Starting point is 00:22:31 the more he's support tended to dwindle, away. He was not actually someone who was able to get a message across to most Russians. They didn't like him and they didn't like his message. And he's
Starting point is 00:22:47 the way he conducted himself, not just on a few occasions, but on many occasions was almost calculated to put people off. This is in terms of Russian politics not as significant
Starting point is 00:23:03 of them. However difficult it is for some people to accept. More significant is going to be the international reaction which is predictable though. I mean, we know what the reaction is going to be though. Yes. Yes. But there will be disappointed.
Starting point is 00:23:21 There will be a sense of frustration and disappointment also. Because the one person that they still staked all their hopes on has now gone. And there is no one now who can take, there's no obvious figure out there who can replace him. I mean, he was the one liberal politician who sort of cut
Starting point is 00:23:43 through briefly among some Russians and in the wider West. Everybody else is just a great blur. All right. We will end it there. The durand. Dotlocals.com. We are on Odyssey, Bichute, Rumble, Telegram, Rock Finn, and Twitter X. And go to the Duran shop, 15% off all t-shirts. Take care.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.