The Good Tech Companies - Neverending Options: Trading Options To Infinity And Beyond
Episode Date: February 11, 2025This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/neverending-options-trading-options-to-infinity-and-beyond. Explore the evolution of crypto ...options and perpetual futures, diving into innovations like panoptions, liquidity challenges, and decentralized trading. Check more stories related to web3 at: https://hackernoon.com/c/web3. You can also check exclusive content about #future-of-defi-perpetuals, #defi-liquidity-mining-uniswap, #options-trading-in-crypto, #perpetual-trading, #perpetual-swaps, #satoshi-nakamoto, #2077-research, #good-company, and more. This story was written by: @2077research. Learn more about this writer by checking @2077research's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com. The article explores advanced concepts in options trading, focusing on perpetual futures, panoptions, and decentralized finance. It discusses the challenges of liquidity, pricing, and the potential for infinite leverage in crypto markets. The piece highlights how these innovations push the boundaries of traditional finance and reshape the future of trading.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This audio is presented by Hacker Noon, where anyone can learn anything about any technology.
Never-ending options. Trading options to infinity and beyond, by 2077 Research.
Explore the evolution of crypto options and perpetual futures,
including innovations like PEN options, and the challenges of liquidity and decentralization.
Crypto was born to disrupt the financial world, and it has, albeit not in the way Satoshi Nakamoto
intended. In becoming so much more, it grew into a massive playground for speculation.
Traders weren't satisfied with spot trading and turned their eyes to derivatives like futures
and options. In this article, we break down options, how they differ from futures and the
evolution of perpetual options on centralized and decentralized exchanges. We also examine flaws and challenges and speculate on what the future holds.
Siddhite, and let's dive in, futures. A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to
buy, sell a certain asset, the underlying, at a given time in the future. At first, futures we
reinvented to hedge risks associated with commodities like soy,
crude oil, or gold. A seller can set a price before they can deliver the underlying and let
the buyer assume some of the risks. Since you don't get the underlying when you sign the contract,
you don't have to pay the full price. Instead, a deposit qual to a portion of your position's
value is all you need to keep this contract valid. Therefore, you can sign a futures contract worth $100 with only $10 and if the price goes up by
10% to $110, you will get a 100% profit, $10. Such is the power of leverage and is ideal for
crypto investors seeking to amplify their returns. Eventually, someone realized you don't have to
deliver the product at a Givant team because cryptocurrencies will always be there. A futures contract that never expires
looks tempting to anyone seeking 100x their investments. There is one caveat, though.
Since Satoshi Nakamoto released his famous white paper, the overwhelming majority of the crypto
community has been longing cryptocurrencies. As a consequence,
the futures market will be dominated by buyers, moving the futures price ridiculously higher than its spot price. Traditional futures contracts also have this problem but the market has a way
to manage it. These contracts expire, so any deviation between the futures price and the spot
price gradually disappears as the expiry date approaches. It happens because the difference between buying on the futures market and the spot market becomes
smaller over time. The same can not be said for perpetual futures. Now that they don't expire,
we may never see the day when the basis disappears. Something must be done.
For the record, we don't know what happened when BitMEX invented perpetual futures but
since these contracts are sometimes referred to as perpetual swaps, one can only assume that they decided to
borrow a mechanism from swap contracts and agreement between two parties to exchange cash
flow, typically used to hedge the risk of oscillating loan interest rates or to exchange
value between two positions. With this mechanism, perpetual futures buyers and sellers must exchange
cash flow,
making funding payments, with each other based on the difference between the underlying's futures price and spot price. If the futures price is higher, the underlying trading at a premium,
the buyers have outbought the sellers. At such times, the funding rate mechanism dictates buyers
must pay sellers based on their position size. This way, sellers will have enough
reason to hold on to their short positions and buyers will have their accounts bled dry if they
keep their long positions open indefinitely. Options. The reason we spent hundreds of words
talking about perpetual futures in an article dedicated to options is that we wish to demonstrate
how removing a seemingly insignificant variable, expiry date, from a financial instrument could lead to starking imbalances in the market and take some of the
most innovative minds to fix it by introducing a new mechanism. Understanding options
Options are quite like futures, except futures contracts impose on both parties the obligation
to transact a certain asset at a given time, whereas options only give them the right.
You have the option to pocket your profit when you're optionized in the money, ITM, as well as throw it into the bin when it's
out of the money, OTM. As such, futures contracts can be priced based on their entry price but
options must charge a premium for signing this contract. This premium is the price a buyer pays
a seller, writer, and options at each price tick form a market on their
own. Buyers are free to choose the lowest ask they can find for a certain underlying at a certain
strike price. Once again, removing one restraint, obligation to buy or sell, from a financial
instrument leads to an entirely different derivative. Traditional options already give
investors immense flexibility for locking profits and hedging risks.
