The Headlines - Trump Threatens to Invoke Insurrection Act, and Grocery Prices Keep Going Up
Episode Date: January 16, 2026Plus, your Friday news quiz. Here’s what we’re covering:Trump Threatens to Invoke the Insurrection Act and Send Troops to Minnesota, by Shawn McCreeshCalling Trump ‘Authoritarian,’ Judge Seek...s to Restrict Student Deportations, by Zach MontagueU.S. Says It Erred in Deporting Student Traveling for Thanksgiving, by Adam SellaMachado Presents Trump With Her Nobel Peace Prize Medal, by Max Bearak and Henrik Pryser LibellDespite Trump’s Claims, Grocery Prices Are Rising, by Kevin Draper and Julie CreswellA.I. Has Arrived in Gmail. Here’s What to Know., by Brian X. ChenTune in every weekday morning, and tell us what you think at: theheadlines@nytimes.com. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From the New York Times, it's the headlines.
I'm Tracy Mumford.
Today's Friday, January 16th.
Here's what we're covering.
President Trump threatened invoking the Insurrection Act today in Truth Socialists.
I'm wondering what his tipping point is.
What would it take for him to invoke the Insurrection Act?
Look, that's only a question, frankly, the president can answer.
But the Insurrection Act is a tool at the president's disposal.
As you know, it has been used sparingly, but it has been used by previous presidents in American history.
President Trump's Social.
media post threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act in response to protests in Minnesota
has set off a flurry of questions of can he, will he, and what would it mean?
The act gives the president broad authority under some conditions to send troops into U.S.
cities.
I will say if I feel it's important to invoke the Insurrection Act, which I have the right to do,
that's a different thing because then I have the right to do pretty much what I want to do.
President Trump has brought it up multiple times this term,
including just last week in the Oval Office in an interview with Times reporters.
This time, the White House is framing it as a warning to Democrats,
who the administration has accused of egging on the protests.
The Insurrection Act hasn't been invoked by a U.S. president since 1992,
when troops were deployed in L.A. in response to riots that
out after several white police officers were acquitted in the beating of an unarmed black man,
Rodney King. In the last week, since an ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good,
thousands of people have been out in the streets in Minneapolis, protesting the killing
and the immigration crackdown agents are carrying out there.
At times, protesters have clashed with federal agents. There are now about 3,000 of them
deployed there. Local and state officials have said that deployment is created.
an unsafe situation, with agents shoving people, smashing car windows, and pulling drivers
out of their vehicles.
No plans to pull out of Minnesota.
No plans to pull out of Minnesota.
When asked about the situation and Trump's threat to use the Insurrection Act, Homeland Security
Secretary Christy Noem said they had been talking about it, but she said it would be up to
Trump to decide what's next.
Oh, I think that the president has that opportunity in the future.
hits his constitutional right, and it's up to him if he wants to utilize it.
Do you think he's likely to do it? I don't know.
Now, two other developments on the administration's immigration crackdown.
A federal judge in Boston issued a new rebuke to the administration
over its efforts to deport college students who demonstrated against Israel.
Judge William Young, a Reagan appointee, called President Trump an authoritarian
and said the administration had violated free speech protections
when it tried to deport international students
who'd been protesting over the war in Gaza.
The administration said it had the authority to do so
under an obscure legal provision,
claiming the students were a threat to American foreign policy.
But in court yesterday, the judge said the deportation threats
were an effort to, quote, twist the laws
and pick off prominent activists to intimidate others.
The judge said that next week he plans to issue a final order, restricting the administration from deporting members of two academic groups that brought the case.
And he said that going forward, the government will have to show that any deportations are not retaliation.
And what's your reaction to that stunning admission?
I accept their apologies, and I hope that based on this apology, I'm able to return back to my studies and also to, um,
be home with my parents.
The Trump administration has made a rare admission.
It said it made a mistake when it deported a college student who was trying to fly home for Thanksgiving.
19-year-old Ani Lopez-Belosa, who was brought from Honduras to the U.S. when she was seven,
was on her way to visit family in Texas when immigration agents detained her at the airport in Boston.
The next day, a judge signed an order saying she could not be removed from the U.S. while her case was pending.
But the day after that, she was put on a flight to Honduras.
one of multiple times that the administration has ignored court orders and pushed forward with deportations.
In court this week, a judge said he would try and find a solution so that she can return to the U.S. and get back to school,
though the government hasn't dropped its case against her.
Since she was deported, her family has faced intimidation from immigration authorities.
Her parents said that last month, agents appeared outside their home in Texas in three unmarked cars.
One agent rushed at her father, but he fled into the house and locked the door.
At the White House yesterday,
I presented the President of the United States, the medal of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Maria Carino Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader who won the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize,
gave her award to President Trump.
She's been trying to curry favor with him since he ousted the United States.
Nicholas Maduro, but he has not backed her efforts to lead Venezuela, saying, she's a very
nice woman, but she doesn't have the respect needed to be president. It's not immediately clear
what, if anything, she got out of her meeting with Trump yesterday. Afterward, the White House posted
an image on social media showing Trump holding up an ornate framed plaque with the gold prize in the
middle of it, and an inscription, recognizing his, quote, principled and decisive action to secure a free
Venezuela. Machado's highly unusual gesture came after Trump has spent months saying that he should
have won the award. In a recent statement, the Nobel Institute made clear that the award does not
work like that, clarifying that it can't be shared, transferred, or revoked, saying that its
decision is, quote, final and stands for all time. Despite that, a few Nobel prizes, which are 18-carat
gold, have been sold in the past.
