The Economics of Everyday Things - 26. Graffiti

Episode Date: November 20, 2023

 Is graffiti public art, or public nuisance? It depends who you ask. Zachary Crockett tags in where it all started. RESOURCES:"Philadelphia Graffiti Pier: A Love Letter to the City’s Underground Arts," by Honora Feinberg (Guide to Philly, 2023)."USA TODAY Names Philadelphia 'Best City for Street Art,'" (Visit Philadelphia, 2023)."Cornbread, the First Graffiti Artist, Shows New Work at Philadelphia Gallery," by Peter Crimmins (WHYY, 2019)."Porch Light Program: Final Evaluation Report," by Jacob Kraemer Tebes, Samantha L. Matlin, Bronwyn Hunter, Azure B. Thompson, Dana M. Prince, and Nathaniel Mohatt (Yale School of Medicine, 2015)."Graffiti Triggers Crime, Littering, Study Shows," by Jeanna Bryner (NBC News, 2008)."Problem-Oriented Guides for Police: Graffiti," by Deborah Lamm Weisel (D.O.J. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 2004).EXTRA:"Urinetown," by Tell Me Something I Don't Know (2017).

When I was younger, I would say like around 13 or 14. I would get on a train and as I would look out the window, I would see a bunch of graffiti. Mainly tags. It kind of intrigued me later on like as I got older. I wanted to do it too. I go by repos and I'm going to fill it up for your graffiti artist. Repos grew up in West Philadelphia. In high school, he began immersing himself in the city's graffiti culture, learning everything

he could. He watched other artists as they painted. I was just soaking it all in because they were focused on their piece. I would just watch their arm movements the way that they would use their body to make certain lines, different techniques, and stuff like that. That's kind of how I picked it up. But as reposed with learn,

not everybody sees the poetry in graffiti. Where one person sees a liberating form of public art, another sees a nuisance, one that costs cities millions of dollars a year. Beauty's in the eye, they've been holder, and my thing is that's great, but you can't do it on someone else's property. For the Freakonomics Radio Network, this is the economics of everyday things. I'm Zachary Kraken. Today, graffiti. Most graffiti artists have an origin story for their name. And repose is no exception.

When I was younger, I used to do mischief stuff, going until abandoned buildings, this one place was like an abandoned house. And there was some spray paint and the basement. And I started just tagging and the basement and I started you know just tagging on the walls and stuff and then we were taking some stuff that was left over or whatever so I was just writing repo because I felt like I was the repo man. Repose started out by tagging his name but soon he began doing what are known as pieces, which are

larger and more elaborate creations. He says that every city has its own unique graffiti style. And in Philadelphia, that style is called Wicked's. It was originated by a guy called notorious Bic. He created this technique where you would have just a regular tag, but you'd be elongated to make it like a tall tag, right? And once you master the wickets, when you just put it up on the wall just one time, people know, oh, this person is definitely from Philadelphia. Repose comes from a long local tradition. In fact, most experts agree that Philly is where Graffiti

art originated, with an artist named Darryl McCray. He started spraying walls in the 1960s under the moniker Cornbread. When the media wrongly reported that he had died in a gang-related shooting, he tagged Cornbread on an elephant at the Philadelphia Zoo just to prove he was alive and well. Before Cornbread, most graffiti in Philadelphia was gang-related, but he inspired a new generation of artists who were in it for individual recognition. City Hall did not take kindly to all of this graffiti. In the 1980s, the mayor's office established the anti-Graphidi network. It later splintered into two different agencies.

One of those became the Community Life Improvement Program, also known as Clip. We started with just 12 employees in a half-million-dollar budget. And we created what was called zero tolerance zones. That's Tommy Conway. He's run the program since the very beginning. We started on Broad Street, which are major thoroughfare in the city.

And the spring guard and worked our way north, but every day we would go back and any new re-tax that graffiti would be cleaned within 24 hours. After we did Broad Street, then we worked on Germantown Avenue. And just snowballs from there. We removed graffiti from 3000 properties in street fixtures in our first year.

Now we're at about 185,000. 185,000 surfaces a year. Properties in street fixtures. Street fixtures are a street furniture, like the poles, designs, benches. Wow, all right, so we're talking like 500 a day. Yeah, just imagine if we weren't doing it. Conway says the city spends around three million dollars a

year removing graffiti from buildings street signs highway underpasses and other conspicuous locations. Of course Philly isn't the only city that deals with graffiti. In Austin, Texas, the annual cleanup bill is around half a million dollars. In San Francisco, it's 20 million. Most estimates suggest that altogether, the US spends around 12 billion dollars annually on graffiti cleanup. Quick removal is our biggest deterrent.

