The Highwire with Del Bigtree - BLEEDING TRUTH FINAL

Episode Date: December 12, 2022

Ron Johnson’s Capitol Hill Covid Vaccine Forum; Is Elon Musk Turning Twitter Trustworthy?; Del’s in the Lab To Investigate Covid Vaccines and Find the Bleeding TruthGuest: Dr. Ryan Cole#CapitolHillCovidForum #Twitter #BleedingTruth #RyanColeMD #Ep297Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening.

Good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Well, we're a few minutes late right now, and I just want to say sometimes we are packing the show up to the last minute. And right now, this is like a Christmas stocking that just won't take that last pineapple that we want to pack into it. But all of our videos are loaded. We have a spectacular and gigantic show, maybe one of the most important we've ever done. We are going to be sitting down later on in the show with Dr. Ryan Cole to discuss the contents of the vaccine. What is actually in it? I went to his laboratory to do a deep investigation.

I'm really tired of hearing from other experts. I want to see it with my own eyes and you were going to find out what we actually found out. I'm going to tell you right now there's some myths that are going to be broken and some that you've never thought about. But all of that is going to be coming up. So very, very important. As I sit here right now, you know, this is an amazing moment. I want to thank my team because I have not been here. Usually we have Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and even Thursday morning to put this whole show together.

But as many of you know, one of the most important hearings that has ever taken place on the Senate floor just did yesterday. Ron Johnson had his hearings, COVID-19 vaccines, what they are, what's in them, and how they might be causing injury. A spectacular event. It took a lot to put it together. And that was on the heels of I was just out in Florida over the weekend at the Moms for America fundraiser. A great group of Freedom Fighters, moms, power moms that have been open to this conversation. In fact, Dr. Simone Gold received an award at this incredible event. So I was there Thursday.

I mean, there over the weekend. Flew back Monday morning in order to try and have a meeting with my team. Flew out Monday afternoon to get to Washington, D.C., to start meeting with this incredible. panel of world-renowned scientists, doctors, experts to discuss what is really going on with this vaccine program around the world, and it was a spectacular event. So I'm about to play you just a little sort of part of what was a three-hour event packed with some of the most important information we've ever seen. And I just want to once again just take this moment to recognize the fact that we have a politician like we do in Senator Ron Johnson that said to you on

this show and during his election, if I get reelected, this issue of the vaccine, the rush to roll it out and vaccine injury will be my number one focus. He proved that to be true. Look how quickly after his reelection in office, even before the next year starts, he decided to have this hearing. This was it on his own page media advisory. Senator, Senator, Johnson to lead roundtable on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety. It was an incredible event. I hope you watched it, but if you didn't, this is what that looked like. The main reason for this event today was, first of all, to provide information that the American public deserves to know, that they're not being told, but anything we could do to prevent

further harm. I don't want to scare the, you know. why not the people. I don't. None of us do, okay? But they need to have that information. V-SAFE is the CDC's premier vaccine safety system for the COVID-19 vaccine. This is a dashboard that I can't create to be able to visually represent the V-Safe data. About 800,000 people reported needing medical care in the database of 9, 10 million. That's about 7.7% of people in V-SAFE reported needing medical care. That is one in 13 people. Yet the CDC did not pull the shot. In January of 2021, I came before you as a military whistleblower reporting catastrophic increases in illnesses and injuries across the DOD. The total number of reportable events went from

110,000 in 2020 to over 200,000 in 2022. The vaccine was introduced into the military in January of 2021. We generated hundreds and hundreds of charts, looked at this every way from Sunday. The UK government until this summer was reporting a data series that showed the relative mortality rates for the vaccinated and unvaccinated by the number of doses of the vaccine. Simplifies down to a conclusion that says that through the last available data set, the people in the UK who took the vaccine have a 26% higher mortality rate. This is a society of actuaries in 2021. ages 25 through 64, the employed people of our nation covered under group life, they experienced a 40% excess mortality. 1.2 million additional Americans in the employed segment of our population got disabled. That is the size of the state of Wyoming and Vermont combined that disappeared from the labor force.

As a journalist, I looked at the emergency use authorization for the vaccine. We wanted us to, had they achieved the stopping transmission, which is our definition of a vaccine. But when we looked at the emergency use optimization, what was known was that the data are not there, limited, to assess the effects of the vaccine against transmission in SARS-Giv-2. They had no idea. They had no idea if it would stop the infection, yet they were making those statements on the news. And now we find out from the heads of Pfizer that they were never even testing inside the trials whether or not it could stop transmission. In January of 2020, I was working as senior advisor to the FDA commissioner on drugs,

and FDA science policy. I don't understand how in good conscience we can still be giving these vaccines at this point for the COVID-19, named after 2019, for a strain of the vaccine that no longer exists. This spike protein, when we inject this gene into the body and start hijacking your cells to make it, these natural killer cells, now look at your own cells, they poke a little hole in those cells, and then they throw a little hand grenade in and start pulling it. blowing them up. It's not just that this spike protein is dangerous. The lipid nanoparticle will go anywhere into the body. It was designed to carry chemotherapy agents to the brain.

You don't want spike protein in your brain. We now have data from multiple sources that the spike protein, which the current M RNA vaccine products ask the body to make, are cardiotoxic and cause the heart to be inflamed. The spike protein sets in motion a cascade of events that activates platelets, to form clots, and inflames the blood vessels lining the heart and the heart muscle itself. What I'm seeing clinically is now patients have taken the vaccine, and they've had COVID, and they've taken the vaccine, and now it's all mixed, and there's multiple exposures. The more exposures there are, in my estimation, there's greater risks of myocarditis and recurrent myocarditis.

and blood clots and more blood clots. And the FDA and the manufacturers strictly excluded COVID recovered patients from the clinical trials because of that fact. I've seen three strokes, transchemic attacks, massive clot to the spleen and liver, spinal tumors, brain tumors, sarcoidosis, lupus, cognitive impairment,

myocroditis, perocroditis. And I see a shocking suppression of the immune system that is pervasive. My patients are women of reproductive age, pregnant women, and pre-born babies. And what I've seen in my clinical practice has been a substantial, massive increase unprecedented in menstrual abnormalities prior to pregnancy, a substantial increase in infertility, a substantial increase in miscarriage, fetal death, and fetal mal from the disease. And what we see is catastrophic.

It's a danger signal like no others. There is significant variance in the toxicity from lot to lot, such as the lot that I received of my second dose that almost killed me as I developed hypertension with systolic to 230. There's some reason why some lots are associated with many more deaths and much more disease than others. My life before my vaccine was beautiful. Sorry, it's hard to remember the worst parts of my life.

I participated in the clinical trial for AstraZeneca. And now I suffered from a severe debilitating form of neuropathy that will progress until I'm essentially left in a care home. I received my one and only modern injection December 30th of 2022. Within one week after my modern shot, I began to have numbness and weakness in my legs. I quickly received the diagnosis of transverse myelitis. This involves an injury of my thoracic spinal cord. I am now permanently disabled.

If you have an adverse event after your shot, you are on your own. There are currently enrolling 50 different clinical trials on other new MRI vaccines. This product, which we've all agreed, inadequate are now being grandfathered in essentially enabling a functional monopoly for Pfizer, Moderna, and Biointech to deploy this technology for virtually any purpose. There are plenty of drugs that have been shown to have antiviral properties and they were very quickly identified around the world and widely used not in this country. About 40% of drugs, 40%

set of drugs used in hospitals or used off-label. That's fine if you're treating heart disease, but suddenly if it's coronavirus, the FDA, the N.I.H do not want you to use an off-label drug because it would compete with big pharma. I want to ask why the American Board of the aesthetics in Ghana College, why the American College of OBJN, and why the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine,

all of whom I've served in a professional capacity in an outstanding fashion my entire career, why they are pushing this lethal vaccine, risking the future of all humanity. Other nations have banned this product because it's too dangerous for younger people. What are we doing? I am passionate for the health of our children.

I'm also passionate for young service members that I served for 13 years in the Air Force a flight surgeon, deployed twice to Iraq. For our healthy children and the majority of our war fighters, the data show that the risk for myocarditis is greater than the benefit of the vaccine products. As a physician who has vowed to do no harm, my opinion is that we should not mandate harm.

I can't believe that the FDA, where I worked as a career medical officer, I'm the only person who's out of the 20,000 employees or so the FDA, physicians, pharmacists, nurses, public health officials, that's here speaking out about this. I don't understand. It's an outrage, a moral, ethical, medical outrage. All the vaccine mandate should be dropped immediately. We need requests for applications and immediate funding for vaccine injury,

centers of excellence across the United States, for screening, detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and management. We need a massive shift in our health care system towards managing now this large number of vaccine injured people. It is absolutely irresponsible to continue any of these shots in our reproductive age kids or younger. Anybody that could possibly pass these on without investigating this, and I am demanding now that this be investigated. Well, I want to say that there is what you see in front of the cameras, and I think we did a brilliant job of taking, you know, over 20 scientists that all came together for this event and tried to get them to contain their number one thought in a couple of minutes so that we could get through so many different perspectives. But I want you to know each one of these doctors and scientists could do a dissertation that would last five or six hours, each one of them with information that is so mind-blowing. If you see what was being brought to the table, I could only tell you this. If you watched it, I know you found it absolutely consuming, but being there.

And if you want to watch it, Senator Johnson hosts expert form on COVID vaccines. There's the entire event. And I also want to say this shorter version, we are currently preparing. By the end of this show, you will be able to have a link. It will probably be in our trending section. And I want to take that small link, and you should share that with everyone you know. With that link will also be the ability for them to watch the longer version. Everyone we know needs to see this.

And I want to make a special plea right now, a call to action. I want every one of you out there to take this little clip at the end of this show, which will also have a link to the larger three hour, and I want you to present it to your senators and your congressmen and women and say, I demand that you explain this hearing and what is happening here and why I'm not hearing you talk about it. That's, you know, in whatever form you want in your email, we need to start sharing this. We need demand.

We had one senator show up, luckily, and watch. And there was a couple I saw in the background, but for the most part, they're trying to bury their heads in the sand on what I believe is going to go down in history as the greatest cover up in the world in all times. The entire world is involved. The governments of the world are involved in a massive cover-up with so much carnage and death and injury. It is absolutely insane that we find ourselves in this position. And if you watch that three hours, I think you will have the same feeling that I do. And just know, we are doing our best on the high wire to get into the deeper discussions that each one of these scientists, doctors, has presented. Many of them have already been on the high wire.

I'm talking to get many more on here. This is a crisis. This is now a crisis of epic proportions, and it must be stopped. And I want to also say, when you look at that panel of doctors, what you are watching in that three hours is the greatest group of heroes we will ever know in this world. I can't think of another topic like this where each one of these individuals is literally putting their careers on the line. Some of them have already been stripped of their jobs, of their careers, of the certifications, all to bring the truth. knowing full well what they were standing up against. These are what it means to be heroes,

some of them from around the world, but truly a spectacular event. And what is being put on the line by these people is unprecedented. This is an unprecedented moment in history, and we captured it with the cameras of the high wire. Lastly, if you want to know what it's like to be in this topic or be dealing with this, on every other Senate hearing we've ever discussed,

there's always an in-house feed, They have a news feed where you just plug in the systems ready to broadcast to everyone in the Senate. They all have a television that lets them know anything that's going on, and it makes it very easy to broadcast out from inside. In this case, it was the heart building to all of you out there in the world. But for some reason, when it came to this hearing that Senator Ron Johnson was having, there was just too much going on for them to supply the technologies to broadcast to anybody in the Senate or get it out to the world.

And so the high wire and my team stepped up amazingly, brought in all the cameras and the equipment and the ability to broadcast out of there. And that feed was picked up by multiple news organizations and used. You funded that. You are making that possible. Nobody's helping us. No Senate. Nobody's paying us. None of the other news organizations said, hey, let us chip in.

That's okay. We are here trying to get the truth out. But this is just one of the many things that is happening that we are doing. We are telling the most important story of our lifetime. We are making sure that when we have a senator putting his career on the line and 20 or 30 different scientists that are putting their careers on the line, we are making sure that it is not a sand painting that's going to blow away in the wind or a tree falling in the forest and no one is there to hear it.