You can hold a long position for an underlying while buying a put option of the same size for
the same underlying at the same price. This way, if the price goes down, your long position is at
a loss but the amount is only equal to your profit from the put option, or its seller,
leaving you losing only the premium you paid for your put. If the price goes up,
your long position stands to profit and you can throw your OTM put option in the bin.
As you have seen, even options that expire are already much more complex than futures.
Black, Scholes, and Merton won a Nobel Prize for developing a formula for stock options valuation.
But what if we take it a step further and remove the expiry date from the options,
like what we did to futures, path dependency? There are two approaches that have our attention.
One was proposed by Paradigm and the notorious Sam Bankman fried in their research titled
Everlasting Options and the other by Panoptic. Everlasting Options. A universal funding model
for efficient liquidity and our bid rage in this paper. The authors proposed a universal funding mechanism for derivatives based on the
difference between mark price and index price of the underlying, for futures,
or the contract itself, for options. This is a generalized version of the perpetual
futures funding mechanism and backed by Fino arbitrage pricing model that where there is
a potential profit, there will bear bidtragers to make the most of it. In the case of perpetual futures, buyers will pay sellers when the mark
price is higher than the spot price or in the case of everlasting options, when the mark price is
higher than the potential payoff. This universal mechanism is playing the arbitrogers and such
activities are ideal for centralized exchanges since the calculations and payments can be made
within milliseconds by their complex trading engine running on mega servers. Indeed, the authors
mentioned the traditional crypto options market being a nightmare, in our own words, for market
makers because there are just so many markets to make. Their everlasting options are equivalent
to a basket of options with different expiration times and weights equal to the inverse of 2 to
the power of the number of funding cycles before the expiration time. This way, market makers can
concentrate their liquidity on these baskets instead of spreading it on 100 markets. But the
thing is, no one said options can only be traded on centralized exchanges with large institutions
as market makers, liquidity providers. 8. Centralized ecosystem calls for decentralized
protocols and mechanisms that are less costly and cumbersome for smart contracts.
P-A-N-O-P-T-I-O-N-S. A Uniswap-inspired, Oracle-free revolution enter Panoptic with
their perpetual options, Panoptions. By comparing a put option to a Uniswap V3 liquidity pool,
they propose this on-chain option that never expires. Uniswap V3 liquidity pool, they propose this on-chain option that never expires.
Uniswap V3 pools allow liquidity providers to deposit two assets and earn fees when the
price ratio between these two assets is within a certain range.
When it's out of the range, your liquidity becomes 100% of the asset with the lower price.
Panoptic put options are essentially concentrated liquidity deployed on
a single price point, its strike price. Let's pretend you hold an ETH USDT panoptic put option.
When ETH's price goes above the strike price, this put option is OTM and becomes 100% USDT.
When ETH's price is below the strike price, the buyer can give 1 ETH to the seller in exchange
for all the USDT in the pool, earning the difference between the strike price, the buyer can give 1 ETH to the seller in exchange for all
the USDT in the pool, earning the difference between the strike price and the price they
paid for that 1 ETH. Panoptic call options work exactly the same except the two assets must switch
places. But that's only half the formula. We still need to price the panoptions by putting a premium
on them. In contrast to traditional options, panoptions charge
a no premium upfront and assume that the value of options can be realized over time.
Meet theta, a Greek letter used to define the rate of an option's value decline over time.
If you studied derivatives, the mathematical one, you would know the derivative of mileage
over time is velocity, the rate, speed of your mileage increase over time. And by integrating
the speed over time, you get mileage. Theoretically, the same goes for options. If we integrate theta,
the value speed over time, we get value. We are able to do this because there is another formula
for theta instead of doing derivatives. Where S denotes the underlying asset spot, or current,
price. Sigma is the asset's volatility,
K is the strike price, and T is the time to expiration. Note this formula is flawed since
we assumed a zero risk-free interest rate when in reality it can get quite higher.
But how high should we take the interest rate from Binance Earn, ETH Staking, Aave Lend,
or heaven forbid, treasury bonds? This question may take an industry to
answer. The good news is, we still haven't said a word about oracles because by tethering pen
options to the corresponding Uniswap v3 pool, this system won't ever need an oracle as long
as there are enough traders swapping tokens via this pool. This way, we have a simulated option
on smart contracts, a premium that is price path dependent but oracle
free, and some solid knowledge in derivatives, both financial and mathematical. We are probably
more ready than 99.9% of individuals on earth to trade options. Perpetual options on chain,
Panoptic built an entire options trading ecosystem with smart contracts. Participants are divided
into liquidity providers, option sellers,
and option buyers. Before anyone can do anything, liquidity providers must first deposit a setting
to a liquidity pool. Sellers and buyers must also deposit their collateral. Sellers need to first
mint their call or put option by paying a 0.1% commission and locking up, borrowing, a certain
amount of liquidity at a strike price.
Then, buyers can buy these options by paying the same rate of commission,
locking up some more liquidity, and minting their position.
