The Duran Podcast - Blinken talks escalation with Iran
Episode Date: July 23, 2024Blinken talks escalation with Iran ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
All right, Alexander, let's talk about the continuing escalation in the Middle East.
We are getting some pretty scary rhetoric from the Biden White House from Anthony Blinken,
specifically when he was speaking at the Aspen Institute events, where he said that Iran's going to get a nuclear weapon in two weeks, one to two weeks, just kind of threw it out there.
And yeah, I was kind of surprised to hear.
that from Blinken. And then, of course, we have the escalation between Israel and Yemen.
Yemen, they sent a drone into Tel Aviv. Israel launched air strikes into Yemen. And now we are getting
reports saying that Yemen is planning a retaliation to the Israeli retaliation. So continuing escalation
in the Middle East, it makes you wonder, what was all of the diplomacy, the eight months
of diplomacy from Blinken and Sullivan.
What was it all for if we continue to head towards
some sort of big conflict in the Middle East?
Well, it was for nothing
because it has achieved absolutely nothing.
It is not won over countries to the side of the United States,
all of the major countries in the Middle East,
including Israel, by the way,
are utterly exasperated with the current government
of the United States. It has not achieved peace in Gaza because there is still fighting going on in
Gaza. Every couple of days, the administration, sometimes Biden himself come out with statements
that a ceasefire is almost about to be agreed, the framework of a ceasefire has been agreed,
and all that remains is a little bit more discussion, a few more negotiations, and it never is
agreed so the fighting in Gaza is continuing. There is still a crisis on Israel's northern border,
Hezbollah and Israel continue to exchange fire, missiles and rockets. There's still not been
an Israeli offensive into Lebanon to defeat Hezbollah. But my impression is that that's only because
the Israeli military itself is not keen on this and they've been pushing back against.
the orders from Netanyahu and the cabinet to do it. And of course, now we have this added crisis,
which is the crisis between Israel and Yemen. Louthis launched drone attacks on Tel Aviv,
and a drone got through and killed a civilian apparently in Tel Aviv. And the Israelis in response
have launched a big air strike on Yemen, which is something that we always knew they could do.
anywhere they've now done it and the Houthis are saying that there will be more retaliation.
So a situation where nothing, the diplomacy, has been completely unsuccessful.
And Netanyahu is still Prime Minister of Israel and he no looks, I would say, more secure in that position than he has been at any time since the Christ.
began following Hamas's attack on Israel on the 7th of October. Because he's seeing off Joe Biden.
Joe Biden is stepping down. It's been absolutely clear for some weeks now that Biden has been
taught, at least the Biden team, have been trying to find some means to leverage Netanyahu out of
office. Chuck Schumer, it almost spoke about that. So Netanyahu, he said,
Yaku has seen Biden off.
He is in full control of his government.
His allies, Smartrich and Ben-Gvier, is still there, and they're still supporting him.
He's still making the key decisions in Israel.
He's just authorized this air strike on Yemen.
He's about to visit the United States and will have a.
triumphant trip to Congress, where he's going to address the two houses of Congress,
highlighting the continuing strength of support for Israel in Congress.
And with Netanyahu, visibly now in control of the situation,
you can see why the members of this enfeebled, disorganized and chaotic administration
in Washington are trying to keep up with events and are now starting to sing Netanyahu's tunes about Iran
and they're now talking as Blinkin is about Iran being within one or two weeks of having a sufficient
stockpile of enriched uranium to create nuclear bomb. So this is where we are.
The Biden administration has completely failed in its diplomacy in the Middle East.
Netanyahu has basically won.
Yeah, very interesting, huh?
They wanted to leverage out Netanyahu and Netanyahu stays.
Biden goes.
Things were chaotic with Biden, with the Biden team's diplomacy in the Middle East.
No doubt about it.
with the situation in
the United States right now
with Biden and Kamala Harris
and all of this uncertainty and instability
over the next four months
do things spiral out of control
because
you just don't have anybody
in the White House
you don't know you don't know what's going on
do things get really chaotic now
yes I think they could get very chaotic
now for one thing
if the next
if the candidate
for the Democratic Party going into the election in November
is indeed going to be Kamala Harris
then Netanyahu who as I said is likely to remain
Prime Minister of Israel for the foreseeable future
will want Trump to win
because Netanyahu's relations with Trump
have always been good
his relations with JD Vance have been good.
his relations with J.D. Vance have been good. He will be looking forward to an administration in Washington, a Republican administration in Washington that is made up with his friends. He will not see Kamala Harris, who is probably going to be under even greater pressure in some respects from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who want a ceasefire.
and a change of policy over Israel.
He's not going to want her as the president.
So he's not going to want to exercise much in the way of restraint.
And he's not going to want to do anything over the next couple of months
that's going to support or assist Kamala Harris going forward into the November election.
