The Eric Metaxas Show - #127 - Joe Loconte

Episode Date: May 29, 2026

Today On The Eric Metaxas Show, Eric talks with Joe Loconte about his new documentary on Benjamin Rush, one of the most overlooked figures of the American Revolution. They discuss Rush’s Christian faith, his work as a physician, his role in the Continental Army, his fight against slavery, his humane treatment of the mentally ill, the Protestant roots of religious liberty, John Locke, George Washington, John Adams, and why the secular version of America’s founding leaves out some of the most important parts of the story. Subscribe for clips from The Eric Metaxas Show to hear politics and culture from a Christian perspective.⭐ PRE-ORDER TODAY:Revolution: The Birth of the Greatest Nation in the History of the World📕: https://a.co/d/0ir3NlapTODAY'S SPONSORS:⭐ FREE SLAVES with CSI: https://csi-usa.org/metaxas/🛏️ MyPillow — Save BIG with code ERIC: https://www.mypillow.com/☀️ Honest, fast, and free Medicare plan guidance: https://askchapter.com/metaxas/

In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19-speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility, and Optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at Cadillac Canada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. Rises knows a thing or two about great combinations. Chocolate and peanut butter, obviously,

but there's more than one way to Rises. From indulgent Rieces Big Cups with caramel to crunchy Riesces pieces and Riesce's miniatures, there's a delicious Rieces for every mood. It's the same combo you love, just with more ways to enjoy it. So whether you're snacking, sharing, or just treating yourself,

nothing else is Rieces. Hey there, folks, if you know this program, You know that I'm friends with a guy who goes by the name of Dr. Joseph Lecante. And we've had him on many times, and it's always a joy to have him on as it is right now. Joe LaCante, welcome back. Thank you, Eric. Great to be back. I also go by the name of Joe.

Joe is just fine. Yeah. You sometimes go by Joe, but not Joey. Not Joe. Just Joe. Just Joe. You know, yeah, just Joe. My dad used to call me Joe Pepp because the Italian name for Joseph is,

Giuseppe and short for Giuseppe is peppy. So I might be known as Joe Pepp around the house. Joe Pepp. Joe Pepepetone. Joe Pepetone. Did a lot of cocaine back in the day. We're not going there. We're not going back there.

Joe Pepitone. I had a Joe Pepitone baseball glove in the 70s. Oh, gosh. Well, all right. Listen, this is the problem. When people are my friends, I forget how distinguished they are. I have to tell my audience who this really is. Folks, Joe LaCante, Dr. Joseph LaCante, is director of

the Rivendell Center in New York City, serves as presidential scholar at New College of Florida and the C.S. Lewis Scholar for Public Life at Grove City College, New York Times bestselling author of many books. I've had him on the program many times. He's been on Socrates in the city. But Joe, you and I right now

are working on something very similar. You have made this documentary. I want you to tell my audience about it. All about Dr. Benjamin Rush, one of the great heroes of the, American Revolution. I don't deal with Rush very much in my book. I mentioned him here and there and the quotes, but you tell the story. So let's start at the beginning. What is this documentary? What led you to make a documentary about Benjamin Rush? Yes, I think like you, Eric, we wanted to

contribute to this cultural moment of honoring America's 250th. You and I both aware that a lot of people are going to get it wrong and we wanted to try to get it right. I came across a box. of Dr. Benjamin Rush, and I realized this founder is among the most extraordinary of American founders, and most Americans have never heard of him. Because think about, in summary, he signs the Declaration of Independence. He's the chief surgeon in Washington's Continental Army. He is a pioneer in the field of psychiatry. He's an abolitionist, and he's a man of Christian faith. He's just a remarkable character. He knows everybody. He's the ultimate insider in the revolutionary era.

Well, I mean, that's why I quote him quite a bit in my book. I don't really get into him very much, but he knew everyone. He was close to everyone. And I think you understated his, you know, as you say, he's a Christian. Many of them, most of them were Christians. He was a particularly serious, devout Christian. Yes, he was. He was famous for his Christian faith.

He was a great man of Christian faith. And I think that's one of the reasons that history pushes them away because you've got all these Enlightenment people that they kind of like it makes them uncomfortable. They'd rather talk about Jefferson or somebody. They don't like these outspoken Christians. And of course, it's the, well, it's the unstated thesis of my book that without these Christians, you got nothing. You're not going to have a revolution. But he, to me, is at the center of it. So how did you discover Dr. Benjamin Rush?

What was the first way in for you that you said, I think I want to talk about him. I want to make a documentary about him. Yeah, I think it was coming across a couple of different biographies and realizing that there's gold here with Benjamin Rush. And to your point, the historiography, the modern historians, the 20th century historians, they love to gravitate toward a Jefferson or a Franklin because they're perceived as very secular, very enlightened guys. Why focus on Benjamin Rush, a leader in the American?

Bible Society, for example, a founder of the Sunday School movement, he just raises too many uncomfortable questions, I think, for the militantly secular historians in our ranks. But you really can't tell the story of the American Revolution, as you know, without telling the story of Christianity, because these different streams are so interconnected, evangelical Christianity, republicanism, right? Separation of powers, religious liberty, these streams are all coming together in the American founding, aren't they, Eric? Well, you know, you and I have talked about this. It is, to my mind, astonishing how clear this is.

