The Highwire with Del Bigtree - ARE THE ROOTS OF TYRANNY TAKING HOLD IN THE EU?

Episode Date: September 25, 2023

German Member of the EU Parliament, Christine Anderson, discusses the hurdles facing those fighting edicts that restrict basic human freedoms, including the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Treaty in Europe. She details the haunting similarities between 1930’s Germany and the foundation being laid through proposed policies including 15-minute cities, climate lockdowns, and COVID restrictions.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

My next guest, you know, I think of people that are brave and look at who we've had on today. We've been talking to Djokovic, we got to talk to John Rich, who stood up against the system in his music world. But can you imagine being a politician in the middle of all this, trying to tell the truth when everyone else around you seems bought out, you're on television, all the big baddies that you know from world economic form and the WHO are watching you. I'm sure they know where you live. Can you imagine speaking your truth in there and sounding this freaking amazing? Christine Anderson is a German politician.

Ms. Christian Anderson, a member of the European Parliament from Germany. Christine Anderson, representing the alternative for Germany party. Whenever a government claims to have the people's interest at heart, you need to think again. There has never been a political elite, sincerely concerned about the well-being of regular people. What makes any of us think that it is different now? It is very clear what they have in store for us,

and it is, in fact, to establish erect a totalitarian regime. An unelected body like WHO, who is controlled and run by multibillionaires should never be allowed to act in place. of a democratically elected government. Never, ever. How are you going to go against WHO? They're funded by the richest of the super rich people in the world. They don't care. They have all the money,

and they don't care about fundamental rights or democracy. A prime minister who openly admires the Chinese basic dictatorship who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his, own citizens as terrorists just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy should not be allowed to speak in this house at all. Mr. Trudeau, you are a disgrace for any democracy. Please spare us your presence. This vaccine campaign, it will go down as the biggest scandal in medical history.

And moreover, it will be known as the biggest. crime ever committed on humanity. I dare the European Commission and the German government throw me in jail, lock me up and throw away the key for all I care. But you will never be able to curse me into being vaccinated. If I, the free citizen that I am, choose not to be vaccinated. You cannot comply your way out of a time. tyranny. It is impossible. Trying to do so, you will only feed a gigantic alligator in the hopes of being eaten last.

I am determined to leave my children a free and democratic society. And this I will fight for tooth and nail. End your silence. Speak up. For God's sake, stop complying. Start. Start. rebelling. They're out to get you if you do not resist. No one grants me freedom, for I am a free person. Well, it's my absolute honor to be joined now by Christine Anderson. Christine, you are a rock star. We love you. We've been fans all the way through COVID. Thank you for joining us today. Thank you for having me. And that was a very nice conversation. Thank you. Well, you've said a lot of brilliant things, and it has seemed that you're all on your own.

We sort of mine all of the governments of the world throughout COVID to see who really seem to recognize the lies that were taking place. And from my vantage point, you're outnumbered out there. Is that wrong? Are you getting a lot of support from your other parliament leaders, or is it a lonely world out there telling the truth. Well, I am getting support, obviously, but on the other hand, it is a lone world. I mean, when you look at it, we started out, it was four, four parliamentarians, and we said enough already, and we are going to speak out. And it was like an association

between any peace, you know, it was across various groups. So we started out with four, people and we are now up to about 12 who are willing to show that camera and there is a couple more in the background that cannot really afford to go forward and you know publicly known as dissenters but when you look at EU Parliament if things go really really well in plenary for us for our side the most we can hope for is 150 votes and that's if things really go well but there is 705 sitting members so just to put a perspective on we are outnumbered and I always say you know our my hope or our hope lies with the people because we represent

the people we really serve the people and we act in the best interest of the people. So once again, I have to thank each and every one that took to the street and yeah, simply started saying no to all this madness because that's the support that we need and that's the strength, you know, that or the strengths we kind of got that kept us going. So thank you to all the people that actually didn't they know. Let me ask a question for, I mean, a large part of our audiences in the United States. I don't think, I think many of us don't fully understand the parliamentary system. You're from Germany.

