The Highwire with Del Bigtree - BREAKING MASS PSYCHOSIS

Episode Date: January 7, 2022

A Look Back on HighWire’s Coverage of Covid; Welcome to the Party, Joe Rogan; ICAN Sues for V-Safe Data; Are You Suffering From Mass Delusional Psychosis?; COVID Deaths Down, excess Deaths up? Are Government Payouts Manipulating US Covid Data?Guests: Dr. Mark McDonald, AJ DePriestBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. Good morning.

Good afternoon. Good evening, wherever you are out there in this world. It's a brand new year, and it's time to step out onto the high wire. Well, everybody, welcome to 2022. How are you feeling? I mean, where are you at right now? Are we approaching the new year with excitement, a little bit of cautious optimism, total terror? I know, it's a mixed bag of emotions, isn't it right now?

I mean, we are literally going into years, like three years of the COVID pandemic now, which is hard to wrap our heads around the longest 15 days of flattening the curve the world has ever seen. But before we really sort of launch into this new year on the high wire, I just wanted to take a moment to talk a little bit about our culture, what the highwire is, because coming into the end of last year, we were accelerating, growing exponentially. we are now speaking to millions of you around the world as you watch this show right now in your homes. We want to thank you for being a part of our family. But many of you don't really know what the high wire is. Maybe you're thinking, well, it's like all those other podcasts out there where

they tell the truth or they jump on these stories that no one else will cover. Or, you know, it looks a little bit like television. I know Dell came from television, so it's sort of like a news show. But to be clear, we do things a little bit differently here. And I want to lay that out because as we go into our investigations this year, I really want you to understand what you can expect from us on the high wire. It's not going to be any different than what we've delivered for the last several years on this conversation than all of those before when we started. But here's what the high wire really is. It's a bit of a dream of mine, certainly, and many of my team members that come from different places. But for those of us that worked in television

together. What you don't understand when you watch a show where they're having a guest and they're interviewing them is there is what is called a pre-interview that is done. That is when a producer sits down and, you know, discusses everything that could possibly be spoken about with that potential guest. And all of that conversation is written down, all the questions, these amazingly talented people that can like ask questions, then type it all out at the same time, all the answers. And then they set about producing the show so that when that guest comes on, you make them say exactly the parts of what you like that they said and leave out the parts that you didn't so that you can sort of push the agenda of the network that you work for

or of your sponsors that are paying for the commercials. Now, that's how television is done and it makes a lot of sense because you don't want to have things that are out of your control and you want to know where everything's going. Well, here on the highway, we wanted to do something different. For those of us and I worked in television, as many of you know on the doctor's television show, And before that, I was a producer on the Dr. Phil show. But what you miss out on when you watch television is the amazing discoveries that happened in that phone call, in that first pre-interview with a guest and what's going on.

And then you sort of get involved with sort of manipulating it to just push the part of the story you want. We didn't want to do that. I said, imagine if we did a television show where the investigation is happening in real time, where the producer, which in many cases is me in this scenario, is doing. the interview for the first time and learning what the guest has got to say or what their perspective is or their theory is for the first time in front of everybody, making it much more of an interactive experience with you and I, meaning as I'm learning this information, so are you. Now, there's obviously

risks to doing a show like this, meaning it's all live and there's nothing we can take back once it's happened. In fact, this camera I'm looking at, if I was on any other set in television, would be a teleprompter that is basically set up this entire monologue that I'm giving you right now. I don't use a teleprompter. We do not write out a script. I don't know what I'm going to say prior to the moment I come in here because I want to be honest with you. I wanted to do something where we're all having conversations all the time. This is really a conversation between you and I.

We're normal people. We're trying to figure out what's going on in conversations with the best experts in the world that I can find to answer the questions that I have. Now, I have an amazing team behind me that is studying the science and is looking at, is finding these guests, is finding where the breaking science and stories are happening. But here's what's going on. When I'm doing an interview, as I said, I don't know where it's going to go. We have a light, sometimes if they've written a book, I'll have read the book. But when I'm getting that interview, we don't know where it's going to go.

And because of that, sometimes there are things that will come out in the show that may or may not prove to be true in the end. They are the theories or the ideas of our guests, which we are letting them present freely. Now, in our minds, that is the best way to do journalism. We believe that that really represents the scientific method, because any decent, real scientists on this planet would have to admit that in the scientific method, a scientist comes up with a theory or develops a product and then writes a paper or puts that product out for the judgment of the scientific world. And then they read that paper and that study or analyze that theory, attack it from every position that they can until to see if they can bring it down or tear

holes in it. At which point that scientist then, usually in the journal he's been published in, has the opportunity to rebut or make some adjustments to that paper as the entire world helps that scientist move in the right direction. If their theory proves to be true or maybe makes the adjustments, everybody is involved in the process of learning and understanding and evolving the concept. That is what we think our job is here as journalists, not to choose a side and to pick one singular side and only represent that side and censor everybody else. That is what mainstream media

has been doing over the last several years and we all know it. It's dangerous. It's terrifying, but it's even more terrifying that science has taken up this approach too. When Tony Fauci tells us that if you question me, you question the science, we should all be horrified as listening to one of the least scientific, most terrifying statements ever made by a scientific person in any type of leadership position. That is dangerous. It is terrible and it could be devastating in the consequences if we don't allow all the voices to be heard. So when you watch the high wire, know that when we're doing these interviews, it's the first time I've heard it too. And we may come back weeks later with a different perspective from another scientist because as I told you, we are

involved in a live interactive investigation to find the truth with you. So we will continue to do our best to let you know what may be a theory. I say it all the time if someone's coming on the show. This is their theory or their idea about what's taking place. There are also times where we feel like the science and the evidence is now lined up to a place where we can call it a fact, and we let you know that. All along the way, we are not asking you to trust us implicitly. In fact, I have said to you, and I will always say this to you, we are not trying to tell you what to think. We're trying to teach you how to think, how to research your information, and how to test the things that you're hearing. That's why if you are signed up to our newsletter at thehighwire.com,

just put your email in there, then you are a part of a team that can now do your own investigations because every single Monday, after our Thursday show, we send you a hyperlink to every single study, everything we present, all of the videos so that you can read them, watch them in their entirety yourself so that you can decide whether Del Batry appears to have cherry-picked this information or where it came from or it appears that this isn't a fully published. This is a pre-print that hasn't even come out yet. That's right. Sometimes we're presenting brand new breaking scientific information that we will watch as scientists attack it. We're putting you on the front line of the investigation. And for those of you that are with us and the millions that have joined,

I think you enjoy that process. But to be clear, there are, certain stories that we've done. And let me just put one out there. I've been attacked a few times right at the end of the year by newspapers that said that I spread misinformation and put out the false narrative that there's graphene oxide inside of the vaccine, for instance. Well, I want to let you know that we did have a scientist come on and show, you know, images through a microscope that what, you know, showed what he believed was graphene oxide. But I've also been talking to scientists that said that they can prove that graphene oxide is not there. In that case, we're about to perhaps bring a scientist like that on, or, to be totally honest with you,

we're trying to secure a laboratory. We're trying to figure out how to legally get a hold of some vaccines so that we can put them into a microscope because I want to see this thing with my own eyes. If there's little creepy, crawly aliens in there, I'll let you know if I see them once I see them in my own eyes. I'm not going to report things that I cannot prove. In this case, we have an ongoing investigation. We're going to continue to look. Is there really grapian oxide there?

I'm just letting you know. Some of you're saying, of course there is Dell. I know it for a fact. That's you. That's not me. I'm still not convinced. The jury's still out. That's something you're going to watch us investigate as this year goes on. There's a lot of things like that. And we're trying to be clear with you as we go through this process. So all of that being said, before we get started jumping into 2022, I want to talk about where we've been. I want to know where our baseline is as we're starting out to move into this next incredible year. Who knows where all of this is leading. Obviously, it feels like crazy time, a lot of the time. And I know many of you

talk about coming to the high wire because at least it gives you some sense of reasonability, and they're looking at all the ideas. But over this last now, it's actually been 100 episodes we've done, 100 weeks of flattening the curve, 100 weeks of the COVID pandemic that we've covered. And in order to do that, we have, you know, not every single segment that we do is, you know, on the coronavirus, but most of it has been, or the pandemic or the vaccine. But in total, we've had about 153 hours of programming, and that's 9,310 total minutes packed back to back, usually at least an hour and a half long, even though we'd love it to be shorter, giving you the information. For those of you that are here, you know, some of those videos have been literally like masterclass. getting so deep into the weeds, no other telephysian producer on earth would ever risk boring their audience with that much detail.

That's what we do here. I believe part of what the high wire does is we are building a time capsule. Even though our governments and health officials around the world are trying to bury the truth to hide the data, we have gone out of our way to find every piece of data we can find in every database using an international team of investigators and scientists and lawyers so that we can put it into the time capsule known as the Highwire. They will never get away with saying we did not know that. If it was to be known, if it did exist, you could find it

and we'll be able to see the archives of the High Wire where it exists. In that process, we reached out to world-renowned scientists all over the world that were being censored and silenced for trying to give a different narrative, a perspective that didn't believe that the lockdowns worked, that didn't think rushing a vaccine into every single human being on the planet was a good idea. People that had worked for Pfizer, people that worked for the best universities in the world.

The high wire has become a beacon and a landing place for those scientific voices that are not allowed to be heard anywhere else. We are still nurturing relationships with scientists that have been giving us information for many months now, but are still not comfortable risking their credibility, their name, their lives to come onto the high wire and share it with the world. But let it be known, those heroes that have stepped beyond their comfort zone. These are not Hollywood movie stars. They are real scientists that are not used to being in the public eye, but are so troubled by what is happening, the destruction of science, that after we talk to them many times for weeks or months, finally say, Del, you know what? I'm willing to come forward now. The world needs to hear this, and I will take whatever repercussions follow.

And because of that, we have broken more stories and introduced you to more of the world's leading scientists. than I think any other show there is. There are many shows now that are following our lead, that are jumping on board. And we are happy about that. We are not in competition with anyone, and I want you to know that we take the transcripts of every show after it's finished, and we send it to multiple mainstream news agencies. They don't ask for it, but we found their producers and we sent it to them and said, you are allowed to use any of this information.

It is totally bedded by our scientific team. We would love for you to share it with the world. And on occasions, we do see that, you know, blades across the screen of televisions in this nation and around the world. We are doing our part to make a difference. We don't care who gets the credit. And that is the culture of the high wire. We are all about change. We're all about transparency.

And I'm going to continue to be as honest with you as I possibly can. So before we get started and jumping into this next wild and crazy ride, this next year, why don't we set a baseline? of where we've been. This is the last 100 episodes of the high wire and this pandemic. Good morning. Good afternoon. Good evening wherever you are out there in this world, in this beautiful world. We're stepping out onto the high wire. The biggest story in the country and maybe the world as we speak is coronavirus. We don't know whether it was transferred from eating meat from these creatures, or whether it was from viruses that were isolated,

brought into a lab and an accidental release. So to say that it's a release from a lab is very different to say it's created in the lab. An accidental release from the lab is, but like I said, it's been known to happen before. At what point did you break away from believing in the Imperial model? How early on did you start suspecting it was wrong?

From the very beginning, I never believed in it. If you start looking at the actual numbers of how long, dollars come into this. A typical garden variety pneumonia without complications for a Medicare patient will be about $5,000. If you have COVID-19 pneumonia, it's about $13,000. And if you use a ventilator, it's $39,000. And these numbers come straight from CMS. Right there they are. If you're going to do an experiment, you better have some good scientific data before you lock people in their homes, tell them they can't come out, cause depression, anxiety, alcoholism.

This is stuff is coming into my offices. This is not fabricated. I am so frustrated with the government and with the regulatory groups in medicine like the CDC and NIH. And Johns Hopkins University now getting in on this now. We have universities that are declaring knowledge of how many people have died from COVID. That is scientifically impossible that they can say this many people died of COVID. Who in the media do you trust right now? Like, who do you think is not lying here? Does that bother you at all that we're rushing science and not really using the scientific matter?

as we know it. Well, I think we ought to rush the science, and then I think we ought to be very, very careful. And I would try to get the vaccine as soon as possible, but I would not impose it on people right away. I would start with voluntary, voluntary compliance. I would expect that most people would want to get it. But if a person refused to get it, I would certainly allow those people to get at the end of the line and wait until we had double-blind testing and placebo tests and all of that.

I think you do have a right to demand of your country that they follow the scientific method. This is fear mongering that is stimulating all kinds of anxieties in people. And I believe it has a purpose. I don't think it's accidental. The more afraid a population is Dell, the more you can control it. If we can prove that it was in your town, in your hospital, in September of 2019, why? Why are they locking us down in March? The horse left the barn.

The out here is going to be building up a sufficient degree of immunity in the subpopulation that can actually transmit the virus. If you look at the literature, you have to look at randomized control trials, but with a verified outcomes where you've actually measured whether the person was infected or not. If you look at those, none of them show a statistically significant advantage to wearing a mask. The young healthy people defined as under the age of 60 with no medical problems. 99% of them got better without any intervention. So all hydroxychloriclin does in this context, it opens up a transport channel, it opens up a canal that lets the zinc go into the cell, and that's important because that's what the virus is.

And my survival rate with my patients is 99.7. People are not dying from COVID-19. from COVID-19, the dying by politics. It's called death by politics, death by stupidity. Anyone who got in the way of access to care, who got in the way of access to patients having medication, committed crimes against humanity and are guilty of mass murder.

The additional health impacts of the lockdown have been catastrophic. There's been a mental health epidemic. We are in right now, depression, anxiety, suicides, and overdoses. Right now, public health in the United States, United States is entirely focused on increasing the profits of the pharmaceutical industry, and it's literally killing us.

