The Highwire with Del Bigtree - CANADA THREATENS LIFE SENTENCES FOR “HATRED”
Episode Date: March 17, 2024Canada’s proposed bill, C-63, lays out liberty-crushing, due process annihilating terms for ill-defined thought crimes such as ‘fear of hate propaganda.’ Meanwhile, Ireland has a similar bill as... the public is seeing a hidden hand crafting legislation aimed to disrupt society.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
We're following this theme through all these stories of mandates, government mandates,
government trying to come in and control something that really shouldn't have this heavy-handed
government response.
And so this next segment is going to be about something we do just about every time here
on this show is talk and express emotions.
So this is something in Canada that's happening, but it's not just Canada, but we'll start
with Canada.
Draft Canada law would force social media companies to quickly remove harmful content.
the headline. Then another one out of Canadian journalists, CBC, long-awaited online
law proposes higher sentences for spreading hate online. It says legislation would establish a
five-member digital safety commission to enforce new rules. So here we go. Great. More government
bureaucracy as if we didn't have enough through COVID, so especially up in Canada, very interesting.
So let's just go to the bill and forget about the headlines now. And let's see what the bill says.
So this is Bill C63.
It's in the Canadian House of Commons.
And it enacts what's called an online harms act.
It also amends the criminal code and the Canadian Human's Right Act.
So it's really making some big moves in Canada.
And you can go in there and it actually defines hatred.
So you have a human emotion now that's trying to be legislated and controlled by the government.
It says hatred means the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than disdain or dislike.
So, you know, instead it's trying to work.
Got it. Got it. Understood.
I know exactly where to bowl that one.
You know, instead of trying to just work through this with conversation, with open dialogue, the government's going to step in and say, we're going to tell you how to deal with that emotion.
And so let's go further into this bill here.
So it says an offense motivated by hatred.
So if someone does something and they find it's motivated by hatred, this is what it says.
everyone who commits an offense under this act or any other act of parliament if the commission
of the offense is motivated by hatred based on race national or ethnic origin language color religion
sex age mental or physical disability sexual orientation or gender identity or expression is guilty of
an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for life the the only other thing you get
imprisonment for life for pretty much in canada is murder manslaughter so they're going to put that up there
if you say something, you commit a hateful offense to somebody.
Imagine saying you're angry that you just found out your kindergartner was just
shown images of transgender sex change operations.
I mean, these are things we've seen in the Netherlands and England.
I mean, imagine you say, wait a minute, I'm totally against that.
Oh, you're being hateful? Because if you are, guess he's going to jail?
I mean, that's just one example that pops of my head is like a million ways this could go south.
Well, it can go south a lot more, and we're going to get into that right now. So in that, it's an offense. So someone could say, well, yeah, if someone's committing a criminal act, an offense, then if they're doing it in a hateful way, I don't know if anybody does a joyous offense, but they're going to tack this on for possible life imprisonment, but then it has pre-crime in there, written in there. So this is the actual language. It says fear of hate propaganda offense or hate crime. And it says a person may with the attorney general's consent lay an infant.
before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that any person will commit
and that goes on to say these hateful offenses. So if a person believes that they're going to, someone may,
may do something but hasn't done it yet, they can start a case. And then it goes on from there.
And this is just a couple more things. It allows someone to make a complaint of a discrimination anonymously.
So you don't get to know who's accusing you. And it found legit, if that hateful complaint is found legit, a maximum
with $20,000 goes to that person. You can imagine how that's going to be abused. And then $50,000
wait to the snitch, the snitch gets $20,000 for turning somebody in for potentially being hateful.
Absolutely. And the Canadian government up to $50,000. So there's $70,000 that is on the line there
for an anonymous, you know, whistleblower or snitch or whatever you want to call them. But, you know,
more importantly, so we have the individuals that will abuse the system on this. It's written right in their
bill. You can see how this can happen.
happen. But you have a government there, namely a leader there, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
who seems to throw around these words in situations that they do not apply. Namely, when the truckers
were protesting, the vaccine mandates, the vaccine passports, you know, the ones that didn't stop
transmission. This was the headline. Trudeau accuses Canada truckers of hate, abuse, and racism as he
test positive for COVID after evacuation. You go in this article, it says Canadian Prime Minister
blasted a convoy of truckers protesting vaccine mandates as showing disrespect to science and champion
hate, abuse and racism hours after announcing he had tested positive for COVID-19. I mean, so much wrong
with that right there, but you can see the lining up, I mean, it's already happening. So imagine
if this C-63 bill was already implemented and being used. If those wheels were greased, you have to
wonder, Trudeau. Assembly and saying, I don't want that vaccine. It just failed you, Prime Minutes.
