The Highwire with Del Bigtree - CANCELING COVID

Episode Date: February 5, 2022

New High for Vaccine Failure; Freedom Convoy Goes Global; Unrest at HHS; Countries Roll Back Restrictions; Cancel Culture Cancels Self over Joe Rogan; Economic Forecaster Predicts End of NationsGuest: Martin ArmstrongBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out on to the high wire. Now, I know many of you are joining us. We've been all over the news, and you're probably asking yourself, like, who is this Dell Big Tree guy? What is the high wire? Well, I want you to know that we've been here for many years, and we've been successfully discussing the issues of the COVID pandemic and the vaccine since it started. And I have to tell you, working on this show, one of the things that's really difficult right now in these current times is to not just get a little bit giddy as we watch so many of the predictions that

we made all the way back when this started coming true now. Today I want to talk about one of those predictions, specifically about the vaccine itself. Now, when they were talking about the vaccine was going to be launched on America and they were rushing to make it, we talked about how excited they were. The FDA knew it was going to work before it was even safety tested. Everyone was going to warp speed this out, which is why we sort of said, well, it sounds a lot like a vaccine. vaccine unicorn, and this is the video we'd play every time we talked about it. Now this vaccine program was rife with problems from the very beginning. In fact, before we even discussed a vaccine unicorn, we had already been reporting on all of the problems they had had in trials of the coronavirus vaccine for the last 20 years.

We discussed antibody dependent enhancement, this problem that reared its ugly head in every single animal trial that was done on every attempt of a coronavirus vaccine by every single single drug company that tried it since the late 1990s, early 2000s. They had all decided, hey, a coronavirus vaccine would be really great to have after the SARS coronavirus, the original SARS coronavirus, tried to sweep the world. But in the end, every time they would inject the animals with their product, the animals would seem like they were healthy, and then they would draw the blood and it was like creating lots of antibodies, so they were really excited thinking, it's going to be a success, we're going to be billionaires.

But the animal trials all went one step further than human trials usually do, something called a challenge study, where they actually put the animals in contact with the coronavirus, and what they found, paradoxically, as Dr. Peter Hotezes said so many times, what they found was that instead of the vaccine protecting the animal and neutralizing the virus, it seemed to enhance the disease by drawing the virus deeper in the cells faster, creating what was called a cytokine storm, in many cases, organ failure in death. called antibody dependent enhancement or disease enhancement, meaning the vaccine enhances the disease. We also knew that Moderna, for instance, that was going to be one of these great companies rushing

this vaccine out was going to use a brand new technology that they had failed to make successful for over 13 years. Since the beginning of Moderna, not a single product they developed had ever been able to be launched into the public. So you had a failed company with a failed product and a history of failed products. So we thought, you know what? The odds. that this vaccine are going to turn to a vaccine unicorn aren't very good, meaning the vaccine unicorn might end up looking something like this. Well, now we have time on our side. We get to reflect upon the vaccine, what they said, what they promised, and what it actually is today. So let's remember how they described the beautiful

vaccine unicorn as they paraded it out to the entire world. They admitted, well, it's not a hundred percent effective, but it is 95. News in the race for a COVID-19 vaccine, drug giant, Moderna, announcing their vaccine trials, show that it is nearly 95% effective. 95% effective, 95% effective. Close to 95% efficacy. 95% effective against COVID-19.

94.5% effective at preventing COVID-19. 95% effective at preventing cases of COVID-19. 95% effective. So I think this is a really strong step. forward to where we want to be about getting control of this outbreak. So they told us that the vaccine unicorn was 95% effective and that we should all rush out and get the vaccine so we could stop this spread in its tracks and end this pandemic and get back to our lives. But the question is, did it stop the spread? Can it stop the spread? Well, now we know that's absolutely not the case. In fact, we have a bigger problem. We've been reporting on it for about the last two weeks. It's something called negative efficacy.

There was a huge study that came out actually last week from Scotland, and we showed you the data. This was it, Public Health Scotland, COVID-19 and winter statistical report. And as for Scotland's data, as you see here, you can't say, well, the unvaccinated group is smaller than the vaccinated group, and that's why the numbers are different. No, this is per 100,000. These numbers represent a fraction of the 100,000, which are bigger in the vaccinated group than they are in the unvaccinated group, showing that those have been vaccinated are in an increased risk of being in. infected with Omicron over those that have not received the vaccine. Now, to get deeper into this,

we decided to have our team in Europe do a deeper dive in investigation, especially on the UK numbers, which have been pretty accurate. And so they broke down the UK numbers looking at per dose, per person, and their relative risk of infection. And this is what we found. As you can see here, now, if you look, the blue represents the third dose, those who have gotten a booster shot, The orange is the second dose. So those people that stopped after the second dose, and the gray is those people that stopped after their first dose.

And what we find when we look per dose, per person, and the actual infection rates, what we are seeing is this. And this is compared to the unvaccinated. So comparing those with each one of these doses to those who did not receive the vaccine gives us the relative risk in the percentages here. And so here you will see that under the age of 18,

now remember, this is zero. If the vaccine is effective, we should see its efficacy going up here, that it works better than being unvaccinated. So in this case, in under 18-year-olds, we do see currently some advantages to the third shot and the second shot. But those who only got one shot are having a negative result, meaning they're about 50% more likely to be infected than those that didn't receive a vaccine at all. Now, I think this anomaly exists a little bit because it's really the waning of these vaccines that gets to be a problem. As they start to wear off over a couple of weeks, you start getting this susceptibility to the virus. So we just need a little more time for these two columns to see them flip over. Now, why do I believe that? Because of all of the rest of this graph.

Look at what's happening at 18 to 29 year olds. They're still having a little bit of success where they've had the booster, but that's because they've just received it. But look at those that only got the second shot. They're now having a 200% increased risk of developing Omicron over those that didn't get the second. over those that didn't get the vaccine. And then here we have the first dose. They're at about, I don't know, that's about 60% more likely

to be infected. This is terrible, folks. 30 to 39-year-old. Remember, this is supposed to be 95% effective. Up here, up here in the 100%. Right in about here is where we should be seeing this. Instead, we're getting negative 100%. Okay?

So now 30 to 39, same thing. Second shot all the way down here, nearly 300% more likely to develop Omicron infection than those that weren't vaccinated. As we go along, obviously, 40 to 49, same thing. 50 to 59. Look at this. 60 to 69. 70 to 79.

80 or over. This vaccine is a complete and total disaster. Now, for those of you that may be saying, well, that's just the UK as though they have a different body and human body type and maybe they don't have the same two arms and two legs that we have here in the United States of America, there's a very interesting graph I want you to look at. And this is a comparison amongst different continents. and nations. So here we see since about January 28th, 2020, we're looking at daily new confirmed

COVID cases per one million. That is what this chart is showing us. And when we look at this chart, you see the rise that happened November 16th, 2020, February 2021 as it came back down. But what we really want you to look at right now is where we are at as of a week ago. Now let's go all the way over here. This is the United States of America peaking right here somewhere around. 2,500 cases per 1 million. The United Kingdom is just above us, just above the 2,500, somewhere around probably 2,700 cases per 1 million. Now, what's shocking about this graph, if you haven't already seen it already,

is down here. What's down here? What's down here are the nations that do not have the same medical care that we have, that we're not able to get the vaccines that we're able to get. We couldn't get them distributed. They couldn't afford them. Remember, all these discussions, let's not go to a booster shot until we get Africa vaccinated?