How does it work? I mean, do the people of Germany elect you? How many go over from Germany and represent in this European Parliament? Just give me a sort of a quick rundown of how this system works out there. Well, how does it work? That's just the point. It doesn't. Especially EU Parliament or the whole EU institutions and all of that, it is a democracy illusion.

So, you know, just starting with Parliament. It is actually an insult to every democratically elected parliament that the EU Parliament is called a Parliament. We are not a Parliament. We lack certain, you know, competencies that every Parliament has. So we cannot initiate legislation for one. So what we do in Parliament is actually vote on resolutions, which is like, you know, writing a letter to EU Commission.

You know, it would be nice if you could do this, that, or the other. But I mean, if they don't, then they don't. So we have nothing to decide. That's the point. We don't have control of a budget, which is good, because if EU Parliament had control over budget that would mean the national parliaments who are in fact democratically elected would have to surrender their control over budget. So this is like, like I said, it's a democracy illusion.

And I would like to say the whole EU construct, it's not only undemocratic, it's downright anti-democratic. But it's part of a scheme. And but it seems to be wielding at least a large conversation. And one of the issues that you're really getting into is W.HO in many ways, yes, these things have no power, but these sort of, you know, kangaroo, you know, parliaments and these NGOs that used to just be, oh, I guess you're working with sick kids in Africa, that's okay. but these things that seem to just be theater are are tending to have more and more

sway in the world, are they not? They absolutely do. And, you know, it's not just NGOs, you know, and as you rightly said, at some point, they had some legitimacy, you know. They were helping, you know, kids in Africa. Well, you know, by all means go and do it, you know, you know we would support and fund you whatever but they were taking over the world they're

running the world but it's it's not just that it's um it think tax you know um just looking at uh there's one organization it's called the roundtable of industrialists um so it's like the 50 representatives of the 50 largest global corporations they're part of that around table of industrialists and they were literally dictating legislation to the governments, you know, and then it's being sold as something brilliant that the government came up with to, you know, relieve the burdens on the people. Yeah, right. Seriously, our democracies, especially in the Western democracies, they have become a scam at this point. And if people knew how the democratic process has actually worked.

In the parliaments, I guarantee you, they would get out, you know, whatever weapons they have and they would run them out of town, seriously. Wow. So one of the things you are doing, though, in the European Parliament that I love, is you are bringing expert witnesses.

You did throughout COVID to discuss some of the problems with the vaccine, problems with how it's financed, questions. Some of the most important questions I think have come up. I think about, I think is it Robert Ruse was his name who asked the question of Janine Smalley from Pfizer. Did you test to see if the vaccine could stop transmission before it was released to the public? I mean, because you're bringing people like that in, demanding that the heads of Pfizer come in, you are at least using that position to, I think, get, I don't, is it sworn testimony that they're giving,

but you're getting testimony on cameras. Do they swear in to be there? No, unfortunately not. So this committee, what you're talking about, there was a special committee, and it was not an investigative committee. And we pushed really hard to get an investigative committee because then we would have actually been able to compel people to show up in front of our committee. So that Janine Small, that the CEO representative, she was sent instead of Albert Borla, the CEO of Pfizer, who we actually wanted that committee. But he declined. He just said, well, you know, don't feel like it or whatever. We invited Ursula von der Leyen, who negotiated these despicable deals with the pharmaceutical companies via short text messages. And she refused us to disclose these messages, but we actually had no power.

