The Highwire with Del Bigtree - ACTS OF MALICE

Episode Date: June 4, 2022

Memorial Day Irony; Biden IHR Amendments Fail; New Risks In Vaccine Tech; Media: “Anti-Vaxxers Can’t Be Beat”; Pfizer Docs Paint Perilous Pregnancy PictureGuests: Meryl Dorey, Katie Ashby-Koppens, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, Dr. Naomi WolfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world. It's time to step out onto the high wire. Well, here in America, we all celebrated Memorial Day weekend. I had a great opportunity to spend some time on Lake Travis here in Austin, Texas, with my family. And I will tell you, it looked like every family in the world was either traveling on the road, in a lake, on a plane, on a bus, on a train. It is clear that we are back to enjoying ourselves, back to taking a living. time off with our families and most of all back to vacationing, which was a brilliant thing to see after so much time locked down. But there was a headline that accompanied this that I think

is quite interesting, and this is what it was. Reported COVID-19 infection levels nearly six times higher than last Memorial Day weekend. It goes on to say this week also marks the eighth consecutive week of increasing COVID-19 cases in the U.S., the data shows. Last week, updated CDC data also revealed that more than half of the U.S. population is now living in a county that has a high or medium community risk level for COVID-19. Amid the rise in infections, a growing list of school districts and universities are now moving to bring back mask requirements. You know, I question whether or not I should even bring this headline on because I have so many

mixed emotions about what it's saying. Number one, I think we have to all agree. The vaccines are totally useless, absolutely achieved nothing of what they promised, which is to end this pandemic, didn't happen. All the lockdowns, all the masking, slowing the curve, all of it, we have said from the very beginning at some point, even if it works to hide from this virus, which I doubt it does and it doesn't appear to in any of the studies we looked around the world, when are you going to come out? When are you going to finally come out and start, you know, deal with? with this cold, which is what it is. And so I want to reflect back just on the fact that I have lost my YouTube channel, my Facebook

channel, and been attacked by almost every major media source for saying all the way back in the beginning, for those of you healthy enough, not the elderly, not those with comorbidities like COPD and heart conditions that are really in the high risk group. I said to the rest of us that are healthy, we need to go out and catch this cold. Now they have said that was the craziest thing ever stated, but that's exactly what's The United States government, the entire world has just decided, you know what? Instead of saying go out and cash this cold, they said, learn to live with it. You're going to catch it.

Even Fauci is saying you're going to catch it no matter what. And now we're seeing rates of infection higher than they were back when we were locking things down. And so the question we've got to ask ourselves is, where is this going, right? Where is this going? The reason I struggled thinking about should I put this headline out, I don't want to do their job for them, which is to make you all afraid that you got to lock down and start mass up again, which is what you get a sense has happened. The CDC is revisiting masks on airplanes and see if they really want to drive that line in the sand. And I think from the beginning, this has always been a bad cold at the very worst, and it's really bad for a select group of people.

It's figured out how to protect them while the rest of us attempt to get to herd immunity. But we now know, based on Geert Banden Bosch and many of the other world-renowned experts that have been on this show, that it appears this vaccine has dumped something, you know, unique and in the fact that it has blocked us. It's actually kept us from reaching herd immunity. We haven't heard to learn to live with any other virus before because we always eventually hit herd immunity. The virus disappears and we all go back to our lives and wait for the next cold or flu season to come along where some new variant will arrive and we'll deal with it the same way. But now we have vaccinated so many people, at least in the first world, that we don't seem to be able to get to herd immunity. And as these infection rates rise and Gier, Van and Bosch said they were

going to all on a track to eventually create so much pressure on this virus that it mutates and perhaps becomes deadly for those who were vaccinated. We'll see how all of that plays out. But what we know is this virus is not going away. It's not going down. And everything the United States of America and the world did was wrong. It's put us in a position we've never been before. And so when we think about what just happened last week at the WHO where they were voting on amendments by the United States of America, World Health Assembly number 75, to vote on sweeping decisions for health and sovereignty. This was by Shabnan Palaisa Muhammad. When we think about that boat that was going down and the idea that the World Health Organization, which was at the center of a lot of this

decision making, like forcing a warp speed vaccine on the world, locking people down, masking them down, all of which did not work, it's amazing that this is the very group, you know, attempting to seize power over the entire world and dictate how we move forward for future pandemics and even the thought or fear of a concern for a possible pandemic. Well, two weeks ago, we had Shabnan and Polisa Muhammad on the high wire to talk about this vote coming up. This is what she had to say then. The WHO is looking to use this coronavirus chapter to centralize health and take power for itself to make decisions on behalf of sovereign countries such as America, such as South Africa, such as the UK.

And they're doing this through the amendments to the 2005 international health regulations. There are about 13 amendments they're looking to change or to amend, including increased surveillance, including unilateral power given to the directed General Tedros to decide if your country or your region has a public health emergency of international concern. Now, prior to these amendments, the WHO and Tedros would have to consult with our countries to decide whether we do have a public health emergency of international concern. These amendments make it such that there isn't any consultation. He may consult.

He doesn't have to. So, of course, this has massive socio-political and geoeconomic considerations, especially when we're hearing rumblings about sanctions being enforced in certain countries that perhaps might not tour the line. Surely there's got to be a better way than depending on the WHO and the farmer cartel to make decisions about our health. The great awakening is here and the power of the people is always greater than people in power. Well, two weeks ago, Shabana and Palaisa Muhammad was in the airport on her way to the Better Wake Conference being sponsored by the World Council for Health in Bath, England. I was on my way there and we met and discussed how were we going to stop these measures, really being referred to as the BATERALTH.

Biden amendments. So we all were there. I believe Shadnam is still in Bath, England, but she joins me now. So Shabnam, it was a huge week. Obviously, we had the World Economic Forum going on, World Health Organization meeting, and of course, the World Council for Health. We had our incredible first debut of a great group of people that I think will start to lead the other side. the truth, the truth seekers as we move forward into the new world, some of the greatest experts in the world gathered, but we were not at the WHO, but you have been tracking that. So what happened this week to the Biden amendments when they, you know,

were being presented to the WHO? Well, Dalpuster point was an extraordinary conference, and you were absolutely superb looking forward to next year. But focusing on what happened at the World Health Assembly, what happened is exactly what we said on the last time I was on your show, that there is going to be a pushback. And these international health regulation amendments and that new pandemic treaty slash accord is a gross miscalculation by the other side. And we saw that happen in terms of the outcomes at the World Health Assembly number 75. I couldn't be happier. Certainly there's a celebration happening around the world, but we continue to keep our eyes on them.

So here's what happened. 12 out of those 13 amendments were taken off the table. I think those that would propose those amendments were rightfully quite embarrassed and had to scramble around trying to save face. Why were they taken off the table? Well, countries such as the African block countries on the African continent together with Iran, Russia, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia and even India said we're having none of it. In fact, specifically. There was a well-placed source who reported to me that the resolution on the IHR amendments was not passed, as African countries were concerned that there was inadequate consultation amongst member states, and the process was being rushed. You know what, actually, I think we actually have some video of some of these African states standing up and making this point during that assembly. Let's take a look at this. Regarding the proposed amendments under the agenda item, the African region hereby reiterates its position regarding the HR-205 amendments, which include the need to undertake limited, targeted amendment of the HR to maintain its integrity and ensure the gains achieved in core capacities and other provisions are not lost. The amendments need to be considered as a holistic package and the process should be transparent, inclusive, credible and consensual and with full respect for the sovereignty of member states while pursuing our collective action.

The African region shares the view that the process should not be fast-tracked by the amendments of Article 59 or the technical adjustment amendment of Articles 51, 62 and 662. at this Health Assembly. Namibia aligns with the statement delivered by Botswana on behalf of the African region. Namibia underscores that the amendments need to be considered as a holistic package and that the process should be transparent, inclusive, credible and consensual with due respect to the sovereignty of member states. The United Republic of Tanzania aligns with the statement delivered by Botswana behalf of the 47 member states of the African region. Tanzania has

aware of some concern in the amendments of some of the articles such as paragraph two of article six on sharing genetic sequence data and other information. There should be provision of clauses that will protect member states following sharing of information about public health risks to protect them against the anticipated economic consequences. I mean it's it's so inspired to see this language. And really, as I looked, as we were looking at these, as they're calling the Biden amendments or the U.S. amendments that were drawn up, there was a lot of concern that here in the United States of America, we would be seeding our power over the WHO.

But in many ways, this looked like a power grab to control nations, you know, the continents of Africa and India, nations, we tend to just, you know, run testing programs through and they have no control. And it seems to me, They've had enough of this. And there, I mean, when we look at even the forced vaccine across the world, some of the lowest rates are coming out of these countries that are saying no to the WHO. And I find that interesting because they've had the most contact with the WHO. In America, this is just like something that the third world nation is involved with. It's a group.

It's like UNICEF or something like that. We barely have any recollection or understanding what they do. But for those nations, in direct contact, in a lot of the time with all the different measures that they do and that they do, and the things they do to apparently try to help these nations. It seems that there's a really bad taste in the mouth in Africa, in India, towards the WHO. Am I reading that correctly? 100% on point.

I mean, I spoke at, and I'm part of the International Alliance for Justice and Democracy, which held a press conference in Geneva on Saturday, the 28th Dell. And my role was to speak about one conflicts of interest with the WHO and we'd need until tomorrow at least to 20th century. about all of those, but also some points about the IHR and the WHO slash big farmers role in Africa. These were some of the points we specifically highlighted that the WHO stands accused of facilitating or legitimizing Pfizer experiments in 1996 on Nigerian children without proper informed consent. 11 of 200 children died and their families only received compensation or some of them in 2009.

But that's just one example of what happens within the architecture of the WHO. The WHO's malaria study was reported in the BMJ to constitute a serious violation of international ethical standards, again, due to a lack of informed consent of Ghanaian, Malawi and Kenyan children. This was a Glaxo-Smith-Kline vaccine was quirics. It caused 10 times the amount of cerebral malaria as opposed to unvaxed people and a double of the death in girls. And we've never seen the WHO said that big farmer needs to take accountability. They rubber stamp these experiments.

