The Highwire with Del Bigtree - AFRICA INTERCEPTS W.H.O. TAKEOVER

Episode Date: June 13, 2022

AFRICA INTERCEPTS W.H.O. TAKEOVERBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Here in America, we all celebrated Memorial Day weekend. I had a great opportunity to spend some time on Lake Travis here in Austin, Texas with my family. And I will tell you, it looked like every family in the world was either traveling on the road, in a lake, on a plane, on a bus, on a train. It is clear that we are back to enjoying ourselves, back to taking time off with our families, and most of all, back to vacationing. which was a brilliant thing to see after so much time locked down. But there was a headline that accompanied this that I think is quite interesting, and this is what it was. Reported COVID-19 infection levels nearly six times higher than last Memorial Day weekend.

It goes on to say this week also marks the eighth consecutive week of increasing COVID-19 cases in the U.S., the data shows. Last week, updated CDC data also revealed that more than half of the U.S. population is now living in a county that has a high or medium community risk level for COVID-19. Amid the rise in infections, a growing list of school districts and universities are now moving to bring back mask requirements. You know, I question whether or not I should even bring this headline on because I have so many mixed emotions about what it's saying. Number one, I think we have to all agree the vaccines are totally used to. list absolutely achieved nothing of what they promised, which is to end this pandemic, didn't happen. All the lockdowns, all the masking, slowing the curve, all of it, we have said from the very beginning at some point, even if it works to hide from this virus, which I doubt it does and it

doesn't appear to in any of the studies we looked around the world, when are you going to come out? When are you going to finally come out and start, you know, dealing with this cold, which is what it is? And so I want to reflect back just on the fact that I have lost my YouTube channel, my Facebook channel, and been attacked by almost every major media source for saying all the way back in the beginning, for those of you healthy enough, not the elderly, not those with comorbidities like COPD and heart conditions that are really in the high risk group. I said to the rest of us that are healthy, we need to go out and catch this cold.

Now, they have said that was the craziest thing ever stated, but that's exactly what's happening. The United States government, the entire world has just decided, you know what? Instead of saying, go out and cash this cold, they said, learn to live with it. You're going to catch it. Even Fauci is saying you're going to catch it no matter what. And now we're seeing rates of infection higher than they were back when we were locking things down. And so the question we've got to ask ourselves is, where is this going? Right.

Where is this going? The reason I, you know, struggled thinking about should I, you know, put this headline out, I don't want to do their job for them, which is to make you all afraid that you've got to lock down to start masking up again, which is what you get a sense is happening. The CDC is revisiting masks on airplanes and see if they really want to drive that or that line in the sand. And I think from the beginning, this has always been a bad cold at the very worst. And it's really bad for a select group of people that's figured out how to protect them while the rest of us attempt to get to hurt immunity. But we now know, based on Geert Banden Bosch and many of the other world-renowned experts that have been

on this show that it appears this vaccine has dumped something, you know, unique and in the fact that it has blocked us. It's actually kept us from reaching herd immunity. We haven't heard to learn to live with any other virus before because we always eventually hit herd immunity. The virus disappears and we all go back to our lives and wait for the next cold or flu season to come along where some new variant will arrive and we'll deal with it the same way. But now we have vaccinated so many people, at least in the first world, that we don't seem to be able to get to hurt immunity. And as these infection rates rise and Gied Van and Bosch said they were going to, all on a track to eventually create so much pressure on this virus that it mutates and perhaps

becomes deadly for those who were vaccinated. We'll see how all of that plays out. But what we know is this virus is not going away. It's not going down. And everything the United States of America and the world did was wrong. It's put us into a position we've never been before. And so when we think about what just happened last week at the WHO, where they were voting on amendments by the United States of America, World Health Assembly number 75 to vote on sweeping decisions for health and sovereignty.

