The Duran Podcast - US POLITICS & POLICY, post Trump win w/ Mel K (Live)
Episode Date: November 7, 2024US POLITICS & POLICY, post Trump win w/ Mel K (Live) ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
All right. We are live with Alexander Mercuris, and we are so very happy and honored to have with us the first time on the Duran.
Mel Kay from the Mel Kaye show. Thank you for joining us on the Duran. How are you doing today? How are you feeling?
And also tell everybody that is watching us on all of our channels, where is the best place to find you and also talk a little bit.
about your book as well.
Oh, okay, well, that's great.
Thank you so much for having me.
I'm a big fan of the show,
and I'm really excited to be here.
I am found at the emailkyshow.com
and our main hub every night,
we put up a new show on Rumble
and wherever free speech is still allowed.
And I recently put out a book called Americans Anonymous,
restoring power to the people, one citizen at a time,
because it's time for America to admit
that we have a problem and in fact that we are the problem and that we are also the solution.
So that's where I'm headed.
I'm very excited about the win by Donald Trump on multiple levels.
But the work begins now.
I don't feel that Trump won.
I feel we the people won.
And now we the people have to do the heavy lifting and not stop the momentum that got us here.
Yeah, absolutely agree.
That's what we're going to talk about in this last.
So I will have all the links to the Melkay show and to the book and everything as a
in comment when the live stream is over.
A quick hello to everyone that is watching us on Odyssey, on Rockfin.
Hello to everyone on Rumble and on YouTube.
And of course, a big shout out to our community on the durand.com.
And always a big thank you to all our moderators.
Thank you so much to our moderators, Zareel, Brett Peter.
And everyone else, that is helping to moderate this live stream.
Alexander, Mel Kay, let's talk about the elections.
What happens next, Alexander?
Well, absolutely.
Can I just say, first of all, by the way, welcome to the Duran Pelke.
It is a joy to have you first time, and I'm sure we'll be having you many times from this point on.
obviously a momentous days in the United States, momentous days in the world, because the United States is still so pivotally important.
In fact, as important in my opinion as it's ever been in terms of directing, changing the international atmosphere, the geopolitical atmosphere, the cultural, everything is going to change if the United States changes.
And I was very, very interested that you use those words, we the people, because of course,
those are the first words of the US Constitution. It always amazes me that people, especially
outside the United States, overlook those words there at the beginning of the US Constitution.
Because that, in my opinion, programs the Constitution, which is at the foundation of the United
States, because people always say that the United States is an oligarchy or the plutocracy or things
of that kind. But democracy is the state of power where the people exercise power and the
Constitution says that we the people, the first words, very first words in the Constitution.
And I would argue that those words actually programmed the United States very intentionally
by people who knew exactly what they were doing to democracy. And democracy in the United States
has been eroding and eroding a lot in the last few years.
We've seen restrictions on speech.
We've seen attempted control.
We've seen the politicisation and weaponisation of the legal system.
And not just against one individual, by the way.
I think there is a misunderstanding.
It's been very, very much more widespread than the attacks on one particular person.
And we've seen all of this happen in all sorts of places.
in the United States, in all sorts of spheres of life in the United States.
And it all had done in a very, very, I would say sinister way as well.
And I agree.
I think this is a watershed election because the American people who are, as I said,
living in a society which is hardwired to go in a certain direction,
finally said enough.
We stop.
We can't accept this any more.
and you can see from the reaction in the United States
amongst those people who were taking us in that direction
of how angry and disappointed and frustrated they are.
And the things they've been saying about the American people, by the way,
in the media have been just incredible.
I mean, insult after insult, again, ignoring the fact
about what democracy is supposed to be
in a way which strongly suggests to me at least
that these people actually don't believe in democracy.
Just saying, I mean, if you're talking about the sovereign people
in that kind of way, then clearly you don't really get democracy.
But anyway, you have so much to tell us, Mel Kane.
You're going to say that this is the start.
This is where we begin.
So tell us what needs to happen.
Maybe it's a big question, but let's start with that,
because you put it that way.
I agree.
I agree.
It isn't just one person, a man of 81,
very vital, energetic, exuberant, intellectually, active man of 81.
But he is, you know, on the late side of 80, let's say.
So it can't just be down to him.
What do we need to do?
What needs to happen now?
And how's it going to happen?
And what are the chances of pushing forward?
Well, you know, I love what you said,
because first and foremost, it has been Trump, who said many times to this nation,
they're not after me, they're after you and I'm in the way, where I believe that it's bigger than
that. I don't think they're after America. I think they're after the world and America is in the
way. And when I say that, I mean because our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, even our just
our founding and how we've gotten this far is a threat to who I believe is the dangerous,
I call them the parent company, but a global public-private partnership of
so-called stakeholders that because we have been distracted and manipulated and propagandized and
the color revolution, I believe America has been living through since 2016,
orchestrated by the same people that do it all over the world,
the American people right now are so sliced into every single thing you can imagine
so that we can't unite long enough to see that there is a real problem here and it's not
each other. And it is not, you know, your neighbor or the person on the other so-called side.
Frankly, I don't believe that there's a left and right Republican or Democrat Party at all.
I believe that we're being fed the illusion of both, but that they do not exist at this point.
And I would pinpoint two things that have happened over the last several decades, first being
the fraud that I believe is the United Nations and their goals for the world coming to fruition,
especially when you look at the writings of Brasinski and Kissinger
and Rockefeller and the Crown
and many people that were involved in the post-World War II world.
And I think that for me, you know,
I have Americans Anonymous out,
which I believe is a recovery book for American citizens
because in our country, I believe that we have a situation
where we are in fact as sick as our secrets.
And our secrets here in America,
I believe the American people deserve,
to know the truth about a lot of our history that has been
basically written by those that have slowly but surely eroded the Constitution
and the Bill of Rights by design.
The first coup, I believe, in America,
you can call the Federal Reserve one,
but really was the murder of JFK in front of the whole world.
Then those same people, I believe,
putting themselves in the commission to check out what really happened to JFK.
And then everyone going along with a,
Warren report that the whole world knows by this point is totally fraudulent. And from that point on,
you have to look at America and realize that we've barely had one cover up after another cover
up inside the intel community and the powers that be that don't benefit the United States.
Frankly, they put a lot of things out there and say they hide them from the people for reasons
of national security when what we're learning and what I've learned is reasons of national
security redactions usually mean our government committed a crime and they don't want to be held
accountable. So the American people for far too long, starting in 1963, have been deceived on a
massive scale by the people that are running this country, especially, you know, the CIA,
FBI, all the people that have known the truth, not just about JFK, but RFK and MLK and whatever has
gone on since all the way through, you know, 9-11 and Las Vegas and Epstein and all these endless wars
against a tactic known as terror that has never even been defined.
The second thing that happened to America,
the most unconstitutional thing, in my opinion, is the Patriot Act.
And what happened after the Patriot Act is, which was written before 9-11,
and in tandem with the very, I believe, nefarious and failed project for a new American century,
militarization plan for the world,
while we weren't paying attention to what China and everyone else was doing,
they went one direction, which is the one we should have gone,
which is building up ports and transportation hubs and all that,
all over Africa and South America and Europe.
We should have countered China's Belt and Road initiative,
but we didn't.
We militarize the world, and when you look at it,
and you realize all the trillions of dollars that have disappeared from the Pentagon,
we don't even know how far the black ops go.
This agency, I think, needs to be torn apart and audited U.S.AID,
National Endowment for Democracy,
all these things went all over the world
and facilitating color revolutions and all that
without the American people even realizing,
A, that it was happening,
B, that we were being lied to to support it,
and C, that it's our money and in our name.
And I think over the last three and a half years, four years,
most people have, whether it's because of the pandemic
or because of people noticing finally
that the media was really an intelligence operation propagandizing them, or how much Hollywood
hates this country and presenting it, or the very ridiculous removing Joe Biden and putting in
Kamala Harris as if that was normal. So they've just gone with, it's like the Yuri Besmanoff
interview from the 80s. They've gone through the whole thing. And like I keep saying, the parent
company, the public private, global public private partnership stakeholders have never
been so close to their one world top-down totalitarian technocracy. And frankly, they've never been so far.
