The Highwire with Del Bigtree - CALIFORNIA SCREAMIN’

Episode Date: April 1, 2022

California’s 10 Tyrannical Bills; FDA Shows Cards in Booster Approval; Ex-Sky News Exec Blows Whistle on Government Censorship; V is for Vaccine; A Doc Who Wants to Defeat The MandatesGuests: Amy Bohn, Mark Sharman, Josh Coleman, Jeffrey Barke, MDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Well, just as we probably could have predicted, at the moment we had our champagne glasses high in the air, we're all clinking our beer mugs together and celebrating the victory over the COVID pandemic, the lies of the deceit. We're all starting to watch and bask in a new news story of a Russian invasion of the Ukraine behind our backs, quietly, maybe even sneaking around, they started to bring the bills from hell. Now, if you want to know what's going on in the world or what the agenda is, you could listen

to Klaus Schwab or you could just look at California. Now, before we get into what's happening at California, let's remember how they were the leaders of this insanity we've all been through. They were proud of locking people down. They were proud of masking. They were proud of turning people into Nazi snitches. And it looked a lot like this. Tonight, Los Angeles County, where 10 million people live, has declared a public health emergency. Breaking news, stay at home. That is the order. A statewide order for people to stay at home. California, with its 40 million people becoming the first state in the nation to order a virtual lockdown.

Here in California, they are saying that people could be charged with a misdemeanor if they violate the shelter at home. If you've observed recurring violations of the safer at home order, please. Please continue to let us know. You know the old expression about snitches. Well, in this case, snitches get rewards. We want to thank you for turning folks in and making sure we are all safe. The governor made the decision to close beaches

after seeing the heavy crowds in some beach communities, especially in Orange County. Aerial video showed packed crowds at Newport and Huntington Beach this weekend. Those young people that are still out there on the beaches thinking this is a party. Time to grow up. You know, time to wake up.

Just a short time ago, one of the city's most popular hiking trails was shut down. Being cooped up in the house is, you know, it's not good. Recently, we've seen the reports of some large parties and gatherings in flagrant violations of health orders. These large parties are unsafe and can cost Angelinos their lives. That is why tonight I am authorizing the city to shut off Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Service in the egregious cases in which houses, businesses, and other venues are hosting unpermitted large gatherings. Nancy Pelosi is under fire today after surveillance video shows her at a hair salon, getting a blowout

and not wearing a face mask. The most powerful woman in America can be seen with wet hair inside a salon in San Francisco. The problem is, under California COVID-19 regulations, clients cannot be serviced indoors. As it turns out, it was a setup. So I take responsibility for falling for a setup. This morning, Californians waking up to a new reality, racing for a statewide lockdown affecting 33 million residents after infection soared past 20,000 a day.

Tonight, Governor Gavin Newson says he's stopping indoor dining in restaurants and closing all bars, wineries, and movie theaters statewide. In Los Angeles alone, an estimated 15,000 were forced to close during the pandemic. I'm losing everything. Everything I own is being taken away from me. They have not given us money and they have shut us down. We cannot survive. My staff cannot survive.

Mayor Garcetti and Gavin Newsom is responsible for every single person that doesn't have unemployment that says not have a job and all the businesses that are going under. For those who blame you, what do you say to that? I take responsibility for trying to save as many lives as we possibly could by moving first, to the nation with a state home order. We think that's saved lives. As the LAPD says its efforts to prevent more violence have been complicated by the pandemic, continue rise of murders and shootings in L.A. is causing community concerns and it has families living in fear. Homeless camps piling up on affluent L.A. sidewalks. We have a very serious homeless crisis in San Francisco.

As tents move in, there's a clear exodus of residents moving out. If you're not by what you see, then I don't know what you would be shocked by. Moments ago, the governor of California announcing the COVID-19 vaccine will be added to the state's current list of immunizations required to attend school. This is a first in the country. Proof of COVID-19 vaccination will be required at bars, nightclubs, and more in Los Angeles County. A new bill that could mandate all California businesses require employees and independent contractors to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Dr. Richard Pan says this needs to happen.

Having a safe workplace is essential to keeping their businesses going. The lawmakers are considering a bill that would allow children 12 and older to get the coronavirus vaccine without their parents permission. The new bill would require all K through 12 students to get vaccinated against COVID

to think that our legislature would pass a bill and put it into law that are little children from K all the way up through 12 have to submit to what is essentially an experimental medical procedure. There's no liability here for anyone. A lot of us can't afford to quit work to homeschool our kids. It's not fair that we don't have a choice. This needs to end right here, right now, today. This is worse than the Nazis. We cannot be living in a whole any longer. Everyone's on the brink of just like complete like financial devastation at this point. going under. You need to step up and do the right thing. Do not make Orange County into the

People's Republic of China or Nazi Germany. As California goes, so goes the nation. So before you sit there and say, oh my God, thank God I don't live in California. I want to think about the final line by Gavin Newsom because I believe it's prophetic. As California goes, so goes the nation. Our conversations today are going to be what do they want for this nation and how do we see that through what's happening in California. I want you to take this very seriously because what we are seeing in California and what we talk about today, you must realize is what is happening inside of every governor's office, inside of every Senate office, congressional office.

The largest, most powerful lobby in Washington is pharma and we are seeing what they want for this nation take place in California to give you a sense of it. Ten bad bills were released just over the last couple of weeks. There's this great brochure put out by PERC, which is protection of the educational rights of kids. Let's go through the list of these 10 bad bills, shall we? Here they are. SB 871 requires all children, 0 to 17, to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

SB 866 lowers the age of consent to age 12. SB 920 authorizes the medical board to inspect a doctor's office and records without patient's consent violating HIPAA laws. SB 1464 forces law enforcement officials to enforce public health orders, even if they oppose them. SB 1479 requires schools to continue COVID testing. SB 1390 censors any social media platform that posts its senting information that contradicts the government narrative. SB 1184 changes the California Medical Privacy Act to authorize a health care provider or service plan to disclose your child's medical information to a school link services coordinator without. parental consent. AB 1797 makes changes to the California immunization record database for government

agencies to have access to all vaccine records in addition to just students. AB1993 requires all employees including independent contractors to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination and AB 2098 classifies the sharing of COVID-19 medical opinion by doctors and surgeons contrary to the CDC narrative as misinformation and as unprofessional conduct that would result and disciplinary action, a total military takeover of the state based on your health records that were once yours, the decisions for your body and your children that were once yours all on the chopping block. Well, that great letter or brochure that was put out by Perk, Perk is doing such amazing work. We've had the leader Amy Bond on before, but for those of you

that missed that episode, here is one of the greatest gifts to California, Amy Bond. Take a look at this. And joining us now is Amy Bond, the president of Perkins. Give it up for Amy Bond. Is that not an incredible woman? We're willing to put everything on the line to fight to protect not only our children, but all of the children in California. So we are going to defeat those vaccine passports. We are going to take back our country. We are going to fight with everything we've got. We came out swinging with a lot of punches. We filed six lawsuits in California. They were planning to ban and kick. out over 35,000 children at the beginning of January if they didn't have a COVID shot.

ILAUSD lawsuit really held the line on that and they ended up delaying and suspending that mandate until the fall. I ask you to stand with us and do whatever it takes to stand with your first responders, with your city employees, with your heroes. If you ever feel alone and wonder if you can do this, know that you are not alone. You are a part of a global movement that is not going to stop. Yeah, this issue is broader and bigger than just any one group that we kind of like to separate ourselves into.

It's about freedom and liberty. We shall defend our land, our children, our lives. We shall never, ever surrender. Well, Amy Bond and Perk, probably one of the only nonprofits giving us a run for our money on the the amount of lawsuit wins taking place in the United States of America. It's my honor to be joined by Amy now. Amy, welcome to the high wire once again. It's great. It's really great to have you. So first, you know, I was looking at this list. It's incredible. Just when really we all thought it's safe to go home, we can get back to business as usual.

Clearly, they're trying to lock down California forever. Now, when we first talked about having you on, this was, you know, the 10 bad bills was this, this leaflet that you put. out with PERC, but it's not 10 anymore. Can you tell me where we're at right now and why that number has changed? Right. Okay. So right now, these are the most extreme bills that we've seen across the entire country. Okay. And having 10, that's a lot all in one time. Yeah. So to start with, we have one that we think we've killed. Now, it can come back, but it's the one that was going to require the COVID shot on all employees and contract workers across the entire state. Okay. So that was going to be a mandate. And that one's AB 1993. Okay, AB

1993. Let me strike that one off for the moment, not permanently. We should be careful. But so how does that happen? What happens? I saw that it was defeated, but I had been talking to you. I saw the headlines were defeated. We can't, it's not defeated. We can't trust that language. Right. So what's happened so far is that the bill author has put a hold on the bill. So it's on pause. The co-author, the bill has removed her, basically her endorsement of the bill and her name off the bill as well okay we have two public statements one from the author and the co-author that this bill is on hold on pause and it doesn't look like it's going to be moving forward however we do know some of the legislative tricks so it could come back so it could come

back between now and the end of session in the form of when is the end of session just we think about that we're looking at okay so you've got September so you've got the legislative season essentially but we're watching this one especially until about May. Okay. So watching it until just before the summertime. But if it comes back, they could try to bring it back in a basically a cleanup bill, which is a trailer bill. And that, if they do that, the whole purpose of that is to remove the public from knowing

what's going on. It doesn't have to go to committees if it comes back through a trailer bill. And it's something that they do to not be as transparent. So it's to kind of go through some loopholes to try to get around. So right now, I mean, we're really confident that we've got it, but we still have to be vigilant just in case they try to bring it back. So now the reason why we are victorious with this is because all of the California organizations, the freedom groups, you know, firefighters, you name it, everybody has been unified to defeat these bills. Right. So it's been a tremendous effort with more than 80 plus, you know, opposition letters that, you know,

were submitted to the committee on this particular bill. And that's part of how I think we've won and are defeating that particular bill. So we still have to have, you know, put the pressure on, be ready. Yeah. In case it comes back. It's not done until it's done. But it's a sign truly that the confidence around some of these laws is not what they had hoped, right? And so is that one of the things you do? Do you go after co-authors of these bills and start, you know, sort of saying you're going to be in trouble. If you want to get elected again, we are going to go out. We're going to put your name everywhere. Do you start really letting them know, don't stand with this bill any longer? Oh, absolutely. One of the reasons why the co-author on this bill removed her name is because

her local constituents put so much pressure on her that it was enough for her to step back. Okay. And I think that because they're going so far and it's so extreme with this whole packet of bills, this whole set of bills, that some of these legislators know what, they don't want the stigma. They don't want to be labeled as extreme and putting forward, you know, basically the worst bills that we've seen thus far in the entire country. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, a failed vaccine does not work, fourth, fifth boosters. I'm going to talk to Jeffrey Jackson at that later. The idea that you could not work still, not be employed, not have employees that run a business in California. Without that vaccine just seems absolutely,

just this side of completely stupid. But so any other bills that are knocked off yet or any that are wavering? So I would say the next bill that again we have to keep the pressure on. Yep. So nothing's done until it's done and defeated but SB 871 we've got a couple of things with that. Okay. Okay. So this is the one that requires children 0-17 to get the COVID vaccines. This is it basically be your average vaccine education bill. Right. And it does a little more than just back to you. It removes the personal belief exemption. So basically there are no exemptions for children and it's at the age of zero basically six-month-old. and above would be required to, you know, have the COVID shot.

Now, is this the one, because you said personal belief exemption, and those of us that fled California, we fought SB 277, the personal belief exemption was what was removed. So why is this back again? Why is this personal belief exemption language in this bill? Well, because during SB 277, the bill of, during 2015, the author, he looks at it as a loophole, which is ironic, that the author of the very bill says it's a loophole,

that there's a personal belief exemption for any additional vaccines that are. We're talking about Senator Richard Pan who brought SB 277. Right. Okay. Exactly. So they see it as a loophole that I don't think they realized it was there perhaps. And then all of the freedom groups said, oh, guess what? We can have an exemption if you try to require.

My understanding when we were there is that was one of the things that we're fighting for, you know, so many groups, it's hard to name them all. I don't want to even start because I'll miss somebody. but all these groups, when we were pushing on SB 277, I believe that was one of the concessions. Like if you're going to pass this, then at least you have to have, you know, the personal belief exemption for all new vaccines. That, you know, you're saying that the current list of vaccines is safe, but we don't want to be subject to new ones. And so that was the concession was, okay, any new vaccines. Well, now COVID comes along and now they are stuck with this, you know, this piece of legislation that says any new vaccine has to have a personal belief exemption.

Here's where they're trying to raise it right out of the gate. And they're trying to make it so that they don't have to go through the legislative process anymore. So any vaccine in addition to now, they're trying to make it so that the California Department of Public Health can add any more. Wow. Any more doses, any additional vaccines. They also, it looks to us as we've analyzed the bill, they're trying to get around the EUA status for children as well. Wow. And they've, you know, they put these little clauses in the bill.