This was by Shabnan Palais and Mohamed. When we think about that boat that was going down and the idea that the World Health Organization, which was at the center of a lot of this decision making, like forcing a warp speed vaccine on the world, locking people down, masking them down, all of which did not work. It's amazing that this is the very group, you know, attempting to seize power over the entire world and dictate how we move forward for future pandemics and even the thought or fear of a concern for a possible pandemic. Well, two weeks ago, we had Shabnan, Polisa Muhammad on the high wire to talk about this vote coming up. This is what she had to say then. The WHO is looking to use this coronavirus chapter to centralize health and take power for itself to make the

decisions on behalf of sovereign countries such as America, such as South Africa, such as the UK. And they're doing this through the amendments to the 2005 international health regulations. There are about 13 amendments they're looking to change or to amend, including increased surveillance, including unilateral power given to the directed General Tedros to decide if your country or your region has a public health emergency of international concern. Now, prior to these amendments, the WHO and Tedros would have to consult with our countries to decide whether we do have a public health emergency of international concern. These amendments make it such that there isn't any consultation.

He may consult. He doesn't have to. So, of course, this has massive socio-political and geoeconomic considerations, especially when we're hearing rumblings about sanctions being enforced in certain countries that perhaps might not tour the line. Surely there's got to be a better way than depending on the WHO and the farmer cartel to make decisions about our health. The great awakening is here and the power of the people is always greater than people in power. Well, two weeks ago, Shabana and Palaisa Muhammad was in the airport on her way to the Better Way conference being sponsored by the World Council for Health in Bath, England.

I was on my way there and we met and discussed how were we going to stop these measures, really being referred to as the BATERALTH. Biden amendments. So we all were there. I believe Shaddam is still in Bath, England, but she joins me now. So Shabnam, it was a huge week. Obviously, we had the World Economic Forum going on, World Health Organization meeting, and of course, the World Council for Health. We had our incredible first debut of a great group of people that I think will start to lead the other side. The truth, the truth seekers as we move forward into the new world, some of the greatest experts in the world gathered, but we were not at the WHO, but you have been tracking that. So what happened this week to the Biden amendments when they, you know, were being presented to the WHO?

Well, down first of all, it was an extraordinary conference and you were absolutely superb, looking forward to next year. But focusing on what happened at the World Health Assembly, what happened is exactly what we said on the last time I was on your show, that there is going to be a pushback. And these international health regulation amendments and that new pandemic treaty slash accord is a gross miscalculation by the other side. And we saw that happen in terms of the outcomes at the World Health Assembly number 75. I couldn't be happier. Certainly there's a celebration happening around the world, but we continue to keep our eyes on them. So here's what happened.

12 out of those 13 amendments were taken off the table. I think those that would propose those amendments were rightfully quite embarrassed and had to scramble around trying to save face. Why were they taken off the table? Well, countries such as the African bloc, countries on the African continent, together with Iran, Russia, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, and even India said we're having none of it. In fact, specifically, there was a well-plicated. source who reported to me that the resolution of the IHR amendments was not passed as

African countries were concerned that there was inadequate consultation amongst member states and the process was being rushed. You know what? Actually, I think we actually have some video of some of these African states standing up and making this point during that assembly. Let's take a look at this. Regarding the proposed amendments under the agenda item, the African region hereby reiterates its position regarding the HR 2005 amendments, which include the need to undertake

limited, targeted amendment of the HR to maintain its integrity and ensure the gains achieved in core capacities and other provisions are not lost. The amendments need to be considered as a holistic package, and the process should be transparent, inclusive, credible and consensual, and with full respect for the sovereignty of member states while pursuing our collective action. The African region shares the view that the process should not be fast-tracked by the amendments of Article 59 or the technical adjustment amendment of Articles 5161, 62 and 63 at this Health Assembly. Namibia aligns with the statement delivered by Botswana on behalf of the African region.

Namibia underscores that the amendments need to be considered as a holistic package and that the process should be transparent, inclusive, credible and consensual with due respect to the sovereignty of member states. The United Republic of Tanzania aligns with a statement delivered by Botswana on behalf of the 47 member states of the African region. Tanzania has, however, some concern in the amendments of some of the articles, such as Paragraph 2 of Article 6, on sharing genetic sequence data and other information. There should be provision of clauses that will protect member states

following sharing of information about public health risks to protect them against the anticipated economic consequences. I mean, it's so inspiring to see this language. And really, as I looked, as we were looking at these, as they're calling the Biden amendments or the U.S. amendments that were drawn up, there was a lot of concern that here in the United States of America, we would be seeding our power over the WHO. But in many ways, this looked like a power grab to control nations, you know, the continents of Africa and India nations. We tend to just, you know, run testing programs through when they have no control. And it seems to me they've had enough of this. And there, I mean, when we look at even the forced vaccine across the world, some of the lowest rates are coming out of these countries that are saying no to the WHO. And I find that interesting because they've had the most contact with the WHO.

