The Highwire with Del Bigtree - BACK TO PARENT EPISODE ELON’S X DEPLOYS MISINFORMATION AGAINST VIRAL HIGHWIRE POST

Episode Date: December 9, 2023

The HighWire’s X (formerly Twitter) account posted a video last week featuring ICAN Lead Counsel, Aaron Siri, Esq., that quickly went viral. Before too long it was slapped with a ‘Community Note�� warning from X that vaccines “do not cause autism”, complete with links to studies. The problem was, the post never made that claim. But that’s not all. Hear Del’s scathing response as he explains how community notes committed the exact same sin the CDC when they tried to combat this same truth.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

We had a lot of fun this week. In fact, we started a little bit of a war on Twitter or X if you've decided to take on the new moniker. How did we do it? Well, we just put a little video that looks something like this. The CDC finally listed 20 studies that they rely upon, they say, to claim that vaccines don't cause autism for the vaccines given in the first six months of life. I can only assume they think we don't read or something, but we do. So we read the 20 studies. Here's the thing about them. 18 of them involved the Marisol. an ingredient not in any of the vaccines we asked about, or the MMR vaccine, not given until at least one year of life. One of them involved antigen, one of the studies, not vaccine exposure, and that study even says it cannot tell you whether vaccines don't cause autism because it didn't study them.

The only review or study they provided us that actually involved a single one of the vaccines given in the first six months of life was a study by the Institute of Medicine that found we don't have a single study of whether DTAP does or doesn't cause autism. Well, I mean, it was innocuous enough. That was actually just an excerpt from the show that we aired during Thanksgiving last week.

It came from the Freedom Fest presentation that Aaron Siri and I gave together, sort of talked about the experts that were under oath. But, you know, Twitter wasn't having it, or at least their sort of community response popped up on our feed. This is what that looked like. Community notes. And it says CDC couldn't, oh, this was our post. And here's what they said. Vaccines do not cause autism.

Countless studies have shown no link between vaccines and an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder. And then they posted three, I guess, studies. Now, what's funny about this is we weren't saying that vaccines do cause autism. What we're saying and talking about is the fact that we sued the CDC when they refused to tell us what studies they were relied upon to make the statement that all vaccines don't cause autism. We were specific about the first six vaccines in the first six months of life. which is hepatitis, rotavirus, diphtheria, tetanus, accellular pertussis, hemopluous, influenza, pneumococcal conjugate, inactivated polio vaccines. We said, of all those, which one of these,

because you're saying all vaccines don't cause autism, just show us what studies you did to make that statement. They couldn't provide anything. But apparently, you know, under these community notes, they thought that they had some studies and they posted them. Well, we responded to that, and this is what we wrote back. Would act community notes, Please provide the studies that our regulatory agencies relied upon to make the claim vaccines do not cause autism for the vaccines administered in the first sickness of life. We put it out there again. CDC couldn't do it. Maybe you people can, but you're not doing here. Also, please tell us where we make the claim vaccines cause autism in this post. This note doesn't address the facts laid out in the video at Elon Musk. What say you?

And so for a little while, they took down the community notes. Now, I'll tell you, those three studies didn't address our question at all. They were totally irrelevant. But eventually they came back and this time they had five studies. And by the way, hundreds of thousands of views now going on in these different exchanges. Vaccines do not cause autism. They said again, countless studies have shown no link between vaccines. There it is again, all vaccines and an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder. Again, we weren't saying that the vaccines cause autism. What we were saying is what studies proved they'd do. Don't. Now, let's very quickly, since these geniuses have now added five studies. And imagine this seven studies, it must be coming from all over the world. I mean, now this is not just a question

going to the CDC, which is the lawsuit where we basically prove they did not provide a single study, but now the whole world's weighing in on it on Twitter and they've come up with seven studies. Why don't we walk through us? Remember, we want the vaccines in the first six months of life. So let's take a look at these seven studies. The first studies is a measles month. bumps rebella vaccination and autism study, a nationwide cohort study. The measles months vaccine was not given, is not given in the first six months of life, has nothing to do with what we're talking about. Next study.

It's exactly what the CDC did to us, by the way. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children age eight years. This is really just talking about the prevalence of autism. But here's what's interesting. This is recommendations for the ADDM network include enhancing strategies two. Number one, lower the age of age. first evaluation of ASD by community providers in accordance with the Healthy People 2020 goal that children with ASD are evaluated by age 36 months and begin receiving community-based support

and services by age 48 months. And here's what's interesting about that. We are now diagnosing children with autism at a much earlier age than it used to be diagnosed. It used to be after 4 years old was when they would really start finding it. But now they're shooting for 3 years, 36 months. And so this is why we thought, you know, when we asked for the first six months of life, we thought, well, we shouldn't we really be looking? If it's this early that they're diagnosing, then it would be those first vaccines. If vaccines cause it at all, then you would see it from these first six months of vaccines that are given over and over and over again.

And we should, you know, if you're going to say vaccines don't cause autism, those are very important. So that's why they've lowered this age of diagnosis, meaning let's not look at the ones later on. Let's look at the early ones. Okay, but has nothing to do obviously with our question. Early exposure, here's the other one, early exposure to thymarisol containing vaccines in children's cognitive development. There is no thimerosol in any of the six vaccines that are given the first six ones alive.