So they make it, you know, this little phrase that they can. can follow the guidance of the CDC and ASIP and, you know, these agencies. So they're trying to get around the EUA. We know that. And remove all exemptions, basically, requiring it for zero and above. So basically, they want to continue this world we're living in where Tony Fauci's and Health Department officials, we've never elected, make the decisions on whether we can have an education, whether we can go out and have a job, whether we can walk and drive down the street, something that I think needs to be ended immediately.

I think we all just saw the danger of giving health departments the level of power they've had through this. We can't unseat these people. We didn't vote them into office and they seem to have more power than our governor, more power than the president of the United States. And here they want to seat even more power so there's no legislative process. So that's a really bad one, SB 871. But you're saying obviously there's some political pushback. There has been so much pushback from the entire state, just parents, people, everyone, that after. As of right now, that bill has not been set to be heard in any committees yet. Okay.

And we have the commitments from several of the committee members, those legislators, that they're going to vote no and that they are encouraging their colleagues to vote no too. Okay. So those are, you know, conversations we're having behind closed doors, you know, everybody's really working hard, pushing hard on them. Yeah. Again, some of these officials, one of the committee members, she's actually trying to get elected for a different position as a board of supervisor in L.A. And by so doing, she wants her constituents to vote for her. And so, you know, she's got skin in the game in a different area now. And I think she's trying to please those constituents. But the truth is that we're hearing from the legislators that there is so much power and so much of a force

coming behind all of Californians uniting together that the legislators are scared. That's generally, I had a conversation just yesterday. And that was. from one of the senators saying that, you know, these committee members, these Democrats, because they're the ones that typically are bringing these bills, are scared. And that means we're winning. That means the pushback is just, it's working. And that's why we're not seeing that bill being heard in a committee yet because they don't have the votes. That leaves me too. I mean, part of what this show is about really is trying to get people to understand how important this rally coming up on April 10th is, the defeat the mandates. I mean, first,

the work that you do. You know, you don't need a crowd around you. You're walking and you're having these conversations. But if we could put 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 people into Grand Park all standing together in unity against these mandates, how much easier do you think it makes you when you see the political climate right now? Does that have an effect on these politicians in California and really across the country when they see it? Because I really felt like we saw real relaxing by the Biden administration on the mandates as soon as the D.E. Rally defeat the mandates happened. I think they were so shocked and all the news reported, wow, this is no longer some fringe group. This is a serious movement that needs to be taken seriously.

Yeah, I think that the fact that the mandate rally and event is coming straight to the heart of California in L.A. where so many of these mandates and these things are being pushed right now, the people are tired of it. Californians are tired of it. West Coast, they are tired of these just draconian laws, the policies, people are losing their job, not because of any other reason other than they aren't testing or they're not getting the booster shot. Right. People that have gotten the vaccine are tired of this too. So we are hearing from the grassroots that just they're so done.

And so to come together by the tens of thousands, which I imagine it will be. And to stand together in unity, you know, black, white, different religions, all, you know, all political backgrounds as well. Vaccinated and unvaccinated. It shows those policy makers at all levels, state, city, county, that the people are not going away. Like they're not going to,

we're not moving, we're not budging. This force is a force to be reckoned with. And it is so strong. And so yes, that is a symbol that we are all part of a global movement. Yes. California is waking up. it took a little bit of time and it took it takes people being willing to say something and do

something yeah and we're seeing that everywhere people that didn't even know about SB 277 or even any previous bills before the you know lockdown happened they are starting new organizations and meeting with the catholic faith leaders across the entire state and and that's just a that's an example of the momentum that we have and that people are bringing that together so being there to together in person, I just think it's going to, I think it's going to be historic, honestly. I cannot wait. I know. I'm so pumped for it too.

So let's look at, because one of your sort of areas of focus has really been law enforcement. You've been getting together with firefighters, police officers, sheriffs. They're really hanging in the balance right now. So this bill, the bill on law enforcement forces law enforcement to basically uphold whatever health department mandate is out there. Again, these unelected officials now have a police enforce working for them to go. And as Garcetti said, arrest people. Like, we want to, like, we want to go after you if you're breaking the rules. And so this law basically is going to say you have no way to opt out. How does law enforcement feel about this? So that, I'm so glad

to brought up that one because, yes, we have been working quite a bit with all law enforcement, sheriffs, police department, you name it. And not only are they standing in opposition to this just to all of the, you know, members of those communities. But in addition, the sheriffs are against this bill. The sheriff association statewide are, they are united. We just found this out yesterday, literally. They are uniting with the largest police officer union in the state. And they're going to be working together to oppose that particular bill. And they also, we just found out yesterday as well, that they, that the legislators amended the bill. So it's even worse than what we thought. They're actually planning to cut funding from the

law enforcement if they don't comply and enforce the health orders and reallocate it to the health department. Oh my God. Yeah. Unbelievable. Here it says the bill would if funds are withheld, require those funds to instead be reallocated to our brand new government, the country public health department of the county in which the law enforcement agency operates for public health purposes. You can't, I mean, this is the science fiction movie is what we're talking about. The health departments want so much power now. They literally want to turn the police and sheriffs into their go out and drag people out of their homes. And I remember here in Texas, there were several sheriffs in counties right around us saying, I will not enforce this.

There was a curfew. There was our sheriff, one of the sheriffs, I think Hayes County said, don't worry about it. Drive whenever you want. I am not pulling you over. None of our sheriffs are. Sheriff Villanueva was very outspoken in California saying, I am not upholding any of these laws or, you know, that have to do with locking you down. That's not what our job is here. And of course, you've had this huge defund the police. So they're already strapped. They're already barely able to handle. And we're seeing all of the crime breaking in major cities and Los Angeles the same. So. Well, yeah, they're short-sacked. Yeah. Across the entire state, both, you know, firefighters, all first responders are short staffed because of the mandate policies. I mean,

they are leaving, they're retiring early, they're transferring from one city or county to another that's a little bit less restrictive on the mandates. Yeah. So they're already dealing with very, very, you know, burn out and short staffed department. All on and double over, either overtime all the time I'm hearing because they just don't have enough staff to cover things. Exactly. And we, I actually think that this particular bill is kind of right in the face of the sheriff like Sheriff Villeneweva. Yeah. Who did not enforce these health orders and did not require, he respected his, you know, his officers that they had could make this choice for themselves. Yeah.

So there were thousands of people in the sheriff department who did not take the vaccine and he was not going to fire them. And so when you, you know, when you see bills like this and even. even all the bills that we're talking about, these laws are trying to pass, this is their way to get around the lawsuits, to get around what they couldn't do. Right, what they didn't work, right? I mean, they didn't learn from this. They didn't say it didn't matter that people hated this idea or that it really turned on us.

They just thought we just didn't have enough power over the people to really force this all the way through. And now we've got to get that power. I mean, it's really incredibly shocking. And it's one, you know, we've come into this issue with the rally, been working with the rally organizers. I mean, one of the issues is, is there enough sheriffs or enough police to handle a rally like we're doing? It's some of the conversations you helped out with over this weekend bringing people.

But, you know, what I found interesting about the conversation is that there's this risk and fear that there's thousands more to be laid off in the public agencies across the state, right? Yes, exactly. So that's the thing is we have a lawsuit, one of our lawsuits, we have many. Yes. But one of our lawsuits is in L.A. County. And we filed that in October. And ever since October until now, it is what's been holding the line and stopping mass terminations. Now, we haven't been able to stop every person from not being terminated or suspended.

But that's literally the, we're holding this wall with the lawsuit. So we know that they're actually trying to change the rules in the county and change ordinances and everything. So they can lay everybody off. and just it's just but it's mind-boggling that they're short-staffed and they want to fire more more people and I just I cannot make sense of this but sometimes when people do stupid things it's good for us with lawsuit well I mean I think all of this has helped wake up enough people and that's why I think this rally is going to be one of the biggest we've ever seen we can't go through all of them I have a huge show coming up but SB 866 this lowers the age of consent to age 12 now I'm amazed I'm

seeing this here because we just won the lawsuit, our nonprofit informed consent action network, won this lawsuit against the, you know, minor age of consent to vaccination. 11 years in Washington, D.C., it got passed, it got ratified, it was being, it was in action, and we fought and won. And I think part of what makes that lawsuit win so important was we won on the basis that it defies the 1986 Act, the parents' right to be informed, you know, not just about the vaccination, be aware of it, but also of the VERS system should their child be injured of the Vares court, you know, the vaccine compensation court, which the whole point to the 1986 Act, if I'm not informed, if I don't know that my kids in the hospital right now because

they got a vaccine, then I'm not able to use the protections of the 86 Act. The judge then said this violates federal law, which that means that set precedent for every other state that's going to tempt this. Do you feel like our lawsuit is having any effect in the conversation inside the state cap on California? Oh, absolutely. The second we saw your email, uh, we were like, I mean, we were all just cheering literally because it does create that precedent that we can sue them if they try to pass this. So I feel like we're in a good position either way. One of the co-authors of the bill has already removed her name. Fantastic.

Which again is a sign that they're feeling the pressure. What we're doing is working. The people pushing back. And I mean, everyone, organizations, parents, you name it, just this collective push is working. That's why you have authors pulling their name off. That doesn't just happen because they have an epiphany one night. Right. It's not cool to be a co-author on it anymore. How many of these bills, when I look at them 10 here, would involve Senator Richard Pan? I mean, I hate to make it like the one boogeyman, but it really feels like this one guy that has just had this agenda.

I've always believed that he is gunning. I think he wants to be a future Surgeon General for the country. I'm sure Farma would love to get him there. How much is he involved these bills? I mean, we see these other authors, but is it really a Senator Pan bill that somebody else is sticking their name on? I think it's a combination. So definitely, Senator Pan is all over these bills. He's got to be the initiator who set up the vaccine caucus, which is essentially seven legislators that are all together in this subgroup that are basically pushing forward these bills.

But he's literally the author of multiple ones of these bills right here. definitely I think he's definitely behind it and I think he's trying to leave this vaccine caucus, this working group that will continue vaccine bills forward after he leaves office because he turns out this, you know, at the end of this particular term. So I mean, he's, I mean, he just, but I think he's going so far. The other legislators, his colleagues, they don't like it. They don't like the pushback from the public. They don't like that he's doing so many, so fast. And I, you know, We're hearing behind the scenes, those types of conversations. They're tired of it.

The legislators themselves have COVID fatigue, and they're tired of these types of bills. And, you know, I think some of them have gotten a little wiser that, again, the parents and the people in California, we're not going away. We're not running away. We're going to stand and fight the bills. So what's the worst one when you look at what's left. I mean, I think 866 is going to be wavering because the work that we did. 871 has been pulled. I mean, 993 has been pulled.

the children's vaccine is wavering and trying to take away the personally. But what is one in here that you would say we should draw attention to and be looking out for in other states? You know, I think, okay, so the children ones are definitely the ones I think that are the worst. Yeah. But I would say I've actually been doing a little more research my team has into SB 1390, which is one that is kind of off people's radar a little bit. It's essentially set up to censor anybody on social media. for whatever they deem as misinformation.

And that includes any kind of vaccine misinformation, you know, political stuff, elections, conspiracy theories. This bill here's what it says. This bill would provide that harmful content includes liable or slander or as specified threats of imminent violence against governmental entities because, yeah, that's happening. And disinformation or misinformation, including but not limited to false or misleading information regarding medicine or vaccinations, false from misleading information regarding a elections and conspiracy theories.

I mean, I read that, or elections and conspiracy theories. I mean, I remember the dangling Chad. I mean, I'm a lifelong Democrat, like that dangling Chad, Al Gore. I mean, how many Democrats, every single news station. Now, we say we're going to live in a time where it's going to be illegal to challenge the other party or whoever's in office and say, I'd like to see that vote. I'd like to see how you're counting those cards. So we're not a lot.

We just have got to assume that the elections are perfectly safe and honorable. and if we question it, now we're a conspiracy theorist and a threat to the nation and need to be censored? Right. And this is basically if you disagree with the government or the government's narrative, state, local, federal, then that can be deemed misinformation. So you pull away, I mean, this is not just censoring people. This is leading towards, honestly, my opinion, towards totalitarianism, towards a type of policing type state where you can't go anywhere. You can't say what you want. you can't think you have to be controlled in every way. So I think that's a really, really bad bill that's kind of off people's radar. I mean, overall, these bills in general, they're anti-education bills. They're, you know, anti-speech bills.

