The Duran Podcast - EU war economy utopia, Eurobonds and direct taxes
Episode Date: February 28, 2024EU war economy utopia, Eurobonds and direct taxes ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
All right, Alexander, let's talk about the European Union's push towards a war economy,
or is it a push towards more centralization of power?
Is that what this is really all about?
What are your thoughts?
Because we are getting a stream of articles and statements connected to how the European Union needs.
to ramp up the manufacturing of weapons and needs to invest in weapons manufacturing.
It needs to increase their military budgets and their military spending.
And all of this has to be done from a European, from an EU level.
It all has to be coordinated from the offices in Brussels.
What are your thoughts?
Well, I should say straight away that there's been a brilliant article about this by Tom
long ago. And he points out that really all this talk about rearmament serves a completely different
agenda because rearmament within the EU is industrially, for all practical purposes, impossible.
EU industries are in decline. The manufacturing capacity to convert, you know, to transform the EU
into a military superpower does not exist if the EU got all together and appointed the right planners
and did a job of pulling together all the universities to churn out STEM graduates and things of that
kind. Perhaps in 20 years, you know, with a complete change of industrial policy, they might get
themselves to the kind of position where the United States, you know, was.
30 years ago in a situation where they could start producing convincing amount of weapons.
But that's not going to happen and nobody really expects it to happen.
But talking about this all the time, harping upon the Russian threat, saying that there has to be
this big increase in military production.
and also saying that it has to be centrally coordinated from Brussels by the EU
and that this is another project that the EU should run.
As Tom Longo correctly says, it looks like another device to start to launch Eurobonds.
Now, Eurobonds are bonds, loans, in effect, issued by the European Commission.
The European Commission floats bonds to raise money on the financial markets to carry out its various projects.
That's what governments do.
The European Commission is not a government.
It is not a government of a sovereign state.
It is not backed by a Treasury Department.
It doesn't have direct taxation powers.
It depends entirely on the member states to provide tax funding in order for the European Commission to be able to do its work.
And the European Commission has always been extremely dissatisfied with this.
They've got the single currency, the euro.
They've got the central currency.
Bank, the European Central Bank, in order to complete the project of European economic integration, as they call it, economic unification.
Well, in order to make themselves a real government, a European government, they need to be able to float bonds.
And if they could float bonds, sooner or later, they will come along and say, in order to serve them.
in order to service those bonds.
We need to have the same power that all governments have.
We need to be able to raise tax revenue.
And that means that we need to be empowered
to impose direct taxes on EU citizens.
So they've been yearning to do that.
Now, the original treaties, the master of,
Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty expressly prohibited the European Commission from doing that.
But they've been trying to find ways round and they found a way during the pandemic.
They said we need to do this during the pandemic.
Angela Merkel agreed they floated bonds during the pandemic.
It was supposed to be a one-off emergency measure.
discussed at the time that one off emergency measures if you're talking about the european commission
never exist they will treat that as a precedent tom long ago points out that this bond has been
for anybody unwise enough to buy it an absolute catastrophe it doesn't train very well people that
people that like it but they are now using it as a precedent and they're saying look we did that
during the pandemic, now we have to do it on a much bigger scale so that Europe can rearm and face down
this terrifying supposed threat from the Russians. So what this is all about, what this tells you
is that the European Union, the Commission, has a vested interest in keeping the war in Ukraine going
and in hyping up the Russian threat,
because from their point of view,
it accelerates the process of European centralization
of the conversion of the European Union
into a state in which the Commission acts as the government,
which has been, to be absolutely clear,
the project all along.
Right, so let me see if I've got this right.
The European Union wants to keep the war going.
They want to annihilate Ukraine, continue the suffering and the casualties in Ukraine so that eventually they can tax Europeans.
Yes.
In a word, exactly right.
Okay.
Germany has been resistant towards Eurobite.
as you mentioned Angela Merkel, she gave her blessing, but one off only.
So what does Germany say or do about this?
And what do people in the European Union do about this?
I mean, I'm in the European Union.
I don't want to be taxed by the EU.
Another tax?
I mean, does your country's tax go away?
Or is this going to be very much like the U.S. system where you have a state and a federal?
Right. Well, I mean, they wanted to be, in effect, the US system, but a degenerated version of the US system. Because remember, the European Commission is not elected. There's no elections to vote for the European president. And it's difficult to imagine how that could ever realistically happen. I mean, that's the first thing to say. But let's go first to Germany.
Germany
Germany has resisted
but
Germany is in the grip
of a hysteria at the moment
and of course
within the German government
there are political
figures
Habek
Annalina Bebork
fervidly
anti-Russian, passionately
pro-EU
they would back this thing
so German
resistance is no longer as solid as it once was.
The one way, perhaps, to persuade more Germans to accept this,
is to, you know, conjure up the specter of Russia.
So you can see why they're playing it up relentlessly there.
And I think there would still be opposition.
And there might eventually be a big backlash.
But for the moment, they got their wind in their cells.
They feel that the mood in Germany is probably more conducive to doing this thing
than it has ever been at any point since the euro was first created.
So that's the first thing to say.
Now, what do you as a EU citizen?
What rights do you have?
How can you oppose this thing?
The answer is, of course, you can't because this is not an institution, the EU, that is susceptible to elections.
The EU Commission itself, as we've said many times, is unelected.
And we have seen repeatedly that EU governments can come along.
They can protest.
They can complain.
Orban did it over the 55 billion euro package for Ukraine.
They get threatened.
They have, you know, pressures exerted on them.