But this committee, actually, when it was set up, I was kind of surprised that they did set it up. And the title of the committee was lessons learned from COVID. And I was like, what? They really want to like, you know, get into things and, you know, start investigating. No, no, they didn't want to do that. What they wanted, they didn't want to look at, was this vaccine, in fact, safe and effective? Were there fundamental rights abused? You know, did we harass people, stigmatized people?

did we ostracized people. That's not what they wanted to look at. What they wanted to look at was where did we fail to get the people to do what we wanted them to do? Oh, my God. That's what the entire committee pretty much was set out to do. Now, in this committee, we, because, you know, behind the scenes, we were pushing us hard as we could,

you get as many people from our side into this committee, which actually succeeded. So despite everything we uncovered in this committee, despite all the lies we exposed in this committee, when it came down to it, we were still in the minority and this report that came out of this committee, it's not the paper word that it's written on. I mean, they repeat every every single freaking lie. Wow. Every single lie. So, but what we did do,

yeah, we, you know, kind of exposed it. People know about it. And yeah, we do use the possibilities we have by calling these events, you know, organizing these events, bringing in all kinds of people. But the EU is quick to the nouns, you know, this is not an official EU kind of thing, whatever. You know, it's like the small French minority.

And they're, you know, doing their thing. But the thing is this, in the beginning, they were laughing at us. They were not taking us seriously at all, you know. But ever since we held the International COVID Summit three in Brussels, and I mean, we're renowned scientists there, they are starting to take us seriously. And we noticed that, I mean,

when you have people stepping off the elevator, just because I step on the elevator, you know, you know what's going on. Yeah, I know, there's so ridiculous. It's fantastic, and look, you have the same advantage we have, we got censored, we were kicked off of social media channels, but now I can at least every time New York Times or Washington Post

wants to ask me a question about misinformation that says you're the one that's suffered for misinformation. I'm the one that got right in the world now knows it. The vaccine couldn't stop transmission and you reported that. You keep having these hearings though and bringing in great scientists

and I want you to know for what it's worth, people like us and you know, organizations like ours in the Highwire and our nonprofit are using the material that you are bringing up. So I want you to keep up that great work. In fact, yesterday you had a really brilliant panel of scientists and specialists.

This was the health and democracy. under the WHO's new proposed rules. Everybody, take a look at this. This just went down yesterday. Please join me and my colleagues in welcoming the experts who took the time, who put in all of the effort and thanking them for their commitment,

their courage and their determination to uphold freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. of law. We are here today because we are all concerned by the World Health Organization's strong pressure to extend its powers, its structural and its financial capacities with a permanent effect over the sovereignty of the countries and over the self-determination of the people. WHO did an awful job in managing the COVID crisis. with a number of severely detrimental, non-evidence-based recommendations,

leading to losses in physical and psychological health, loss of lives of many human beings in Europe and throughout the world. Why should we bestow more power and responsibilities to this organization? Over the past years, unelected global entities such as the WHO, but also our governmental structures and their governments, and their experts pushed the narrative that one method, one treatment fits all. They told us what injections we need to use, ignoring safe and effective, repurposed drugs. The European Union Digital COVID Certificate was and is absolutely lacking in scientific evidence

and a clear instrument of discrimination and a clear instrument for pushing the citizen to the so-called vaccination with experimental genetic engineering-based substances. The WHO is standing behind these vaccines. They are far more of a problem than a help to the European Union. And it's my belief that the European Union, the United States, and all major stakeholders should actually completely pull out of the WHO and leave the WHO to its own endeavors. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit. Well, I'm going to tell you, since its formation in the 1940s,

the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. The new WHO rules establish a regime that creates a regime that creates a a virtually insurmountable tension with the constitutional and international legal obligations of its member states and thus threatens to undermine the principles of human rights democracy and the rule of law the pandemic treaty and the amendments to the international health regulations that have been discussed here or just one huge step forward at the level of the use of to convince the population, to accept the replacement of a democratic system by a technocratic system.