When they put it up there, we try to get it down within a couple of days, and we've been pretty successful at that. The services that Clip provides are free. You just call the local non-emergency complaint line to file a graffiti report, and Conway sends one of his 14 in-house crews to clean it up. Other big cities like New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles, handle graffiti removal in much the same way. It's become a necessary city service, and Conway says the work has benefited everyone. When you have graffiti in your community, it's a sign that folks don't care and

lollessness, and graffiti unchecked reads out the graffiti. So we'll just continue and then creates trash and litter and dissents of hopelessness. So cleaning it up was very good for business. Some reports have suggested that graffiti leads to reduced retail sales, declines in property value, and lost revenue from less ridership on transit systems. There isn't a lot of hard data to back up those assertions, but Conway takes them to heart. He says that last year, Clip received around 30,000 calls for graffiti removal,

and that they take down pretty much everything that gets reported. Only a few exceptions are made. that gets reported. Only a few exceptions are made. Sometimes if there's an issue with the graffiti, for instance, if it's in memorial of somebody, we'll work with the police department and give the family time. We'll leave it up there for a couple of weeks

until we have to get a burial. Then we would take it down. That's one instance and the other ones are if it's on the top of the center city building. And the graffiti is not the major issue, but someone's getting on your roof. So that's more of a safety concern for them. There's a couple of occasions one that pops in my head

is like, off of the fish street, or it was a junkyard that the entire wall was many different pieces and the community didn't care. And it was very colorful. So we left that there and it's still there to this day. Repose says that most graffiti artists follow an informal code of conduct when it comes to choosing a location for their art. One of the main roles is you don't write on people's personal property, you know like cars and churches you don't go over things of this or you want to hit like abandoned places.

In Philadelphia, one of those abandoned places is graffiti pier on the banks of the Delaware River. It's on the underside of a vacant railway spur. And what you see is row after row of concrete support columns in Technicolor. A place where street artists can paint without worrying about rules. Tags cover tags, cover pieces, cover tags. It's really something. I went to pretty much practice, but I wanted my name to live. So I put my name up high all over graffiti pier. Graffiti pier has become a popular destination not just for artists but

for Instagrammers and tourists. The city of Philadelphia has taken note of this popularity and it's been working on another approach to graffiti one that treats it as a benefit rather than a cost. That's coming up. In the early 1980s, Philadelphia's approach to graffiti was mostly punitive and focused on removal, but the city realized that something positive could come out of this public art. So they brought in a young artist named Jane Golden to convince taggers to paint city-funded murals instead.

I started talking to graffiti writers trying to understand why they wrote on walls and trying to figure out how we could design a program that would be palatable and not punitive, because I was really taken by a lot of the graffiti art I saw around the city and it was sort of reminiscent of abstract expressionism to me. So I felt like, oh, there's a lot of talent out there. At first, Schmet resistance from graffiti artists. There were a contingent of young people that just wouldn't sign up for that. I'd meet them wherever they wanted to meet, behind a rec center, like a corner store. And so I had a connection to the broader graffiti world. And I think I understood that rebellion and the desire to live outside

the system. And the challenge didn't stop there. Then the resistance came from the formal part of the art world, because people would say to me, you all are not doing public art, and I'd be like, well, we're in public doing art. So what do you think we're doing? Golden eventually convinced both sides that street art could add value to the city. Today, she's the executive director of Mural Arts, Philadelphia,

the largest public art program in the country. By most accounts, Mural Arts has been a success. The city now has around 4,000 murals. And earlier this year, USA Today designated Philly the best city in America for street art. In 2015, the Yale School of Medicine published a study showing positive effects on the mental health of both the artists and the neighbors, where such projects were installed. But artists like Repos say that while the program has done meaningful work, things are complicated.

I've done murals with mural art, so I kind of play both sides. I don't mind working with them. I don't feel like it's selling out. My thing is, why do they put certain murals in certain areas? Is it for gentrification reasons? Because it just seems like that for me sometimes. And for a lot of graph writers, especially because it goes into like a racial kind of thing. So you do have black people who write and you have white people who write, but what are

the murals really for? Are they really beautifying the city or is it mural art using people of color to capitalize off of what they do as an art. Mural Arts says it budgets anywhere from $25,000 to $50,000 to make a mural, depending on the size and the scope of the work. Around $3,000 to $10,000 of that is shared between the artists. Repose says he took home around $1,200 when he painted a mural with the program.

That's much less than the fees he says he's earned on the open market. Where some businesses use street art to draw customers. If I go get a wall on my own, I can make 40,000, 60,000, depending, you know? So there's definitely a big difference. I've worked with Foot Locker. I've worked with regular residential people,

but for the most part, I just reach out to people in the community. Now, the big question here is whether or not the city's efforts have led to a decrease in Philadelphia's graffiti problem. The answer is sort of. The combination of removal crews and the mural program seemed to be working well for a while. And then, COVID happened. Since COVID, graffiti in our city has gone up, and our underpass walls in particular are vulnerable to graffiti. And this is a puzzle for me, right? Because for so long, it was not the case. Tommy Conway of Clip has a theory.

The pandemic created a whole new breed of graffiti vandal because people were stuck home, they were bored, they took us probably good two years to get it back onto control to where it is today. Repose says that these days, heinous fellow graffiti artists are again outmatched. They're winning big time. And whenever Tommy Conway's removal crews feel like they're up against an impossible task, he likes to remind them of a simple fact. I like to just tell the guys we have more paint than they do. For the economics of everyday things, I'm Zachary Crackett.

This episode was produced by Julie Canfer and Sarah Lilly, with help from Lyric Boudich. It was mixed by Jeremy Johnston. I showed President Bush had a power wash. You're kidding me. I remember saying to his secret service, he shouldn't really be power washing because I showed President Bush had a power wash. You're kidding me. I remember saying to his secret service, he shouldn't really be power washing because of people with the cameras behind him who are all getting hit with pieces of, you know, bricks and, uh, sort of like, you know, tell the president what to do.

The Freakonomics Radio Network, the hidden side of everything. Stitcher. radio network, the hidden side of everything.