I don't believe it works.
Well, that's now a hate crime because the prime minister that's now sick has decided that you're full of hate in being against the fact.
It sure looked hateful, all those people dancing in the streets.
I mean, it's really, you don't even have to use your imagination.
This is really totally out of control.
It's so dangerous.
And I was just up in Canada speaking to people up there.
They're really terrified of the way that they were treated during that.
They shut down bank accounts, as we all now know.
and now you have a bill coming out of that saying not only do we feel like we're justified in the future,
we want to throw you in jail for life if you ever attempt to speak out against the government again
and anything we want, any product we want to force on you.
And Trudeau used one of the most aggressive tools he had at the time of the Emergencies Act,
which a court found he had no reasonable justification to do that.
So imagine again if this, and this bill, this legislation is not a law yet.
So people can fight this and a lot of people are fighting this.
even outside of Canada, they're standing behind Canadians in trying to fight this.
So that's good news.
One of the other issues we're seeing, though, is that there seems like a coordinated push
across multiple nations with similar language when it comes to these bills that are coming
across to fight online hate, these nebulous words.
And so this is the Hill reporting on what's going on in Ireland.
So this says proposed Irish hate speech regulations could have a chilling effect on freedom.
In this article, I mean, similar bill, it says, as
the tentative legislation so it's not it's not law yet people with protected characteristics which
include intra alia race color nationality are afforded new legal protections against physical and
physical and mentally inflicted harms in which offenders are motivated by hatred even more worrying
it says is the bill's criminalizing of possession of ill-defined hateful material with a view
to the material being communicated to the public or a section of the public despite ireland's
common law tradition of innocent until proven guilty. The legislation places the onus on the
accused to prove he or she did not intend to distribute the hateful material in public. And then
finally, this is the one that'll blow your mind. It finally goes on to say this. As such,
Ireland's police force, Angarda Shahana, will have the authority under the bill to raid
the home of the possessor of such material, demand their password and seize their devices. Failure to
comply could result in a year-long prison sentence.
I mean, these are society destroying bills.
It was really bad, and we just reported just a couple of weeks ago,
France is working on the bill to make it, you know, illegal to speak out against science,
products, MRNA technologies.
We went through all of that.
And folks, what you really have to look at here is, you know,
this isn't just happening, you know, in some sort of, like in the middle of Russia or North Korea.
This is happening in essentially Democratic.
nations or at least socialist nations, but all of these nations are going to the world
economic form. They're going to these international symposiums where these ideas are spoken about
freely. And you've got to look at how many of the politicians that are in our government right
now have been seen in Davos, celebrating these ideas that you'll own nothing and be happy.
a new, you know, a great reset, a new world order that they'll slip up with when they talk about it.
And then when you see the darlings, Macron, you know, and Trudeau now bringing laws that essentially are going to throw you in jail for your, you know, speaking your mind.
You know, you have to realize how close we must be here in the United States of America.
that if our president, and Joe Biden is one of them that has been seen celebrating WEF and, you know, Obama, of course, was there.
And, you know, we've got to look at these politicians that were electing and ask ourselves, do they believe in this idea of governance at all?
Have they made any statements? And clearly, clearly we have the president of the United States did lock us down, did say, you know, that you should have to get this vaccine or have your job taken away.
did go to Facebook and YouTube and social media companies with our government and say,
censor anything that's misinformation, which we now know is just information that the government
doesn't want you to hear. So, and all that happened, all that, like, we lost our YouTube
channel, Jeffrey, we lost our Facebook channel in the middle of this. We were censored,
and as you pointed out, you know, all the way through your report here, we were right.
They were wrong. The liars were rewrite in the history, right? So it's very, very scary stuff you're reporting on here. It's truly shocking and it is pounding on our door as we speak. Hopefully enough of us are going to wake up to make sure that these individuals never, ever get control of our government.