This is not some interpretation. It's just clear, but there are people that are uncomfortable with it. The secularists, the leftists, they're very uncomfortable with this. And a lot of conservative secularists that they pretend like, I can ignore this. It was all about the Enlightenment or Montesquieu or whatever. They just, they don't, it just makes them uncomfortable. And so it's by omission they kind of ignore this stuff and they push anybody that's perceived as being D.S. or whatever. I mean, the way they pushed Thomas Jefferson, I am amazed, Joe, at they practically make it sound like he wrote the Declaration of Independence in the sense that he came up with it.

And I think he came up with nothing. He wrote it. You know, it's like somebody says, I got all these ideas and I tick off the ideas. And he said, can you put them on a piece of paper? It's like, got it. And then, you know, you write up what you just heard. He didn't come up with any of this stuff himself. None of it.

None of it. But they act like nobody really knew what they believed. And they turned to Jefferson. And Jefferson kind of came up with these great ideas. We owe these truths to be self-evident. I mean, that wasn't even his phrase. That was Ben Franklin's phrase. And I feel like that's part of the subtext of the history.

the revolution is how historians have really pushed this enlightenment idea to the exclusion of the faith idea. And so that's one of the reasons that I want to know about Benjamin Rush. Now, before we get into the subject of Benjamin Rush, where does this documentary exist? How can people see it? Yes, thank you for asking, my friend. We just did a film screening at the Tribeca Film Center here last week, which was terrific. We have as a one hour now film.

It also exists on my YouTube channel in four different episodes. So we are negotiating with distributors right now where people can see the one hour, you know, uninterrupted, ready to go. That's in negotiations now, but you can see it in four parts on my YouTube channel. People can watch it on Joe LaCante's YouTube channel. Fantastic.

I got to put that up on X or whatever because this is just so important. It's so important. But Joe, tell us the story. then, if you would, about Dr. Benjamin Rush, where was he born? What happened? Yeah. I want to reinforce your earlier point, as we get into here, my friend, the secular

narrative is that America came to its senses, had its revolution, declared all these natural rights, freedom, et cetera, because it became less and less religious. It was these secular enlightenment guys. You really gave us all these wonderful ideas. And that narrative was completely false. And Benjamin Rush really embodies the truth of the thing. Because in Benjamin Rush, you have this, yes, he's a man of science. He's an enlightenment guy in the American sense, which means absolutely friendly to historic Christianity.

So he's a thinker, but he's also rooted in the scriptures. Deeply rooted in the scriptures, go. What we're really talking about, the lie that's been pushed, is that you have to choose between faith and reason. That is a vile lie from the pit of hell. I know you're not going to say that. You're Dr. Joseph Laconte, but I will say that. Ladies and gentlemen, that is a vile lie from the pit of hell. That you have to choose between faith and reason.

That is a lie. Faith points you to reason. Reason points you to faith. So this idea that I've got to pick one is complete nonsense. And in my research for my book, I mean, the Enlightenment sharpened the theology of the Christianity. Christians in America. It forced them to clarify where they were coming from and leads to religious liberty. Yes, actually. I mean, it's kind of interesting. So the Enlightenment critique of religion

forced American Christians to to really, in a way, double down on what is this faith. And at the heart, when you squeeze the Christian faith, religious liberty comes out of it. It's an amazing. It's an amazing paradox, it's beautiful, and it's so misunderstood. So that's why it just throws me, you know, that you're on this page that you get this. And we have to re-educate, you know, Americans say, hey, folks, don't, don't, don't be fooled. The faith is not at odds with reason. It really is something that it's going to take some time to re-educate people about what really happens. The person of Benjamin Rush helps us do that. So, So, yes, start on, you know, where did he, where did he grow?

I guess he grew up in Boston. No, he's a native Philadelphian, a native Philadelphian. Forgive me. He goes off to medical school in Scotland, but he is a local Philadelphia guy. He will study for a while at the College of New Jersey, now Princeton. He'll have some interactions with the Reverend John Witherspoon as well, but he is a native Philadelphia, and he's deeply embedded in that community, my friend. And I think, again, back to Rush.

and his how he embodies the truths you just expressed. Reason, revelation, give us the American Revolution. That in my mind is kind of a conceptual trinity, if you well. Reason, revelation, revolution. So what do you have with Rush? Yes, he's a surgeon in Washington's Continental Army, and he's deeply concerned about how the soldiers are conducting themselves, how they're being treated, the state of the military hospitals,

and he will write a manual, a really important manual for physicians and for politicians. Here's how we need to raise the standard of health in the military hospitals and there in the field. And Washington will take many of his recommendations. We can only guess at how many soldiers live to fight another day because of Benjamin Rush's recommendations, particularly there at Valley Forge. Actually, when I did my research on Valley Forge, I was astonished at how, How many men died. They just died, folks.