They continue to proceed without informed consent. And you're quite right. Countries or continents like Africa and countries like South Africa are now saying, well, enough is enough. I couldn't be prouder. And I think this is the start of a massive change in how we view health and our role in taking control over health and wellness. I'll tell you what it's a massive change of,

is my perspective of Africa and India. Growing up in America, we just see ourselves as the beacons of light and hope for freedom and liberty, the UK, these power nations, you know, that seem to be running the world. And as I said at the incredible event that we're at, the Better Weight Conference, so many of your compatriots from South Africa and India were talking about these amazing legal successes

they're having against mandated vaccine programs, against vaccine passports, and the people there are really standing up. And I said right there, is everyone else, you know, from America and the UK and those of us that always sort of had these like delusions of grandeur starting to think that maybe the fate of the world, the fate of our species could actually be in the hands of Africa and India? Well, it proved out again this week that we are not leading in America. We are actually following. And some of the greatest resistance happening in the world to these draconian measures and this attempt for a globalist takeover really seemed to be being spearheaded out of Africa. in India, which is just, it's hard to hear that even come out of my mouth. I mean, do you feel that living in South Africa? Does your nation recognize the leadership position they now find themselves in for the world? 100%.

I mean, there's a sense of jubilation and deep pride, perhaps a little bit of astonishment for those who haven't been aware of what was going on. But now the news is spreading like wildfire. And people are saying it's time to take our power back. They know that the politicians are largely captured and corrupt. And of course, institutions like the WHO spend a lot of time in grooming and, you know, lobbying politicians to take up positions within the WHO very strategically. But the people have had enough. The conflicts of interest regarding WHO and Big Pharma couldn't be more clear.

You know, the Welcome Trust, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, all of them in this one incestuous cesspool. And the more Africans are finding out about what's going to be. going on with a very common sense realization that nothing the WHO has said during the last two years has actually worked. I mean, it's like Einstein says, Dahl. One sign of insanity is doing the same thing, expecting a different result. And I think Africa's just had enough. We want to take back our power. But so too the other countries.

India's got a fierce reputation of standing up to big farmer. But I also want to highlight that they are US senators who are now proposing bills to take power away from the WHO to stop funding it, to make sure that bills go properly through Senate, to limit the powers of the WHO. I mean, yeah, that's it, right? Is the headline on that exclusive Senator Ron Johnson leads bill to pushback on WHO overreach, insures Senate's power over pandemic treaty? I think over 15 senators have signed on so far.

I mean, it's just awesome because this is the type of issue that in America, our politicians don't tend to be, you know, focused on or concentrating on, but because of the massive outreach that we've had, both from the high wire, other groups like ours, groups like yours internationally, and then inside when we have these world-renowned scientists and doctors like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, here at Vanden Bosch, I mean, all these folks that showed up, Tess Lorry, of course,

who really put this all together in England, but it's having a dynamic effect on the politics here in the United States of America. And finally, I mean, I've been at this for years. finally we are seeing, you know, our own politicians recognize, oh my God, there's a power grab going on here. We need to stop it. Let's get down. I have just a little bit more time here to detail.

So ultimately, my understanding is they just, none of this stuff really got to a vote. It's not that it got voted down. They just never, they recognized there was so much pushback. There wasn't a, you know, it wasn't going to be smart to bring these amendments to the floor. And so they did get voted on. But this treaty did. There's some things we need to keep our eyes on, you know. I think it's a time to celebrate, but also they're not going home.

They're not giving up. So what is it we need to be looking for and watching very closely as we move into the future with the World Health Assembly? Yeah. Right. So one of the original amendments, Article 59, the amendment did get through. And so now they've reduced the amount of time it takes for amendments to go into force an effect from 24 months to 12.

So they've speeded this whole thing up. And then they were draft resolutions proposed appellate. World Health to object to to these amendments in time. I'll tell you what, Dale, and James Boguski agrees with me

that this is a violation of Article 55 of the IHR, because amendments must be sent to... Hold on one second. You broke up right when you were saying that. Just repeat that last little part. What was it that did get agreed to or what did they work on?

Right. So essentially, we now have 10 months instead of nine to object to or provide a reservation to amendments, but there's something very wrong with how all of this happens because Article 55 of the IHR says that amendments must be put on the table at least four months before they're adopted. That didn't happen. These draft resolutions, new ones presented right there at the WHA and accepted simultaneously. So of course we're going to be pushing back on that. There's also now a new stand, a permanent standing committee on public health emergencies. So more money for the WHA. But in terms of the call to.

action. Here's some very, I suppose, infuriating news that has come through. Now, let's talk about that new pandemic treaty or record. Round one of the public participation process was in April. It happened because we pushed for it in every interview and through mobilizing. They did admit the WHO committed to round two on the 16th and 17th of June. So here's all of us preparing for it. There's it on your screen right there. But as James discovered in one of the documents that came out of the WHA in a little footnote, they're not planning to have Ram True. They're planning to finish a draft of that new pandemic treaty and then perhaps consider having more public participation. I mean, what does it tell you? We can't trust this organization as if we needed any evidence.

They don't take us seriously. We need to take ourselves seriously. Defund, exit, continue building the better way. So the 60 to 17, is that still available for us to write in though? Are we going to have the opportunity to make our, no, it's been taken away? It's been taken up the table, I've updated their website yet, but one of the documents to come out of the World Health Assembly in a footnote said they're not going to do it. They're going to instead draft this document and then, I suppose, perhaps, look at a public,

it's sort of a predetermined conclusion, isn't it? They're not really interested in what we have to say, but we're going to keep making our voices heard using multi-pruders. pronged campaigns and of course just making them irrelevant. That's the way to go. Absolutely. Well, as I said here, the WHO has no power over my life. We need to start recognizing that we give these groups power by thinking about them, by caring about them. Yes, we should write in. Yes, we should be speaking it down. But what we should really be doing is inspiring our politicians and our different nations to stand for the rights of the citizens that have

voted them in the office. Shabnam, you're doing such amazing work. It's great to have you. You know, reporting to us from around the world, especially getting this African perspective, is so exciting. Keep up the good work, and I'm sure we will have you on soon to, you know, keep us abreast of what's actually taking place as these globalists keep going back to the drawing board, figuring out how to take over the world, and we keep having, you know, winning the battles. There's a larger war going on, but I love that we get to celebrate the battles that we've won. All right, let's look at this. African sovereignty coalition launch, focus Africa unites against the dead. WHO power grab 18th of June 22. Save that date, everybody.

And for everyone out there, just so you know, all you have to be is on our mailing list, and you'll get all this date. If you can't write it down fast enough while we're talking about it, it's all going to be in your inbox. Shabnam, take care. I look forward to talking to you soon. Power to the people. Thank you, Del.

Power to the people, indeed. Take care. All right. Well, I mean, it's super good news. I mean, not only are we winning battles here in America, But when you start seeing that the world is involved in this, I've said this, we are not standing alone anymore. There are beacons of light shining in nations you never expected would be taking the lead. So again, just so many victories. But to get into more of the details about that, how about we get into the Jackson Report? All right, Jeffrey, what do you have for us this week?

Del, I have some great news for you this week. Well, I've been covering public health. the issues of medical corruption, public agency corruption, corporate corruption for like seven years, maybe eight, several of those years alongside you as we're spotlighting these issues with vaccine safety. And I've noticed, obviously, as everyone else has, there's this narrative, this anti-vax narrative that was created and has actually been really successful. And it's, it's been able to neutralize a large conversation into this small one-sided conversation and render anybody with that label put on them invisible. That doesn't matter if you're a doctor or

well-credential doctor. It doesn't matter if you're a parent of a vaccine injured kid. If you get this label on you, you're done. And the media has kind of run roughshot over anybody that has any questions about the vaccine program, as we've covered here for several years. That is changing in a big way, in a way that I've never seen it change in all this time. And this is what I want to bring to you and the viewers in almost, you know, almost in a celebration because now justice is happening in an interesting way. So check this out. The New York Times wrote this article recently. It's a gigantic article. It's the anti-vaccine movement's new frontier. A lot of clips from this I want to read just to give you an idea of the flavor of what I'm talking about. So let's let's look at first.

They talked to a couple of pediatricians. This one's Robert Frock. He's a pediatrician. And it says here, in his 14 years of practicing medicine in Littleton, a Denver suburb, frog has seen parents decline their children's vaccines for the sake of a more, quote, natural lifestyle. He had also seen parents worrying about overstressing their children's bodies, requesting that vaccinations be given on different schedules. But until the past nine months or so, he has rarely seen parents with already vaccinated children refuse additional vaccines. Some of these parents were even rejecting boosters of the same shots they unquestionably accepted for their children just a few years earlier. Frach estimates that he has faced around

20 such parents, maybe more. It goes on to say this. These parents are not just uneducated, are not uneducated, Frock told me. Some of them are literally rocket scientists at the nearby Lockheed Martin facility. They go to talk to another pediatrician. This is Eric Ball, pediatrician in Orange County. He's also a vice chairman of the local American Academy of Pediatrics chapter. He told me that when California passed SB 276 in 2019, which tightened the oversight of exemptions, he and his colleagues felt emboldened to push for similar legislation in other states. Today, just three years later, these same doctors are embattled. We're completely on the defense, he said. Now we just want to hold on to what we have. And listen to this. This pediatrician goes on

to say, such doubt has been accompanied by and may have been augmented by an erosion of confidence and medical expertise generally. We used to be able to persuade more with our background and training, he says. Parents trusted his advice because he was a doctor. Now, when he cites the centers for disease and control and prevention or other official guidelines, skeptical parents sometimes accuse him of being a shill. And then they finally, one more quote here, this is from Colina Coltai. She studies misinformation of vaccine, anti-vaccine movement at the University of Washington. She says, during the pandemic, the anti-vax movement was able to springboard to the mainstream, Coltie says. I don't think it's that taboo anymore to be vaccine hesitant.

Wow. I mean, that's a huge shift. Let me just take a moment here, Jeffrey, to just basking what you've just said for a second. And think about where we're at, as you said, with the high wire. When we were fighting for parents that were just being sidelined, accused of being crazy, being opportunistic about the vaccines and its relationship to the so-called injury they had, I mean, this is, I left my job at CBS because it was so clear to me that the evidence was there that these injuries were happening. It changed my entire life. I'm so grateful for where I'm at.