They're anti-doctor bills. They're anti-labor bills. They're at the heart of what makes us even human to be able to live, breathe, work, you know, choose what goes into our body. These are all the antithesis of that, of being, you know, just being in social. society. So I think that and they all go together too. You can see this thread of removing parents out of their child, children's decisions, you know, removing parental consent. Yeah. And then also it's, these are basically vaccinate everybody in California with the COVID vaccine. That's what

eight seven. And not just one. I mean, nobody's done. I mean, nobody that did it that complied is done. I mean, I'm looking at I have friends in Hollywood. They're like, wait, I got the two shots. You know, now the three shot. I got to get a third shot. I'm not allowed back on. set. I mean, this is what happens. This is a slippery slope. We're going to talk, you know, with Jeffrey a little bit. Five vaccines now for some groups of people. I mean, so I'm never off this treadmill. There's never enough compliance. And this is what is so terrifying. So as we look at California, Gavin Newsom says, as California goes, so goes the nation. Is California, do you feel like that's the testing ground of what they really want for the rest of the nation? Is that what we're

watching here? Most definitely. We have seen pilot programs coming in through the schools, you know, the vaccine passport, for example, the first, the first idea or, you know, hint that we had that this is an issue was actually because of the schools, because they were trying to create a daily pass through Microsoft data pass so kids could go back to school in LAUSD, and they had to have, you know, their phone would scan them in, right? So I definitely have seen the writing on the wall that California is a pilot program. Like what they're doing there is coming to a state near you, near anybody, and that's why it's so important for us to fight because they're testing California. They're testing some of the more liberal areas, trying to, you know,

trying to push it as far as they can go. But the thing that's funny about California is there are so many people that are more moderate and balanced. It's just that those who hold office, hold the decision seat, you know, the policy makers, the lawmakers, they're the ones that are going too far to extreme. I mean, the people themselves in California are smart. They're incredible. They're brave. And they're ready to take this on. But it is definitely a pilot, pilot state, I think. Well, I mean, this is where I'm at. I mean, I think Gavin News is right. As California goes, so goes the nation. So as California fails at this, so fails the nation. So why it's so important, I'm looking forward to being on the stage with you. April 10th is going to be an amazing

event. As I said before, you were leaving Texas and heading to California. I was leaving California heading to Texas. So we traded out. I think it was a good trade. You have been amazing in California. So keep up the good work. Thank you, Del. Thank you for having me on and talking about this. It's so important. I'm glad to be here. Thank you for joining me. All right, I'm going to throw a curveball at my team right now. I want you to queue up to defeat the mandates rally video because here's what I want to say right now. It's all about California and it's all happening in California. There's a lot of people who are saying, well, why are we rallying now? We've won.

You know, the pandemic is over. We have not won. We have won when bills like this are never, ever thought about, that they're embarrassed to even mention it or ever having had their names on it. That's what this rally is all about in California. We need to make sure that the people that try to do this to us to use our law enforcement as goons to work for health department officials that have nothing better to do than try and force their hypochondria on us.

We can make this fail in California. We can make it fail everywhere. It is so important that we all be there. I'm going to be there. There's a bunch of stars that are lining up to be there. We're going to start mentioning some of them. We've got Jimmy Levy, musicians, you know, it's going to be a rock concert. You should see the size of these jumbo-trons are going to be there.

But if you miss D.C., this one's bigger, but this is defeat the mandate. This is the example of what you get when you choose to attack all members of the human family. This is what you get when you do. decide to go after a person's child. And I have to make it very clear that they really didn't expect all of this. Thousands from across the country rallied today in Washington, D.C. For a rally against COVID-19 mandates. The message for many on Sunday was not anti-vaccines, but the right to choose. Thank all of you for coming out today to stand up for our children, Our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren.

The determination to preserve medical freedom is in your hands. We're fighting for ourselves, our patients, and all of you. We are fighting against big pharma. They have always put profits before patients. You know, here in the United States, really, it's going to be black people who really should get it first. So my African-American brothers and sisters, the vaccine that you're going to take was developed by an African-American woman. As an African American, I come here as one of the most vaccine hesitant group. If you choose to take the vaccination, do you take it? We should have a choice. The vaccine

passports and the vaccine mandates take us back to the days of segregation. It's back to the slave passports. Are you free or you're not free? You can't go here if you're not free or you're clean or not clean. I'm tired of these people that sit in the White House that stimulate race wars. We're going to come together and we're going to fight these mandates together. Tired that we are being We are being deceived. I'm tired that we are being manipulated. They used our artists. They used our athletes, our singers, our rappers.

Celebrities are under a tremendous amount of pressure because they use celebrities to control the black community. Shout out to We the People. Oh yeah, I forgot. They made that phrase, racist too. But as you see in the audience, those who are Muslims, Christians, those in the Jewish community, Democrats, Republicans, white, black, everyone, everyone who are.

everyone all in between. This is the example that they do not want to see, but they have no choice. This wall is so beautiful. Look at all of you. Look at you. The world sees us. We are 17,000 doctors. We are the last vegan of hope. We will not stop fighting for truth and for life. I believe in you. Are we ready to reclaim the dream? Now the people rise up.

Let's reclaim our country! The truth is like a lion. is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself. It's so exciting. I'm, you know, you can just feel like the energy as we count down to that date. I'm telling you, if you miss this event, you are going to be kicking yourself. This is going to be historic. They will reference this moment in time when we showed the world how big we really were. And this is not going to just affect decisions on bills in California. This is going to affect the votes that are happening across this nation in 2022. You need to be there. You need to be part of

this. If you believe in this, if you want to stand for something, for some of you at spring break, I want to ask you, you know, if you decide not to show up in California, well, it's spring break, how about if you never get a spring break again? When was your last spring break? How was your Christmas break during the COVID pandemic? Because we have got to stop this stuff. We've got to stop it now. I didn't have the opportunity to really get some attention on PERC and the fact that they need your donations. They are doing incredible work. They are winning lawsuits to go to www.perk-group.com and donate now. Lawsuits are expensive.

And Amy and her team are bringing powerful, successful lawsuits with a great team of lawyers there. So proud of the work she does, but she doesn't do it for free. She doesn't do it alone. She needs your help. So please support Perk when you have the opportunity. We're going to be talking about California. We're going to be talking about all the issues. But I have a huge show coming up today.

I'm going to be joined by Mark Sharman, who is a former executive for Sky News and director of news and sports at ITV in the UK. He has got an opinion about what took place in media that you're going to have to hear. And then I'm talking to Dr. Jeffrey Barky in California. We're going to get into a little bit more of how these bills are going to affect children, schools, and doctors. He's coming up. And then, you know, one of the great marching advocates, you know, out there, Joshua Coleman is joining me. He's given the look to this movement, the signs,

the power, the presence. He's going to join me and talk about what it means to stand up for our freedom, how important this is right now. But first, it's time for it, the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, got a lot coming up today. So let's get to it. What's going on in the news? All right, Dal.

Well, just like you mentioned with Amy, it's booster season again, booster mania. At the high wire here, we report on the story as it was breaking. the highwire.com news section, FDA authorizes fourth, fifth booster doses for various groups and ages, bypasses expert vote. What they did was they allowed what they called a second booster of Pfizer-Mordera for 50 and overs. They allowed a Pfizer booster, a second booster. I should say, this is their language, of Pfizer for 12 and over immunocompromised, and a second booster for 18-and-overs

for Moderna. Now, what's interesting about this was the science and the medical community has already been in an uproar. We reported on this since basically eight months since August since the first boosters began rolling out. They continually bypass this committee and has been no different this time. Johns Hopkins, Marty McCari, he's a surgeon public policy researcher at the university. He took to Twitter and just blasted the CDC and the FDA. There is zero clinical data that a fourth dose reduces hospitalization risk, he writes. There isn't even any evidence that a third dose reduces hospitalization risk in young people. He goes on to say political interference over booster. was the issue behind two high-level FDA departures in the fall.

There is no greater slap in the face of science than bypassing the customary FDA external expert voting process over an authorization with insufficient supporting clinical data. And what is he talking about? Well, on August 18, 2021, the Biden administration during the first booster push, unilaterally announced boosters before the CDC ASEP committee, the advisory committee, even met to talk about them, even met to go over the science. They just unilaterally did it. And what happened right after that was this headline. This is what Marty McCarrie is talking about.

Top FDA vaccine officials to leave agency as decision on COVID boosters looms. This is Marion Gruber. Philip Cruz at the time. We talked about this. These were the two veteran vaccine researchers, decades of experience between them. They unexpectedly left at the time. Now we know it was over this booster push with insufficient data. So now that's bringing us right back. You know what's really terrifying to me right now. And I just made this connection after talking to Amy Bond about you have the bill that's trying to, you know, bring back the vaccination for children. It's trying to get rid of informed consent. But what she was discussing and using the bill using law enforcement to work for the health department. But what she's saying is they want the right in California.

They're trying to give the health department in California the right to override legislators, that there will be no more legislation involved in future vaccine decisions, that the vaccines will just be decided. by the health department if they want to add a booster, and by saying whatever the FDA or CDC recommends, we could go with that, even if they didn't speak to the vaccine data group or ASIP. So what you're seeing is there's a line being drawn straight from whatever globalist power system

of the medical establishment right into our bodies without any interference. There's going to be no legislation interference is what they want. They don't even want to have the emergency use authorization standing in their way. If someone inside the FDA overrides all of the panels and groups, professional groups they normally relate to and say, hey, we're going with it because I work for Merck and that's that's what we're going with or I used to work for Moderna. And I'm pushing this thing ahead.

I believe in it personally. No professional groups, no EUA, straight to whoever wants it. The Health Department of California and other states just say, there it is. No legislators can get involved. Do you see how terrifying? They're just creating a direct line from pharma straight into our bodies with no ability. to interject any legislators. And then if we stand up and complain about it, we're censored. If we actually walk down the street without it, they're going to use the law enforcement,

like military to, like, kick in our doors and arrest us. I mean, these people are freaking crazy. And a lot of the commentary out there right now is saying, well, how can the CDC and the FDA gain back to public trust? They really lost it here. But no one's really talking about what's happening right now and saying about this, like you said, these lack, a complete loss of medical checks and balance, medical lawlessness, if you will. Let's go to the FDA's press release. So again, they bypassed their Verbat committee. Their expert voting panel.

This is the independent panel of experts. They just didn't even care to consult them. They gave us a press release. Here it is. March 29th, FDA authorized a second booster. So they're calling it second booster dose. And this starts get confusing. We're going to break it down of two COVID-19 vaccines.

That's Pfizer and Moderna for older and immunocompromised individuals. And it says in there, the FDA previously authorized a single booster dose for certain immunocompromise individuals following completion of a three-dose primary vaccine vaccination series. Hold on. I thought it was a two-dose series. So they're saying in here three-dose series. They go on to say, this action will now make a second booster dose. So that would be number five, if anybody's counting, of these vaccines available for other populations at higher risk for severe disease, hospitalization, and death. When did three end up becoming like the standard? I mean, like you said, well, we see

fully vaccinated, that was two. It was a two-dose program. Right, right. And so let's bring it back to that that fateful time where Marying Gruber, Phil Cruz, left the agency over the booster decision. There was this vacuum that was created. A couple days later, there's an A-SIP committee meeting that's the CDC's ASIP committee. And Stanley Plotkin, the godfather of vaccines, we've covered him here so many times. He called into that ASIP meeting. And this is what the article is actually an article at stat news that reported on this. The debate over COVID-19. vaccine boosters, what to call them, and whether they're needed. So he interjected here via a phone call and said this, calling the third dose of booster is immunologically incorrect and also gives the

wrong impression that somehow the vaccines failed when they could not really have been expected to give a long lasting immunity from the first dose, Plotkin said. So that is where this thing really started. It's kind of weaving around there in the background after he's spot that out there. And then it pops through the surface here in this FDA newsletter release. So now we're talking fourth and fifth boosters. And where did the CDC rely on this data from? Well, it says in their own press release, the immunogenicity data,

they took from an ongoing open label, non-randomized clinical study at one healthcare center in Israel. And what did that look like? Well, here's the actual study. Let's take a look at it. Fourth dose COVID-MRNA vaccine, immunogenicity and efficacy against Omicron variant of concern. The authors say breakthrough infections were common, mostly very mild yet with high viral loads. Get this, vaccine efficacy against

the infection was 30% and 11% respectively. That's for 30% for Pfizer, 11% for Moderna. Local and systemic adverse reactions were reported in 80% in Pfizer, 40% respectively in Moderna. So this is what the FDA is relying upon. This is what they used to override having any of the Verbeck, the professional, you know, committee group that was supposed to give their advice or ASIP. They overrode all of those things because of this study that basically says, at best, you know,

a 30% efficacy and an 80% chance of getting, you know, a mild vaccine injury. Yeah. And they looked at some of the safety data from the Ministry of Health Population coverage in Israel, nothing from America, really. And these authors went on to conclude in this study, the fourth COVID-19 MRI dose restores antibody titers to peak post-third dose titers. But they also say low efficacy in preventing mild or asymptomatic amicron infections and the infectious potential

of breakthrough cases raise the urgency of next generation vaccine development. And here we are, sitting on the cusp, almost a year ago to the day, we had the CDC director, Rochelle Walenski, go on MSNBC and say that vaccinated people don't carry the virus, whatsoever. We've known this was a lie really since then. We covered it then. And it's been a lie. This study continues to say this is a lie with even the boosters. And here we have the lead author of that Israeli study. He's been doing the rounds in the media. This was him on MPR. He says, this is the headline, who might benefit from a fourth shot and who might not. He says this, not a third dose, not a fourth dose, not a fifth dose will do anything to stop infections long term, says Dr.

