The Headlines - The Supreme Court’s Momentous Term, and How Trump Has Made at Least $2.2 Billion in Office
Episode Date: July 1, 2026Plus, zombies at the mall. Here’s what we’re covering: Takeaways From a Transformative Supreme Court Term, by Ann E. Marimow and Adam Liptak Trump Pulled in at Least $2 Billion After Returning t...o the White House, by Ben Protess, Andrea Fuller, Eric Lipton and David Yaffe-Bellany Killed by the Venezuelan Quakes Just Hours After Being Deported From U.S., by Luis Ferré-Sadurní and Patricia Sulbarán More Than 1 Million Migrants Apply for Legal Status in Spain, by Carlos Barragán Horror Fans Bid a Bittersweet Farewell to an Empty Mall Full of Zombies, by Brian Raftery Tune in every weekday morning, and tell us what you think at: theheadlines@nytimes.com. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From the New York Times, it's the headlines.
I'm Tracy Mumford.
Today's Wednesday, July 1st.
Here's what we're covering.
The Supreme Court closed out its term yesterday with a major blow to President Trump's agenda,
blocking his administration's efforts to limit birthright citizenship.
Trump had issued an executive order on his very first day back in office
that would have prevented babies born to undocumented immigrants from automatically becoming citizens.
But in a six, three-year-old.
decision, the justices reaffirmed the long-held principle that nearly all children born on
U.S. soil are Americans. After the ruling, Trump took to social media to call the decision,
quote, too bad for our country and tried to punt it to Congress, falsely claiming they could
reverse it with legislation. In all, this Supreme Court term involved decisions in nearly
60 cases, and my colleague Anne Marimo, who's been tracking the rulings, said there were some
clear moments where Trump did not get what he wanted, but also some major expansions of presidential
power. So the term showed the court willing to check President Trump's boundary-pushing agenda.
They rejected his sweeping tariffs back in February. And just this week, we saw them reject
his efforts to limit birthright citizenship and also his attempt to fire a leader of the
influential Federal Reserve. Notably, it was some of Trump's own nominees who made those losses
possible. At various times, justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney-Barritt,
joined with the Chief Justice and the three liberal justices to reject major parts of the president's
agenda. That said, the court's conservative majority delivered long-lasting conservative
wins that will have an impact for many years to come. The court expanded the ability
of presidents, including Mr. Trump, to fire leaders of independent agencies.
In doing so, they overturned a 90-year-old precedent.
They significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act,
and they made it easier for presidents to strip migrants of deportation protections
and to turn away asylum seekers at the border.
These are long-lasting conservative victories
that have been sought for many decades by conservatives,
and they've delivered on those this term.
You can find a full recap of the major cases this term at NYTimes.com.
That includes two others of note from yesterday.
The court's decision to allow states to bar transgender athletes from girls' sports
and a decision to lift some spending limits for elections,
which could help Republicans ahead of the midterms.
Yesterday, President Trump's mandatory financial disclosure report was released,
and it details just how much money his business operations made last year.
The form shows that in his first year back in office,
he brought in at least $2.2 billion.
It only shows revenue, so it doesn't reveal whether his businesses turned a profit or a loss.
But that amount is nearly four times higher than he made the year before, 2024.
It includes, for example, tens of millions of dollars the Trump family pulled in from real estate branding deals in the Middle East, Europe, and Asia.
The president's properties like Mar-a-Lago and his golf clubs also brought in tens of millions.
The biggest source of money revealed in the report, though, was Trump's cryptocurrency businesses.
He used to be a big skeptic of crypto, but moved aggressively into the industry right before
retaking office. And last year, Trump's crypto ventures brought in well over a billion dollars
from things like the sale of his meme coin and the sale of a huge stake of his family's
crypto business to a firm tied to the UAE government. Those crypto-bibes,
businesses highlight a major source of conflict. Trump is both a significant player in the industry
and its top policymaker. And as president, Trump has undertaken actions that directly benefited
his family's crypto interests. Overall, presidential historians said they could identify
no other president in American history who entered into new business enterprises right before
moving into the White House and then continued to personally profit from them while in office.