The power will not be anymore in the hands of the people. Therefore, these negotiations have to be stopped immediately. Everyone is committed to one goal and one goal only, and that is to serve the people and to fight for freedom, democracy and democracy and and the rule of law. Really powerful. How important is this WHO treaty, this set of rules that governments around the world appear to be poised to sign onto? I mean, it appears from my perspective and as obviously some of the specialists there, that this is a goal to create, as you well put, you know, a government outside of all governments that.

overrides our own constitutions and our rights to citizens in the countries and override the political leaders that we have voted into place to govern us? Yeah, well, that's, you know, like the scheme that is going on right now, especially with WHO. So when I spoke about COVID committee and the lesson they wanted to learn was, you know, where did we fail to get people to do what they needed to do or they needed them to do, It's, well, WHO seems to be the key. Because the problem is that the elected governments,

especially in the Western democracies, they eventually will be up for re-election. And if they infringe on fundamental rights, if they harass people, stigmatize people, ostracize people, harass people, you know, and coerce people into things they don't want to do, they may not be elected. be elected again. And that's, that's a real problem. So if the elected governments and the democracies

can say, well, you know, have been up to you, we would have never done that to you. But it's the WHO that's saying that now. So we have nothing, you know, no repercussion. And this is the thing that is also holds true for the whole EU institutions. In the national, in the national member states, every party that is along those lines will tell their people, well, we would not have post that on you. We would not have passed that legislation, but it came from EU and there's nothing we can do about. So it's kind of like, you know, blaming the other guy. On top of that, it's removing democratic processes further and further away from the people,

because the political accountability, which is like the key to a democracy, you know, in of itself, and they no longer want this. They no longer want the people to know who is actually responsible for decisions. And even if the people knew who was responsible for it, and they should not have any repercussions. And this is the game they are playing.

So at WHO, I mean, it's just, just one aspect. It's just one single aspect of it. There is so many others. You know, talk about climate change. Talk about this whole transgender madness. I could go on and on and on. And the people need to understand and they need to see. I mean, this is the fragmentation. You know, look at this issue, this issue, this issue. They need to connect the dots. Because take all of these programs, whatever the governments are pushing right now, take it up to the next level and see how is it possible that this issue and this issue can be used to abolish freedom, democracy and the rule of law. And there you go. Every single thing they're pushing right now, every single agenda they're pushing right now, it's all about. stripping the people of their rights, taking away freedom, democracy, and the rule of law,

and, you know, literally taking whatever tax money they can to impoverish and ultimately enslave all the peoples around the world. This is how big all of this is. It's a very interesting point you make that I hadn't really considered, which is what you're saying is you are seeing a lot of leaders that wanted to sort of defer their responsibility to other organizations. They would prefer to be in a position that says,

hey, just tell me what to do and I'll do it. And then I don't have to be responsible. I can just say I was told to do it. And it really is what I feel like in the world. And maybe you're explaining some things from me because it looks like leaders in the United States of America. I think our president, I've said it before. I don't feel like our government is any long.

the decisions in our laws are not being written inside of our own borders. It feels like it's coming from outside. And I'm thinking, who would want the job of president and then defer all of the power of that position, you know, to be leader of the free world? And we have someone that's clearly not the person that's running this. It's obviously, I think it's obvious to everyone right now, just based on the health status of our president, that there is something else that is making decisions for our country. But it really had, you know, occurred to me that that is what's happening in power structures

all over, that real leaders, real thinkers like yourself have a very hard time rising up to the political systems. It's those that will do what they're told. And then when they get to that final leadership position, of course they're going to defer that power because that's how they got there. They never got there as leaders. They never got there for being critical thinkers and standing on their own against, you know, wrongdoing. They got there because they just tow the line and they want any amount of tugboes

to yank on them as they can get. Right. You're absolutely right about that. But you know what? Like I said, you know, the problem for I call them the globalitarian misanthropists, you know, for lack of better word, but I think that's very fitting. They are actually running the world. And, you know, for the most part, the democratically elected leaders, whether it's the German government or, you know, Ursula von der Leyen, EU Commission President, or even, you know, take your Joe Biden or, you know, Justin Trudeau, that sorry excuse for a prime minister. You know, they are all puppets. Yeah. They are not running the shell. They are not. They are puppets.

They're just, you know, repeating whatever lies or whatever lines they are they've been given, you know, from whoever. But it's these globalitarian misanthropists. And from their perspective, democracy, oh my God, that's so, it's such a nuisance to them. You know, you have to ask the people seriously, but the people don't want what they want. Because, you know, let's say they want to eat steak, but they aren't allowed to eat steak anymore. because, you know, it's obviously killing the planet. So, but the globalist, they still want to eat steak, you know. So they come up with this, yeah, eat bucks, you know, whatever.