They weren't killed. They just died with disease. We're going to come right back talking to Zolacanti about Benjamin Rush. How much are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness worth to you? That is the question America's founders had to answer. You see, for more than 150 years, America's 13 colonies governed themselves until Britain declared that they had no right to self-rule. So ordinary people had to make extraordinary choices and risk their lives.

their fortunes and their sacred honor to fight for independence. And against all odds they won. And in victory, they built one of the most stable and lasting republics in history. Now experience the American Revolution like never before, thanks to our friends at Hillsdale College. Revolutionary America, a new documentary from Hillsdale Studios, narrated by Tom Selleck, brings the founding of our nation to life through the voices of those who lived it alongside insights from leading scholars and commentators.

At a time when history is often distorted, this is your chance to see the story as it truly happened and ask yourself, what would you risk for freedom? Face the decisions, our founders grappled within Revolutionary America, a Hillsdale Studios film. Only in theaters, May 31st through June 2nd. Get your tickets now by going to Hillsdale.edu slash revolution. Hillesdale.edu slash revolution. You don't want to miss the opportunity to see this on the big screen. Trust me, go to Hillsdale.

orgia slash revolution to locate a theater near you and buy tickets now for Revolutionary America. Did I mention I'm in this film? It's a great film. One more time, that's Hillsdale.edu slash revolution. Welcome back talking to Joe Laconte, Dr. Joseph P. LeConte to you. But I get to call him Joe. Joe, we're talking about your documentary on Benjamin Rush. And this is important in this 250th supercentennial year.

In case anybody wants to know, the official term is the supercentennial. It's America's supercentennial. But this is actually very, very important work that you're doing in telling the story of Benjamin Rush to correct some of the mistakes that have lingered for decades in American higher education. the culture at large about the role of faith. You were just talking about what a man of science, Benjamin Rush, was, that he was the lead surgeon of the Continental Army. I got confused about Boston for a second because he was so close to John Adams. John Adams, right. For a second, but I mean, he really was, he was the best of the Christians of that era because he did embody science.

And again, that lie that we have to choose. Yes. We've really got to undo that. We've got to work against that. Excellent points, Eric. I didn't mean to interrupt you, friend. I think it's hard to imagine an American founder who was more consistent in applying the principles of the declaration and the Constitution in every realm of human endeavor that he entered. So I'll give you an example. He gets to the Pennsylvania hospital there where he's, it's a huge part of his career, his work there as a surgeon at the hospital. He arrives. He sees the mentally ill chained in the basement, treated like animals, like they're in a cell. And he immediately decides, we need more

humane treatment, off with the chains, and figure out how to connect with these people and treat them humanely. And as a result, Dr. Rush will be known as the father of modern psychiatry in the Pennsylvania Hospital to this day has that reputation as being a pioneer in this humane treatment of the mentally ill. That's out of his Christian convictions. That's not contrary to. It's a result of is Christian conviction. That's just one example we can talk about more. It's funny. I, in my research on when John Adams goes in 1774 to Philadelphia for the first time, he talks about getting a tour of a hospital and of the underground cells of the lunatics. That's it. And when I read that, it chilled me. I thought, what were troubled people treated like in 1774?

And so you're telling us that thanks to Benjamin Rush, that's right. They were treated more humanely. It's just beautiful. I did not know that. It's one example. I think the principle that guides his life, Eric, and it comes out in my documentary film,

it's the principle of the golden rule. Treat others as you want to be treated. And he applies that rule to his civic and political life in profoundly important ways. The other obvious example is he's an abolitionist. And he's an abolitionist when it's, It's not a comfortable thing to do in Philadelphia where something like a third of all the households in Philadelphia, they have slaves. And some of his good friends, Benjamin Franklin, for example, are slave owners.

So he's writing tracks denouncing slavery in the harshest terms in like 1773, 74, even before the revolution. And he's calling out the Christian ministers in Philadelphia for justifying slavery. It's an amazing, bold and courageous step, and it's not going to help him in terms of his business, his social status. But he's, and again, he's arguing from the scriptures as well. It's coming out of a deep Christian conviction, and he's calling people to account. Pretty impressive stuff. Well, I was going to say, that's something that I noticed, too. I don't really say much about it in my book, but how the devout Christians were really strongly, openly, explicitly.

against slavery. I mean, you see it, especially among the Boston Puritans, you know, James Otis Jr., John and Abigail, Adams, and on and on, they really railed against it. Samuel Adams was given on his, for his wedding, someone gave him a female slave for him and his wife. And he made it real clear, I will not live with someone enslaved under my roof. And they freed her. And so I think she stayed on as a servant, but it's so interesting because that story is not enough told how the Christian voices spoke so strongly, very strongly. And James Otis Jr., not somebody that many people know his story, but I write about him a little bit.

But it really is interesting how little told that story is. And even those who were slave owners, how they in the course of the revolution were persuaded against it, Benjamin Franklin at the top of the list. fascinating. Yes, yes. Those who are slave owners, as you know, they all seem to have a guilty conscience about it, or most of them had a guilty conscience about it. And what Rush understands early on in his initial tract against slavery is that the logic of the American Revolution, the logic is it's putting the institution of slavery on notice all over the world. Your days will be numbered. Your days will be numbered. We'll be right back talking to Joe LaCante.

