The Good Tech Companies - How 0G Storage Plans to Solve the $76 Billion Problem Every AI Company Faces
Episode Date: October 21, 2025This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/how-0g-storage-plans-to-solve-the-$76-billion-problem-every-ai-company-faces. 0G Labs launch...ed its Aristotle Mainnet in September 2025 with a storage layer designed for AI workloads, achieving 2 GB/s throughput and backing from over 100 p Check more stories related to tech-stories at: https://hackernoon.com/c/tech-stories. You can also check exclusive content about #og-labs, #blockchain, #web3, #cryptocurrency, #og-labs-news, #good-company, #ai, #decentralization, and more. This story was written by: @ishanpandey. Learn more about this writer by checking @ishanpandey's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com. 0G Labs launched its Aristotle Mainnet in September 2025 with a storage layer designed for AI workloads, achieving 2 GB/s throughput and backing from over 100 partners including Google Cloud and Chainlink.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This audio is presented by Hacker Noon, where anyone can learn anything about any technology.
How zero-g storage plans to solve the $76 billion problem every AI company faces?
By a Sean Pondy, greater than can blockchain technology fix what traditional cloud storage cannot,
as AI systems consume data at rates never seen before, a question emerges that could define
the next decade of technological progress. Where will all this data live, and who will
control access to it, the answer arrived quietly in September 2025. ZeroG Labs launched its Aristotle
main net, bringing with it a storage layer designed specifically for AI workloads. The launch came
with backing from over 100 ecosystem partners, including Chainlink, Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud,
and major wallet providers like Coinbase and Metamask. The data storage crisis no one is
talking about. Every AI system, from chatbots to autonomous vehicles, depends on one fundamental
resource, data. Not just any data, but vast quantities that must bestored, accessed, and processed
at speeds that push current infrastructure to its limits. The AI-powered storage market reached
$30.57 billion in 2024 an analyst's project it will grow to $118 billion by 2030. Behind these
numbers sits a reality that most developers face daily. AI training datasets now require
terabytes or petabytes of storage, a facial recognition.
system alone needs over 450,000 images. Large language models consume millions of text samples.
The data never stops growing. Traditional decentralized storage solutions like IPFS, Filecoin,
and Arweave were built for different purposes. IPFS acts as a protocol for content addressing
but lacks persistence guarantees. Filecoin creates a marketplace for storage but requires continuous
deal renewals. Arweave offers permanent storage through one-time payments but faces
challenges with cost and retrieval speed. None were designed for the rapid updates,
structured querying, and Milly second-level performance that AI applications demand.
Michael Heinrich, CEO and co-founder of ZeroG Labs, stated in the Maynett announcement,
our mission at Zero-G is to make AIA public good, which involves dismantling barriers,
whether geopolitical or technological, and this launch marks a milestone in that journey.
I could not be more proud of the 100-plus partners who are standing with us from day one.
Together, we are building the first AI chain with a complete modular decentralized operating system,
ensuring AI is not locked away in big tech silos but made available as a resource for everyone.
What makes zero-g storage different? Zero-G storage operates through a dual-layer architecture that
separates concerns in a way that existing protocols do not. The log layer handles unstructured
data leaky model weights, datasets, and event logs through an append-only system. Every entry receives a
timestamp and permanent record, data gets split into chunks, erasure coded, and distributed across
the network for redundancy. The key value layer sits above this foundation, enabling structured
queries with millisecond performance. This layer allows applications to store and retrieve specific
data points such as vector embeddings, user states, or metadata while maintaining immutability
through logging every update. This architecture enables real-world use cases already in motion.
AI agents retrieving context on demand, DEPIN network's streaming sensor data,
LLM pipelines accessing training data, and applications persisting state data across chains.
Performance benchmarks from the V3 TestNet demonstrate the systems capabilities.
ZeroG storage achieved two gigabytes per second in throughput,
which the team describes as the fastest performance recorded in decentralized eye infrastructure.
The Galileo TestNet delivered a 70% throughput increase over previous versions and
can process up to 2,500 transactions per second using optimized CometBFT consensus.
Security comes through cryptographic commitments for all stored data, allowing every operation
to be tracked and verified. The system uses proof of replication and availability, where
storage providers face random challenges to prove they hold specific data. Failure to respond results
in slash rewards. The economics of keeping data alive, storage at AI scale presents not just
technical challenges but economic ones. Zerog introduces a three-part incentive structure that balances
cost with long-term availability. Users pay a one-time storage fee based on data size. A portion of
this fee becomes a storage endowment streamed over time to storage miners for continued availability.