There is not one scientist who has isolated or purified a virus and made a concrete association with a new illness. There have been spikes in mortality around the world in different places, but we need to look for other causes or explanations of that, since there's no solid evidence that there's a virus causing any. Yesterday, our YouTube channel was deleted. I want to want to say to pharma and the dark powers of these lying hypocritical health departments around the world we are still here kids are at much greater risk of drowning over the summer than they are from dying from COVID-19 and they've got about a 50 times increased risk of dying in a traffic accident coming to school than they do with anything related to COVID-19 when you have as much money as

people like Bill Gates and you're directly tied to investing in most of the tech companies. You can literally erase history. I want to believe that one of the richest men in the world is doing everything he can for the betterment of humanity. But at this stage, Dale, there's no doubt in my being that that's not the case. I believe that the censorship that's going to happen are going to be unlike anything we've ever seen before. I knew that the censorship that they were doing before the election was insane. And I realized that that the insanity would be cranked up to 11 when we got to the election. I get so many phone calls from my colleagues around me and emails and all are saying the same.

We understand completely what's going on, but if we would say something, we will lose our jobs. So we are afraid. If you really go into the details, you see it's organized crime. If you just follow the money. I've sat on numerous infectious disease boards. And what I did is I sat and educated nurses, doctors, surgeons on how to deal with flu outbreaks, the SARS outbreak. When you're dealing with infectious disease patients, these are not the masks that you wear. Even N95s are not fully rated to protect against a virus.

We have a director of OSHA saying, using surgical masks as a form of personal protective equipment may lead to adverse health effects. Boom, mic drop. COVID is an inflammatory lung disease. Budesinide is an anti-inflammatory medicine for the lungs. It's a perfect, overlay is almost like eudescineid was made for COVID-19. What takes so long to get a life-saving treatment into the public in the middle of what we're being told is an emergency pandemic where we should be trying anything we can find? It's against the messaging that we're supposed to be following, uh, that there's no hope. We're helpless. We're hopeless. Stay paralyzed waiting for Anthony Fauci to tell us that we have a vaccine to COVID.

Facebook finally deleted our page. The high wire is no longer to be found. Facebook, your page has been unpublished. What do we need to do to make sure we don't make one of the greatest scientific errors in human history? Protect yourself and protect all your neighbors and friends so that they don't get this vaccine and it's a great betrayal. We are betrayed.

It is irrational to take an untested, unproven... unproven medication that is shielded from liability when you're perfectly healthy. It's just plain, unethical and immoral. The hugest experiment ever been done in the history of medicine is being performed on men, on people. This is the thing that is so scandalous, so scandalous and so horrifying that any politician want to go for this, that any authorities, any medical people will say this is the right way to go? It's such a frightening, horrifying thought to me as a doctor. All lockdowns do is simply push the infections further down the road.

You close down all social activity, human interaction, the infection, the infection rate falls, you relax it because it's fallen, and hey, presto, the... the rate of infection goes up again. This is not a science fiction movie. I really wish it were, but it is not. You know, the UN, the EU, they are working hard to make vaccine passports a condition of air travel. You are going to have to show that you either have tested negative

for the coronavirus or that you have received the vaccine. And either way you look at it, that's an intrusion on personal liberties. There are 10 steps that would be dictators always take when they want to close an open society. And people always say, tell us when we're at step 10, and we're at step 10, and the vaccine passport, you cannot come back from it. I try not to overstate things, but this is, this is the end.

All three of us sit here today with no job, no income, our medical bills are stacking up, and we still have no answers and no help, and we are, what, three months in? It's very dishearting. You know, you trust the medical industry to help you. And at the end of the day, when there's no help, you just sit back and wonder why. We are completely being left out.

This virus is a man-made gain-of-function virus, paid for by U.S. taxpayers' dollars, including monies that came from the Department of Defense. defense. This is a bio weapon by every definition. Everest is nothing like he was before. It's a big difference to go from seeing your kiddo play basketball for hours a day. And you never worry about his health and to see him struggle, you know, to get out of the shower. And I did that. I mean, I let them do that.

I'm afraid everything, our governments and their scientific advisors have told us for a year and a half, all lies. All lies. Why have we got ourselves as a position where we vaccinated, you know, 80% of the population in Britain, or I think it's 75% of the population of Britain? We've got no long-term safety and it makes you think is someone trying to kill large numbers of people. I just don't understand how any of the scientists involved in what they're doing, can sleep that night. This is the largest uncontrolled clinical trial in medical history by orders of magnitude. An unsafe product is being injected into billions of people's arms.

We could have any clue about their long-term, long-term risk. I kind of cut my teeth at a place called the Salk Institute, created on the cliffs of La Jolla, looking out over the Pacific by Jonas Salk. It's kind of a temple to vaccines. I'm a physician and a scientist. And I'm I'm rigorously trained in bioethics. And I've written about the bioethics of experimental COVID-19 vaccines. And what I see as major issues that I'm concerned about.

I think Fauci can be nailed to the wall, or is he going to slide out of this again? I think he'll get out of it again because, you know, he was caught red-handed in HIV-AIDS. I mean, that was murder. the vaccine that they that they inoculated the military with giving millions of healthy young men, you know, pieces and parts of HIV and destroying their lives. He can just keep lying. He's the consummate liar. It's all a lie. You can track it all down. We knew even in the spring in the United States, our CDC had a fully documented 10,000 cases of vaccine failures by the end of May. So we knew the vaccines were even failing.

before the Delta variant moved in. And in fact, the CDC gave up on this, and they started doing what's called asymmetric reporting. This is important to understand that they were only going to report COVID-19 community cases than those that were unvaccinated. And all these people have gotten the vaccine instead of being protected.

Now they're actually susceptible to the Delta variant. Vaccine passports have nothing to do with health. They have to do with implementing a new digital, financial transaction system, which is in essence complete control. Health care is the marketing plan for the re-engineering of our governance and financial systems. This is a coup. After the vaccine rollout, I definitely noticed an uptick in heart attack, strokes,

blood clots, gastrointestinal bleeds, gastrointestinal complaints, appendicitis, we even saw pancreatitis, recurrent cancers. It was noticeably increased. It wasn't just me noticing it. Everybody seemed to notice it. It became clear to me that there was something wrong. How many cases do you think these were reported to theirs? I kind of lost track at 120.

I never thought in a million years that anybody would be against this idea. Because again, I have this belief that, you know, we're all health care workers and we have a common goal of doing the right thing and keeping our patients safely. I got a very interesting note from a family doc that's been in Ireland for 40 years. He knows his community, he knows his patients. And he said, hey, you know, a lot of my patients are getting the shot. Some aren't. But in those that are, and then he listed the number of cancers he's seen in a six-week period of time

that he's never seen in a 40-year career. Inexplicable cancers at really unusual ages that are really thick cancers and really aggressive cancers compared to what we are used to seeing in the lab. What mass vaccination has done, it has, within a short time frame, generated an excellent breathing ground for these more infectious variants so that now their propagation has exploded. If we are now going to vaccinate these people, these people will have their innate antibodies completely suppressed

and their acquired antibodies through vaccination, are completely worthy. Can you imagine what that means for individual health and for the population health? The order of magnitude will be something completely, completely unprecedented. It seems obvious to a growing multitude of people in this country and around the world that not only does he have the highest death rate in the greatest hospital system that's ever existed, and how you can explain that, I have no idea, but we see the destruction of our use of treatments that could work.

Are we going to get this guy, Bobby? We're meeting with attorney generals. We have attorneys who are preparing the suits. And, you know, at some point we are going to bring Tony Fosci into justice. These crises are used to justify the stripping away of our freedoms. And if the people are scared enough, they will allow it in ways that are unimaginable. They've now justified contact tracing, surveillance, all the stuff in the name of health. But it's really a game to corral us into kind of a technocracy-controlled environment.

The main idea of collectivism is that the group is more important than the individual, and that the individual must be sacrificed, if necessary, for the greater good of the greater number. We call them the deep state, but it's more than that. It's the super financial interests in the globe. They want their word for it is a new world order. It won't be communist. It won't be capitalist. It'll be collectivist. So what do we do about it? We have to get the word out to that 15% that we're talking about. And then we have to mobilize that 15% to get out and do something. It's not just about who you're going to vote for.

Not about who's going to get in the White House. Is though one man can do anything alone. We have to build this thing from the bottom up, county by county, city by city. That means we have to become organizers, we have to be activists. I go to bed at night and a big smile in my face, in spite of all the bad news, because I've been able to lay some foundation bricks. And as your video goes around to those millions of people, there be some more bricks go in there. And someday it will be beautiful.

I want to just, first of all, you know, take my hat off to my team that put that together. That is a lot of work. And it's an amazing body of work that we are very proud of. You know, many of you know I get attacked. We're in the New York Times, we're in the Washington Post, every fact checker in the world. I will continue to take all of those interviews gladly. I've told you before that many times I will say to them,

I know you're not going to print what I've said here or all of the facts or the truth. But I want to thank you for reporting on me, even if it's an attack, because millions and millions of people are waking up every single day and they don't know where the truth is. And by attacking me, they'll say, you know what? I'm tired of mainstream media. I'm tired of being lied to.

It is clear that none of the things you've told me are working or even proving to be true. I'm going to go ahead and check out the Highwire or Del Bigtree and they will come to us. And you have and you're here. We need to wake up even more people. And so that is part of this process. Today we have an amazing show. We're going to get into the psychology of what's taking place with Dr. Mark McDonald. And then I'm going to talk with a health policy expert about maybe the incentive.

that have driven this thing off its tracks and perhaps led to a killing spree that will only be truly understood in the history books in the future and those pages that we're trying to write right now. But in all of this, you know, when I look at the work that we've done, we are incredibly happy with how our information is aging. And I say that in these articles that try to attack me, I said, you know what, and they'll say to me, Del, you're not really a journalist because, you know, you sue, you have a legal team and you sue the government things. You are an activist. You're not a journalist. I was like, well, I don't know what you want to call me. And frankly, I don't care. What we are doing is what we are guided to do. I, you're right. Maybe I'm not a true journalist.

Maybe I'm not one of those guys that can stand there with a camera and watch a kid in danger in a war zone and get shot. I'm going to grab that kid and I'm going to pull them out of the way. So go ahead. Sue me. I'm not a perfect journalist. I get involved. That's what we're doing here. Where we see a problem we set out to fix it. And frankly, there's no way to get to the truth when the government is owned by, you know, giant corporations in the pharmaceutical industry and the technological industry and gas and oil and all the rest of it. So sometimes you have to sue to get to the information. So we're directly involved to tell you what I do not do. I do not work for a corporation.

I do not write articles based on what Pampers or Exxon or Pfizer has to say. They do not sponsor us. The people sponsor us. The Highwire is a show for and about our world. is driven by the desires and questions of the people. And so that is what we're going to continue to do. And I think we're starting to really influence this conversation. We feel really good, even though we were started in a little closet.

Our numbers are now exceeding those of many of the top-rated shows at CNN and Fox, because I think you know when you hear the truth. And for all of those reasons, one of the biggest stories now, I think starting out this new year, the thing that I think is one of the most exciting things that we've seen happen, in all of this is there's a brand new player that has stepped up to this poker table to decide to tell the truth. This is none other than Joe Rogan with, I think, the largest podcast audience in the world. I want to say he's in the hundreds of millions of followers. And this is something that we've reached out to multiple times. I can tell you over this entire pandemic. I know for a fact,

I've talked to Robert Kennedy Jr., who's reached out and said, you know, you've interviewed Dr. Peter Hotez, why don't you interview me? We've done the same thing. We've presented. We send information over to Joe Rogan. And he was not interested in a very long time into getting involved in this. We all know he took a giant contract at Spotify and, you know, blew that up and good on him. I mean, look, I've been watching his interviews. They're super fascinating. It was really frustrating that he wasn't diving into a topic where there was so much information and he seemed like such a logical guy. But then, as we reported and we all watched, he came under attack because when COVID became real to him, he had to decide what he was going to do once he was infected.

And yes, there was enough information out there that he decided to take ivermectin, got attacked by CNN and all of these networks saying that he was taking horse deworming medication. We talked about how the fact that Sanjay Gupta, he got him onto the show and reamed him for lying about the fact that he was taking veterinary medicine, when in fact he was taking a human prescription of a drug that had won the Nobel Prize. in 2015. And then the headline said he was an anti-vaxxer, something we were very sure in our communications in trying to reach out to him were not true. But this is what happens all over the world to those specialists, those scientists, those journalists that dare to ask just really obvious questions and find, you mean by simply asking a question or using a drug that when I looked at all the studies around the world was having great effect, I decided to use it on myself. I didn't force it on anyone.

It's simply what I decided to do with my own body. Now I'm an anti-axer. Joe, welcome to the team. Welcome to what happens to anybody that asks an honest question. I love that because really what it's doing is it's growing our movement. They decided they would try to use a pejorative to isolate all of us, but all they're doing is taking everybody that was maybe in a middle ground zone and pushing them onto our team.

And now more and more people are recognizing, wait a minute, if I'm being considered an anti-baxer, I'm going to have to reevaluate all of the team. reevaluate all those people I've been judging through the years. Well, of course, what I'm leaning up to is perhaps I think the biggest story that is breaking right now. And it's all because Joe Rogan has decided to get into this conversation. And he brought on to previous guests of the high wire other world-renowned scientists that we know and love. Our friends, Peter McCullough, who has been on multiple times and the inventor of the MRI vaccine technology, Dr. Robert

Malone. Two heroes amongst many that you just saw that have appeared on the high. Highwire. Well, they were finally asked to appear on Joe Rogan's podcast. And because of that, the internet has been broken. Here is that story. Let's take a look at the headlines really quick in what it's done. YouTube takes down anti-bax Joe Rogan interview with Dr. Robert Malone, which likened vaccines to mass psychosis. Calls ring out for Fauci to debate biologist after Rogan podcast appearance. Those are huge moves. And we are starting to see this start. to get into the mainstream. Perhaps Joe Rogan is that bridge into the mainstream.