Well, those discussions are what make you really question what we're seeing here. While United States and the United Kingdom are peaking, down here, India and Africa are having barely any infections. And in case you think, well, they've just gotten through it. I mean, look all the way across this graph. They never got to the peaks that the vaccinated pro-hospital, pro-doctors, you know, got to. And maybe some of the questions we should be asked for ourselves, because there are some confounding issues. Some in fact, that are even more sort of tragic, which is these are countries

that use ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. So we know that ivermectin hydroxychloroquine can be preventative so people that were taking those, maybe they didn't catch COVID, or if they did, maybe it went away quicker. So we have to account for that, so we can't totally blame the vaccine, but what we can blame is the CDC, the FDA, and the WHO because everyone that stuck with the protocols, this is where they ended up. Now I want to show you who we've added to this graph. Now, United States, United Kingdom, done very, very bad. But look at this. This is Oceania. I mean, apparently that's what we call Australia and New Zealand in those areas. Now, they're right up there with us. These were the countries that said, we can hide from it. We have an island.

If we stop all travel coming onto our island, if we lock everybody down in a hotel room until they're testing negative, everyone we catch, we'll be able to keep this by. to get it from getting to us. And that was the plan. And then we're going to vaccinate everybody. They start vaccinating everybody like crazy. And still, it hasn't mattered. They have a really high infection rate all the way up above here, above the 2,500.

And so we've got to be asking ourselves, what is going on here? Still, those who can't get vaccinated are doing better. Those who can't get our great medical care are doing better. Now, what would be the outlier? What would be the one focus we'd want to make in all the work we've done here at the high wire? What's the one country you're really curious about? Because we've talked about a lot. If you're brand new, you won't know this.

But if you've been watching for a while, you know what I'm talking about. You know that nation that had a prime minister that basically turned the entire nation into the largest test group in the world and said, nanny, nanny, boo, boo, we get all of our vaccines before you because we sold our people to Pfizer so that they will do studies on us, but we'll get vaccinated before you. That's right. I'm talking about Israel, the nation that isn't really at the two shots or even the three. three shots that we're starting to see here in the United States of America. I believe we're about 45% of people have gotten that third shot, meaning 55% of us are saying,

oh, hell no. But in Israel, they're on their fourth dose of the vaccine. So how are they doing as of last week? Well, it's an orange line. Let's see if you can see it. As you can see, it is quite a bit higher. In fact, it's going off of our chart. So we're a little bit unorthodox here sometimes, so let us deal with our inconvenient

truth, shall we? Now, in order to relate exactly how far up this line goes, I need to do this. Because that is where Israel's at. 10,968 cases per million per day. One of the highest rates we've seen in the world as of last week. Now, look at this. Is this like unbelievable? I about fell out of my chair. I almost fell out of this cherry picker when I saw this graph. It's absolutely. It's absolutely, It's absolutely incomprehensible how bad this vaccine is. Remember, this is the vaccine. The people that didn't just get third dose, they got a fourth dose,

meaning the vaccine is not helping stop it. It's not stopping the spread. It's lighting the spread on fire. Now, you might think, well, Dell's kind of exaggerating here and certainly the vaccine's doing its part, maybe not 95%, really? Not 95%. We're nearing 0% here, as admitted by Tony Fauci himself.

talking about how Amicron is going to infect everybody, even the vaccinated. Take a look at this. I think in many respects, Omicron, with its extraordinary, unprecedented degree of efficiency of transmissibility will ultimately find just about everybody. Those who have been vaccinated and vaccinated and boosted would get exposed. Some, maybe a lot of them, will get infected. So what's the box that we're all looking at now? That box is control, namely getting the level of infection that causes severe disease low enough that we can incorporate this infection.

Some people have said learning to live with it that I believe we are possibly approaching that. What is that box? Where is that box? Is there a box? Is that box? That's the vaccine fairy box. It stays in the little box is what we're talking about here. I mean, this whole thing has gotten so absurd.

And I have to tell you, for those of you who haven't watched the show for many years, I worked at CBS. And so I used to be on the television show The Doctors. We would have been covering this from the beginning. We would have been promoting this vaccine. And I have to tell you, when I think about, my God, if I was still on that team, if I was still over the doctors trying to sell this level of bull crap, I can't imagine what I'd be doing.

I mean, there must be people arguing with each other, screaming at each other inside the CDC, NBC, MSNBC, Fox, all of them caught lying, CBS where I used to work. So all I got to say to you is, you know, every once in a while you get lucky, every once in a while you bet the right horse. And boy, am I psyched that I jumped off when I did, and I'm here at the highwire where we have predicted and delivered the truth better than anyone else in media. And speaking of one of the people that has helped us do that, it's time for the Jackson Report. Amazing. I mean, it's just utterly amazing. Do you still, my, it looks like your cheeks are hurting a little. They're hurting a little bit from all the laughter that, you know, at how absurd our opposition, what they're having to say and what they're having to do to try and get around this. It's outrageous. Oh my gosh. It's really easy to look at these headlines these days and just think about all of the stuff that we've predicted over the past couple of years. It's been almost like a crystal ball, but it's just following the data, following the evidence of what the people that. push the vaccine program in the past have done by ignoring the safety. But Del, last time we talked, truckers were converging from all corners of Canada to descend

on Canada's capital in Ottawa. And days after our broadcast, some of the first truckers rolled in there and started to occupy the city. They've only been increasing since. And they are still there right now. And these are what some of the images look like. Take a look. We are in the middle of Trans-Canada Highway.

And as you can see, the long epic convoy is passing by. It's an incredibly long convoy, enormous support all across the road. A lot of you don't realize the magnitude of this convoy and what we are actually standing for. As of yesterday, we were well over 60,000 trucks strong and growing every day. We have support from west to east and everywhere in between in support of freedom. That's what we're fighting for. It's time to stand up. Don't let our freedom.

Don't let our freedoms go, never get them back. I'm scared of what's coming and... Trying to keep it together here. It's emotional. It's Chris from Police on Guard here and I'm in the car with my family... On the way to Ottawa. And every overpass is packed with Canadians. Look at this right here.

Do you? Look at this. This is not a fridge. We will not be divided. This is Canada. We stand together. We stand on guard for thee. God bless Canada. You've pushed the trucking industry to a point where we had enough. We've heard the cry of the Canadians and now we see the support of all Canadians coming together. This is democracy. This is what democracy is all about.

People believe that the government has overstepped with mandates and they're here to exercise their democratic right. There's no science to keep these recommendations. these draconian measures and these mandates. That's why these people are here and that's the beginning of the end. You see the place opening the way, allowing the truckers right in. How are you doing today? Doing great.

How's it been down here? Nothing but good. People are super good. The truckers have been having a good time. They've been getting their point across. It's a beautiful city that we're in and they can't ignore all of this. Absolutely. We want all mandates, we're all Canadians completely abolished.

We've done what we've been told to do. And enough is enough. It doesn't change. Vaccines don't work. The government takes your freedom. They're not giving it back. And we're here to make sure that the Canadians know, the world knows that we're behind people. We want to get back to the way it was not the new normal.