Gile Rajab Yashay, an infectious disease specialist at Shiba Medical Center in Tal-Havshar is real, the lead author of the new study. And just to cap off this section, so we were kind of left. This is proof. This is proof that they know nobody reads. No doctor reads, no scientist reads beyond the headline because they put in there, because of this study, we have proved that it works, we're giving a booster shot. No one's going to read this study. You did. You did. And you found that the lead authors saying, yeah, these things don't work at all. It's not going to stop. You're going to be spreading it everywhere you go. Yet they are so sure that we're that stupid, we're never going to read that this is what we're basing our information on. Right. And, you know,

just looking at this, from the FDA standpoint, if you're immunocompromised or even 50 and over, it looks like you are just going to be in line for whatever amount of boosters that they want to give you. That's basically what they're saying. But now a day after this FDA press release broke, We had Peter Marks. He's at the FDA's head for the Center of Biologics evaluation and research. We've had a lot of exchanges with him with our lawyers. And he went on a press media call. Listen to what he had to say about the boosters. Will people be expected to get another booster in the fall or summer if that's frequently? Thanks for reminding me of that part of the question. So there will be a discussion at the

at the vaccine's advisory committee meeting next week, where I think this will be discussed. I should say that it would not be surprising if there is a potential need. I don't wanna shock anyone, but there may be a need for people to get an additional booster in the fall, along with a more general booster campaign

if that takes place, because we may need to shift over to a different variant coverage. In other words, it may be that a decision is made that rather than what we currently have, the vaccines we currently have, which are called vaccines against the prototype virus, that we will move to a vaccine that is either

against one of the variants, whether it's Omicron, Beta or Delta or something else, I can't say right now, that's for discussion, or whether it's something. some nicks of different ones, but it's possible that people will need to get another vaccine there. And getting this booster will not preclude people from getting that booster necessarily if there's evidence that another booster could be of benefit. Man, I'm telling you, the high water would be half as long if these people can just say exactly

what they mean instead of just like drum up this ridiculous word salad. I mean, here's what he's basically saying, yeah, COVID boosters till the end of time, probably every couple of months. We've already given you four or five. We're looking towards six in just the first year. So what are you think? Of course boosters are coming. Yeah, we're going to try and hit other variants,

probably try and pack them all to a vaccine. You know, that probably won't work either. But, you know, I'm supposed to tell you, well, there's a chance there could be a booster. Folks, get ready. If you're already on that conveyor belt, it never ends for you. Doesn't matter that it doesn't work. They've wiped out your immune system and they have no other plan for you except to keep trying to boost you every country.

couple of days with a brand new product where they make billions and you get sicker and sicker and sicker and from my count that would be six and he's basically saying i don't want to shock you but six are coming and six isn't going to be enough because we have just the prototype strain that we've been vaccinated you against we don't have the new variant coming out of you right i know he doesn't mean that i'm not going to make a big thing out of it but aren't we calling that the Wuhan strain or the out there's alpha beta delta but the prototype strain, just such an odd use of language there. Right. And you know,

Dillonly mentioned about reading these studies, hoping they won't read them. I spoke to our legal team before I went on air. The, uh, the next installment of the Pfizer documents data dump will be coming tomorrow. We're expecting over 10,000 documents. You can go to I can decide.org to get these documents. You can be right alongside us in the investigation here as we look through these and we see what we're going to find. And, you know, understanding this, the trials as we, as we covered this, the trials, the

trials were not designed from the beginning to determine whether the vaccines could interrupt transmission. They had deliberate cutoff points at six months, right when these antibodies were plummeting and they knew that, you know, these things probably wouldn't be effective past then. And what will we call then? We were called Russian disinformation and Russian bots sewing disinformation. Right. Totally. Yeah. Remember that. That's right. And so now moving on to this next story, perhaps some of the biggest news in America right now is the Hunter Biden, laptop story. And we're going to get into this here just because we've had similar attacks in the media against us. And they're throwing those same attacks at this story as well. And they have been

for over a year. So it really started, just to bring people back to get this record straight, it really started with the New York Post. They were originally reporting on a series. They had an expose of several stories from this laptop. The laptop was allegedly left in a Delaware repair computer repair store in 2019. The gentleman that owned that. store turned it in and you know the rest of this this this laptop has been producing evidence ever since smoking gun email reveals how hunter biden introduced ukrainian businessman to vp dad this businessman was a they call him a shady advisor an oligarch to this oil company called barisma in ukraine uh well what happened right after that remember this is on the run up to the election this was a very pivotal time

in the trump biden election cycle twitter and facebook did some of their hardest censorship to date that we've ever seen. This is what the headline looked like here. Twitter, Facebook censor posts over Hunter Biden exposé. Facebook restricted the story. The fact checkers attacked it. Twitter went a step further. They locked the New York Post's account and they blocked users from sharing links to the stories. I mean, you couldn't shut down a story any harder than that. And why did they do that? What gave them the credibility to do that? This is what it was. In Politico, this article talking about this letter, Hunter Biden's story is Russian disinfo. There it is. Dozens of former Intel officials say. So they had more than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter and it

saying it was casting doubt on whether this story was real. So here you have this story, a paper, one of the oldest papers in the United States runs an expose. And you have a concerted effort by intelligence officials, CIA, Department of Defense, all coming out to kind of interject in the news cycle and say this is not true. And what did they say at that time? This is very interesting to the rest of the story we're going to report on. So this was their public statement. They they released a concerted public statement on the Hunter and Biden emails. And they said here, we want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement. Just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that

Russian government played a significant role in the case. So there you have it. They didn't have any evidence. And why is this coming around? Why are we talking about it? And what I find interesting about this, because we tend to just let these headlines go by. But what I think about, now and we all know where the story is going because it's all over the news and we're going to give it our spin and sort of get into our details. But when you look at 50 intelligence, former 50 intelligence officers, FBI, CIA coming out and saying this is Russian disinformation. Every news media outlet is saying this is not true. It's fake news. It's Russian disinformation. And when I think about that, and I think behind the scenes you have President Joe Biden, you have a son, Hunter Biden,

who both know for a fact that this is a true story. They are literally letting these reporters hang themselves. They're letting these CIA agents and FBI former, you know, government officials hang themselves on this story because it's inevitable. The truth will always come out. I mean, unless they're crazy enough to think that they could bury this. But when you look at that, I just want you to remember that as they are watching the same headlines we are, where people are putting their reputations on the line for this soon-to-be administration,

all to sort of, you know, push this story aside. These people, our current president, knew this was a lie and did not care how many people were going to hang themselves trying to protect him and his son. That's the part of this that really disturbs me. When it comes to the integrity, I don't care what ends up being in there or what, you know, but just the idea that you don't even have the integrity, that you would let other people dive on swords

when the entire thing is your lie. That's what I find incredibly disturbing. And you know, the corporate legacy media, their dwindling power, but still power, they were able to kind of crush this story and anybody that came close to it until just recently. And this is why this story is being resurrected. One of the reasons in the corporate media, the New York Times has admitted that this laptop was real. This is the headline, Hunter Biden paid tax bill, but broad federal investigation continues. There isn't a federal investigation going on with him involved in there and his business partners. But it says here in the article, people are familiar with the investigation. said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer, and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity. These emails were obtained by the New York Times, by the New York Times from a cash files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and the others, the email and others in the cashier were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation. Wow. Now we enter someone that one of the people.

So it's almost like a side glancing view that caught the. thing in the crosshairs right it was brought up in a courtroom are these your emails yes i was a part of those emails and those emails were on what was supposed to be a fake laptop new york times only has them because they had that laptop information and so now it's been verified these emails were inside of that therefore that we now know whose laptop this is really interesting yes and those those same emails were able to be verified by others who had reported on it and said they were were verified. However, they were they were neutralized by the media and by the CIA operatives that were coming out with this letter. One of those who attempted to be neutralized,

but was not, was Glenn Greenwald. He is an American journalist and he started, he was one of the founders of the Intercept. For people that maybe don't know the names, you know, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange. I mean, he's been deeply involved in trying to get their stories out there. So this guy is sort of my kind of journalist, a guy who's really put it all in the line, come under incredible risk to share inconvenient stories about characters that may or may not be how we want to hear this information, but really revealing lies and deceit coming from inside of our government, a very bold journalist, really one of the last of his kind. So I just want to put that out there.

Glenn, if you're listening, I'm a fan. And you know, the Intercept was kind of borne out of his reporting of Edward Snowden. He's kind of wanting to get this truth out. And some of his board members, some of the people at The Intercept actually gave him some big issues. And we're trying to really, if you look into it, spike the story in a way when he started originally reporting on this 100 by a laptop. It caused him to leave and start his reporting at Substack, which really was one of the biggest voices that went over there and started that off. And now he just wrote this article here, kind of coming around full circle. The New York Times now admits the Biden laptop falsely called Russian disinformation is authentic.

And he says here in the byline, the media outlets, which spread this lie from ex-CIA officials, never retracted their pre-election falsehoods, one used by big tech to censor that. So he says very few, these are all the, you talk about the media outlets, very few even included the crucial caveat that the intelligence officials themselves stressed, namely, that they had no evidence at all to corroborate this claim. Instead, as I noted last September, virtually every media outlet, CNN, NBC, news, PBS, Huffington Post, The Intercept, and too many others account began completely ignoring the substance of what they're reporting, and instead spread the lie over and over that these documents were the byproduct of Russian disinformation. And then, sure enough, too, at Substack, we have Matt Taibi. He is another prominent journalist. He's been around for a long time.

He put a really fine point on this piece. His article, too, kind of running in parallel with Greenwald, the media campaign to, protect Joe Biden passes the point of absurdity. And he nails it by saying the line between the intelligence community and commercial media has blurred to the point of meaninglessness. They know everyone knows they screwed this up and are long past pretending to care. These are these are shocking words. I mean, we're looking at kind of almost like a media coup. We know how bad the media can be here in the United States. But it's really, it really rise to another level here. And the reporting now is it looks like they're trying to, the media is coming

I'm seeing reporting at CNN and other big outlets that, you know, spike this story and lied about it, essentially. They're really circling around Joe Biden saying, well, this is the son's issues. There may be some tax evasion situation, but, you know, Joe Biden has nothing to do with this. So that looks like the talking point we're seeing right now. But this story took a crazy, crazy twist at the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This is what it looked like. This was Victoria Newland. She's a senior White House official. And she was quite a quite by Ted Cruz at a Senate hearing committee. Listen to this. Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?

Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent. prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach. I'm sure you're aware that the Russian propaganda to groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they've uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country and with NATO's coordination. If there's a biological or chemical weapon incident or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100 percent it would be the Russians that would be behind it There is no doubt in my mind, Senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves.

Of course, that wasn't Ted Cruz. There's Mark Rubio questioning there. But, yeah, you know, all right, so continue. I'm not going to interject. Where is this story going? It's a little bit scared. I'm already scared. I'm already scared. It's a wild story. So three days after that, the W.H. came out, and this was in Reuters, this was the headline here. W.H.O. says it advised Ukraine to destroy pathogens in health labs to prevent disease spread. So the WHO is saying, look, these things do exist. And we need to get this, we need to get this taken care of because there is a Russian invasion

happening right now. But here's where the twist comes back into the, to the Hunter Biden laptop. This was again, the New York Post just recently. Hunter Biden helped secure funds for U.S. Biolab contractor in Ukraine, emails, daily mail, similar reporting, Hunter Biden did help secure millions of funding for U.S. contractor in Ukraine specializing in deadly pathogen research laptop emails reveal. Now let's look at a couple of those emails. We have the first one from Mary Gutiari. She's a vice president at a place called Metabioda. And she says here, as promised, I've prepared the attached memo, which provides an overview of metabioda, our engagement in Ukraine, and how we can potentially leverage our team

networks and concepts to assist Ukraine's cultural and economic independence from Russia and continued integration into Western society. So here you have someone from a bio lab talking about integrating Ukraine into Western society speaking with Hunter Biden. And then we have another email. This was again from from the laptop as reported by the Guardian there. This was from Vedam Pesarski and he is this shady oligarch go between between that Burisma oil company. And he says here, please find few initial points to be discussed for purposes, analyzing the potential of this, as you called, science Ukraine project. Now, he's talking about DOD financing. He's talking about partnerships in governmental players in Kiev. I mean, this thing wraps in so many levels. It's mind-boggling.

But these were in 2014. And sure enough, also in 2014, there was a Department of Defense, a DOD contract that was given to Metabioda. And this is it right here, Department of Defense awarding a contract to Metabioda, $23.9 million, starting in 2014, ending in 2016. And there is a subsection of that, $307,000 basically to exercise an option Ukraine research projects. So since that's a whole separate level of this story. But since 2014, Metabioda has also partnered with EcoHealth Alliance to do a project called PREDICT. And it's basically predicting global emerging disease threats. So we have this link here.

