The Good Tech Companies - Channel Your Inner Hacker By Breaking Into a System With Nothing But a Name
Episode Date: December 24, 2024This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/channel-your-inner-hacker-by-breaking-into-a-system-with-nothing-but-a-name. From initial in...formation gathering to vulnerability identification and exploitation, we show how each phase builds on the last. Check more stories related to cybersecurity at: https://hackernoon.com/c/cybersecurity. You can also check exclusive content about #ethical-hacking, #pentesting, #tools-for-penetration-testing, #penetration-testing, #black-box-penetration-testing, #hacking-guide, #breaking-into-a-system, #good-company, and more. This story was written by: @sekurno. Learn more about this writer by checking @sekurno's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com. This article examines the full lifecycle of black-box pentesting - from reconnaissance to reporting. From initial information gathering to vulnerability identification and exploitation, we show how each phase builds on the last.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This audio is presented by Hacker Noon, where anyone can learn anything about any technology.
Channel your inner hacker by breaking into a system with nothing but a name.
By Sikerno, have you ever wondered how an attacker could breach a system with zero inside knowledge?
Without joining the ranks of Anonymous or the Lizard Squad, learning black box penetration
testing is probably the closest you'll get toe-walking in their shoes.
At SikernNo, we specialize in
the art and science of uncovering vulnerabilities, and we're excited to bring you into our world.
Whether you're new to cybersecurity or a seasoned pentester, this guide has something for everyone.
Beginners will find a clear, step-by-step guide to mystify the process, while experts can gain
fresh perspectives and revisit foundational principles. Imagine starting with nothing more than a company's name or domain and systematically
peeling back layers to expose vulnerabilities. We'll explore the full lifecycle of black box
pentesting, from reconnaissance to reporting, showing how each phase builds on the last to
expose vulnerabilities and deliver actionable results. By the end, you'll see why black box
pentesting is more than just a
technical exercise and a strategic necessity for staying ahead of evolving threats.
Warning editors note, the contents of this article are for informational purposes only.
What is black box pentesting? Black box penetration testing is a cyber security
technique where the tester evaluates a system's security without prior knowledge of its internal workings, such as architecture, source code, or configurations. Simulating an external
attacker's perspective, black-box pentesting provides invaluable insights into how exposed
the system is to real-world threats. Testers often rely on recognized frameworks and methodologies
to structure their approach. Popular options include OWASP Web
Security Testing Guide, focuses on web applications. PTES, Penetration Testing Execution Standard,
covers end-to-end testing processes. OSSTMM, Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual,
ensures measurable security tests. Backslash dot. The choice of methodology depends on factors such
as the type of application, client requirements, and the engagement scope. Reconnaissance phase.
We always begin with the reconnaissance, recon, phase. This foundational step involves gathering
as much publicly available information about the target as possible. By mimicking how a real
attacker would approach the system, identify exposed assets, discover potential entry points, and map the attack surface.
There are two main types of reconnaissance in the recon phase of penetration testing,
passive and active. Passive reconnaissance
Passive reconnaissance involves gathering information about a target without directly
interacting with its systems. This approach minimizes the risk of
detection, making it an ideal starting point for mapping a target's surface area. By leveraging
publicly accessible information, passive reconnaissance provides valuable insights
while maintaining stealth. Below are examples of tools commonly used. Domain and asset discover
why CRT. Shown powerful tool for uncovering hidden subdomains is CRT.
Shish. A Certificate Transparency, Court, Log Search Engine. CT logs publicly track SSL,
TLS certificates issued to domains, which can reveal subdomains that were not meant to be
publicly visible. For instance, in 2018, researchers used CT logs to uncover unintended subdomains associated with
Tesla, including a staging environment potentially vulnerable to exploitation.