He's certainly a bridge into the youth and the college students and the people that are questioning this. But as I said, simply bringing on two scientists that are now being censored, now Joe Rogan's getting kicked off of YouTube, at least these videos are, he's now recognizing what it takes to break the internet. Here's what happened. Well, the term mass formation psychosis trended over the weekend with so many searches that broke the internet.

When people went to search for the term on Google, a couple of strange things happened. Some people saw this odd disclaimer from Google saying the results were changing quickly and that it would take time for results to be added by reliable sources. What does this even mean? I thought when you Googled something, it would bring up sites relating to the topic. Why would Google need time to add results by quote-unquote reliable sources? Sounds like they're censoring search results. Well, a few hours later, when people searched for the term, a bunch of sites began to pop up,

claiming it was a new far-right buzzword, or one attributed to anti-vaxxers. So what is mass formation psychosis? Well, the term came recently from the Joe Rogan Dr. Robert Malone interview that aired this past Friday. And this leads into this whole issue of mass formation psychosis. There's good modeling studies that probably half a million excess deaths have happened in the United States through the intentional blockade of early treatment by the U.S. government. but was also heard and explained in more detail during Dr. Peter McCullough's interview with Rogan.

We're in what's called a mass formation psychosis. This is very important. I give credit to Dr. Matthias Desmet in the University of Ghent in Belgium. And recently, Dr. Mark McDonald, psychiatrist from L.A., Mark McDonald's got a new book out, The United States of Fear, describing how the mass psychosis developed. What your listeners need to know is a mass psychosis is when there is a mass psychosis is when there is a a group think that develops so strong that it leads to something horrific. And the examples are these mass suicides that occur in these religious cults. The example is Nazi Germany when people walk into gas chambers and were gas. These horrific things.

And four elements here is very important, Joe. First, there must be a period of prolonged isolation, lockdowns. Number two, there must be a withdrawal of things taken away from people that they used to enjoy. That's happened. Number three, there must be constant, incessant free-floating anxiety. Number four, there must be a single solution offered by an entity in authority. The solution was vaccination. Years ago, we were told by one of our presidents that we really don't have anything to fear,

except for fear itself. But now we're told that fear is good. Fear is necessary. In fact, fear is a virtue. Well, it's the term that broke. the internet and the book all about this is the United States of Fear. I'm joined right now by the author, Dr. Mark McDonald. First of all, let's sort of get some things straight. I mean, obviously this term is now all over the internet. Everyone's talking about it, but it's not exactly

the right term, right? This term mass formation psychosis. Is that is that the correct term of what we're even talking about? It's a bit of a mishmash between two terms that were, Let's just use the word invented. Okay. In parallel between me, a psychiatrist in Los Angeles, and a psychologist named Matthias Desmond in Belgium. We both arrived at the same conclusions, but we use different language. His term is mass formation. My term is mass delusional psychosis.

And McCullough and Malone's term is both combined together. Okay. Which is fine, but they mean all the same thing. Okay. And what is that actually? In fact, in your book, and by the way, I just want to say, like, reading this book, I've read several books. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book on The Real Anthony Fauci, and then Scott Atlas' book about

working in the White House. And both of them filled me with such anxiety and in frustrations. I wanted to put my fist through a wall. I really have to say, for everybody out there that is a clear-thinking person, find like you're in some, like, weird dystopian novel. this book really I found it settling because you gave you know credibility and understanding and reality to those of us to really understand we are not the crazy ones and what we're seeing truly is crazy but to describe that craziness just a little bit let's just take this excerpt from the book where you get into the actual term mass formation psychosis many parents were refusing to bring their children to see me frightened they or their children would catch a fatal disease simply by coming to my office One told me his eight-year-old son had put his fist through a plate glass window at home, unable to tolerate being confined to a two-room apartment 24 hours a day for months on end.

Another patient began wetting the bed, yet another attacked her brother with a kitchen knife later that summer in speaking with colleagues around the country at conferences and sharing clinical experiences with them through group email. I discovered that this was happening everywhere. This was self-evident, yet a large segment of society, continued to voluntarily sequester at home, wear masks, outdoors, and perform other superstitious and scientifically baseless rituals like wiping down Amazon deliveries with bleach. I knew one man whose wife insisted on taking off her clothes whenever she returned home and throwing

them in the dryer for sterilization. That is insanity. Previously, normal appearing individuals had clearly lost their minds. Worse, these behaviors were not limited to a handful of people. I read reports of extreme changes in thoughts and actions from all over the country, primarily from large urban centers, much of the nation had disconnected from basic reality. I began to call this condition a mass delusional psychosis. So how did you come to that term and what is involved in that description? Well, I started using the term mass delusional psychosis way back in May of 2020, and I spoke about it in Washington, D.C. at a conference in June of 2020. What I meant by that and what I still mean by that today is an entire group, an entire population, which is the American people all at the same time losing their rational faculties, being unable to think, acting as a herd.

That's what I mean by mass delusional psychosis. How is that achieved? I mean, is there a historical reference to, I mean, obviously there's been references to Nazi Germany, things like that where you sort of have. population start moving in mass against what would sort of be the moral standard that we'd been used to. Is this something that is only forced by, you know, larger organized groups on purpose? Well, this is where it gets interesting, Delo. My argument, which I make in the book, is that their fuel for this mass delusional psychosis. It doesn't just show up. The fuel is fear. We cannot become massly, delusionally psychotic without first being scared.

The fear has been the drive behind this pandemic from the very beginning. Without fear, it all falls apart. Scientifically, medically, we won this battle at the very beginning. We've known how to treat this disease. We've known how to help people. We've known how to keep people safe from probably week two, week three. but we have collapsed as a country physically, psychologically, economically, not because of a virus, but because of fear. And it's the fear that has been driving and driven by government, by corporations, and by media, all colluding together to perpetuate the mass delusional psychosis, meaning the irrationality, because it benefits them.

Because the end stage, the end goal, the end point of this is the same as it is for every totalitarian regime throughout the 20th. 20th century. Dependency on government. Once people are dependent on government, then they don't depend on their families. They don't depend on their churches. They don't depend on their communities. They look up, but they don't look to God. They look to government. That in my view is the end game. And so how did you see this? When did you decide to write the book? I mean, you're living in Los Angeles, correct? Los Angeles, California. And where from, you know, I consider, myself a refugee. I left California just two years, two and a half years ago now to be in Texas, but still my heart is there. So many of my friends are there. When I visit, it's a whole other

level of insanity from what we're experiencing here in Texas. But at what point, did you, was it sort of the people coming into your practice? What was making you think there is something going on and it's on a mass scale versus when in your job as a psychiatrist? you're probably used to people having their own, you know, hang-ups, issues, phobias, whatever it is. When did you start realizing there's a similarity across a larger body of people? I realized it when I started leaving my home in the morning and hearing the door closed behind me and feeling the same sense of confusion and disbelief that I felt when I would walk into the locked units in the psychiatric hospital when I was a resident.

and the door would close behind me, and I would see the people moving around the room, and I would remind myself, anyone inside this locked facility that doesn't have a badge is probably crazy. When I started to feel the same way walking around outside outdoors in Los Angeles, every single person that I see walking by himself, by herself wearing a dog is probably crazy. That's when I felt that something was up. I felt like this is not just one crazy homeless person talking to himself under an overpass or a drug user urinating by the side of the school park.

This is everyone. This is educated people. This is not just derelicts people that you dismiss as being crazy. This is a population-wide illness, which is spreading throughout the entire city. Yeah. He had this great quote from the book because I think it really brings it in the difference between sort of a delusion and just a disembate. agreement, right? You say in the book this, all delusions, though, are by definition irrational. This is what makes them pathologic. The harm they bring to the individual holds them comes

from a diminished capacity to live with reality. They are also impervious to reason. Otherwise, they would simply be wrongheaded opinions that change once confronted with reality. Now, I know almost, I think my entire audience reading that knows exactly what we're talking about, but what's crazy about it is if I just took that quote and showed it to those people that are walking in the world that are crazy, they would say, yeah, that's exactly what they feel about us, right? They think we're crazy, that we are not, you know, recognizing the obvious incredible danger that this virus brings and the risk that we're all at in. And if we're not wearing our mask, we're putting everybody at risk. They do believe that.

And it's largely because of media. The media that they listen to every morning, they wake up and they listen to CNN, they read the New York Times. And what do they see every day? And what have they seen every day for the last 18 now, 20 months? Cases, hospitalizations, and deaths from a virus. That's all they hear all day long. And if they hear anything else, it's all the people that are denying that are all right-wing

conservative Trump supporting crazy people right and this is the propaganda this is the hypnosis that many americans have been under now for the last two years they are no longer able to take in information which is truthful and objective and you couple that with the fear where they wake up scared every day people who are afraid they don't want to go out and slay the bear go to work they want to be protected they're like infants and they're turning towards a higher power to protect them. And it used to be mommy and daddy. Well, now it's the government. The people who are not fearful, the people like you and I, we don't rely on those powers to keep us safe. We rely on ourselves, our families, our communities, our churches. That's what separates us.

They are dependent and they are fearful. And they cannot listen or hear any alternative arguments. This is why I've been saying from day one, this is not a data war. I completely agree with Dr. McColl on Dr. Malone on the data. We are in sync there. However, they have been speaking this for almost two years and it's not making any headway. What made headway in the last 48 hours? The term mass formation psychosis, which is not a scientific data term. It's a term about psychology. It's about fear and craziness. This is what broke the internet. It wasn't data points about the failures of vaccines. It wasn't data points about the risk of healthy people to a virus as a essentially nil. Nobody cares about that because they're scared. But when they notice, when

Americans who are scared hear the term mass formation psychosis or mass delusional psychosis, they think, whoa, that's interesting. That kind of describes me or my neighbor. There's something, I'm curious to know more about that. And it's curiosity that has to precede the dropping of fear. People who are curious but fearful, they have a shot. But when I talk to people who are brainwashed, who are scared, who have no curiosity about the other side, no curiosity about what it means to be mentally ill, what it means to be paranoid, there's nothing you can do for them.

No data point is going to change their mind. So is that, you know, if I was, you know, and you probably already answered this, but I remember watching a film years and years ago called Jacob's Ladder, and it was one of the most terrified movies ever seen because it's just about being inside of a guy who's losing his mind and doesn't know reality from not.

And it really is scary to think you're losing, your mind. And part of the problem is, would you know it? How do you know you're not the one from those quotes? How do we know we're not the ones that are crazy and they're right? Because it's almost a 50-50 divide, it feels like. Certainly here in the United States of America, I'm going to assume based on the fact that we're very similar as a species around the world that there's 50% of us that

are saying the other side is crazy. Is there a way to sort of a litmus test that you can have? for yourself that would say, no, I'm still saying. And for those, if you put both groups into a room right now and said, I just read you the quote, here's a delusion, here's the difference between being wrongheaded or wrong-minded and delusional, what is the litmus test we run ourselves through as we check in to say, no, I'm still good? A lot of people ask me this question in a different format. They'll say there's so much information out there that that conflicts. There's so many differing views. How do you know who to trust? Because you want to be the right person. You want to

follow the right people. You don't want to be the crazy person following all the nonsense. The one that's arguing that incantations and talismans are the way to get out of this. You want to follow the science. That's what we all say. Even the people that disagree with us that are scared say they're following the science. It's a very fair question. This is how I answer it. Don't follow me. Don't follow a guru. Don't follow someone who says he has a monopoly on truth. Just do the following.

Ask yourself, the people that you followed, the people that you believe, the people that you trusted from the beginning from March of 2020, have they been right or have they been wrong? That's how you show and prove that someone is telling you the truth. It's through patterns. It's not through projecting. into the future whether someone is going to be right and i can tell you that if you look back from the beginning for march april may and you look at the people like me like robert malone like peter mccola people that have been speaking out providing you with information from the very beginning they have been right they have been proven right time and time again and even more importantly

when they've been wrong they have owned up to it right the other side has never done that just think about Anthony Fauci how much of what he said has been proven to be wrong. How many times has he changed his mind and how many times has he actually owned up to it and apologized? Never. Right. I think that's a very, very good way for any individual person who wants to be intellectually honest to see if he's on the right side or the wrong side. Don't trust me. Look backwards. You know, this is, again, this book is just really helpful for all of you out there that, you know, I think we're, We're moving into this new year, 2022.

And if I'm speaking, you know, for a lot of people out there, I have a little bit of anxiety right now. I have anxiety because I have to do this show. I'm going to have to keep saying Anthony Fauci's name and I want it to go away. You know, I'm going to be having to talk about, you know, President Biden pushing policies, schools shutting down and children not being allowed in schools, watching people forcibly, you know, putting masks on children, forcibly vaccinating children for an illness that, as you clearly state, it's full of science here also, we know this doesn't affect children.

And so there's this inner rage that I think those of us that are saying, you know, carrying a certain amount of rage can't be healthy either or sane. And so what would be your advice for those of us that are finding such incredible frustration staring into the eyes of these people that are just totally brainwashed, not really home? And then they're condescending towards us as though we're the ones that, you know, aren't listening to the science and the reason. Can you give us, you know, some sort of way forward in this year? Because I think we've still got a ways to go to get to the end of us, even though it's crumbling down around them,

and every day they're having to backtrack or change their tune and all of that, and we've had a lot of fun with this entire experience on the highway, like you, being able to point out how many times we've been right along the way. But it's still, I think there's a lot of people that are getting a point where they just want to reach out and strangle their friend, their loved one, that is just not even home anymore. What do we do for ourselves to stay sane? This is something that I faced in Los Angeles, as you know, is one of the epicenters of insanity in the United States today, along with San Francisco and Portland and New York.