Some of you know that we are right now doing a campaign to free slaves literally. This is a big deal. I see it as a great opportunity for people who believe in truth and justice to be able to act on those values. And Todd, we're just always grateful when you can come on and give us a little more explanation of what it is we're talking about. These women, they've been enslaved in Sudan since the 1990s. and CSI, in partnership with Eric Metaxus, thanks to your generosity, has been able to free literally tens of thousands of those individuals and bring them back into a new life of freedom. So we're so excited to be here and invite you to help us free even more slaves this month.

I guess the way I see it, Todd, is this is faith in action. Again, the easy way to do it is go to Ericmetaxis.com. The banner comes up. All the details are there. I beg you, folks, please participate and thank you. Welcome back talking to Joe LaConte. We're talking about Benjamin Rush, one of the great, great figures of the American Revolution. And you were just saying, Joe, how it became clear that, you know, when you say we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, there's a problem that many of them saw the handwriting on the wall that somehow we cannot say we believe in this.

if we don't deal with this. And it is interesting how various of them dealt with it in their different ways. I mean, Benjamin Franklin becomes very, very outspokenly against abolition. Earlier in his life, he himself owned slaves. Yes. Yes. It's like follow the logic of the language of the declaration. Follow the logic.

And that's precisely what Benjamin Rush does. and one remarkable act that he's involved in, I think it's one of the most remarkable acts of racial reconciliation in the early American Republicans in 1793. Rush is part of a celebration because he's supporting the black churches, the independent black churches in Philadelphia.

There's a roof raising, there's a celebration, a big picnic. Initially, the carpenters, the white guys, the white colonial guys, sit down at the table and they are served by the African Americans. And then they change points. places. The white guys get up from the table. The African Americans, 50 or so, sit down to the

table and they are served by the white colonial guys who are helping to celebrate the church. Rush records this event in his journal. It takes your breath away. It absolutely takes your breath away. The fact that that could happen in 1793 absolutely takes my breath away. I think you you mentioned that on this program some months back. It's almost unbelievable that they could be that progressive in the positive sense at that time that their Christian convictions were so strong. Now, you know, you know, I know about William Wilberforce. I mean, the evangelical Christians really got this.

Yes, they did. Most other people didn't really get it. And it took time. But it was usually the outspoken evangelicals. evangelical Christians, we would call them. They wouldn't use that term. But folks like Benjamin Rush that really pushed the logic of it, I mentioned James Otis Jr. They understood this, that there's no way around this.

How do you get around this? And it took time. And again, so many of the revolutionary leaders evolved. I mean, George Washington evolved dramatically himself on this issue. Yes. And back to your early point here, Eric, this is not coming out of some cultural religious vacuum. these deep convictions about human equality and human freedom, that is rooted in the Anglo-Tradition, the Anglo-American tradition.

We have to have a nod here to John Locke and his second treatise. What Locke does in the second treatise is to lay out a theological foundation for human equality and human freedom. And all those American revolutionary leaders, they have Locke's second treatise in their hands. They've read it. And some preachers are actually using it in place of sermons from the pulpit. a biblical basis for human equality and human freedom. The American Revolution is a Lockean revolution,

meaning it is deeply rooted in a Christian biblical understanding of the human person. That's a big deal. You've done a lot of work on John Locke. Tell us, tell my audience more about John. If somebody knows nothing about John Locke, we'll talk about him because you've done a lot of work on him. Long story short, John Locke is this English philosopher in the 1670, 1680s, and he's up against this absolutism, political absolutism, religious absolutism, tyranny. They're joined at the hip.

And part of Locke's solution is to write his two treatises of government, the second treatise in particular where he's laying out the case for natural rights, universal human rights that come from the hand of God. And he's even quoting a bit from Ephesians 2, we are God's workmanship sent into the world about his business, we belong to him. And that language really resonates with the Americans a hundred years later. So Locke lays out the vision for human equality, human freedom

in a really accessible way, natural law, but also the scriptures. And the Americans being so Protestant, so biblically literate, they run with it like no one else in the world is going to run with it. Well, it is interesting. You say so Protestant. I want to come back to that in our next segment.

because that's something that fascinated me about my, in my own research, the Protestant quality, particularly Protestant quality, whatever we mean by Protestant, I guess we'll have to get back to that. But it's also fascinating to me that this battle of ideas was going on in England before it comes here, before, you know, that some were going along with it, some were buying this stuff, but it really was not settled. in England. And I actually, Joe, I don't know that it's settled today when we talk about this. We're going to go to a break. We'll be right back talking to Joe LaCante. Folks, before we go, I want to recommend to you in case you want to do something crazy and beautiful, we are doing another campaign with our friends at CSI. These folks are heroes. If you want to free

a slave, literally, this is what CSI does. Every $250 sets one captive free and puts them into a life of freedom sets them up. This is important. Help us do this. Go to ericmetaxis.com. Click on the banner. Couldn't be easier. Please go to ericmetaxis.com.

Click on the banner. Very important. Welcome back talking to Joel Ocante. He has a new documentary out on Benjamin Rush. You can see at his YouTube channel. Highly recommended folks. This is so important. So Joe, I just was mentioning that

it's fascinating, you know, when you talk about a figure like John Locke, this just fabled philosopher in England in the 1670, 1680s, he writes his two treatises. And it's, what's fascinating to me is how these things were not settled in England. This battle of ideas was going on then. It goes on all through the 18th century. We turn these ideas into a country called the United States of America. We say we believe in religious liberty, we believe in free speech, we believe in all these ideas. We turn these ideas, which are Christian ideas, into a nation.