So there is like this, all of these layers are going on. But it's seriously, there is a few people actually pulling the strings behind the scenes. And it's not Klaus Schwab either, by the way. I mean, he is the idiot putting his face. in the camera and just, you know, repeating whatever agenda they came up with and, you know, advocating that. No, it's really about, we will actually look at a world that we no longer recognize. And especially in the Western democracies. And why do I always stress the Western democracies? Well, very simple. I don't expect freedom democracy in the rule of law.

in, let's say, China. No, I don't. You know, that's a totalitarian regime. I don't expect democracy there. I don't expect in North Korea. And I do not expect it in Russia either, to be quite frank. Yeah. So this is happening.

What we're seeing is happening in every single Western democracy. But what they can't do to abolish them. They can't, you know, show up and say, we don't want to vote anymore and you know we need to get rid of democracy but because the people don't want what the globalitarian misanthroat was so um this is not working uh so what they do instead is gas light uh you know uh framing something it's about your health it's about we need to break this new wave you know of uh COVID what's coming but like I said before it was never about breaking any waves. It was always about breaking people. That's what it was about. So they want to

cut down on the fundamental rights because, you know, people have having the right to take the streets and assemble freely. No, you can't have that because then, you know, someone may notice that the emperor actually is naked. If enough people say he's naked, right. So they need to cut down on all of that. Then you have to fight against, you know, disinformation, a hate speech. This is all, this is censorship. And these are the very signs of totalitarian regimes. That's what it is all about. Well, I mean, and you, they cannot come out. You know, so they need to gaslight people into thinking, we are the good guys, you know, we are trying to protect all of your health, whatever it is, we want to save the planet, and don't you want to save the planet?

No one is going to say, I don't want to save the planet, but the measures they're imposing will not save the planet. All it will do is to abolish freedom, democracy, and a rule of law, and it will impoverish and enslave people. That's the end goal. When I, you know, when we look at this issue, when you talk about authoritarian governments, obviously you're from Germany. I did some time. I was, when I was in musical theater years ago, I toured all over Germany and the Broadway touring company of Hare, the musical. And everywhere I would go, the youth in Germany would say to me, I'm sorry for Nazi Germany. It seemed really weird to me to be apologizing for something that clearly this generation had to me had nothing to do with. but there is a sensitivity there.

And so when you look at Germany and honestly, some of the best data that we're seeing in all-cause mortality, we saw it first in Germany. You were the first ones to have some lawsuits and some insurance data that came forward and shows that your all-cause mortality is up through the roof since the vaccine. We're seeing things coming out of Germany

that the insurance companies are paying for vaccine injury at numbers that they're not happy with. So there's a lot being. revealed there. But when, you know, when we look at Germany now as a democracy, is there an added, you know, sensitivity for you of this idea of authoritarian regimes? Because you seem so passionate about it. And I would think rightfully so. And it's amazing to see Germany in the middle of it. And then on the other hand, to watch Israel put their entire, you know, to watch Netanyahu, basically hand his entire nation over to a Pfizer deal.

And then the history of that, it's like these old guards are coming back up now. And we're having to face our demons, I feel like, as a species. Yeah. Well, I will have to say, unfortunately, you are not right. I would have thought, and I really wish that it would have been Germany out of all countries, you know, to recognize what is about to happen here, to establish yet another totalitarian kind of group thing, kind of thing, right?

But the majority of Germans actually did not recognize it. So, and that is really frustrating. And sadly, I have to say, the ones that scream loudest, never again, And the ones that are determined to fight the beginnings, they wouldn't recognize the beginnings if they jumped up and bit them in their freaking faces. The ones that are so determined and they were convinced

that would have fought fascism back then in the 30s. Right. You know, they would not recognize fascism if it literally jumped up and bit them in their faces. So if you want to talk about fight beginnings. That actually means you need to have an understanding of how it began back then. Because the Nazis did not start out by rounding up people and transporting them off to cans. It started way before that. It was little steps, one step at a time.