It's pretty bad out here. About 80% of Los Angeles are still walking around outdoors with masks on, whether they're biking, exercising, driving, pushing baby carriages. They're still wearing masks. They are not getting better here. They are still very, very sick. almost insane and I felt alone. I felt isolated. I felt that there was no one around me that was thinking rationally. So I did this. I decided that I would actively surround myself with like-minded people. I would build a community of people here in Los Angeles that I would actually spend time with face to face in groups and one-on-one. That made all the difference. If you are in the camp of the rational and the non-fearful, you cannot isolate you. yourself. You cannot sit in front of a Zoom screen or a news broadcast all day long because you know that those people are scared and they're going to make you sick. You have to. You have to find

other people that are like you. If you live in a very isolated area, it might have to be somewhat remote. You might have to form a telegram group or a signal group or some form of online community. I get it. It's not ideal, but it's better than sitting at home by yourself. But in most places, there are other people like you and if you start to speak out if you start to take a risk then you will come across other people that will be attracted to you because you are one of the same ones and that has happened to me more than every i'd say the last 10 years of my life the last 18 months i have come across more people locally and throughout the country who are like minded and who share my views and who are sane and rational than i have in in all the years

prior and it's because I have spoken out I have stepped up I have taken a risk to express my views I've lost in my life but they weren't people that I actually miss losing as I as I heard from Mickey Willis recently when I was filming Plandemic out in Austin and out in your neck of the woods yeah I didn't lose a single friend in putting together my Tlandemic series because the people that left me were not my friends and the recompense of wonderful people since then has been enormous trust me this is true it has been true in my life as well i believe that you can attract great people by being honest and sincere and stepping up and fighting the fear i have not been depressed or sad for the last year because i've done that and has made all the difference i talk about it in more detail in

my book in the last chapter but i think this is the very very most important first step to do find like-minded people form a community it will inoculate you against the craziness That's really great advice and it's so true. It's something we've talked about. And I think it's one of the beautiful side effects of this insane time we're in is that it's really truly helping us recognize what is, you know, who are our true friends, what really is our inner family and circle. And community is huge. I had that experience. I was, you know, back visiting my family back in Boulder, Colorado and I decided at the last minute to give a talk. There was no advertising, but my father's minister. So let me take the church. I want to talk about vaccines in Boulder. Boulder's like an epicenter of insanity, like, you know, California. I think they're bragging that there's somewhere around 85 to 90 percent vaccinated. And, you know, I didn't even visit a year ago because I just couldn't handle seeing my hometown in that condition. But I'll say without any advertising, I walked in there and the place was packed. I mean, to the walls, I think the room holds 700 people, standing room only, in the edges of the doorways.

And one of the beautiful things about it was everyone came up to me afterwards and said, thank you so much for having this moment. I didn't realize they were meeting their neighbors saying I didn't know my next door neighbor believed the same thing I did. And here we all. We ran into each other here. And it's part of the problem. They have us so afraid to speak our truth that we're not being heard by someone that maybe 10 feet away that is in our community, is in our family. It's why we've got to speak out. We've got to start standing in our truth. We are the sane ones. They are crazy. and so many stories of families that got together where the crazy wears off when they're around you long enough.

They're around sane people. They start, you know, the mask starts coming down and eventually you get a hug three days into the family vacation because they're recognizing, I remember what it was once like to be sane. We've got a long road ahead of us to dig our way out of this. It's an incredible book, Mark. It really is a fantastic read. It's an easy read, but it brings sanity back to this conversation.

I want to thank you for doing it, And I hope we get to have you on the show again soon. All right. This has been great. I really appreciate it and enjoy it. Thank you. All right. You bet.

Dr. Mark McDonald, keep up the good work. How do we follow you? How do we follow the work that you're doing and maybe speak engagements you might have around the country? So I just started a substack in anticipation of my firing from Twitter and Facebook, as most have gone that way recently, including Robert Malone, which is called Dissident MD, D-I-S-I-D-E-N-T, D-S-S-I-D-E-N-T, Dissident M-E-E-E-E-N-E-D. Okay. Which is also my website, which you have up now as well. Dissidentmd.com where I post obviously this book, as well as some of my op-eds and recent publications that I put on on my substack account. This is where you go to find out what I'm writing.

I also do a lot of posts, at least until I'm canceled, on my Twitter and my Facebook page, which are M. McDonald-M-D., and Mark McDonald-MD., respectively. But I get censored and shut down frequently. So I really would encourage people to go to dissident MD.com or the substaffer where I'm going to start to post regularly every week. And also I'm going to start putting information about my book in process, which is going to cover recovery from fear, an entire book on how to recover from fear. Because I see year 2022 as the year where we recover from fear. No more mass delusional psychosis. We're recovering from fear. And I want to lead that charge.

All right. sounds good. Well, we want to help you with that charge. So important to get our lives, our sanity, this planet back in our hands. Take care. We'll talk to you again soon. Thanks, Stowe. All right. Well, to get deeper into that insanity that does surround us, it's time for the Jackson Report. Well, happy New Year, Jeffrey. Here we go. Another year. We're still here. We're still here. Rocking it out. You've been amazing. You know, how was your holiday? It was awesome. All right. Yeah, it was awesome. Lots of rest. No fear. All right, good. No mass formation psychosis. No delusion. So anybody out there watching the news, they're probably in fear. And why is that? It's because the news lately the past couple weeks

is looking like this. Take a look. We begin tonight with the latest wave of COVID infections, making it feel yes, like December of 2020. The country is in the midst of an Omicron tidal wave. The average number of new COVID cases nearly 300,000 a day. Americans wondering whether family gatherings will affect the spike in cases fueled by the Omicron variant. The CDC is now saying the Omicron variant is responsible for nearly 60% of all COVID cases across the country as of Christmas Day. COVID cases are rising extraordinarily quickly, even in people who are vaccinated. Dr. Fauci today said COVID Omicron will become the dominant variant very soon. There are some encouraging signs.

Many people with this new Amicron variant get asymptomatic infections. While new COVID-19 cases shot up 60% in the last week, hospitalizations rose just 14%. The average number of daily deaths actually dropped by 7%. If you have tried to get a test lately, you already know it is very hard to get one right now. Again, today, long line stretching through streets in major cities all across the country. Look at this. Miami. Today, once again, jammed with cars at a testing site. And in New York City, people sharing videos showing long lines at testing sites.

And chaos at testing centers. With tests sold down at many pharmacies. We've obviously got to do better. There certainly is. I mean, you know, this is one circumstance where, you know, we talk about the media being sort of sensational and they're putting a lot of fear around it. But I'll be honest with you. And I've been asking about for me,

I do feel like Amacron is not like anything I've seen as far as the amount of people that got sick over the holidays. I would say almost everyone in my family that had not previously got sick seemed to have come down with it, you know, put me through. But it does feel like it's everywhere. I mean, I don't remember it feeling like this up until this moment. Amacrom does seem to be a little bit different in that. It's sweeping certainly America and I would guess is it appears the world. Yeah, and there's a lot of new information that's come out. So let's check that out right now. Let's go over it. First of all, this is mainstream headlines right out of Reuters from the WHO. World Health Organization says more evidence that Omicron causes milder symptoms. So they're saying there's studies and evidence emerging that the Omicron variant is only affecting the upper respiratory tract compared to the other variants that were going deeper with their pathology. And you know, you get the people running to the ventilators at the beginning of the pandemic. We all remember, sadly. So that's a good sign because, it's staying out of the deep lung tissue pathology.

But here's, let's look at a study. We have some of the first studies that are really digging into the Omicron versus the Delta. And this is a study right here, comparison of outcomes from COVID infection and pediatric and adult patients before and after the emergence of Omicron. They looked at five, almost 500,000 first time SARS-CoV-2 infected patients nationwide. They looked at a nationwide database from multiple surveillance sites in the U.S. And this is what they found. So they write, and these are the comparisons, they write the three-day risk in the emergent

Amicron cohort outcomes were consistently less than half of those in the Delta cohort. Emergency department visits were 4.55%. This is the Amacron versus 15.22% in the Delta. Hospitalizations, 1.75% in the Amacron versus 3.95% in the Delta. ICU admissions. 0.26% in the Amacron versus 0.78% in the Delta. And then finally, the mechanical ventilation. God forbid, we're still doing this to people.

Luckily, it's 0.07% in the Amacron compared to it was 0.43% in the delta. So to summarize, really, a lot of numbers there. 70% decrease in emergency department visits. Yeah. 55% decrease in hospitalizations for the Amicron variant. 66% decrease in ICU admissions in 83%. percent decrease in mechanical ventilation. So that's really, really good news. Yeah, super good news. Absolutely. So even though it's sweeping, it's much more like a cold and not really like

even a flu. I mean, those numbers are really low. Yeah. And more good news from this study, those authors go on to say this as well, talking about the wide range of population. They say in children under five years old, the overall risk of emergency department visits and hospitalization in the emerging Amacron cohort were 3.89% and 0.96% respectively, significantly lower than the 21.01% and 2.65% in the matched delta cohort. And then the kicker right here, similar trends were observed for other pediatric groups ages 5 to 11, 12 to 17 years, adults 18 to 64, and older adults, older adults, over 65. So basically everyone is experiencing less of these larger issues that are really associated with this with this COVID virus that we're seeing.

And now in the you in the yes absolutely in the UK we can go over to there. There was a report that was put together with their numbers office national statistics and so on and so forth. And here's the headlines coming out of there over 70s those are 70 year old people 10 times less likely to die from COVID than last year. This is from professor Anthony Brooks. He's an expert in genetics and health data at the University of Lester. He helped compile research based on office national statistics government and NHS infection reports. And he says, COVID no longer posed a significant threat to, quote, the vast majority of people, end quote.

He continues, we will not be in anything like the same place in January 2020 as we were in January 2021. Infected individuals are at dramatically less risk of becoming seriously ill or dying than a year ago, he said. And here's the kicker. He added, over the last month, the risk has been dropping further, thanks to Amacron, now accounting for about 95% of cases in. in England. Amacron is around four-fold less dangerous. It's like nature's vaccine. So we have an amazing statement, in fact, and we've had that conversation. I'm not sure if I said it on one of the previous shows when we were talking about, but what we have been, you know, thinking to ourselves is, you know, we've mentioned, I think it should be on the table,

whether this is man-made again or natural. But if it's natural, you know, I think there's even scientists that have called this perhaps God's vaccine. But it really does feel, I've been watching this no matter what, whether there's some benevolent person out there, maybe they're saving their own butts, they release this, I don't know. But it does feel like, you know, or the thought that I have is it possible that a milder virus like this that is sweeping across everybody. In fact, it's getting everybody that doesn't matter, one shot, two shot, three shots, vaccines, it seems to get right through that.

And for us, we know that you're really hurting your immune system. You're blocking the ability for your immune system to have a decent recognition, future variants. I wonder if Omicrom could even reset those individuals. My thinking is, is this sort of that last exit to Brooklyn, that last opportunity to jump off this crazy bandwagon, let this virus run its course, of course, always protecting. I'm never going to say just blanketly, just let it run its course, but to say that for those that are still at high risk, you know, even though this is much lower risk, let's protect them. But honestly, of all the times, I've been ridiculed early on when I said, for those of us that are healthy, we need to get out and

catch this cold. In this case, I don't think you have to do anything. It's going to find you whether you're wearing three masks, triple backs, it doesn't matter. This thing is coming your way. The mistake, it seems to me, would be to add a booster after it. I've met people that say, oh, I just got that omacron, but I'm finally testing negative. I got to go get my booster shot. I'm thinking, what in the hell is wrong with this person? You have like the Ferrari of immunity now. You've been through it. You've built up, you know, memory, you know, B cells and T cells and antibodies. You're ready to go. You have a Ferrari. You're going to trade that in now for a Pinto and go back to vaccinated, you know, immunity and for

everyone that's watched all of our shows on what that vaccine actually does, the specific antibodies. But man, does this feel like a get out of jail free card for all sides? For all sides. For Fauci and all of them. Go ahead. Take it as a victory. Let this thing sweep.

Stop this vaccine program. Let's listen to Geert Van de Boch. My concern is that if we don't use this opportunity to jump off this crazy train, that the next, you know, that next moment will be like. that dark cloud that covers the sun and we thought we were through it. And then what happens if you continue to pressure this virus? It obviously figured out in some way how to be more infectious. What if it becomes more deadly? We're really lucky right now. It feels like wherever this comes from, it really could reset. And as that guy said, it's like a natural vaccine.

We should really, I think, celebrate this and got to be a great time for like all of those great Barrington scientists that were really believed in, you know, sort of controlled you know, acceptance of this virus and let it sort of run its course, but protect those that need to be protected. Scott Atlas is part of that group too. Man, I really, I pray to God we come to our senses before we do something really stupid like continue to vaccinate. Yeah. And speaking of that, running parallel with this Amacron variant and all of its points, there are some information that's been known for coming on two years now about the vaccine. So there's probably the hardest push for vaccination we've ever seen across the world because of the lockdowns and how the unvaccinated

are being treated from Australia to France to Italy. So the heart group. This is a UK group of independent doctors and scientists. They wrote an article and they compiled all this research. It stands for Health Advisory and Recovery Team. And they titled that the worrying phenomenon known since, known about since 2020. And what they're looking at, they concluded, they looked at nine studies and they concluded this. In summary, the evidence of an increased infection rate, in the first two weeks after vaccination is well established. There remains debate around what causes the higher rates immediately after vaccination, but the fact that this occurs is not disputed.

