The Good Tech Companies - Neo and SpoonOS Offer $100K to Solve the Problem Centralized AI Cannot Fix

Episode Date: October 20, 2025

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/neo-and-spoonos-offer-$100k-to-solve-the-problem-centralized-ai-cannot-fix. Neo and SpoonOS launch $100K Scoop AI Hackathon across 8 cities to unite AI and blockchain developers building the sentient economy Check more stories related to tech-stories at: https://hackernoon.com/c/tech-stories. You can also check exclusive content about #spoonos, #spoonos-news, #neo, #web3, #blockchain, #cryptocurrency, #ai, #good-company, and more. This story was written by: @ishanpandey. Learn more about this writer by checking @ishanpandey's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com. Neo and SpoonOS launch $100K Scoop AI Hackathon across 8 cities to unite AI and blockchain developers building the sentient economy

This audio is presented by Hacker Noon, where anyone can learn anything about any technology. Neo and Spoon OS offer $100,000 to solve the problem centralized AI cannot fix. By a Sean Pondy, greater than what happens when software learns to trust itself, this question sits at the center of a shift that could redefine how value moves, how decisions get made, and who controls the infrastructure that powers both. On October 20, 2025, Neo and Spoon OS announced the SCOPEA. hackathon in Singapore, distributing $100,000 across eight cities over four months. The prize money matters less than the problem it addresses. Can humans build systems where

I agents operate autonomously on blockchain networks before either technology fragments into incompatible ecosystems? The hackathon targets developers who understand that the Internet's next phase will not be built by companies alone. It will emerge from code written in Moscow, Hanoi, Tokyo, Seoul, Silicon Valley, Bangalore, Beijing, and London by programmers who see what comes after today's centralized AI-enclosed protocol blockchains. What the sentient economy actually means. Strip away the terminology and the sentient economy describes a world where software makes decisions without waiting for human approval at each step. Not because humans lose control, but because they encode their intent into systems that execute autonomously.

An AI agent manages your portfolio based on parameters you set. Another coordinates supply chains by reading data from sensors, executing contracts, and routing shipments without manual intervention. A third provides services, bills customers, and reinvests revenue into improving its own capabilities. HTTPS-slash-slash-Egs.com, SpoonOS underscore I, status, 1 quintillion 980 quadrillion, 210 trillion 267,289,289,239,9, embeddable equals true these agents need infrastructure. They need to store data somewhere. They need to prove they executed tasks correctly. They need to

coordinate with other agents they've never interacted with before. They need to transact value without intermediaries who could censor or delay. This is where blockchain enters, note as a speculative asset, but as infrastructure for coordination between autonomous systems. Spoon OS, which launched in April 2025 with a $2 million fund, builds the layer that lets developers create these agents. The platform runs on Neo, a blockchain from 2014 that survived multiple market cycles by focusing on developer tools rather than token speculation. Da Hongfei, Neo's founder, frames this as evolution from a smart economy into a truly

sentient economy. Translation. From systems that automate contracts to systems that make decisions. The numbers suggest this matters beyond theory. 64% of blockchain developers now integrate AI into their work. That integration generates revenue. AI-driven Defy Protocols produced $1.1 billion in 2025, while AI in blockchain security represents a $500 million segment.

These figures measure demand for solutions that don't exist yet at scale. The hackathon asks developers to build them, why structure matters more than prize money. The hackathon runs from October 2025 through January 26. Four months, not a weekend. This duration acknowledges that solutions worth deploying need iteration, testing, and refinement. Participants can join in person or online depending on location. Each city partners with regional developer communities to provide mentorship and support.

The $100,000 prize pool splits across theme tracks, AI infrastructure, agent-based systems, and decentralized intelligence. Cash matters, but the structure reveals intent. Winners gain ecosystem grants, venture partner introductions, and integration opportunities with Neo and Spoon OS platforms. This approach filters for developers building on these platforms long-term, not teams chasing prizes before moving to the next competition. Registration details and documentation will appear as each city event approaches. The structure allows teams to compete locally while contributing toa competition that spans

time zones and regulatory environments. This matters because solutions that work in one jurisdiction may fail in another, and the market needs systems that function across borders. Geography as strategy. Moscow, Hanoi, Tokyo, Seoul, Silicon Valley, Bangalore, Beijing, and London. These cities represent where blockchain development concentrates and where it is expending. Asia-Pacific accounts for 39% of the AI in Web 3 market share, while North America holds 33%. But the distribution suggests something beyond market share. Each location faces constraints. Bengalore confronts infrastructure limitations sand regulatory uncertainty.