So in the beginning, the Jewish people weren't allowed to sit on benches anymore. Well, you know, what's the big deal with the, you know, like the rationalization of it? They can sit on another bench. And the next step, they weren't allowed to own pets anymore. Well, you don't need a pet to be happy in life, right? So next step was, well, no, you cannot even marry a Jew anymore. So it went on and on and on. And the really scary part about this is the Nazis were elected in 33.

It's when they came to power. It took them five years up until the point when they were actually capable of passing legislation to openly discriminate against Jewish people and ostracize them, you know, deprive them of their rights or whatever. It took them five years. How long did it take them this time? Not even one year. And the majority was all for it. They were literally begging the government for more restrictions

and for bashing down harder on the ones that would not comply. One year. This is scary. This is really scary. It absolutely is. My last question to you because you know, you're one of these people, you're, you know, you're walking around other politicians from other countries. Are they going to, do you feel?

feel like there's another lockdown in our near future? Do you think, I mean, they seem to, this seemed to be more about just a vaccine or a virus. This, as I agree with you, was about how much control can we assert on humanity right now. Do you feel like that they want to do this more, that we should be expecting another attempt, whether this winter or somewhere in the near future, a crisis where they lock us down again in our houses around the world? Yeah, well, not only that. Okay, so number one, yes, this whole COVID thing seems to be starting again. There's already talk about, you know, masking up again, like in Israel.

There are certain places that already imposed mask mandates. There is, from what I know, universities in the United States, they already, you know, reduce the mask mandates. It is, yeah, and there is like this new MRI shot for a vaccine, this Marnay shot for this new variant, whatever. Yes, it is coming again. They will try again. And what I said yesterday in the conference

that we heard about earlier, I promise the people that me and my colleagues, we will never stop standing up for the people. We will never stop being on their side. We will continue our fight. But I asked them or kind of said, we need a promise from you too. And the promise is you need to say no.

So if they want you to mask up, say no. If they want you to take, I don't know, the 18th or 19th booster or whatever, say no, don't do it. If they impose a curfew on you, once again, simply say, No, because that's the support we need at this point, you know, people saying no and not going along with this anymore, not supporting this anymore.

So the second issue is this whole COVID thing is just one aspect. Take the climate change, you know, we're all going to die. Seriously, this time for real, you know, kind of, at least that's what your TV is telling you So they're already talking about climate lockdowns. There's counties in Great Britain, they already passed legislation that would enable them to impose climate lockdowns, meaning if whatever number exceeds whatever thresholds,

they can lock you down. And then you will stay in your assigned area, which leads us up to these despicable 15-minute get-outs. That's just the preparation for future climate lockdowns. And I swear to God, it's true. Because what they realized during COVID is when they imposed these curfews. And in Germany, it was like you were not allowed to leave your house for more than 15 kilometers. Well, why did they have to allow you at least this 15 kilometers radius?

Well, because the infrastructure wasn't set up. And they will do that with these 15-minute get-outs. You will have everything you need for your daily need within a 15-minute walking distance. And if you think that the next lockdown, you will be allowed to remove 15-classes, you kilometers around your house, now you won't. Don't even count on that. It will lock you down, seriously. Well, Christine, it's really great to know that you're out there.

I'm glad that your numbers are growing, 12, and then hopefully on a good day, 150 that might have the guts to vote. You are clearly driven, inspired, you're inspiring. And I want you to know that, you know, we have millions of people watching you from the high wire here. Keep up the good work. Don't lose hope. It's people like you are the only chance we have. Never. Thank you so much.

And I can guarantee you I will never lose hope. The day I lose hope is the day that I die. All right. Well, we will pray for your safety so that that day is a long way off. Christine, keep up the great work. We love you. Thank you. Thank you so much for having me.

Bye-bye. Bye-bye.