You are making it possible so that the world can see what is actually going on here. So please, right now, as we come to the end of this year, and you're thinking, you know, maybe I have a last moment here that I can donate to try and make a difference. I want you to think about all the lawsuits that we won with our informed consent action network this year. I want you to think about all the scientists that you saw here speaking their truth. And I want you to think about broadcasts like this where we take an entire team and set up

a, you know, CNN-level mainstream media production to make sure the world will know what happened there. We can't do this without you. You are making it possible for us to. change the world. And man, do we need change and we need it fast? We have so much coming up. Even that trip down to Florida, I sat with Aaron Siri, who's in Florida right now, to discuss everything we've achieved this year and our goals and wait to you, see the Blitz Creek we plan on bringing next year against lies being told by the pharmaceutical industry, by

government officials and the like. You're making all this possible. This is not like any other new show you're watching while you are helping, you know, fund and support us. We are not only telling the stories, we are fighting to make sure that these stories are changed in the courtrooms in this country and around the world. So right now, if you have the opportunity and you're on the highwire.com, just click on that button up in the top right corner. You are our sponsors. You make this happen. Please become a recurring donor if you can. We're asking for these last few days, $22 for the year $22, $22 a month. But, let's see. look if that's too much for you then give up a cup of coffee or maybe a big mac or a bag of

Doritos this week and just text donate to 72022 and we will make this as easy as possible so that you can be a part of this incredible moment I can't tell you how powerful it was to be in that room imagine if you could sit here today and say oh my goodness I help fund and make sure that all my friends and family could see the video that I'm about to share I made that happen Everyone that's donating to us right now, I want you to pat yourself on the back and say, my God, Luke what we achieved this week. Yes, we. We are all a part of the conformed consent action network.

And thank you for your support. Before I get into the incredible science and their revelations that are about to come through my work with Dr. Ryan Cole, it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey Jackson's a heck of a week going on here, man. So what do we got? Yeah, Adele. Well, there is an important test happening within the United States right now. A test for our free speech, a test for open debate.

And over the last couple of years, we've seen government organizations, regulatory agencies, even the Department of Homeland Security get into the conversation of really censoring speech in trying to put a stranglehold on what can be talked about on these big tech. platforms and in order for that to work all the big tech platforms have to play by the same rules of misinformation and disinformation censorship Twitter's not doing that and it really started with Elon Musk we talked about that last week he put a lot of tweets out promising transparency and in fact this one is the most important one to kick off our section here he put this out at the end of November he said this the Twitter

files on free speech suppression soon to be published on Twitter itself the public deserves to know what really happened. So that has come to fruition. The first installment, episode one, if you will, of the Twitter files, has been published. And how it was published was very interesting along the lines of what he said. He contacted a journalist Matt Taibi. And if anybody isn't know, Matt Taiibi is a longtime journalist. He was an editor at Rolling Stone. He's been reporting on the abuses of power within power structure in the United States for over a decade, Occupy Wall Street and so on and so forth. And a journalist Barry Weiss. She is another American journalist.

They were given these document dumps. And instead of making it into an article or putting it on, you know, a TV show or something like that, they put the article out. Matt Tybee put the article out in a series of Twitter posts, of numbered Twitter posts. And this is what the first one, the first kind of conversation was around. They were talking about the censorship that Twitter had. Twitter was something that wasn't supposed to have boundaries. It was supposed to be open debate. And Matt Tybee writes this.

both parties had access to these tools, meaning the tools to censor misinformation and disinformation within Twitter. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However, he goes on to say this system wasn't balanced. It was based on contacts because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation. There were more channels, more ways to complain open to the left, while Democrats, than the right. And what does he mean by that? Well, if you go to open, Insecrets.org, they show, they have a chart here. They break down this information quite a bit, but this chart shows how much Twitter employees gave to federal candidates and parties. And you can

see here in the blue Democrats, especially in 2020, that pivotal year, right as the elections were happening, the Twitter employees gave to Democrats nearly $1 million. And the Republicans weren't really even represented on this. I mean, we're talking under $10,000. So there was a political bias in this organization, which was fine. Unfortunately, what came out of that organization was also political bias when it came to speech. And this is really the big story here, at least for episode one of Twitter files. So Matt Taibi goes on to explain in his expose on Twitter. He says, by 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine.

One executive would write to another. More to review from the Biden team, the reply would come back handled. And we can look at this email. This is the actual email here from these Twitter files. You can see more to review from the Biden team. So this is something apparently was a regular situation that the Biden team would send over literal URLs of accounts. Most of these counts still are blocked, still are banned. I mean, this is October 24th, 2020.

And it took, notice the time stance, it took a little over three hours for the Twitter employees to come back and say, handle these. That's how quick if you are in the Biden White House or presumably in the Trump organization from what was shown here, that you get satisfaction on Twitter, you know, looking at these. accounts, perhaps deleting them, shadow banning, whatever they're doing in the back door there. So in this atmosphere, in this, you know, in this environment, we have the Hunter Biden laptop story dropped right in the middle of it. And this is where the story really begins. So just to remind people, October 14th, the New York Post posted this headline, smoking gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP Dad. And then a day later,

the New York Post posts this one as well. Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm. So again, you know, there's been a little bit of, you know, really some red herring here. This wasn't about illicit drug use or whatever else was on this laptop. It was about influence peddling. It was about trying to really get access to his father and gain business deals with Ukraine and China, which is really interesting, multimillion and sometimes billion dollar deals. Well, let's be honest.

I want to be honest, and by the way, this is not a political show. There's, you know, we are about freedom and we are representing free speech, and we have been affected by this censorship, which is a lot of why we're talking about this. But I just want to say, and I've been very clear, you know, my background was growing up as a progressive liberal. I now consider myself politically marooned. I know I say that. It's like a drinking game now. But the truth is, is that, you know, I have family members that really were concerned about the connection to the Trump administration and family members and work that had happened with. Russia. I just want balance, right? If there are actual interactions and business dealings inside of

the Biden family with China and Ukraine who both are now two of the major countries we find ourselves either in conflict with or in a conflict, you know, helping or in some way a part of a lot of our news cycle, gee, we should really know if there are any, you know, compromising situations there. All anyone is asking for is investigations. And when investigations are blocked, that's when I start getting really concerned. And so just to play this across the board, I think it's perfectly okay to investigate any president for anything like this. That's what they're there for. And so, you know, it's just weird when you're not allowed to even talk about it. Right. And remember at the beginning, Matt Tybee says both parties had access to and use these

tools. So right now we're seeing the information that is presented to the public right now, which we're reporting on. But we will gladly report on the other administration or on, you know, on Elon Musk himself if he tries to turn this in a different direction. So what we're reporting on is public disclosure here. So let's listen to Joe Biden at that time, talk about this release of the story from the New York Post. Take a listen. Do you believe the recent leak of material allegedly from Hunter's computer is part of a Russian disinformation campaign. From what I've read and know, the intelligence community warned the president that Giuliani was being fed disinformation from the Russians. And we also know that Putin has trying very hard

to spread disinformation about Joe Biden. There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have said, said that this has all the car, four, five former heads of the CIA, both parties say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage. I swear I can't help but think right now about Watergate. I really can't because these are statements being made by a man running for president accusing his opponent of spreading a Russian piece of disinformation and that it is a total lie. We are now finding out that not only is this not Russian disinformation, it was true, and that

government officials were being used to cover up this story, and then to see on the news like this idea that it's a nothing burger, in many ways, Watergate's a nothing burger. All right, so I tapped somebody's phone that was trying, you know, run against me. If you had fessed up right there, maybe you could have gotten around it. I don't know, but it's this cover. When you start using other departments and going out of your way, and if this was a nothing Burger, why so much effort to make sure that no one could talk about this story? I mean, truly, if it was a nothing burger, you should have just let it run.

I just want to remind everybody that, you know, this is how the last time we saw a story like this that seemed small, this is kind of how that one ended. And I want to say this to the television audience. I made my mistakes, but in all of my years of public life, I have never profited, never profited from public service. I've earned every cent. And in all of my years of public life, I have never obstructed justice. And I think, too, that I can say that in my years of public life, that I welcome this kind of examination, because people have got to know whether or not their president is a crook. Well, I'm not a crook. I mean, look, I'm making no accusations right now.

all we are doing is saying why we believe investigations are necessary. Some of the things he said there, you know, I've never profited. Well, we need to find out, has the president that Donald Trump is under plenty of investigation over this issue, there's no way that the sitting president right now, if we know that his son is having business dealings, was there profiting going on? That's a huge question. Was there, you know, sort of contaminating evidence or blocking an investigation? Certainly if you're using people to change a story with the public and anyone that's trying to report on it is being blocked

I don't know I don't know all I'm saying is in my mind There have been nothing burgers before. I hope this turns into a nothing burger But that won't happen without some serious You know nonpartisan investigations and looking beyond the left right political paradigm really the most concerning thing here is we have a concerted effort by the national intelligence community this is the CIA the FBI the FBI and The NSA, these former members, all came together. And as Biden said, there in that clip, and wrote this letter to kill this story at a critical time. So the reason we're also reporting on this,

obviously it's the Twitter files, but Twitter took the hardest stance to suppress this story. They wouldn't let anybody share it on their platform. They were blocking accounts, but they also wouldn't let people post it in direct messages from one to another. This is unprecedented level. I mean, you couldn't kill a story any harder on a platform. So after this story was censored,

we have Mike Hahn. was a social media staffer on the Trump campaign. And on October 14th, the day that New York Post posts this, this is the email he sends to a Twitter higher up. He says this, Kaylee McEnany has been blocked out from her account for simply talking about the New York Post story. All she did was cite the story and firsthand reporting that has been reported by other outlets and not disputed by the Biden campaign. I need an answer immediately on when and how she will be unlocked. I also don't appreciate how nobody on this team called me regarding the news that you'll be censoring news articles. Like I said, at least pretend to care for the next 20 days.

And, of course, that was the presidential election he's talking about in the 20 days. So now we go on to Matt Taibi's story as it unfolds here on Twitter. And we have a woman named Carol Strom. And this is what Matt Taiibi writes. He says this, this lead public policy executive Carol Strom to send out a polite W, I'm sorry, this led public policy executive Carol Stron. is sent out a polite WTF query. Several employees noted that there was tension

between the communications policy teams who had little less control of remoderation and the safety and trust teams. And she writes this, Hey team, are you able to take a closer look here? So this really got some movement because there apparently was some rogue individuals or groups within Twitter

that were making these decisions without the higher ups even knowing. So now the higher ups are really, they have their binoculars on this situation saying, let's figure this out. So it goes back to Matt Taiibi's emails. He said Strom's note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for

violation of the company's quote, hacked materials policy. And then it goes on to see the internal conversations on the internal server. And these are confidential emails that have been released. And it says this. We have a gentleman named Trenton Kennedy. And he says, I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe. He's talking about the New York Post story. And I think the best explainability argument for this externally would be that we're waiting to

understand if this story is the result of hack materials. We'll face hard questions on this if we don't have some kind of solid reasoning for marking the link unsafe. And a lot of higher ups in Twitter were copied on that as well. And then we have the former VP of Global Communications, Brandon Borman, and he was on here as well. And this is, again, back to these internal communications. And he writes, to Ian's point, can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy, i.e. as part of our approach to addressing potentially hack materials, we're limiting

visibility of related stories on Twitter while our investigation is ongoing. So Matt Taibi goes on to say this. The problem with the hack materials ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official law enforcement finding of a hack, but such a finding never appears throughout one executive describes as a world-win 24-hour company-wide mess. And as a side note here, Matt Taibi calls it a subplot bringing Jack Dorsey just to show the disconnect of the levels within the Twitter censorship regime, if you want to call it for this story. He says this, an amazing subplot of the Twitter Hunter Biden laptop affair was how much was done without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey and how long it took for the situation to get blank as one ex-employee put it, even after Dorsey

jumped in. And so this is where the story brings it really up to speed here. We're waiting, You know, we were told after this email dump on the first installment, they were going to be consecutive installments of these Twitter files, but nothing has happened. So why hasn't that happened? Well, part of the story now, we have to go back to right before the New York Post story, about four months before that to really understand this. And at that time, Twitter brought on for a lead general counsel, their legal counsel, an FBI employee, not just any FBI employee.

Here is the picture of this man. lawyer James Baker. And the headline here, Twitter hires former FBI lawyer James Baker to join legal team. He was a pivotal in the Russia Gate story as well. And so this is where now this gets interesting because he's still working for Twitter as these Twitter files are being put out there. So Matt Taibi says this. On Friday, the first installment of the Twitter files was published here. We expected to publish more over the weekend. Many wondered why there was a delay. He goes on to say, we can now tell you part of the reason why on Tuesday, a Twitter deputy general counsel and former FBI journal counselor Jim Baker was fired.

Among the reasons, vetting the first batch of Twitter files without knowledge of new management. So it appears Baker intercepted the files and apparently tried to shape their release. And so now he has been let go. This is the headline showing that Elon Musk quickly let him leave the building, exit the building. Elon Musk fires Twitter lawyer Jim Baker, who was involved in censoring Hunter Biden laptop and Russian probe. And so that's where we're at right now. And a lot of the questions are, well, why don't you dump them all? This was kind of the balancing question.