And two days ago, I think they got their death blow. And I couldn't be happier. But that requires
all the people of all of our nations to be honest about how we got here. And that it was our lack of
participation, whether we were programmed and propagandized, distracted by media and television
and endless false flags, whatever it was, it's still up to us to change our country. And we're
countries, because at the end of the day, the small group of politicians or oligarch billionaires
that run America are a very small group if the people can organize to make sure that, you know,
I think it was Madison that said when the people feel the government, it's tyranny.
When the government fears the people, it's liberty.
And we have to start realizing that they only have their jobs because of us.
And if we decide that they shouldn't have their jobs, we need to act like it, or at least act like
oversight and not wait for the 10 by 10 vassal state and the district.
to Columbia to clean up itself.
Mel, you've made some extremely important points.
Let's start, first of all, with the point about division,
about the American people being divided amongst each other,
because this has happened to an extent that I have never known at any time.
And by the way, I should say that this is a complete repudiation
of the original purposes of the civil rights movement of the 1960s,
which I am old enough to remember the point about the civil rights movement,
was that it was all about bringing the American people, all of them together,
not separating them from each other.
But now we see separation everywhere, or at least attempts to achieve separation everywhere.
And one of the most extraordinary things about the media coverage of the last couple of days,
two days since the election, is that there is a huge lamentation that that isn't working
that people of different communities are actually combining.
and voting together to defend their democracy and to repudiate all of these things that are going on.
And, you know, you get incredibly angry people saying, you know, why don't they understand that they need to be a part that, you know, it's all got to be, you know, it's just panics and black people and men and women.
They're not really understanding that they have to do all of these things and behave in this kind of way.
So actually, I think that's a massively hopeful and good fact.
about what's just happened, that it is the end,
or the beginning of the end, of that kind of politics.
People right across the United States are discovering, again,
that they have more in common with each other,
that they're ultimately Americans,
and that they're coming together as Americans
to defend their politics and their way of life.
So I just wanted to say that.
The other thing is about the security state,
the national security state,
which emerged out of the Second World War and the Cold War.
And you can see why.
I mean, you can understand why.
But it is important to say, again, how alien to the American system that is.
If you know anything about American history, if you know, go back to the 1920s, for example, people like Henry Simpson, who was Secretary of War at that time, he actually shut down the Navy's department, which was breaking codes and doing all kinds of things.
because he said that gentlemen don't read each other's mail.
It sounds incredibly idealistic today, but that was what he said.
And the point was that was a Republican conception
because the idea of a national security state is essentially a secret state.
And a secret state is an unaccountable state.
And an unaccountable state is incompatible with democracy.
And what you also discover,
and you know that very well if you live in Europe,
is that all of these various secret states eventually get together
and start talking to each other and start coming up with all sorts of ideas
and exchange information and do all sorts of things in ways that none of us know.
So that is also what has been happening in the United States to an increasing degree
and extent over the last 50, 60, 70 years.
And look again of what the most, the most.
major case, the biggest of the case is that they brought it back against Donald Trump,
all about classified documents, the fact that he had information in his possession, which they
decided was secret, and which the president of the United States, no less, shouldn't keep
with him when he leaves office. I mean, that kind of, that kind of, that kind of thing. So an awful
lot of that is going on. But, all right, we have a president who does seem to be a lot more open to
these things. He seems to have some understanding of this. He also, and I think this is one of the
major reasons of his success, I'm sorry, I'm talking a lot, but I just wanted to just say this.
One of the reasons, and I've said this already, one of the reasons why he has been so successful
is because he goes out, he talks to Americans, and he gives the impression of actually liking
Americans. He's able to relate and talk to Americans and listen to them. And of course, you look at
the others, all of these, his opponents, the vice president. And I don't get the impression that
she likes meeting Americans like that at all, which is extraordinary. And again, in a system
that is supposed to be a democracy. So anyway, we have that kind of a person. We have a president
who is open to those things. We seem to have a vice president as well, who thinks a little bit
in that way, though I hope a lot in that way, actually. But what exactly do we have to do?
Rather, when I say we, I'm of course not an American.
I am an outsider.
But I completely agree that what goes on in the US is vitally important and important to the world.
But what do Americans have to do?
They've broken through.
They have defeated this complex that we've seen.
They've got someone that they want in the White House.
How do they take this revolution forward?
Well, first and foremost, we have to realize that the vassal state of the District of Columbia is not our biggest problem.
Our biggest problem individually is in our backyard because, like you said, post-World War II, there was an infiltration and a subversion of many of our institutions, not just throughout America, but locally as well.
In our states, in our counties, you know, when they started the infiltration, even if you go back to Operation Paperclip, but certainly that was one of many.
It really did start in local school boards, in local judges, in local, you know, they didn't, as much as what was going on in D.C., and I have a whole idea of many things that can be done there.
But if the American people continue to sit out their own destiny and think other people that they don't know are going to be, you know, making life where they live, their sphere of influence, their backyard, decisions for them without.
them participating and just picking a fake side R or D, then nothing's going to change.
What needs to change is the American people need to redefine their relationship individually
with their government and their fellow citizens and what their responsibility is.
You know, when Ben Franklin said you have a constitutional republic, if you can keep it,
he meant literally if you can keep it.
And that meant continuing down the path of getting together locally, discussing
things. The people should be the oversight for the taxpayer dollars that disappear. The people should be
the oversight for who's getting the local no-bid contracts. The people should be the oversight for the
surveillance state that has been installed in every nook and cranny of America and getting rid of it.
You know, there's just a lot that people can do on the local level, but I believe also, and this is
really laid out in my book, that we have been under a concerted and a very serious, like you said,
in the farest effort to make.
us feel that we are helpless, that we can do nothing as individual citizens, that we don't know
enough, the technocrats and the experts, you know, are, listen to them. Well, after COVID, thank God,
hopefully that fallacy is gone. But at the same time, we need to be the oversight of our own domain,
our own land, our own peace of America. We have to take what's happening here personally and not
be distracted by reality TV and fake 24-hour news nonsense and these, you know, debates that are all
based on nothing. And frankly, I think that that was the biggest change and probably the best
direction for the future is that mainstream media, which has been totally corrupt, but was
tripled down on its corruption when Barack Obama turned around the Smith-Munt Act with the
Smith-Munt Modernization Act and made it legal for the news to propagandize us. And they've gone
full seam ahead since, and I do believe that they have completely destroyed themselves and any
credibility they had left, which is great, because I don't believe that MSNBC or CNN or even
Disney ABC, again, I believe they work for the public-private partnership that runs America,
like they're a parent company, and that we, the people are just lucky to live here, first and
and foremost. Second, I think people have to realize that, like I said, a lot of our history isn't
true. And it's not, it has been fed to us since, you know, George H.W. Bush walked on the floor of the
UN and said, we're going to have a new world order run by the UN. I think people have to understand
he meant it, you know, and that both Bushes, Clinton, Obama, Biden have all been in on it.
So we haven't really had, like I said, since the murder of JFK, a real representative government
that is working for us. And at this point, if you ask me, I believe that the intelligence
blob that came out of the Patriot Act, that would be DHS, DNI, TSA, all of that, was used to be weaponized,
not against Donald Trump, but against any opposition to the long game plan of, say, Agenda 21,
Agenda 2030, which of course, Barack Obama, without the consent of the governed or even
explaining that it was a post-nation state plan signed us onto in 2015.
And what I was worried about is a lot of Americans, while we were saying,
seeing all the pomp and circumstance of the wag the dog Kamala campaign and the wag the dog honestly
Biden entire regime time in office what they weren't seeing was that Barack Obama had signed us
onto something that would fundamentally transform the nation out of being the United States of
America and more into being a globalist controlled now that they have the technology to actually
pull it off, communist slash socialist entity run by the 0.001% of stakeholders, you know,
that go to Davos and Bilderberg and cop conferences. And those guys don't care about the nation states.