But to be sitting reading this now, as you said, after all of the name calling, and by the way, I had like 20 questions from the New York Times that I had to answer, you know, in triplicate because they're never happy with the answers for this article, only to get like one sentence in the end. But the point being is for all of you out there, whether you have been with the high wire from the very beginning and you know who you are, you know you were there with Vax, you were probably recording your interviews, you know, about the injury in your family or to your children as we were traveling to all of the state capitals around the country and then we started the high wire or whether you just came on

during COVID, what you have to recognize is that this entire conversation has changed. Not just because we're doing a show, but because you were sharing the information, not only sharing that information, but our vaccine safety project, which are the talking points, so many of you've been carrying into your pediatricians that are giving these pediatricians a hard time, and now they're saying, I can't even win this argument. We did something, I want to point this out to you, we did something they never thought was possible. You know, when I got together with Aaron Siri, the lawyer that we work with to bring our lawsuits, remember, when we started this, when you were all with us, you could not sue the vaccine manufacturers. They are protected from liability.

because the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program, taking one of the most dangerous industries that pays out billions of dollars for killing people all the time for lying about the safety of their products, and here was a product you couldn't touch them on. And everyone was telling me, all the lawyers was going to saying, oh, there's no way to get to it. Well, Aaron, Siri and I sat down and we mapped that away.

We said, you know what? If the government is taking on the liability, then we are going to sue the government, and we're going to show the world what they're lying about. And we did, as I said, what they never thought, we thought we could do we showed that the CDC is complicit in this that the cdc has been a part of the lie that the cdc is taking funding from farmer has a revolving door and that this is the problem this is the disease and so when i read that when i read a doctor saying i quote the cdc and now

parents call me a shill folks we have done it we have done the impossible we brought down this monolithic lying machine in the united states of america and now the new york times is admitting it so i just watch you to all take a moment here, pat yourself on the back and say they never thought we would walk right through their front door, into their cathedral, and say, this entire religion is coming down. We're getting back to the science. You have done that. The high wire has done that. And when I travel the world, when I'm in England, to see the effect we're having around the world, it's all because of you and your support. So let me just take this moment to say how important it is that you continue to help us do this work.

both the work to grow this media. You know, I want it to be an empire. They blame us for having an empire, but we're talking to reporters all around the world. We want to expand. We also need to bring bigger and bigger lawsuits because right now in California, they're going to try and pass a law saying that a 12-year-old

can approve a vaccine without parents being involved. Now, you know we won that case in Washington, D.C.? Well, we're going to have to pay for that case in California. It will be even bigger. All of this means this is the moment. We are winning, but if we get complacent now, While we're in the winning position, you know, we rocked Goliath. Goliath is knocked back right now, but do not let him come back to his senses.

I need your help. I need it now. There's so much we're trying to do. I cannot talk about it all. I'm not going to telegraph at all because, boy, are they dying trying to figure out what our next move is. But please support us in that move right now. If you're a donor, just add five more dollars a month if you can. If you haven't been donating, you're watching what we're doing here.

Make this your moment to get involved to help us change the world. Go to the highwire.com, click on the donate button. You can also see it in the I Can Decide website and become a recurring donor. This is a really great way to go. We're asking for $22 for $22, but by seeing projected costs, we know what we can get into and what we can't, and frankly, I don't want to turn down a single lawsuit right now. I don't want to let another reporter get kicked off of the BBC and say they have nowhere to go. We want to build that landing space.

I need your help. It's going to be very expensive as these things. things are and you know it in this crazy world. You are changing the world. We are just reporting on it and using the skills and the people that we have around us to do the best that we can. Please note that you have done this and your help is how we move forward. All right. Sorry for interrupting you, Jeffrey, but this is, it's just so huge. It may just be words to some people that got involved, but I know those of us that have been at this, you know, I've been at this since the 2015. So many people back, you know, decades before that.

But we're finally seeing this giant ship that everyone said couldn't be turned, being turned. It's truly an exciting moment. We've never thought we'd see words like this. And let's not just take the words of a couple pediatricians quoted in an article from New York Times that a lot of people don't believe anymore because they've treated the information

and people so poorly over the years. Let's look at more supporting evidence here. So that doctor said a lot of these parents aren't, aren't, you know, uneducated. They're literally rocket scientists. Well, there's a Carnegie Mellon University study that came out in 2021. And this is the headline here, the most hesitant groups of all PhDs. And let's look at this graph here, this bar graph. So they did a survey during 2021 when they were rolling out the coronavirus vaccines. And they found that 23.9% of people that were labeled as vaccine hesitant in this survey were PhDs. It's called a U-shaped survey because on the on the flip

side high school or less were the other high degrees of people that were vaccine hesitant. But why are we having PhDs leading the vaccine hesitancy? There is another big question. And that that cooperates what that pediatrician in Denver was saying. We're right outside Denver. But let's look at the headlines here. He says he quotes the CDC and patients call him a shill. Well, it's not because anti-vaxers.

It's because of the CDC's own work during the coronavirus and their, their politics. Here's just some of the headlines if people don't remember of their own doings. This is 2021. Embattled CDC rethinks pandemic response after criticism of guidelines. And then we have stat news. This was typically a very pro-vaccine outlet. This is them reporting on the FDA's decision to skip the independent experts. U.S. official's decision on COVID-19 boosters shots baffle and upset some scientists. And then we have this from TableMag, how the CDC abandoned science. This is Vinnie Prasad.

He's saying the CDC has severely damaged its reputation, led to a growing divide in trust in science. And even HHS and Bacera is in its mix as well. So we have all the agencies. This is the headline White House frustrations grow over health chief Bacera's handling of the pandemic. These are just headlines over the past about year, year and a half. And no one's happy with the leadership or these public health agencies. And they're creating their own downfall by this politicalization of science. But let's look at more of a focused analysis here.

This is in the BMJ. And when things are in medical journals like this and they're a long drawn out analysis, these are beacons to the medical community, public health community, the intelligentsia of medicine to stop and think. This is a big deal here. So this is the headline. The unintended consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine policy. why mandates, passports, and restrictions may cause more harm than good.

This is a big deal. Let's look at the graph here from that. And it's saying here are the unintended consequences. They break them up into behavioral psychology, political and legal effects, social economics, and the integrity of science and public health. But notice one thing here. We have the WHO trying to create this global health governance, trying to have oversight that literally one of the tools they're using,

which is this forced vaccine policy, doing the exact opposite of that. If you look at this graph again, they're saying that the unintended consequences of this vaccine policy under political and legal effects, disunity and global health governance. That's the exact opposite of what the WHO is trying to do. Polarization of the anti-vax movement. This is what they're trying to bring together. And then if you look under integrity of science and public health, the erosion of trust in regulatory oversight. This is what we're experience right now erosion of key principles of the public health ethics this is exactly against the mission statements of these agencies and they go on to write this in the bmj denying individuals

education livelihoods medical care or social life unless they get vaccinated especially in light of the limitations with the current vaccines is arguably in tension with constitutional and bioethical principles they go on to write especially in liberal democracies while public support consolidated behind these policies in many countries, we should acknowledge that ethical frameworks were designed to ensure that rights and liberties are respected even during public health emergencies. And then it goes on to say this is perhaps the most important statement of the day here. The pressure to vaccinate and the consequences of refusal heightened people's scrutiny of information and demand for clarity and transparency. Jobs done. Basically they're saying the more

we're pressuring people to vaccinate, the more they're using critical. thinking, the more they're seeing through us, the more they're using clarity and demanding transparency. This is the exact thing that we've been working towards. And it's been it's been supercharged by this push as we've been showing for so many years. But then and Jeffrey, I also think that where would any of this be if no one was reporting on it? Because you certainly weren't hearing these things from the New York Times. You weren't hearing from the Washington Post. You weren't hearing on MSNBC. Fox, you know, thank God Tucker Carlson and maybe Laura Ingram, Star, covering some of these things.

We were certainly sending them all the information we had. I'm glad somebody jumped on. But really, without us being here reporting on it, are we here? I mean, it just seems like they have been used to decades and decades of everybody just being snowblown, right? Like whatever, CDC is amazing, doctors are amazing. I just trust whatever it is I hear, you know,

this voice, we gave the people voice, and we put the microscope, the magnifying glass glass on top of this lack of integrity, this lack of scientific method. I just wonder, you know, I mean, not, I'm not trying to like sort of toot our own horn, but it really feels like we are, you know, we've managed to give languaging and visibility of something that has always been there. Nothing changed. That's, I guess, my point.

This has always been the case. You and I look back, we've looked at the history of the CDC, the FDA. This isn't something that's totally brand new. The corruption has gotten a little bit worse, but they have been. just covering up their errors and shuffling all the problems under the bed. And now the one thing this changed is we came along and said, you know what? Let's build an entire news program around these liars. And look where we're at now.

I mean, again, it's just truly amazing that we can have that effect. When we do what's right, when we tell the truth, it really, truly can make a difference. Shabnan was just, you know, I know the work she's doing in African India. I just want people to get that, you know, it's not just because we have a show, But when we all do what we're guided to do, when we actually give up this fear that, oh, my God, it's so much bigger than us, there's nothing we're going to be able to do. When we actually step up, we do make a difference. We stop the WHO. We stop the CDC, the FDA.

And there's more of that to come. Boy, they're going to come back all guns blazing. But I know because of this success, we can be successful there too. You hit on something, too. It's very important. You know, conspiracy theories aside, at the very least, the media with all of their millions of dollars there are hundreds of thousands of journalists there there dozens of outlets they're lazy the story's

been there to be told for decades and decades and they missed it at best they missed it they're lazy flat-footed stenographers of the CDC parents have been waiting for this story to be told and they didn't do it I talked to the parents with these these these journalists come to their houses and do these large exposés and they don't run them so they're lazy so get a media get off your butts, there's stories to be told. Go get them. You don't have to neutralize people anymore. But let's look back to 1976. Perhaps a time when the media actually did their job. We're going to talk about something called Guillain-Barre syndrome, but we first really heard about

this link with the vaccine around 1976 during the swine flu outbreak. Take a look. Okay. Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the U.S. government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation. And Washington decided that every man, woman, and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nationwide outbreak, a pandemic. Well, 46 million of us obediently took the shot. And now 4,000 Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to $3.5 billion because of what happened when they took that shot. By far the greatest number of the claims, two-thirds of them, are for neurological damage.

or even death. One of those who did roll up her sleeve was Judy Roberts. She was perfectly healthy, an active woman, when in November of 1976 she took her shot. Two weeks later, she says, she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs. I joked about it at that time. I said, I'll be numb to the knees by Friday,

as if this keeps up. By the following week, I was totally paralyzed. So completely paralyzed, in fact, that they had to operate on her to enable her to breathe. And for six months, Judy Roberts was a quadriplegic. The diagnosis? A neurological disorder called Gianne Buray Syndrome, GBS for short. You know, we've used clips from that 60 Minutes episode so many times.