Since our premium is accumulated over time, there should be zero premium when the option
was just sold. Instead, sellers would be credited a streaming premium every time the spot price
crosses the strike price.
When exercising their options, buyers will pay back their borrowed liquidity plus premium
while getting the numeraire for put options or the underlying asset for call options.
On one hand, Panoptions is genius.
By synthesizing options with Uniswap v3 PoolSand settling premium when the option is exercised,
the entire process is moved
onto the blockchain. Anyone can access these financial instruments as long as they know their
way around wallets and smart contracts. Under the ERC-1155 token standard, you can mint several
options into one token for further risk and volatility customization or even duplicate a
composition someone else just shared. On the other hand, since PAN options can be minted at zero premium and a 0.1% fee,
who's to stop arbitrageurs from buying ITM options before immediately exercising them
for guaranteed profit? After a few costly lessons, who's to encourage sellers into
minting ITM positions only to lose money? With only OTM options, the market will be
as bustling as an empty bucket. Finding the F law in funding and finance. That's not to say the
centralized approach has no flaw. The universal funding mechanism can be perfect if the funding
is calculated and implemented every nanosecond. But when the funding cycle is stretched to 8 hours,
a lot of things can happen right before
and after funding payments are made. People may open apposition 0.01 seconds before funding and
close it immediately after receiving funding payments, leading to abnormal fluctuations
around the time of funding. If we take a step back, the funding mechanism is merely a band-aid
slapped onto someone with a headache that has CEX-traded crypto options.
The real hurdle that is holding so many exchanges back from introducing options is the lack of
liquidity. When you first look at it, crypto options seem a good instrument boasting similar
open interest to perpetual futures. When in reality, the options market is divided into
hundreds of sub-markets, each with a different expiration, strike price,
and supply and demand. As a result, liquidity is fragmented into dozens of pieces and the spread
on some sub-markets can be jaw-dropping. And that's just Bitcoin. Go to Bybit, the second,
third CEX, and look for options for Solana, the fourth largest crypto. Not counting stablecoins,
looking to surpass Ether, you'll find almost half of the
sub-markets empty. Options are just too complex for investors without a systematic understanding
of finance and investing, at least at first glance. It's not even friendly to market makers,
as mentioned in path dependency. Looks like we must educate all traders about the benefits of
options and invite them to trade these fine instruments.
Markets can be made as long as there are enough traders. But that's just another band-aid on an even grimmer headache. If you're looking to trade crypto derivatives,
there are two places to go. CEX and DEX. CEXs are generally faster with more liquidity but
you must go through an arduous KYC process and put your funds in the hands of others.
DEXs give you more control and freedom but are not nearly as fast or efficient as CEXs.
At its current state, blockchain will never be an ideal place for sophisticated OR institutional traders commanding huge liquidity who would choose speed-overed centralization and
permissionlessness any day. Many DEXs will look to centralize one or several links in their
protocol such as order book, order matching engine, database, market makers and more to
maximize efficiency and attract large institutions with deep pockets. As a result, centralized
institutions will have more and more say in these protocols and in the end, they may just turn into
on-chain CEXs where decentralization is nothing but a name.
Such is the finance industry. When even the slightest edge may put you ahead and rake in
billions of dollars, the survivors will look to build higher and higher walls and work with
players from all walks to protect their interests. To a newcomer, the world of finance is as much a
dark forest as Ethereum is although neither was designed to be initially. Uninitiated
individuals will always get eaten alive in such a hostile environment while the survivors feed
on their remains and grow into behemoths that are too big to fall. In the end, these financial
giants will have immense fun playing with sophisticated, quadruple-synthesized products
like MBS in an extremely centralized walled garden while the outsiders will do anything
for an entry pass.
Satoshi Nakamoto did invent Bitcoin to battle centralization but now,
the cryptocurrencies may just become another place where institutions take an individual's funds and throw them one or two bones every now and then. A look into the future.
But the future is not all doom and gloom. There surely will be more brilliant minds
trying to innovate on perpetual
options and evangelizing this financial instrument. Options that favor long-term investors with
minimal arbitraging opportunities may be invented and blockchain is just an ideal place for them.
Account abstraction may eventually bring in hundreds of millions of new users and with them,
fragmented liquidity may not be a problem anymore. Traders who value decentralization
and privacy will still get to play and grow their own games. A few boutique protocols may survive
through the years and eventually be discovered by the masses. Looking back, perpetual options may
not even be the right answer we are looking for. They are one of the most important derivatives
with a spark of crypto innovation but at its current state, it's merely a derivation from a traditional financial instrument that is as far
from decentralization as an empty bucket. To disrupt the old finance, we may need to build
a new one from the ground up. A version of this article was originally published here.
Thank you for listening to this HackerNoon story, read by Artificial Intelligence.
Visit HackerNoon.com to read, write, learn and publish.