So let's go back just really quickly as we round this story up to veterans today. Last year they wrote an article. We heard that the idea of Ukraine biolabs funded by the United States was a Russian disinformation. Well, this is a story. This is a journalist. She was also censored. She's a Bulgarian journalist that wrote all of this info here, Deliana, Gutizara. She says here, this is the title of the DOD Defense Threat Reduction Agency DTRA has funded 11 bio laboratories in the former Soviet Union country, Ukraine, bordering on Russia. And so that is happening right now. And then we just have this final story here. Another outlet that had been out front for over. over a year here was the National Pulse, especially writers Natalie Winters and Rahim Qasam. Their recent title, check this one out, it's very, very in depth, as most of their stories are on this,

Hunter Biden biofirm partnered with Ukrainian researchers isolating deadly pathogens using funds from Obama Defense Department. So again, there was a predict program, Metabioda, Equal Health Alliance. They were cooperating to surveilling diseases, especially zoonotic diseases. This story has so many twists and turns. I have a feeling we're going to be really biting into this a lot harder now and just seeing what the media,

how the media is going to try to spin this at this point is fascinating. And just so we see the map of the laboratories, here they are as they exist in Ukraine. Of course, we have a full-on war taking place there. You have this cat and mouse game happening. Senators asking, do you think Russia is going to, you know, start a bioweapon release and then try to blame it on the Ukraine as though we need that idea of floating out there in public. You know, I'll just say this, Jeffrey. I'm at this point with the news. I don't know how to even talk about Russia and Ukraine. It bothers me this conversation about, you know, are you 100% sure Russia would release something and then blame it on your hand?

I'm 100% sure. Really? 100% sure when you can't even tell me where this original bio-attack came from? You're still, I guess, are we still, what is the government think? I mean, does Mark Rubio still think this is like a bat or a pangolin that crossed the border and, you know, made it with a cobra and somehow, like, put out this deadly virus? I mean, where are we at? How are you 100% sure about anything? And when we live in a time where our own U.S. government officials like Tony Fauci have been funding the Wuhan lab where it looks like this original pandemic started and then being caught lying about it, everybody's lying. And I just, I mean, I'm living in a time now where I love the country I live in the United States of America. I don't trust anybody now.

I mean, this all seems to be some globalist agenda. I'm starting to feel more and more like we're just a bunch of pieces in a Stratigo game. And some big players are just, you know, go ahead and have the media tell them this and tell them that. And we'll start a little skirmish while this is what's really going on. You know, I want to just because they'll try to spin this and say, I don't care about the Ukrainians that are dying. I care about death. I hate war. I'm against war.

any way that it exists. But boy, talk about a wag the dog moment. It just everybody started just forgot about COVID. Now we got bio labs. We got Hunter Biden laptops. And so for anyone that keeps asking me, Del, what are you going to talk about in the high wire now that COVID's over? Trust me, we're finding plenty to talk about. And one thing's for sure, you know, aside from all of those conversations, one thing is for sure, the independent media, independent journalists and smaller outlets, ate the mainstream corporate media's lunch on this story, as we have with the COVID narrative throughout the last two years. And so I think my advice to anybody trying to make heads or tales of this story is follow independent media, follow obviously your gut is well

and your discernment, but look at these independent voices, read the National Post, look at Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibi, New York Post, places that they tell you not to look at. Read these, Read what they're saying, not just what they're saying about what they're saying. That's the important part of this. Make your own decisions. And if Twitter censors it or Facebook censors it, I would make that important reading. Put that at the top of the list. That censorship is now, I think, the stamp of approval that somebody's on to something. Like you have been the whole time. Jeffrey, you're amazing. You're doing amazing work. I mean, I watch the news. I see the bio labs. But the way you put that all together is just so fantastic.

Thank you for bringing some clarity to that. I really appreciate it. Thanks, Al. Thank you. All. Cool. See you next week. Look, if you like the work that Jeffrey is doing, sometimes he's breaking these stories even before it gets on the high wire at the Jackson Report. There it is. And, of course, we're putting these stories on our news page there. The website's been amazing. You're all really digging it. And, of course, you see that little donate button up there in the top corner. Anytime you want to help us with the work we're doing here, we are being censored, we are being attacked, we are suing.

We're doing everything we can to make a difference. We're winning. You're making that possible, but we need your help. This is the biggest fight of our lives. It's not going away. Even though some of you may be taking a spring vacation to a beach somewhere here at the high wire, we are fighting for your future and the future of humanity. So help us do that work by donating now.

We're asking $22 for $22. It really makes a difference to know, you know, not just like we love those donations that come in one at a time, but when we know where we're going, it allows us to know how many lawsuits and things we can take on how many reports we can do can i send a reporter out to get a story all of that you're making possible well as geoffrey jackson said it's been the small media systems things like the highwire daily mail those that are out there that aren't in mainstream we have been getting it right from the beginning on covid why because i don't have any sponsor at least that's my excuse i don't have a single sponsor there's no one

telling me what i can investigate what i can report and that's what i'm why I am reporting what I find interesting and my team. We have international scientists and lawyers all around the world. We are following the data. We're following the science. There is no agenda involved in what we're doing here, which is why we've been able to say, I told you so so often.

In fact, there's been some debate whether we change the high wire to I told you so news.com. I think we'll stick with the high wire. But the point being that when we look at, I want to look at this California bill, because this is it, right? This is what they're attempting to. This is Big Brother.

Wipe out the voices that have been right the whole time. This bill, Senate bill introduced by Senator Pan, of course. This bill would prohibit a social media platform as defined from amplifying harmful content in a manner that results in a user viewing harmful content. The bill would provide that harmful content includes liable or slander as specified threats of imminent violence against government entities and disinformation or misinformation. They're going to add mal-information there, as we have talked about Homeland Security added that term. including but not limited to false from misleading information regarding medicine or vaccinations,

false from misleading information regarding elections and conspiracy theories. I've already pointed out. This bill would authorize the enforcement of these provisions by civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction by the Attorney General and specify civil penalties to which violators would be subject. I understand that there's something like a $100,000 fine that would be there. I'll tell you what. If you're talking about me, Senator Richard Pan, if you are talking about the high wire, I dare you to try incensurist.

I dare you to take me to court because there you would have to actually prove that what we're saying is misinformation. And I would love the opportunity to show the entire world what truth actually is and what reality is. And you are not in it, my friend. And after you waste all of my legal funds and time, I'm going to make you pay for it. So I dare you. If this bill ever passes, go ahead, make my day. Try to take out the high wire with this ridiculous bill. All right. All of that being said, we are under attack. Those that are trying to tell the truth are under attack. We have lost the free press. I've been saying this all along. In the United States of America, media, the news was considered the fourth branch of government. And basically the idea from Thomas Jefferson and beyond, they all said, if we lose a free news system, then we will lose democracy, we will lose America. The news must always be free.

be unaffected by government so that it can always challenge government with whatever challenge it wants. It can always challenge any industry that is always asking the hard questions, and it never beckons to bias or agenda. It must be free or we will lose our nation. I really thought and took that to heart as I saw an incredible interview being done on a network in the UK. This is Mark Sharman, former executive at ITV and Sky News. take a look at what he said. And I want this to really sink in

because he's not just talking about the UK, he's talking about the whole world. It's such pleasure to have you here as part of the lockdown inquiry. I know this is quite a big deal for you to come out from behind the camera where you've been an executive in the industry for so long. But I know you want to do it

because you have been so disturbed by the coverage of many of your former colleagues, the organizations that you used to work for over the course of the pandemic. So can you just start by explaining this chilling warning that Offcom gave near the start of the pandemic and how you think that may have impacted the coverage? Well, I definitely think it impacted. It's not so much an offcom regulation.

It was advice or a warning actually. It's like a little bulletin, wasn't it, said to it. It was a warning to basically say, do not question the official government line. Now, to be fair to them, they said you can have opposition voices on, but you must, presenters must intervene if there's any danger of harmful or misinformation. So did that essentially turn presenters at the BBC Sky News into essentially representatives of the government? Yes, I think it did. Not just on air talent. I think that warning. affected all broadcasters. Most of the major broadcasters followed it and actually it was only the one or two

little smaller ones who wouldn't have that backup power who got caught. I mean, Uckfield Community Radio was censored for putting something out. But actually I think what it's led to, I think it's created an environment which will will lead to the biggest assault on freedom of speech and democracy. I've known in my lifetime. I've never seen a warning from Ofcom like that. I've never seen the broadcasters toe the line. And rather than question the government, they became cheerleaders for the government.

It's my honor and pleasure to be joined by Mark Sharman, former executive at Sky News and producer at ITV. Mark, those are powerful words and dangerous. I mean, dangerous at a time where media is being told don't allow conversations like that to happen. Of course, you're not on Sky News when you're saying you're on a smaller network like GBN, the smaller networks that were the only ones brave enough

to carry stories like this. Why are you going public with this perspective now? Well, hello, thank you for having me on. And first of all, I, agree with every word you've just summed up. I mean, we have lost the free press. And it goes against every principle I've ever been taught and grown up with.

We were always taught to be fair and balanced and show both sides of a story and let the viewers decide. And that has just completely gone out of the window. It feels to me like free speech and democracy with it. We're in a room and the walls are coming in and the ceiling is coming down and the floor's coming up. And you've got big tech on one, side and mainstream media on the other closing us out. Somebody at world level, as you say,

decides what the answer is and we're all prevented from that point on for asking any questions. It is not what journalism is about. It never has been and it's a very, very dangerous precedent. Who are these people that are deciding what's information and what's misinformation? Who are they to dismiss scientists, eminent scientists and doctors who question the official narrative and say it's misinformation? I mean, since when did science stop? Since when did people stop reviewing it and asking questions and debating it? And we are losing the ability to debate.

Yes. Let me ask you for those of us in America that don't know what off-com is. What is off-com in the UK? because that's who sent out this warning to all the media agencies basically say, you know, tow the line for the government. You can have someone that questions it, but then immediately stop them and hold them back from spreading misinformation. What is off-com for those of us that don't know? Well, in the UK, newspapers are partisan.

They have political leanings and a political agenda. Television has always been independent. You know, we don't have the Fox News and the CNN with different political lines. They are independent. Ofcom is the government regulator who, in normal times, actually take a light touch on things. They don't tend to intervene. Usually they react if they get via complaints. So, as I said on the other clip, I've never seen an instruction that warns broadcasters not to question government policy.

But I mean, what's emerging is it's not really government policy, it's worldwide policy. Yeah. It's WHO policy. You know, the actual instructions on the social media that they list out on YouTube what you can and can't say about some of the treatments that might have been available as opposed to vaccines. It's all listed there. There is a, you know, it's not a coincidence that every country in the Western world, world reacted in exactly the same way. You know, what's happening in America, exactly the same as what's happening here and in Europe.

Anybody that questions that official line is taken down. I mean, I'll give an example of how far it's got. I'm very concerned about vaccine injuries at the moment. It's a subject that's not really being investigated properly. Amen. We have a politician called. Sir Christopher Chope, Sir, a knight of the realm, who has taken up the case of vaccine harm and he's introducing a bill into Parliament. His speech as an elected member of the British

government given under parliamentary privilege in the House of Commons was taken down by YouTube. I mean, how dare they? This is democracy at work and somebody in America decides that that is inappropriate for us to discuss. We cannot discuss vaccine injuries. I mean, how far has it got to go before people get, have had enough of this and say, hang on a minute, we live in a democracy. When you, you know, obviously you've been in media, I have too. You know, I was just interviewed by an ex-New York Times reporter the other day. And I was saying to my friends, how refreshing it was, just that that no agenda, no baloney, hard questions being asked of me, didn't, you know, like any, just challenging me from every side, but I enjoyed it. There seemed to be just,

just strong inquisition, strong skepticism. That's the place of the journalist. The journalist is supposed to always be skeptical. We are not cheerleaders for any point of view. I remember being in journalism, you know, classes. And, you know, at that time, I was a fictional writer. And so I was always getting in trouble. I was getting bad, in journalism class because the teacher kept saying, Dell, you're not being objective. You are instilling your opinion in this. Journalism is about showing all sides,

being fair and balanced, so that let the viewer decide what they're going to do, or, you know, the reader, is journalism dead? Are they even teaching that in journalism school? Because I don't see anywhere in the news, certainly not in America, where we have that objectivity anymore. All it is is opinion.

I mean, what happens if a world living on opinion, on opinion with no actual objective news. Well, it wouldn't be so bad if there were various opinions, but you're only allowed one opinion at the moment. It has to be all down the same track. But I mean, there are plenty of questions to us. Look, I can understand the media in the first two or three months of COVID. I can understand why everybody was nervous.

We didn't know what this thing was, and it was probably right to be cautious. but it became obvious quite early that the numbers were being inflated. They weren't correct. And since then, you know, why are we not questioning why governments gave indemnity from prosecution to Pfizer? Right. Why would you allow Pfizer to be secretive about their trials for 75 years? Right.