And I tell you, every time I see it, it blows my mind. Like, this time when I watched it, because of the focus we have, I think they know. Like, even these reporters that were involved in the 60 minutes, you know. When you have a brand new product that is, you know, they use a scare tactic and try to give it to everyone in the world, you could have serious, serious complications, you know, we forget. It's like this is the first time it's happened maybe or, you know, why are they so, you know, brazen with this propaganda and this push? But when you look back, I mean, it's just shocking that anyone thinks it would be a good idea to take a total experimental product. One, by the way, that was failing in every single animal trial it was going through for 20 years. Let's just give that to everybody.

So I don't, you know, go ahead. Where's this story going? I can only imagine it's not looking much better than it was then when 60 Minutes was allowed to actually talk about it. Right. So we have this Guillain-Barre syndrome. This has been causally linked to the vaccines for since 1976, really since those stories started coming out. And it's been kind of bobbing on the headlines. This is just a disorder where the body's immune system attacks the nerves.

And it can go anything from like this woman showed. from numbness in the legs, but it travels pretty fast sometimes in a lot of people to full body paralysis, which is a really big deal. And it's really important to catch this quick because you need blood transfusions because these antibodies are attacking your nerve cells.

But this was even associated in 2009 with the H1N1 vaccine. When that was pushed, this was again, not a fully tested vaccine pushed by Fauci. It's a story for another day. But here's the headline. This was just a couple of years after they find H1N1 flu vaccine tied to higher risk

of YonBarray syndrome. And now we have this, Asterozenica's vaccine, their COVID vaccine, also getting the label slapped on it. This is the headline, Astrozenica vaccine may increase risk of serious neurological condition. This is the GBS. And they're saying in this article here that the scientists are believing that the Jab's Trojan horse delivery system. Remember, it's that adenovirus.

It's that little spaceship that takes a genetic material. Right. Through the body into the cell, they're saying that delivery system could be causing a rise in these cases. So looking at this article here. tuning in for the first time. The adenavirus vector vaccines, that's the Johnson-Johnson-Johnson-Astrogenic. They basically take a monkey adenavirus that supposedly doesn't affect human beings.

That's why it's used, like as we call it, the spaceship. You put the message in there that's going to go to the cells to start creating, you know, the spike proteins and immunity towards that. But it's that vector. It's that virus, this monkey virus, the adenavirus, that could really be a problem. and it was just there as sort of the delivery system. All right. So continue on.

Right. So let's read about this Astrozenica risk from the article here. And this is really chronicles what's going on. It says lead author, Professor Michael Lund, he's the UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology said at the, at the moment, we don't know why a vaccine may cause these very small rises in GBS. He says it may be that a non-specific immune activation in susceptible individuals occurs. But if there were the similar cases, if there were, the cases, similar risks may apply to all vaccine types. So he says it is therefore logical to suggest that the

Simeon adenovirus vector often used to develop vaccines, including astrozyics, may account for this risk. And so what they were doing was monitoring. They said between January to October 2021, 996 Guillembrae syndrome cases were recorded in the UK's national immunoglobulin database. But there was an unusual spike in GBS reports occurring between March and April of 2021. What they found there For those two months, there are about 140 cases per month compared to the historical rates of 100 per month. So there's a 40% increase in those months when they're giving this AstraZeneca vaccine over in the UK. But this shouldn't be a surprise because in 2021, they had their Eurovigilance. This was for the vaccine monitoring, safety monitoring.

They had them add a warning to this to the AstraZeneca vaccine for GBS. Here's the headline here. UK adds nerve disorder as rare side effect of Astrozenica COVID-19 vaccine. And even here in the United States, like you said, Johnson and Johnson was the other adenovirus vector vaccine. The FDA added their version of that here in 2021. FDA warrants a potential rare neurological complication with Johnson and Johnson coronavirus vaccine.

As we know, the CDC has now has limited that vaccine here. But the Journal of American Medical Association even did a study looking at the vaccine safety data link. This is the kind of the CDC's warehouse of to track issues with the vaccine as it gets rolled out in real time. This is the headline instances of Guillainbrae syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination in the vaccine safety data link. They find this, the authors write the unadjusted incidence rate of confirmed GBS in the one to 21 days after receiving the AD 26 COVID-2S as the Jansen vaccine was 32.4 per 100,000 person years, which was significantly higher, than the background rate of GBS, leading to the conclusion of in this cohort study of COVID-19 vaccines,

the incidence of GBS was elevated after receiving the Jansen vaccine. Surveillance is ongoing. So there you have it, just like mild carditis is way higher than background rate. We have this GPS with these adenovirus vaccine vectors. And here is probably the most stunning graph to drive this point home. This was from the open VERS. That's the vaccine adverse event reporting system. And this is just looking at Guillain-Barray syndrome and transverse transverse myelitis the transverse myelitis is kind of like a nuanced version of this where it's just affecting the spinal cord but still inflammation it's attacking the body and you can see starting from 1990 not much going on in those that blue box is only the flu vaccine reporting because that was that was the big story is well this is just for a flu vaccine or flu virus

we're only seeing this in the flu vaccine all the sudden though in 2021 you see a spike through the roof And this is all Guillain-Barre and Trembur's my lightest reports, not just food vaccine. Same thing with 2022. Let me just jump in here to give it a little perspective because we kind of say not much going on, but this was what was going on and you and I were reporting. You know, when you look at like 2009, 2015, those are all like 300, you know, 300, 400 cases every year being caused by vaccinations. That's not nothing going on. Those are people whose lives were changed forever.

Some of them in wheelchairs, you know, I think of our good friend, Josh. Coleman and his son and the work that he's done to get this story out there because those are real people. But look how many real people are being affected by these vaccines and they're not even discontinuing them. They're not doing what they did back like, oh man, our bad, let's pull that vaccine. They're sticking with this. They're doubling down. They're saying get a third, fourth. Imagine every time all those people that maybe got through this problem, the first time they got the vaccine. What happens if you get a second time, a third time, a fourth shot? I mean, this is just It's malicious. I mean, I don't know how else to say it. This is your, the CDC, the FDA, they know this. The WHO knows this.

Yet they are still promoting this horrible product. And there's two big red warning lights besides really the obvious here is this VAR system is a passive reporting system. As we've always said, it catches very, very small percentage. Some say about one percent or less. So, you know, double that as you will with the mathematicians out there. But also this headline, this next headline, doctors shrug off. patients with rare vaccine disorders, delaying treatment. They're talking about GBS in this article. So doctors don't know how to treat this thing, and they don't want to, a lot of them don't want to admit or don't want to even look at the fact that the vaccine may have caused this. And they don't have the training to understand how to fix it if the vaccine causes it. So this is mainline reporting, and this is happening a lot. So that huge graph of people there, those are people that have this disorder and are getting the best medical treatment in the world. These are people, you know,

know, a lot of them that we talk to and help, you know, help them file these reports. That's the last resort. They're trying to get any help they can, any funding they can because they're playing whack them with the medical community, trying to get anybody to help them and give them something that works. Now, as we're talking about vaccines, another study came out just recently, and we added this in here because it's so important. One of the big conversations is a myocarditis as well, you know, this is during a pandemic

and the coronavirus does cause myocarditis as well. So it's hard to find out how many people are getting myocarditis from the shot or from the actual illness. We just don't know. So, you know, carry on. And here's the title of this article for anybody wants to read it. The incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis and post-COVID-19 unvaccinated patients, a large population-based study.

So they're looking at all the unvaccinated patients and trying to find out, okay, let's take the vaccine vector out of here. and let's see how bad this virus really is in causing these. Before we look at it, I just want to state that I have ranted on here as they've lowered the age further and further for the recommendation of these vaccines, knowing full well as we've shown the data on the rise in myocarditis, the big studies coming out of Israel, up to six times more likely to be hospitalized with myocarditis from the vaccine than to be hospitalized from an infection of COVID for children. There's that study. And yet they seem to keep moving forward and end the vaccine admittedly in this last by the FDA and and marks.

Dr. Marks saying, well, it may be below 50%, but we'll probably still, you know, in its efficacy, but we'll still recommend it anyway. But the argument they've made is, well, yes, we know myocardis is happening. It's in a heightened rate to the background rate. But if you catch COVID, you're just as likely to have myocarditis. So therefore, it washes out, right? Like, you know, we have to protect you from the disease. And though there will be some myocarditis from the vaccine, you're definitely going to get myocarditis from COVID. And that's why we're approving this.

There is myocarditis risk higher after COVID infection than Pfizer or Moderna vaccination CDC fines. Remember, CDC fines. When they want to know why they've lost all credibility and what network was responsible for pointing that out, it's right here. So lay it on us. Were they right in that headline? the CDC's brilliant geniuses that are promoting this vaccine? Well, they looked in this study at a health insurance agency in Israel that covers over 50% of the population. The health insurance there is mandatory. So this is one of the biggest one is

Claylett Health Services. They looked at 196,992 adults after COVID-19 infections. These are people that were infected, tested for the PCR, had symptoms. And they started 10 days after infection. infection onset and they follow them all the way up for six months. So this is a pretty long, robust study, a lot of people. And they also had a control cohort, a group of people of over almost 600,000 people that did not test positive. So what they found, here's what the here's what the author said, quote, in the current large population study of subjects who are not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, we observe no increase in the incidences of myocarditis or pericarditis from day 10 after of SARS-CoV-2, and that's up to six months as well. They're actually finding more myocarditis

in the control group than they were in the infected group. Wow. In the group that didn't get infected at all, there was higher rates of myocarditis, meaning that the COVID is not causing myocarditis. Yeah, so, I mean, that's it. That's the biggest study to date. And that should be something that is grabbing headlines again, New York Times, everywhere, because this sets the record straight this reduces fear in the population yeah and it helps the medical community focus on the actual cause of this myocarditis which is the vaccine especially the second dose in younger kids of the mr and a vaccine but we're not seeing it anywhere we're not seeing these lines being made except here so let's let's rewrite a lot of a lot of stuff we do on this show del is to re not rewrite but uh

rewrite the gaslighting to lay the tracks of history down as they are found in truth and this is this next segment, this final segment here is going to be doing that. Now, at the beginning of the pandemic, obviously we are seeing people, those crazy videos out of Wuhan of people falling over and we are hearing hospitals were overrun and we knew people in nursing homes that were having problems breathing and these symptoms were obviously a big deal, a symptomatic COVID. But all of when that started to go down a little bit, we heard these, we heard these rumblings of this asymptomatic super spreader. This person is, you know, in the shadows and you don't even know if this person's sick, but they may be coughing over your kids in the classroom. So we've got to put the

masks on the kids in the classroom. So here's some of those headlines from that time. This was CNN, March 19th, 2020. Infected people without symptoms might be driving the spread of coronavirus more than we realized. Here's another headline, January 7th, 2021. People without symptoms spread virus in more than half of cases CDC model finds. Again, CDC model. Boom, look at that. And just fear porn, as we call it, right? Fear it, fear. And this was the first we'd ever heard of it. Let's make totally healthy people walking past you your enemy. And by doing that, then everyone's going to have to wear masks and lock themselves down because, God, we don't know where it's coming from. It's not the person actually sick.

