The Headlines - The G.O.P. Scramble Over Trump’s Policy Bill, and Tracking Major Supreme Court Rulings
Episode Date: June 27, 2025Plus, the Friday news quiz. On Today’s Episode:Top Senate Official Rules Against Several Key Provisions in G.O.P. Policy Bill, by Catie Edmondson and Margot Sanger-KatzWith Flu Shot Vote, Kennedy�...�s Vaccine Skepticism Comes Full Circle, by Sheryl Gay StolbergTrump Justice Dept. Pressuring University of Virginia President to Resign, by Michael S. Schmidt and Michael C. BenderU.S. Approves $30 Million for Contentious New Gaza Aid Group, by Ephrat LivniThe Lethal Risk of Seeking Food in Gaza, by Rawan Sheikh Ahmad and Adam RasgonSupreme Court Rules Planned Parenthood Cannot Sue Over S. Carolina Defunding Effort, by Adam LiptakThe Major Supreme Court Decisions in 2025, by Adam Liptak, Abbie VanSickle and Alicia ParlapianoHoney, We Shrunk the Cod, by Emily AnthesTune in every weekday morning. To get our full audio journalism and storytelling experience, download the New York Times Audio app — available to Times news subscribers on iOS — and sign up for our weekly newsletter.Tell us what you think at: theheadlines@nytimes.com.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From the New York Times, it's the headlines.
I'm Will Jarvis.
Today's Friday, June 27th.
Here's what we're covering.
Thank you all for being here to support one of the most important pieces of legislation
in the history of our country.
President Trump is trying to rally support for his sprawling domestic policy agenda,
even as Republicans on Capitol Hill are scrambling to salvage some of its key provisions.
As drafted, the so-called Big Beautiful Bill would extend tax cuts from President Trump's first term
and make deep reductions to public services like food benefits and health care, among many other policy changes.
The House signed off on its version of the legislation last month.
Now it's in the Senate's hands, and the president has given GOP lawmakers a July 4th deadline
to pass it.
We are in potentially the messiest possible place that this bill could be in right now
in the Senate. Most of the major elements of this legislation, the cuts to food assistance
programs, the cuts to Medicaid, they're still up in the air right now.
My colleague Katie Edmondson covers Congress. She says that the bill has hit
major roadblocks, in part because of the wonky process the GOP is using to avoid
a Democratic filibuster and get it to the president's desk.
It means that before the Senate can pass the bill, the parliamentarian who enforces the
chamber's rules has to confirm that the policies in it meet certain budget requirements.
She's already found that a number of them don't.
The Senate parliamentarian, in fact, has told Republicans that they need to either revise
several major elements of the legislation or that they need to discard them
from the bill entirely.
That includes some of the cuts to Medicaid.
And so right now, Senate Republicans are looking
to try to make edits to some of those provisions
to be able to include them in this legislation.
At the same time, a trend that we've been seeing play out
across the nation really, is that a number
of these Republican senators have been hearing from constituents who are
deeply concerned about the impact that some of these cuts to popular programs like Medicaid,
like SNAP or food stamps might have.
And they have a very short amount of time to figure it out in.
But I do think the bottom line here is that they are feeling enormous pressure to deliver,
to deliver the tax cuts that President Trump has promised.
The prevailing wisdom here on the Hill is that they are going to be able to pass something
and soon.
Katie says that party leaders hope to vote on the bill as soon as this weekend.
The Senate Majority Leader John Thune said there were what he called speed bumps along the way, but that, quote, we're moving forward.
Now three more updates on the Trump administration.
So we have five yes votes, one no vote and one abstain.
Yesterday, a federal vaccine advisory panel appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,
voted to walk back its long-standing recommendation for a flu vaccine
that contains an ingredient the anti-vax movement has falsely linked to autism.
Dozens of studies have shown the chemical, thimerosal,
which is used in only a small subset of vaccines, to be harmless, but the group voted against recommending it.
The vote signaled a significant shift in how the government approaches vaccines as it starts
to act on Kennedy's skepticism about their safety.
He had previously fired all 17 members of the panel and named eight new ones, half of
whom have publicly questioned vaccines.
Also, The Times has learned about a new front in the Trump administration's crackdown on
American universities.
The Justice Department has privately demanded that the University of Virginia oust its president
over his handling of the school's diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
It's accused the president, James E. Ryan, of failing to dismantle the DEI programs,
which President Trump has aggressively targeted.
And DOJ officials have told the university that it could lose hundreds of millions of
dollars in federal funding if Ryan is not removed.
Legal experts told the Times that this kind of pressure on a state university is extremely
rare.
One said it's a tactic you'd normally expect to see when the government is playing hardball
in a case with quote, pervasive criminal activity.
And the State Department says it has approved $30 million in funding for a contentious aid
group in Gaza.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is run mostly by American contractors and is backed by Israel,
with Israeli troops guarding its aid distribution sites.
But the aid plan has come under heavy criticism for putting Gazans in danger, with a spokesman
for the United Nations calling the sites death traps.
In the past month, hundreds of people have been killed while they gathered to collect
food, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, and witnesses have reported Israeli troops opening fire near the sites.
The Israeli military has said it's fired, quote, warning shots.
