The Headlines - Who Is Running Iran, and How Doctors Cashed In on a Consumer Protection Law
Episode Date: April 23, 2026Plus, the Labubus linked to forced labor. Here’s what we’re covering: A New Era and New Leadership: The Generals Who Are Running Iran, by Farnaz Fassihi A 60-Day Deadline Could Pressure Trump on... Ending the Iran War, by Robert Jimison A $440,000 Breast Reduction: How Doctors Cashed In on a Consumer Protection Law, by Sarah Kliff and Margot Sanger-Katz Youth Suicides Declined After Creation of National Hotline, by Ellen Barry Some Labubu Dolls Contain Cotton Banned by Forced Labor Law, Testing Shows, by Ana Swanson, Sapna Maheshwari and Meaghan Tobin Tune in every weekday morning, and tell us what you think at: theheadlines@nytimes.com. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
From the New York Times, it's the headlines.
I'm Tracy Mumford.
Today's Thursday, April 23rd.
Here's what we're covering.
One of the key questions swirling as the U.S. attempts to negotiate an end to the war in Iran is,
who is really running Iran?
The new Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Moshhtabahamane, was wounded in airstrikes at the start of the war,
which killed his father, the previous Supreme Leader,
and he's been in hiding while he recovers.
He still has not been seen in public since he took.
over, and that has fed into uncertainty about the country's leadership.
To try and trace Iran's new power structure, the Times spoke with senior Iranian officials,
members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and others familiar with the country's
inner workings. Several officials told the times that Hamine's injuries are severe.
He's had surgery on his hand and legs, and his face and lips were badly burned, making it
difficult for him to speak. They say he's sharp and engaged, but he hasn't released a
video or audio message because he doesn't want to appear weak in his first public address.
Also, because of fears that he could be targeted again, messages to him are handwritten,
sealed in envelopes, and relayed via a human chain from one career to the next.
They travel on highways and back roads, in cars, and on motorcycles, until they reach his hideout.
His responses go back the same way.
That combination of his injuries and the challenge of reaching him has led Homeney to
delegate decision-making to commanders in the Revolutionary Guards Corps. It's essentially left
the hard-line military calling the shots. Those generals were the ones who came up with the strategy
of closing the Strait of Hormuz and of striking neighboring countries in the Gulf. They were the
ones who agreed to the temporary ceasefire and who decided to pull the plug on more peace talks this
week because they felt President Trump was trying to pressure Iran to surrender. Overall, Iranian
officials tell the times the generals are feeling confident in this moment, like they've been
able to prevent the U.S. and Israel from toppling the regime, and that the country still has
leverage in the conflict. Now, a few more quick updates on the war.
I can confirm that there was an attack against the quick-owned cargo ship.
Yesterday, Iran tightened its stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz, saying it had seized
two ships trying to get through, and there were reports that other ships were.
were fired on. Before the war, more than 130 vessels went through the waterway every day,
and there was hope that the sea spire would get those numbers back up. But with Iran renewing
its attacks, traffic in the street has pretty much come to a halt. Also, I was approached by
more than 10 of the most vulnerable and poorest countries in terms of energy, and they ask us to
extend that sanction. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent doubled down yesterday,
on the Trump administration's decision to extend a sanctions exemption on Russian oil as a way of trying
to ease the energy crisis sparked by the war. Russian oil had previously been blacklisted because of the war
in Ukraine, but the Treasury Department said it wants to ensure, quote, all oil is available to
those who need it. Besson first paused the sanctions in March, saying it was temporary.
According to one analysis, that move caused Russian oil revenues to surge, nearly doubling.
last month and providing a financial lifeline for the Kremlin.
And last update on the war, President Trump is staring down a looming deadline for U.S. military
operations in Iran. By law, the president can wage war for 60 days without getting congressional
approval, but at that point, lawmakers need to authorize it to continue. For Trump, that date
is May 1st next Friday. While Republicans in Congress have largely backed his campaign so far,
some have signaled they won't continue that support after that deadline.
If lawmakers don't authorize the war, Trump will either have to pull back immediately
or give himself a one-time 30-day extension that would be used to safely withdraw U.S. forces.
There's also a chance he could push past the deadline altogether, though, which would not be unprecedented.
In 2011, President Obama continued military operations in Libya past 60 days,
which prompted bipartisan backlash.
A couple of years ago, Republican and Democratic lawmakers
banded together to take on one of the most costly and frustrating parts of medical care,
surprise billing.