Beijing operates under policies that banned crypto trading but encourage blockchain development. Silicon Valley has capital but increasingly exports talent to regions with lower costs. Tokyo and Seoul have technical sophistication but aging population. populations that may accelerate automation adoption. Moscow and London sit at geopolitical crossroads where trust infrastructure matters more as traditional institutions face pressure. India recorded 17% of all Web 3 developers in year-over-year growth. The Web 3 development market projects growth from $4.43 billion in 2024 to $6.15 billion inches 2025. These figures show where talent emerges and where it concentrates. By hosting events across these cities, organizers access developers

who face different problems and bring different approaches. A solution designed in Hanoi may work in conditions that would break a system built in Silicon Valley. This geographic distribution also hedges against regulatory risk. No single jurisdiction can shut down a movement distributed across eight cities on four continents. The decentralization isn't ideological, its practical insurance against capture by any single government or corporate interest. The market signal behind the movement, the Web 3 market stands at $3.47 billion in 2025 and projects to reach $41, $45 billion by 2030, a 45, 15% compound annual growth rate, AI in Web 3 specifically values at $2, $7 billion in 2025, with projections to $17, $8 billion by 20,000.

30, thesis projections come from market analysts who track capital flows and technical capability. They measure what institutions believe will happen, which often creates the conditions for it to occur. Coinbase captured $2.03 billion in institutional revenue in Q1 2025. Institutional allocations above $100 billion flowed into defyed during 2024. Theson numbers reveal that the infrastructure crypto enthusiasts built over the past decade now serves institutions with serious capital. Those institutions need solutions that don't exist yet, which creates opportunity for developers who candle them. Hackathons function as talent identification mechanisms in a market where Haringas harder than funding. Da Hongfei stated in a May 2025 AMA

that Spoon OS targets developers, not end users. The $2 million fund splits across three programs, the global beacon program for ecosystem advocates, the global developer program for technical contributors through grants and hackathons and ecosystem collaborations for partners building infrastructure. This structure treats developers as the scarce resource and capital as the abundant one, which reflects reality in 2025. The Scoop AI hackathon slots into this framework as a filter. Most hackathon projects never launch. Most teams disperse after the event, but a percentage will continue, and some of those will build solutions that institutions adopt. Neo and Spoon OS positioned themselves to work with those teams from the start, which costs

less than acquiring them later are competing with platforms that already have relationships. Three tracks, three futures. AI infrastructure covers the base layer, how models run, how data flows, and how computation distributes across networks without centralization recreating the problems decentralization solves. Developers in this track confront questions like, How do you run a large language model across distributed nodes without an single node seeing the entire dataset? How do you verify a model produced a specific output without rerunning the entire computation? How do you coordinate updates to a model when the model itself operates autonomously? These questions lack answers at scale. 42% of Defi projects now use eye-powered risk assessment

tools, but most run on centralized servers that could be shut down, censored, or hacked. The infrastructure track asks developers to fix this be building systems where AI operates on decentralized networks without compromising speed, accuracy or privacy. Agent-based systems focus on autonomous software that executes tasks without constant human oversight. These agents could manage portfolios, execute trades, coordinate supply chains, provide services, or perform any function a human could delegate if they trusted the system. The challenge involves making agents that work reliably while maintaining transparency about their decision-making and preventing them from optimizing for outcomes humans didn't intend. Consider what this enables, a small business could deploy an agent that handles

invoicing, payment collection, vendor coordination, and basic customer service without hiring staff for those functions. A freelancer could deploy an agent that finds clients, negotiates rates, delivers work, and handles disputes based in parameters the freelancer sets. A researcher could deploy an agent that Redspapers, identifies gaps, proposes experiments, and coordinates with other researchers' agents to share data and avoid duplication. These capabilities exist in prototype form today. The agent track ASKS developers to make them reliable enough for deployment, which requires solving coordination problems, trust problems, and economic problems simultaneously. Decentralized intelligence tackles how AI systems can learn and improve without centralized control

that creates single points of failure and manipulation. This track may produce solutions for federated learning, where models train on distributed data without the data leaving its source. It may produce coordination mechanisms that let multiple agents work toward shared goals without a central coordinator who could redirect them. It may produce governance systems that let communities guide AI development without either corporate capture or mob rule destroying the system. Each track addresses a different layer of the same architecture. You need infrastructure to run agents. You need agents to demonstrate value. You need centralized intelligence to prevent the infrastructure and agents from recreating the centralization problems they're meant to solve.

Projects that's been tracks or show how their solution connects to others will likely gain attention from judges and investors. Context in a crowded field, events like ETH Denver draw 95,000 attendees. Blockchain Life 2025 expects 15,000 participants from 130 countries. The EasyA consensus, Hackathon in Toronto aims to host 1,000 developers. These numbers show that blockchain hackathons have become an industry, not an experiment. Web3 developers reach 25,000 by 2024, up 40% from 2022. These developers work in an environment where more than 50 million users now use Web3 applications. This represents a shift from speculation to utility, from demos to deployed systems that people use daily. The Scoop AI Hackathon enters this field with a specific focus,