What we've seen in the last year with demonization of people, turning people against each other, the hatred that has been spewed from the highest levels, is completely unacceptable. And the people have had enough. It's about joy, it's not about vaccine. And we are all together. We are all Canadians, we're all trackers.

I want to fight for the freedoms of Canada and my grand children and my kids. All right. And how long do you plan on staying? I plan on staying till I thought it's open. So Justin resigns. All mandates are lifted. Wow, so all mandates are lifted and the passion of these people. Some of the reports, I think I remember seeing 22 degrees below zero.

Zero, is that right? Did I read that right? I mean, just nothing stopping them singing, dancing into the night. Absolutely an incredible display in Canada. Let me just say the world is watching down here in Austin, Texas, we're watching all over the world. We're getting reports. We're seeing the tweets. We're seeing the Facebook posts. Nothing can stop what you're doing there. We are so proud to be here on the other border, loving every minute of what they've got going on up there in Canada. Just fantastic. And of course, for anybody catching up to speed with this, this was in response, it started in response to the cross-border vaccine mandate on truckers, which is a digital mandate. Obviously, it has blossomed into a much more unifying movement at this point. But interesting to note, Justin Chudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada, he was allegedly in contact with someone with COVID and quarantined just days before the truckers rolled into Ottawa.

And then lo and behold, this headline happened as the truckers began to occupy. Ottawa, New York Post. Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau test positive for COVID during vaccine mandate protests. He said he's going to continue to work remotely this entire week, which is now coming to an end. Again, he was double vaccinated and boosted. He told his people on Twitter to get vaccinated regardless, but kind of interesting and ironic twist to that story. But let's look at some of the headlines coming out of Canada.

The Saskatchewan Prime Minister, this is CBC, Saskatchewan Prime Minister, plans the scrap proof of vaccination requirement by end of February. And then we have Scott, Scott Moe, this is his Twitter account, and he is the premier of Saskatchewan. He says, today, trucker rallies are being held at many locations across the country, including on Parliament Hill and Ottawa and in various communities in Saskatchewan. Here's my message to Saskatchewan and Canadian Truckers. And he wrote this press release out of his office. And he says, in part, because vaccination is not reducing transmission, the current federal border policy, for truckers makes no sense. An unvaccinated trucker does not pose any greater risk of transmission

than a vaccinated trucker. He goes on to say, however, the current federal policy does pose a significant risk of Canada's economy and to the supply chain in our Saskatchewan communities where you and I live. And then this headline, this is a fantastic turnaround in less than a month. We're talking in like two weeks. This is Quebec premier Francois Lago, and he says on January 11th, Quebec to levy financial penalty on unvaccinated adults. And now at that time, this marked the first time a government in Canada was announcing a financial penalty. And in that article, you can say that they didn't have the number yet, but they said it was going to be significant. And in the coming weeks, we're going to announce this and it's going to be deducted from unvaccinated people's finances.

Well, we're living in the coming weeks right now. And check out this headline. Here's how it's turned. the Quebec Premier drops unvaxed tax plan saying it divided people. He says he doesn't like the division he's seeing and he's the anger and he's, it's about protecting not only the health of the people, but about protecting the people in general and fairness for all those people. So huge.

Protect your own ability to be reelected because clearly there was a lot more people than I realized that think that this is a boneheaded idea. If I want to stay in power, I should probably acquiesce. Amazing. How are the people, everybody? That's how it works. And over here in the U.S., speaking of covering your butt, it's scapego time. Let's check out first, Javier Becerra. He's the head of HHS here in the United States.

And here's the headline out of Washington Post. It says White House frustrations grow over Health Chief Becerra's handling of the pandemic. It says here, White House officials have grown so frustrated with top health official Javier Bucera, as the pandemic rages on that they have openly mused about who must. might be better in the job, although political considerations have stopped them from taking steps to replace him, officials involved in the discussion said. It goes on to read, several administration's officials voiced similar displeasure with Bacera's leadership, although they would not do so on the record because they were not authorized to speak with the media. The health secretary, quote,

is taking too passive a role in what may be the most defining challenge to the, to the administration, said one of the senior administration officials. And now this story from the Washington, This story is based on interviews with 28 senior administration officials, health agency officials, outside advisors and experts, most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to detail sensitive discussions. Now, just to recap, no one's doing anything because of politics and because they're too scared to talk to the media. All right, but hold on. What's so amazing about this, Jeffries, first of all, I think probably 90% of this audience, including I kind of have to throw myself in there. don't even know who Javier Bacera is.

We're just like, wait a minute. I mean, I vaguely remember some guy named that. But, like, this is the guy that's our problem. A man who hasn't been on the news at all. Like, clearly is not making a single decision is going on. I know who Anthony Bouchy is. You know, I know who Rochelle Wollinsky is, but Javier Bacere is the one we're going to, like,

I'm wondering, like, he's probably sitting in some dark closet at HHS back there eating like a jelly donut, and the door swings open. He's like, huh? You know, powder all over his face. Like, what's going on? Get ready, Javier. We're about to throw you under the bus.

Me? Why? Just wait for it. I mean, it's like ridiculous. He's so far down the line, but this is how this starts, right? We got to throw somebody. None of the people that are actually involved in decision making. This chucklehead that's hiding in a closet somewhere waiting for, you know, for his paycheck to come in. I don't think it's coming in, Javier. I think you're in trouble. May you want to start pointing some fingers. Well, let's move to an agency you may have heard of, and this is the CDC. Now, again, mainstream here, Wall Street Journal, Embattled CDC Rethinks Pandemics Pandemic Response after criticism of guidelines. It says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is looking to

reassert itself in the country's COVID-19 response to make criticism. It is sown more confusion that it has offered answers. Get this, Dell. It says among the first order of business, according to the agency, is upgrading data collection. That is hobbled decision-making and clearing up messaging that has confused many. It goes on to say the CDC hasn't had enough actionable information to respond in real time because its data collection methods are outdated and it has operated like a slow-moving academic institution. Explaining complicated science to 330 million people is hard, said Ezekiel Emanuel, co-director of Healthcare Transformation Institute at the University of Pennsylvania and a former member of the Biden administration's disbanded coronavirus advisory board. It is also true

that they have bungled a bunch of things. Well, to Mr. Ezekiel Emmanuel, it is hard to explain complicated science. We do this here at the high wire to millions of people every week and we seem to actually get it right with about one one millionth of the budget of the CDC. I mean it's unbelievable and I mean this is what we've been complaining about, right? I've been saying, how is it that the United States of America, we are the home of Microsoft, we're the home of Apple. I mean these are things that we are, we have computer learning. This is the modern world, yet we have the worst data collection, the slowest data delivery, which is why we keep showing you graphs out of the UK, out of Israel, out of other countries, because they're actually

better at collecting data than the United States of America. It's embarrassing. It's horrible. And it's incredible to see how much money has been spent on this pandemic by this administration. And the one thing they never did was collect proper data in the middle of what they said was a horrible pandemic. I mean, Wall Street Journal, clearly, Jeffrey, what's happening here is these are all news agencies that towed the line.

They did what their rulers told them to do. They got behind the vaccine. They pushed it. They pushed the pandemic. They said we got to lock down. And slowly but surely they find themselves standing out in the cold in Ottawa with no clothes on, freezing to death, saying, what happened here? We are pissed off. You're leaving us all hanging out to dry here.