They really, they just as Kissinger laid out, they care about regional control like at the EU.
And I believe that if they were going to go forward, Harris Biden had put out in September
for 2023, a renewed commitment to achieving agenda 2030 by 2030, and that they were all in on that,
and then delineated 17 goals and about $3 trillion of U.S. taxpayer money to all of the entities that are
part of the, you know, the octopus of global control, they call it, at the UN and all of its
agencies and the people that run it, the banking cartel above them.
So I think that all the plans were laid.
Trump comes in in 2016 and starts dismantling that.
He takes us out of UNESCO, out of the World Health Organization,
out of the Paris Climate Accords, asking NATO,
what's the point and what are we doing and how are we doing this?
And all this stuff.
Well, then the panic set in and the parent company had a meeting out there.
I believe Larry Fink to be the most powerful person in America right now,
but sadly the most powerful person in many countries
because of his standing at the top of the World Economic Forum
and his close relationship with the C.E.
who was also at the top of the World Economic Forum and the UN.
He had a meeting shortly before COVID.
Trump's dismantling this globalist thing.
And he basically told all the bankers and billionaires that he sits on the board of the parent company with that they would have to go direct to the people.
And what did we see?
COVID came six months later.
And direct to the people, in my opinion, meant banking and the multinational corporation, public private partnership,
skipping the governments and going directly to the people.
And Larry Fink made a whole speech about controlling the behavior
and they're not going fast enough.
And what he meant was they're not going fast enough to this, you know,
to them, utopian world government,
but to me, dystopian, you know, anti-human, anti-freedom future
that they have decided, because they're the stakeholders somehow,
they get to plan.
And honestly, they saw it more in Europe first,
But then you see through a lot of the executive orders that Biden put in,
a lot of the infrastructure to make the digital public infrastructure work,
which is what they need,
which is the world basically being on a track and trace surveillance system like they built in China,
which I believe they built for us.
But at the end of the day, this is a big, big blow.
And that's where people need to start,
which is, well, how does this affect not just America, but the world?
because part of the last three and a half years in this phase of this color revolution was to turn the world against the people of this country.
And I believe that they were doing a lot of damage because people were looking at America and thinking, God, they have a constitution.
They're not doing anything.
They're not standing up.
But then you go back to January 6th and you go back to 2020 and you go back to the pandemic and going direct.
And you kind of realize, well, they had a plan.
And luckily, shows like yours and hopefully mine.
and other people like that, really, as much as we didn't know how much work we were doing to change
parts of minds, I think we did a tremendous job and that hundreds of millions of people all
over the world started to see that maybe we're not each other's enemies. Maybe the enemy
is above us. And that's where we are. Absolutely. Can I just get a pick a few quick observations.
There's somebody who worked as what you might like to call a functionary or a technocrat within government,
I have done. I can just say one thing. Firstly, if you do that, you understand how bad decisions
which are made in secret always and invariably are. The idea that these people, though they really
do believe it, by the way, they really do believe it. The idea that these people know better and a wiser
come up with optimal solutions and, you know, you just get the sort of messy political process
out of the way everything will turn out well.
That idea is so profoundly wrong.
And if you saw how unimpressive the people who think that way also are,
you would be under no illusions at all about any kind of technocratic paradise and how well it works.
I've seen it.
I have absolutely seen it myself.
Secondly, about this idea that there is a general desire, a general impetus to try to centralize power.
and to take it away from the sovereign states and from the people of those states.
That is indisputably true.
You only have to see all this cute structures of treaties and agreements and things.
And of course in Europe, we have felt it particularly strongly.
In many many programmes, we have discussed how the EU centre, which is absolutely part of this.
I mean, the WEF started as an EU integration movement.
It was the European something or other movement when it was first set up in the 60s.
The EU Centre wants weak states, weak governments.
It is fundamentally antagonistic to politics as politics have normally been understood.
We've discussed this many times and many programs on the Duran.
And again, the result is incredibly bad decisions.
Decisions that are completely inconsistent with anybody's interests.
And if you know anything about the state of Europe,
it today. You can see that, how bad that is. There's one specific question I want to ask you,
because you identify the assassination of JFK as a key moment about which, by the way, I completely agree.
I really do agree. Is that the reason why there's been this enormous resistance to opening up
the files about this? And is that perhaps?
something that new president should be asked to give precedence to,
because there's so many unanswered questions about what took place then.
Yeah, it's going to be, this is the most important part of Trump winning,
is who he's going to be picking around him.
What people do know, I guess, that probably watch us,
is the CIA came out of the OSS,
and I firmly believe the Dolis Brothers to be two of the worst people to have ever lived.
And when you look at them and the construction of the CIA and then the other tentacles and all of that, it appears to me what I heard was that Pompeo was the one that did not want Trump to release the JFK files.
And he was very disturbed by what was in them.
Regardless, that must happen.
I don't only think he should release the JFK files.
I think he should declassify everything the American people need to know.
And that's a lot.
but starting with the JFK files.
And the other thing that I think most people started to realize
was that if we were lied to about the murder of a beloved president live on TV,
and then we had subsequent murders of people that threatened the institutional power in D.C.
So that would be RFK, MLK, Malcolm X, many other people along the way,
you can prove or not prove were assassinations to maintain power in the,
this post-World War II kind of Bush New World Order plan, then you start to really see that
this is a time where I think we have been through enough that we can handle it. I really do think
that this last three and a half years really changed on a on a core level, the American
electorate and probably people all over the world in terms of now, no, I deserve.
to have answers about what happened there, the skepticism of the government and of this,
but we also have to understand that everyone that has been in the FBI and CIA knows. So why does
a small group of people know and not the entire country? And there's a reason for that.
It is because I believe that what has gone on since then is anyone that would cover up,
I mean, it feels like it's the mafia. If anyone would cover up crimes by our government against,
we the people or foreign nations, such as Libya, that they would be promoted within the intelligence
community rather than demoted. Much of our intelligence community has nothing to do with meritocracy.
It has to do with secrecy. And that is a real problem. No, that was not what the Constitution
was about. That is not what we the people pay our taxes for to be hidden in the dark from what our
country is doing. And I think what's very sad for me is I go around the country a lot and I meet so
many veterans that fought in the Iraq war and in the Afghanistan war. And now because so much has come
out because of the lack of control of the narrative by the usual suspects in the mainstream media
and beyond, a lot of veterans in America want answers about what we were doing in there and what
the truth is and why we really went into Libya. It's not over. We still don't have answers. Why
Why did we go into Iraq?
Why did Wesley Clark come on stage and say Rumsfeld?
And unfortunately, some of these criminals are dead, but said that Rumsfeld said,
we're going to these countries and then right after 9-11 and Wesley Clark was like,
why?
They weren't involved.
And because it had, the war on terror wasn't about a war on terror.
It was that terror was never defined.
It really was a time when I believe people like Dick Cheney and all of his friends decided,
you know, war for profit was, was better for them.
And somehow for the world, which it wasn't, which is why I always say to people,
go read the project for a New American Century document that Wolfowitz and Cheney and Kagan,
all these people wrote, would you ever have agreed with that plan for the future?
So now is the good time because a lot of these plans have finally failed.
They were on, I think, a hundred year trajectory, some of these and then certainly many,
World War II, post-World War II.
I think also the UN has exposed itself as a fraud.
The World Health Organization and UNESCO is basically money laundering, you know,
unnecessary agencies that are corrupt to the core.
So, I mean, as hard as it's been, I think we're going through birthing pains of a better
future for all of us.
And, you know, we have to be very honest, too, about what the United States, in terms of
USAID, but also National Endowment for Democracy.
Also, what is the IMF been doing all over the world?
Because I'll tell you what, developing nations that have never developed in 75 years is a choice.