In fact, former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey actually tweeted at Elon Musk. And he asked that, he asked the same thing. He said, if the goal is transparency to build trust, why not just release everything without filtering and let people judge for themselves, including all decisions around current future actions, make everything public? And Jack Dorsey actually, he said that he was in front of the House and Energy Commerce. committee in 2021 and he was asked about the new york times story and he said that was a total mistake to censor this story there was you know in-house issues new york post story new york post not yeah the new york post story i'm sorry yes the new york times story and so uh jack dorsey even admitted that was a mistake so now we have it's an interesting back and forth between musk and dorsey but

this is where we're at right now so we're kind of all eagerly awaiting the the future batches of these twitter files just to see what's going on here i can say our team's awaiting the covid twitter files because because the misinformation policy led to over 11,000 accounts to be canceled. So, you know, we've been hearing from Matt Taibi, you've been reading his post, but let's hear from Elon Musk himself on this conversation. Take a listen. It's trying to turn it into a nothing burger because they were complicit in deceiving the American public. And so rather than admit that they lie to the public, they're trying to pretend that this is a nothing burger, obviously.

To anyone looking at it, that's clearly what happened. We cannot gag the voice of the people. This is not good. I read a lot of history. I love history. And now we have this like rare moment in history where the voice of people is mostly not suppressed. But now there are people trying to suppress it. And we just need to fight really hard for freedom of speech.

This is, I think, essential to the future of civilization. There's this whole sort of move to crate at disinformation ministry, which was insane. and like George Orwell is turning in his grave. Wait, did you hear such things? George Orwell's 1984 supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual. Competition does keep companies honest or is a force for keeping companies honest. So if there's a competition for the truth and Twitter wins the competition for the truth, then it will win over the readership and the attention of the public.

And everyone else will be forced to tell the truth too. Wow, I mean, I can't help but sit here and just think, what a spectacular moment in time we are living in right now. I mean, whistleblowers, when I think about this COVID issue that we've been covering and the hearings we just had, and I keep asking myself, how do they think they're going to cover this up now? How do they think they're going to get away with this? The cat is out of the bag. The genie's out. You can't put them back in the lantern here. The truth is breaking out.

And in this case, these are all whistleblowers in many ways. I think Elon Musk, in the sense, is a whistleblower. He is dumping private files for a company that is massive and was directly working with the government to imagine who's going to start turning in who. Who's going to start singing like a bird as these names and information starts being revealed more and more. I don't know. It's again, these start out as small stories, but all of these stories we're looking at, they are growing. There's a serious. We should all be in. incredibly concerned, especially if you're watching the high wire, all that we usually cover, and we're branching out right now into another space, but it's always about free speech. What is our government up to? And how did they think they were ever going to get away with this? And one of the biggest stories that was actually discussed at the Ron Johnson hearing was something we've been covering on the highway for a while. And that's the excess population deaths after the vaccine, during the vaccine rollout and after the COVID vaccine rollout. And this has gained attention in the European Union by their parliamentary members.

This is also gained attention in the German media. This is something that a lot of people are asking questions about right now. But a sub-story to that just as important are the numbers, increasing numbers of miscarriages and infant deaths shortly after birth or at birth. And this is something now we're seeing in the media. It's being reported. We're seeing it in the statistics as well. This is just some of the headlines here, just to pad this story and really understand

and why we're investigating this, because this is an open investigation here, and we're going to bring the viewers along with it. So check out this headline from the BBC. This is out of Scotland. Baby death rate in Scotland at highest for a decade. And this is the Herald now, Scotland neonate death spike,

not linked to COVID in mothers or babies. And the next headline in that same newspaper, the investigation launched into abnormal spike in newborn baby deaths in Scotland. So they've launched an internal investigation the government has there. Now, bringing this over to the United States, We have open, we have the VAERS system, the vaccine adverse event reporting system.

We have open VERS, which kind of collates all that data and gives charts, gives raw numbers. And we have the charts here on miscarriages, reports of miscarriages and stillbirths by year. And you can see here, 2021, the vaccine rollout really gets going. You can see almost 3,500 reports. Now, anything close to that was maybe around 2008, 2009, maybe about 200, 250. And then you can see in 2022, same thing, 1,500. But now we're looking at the OpenVares miscarriages by day. So what days are these happening?

And day zero, obviously, you know, a miscarriage on day zero, but one, two and three. So this is after vaccination. Like they got vaccinated and they immediately have a mace carriage one day, one day after vaccination, two days after vaccination. And this is what we call a signal, right? I mean, if there's a slight rise, maybe you're just trying to make some temporal association. When you have this many reports coming in that are all happening that close to the vaccination, literally the day you were vaccinated, that's alarming.

Look how many reports we're talking about there. Right. And, you know, we're going to piece this together here and bring the audience with us. And so we have headlines. We have the media is beginning to cover this. We have the Open VERS reporting system, which is this voluntary reporting system. And then we have anecdotal stories and even admissions from hospitals as we've had a nurse whistleblower on just recently on our show say to really blow the whistle on this very subject. Take a listen.

Yeah. I'm a postpartum nurse. I've thought about quitting multiple times because of all the carnage that I've been seeing. In March of 2021, it was about two months after the vaccines really started to roll out. I noticed that in the NICU, a neonatal intensive care unit, it used to always have about, 50 babies in there and all of a sudden in March 2021 there were 80 babies in the NICU. So that's a very high number for the NICU. And then in April of 2021, I started noticing that there were fetal demises on the board in labor and delivery. A fetal demise is a baby that passed away in

utero, but they're usually full term. So, you know, anywhere from 32 weeks to 40 weeks even, I would look on their charts and I was noticing that a lot of these mothers had received the vaccine. What would be the average rate of, you know, stillborn field demise on your floor? When I started working there in November 2020, there used to be one or two every two or three months. Since March of 2021, there were one or two each week. We could just say, well, this is. just Michelle's opinion. Today, she has bravely released to us an internal document, an email from that hospital system that was sent out to those working there. This went out to the staff.

Good evening, everyone. Well, it seems as though the increase of demise patients that we are seeing is going to continue. There were 22 demises in August, which ties the record number of in July 2021. And so far in September, there have been seven, and it's only the eighth day of the month. I have to say I feel like the oxygen has just been sucked out of my lungs. To read that from someone that is as objective, I guess, as you could get, working for the system itself,

it now corroborates what you're seeing with your own eyes. And for anyone that was having a question, anywhere around the world now. This is a shocking, shocking email. I said to the team after, and that was breaking as we were hearing it. That was the first time I ever read that letter was right on camera. And I said to the team, that may be the biggest story we ever broke. I mean, that is gigantic.

So, yeah. Speechless on that. And so, you know, we're painting this picture, continuing to paint this picture. We keep seeing signals here. obviously that's a gigantic signal. Let's look at the data, the raw data from other countries now. So let's look at the UK first. So the UK has a COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report. Their most recently report, week 48, that's for December 22. It's by the UK government health security agency. And we took this data here and we crunched the numbers and we looked at this.

Now, this is the UK births and overall vaccine coverage in women giving birth by month of delivery. So you see in the blue that's vaccine uptake and you see in the orange that is the women giving birth, the birth rate, basically. And now you can see something interesting about that. As the vaccine uptake goes up, you see the birth rate start to go down. And the next slide shows if you really start to want to compare these, we have a statistically significant drop in births as the vaccine uptake increases. So that first black box on the top left, that's really low. to no to relatively low vaccine uptake. So that second black box on the far right, that is high vaccine uptake. And you can see the red line showing that there is a drop now. As that vaccine

uptake goes up, the birth rate goes down. And that is that that's in the UK. It's from the UK's own data. And it's, you know, another way to be clear, Jeffrey, as we're looking at graphs like this, we made this graph. This is an I can create a graph by our science team, using, the data that's found because if they go and we will provide that data in the links as we always do but if you're looking for this graph we created the graph based on the actual numbers that exist in in that in that document and correct and for the researchers out there and writers and journalists if you sign up for our newsletter you will get this information every Monday we give the links all these charts will be in there and so and you can go there right there to the

website at the bottom please put your email in and challenge us I mean this is all about transparency. If you think somehow, oh, you're cherry picking or you got it wrong, it's exactly what we want to have happen. I want you to look at that data. If you see that our graphs are ever off or somehow misrepresented, contact us immediately. So far to date, we have world, scientists all around the world are now writing in that they're watching our show because we do get so specific on this. But as always, it hasn't happened yet. But if we have sort of misrepresented with a graph, we will let you know. I want everyone out there to know. that transparency is the most important part of science.

And obviously, getting it right and not fast, but right is the most important part of what we do here at the Highwire. I just wanted to clarify that, because we show a lot of graphs, and sometimes they come from the documents, that is ours, okay? Absolutely. And so another way of looking at that UK data, we take a regression line.

The regression line is another way to look at that and see if this data fits. So you see just these random dots. These are all the data points from the data, And you can see a line there is drawn. So at the bottom, you have the percentages. So as the percentage vaccine uptake increases, you see this line goes down. So all the statisticians out there, you're going to see that P value is statistically significant

at 0.01. And then R squared is also showing that there's a correlation here. So that's also what we're seeing in the German data. So if you go to the German data, they're actually looking from 2015 to 2022. These are the monthly live births in Germany. And you can see here in the red 2020, you see a significant drop in that year. This is the most recent German data as well. And another way to look at that here, we broke that down in a little different way.

We took the average births from January to March 2018 to 2021. And we looked at the births from January to March of 2022. And you can see here, there's, you know, we're missing about almost, it looks like 10,000, almost 10,000 births there as far as an average. in Germany. Switzerland, same kind of trend we're seeing here. So in the Swiss chart, you're seeing in the red there. That's 2022. That is the monthly live birth in Switzerland.

And you're going to see that drop there. Those lines on the left are the vaccination uptake. And you can see it almost correlates once that vaccination uptake gets around 70, 75%. You're seeing a drop in those monthly live births in Switzerland. So we're painting this huge picture here. It's amazing. I just want to put this out there because I know we're going to get into the sort of a thought on what may be causing this, but let's be honest here.

We should be seeing a baby boom. We just had an international, in some cases, two-year blackout, lockout, locked in your house. I mean, I'm sorry, let's not get graphic here, but when you're stuck in your house with nothing to do, the usual outcome is a baby boom. So to be, I mean, even if it was flatline, we should be concerned, even if it was just like last year, we should be like, you know, under the circumstances, that's a little. shocking to see a drop after the circumstances we've all come through. Honestly, folks, getting outside of science, that seems a little odd, does it not? Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. And so,

you know, we have these anecdotal stories. We have hospitals talking about it. We have statistics that are pointing in one direction here and even headlines, investigations within government. So we're starting to look at the science. Are there mechanisms? Are there possible ideas of how this might happen? Because we're not hearing much of that yet. And so we're seeing, again, open investigation here, we see a study and anybody wants to look this up or follow along. This is the name of the study here. It's called skewed fate and a hematopoices of CD34 plus HSPCs in umbilical cord blood amid the COVID-19 pandemic. So HSPC, it's hematopoetic stem progenitor cells. So the researchers gather these progenitor cells from the umbilical cord of donors.

And so to understand what these progenitor stem cells are, we have kind of like a little bit of flow chart here. And these are what they sound like, progenitor cells. These are the first cells, the ancestor cells, the beginning of from which all other cells are derived from. So right at the top there, you see the hematopoetic stem cells. And from there, we have branches off into the two myloid and lymphoid cells. And from there, you get your immune cells, your natural killer cells, your B cells, your T cells, your mass cells, macrophages, plasma, and even erythrocytes, the red blood cells. So keep that in mind. But understand that is in the umbilical cord. So what these researchers did is they took these cells from the from the umbilical cords of donors and they just

I just feel like I have to interject right now because I know we have brand new audience every day. Yes, we get very scientific here. Hold on. You're not going to be quizzed on all these things. You will actually come out. Even if though we're all lay people at different levels, just hold on. Jeffrey will take us through this and get down to the simple nuts and so you don't have to memorize every term there. But very interesting. So basically the creation cells that create all other cells are these whole, I'm not even trying to say,

the hematopoices. There we go. I got it out once. Go ahead. Okay, so we have these stem cells, these HSPCs, just think stem cells, the beginning cells. So the researchers write this. In general, HSPCs are considered as one of the first responders

to infection as well as vaccination, which include, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokine. So those are the immune system kind of helpers that go out and get this virus and signal it. So it goes on to say the researchers write, the immune responses in cytokine profiles and pregnant women who were infected by SARS-CoV-2 and or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 indicate a concern in the maintenance and proper function and phenotypes of HSPCs in the UCB, as ambilical cord, as well as hematopoices in the fetus and neonate. So they're saying It's a concern in hematopoises, which is blood cell production in the fetus and neonate.

And so we're going to look at some charts really quick, but there's this number, CD34 plus. So when you see CD34 plus, just think stem cell, because those are the signaling molecules that the researchers use to identify where these stem cells are and what they were doing. That's kind of just the measuring stick they use, so to speak. So let's look at this first chart here. This first chart shows the percent CD3-4-plus frequency, so stem cell frequency, and you have a negative control on the left side.