But they didn't do that over there. They really continue to. Yeah. You're right. I didn't mean to wrap, Eric. No, no, no. I'm curious to your response to that, because I'm, I really was fascinated at how, you know, you've got figures like, you know, Edmund Burke and.

William Pitt and others in England who get this stuff. But they're sort of in the minority. They lose ultimately when, you know, arguing with the king and his government on these ideas. They sided with the colonists. But so these ideas were working themselves out. But they really never seemed to get settled in England in the way that they got settled here. I mean, and to this day, I kind of, I just look at England. today and I say, what do they believe over there? Do they believe in freedom of speech?

It doesn't seem like it. It doesn't seem like they have the values. Yeah, they got real troubles over there. The great breakthrough in Britain was in 1689, 1690, the glorious revolution. Now, why that's so important for the Americans is they reaffirm constitutional government, constitutional Marnakey. They still have the king, but they're going to put limits on the king now. He's going to have to rule with parliament. He can't just dismiss parliament. So that's really important. Think about the Americans. They're claiming their rights as Englishmen. They're claiming Magna Carta. They're claiming the English Bill of Rights, which came out of that glorious revolution a hundred years before. But you're right. The Americans take those principles and we

run with it. We give it a political form. We embody it in a constitution like no one else has done in the history of the world, right? That's impressive stuff. Well, that's, and I want to get back to the Protestant thing, but just to follow this, what amazed me was how King George the Third didn't get this and he pushed against it. And we see this in our own government, the United States of America. Now, you can have an administration

that seems to be pulling away from the Constitution. So this is constantly something that's in play. But it's fascinating to me how George III, largely due to corruption, he was able to just spend a ton of money to get people to vote his way and to say, listen, we're not gonna, we're not gonna, We're not going to follow the logic. We're not going to follow our own logic,

even though you have people like Burke and William Pitt pushing and others, Isaac Barry, whatever, they see the Americans' point of view, and they see that it is fundamentally English. This is in our own constitution. This is something that we theoretically figured this out a while ago, you know,

and we're not being true to it. And it really is clear that they weren't. I was fascinated. showed that I didn't know this, but that King George the 3rd, when we defeated Cornwallis

at Yorktown, we, meaning you and me, when we defeated Cornwallis, the handwriting is on the wall, I'm using that phrase again, but everybody in England could see it's over. Lord North famously says it's over, it's over.

King George III didn't think it was over and he was so upset. that Parliament wanted to say it's over and that we need to move on, we can't fight this revolution, we can't fight this war anymore, that he chose to abdicate. Did you know that? I did not know that. I have to confess, no.

I was so astonished. He wrote a letter of abdication because he refused to exceed to the will of parliament. And Lord North has to take him like a child and explain to him, excuse me, you know, according to our new. a constitution according to gay. As king, you do need at this point to exceed to what parliament has chosen to do. But he actually wrote out his abdication because his version of things says, you know what, if I cannot be, you know, if I can't do what I want to do, I need to, I need to leave.

And Lord North is trying to explain him like, no, no, no, we need a monarch who is willing to follow our constitution. Yes. But I was just astonished that he actually went to the trouble of writing out his abdication because of this class. Anyway. Yeah. Hence the problem with monarchies at the end of the day, right, Eric? I mean, this is what makes the American Revolution so radical, right? We get rid of the king and we get rid of a national church at the same time.

Two of the most stabilizing institutions in Europe for centuries and we get rid of them. Wow. Now how are you going to hold this? Go ahead, go ahead. Which brings us to, I have. have a whole chapter in my book about Tom, sorry, John Adams writes an essay in 1765 called a dissertation on the canon and feudal law. And I was bold over by this essay. I think I mentioned it to you when we were together. And it brings us to this idea that at the heart of American liberty,

at the heart of the principles that lead us to the revolution and that lead us to fight the revolution and to establish the government we have in our constitution, at the heart of it is Protestantism. It's really not escapable. And that was a very strong thing at the time. We've sort of lost sight of that. And this doesn't mean that we're anti-Catholic. I'm certainly not. But it needs to be dealt with that this was a reaction to the authoritarian canon law in the churches in Europe at the time. So talk about that because I know you know about this. Yes, and this is again,

Benjamin Rush was excellent on this point. What is distinctive of Protestant Christianity in the 18th century in colonial America? Well, a number of things we could say, certainly the supremacy of the Bible as the highest authority. And freedom of conscience in the pursuit of truth. Conscience grounded in the word of God,

not free-floating. Conscience rooted in the word of God in the pursuit of truth. truth. That's a Protestant distinctive. And, you know, it's regretful to say that the Catholics are just not there in the 18th century at all. They don't represent that viewpoint. But that viewpoint is so important to the American Revolution, isn't it? Because it emphasizes the importance of the individual, human agency, moral agency, and human freedom. Well, it's interesting to me because you, you know, I think that, you know, when John F. Kennedy was running for president, there were many