We supported you. And now you never had any decent data. And guys like Del Bigtree and Jeffrey Jackson, the Highwire, are making a laughing stock out of us. That's what's going on. And now these headlines, like, you know, the dog is off the least, if you will. as far as the government and how they've been treating media. Media is now stepping on its own. It seems pissed off that it should be.

Right. And let's talk about numbers here. So we heard throughout the entire pandemic of how bad the hospitals were doing. And then once the CMS healthcare worker mandate went through, they began obviously firing unvaccinated employees leading to a greater health care shortage. So the government was supposed to help these hospitals. Now, let's look at stat news over the headlines here. The Biden administration used billions in hospital,

COVID-19 funds to pay drug makers. It goes on to this to read, the Biden administration quietly took nearly $7 billion from a fund meant to help hospitals and clinics affected by the pandemic and use it to buy COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics, according to a document obtained by stat. Now, the hospital money, known as the provider relief fund, has run dry and has no new money left to allocate, according to the agency that administers it. Providers have only been able to submit request for expenses incurred through March 2021 before both the Delta and Omicron surges battered the health care system. This seems like kind of a problem to me. Yeah. I mean, it's probably why they're saying we're going to have to learn to

live with it because the hospitals are bankrupt and the government doesn't have any more money to give them. We gave it all to the drug companies who are running off to party with tens of billions of dollars. And it's not just here in the US. In Germany, we have op-eds that look like this. This isn't one of Germany's biggest newspapers, uh, Belina Zintong. This is the headline, interjection from a vaccinated person, why I have sympathy for the vaccine skeptics. Now, he goes on to talk about American social psychologist Leon Fetzinger, who coined the theory of cognitive dissidents and wrote the book

when prophecy fails about a group called The Seekers that thought the world was going to end. And when it didn't, they kept adjusting their timeline to when it was going to end further and further and further out. So this author writes this. However, the way in which we are currently reducing our quote cognitive dissidents with regard to the promise of vaccination or i should say fail promise appears to be much more problematic than in the historical example of the seekers because we use one of the most unpleasant psychological mechanisms to vent our anger we project it onto the outsiders in this case the unvaccinated whom we make scapegoats for having our hopes dash now he's talking to the vaccinated here and it goes on to say it is therefore obvious and all too humane to now target the

vaccinated. But is that really justified have, quote, skeptics and, quote, deniers thwarted the success of the vaccination campaign? Are they now the, quote, drivers of the pandemic? It's probably not that simple as the recent scandals about manipulated statistics in Bavaria, Hamburg, Saxony have shown there, as the world found out, people with unknown vaccination status were assigned to the unvaccinated, to a large extent. We covered that last week here. But Dell, let's go over. This is, in my opinion, one of the biggest stories that's happening right now. Let's go over to now to the UK, where we have health minister, Saji Javid, and he just came out with a bombshell statement. Take a look. Okay.

I believe that it is no longer proportionate to require vaccination as a condition of deployment through statute. So, Madam Deputy Speaker, today I'm announcing that we will launch a consultation on ending vaccination as a a condition of deployment in health and all social care settings. Subject to the responses and the will of this house, the government will revoke the regulations. Wow, I mean, just a couple of weeks ago, this guy was like a tyrant saying that no one was going to get to move forward without a vaccination. And now he's pulling the entire deal. It's amazing how they can just flip-flop without any emotion whatsoever. But thank God it's happening.

Right. This guys never talk like this. And here's the headlines here. Trust, this is an NHS, trust clear to use unvaccinated health staff amid reports of Javid U-Turn. Now, that leads to articles like this in the U.S. with the CMS health care mandate. Top dot calls for reinstatement of people fired over vaccine mandates. You can see the drum beginning to beat here in the U.S. But there's also a big investigation that's happening in the U.K. And it's something we've reported on for a while and it's really come to a head here.

So check out this headline. Government, this is a telegraph, by the way. Government used grossly unethical tactics to scare public. into COVID compliance. The MPs there have launched an investigation after a bunch of psychologists has criticized the tactics they used during that pandemic. And it says here in the article, the letters 40 professional signatories led by Dr. Gary Sidley, a retired clinical psychologist, said they opposed the use of dramatic adverts, which included slogans such as, if you go out, you can spread it. People will die. The letter added, quote,

government scientists deploying fear, shame, and scapegoating to change minds. is an ethically dubious practice that in some respects resembles a tactics used by totalitarian regimes such as China, where the state inflicts pain on a subset of its population in an attempt to eliminate beliefs and behavior they perceive to be deviant. Now, what are we talking about here? Let's go back all the way, and this is one of the things they were talking about, to March of 2020. A group of experts called, I believe, Sai B, brought these options to the prime minister, for persuasion and discussions. So options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures.

That was a big thing at the time. This was before all the vaccine mandates rolled out. So here's one of their options. It's under the headline, persuasion. Here's the option they actually went to go with. A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened. The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent using hard-hitting emotional messaging, which they did.

To be effective, they must also empower people by making clear, the actions they can take to reduce the threat. So we're talking basically, scare the heck out of them. And, you know, the consequences of that, anxiety, depression, suicides. But at this point, reading this, I hope the people who ran this op feel sufficiently, personally threatened by this new investigation that the MPs are launching upon them. And I really do hope we can report that justice will be served on this.

I mean, we've been talking about. I started talking about it last week. Of course, I had it in my speech when I was in Washington, D.C. It's time for the Nuremberg trials 2.0. We need an worldwide investigation of those culprits that lied about the data that pushed faulty, you know, models, and then use fear tactics, psychological, you know, deranging fear tactics to scare people like screaming fire in a crowded room. You know, untruths, mismanagement, you know, misleading statements, all to scare people into compliance to use a product that we now know is increasing the risk of infection across this country. That's right. And now we noticed about two weeks ago, the UK opened up kind of out of nowhere, but now we're getting the story, the real story is coming out. And much like in the U.S.,

Fauci admitted this a couple weeks ago, the UK is also admitting it in its headlines. Majority of COVID-impations in England are not primarily ill with the virus for the first time ever. As experts say, worse, a pandemic now certainly over. So they're basically saying what Fauci has admitted, that going into the hospital, they were tested for a range of other things. They went to the hospital for besides COVID and they found out well, whoops, I have COVID as well, so we're just marking down for COVID. But check out this, check out this graph here or image. This is the percentages they found. So we're talking at some of the places, 57% of the percentage of COVID inpatients who are not primarily ill with the virus. 54%, 46%. So it's like a coin toss at that point.

So what would these numbers have been if they were reported from the beginning of this pandemic? This is the thing we're really asking. And a group of citizens, they petitioned the Office of National Statistics in the UK for these numbers. They said, we want to know how many people have died with COVID on their death certificate. Just COVID, not pneumonia, not heart disease, not cancer. And this is what they found. So this is the raw numbers here. And these are the number of deaths where COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate from February 1st, 2020, to

December 31st, 2021. Now, if you notice this highlighted region, basically zero to 24 years old, it's broken down in male and female columns there. It's only eight people. Only eight people have died. And males and females in this category from zero to 45, it didn't even break a hundred people in either one of those columns. And, you know, just to drive this home, because numbers are numbers, check out this chart. We have a chart we made of this, and it drives home a little more of this idea. So, you know, we're pushing vaccines on kids all the way, you know, look at basically less than one years old to, you know, 30 to 34, even 35 to 39 ages for male and females. There's almost nothing happening there in these COVID age groups. And then it goes on to go up to the older people, but still the numbers are so, so low.