So that points to Netanyahu probably from now,
on looking towards escalation. And he is already escalating. He's escalated with this big
airstrike against Yemen. And of course, we're now going to see a lot more rhetoric cranking up
about Iran again. And as I said, Blinken is starting to reflect that. So this is where we are.
the Biden White House made its foundational error about how to handle the situation in the Middle East
in the week directly following the Hamas attack on Israel.
When Biden went to Israel, gave Netanyahu a blank check, and that in effect gave Netanyahu the initiative.
which is kept ever since with the administration increasingly trying to call that check back,
but finding that they lack the political strength and unity to do so.
So the result is Netanyahu is now in full control,
and he's going to press forward,
and he's going to press forward in the confident expectation that his friends will soon be back in power in Washington,
and that he has absolutely no reason to help Kamala Harris become president of the United States.
So, you know, brace yourself for continued escalation in the Middle East.
Yeah, there are reports that Netanyahu is trying to work things out with Trump.
They had a falling out.
Yes.
Trump and Netanyahu, they got along very well when Trump was president.
They had a falling out after 2020.
but now there are reports that Netanyahu is reaching out to Trump, of course,
with the understanding that Trump is going to be the president of the United States in January
2025.
What do you think was behind the Blinken statement at the Aspen Institute?
Is this another WMD type of moment?
Is he trying to distract away from everything that's happening at the White House
by creating a WMD moment?
What was that about?
I think it's lots of different things.
Firstly, I think it is a WMD moment.
I mean, I'm not saying that Iran doesn't have the ability to, you know, acquire all this enriched uranium.
It probably does.
But as even Blinken admitted, there's no evidence that the Iranians are for the moment working towards acquiring a nuclear bomb.
And for the moment, I don't see that it serves their interests to do that either.
So in that respect, it is a WMD moment.
But what I think it is is an attempt to take away attention from Israel and from Netanyahu,
who is clearly now, as I said, overall in control.
And to shift it back to Iran.
Iran has just had an election.
It's elected a new president.
Many people thought this president would be a reformist.
However, he's apparently moving forward with the strategic party.
partnership with Russia, which is about to be concluded apparently in a few weeks. It doesn't look
as if Iran is changing his policies in any fundamental or important way. And I think that given that
that that is so, and given the fact that, as I said, Netanyahu is looking very entrenched
at the moment in Israel. I think that Blinken is basically, as he often does, he's trimming
his sails to the prevailing wind, which is towards more escalation, further escalation.
Bear of mind, Blinken is anyway, a neocon himself. So he's probably not altogether averse
to a conflict with Iran of some form. So this is what I think this is. It is a WMD moment.
I think that it does increase the high likelihood that we're going to see a strike on Iran
within the next few weeks or months.
What I would say, by the way, about Netanyahu and Trump,
is that I am sure that Netanyahu believes that when Trump is installed in the White House,
and I'm sure that Netanyahu believes that in November, Trump will be the winner of the election.
he expects that he's going to have a Republican administration that is going to be fully supportive of him.
He might actually be disappointed in that in the sense that I get the impression that the new team that's emerging on the Republican side are hard-nosed American realists.
And obviously they do support Israel.
But I think they're much more tough-minded about foreign policy and far less sentimental than previous American governments have been.
And they will probably not want to be drawn into open-ended commitments in the Middle East.
When he was president, Trump avoided them.
He avoided getting involved into conflicts in the Middle East.
He avoided getting involved into conflicts in Syria and avoided out-and-out-conflicts.
confrontation with Iran. Just say.
Final question. What about, yeah, what about Iran? I mean, okay, you mentioned he avoided Iran,
but we seem to be drifting towards some sort of action being taken against Iran, some sort of
strike, some sort of conflict. If you go by the words from the Biden White House, is this something
that Trump's realist team of foreign policy guys, is this what they're going to do?
They're going to go after Iran?
No, they're not.
I think, as I say, I think that what they want is peace and quiet in the Middle East,
peace and quiet wherever they can,
so that they can stabilize the economy and focus on sorting out the major challenge,
which is China, where I think, by the way, that they will want to pursue negotiations.
I don't think they will want immediate direct confrontation with China over Taiwan or anything like that.
But the danger is not what happens after November or after January.
It's what happens whilst the present team remains in office.
Because you have a very, very weak administration now.
A president who has lost all authority and all credibility and who is the labest of lame ducks.
And you have a Netanyahu who is unconstrained.
and this is his moment he may calculate to do change the configuration of events in the Middle East
by launching strikes on Iran, launching strikes against the Houthis, doing all of those kind of things
in order to put an imprint on the situation and present the Trump administration when it comes in,
in January, with a kind of fet accompli. So I think this is going to be,
Netanyahu's instinct, and he's coming to Washington on Wednesday, and he'll be talking with all his friends there,
and he'll be trying to make sure that if he does move forward in that way, that he has the necessary backing in Washington.
All right, we will end the video there.
The durand.com.
We are on Rumble Odyssey, bitch, shoot, telegram, rock fin, and Twitter X, and go to the Duran shop.
Pick up some limited edition merch.
You will find a link in the description box down below.
Take care.