It's the person that's healthy jogging right past you on the street. What? And these headlines, this fear preceded a lot of the lockdown restrictions that were so hard to get removed, you know, these masks on the kids in the school and everything. So now we find this may not be the truth. This is the headline out of the Daily Mail. where fears about asymptomatic COVID spread overblown, infected people without symptoms are two-thirds less likely to pass virus on, study finds. And then it says in here, excuse me, a study of nearly 30,000 people has found asymptomatic carriers are about 68% less likely to pass the virus on than

those who get sick. A new global study spanning 42 countries, including the U.S. and UK, found there were only responsible for as little as 14% of cases. There are, estimates that the overall risk of passing the virus on to someone else is about two-thirds lower. Again, let's go back to the CDC. This was in 2020. Take a look at this headline. CDC now recommends all people expose to COVID-19 get tested, reversing earlier controversial guidance. And it says in here, if you have been in close contact with an infected person and do not have symptoms, you need to test. The CDC said an update to its website Friday. And they said, due to, the significance of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission.

This guidance further reinforces the need to test asymptomatic persons, including close contacts of the person with documented SARS-COVID-2 infection, the CDC says. So what happened there is they tested everybody and their contacts. Symptoms are not. And remember on the screens, when we were watching the corporate media, you had these rising cases just skyrocketing everywhere, cases going up everywhere, everywhere, everywhere.

It's because of these false positives. Yeah. because they wanted to test everyone like this. And it's finding out that that was never needed. It was overblown. And that obviously led to a lot of these restrictions that perhaps never needed to happen in the first place. You know, it makes me think about just now as I'm thinking about. I talked about the headline I led with the fact that we have higher infection rates now than last Memorial Day weekend.

And I thought, you know, part of it has got to be testing, right? How many people wanted to go on vacation this Memorial Day weekend and went and got tested? Whereas last year said, I can't go anywhere. there's no way to travel, so why get tested at all? I mean, we could literally have just seen the Memorial Day weekend numbers go up because people finally recognized, hey, I'm being allowed to learn to live with it, which is what Del Big Tree was recommending two years ago, but now that's the case, and let me get tested and see if I can, you know, leave the country even.

So I wonder, I mean, you just think about all these things that affect the other things, and yet, you know, we're sort of just getting dragged, you know, around, as they say, the tail wagging the dog. Jeffrey, such great reporting. I mean, it's so wonderful to get good news amidst all of this truly a spectacular week that you're laying out there. So many successes and having to admit that apparently, you know, we're no longer crazy. We're no longer conspiracy theorists. It's no longer taboo to say, you know what?

I'm not sure I trust this vaccine thing. Really? Neither do I. Fantastic work, Jeffrey. We'll see you next week. day. Thanks, Del. Take care. Well, I mean, this is what happens when you actually just report the news. As Jeffrey said, and I want to be clear because I believe that there are people just like I worked to CBS. I haven't changed. I'm not a different person. I was doing controversial stories as controversial as they would allow me at CBS when I was working in the doctors.

You know, most of what I wanted to do went through because I got really high ratings. I was good at what I do. But there was the occasion to say, oh, come on, we're not going to piss off one of our sponsors. Can you just lay off on that subject? You'd sort of walk away. But deep down, I knew that the truth was out there, and it was something I wanted to report. I also believe, and I know this to be the case, that at the Washington Post, at the New York Times, at CNN, at MSNBC, at all of these news agencies, there are people that truly went to, you know, school for journalism believing in being non-biased, being, you know, objective on topics, that see all the lies, see that they are being forced

by their sponsors to actually push propaganda. They don't know where to go. They don't know what to do. I think there's a future for them. We're going to build that future. I really need your help. Let's save those voices. Let's not let journalism die along with science, which is something we also support here. It's time that we all invest. I need your investment into what should be the truth. Real news again. The real scientific method. Can you imagine what we're going to do? we could do if we could start sponsoring science institutions and letting them do the studies that they're being kicked out of universities for doing. This is the future. This is how we make a difference. This is how we get involved. So please do your part. The more that you can help us, go to the

highwire.com and hit the donate to ICAN and become a recurring donor. Yes, I am hitting this a little bit hard this week. We have so much to do and it's really not that hard. It isn't. I know what you're spending for your Netflix. I know what you're spending just to watch the CNN coming through your cable. I pay for all that crap too. So while you're at it, why don't you just take that cup of coffee from Starbucks and go ahead and take that and hand it over to the high wire and let us invest that in your future and the future of your children. We're proving that's where it's going. We have an incredibly low overhead for the work we're doing around the world. You're making that possible. and I want to thank all of you.

You have been generous. We're here because of you. But imagine if this is what we've done, if we brought in more voices, if we started to really build, you know, this world as we see it, what we are capable of. Well, speaking of those conversations

and, you know, thinking about what the CDC and the FDA, what kind of science they go through to make the recommendations they have. I mean, we've already spent an hour on the show showing you how many times they were wrong, how many times they blatantly said things that were not true and we have to assume they knew it from the beginning.

Well, here is an issue that is not just an adult, it's not just a kid, it is maybe the most vulnerable among us. That growing infant, when we think about pregnancy, when you think about the recommendations for the pregnant, have you asked yourself, huh, I wonder how much science was supporting this? Getting COVID-19 could be bad. Being pregnant and catching the virus could be even worse. Now the centers are issuing an urgent health advisory for pregnant women to get vaccinated. The CDC issued its strongest guidance yet urging pregnant women to get the COVID vaccine. Multiple studies indicate there is more risk in not getting vaccinated. There's nothing about the vaccines that have been licensed so far that raise any red flags for people who are pregnant.

The data are really very, very strong. If you look at the tens and tens of thousands of pregnant women who have gotten vaccinated, there's no safety signal of concern at all. The vaccines benefits outweigh any known or suspected risk, and they are recommending them aggressively for women, either before pregnancy or in any of the trimesters. We know tens of thousands of women have been vaccinated who are pregnant already in the United States, so so far it looks safe.

I'm really worried about the long-term effects. What about when the baby's five years old? It's important to remember that this is an M-R-N-A vaccine and that's the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. They are not live vaccines and importantly they don't cross over to the through the placenta to the baby. There is not an increased risk of miscarriage and in fact there is no biological mechanism by which that could happen because we don't think that the vaccine actually crosses the placenta and affects the baby.

There's new evidence that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 while pregnant can also protection to the baby. The antibodies that the mother has can go through the breast milk to the baby and may only serve, you know, maybe to protect the baby a little bit, but there's absolutely no harm. It's very safe. Despite the lack of controlled trials in pregnant women, their babies have been just as healthy as their counterparts who weren't vaccinated. This is a safe thing to do for yourself and for your baby.

Honestly, I can't think of a single reason why a woman is a woman. a woman wouldn't get vaccinated while they're pregnant. Now, I suppose we could have all stayed asleep and gone on believing that the CDC was right and all of this was actually news and not propaganda. But luckily for us, a group of world-renowned scientists and experts hired Aaron Siri, the same lawyer that we use here at the informed consent action network and for the high wire to go after the FDA that wanted 75 years before where they release the data on the trials for the Pfizer vaccine. Well, obviously, we've reported here that Aaron Siri,

both won in the court and on appeal, and all that information has been dumping into our laps and is due to all be presented, not 75 years, but within this very one year. It's an amazing victory for Aaron Siri. You can find those documents on our website, but this is a part of how we are changing the world and how we do things.

It's really about open source, right? Let's get this information, and let's let the information, and let's let the whole world jump in on it. And what's happened here is proof of how brilliantly that works because one of the great investigative minds, one of these people that has been in politics for a very long time, knows where the bodies are buried.

Of course, I'm talking about Naomi Wolf. She took a team of people to dig through this incredible amount, tens of thousands of documents, to get to the bottom of this discussion. And specifically around pregnancy, She has some shocking new details to share, and it's my honor to be joined by Naomi Wolf now. Thank you so much for having me, Del. I appreciate it. And thank you to Aaron Siri.

I wish I could thank him and his team as well. They really changed history with their persistence in getting these documents to the public. I agree. So tell me, first of all, what is the group you're working with? Who is it that you've got sort of plowing through this material? It's obviously a lot. How do you approach tens of thousands of documents as an investigator? Yeah. So it's a fantastic new model that's really yielding fruit. Basically a call went out from us on Steve Bannon's War Room and also on our own news site,

DailyClout.io, to ask for experts to convene to read through these documents because, of course, you know, a lay person like myself or other journalists, even if we could read through 55,000 documents, they're highly technical. So we got an amazing response. Now it's 3,000 volunteers. They range from physicians and RNs to biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians,

biological scientists, and they are in six teams, and they're going through the Pfizer documents systematically. they've issued about 17 reports and the headlines they found are absolutely shocking. I can bring you up to speed with some of the major headlines or I can focus primarily on the most recent headline, which is, I think, the biggest story of our time. And of course, all the major legacy media are ignoring it. There is a baby die-off to vaccinated women and there are harms to vaccinated women. and the mechanism is clear in the Pfizer documents.