American Protestants who were worried, who thought, how's this going to work? Isn't his fidelity fundamentally to the Pope in Rome and not to the Constitution? And of course, there are some Catholics that would say, yes, it is. But there were other Catholics, I would say Kennedy was among them, who didn't see it that way, whose fidelity was to the Constitution. So it is interesting how, you know, you kind of say, well, then what is true Roman Catholicism? what is true. It's kind of like, you know, when I talk to certain cab drivers in New York who are Muslim, they're not radical Muslims. They identify as Muslims, but they believe in America. Right. So when did that happen for the Catholics? It's an interesting conversation. It's a great question. And I think you could argue when it comes to religious liberty, freedom of conscience, we're all Protestants now. Come on in, the water's fine. But it really was that Protestant stream that established that political principle. Because, of a respect for the nature of faith, the nature of the human person. Faith has to be freely chosen. It can't be imposed by political or religious authorities. So Benjamin Rush is really important

in this point, Eric, because when there's a debate going on among the Pennsylvania delegates, if you're going to approve the Constitution, do you have to swear to a religious oath, affirm the Trinity, affirm the Bible, affirm Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord? Benjamin Rush believes all those things, but he says, no, can't have a religious test for office. Can't do it. He will lose the argument initially, but of course that will be embedded in our Constitution. No religious test for public office. That again is a Protestant distinctive. No one else is thinking this way on the world's scene. That's an incredible contribution, it seems to me, to liberal democracy. Well, I mean, I really couldn't agree more. And I was so amazed. I was even

amazed in in 1775 when george washington sends benedict arnold through the woods of main to canada because they they were hoping to take uh canada from the british uh they they were hoping to get uh canada to join us in the rebellion and he sends benedict arnold up there and he strictly enjoins him in his orders that yes we have theological differences with them in fact it's interesting that Washington says, in effect, yes, they are wrong in their Catholic theology, but, but it is not our job to correct them, to insult them. So he puts religious liberty above his theological beliefs. He doesn't say I have no theological beliefs. He has theological beliefs. This is talking about George Washington, but he puts religious liberty above that. When we come back, we're talking

to Joe LaCante, new documentary on Benjamin Rush. Folks, this is important. If Medicare has you confused. If you've got questions, we understand, and this is why we recommend our friends at Chapter. They're there to help you to kind of talk you through what might work best for you. This is very important that you get it right. You can call them at 571-4-1-2-5-3. These are our friends at Chapter 571-4-21-1253. Welcome back talking to Joe La Cante. about many things, but centered around your new documentary

on Benjamin Rush, which people can find to your YouTube channel. What's the YouTube channel? Joseph Laconte, Joe Loconte. Joe Loconte, J-O-E-L-C-O-N-T-E.

Joe LaCante. So I was fascinated by, because there's this, it's not maybe a conundrum, but there's a paradox, right? That you're saying, and I'm saying that, that we believe that Christianity teaches X.

And part of X is that we're not going to force everyone to believe in X. Right. Right. So when George Washington sends Benedict Arnold up to Canada, he says, yes, according to Benjamin, sorry, according to Washington, the Canadians up there, the Catholics,

they have there in some theological error, but it is not our job to correct that error. This is at the heart of the American Revolution. It's the heart of the creation of this nation is that we believe certain things and there are certain things we will insist on, but there are other things we won't insist on. We won't insist on everyone believing

every little bit of theology that we do. I mean, that right there is, you talk about something new in world history. That right there is an amazing, epical moment in world history. Yes, and it doesn't happen without Protestant Christianity, my friend, to your point. What the Protestants understand, go back to the scriptures, the scene there with Jesus and the rich young man who wants to justify himself, what must I do to be saved?

And Jesus tells him, sell everything, and then come follow me. Come follow me. You know, we call that a call. He's called by Jesus. It doesn't get any more vivid than that. Come and follow me. What does the rich young man do? he goes away sad because he had great wealth.

Jesus allows him to make that choice. The Protestant insight is that's the nature of faith because it's a relationship with a real person, the God of heaven and earth, Jesus, our Lord. That has to be freely chosen. The Protestants get that, unfortunately, long before the Catholics get that. But that is so crucial to understanding the American story, it seems to me, representing, respecting the names.

of the human person made in God's image. And there are some Christians today, mostly Catholic, but some Protestant, who are going backwards on this. The Catholic Integralists, I think John Zemirik has talked about Patrick Danin and others who seem to believe that we need somehow to impose. Yeah. What do you call it? I mean, of course we impose a certain kind of morality. We have rules and things, but it's a little bit troubling. And this is, there, there's, are some genuine Christian nationalists in the pejorative sense,

not have a wholesome sense that I believe in my nation and I'm a Christian and I want to have an influence, but there are people that that seem to go a little bit farther than that. And I don't think they're going to have much success. But it is interesting that this battle for these ideas is ever new. Yes, it's ever new. And, you know, John Adams and Benjamin Rush, they worried about the future of the Republic. Are we going to be, are we going to have the kind of.

of civic character and virtue that's required to sustain the Republican. John Adams is very worried about it in his correspondence with Rush. And Rush responds in an essay, and he says this, we are neglecting the one thing that we need to ensure our Republican form of government, that is the teachings of Christianity by means of the Bible. He wants the Bible throughout public education, an educational system. Now, we live in a different era, obviously, obviously than Benjamin Rush, very religiously diverse and pluralistic. But we need to think seriously about what these guys are, what they're saying, what they're believing about the nature of this Republican government.