AI blockchain integration rather than blockchain alone. This focus matters because the infrastructure challenges differ. A pure blockchain project might optimize for transaction speed or cost. An AI blockchain project must optimize for computation that blockchain networks weren't designed to handle efficiently, which requires architectural innovation rather thanparameter tuning. Neo positions itself through technical choices that differ from Ethereum, which dominates developer Mineshare. The platform launched NeoX in July 2024, a side chain compatible with Ethereum virtual machine. This compatibility lets developers use familiar tools while accessing Neo's architecture, which includes native support for multiple programming languages and built-in services for

storage, oracles, and identity that Ethereum requires third-party protocols to ProVeed. Spoon OS adds AI-specific capabilities, including including BEVEC, a vector database designed for blockchain environments, and an AI agent interoperability protocol for coordination between agents. These tools don't guarantee adoption, but they allow barriers for developers who want to experiment without building infrastructure from scratch. What winners actually get? AI Web 3 startups raised $6.3 billion in 2024 to 2025. Seed round funding reached $4.8 million in 2025, 31% of blockchain. venture capital deals involve AI integration. These numbers suggest that capital follows capability

in this space, which means winning projects with technical merit could access funding beyond the prize pool. The venture partners and ecosystem opportunities mentioned in the announcement matter because they provide paths from hackathon project to funded company. Most hackathon winners return to their jobs. Some try to build their project independently and fail because they lack infrastructure, distribution, or capital. A few receive support. that lets them focus on development full-time, which increases their odds of shipping something users adopt. Integration with Spoon OS and Neo platforms provides infrastructure that startups typically purchase or build. This includes node infrastructure, APIs, development tools,

security auditing, and access to communities that might use the product. The value of this support depends on whether the startup actually needs what Neo and Spoon OS provide, but for teams building on these platforms, it removes months of infrastructure work for that doesn't differentiate their product. The four-month duration creates time for iteration that weekend hackathons don't allow. Teams can build, test, get feedback, rebuild, and ship something that works rather than something that demos well. This matters because the gap between demo and deployment is where most projects die. What this reveals about the future, the Scoop AI hackathon addresses a timing question that matters beyond this single event. Can developers build AI

blockchain solutions before the market consolidates into a few dominant platforms that control infrastructure and extract rents from everyone building on top. History suggests that platform consolidation happens fast once network effects kick in. The web consolidated into a few browsers. Cloud computing consolidated into into three providers. Social media consolidated into a handful of platforms. Mobile consolidated into two operating systems. Each consolidation made sense technically and economically, but each also concentrated power in ways that limited what developers could build and users could do. Blockchain promised to prevent this pattern by making infrastructure that no single entity controls. AI threatens to recreated by requiring computational resources that only large companies can

provide at scale. The combination creates tension. Blockchain needs to decentralize, AI needs to centralize to function efficiently. Solutions that resolve this tension will define what comes next. The $100,000 prize pool appears modest compared to some blockchain hackathons, but the structure emphasizes ecosystem integration over cash. This filters for developers who want to build on Neo and Spoon OS long-term rather than those optimizing for maximum prize money across multiple competitions. That focus may produce fewer teams but more committed ones, which matters more for platform adoption than headline numbers. The sentient economy, framing risks sounding like marketing, but the concept point

to something real. We're building toward a world where software makes decisions about resource allocation, contract execution, and service delivery without humans in the loop for every decision. This creates opportunities for automation and coordination at scales we haven't seen. It also creates risks if systems optimize for outcomes humans don't want or if the benefits concentrate among platform owners rather than users. Whether this happens on Neo and Spoon OS or other platforms remains uncertain. What seems certain is that that it will happen somewhere because the economic incentives push in that direction and the technical capability exists or will soon. The question is whether it happens on

infrastructure anyone can use or on infrastructure controlled by companies that can change rules, increase prices, or shutout competitors. The eight-city structure shows understanding that solutions need to work across contexts, not just in places with fast internet and stable governments. A system designed only for Silicon Valley conditions will fail in Bangalore, Hanoi or Moscow, which limits its addressable market and its utility. Systems that work everywhere face harder technical constraints but serve larger markets and resist capture by any single jurisdiction. The proof arrives when projects launch and users interact with them. Most won't survive. Some will find product market fit in niches the organizers didn't anticipate. A few might build

infrastructure that others build on, which creates value that compounds over time. The hackathon functions as a search mechanism for those few, which makes it worth running regardless of how many projects fail. What makes this moment interesting is that multiple technologies are maturing simultaneously. Large language models reached practical utility around 2022 to 2023. Blockchain infrastructure became viable for applications beyond speculation around 2020 to 2024. Zero knowledge proofs that enable privacy-preserving computation reached practical performance recently. Decentralized storage became cost competitive with centralized alternatives. The convergence of these capabilities creates a window where new architectures become possible. Whether developers

sees that window depends on whether the tools, incentives, and support exist to help them build. The Scoop AI hackathon provides some of those pieces. Whether it's enough remains to be seen, but the attempt matters because the alternative is waiting for large companies to build this infrastructure and then asking permission to use it. Don't forget to like and share the story. Thank you for listening to this Hackernoon story, read by artificial intelligence. Visit hackernoon.com to read, write, learn and publish.