So all those clips you had of all those spokes models of pharma and government, they are lying. And what's worse, if they were with the FDA or aligned with the FDA with the CDC related to Pfizer-D-all, they knew they were lying. When you reached out to us last week, you sort of laid out six major points to this work that you've done. Why don't we start there? Because I just think the people need to hear, you know, exactly the details. Because hearing it, it's shocking, yes, but take us through it.

What is it that this incredible team has uncovered in the Pfizer documents that come, these come from their trials mostly, or is it also upon release to the public? What is it we're looking at? I mean, these are, there's a table of adverse events that are from reports from the public. And there you see, and this is well known, more than 42,000 adverse events in a short span of months, More than 1,200 people died and four people died on the day that they were injected. But the volunteers have found other shocking things.

And then I'll get to the babies, but I want to give you a little bit of background. The volunteers found that Pfizer knew in December of 2020 that the vaccines did not work. The internal documents, and I've seen these, have categories vaccine failure and waning efficacy. Also, they show that one side effect you get when you're vaccinated is COVID.

They knew that a month after the rollout. But they didn't tell anyone. People thought, you know, I'll have two shots, I'll be done. The president said, have two shots, he'll be done. Pfizer knew that what we didn't find out until April of the following year with an Israeli study, that the vaccines weighed in efficacy. So, oh, you need a booster. Oh, you need two boosters.

You need three boosters. We found the document that shows there going to be six boosters. And in fact, Sweden just rolled out a fifth for pregnant women. and I'll get to why that's so dangerous. Pfizer knew that the injection did not stay in the deltoid, which all the doctors, you know, licensing boards, CDC claimed. I had doctors say, of course it stays in the deltoid. It doesn't.

They knew that the spike protein, the mRNA, and the lipid nanoparticles go within 48 hours through your bloodstream. A Japanese study has confirmed this as well. But they lodge these are Pfizer documents in your, lymph nodes, liver, spleen, adrenals, and if you're female in your ovaries. And I got deplatformed in March of last year from Twitter and widely attacked for noting an early signal of menstrual dysregulation in women.

Well, now we see one possible mechanism. And now a year-not something later, the NIH has confirmed that on average, women are menstruating on average a day more a month. the Pfizer knew that the 100 microgram. Let me interject really quickly, Naomi, just because I want to give a detail to this, the lipid nanoparticle. I was just at an event where I was talking to Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist. And they all said the same thing, which was, I hadn't wrapped my head around it,

that the lipid nanoparticle technology, that they're sort of wrapping this, this mRNA in to send into the body, was actually designed for cancer drugs. And the specific purpose was to get the drug into the blood. brain, which is really hard to get a delivery system for a drug dealing with brain cancer. So this lipid nanoparticle, I found this fascinating, was actually designed to get past the blood brain barrier. That's what it for. So when they used it in this vaccine to deliver the vaccine and then said to us, it'll stay there.

How is that possible you're using the technology that was designed to not stay there, but to go to the brain and other organs in the body? I just wanted to sort of add that detail in there. It's just shocking. Yeah, I want to add to what you just said. But I personally chose not to get vaccinated when I looked up lipid nanoparticle technology and found, and I'm a tech CEO. And I found that there was a lot more excitement about the technology in the biotech industry

journalism, you know, newsletters than there was in medical journals. And so I recognize this is a, this is a bubble. You know, someone's going to have a big exit after all the damage is done. And I didn't want, you know, to participate in someone else's big exit at my expense. But lipid nanoparticles indeed were used to deliver medicine to people with brain tumors. So yes, they knew it crossed membranes, but also it's used when things are drastic, right, for a cost benefit that is, you know, otherwise you're going to die of a brain tumor. But absolutely the technology, it is not surprising, crosses and our volunteers found this,

the placental barrier. So it enters these, people have to understand they're tiny but they're hard, fatty casings. These are zooming around your bloodstream, right? And they're crossing, as one, the scientist put it, every membrane in the human body or traversing. So this is the fetal environment where the baby is gestating. And so just skipping ahead, I guess, for the sake of time, to the babies, right? And there are other horrible headlines I can share with you. But getting to the babies, I asked the volunteers to drill into pregnancy, childbirth, and lactation.

I didn't understand with, you know, eighth grade biology how if this is happening, how babies are going to be safe. And indeed, they found that Pfizer excluded, you know, all pregnant women were excluded from all trials, right? But the claim that it's safe and effective, which you just heard all these spokesmodels echoing, is based on a study of 42 French rats. What? Followed for a period of 44 days. And the scientists who ran the study were investors or employees of Pfizer or bio-entech. They didn't let these poor mother rats actually give birth and check to see if their babies

were developing normally, growing normally. They autopsy the fetal rats and they decided that these, you know, fetal rats were fine. So therefore, the vaccine was safe and effective for pregnant human women and their babies. And not just four pregnant women, but like every pregnant woman. They study 40 rats. I mean, you can't even make the stuff of 40 rats and decide the fate of humanity. 44 rats for 42 days. They followed them.

24 rats for 42 days. And that gave us enough information, didn't watch one of them give birth to say to the world, if you're pregnant, go out and get this vaccine that we know crosses blood-brain barrier, therefore must cross every barrier, lie to the public, lie to the news. I mean, these people, I'm telling Naomi, they've got to go. to jail but let's get to that you know let's let's hear the rest of these details okay yeah no i have to tell you the rest so you've got to understand pregnant women were excluded from the EUA no one knew just as why like why people didn't know what would happen except right the stuff is designed

to to cross every human membrane so then the Pfizer documents show that nonetheless 270 women did get pregnant uh in in the trials and they lost about 230 of those women's records. They don't show up, they're not followed. However, 36 women did give birth who were vaccinated. And Pfizer knew that 28 of those women lost their babies. The babies died. Pfizer knew that.

Pfizer knew that there's a baby that died after lactating, nursing from a vaccinated mother. The baby died with an inflamed liver after GI distress and agitation. Now I'm gonna fast forward. I'm hearing signals around the country of babies of vaccinated mothers that are having GI distress, failure to thriving,

they're not growing appropriately, and sleeplessness and agitation. What the studies show is that polyethylene glycol is one of the ingredients in the MRA vaccine. Polyethylene glycol is a petroleum product. It's used in things like, like white strips, right? You're not supposed to ingest it.

Well, this is one of the ingredients that's going into these pregnant women's lactating women's bloodstream. Well, you know, breast milk is made from, you know, from blood and lymph. It's supported by blood and lymph. And so these models, you know, these spokesmodels you just show were like, oh, it can't possibly affect your breast milk. Well, the NIH study that I cite in my most recent substack

shows that they knew perfectly well. They found polyethylene glycol, in trace amounts in vaccinated women's breast milk, they decided it was negligible, how much of a petroleum product is negligible when you're a tiny newborn with no immunities, and this is your only food. And the study acknowledged that the vaccinated mothers, babies

are having agitation and sleeplessness and gastrointestinal issues. They acknowledge that, and they're like, more study is needed. Now I want to fast forward to the real shocker, but which now should not be, even, you know, so surprising because we understand some possible mechanisms. A Tana Hecht and Israeli journalist who reports on what our volunteers are doing, she put together news stories from around the world and she found that there is a baby die-off

in vaccinated countries and of vaccinated mothers. And here's what I mean. In Ontario, Canada, one province, they usually baseline five or six neonatal deaths, in a quarter, in 2021 after almost the whole province was vaccinated because you can't do anything in Canada if you're not, 86 babies died. So dramatic a spike that there was a parliamentary announcement about it. But it didn't stop Canada from vaccinating pregnant women. In Scotland, where I used to live, a highly vaccinated country, there has been a doubling of neonatal deaths.

Twice the number, the normal number of babies are dying. And in Rombom Hospital in Haifa, they show that there's a 34% increase in spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, and neonatal deaths in vaccinated mothers compared with unvaccinated. So you've got to now listen to what I just said, Dell, and expanded over 190 vaccinated countries. There's a war against babies and a war, a war against against, the right of mothers to know what's going into their body. None of this was disclosed to them. So this is all illegal according to the Nuremberg laws and every code of ethics. And there's a war against a woman's ability to sustain a baby with her own body, which is one of the most miraculous

things the human body can do. So just to sort of summarize, because you laid out so much there, we decided the safety of this vaccine on pregnancy using 44 rats. We in the trial accidentally, unfortunately, I'm sure for the trial, people hosting the trials, women went out and ended up getting pregnant. And instead of saying, well, good. And by the way, you said there was something like, what, 267 women, was that what it was? That got pregnant? 270 women got pregnant, but about 230 of them can't be found.

We don't know what happens. Can't be found. I mean, so when we think, it makes me think, is that just because they were pregnant? Or is the data collection that bad on a trial that they're just letting people drop off that we just won't know what happened? Either way, you tell that story, it looks really bad for people that are in an emergency situation, passing an emergency use authorization, knowing full well this thing is being rushed, and every piece of data should be like gold because people's lives are hanging the balance. And you are disappearing the majority of people that are, you know, representing an important group that you

are telling to get this vaccine. And so you're saying we have this mysterious disappearance of over 230 of these women that got pregnant, but the ones that they did follow, how many was that 30 something? 20,000 of the 36 babies died. Wow. I mean, there's, I want to put it out there, that we can't extrapolate the math as that percentage because we don't know. what happened in this other group. I'm not going to jump to conclusions, but one could suspect that there's a reason that those cases are missing.

They probably didn't look good. I would think at this point, they would be trying to get every survival baby into this so that it didn't out them, especially as they're throwing the data out to the public. If that is not getting out to the public, I would imagine we have a real problem. And as you've said,

so when we look at this, Naomi, you have what happened in the controlled clinical world. We have missing data. But that then is corroborated as we look around the country. We all have friends. I have a friend now is having difficulty with their baby eating. They're having serious gastric distress. They did get the vaccine.

Obviously not a close friend because they didn't ask me about it before they decided to do that. But I'm hearing these stories too. And then you see Scotland. You look at Bears COVID vaccine reproductive health related reports. This is miscarriages by reported date and miscarriages by a vaccine date. I mean, look at that. It's outrageous. What we're seeing in this data, that's theirs. That's mostly America, as you said, Scotland, Israel. These stories are lining up everywhere. So as you, you know, at one point, you know, there's a headline there where you're starting to accuse, can I say accuse experts, CDC, FDA of negligence, not even that, like wrongful death or for, this, you know, when you're moving into this languaging, you know, you've been in politics, you've been in media longer than I have, you are, you know, a pillar of these institutions.