Why aren't the mainstream media looking at some of the Pfizer results, which are clearly showing, clearly showing that they're either flawed or fraudulent and they certainly the vaccine certainly don't work as well as we've been made made to believe the questions are there to be asked but no one in mainstream media is asking but it's worse than that I mean constantly the figures of death figures were posted every night the scare tactics continued and I'm sorry to say that They exaggerated the situation in hospitals. They exaggerated those that were unvaccinated in ICU. And they vilified those who didn't want to take the vaccine.

They actually created deliberately a split in the nation. It's beyond precedent. It really is. How do you think when you look at this right now, I keep trying to, you know, people ask me if you could take a time capsule, you know, 20 years from now. I said, I don't want one 20 years from now. I want one five years from now. I want to see where we're at five years because we are either going to stand up against this and, you know, grab a hold of our liberty and our freedom and what our nations once,

you know, believed in and hold back that sort of technocratic takeover, this horrible cabal of, you know, media owned by tech and pharma and, you know, all of these issues, or we're not. When you look at this And you think about the history books. Should they get it right? What will the history books write about this pandemic, how the media handled it, how the government agencies? Will these people regret how they acted here? Well, it depends at what level it comes out and what questions are asked and what's revealed. I mean, I have great hope for your country, actually.

We're up against the same powerful enemy. But I do feel as though you've got much more firepower on our side of the fence, if you will. Yeah. I'm hoping that it'll break in America because if it breaks there, it'll break everywhere. And that's really our hope because we're in the same situation. The bill you just read out in California bill about the online safety. We've got exactly the same coming in the UK, the online safety bill.

It deals with misinformation and disinformation and basically makes off-com again in partnership with the big tech companies, the arbiter of what's misinformation and what's information. You know, who gives them that power? Who gives them the knowledge? You know, who suddenly decided they were the fountain of all things accurate? But of course, like you, I mean, I'm suspicious of where the power's coming from and what the message is and what the agenda is, to be fair. What is your message to people that aren't reporters, aren't journalists like us? We're out there. I know you're trying to get the story. You're fighting to get the stories of vaccine injured. into the limelights so that people recognize what's happening there.

But for your average person listening right now, what is it they need to do in order to maintain a freedom in a space that maybe they're not fully aware of, which is the news and media? What can your average person do right now? It's very difficult because I think the average person, certainly in this country, probably still believes what they're being told.

I mean, there's a very, very significant amount of people who do watch independent news and as a consequence, don't trust the mainstream media at all. But bear in mind, we have the BBC, which retains a reputation for truth around the world. I'm sorry to say, it's not deserved at the moment. They employ their own disinformation reporter, who, and they also have a thing called

the BBC trusted news initiative. But when you look at that, that's in partnership with Microsoft and Facebook and all the same people. And I mean, it's interesting, they call it the BBC Trusted News Initiative. They wouldn't have called it the Zuckerberg Trusted News Initiative, would they? So, I mean, it's, it has, sooner or later,

something major has to happen to make people realize that everything they've been told is not true. Not everything's untrue, but not everything they've been told is true. And in particular, in particular, it's, Why were people not told that this vaccine was experimental, that it had not gone through trials, and that it was a risk to some people? You know, our figures now for our yellow card reporting system for vaccine injuries are something like 450,000. But we all know that's a fraction of the real number.

And I'm, you know, I'm getting all kinds of emails and talking to what sorts of. people and actually it's heartbreaking people's lives have been totally utterly ruined by these vaccines now it doesn't apply to everybody but they should have been made aware number one were you really at risk from the virus right for the vast majority population they weren't and number two if you do take these jabs here is what it is and here is what the risk might be and that never happened and i think there could be a huge anger in the population if they find out they were continually told safe and effective when in fact it was neither to some people yeah well you're absolutely right that has been a major focus of us on the high wire mark i want to thank you for taking the time today to join us

it's always a it's always a great moment to discover that i have a brother on an across the ocean that is fighting the same fight, standing for the same truth in journalism. It's so important to us here. And I just want you to know you're not alone. We're here with you. If you have any breaking story, anything you ever want to share here in America, you're right. I do believe America leads this fight. I believe we have the ability to beat this back and to stand as a beacon of light, of liberty, of free speech once again. It is hanging in the balance. And many of us, those that watching the show recognize what's at stake and what's in our hands. And I want to thank you for sharing your sentiment. Though you're living in a different place, we are all under the same regime

at the moment that has to change. Thank you for taking the time today. Thank you very much. Please keep on the good work. We will. Take care. Thank you. Well, I mean, whether it's, you know, the attack on media, whether it's the attack on your children or how about the attack on doctors, How many doctors set out to do what was right as he was saying. How many doctors had solutions, had cures. How many doctors wanted to tell the truth? Really knew what the actual hospital numbers were. Really knew how many were dying and how many were not.

How many were silenced? The censorship of media is happening, but the censorship of doctors, one of those doctors that just wouldn't put up with it and stood up and stood out and spoke the truth from the beginning was Dr. Jeffrey Barkie, and we are a fan. Here's a little look for those of you who don't know him. Dr. Barkey is joining us. Dr. Jeff Barky joins us now.

Dr. Jeffrey Bakke. Physician, Dr. Jeff Barkie. I'm a board-certified primary care doctor. I practice in Coastal Orange County. I've been doing so for over 25 years. When kids get COVID-19, first of all, they either have no symptoms or they usually have mild symptoms. Time to get kids back to school.

The lockdowns were a huge mistake that they caused more harm than they helped. and that constitutionally they were completely wrong. I'm here representing thousands of physicians across the country whose voices are being silenced because we don't agree with the mainstream media and the experts who are telling us what to do. We are excellent at treating this viral illness, especially if we can get to you early. We don't need the government's involvement.

We don't need Anthony Fauci's involvement. This has become a joke. We all watched the Super Bowl on Sunday. We saw Mayor Eric Garcetti there without a mask on. We saw 90,000 fans in the stands, not a single mask to be found. But yet today, our kids show up to school with masks on. We have created a post-traumatic stress-like syndrome in our children. It doesn't make any sense to me to vaccinate a child that statistically has a 0% risk of dying of this illness.

The parents of California need to stand up and say we're not going to take it anymore. Enough of the political hypocrisy and let's protect our children. I am joined by Dr. Jeffrey Barkie now. First of all, thank you for taking the time today, brother. Appreciate it. I know you're a busy man. We're sort of yanking you out here, but thanks for taking the time to join us. Del, great to be with you.

It's an honor. Absolutely. All right. So I want to get right to it. You know, we live at a time here. It just feels like everybody is just exhausted by the pandemic, just the lightning of some restrictions. Everyone wants this to get out in the sun

and forget about what's going on, but California is under attack. And I think, you know, the interview I just did, it is clear that there is still a powerful agenda at play that is pumping through the blood systems of almost every government in this nation, in the UK and around the world. And it's really, really alarming.

I want to just get to a couple of the bills in California with you specifically when Amy Bond was talking about, I believe it's SB 871, the vaccination for children, zero to 17 in order to go to school, and then you have 866, which lowers the age of consent down to 12 years old. But she said something very alarming. And that is that, that they want to bypass the legislature now, that all future vaccines, after they approve this, that they'll take away, you know, your personal belief exemption, and they'll take away that the legislators will ever be involved again. So the health departments will just be dictators for whatever they feel. And it looks like there's languishing to get around the emergency use authorization in which if the CDC says they

like it, whether or not it's been properly approved, them simply liking it is enough for the health agency to bring it. No legislator can get in the way. You're a doctor. And when you watch this, I suppose some doctors like, great, take all politics out of the way. What is your feeling about this level of power and control in the hands of health officials? Dill, you're absolutely right about California being the battleground. A lot of my patients and friends ask why my wife and I haven't moved out of California to one of the usual states. And the answer is because this is the front line. This is the battle. This is the time and we must stand and fight because what happens in California is going to spread across the country.

including the red states that many people are considering moving to. That's why I stay in fight. But I'll tell you, Del, the Marxists in Sacramento have underestimated what they've done. They're coming after our children, and there's hundreds of thousands of mama bears that have said, no way, you're not going to do it, we've had enough, we're standing up. So we're seeing a pushback and thank goodness that we are. And these bills are horrible. I think they're unconstitutional.

They absolutely go against medical integrity, that sacred doctor-patient relationship. Listen, I know doctors that are going back from electronic records to paper records because they're worried about the privacy of some of their medical records. There's a bill also that will allow the government to come into my office. Let's talk about that. Let me go ahead and name it. This is AB2. You're going there and I want to go there with you.

AB 2, is this it, 920, AB 920, right, enactment S220. And so tell me about it, here's what it says. At the discretion of the board is part of an investigation, a board investigator and a medical consultant may inspect the business location in records of a physician or surgeon, including patient and client records. Two, if the board does not have the consent of a patient to inspect that patient's records, a board investigator and a medical consultant may inspect records in the office. of a licensee for the limited purpose of determining whether good cause exists to seek an investigative

subpoena for those records. What does this mean for someone that means? I mean that it's a bit out there. This is your office. They're saying they want to be able to come in. Now go into what you were about talking. It's one people to show you the actual bill. It's garbage is what it is. It directly undermines the doctor-patient relationship. It creates a level of distrust. If a patient is disclosing to me their intimate details of their medical issues. And they think that the government at any time can come in without their consent and look through their records. It'd be the equivalent of a police officer without cause to search your car, to search your home to look for something that you're doing that's nefarious. This is communist stuff. This is totalitarian stuff. This is what we

expect to happen in Russia or Cuba or Venezuela, but not the United States of America. And thank God we have patriotic mama bears that are standing up and saying, oh, hell no. And I know a lot of doctors that are on the edge with some of these bills that are looking for an excuse to move out of California and you're going to see this. And if these bills come through that require COVID vaccines for children to attend school, you will see a mass exodus more so than we've already seen from these government schools. It's wrong to do this. And here's why, Dell, children are not at risk of COVID-19. No. Why the heck would we vaccinate a child against a disease that they're not at risk? Using an experimental vaccine that has no long-term safety studies, it makes no sense at all.

It's dangerous. It's wrong. And now they want to allow 12-year-olds to consent to that. I mean, a 12-year-old can't even figure out what they're going to have for dinner or what time they're going to go to bed. And we're going to let them consent to a vaccine that causes more harm than good. it's ridiculous. It's wrong. It's dangerous. And we need to push back and say no. How are they selling this? I mean, when I look at these bills to some people that are still thinking, and maybe we just haven't been under lockdown long enough. I've gotten too much fresh air. But here in Texas, I look at this and say, what politician would think that they can support this? Taking away the doctor-patient relationship saying we want to be able to charge into your office

and look through any of your records, look through any of the records of your patients, nothing you can say about it. How are they selling it? What are they saying is the need to do that? Because obviously they've got a pitch for it. What is the pitch like? I mean, how are they trying to make it make sense to others and maybe even for themselves? I mean, does it make any sense? Yeah, you know, it's the famous words of Ronald Reagan. I'm from the government and I'm here to help. They sell it under child safety. They sell it under public health, et cetera. But they don't allow a debate. They don't allow a discussion. When I speak out on on social media. I'm not invited to the table to debate it up in Sacramento. You don't have dissenting

voices that are pushing back that are giving the facts like you do on the high wire every day. They're not asking Peter McCullough, the nation's expert, maybe the world's expert on COVID-19. They're not asking opinions from people that disagree with legacy media and these unelected health care bureaucrats. This is dangerous. It's not just wrong and it's not just something I I disagree with, but it's dangerous to be pushing these vaccinations on children. They're not looking at the data. They're not looking at the studies. They're not realizing that they cause more harm than good in children, especially as it relates to myocarditis. And we have no long-term studies. We don't know with a young person what's going to happen five years, 10 years. All of a sudden,

we'll see infertility in the future. And of course, they'll say, you know, these aren't the drones you're looking for, nothing to see here. It's not related to the vaccination. So we, we'll see. need to push back. I hope doctors will stand with me. I hope the mama bears will join me in Sacramento and say no, we're not going to put up with this. And if you pass these laws, we're no longer going to go to government schools. Mass exodus to the home schools, to charter schools and other schools that share your values. Enough is enough. California is the battleground and we must stand up and fight this fight. I want to ask you about one more bill, AB2098. This bill, basically says this. The bill would designate the dissemination and promotion of

misinformation and disinformation related to the SARS COVID coronavirus or COVID-19 as unprofessional conduct. The bill would require the board to consider specified factors prior to bringing a disciplinary action against a physician and surgeon. The bill would also make findings and declarations in this regard. This one seems like it's directed directly at you. You have been outspoken. You just said it yourself. Children do not need. this vaccine is more harm than good. You have been in there, you know, promoting the use of products that we see working in studies. I have no problem saying Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, folks,

they work for a large percentage of people, large enough to make it, you know, something that you should at least use or try to use since it has such a high safety record. I can say that, and there's nothing they can do to me, but this bill literally is trying to make it so they can do something to you as a doctor. passes, what does this do for medicine in California? Well, listen, fortunately, there's organizations like the Highwire and Children's Health Defense and so forth that we'll be filing lawsuits if this thing passes. I believe it's unconstitutional. It's an anti-freedom of speech law, and I don't think it's

going to hold up. Listen, the Medical Board of California is the licensing board of all physicians. The Medical Board of California is appointed. Every member is appointed by the governor. They're turning the medical board into a political organization, and they're removing any semblance of this being a medical organization. So this is politics entering into health care, and it's wrong. It's wrong to shut down voices that dissent. Listen, I'll challenge anybody any time to come in debate, and I don't even care.