How much of a higher infection rate? Just a couple of those studies. Here's some percentages. A Brazilian study, 69% higher rate in vaccinated healthcare workers compared to unvaccinated healthcare workers for the first 13 days after the shot. We have a Danish paper 40% increase in the first two weeks among vaccinated home care residents. And even Pfizer's own data showed a, a 40% increase in what they call suspected COVID in vaccinated versus the placebo in the original

data that they submitted. Now, what's interesting about this is, I mean, I love how they say that it's accepted. We've been saying that we've been showing data that we've been showing these data drop where we see it appears that you, you know, lose your immune protection at least for those first couple of weeks. I love that they're saying that it's widely accepted. I certainly, I'm listening. I hear it on the high wire. I don't know what it's that widely accepted at CNN. MSNBC and Fox. Right, right. But it's great that somebody's finally admitting that this is the case.

And the issue is like you talked about with Professor Norman Fenton a couple weeks ago, those first 14 days, those first two weeks are typically omitted from the science. But most of the science, but a lot of the science also adds those numbers to the unvaccinated group. So it's kind of an unfair counting. But as this vaccination push is happening, I think it's important to really. understand that this is the data. So as we're seeing these cases explode along with the vaccination rates, we have to parse that out and see exactly what's happening there. But as we're talking about the vaccinations, some big news just happened this week for the FDA and now also yesterday, the ASIP

committee. And that was the approval of boosters for the EUA. They extended this. This was the headline at the highwire.com news page. FDA bypasses advisors, approves Pfizer boosters for children as young as 12. These vaccines and related biological product advisory committee, that's Verpack. Man. Yep. They skipped Verpack and they just went right for it. And, you know, we've covered this before.

It's not the first time they've skipped that committee and ignored them. But here's what's interesting about this. It's starting to gain some focus and it's starting to gain some attention from the wider scientific community about how wrong this is. So here's John Hopkins, uh, professor, surgical oncologist Marty McCarrey. And he took to Twitter and just blazed it out there. He says, Dear President Biden, FDA is bypassing it scientific advisors to authorize boosters for all kids 12 to 15 next week. This is unconscionable, undermines the integrity of the FDA's standard process. Please require

FDA to put this authorized before the Verpack advisory committee for a vote. Well, that didn't happen. So he went back and said this. It is a slap in the face to science for U.S. FDA to circumvent the standard convening of the expert advisory board. FDA is quietly doing this because their experts previously voted it down, voicing concern about medical harms. That's at President of the United States and Dr. Janet Woodcock. Ram Paul even got in the mix, jumping onto that Twitter thread, and he had this to say about it. This is Kentucky Senator. He said, so government is ignoring its own rules to push booster vaccines on kids for a disease that is less deadly in children than the seasonal flu. And then finally, we have, this is a hematologist, oncologist, health researcher, Vinay Prasad.

He was on Twitter and he said this, deciding to boost millions of kids with zero efficacy data with no idea the risk benefit is favorable is something I never thought I would see from the FDA. Would not have happened if Gruber Cruz still work there. What does he mean by that? This is the scientist, Dr. Marion Gruber, director of the FDA's vaccine office and her deputy. Philip Cruz, and they stepped away from the FDA. And at the time, the headlines looked like this. Scientists who quit FDA criticized plan for widespread COVID vaccine boosters. And after that happened, it was smooth sailing it looked like.

But what is Dr. Prasad saying in that tweet there? Let's look at the FDA's basically science by press release. This is what they gave us since they didn't have that expert committee. And this is the headline there, they expand expanding the use of the fires of bioeastern. N-Tech vaccine. And it says here, the FDA reviewed real-world data from Israel, including safety data for more than 6,300 individuals 12, 15 years of age to receive the booster dose. So that's what they're basing it on. Then they go on to say, astonishingly, the data shows there are no new safety concerns following a booster in this population. There were no new cases of myocarditis,

paracarditis reported to date in these individuals. Well, that's really interesting. And what that led was yesterday the advisory committee on immunization practices, and also CDC head Wollinsky signed off on this. And here's the headline, CDC approves use of Pfizer COVID boosters for ages 12 to 15. You know what just stands out to me as I see that. You just did that previous slide where they say, and there wasn't a raise in risk of myocarditis and parocharditis. I mean, how many people do we hear in hospitals when their child is now in the hospital with a swollen heart, which may be a permanent issue that could lead to their, you know, early demise, say, I had no idea that this was a side effect of this issue.

And here it is clear. The FDA knows it is such an important issue that it goes out of its way to bring it up, say, it's not worse than it already was than the other vaccines we gave you, so just step right up and get it. But it shows you it's on their minds. It shows you that it's there. This is not something that, you know, anti-baxies are making up. They know for a fact, and everyone watching this, maybe watch this for the first time,

I want you to know this. If you're one of those people that's now joining us because your child had a swollen heart and you thought that that was just crazy talk by anti-vaccurers, now you know the FDA accepts this as a casualty. They are perfectly okay with every one of those children out there that are getting a swollen heart, maybe even dying with heart issues, whether it's on a soccer team or in a football field or a baseball field or playing tennis. They accept that. They are looking at that. They're staring it right in the face and saying, yeah, we don't care.

Get it out there. Right. And we're talking about heart inflammation, mildcarditis, pericarditis. And there is a gigantic study that just came out that was pretty much not reported in the mainstream whatsoever. And we're going to cover it here. This was out of Kaiser Permanente Northwest, one of the largest health care organizations in the United States. And its risk of mild parricotitis following COVID-19, MRNA vaccination in a large integrated health system. They looked at people, a cohort from December 2020 to October 2021. And understand, this is what the conclusion was. They say, we identified additional valid cases of myoparicarditis following an MRNA vaccination that would be missed by the VSD's search algorithm. The VSD is a vaccine safety data link, which depends on select hospital discharge diagnosis codes. The true incidence of myopercaditis is markedly higher than the incidence reported to U.S. advisory committees. So understand what these authors did. The VSD just looks at these ICD codes. That's the code they use for billing.

And that's all they do. And they say, well, that's what the code is and this is what we have. But these authors search the text, the actual text the doctors wrote down during the visit. Search all of the information, all of those notes. And they also search the billing code. So sometimes someone, because the CDC only has certain centers that they surveil from. So if you get the shot at one of those centers and then your kid goes not to the center, but to a local doctor because his heart swells up.

Sometimes that gets lost in the billing codes and that doesn't get caught on the VSD. So these authors went and checked all of those things. And this is what they found. This is the image about the rates here, the chart. So you can see here the biggest number there, 537.1. If you track that down, males second dose per million. So that's 537.1 per million. So cases of 18 to...

of a yes cases of myocarditis okay wow correct yes and ages 18 to 24 and the second biggest one is ages 12 to 17 uh and that's male second dose that's 377.4 per million now those numbers we're looking at those and thinking okay what's going on here what are they is the cdc really missing this well we pulled some reports from the cdc okay and this was a report this was their m mw r report from June. And remember June 2021, this is when they had to pause because mild carditis became a big issue. And they actually had to have a meeting, ASEP had to have a meeting on myocarditis to see if the benefits outweighed the risk. Well, let's look at the numbers they found here. They write in this report. The highest reporting rates were among males, same age group,

parsing up, age 12 to 17 years, and those age 18 to 24 years, 62.8 and 50.5 reported myocarditis cases per million second doses of MRNA COVID vaccine administered respectively. So you're talking 62, basically 50 verse 537 per million and 377 per million. I think we brought up a graph. Let's see that graph so that people can see the comparison between what the CDC had said was the actual issue versus what is now being revised by this new study. So there you have it. The estimated by the CDC, remember that's when they vote. They voted based on those numbers said, yeah, we're willing to accept 62.8 people per million and 50.5 per million. But what they're really accepting because they don't do decent data collection and didn't really

care enough is that that number appears to be much high. What is that? Five times higher at least, maybe, you know, 10 times higher, a thousand percent, a thousand percent increase to 377 per million in the 12 to 17 range and 18 to 24 in the 537 range. And by the way, people, this is Kaiser-Binente. these are five, these are numbers of pro vaccine people, pro vaccine doctors just decided to actually do a decent investigation. So that is shocking. I mean, it's shocking how far off the CDC,

which is who we trust, our government regulatory agency that is supposed to be blocking us from getting a dangerous product from the pharmaceutical industry that's bragging about making tens of billions of dollars from it. And they don't even have their numbers straight and are way, way off the mark. Just to add a continued point to this, I pulled another slide here. This is from October 20, 21. So even further along the line, and their numbers are basically still low. We're still in the double digits here. Pfizer is looking at 69.1 there with the second dose from ages 16 to 17. 18 to 24 is 38.6. So it's just going lower and lower and lower. So this is this is what we're looking at here from the latest from the CDC but let's go back to the

fda so they used israeli data that's what they essentially based this entire booster emergency use authorization on so how much data did they use where did they look at is it safe here's the actual slide from the presentation you can see here is they extended it in 12 to 15 year olds so in males remember males second dose is where that myocarditis is really getting hit hard you can see here zero post third post dose three that one two three fourth column in males 12 to 15 zero and if you go one more one more a column over there was only three thousand one hundred and seventy eight kids that they use for that cohort for that group of people that they were investigating now let's go back to that kaiser permanente data and that kaiser permanente data if you break that down you know it's in

per million so that's kind of hard to understand what that really means but if you do the math that. It's basically one in 100, 1,860 cases of myocarditis in males aged 18 to 24 and 1.2,000 650. When we hear millions, when we hear the millions, it's hard to wrap your head around it. But does anybody want to take a risk of a heart disease in your child in the thousands? One out of 1,800 cases that get the vaccine are going to have a heart issue? These aren't millions. This isn't hundreds of thousands of people. Folks, this is how close you are. In a group of 1800 kids, the chances is that one of them is going to have a heart condition. But go ahead. I'm sure that's not the point that you were making. But that is, I think that is well in the realm of,

you know, I always think, like if I laid, you know, 1,800 cookies out at your average, you know, elementary school or high school that has them many kids and said, one of these is going to poison you and give you a heart condition. You go ahead and have a cookie. The rest of you be fine. I don't think anyone's going to touch, you know, those cookies. If it was one in a million cookies, you might take the roulette shot there, right? But one in 1,800, that's, that is a. That is a. a super low and terrifying number. And it is. And if you look at the Israeli data,

we're looking at basically based this booster authorization for the third dose on 3,178 kids. So any epidemiologists out there, any scientists, any researcher worth their weight is, can you look at that and say that's a sufficiently powered study to figure out myocarditis

rates? And that's real time data. That's not data. That's a great point. It's one in 1,800. You don't even have enough to, there to be potentially two cases you can see, right? And obviously, randomizing it, you would really need to see, you know, tens of thousands of kids at least so that you see that one in 800, one in 1,800 show up. They don't have enough people there to see two cases. And then if they even did see them, they say, well, it's, you know, it was not statistically significant

because it was such a low number. We can't extrapolate from that. So it's just crappy. It's just continued total crap science and wishful things. think right right and you know what why is this why is this conversation important for so many reasons but there's some headlines that have been happening this week and they're going really fast and they're going into next week as well schools are shutting back down schools are shutting back down and they're closing because of this omicron case surge we're seeing and as we know we covered so many times we covered at the top of this segment that the the the hospitalizations the deaths to mortalities, the ICU visits and kids are minuscule.

And these teachers are closing these down. This is the headline of what it looked like. We're covering it, tracking it at the high wire. Harms of school closings on kids ignored as teachers and teachers' unions rush to remote learning. And this is all in the backdrop of what we know now. So this is the Toronto Sun calling it inexcusable. This is an opinion piece, but these are in all the papers now. Closing schools at this point is inexcusable.

This is Jennifer Grant. She writes, it's almost impossible to enumerate the harms school closures. Let's go to Chicago. That's one of the biggest pops in the news recently. Chicago's Teachers Union voted to close their schools. Chicago schools cancel classes after teachers union votes to go virtual. So 73% of the teachers union members voted for remote instruction. Now, that's against a backdrop of this. This is the quote from the article. Roughly 100,000 students and here it is, 91% of its more than 47,000 staff in the district are vaccinated. according to the district. So you're telling me that these vaccinated teachers that are safe,

you know, that's why they got the vaccine is to be safe, are going to put these kids with all the harms we know now of school closures on the chopping block because what? Because they're scared. And this isn't just in Chicago. This is going on everywhere. This is a chart from Burbino. They're a data aggregator for K through 12 schools showing all the school closings. And you can see here, it's 4,781 schools moving away from in-person instruction. This is to the pandemic response. And that's just in the first week of January. Now, just to remind listeners and viewers, why is this important? There's been lots of studies out talking about the harms, but one of the biggest indicators is years of life loss. This is an article or a research paper in JAMA,

estimation of U.S. children's educational attainment in years of life loss associated with primary school closures during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Now, they talk about a relative risk of annual mortality related to education attainment. And it says here, they say, summed across the population based on the RR, that's relative risk from U.S. studies, an estimated 13.8 million years life loss may be associated with school closures. Now, if that's not enough, we have two of the most celebrated epidemiologist doctors, Johnny Ionidis. He's the professor of medicine, Stanford University and then we have Jay Badacharya, Great Barrington Declaration, Siner, creator. They have a new study about the lockdowns. Now, these include the

schools. And this is what the study looks like. Again, this should have received mainstream attention. It has not. We're going to do our best to spotlight here, assessing mandatory stand-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19. And they write, in the framework of this analysis, there is no evidence that more restrictive, non-pharmaceutical interventions, lockdowns, contributed substantially to bending the curve of new cases in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, or the United States in early 2020. This is something that these teachers really should be paying attention to at this point. Yeah, I mean, it's absolutely outrageous. And we've shown the studies. The studies actually show

the safest place for those teachers who think that they're at risk is inside of these schools, that the children are more of a filter. They don't seem to get infected when they do. They don't seem to spread it. They don't spread it to the teachers. The numbers are super low. They're much higher in your own home. They're much higher when you walk through a gas station or a grocery store.