What allows you to cross over to saying it's an accident, the CDC didn't really realize, hopefully they do now, to saying, I believe they're killing babies? How do you, how do you, go ahead. Sure. Yeah, no, that's a fair question. And I'm glad to say that in addition to our 3,000 medical and scientific researchers, we have 250 volunteer lawyers and three legal teams taking the evidence that the volunteers on the scientific side who compiled and using it. They've written four attorney general letters in four different states, and they're preparing a range of actions that range from fraud to, you know, to criminal offenses. But I personally, I'm not a lawyer, I'm not a doctor. I'm not a doctor. I'm not

not a medical doctor. I have studied genocide and I'm the granddaughter of a survivor of a family that lost nine brothers and sisters to the Holocaust. And what is clear to me from the Pfizer documents, and we've just talked about a handful of things that they found, but what I can tell you overall, quite apart from the babies and the baby deaths, is that there are such vast scales of undisclosed harms ranging from, and things that people I love and care about were baffled by, you know, crippling muscle pain, myalgia is one of the top harms, crippling joint pain. No one tells you about that on the CDC website that you might have to limp, you know, after you get vaccinated. So many forms of clotting events, so much thrombocytopinia,

so many stroke-like events, encephaly, you know, so many neurological harms. you know, I personally shied away because I thought the structure of this is going to lead to neurological damage and I'm a layperson. And indeed, the neurological harms, Guillain Barre, Bell's palsy, you know, MS are off the charts. So the point is looking at this and knowing as I do the history of 1930 to 1933 in very great detail when even before the Nazis were officially in power, they were weaponizing boards of health and they were weaponizing medical licensing boards and professional organizations of doctors precisely to stigmatize, you know, the clean and the unclean, the fit and the unfit, and to kind

of politicize medicine. And that, you know, was, and to say like, you're worthy of being saved and you're not, right? All the way to nine years later, Mangala's experiments. Initially, before I saw the Pfizer documents, I thought, comparing this to Dr. Mangala is rhetorical, it's excessive. There's no cause for Now I've seen these documents. These people knew for 14 months to this day, right? They know that these injections kill babies, that these injections cause neurological harms, cause strokes, cause clotting. They know, you know, people I know are collapsing and there's like a meme on social media

of athletes collapsing. Doctors are mystified. I looked at the SEC filings of Bioentech. One of the things Biointech discloses to the SEC, but no one disclosed to you and me is that fainting so hard you could hurt yourself is an identified side effect of these injections. Right. So what do you call that?

I mean, they knew that babies were dying and they kept going. They knew that people were having strokes and heart attacks, that there was cardiac damage to kids. And they kept going, right? And they kept saying, yes, we're authorizing this for teenagers. Yes, we're authorizing this for, you know, young children. Now we want to authorize it for babies to five-year-old. We have never seen that before in history, but genocide is narrowly defined legally as targeting a population that's ethnic or racial.

That's just a legal definition in international law. But genocide, in terms of its root structure, means the killing of a people. Well, the intentional killing, intentional, it's intentional if you don't stop it, right? If you know and you don't stop, and if you say, and even legally, right, a lot of the lawyers are looking at conspiracy, you know, RICO type things, racketeering. If you know there are dangerous harms and you expose children to them, that's a criminal offense. If you know that someone can get, die and you, you know, do it anyway, that's at least medical malpractice, if not manslaughter. I mean, these are categories of harms we haven't seen before, but the effect is to target the human race. You know, they're vaccinating everyone. And they

literally did not know what would happen except that they were seeing, you know, the tallies come in of people being injured, broken, miscarriages, abortions, spontaneous abortions, and dead babies. So, yeah, I call it, what I call it is it turns out there can be a happenstance genocide. Wow. Naomi, you're doing such great work. I know there's so many other things that you, at the top of this, you talked about other issues that you've uncovered. So if people want to do a deeper dive into your work, where's the best place to find that work and where you're reporting at Thank you. So again, I'm not doing this research. It's these extraordinary experts, and you can find all the reports on daily clout. I.O. So if there's a complete media blackout, I'm asking everyone to kind of step up and tell people about these harms, show them these reports. All of the primary citations are in the reports. They're right there. And we have to educate each other. Even if you get kicked out of the PTA or they don't invite you to that cocktail party, now is the time to be a little selfless to save, you know, here. humanity and if you want to support us and the lawyers work please go ahead and my own book came

out two days ago amazon is already telling people they can't have it after it hit number one in 24 hours this is the bodies of others and it is the back story of how we got here and the die off of the babies is one last piece of evidence that there's a war on humanity that started two years ago um with a pandemic is amazon the best place to get your book right now no thank you please order it from all seasonspress.com or from your local bookstore which we want to support of course. Okay, so go to your local bookstore, all seasons press. Obviously, I'm sure that's going to be a fantastic read. You're such a brilliant interview. It's such an honor. These are those moments, Naomi, where I grew up watching, not that you're older than me, but I just wasn't as engaged in the world as you were.

But, you know, you're a superstar. And when I get to sit here thinking, you know, some of those people that I watch it. And by the way, back, and we've talked about this the last time you're all, back when I was a liberal, you were just an amazing liberal out there, you know, sounding the alarms and here you are like me. I think just like me, I would guess, I said, look, if my side started doing what I think the other side is doing, I would call it out. And here we are. I'm calling it out. This is not right. I'm now considered myself politically marooned. This isn't a political conversation. but we're all shocked that regulatory agencies and government agencies are killing people.

I don't know how else to put it. You're killing people. You are knowingly putting children and people in harm's way and you know it. It's maybe, you know, I think about the old Sting song, Murder by Numbers, right? It's as easy as one, two, three. These power brokers just accept casualties as a part of their daily, you know, coffee routine. And so when you think, my last question to you, when we think, you know, if there's a place to it at the tack or where the real harm is,

are you more angry at Pfizer and Moderna and Ash's end of these pharmaceutical industries, or is it more our regulatory agencies? We could only fix one thing. What is it you think we need to fix to write this ship? Because, you know... Well, yeah. I mean, obviously the FDA uses our tax dollars to pay their employees, and their brief is to protect us from exactly these harms.

And they did more than fail, right? This is not failure. Again, at the bottom of these documents, it says FDA confidential. So they saw, they knew, they cannot escape, you know, criminal charges and civil charges themselves. These people need to be locked up. But I do blame them even more than Pfizer and Bioentech because it is my view that we're under,

that this is a national security attack, and that these injections are aimed at our national security. It turns out my earlier reporting shows a lot of partnership between Bio-Ntech and the Chinese Communist Party. And actually, the SEC file shows that there was a tech transfer of 100% at the end of 2021 from Bioentech to China. They use that word, China. They don't say a Chinese company or a Chinese entity to China.

So it's my analysis that we're under attack right now. Our southern border is open. You know, I think our administration is hostage to an adversary who's not our friend. And the fact that these injections cause too much damage and we're forced on our military is a national security issue. So I think Pfizer is not just a pharmaceutical company. I think it's being used by other actors. It's a gigantic global entity with all kinds of other partners. And we don't know yet, you know, the full extent of that, but there's no way to look at the harms of the Pfizer documents and not see a national security threat that has been successful, let's put it that way, to our well-being.

Amazing. Naomi, I agree with absolutely 100% of everything you just said. We are completely aligned when we look at this, which makes me think there's got to be so many reporters I said before you came on at these news agencies. They know. You're not, we weren't all, there's just not that many stupid reporters. You know the truth. You're not speaking out. You work at these pharmaceutical industries. You're not speaking out. You work at the CDC, the FDA. You're not speaking out.

This is the year of the whistleblower. It is time to step forward, make a difference in this world. Save lives. Be a hero. And by the way, there's millions to be made. So if you want to be a whistleblower, you need legal assistance. You can do that. Just go to whistleblower at Ican decide.org.

And we will make sure to take care of you. you make sure that your story is not out there until you're safe. Naomi, one more time. Tell me about your book and your favorite place for us to buy it. Thank you. It's called The Bodies of Others, COVID-19, the new authoritarian and the war against the human. And you can buy it at all seasonspress.com. You can actually buy it at daily clout.

I.O., your local bookstore and Amazon, if they'll let you. Let's put it that way. All right, Naomi, you're a superstar. Thanks for taking the time. I know you're on a huge press junk. it right now. I can't wait to read the book. I look forward to speaking with you soon. Thanks for having me. I appreciate you so much. Take care. Take care. Wow. There it is. I mean, you saw it again here on the high wire. I know you got that MSNBC,

the CNN, you're addicted. I know you are. You can't turn it off. Boxes in your car. I know it. And you're sitting there and you let it think, well, it's not getting to me. But at once a week, you get to tune in here and get to write the ship and know what's really going on. That should have some in your life. I know it does. I know, look, we appreciate you. I appreciate that you're supporting me in the opportunity to get to, as I said, interview some of my lifelong heroes, people that have always told the truth no matter what side it was on, no matter how uncomfortable it was. As she pointed out, she has a legal team, so definitely support her. We have a legal team. This is where this is at, folks. We've got to sue. We're suing government agencies.

None of that is easy. But when we think about, you know, who is going to lead the charge? Who was going to win this battle? We started out this show, talking about the brilliant work Africa and India is doing, standing up against the WHO, shutting down the America amendments, the Biden amendments, you know, being flushed down the toilet,

at least this time around, because some nations we just sometimes don't take seriously enough stood up and are fighting battles that will affect our lives. Well, when I think about that, one of the biggest issues we have right now is this emergency. We still have an emergency in the United States of America for what is now a cold we're being told we need to live with.

Well, if we have to live with it, can we end this emergency and get over this? You know why it's there. It's there because that's how they get the testing. That's how they get to keep masking us. That's how they get to keep funding the vaccine. And by the way, delivering vaccines that were only authorized by emergency use authorization haven't been fully approved yet. So all of this.

And then building housing centers for the sick, all of that is around this emergency that has to end. Well, right now there's a case in Australia. And that is a part of what they are attempting to do. And believe me, it's not just Australia. Any nation wins here. It could affect the entire world. This is one of my favorite groups, Australian Vaccination Risk Network in Australia. I am being joined now by Katie Ashby Coppins and Merrill Doree.