A few years ago, James Watson, who helped discover the structure of DNA, sold his for over $4 million.
And more recently, a Russian journalist who won the Peace Prize auctioned the award off for over $100 million to raise money for Ukrainian child refugees.
And last update on the Trump administration, a quick fact check.
Our economy is unbelievable, and I'm bringing down the prices.
Remember this. I did cause the high prices.
Recently, as affordability has become the topic in American politics,
Grocery prices are starting to go rapidly down.
President Trump has repeatedly claimed that grocery prices are falling under his administration.
But new government data shows that prices are actually rising.
Overall, in the past 12 months, grocery prices went up more than 2%.
For certain foods, that number is way higher.
Coffee is up almost 20 percent, and ground beef prices surged to a new record high last month.
There are a wide range of reasons for the uptick, like fuel costs and extreme weather, and some of Trump's own policies.
Tariffs have driven up the cost of aluminum for canned goods, for example, which could be contributing.
Plus, the administration's immigration crackdown has left some farms struggling to find workers.
And while the prices of some products have come down,
notably eggs and milk, shoppers are still being squeezed.
Low-income Americans in particular are trading down to cheaper products and buying less,
according to grocery executives.
They say they're starting to see the same behavior in middle-class consumers, too.
And finally, if you use Gmail, like a billion-plus people worldwide do,
you've likely seen AI showing up on the platform.
Maybe it's offered to write some replies for you, so you don't have to type out,
Thanks, that sounds great, yourself.
Now, Google is rolling out even more AI tools, some free, some not, that it says can help people manage their overwhelming inboxes.
For example, you can now find an email by typing a question, like, what's the name of the job recruiter I talked to last month?
But, of course, to make the new features work, Google's AI assistant, Gemini, needs access to a user's entire.
entire inbox. And that has raised questions about whether the new tools are worth the potential
trade-off in privacy. Times tech writer Brian Chen tested out Google's new Gmail for a week. It
automatically generated a to-do list for him based on his emails. Get back to the pediatrician,
fill out that preschool enrollment, which he found very useful. He didn't love the tools
intended to help speed up writing email replies. One privacy and security expert he talked with,
said the AI rollout should be a reminder to people that nothing in your email is 100% private.
Google, or whatever platform you use, has access to it, so does law enforcement with a subpoena.
So the more you start relying on it, chatting with it, telling it about your life and your plans,
the more it has access to.
One thing to note, a lot of the AI features Brian tried out are or will be turned on for
Gmail users by default.
But there is a way to opt out by going into your account.
settings. Those are the headlines. If you'd like to play the Friday News quiz, it is just after these
credits. This show is made by Will Jarvis, Jan Stewart, and me, Tracy Mumford, original theme by Dan
Powell. Special thanks to Isabella Anderson, Larissa Anderson, Zoe Murphy, and Paula Schumann.
Now, time for the quiz. We've got a few questions for you about stories the Times has been covering.
Let's see what you got. First question. Under a new law, which was signed by the president this week,
one item could soon be back on the menu in school cafeterias across the U.S.
Your question, what food or beverage is no longer banned from federally funded school nutrition programs?
If you're racking your brain, this vintage ad may help you.
Makes you big, makes you strong.
Any ideas?
Good for teeth and bones and hair.
It's milk.
It's good.
Full fat and 2% of it.
milk were nixed from the National School Lunch Program back in 2011 under the Obama administration
to help fight childhood obesity. Now, milk is having a bit of a comeback. Milk consumption rose
recently after years of decline. And Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has vowed to end
what he called the attack on whole milk, cheese, and yogurt. Next up. For a real estate development
company, we have big projects now, but we started out with a little project. The billionaire
estate mogul Stan Cronkey is now the largest private landowner in the entire United States.
If you're wondering, what does that take? It takes owning a total amount of land more than double
the size of Delaware. He bought up almost a million acres just last month, which helped push him
into the top spot. He also owns a lot of other stuff. So this is a quick game of, does he own it or not?
End zone throw, touchdown rounds. The L.A. football football
team the Rams.
Yep, he moved it there from St. Louis.
It's a stunning, state-of-the-art super stadium.
The $5 billion stadium the Rams play in.
Yes, he owns that too.
It's a unique property.
It's one-of-a-kind.
The largest contiguous ranch in Texas.
Mm-hmm.
The English football club, Arsenal.
Uh-huh.
Huh? He bought out a Russian billionaire to get full control.
And last one.
Save money. Live better. Walmart.
Walmart.
No, he does not own Walmart.
But his wife is an heiress to the Walton family fortune.
And the final question of the quiz.
This week, a major pop group announced that it's coming back after a three-year hiatus
and launching a colossal new world tour this spring
with almost 80 shows across five continents.
Part of the reason for their long absence
was that some of the band members
had to complete mandatory military service.
Which pop group am I talking about?
The hint?
Another hint, their fans refer to themselves as the Army.
The answer?
BTS, the supergroup from South Korea.
Most men in the country have to serve for a time.
And while there are exceptions for Olympic champions and some classical musicians, pop stars, not exempt.
That is it for the news quiz.
You can tell us how you did at the headlines at NYTimes.com.
The show will be back on Monday.