So that means people that had no evidence of infection, they didn't have an antigen for the spike protein, they didn't have any record of vaccination, nothing. So this is, if you will, what a normal person should have. So now we see the non-vaccinated person there on the bottom versus the vaccinated, and the percentage of these stem cell frequencies. So you see the non-vaccinated person who has, you know, evidence of being infected, you see a drop. There is a drop. It's not substantial, but there's a drop. And then when you see the vaccinated person, you do see a larger drop.

And if you go across to the second chart on the right, just the cell count, you see a dramatic drop. And that caused the researchers to say this. They called the word striking. Striking changes were observed in the CD34 plus cell fraction. The total numbers of CD34 plus cells drastically reduce fourfold in the vaccinated donor group in which this change was correlated with the induction of apoptosis in CD3-4 plus cells apoptosis is cell death so the researchers saying you know we waited we stuck around we were hoping that they would go back to baseline maybe it just dropped for a little while no no the cells died apoptosis so they're not coming back so you have these stem cell progenitor cells that are providing red blood cells oxygen the babies we're losing those they're not coming back

after vaccination. And so let's look at this next chart just to show the decline a little more with these researchers found. So this gives you a little better idea. So that that dotted line at the top of both these charts is, again, the normal baseline. That's like the negative control. That's where you should be. Yes, that's where you should be. And so the researchers said, okay, we know about infection and really we see a signal on vaccination. So let's just look at vaccination. So let's look at how many days after their second vaccination, what happens after the second vaccination to these stem cells? these CD34 plus stem cell molecules. And you can see here, as the days progress after vaccination, these numbers drop.

They're dropping significantly in percentage and frequency quite a bit. And so you're seeing that, you know, that's a plot, the researcher plot of these percentages. Down to really zero at 300 days out. Literally the cells that create all the other cells in many ways are disappearing after vaccination over time. Right, right. And so you're seeing the percentage frequencies versus days after vaccination. And the researchers write this. Both parameters, both of those parameters that were researched, were inversely correlated with the term following the vaccination, though there was no significant difference in significance difference by the positivity for IGGs against SARS-CoV-2 S&N proteins, indicating that these impacts on CD3-4 plus cells were largely caused by the vaccination in which the trends continued without recovering to baseline over the. the entire gestation period. Wow. So, let's pause right there for a second.

The researchers, the researchers said that increasing cytokine activity, the inflammation, these cells, these stem cells are the first responders and they release inflammatory cytokines for infection or vaccination. So looking back in the research in 2013, there's more research to inform this decision, to inform this data. And this is the study right here. It's called regulation of hematopoeic stem. cell activity by inflammation and it says in here chronic inflammatory cytokine signaling you know the

stuff that you get when you get vaccinated or infected can lead to hSC that's a hematopoetic stem cell exhaustion and may contribute to the development of hematopoetic malignancies so there's evidence there you know think about this you get the first shot second stop booster third fourth fifth boosters you're getting this pro-inflammatory immune response cytokine response and so there's there's showing that this is affecting these stem cells. And so let's bring this back and finish it. How does this affect the child? Does this affect the child? Well, do these stem cells, what do they do in a children and a developing child in the womb? And let's go to MedPage. This is what they have to say about it. This is kind of the basic science. They say hematopoises in the embryo produces

only red blood cells that can provide developing organs with oxygen at this stage in development, the yolk, which nourishes the embryo until a percent is fully developed controls hematopoises. The embryo continues to develop, the hematopoices process moves to the liver, the spleen, and bone marrow and begins producing other types of blood cells. And that's where you get your development of literally your immune system at the cellular level. So this is what we're talking about here. These are tracks that we're laying down for researchers who want to look at this that are vitally important. And if this clue, you know, God forbid if this clue is true, and this is what we're researching

here, it's an open investigation. and we welcome anybody in the science community or the medical community or journalists to jump on board and help us with us. Yeah, just to be perfectly clear, a lot of this seems, you know, incredibly damning. You see the German numbers, all of those, look, this is anecdotal evidence that we're showing you. We are just journalists investigating what we're seeing and following the studies that are being done as a part of an open investigation. We are not saying that we can prove unequivocally that the vaccine is, you know, causing miscarriages. This story is growing and as it grows, we feel our job here at the high wire

is to try and track what would be the plausibility. Is there any action that can be described? And so our international science team works with Jeffrey, goes out there and this set of studies came to our attention just last week, that's what we're sharing with you is literally the investigation we find ourselves in the middle in.

Jeffrey really, I mean, obviously deep science stuff. I love that you're in there figuring this all out. but it's alarming, important, and just so glad you are on our team. So keep up the great work, really great stuff. All right, great to be standing next to everyone on that team and yourself too, D.L. Thanks. All right, I'll see you next week. You know, what we're just talking about is a lot of what the conversation was at the event in Washington, D.C. We have a spike protein that is toxic.

For some reason, they took the most toxic part of the virus and decided to make a vaccine. a vaccine out of that, meaning instead of taking the mild part of it and then hoping that it would kill the whole virus if your body fought the mild part, they took the most dangerous, deadly blood clot causing, you know, thrombocytopanic-causing, you know, elements of this virus, and then brag that they are making our bodies make more of it through injection than we would normally come in contact with through being infected. And then the questions that then arise is that the actual spike protein. That's the problem. In this conversation, about these sort of creator cells in the umbilical cord,

or is the inflammation that's caused by spike protein and other elements that could be, you know, exacerbating these situations to get into sort of all of that. And by the way, this is all about science. It's a huge conversation going on right now. There's documentaries out there that have been discussing this sudden adult death syndrome and the discussion of corners and things out there.

I have no desire. I'm glad there are multiple groups and multiple organizations that are doing investigations, but many of you have asked, where's the high wire ad on this? And we've been working for several months, actually, on trying to get to the bottom of this. And that is what I'm about to involve you in.

And some of this is brand new information that's just coming into me today because of this. But what drove this is there are several headlines that we've been reporting on through the last couple of years and tweets and things that I know we're all discussing. This is just what some of those look like. Here's how graphene oxide in all of COVID vaccines is slowly killing the vaccinated.

That's one article that was in Nutra True. Scientists worldwide claim all COVID-19 vaccines contain nanotechnology and graphene oxide. That was in the exquisite. Here's one of the parasites. There it is, found in the ModernaVax analyzed under microscopy, observed it lift itself off the glass and moved on its own. are all shocking statements. Some of these, you know, we've addressed here and others we haven't. Part of it is I really don't like addressing something that I don't know where the information's

coming from. If you're watched our show long enough, I do not trust experts just because they tell me they're an expert. I want to see the science. I want to see the evidence. I want to see how it's done. I don't trust Tony Fauci just because he's Tony Fauci, you know, and in some ways, that's worked really well for me in predicting where we now.

find ourselves at over these last couple of years. But when it came to these conversations and many of you come up to me and talk about it, I will be honest with you. I am struggling with these headlines. I'm struggling. We've even had people come on and discuss grapene oxide a little bit and talk about these amoebas or aliens or whatever, you know. But I got to the point where I was like, I'm sorry. I love everybody out there, but I'm going to have to see this with my own eyes. And so I reached out to Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist who has proved to me that he's impeccable in the work that he does unbiased. And I said, would you do me a favor? Can we get a hold of these vaccines?

And I want to come into the laboratory. I don't want you doing it. I want to be standing there. I want to see it with my own eyes. Can we bring some cameras in and really do a real investigation? Because I want to know what the truth is. So what we are about to do is break what we found in this investigation inside of Dr. Ryan Cole's laboratory. Let's get started, shall we?

Today I'm at Cole Diagnostics. This is Dr. Ryan Cole's Laboratory. Of course, we've had him on speaking as a pathologist on many of the issues around the COVID vaccine. I want to see it with my own eyes, and Dr. Ryan Cole is going to give me that opportunity. So let's go in and see what this lab's all about. Right, Dr. Ryan Cole, brother. Good for you, man. Great to having a night at home, my friend. Oh, it's good to be here.

Welcome to Cole Diagnostics. Welcome to the lab. Let's do a quick tour and do some science. All right, sounds good. See what you've got to go on. All righty. So this is where the magic begins. This is where all the specimens roll in. Blood, microbiology, molecular biology, biopsies, you name it, we do it. Early on in COVID, the hospitals were lagging and struggling. As you remember, the big labs early on is where everything was going. but it was taking too long.

So we started early and tried to ramp up for helping the community. This is kind of the sports car of amplifiers in terms of being able to take a lot of patients and throughput continuously as well. Over here is kind of the heart of the lab. Here on the architect, we do all the different chemistries and thyroid panels and you name it, that machine. pretty much is the workhorse.

On this side we do the tissue processing and here at the microtome and this water bath they cut the slides into thin 4,000th-7-inch sections and that's what comes to my desk each day is the biopsy slides. You are a pathologist for decades now, how many years? 26 years. Have you seen anything that resembles these types of clouds before? No. Never.

From around the country, from coroners and embalmers, I have received some samples and specimens from, unfortunately, the patients that have not made it. Now, me personally, I've done about 550 autopsies. And when you do an autopsy, yeah, the blood congeals, but it tends to be red and jelly-like and soft, almost like jello. But these have been coming out of individuals' bodies at the time of embalming. blocking large stretches of vessels in the arm or the leg or in the lungs, or I have some coming from a surgeon in another state who has been removing these huge rubbery crotted plaques.

And so the normal composition of a clot should be fibrin, platelets, some trapped white blood cells and whatnot. These are firm in rubbery. You know, patients do form deep-bane clots. But the consistency of those clots is different than this. They're not white like this. They're not firm in rubbery. You know, if we pull these out and put gloves on and squish them, they bounce back. And obviously coroners do this all the time.

They do. They're sending this out because something's bothering them. Something's bothering them. So this is what I would normal see at autopsy. You know, some red cells, some trapped white blood cells within the metal. Yeah, that's a normal post-mortem clot. there a little bit of kind of that magenta in the background that would be fibrin strands but what you don't see is just thick thick thick casts of all

fibrin it should be mixed elements see kind of that greenish greenish-glow so that's true beta pleated amyloid so that's a special type of a protein congealing but if I go and I look at the clots themselves haven't had that same glow to them. And I've looked at about 20 of them with this Congo red stain. My next step is spike protein stains on all of these to see is there spike protein deposited in those protein sheets. But like this entire, you know, this is one of those spaghetti strands and it's just one long line, one long line of protein.

congealed together. That was one giant clot that came out of a vaccinated woman and it came out in the shape of the inside of the uterus. And I've talked to obese left and right that are seeing this. Sad thing is it just takes that much of a blockage in a medium-sized vessel to now you can't get red blood cells pass that, you can't get oxygen past that, you had a heart attack, you get a stroke, you get infarct your lung, you infarct another organ, you you can't, you You can't perfuse around this. Is that just, is that thick? Is it that wide?

That's wide, yeah. This type of clot. It's different in consistency, color, size. It's just a completely different consistency. And have I seen clots? 500,000 patients later? You bet I've seen clots. Clots like this, no.

And talking to other colleagues, other pathologists, hey, have you seen these? No. Coroners, no. This isn't normal. folks. There's nothing normal about this. In some ways, it's nothing short of a horror movie, but to get to the bottom of how this story is being written, what's really going on here. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined by Dr. Ryan Cole.

Del, good to see you. I just want to thank you. We have worked hard to get you here for this. You are a very busy man. I mean, not only do you do this incredible work you're doing, you are flying all over the world trying to spread the truth, you know, as I am. We are trying to wake up every single soul in this planet that we can. We're in a crisis. We are. It seems. And you were at the event, let's just for a moment reflect on that event. That event was phenomenal and I talked to a lot of people around the world and they congratulated Senator Johnson for his seeking of truth and allowing, you know, all doctors

agree when you censor the ones who don't. So to have those who are such brilliant minds and scientists together in one room, it was such an honor. And it was such a feeling of this is truth coming forward in a way it should. And this is the dialogue all of society should have been able to have all along. It was an amazing experience. We're here, we spent some time in your laboratory.

Let's sort of begin with these clots. And I'm gonna be clear right now, I think we get sometimes a sensationalization around these conversations. And we are in a sensational time. And we looked at all the things we just talked about, you know, in our sort of hot headlines section. But I don't want to be a sensational about this.