By leveraging CRT, Shish, ethical hackers, researchers, and penetration testers can
quickly identify misconfigured or exposed assets that could pose significant security risks,
making it an essential tool in the reconnaissance phase of black box penetration testing. DNS Dumpster DNS Dumpster is a powerful DNS reconnaissance
tool that provides detailed information about a domain's DNS records, such as A, MX, and TXT
records, as well as associated IP addresses. This is particularly useful in mapping the attack
surface during reconnaissance, identifying hidden assets, and spotting potential misconfigurations that could be exploited.
Google Dorks
Google Dorks are advanced search operators that allow testers to uncover publicly available information indexed by Google.
By using operators such as and, testers can locate sensitive files, directories, or pages related to a target organization.
For example, a query like can reveal publicly accessible PDF documents,
while can expose directories left unprotected. Google Dorks are an incredibly effective,
yet often underestimated, reconnaissance tool for identifying potential exposures during the
early stages of testing. Shodan a specialized search engine for discovering
internet-connected devices and services, offering unique insights into the online
infrastructure of a target. Unlike traditional search engines, Shodan indexes devices such as
exposed servers, IoT devices, databases, and misconfigured systems. For instance,
awesome pull query can reveal open ports, unsecured databases, or outdated software running on public-facing systems.
Its ability to filter results by IP, location, or service type makes Shodan an invaluable tool for penetration testers during the reconnaissance phase.
Data leaks to hashed Intel X
These tools help identify leaked data, such as credentials or sensitive documents.
Both require subscriptions
for full functionality, intelligence indexes, dark web and public internet content, breaches,
and historical website data. Example queries. To find breaches or mentions involving the email
address. To discover leaked credentials or documents. Have I been pwned? HIBP. A free
online service that checks if personal data has
been compromised in known data breaches. Widely used for enhancing awareness and mitigating
credential-related risks. Wayback Girls Wayback Girls is a tool that retrieves archived URLs from
the Wayback Machine, offering a glimpse into a target's historical web configurations.
It can uncover hidden resources, outdated pages, or endpoints
that may no longer be visible on the live site but could still pose a security risk.
By analyzing these archived URLs, testers can identify patterns, legacy vulnerabilities,
or forgotten assets that might otherwise go unnoticed.
Command Example. Active Reconnaissance. Active reconnaissance involves direct interaction with
a target system's toe-gathered detailed information. While this approach provides
precise and actionable insights for penetration testing or attack planning, it carries a higher
risk of detection, as target systems may log or alert on suspicious activity. It is essential
for identifying vulnerabilities and understanding the technical details of a target's infrastructure. Subdomain enumeration identifying subdomains is a critical step in
penetration testing, as subdomains often host services or applications that may be vulnerable
or misconfigured. Subdomains may also provide entry points like admin panels or APIs that are
not immediately visible. Sublist3 risks a widely used open-source tool for subdomain
enumeration. It aggregates data from multiple sources, including search engines, DNS records,
and APIs, to identify subdomains linked to a target domain. Its ability to query platforms
like Google, Bing, and VirusTotal makes it a reliable option for quickly mapping an organization's
external attack surface.
Command example service discovery after identifying subdomains, uncover open ports,
services, and operating systems using tools like DIG and Nmap. This step helps map the target's
attack surface. DIG, Domain Information Groper, a command line tool used to query DNS records.
It provides detailed information about a domain's
DNS setup, including A, MX, TXT, CNAME, and NS records. DIG-ESA staple in network troubleshooting
and reconnaissance, allowing testers to verify configurations, identify misconfigurations,
and gather insights about a domain's infrastructure. Its speed and precision make it a go-to tool for DNS analysis. Command Example. Nmap a versatile tool for
network discovery and auditing. Nmap identifies open ports, services, and operating systems,
providing critical insights into a target's attack surface. Basic Scan. Port Scanning.
Aggressive Scan. Combines OS detection, service detection,
and scripting, directory and file discovery uncovering hidden pages, configuration files,
and admin panels can provide critical insights for penetration testing.
Tools like DERB, GoBuster, and FFU fare commonly used.