So this really puts into context some of things that I really hope we get this type of really forensic information here in the United States. But as we're waiting here in the United States for full opening, the rest of Europe seems to be opening up. Let's run through some of these headlines here. And we have boost for family holidays as Europe changes entry rules. So they're going to let children who have recently recovered from COVID completely open for travel. Adults that have been recovered in the last 180 days. So they can travel as well. Natural immunity is recognized now.

So this is a big thing. So natural immunity is finally being recognized. We have worked so hard to at least make that point. there's no vaccine that has ever been as effective as a, you know, natural infection that's been cleared. You now have stronger immunity, more robust, longer lasting, and finally they're starting to admit it. I mean, we're still not at that point. We're still waiting for Tony Fauci and our health department that's now under attack and under investigation by the Wastreet Journal and, you know, all these other newspapers. But, you know, it's a good sign for sure.

Yeah. I think I remember Fauci saying it was a good idea to look into it in one of the interviews when he's questioned on it. So maybe he's looked into it. Maybe we can get a progress report at this point. But let's go over to Sweden. This is another big headline of this week. Sweden decides against recommending COVID vaccines for kids age 5 to 11. Of course, that's the heart inflammation malcarditis risk.

That's driving that decision. Denmark over at the Daily Mail. Denmark will lift nearly all COVID restrictions within days and return to life as we knew it before Corona. After a vaccine program, wait for it, proved a super weapon despite soaring cases. Some kind of sarcasm in that headline there from the Daily Mail. Finland, their Prime Minister, Sonoma, Finland, to lift all COVID restrictions in February. Norway following the same thing. Norway ends most curbs despite rising COVID infections. I remember just from recently, Ireland drops most COVID restrictions in wake of Amacron storm.

And then the big one here, France, France, the old Kramudgy in France and Macron there, Prime Minister, are finally releasing this grip slowly. France to stick to timetable for lifting COVID restrictions. So a government spokesperson said France has already started easing mask wearing, working from home, and they'll allow a number of like the big events to open up. And that's phase one. Phase two is going to start in February. So why is this important?

Because France and the people of France have protested for 29 consecutive weeks. In the next couple days, this weekend will be the 30th consecutive week. So they obviously probably won't be stopping at this point while they're opening up until all restrictions are released. the vaccine passport is over with. It's going to be very interesting to see how the, how Macron navigates this with the truck rally in Canada. I think they're really watching what's happening there because that's starting to happen in Germany

in other European countries. We've been talking about it, Jeffrey. I mean, this is, you know, the politicians, they carried again, just like the newspapers and the media did. They towed this line. They carried it out. We started seeing Boris Johnson getting itchy, decided to bail out.

I mean, a certain point, and we've said that these people are being forced to commit, political suicide. And now, as the writing is on the wall, the vaccines, disaster, everyone with blood pumping through their veins and brains knows it. And so now what do they do if they want to stay in politics? I hope all of these people disappear. Even Boris Johnson, frankly, I mean, he was a tyrant. It was ridiculous. I don't care that you finally came to your senses. You destroyed your country. You destroyed the economies of your nation and the world. These people need to be just walked off and kept away from politics for the rest of their lives. And,

written in the history books as the, you know, the useful idiots that they proved to be. Well, let's talk about the media because they were complicitant in this as well. And so as the world, the curtain begins closing on all of these restrictions across the world, the United States corporate media has been focused and obsessed on one topic. And that topic is Joe Rogan. Take a look. You have a First Amendment right to say what you want. You don't have a First Amendment right to appear on a platform as large as Spotify.

The thing is a lot of people do listen to it and they're getting false incorrect information. And that's why it seems so dangerous. And not all opinions are created equal. You think about major newsrooms like CNN that have health departments and deaths and operations that work hard on verified information on COVID-19. And then you have talk show stars like Joe Rogan who just wing it. Joe Rogan is correct that the medical world gets stuff wrong. But there's a process by which the medical world corrects itself.

And that process is not interviewing guys on the fringe of the medical world on your, massive platform. Because figures like Rogan are trusted by people that don't trust real newsrooms, we have attention, a problem that's much bigger than Spotify. Many say it's up to people like Neil Young to quote unquote delete Spotify, right? We have not seen that take hold, Brianna, not at all. This is having a conversation. That's what Joe Rogan will say. It's a life or death issue. That's why it's in a special category. I had a chuckle that, you know, some people were asking who is Neil Young. There weren't people, many people, at least asking who is Joe Rogan.

He's incredibly influential and many people do listen to his podcast, upwards of 10 million a day in the United States alone. Who is Neil Young indeed? Joe Rogan obviously finds himself in the middle of this. It's incredible to listen to the media in the United States of America saying, well, it's not free speech if people are listening to you. I guess it's basically the point. If there's too many people listening to you, then you're not allowed free speech.

We can't allow that. We have to shut it. Oh, if it's dangerous, if it's life-threatening, you know, then it can't. can't be free speech. I mean, what war have we ever reported on? Do we have gotten the wars wrong? There was never weapons of mass destruction.

This is where the media's job is at. We're supposed to be calling it out. And fringe doctors like Peter McCullough, the most published heart doctor in the world. It's incredible how stupid these people are. But now every day I watch these things. I'm like, they're just etching their place in history to go down and be remembered. For once again, those useful idiots, those propagandists, that carried the story even when it was dying and crumbling around them,

they were desperately attacking people that were bringing the truth. In this case, over the last couple of weeks, Joe Rogan doing a masterful job to bring attention to some really, truly brilliant doctors and scientists. Right. And you have a lot of musicians and artists that are trying to join Neil Young and leaving Spotify in protest. Rogan came out and, I'm not going to call it.

really an apology, but he issued a statement basically from his own camera phone. Take a listen to what it sounded like. I want to make this video, first of all, because I think there's a lot of people that have a distorted perception of what I do, maybe based on sound bites or based on headlines of articles that are disparaging. The podcast has been accused of spreading dangerous misinformation, specifically about two episodes, one with Dr. Peter McCullough and one with Dr. Robert. Malone. Dr. Peter McCullough is a cardiologist and he is the most published physician in his field

in history. Dr. Robert Malone owns nine patents on the creation of MRNA vaccine technology and is at least partially responsible for the creation of the technology that led to MRNA vaccines. The problem I have with the term misinformation, especially today, is that many of the things that we thought of as misinformation just a short while ago are now accepted as fact. I'm interested in telling the truth. I'm interested in finding out what the truth is. And I'm interested in having interesting conversations with people that have differing opinions. I'm not interested in only talking to people that have one perspective. That's one of the reasons why I had Sanjay Gupta on. I'm interested in finding out what is correct and I'm also finding

out how people come to these conclusions and what the facts are. Now, because of this controversy, and I'm sure there's a lot of other things going on behind the scenes with these controversies, but Neil Young has removed his music from the platform of Spotify and Joni Mitchell and apparently some other people want to as well. I'm very sorry that they feel that way. I most certainly don't want that. I'm not trying to promote misinformation. I'm not trying to be controversial.