I really want to get down to what we can and cannot prove what is and is. And it's what we said yesterday, actually. Behind the scenes, when I was sitting with all of the doctors and scientists that were going to speak, I said, we're all at different levels of what's going on here. What this event needs to be is simply what we can prove. I don't want to hear that we believe it's a bio weapon,

or that we believe that people are being killed on purpose or any of that. That's speculation. Doesn't matter how much it looks like it adds up. This is science. This is science right now And though behind closed doors we can have theories and discuss them when it comes to going to the public The public should only be really aware of what the scientists can prove and that's what we're focused on me. Right and in science what we know is the tip of the iceberg even what we're discovering now It's still the tip and there's so much more to learn right and it's that willingness to look for it But it's also the ability and

or the permission to do so. Now, good science, usually all the great discoveries are accidental, but when you suppress the ability of scientists to look, you'll never find. Right. And to put out information, and what's really, I think, damaging right now, the scientific method is gone up in flames. But even these papers, where we're seeing retractions all the time, that just, it goes against what science is supposed to be.

If people have issues with something printed, those papers used to have that. argument. If you have something against this paper, please state it, write it out. And then someone else would weigh in. And this is how science, and in the end sometimes is like, you know what, you were wrong. And it would sit there standing the test of time saying, yeah, I was wrong and I got to look like an idiot for the rest of my career because that doesn't get taken down. Enough scientists beat on my hypothesis or my discovery that it didn't hold up. This idea that before it even gets to the debate is being taken down. Right. It's really, really, it's the end of

of science and we continue to allow this to happen. And you bring up a great point because real science should always involve humility and the willingness to say it's not about my ego, it's about an issue and we're trying to get to the best scientific truth we can with the methods we have now. And obviously science advances, but it is super frustrating to have very good science in the literature being pulled for no good reason. One of these, so let's get into these blood clots for a moment and it's these post-mortem blood class and we've seen these around have people been you know watching it sort of all

over the internet but what someone said to me yesterday at that was at the panel won't say who but they said a relative passed away and the coroner or somebody said to them well I know they weren't vaccinated and how did you know that like because they were easy to embalmed they didn't have any blocked arteries now that's a pretty outrageous statement I'm not going to put that on the on the balm as people that you're working with but what is happening and the the reason these clots have come to attention is it's these embalmers that are trying to just fill the, you know, the blood vessels

with all the fluid to embalm and is not going through, right? It's getting blocked and stuck. And like what's in there and they're pulling these things out of veins and arteries all over their body. Is that essentially what's going on? And what's interesting, you'll hear coroner say,

well, we're not seeing this. Well, when we do an autopsy, the coroner, the pathologist, we're usually doing a brain examiner, brain exam, a chest cavity exam, but they don't usually do the periphery. So they're not generally dissecting out those veins and arteries that the embalmers use. So why aren't they seeing a percent? Well, we are seeing them under the microscope.

They're just not maybe seeing the giant ones that the embalmers are. And it is unusual. And when did it begin to happen? Well, after the rollout of an experimental injection. And you can tell, at autopsy, we do see clots, but they're post-mortem clots, and they're jelly-like, they're not firm like these ones. And we'll kind of go into, I think. Well, let's give in the slides.

You have a bunch of slides days through. So first, I think we start with this idea of spike protein in the cells. Right. And to be honest, I mean, at the beginning of the day, COVID was clotting disease. COVID itself, the spike protein from COVID caused clotting. Right. And but that spike protein, this injection we used, that gene sequence makes your body make that spike protein.

Well, we know from countless studies we'll get to that the spike protein is excellent at inducing an unusual pathway of clotting. So we'll kind of get to this real quick. So to be clear, the virus itself can clot, but as you said yesterday, and many sort of backed up, they brag that the body's creating more spike protein through injection for a long period of time. For a long period of time.

And there's also been a manipulating, of this spike protein. We've gotten some of that science here, but to make it last longer than it wouldn't actually on its own. And now we don't know how long it lasts. You know, biopersistence and all of these things came up. Those very concerning things. Yeah, how long does it last?

And what is the persistence of a sequence in your body making a toxic protein going to do over time? So I guess we'll dive into the pictures and show some of those. Take me through this. Okay, dokey. So this is, you know, the vaccine, little lipid nanoparticle, has a gene sequence, goes into your cell, your cell expresses protein,

and then your body makes an antibody to that cell. And then in the laboratory, now a cell that may have that spike protein in it or on its surface, we'll make a little tag antibody that will bind to it, and then we make it glow with different chromagens. And so here- So you get kind of a dye that when it sees spike protein,

it lights up, it binds, and then it lights up, exactly. So that's how we can tell it's there. Present or not present. We can do this with thousands of different proteins in the human body. Okay, great. Okay, so here we go. You know, you were told this is an overlay of a needle

going into a muscle and you see that little circle is a venial. And you're told the needle goes in your arm, the shot stays in your arm, good to go, right? Right. However, there's tears in all these little microvessels and we know good technique wasn't used, aspiration of the plunger wasn't done. So now this lipid nanoparticle doesn't just go where it's injected,

it goes into a press. pressurized blood system. And here's deltoid muscle, there's that dye, you see all those dots. So we look at the brown spots? The brown is what the spike protein is. Yeah, those are all our muscle cells with spike protein in it. That should be there if their technology is doing what they said it was going to do. Right, that's what you want it.

Yeah. Right. Okay. However, we'll go forward here. Well, here's peri appendicitis, inflammation of the appendix. Let's look at the next slide. See all those little brown dots. I'll be darned. That spike protein in the appendix.

Well, how did that get there? Right. lipid goes everywhere and then that S1 fragment of this bike and the spike itself can circulate for a long time. Let's pull out from this slide just to get this clear. You have this sort of lipid nanoparticle that was really designed. And you said this and just to be clear, it was designed to cross the blood brain barriers so they could deliver chemotherapy to people that had brain cancer. So this product was made to get outside of the system it's injected to and get to the hardest place to get to the hardest places. the brain that's usually protected from outside elements.

And so when they wrapped this spike protein or this, you know, this MRI technology in this lipid nanoparticle and told you it's going to stay in the arm, that defies all reason because the product itself was made to do exactly the opposite of that, which is not stay in the arm, to get everywhere throughout your body, including your brain. We have 20 years of papers in the literature looking at this delivery device. They knew what it was going to do and where it could go. Wow. Okay. Let's get back to the slides. All right.

So here, another patient, spike protein and the bronchials. So this is again, just over and over I'm going to show you. Spike protein, dot, spike protein, again, bronchial. And just this is a foreign body reaction to some of the inflammation and the cholesterol that breaks off walls. We'll skip to the next one. Okay. Skip that one please. Let's skip that one.

Okay, this is the brain. Okay. And that is, all that blue dot is basically the brain being gobbled up to mush. That's inflammation just destroying the tissues of the brain. So everywhere there's those little dark dots. That's an inflammatory cell. That's a white blood cell. Reacting to something, well, what's it reacting to?

Let's jump forward. That's what it's reacting to. That is spike protein deposited in the tissues of the brain. Despite protein belong in the brain. So this, I'm assuming if we're looking at this, this is a person that has not survived. Is it a brain tissue? Yes, these are sadly, and this is honoring the dead and letting them speak from the experience they had, and they're speaking from the other side saying to us, do the science and honor what we, you know, went through.

I mean, and this is really honoring others. There's a blood vessel and all those brown dots. That's the blood vessels inside the brain, but you can see the brown dots outside the blood vessel. Yeah. And again, like you mentioned, blood-brain barrier, sacred in the human body. body and these are going across that barrier and some of those lipid nanoparticles are going into the supportive cells the oligodendocytes replicating in your own cells inducing other inflammatory cells to come in who's heard of brain fog after an injection or even after COVID that spike protein will

induce all that inflammation and now those neural pathways aren't firing at their normal rates right so that spike protein goes everywhere that lipid nanoparticle goes everywhere and then it induces so much inflammation in the body to the degree that it can cause these sudden deaths and I know we'll get into the clots in a second here too yeah let's do it just keep it rolling keep it rolling here let's see what do we have next okay this is the lining of a blood vessel okay and that whole rim of brown is all spike protein so if nothing else it causes inflammation of the blood vessels potentially throughout the entire body now once you have that inflammation on the lining of the vessels now it starts to trigger stickiness and cells be it your

platelets, your red cells, your white cells. Next one, please. Same, next. This is in the lungs. And see those big tubes, those long, snaky things. Those are the clots that we're talking about. And all that brown dot within that, that brown dotting is spike protein in the middle of these clots.

Now these are medium-sized vessels in the lungs, but you have a clot in your leg that gets thrown up to your lungs, and now it fragments and plugs your lungs. plugs your lungs vessels, now you can't breathe. Wow. So that's spike protein, there's a close-up showing that brown dotting within that clotting material, and again that spike protein

will induce this. And we'll go on to the next one, next one, just slide after slide after slide, you can see what this is doing. Yeah. Okay. And then, so now let's get into the actual clots themselves. What was that, did we just see them? I forget, is there more? I think we cut some spots.

We cut some out. The clots, we have some overall gross picture. That was all microscopy under the microscope, but I think we do have some of the big, you know, there we go. So this is a patient, she's still alive. Okay. And this is interesting. A colleague in Germany sent me this. And she got three shots and would get pain in her fingers and toes.

It's called Renault's phenomenon whenever the temp would drop below 72 Fahrenheit. And they drew her blood and setting it on the desk, fibral started forming. And they spun it down and then this big glob formed. And so this was analyzed and it's unusual proteins. And this is what the spike protein is doing. It's inducing clotting pathways that can bypass normal ones. Here you see on the left, this is also taken from a living patient, thankfully. So when the critique comes that says, well, you know, these are post-mortem clots and it's

It's only happening after death. No, this is happening in living patients. Well, I'm thinking, I mean, I think about this, and again, as anecdotal, I don't even know, but like Al Roker, we're seeing these news headlines of people going in and having clots taken out all over their body. I'm not saying he got the vaccine. I don't know. But under the current climate, it makes you ask this question as we're looking, is this just being caught ahead of time versus it hasn't killed someone yet? Hopefully they're able to stop it.

But there's a lot of stories like that. What is this clot made of? I mean, so it's fiber. I mean, you said usually there's more blood involved, but it's white like this. They're pulling it out of veins. It's the exact same shape as the vein, as though I took caulk and filled the vein.

It's filling it in and then just stays in that shape. Right, and that's what they look like. And so here you see some of these thick, elastic clots, and they do have normal blood elements. And what's unusual is this one on the right, because that's from an artery. That is a long artery clot, not a vein clot, an artery clot. So they will have red blood cells and white blood cells and fiber entrapped in them.

But additionally, there's this proteinaceous material and some sugars too. And there's some studies that suggest the higher your blood sugar, the worse you do, it makes your blood stickier. Our blood cells have glycoproteins on them. So your blood group, O, A, B, whatever it is, it's a different sugar on the surface of your cells. And so because of different blood types, you may, and your blood sugar chronically over time, you may have a higher propensity to form some of these clots. But it's this protein material.

It's this thick, really dense, folded protein that's hard to break down. Now, you can break down a normal clot. There's anti-clotting medicines that have been used for many years and new ones that have come out. And there's some supplements that work as well for breaking down clots. But this type of material, it's an amyloid-like material. material and Dr. Pretoria out of South Africa and I've communicated with her a couple of times and she's fantastic and she's done a lot of the really forward thinking focused on just this area and she's proven the makeup of these and she's found these in post-COVID patients post-long-haul patients post-vaccine patients and

she's characterized it in the medical literature very well and we're continuing to study the mechanisms as to why and she has these great little microtub studies where she watches them form. And you can take platelets out. Here's one of Dr. Pretorius's paper. You can, and so, you know, the platelets are the microscopic band-aids in your bloodstream, and they'll form these little patches so you don't leak your blood out. And so she took these studies and took platelets out and put that spike protein in, and the protein still glommed together, even in the absence of platelets.

So we would assume the platelets are what are binding. She removed platelets from the blood, still put the spike in there and found the protein. that it's able to build proteins, well, is it almost like upon itself? Yeah, it's like an erector set or Legos and just keep sticking one to the next, to the next, to the next, but it's a pretty strong protein bond, and it's just tough to break these apart.

And so the body's normal mechanisms for breaking things apart doesn't appear to be able to do this, and we've known this for a long time in medicine. Amyloid is a very concerning condition in medicine, and there's other medical conditions that can cause amyloid deposition, You know, different tumors and lesions will cause certain abnormal proteins to build up. There are specific ones that will cause an amyloid-like protein to form, but this is rare.