DERB DERB is a web content scanner that brute forces directories and URLs to uncover
hidden or unsecured content on a web server. By using pre-configured or custom word lists,
DERB can identify files, directories, and endpoints that might not be publicly visible
but could expose sensitive information or vulnerabilities. It's a straightforward and
powerful tool for mapping a web server's structure during penetration testing.
Basic command for common directories, custom wordlist, advanced options,
alternative tools for directory enumeration Other popular tools include GoBuster GoBuster is a fast and efficient tool for brute-forcing URLs,
directories, DNS subdomains, and more.
Designed to handle large wordlists, it excels at quickly uncovering hidden
resources on web servers. GoBuster supports recursive scans, making it particularly useful
for exploring deeply nested directories or subdomains during penetration testing.
FFUF, Fuzz Faster You Fool, a versatile and high-speed fuzzer for discovering directories,
parameters, and other hidden resources on web
servers. It supports advanced filtering options based on response codes, size, or words, allowing
testers to efficiently pinpoint relevant results. With its flexibility, FFUF can be used for tasks
like directory enumeration, parameter fuzzing, and API endpoint discovery. Exploring HTTP response headers finally, analyze HTTP
response headers to identify software, frameworks, or server configurations in use.
This step provides detailed insights but is more specific than earlier phases.
Wappalyzer a browser extension and tool that detects frameworks, CMS platforms,
programming languages, analytics tools, and other technologies used by
websites. By identifying software versions, testers can cross-reference known vulnerabilities
in public databases. Scanning. After reconnaissance comes the scanning phase,
where testers actively analyze ETH target for vulnerabilities. Automated tools are essential
for quickly identifying a wide range of vulnerabilities.
These tools are robust, frequently updated, and tailored to evolving threats.
Commonly used scanners include Acunetix, a web application scanner that identifies SQL injections,
XSS, and other vulnerabilities. Nessus, a comprehensive vulnerability scanner for networks and systems. Nexpose, a tool for discovering and prioritizing vulnerabilities across assets.
We primarily use Burp Suite for scanning web applications,
as it offers extensive capabilities for different software frameworks and vulnerability types.
Burp Suite Burp Suite is one of the most widely used tools for web application testing.
It combines automated and manual capabilities,
making it suitable for detecting common and advanced vulnerabilities.
Key features include vulnerability detection, SQL injection, XSS, command injection,
directory traversal, authentication flaws, and more. API testing identifies broken access controls, JSON injection, and insecure endpoints. Advanced
testing. Detects vulnerabilities like CSRF, XXE, SSRF, and parameter tampering. BAP store extensions.
Enhances functionality with custom tools for vulnerability scanning, authorization testing,
and payload generation. Backslash dot, popular burp extensions overview 1.
Auth matrix, manages and tests authorization logic for multiple users or roles.
2. Logger++ provides detailed logging for HTTP requests and responses.
3. Hackverter, converts data formats, e.g. encoding, decoding, and automates payload transformations.
4. Active Scan++ enhances Burp's active scanner with additional checks.
5. JS Beautifier beautifies, minifies JavaScript files for easier analysis.
6. ParamMiner finds hidden parameters in web applications.
7. Retire.js detect Detects outdated JavaScript libraries with
known vulnerabilities. 8. Burp Bounty. Customizes scans with user-defined payloads and match
conditions. 9. JSON Web Token. JWT. Editor. Manipulates and tests JWTs for vulnerabilities
like signature tampering. 10. Autorise. Automates authorization bypass
testing by replaying requests with different roles. Testsil for testing SSL, TLS configurations,
we use Tests.sl. Shush, an open source command line tool. It assesses2, SSLv3, TLS1.0. Misconfigured certificates, e.g. Self-signed, expired,
vulnerabilities like Heartbleed, Beast, or Poodle. Missing HTTPS configurations,
such as HSTS headers. Backslash dot. Command example. Vulnerability identification.