If we're sending $200 billion to Ukraine, you're telling me we can't have clean water, vegetation, electricity, education, transportation all over Africa and South America.
Of course we can.
The reason is that we don't is because the whole scam of developing nations and all of this has to continue all the way up to the, all the way up to the,
Bank of International settlements to maintain power.
So all of this power structure is so threatened.
And I think that that's really what it was about.
When I say they're not after America, they're after the world.
And America's in the way.
I feel that Donald Trump winning was the shot across the bow to these people to speed it up.
And I think they went too fast.
They were too arrogant.
And now, you know, we can all see the emperor wears no clothes, even if that's
Klaus Schwab or somebody.
Enough's enough.
We don't want them anymore.
Just get out of our countries.
Absolutely, because no other country has a constitution like the one that the United States has.
This is, again, something that, and always, I make that, I may, I may that point many times and people always come back to me, but it's a fact.
Again, as somebody who was involved in, you know, law and constitutional affairs, I could say this for absolute fact.
The whole legal and constitutional ethos in other places in Europe is completely different from the American.
And one of the things that you have seen, and I really do think this is the case, is that at some point in the 1940s, 50s, America started to become Europeanized.
And a lot of the culture of mid-20th century Europe started, and imperial Europe, by the way, because remember we're talking about the Europe of the colonial empires and, of course, the militarist Europe at that time, with its standards.
armies and its constant wars and its great power politics and its spies and agents and all of those
things. All of that started to find its way into the United States. And unfortunately, there were a
lot of people there who took to it very well and liked it and thought that they could reproduce
it because it gave them that sense of power that you found amongst the political elites
in Europe.
And it's always,
I always found it surprising
that the US,
which was initially constructed
to be a repudiation
of all of that.
Ended up becoming so much like him.
So that's one thing I would have said.
And I should say, you know, if you look at someone like JFK,
I said that, you know, you see Trump
and the way that he intervened,
interacts with the American people.
Now, they're very, very different personalities,
but with JFK, it's exactly the same.
You see the way JFK used to go out, speak to people,
meet with them, talk to them, he's very, he liked them.
And again, they liked him back.
And no president between JFKs and Trump
has had that kind of same energy.
So, again, I wonder how it happened.
How did America become Europeanized in that way?
Is it something to do with the universities?
Is it something to do with the East Coast elites?
The banking and financial communities of the US.
I should say, by the way, if you're talking about Britain,
which I think played the leading role in a lot of this,
the British, and this is not made up history,
it is well-established, academically, recognized,
history here in Britain. The British in the late 19th, early 20th century, actually said to themselves,
we are exhausted, we can't continue like this, we are the weary titan that carries on its shoulders,
the burden of the earth, those are the words of the colonial secretary, Joseph Chamberlain.
So who are we going to find to help us carry this burden? The Americans will come along and they'll
do it for us. Why do the Americans do this to themselves?
This is a question that I've always wondered.
Well, frankly, I think that you can look at the unholy alliance
between the Council of Foreign Relations and Chatham House.
And I think that you can look at Henry Kissinger and Zig Brasinski
as to how this happened, and you bring up the EU and the World Economic Forum.
Well, again, you can also go right to the universities
and even Operation Paperclip and the infiltration of a lot of our universities.
and you can look at that the CIA and Henry Kissinger
actually paid for the program that recruited Klaus Schwab
to start the World Economic Forum
so that they could basically connect Europe and America
through the public-private partnership
that most people couldn't see
as they built their stakeholder stronghold on a regional scale.
I think that's first and foremost.
I also recall that Henry,
Kissinger said that he talks more to the crown than he does to the
to the people in Washington, D.C. So if you're going to look at that, I
still go back to the global public-private partnership and the
institutions connected to them, including the IMF, the World Bank,
the BIS, but also Chatham House and Council Foreign Relations.
These are all groups that until this past two years, I feel like nobody
in America ever thought about. Because by design, because many of the people
in both of those, you know, to me, the UK,
Chatham House is actually the parent company
of the Council of Foreign Relations,
but if you look inside those secret societies,
as JFK would call them,
because that's one of the ones I think he was talking about,
you're going to find that it's very much based on not just globalism,
but the media and the capture of the media
and this idea that, you know,
you have made it to the highest levels in media and journalism
if you are asked to be a member of the council
Foreign Relations here. And then they have all these events. If you remember, it was the Joe Biden
quid pro quo laughing about getting a chokin fired in Ukraine with a standing ovation at Council
of Foreign Relations when it should have been horror of what are you talking about? You said you would
hold back, you know, money that was already passed and allocated if they didn't fire a prosecutor looking
into your son and your family's business. And that's essentially what they did at the Council
foreign relations to great applause.
And then, you know, you look at the World Economic Forum or Davos and you watch some
of the things they're saying.
And the whole room erupts in applause and you're thinking, that sounds like a dystopian nightmare.
Why are they clapping over this?
So, you know, there is that, I mean, I want, I really do hope that I don't know what's
going to happen with the EU, but I do find that they've been lied to on a massive scale about
what the point was.
I really think that the EU, the whole plan, if you do look all the way back to Kissinger and the recruitment and going off the gold standard and everything, it does seem it's between the billionaires and the bankers in America and the billionaires and the bankers in the UK that this was all constructed and then throw in nonstop propaganda and entertainment and media and manipulation and military grade mind control and cognitive warfare and you end up here.
to where they needed a pandemic to speed it along before we woke up and realized.
And frankly, the pandemic failed.
And hundreds of millions, if not billions of people on this planet,
realized that they've been deceived for decades.
And that's where I hope that we have a global community of friends and citizens of all of our countries
that realize right now what we are fighting, unfortunately, is not like World War II,
where Germany is the enemy or, like, you know, World War I or even,
Vietnam or anything like that. This is actually the people, this is a cognitive war, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a, a
a Satanist Colonel Aquino, who ran the U.S. mind control military side for many years, um, this is a mind war. You know, it's a different kind of war. It's an information. It's a manipulation. It's on every level. So to me, breaking that, which I think we've done. That's what I feel like. I feel like. I feel like we've kind of broken the, the propaganda, psychological warfare.
matrix. We have a lot more work to do, but people like you guys and me and people watching this
now see it very clearly. And that is what, that's where they failed. They didn't have the brains and
the intellect and the training and the education system that brought up Kissinger and
Brazinski when this current group of world dominators came along. These guys got dumbed down with our
kids, you know? Absolutely. Because of course, the system they want to create requires an erosion
of proper academic rigor.
And so the inevitable result is,
I speak as somebody whose wife is an academic.
What the result is, of course,
the political elite degrades.
It is inevitable.
It's exactly what has happened.
It atrophies.
As it always does.
I mean, if you remove, you know,
if you take away light and air,
everything gradually slows down and dies.
That is the action.
way, that is the actual way it works.
The very last thing I wanted to say is that one of the most interesting things is the way
in which, I agree for your perspectives, I should make that very clear.
And I think they are authentic American perspectives.
One of the most misleading and corrupting things is, of course, the other side talk all the
time about the fact that they stand for American values.
when in fact they stand the exact opposite of those authentic American values.
And one of the things that needs to happen in the United States and in the world,
and I think which is happening,
and one of the reasons why we're breaking through,
is that there has to be a recovery of language.
Language has to be used properly again.
The Chinese Confucius came up,
this concept of the rectification of words.
words should be used clearly and simply and straightforwardly and in good face and inconsistently.
And I think we are making progress there actually.
But, and that is obviously essential in any kind of proper democratic republican system.
Because if words change and shift and narratives are constructed, which have no connection to reality all the time,
then by definition, a proper Republican government is impossible.
So I think we are making progress on that too,
simply by speaking clearly and straightforwardly in the way that we've been doing.
So that's what I wanted to finish,
but I just, if you want to say something about that.
Well, yeah, I want to say something about that.
Yeah, I want to say something about that because I have a couple friends,
well, I have a very close friend who is one of the only living survivors of MK Ultra
sold to the CIA when you.
she was three years old and didn't get out until she was 30.
