The Highwire with Del Bigtree - CANADIAN BILL EXPOSES DARK EUGENICS HISTORY

Episode Date: October 7, 2025

Canada’s new bill banning forced sterilization of First Nations women shines a light on a chilling global pattern of modern-day eugenics, from Kenya’s tetanus vaccines to Colombia’s HPV programs.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

There's a lot of ways to control the population. You control the speech, which is thought, and thought, which is speech. But a lot of populations are in decline right now. Canada being one of them. Here's a recent article looking at Canada's replacement, basically, birth rate. Canada's population growth slows to historic lows as temporary residents decline. This is going on in a lot of countries as well.

But Canada's interesting because on one end, you have the birth and the population slowing, but on the other end, on the end where people are ending their lives, you have made, which is this medically assisted dying. Assisted dying now counts for one in 20 Canada deaths, is the headline. And we've spoken about this on the show before. So you have a squeeze on both ends. And so knowing that, when I saw this headline come across my desk from the Canadian Medical Association, I kind of scratched my head. It says, is a CMA, Canadian Medical Association, supports national effort to end forced and coerced sterilization. And you go into this and it says the CMA supports Bill S-228, which makes it clear that performing a

medical act without free prior and informed consent constitutes aggravated assault. And so first of all, I didn't know this was still going on. I thought we ended that, you know, with Margaret Sanger in the 1930s. But apparently they're trying to stop this and they have to put a bill forward to stop it in Canada, of all places, with the population that's already decreasing at record numbers. So this is Senator Yvonne Boyer, and she put forth this bill. And this is really for people in the First Nations, Inuit people, maybe people of Canada. And this is Bill S-2-8. they've been the most vulnerable to this coerced and forced sterilization.

And this all stemmed from a Senate Committee on Human Rights Report, and they looked at this. They went out into the field. They did testimonies. And they concluded this. Again, this was in 2018. So we're talking pretty recently, concluded witness testimony confirmed the ongoing practice of forced and coerced sterilization in Canada. The forms of coercion described by witnesses range from confinement to manipulation,

exploiting the vulnerability or omitting to consult patients before forever moving their ability to conceive. So I want to tell a story here off the back of this because clearly it's still happening. And we look back and this is, again, this is eugenics. And we've covered this throughout the show. We've covered the roots of it through Darwin. Again, Margaret Sanger, we have Planned Parenthood.

We even had laws in the US that were doing this. But we had something that happened, at the end of the 1960s, we had the assassination of JFK, RFK, MLK, and that was really the end of political unity, the end of stopping forever wars, of judging people by their character. And a vacuum was created, and out of that vacuum came something somewhat dark. We had 1972 limits to growth, which said humans are the cause and are killing life on this planet, ironically, and we became the target of climate change, humanity itself. But in 1974, You can see this edifice starting to be erected.

In 1974, we have National Security Memorandum 200. This is the National Security Council. You may remember that from the COVID response. And I want to direct people to one line in here. It's subsection E, creating conditions conducive to fertility decline. This is official policy. It says it is clear that the availability of contraceptive services

and information is not a complete answer to the population problem. In view of the importance of social, economic factors in determining desired family size, overall assistance strategy should increasingly concentrate on selective policies, which will contribute to population decline as well as other goals. And you can see that last line there. It says Congressional mandate to focus on problems of what they call the poor majority in lower developed countries. Then it goes on to say, well, how are we going to do this? They said, beyond seeking to reach and influence national

leaders, we're going to improve worldwide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media in other population education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, which is the United States Information Agency, and then USAID. So remember that, UN, USAID. So now, again, this is all year after year after year. You see this being through it. So that was 1974. In the background, the World Health Organization has been funding, trying to make an anti-fertility vaccine. This was their Willie Wonka Golden Ticket for the population problem that they're talking about in this memorandum. By 1976, they have their aha moment. They did it. They found it. And they actually put it in a study here.

This is a very well-referenced study. This was funded by the WHO. I want to emphasize that. iso immunization against human corionic genatotropin with tetanist toxoid. So let's break this down. Isso immunization is autoimmunity. So that's when your immune system attacked its own cells. So they're saying, we're teaching the body to attack its own cells. What cells? Well, the human corionic genatotropin. What is that? That's the hormone that signals the body's recognition of pregnancy. It's produced by the placenta. So the body's attacking that. And what do they do? The researchers took that hormone, chemically linked it with the tetanist toxoid. They use that as a carrier pathogen. And now you're making antibodies. The women are

making antibodies when they're injected to their own, basically, pregnancies. And so they have this new weapon the WHO funded it by 1982 you see something from USAID here it comes in again 1982 policy paper on population assistance it says USAID policy governing the use of agency funds for sterilization provides that USAID funds can only be used to support voluntary sterilization activities if the following six conditions are met and they have this this great flowerly language in there oh we need informed consent we need to give them other options if they want. But, you know, there was no enforcement mechanism. So unfortunately, that didn't happen. And as the records show, there was forced vaccination camp, a sterilization

campaigns in Peru. And this was the headline here. The U.S. government led. It did lead a program that forcefully sterilized thousands of Peruvian women. So that's USAID for you. It says an unsettling aspect of the entire Peruvian campaign is the involvement of the U.S. government. The specific agencies that were involved in Peru's sterilization campaign were the U.S. agency for international development, USAID and the United Nations Population Fund. And then it says Nippon also from Japan is known that the United Nations Population Fund donated 10 million for the forced sterilization campaign. They're really excited about that, really wanted this. So people watching this might go, well, that was the 70s, that was the 80s. I wasn't even born then, say some people, okay, well, let's bring this to