Once the reconnaissance phase is complete,
we move to the vulnerability identification stage. This phase involves analyzing collected
data to identify security weaknesses such as misconfigurations, outdated software,
or weak credentials. By combining automated scanning tools with manual probing,
we can pinpoint vulnerabilities that could be exploited in real-world scenarios.
OWASP Web Security Testing Guide, WSTG. The OWASP WSTG is a comprehensive resource that provides structured methodologies for testing web application security. It ensures systematic
and thorough assessments by guiding testers through common vulnerability tests, such as
SQL injection, testing input
fields for exploitable SQL queries, session management flaws, evaluating mechanisms like
session timeout and secure cookie handling, authentication issues, checking for weak
credentials and improper multi-factor authentication implementations. By adhering to the WSTG,
testers ensure consistency and depth
in their vulnerability identification process. Example. Keycloak vulnerability analysis during
one engagement, we discovered that a web server was running an outdated version of Keycloak.
Further analysis revealed that this version was affected by multiple known vulnerabilities, CVEs, including CVE-20241132, CVE-2023-6484, CVE- CVE 2023 to 6,717. CVE 2023 to 6,544. CVE 2023 to 3,597. Potential exploits identified
through our analysis, we determined that attackers could leverage the sub-vulnerabilities to
access sensitive URLs via path traversal. Inject malicious content into logs
through improper input validation. Cause DDoS attacks using origin validation error. Gain
unauthorized access by exploiting an authentication bypass. Steal tokens and impersonate users via
open redirect. Execute arbitrary JavaScript with cross-site scripting, XSS. Register unauthorized clients through authorization bypass.
Bypass multi-factor authentication due to missing critical steps in the authentication flow.
Exploitation.
The fourth step, exploitation, involves using the findings from the vulnerability
identification phase to simulate real-world attacks.
This process demonstrates how an attacker could exploit
vulnerabilities to compromise systems, steal data, or gain unauthorized access. Conducted in a
controlled environment, exploitation provides valuable insights into the potential impact of
identified vulnerabilities. Controlled Exploitation
Validating findings exploitation begins with testing the vulnerabilities identified in the
previous phase to confirm their validity and understand their potential consequences.
For example, in a recent assessment, we uncovered several public CVEs linked to an outdated version
of Keycloak. Among these vulnerabilities, we successfully validated an open redirect issue.
Using Burp Suite Collaborator, we demonstrated the vulnerability by testing a
redirection scenario. The server's response confirmed the exploit's validity, as shown below.
Real-world impact The exploitation phase highlights how vulnerabilities can be used to achieve various
objectives, such as data theft, exploiting open redirects or improper access controls to steal
sensitive information.
Unauthorized access.
Bypassing authentication mechanisms to gain administrative privileges.
System compromise.
Injecting malicious payloads to execute commands or disrupt services.
Mitigation recommendations following the exploitation phase.
Clear remediation steps are essential to address the identified issues.
In the Keycloak example, we recommended the client upgrade to the latest version of the software to patch known vulnerabilities. Important considerations during exploitation,
it's common to encounter scenarios where 1. Not all CVEs are exploitable. Developers may
have patched or mitigated vulnerabilities without updating the software version string, leading to false positives. 2. Context matters. Certain vulnerabilities may only be exploitable
under specific conditions or configurations. 3. Controlled testing. Exploitation should be
carefully executed to avoid unintentional harm to the target environment. Reporting. The final
step in the pentesting life cycle is the reporting and
remediation phase. This stage consolidates all findings into a detailed report that outlines
vulnerabilities, their severity, and actionable recommendations to mitigate risks. A well-crafted
report bridges the gap between technical teams and stakeholders, ensuring vulnerabilities are
understood and addressed effectively. Key elements of a pentesting report to maximize impact. Reports should adhere to best practices.
1. Categorization by severity. Clearly classify vulnerabilities as high,
medium, or low based on their potential impact and exploitability.