She testified to end it.
But what we have to understand is that there's a level of manipulation and mind control
that is military grade that did come out of Nazi Germany and was then perfected, I believe,
over the last several years along with technology and other things.
So when you talk about the language, this is a giant problem.
So if you ask me what needs to happen in D.C., first and foremost, we should make lots of
lobbying illegal.
Lobbying should not be allowed.
It is the number one thing that takes away our votes and our voices in this country,
especially lobbying by foreign countries in D.C.
We can't have a CCP lobbying firm, a Ukraine lobbying firm, an Israel lobbying firm,
within blocks of the Capitol.
This is exactly what George Washington said never to have.
Never have foreign governments or foreign leaders influencing our country.
And we should never be in their country.
countries, which is even worse of a problem. So lobbying has to be dealt with. Think tanks have got to
be totally transparent in who's funding them and totally live up to some kind of standards to allow
them to function and should not be a non-profit, okay? Because that is not what's going on there. There's
billions of dollars in grants and everything else. Again, I point a lot to USAID, which I believe to be
the financial backing of a lot of these operations that the American people do not know about.
about or never know about till decades later.
We also have a real problem with 501s in this country, 501C3, 501C4,
this idea that the IRS is giving tax breaks to billion, global billionaire,
you know, NGOs that are working all over the world to do things that are none of our
business in foreign countries.
So there's a lot that can happen in D.C.
I also, I'm very friendly with Cash Patel.
And like you just said, I said to him, well, what are we going to do?
he goes, we're going to use the Constitution, okay?
Because the Constitution is very plain language.
And like you just said, I put in Americans Anonymous
the entire Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence,
so people can read how clear the language is.
Now, what has happened here more than any other country,
but certainly here, it's called lawfare.
And there are the worst people in the world
that have been undermining America since the Clinton,
but certainly the Obama administration,
with Holder and then all the fraud of Crossfire Hurricane,
the total fraud and cover-up of the Mueller of Weissman report,
the two fake impeachments, the fraud of 2020.
I mean, this is a small group, mainly of lawyers,
a lot of them connected to the Brookings Institute,
Eisen, Weissman, McCord,
people should know who these people are.
First of all, they're behind all the lawfare that we see elsewhere,
but they are also the purveyors of changing language.
believe that the leader of this in America was somebody named Cass Sondstein, who came in under
Obama. He's right now writing behind the scenes the border legislation for the border to keep it
open forever. His wife also happens to be Samantha Power, the head of USAID, the former regime
change warmonger. So what we do have to understand is that all of this, I believe, language,
The manipulation of language, again, straight out in 1984,
is about weakening the people so much so that they can't think at all.
You know, it's like erasing critical thinking and everything.
And then imagine what they're doing to our kids,
really coming from UNESCO, in my opinion,
if you look through it in our country,
what they're trying to do is make a,
and this is very sad for somebody like me
who really studied the 30s and 40s in Germany,
is that they are trying to make a society of people
who will never stand up for themselves
who are so confused and don't know what's right and wrong,
who don't know what their rights are,
who never read a constitution,
they're told the constitution's out of date,
who think the bill of rights is optional.
Like, they are educating,
and a lot of this does go to Soros
and his cohorts, you know.
There was Soros after the USSR fell.
He actually has an interview
where he calls it the Soros World War II.
order. But a lot of what is going on in terms of weakening the populace by dumbing them down,
keeping information, changing language, all of that is exhausting. And there are these people that
are lawfare, you know, they even have the Lawfare Institute at Brookings, if you go check it out.
Lawfare, and listen, it happened over there too because they had the tactical group out of
the World Health Organization with Kassanstein as well that was pushing the Nudge Theory.
to get the vaccine.
These people are a small group of people.
Most of them are Poison Ivy League graduate lawyers.
But the truth of the matter is that it's backfired.
And what we do have to do is get back to language
and get back to everyone in America understanding
that there is very simple language that is what it is.
And again, here we have the problem of the Marxist rogue judges,
also from the same universities,
that then allow this language to be manipulated.
So until we get back to law and order as defined in our documents, we will have a difficult time.
But for what you're saying about language, that is purposeful.
And that is a joint venture, I believe, between the globalist billionaires that align with Soros
and with the lawfare people that are mostly out of the Clinton and Obama DOJ that have
aligned with the blob post-9-11 unconstitutional intel blob.
And I don't think the lawfare crew or the 9-11, post-9-11 intel crew work for the United States of America.
I frankly think they work for the parent company that runs America and by any means necessary.
When they say they want to protect democracy, they mean they want to protect themselves and their institutions, not us.
They don't even consider the people.
And that's why a lot of this needs to go by the wayside, ASAP.
Thank you very much.
I, again, should say that I completely agree.
last comments.
As somebody who is married to someone who is an English literature person,
I mean, concerns about language, who by the way, at this moment, as it happens,
is reading all, well, just to say.
Oh, see that.
Look at the description of the state, and that's what we're working with.
They have no allegiance to any flag, any country, any people, any religion.
It's not what this is about.
It's straight out of 1984.
for power for power seek. Correct. Just just compare the language of the Constitution with its clarity
and its simplicity, which speaks very directly to everybody and just look at the kind of nonsense
that is churned out every day by governments and the manipulative way in which that is written.
And you'll see, you'll understand immediately what has changed and where the problem is.
And I'm not going to even start on the kind of things that the European Union churns out, which, frankly, you really don't want to read.
It gives you an headache to do so.
I'm going to hand over to Alex.
I'm sure we got lots of questions.
And Mel Case, I wanted to say thank you.
I have to leave for just a fraction of a moment, but I'll be back and I'll be listening to all the things that you're saying.
Okay, great.
You have 15, 20 minutes?
I have five minutes because I've got on so far.
Let's, okay, let's go. Let's go get some questions for you from Nikos. I am not an optimist person,
but for the first time, in a long time, I feel hope. I do believe that Trump will end the war in Ukraine
and stop World War III. Your thoughts?
100%. It's already in the works, been planned, many meetings. We don't need to see children
dying anywhere on planet Earth in 2024 for the benefit of a very few people at the end of the
day. So I not only do I think they'll end, I think we are going to see a renaissance in cooperation
with the rest of the world like America has never seen before or been allowed to do.
Okay, great. Rao Pinto says, do you see anarchy orchestrated by the swamp, prevent
Donald J. Trump from taking office in January? Yes, because the lawfare people, as I mentioned
before, the Eisen Weissman Brookings crew, they have been planning for this for a year. The good news is that I
also happen to know, so have the good people surrounding Donald Trump that maybe aren't in front of
the cameras. So, yes, they are going to try everything they can. They will fail, but they will try.
And they will have a lot less opportunity to rise up like Black Lives Matter and Antifa and all that again,
because honestly, a lot of those people don't buy it anymore either. But between now, we have 76
six days of craziness and lawfare coming at us, but I believe we'll prevail no matter what.
All right. Shane Cameron says Cass Sunstein wrote the book, Nudge. He was behind automatic 401K
contributions in employees' contracts. Right. True. Terrible guy. All right. Regarding the Trump
trying to, where is it, Sanjo, Wlaxo says that they tried to,
to take out Trump.
You were talking about JFK,
they tried to take out Trump.
Your thoughts?
Twice.
They tried to take out Trump.
And I believe that it goes to these same people.
We will have to investigate no matter what.
And it's not about retribution.
America needs to investigate crossfire hurricane
and everyone that was in the room with Obama,
because I am telling you right now,
they are most fearful for themselves.
They are willing to burn down America,
so they are never held accountable
all the way up to Obama and Hillary Clinton.
So frankly, I believe, thank God they did not succeed,
but the fact that they were willing to do that kind of trauma and terror
that would have happened had they succeeded should tell everyone who were dealing with.
They wanted another JFK.
They wanted another psychological disaster meltdown of the people.
They wanted it.