I've never tried to do anything with this podcast other than just talk to people and have interesting conversations. My pledge to you is that I will do my best to try to balance out these more controversial viewpoints with other people's perspectives so we can maybe find a better point of view. I want to show all kinds of opinions so that we can all figure out what's going on and not just about COVID, about everything, about health, about fitness, wellness, the state of the world itself. I mean, I think those are really great statements ultimately. I think he's playing it exactly right.

A lot of what we've said here. I mean, Joe Rogan essentially saying what I say, which is I'm not here trying to tell you what to think. I'm trying to teach you how to think. I'm trying to show you that there's other differing opinions on there. We were told when it came to vaccines that there was scientific consensus on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Clearly that does not exist for this COVID-19 vaccine. There are scientists all around the world, some of the most decorated scientists in the world. In fact, almost every scientist that isn't being funded by pharma or in a government agency seems to be against this vaccine.

And so to Joe out there, you know, I know you're not stressing about this. Even if Spotify decided to do the wrong thing and cut you, I would guess your contract probably allows for on their side. If they cut you off, you probably get to hold on the $100 million that gave you for being there. And frankly, the second Joe Rogan leaves Spotify or anything like that, wherever he goes, his audience is going to follow them. That's what's so moronic about this whole thing with the press, like with us. I mean, they cut our Facebook, they cut our YouTube, as though somehow that's going to make our audience go away.

We have the biggest audience we've ever had, and it continues to grow, passing six million last week. Thank you, all of you for all of your support. But as it turns out, the mainstream media got it wrong. You were capable of typing www.thehighwire.com. They thought, like, if it wasn't on your Facebook, look like you'd never be able to find us. I mean, the whole thing is so incredibly ridiculous.

But I want to say, you know, in terms of what Joe Rogan's saying, I understand he wants to be balanced. And frankly, we were frustrated that he wasn't being balanced. He was talking to Peter Hotez and Sanjay Gupta. I know Bobby Kennedy was reaching out to Joe Rogan, and we were trying to reach out saying, get somebody on to show a different perspective. Well, now he's done that. And two of the greatest voices, I think, he could have interviewed.

There's more out there. Obviously, it tends to show both sides. But I have something I want to say to Joe because I really think it's critical, and I think you have set this up so perfectly. Spotify wants you to show both sides. So you said I'll show one, and then very quickly after I'll show the other perspective. Well, why don't we just sort of, you know, why don't we warp speed that process, if you will? Why don't we bring both of those voices together at the same time? Joe, I don't think there's anyone better on the planet to host the official debate between both sides.

And you said it once when you were interviewing Peter Hotez, you said, why don't you, you know, why don't you have a debate with Robert Kennedy Jr.? And Peter Hotez said something like, you know, I don't want to verify that perspective, you know, I don't want to give it power. And you said, well, it's like one of the biggest, fastest growing movements in the world. I think it already has verified itself. I think it's legitimate, you know, and so you're going to have to address it. Well, we are certainly at that place now. As the vaccine is failing to work, as we're still seeing success with Iver-Mexam.

and hydroxychloroquine in the nations that can use it. You know all about these things, but you've been objected, you've been in the middle. Why don't you say to the world, you know what? I am demanding a platform that both, bring your best and brightest from the CDC, Health and Human Services,

Tony Fauci, whoever you want to be. Bring two or three of you to the table and I'm going to reach out to Malone and McCullough and see who else they want to have at the table and why don't we put this all on the table in front of everybody? And then, Joe, if the other side doesn't show, up now. Now that we have put 40,000 people in D.C. We're about to announce, I think,

in about a week on the highway, we're going to have the official announcement of the next big rally that I think is going to be even bigger than D.C. So even if you miss Woodstock, don't worry, it's right around the corner. Another one's coming. But the point being that, you know, if they do not show up at this point where every headline is talking about how fast this movement is growing, if they will not stand in their truth, they're going to lose this argument. And so I think you should offer up. Joe Rogan, I think, I think, you should offer up, Joe Rogan, I think it'll be the biggest podcast you've ever done. The world will watch.

Demand that both sides come to the table, and then you ask the important questions as you do so well of both sides. And let's have this out now. The future of humanity depends on this. And so that would be my recommendation. I think if you do that, it will be revealed who is actually, if they don't show up, then it can't be on you because you have made your attempt to be fair and balanced. be my recommendation. I think you'll shut this whole thing down if you do it. But by the way, you know, Joe, we are in complete support here. It's so great to have you in this conversation.

And to everyone out there, I want you to think about what's happening here. This is cancel culture, right? This is an attempt by a bunch of so far, you know, not as famous musicians. Of course, they were back in the 1960s, but now, obviously, they're terrified of dying. I have a theory about this, actually, like with, you know, these artists that ultimately, they've lived the most incredible lives when you think about it. Right? You got Neil Young. These guys are loaded.

Everywhere they go, people just give them free food and restaurants and, oh, my God, can I get your autograph? I mean, living in castles, you know, sailboats around the world. I get it. They probably don't really believe in God and they are terrified of dying. There is no way for Neil Young that heaven looks better than the world he's been living in. So he's afraid of dying. And I get it.

He's going to do anything he can to stay alive and he watches the news and he thinks this vaccine is going to keep him alive. he can enjoy his wealth for a few more years. And you have every right to do that, Neil. You just don't have to live on our lives or force us, you know, as the saying goes. You know, if you're truly about being, you know, free and wild and a rocker, then certainly you should allow us the same freedom that you had in your youth that made you so incredibly wealthy.

In the end, though, this is what we have to do. I want to make this a call to action for everyone in our audience. There are millions of you now. We need to support Joe Rogan. We need to go right now. I just did it. A week ago, I've never watched, I listened to Spotify. I joined Spotify so that I could hear the Malone interview.

We'll go to Spotify now and just click on, you know, Joe Rogan experience as one of the things that you're interested in seeing. Simply by doing that, you will show Spotify that they are standing with the right person in this conversation. It's really simple, but this is how we vote with our dollars. This is how we vote with our attention. If you want to make a big difference today, then go out and show Spotify. what side of this conversation you're interested in, or at least that you're interested in having the conversation, that you believe in free speech.

You can vote for that today by going to Spotify and making Joe Rogan the most popular. I mean, he's already the most popular, like Uberly popular. I think that would be great. And by the way, if Joe suddenly just jumps off the track and starts just having pro pharma people and doesn't show the other side anymore, then just withdraw Spotify,

and it'll have the same powerful effect. This is how we play the game. So let's do our part. and support Joe Rogan at Spotify. I think it's really important this week that we stand with him as he takes on this onslaught from yet more of the useful idiots out there in the world. All right, Jeffrey. That's my little diatribe and my little handoff to Joe Rogan.

I am happy, though, that he's here. It is clearly, I mean, these headlines is what we said. I've said from the beginning, there's no such thing as bad press. Joe Rogan has brought so much attention to Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough. It's fantastic and the world is waking up because of it. And so here we are. Joe releases a balanced statement. Spotify says we'll put a label on some of the more controversial interviews, I guess, whatever that means.

That should be enough. This should be done. But it's not the White House has jumped into it. Check this out. Headline, White House urges Spotify to take further action on Joe Rogan. More can be done, says Jen Saki. Now keep in mind, Spotify is a Swedish company based out of Stockholm. home and the White House is asking pressuring them to censor people and change their business model to stop free speech of an American citizen.