There's still widespread hunger in Gaza, according to the UN.
Most families survive on just one meal a day.
At the Supreme Court, the justices have been handing down their final decisions of the
term.
Yesterday, they ruled that Planned Parenthood and one of its patients cannot sue South Carolina
over its push to cut funding for the organization.
That could potentially make it easier for other states to also deny funding to Planned
Parenthood.
And today, the court is expected to release a number of other decisions on hot button issues.
It will weigh in on President Trump's effort
to end birthright citizenship for the children
of undocumented immigrants
and some temporary foreign residents.
It'll also rule on whether Texas can limit kids access
to online pornography by requiring age verification.
And it'll issue a ruling on how race was used
in drawing Louisiana's voting map
in a case that could eventually determine
which party controls the House of Representatives.
Those decisions and others are set to be announced
at 10 a.m. Eastern.
And finally, two scientific studies published this week are adding to a growing body of
evidence that human activity is driving the evolution of some wild animals.
Take for example the Eastern Baltic Cod.
If you were a fisherman in the Baltic Sea just a few decades ago, you would have been
used to catching cod that could be the size of a human toddler.
But today, a typical fish is so much smaller it would fit in your cupped hands, according
to a new study published in the journal Science Advances.
Researchers found that intense fishing in the region seems to have contributed to the
change in cod size, not because all the big cod were caught, but because the smaller
ones had a survival advantage.
They could slip out of fishing nets, and,
over time, the genes of the fish actually shifted to help the species stay alive.
Meanwhile, at the Field Museum in Chicago, scientists found another case of human-driven
adaptation in rodents.
Researchers looked at about a century's worth of chipmunk specimens and discovered that
as the city grew, the animal's teeth got shorter.
All that human food and trash in the city might have meant there was less need for robust
teeth to pierce into nuts and seeds.
And that changing diet could also explain why the chipmunk's skulls grew larger and
larger, potentially because they could pack on weight year-round.
Together, the studies showed just how fast human activity could be driving changes in animals.
As one of the Chicago scientists told the Times, quote, there is evolution happening
everywhere all the time.
You just have to know where to look for it.
Those are the headlines, but stick around, we've got the Friday news quiz for you after
the credits.
Today, on The Daily, an inside look at the trial of Sean Combs as the jury
prepares to consider the charges against him. That's next in the New York Times audio app
or listen wherever you get your podcasts. This show is made by Jessica Metzger, Jan
Stewart, Tracy Mumford, and me, Will Jarvis. Original theme by Dan Powell. Special thanks
to Isabella Anderson, Larissa Anderson, Jake Lucas, Zoe Murphy,
Adam Nagourney, Katie O'Brien, and Paula Schumann. Now for the quiz. We've got
questions about three stories The Times has covered this week. Can you answer
them all? First up, we assess that the American
strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities has set back Iran's ability
to develop nuclear weapons for many years to come.
President Trump faced questions this week over how much damage the US has inflicted
on Iran's nuclear program.
Trump has repeatedly claimed it was very high, using one particular word over and over again to describe the destruction
Take a listen that word is gonna be bleeped out. You tell us what it is
The word is
Obliteration and I was told that they. The word is obliteration.
And I was told that they said it was total obliteration.
You know, they have guys.
So far, U.S. intelligence assessments have confirmed substantial damage to the nuclear sites,
but have not used language that strong.
Okay, next up.
State officials in Florida announced this week that they started work on an unusual
new detention facility for migrants.
When the site opens as soon
as next month, people will be housed in large tents on an old airstrip surrounded
by swampland, and officials have given it an ominous nickname. What is it?
Here's a hint. It's inspired by the notorious prison in San Francisco Bay.
The answer?
Alligator Alcatraz.
Florida's Attorney General said that the alligators and pythons in the Everglades surrounding
the facility will stop people from escaping.
Notably, President Trump once talked about trying to deter migrants from even entering
the U.S. by building a moat along the U.S-Mexico border and filling it with alligators or snakes.
Okay, last question.
We told you earlier this week about the Times list of the 100 best films of the 21st century, today the
top 20 came out.
We're going to play a clip from the top 3 movies on that list.
You have to identify each film.
Let's start at number 3.
A mice trawl reaches across the roomand starts to drink your milkshake.
I drink your milkshake!
That's Daniel Day-Lewis starring in...
I drink it up!
...There Will Be Blood from 2007, with that unforgettable final scene.
Next up, the number two film on the times list.
This one's a bit tougher.
I can see him through the wall. I can see his face. I hope that I never see that
face ever outside of a dream. If you need a hint the director was David Lynch.
Okay. And the movie is Mulholland Drive from 2001.
Lynch originally wrote and filmed part of it as a pilot for a TV show.
When ABC turned it down, he made it into a feature film instead.
Now for the best film of the last 25 years, at least according to the directors, actors, and other Hollywood
insiders, The Times polled.
A hint on this one in 2020 became the first movie not in English to win Best Picture
at the Academy Awards.
The answer,
Parasite by South Korean director Bong Joon-ho.
Another one of his films, Memories of Murder,
was also on the list.
You can see the full ranking at nytimes.com.
All right, that is it for the news quiz.
The headlines will be back on Monday with Tracy Mumford.