All the other things that you are now going to do with your life other than teach our children. Are going to put you at a much higher risk for catching the Omicron variant, which has got almost a minuscule death rate. So they're literally putting themselves at risk and destroying our children's lives, live years lost in the millions. It's, again, I mean, this is that sort of, right, mass delusional psychosis that we're all having to witness right before our very eyes. And we're supposed to be looking at data-driven information. And the cases in kids are already extremely low. And that's with our counting. But as we reported on the high wire previously, the counts are off.

And believe it or not, we have Dr. Anthony Fauci, he just went on the media this past week. and he admitted something, it's been an elephant in the room, and he comes out and says it. Take a look. If you look at the children who are hospitalized, many of them are hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID. And what we mean by that, if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID, and they get counted as a COVID hospitalized individual, when in fact they may go in for a broken leg or a appendicitis or something like that. So it's over counting the number of children who are, quote, hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID. It's crazy when, you know, like a whole

year later, you hear like Dr. Doom saying exactly what we said a year ago, you know, and all of these things. You're miscounting this. Having COVID is not, you know, it's not why the kids in there. It's not why people are dying. When the adults, it's cancer, it's, it's heart disease. In this case, broken legs and stuff just because they happen to have COVID shouldn't be being listed as why they're in the hospital or being hospitalized. Seems obvious. Right. Yeah. We've been sold a lie on our kids. And that's the bottom line there. But what's interesting now, it's not just Fauci. We have people that previously were all in on the school lockdowns. We're all in and keeping the kids home. They're starting to sound like people that would appear on the high wire here and talk about actual facts. Listen to mayor of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot. She's going to bat for the parents. Believe it or not. check it out wow I have to tell you it feels like Groundhog Day that we are here again at this hour almost 8 p.m. after everything that we've gone through over the last two years with the ct u leadership unfortunately tonight ctu leadership is compelling its membership to make a decision that will

harm hundreds of thousands of chicago families who rely upon cps for their daily needs for their education, for their nutrition, for their safety. That's real harm. And we can't overlook that. I remember very clearly when the previous administration said, Open the Schools, we got to Open the Schools, was attacked by Lori Lightfoot and all of those and all of the sudden, it looks like her tune is changing

as we start to wake up from this nightmare we're in and say, oh, my God, and when you think about Chicago, Can you imagine, you know, these urban schools, you put some of these kids back on the street and don't have, you know, would, you know, nowhere to go. Crime is already just through the roof and kids, you know, that don't have somewhere to go or be focused or focus their energy. What is going to happen there? Yeah, not only Chicago, but a lot of these kids in these schools rely on the school's program for nutrition, for their food, for their meals as well. So it's just a complete disaster. And we even have the big guy, Joe Biden, talking about.

He's singing a similar tune. Listen to this. We have no reason to think at this point that Omicron is worse for children than previous variants. We know that our kids can be safe when in school, by the way. That's why I believe schools should remain open. You know, they have what they need because of the American Rescue Plan where the first month we were in office or second month that I signed in March, we provided the states with 130,

billion with a B, billion dollars to specifically keeps our students safe and schools open. It's so annoying because honestly, you idiots cause this problem. It's like watching Frankstein complain that, you know, Dr. Frankenstein that his creation, this monster he built is, you know, wreaking havoc. They created the fear. They built this thing. They made everybody feel like they can't go out. They shut down the schools. They scared the teachers. They filled the television with baloney and increased this 0.27% death risk into something that's going to kill us all. And now it's backfiring on them and they recognize it. You know, as we look at all this, you know, breaking down. When we see how mild Omicron is, it really reminded me of, you know, what I said in the beginning of

this. In the very beginning, my biggest concern and our biggest concern, as we talked about this, is we got to set standards here. We were talking about it. At that moment, we didn't know what the death rate of COVID was, but we were saying we've got to say what line, what level, you know, what is the number, the percentage risk to a disease that warrants shutting down schools, destroying kids' lives, destroying economy, shutting down restaurants. If we don't come up to that line, we're going to be forever locked down.

In fact, here I guess we have it. Here's me all the way back, and I believe it's March of 12. 2020, nearly two years ago, expressing what I thought would be the biggest concern if we didn't set a standard in the middle of all this. Here it is. Number one, in the United States of America where I live, and every one of you that is watching this around the world, should ask this of your own government officials and your state officials. But what we need to ask is what is the death rate that warrants quarantining a population and stopping them from be able to work? and go on with ordinary life. We have never done it before for the flu, which is said to have a death rate of about 0.13%.

And then question number two, once we know what that rate is, and we know what that number is, if once our testing does come online and the models start to show us all around the world in our own testing of all the people showing the mild cases and the asymptomatic, and we watch this death rate dropping down as we know it naturally will. Once it drops below that threshold that our governments have set, will we remove this quarantine and say, false alarm everybody, sorry. We took obvious precautions which were necessary,

but now that we've recognized that this death rate is well below a threshold that we have set, we are going back to our normal lives. because if we don't know what this number is, we're on the verge of being in perpetual quarantine from here forward. I mean, that's our concern, right? I said, and I kept demanding, will someone at the press corps ask, you know, Tony Fauci, what is the acceptable death rate and what's not acceptable?

We know for a fact that the flu death rate tends to be on average around 0.13 of those that are infected. I said it then at 0.13%. we've been saying from the beginning, multiple studies including the very last one, just a few months ago by Johnny Enidis, looking at the death rates all across the world, you know, that came up with and that death rate is still right about thinking that there's 0.27%. It's been holding strong this entire time for two years, the entire death rate, including all the elderly and the young. And let's bring up the tweet that came out of this study or the information that came out of this study because we know that's everybody. But look at the age 0 to 19. It's now going to be forced or asked to get a third boost. shot, their death rate is 0.027%. It's only the elderly all the way up there over the age of 70 with other comorbidities that are pushing us to the 0.27%. And here's my point, as you laid out all this information, Jeffrey, Amacron, as you've now shown by that study, is at least half as deadly, if not 70 or 80% based on the numbers in the age groups you're looking at. So we now know

if Delta was in all these other previous, more deadly versions of the variants were at 0.27%. We are literally now dropped below the flu number of 0.13%. I'm guessing if we did the math, we would find that the Amacron that is now the dominant strain around the world is somewhere in the 0.1, maybe even 0.09% for all of the most in danger for everybody on this planet. Yet we are shutting down schools again. We are watching New York shutdown restaurants destroy businesses, California. And this was the problem. By not setting a standard, we are now going to be masking everywhere we go for what would have been literally called the common cold two years ago.

It is clear to me, Amacron has about the death rate of the common cold, less than the flu. When we never mask for those things, we never said you can't get on a plane. We never, you know, shut you down. We never kept you from traveling. Never shut down your businesses. This is the insanity. And we've got to point it out. I know we're going to work really hard this year to continue to beat the.

this drum. We need standard set. We need these people to admit what is an acceptable death rate and what is not because these are just numbers. It's really easy to figure out the math now. We're so far along in this. We know the truth. We all know the truth. Anybody with a brain can read the truth. Now we've got to start waking people out of this coma and this mass delusion. Yeah, well said, Della. And remember for the kids, this is, it was kind of not a big deal for the kids. and those were the cook numbers we were going on. Those were the numbers that Fauci was saying, well, whoopsie, those are kind of cooked.

They're not really that bad. So I remember when you had that conversation and hearing those words again that you just replayed from so long ago, it really is such a juxtaposition compared to where we're at right now as we're fighting to keep these schools open. It's sad, it's surreal,

and it's got to be reversed, and hopefully we can do our part to do that here. All right, Jeffrey, keep up the great work. Thank you. Awesome. Happy New Year. Here we go. we're back on the horse. All right.

I'll see you next week. Thanks. All right, definitely take your opportunity to read the Jackson report. If you go to the highwire.com, he gets into more details on a lot of the things that he discusses here on the show. So for those of you that like to read and get in even deeper, the Jackson report is an awesome place for you to go. We have talked a lot. There's a lot of things are going on. As I've said, I get accused of not being a pure journalist that actually sue government agencies is true.

We are suing government agencies for you. One of the big stories just at the end of last year was the fact that the Pfizer documents. There's now all these documents that stacked up that and there was a FOIA request by a large group of world-renowned scientists that got together. They wanted to see those documents so they can start assessing the data, the dangers of the vaccine, the effectiveness of the vaccine. Let's get this outside of Pfizer and let world-renowned scientists study that data. Of course, they're being held up. Pfizer is now saying, or the FDA, actually, the government is saying, we are not going to really. It's going to have to take a 75 years to release those documents.

So while I know that court case is going on with our lawyer, Aaron Siri, there's another thing that we have an issue with. We all know about V-SAFE, but there's V-Safe. There was a database because they knew they were going to basically be releasing this vaccine to the public and turning the public into a giant experiment. So they built B-Safe, which was supposed to only track the COVID injuries from the vaccine. Well, here's the problem. They have all of that data now. And yet they're not being transparent. They promised us if they be transparent.

There are scientists all over the world that are ready to dig through that data and really start cranking out for free, based on their own dime, based on their own universities, understanding of what this vaccine is doing, how good it is, how dangerous it is. And now that is being blocked. Well, we're bringing another lawsuit, the informed consent action network, which is our parent company, the nonprofit that funds this educational program called the high wire there. I think the New York Times has accused me of not telling you that the informed consent action Network funds this program. So there it is. That nonprofit, which you fund is what we're doing.

We brought this lawsuit and it made headlines just over the last couple of weeks. CDC sued for withholding post-licensure B-Safe data on COVID-19 vaccines. This is Fox News. CDC sued for vaccine safety app data after multiple refusals. They did a pretty good job of writing this up. Announced Thursday the lawsuit surrounds data from the B-Safe system used by the CDC to track patient's health after receiving the coronavirus vaccination. The group says the CDC has already provided Oracle, a government contractor with the data in a de-identified form, meaning no personal information is there or lacking personal information. It goes on. Attorney Aaron Siri, our hero, the man, the myth, the legend, who represents the informed consent action network, said that the CDC initially refused to provide

app data because it purportedly wasn't de-identified or stripped of personal information. When I can't followed with a request for all data submitted to be safe and subsequently de-identified, the CDC rejected the request as duplicative of the original. And so if that sounds ridiculous, it is. It's because it is. And Siri, the public should be outraged by the CDC's games. They're trying to hide information from us. And so, yeah, we're not just a regular news agency.

This is, okay, well, I guess they're going to hide it from us. We're suing them. We're after them. We're all over them. We are crawling up their behinds. We got flashlights, we got scopes, and we are not stopping. That is what the informed consent action network does, and we continue to need your help to bring these lawsuits against the government.

You know, we've won against the CDC, the National Institute of Health, FDA, Health and Human Services. We've got multiple cases now. We've won over the years you've been watching it, but here's the issue. Obviously, that pressure has gotten to them. Obviously, they're getting really tired of us digging through their emails and digging through their information and digging through their data and they want to stop our funding. And so for Christmas, what we received here at the informed consent action network was a shutdown

of our PayPal account. Here it is. This is what we got. On Friday, December 17th, PayPal is exercising its contractual right to cease doing business with you pursuant to PayPal's user agreement. Under that agreement, PayPal, in its sole discretion, has the right to terminate your account for any reason at any time upon notice to you. In addition, we have recently reviewed your PayPal account activity and determined that you are in violation of the acceptable use policy regarding your use of a PayPal product or service.

We are providing you notice that following this notice, we will permanently limit your accounts and will no longer be able to process transactions through PayPal or any of its services, including Venmo. Well, thank you very much, PayPal. Obviously, you are doing the bidding of corporate interests and government interests. I guess how we broke your rules as we actually are providing truth to the public. We're totally transparent and handing you our audience all the information that our show is about. But here's the point. For all of you that are helping make all this possible or helping these lawsuits happen, you've been donating you're a recurring donor.

If you set up your recurring donor account through PayPal in any way, if you remember using PayPal, we are no longer receiving your donations. And so I would like to ask you, we sent an email out, but I get it. I don't see all my emails either. If that is you, then we would really love for you to go back into the highwire.com, go to our donate page and get back involved. We really need your help. Obviously, we want to stop this, you know, mass psychosis event.

The Highwire has been very effective at doing that. So go in. And this is 2022, folks. So how about this year, $22 is what we would love. from those of you out there. If you haven't started donating, this is a way to get involved to actually take it to the man,

to override the mainstream media brainwash. $22 for $22 would be awesome. It's just a small percentage of you of those millions of you out there watching that actually get involved and get active. I want more of you to attempt to be a part of being active. It's really easy by simply signing up for a donation.

It doesn't have to be $22. If you only have a dollar a month, If it's just a cup of a coffee, maybe $6 or $7. And for those of you that have done very well, take care of that gap and those that couldn't get to the $22. And maybe for you, it's $100 a month. But for all of you that were trusting that PayPal would never censor free speech, they have. So go back in there and please sign up.

And for anyone out there, so many of you were really gracious over the holidays. And at the end of the year, thank you very much. But boy, do we have our work cut out for us. You saw the montage at the top of the show, all that we've done. achieve all of the scientists that we've given a platform to bring the truth. We're starting to see Joe Rogan and other people pick up this information. It's spreading. We're winning.

We're rising to the occasion. That's all because of your help. So please start out this year in the best way. And as I've said before, make it a part of your consciousness. When you start to donate to things you care about, then you're going to get out of that pessimistic perspective, which is nobody does anything. We, this is hopeless. never going to win this because you are looking yourself. You know, hey, I don't donate so

nobody else must. I don't step up, so I'm assuming everybody else is like me. Change that today. Change truly does start with you alone. Step in. Start becoming active. Start donating to the people that are making a difference for you and are, as was so well put by Dr. Mark McDonald, are telling you the truth and proving being able to rule a history of everything they've said improving, we've gotten it right from the beginning. How about help us out? Because you're funding CNN with your cable bills, you're funding Fox to lie to you all the time. How about give us a little bit of help to so that we can counteract that. Okay. So coming in to, obviously we knew this has been a bit of a show. I've had a lot to say as the holidays have been building up. But there was one

headline that was so shocking. I think you probably saw it too. But it just blew my mind and here it was. Indiana Life Insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% amongst people ages 18 to 64. I mean, the heart of America dying at a 40% increased risk. Well, we have the video that spawned these articles all over the country. This is that CEO. I think he's in some sort of national meeting, a Zoom call of sorts. And this is exactly what he had to say. He's not mincing words. He's telling the truth. Listen to it.