2. Detailed vulnerability descriptions. Include a summary, reproduction steps,
potential impact and
remediation difficulty level for each finding three actionable recommendations provide clear
and implementable remediation steps to address the identified vulnerabilities four tailored content
feature an executive summary for stakeholders and detailed technical sections for security teams
tools for reporting tools like
PWNDOC streamline the reporting process by offering customizable templates and ensuring consistency.
Using such tools accelerates report generation and maintains professional formatting.
For inspiration, review the Public Pentesting Reports repository,
which showcases examples of professional pentest reports.
Example. Broken access control. An
example of a vulnerability report for a broken access control issue includes description.
Unauthorized access to sensitive endpoints. Impact. Attackers can bypass role restrictions
and gain administrative privileges. Remediation. Implement proper role validation checks at both
client and server levels.
Critical findings and remediation for critical or high-severity vulnerabilities,
such as those identified using the CVSS calculator. The report includes comprehensive descriptions,
detailed explanation of the issue, its exploitability, and its impact.
Recommended fixes. Steps to remediate the vulnerability effectively.
Backslash dot. To assist developers linking to resources like the OWASP ASVS application security verification standard
ensures they have access to a structured framework. The ASVS provides detailed security
requirements and guidelines for developing, testing, and maintaining secure applications,
aligning projects with industry standards.
Common Challenges in Blackbox Pentesting
Blackbox pentesting offers valuable insights into an organization's external vulnerabilities
but comes with specific challenges and limitations that testers must navigate.
Limitations Blackbox testing is resource-intensive and inherently limited by the
testerlic of insider knowledge about the system.
Key limitations include missed internal vulnerabilities. Without access to source code or internal architecture, certain issues may remain undetected.
Time constraints. Testers often lack the time to create complex exploits to fully compromise the
system. Defensive measures. Firewalls, strict filters, and other security mechanisms may block tests
and skew results. Efficiency. Limited system knowledge can lead to redundant testing or
overlooked issues. Tip-tip. Combining black box testing with other approaches, e.g. gray box or
white box testing, can help mitigate these limitations. White box or black box? While
black box testing provides
a valuable external perspective, it works best as part of a multi-layered testing strategy.
Organizations can benefit from combining testing methodologies. 1. White box testing
involves full access to internal systems, enabling a comprehensive analysis of source code,
configurations, and architecture. 2. Black box testing. Simulates
an attacker's approach, validating vulnerabilities identified through white box testing.
3. Red teaming. Provides an advanced assessment, simulating sophisticated and persistent threats
to test both technical defenses and organizational processes. Tip pro tip. Layered testing,
incorporating both white box and black
box methods, ensures a thorough evaluation of internal and external vulnerabilities.
AI challenges the integration of artificial intelligence, AI, into pentesting has transformed
how vulnerabilities are identified. AI-powered tools enhance testing efficiency by automating
repetitive tasks and processing large datasets.
Key considerations include tools leveraging AI. Deep exploit. Automates the exploitation of
identified vulnerabilities. Shodan. Uses machine learning to map exposed devices and open ports.
Spiderfoot and Rakan Inc. Automate OSINT collection and data correlation. Applications of AI. Analyzing
IP addresses, subdomains, and services at scale. Enhancing cloud-native environment testing,
including APIs and microservices. Limitations of AI. AI tools excel in automation but lack
contextual understanding and decision-making. Human expertise remains essential for interpreting
results and applying them effectively. Info-insight. Combining eye-driven tools
with human testers creates a balance of efficiency and contextual insight,
leading to more effective pentesting outcomes. Summary.
Blackbox penetration testing is a vital approach for assessing an organization's
security posture. By simulating real-world attack scenarios,
IT provides insights into vulnerabilities that could be exploited by external attackers.
This blog post explored the full lifecycle of black box pentesting, highlighting its key stages
and challenges. 1. Reconnaissance. Gathering information about the target using passive
and active techniques to map the attack surface.