2014. It's getting a little closer now. So in 2014 in Kenya, all of the sudden, out of the blue, government there said, we're going to do a tetanus campaign. We're going to go and start giving tetanus vaccines to not the entire population, just women, ages about 14 to 49. So we have the Catholic Health Commission, the Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops came forth because they're the ones that are working in the field with these communities. They said, wait a minute, no one said anything about any type of tetanus crisis. Why are we just giving this to women? So they put out press release and they they question w h o this again it was sponsored by w h o very interesting and this actually even made washington post kenya's catholic bishops it says tetanus vaccine is birth control

in disguise well they never really received the answers they wanted but thankfully researchers independent researchers took up the the information there and they put forth this paper which is forever on the record now hcg found in w hos tetanus vaccine in k k kines Kenya. And it says this. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO-Tennis vaccine being used in March of 2014 and found HCG where none should be present. In October of 2014, six additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors and were tested in six accredited laboratories. Again, HCG was found in half the samples. And that is, I really do think that if the alternative media is what it was now back then, this would have been an international

crisis, we may have never even had COVID run as far as it did because people would have been on the lookout for this. Now let's bring it all the way to real time. 2019, we have some other issues. It's not just lower developed countries. It's the United States. We have this study, a lowered probability of pregnancy and females in the USA, age 25 to 29, who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection. The researcher here says approximately 60% of women who did not receive the HPV vaccine have been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of the women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived. And the researcher went on to conclude, if 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggests the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by

2 million. Well, that couldn't stand because the safeguards weren't there for independent researchers like they are now through what Kennedy is doing and also what Javada Chari is doing at NIH. So that article was retracted. Can't have that in a medical journal. The author Gail Dahlong, the late Gail the Long actually, she wrote a rebuttal to that and said, with a, gave detailed explanation why that study should stay, although they pulled it because they didn't actually give too much of a reason why they pulled it. But that forever stays. And so that's bring it up to the present day in 2024, the last year the Biden presidency, otherwise known as the Autopenn Presidency, there was a final rule here that was done by the FDA. It was signed in for the

institutional review board. It says this final rule permits an institutional review board to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent under limited conditions for certain FDA regulated minimum risk clinical investigations. So now we come full circle to Canada. we have minimal risk informed consent waivers. Well, the MRNA vaccine is minimal risk. There's a lot of other interventions that would be considered minimal risk

that we know are not. So this is on the books now with the FDA. I think it's very important for the FDA to re-look at this waiver because I don't know why we're reducing informed consent in an era where Canada is still trying to stop force vaccination or forced sterilizations. Yeah.

You know, it's really, I love it when we do these stories. We've covered this before. We've covered Kenya before. But to see right across the border, you know, that wasn't just vaccination programs. There was hysterectomies and all sorts of things they were doing to women. Sometimes without even their understanding, they thought they were in the hospital for something else. It's absolutely horrific.

But as you point out, the historical references that put us in this position. But I just want to say this very clearly. It's one of the greatest concerns I have with a mandated vaccine program. really, and, you know, you could call it a conspiracy theory, except that we have the evidence. We have all of the writings where they refer to reducing population through use of what? Vaccination. We've caught them using vaccines to reduce populations around the world. In fact, right here in America, we celebrate a vaccine program of the deer population because we use a vaccine, you know, that, you know, stops fertility amongst deer.

So vaccines and infertility and using them to, you know, reduce fertility is a part of the science. It's a part of the vernacular. It's in all the textbooks. It's how they talk about it. And so when I first got onto this issue, whether or not you love the vaccine program, I've said it clearly. It is a free country. If you want to inject these things into you or your children, then that's a choice you get to make.

But it should never be mandated on you. I cannot. I mean, if and when you hear as many leaders and as many citizens, And as many scientists, the head of Gavi, the heads of WHO, we're talking about obviously Bill Gates is in there. When they keep telling you they want to reduce population through modern medicine, I'll say it again, listen to them, believe them. They are telling you their truth. They have lots of money going towards this. And how do you think they're going to do it?

Well, the easiest delivery system would not be like atomizing it in the sky because then they have to breathe it. This is just my perspective. They wouldn't be putting it in the water because how do they know, they just drink bottled water. But you know it the best delivery system to bring harm or at least fertility problems against anyone. Maybe they're not socioeconomically strong enough to be a part of a society, especially with AI coming.

And now we're going to have, you know, universal basic income and all these people playing video games and not working. Well, what are we going to do about it? They're telling you what they're going to do about it. They've done it before. The best way to reduce population, the most accurate scalpel you could ever use is, a program that every single one of your citizens marches in to do believing it's perfectly safe and effective, you know, that it's all there for your good and you never question what's in it.

You never question what it's there for. And anyone that does question it gets cease and desist letters say you're not allowed to talk about that. And so that's the world we do live in. And I do believe that that is our future. Whether it's happening right now or not, that's to be debated. But do they think about this product as a way to control the size of your family, Wherever you are, absolutely you know that conversation is happening. So that's why, you know, over all other things, what we stand firm on here at the high wire

and I can is your right to choose. It's why we fight so hard of these legal cases that we've won in Mississippi, why we're spending fortunes right now to bring freedom, religious freedom from vaccination to West Virginia and the rest of the five stays free of the five. That is what we're dedicated to is your freedom. All right, Jeffrey, I'll give you the last word. So important. All right, no, that was wonderful.

So just looking across time, this is why informed consent and free speech are so important. The two things, the two backbones of the high wire and I can, because you look throughout time, when does eugenics kind of raise its ugly head? It's when you had political division, division between government and the people, and also unchecked power. those two, one plus one, equals, it seems to be this eugenics ideology that comes forward. So we're seeing those ingredients starting. So this is why we have to keep out for this. We're the watchdog, the public health watchdog. And we're going to keep reporting whatever we see is as shocking as it may be.