This is terrifying. We offer group life and disability insurance to employers. And we are seeing right now the highest death rates we have ever seen in the history of this business, not just at One America. The data is consistent across every player in that business. Now, this is primarily working-age people, 18 to 64 that are in employers like all the employers on the screen here. And what we saw just in third quarter,

we're seeing it continuing to fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic. Now, just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-and-two-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So 40% is just unheard of. And what the data is showing us is that the deaths that are being reported as COVID deaths

greatly understate the actual death losses among working age people from the pandemic. It may not all be COVID on their death certificate, but deaths are up at just a huge, huge numbers. This is something we've spoken so much about. He's telling you it's not COVID folks. That underestimates it. It's all-cause mortality, something you're only hearing being presented here at the high. This is those deaths of people when they're out of work. This is those people that are dying from suicide.

This is those people that are drinking themselves to death. This is the abuse that's leading to, you know, a rise in crime and murder cases, all of this. The deaths, but 40% listen to what he said. To put it in perspective, when we look at like, I think it was a once in a century, every 200 year catastrophic event, that tends to be about a 10% rise in death. We are looking at 40%. I mean, when I listen to that, and I'm reading Scott Atlas's book, and I hope we can get him on the show sometime in the near future, this is what he was so frustrated about inside of the White House. The book's incredible because he keeps talking about.

No one wanted to talk about the all-cause mortality. No one wanted to talk about the suicides and the depression and all the issues that these lockdowns that Deborah Birch and yes, you, Tony Fauci, you will be held responsible for this. I will make sure you're held responsible for this. It's not just about COVID. How many people are you going to kill with these murderous policies? And so, you know, when I think about these people and what they've done to us, and then I think about there was a quote, I think we have it, where Tony Fauci talked about, you know, who is hit hardest by COVID?

Take a look at this. At the end of the day, everybody got hit really badly. I mean, if you look at even the ones that thought that they were doing so great, like Germany and the UK and the EU, as it turns out, everybody had a lot. a problem. However, a big however, that does not explain how a rich and sophisticated country can have the most percentage of deaths and be the hardest hit country in the world. That, I believe, should not have happened. He's talking about the United States of America being the hardest hit, the richest nation, with the best hospital system.

in the world, the biggest hospital malls. We've bragged about the highest paid, best educated doctors. The world has seen come from all over the world to be in our medical system here. Here we had the highest death rates. And he's talking about COVID, and now we're finding about all cause mortality, all of the issues that we created.

Here is the highest. And yet, I have to read articles where they're discussing whether Tony Fauci is the sexiest man alive. The Guardian proclaims Anthony Fauci is the sexiest man alive. The Guardian proclaims Anthony Fauci is the sexiest. sexiest man alive. Are you kidding me? He's not only not sexy. He's downright moronic and stupid and terrifying. And he has overseen the worst handling of this epidemic in the world. I was talking to

a doctor, friend of mine, we're having a little bit of a spat. And he's like, well, I mean, you know, you have your perspective. I have mine. I said, yeah, here's my perspective. I mean, I get it. I know you're trying to do what's right. But we have the worst death rate by percentage, not overall numbers by percentage than most of the world. How do you explain that? Because I know you're a good doctor. This hospital seems to have every piece of equipment and drug known demand. Why is it we're doing worse than Africa?

And to prove that, here's where we're actually at. We looked at the numbers today. This is when you look at these are by percentage per million. These are the amounts of deaths. So these are the countries. It starts Peru did the worst. And if you look at a lot of those countries, probably a lot of elderly. But here's the United States of America.

Not number one. say of all the large western nations we did the worst number 21 we're inside the top 10% of worst handling of COVID with under the guidance of Deborah burks and Tony Fauci and now all the other chuckleheads inside of our regulatory agencies we have a death rate I believe it's like 2,556 per million at 21 I mean as you go down this list even Italy that started this whole thing and said look we have so many elderly that's why we're dying they did better than not us. Mexico did better than us. Russia, Tunisia did better, Chile. In fact, you'd be shocked that there's not a single third world nation that did worse than us. In fact, they seem to be doing

better than everyone else in the world. If you go all the way down that list, when you get into the 200s, that's where you start seeing Chad and Nigeria and Tanzania. Look at that. And here's what's really scary. Do we have it in there? Right down there near the bottom is yes, none other than China. China, there it is, number 208. The actual source for this virus, whether it came from a lab or a bat, were leaning towards lab in China. Somehow the place that didn't know it was happening, knew nothing about it, was the first hit and caught by the most surprise, is doing better than almost the entire world. Huh? That's really weird, isn't it? How strange? There we are. Tony Fauci. That's what he should be proud of. But I want to show you,

something as I was we were I was ranting about this obviously as I am right now with my team as can we see this to the overall death rates and here's one of the things that you have to think about we know that as cases rise then we'll see a rise in deaths right and there's been charts that look at that I want you to look at something this is the chart from from the EU from Europe and this is charting out the different countries and their death rates as they go up and as you can see as they had higher rates of infection they also have higher rates of death. Now, when I look at charts like this and I do it all the time, it's not something I planned on doing with my life, but somehow this is where I've been guided. But I look at these charts

sometimes I think, yeah, I see how you've drawn that straight line, but it's really kind of all over the map. I mean, I guess that's sort of the direction it's heading. And that's what that R value up is they're saying, yeah, we see those ones that are really out of line. So they're saying it's about 79% within the threshold of moving in this is cases going up with deaths going up, right? But you see how kind of random that is. Yes, it moves in the direction, but pretty randomly. I want you to look at something really weird. We pulled up the United States of America.

Take a look at this. Here are the states inside the United States of America. Those that are the hardest hit and the numbers, they all go up. And as the numbers go up, obviously so do the deaths. But look at that pattern, folks. That is not zigzagging anywhere. I want all of you that are mathematicians or maybe you work for the IRS or you're a tax accountant.

If you were doing an audit on somebody and their numbers almost drew a perfect, straight line where they didn't deviate at all, where it is exactly as the cases go up, so do the deaths in literally, I mean, look at those dots almost draw the line. Folks, that is unnatural right there. It is reaching a 97% threshold. That's how accurately the deaths go up with our rise in cases. So when you look at that, you know, someone in the IRS would say, we got to do an audit there. There's obviously someone lying. And we're trying to figure out what explains that? What explains that perfect line there that is not that there's nothing in nature that works that accurately? So either these are totally manufactured and synthetic numbers that we're being delivered here in the United States America, which could be the case.

Or you have some mechanism by which that we're almost following a plan. It's almost like it's planned out that as things rise, we see a perfect death rate as though somebody somehow we make sure you die when we hit certain percentage rates. I don't know. I mean, it boggles the mind. But when it comes to a plan and what would be behind it, this is one of the conversations we have. People say, Del, you know, you're saying that doctors are lying or that doctors are killing people. I have said from the beginning, doctors are just as clueless as most people in the population. None of my doctor friends know any of the data points that I know. They haven't looked at the Pfizer documents. They haven't looked at, you know, what's happening inside of hospitals. They don't read about ivermectin. They don't read about a hydroxychloric queen. In fact, a doctor friend of mine, they That's exactly I said. Well, what are you using inside of the hospital? Well, we use remdesivir. I was like, you realized that remdesivir showed absolutely no benefit in almost every study that was not manipulated by Tony Pousie himself. Have you tried hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin inside of your hospitals? Well, no, they don't work. How do you know they work? Don't were you tried them and you saw it with your eyes? No, no, we were told they don't work. I said, you see, this is the problem. And when you think of that list, right, when you think of that list, who's at the bottom of the list, who's not got high death rates? Like the entire third rule, like everybody that just,

just so happens to use hydroxychloroquine because they have malaria in that country, or ivermectin because they have different parasitic diseases. That's being widely distributed all over India. Guess what? They don't have a high death rate. So you're telling me the third world that's using the drugs that we don't allow in our hospital, that that they're doing better than us, all of these things are things we're going to really start to expose this year. We got to get to the bottom of this because people are going to go to jail for crimes against humanity. I'm sure of it. But to get into more detail. I actually want to bring on a public health analyst that got a team together and said, what would be incentivizing? If you were going to try and create a plan that created a pandemic,

maybe, or a very high death rate, what would you have to do? You'd have to incentivize that in some way. We've been asking the question, where are all the incentives coming from? Well, we've talked about a few of them, but right now I want to bring on AJ DePriest who got a team together. AJ, thank you for taking the time. We ran into each other at a function just a couple of weeks ago, and you blew my mind with what you were telling me, so I'm going to hand it over to you. First of all, how did you get into sort of looking at the data and looking at sort of incentive projects happening from our government?

Thank you, Del. It's so good to be here. Thank you for giving us a voice. About a year ago, 28 people got together, all volunteers and formed Tennessee Liberty Network. small think tank here in Tennessee. We're not controlled by anyone. Nobody, nobody gives us money for anything. And we wanted to do some research into the CARES Act money coming into the state to find out how exactly all the different areas of our state were affected by that money. We didn't find anything really untoward there. But when the American Rescue Plan Act was signed by Joe Biden in

March, early March of 2021, was about the same time that we started going to school board. meetings and discovering that there was this very disturbing trend of parents and citizens standing in front of school boards crying and begging for their kids to be unmasked and yet the school board members kind of sat there glassy-eyed and sort of like zombies almost like they didn't have a say-so in the matter so we decided to dig into that and discovered that the school boards really don't have a choice in the matter okay how's that and in the in the cares act um ester money that's um elementary and secondary school emergency relief money was sr one and two were released under the cares act okay um as or three money which was more than than any money ever given to to schools ever by the

government was released shortly after biden signed the arp act in march 2021 and yes this is a great graphic here because you can see that in December 2020 the CD released a report the CDC released a report saying that it would only cost 25 billion dollars to get every single school in United States up and running okay and to date schools have been given almost 200 billion dollars in food relief money yeah big carrot right yeah huge huge where's that money going well it's it's it's it's it's it's it's was going to a lot of things to help schools with, you know, a lot with like tele-school choices because a lot of the rural schools didn't have ways for kids to attend school online. So that was

really great to do. And, you know, a lot of health-related things, a lot of sanitation issues, you know, being fixed in schools. But we started to ask, you know, why, if COVID is so deadly and masks are so necessary, why aren't there any OSHA-regulated hazmat bins in schools? Right. Something's up with this. It can't be about health and safety like they're telling us. So we looked into the S or three money, which is the most schools are given. Okay. And we found that Tennessee had to submit a district plan. And not only Tennessee, we discovered that every state submitted their district plan. Our commissioner of education,

Penny Schwinn, submitted our plan. It was approved by Miguel Cardona, the Secretary of Education up in the swamp. And this plan is something that schools have to submit every six months through September of 2023. And they have to prove how they are universally masking children. Find this online and look for it in your state and go to the requirements. To get this money, they have to do these things. Universal and correct wearing of masks. Physical distancing, hand washing, cleaning, ventilation, contact tracing, quarantines, isolation, and the last second to last on the list is vaccinations. This is why they're getting the money to mask your kids. So when we're standing there as parents at these school board meetings and saying get the masks off my kid, they're getting rations on their

face. My kid's depressed. They haven't seen their teacher smile. They're not interacting socially. I see them failing. And we just see those blank stairs because that school board knows, I'm not going to turn down, what is it, $10 million or $15 million to listen to you? Much more than that. Really? In Tennessee, in Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, Shelby County gets almost three quarters of a billion dollars in COVID relief funds. For education, just to the schools. Yeah, to the school system, Shelby County School Systems. Hundreds of millions of dollars.

Nashville Public Schools is half a billion dollars in COVID relief funds. But to get that money, they have to prove how they are fulfilling these requirements. Universal masking, contact tracing, isolation, quarantine, vaccinations for all students, staff and teachers. To get that money, they have to fulfill. those requirements. That's what we discovered in every state is doing it. So we want parents to stop going before school boards and crying and begging them to release their kids from masks. Just stop it. Okay. Find this information in your state. Contact us and will help you. We'll point in the direction to find this information. Take this in front of your school boards

and confront them. Ask them, how much money are you taking from the federal government to commit this, this egregious tyrannical behavior on our kids. And if they don't know, tell them how much it is and tell them to give that money back. Fantastic. Absolutely. I mean, this is something that I suspected. I suspected that this was going on. There's got to be a payoff that's going on here because it doesn't make sense. These schoolborns aren't acting naturally and they don't seem to care. And so that is huge. Hundreds of millions of dollars just in one school district there. And you're saying that's happening all around the world. Of course, they're not going to walk away from it. So as parents, we got to recognize. Like, you got to know your enemy, right? Your enemy is money.

Right now, you are asking your school board when you're thinking it's just about a mask and whether they care about your kids, they're not going to walk away from hundreds of millions of dollars that are coming again. Here's all of Tennessee. Oh, look at that. Look at these are the numbers as they break down. Billions, literally billions of dollars being funded to imprison your child. to socially distance them, to shut down this school or make them wear masks, all of that is being funded against you by your president, by our administration, and probably more specifically, a lot of this comes out of the NIH and the FDA, CDC, all these.