And that's what we need to know.
And again, that came out of DHS, Mayorkas,
and it goes right up to the same team that has been involved since 2016
and got away with it, put themselves back in power.
power, they need to be handled.
All right.
We got two more, and we will let you go from Sparky.
Sparky says, Melk, hey, does Trump realize when people blame George Soros?
They're actually blaming the CIA.
Soros set up NGOs in the 80s to foment discord in Eastern Europe and help the CIA ever since.
Yes, we're trying to get that out.
There's people like me and Mike Benz and a bunch of other people out there who've been
pointing out that George Soros is an operative of some sort.
that has been involved for a very long time.
And a lot of the color revolutions around the world
that, like I said,
are everything that the founders of this country
wanted nothing to do with do lead to George Soros's NGOs.
That's why I'm saying the 501c3, 501C4 model.
You know, open society doesn't pay taxes.
So he gets to go around the world with grants from us
through the state department, also I believe CIA functioning,
and destroy countries and overthrow governments.
And of course, I believe that there will,
one in the same, just as I believe our State Department must be cleared out of people that
align with that same network of Soros.
And, you know, basically these are the people, the parent company, that believes that they're
the stakeholders of the world and we should follow them.
I think his days are numbered.
And I think that we will see the collapse of the Soros network in the next four years.
All right.
Final question from Sparky Mel.
Is Trump keeping Pompeo around to play good cop, bad cop, not yet realizing that he now
needs to rebuild trust with the rest of the world by openly and notoriously draining the
swamp. Well, there has been a lot of pushback since Trump brought up Pompeo on Joe Rogan.
And by everyone that I know that is involved. And just on my show, I have to say, multiple people
have come on my show that worked for Trump that feel the same way about Pompeo. I do not understand
the use of Pompeo unless there's something else. I don't believe he'll have a position in the
government. I really do not. There's too much pushback. And frankly, I think Pompeo should be held accountable
for multiple things that he was involved in. Also, for being part of the CIA and not doing anything
about it and allowing it to keep going at the Russia collusion hoax when he could have done that in the
first two years. So I don't understand why Trump would even trust him anyway because he had eyes as did
Bill Barr on all of the evidence that they were setting up against Trump and they both did nothing.
So we'll see what happens, but I'm very against Pompeo having anything to do with this government at all.
Arcane Eclectic says please have Melkate on as a regular guest.
Anytime.
I appreciate it so much, Alex.
It was so much fun.
Thank you so much.
Okay.
Tell Alex, other Alex, that I look forward to the next time.
Really appreciate it very quickly.
Where can people find you before we?
The Melkate Show.com.
The Melkayshow.com free resource page there.
I have a lot of the documents that have disappeared from the internet.
So if you're looking for something, go check it out.
out. And the Melkayshow.com, Melkays show every night on Rumble and elsewhere. And I appreciate
you so much, Alex. And the book is Americans Anonymous, restoring power to the people, one citizen
at a time, not just for Americans, for all of us. Thank you so much. Fantastic show. Thank you,
Mel Kay. Thank you so much. Thanks. Take care. Bye, Alex.
Bye. Alexander, you're muted. You're muted. Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. I had to answer,
answer an urgent call.
No worries.
That was fantastic.
I've really enjoyed such a program as much, if I can say.
Yeah, that was great.
That was great.
Fantastic guest, Mel Kay.
I will be reading.
I do hope we did get the JFK papers published, and I will go through them with a microscope.
I think it's going to be a lot of stuff to go over.
Oh, I will still go through them with a microscope.
Don't worry.
I'm good at that kind of thing.
Yeah, yeah.
Yes, yes.
So, you know, you'll be able to analyze them in only the way that you can.
And you will pass everything over to our viewers as well, I'm sure.
Absolutely, right?
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
Well, I mean, what do you think before we answer the questions?
Do you think Trump will release them?
Yes, I think he will.
I think he's promised to.
I think he understands the importance of it.
He's got people like Melke.
to remind him about it.
And I'm sure that, you know,
I don't know whether they know each other,
but she belongs in the political world
that has enabled him to become president.
And I think his own inclination,
his own very strong inclination is to do it as well.
And of course, remember, there's somebody else there
in his team, RFC Jr.,
who will also want them to be released.
So I think we'll get the JFK papers released
and the RFK papers released.
And it'll be very, very interesting
to see what they say.
I still don't think they'll be complete, by the way,
because, again, I speak now from experience,
an awful lot of the most important things
will have been destroyed.
Destroyed?
Absolutely.
No question about it.
Things do get destroyed.
But when they are destroyed,
you sense, if you really know
how to read documents and archives,
which I do,
you quickly see where the gaps are.
And the gaps themselves tell a story.
And you can't destroy everything.
That is the other thing.
You find references to a particular document,
which you can't find in another document.
And that also leads you down some rather interesting directions.
But on something like the JFK thing,
it is inconceivable that everything is still.
there but what it what is still there is going to be very interesting and it will as i said it will
answer a lot of questions all right let's uh let's answer some questions yeah yeah from ilia
koriakin says first was federal reserve act second was conspiring against henry wallis the third
was breton wood fourth cia and the fifth was j f k yeah i i can understand i understand why melch
I don't disagree, by the way, but I can understand why Mel Kay has focused on JFK,
because in a sense, that was when the change became visible.
And it did, because up to that point, we had not had this vast political secret state superstructure
that existed in America, and it really came into its own after JFK was killed.
Or when JFK was killed.
Right.
And Iliak Uriakin says you'll need X-ray vision because 99% will be blacked out with regards to the UK.
Well, I hope not.
That is, that is, of course, the other big question.
I mean, will when these documents are released, will they be released in release completely?
I mean, bear in mind, we're talking about something that happened, what was it, 60 years ago now?
it's hardly likely to be any information there that is sensitive in terms of genuine national
security concerns today.
I mean, the Soviet Union, which is the adversary, doesn't exist anymore.
So, I mean, what would be the justification for blanking things out and keeping things secret?
You know, the amazing, the extraordinary thing is you can actually get a lot more information now in Russia
from the archives there than you can through the US.
And I'm not going to even start with Britain.
It's true.
You can read all the paperwork that was produced by Stalin's office, for example.
It's all available.
It's accessible to researchers.
And of course, you can't get the same level information about an awful lot that
happened in the United States.
That is the remarkable thing.
Sparky 63 says, break it off in BlackRock by spoiling their Ukraine plans. Make Ukraine Russia again.
Yeah, well, that's probably where we're heading. I hope everybody here is aware of the fact that the Russian foreign industry has published a very, very powerful statement about the Ukrainian conflict.
I discuss it in my program that's coming up on my channel today, in which they say that whatever happens, we know Donald Trump, we're familiar with.
with him. He's well known in Russia, but all the objectives of the special military operation
will be achieved. Full stop. Yeah. Niko says, channeled my inner daredevil from S-0-3 in yesterday's
comments. It feels so good to see Democrats, the elite and the Marxist woke mob melt down.
Absolutely. It's been absolutely marvelous. It's been incredibly enjoyable. It's been, it's almost
worth it if nothing else happens. I mean, just to see them have this complete collapse.
But one thing, a lot of them here in Britain really did believe that Commander was going
to win. I mean, you know, they really persuaded themselves. And not a lot of them, most of them.
Yeah. Dr. Steve Turley had a great show today where he actually had all of the expert opinions
saying that Harris was going to win, like Bill Mars, all these people. Who was the documentary
filmmaker, I forgot his name, Michael Moore.
And they were predicting. They were predicting, Harris, they were confident.
He's going to win. She's got it.
Absolutely. You just got it.
Yeah. And he just documented all of it.
I know.
A, relying heavily on a single opinion poll in Iowa of 800 people.
I mean, that, that really, I mean, don't let me get me to start on that.
Nico says, Duran, you are busy, but I need to see you with the three guests
I suggested Dima.
I think Dima we have in the works.
We've had, we've had.
Yeah, we're going to work.
I think we're working on that.