While there have been past scandals around the business ventures of president's family members,
most presidents have taken pains to avoid potential conflicts.
George W. Bush, for example, sold his stake in the Texas Rangers baseball team before his election,
while Jimmy Carter turned over operation of his peanut farm to an independent trustee.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment from the Times,
but a White House spokeswoman said in a recent statement that Trump acts in the best interest of Americans
and that there are, quote, no conflicts of interest.
It has been nearly a week since Venezuela was hit by devastating earthquakes,
and while rescue efforts continue,
the disaster's official death toll has now passed 1,900 people.
The Venezuelan government believes thousands more are still trapped
under literal tons of concrete.
And the Times has learned that one group of victims from the quakes
included migrants who were deported from the U.S. just hours before.
the disaster. Last Wednesday, a plane carrying almost 150 Venezuelan deportees landed at the country's
main airport. They were then brought to a state-run holding facility where the Venezuelan government
planned to process and release them the next day. But the building they were being held in was
crushed in the quakes, trapping and killing people who'd just returned to their home country.
Two survivors said the walls and ceilings fell around them as people scrambled to escape. The
Venezuelan government has not said how many people were in the building or how many died, and family
members say they've been given little to no information. One survivor told the times that Venezuela
intelligence officers showed up after the earthquake, but did little to search for survivors,
and he said they threatened him to remain quiet about what had happened. The U.S. Department of Homeland
Security did not respond to questions about whether deportation flights to Venezuela would continue.
According to online flight trackers, there have been no deportation.
flights to the country since last Wednesday.
Around the world, as many countries, including the U.S.,
have been increasingly cracking down on immigration, Spain has been bucking that trend.
Earlier this year, it announced it was launching a program offering undocumented immigrants
a legal way to stay in the country.
And as of yesterday, Spain's solicitudes presented as to how much
And as of yesterday, Spain's prime minister announced that more than one million people have applied,
roughly 25% more than they had expected.
Spanish officials have described the program as both a humane gesture to immigrants
and an essential move for Spain's economy.
The country has one of the lowest birth rates in Europe,
and foreign-born workers fill gaps in critical economic sectors like tourism and agriculture.
Economists and government officials say Spain's influx of immigrants has helped turn its economy
into one of the fastest growing on the continent.
The program has drawn a lot of criticism from the conservative opposition, though,
who say it could strain the country's infrastructure and exacerbate housing shortages.
It's also heightened a standoff between Spain and the U.S.
Spain's prime minister called the program an antidote to policies pushed by, quote, maga-style leaders.
And finally.
Imagine, if you will, that something has gone terribly wrong.
In the late 1970s, George Romero, the creator of the zombie genre as we know it, brought that horror to the mall.
What are they doing? Why do they come here?
Some kind of instinct, memory, what they used to do.
In his film, Dawn of the Dead, survivors of the zombie apocalypse hole up in a shopping center.
To film it, Romero took over the Monroeville Mall about 20 minutes outside downtown Pittsburgh.
He said it was the perfect backdrop for a gory allegory about consumerism run amok.
And as the movie became a classic, the mall became a sacred place for horror fans who made pilgrimages there.
They hosted an annual Living Dead weekend.
One woman even told the times it was her.
her honeymoon destination. But the mall's end now seems near. Walmart and a developer have bought
the building and have plans to demolish it. In response, many fans are bidding their final farewells.
Last month, the mall hosted its last Living Dead weekend with some 3,000 people showing up,
many dressed as the undead themselves. Even with the crowds, it had a slightly abandoned feeling,
as many stores there have closed over the years, like in a lot of the last.
lot of malls around the country. One Romero fan told the Times, quote, it looks like a zombie
apocalypse happened here, which is kind of spot on. Those are the headlines. Today on the daily,
a look at how new federal limits on student loans could shut some Americans out of higher education.
You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford.
We'll be back tomorrow.