So Tony Fauci is probably behind a huge part of this and those that represent that. This is how a small group of people infect and make everybody evil. They force them into it by funding them, giving them the biggest carrot known demand. How does this translate? When I started by talking about hospitals and we're seeing this incredibly, almost like planned out death rate. We've talked about some of the funding.

You decided to sort of get into hospitals too, right? Yeah, Tennessee Liberty Network, about the time that we finished wrapping up our deep dive on the education money, we started getting calls from people looking for help because they had loved ones in hospitals that were dying. And we started, first we started looking at the cases in Tennessee. And to date, we've lost about 20,880 people in Tennessee in hospitals.

These people aren't dying at home from COVID. They're dying in our hospitals. So we started looking into that and tracking the money from the ARP Act as well. And then we figured that there had to be more than just the ARP. And so our research has led us to, I'm just discovering that the CMS is also heavily involved in funding hospitals and these deadly protocols. And so we confront these hospitals daily now. We formed another organization called the Atom Group.

And we have a website, the atomgroup.net. Thank you. Okay, great. And our goal is to educate people on how to prevent COVID because it is preventable. And how to treat COVID at home because it can be treated. at home without going to a hospital. Our goal, the number one goal is to keep people out of hospitals because we know from experience what happens there.

And the advocacy work that we do with people who are in hospitals, it's the stuff of nightmares. It's nightmares. In Tennessee, Tennessee hospitals get $166,000 for every COVID patient in a hospital. What? $166,000. I mean, I remember. Virginia. Hold on, though, $166,000. I'm trying to wrap my head around that because I remember we've talked about, you know, early on it seemed like there's like $13,000 to be diagnosed with COVID. I remember something like $26,000 being reported. And Scott Jensen, who I believe is running for Senate, risked his is, oh, actually I think he's running for governor, governor, I mean, up in Minnesota. But he came out and said, we're being incentivized here, folks, to take anyone we can to make them a COVID patient. and then to put them on a ventilator.

And so those numbers were like 13,000, 26,000. But you're saying, oh, my God, so these are other states. Nebraska is getting 379,000 per COVID patient in the hospital, West Virginia, 471, 339,000, North Dakota. So what do they have to do to get that money for that patient? They have to follow the NIH protocol for the treatment of COVID in hospitals. And they will tell you, oh, we don't follow. NIH guidelines we follow the CDC guidelines for inpatient treatment of COVID

in hospitals but if you go to the CDC website yeah it points you right to this document right here the NIH protocols so Cd is they say no we go to CDC but that puts you back to NIH right it's right right it'll point you right back to the NIH it's right there on their website there's a link that says this is the protocol that we follow the CDC and it takes you right to the NIH website there's a link there so so they can try to obfuscate and and point you in another direction, but it all leads back to those NIH protocols that in those protocols, the only approved EAU drugs for the use for use in hospitals for COVID starts with

remdesivir. Right. And the reason why other countries don't have the death rates we do is because the United States for the whole year of 2021 was the only country that was allowed to use remdesivir. Wow. Lucky us. Lucky us. Yeah, I know.

They bought it all up. Failed as I put it out. And if you're brand new, a failed Ebola drug that was so toxic, they said, you're better off with Ebola. We're pulling it out of this trial. Right. But, oh, hey, let's use it for a really bad cold to give it to everybody. And when I think about this, right, we send people in the hospitals. We, once they get there, I mean, first we send you home if you don't have low enough oxygen levels.

Because for the first time in history, early treatment is not the answer. Go home, get more sick. then come back to us when your lips are blue. We put you on a ventilator. We give you remdesivir. What's remdesivir? Shush down your kidneys, which fills your lungs of water. Now we say you're dying of pneumonia.

It's actually a side effect of remdesivir, and boom, perfect line of deaths of everybody walking in the hospitals. Well done. Are they incentivizing it though? Are they instead beyond that? Do you get paid in any way, like the ventilators or things like that that we were talking about? Yeah, I think Dr. Jensen said it earlier on your show, $39,000. for every COVID patient on a vent.

They get paid. Hospitals get paid a fortune just on these faulty PCR tests. They get the test for free. The government pays every time they administer a test. They pay for every positive test. They pay for every test that results in a hospitalization. So they make a fortune just off the faulty tests alone. Then they get paid for every COVID patient, $166,000 in Tennessee.

And then they get $39,000 for every COVID patient on a vent plus there's a 20% bonus add-on which is a weird thing to call something when you're murdering people for there you go 20% for using remdesivir and and the ventilators and the CMS is responsible for that that's the centers for Medicaid and Medicare they've got their hands all their fingerprints are everywhere all over extra payments to hospitals for killing people but here's what I want to point out about the NIH protocol because people are going to court begging for the use of ivermectin and HCQ. If you go to the NIH protocols and you read those those protocols, believe me, we've read them cover to cover and it's a big document, but there's very valuable

information in there because ivermectin is actually listed as number four in that document. As possible treatments or useable treatments for it, right. Right. It's in the NIH protocols, but the FDA has not given Ivermectin and EAU approval to be used for the treatment of COVID in hospitals. It's in there, but remdesivir and those covered countermeasures like remdesivir and the ventilators are the only ones that are covered under the EUA for use in hospitals. And if you want to throw one more wrench in the spokes, the Prep Act, the Prep Act protects all the hospitals and doctors from full liability. From killing you with products that don't work. Right. Yeah, for injury, even death. They're completely protected, but not if they use ivermectin. It's only for the covered countermeasures, and that's remdesivir and ventilators. But I want people to go, I want people to go to

page 33 of the NIH protocols, because on page 33, there is a section called evolving knowledge on treatment of COVID-19. And in that section, it clearly says that providers can access and prescribe investigational drugs, even off-label drugs like ivermectin. And the very last paragraph, it says it's important to stress that the rated treatment recommendations in these guidelines should not be considered mandates. The choice of what to do or not to do for an individual patient is ultimately decided by the patient and their provider. So anybody who's out there fighting to get Ivermectin and they're in court and they have a lawyer, take page 33 out of the NIH because this gives the hospital permission. They may not make all the money that they make off of remdesivir and the ventilators.

Right. But this gives them permission to do it. And if a lot of doctors in hospitals really, if they take their Hippocratic oath seriously and they read this from the NIH, maybe just maybe they can form a lot of hospitals. really, if they take their Hippocratic oath seriously, and they read this from the NIH, maybe just maybe they can form a coalition and start fighting back against these hospital protocols and saving some lives.

A.J. DePriest, that's amazing work, and I want people, why you really listen to what's just happened here? When you're advocating for your loved one in a hospital, should it get that dire? Hopefully you've been watching this show. You're taking all of the different things that we take here.

You got your zinc, you know, up levels, up your vitamin D levels. We now know are very important. You're doing the preventative things. Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin. I hope you have, you know, your stash ready to go. Should that moment come? And look, there's always a chance in any situation that it gets out of your control. I understand that.

But if you find yourself in a hospital and they're not treating you properly, look what you're up against. That hospital wants to make that $350,000 being handed to them by these ghouls, by these people that are pushing up an agenda and a plan, whether it's to kill you on purpose. I mean, it's hard to imagine that it's not with those levels of numbers. That funding is coming to do the things that are going to kill your loved one. That's really great advice in their own websites.

And this is what we do here. We use their own evidence against them. They're telling you that ivermectin is acceptable. You're just not going to get payment. So when you're looking at the hospital, remember that doctor does care about you. They don't even realize that it's their boss, the hospital owners, these hospital malls that are taking these incentives and laying the mandate down saying, you know, ivermectin doesn't work and neither does hydroxychloroquine because they need to make that money.

And that's why they need to do it. You know, AJ, we looked up a number. We looked at something when I knew we were going to come on. I want you to take a look at this because I think it really just puts an exclamation point on the work that you've done. We looked at back, this is July 17th of 2020, Health and Human Services announces additional distribution of funds to hospitals with high COVID-19 admissions, meaning we want you to have high high. admissions. Remember, when we started shutting down oncology units, we started shutting down the heart programs and the diabetes only to cover COVID. Why? Because we're going to give you extra money. And in that document, it basically lays out that we're going to give you, I think it was 50,000.

HHS will distribute funds in hospitals with more than 161 COVID-19 admissions during this time period, which equates to one admission per day. It also will distribute funds to those hospitals that experience the disproportionate intensity of COVID-19. So get those cases into your hospital. that exceed the average ratio of COVID-19 admissions and beds. Hospitals will be paid $50,000 per eligible admission. Look, that's July 17, 2020. You want to see something really interesting. Remember, we shut down half of our hospitals.

All that money that comes in for cancer, all that money that comes in for heart disease, disappeared all there was with COVID. Well, look, this is just one of the hospital systems that's, this is the stock tracking. Look at the S&P 500. Look at tracks. The green there is this HCA.

That's a hospital group that does very well. It kind of goes right along with the index. But look, right in there around May and then July, you start handing him giant funding. Look what happens to their stock. They stop treating cancer. They stop treating heart disease. No money coming in from anything else except the government paying you to kill people with remdesivir and ventilators.

And now you're more profitable than you've ever been. That is absolutely shocking. And it's deplorable. And I don't think it's going to age well in our history books. No, it's not. Del, there is a hospital very close to me here in Tennessee that was interviewed for an article in a paper, and they were bragging about how for the second year in a row, they're operating in the black after never operating in the black. And they were bragging about all the new equipment and technology they were going to buy and all the new wings they were going to build to the tune of about $19 million. It was disgusting because that hospital alone, we've lost almost two dozen. COVID patients in. They've killed them by REM Decephirin ventilators. So we want communities to start getting more involved. And when you know these hospitals are doing that, the people of that community need to show up at that hospital in mass and start telling them that you as a community

are going to be advocating for every single COVID patient that walks through those doors. And you are going to hold that hospital accountable to their patient bill of rights, to their stated visitation policies and if your state is not in a state of emergency anymore there shouldn't be any reason why patients are medically kidnapped and separated from their families and isolated. There's absolutely no reason for it but the communities have to get involved and they have to confront these hospitals and tell them we're done you're not killing any more of us. Amen. A.J. DePriest, you know, mirroring the words that came from Dr. Mark McDonald earlier, it's about community. We've got to find our community. We've got to get vocal with our community.

And we've got to stop this insanity now. I don't know if it's on purpose, but they are murdering a lot of people. I know that Robert Malone said in his interview with Joe Rogan, they have killed 500,000 people at least. It's scientific. We know it. People that did not need to die. Should they have had access to the drugs that we know work in all the third world nations that are beating us right now when it comes to COVID. AJ, it's people like you that make a difference that put together a group to just do your own work. Nobody funded you. Nobody made it happen. You got out there and made a difference. You're a true hero and I want to thank you for taking the time of sharing your data. And for everybody out there, a lot of this goes flying. It's live. We'll make sure the links to all this data is there

for you. As we provided to you on Monday, you want to go back and really look at these documents she's talking about. You want to find that page 33. You're going to be sitting to yourself saying It was on 33 page somewhere something. Just sign up to our newsletter and that information will be in your inbox on Monday. AJ DePriest, you're a hero. Keep up the good work and we'll have you. Any new discoveries you have, please let us know. Thank you, Del.

We love you here in Tennessee. All right, you take care. All right, there it was jam-packed as it has been for a couple of years now, full of information you can use. And remember, you know, one of the things, the way this show is set up is, yeah, We could try to do Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and break all this up. But that would mean our team would have to be a hundred times its size. Why?

Not because we can't see the same headlines or find this information, but this information we find, we usually find it Saturday, Sunday, Monday, on Tuesday, we really start reaching out to our scientific body around the world to start vetting whether it's accurate or not. Are there any other corroborating evidence or studies that backed that up so that by the time we do this show on Thursday, what we're presenting with you, we made sure that. it was true and that it made sense and that it wasn't some fake piece of information put out there trying to lead us astray. There are other people that may get to things first or say it first

and then they have to maybe backtrack or maybe they don't. Here we're all about getting it right. It's jam-packed, but we are breaking these segments down. It's part of why we've expanded this team. So for those of you that watch the whole thing, awesome is great. But remember, you can just grab one piece at a time, one interview at a time, and if there's one that really stands out to you, just share that little piece with your friend. You don't have to have them sit down to the whole show. It's only those of us that really care that much that really want the full scoop and the information. And remember, I know most of you people have got CNN or MSNBC rolling for like 20 hours a day. So if you can just break away for a couple of hours, obviously

there's a lot here. I want to thank you for taking the time. I want to thank you for all your support over the years that we've been here through this pandemic. 100 down. This is 101 today. And onward we march. There is a couple of headlines that to me just exemplified this mass psychosis delusional event. This is one of them, Antarctica Research Station hit by COVID outbreak, despite remote location and pre-trip testing. The team of just 25 are fully vaccinated and had been tested prior to their arrival at the station. Are you telling me, these people are in the middle, literally of nowhere?

Antarctica, it's freezing cold where nothing can live. live. They were fully vaccinated, fully mass distancing tested, get out there, and still they caught coronavirus and spread it to each other. Folks, if they're not protected and they couldn't hide from this virus, I have news for you. Nobody can. And can you imagine walking up to your drugstore, your heroes, that's salvation thinking, I need that booster shot and this is what you see on the door. Yeah, this is your place. Come on in for your flu and COVID vaccines right here. Only one problem. We apologize for the delays. Half of the pharmacy staff is. out sick. We appreciate your patience, but do come in to get that vaccine that didn't work

for any of us inside of here. There it is. That's it. If that's not crazy, I don't know what is. We're going to keep bringing you the truth. We're going to do what we do best, and you can count on us. Please tell your friends, share this with everyone you know. It is time to wake up everybody. We've got to end this insanity now. But remember, no matter what, seven days till I see you again, I know what you're dealing with. We're all dealing with it. I know who you're going to run into. I know what's on your television.

So remember just one thing. If you hold on to one thought through this week until we get to next week and we meet again, you are not the crazy one. I'll see you next week.