2. Scanning. Employing automated tools like Burp Suite and Tests SL.
Shish to identify vulnerabilities efficiently, complemented by manual probing for complex issues.
3. Vulnerability Identification. Analyzing findings to pinpoint weaknesses such as outdated software, misconfigurations, or weak credentials,
leveraging frameworks like OWASP WSTG for systematic testing.
4. Exploitation. Demonstrating how attackers could exploit vulnerabilities to compromise systems,
ensuring findings are validated and actionable. 5. Reporting. Delivering a comprehensive report that categorizes vulnerabilities,
outlines their impact, and provides actionable recommendations for remediation.
Backslash. Despite its advantages, black box pentesting has limitations, such as its inability
to uncover certain internal vulnerabilities and the challenges posed by time constraints
and defensive measures. However, combining it with methodologies like
white-box testing or red-teaming creates a more layered and thorough security assessment.
Emerging technologies like AI are enhancing pentesting efficiency by automating tasks
and analyzing vast datasets, but human expertise remains indispensable for contextual understanding
and strategic decision-making. By adopting a structured approach to black box
pentesting, organizations can proactively identify and address vulnerabilities,
ensuring stronger defenses against external threats. At SickerNo, we deliver thorough and
actionable assessments to help businesses stay resilient in the face of evolving security
challenges. FAQ 1. What is black box pentesting? Black box pentesting simulates external attacks
to identify vulnerabilities in systems without prior insider knowledge. 2. How is black box
pentesting conducted? It involves reconnaissance, vulnerability identification, scanning,
and exploitation to assess the security posture of applications and networks.
3. How does black box testing differ from gray
box and white box testing? Black box. Simulates external attacks. Gray box. Combines external
attacks with partial insider knowledge. White box. Provides full access to internal systems
for comprehensive testing. 4. What tools are used in black box pentesting? Common tools include NMAP,
Burp Suite, Metasploit, and OSINT resources like Shodan.
5. Why is black box pentesting important? It provides an attacker's perspective,
ensuring that external vulnerabilities are identified and mitigated before exploitation
occurs. About the author, this article was prepared by Anastasia Tolkacheva, a security
testing engineer at Socrano, and reviewed by Alex Rozniatovsky, co-founder and CTO of Socrano.
Anastasia has over five years of hands-on experience in penetration testing and security
assessments. She specializes in testing web applications, infrastructure, both on-premises and cloud, and mobile platforms,
iOS and Android. Her expertise spans black box, gray box, and white box methodologies,
alongside proficiency in vulnerability assessments and source code security reviews.
Alex has seven years of experience in development and cybersecurity,
has an AWS open- source contributor dedicated to advancing secure
coding practices. His expertise bridges the gap between software development and security,
providing valuable insights into protecting modern web applications.
References, tools and resources 1. Certificate Transparency, CRT, SHISH, 2. DNS Dumpster,
3. 40 Google Dorks You Can use for various purposes 4 wayback girls by tom
nom nom 5 wayback machine web archive 6 shodan 7 de hashed 8 intelx 9 have i been pwned hibp Wappalyzer 11. Sublist 3R 12. Derb on Kali Tools 13. GoBuster 14. FFUF Fuzz Faster You Fool 15.
Nmap 16. National Vulnerability Database Nvd 17. Exploit Database ExploitDB 18. CVE MITRE 19. Acunetix 20. Nessus 21. Nexpose 22. BERT BAPSTORE 23. Tests SL
SHISH Guides and Articles 1. OWASP Web Security Testing Guide WSTG 2. Public Pentesting Reports Repository. 3. OWASP Application Security Verification Standard, ASVS.
4. API Pentesting Guide by Sikerno. 5. Node.J's Application Security Guide by Sikerno.
Thank you for listening to this Hackernoon story, read by Artificial Intelligence.
Visit hackernoon.com to read, write, learn and publish.