The system adds data sharing royalties, where nodes earn rewards for helping others retrieve
and validate data through poorer challenges. This model contrasts with competitors. Filecoin operates on
ongoing storage deals that require continuous renewal, R-Weave charges higher up-front costs
for permanent storage, which can become prohibitive for large datasets. IPFS lacks built-in economic
incentives entirely, making data persistence dependent on manual pinning or third-party services.
The network went live with operational infrastructure from day one. Validators, defy protocols,
and developer platforms provide indexing, SDKs, RPCs, and security services ready for production workloads.
The platform making it visible. Storage scan serves as the transparency layer for 0G storage.
The platform received updates in May 2025 that added real-time analytics, minor leaderboards,
and reward tracking for both turbo and standard storage nodes.
The interface splits networks by performance tier.
Standard network uses HDD storage for cost efficiency with less time-sensitive data.
Turbo network deploys SSD storage for applications requiring faster access.
Storage providers can track earnings across 24-hour, three-day, and seven-day periods,
giving visibility into node performance and optimization opportunities.
This transparency addresses a gap in existing decentralized storage systems,
where providers often lack clear insights into network operations and reward distribution.
Where this fits in the bigger picture,
ZeroG Labs raised $35 million across two equity rounds to support development.
The Maynet launch follows extensive testing.
The TestNet V3, called Galileo, saw 2, 5 million unique wallets, 350 million plus transactions,
and roughly 530,000 smart contracts deployed.
The storage market context matters here.
Mordor Intelligence values the AI-powered storage market at $27, 06 billion in 2025 and
Projects $76.6 billion B. 2030, cloud storage will reach $137,3 billion by 2020.
according to market research firms, analysis from 2023 indicated that decentralized storage costs
roughly 78% less than centralized alternatives, with enterprise level differences reaching
121 times. Yet adoption remains limited, centralized storage still dominates due to better
user experience and mature product ecosystems. The challenge for 0G and similar platforms
lies in bridging this gap while providing the performance characteristics that AI applications
require. The composability factor. ZeroG storage operates as a modular system. Developers can
integrate it into existing applications, use it with or without the zero G chain, or plug it into
custom roll-ups or virtual machines. This design philosophy differs from closed ecosystems that
lock users into specific architectures. The platform supports applications across chains and
intelligent agents, positioning storage as infrastructure rather than a siloed service. This approach aligns
with how developers increasingly build applications that span multiple blockchains and
execution environments. What comes next? The main at launch represents a starting point rather
than a destination. AI data requirements continue to grow. The global I training dataset market
reached $2.6 billion in 2024 and analysts project $8.6 billion by 2030 by 2,25,181
and zetabytes of data will be generated globally. Storage infrastructure that can handle this scale
while maintaining decentralization, verifiability, and performance will determine which AI
systems can operate independently of centralized control. The question is no longer whether
AI needs better storage infrastructure. The question is whether solutions like 0G storage can
deliver on promises that existing systems cannot fulfill. For developers building AI agents,
D-E-P-I-N networks, or applications requiring persistent state across chains, the availability of
production-ready infrastructure changes what becomes possible. For the broader blockchain ecosystem,
it tests whether decentralized systems can compete with centralized alternatives on performance
rather than just ideology. The data keeps growing, the models keep getting larger. The question
of where to store it all and who controls access matters more with each passing month.
0G storage enters a market where the stakes extend beyond technology into questions of access,
control, and what it means to build AI systems that no single entity can shut down.
Final thoughts, the launch of 0G storage on MaynED arrives at a moment when AI infrastructure
faces real constraints.
Traditional decentralized storage protocols struggle with the performance demands of AI workloads.
Centralized solutions maintain control over data access in ways that conflict with the vision
of open AI systems. What zero-g storage offers is not revolutionary in concept but potentially
transformative in execution. The dual-layer architecture addresses real pain points that developers
face. The economic model creates incentives for long-term data availability without the recurring
costs that make existing solutions prohibitive at scale. The modular design enables integration
across ecosystems rather than forcing lock-in. Whether this translates to widespread adoption
depends on factors beyond technology. Developers must choose to build on it. Storage providers must
find the economics attractive enough to participate. The performance must hold UP under real-world
load. The ecosystem must continue to grow and attract the applications that justify the infrastructure.
The data storage crisis facing AI development will not resolve itself. As models grow larger
and applications more complex, the infrastructure question becomes more urgent. ZeroG storage presents
one answer to this challenge, time will tell IFIT becomes the answer that the industry needs.
Don't forget to like and share the story. This author is an independent contributor publishing
via our business blogging program. Hacker Noon has reviewed the report for quality, but the
claims here and belong to the author. Hashtag DiO thank you for listening to this Hacker Noon story,
read by artificial intelligence. Visit hackernoon.com to read, write, learn and publish.