Prove me wrong if you want to, but shut me down as unconstitutional and it's un-American. It's not right to do this, and it's dangerous if you do. do this? Do you really only want one point of view, the government's point of view as it comes to medicine? And where will it stop then? If I tell patients that they should eat a certain way, that they should avoid certain foods, are you going to come after me then because I'm spreading your so-called misinformation or disinformation? I don't want the government in charge of health care. Patients don't want the government in charge of health care. They are going too far and there's going to be consequences. Well, speaking of those consequences, one is that it has created

a movement like we have never seen before. When you first got involved with this, at the beginning of this pandemic, we were speaking to hundreds of people, maybe a thousand. We are about to have a rally in California, in the heart of Los Angeles, to defeat the mandates. April 10th, just over a week away.

You're one of the speakers there. How important is it for, you know, for people to show up to stand? I mean, we keep talking about how the media sees it. We also know that I think that this will affect, votes and legislatures in the future from thinking what they can get away with, how many people are really against this. But what does it mean for doctors and hospitals and medical associations in California to see people standing shoulder to shoulder on this issue?

You know, I think it's really important. And I'm asked all the time, what can a person do as an individual to make a difference? There are several things you can do. You can donate to organizations like the Highwire and Children's Health Defense that are fighting this battle, that are filing lawsuits and trying to defend freedom. You can come out to rallies like the one in LA on April 10th. I'll be there, and I hope we see hundreds of thousands of people that show up. You can write letters and call your local legislators and push back and tell them that you do not agree with the laws that are going to pass.

Do so politely, but do so indeed. It makes a difference. Write letters, emails, phone calls, support those that are filing the lawsuits that are standing up for liberty and come out to the rally and make yourself known. All right, Dr. Jeffrey Barkie, I look forward to being able to shake your hand in person. You're a hero. It's an honor to know you. You have never shied away from a camera or a microphone.

I know your career is at risk at the moment, saying the things you're saying, that you have basically written your line in the sand. If these bills pass, they are going to come straight for you. It hasn't stopped you. That's what it means to be an American. And I think when Mark, who I was just speaking to, was talking about as the executive for Sky News, and when he said, I think America is our only shot, it's because of people like you. They're watching this all around the world.

People like you are making a difference. And I want just to know how appreciative we are of your voice at this time. Thank you, Dell. Honor to be on. I appreciate all you do. And let's continue to take the fight to them. All right. I'll see you in a week.

All right, fantastic. Well, look, this is what it's all about. I, you know, hope you recognize. You can turn this off and say, well, that's California. I said at the top, that is not California. You just heard it. That's the UK. That's New York. They are talking about these bills in every state. Here in Texas, do you think I feel safe here in Texas? I don't. This is a battleground, too. I know that they want everyone here. They want Texas. They've got California. If they can swing California, they can pass these laws, then Texas is next. I'm a little bit. bit skeptical of fact that it seems like all of Silicon Valley is moving just outside of Austin here. My understanding, Microsoft is on the way. Google is on the way. Tesla is coming. Everyone's like, great, the jobs. Well, yeah, great. And a system of thinking that's trying to take over the world. This is why it is so important. It is so important that we stand together. I'm, you know, I can't tell you that we've got a huge lineup coming. We're working on it right now, talking to some people, trying to get them off the fence on the stage. But those that are showing up for sure right now, Jimmy Levy and High Red is going to give you a rock concert to start this out.

Mickey Willis, maybe if we're lucky, he'll even give us a preview of the Plandemic 3. Judy Mikevitz, Will Witt. Dr. Naomi Wolf is getting involved. She's going to be speaking. Her truth, Dr. Pierre Corrie, Robert Malone, Dickie Barrett, who was on this show. He's going to be one of the emcees telling a little bit of his story, having worked on the Jimmy Kimball show. And, of course, me and the usual loud voices that are loud and proud will be there. Keep watching because we're going to be listing more and more people as the days passed by,

but we need you there. A picture is worth a thousand words. Sure, you could go ahead and send a letter, and I believe in that. Send the emails, make the phone calls. But wouldn't you like to back it up with a photo of 100,000 people saying this was on your doorstep? This is how many people are coming to your office or standing outside your building if you decide to take our rights away. I hope you'll come for the biggest event America's ever seen.

Well, when it comes to an event, when it comes to being an activist, when it comes to what do we do? We stand next to each other. What's the way to really be noticed or have a voice when we're amongst the thousands that are out there? Well, one of those people that have given a voice, have given a look to this movement and have been on the front lines of this fight for all the time that I've been in it. Of course, I'm talking about Josh Coleman. And this is a little bit about him. Please welcome Josh Coleman, guys. He's largely the guy responsible for most of what happened today.

We live in the United States of America, also known as the land of the free. When we are told we don't have a choice that we have to do something, it piques our interest. After Josh's son, Otto's devastating vaccine injury, Josh Coleman naturally took to the fight against mandatory vaccination. The average person on the street knows none of these things. And with this action of censorship, the reaction is V is for vaccine. We are going to educate the general public whether they want it or not. In 2016, he joined the Vax documentary bus tour, capturing over 700 stories of vaccine

injury from across the country. He has since kept the pressure on those responsible for pushing these mandates. No one should be compelled or perverse to know anything that can hurt or kill them. Your voice is dangerous. One day, Governor Jerry Brown and Senator Pan will be held accountable for the lives they've destroyed. Most people don't even know a vaccine can injure or harm you. That is unacceptable and it's going to change right now. I believe the true intention of this bill is to, just like Facebook, block the dissemination of information on vaccine risk

despite its validity. We are completely against any kind of COVID-19 vaccine mandate for children and we don't think it's necessary. Parents can make their own decisions for their children's health. Has the California Department of Public Health shown you any safety studies done on masking kids that shows that it's safe? All the money in the world cannot match the kind of unbridled passion and determination that is here today. We can and will win this war to take our fundamental rights and control over our bodies. When it comes to our children's safety, we will not back down. We will not stop.

We have something the other side doesn't have. truth and we have passion you are the ones that will win this battle well it's my honor and pleasure to bring on one of my brothers out there josh coleman josh it's it's a pleasure to have you on the show today thanks for having me on so you know you and i go back you know we were you know we met right before actually as i was just starting to tour with vaxed i think we might even met around sb 277 but you There was so much going on there. Describe this movement, as you've seen it. When we were first against SB 277, you of course, had the opportunity.

You and I have done some traveling all around the country. How has it changed over the last? I guess it's, what do we say, five years now, almost six years? Well, it's been like an explosion of parents, I think, that have come out because of people like Senator Richard Pan and these bills that have been passed across the country. And now, of course, with COVID-19, we've seen a second explosion happen. And now we have all these fresh fish that are in this thing. And some are starting to figure out it's not just COVID-19 that a lot of the things and the complaints that they have about the COVID-19 vaccine actually relate to all the vaccines.

They're all not sufficiently tested. And none of them have, you know, a liability for the manufacturers. So yeah, those are, I think, that really the two milestones for the growing of this community. So in many ways, I think we can credit then, we could say Senator Richard Pan is the godfather of this movement. I mean, he is the one that woke up you and others to this. I mean, actually the injury. I don't want to, like, you know, undermine the injury. But the fact that we had to stand for something, you know, really, we would all be asleep at the wheel if Senator Pan had to start pushing the bills that he did in California.

because it really started there, didn't it? Absolutely, yeah. He basically created me. I exist because of Senator Richard Pan. I was happy doing my own thing. I just went, okay, my son's been injured, and I'm done. No more vaccines for my kids. And I'll just be happy doing my own thing.

And then, of course, SB 277 came, and I had to get involved because it was going to affect my family and my own children. And that's been the case with a lot of people. And that's been your discussion is, you know, you did the vaccines, it didn't work for your family, you know you have a vaccine injured child, and Senator Pan didn't care, he's going to push it anyway. Well, for those of you that don't know who Senator Richard Pan is, we've been talking about them a lot, because behind all these bills, forget who's actually signing on to it. Many of them are being written and then handed over by

Senator Pan so it doesn't look like he's single-handedly trying to rob everybody of their medical freedom. But here is just the history of Senator Richard Pan. invite Dr. Pan, Senator Pan, and he's going to draw the next five numbers. Thank you very much, Senator. Okay, we call this Vax for the win because actually getting vaccinated is winning. People talk about watered and vaccines, right? They say, oh, I'm worried about formaldehyde. I'm worried about aluminum.

You know what's the most dangerous substance in the vaccine? Water. More children die of water toxicity than anything else that's in a vaccine. I'm sorry, I don't understand that. Oh, more children die of drowning. Ah, ah, ah. Actually, it's the second leading cause of death in children that's between two and five. When it comes to a vaccination, vaccination is really about the public's health, about public safety.

If my child has hepatitis B, may they attend school? They may, I believe they may attend school, yes. But if they're not vaccinated for hypotitis, uh, uh, hepatitis B, can they attend school? Well, if they have a medical exemption, then they are able to attend school under this bill. Now, is hepatitis B, can you transmit that? Can one child pass it to another? Hepatitis B, it is possible for a child to pass, well, basically, people of close contacts, so who spend a lot of time of these jokes can pass hepatitis B from one to another.

I myself am a health professional who studies epidemiology, your comments about autism and autism rates. I think it does not actually refer it like the current science. Vaccines are not made from aborted fetal cells. That unfortunately is a myth. So I checked the MMR insert last night from Merck. They do use descendants from the line, the cell line, that are still human, fetal lung fibroblasts. So from the initial boarded fetuses that used in historically, they are still using the cell lines that have been propagated and grown still in the laboratory

to create the MMR. State Senator Dr. Richard Pan is one of the bill's authors. He says he wants to make it nearly impossible to not get children vaccinated in California. Someone decides still vaccines not for them, that's fine. You know, that's their decision. We're not telling them they can't have that decision. Grounded by parents and babies, state senators Dr. Richard Pan and Ben Allen announced legislation that would stop nearly all exemptions for childhood vaccine. We want these kids to go to school, and we are not taking away the parental rights to be able to make a decision. We want to be sure people have an informed decision.

We are authoring legislation that abolish the personal belief exemption that currently allows children who have not received the required vaccinations needed to protect the public health to enroll into our schools. SB 277 is restoring community immunity to protect our children and the public from preventable disease. We cannot allow a small number of unethical physicians to put our children back at risk. I am grateful for the moral courage of the medical community, which is calling for an end to these fake medical exemptions, and for action against physicians who endanger patients and betray the profession. It is so important to give as many people vaccinate as possible. You're going to protect yourself, protect your community. Guess what? You might have a chance of winning a great prize.

Watching, you know, they'd say having your life passed before your eyes, but having a life with Pan past videos, what's it like watching that going through? You've been there in the front lines with a camera this whole time. What does it make you feel when you think about Pan and what he's done through these last several years? Well, first off, I was cringing through a lot of that. That's just so painful. But it's extremely upsetting that that oftentimes what we've heard at all these hearings is the people deciding, the people that are voting, are saying, Well, I'm just relying on you, Senator Pan. You're the doctor. You're the professional. And we're out in the audience kind of waving our hands like he's lying. And that's the thing that people have been saying over and over again for the last, you know, six, seven years, he's lying. He is a liar.

And as you see, you know, these things, water, you know, the water toxicity and human fetal cells, it is just unbelievable. It is clear that he's a liar. And people should stop taking him seriously. And, yeah, it's just infuriating. and I don't think he really cares about our children or any Californian. Well, and he always moves the bar. We predicted it, you know, I believe it was AB. Was it 2109?