Where are we at here? What's going on? But not everyone's buying it. This is the New York Post, one of the articles out of there and another op-ed. Government has no business rooting out and flagging misinformation. This was in response to our surgeon general, Dr. Murthy, who has been really rallying against this idea of just censoring people if they don't tell the line on the COVID narrative, which is failing. But let's look at this New York Times. Right. Let's look at this New York Times reporter. If you want some fresh air, get ready for this. He's going to blast you. We're going to open the window. There's a storm coming. This is a New York Times reporter, Pulitzer Prize winner. He took to Twitter, Matthew Rosenberg, he said, Joe Rogan is what he is. We in the media might want to spend more time thinking about why so many people trust him instead of us.

Now, even over at Substack, this is a place where a lot of people are going to write their articles, to avoid censorship, their vice president of communications took to Twitter as well because Substack has been receiving a lot of the same issues that Spotify has received. And this is what she had to say. She says, at Substack, we don't make moderation decisions based on public pressure or PR considerations. An important principle for us is defending free expression, even for stuff we personally dislike or disagree with. We understand principles come at a cost.

So let's let's find. I want to say, by the way, you know, I've jumped into the swimming pool of Substack myself as of today. My first post ever on Substack is there. Now, a lot of you know I love to talk. Writing is a very slow and arduous process, so it took some time for me to get it out. But it's based on, you know, the conversations that came out of the Washington, D.C. rally, these sort of accusations that we mishandled references to the Holocaust. I dive straight into the fire with that conversation.

If you want to read about it, share it with your friends. Let's go to my Del Beatree.substack.com. Big Truth is the moniker I'm going with on all the facts I'm going to bring you in the stories in the future as I begin trying to slow down to the writing process. And let's continue to support these spaces where we are still allowed to have free speech. It's what's going to persevere, I think, and make sure that we hold on to it. And just to cap this off, great job, Dell. I can't wait to read that. Brian Stelzer said on that video clip, CNN has a newsroom.

They have desks. They have a whole team of people. Well, that team just has minus one now. And that's their president's CEO, Jeff Zucker. He has stepped down announcing immediately. Jeff Zucker resigns from CNN after a relationship with top executive. So he said he hid this during an internal investigation into the now former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who was being investigated by for aiding his brother, Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of New York,

for his sexual harassment scandal. So I don't know what the heck's going on at CNN, but if you want your news and you want people focused on the news, maybe don't check out CNN because it seems like they have a focus on some other stuff going on there. Yeah, they got some problems. And really, this is what happens when you're, you know, when, and it's true. It's sort of, they're toxic. It's, they're full of lies and ultimately those things.

That's a disease that eats you from the inside out. Mainstream media is collapsing. Guys like Joe Rogan here on the Highwire, all of you supporting us. They're writing about it. They're frustrated. They're pissed off that you're there, that you're supporting us. It's making them angry. They're railing against us.

Why are you bigger than us? Why are you doing a better job than us? We need to send you. We need to stop you. We're the ones in the newsroom. It's true. You have a bigger newsroom than we do. But we have more talented people in our newsroom like Jeffrey Jackson.

Jeffrey, you're amazing. Keep up the great work and I'll see you next week. Thank you, Doug. all right, you know, while Neil Young is running around, you know, singing, keep on rocking for moderna! The rest of us have got to be asking ourselves, where is all of this going? I mean, there is this huge divide that is now taking place, and we see it, we feel it. You know, hopefully some of us are starting to feel that mending a little bit because those

that were vaccinated, maybe after the second shot or certainly when the third shot came along and promises of a fourth shot have people, you know, starting to feel delusioned, you know, you know, starting to drop away from their belief in the government system. But is that a good thing? What happens if, you know, we lose faith as a whole in our government institutions, in our health departments? I mean, in some ways, it seems like it could be Armageddon, like a gnashing of teeth as it's described in the Bible.

Is it going to get biblical? Well, you know, my next guest is someone who I am so excited to talk to, because over the years, he has had an almost magical, uncanny ability to predict things in the future. It started with his ability to predict things in the stock market, and then ultimately a couple of opportunities where he predicted the fall of nations. And then he got himself in a lot of trouble. I'm talking about Martin Armstrong, and a few years ago, there was a documentary about him called The Forecaster. Here's just a taste of what that was all about. It starts in August of 1999.

Yeltsin's going to run for election in 2000. They get Yeltsin to take $7 billion from the IMF loans. Now they threaten Yeltsin. You're not going to run for election in 2000. Otherwise, all this is going to come out that you stole $7 billion from the IMF. Today I, in the last time, I'm as president of Russia. This is how Putin gets in.

The reason we have this crisis is because since World War II, they basically borrow year after year. He didn't want to go to college. His father said, you've got to do something. So he enrolled him at the RCA computer store. I thought I could create a system that stores the knowledge of century. to predict the future. The entire trading community would scramble to see

his signals as soon as they were released. He predicted the top in the Nikai Index. The computer says, your country's just going to completely fall apart in eight days. Obviously, that prediction was correct. They realized that the model could forecast the rise or fall of a nation. They wanted that source code, which is text. We went to source code.

I said, not getting that. Sorry. The government came in, they shut down everything, seized all the accounts. I had friends, they said we put up the money in cash tonight. He's held with the worst of the worst. He wasn't back and down and didn't seem like they were either. And he said to his mom, they want what I've spent my entire life developing, and I'm not giving it to them.

2014, the war cycle starts turning up again. You have the natives against the immigrants that are coming in. In 2016, a third party began to rise. You get separatist movements. As the money begins to flow out of the banks, then you're going to see the rates start to take off. That is also the possibility of your breaking up. With rates, it's so low, just a small uptick in rates.

Creating these interest expenditures are just going to take off like a rocket ship. When Europe is getting worse and worse, and the capital comes here. It then forces the dollar up. assets begin to rise. If they're going to fear it collapse in Europe, it's going to move in different places. This is how it does. His name is Martin Armstrong. The documentary of the forecaster came out back, I believe it was in 2015. But it is my pleasure and honor to be joined right now by Martin Armstrong. So first of all, thank you for coming into the highway to talk to us. So just quickly, sort of go through your history. You're a pretty smart kid. You're really into trading

coins and things start by asking your mom, can I get your change and you started collecting that. But at the moment you've got to go to university, you're not keen on the idea. So your dad says you have to do something. And so what ends up being the decision there? Well, I mean, I started, but my father was a lawyer, so he was trying to push me into law. I really didn't particularly care for that. And so it was my father that pushed me into computers. But back then in the 60s, I mean, a computer was as large as this entire stage. Right.

And they were still using, you know, vacuum tubes. Okay. And integrated circuits had just been developed. And so when I went there, I mean, it was basically. you had, in those days you had to do the whole engineering side, electrical and computing side, so you had to do both. So you had to be able to build a computer from scratch, how to design it, everything, which was very good. But then what happened was that RCA made a serious mistake. They thought the computer was more like the radio, that we end up big wooden, you know,

units and it's going to come down to a crystal set that kids going to buy in a five and dime. So they thought they were selling the peak. But RCA was actually the biggest computer company at the time. Wow, okay. Because they came out of World War II with all the government contracts, et cetera. So they sold the computer division to IBM and Univac. And they kept the servicing. So they wanted, you know, those of us that were there, I was offered Tully Greenland, Guam, or Vietnam.