It's not common. And so these clots, and to see them at this rate, especially after a certain program rolled out with an experimental gene and a lipid nanoparticle, et cetera, all of a sudden we're seeing something we haven't seen before. That's scientifically very concerning and should be looked into even more. Like I said, we know the tip of the iceberg. we're still working on more mechanisms and understanding more the makeup of these things. Are you under any impression, because I know you're in the middle of this, that the FDA, the

NIA, clearly this is a problem being seen around the world. Independent scientists around the world are looking into it. Are our regulatory agencies that have sort of supported this vaccine? Are we aware of any studies going on right now looking at this really alarming problem? Crickets. No, crickets. Where's the funding? As many billions as we have spent to different companies, and agencies to advertise, get a shot, get a shot, those same billions should be going into the research. And you're right, I've been overseas quite a few times this year, talk to colleagues, they're seeing it, morticians overseas,

they're seeing it. So it's not just here and just a couple of labs, and a lot of morticians have been seeing it, but they want their job, and so they're staying quiet, but they're sharing material and information. All right, well, you know, as promised, part of, you know, you know, behind all of this, we do know that COVID, the virus itself, and the spike protein are capable of these things. But what's actually in the vaccines? Dr. Ryan Cole was able to secure

Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines so that we could take a look at them. Let's take a look of what we found. We're going to go to the microbiology lab, and we have a clean, heapiltered hood in there that's sterile, and we'll pop the vaccine vials under that hood, go ahead and put some of the contents on the slides, cover slip them, and then you and I can look at them under the microscope. All right, so we're going to set these aside and let them thaw. And we will go grab the J&J. I have those in my office.

Because those are kept at room temp. Great. So this is Johnson and Johnson. Yep. Right now we're on to do about 2000 X magnification. See, there's our little Wigglers. I mean, that's just typical. That's just fluid flowing.

There's an electrostatic charge when you get down to particles that small. What about this hairy-looking thing there? That's a really good question. When you ramp something up this fast, you know, how much debris do you get in the manufacturing process? And that's a good question. Is it, you know, gasket debris? See, that looks like a glass shard to me.

Yeah. So, like, I get what we're looking at, like, at a microscopic level, but I don't want shards of glass moving through my bloodstream in my heart and everything else. How pure are these? There's no guarantee. And I know from Japan rejecting millions of Moderna vials in pure. These are ramped up at warp speed.

We know it usually takes many years to get a drug product safely to market with pure manufacturing. We look earlier last year in 21, the European Medicines Agency, you know, they were getting vials that were only 50, 55% pure. So you're getting fragmented RNA instead of the full sequence to make whatever it's supposed to be making. Do you want a pure product in your body or not? So you saw we did that under a laminar flow hood, hepafiltered, so a very clean environment. But even by the time that I brought those slides to here, you saw there was some dust particles on the cover slip. So when one's doing microscopy of certain types, that's why you have to be very careful and then know what you're looking at without jumping you know to

conclusions that may be you know off the beaten track and that is that like one of the you know adenavirus that probably contains thousands of particles of adenovirus just in that one little well maybe hundreds maybe hundreds just in that one little floating particle going by you know that's that's the carrier per J&J's application of the FDA there's trace human protein trace human DNA. And now those proteins, that would be aborted? Fetal cells fragments, yeah.

And if I put my protein in you, you're going to have an amyelologic reaction because proteins from different people are immunogenic and other people. And that's why when you go to the blood bank, they're trying to match it as perfectly as possible your blood to someone else's blood because blood cells even have tons of different proteins on their surface, red blood cells. So you have to match protein group to protein. knowingly trace proteins that can be immunogenic, cause an immunologic reaction. It's like if you get Moderna here.

Interesting some of those particles are a little more elongated. Those should be the lipids containing thousands upon thousands of particles of mRNA sequence, but I don't know what those rod forms are. And that looks more like a debris-like particle to me. And again, it's not mineral. Yeah, they're clumping around a piece that's on there. And again, if I go up and down, it looks like we may be looking at it on edge, like it's more of a sheet instead of a rod.

And again, so that goes to the question of what other carrier agents are in here besides lipid. We sent some of these off-floor analysis, and it'll be interesting to see. So here we have Pfizer. This is, we did two vials. This is the first lot. It's interesting, these look even a little tinier than the Derno did by a little bit. Now this is interesting right here. Just like we saw with the other, some of them are more elongated, a bunch of particles sticking to another particle in there. Not quite as rod-like as the other that we were saying, oh, there's one. Yeah, that one, yeah.

And again, there's another one floating by up there, kind of in a sheet. You saw it in the Moderna. We're seeing it now in the Pfizer's these sort of rods or sheets. You know, is it a chemical of some sort of bonding together? You and I, well, I brought it up. I said, I wonder if that could be a graphene sheet because they're two-dimensional sheets, a graphene oxide sheet. Sort of like the images that I've been seeing.

So I'm really looking forward to the mass spectrometry. Yeah. Seeing what that looks like. Wow, I mean, it was, what I think just very, very, generally speaking, as we looked at all the different vaccines, though I think one of the conclusions that we came away with is, it's just a hodgepodge. I mean, there were vaccines that seemed like they had no particles or anything,

almost nothing there was almost like a saline shot. And sometimes we even had multiple, I think we had a couple of different fizers, and then the other one would be just packed with all sorts of things. And you just get this sense that the manufacturing of this is totally and completely inconsistent. I agree 100% with that. And you and I looked at it together. Some were more concentrated, some were less. And that goes to the point, where are these being made?

Is the FDA inspecting each facility? No. And these are being made around the world. And they were ramped up so quickly. And it is not good manufacturing process, especially something this quickly. And this is, as was spoken about in the hearing yesterday, this is a very unique brand new process.

which they're using at a mass scale. So the inconsistency was probably a good thing for a lot of people in the sense that they may have done just fine. For those that are now watching the high wire and you're out there and you're thinking to yourself, you know, this is a scary show. I want to say this. There's a potential that you didn't get anything at all. I really think that, I mean, I think that potential is out there. I don't know if it's on purpose.

I don't know if they purposely put out saline objects. But what we could see is it's just some of it's probably settled to the bottom. Who got it first? How long? Was it thawed correctly? Is it totally destroyed because they thawed it way too early? All of that is in play here. So if you're healthy right now and you've made it through this,

I think the message from yesterday's show is, just don't do any more. Right, right. We're not here to judge. If you've got one, don't get two, don't get two, don't get three, don't get four. Yeah, just stop. If you've gotten four, you're still doing fine, you're a superman, and we'd like to analyze you called Dr. Ryan Bowler. Yeah, we'll figure it out because that's, yeah.

And genetically, I mean, who's more predisposed to harm? Do people have predisposing clotting conditions that shouldn't be getting the shot? Well, nobody should get the shot now because it's to an expired protein. But either way, yes, they're inconsistent lot to lot. And I shared this information with some colleagues and I have some very esteemed colleagues overseas that went ahead and they are university level professors had access to over 100 vials from three different manufacturers, different lots. and they went ahead and because, you know, we can look at it and suppose it's this or that.

And they're, you know, bless their hearts, there are a lot of colleagues and scientists that take their medical school microscope and they're trying to, you know, they're curious and then they add to the literature, oh gosh, you know, the graphene this or nanobot that or scary parasites like this. And so there's so many conjectures out there.

And to be clear... And I admire that they have the curiosity, don't get me wrong. Right, but to be clear, we were not able to answer all the, the questions looking through a microscope. One of them being we were seeing this thing that we were calling a rod. It was interesting and it's hard to see. It's hard to capture on the video cameras. But you would see like a rod and then you would move it and then it would sort of turn on and all of a sudden when you turn outside you'd realize oh wait that's not a it's not a line. It's like a flat plate. And that's where we're like, oh is that, would that be the

graven oxide? We hear about this two dimensional thing. So yeah. Here we have a picture. Look something like this. And so it looks like that and it's fun to you know have a a fantasy thinking mind. However, guess what? These are cholesterol crystals. And here's what's interesting. That spike protein is incredibly inflammatory to the lining of our blood vessels. All of us have a little cholesterol plaqued on the walls of our vessels. But when you get that inflammatory process going, now those cholesterol crystals due to inflammation are broken loose. So they're going to get cast off, but now they're free floating out there. And so look at this.

Well, doesn't that look like micro circuitry and a self-assembling nano chip is what you hear online? No, it's just stacked layered cholesterol. Wow. It's just stacked layered cholesterol. And am I just looking at that shape and saying it's cholesterol? Well, yes, but in addition,

we'll have the big reveal here in a minute. But we looked at this with three different types of mass spec, six types of analytical clinical chemistry. And those studies, were very revealing in what was there and what wasn't there. Yeah, well let's get into it. Let's do what the mass spec shows. So these are your friends out in Germany.

Friends in Germany and I sat down personally with them, went through their data sets and so we kind of congealed the data from 100 into one presentation like form. Okay. And what did they find? Well, they found. Take me through it. Yeah, yeah.

What do we find? Okay. Are there contaminants? Sure. Are there metallic particles in these? Yes. aluminum, silicon, magnesium, you know, sodium, chloride, calcium, titanium, iron, etc. Yes, they're contained.

And what is mass spec? Just for those of us that are, what does that term mean? Is it? Yeah, very, okay, let's make this simple. Everything at an atomic level has a mass and a spectrum. So you literally have to destroy the sample and then as it basically flames off, it'll have a signature for its mass and its color that it puts off. And so you can break one thing down into all the multiple elements that make it up.

So it's a very special, expensive processing machine and used in industry, used in lab medicine, to identify what are the constituent parts of something. And so it's like the gold standard in hormone testing we use. It's gold standard in all sorts of manufacturing industries just to make sure something is pure. you can detect the impurities. Why are these other things within that makeup of that particle? Okay. All right.

Back to this. Okay. So this one just shows they're contaminating metals. Now, it's interesting. A small study was done that showed if you took some fluid out of the vials with a pipette, took some out with a needle. Some of these metals are actually coming from rapidly manufactured needles. Really?

Yeah. So they just said, let's do one with a needle, same formulating? plastic and they found metals in it that weren't in the plastic one. Right, that were in the one drawn with the needles. So not only were these vials and these products manufactured quickly, think of how many billions of needles had to be made like that. They made cheap, they're flaking off or whatever. Where did they come from?

Who made them, et cetera. Are they stainless steel or not? So again, science and medicine, medicine requires purity and inspection. And as much as everybody thought this might have been a good idea, well, now we're seeing basically the aftermath. And there are things in there that you don't want in your body. I don't want those trace metals in me. So those were in some of those and in fact all the manufacturers, contaminating particles

in Astrozenica and I won't go over all the chemicals, but contaminating particles in Moderna as well, contaminating metals. So again, under the microscope, those who are looking at these, oh, what's this shape or what's that thing. Well, a lot of those are the contaminants from the manufacturing process. Because think of it, you've got an assembly line going, zip, zip, zip, and bottle after bottle

after bottle, and lid and a quick gasket and et cetera. That's why Japan rejected them. They're like, wait, there's too much particulate material here that it absolutely isn't lipid nanoparticle and polyethylene glycol and MRNA, and so they rejected those. So that accounted for some problems early on, I think. Now, as the boosters have come out,

I think they're more concentrated, and we haven't had the opportunity yet to get any of the bivalent vials, and it'll be curious to do a comparative at some point on those. So there's contamination. That's one thing we do know. But let's go to what's not in there, or what's in there in ratios that we thought might be different. So there's one on, one thing is polyethylene glycol,

and that kind of protects the, it coats the lipid nanoparticle and protects the particle in the MRNA. there was a complete across all these analytical studies and mass spec done. And this PEG by the way, just is one of the things that there is an allergy that exists to PEG. This is one of the concerns because it's in a lot of different products and things that we use out there. So wherever there's access to bodies, some people have developed an allergy to this. It was one of the concerns of the vaccine, right? Correct.

And so that acute anaphylactic death that we saw in many patients, about 70% of the Western world we have an antibody to it which is a pre-primed allergic reaction to have that antibody now this is the stuff that people say it's got any freeze in the vaccine right the polyethylene glycol but it's in that but yeah that's propylene glycol but it's still put here to to help preserve and protect the particle at cold temperatures okay but um and it's not antifreeze from your car so i want to dispel that myth okay um but it's added to protect the nanoparticle at cold temperatures. Polyethylene glycol, the ones we consume, you know, cosmetics and pill casings, etc., it's either topical or through the GI track. We don't inject PEG into ourselves. So, I mean,

to have, you know, a topical exposure to it is one thing and develop an antibody, but to inject it into the human system, that's not a good idea. And studies show, and this is the thing about polyethylene glycol, your most important cell, your Pac-Man cell, your garbage truck cell, that will eat an invader and then present it on its surface and then say, hey, you're like your macrophase. Yeah, your macrophase. They say to your immune system, hey, I've got this little thing, I gobbled up, I put it on my surface. Polyethylene glycol inhibits that process. So now the main cell that you want presenting an antigen and stimulating an immune response is blunted by polyethylene glycol in the system. So it's getting in the way of the proper immune response? Yeah. And so what did we see in

these when we're looking at this PEG? So inconsistency is what we saw. So, homogenous polyethylene glycol coating, it's a mix of lengths of the PEG. And so if you get a bunch of them in some vials, that's going to be a lot more irritating. And so we saw consistent inconsistency in the batches. So some vials had a lot of it, some had very little.