So tell me about your lawsuit. It's an honor to get to speak with you again. We met way back and back. t-shirt takes me back in time but what do you got going on in Australia and where are we at in this case well we're currently taking the federal government to court the secretary of the department of health i might let katy tell you a bit about this as well but basically we believe that the secretary of the department of health has a responsibility to cancel or suspend the provisional approvals for all of these jabs because they are causing an incredible amount of harm and death in Australia.

We've had a greater than 12,000 percent increase in reports of adverse reactions following vaccinations since the introduction of these jabs and an over 1,100 percent increase in reported deaths. And the government is sitting on his hands and doing nothing. And we think that they need to stop doing that. So I might turn over to Katie now for a better explanation. Katie, when we look at the cases like this, you know, as I was just talking to Naomi Wolf, I mean, we can talk about the kids, we can talk about the adults, there's different issues all the way across the board.

Is there one specific weakness that you're exploiting as the heart of this case, whether it's children or adults? I mean, or are you just across the board just the totality of what's happening in Australia as the case may be? So in Australia we've got the attack on the children and that's our main focus. I'm actually also running the same or similar case in New Zealand. So the five to 11 year olds is our age group that we're going after and the reason why is because this is not a group or certainly not an age group that should have been receiving

or even had approval for this product to be given to them. And so that is the crux of our initial part of our case. And then secondly, in Australia, the second part of our case is for the secretary to go back and reconsider whether or not this product should still be available, given the significant harm that is being caused that the secretary is aware of. So I agree. I mean, the thing about children is we have such good data showing that there are, you know, zero risk, really, of death. And so when you look at the myocarditis, when you look at all the injuries to children by the vaccination, it is, as I've said here on this show and I've said publicly many, many times, really for the first time ever, at least in my investigations of vaccines and injury, we can say unequivocally that this vaccine is more dangerous than coronavirus, especially we just reported today. The science is now out, you know, showing that the cases of myocarditis from the COVID infection do not exist. There is no issue there.

And so that comparison that the reason we're seeing high rates of myocarditis and pericarditis in the vaccine is because it's also a side effect of the virus. That is now proven to be another lie that's been put out there. So it's a real weakness in the case. Now, what was the journey of this case? Did this case originally get thrown out of court? I mean, is that understanding right? Are you in an appeals court? What's been the journey to get you to where you're at right now?

Well, do you want that one? No, I think it's probably better if you do it, Katie, about standing. Thank you. Okay. No trouble. So we filed two applications, as I mentioned. We filed one for the five to 11-year-olds, the judicial review, and then ask the secretary to go back and review the,

approval of this product. And that was to be heard over two separate hearings. And then quite out of the ordinary, the judge decided to have a hearing simply on standing. So we already had a date for our judicial review for our five to 11 year olds. That was the 20th of April. And the judge decided, no, she'd have an earlier hearing

to consider whether or not the AVN and a foster parent had the ability or enough loss or a right to bring a case on standing. And the judge decided that they didn't. So a decision came out very, very late, despite the judge acknowledging that this was an urgent case. And both the reason and the lateness of the decision meant that we lost our judicial review.

And we essentially have another boulder in front of us that we have to clamber over. That's something that we deal with at ICAN. We win a lot of cases, but one of the difficulties that you have is this issue of standing, something I never really knew anything about before, you know,

I became as litigious as I am with Aaron Siri. But being that you need the right person to say that they will be affected, if this law doesn't change or what you're trying to win, that it has to affect that person's life directly. That's sort of your plaintiff. And if you can't really approve that or the judge doesn't think that, then you go and you seek out a better plaintiff or another approach towards the case.

And so obviously all of that takes funding, but you're in this fight. You're continuing it. So where are we at now? What's the next court date that's expected? We don't have one as of yet. Sorry, sorry, Katie. We don't have one as of yet. We're waiting for the judge in the case to actually make a decision on call.

So we have to basically look at whether we're going to be ordered to pay the government's costs for this previous hearing. And until we have that, we can't move forward. So we are desperately trying to raise the funds. We have been told by our senior council. We have an amazing legal team. Katie is part of it. We've been told by our senior council that we have an excellent prospect of winning on appeal. if that happens the costs will be returned but we have to put them up in the first instance and

that is the issue is trying to make sure that when we reach that point we have the funding for this because we cannot allow this precedent to stand the avian has standing there is precedent law showing that we do and we have a co-defendant who also has standing what our senior council said is if we don't have standing nobody has standing so we don't have standing nobody has standing so we really and truly need to fight this battle and not allow this precedent to stand because it means that nobody will ever be able to take a case against the government in a case like this. All right. So, you know, obviously we have a very dedicated audience here. If they want to donate and help with this case, which is really crucial, and I've said it, you know, I joked years ago

that Australia is the deepest, darkest vax hole in the world. You guys are really feeling the brunt of that. I mean, we've watched the brutality for... from police officers in the streets, lockdown measures where you could barely leave your home. Just you couldn't step but a few steps away from your home. So fighting on ground zero is so important. Where do people go if they want to support the work that you're doing?

We have a give send go page set up. If they go to our website, that's it. They can go to avion.org.a u. There's a link to that or they can just go to give send go.com forward slash avian judicial review fund and any amount they can give would be so very much appreciated. And we have to give a shout out to give Send Go because they have survived a lot of attacks, not just because of this fundraiser, but their support of the Canadian truck drivers as well. It's not easy to find a place that will fundraise for an issue like this.

And they've done an amazing job. Well, you've done an amazing job. You stay in there, as we pointed out, it is hostile territory there in Australia. You're bringing it every single day. I'm honored to have the opportunity to speak with you and to, you know, show people what it is behind the scenes, what it is to go through these cases, the ups and downs. Sometimes the win is an immediate, but also there's power in the loss. There's power in letting people see, you know, how egregious the court system is, how it's acting so, outside of the norm when we compare it to all the precedents that has been set through the years

in other arenas and other cases. This is truly an anomaly and a very, very strange space for lawyers to find themselves in. But we've been Victoria's here. We're having victories in California, in D.C. here. And I want to see that happen in Australia too. So keep up the good work and keep us posted on how everything's going. Okay. Thank you so much, Jell. If I can add one thing, if the AVN wins this battle, it means that the world has won this battle because this will be a precedent-setting decision for the entire world, a withdrawal of the provisional approvals for these vaccines and a total stopping of the vaccinating of the 5 to 11-year-olds, that will have ramifications worldwide. So this isn't just an Australian case. this is a case for the world. I agree with you completely. I'm glad you're there and glad you're making it happen.

And again, it's our honor to show the world, you know, how active you are and what possibility there is. These changes are coming from crazy places, Africa, India, why not Australia? So keep up the good work. And I look forward to speak with you soon. Thank you so much, Jill. Thank you. All right. Take care.

Well, I mean, it's an amazing time. people just that, I mean, when you talk to so many people out there, I know you're one of them, you think, how did I get into this? All I wanted to do was just live my life. I had a life. I was just raising my kids. All I wanted to be was left alone. Some of us are, you know, fueled by the fact that there's been an injury in our family and an anger and a rage and that, you know, fuels this energy to say, I have to make this have meaning. I have to get this changed in the world. whatever it is that's motivating you, the loss of the job, the threat to your children, the ability, their loss of an ability to go to university, or the idea that someone,

some man or woman, adult is going to sidle and drag your kid into a dark room by themselves and talk about you as a bad person and you need to be closer to me. I mean, something I remember my parents saying, if that ever happens, you run, you scream, you kick, don't ever go in a room with a stranger, even someone you know. Don't go in there alone. Yet we have laws being written that that's what they're allowed to do. They're being told, go ahead, drag that child in, browbeat them, make them feel bad about themselves, make them feel bad about their children so that they'll acquiesce to our desire to give them a product that is going to swell their heart,

that's going to go to their reproductive systems and into their brains. This is happening, folks. It is happening in the world. It is happening to your neighbors, in your schools all around you. I know you know this, but we are making a difference. We are moving this needle. The entire momentum is on our side. So this week, in midst a lot of the horrible news, remember, we just had a great Memorial Day weekend.

We will fight to have other holidays and remain in our freedom to say, damn, the WHO, you have no effect over me. And the Biden administration and all of the crazy laws that keep falling down in courtrooms, proving that it's basically an attack on what truly is legal, my rights given to me by God, my life given to me by God, my health, and all of it. I wanted to point out that if you want to see me live, there's many opportunities to do that. I don't just do this show. The live show is something else.

I'm going to be on the road. I'm going to be at the Next Steps conference starting tomorrow in Atlanta. So definitely go to this website. Check that out. We're going to be in Atlanta. lots of amazing world-renowned speakers speaking the truth there. And then in just a few weeks, I'm going to Max Cain's party. Remember, Max Cain has this great website for farmers where you can contact local farmers,

get involved in your community, farmmatch.com. You definitely want to check that out. You better know where your food is coming from because it may not be coming from anywhere except your local farm. Definitely go to farmmatch.com right now, hook up with your local farmer so that you can create an avenue where your meat, where your cheese, where your dairy is coming from, where your vegetables are coming from, that won't shut down because there is no fuel to put in a truck. You will get there. All of this being made possible. But that event at Max Cain's Farm is

going to be spectacular. Definitely check out his website. And if you want to see me speaking live, Max Cain's party is where that's going to happen. Do we have a website for that? I know we've got some beautiful images there. I can't wait to see it. farm match.com and that'll get you there to you. All right, I look forward to seeing you out there in person. This is how we do it. This is how we do it. We tell the truth. We tell the truth whether we're journalists, whether we're scientists, whether we're lawyers. We tell our neighbors, even if we are not doctors. We are just regular people that actually did our own investigation or love this show called The High Wire. Hey, check out this video. By the way, I would recommend

maybe not share the entire, you know, show in this case. The great interview of Naomi Wolf, we are breaking the show down into little pieces of, you know, your favorite parts because I know some of your friends just don't have that attention span, so give them something that really moved you. We're doing that. It's a part of what our team does here. But most of all, take this moment to recognize that we are capable of victory. We are capable of recreating our lives, of building a new world.

We are capable of crippling our opposition, no matter how much money and funding and power they think they have. We have the power. We are the people. This is our time. This is the high wire. And I can't wait to see you next week.