How do you get civic virtue? How do you get the kind of self-governing citizens that you need to sustain a republic? What do you think, Eric? Well, that's the, you know, this has obsessed me for a number of years. I mean, I sort of wrote a book about it called If You Can Keep It, You realize that this is the paradox at the heart of liberty, which I learned from our friend Oz Guinness. If you don't believe certain things, liberty is going to go away, but you can't coerce those

beliefs. But it's interesting, Joe, that you say we're living in a different society, but you kind of wonder, are we being dishonest with ourselves about the idea that somehow it's, it's, it's wrong to want to teach the Bible in public schools. Why was it wrong then? In other words, I'd like to explore the limits of that in some way because, well, not that I think that Bibles are going to be taught in public schools, but it is interesting that this stuff is, it's inescapable, that if you do not have people, or at least enough people, having a biblical faith and living out that faith, liberty goes away. And so it really is, it's almost impossible

to figure out, but you've got to talk about it. We'll be right back talking to Joe LaCante. It's finally here, our second annual mega sale. This sale only comes around once a year, so take advantage of the best offers ever while you can. For example, save 50% on our Giza Dream

Bedsheets as low as 2998. And for the first time ever on TV, my pillow mattresses and my pillow mattress stoppers as low as 99-98. And you save 50% on our Luxembourg. for your six-piece tall sets, regular 6998, now only 3998.

And our best selling standard, MyPillows, regular 4998, on sale for 1798, way not it, mega sale, only 1498. So go to Mypillow.com, or call the number on your screen, use this promo code to take advantage of our second annual mega sale. But wait, there's more. To make the mega sale even more special when you order

Right now, your order's going to ship absolutely free. Welcome back talking to Joe Laconte. Joe, we've talked about so many different things, but tell us more about Benjamin Rush. I mean, one of the things that fascinated me is his love of Republican principles. And it's interesting how he and John Adams, who were buddies in Philadelphia during the Continental Congress, and they got some stuff wrong.

Like they were both bothered, deeply bothered about the idea of a standing army saying this goes against republican principles it's got to be all on a volunteer basis and we get where that comes from right that that we want everything to be you know uh it can't be coerced but there's that fine line and Washington's pushing for standing army uh yeah i mean rush was as i say i mean as much as i admire him i feel like he kind of got this wrong in a way yeah there were some things that he just dug in on that he shouldn't have dug in on one of them we just have to mention his uh bloodletting you know it was a common practice. If a man is sick, draw out some blood. It's still in practice in the 18th century.

And Rush digs in on that because in some case it seems to work. And even though there are competing theories, he holds the line on that despite the fact he's a remarkable physician, incredibly compassionate and humane. Let me give me one quick example of how dedicated this guy is to his profession and to the people around him. When the yellow fever epidemic hits caused by mosquitoes, Philadelphia, 1793, and people are, they are dropping by the bucket loads. They just dying one after another. They don't know how to treat it. Anybody with means, financial means, will get out of the city. Benjamin Rush stays at his post. He's bringing the sick into his own home, Eric. He's rising at dawn to treat anybody who calls on him. It's a remarkable commitment to

his profession, to his neighbors. He puts his own life at risk. He gets deftly ill himself. He gets deftly ill himself, survives, and of course, gives the credit to the God of mercy. His journal is just filled with his gratitude to Jesus Christ and the Lord for rescuing from this great darkness, but he's committed to the profession. It's so remarkable. That's what Christian men and women do who are living out their faith, isn't it? Right? Well, it's amazing because he was the real deal and he is a hero. Have you thought about writing a short biography, of him? Well, you know, I think there are good biographies that are out there. Stephen Freed's biography is really excellent, single volume biography, really well done, which is a great source for

me. I think that work's been done. We were just excited to get this film out because, honestly, you know, a Ken Burns 12-hour documentary, I haven't seen all of it. And despite good intentions and all kinds of budget and personnel and staff, I worried that these guys were not going to get the basic story right, you know? So, so there we are. I have seen all 12 hours of the Ken Burns documentary, and let me tell you, uh, not great. Yeah.

Not great at all. Uh, he, he makes the standard error. And again, you know, I just shake my head, uh, because I think Ken Burns is a good guy. He's done some great work. But it's fatiguing to see people pretend that, uh, the men of the revolution were all deists and whole thing was an enlightenment. That's just complete nonsense. Yeah, it is nonsense.

It's total nonsense. Yes, it is. But it's pushed by everybody, including by some, you know, good guys like, you know, Joseph Ellis says Washington was a deist. He didn't believe. Joseph Ellis knows way more about Washington than I do, but he's getting that wrong, you know. They're certain they keep pushing it. And in the, I can't really recommend Ken Burns' Revolution Document.