And here you see in homogenous peg coating, it has a short lifetime, which is good because now it's less harmful. But those thick, dense batches of different lengths, persisting for a longer time. Now you're going to mess up that immune response we're just talking about. So that's concerning.

And so, again, what we saw on mass spec is consistent inconsistency. Okay. But harmful. These are harmful... That's a harmful molecule. And here you can see, you know, again, graph

lot to lot, lot, to lot. Totally different. How much is there? Totally. Yeah, all over the map. So, again, inconsistency in manufacturing. And, yeah, And if you are putting a product into humanity, you want to know that it's going to be safe and effective.

Well, we know that these aren't effective now. It doesn't matter if it's effective if it's not safe. So let me ask you the million dollar question. Sure. We've got the mass spec back, over 100 vials. Over 100 vials, gone through mass spec. Really the burning question for me, did we find graphene oxide in any of the vaccine? Absolutely not.

None. Zippo zero nada. None. And so those little flakes that we were seeing, those little lines and floating things, those are three things. Those are those cholesterol crystals we saw. And there's a cholesterol, cholesterol, cholesterol, cholesterol, and spake graphs.

And Pfizer has a lot of salt and some sugars. Moderna has more sugar, a little less salt. And we're also seeing those little plates are also salt flakes and salt crystals. cholesterol crystals and sugar crystals as well. And so at the end of the day, the mass spec showed that that's what it was. These vials have lipid content, they have polyethylene glycol content

and varying ratios. They have salts, they have sugars, they do have genetic material, and that's what was in the vials, and then some lots had some contaminants. So my main point is, it's fun to conjecture what's in them, what's not, and you get all these red herring pathways that people are worried about or scaremongering about,

there's lipid nanoparticle and a gene sequence that makes your body make a foreign protein. Those two things are necessary and sufficient to cause harm. And to get off the beaten path onto all these other things, sure, you want a pure product, but those are the two harmful things there. The lipid nanoparticle is hyper-inflammatory and can be toxic to ourselves. And when it was designed, these were made to be given once. And the studies on giving it two, three, four times aren't there in humans. Right.

So the cumulative toxicity of the nanoparticle itself is concerning. More concerning is the more of this gene you get into your cells that continues to make a protein that has known countless side effects that, you know, we've talked about on other shows, that toxic spike protein, that's what matters. And that's what I found myself saying along the way, is like, look, we're going to investigate all these things. I've been promising everyone that's watching this show. We're going to look into it. But we've already shown you enough mechanisms, the toll-like receptors are being shut down, the potentials to have cancers, the antibodies to have cancers, the antibody-dependent enhancement issues, the spike protein.

It is toxic. It causes clotting all by itself without a vaccine, just in, you know, in whatever delivery. So with all of that, yes, there may be other things. but I was saying, let's be sure that we are not overstating something we can't prove when there is so much right now that is in the scientific literature that can. So to have a little bit more fun, if you will, there's been this idea that there's like an amoeba or an alien. I just want to show some of the images that we've sort of seen on this and it got a lot of traction. This crazy looking thing at one point it looked like it was moving. There was a guy out, I think, in Germany or Russia or somewhere.

one that found another one and you had a fairly, when I was in the lab you had a fairly simple explanation for us and you sat down the computer. Let's look at, let's just do a computer search of what it is we're looking at. All right, this one's fun. So talk me through it. All right, nature.

We live in nature, our environment is full of things. I recognize this right away as botanical. That's from the bottom of a leaf. You see it a lot on the bottom of. It's a stilata tricome is what this is called? Yeah, stellate tricome. Okay. and stellate star-like, and this is on the bottom of leaves,

and doesn't that look scary? If that appears in a microscope from a leaf, then this is what it looks like in your microscope. So if you're doing microscopy in a living room or you're doing it in a non-laboratory setting and environment, you're going to get all sorts of particulates in the air. Go home and put some tape on your windshield and put it under a microscope, and you're going to see...

Look at that one. It looks like an alien. You're saying that's just the bottom of this leaf. That's a bottom of a leaf floating around in the air. So a lot of different leaves have that. And so it's fun to conjecture. It's fun to look at things. But when someone is a classifier of things and that's their profession,

it gets frustrating when people get out of their lane and say, look at these creepy things and scare people. And I'm like, no, let's go back to the science. If you don't know what you're looking at, say you don't know what you're looking at. And I looked at that right away. I'm like, oh, that's botanical. Right. Because I look at everything under the microscope.

It's what I do. What, hundreds of thousands? 500,000 patients. And then beyond that, you know, when I was a kid, it was looking at the onion cells and the frog cells and the pig cells. And going down the street, you know, having a, I'm a nerd, I had a microscope at home and a little kid, I'm like, okay, let's, you know, what does this look like?

What does that look like? So understanding the patterns of like, so no, there's not parasites in these things. Let's dispel that. There's not graphene oxide in these. Let's dispel that. And so sleep well at night. Those aren't in it. But be concerned that there's a lipid nanoparticle and a gene sequence.

that makes your body make a toxin. Do worry about that. That's what you should be concerned about. Not all these other things, red herrings. And so that's why I wanted to do this with you to dispel those. I did want to bring up real quick, going back to that fragments of RNA.

That's concerning. It goes back to purity of product. Right, the fact that you just have a whole RNA, but we're getting these. The broken ones? Yeah, I mean, that's scary to me. It's a Frankenstein piece of RNA. What's it going to do in your system?

That's the important thing. And the medical literature is replete with this. Short RNAs, make shortened proteins. Not all of them are going to code for something, but some of them might. And it is absolutely a known carcinogen. And so we'll get into that in another show, I'm sure, as some of the studies advance. But that's concerning when they're giving you a product that they said must be 100% pure. The European medicine agency said, no, 50% is okay. And oh, by the way, you don't even

have to keep these cold anymore. Well, there's a lot that we did. Obviously, we looked at the vaccines under a microscope. We were looking at the clots and analyzing them and looking at slides to them. But what happens if you just put this vaccine right into a drop of blood? Well, we did that with my blood. Take a look at this. You know, this discussion of blood clotting, you've talked about it, that the vaccines appear to be causing clotting on some level.

Is there a way that I could test to see if vaccines cause blood clotting while we're here? Yeah, it would be interesting to take some blood and put it on a couple of slides and then put a vaccine on each one and see what kind of changes we could see. Do you have an idea of whose blood we might be able to use? I might as well offer myself up for that. All right, Del, taking one for the team. I'll take you out to my lobotomous and let's get some blood and give it a go. Sounds good.

I'll take that. Perfect. And we will go back to the micro lab. This is the closest that I'm ever going to get to getting one of these COVID-19 vaccines in my blood outside of my body. I hear you 100%. All righty. So, here we go. So here you can see, I'm trying to put the same number of drops in the same part of each slide.

And that way we can focus on that one part of the slide. And it should be, you know, uniformly spread. Look at that. Holy cow. It changed immediately. Didn't it? Yep. Holy cow. Instantly cleared.

seen anything do that and I don't mean to sound sensational I just I haven't never seen anything do that nope never seen anything do that look at that oh wow fizer that's the fizer right oh look at that you saw that I saw that wow that's unusual all right let's go take a look again okay so we'll first take the normal one This is the regular without anything on it. Yep. You can see a little platelet clumps up in here throughout and then a couple of white cells in the background. That looks pretty decent.

I think you're going to live forever, Del. All right. Okay, good to know. All right, let's see what the darenet looks like. So again, we'll start kind of out at that thicker edge first. I'll work a way towards, which should be the thinner portion of the prep. Question is, where do all the cells go? Seriously. They're gone.

Seriously. It pushed them back into a big giant clump over at the edged clump. And again, is that the charge on the particles? I don't know. But where we put that drop, there are no red cells there. I was going to say, as they come out, it's almost like they're, you know, getting leather bleaching clear. Bleaching clear, some of them are folded and some are what do we call crinulated, a little crinulated, a little crinkled.

But yeah, I mean, that whole edge is like bleached. So this is the J&J. That's totally different. Isn't it? It's like a nuclear bomb went off. Yeah, it's disordered, isn't it? And then there's a little more of that stacking, that roule here. And again, look at all this clumping here out on the edge of it.

Yeah. It just, yeah, like you said, like a nuclear bomb went off. It just congealed it. And again, that's not spike. That's just the lip of it. nanoparticle. So these are becoming more spherical and you're losing that donut in the middle of your red cell. What's happening here is slightly from the outside of the cell in, causing those cells to balloon up slightly because now you got a subtle osmotic shift here.

And all of these are supposed to be, you know, again, isotonic. These are supposed to be balanced with the pH of the body. You shouldn't be seeing this kind of reaction. It shouldn't be damaging to the cells of the body right away like this. So here's that first visor. And these were the ones where we just put a drop on and the whole thing just cleared. This is where all that fluid went. And again, like that J&J just caused immediate dispersion and clumping. And those don't look very red to me either.

No. Oh, look at this. Those little spikies. Those are called echinocytes. So it instantly changed the pH interior. These are little blubs of protein on the membrane of the red cell because the red cell has involuted and then those proteins on the surface, they don't have room to go. It's like flattening a ball of some sort and it's kind of all baggy.

But, you know, so all these little fingers that is not spike protein. So that's another myth I want mine to spoil it. It's crazy because it's done it to so many. We didn't see that on the other ones, right? Yeah, we didn't see it on the other ones. Well, that's fascinating because that instantly changed the pH of the interior of the cell, and it caused a massive outflow of fluid from the interior of the cell, causing all that cell membrane folding. That's wild.

And it was, I mean, almost instantaneous. And it is everywhere. It is everywhere. So that's wild. Those red cells are now non-futable. now non-functional red cells. Those aren't going to carry a wood of oxygen. And now your body has to decide what to do

and has an inflammatory reaction, because now it has to gobble those up. And then, again, the comparative is, let's go back to the normal. Go out to the thinner edge. No spikies at all. So that's why you do normal control. So what this means is more science, more questions than answers.

There was signal. We have a signal. Well, I mean, that was somewhat alarming. It was a lot of fun, you know. And just, I want to be clear that this is an instantaneous result that we saw. We don't really know what to make of it. I also want to point out that we put, you know, a few drops on really just one of my drops of blood diluted by the amount given throughout the whole body. Who knows if this ends up being, you know, I just want sort of some caveats on.

Yeah, no, a lot of caveats here. This was just playing. I had a colleague did this and he said, don't believe me, just go repeat the experiment. I said, okay, and we repeated the experiment. And so a couple of things come from this. Some is the difference in concentrations that should or shouldn't be there. So to get cell changes because of the ionic shift, the pH, etc., it just means that these aren't a balanced fluid.

Like you want something to go in and it's not going to cause all those other reactions, it is. And, you know, when someone gets a very painful arm after the shot for several days, well, part of that's because of that. Because this is an irritant in and of itself. This isn't making spike protein yet. You know, it could be some of your own natural blood sugars and antibodies. Right. Just to be clear. What are my people, this is an MRI technology. It has to be inserted into a cell. It has to have time to then sort of for the cell to read that recipe, if you will, start creating spike protein and pushing it out on the outside cell. We're not seeing that. Let's look at these spiking things really quick.

I think we have a little B roll of this because I've also seen pictures that says, see, look, it turns your blood into a spike protein right away. I've seen that posted on that. Those aren't spike protein. No, they're not. And I want to absolutely dispel that myth because these are called echinocytes. Now you'll see these in chronic kidney disease patients. So if you were looking at this and you didn't know I just put back,

I handed my regular blood and you saw this prolifically through my blood, what would be the diagnosis? I would do some blood tests and check you for chronic kidney disease. Okay. A spike protein is going to be thousands of times smaller than that. Okay. I mean, microscopically smaller because it's on a virus. You can't see it. So these prokies, this is almost like if I had a tent and a giant windstorm comes, my whole tent collapses, like you said, the cell collapses and the poles are sticking out

in every drug. These are the proteins are stuck in a deflated tent sticking out the edge that makes it look spiked because it's no longer full and round. Yeah, it's a great analogy. Yeah. And it has nothing to do with the spike protein. Okay, that's just a cell- It's alarming in the sense that it's shifting the integrity of the cell. Now, where do those cells go once they're non-functional and destroyed? They go to your spleen. And my colleague and Dr. Burckhardt in Germany has pictures of how much spike protein is being made in the spleen.

So some of these cells that are either being destroyed or carrying it, that's where your red cells get recycled. And so it's fascinating to see, okay, here's damaged red cells, here's damaged white cells, where you're where are they going to be gobbled up and reprocessed? A lot of spike protein in the spleen on microscopic studies. So that's where a lot of them can go. And when we drop that drop and you just see that, just like a nuclear bomb goes off, like I said,

on that, if I dropped a drop of saline on blood, it wouldn't do that, no. It wouldn't do that. No, and again, it just means it's at an irritating level, either ionically or pH-wise. And so it's instantly, in this case, de-heming. hemoglobinating those cells. So the hemoglobin is just wiped out,

and that's why they blanched and bleached. So that just says many of these vials are just very, very irritating in their pre-mixture when they come. So again, nothing's sensational, it's interesting, fun to play with, brings up some questions. Again, it all goes back to purity and consistency of manufacturing.