Was the first bill that basically just said in California, if you decide not to be vaccinated, we just want to read to you all the dangerous harms you're putting your child. And everyone fought that, stood and said, this is just the beginning of an attempt to try and take away rights. I will never enforce the vaccine. I just want you to be informed about, the dangers when you turn it down. Of course, that passed. I think what was it? Two years later,

along comes SB 277, doing exactly that, forcing our children to be vaccinated in California. And we said, if you do this, and he was saying, we need to protect the immunocompromise. You have an immunocompromised child. Did you ever believe for a second that he was going to keep Otto from being vaccinated? No, that's the funny thing, is it's actually been the immunocompromised are usually the ones that are vaccine injured that can't get an exemption and are being kicked out of school. So they say, we're protecting you, but no, we're the ones that are being impacted. Right. And what was incredible about is, and just as we said, you are going after that. You don't believe there's no one that can be vaccinated. This whole community immunity

thing, protecting those that are vulnerable. And sure enough, SB 276 comes along and what is it? It's a law to go after any doctor writing a medical exemption. And so whether you, and we, we had groups that got the vaccine injured parents together, that had children that were immune compromised, even those that had cancer and started calling pediatricians across the state just in the face of the idea of that law being passed SB 276. Will you, I have a child that has cancer, it has immunocompromised, will you write a medical exemption? I think that one group that did that had like 675 doctors offices saying we do no medical

exemptions for anybody. It literally took away. That fear of going after doctors, we're going to investigate you meant that no immune compromised child could be protected. Now, and that's why I, you know, I'm always reticent to go all the way back as far back in the past. There's a lot that's changed from the beginning. You know, I was a little wet behind the years when it came to like going out and marching. But one of the things that bothered me, I just made vaxed. We were just starting to tour and go to these rallies. And I had already interviewed all these parents, you know, that were not being heard with their children that had

been injured by vaccines like yourselves. They were going to Senator Pan. office and asking for a meeting, will you at least hear my story? Let me talk about, I'm one of your constituents, and he just wouldn't do it. I think this may be the moment you and I met. You were a camera guy. You happened to hear that we were all going to go to Senator Richard Pan's office. You were there with a camera, folks. This is going back in time a little bit. We're at least almost, I think six years back, beginning of the release of Vax. This is the famous Pan Rand. For those of you, they're brand new. This is kind of what sort of catapulted me into a bit of a limelight, partly because Josh was there with the camera. Take a look at this.

I'd like Senator Pan to sit down with me at any time on television and talk about why when he knew we had a whistleblower at the CDC saying that this vaccine was destroying children's lives, why would he pass a law making us have to use that defective vaccine? His staff said no, he wasn't there. He was out of the office, and we looked up and we saw him in one of the rooms. And he looked right at us, and he booked it. He just took a run for the door, and he literally ran out the door. We haven't seen this about, we haven't seen, we just thought maybe you'd want to.

We just were only had a conversation with Senator. I don't know where I'm now. You have to start his office. We were in his office. He saw us in his office and then he ran literally out of the back door. I ran out in the hallway. It's pretty fast, actually. I have to give, you know, Senator Pan down.

I don't know if he did. did track and field when he was younger, but he zipped down the hall, ran down some stairs. I think he did two flights of stairs at about seven seconds. Very, very impressive. And then ran down the hall, but I mean, obviously all we want to do is have a conversation. I mean, this is the United States of America. This is a conversation about health. We have a senior scientist at the CBC that's come forward in saying that the MMR autism vaccine studies abroad.

I think Senator Pan should talk about that since he wants to pass bills mandating his vaccine. So I guess he doesn't want to have that position. He's extremely bad. Of course, that went viral. You happened to be there with a camera and put that together. And I think shortly after that we said, you know what, this guy's good with the camera and he happens to get the shots that are necessary. So you hopped on to the tour with us and really documented the,

hundreds, if not thousands of vaccine injury stories that were captured there. You're a huge part of maybe one of the most important archives of vaccine injury that's ever taken place in the world. So I want to thank you for that work. But as we sit here, you know, and I want to say, I, you know, I actually got reprimanded by a couple of politicians and said, Del, nobody wants to get chased down a hallway. And I realize now, you know, it would seem to be like in the movies, that's how a reporter worked, right? You're trying to just get the story. You're not answering any questions. You're not listening to anybody. I just want to ask you a question. That's all it was. And to be honest, this guy really does run. I was at the Capitol,

maybe just like two years ago. I had my daughter on my shoulders. I stepped up to a traffic light, and I saw him step up to the light just across me. I was there for a different reason. He saw me and literally started running down the street, like running. And I'm sitting there like with my daughter, what do you think I'm going to do with my daughter on my shoulders? He tries to make it like he's under attack because I guess a hard question to him is an attack. But he's a dangerous person when it comes to the lives of children, especially the immune compromise, and really anyone that believes that they have a right to decide how their own body is treated on this planet.

Yeah, it's really sad right now. I'm right now getting calls almost every day by parents who have lost their medical exemption. And they're saying, what do I do? I can't move. And my kid is this close to finishing school. And it is awful. You know, these parents are crying. And not everybody has the ability to pick up and leave.

And of course, our military folks, they can't just pick up and leave. And yeah, he is devastating lives. And unfortunately, some parents are moving forward and vaccinating when they don't want to because they don't see any other way out. And I try to offer as much help that I can. but some people are just backed into a corner. And yeah, and it's all because of him. All right.

Well, let's get into this rally, April 10th. You know, how important is it? I mean, you know, in California, when you look it out of the rest of the country, I think you must, what does it like to be at California and looking at Texas? You watch the high wire. I'm talking about the fact that we're not wearing a mask when everywhere around you is. What does it feel like? Do you feel isolated in California when you look at the rest of the nation,

the Midwest that really has it? been sort of as draconian their measures? Yeah, yeah, it's really, really bad here. And it seems like most of the other states have figured out that COVID's pretty much over and ramping down. And they're ramping up here. We have 10 vaccine bills in play right now. It is terrifying. And of course, it affects the rest of the country.

And I think you were just making that point earlier. And people need to understand that because I talk to people and they say, what are you still doing there? Leave. Well, it's ground zero. This is ground zero for the fight. And that's why they go after places like New York and they go after places like California because they get them and then they kind of move in. And I mean, the whole plan here is vaccine passports for children, for adults across the country.

And so it is important to stand up in California. And that's the 10th, you know. And we already have people flying in from all over the country and every Californian needs to be there. This needs to be. I already know it's going to be the biggest demonstration we've ever seen. in this country against vaccine mandates. Now, you've been great. You know, when we were working together, you know, there was vacs, there's all of that.

But you went on and really decided one of the things, you know, I was caught up in the media says, I'm going to create a show. And you were like, you know what? Videos are great and all that. But I think the ground game is what is important. And you were the one that really said you got focused on giving us a look, getting people organized in a way that made sense. All of these great things you've done at Disneyland, at football games and baseball stadiums,

you know, standing out and really, you know, just incredible. The visual is powerful. And there's something about those signs. And I have to say even standing as a speaker on the stage, it's awesome to see all the people out there. But when you see these signs, you know, the media is catching it. You've been at, you know, on a Hollywood, you know, walk of fame where someone's getting a star. And behind it, you see the signs. You're there.

It's such a great way in a place where we're not being given a voice. that board is the voice. And so do you have signs ready for this rally coming up on April 10th in Los Angeles? Big time. We do. We have 1,300 signs to bring out there. And we've never had that many signs before. I think the most we've had at one event was 600 like you're seeing in that photograph right there.

And we have more than double that. And it really, it's very, very strong. And like you said, you know, we can make the best points in the world to the news. and then we cross our fingers and hope that they put those great points that we make with the news into the news, which rarely happens. But if they catch one of those bullet points on a sign in a picture or on a video that goes into local, national or international news, then we're getting something out. And so we're getting out these important messages that for a very long time we've never gotten out before. Now, I know that you can't sell things inside of the park in Grand Park. So for people that want one of those signs, how do we get it?

Where do we go to? You can pre-order it right and then you'll be there handing it out. That's right. Just go to vizforvaccine.com at the very top of the page. We have a button you can click and then you can reserve your sign. We have them for $30 each and just make sure, everybody make sure that they put their name in there so we know who's picking up the sign. And then also if people want to gift a sign, so if you don't live in California, or if you

have some extra money and you want to gift a sign to somebody who might not be a sign to be able to afford one, just put gift in the notes and we'll make sure that that sign is gifted to someone. And I would imagine you know what that sign would be good for getting the autographs of all the people you meet there that were there to make a difference. Maybe someone like Josh Coleman or one of the stars on the stage. This is going to be a moment to remember and I think that those signs are going to be a part of the image that we will remember to the end of time. I think we're going to make a difference this time. We're going to affect California. We're going to affect the vote in America just as the D.C. rally. I think we're going to do better in that. Josh, you

So how are we going to find you? Is there, I mean, you know, so you're going to, are you, do you have a booth set up? Yeah, we're going to have a booth there. And defeat the mandates originally, I guess, was going to charge grassroots organizations for booths. But fortunately, they've decided that they're going to go ahead and let us set up for free and other people set up for free. So people who want to get set up for free and get their booth set up over there, they just need to email info at defeat the mandates dc.com. Just let them know what you want to do and they'll take care of you. And it's really going to be a great spot to go out there and network and show people what you got and, you know, get people on your email list, give them your flyers.

So yeah, everybody please email if you want to be part of that. All right, Josh, it's going to be huge. I look forward to seeing you out there. We're just over a week out from the defeat the mandates. I want to thank you for all of your work. And we're going to see it, you know, on display. This is going to be awesome. So I look forward to seeing you there.

Well, look, I'll see you there. We're all looking forward to it. It's going to be fantastic, so I'll see you there. See you then. All right. Well, look, folks, you know, am I plugging for this rally? You bet I am. I mean, I can't tell you how many times people have called from California.

Dell, we need help in California. Well, here it comes. All around this country, people from around the world are making a trip to be in Los Angeles. You're not going to want to miss this moment. This is, I mean, if you weren't in D.C., this is what has got me so jazzed. You didn't feel what it was like to stand in a crowd that big. We have been through a pandemic. If you, you know, are thinking about spring break right now, well, do I go to L.A.

or do I, you know, go hit a beach? We are talking about being on the verge of never having a spring break again, never being able to cross borders. These people are crazy. As California goes, so goes the nation. If we win in California, we win this for the nation. It is not time to be complacent. It is time. And by the way, this isn't a panic moment.

This is a time to go celebrate, to stand in their face to show them how. How big we are. How many people actually stand against them and how many people are going to vote them out if they decide to try and take away our right to body autonomy or put a hand on our children. I'm going to be there and I'm heard that we've got several celebrities stepping up. We just heard that Kevin Sorbo is going to be a part of it. He's going to make a statement. So there it is. I told you more and more actors lining up. Of course, this is not an anti-vaccine rally.

This is an anti-mandate. We don't care if you vaccinate or not, but you should always have the right to choose. That is what this is about. So those of you that are out there on the fence, those of you actors that we're talking to, this is your moment. This is where you stand. No one is asking you to have an opinion on vaccination. We're having an opinion on free speech and the right to choose and the right to state your opinion freely.

This is what this is about. If this is not my body and I'm owned by the government, then this is not the United States. States of America and we no longer have freedom. It's that simple. If you can be injected with a product, you have no control over, you are not a free citizen, you are a farm animal. If you don't want to be a farm animal, then stop saying move from your bark lounger and get your butt out to California. We're all going to be there. It's going to be a huge event. Lots of great speakers. One I just mentioned, we're looking forward to it. This is it. This is our moment. Time to be present and accounted for. This is.

that moment that makes history. I've been saying it for years. Our generation will be remembered for this. Just as we talk about our founding fathers, Jefferson and Adams and George Washington, as we've talked about Malcolm X and Martin Luther King and all of those who have stood for injustices before and fought for the right to be free. This is our moment. This is who we are coursing through our veins and expected by television executives. in the UK and around the world people that are fighting for their lives are looking to us to the United States of America please don't let this happen if America goes down we all go down they are waiting for us they are praying for us let us show them who we are I'll see you

there next week the example of what you get when you choose to attack all members of the human family this is what you get when you decide to go after a person person's child. And I have to make it very clear that they really didn't expect all of this. Thousands from across the country rallied today in Washington, D.C. A rally against COVID-19 mandates. The message for many on Sunday was not anti-vaccines, but the right to choose. Thank all of you for coming out today to stand up for our children, our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren. The determination to preserve medical freedom is in your hands.

We're fighting for ourselves, our patients and all of you. We are fighting against Big Pharma. They have always put profits before patients. You know, here in the United States, really, it's going to be black people who really should get it first. To my African-American

brothers and sisters, the vaccine that you're going to take was developed by an African-American woman. As an African-American, I come here as one of the most vaccine-hesitant group. If you choose to The vaccination, do you take it? We should have a choice. The vaccine passports and the vaccine mandates

take us back to the days of segregation. It's back to the slave passports. Are you free or you're not free? You can't go here if you're not free. Or are you clean or not clean? I'm tired of these people that sit in the White House that stimulate race wars. We're going to come together and we're going to fight these mandates together.

Tired that we are being experimented on. We have all been deceived. I'm tired that we are being manipulated. They used our art. They used our athletes, our singers, our rappers. Celebrities are under a tremendous amount of pressure because they use celebrities to control the black community. Shout out to we the people.

Oh yeah, I forgot. They made that phrase, races too. But as you see in the audience, those who are Muslims, Christians, those in the Jewish community, Democrats, Republicans, white, black, everyone all in between. This is the example that they do not want to see, but they have no choice. This fall is so beautiful. Beautiful, look at all of you.

Look at you, the world sees us. We are 17,000 doctors. We are the love for life. I believe in you. Are we ready to reclaim the dream? Now the people rise up. Let's reclaim our country! The truth is like a lion.

You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.