Dimitris Leatos working on that.
And NERDIC, we are working on that as well.
I finally convinced Daniel Davis to bring Andrei Martianov to show, convince you to.
Thank you.
Thank you, thank you, for that.
We are working on all of the suggestions.
Sparky says, keep in mind, Israel has killed many more Americans than Iran has.
Remember, the USS Liberty, where they killed 34 Americans.
I believe that is true.
Fuzzy Ball says, are the futures of Hungary in Slovakia as members of the EU or as BRICS members?
What would be the ramifications of EU members defect to BRICS?
Well, we'll see.
I have to say this.
Coming back to the things that Mel K. was saying, if the United States actually opt out of the globalization project, there isn't going to be an EU for very long.
without the US, the whole thing becomes completely unsustainable.
And that is the truth.
So very soon we might start to see countries like Hungary and Slovakia,
achieving levels of independence and levels of agency that they have not known until now.
To just let you all into a secret, I'm in contact with someone in Hungary at the moment who is well-connected.
And I've been very interesting to hear what this person has been saying.
Ms. Texas G says the reason people were surprised that Harris won is because of people like me, secret Trump voter.
We don't talk to pollsters.
We don't have stickers on our cars, flags of Trump in our yards, short of having our phones.
You have no idea who we are and we were there by the millions.
Absolutely.
I completely agree with that.
In a way, that that's a very, very sad thing.
That people feel and feel that they can't be open about their preferences.
It's quite amazing.
Little Eddie on locals put a link to, I have to go over this little Eddie, but he says,
well, worth the read and getting out there.
We must do it now.
Do it all because if we fail, then the essential services that everyone believes we should have
will not be able to be funded.
Virtually everyone in the United States would become economically destroyed.
These are the stakes.
It's a link about the markets and the economies, Alexander, which we're going to have to go
through. Indeed, and this is going to be a major, a major problem for Donald Trump, because contrary to what
the propaganda has been saying, he's got a very, very difficult economic legacy that Biden has left
to him. Yeah. Ijabuchi says, thank God for the Duran and their guest speakers.
Thank you for that. Sixthethe says, hello from Denmark, non-brain-washed Trump supporter.
teeth. Chili pepper says Trump wants Brian Hook, Supreme Neocon, to lead the transition team
at the State Department. Hook was the head of the Iron Action Group in Pompeo State Department.
Well, just wait. I don't think that's confirmed 100%. Exactly. Yeah. I was going to say,
exactly. And what up with the point I'm going to make is at the moment, there's an awful lot of
suing and throwing and pushing people maneuvering and people coming out and saying things. This is
a sign that there are lots of people trying to maneuver and push Trump in particular directions
doesn't follow that that is actually what he intends to do.
Yeah.
I actually talk about that in my video, but it's still a rumor.
It might be true, but at this point, I don't think it's confirmed.
Tish M says justice for Gonzalo Liro and justice for Julian Assange.
Thank you, Tish, for that.
Amazing super chat.
Sheila Grace says Dream Team Conversation, hands down.
Thank for that.
Tish M says taxation without representation.
Hashtack Taxation without representation.
Herman Dormel, thank you for that super sticker.
Tisham says, I believe the people are what's holding themselves down.
Freedom is ours.
Find out how.
Please interview Safia Dean Amas, author of the Bitcoin and Flat Standard.
He's such a nice man, too.
Okay, good.
Yes.
That would be an interesting stream, interesting show.
Serge Stelmack, welcome to the red community.
Chris says there is a clip of CNN saying Kamala didn't outperform Biden in any county, 3,24, statistically impossible.
That's two elections.
That's two elections that were blank.
Yeah, I heard that too.
central relaxus says
Trump got shot
at
FFS, he will release
JFK docs.
Yeah, I think so.
I think he will.
I think he will.
Snowy says
regarding yesterday, Mike Pompeo
spoke at Trump's rally in reading
Pennsylvania on November 4th,
2024.
Yeah.
Oh, I mean, Pompeo is there.
Lindsay Graham is there.
All of these people are still
there. But I mean, you know, it doesn't mean they'll be at the center. We'll just have to wait
and see. Yeah. And you know, they're not going to give up power that easy. Yeah. They'll try every
way to connect with Trump or to sabotage Trump or both. I mean, they're not going to give up.
No, absolutely. Thank you for that super sticker. Sir Mugg's game says if Pompeo and Bolton
made it, they'd spawn an abomination like Tom, pick and cotton. And Coulter has warm.
fuzzy thoughts about him. So no
Bueno.
Thank you for that, Sir Musgrave.
Sancho Rlaxo says, between now and January
20th is a very dangerous window.
Oh, true enough.
Sir Mugsgave says, what's left for
Liz Cheney crawl back up the Chrysler
building and perch on the northeast
corner. Wording off evil
spirits is technically
a job.
I'm afraid
I don't think we've heard
the last of this journey to say this straightforwardly.
I mean, these people, these people are still there.
They're still well connected.
They're still powerful.
We should not be under any illusions about that.
Jeff Bigford says, thank you.
Thank you, Jeff.
A Life of Brian says, I donated $1 to Act Blue
so I could get $1,000 worth of spam texts.
If done at scale, not only does the DNC lose money,
but their donor lists are spoiled.
Oh, okay.
Basil says Joe Biden was assistant in Frank Church Committee.
I didn't know that.
It doesn't surprise me.
Sparky says, Mel, don't trust Cash Patel.
He wants war with China and wanted to keep Assange locked up.
Sir Mugge says there's serious chatter that in Ukraine and the EU,
more rat lines have been laid than on 17th century Spanish galleon.
Can the Piper lead them to their demise?
Yes, I've heard the same thing that people are now in Ukraine.
They're now definitely looking for how to get out of this mess,
how to get out of Ukraine as soon as they can,
that there is already this kind of assessment taking place.
We just have to see.
And I also have heard that the men on the front lines,
the Ukrainian soldiers, are very demoralized at the moment.
They've been led to think again that Kamala was going to win,
And they're now very, very shocked by what has happened.
But anyway, we'll see what happens.
James Edwards says,
I feel the joy of being unburdened by what has been.
Yeah.
In fact, right, thank you for that super sticker.
Chris says, Confessions of an Economic Hitman,
John Perkins' first edition,
explains how central banks and multinational corporations steal.
Yeah.
Basil says, you can't speak the truth
if they kidnapped the dictionary.
Yeah, absolutely.
Rectification of words.
It's a very powerful concept.
And as I said, it was one that Confucius at the time of war and chaos.
He spoke about the great importance of it all the way back then.
And we've never needed it more than now.
From GL-1416, how did the establishment, Obama, et cetera,
push out Biden from the candidacy?
How do they have the power to do that?
Well, I think that is an excellent question, and one we should get answers to.
I mean, there was that very mysterious, was it tweet that was published, which supposedly was a tweet.
Was a tweet, exactly, and all kinds of odd things of that time.
There's an awful lot about that story that has not been explained, and we need to find out about it.
By the way, can I just say something?
So somebody who's brought up Obama, this whole affair, this election, this election, this election,
I think should have punctured the myth of Obama completely.
First of all, he's made a whole series of absolutely, from his point of view,
catastrophically bad decisions.
I mean, it was he who was responsible for making Biden president
because he basically maneuvered him as the Democratic Party's contender in January 2020.
He phoned up all of the Democrats and all the other contenders about Bernie Sanders
and got them all to stand down and endorse Biden.
He maneuvered Biden to accept Kamala Harris.
He got Kamala Harris.
He then got Biden to step down.
He brought Kamala Harris forward.
And then, of course, he campaigned for her in an utterly disastrous way.
I mean, lecturing people in a most unpleasant way.
I mean, whatever one may think of Obama, I mean, he not only clearly has completely lost his touch,
but he's made a whole succession of disastrously bad calls.
He is obviously not a wizard.
Joe Public says BlackRock owns the world.
Vanguard owns BlackRock.