Totally irrelevant to our question. Next study. Prainatal and infant exposure to thimerosol from vaccines in immunoglobulins and risk of autism. Again, no thimerosol in the vaccines that we have a question about. So again, totally irrelevant. And remember that at a certain point, thimerosol was taken out of most of the childhood vaccines because they say, oh, it had no effect. But when they were, you know, confronted with it, they recognize, you know, say mercury is safe to be injected into you,

isn't a really good argument. So why don't we take it out anyway? It is still in the flu shot and is given to pregnant women and getting into, you know, developing fetuses and young children if they get that flu shot. So thimerosol still out there, but mostly not in the flu shot. childhood vaccines and definitely not in the first six months of life vaccines. So totally relevant. Next study. Again, neuropsychological performance 10 years after immunization infancy with a thymarisol containing. See how this goes, folks? This is the whole point. They're not answering the question. Let's get another one here. Dimerosal exposure. All right, you get the idea. Next one.

I think this next one is interesting. Vaccines in autism. This is the last one. And this is basically an attack on the only study that it really, you know, that has been done from this side, which was the study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield. Now, he always comes to the center of this conversation, and so this is what they have to say about that MMR Lance study. I think it's kind of interesting. This is what they say themselves. The Wakefield paper published in 1998 was flawed for two reasons. About 90% of children in England receive MMR at the time this paper was written, because MMR is administered at a time when many children are diagnosed with autism, it would be expected that most children with autism would have received an MMR vaccine, that many would have received

the vaccine recently. The observation that some children with autism recently received MMR is therefore expected. However, determination of whether MMR causes autism is best made by studying the incidence of autism in both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. children, this wasn't done. In fact, this really has never been done, which has always been our argument. Although the authors claim that autism is a consequence of intestinal inflammation, intestinal symptoms were observed after, not before symptoms of autism in all eight cases. I want to just make this point. What they're trying to tell you is that these parents are blaming the vaccine, but that's when they're diagnosed. The problem with this is the Lansing's

study was not about parents who were finally being diagnosed. It's about parents that said my child regressed into autism days or weeks after getting the MMR vaccine. It wasn't like, oh, my child's been autistic for two years and I've been trying to get the doctors to finally admit it and they tend to do that right at the age. They just got their MMR. No, they're saying my child turned into a different child right after the MMR vaccine. So this statement is absolutely, totally bogus. I've done plenty of shows. Go back and watch the brilliant interviews I've done with Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who also was the director of the film that puts me in the middle of this entire conversation, backs from cover up to catastrophe, which you can find on our website and watch that for free.

But I want to say this. Now the entire world is weighed in on this Twitter battle here, and they're still having the same exact issue. You are told there are mountains of studies showing that vaccines do not cause autism. We asked about the first six vaccines given the first six months of life, and no one, not the CDC and not every scientist across the world now waiting in on this, can provide you with one study that compares the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, and especially those that got the first six vaccines to those that didn't get the first six vaccines and say, look, we've proven they don't cause autism. So we are saying, and we are saying, We continue to say this statement that you are making that vaccines do not cause autism has no

basis in provable science whatsoever. Now, we are not going to say that vaccines do cause autism. What we're saying is you can't say they don't. And once again, with now a worldwide attempt to try and take our statement down, they have failed. They can only go to older vaccine, thimerosol studies and MMR studies, and we've covered why those are a fraud, including at the center of Vax, one of the most fraudulent studies ever done. And it's the last study ever done in the United States of America that our government funded

looking at the question, do vaccines cause autism? And specifically, does the MMR vaccine cause autism? If you've watched Vaxed, you know there's a whistleblower inside the CDC named Dr. William Thompson. He's still there. He's protected with whistleblower status. And he provided 10,000. documents that they asked him to destroy. Why? Because it showed a very, very strong correlation between getting the MMR vaccine and an increase in diagnoses of autism. And so that study was fraudulently manipulated, and that manipulated study was the last time in 2004 a single dollar was ever spent by our government investigating this issue. So now the world is weighing in. They have no studies to prove it's not happening.

Meanwhile, autism is going like this still. When you look at some of those studies they're pointing to, they're talking about one in 250, one in 150. It started at 1 in 10,000 when they first started recognizing it. We're now at about 1 in 30, 34, depending on what study you look at. And when we look at boys where it's more prevalent, autism is now seems to be affecting somewhere between 1 in 18 and 1 in 20. to 24 boys. This is one of the greatest epidemic pandemics, whatever you want to call it of our

lifetime. No science can prove that it's not being caused by vaccines and our government has stopped funding any investigation into that correlation even though they cannot prove a single study. So here it is to the whole world one more time. Can anyone provide a single acceptable study showing that the first six months of vaccines do not cause autism, especially the D-TAP vaccine, which parents have been complaining about. In fact, it's one of the number one vaccines complained about. My child regressed into autism right after the D-TAP vaccine. When we look at the Institute of Medicine that looked at it,

and we find after 30 years of parents complaining about that, that our U.S. government, the NIH, the CDC, the FDA, none of them have ever done a study investigating D-TAP vaccine and its correlation to autism, that is egregious. That is absolutely horrific. And we will continue to press this issue until the end of time, until we get a president in our government that decides to put someone into the NIH that will actually start doing proper vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies to look at a whole lot more than autism. How about asthma?

How about ADD, ADHD? How about lupus? How about leukemia? How about cancer? How about this incredible rise in autoimmune disease that is just absolutely crippling the children in America today? Our children are sicker than they have ever been. We went from one in 12 basically, one in, I mean, one in, was it, yeah, one in 12? There, here we go.

Thank you. 11 doses, 12.8% chronic illness in the 1980s when we're giving 11 vaccines. 53 doses in the 2000s, and now we have 54% of chronic illness in our children. This means that more than half, more than one in two children are suffering from an illness. They will have their entire freaking lives, either a neurological disorder or an autoimmune disease. That is the greatest decline in human health ever recorded, and it's on the back of the rise in our vaccine program. I'm going to continue to drop the mic on this until someone decides to do some real science.