Yeah. And that's my bigger concern. They're inconsistent. Go back to the key point, I want to drive this home. They're going to try to do. lipid nanoparticles plus influenza genes and plus RSV genes. And for all these other shots going forward, we already know that this was a failed, quote,

vaccine program. They have a technology that's harmful. And as you heard me say yesterday in the Senate, human cells are meant to make human proteins. Human cells were not meant to make foreign toxic proteins. So traditional vaccines don't do that. This is a new technology of which many, many people have gotten it, and your body wants to make its own protein. Not a flu protein, not an RSV protein, not any other viral protein, not a SARS-CoV-2 protein.

This platform is sufficiently proven to be dangerous that not only do the COVID shots need to be stopped, but the platform and these agencies that have taken upon themselves carte blanche to keep pushing this forward as though they've done 10 years of safety studies, they have not. And that's my biggest scientific concern. We see enough things already happening wrong that going forward I think that's the message to humanity, to regulatory agencies, to government officials that are willing to step in and block regulatory corruption and allowing something experimental to continue going forward

that is proven to be harmful and has no signal of safety. Right. I mean, to me, this is, you know, just asking, when you look at this technology and where it was at, I know you know the history, of all the products we've ever rushed onto the market, this to me is one of the most terrifying. I mean, I've said this may be the advancement of science in the future. But it is spielunking into a place in our immune system. We've never attempted to mess with before. In a way, we have no idea what the result is going to be to see that of all the things we've ever been. rushed onto the market, you're rushing this one? Right. And it's a gene-based technology, and it went through the regulatory steps under emergency as though it were a vaccine. By calling it a vaccine, it went to this FDA vaccine committee. But as Dr. Weissman astutely points out in that Senate hearing, it should have gone through

the gene committee, and that they should have looked at reproductive toxicity. They should have looked at genotoxicity, mutagenicity, et cetera, et cetera. They went through the wrong regulatory process. And frankly, through a team of people that know nothing about gene therapy. Exactly. You know nothing about what you're looking at right here. You're looking at it like it's a regular measles vaccine. It is not.

This is a gene therapy. Exactly. That is that end. And Malone said multiple times behind closed doors on the stage, we stop these gene programs multiple times they've stopped in the tracks because we're causing too much cancer. We're having serious problems with this technology. It has been stopped for all those. reasons we should have been very concerned using it as a vaccine, certainly not rushed it,

and instead we put it in front of a bunch of really, you know, kindergartners when it comes to this technology. They didn't know nothing about what they're looking at and they approved it. It's truly been a wanton disregard for public safety. And those individuals that technically work for us are not working for us. And they should have put safety first, safety first, safety As Dr. McCullough points out, we had the signal in February of 21 with enough people dead already that it should have halted right away. And with all these esteemed colleagues that I'm lucky to know now and learn from each of them, I think the collective knowledge and that hearing, I hope everybody watches it and shares it with friends, that hearing was enough that anybody with two brain cells to rub together would go, Houston, we have a problem. Houston, we have a problem. And to think, as Malone was really shouting from the mountaintops yesterday about,

they are trying to take this truncated, rushed vaccine program of a product that did not properly do a safety study. We have hit that every way sideways and say, we're going to release all these new MRNA vaccines, flu and RSV and all these, every bacterian virus that we can inoculate you for. We're going to build an MRNA technology because we can do it overnight. and we want to have it approved immediately based on the safety that was already established by the COVID vaccine. While people are dying of adult, death syndrome are having clots like we've never seen before, babies, all of it, cancer, all of it, which we cannot prove all of it, but there is something going wrong. And when we listen to Edward Dowd there, who's like just from the insurance actuaries, you know,

going underwater because of the rise in all-cause mortality, all of this happening, and they literally want to fast-track a system where they can just start just banging these out, We don't need safety trials. It is, I mean, I don't know about you. I'm sitting here. You just keep thinking, am I, I'm inside? This is a movie. This is a cartoon.

What is that? How are real people acting like this? It's a dystopian experience. And as you saw from these images, the cells don't lie. Yeah. I mean, if it's there in the cells, the cells aren't lying. You don't have to believe. You can spike in your brain.

There's no two ways about it. If somebody proved to me it's okay for it to be there. Do some science. Do some science. I agree. And going forward, let's focus on humanity, on, you know, let's get back to normal for sure. Let's stop these programs,

let's continue to do proper science and not rush science. You know, that quote in the European Committee, oh, well, we were working at the speed of science. Well, good science isn't rushed. Correct. In fact, I think that's the most dangerous word to see in a sentence about science. We rushed the science.

And who was the Pfizer exec that just, just stepped down, well, we were building the airplane while we were trying to fly it. Right. Good grief. And she was proud of that. I'm like, no, that's not what you do to your fellow human beings. And that's not what we do in medicine and safety. And to my point, even if we somehow got dumb lucky and did not end up killing ourselves

with this product that we built while we're flying in the air, if we keep building planes that we're all in while it's flying, we will not survive this. We cannot allow this to be the way we are doing science from here going forward. You know, it is clear, I think, to those of us that are looking at this literally through a microscope, that this one did not survive this challenge. We did not survive. Many of us didn't survive this flight. But if you are in the brain dead space of thinking and sticking your head in the sand, at least imagine a world where pharma never does any safety trials anymore. And we just start, oh, because the president said so, here comes the next one. And flying the plan while we're in it, I don't think this species.

last? These are critically damaging choices being made. That's why this platform must be stopped. I was an aeronautical engineering major. I'm going home on an airplane today. I trust that everything has been done and proven and I feel very comfortable getting on that airplane. But with these things, airplane's still being built and it's not going to fly well. And it's not going to bode well for humanity to make human cells into foreign protein factories with any of the ones going forward that they want to. That is not how we were designed or built. We were meant to be human, not to be, you know, transhuman, or one of these conglomerations of some odd genetic

combination of something that does not belong in ourselves. Well, Dr. Cole, it's an honor to know you. I know you are coming under, you know, massive pressure. This is affecting your livelihood, your business, your specialty, but I believe, you know, you're going to be a part of making history here. I don't think they're going to get away with this. And I think that we are really shifting this conversation and we couldn't do without you. And I wanted to thank you for taking time out of all the incredible work you're doing to let us ask some of these questions that our audience has been asking. It's been, you know, very enlightening. The honor is mine, Del. Thank you.

Take care. Well, obviously we cover a lot of signs here. For some of you, maybe it goes too deep. And for many of you have friends, Della, I have friends that can't sit through that. They're never going to like go through all that. They don't care enough yet. Well, that's why we have Get Vaccinated. Folks, it's time for you to get vaccinated.

The Highwire is launching a brand new campaign to arm you with the facts. In short videos you can share anywhere, featuring the world's leading experts on COVID-19, vaccines, and everything in between. Natural immunity appears to be robust, complete, and durable. These are the drop-the-mic, fully cited facts to help you, the super spreaders of truth in this real war of misinformation. Share the link, download the short video,

and post to your favorite social media platform. All you have to do is go do the highwire.com slash debt vaccinated for all of the latest short videos and make sure to grab your get vaccinated merch at the highwire.com. Click shop for the latest in highwire gear. We want you armed with the facts online and on the front lines. Get the facts, lose the fear at the highwire. dot com. Wow, I mean that was exciting, alarming, and all of the above while this show was live. In fact, minutes into going live we have breaking news.

news that came out. The head of our legal team, Aaron Siri, just broke this story on Twitter. Quite alarming. Here is what we have is breaking news right now as we speak. Today, the FDA just authorized a new COVID-19 bi-valent vaccine for babies six months and older without any safety data from a clinical trial of this vaccine. None. What could possibly go wrong? See at Highwire talk. you can't make this stuff up. I mean, we now have, in the FDA, a regulatory agency that has gone completely rogue. It is doing nothing to protect us.

It is not instilling, it is not using any scientific method whatsoever. And then these products, the CDC, the sister group, is taking these untested products and then adding them to our childhood schedule so that moments from now our kids will not be able to go into school without taking these totally untested products while people are literally seeing rises in miscarriage and death all over the world. Is it time to wake up? Is it time to wake up your friends?

Are you done being careful about this conversation? Are you really afraid to have that conversation with your brother, your sister, your mother, your father, your priest, whoever it is? We need everybody all hands on deck. And I want to say, as I was watching some of the comments on the Ron Johnson hearing, I'm getting a little bit tired of seeing things like,

oh, what difference is this going to make? They're just going to ignore this too. No, you're the problem. If that's what you are saying, you are a problem because the difference it makes is us. The only difference there is is us. It's not Ron Johnson. It's not Joe Biden or Rhonda Sentis or Donald Trump.

There's no singular hero out there. It's you. If you were sitting watching this information and saying, what good is a hearing of the greatest world-renowned scientists coming forward and giving us some really hard evidence of some really hard truths, what I don't want to hear from you is, well, what difference is this going to make? Nothing if you're sitting there eating popcorn on your couch and complaining about

the world around you. Everything, if you share it with everyone you know, because we have moved this needle. We are now moving the needle. We now only have 11% of people are taking the bivalent vaccine booster. There's the word I'm looking for, booster that are eligible for it. 11%. We are getting through even to people, how many of you watching right now have already had the vaccine? And by the way, you're welcome. You are a part of this now. At whatever point, we all wake up. But if you're sitting there being a Debbie Downer about, oh, what does this lead to?

You know, don't even bother. Why even watch it? We don't need to hear from you. For the rest of you that are making a difference in the world, right now, you do make the difference. Right now, it's never going to be some politician, some news anchor. It's literally how many people stand outside the gates of this. castle which is now turned against us and say we have had enough we are the United States of America we are Germany we are Spain we are France we are the

free citizens of this world and we're not going to take this anymore that is where we're at they are killing our children they are killing our elderly they are killing people knowingly not even if it's just one it's one too many that's what they tell us about COVID how about this vaccine You cannot and are not going to get away with this. So go ahead and whine and complain. I don't need you on the team. But for the rest of you out there, they're saying,

what can I do? It's simple. Share this information. Don't let your senator or congressman off the hook. You actually get to heckled it now. Just keep sending them the nine minute video until they write back and tell you, okay, Susan, Johnny, Deborah, Tommy.

I've watched it. I've watched the nine minutes. That's what we have to do right now. Senator this is the QR code right now. You can take a picture of it. This will help you share it. The nine minute version will lead everybody to the three-hour version once they've gotten through the nine minutes.

We are doing what we can do. This is all the Highwire can do. This is all Senator Johnson can do is bringing the world-renowned scientists of the world inside the Capitol, get the logos, and say, this happened in a Senate hearing. This is really going on. Does the difference get made inside that Capitol? No, it gets made in us. It gets made with every brother and cistion.

that still considers themselves free-thinking individuals. Wake up everyone else on this planet that you still has. Free thought is out there. Go and get them. It is our time. We must stop this now. And as I said to that group of scientists, you know, in the end,

there's really not a whole lot to stress about when it comes to the truth. The truth will ultimately prevail here. In the end, I don't think we will live in a world that believe that this was a great vaccine. There is no way they cover this up. It's too much, and it's growing every single day. It is a serious problem. If they keep cranking out newer and newer vaccines with no testing,

the problem will get worse and worse and worse. But eventually, so many people will die. So many will be injured. It will be unavoidable as to what happened here. The only question we will ask ourselves is, did we do enough to save enough lives, to wake people up before it got to that point? Every day you can save lives now.

Who cares what this entire event of Ron Johnson meant to him or to the 22 scientists there? What are you going to make it mean for you and the people around you? This is who we are. This is what being alive is all about. This is what standing for something is all about. Can you look at this and not recognize? We are needed in the most critical time in humanity never before has every, virtually, every government agency attack their own people with a disastrous, deadly, toxic injection.

We can do something about this because we outnumber them. Because in the end, they work for us. I'm asking you to be civil. I'm asking you to be intelligent. I'm asking you to open up the debate with everyone you know. you have the tools in your hands act accordingly this is the high wire

we're going to keep hitting it out of the park every week because there are so many great people working with us and around us to make a difference in the world I know you're one of them and I'll see you next week search reach reach true words get heard Reberd, get squirred. So do lies, nothing will cloud my eyes.

Where can I find? Some verifiable facts do we're to fire these times. Because it's a new situation with the false information. False information. They're checking and pulled, spread so beautifully. Two words of power lies with true disease. They're trying to take us to the brick one more time. The truth they never sticks to with you look, you can find.

We got a media. by a mockingbird they keep deceiving us you can't believe a word so i keep swerving i'm the lies i do not believe it