There was all that blackmail exerted on Orban a few weeks ago,
you know, that they would make life impossible for Hungarian citizens,
all that kind of thing.
We've seen how in Poland, Donald Tusk,
how aggressive he's been against the Law and Justice Party,
on behalf of the EU,
now that he's come back to power.
To all practical purposes,
there is virtually nothing
that most EU citizens can do about this.
Only in two states,
perhaps might such resistance,
math count,
the most important obviously is Germany,
which is still around 40% of the EU's GDP.
The second is France.
but France has an enthusiastic, a passionate, true believer in the EU project as its president,
Emmanuel Macron.
He might be bitterly unpopular, but his solution to every problem is more Europe, as he says.
And if you're looking to the next election in France, it's not going to happen before 2027,
which is three years away.
So they've got the time, they've got the space, electoral obstacles don't really stand in their way, and they're going to push hard to do it.
They may come up against some resistance from Germany, but don't count on it this time.
Yeah, and they've got the macadone replacement already picked out.
So they've got that set up as well.
And now everyone understands why the European Union decided to give 50,
what was so important for them to give 54 billion to Project Ukraine and to Project
Ukraine and why it is so critical for them to keep the war going.
They have to keep the war going.
They have to keep the specter of Russia and Putin ramped up because we're talking about
a lot of money.
A taxation without representation.
Yeah.
And a lot of money for all of these technocrats and bureaucrats to make.
Absolutely.
From each member state, all of them are going to win out from this.
You're absolutely correct.
I think Tom Longer, by the way, we should thank you for writing such a clear article about this point.
But can I just also quickly say that, you know, we've been talking about this for a very, very long time.
The EU Commission has always been on the project to get Eurobile.
established. This has always been their load start, ever since specifically the 2008 financial crisis.
And for them, Eurobonds is the gateway to everything else.
And if they have to crash the European economies to do it, if they have to sacrifice Ukraine,
These people who, you know, are pretty fervid about all of this,
their real passionate believers in this whole enterprise,
they will probably say to themselves,
these are sacrifices worth making
because the project to create this great new Europe
who's such a great and wonderful one
that, you know, a few bumps in the road like that,
a shattered Ukraine, a massive economic recession in Europe,
de-industrialisation. Well, these are just bumps in the road to the great new beginning,
which will be the EU state that we are intent on creating. So they probably don't think of
themselves as cynics in the way that they appear to be to you and me. Their calculations may be
cynical, but in their own self-conception, they're idealists and visionaries, which is, by the way,
true have everyone, all revolutionaries who embrace utopian revolutionary projects.
Yeah, they're religious fanatics. They believe in the cause. Yeah, absolutely. One final observation.
It's interesting that this is happening with regards to the war and military and ramping up military production.
Because in a way, can you make the claim that this kind of kills two birds with one stone in that they get to Eurobonds, they get to the taxation part?
But they also open the door to this EU army that they've been trying to create as well, which is not an army.
I think this is now clear that this is not going to be an army to replace NATO.
I think this has been understood by all of these officials now.
But this will be more of like a National Guard, which I imagine will be an EU army turned inwards, while NATO will be the outward-focused army.
I mean, is that a safe, is that a correct assumption to make?
That is an absolutely correct assumption.
That's exactly what this is all about.
So, you know, you create, you know, you're a government, you have an army, which is, as you rightly say, more about internal security than anything else.
You can move, shuffle this army around Europe if you need to.
And, of course, if you have an army, you also have, you know, the usual security in intelligence agencies the states must have.
And you see you already have all kinds of policies and legislation about controlling information.
The EU is, let me say it straightforwardly, a pioneer in this kind of thing.
I mean, they're right there at the cutting edge of it.
And you could see, and of course, given, and what has to say this,
the way in which this project is being conducted without consent, and I'm public consent,
And I'm speaking my words very carefully here.
You could see why they would need all of those things.
Yeah, the EU citizens.
I would like to think that the EU citizens would not accept such things,
more taxation, stuff like that.
But I think the past has shown us that the EU citizens will accept all of this.
That's just my hunch.
Yes.
I would be surprised.
I would just, since we brought up Tom Long ago,
I would just quickly say that he also argues that they have to do this anyway,
because with a very high interest rate,
it is very difficult to keep the whole board on the road anyway,
because funding is becoming tighter for the EU financial system,
for EU banks and all of that, I don't think.
And that acts as an additional spur.
I know that he's right.
But I would say being somebody who's lived with the EU,
and as you are, that the key driver behind all of this is ideological.
It always has been right from the very first day.
Yeah, well, we'll see if this plan works.
You know, I don't know.
We'll see.
Well, it will work.
It will work in the same way that the parasite,
which ultimately kills the host,
gorges itself for a very, very long time
because that is what is happening.
That is how it's turning out.
The EU is increasingly the parasite
that is killing the host.
Trouble is the host,
as is often the case,
has no real response to this.
Yeah.
And it doesn't even know that this is happening.
No.
Most people don't understand this at all.
They don't really,
they don't really, because all this is very arcane and complicated and, you know, what are euro bond?
Most people ask them what are euro bonds?
They won't know.
And they won't understand.
Or Putin bad.
Are you a Putin stooge?
Exactly.
Well, that's the thing.
That's a much easier thing to get across.
But explaining to people what is the danger from Eurobonds, that is much more difficult.
That is much, much harder.
All right.
We will end it there.
the durand.locals.com. We are on rumble odyssey, bitch shoot, telegram, rockfin, and
Twitter X and go to the durand shop. Fifty percent off. All t-shirts. Take care.