In America, this is just like something that the third world nations involved with. It's a group. It's like UNICEF or something like that. We barely have any recollection or understanding what they do. But for those nations, in direct contact, in a lot of the time, with all the different measures that they do and the things they do to apparently. try to help these nations. It seems that there's a really bad taste in the mouth in Africa, in India, towards the WHO. Am I reading that correctly? 100% on point. I mean, I spoke at, and I'm part of the International Alliance for Justice

and Democracy, which held a press conference in Geneva on Saturday, the 28th Dell. And my role was to speak about one conflicts of interest with the WHO and we'd need until tomorrow at least to talk about all of those, but also some points about the IHR and the WHO slash big farmers role in Africa. These were some of the points we specifically highlighted that the WHO stands accused of facilitating or legitimizing Pfizer experiments in 1996 on Nigerian children without proper informed consent. 11 of 200 children died and their families only received compensation or some of them in 2009. But that's just one example of what happens within the architecture of the WHO. The WHO's malaria study was reported in the BMJ to constitute a serious violation of international ethical standards,

again, due to a lack of informed consent of Ghanaian, Malawian, and Kenyan children. This was a Glaxo-Smith-Kline vaccine was quericks. It caused 10 times the amount of cerebral malaria as opposed to unvaxed people and a doubling of the test. a doubling of the death in girls. And we've never seen the WHO said that big farmer needs to take accountability. They rubber stamp these experiments. They continue to proceed without informed consent. And you're quite right.

Countries or continents like Africa and countries like South Africa are now saying, well, enough is enough. I couldn't be prouder. And I think this is the start of a massive change in how we view health and our role in taking control over health and wellness. I'll tell you what it's a massive change of. is my perspective of Africa and India. Growing up in America,

we just see ourselves as the beacons of light and hope for freedom and liberty, the UK, these power, you know, nations, you know, that seem to be running the world. And as I said at the incredible event that we're at, the Better Way Conference, so many of your compatriots from South Africa and India were talking about these amazing legal successes they're having against mandated vaccine programs,

against vaccine passports, and the people there are really standing up. And I said right there, is everyone else, you know, from America and the UK and those of us that always sort of had these like delusions of grandeur starting to think that maybe the fate of the world, the fate of our species could actually be in the hands of Africa and India? Well, it proved out again this week that we are not leading in America. We are actually following and some of the greatest resistance happening in the world to these draconian measures and this attempt for a globalist takeover really seemed to be being spearheaded out of Africa. in India, which is just it's hard to hear that even come out of my mouth. I mean, do you feel that living in South Africa? Does your nation recognize the leadership position they now find themselves in for the world? 100%. I mean, there's a sense of jubilation and deep pride, perhaps a little bit of astonishment

for those who haven't been aware of what was going on. But now the news is spreading like wildfire. And people are saying it's time to take our power back. They know that the politicians are largely captured and corrupt. And of course, institutions like the WHO spend a lot of time in grooming and, you know, lobbying politicians to take up positions within the WHO very strategically. But the people have had enough. The conflicts of interest regarding WHO and Big Pharma couldn't be more clear. You know, the welcome trust, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, all of them in this one incestuous cesspool.

And the more Africans are finding out about what's going to be. going on with a very common sense realization that nothing the WHO has said during the last two years has actually worked. I mean, it's like Einstein says, Dahl. One sign of insanity is doing the same thing, expecting a different result. And I think Africa's just had enough. We want to take back our power. But so too the other countries.

India's got a fierce reputation of standing up to Big Pharma. But I also want to highlight that they are US senators who are now proposing bills to take power away from the WHO to stop funding it, to make sure that bills go properly through Senate, to limit the powers of the WHO. I mean, yeah, that's it. Here's the headline on that exclusive Senator Ron Johnson leads bill to pushback on WHO overreach, ensures Senate's power over pandemic treaty. I think over 15 senators have signed on so far.