Every year, millions of Americans who unexpectedly saw a doctor out of network,
often in emergency rooms,
would be hit with far higher bills than what their health plans normally covered.
So Congress passed the No Surprises Act,
which barred out-of-network doctors from billing patients directly.
Instead, physicians can take their claim to a government-approved arbitrator to try and make a case for how much they think the patient's insurance company should pay them.
This new law, by all accounts, did do a lot to solve the problem of surprise medical bills, so patients are no longer in the middle of these billing disputes between insurers and doctors.
But what we found is that doctors have been flooding this new arbitration system with millions of claims and getting paid rates much, much higher than they did in the past.
Sarah Cliff is an investigative health care reporter at the Times.
This arbitration system is actually modeled on the way that Major League Baseball
settles disputes. Each side submits what they think is a fair price for the medical care
rendered. They submit some arguments, and then the arbitrator selects one of them.
There is no middle ground. Somebody is going to win. And once the arbitrator picks someone,
that is the final decision, there is no route to appeal.
Sometimes the numbers that insurers and doctors bring to the table are wildly different.
There was one case that we looked at where the insurance company offered $2,600 for a test of blood flow to the brain.
The doctor asked for $330,000, and they won that dispute and got that money.
We saw this happening repeatedly in this massive data set that had millions of claims.
We saw a breast surgeon who was getting $440,000.
thousand dollars for each breast reduction he did. We saw gynecologists who were getting 600 times the
normal rates for placing a contraceptive called an IUD. The doctors are overwhelmingly winning these
disputes. We found that in 88% of the cases, they win and they're often winning hundreds of times
of what they used to get paid before this law passed. One of the mysteries is why the results are so
lopsided. It surprised the lawmakers who wrote this law when we asked them about it. There are a few
theories. One is that the arbitrators are paid on a per case basis, so they have an incentive to
render decisions favorable to doctors, to have doctors continue bringing them disputes. Another is that
doctors are just viewed more positively by the public than insurance plans are, and maybe
arbitrators have those same kind of biases that the general public does. Sarah says, as a result
of the huge new payouts doctors are getting, some insurance companies say they're having to raise
premiums for patients, essentially passing along the cost of this new arbitration system.
A new study out this week found that after a national suicide prevention effort went into
a fact a few years ago, the rate of youth suicides in the U.S. dropped.
Three numbers help me find the help I needed.
988, suicide and crisis lifeline.
The idea was to basically create the 911 of mental health, taking a 10-digit hotline number
and simplifying it to just 988.
Lawmakers also put more than a billion dollars
towards supporting crisis centers.
Now, researchers have found that in the first two and a half years
after the hotline launched,
the rate of suicides among young people
was 11% below projections.
There could be other factors driving the drop.
For one thing, the hotline launched
right as the country was coming out of the depths of the pandemic.
But to try and get a true sense of the hotline's impact,
the study compared,
suicide rates between states. It found that in places that had the biggest surge in calls to
988, youth suicide rates dropped significantly more than places that saw a smaller uptick in calls.
Overall, since 988 launched, it has fielded more than 25 million calls, text, and online chats,
according to the Department of Health and Human Services. And the agency has asked Congress
for another half billion dollars to fund the program for next year. And finally,
The Lubbubu craze over the last few years has meant that the furry little monster dolls have been everywhere from backpack key chains to high fashion runways.
People have waited in line for hours to buy them.
Some of them go for thousands and thousands of dollars.
But the best-selling toy has now been linked to forced labor in China, specifically in the Xinjiang region of the country.
The U.S. government has banned the import of cotton from there over concerns about human rights violations.
A nonprofit group that advocates on behalf of Uyghurs, an ethnic group that mostly lives in Xinjiang,
commissioned a test of the cotton used in a libubu, and the Times then independently confirmed the results.
My colleagues took 20 of the dolls for testing, which showed 16 had clothing containing cotton from Xinjiang.
There could be serious consequences for Pop Mart, the Chinese company that sells Labuboos,
companies found to have violated the U.S. restrictions could have all.
their products banned. A spokeswoman for Popmart told the times it would conduct an investigation
into its supply chains and that the company held itself and its suppliers to the highest standards.
One U.S. lawmaker who co-chairs the Congressional Executive Commission on China said, quote,
Pop Mart should prove that all of its dolls in the United States are slave labor free.
Those are the headlines. Today on the Daily, a look at what the recent monopoly case over
live nation could mean for concert goers. You can find that in the New York Times app or wherever
you get your podcasts. I'm Tracy Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow with the latest and the Friday
News Quiz.