There's just so much in it. I mean, he spends. half the time, you know, talking about the Lenape and the Iroquois, and that he just goes on and on and on. It's so, it's politically correct to talk about the sadness of, you know, right. On it, you know, a lot of these Native Americans sided with the British and they lost and oh, it's so sad. And you think, well, he's like, he's missing the story. He's missing the incredible story, which is you cannot, you can hardly overstate the importance of biblical assumptions to the American Revolutionaries. The moral assumptions

the theological assumptions. Human equality, human freedom. It's not a secular idea. It's a profoundly biblical idea. And these American revolutionaries are rooted in that great book. And honestly, he barely, barely touches on it. In fact, he pushes against it. No, it is astonishing. It's an astonishing thing that you could do 12 hours on the revolution and miss this central fact. It's kind of funny. It's not like I planned my book as a corrective, but it ends up being without trying to be because my book is not about the faith of the founders.

But it just by telling the story, you say, here it is. I mean, one of the classic cases is the story of Nathan Hale. One of the great Christian heroes killed the 21. But I mean, what a hero he is, he gets about 18 seconds in the 12-hour documentary. Wow. It's kind of scandalous. We're out of time.

be talking to you at Socrates in the studio. Folks, if you want more of this, tune in to Socrates in the studio, plenty more with Joe Leconte. But Joe, for today, we'll leave it there. God bless you, my friend. Thank you. Thank you. Great being with you.

Hey there, folks. We break into a regular programming. We kind of have a news flash here. In case he didn't know, I'm excited to get for a few minutes at least Todd Chapman on the program. He's a spokesperson for CSI Christian Solidarity International. Some of you know that we are right now doing a campaign to free slaves literally. This is a big deal. I see it as a great opportunity for people who believe in truth and justice to be able to act on those values.

And Todd, we're just always grateful when you can come on and give us a little more explanation of what it is we're talking about. Yeah, Eric, grateful to be back. And I got to tell you, this is, it's always a highlight of my. My schedule of my year when I get to come before you and your audience and give an update, first of all, as to the incredible difference that the Eric Pataxus audience is making in the lives of so many individuals that, frankly, the world doesn't know about or has largely forgotten about. And I'm talking about women and children who have been enslaved for literally decades, well, at least the women. The kids, not so much because they're still very young. But these women, they've been enslaved in Sudan since. the 1990s. And CSI, in partnership with Eric Metaxus, thanks to your generosity, has been able to free literally tens of thousands of those individuals and bring them back into a new life of freedom.

So we're so excited to be here and invite you to help us free even more slaves this moment. Please. Please. I mean, it's a, the problem, Todd, is it's almost unbelievable. Even to me, you know, when you say things like this, that we freed, you know, 1,300 human. beings, I just think, can it be? I mean, and I know it's true, but it is very hard to get my head around. So for people who aren't familiar with what it is we're talking about, talk to them. Go ahead. Yeah, this is something that most people, and I have this conversation a lot, when people ask about CSI and then we inevitably talk about, you know, what is, CSI does a lot of things. But the freeing of these Sudanese slaves is their primary focus. The only organization in the

world that's actually focused on liberating these precious women and children. And people are shocked. They're like, you know, I've never even heard about this. So what happened was back in the late 1980s, Muslim marauders were basically allowed to do a bit of a kind of like a religious cleansing against Christians living in what is now South Sudan. And when I say they were allowed to do a cleansing, they were armed by the government, allowed to go in and ruthlessly murder men and, you know, take enslave the women and children in these Christian villages. And they took them up into the north, what's now North Sudan, and they've been held enslaved ever since then. And it became evident as CSI was working with the governments there to get these slaves freed, that the

governments had no inclination to do that. So CSI just said, well, we'll see what we can do. And brought it to their supporters, and we've been bringing it to Eric Metaxus listeners now for a number of years. And all, what it's all said and done, over 100,000 of the Sudanese slaves, now grown women, many of them, most of them were taken captive when they were children, and now they're grown women, but they've lived their entire life in slavery. We're setting them free, bringing them back into South Sudan, reuniting them, reintegrating them into their home village whenever we can, and setting them up in a brand new life of freedom. And it's just a really beautiful opportunity for you, if you've never heard about this before, to step in and give a gift that literally

will set a human being free. It's awesome. Well, again, it seems almost unbelievable, but I want to encourage my audience. Folks, this is true. We've been doing this for a number of years. Without you and your support, we don't do this. We can't do this. So it is up to you. The easiest way to do it is go to my website. It's just ericmetaxis.com. The banner will pop up. And they're all the details there, but I have someplace here. Maybe I don't even have it with me today, but there's a phone number, which we're going to get to you. But I have to say, it is almost crazy that this is happening that in this day and age, we have this kind of thing going on on the globe. It sounds like something out of history. Unfortunately, evil and slavery are alive and well on the globe today.

But the good news is that Christian faith has entered the equation and people of Christian faith, no slavery is evil, and have the ability, thanks to CSI, to do something about it right now. So it's a tremendous opportunity. The $250. Now, by the way, if you can't give that, give whatever you can because it all goes to the same thing. But for every $250, it just does, it doesn't just free someone. And Chris, I don't know if you can get us the phone. number, but it doesn't just free someone from slavery. It sets them up in a life of freedom. That's what Todd was just talking about. So it's the whole package. Every $250 sets someone free. It is really just, I guess the way I see it, Todd, is this is faith in action. If anybody else, you know, what can I do? What can I do? You can do this. Everybody can participate in this. Again, the easy way to do it is go to Ericmetaxis.com. The banner comes up.

All the details are there. I beg you, folks, please participate and thank you.