I mean, it's just awesome because this is the type of issue that in America, our politicians don't tend to be, you know, focused on or concentrating on. but because of the massive outreach that we've had, both from the high wire, other groups like ours, groups like yours internationally, and then inside when we have these world-renowned scientists and doctors like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, here at Vanden Bosch. I mean, all these folks that showed up, Tess Lorry, of course,

who really put this all together in England, but it's having a dynamic effect on the politics here in the United States of America. And finally, I mean, I've been at this for years. finally we are seeing, you know, our own politicians recognize, oh my God, there's a power grab going on here. We need to stop it. Let's get down. I have just a little bit more time here to detail. So ultimately, my understanding is they just, none of this stuff really got to a vote. It's not that it got voted down. They just never, they recognized there was so much pushback. There wasn't a, you know, it wasn't going to be smart to bring these amendments to the floor.

And so they did get voted on. But this treaty did. There's some things we need to keep our on, you know, there's, I think it's a time to celebrate, but also they're not going home. They're not giving up. So what is it we need to be looking for and watching very closely as we move into the future with the World Health Assembly? And yeah. Right. So one of the original amendments, Article 59, the amendment did get through. And so now they've reduced the amount of time it takes for amendments to go into force an effect from 24 months to 12. So they've speeded this whole thing up. And then they would draft resolution. proposed at the World Health

The same ones to object to write a reason to these amendments in sign. Well, I'll tell you what, Dahl, and James Boguski agrees with me, that this is a violation of Article 55 of the IHR, because amendments must be sent to. Hold on one second. You broke up right when you were saying that. Just repeat that last little part. What was it that did get agreed to, or what did they work on?

Right. So essentially, we now have 10 months instead of 9 to object to, or provide a reservation to amendments. But there's something very wrong with how all of this happens because Article 55 of the IHR says that amendments must be put on the table at least four months before they're adopted. That didn't happen. These draft resolutions, new ones presented right there at the WHA

and accepted simultaneously. So of course we're going to be pushing back on that. There's also now a new stand, a permanent standing committee on public health emergencies. So more money for the WHO. But in terms of the call to action, here's some very, I suppose, infuriating news that has come through. Now, let's talk about that new pandemic treaty or record.

Round one of the public participation process was in April. It happened because we pushed for it in every interview and through mobilizing. They did admit the WHO committed to round two on the 16th and 17th of June. So here's all of us preparing for it. There's it on your screen right there. But as James discovered in one of the documents

that came out of the WHOHA in a little footnote, they're not planning to have Ram 2. They're planning to finish a draft of that new pandemic treaty and then perhaps consider having more public participation. I mean, what does it tell you? We can't trust this organization as if we needed any evidence. They don't take us seriously. We need to take ourselves seriously defund, exit,

continue building the better way. So the 60 to 70, is that still available for us to write in though? Are we going to have the opportunity to make our, no, it's been taken away? It's been taken up the table. I've updated their website yet, but one of the documents to come out of the World Health Assembly in a footnote said they're not going to do it. They're going to instead draft this document and then I suppose perhaps look at a public, it's sort of a predetermined conclusion, isn't it? They're not really interested in what we have to say, but we're going to keep making our voices heard using multi-pronged campaigns and of course just making them

irrelevant. That's the way to go. Absolutely. Well, as I said here, the WHO has no power over my life. We need to start recognizing that we give these groups power by thinking about them, by caring about them. Yes, we should write in. Yes, we should be speaking it down. But what we should really be doing is inspiring our politicians and our different nations to stand for the rights of the citizens that have voted them in the office. Shabnam, you're doing such amazing work. It's great to have you you know, reporting to us from around the world, especially getting this African perspective, is so exciting. Keep up the good work, and I'm sure we will have you on soon to, you know, keep us abreast of what's actually taking place as these globalists keep going back to the drawing board,

figuring out how to take over the world, and we keep having, you know, winning the battles. There's a larger war going on, but I love that we get to celebrate the battles that we've won. All right, let's look at this. African sovereignty coalition launch, focus, African unites against the WHO power grab 18th of June 2020. Save that date, everybody. And for everyone out there, just so you know, all you have to be is on our mailing list, and you'll get all this date.

If you can't write it down fast enough while we're talking about it, it's all going to be in your inbox. Shabnam, take care. I look forward to talking to you soon. Power to the people. Thank you, Del. Power to the people, indeed.

Take care.