Rich West says,
How much does GCHQ interfere in our American political process?
That is an excellent question to which I do not know the answer.
G.L. 1416 says,
Alexander, do you have any book recommendations on how the world really works?
Who has power? How does government work?
In practice, not theory.
You know, this is a good question.
I don't really.
I'm sure that it is dispersed over many books.
I mean, Mel Kay's book probably touches on this.
I don't think anybody, any single book, brings it all together in one place,
perhaps because this is too big a thing.
And every one of us has seen Asper,
who've been in government has seen aspects of this.
I mean, I'll give you one example from my own experience.
I used to be a secretary of a committee that worked in London in the legal system.
That committee, in theory, never existed.
It doesn't appear on, it didn't appear on any wire diagrams.
And I was absolutely astonished at the kind of decisions that were made in that committee,
completely unaccountably.
and without any real record.
And I had to write up the minutes of that committee.
And I had to make sure, because that was what I was required to do,
that those minutes reflected certain perspectives,
which didn't often reflect what was actually discussed there.
So that goes on all the time.
It is right through the whole system.
How do you bring this all together?
I'm sure there are books that cover this.
But experience says a great deal,
and I've been talking to others, people who were in British government,
who've actually been in the cabinet office recently,
in Boris Johnson's time, for example, not quasi, my friend, you know, the MP,
the politician, but others who were there.
And as it's very difficult to put it all together in one place
and to understand and to see how it all was.
King's Coat says, a good one off topic, but could you guys get
a Japan expert forestry, new government, international alignments, etc.
And I have, I'm thinking of one particular person who,
I'm interesting that you said that,
because I was reading an interview that this person has given,
he's Japanese, about Japanese politics.
And I was very, very impressed by him.
And he explained an awful lot about Japan
and about Japanese foreign policy.
I can't remember his name,
but I would be very interested in having him as a guest on the Duran.
Red Z says, hey, fellas, future looking brighter.
Congrats to everyone.
Absolutely.
Russell Hall says,
when it comes to the likes of Bolton-Pompheo Graham, et cetera,
Trump should grasp that it is best to keep his friends close
and his enemies far the hell away.
I completely agree with you.
I am absolutely of that view.
I think that bringing these people into the inner circle,
It's bad news. It's introducing the fox into the chicken coup.
Yeah. Basil says 1122, 1963 was the day the Constitution of the United States was assassinated.
Yeah, lots of people think this. I mean, and I think there's a lot of truth in that, too, by the way.
Darren and Levy says, do you think Stammer will try to play Trump like Blair played Bush, example, the Middle East wars?
no he can't he's not got anything like Blair's brains
I'm happy to say that
I mean I should make it clear
I mean I'm not only didn't like Blair
I never liked Blair
I actually because I could see that he was going to win the election in 97
I made sure that I was out of Britain
the election in 1997 happened
because the idea of Blair being elected
to fill me with
horror. But I am the first person to acknowledge that in some respects, he was a very clever man.
Stama isn't clever in that kind of way. He doesn't know how to manipulate. He certainly wouldn't
be able to manipulate anybody in Washington today. Chris says Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
John Perkins' first edition explains how the game is played by central banks and multinational
Yeah, absolutely.
Sir Muggeem says,
should we brace ourselves
for Secretary of State Kushner?
He's American Talleyad
after his brilliant work in the Middle East.
So say some top-notch weirdos.
Actually, Trump said he's not going to have any family members
as an administration.
Yeah.
He came out and said that.
Yeah, I think Kushan will be there.
Though he is a clever man, by the way.
We'll see.
We'll see.
Ahmed Kay says,
it honestly feels like the world is a better place after the election of Trump, a big sigh of relief.
I completely agree.
By the way, I mean, I've also had people in London who contacted me and told me the same thing.
Others, whom I know are specifically upset and furious about it, but some people I know,
surprising people have come forward and said, you know, this is a huge relief.
It's like a lifting of a burden.
Elsa says, I don't want to be too pessimistic, but who would end up in the White House?
House if Trump didn't survive until the inauguration theoretically. It's a bit suspicious that
Democrats are so calm. You know, this is an excellent question. I don't know the answer because I don't
know the constitutional setup. If the president-elect is assassinated, then I presume that the electoral
votes that belong to him would pass to the vice president, the man who's picked as vice president,
say it would be J.D. Vance. I presume. Yeah, yeah, I think that's spot on.
I think you know.
A Sermos game says, will we see Trump international Gaza with Ivankalat and others partying in the Joe Biden Memorial Presidential Suite?
I'm not sure I've understood the question.
Will we see Trump International Gaza with Ivankalat, others partying, and others partying in the Joe Biden Memorial Presidential Suite?
I'm still so clear, understand the question.
The rumors are, there are just rumors.
I want to say this.
If you're talking about the war in Gaza,
that Trump has basically communicated to Netanyahu
that he wants everything to be ended as quickly as possible
and wants ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon
and he would prefer them to happen before he becomes president.
You may believe that.
I'm not so sure that it's true, but that's the rumor anyway.
Sparky says during the period Trump went to military school was when kids who were hanging around the wrong people went to military school.
Perhaps Trump hanging around Pompeo is a throwback to his childhood.
Well, who knows?
Yeah.
Mark Hewitt says Trump got 1.5 million less votes than in 2020.
Harris, 14 million votes less than Biden in 2020.
Will someone start asking questions again by Biden's 81 million votes?
Lots of people are asking questions.
Lots and lots of people.
Steve Bannon has come forward and said that the whole thing really needs to be revisited.
Yeah.
Tish M says,
Love you, Alex Alexander.
Correction, it's the Fiat standard by author Safia Dine Amos.
Right, okay.
By author, Safi, Safiuddin.
Okay, we'll contact.
We'll contact additions.
We'll try to get him on.
Sir, Mikem says, say what you will, the Ukraine soldiers still fighting the Russians seem like the type to ride into hell with a bucket of water.
Yeah, I mean, there are some Ukrainian soldiers who are incredibly tough and very brave and very motivated and very committed.
I think that that group of soldiers is still there, but their numbers have shrunk.
A lot of other Ukrainian soldiers who have been recruited more recently are not of that kind of view.
And I suspect it's the second that are very demoralized now.
And Basil says Obama used to be Obama, Oprah used to be Oprah,
Biden used to be Biden.
Yeah.
All right.
I think that's everything.
Final thoughts, Alexander?
I do a great program.
It was a great program.
Certainly, certainly the election has, as I said, created.
shock waves around the world. I mean, it really has, especially in Europe. And the events in Germany,
which are incredibly interesting, by the way, this collapse, sudden collapse of the German government
are connected to the election in the US. Clearly, Lindner could see that it was coming.
Yeah, he could. And poor Olaf Schultz, a hostage to the Greens. He's a hostage to the Greens.
pathetic. It's incredible. Unbelievable. I mean, you know, the
Chancellor of Germany should be controlled by people like
Harbeck and Bebock seems bizarre. It is amazing.
And the German people should be controlled.
Their whole government should be controlled by people like that.
Let's never forget, they never polled more than 15% of the
in the election. Yeah. There's like 50% of, yeah.
No. Why do they give them so much power and so much? Why? It doesn't
make any sense at all.
Unless someone is
telling him to give
them power. I mean, I don't
know, I can't explain it any other way.
But they can't
control the government. Absolutely.
I mean, the last
three years has
been the government by the Greens.
All right.
We will end it there, I guess.
Let's end it there.
Thank you to everyone that
watched us on Odyssey
on Rockfin on Rumble and locals and YouTube.
Thank you to our moderators.
Tish M. Zaryel, Peter, T. Jordan, Brett.
And that's everybody, Brett Harris.
That's everybody, yeah.
Thank you to our moderators for everything that you do.
And thank you to Mel Kay.
Yeah, absolutely.
Fantastic show. I will have all of her information as a pinned comment down below.
Thank you to everyone that watched us on the durand.locals.com.
And we will end it there.
Take care. Take care.