Okay. And the merry guys were getting London, Paris, stuff like that. And I said, you know, first it was like you can volunteer. And then I said, I don't want to volunteer for any of that. Thank you. Right. And then it came down to, well, you got to pick one. And I just didn't want to do it.

I mean, it just, so I decided to quit and I wanted to go back to trading. And but, so I thought at the time, all this computer engineering and everything was a waste of time. Right. But when I got into trading, I could write a program to actually do this, you know. And so that's how I kind of ended up developing really the first artificial intelligence system. and they still don't have anything remotely close to it. But then I basically saw how things were really happening. Well, just right there, your idea of building a computer that could help with trading

was you thought if we could input all of the information like on currencies and go back with all the knowledge we have and input all of the, you know, the gains and drops that had happened over maybe a century if the information was there, that through that history the computer could learn? What was about the past? Okay, pick out patterns. What I would say is that what I've understood, also being an advocate of history and interested in that, is that history does repeat mainly because the passions of man never change.

I mean, you can go into Roman history, and it was still the same things, the credit crises and things of this nature. And, I mean, there were major, like, earthquakes in Turkey, so the emperor, you know, Tiberius, you know, created a welfare program to help bail it out. So it's always the same thing. It's never, I mean, the names change or whatever. But, you know, I would say,

what I've learned over the years is that if you put, I don't care who it is, it's like an animal you cornered and it will defend itself. So we are the same way. There is definitely a herd instinct. And the way markets really function, because they've launched all sorts of investigations every time there's a crash, they just don't understand it. It's not that somebody comes in and is some huge short player and forces the market down. They've never been able to find such a person since every investigation since 1907. All right. What it is is that everybody that has ever thought of buying is now in. And this latest news, whatever, causes some to take profit. And then what happens is that you get a market that's extremely lopsided and then you try to sell and there's no bid.

So then the market will come down like crashing a thousand points and stuff like that. Yeah. And when I was doing a lecture in Tokyo, I met, I would say, the guy that actually bought the high in 89. He snuck in because it was an institutional thing, but he bribed his way in. Okay. And he apologized. He said, I just had to talk to you. And I said, you know, what was so, you know, compelling here?

And he had bought $50 million the very day of the high of the stock market. Okay. But what I found interesting, he was in his 60s, and he had never invested in stocks his entire life. So I said, what made you do that? And he said, the brokers call them every year for seven years and say every January, the market goes up 5%. And it did. So he bought the last day of December in 1989, and that was the hive. So when you sucker in the very last possible person, there's nobody else to buy.

So you lost a ton. Oh, yeah. Yeah, okay. But you then run out of the energy of people coming in to buy more. Everybody's bought, and they're waiting for it to go up, but it doesn't go up because you ran out of people buying. Right. And then all of a sudden it just turns, and that's what a crash is really about. And unless you're a trader, you don't see it.

You know, the academics tend to look at things theoretically back and forth. And, you know, you have to have a trading experience to really see it. I mean, you pick up the phone. And like the 87 crash, what made it, because I got pulled into the Brady Commission on that. And what really made it interesting was that the theory was, oh, computer trading, and that's what caused it. And it wasn't. And they went and they actually investigated all the big funds. And then, you know, why did you sell?

because there was no news. And they called the broker and I go, what the heck is going on? And he's, I don't know. So what happens is the lack of news is even worse. If you're a professional fund manager and the Fed raised interest rates, okay, they've done that plenty of times.

There'll be a knee-jerk reaction. You don't panic. When you pick up the phone, you say, what's going on? And the guy says, I have no idea. Now you don't know. the Russia just invade Europe. The rumors get crazy.

Yeah. So they just sold and they said, well, I don't know. It's down, you know, a thousand points. Maybe it's going to go down another 1,000 of them more. I don't know. Right. So to be prudent, you sell. Right.

You get out because you don't know what's going on. And that's where it really was the 87 crash, because it was prompted by basically forming the G5 in 1988. And then these politicians stand up and to affect the trade deficit, oh, we're going to lower the value of the dollar by 40%. I warned them. I said, you're going to create a crash. Oh, why? I mean, you just sold a third of the national debt to the Japanese.

Right. Now you're saying you're going to lower the value by 40%. You don't think they're going to sell. Why would they? Because, you know, this is the problem we have with governments, the people that are actually there making these decisions. decisions have no experience whatsoever. And so the 87 crash, my biggest accomplishment, if you look at the Brady Commission report, the government will never blame itself.

At the end of the report, it says, we think foreign exchange had something to do with it, and that's it. Wow. But it's creating the G5, the Plaza Accord, and standing up and saying, we're going to lower the value of the dollar by 40 percent, you know, Yes, okay, fine. The dollar will be cheaper, so you'd be able to export more, but also all the assets you just sold to somebody. Right. They don't, they really don't understand the economy.

One of the things that I've discovered, because I talked to a lot of politicians, and the first realization I had was we grow up thinking that they're these super brilliant people or something. Like they were like born as politicians. And when you sit and talk to them, you realize this guy's just an old pole miner that got into politics or a dentist or even. even a mailman. Like these are just regular people that decide to get in politics and then elevate themselves up. But that's like their education level was there. I mean, they don't, so what you're saying is there's really very few people in our government that actually were stockbrokers or have any understanding of how money moves and flows or, you know. Yeah, I'm very, very, I don't think I've met any. I mean, the, the only one I would say

was probably the most intelligent that I ever met was Margaret Thatcher. Okay. She was very good. She understood history, I think, which is what made her really different. But most of these other people, I don't know, maybe that they just want to be loved, so they want to run for politics or something, but they have nothing really to offer. So, I mean, you look at the COVID thing. I mean, a lot of them are imposing things only because somebody else did.

So it's kind of like a me too type thing. It's like, I don't know, they did. So it must be, you know, it must be okay. And they're putting all these draconian, you know, lockdowns and stuff like this. And the economy goes down and, oh, gee, people lost jobs. I didn't realize that, you know. It's really quite pathetic. All right.

So before we get, I want to get into COVID, but just to sort of sum up, people want to watch the documentary, the forecast that they can, get into it but you build this computer that becomes really good at analyzing all the data that's being put in and starting to predict market you know market crashes futures economies really right what things are going to do what was the first was the sort of the moment where the computer surprised you I would say early 80s it came out with a forecast that the British pound was going to drop from 240 to to par and that the British economy would

flip and align with the United States. And this can't be correct. And I thought this is completely nuts. And it happened. So I developed queries that I could say, how are you coming up with this? And basically it picked up the North Sea oil. So suddenly Britain was becoming an energy exporter versus Europe wasn't. And then when you begin to see, they say, oh, okay, fine, I can understand this.

So the computer was finding things that the normal person wouldn't be paying attention to, sort of. Yeah, I mean, you, I mean, if you sat there diligently and you correlated absolutely everything, you'd find it, perhaps. But, I mean, the computer was just doing it without, you know, any passion. Right. We were advising the Universal Bank of Lebanon, and they found somebody where the ledger had written down all the Lebanese pound every day, and they asked us to do a model. I said, sure.

I put it in. And it came out and it said, in eight days, your country's going to collapse. And I thought the computer's got to be wrong. I said, look, I don't know what. Something's wrong with the data. And they very calmly said to me and said, okay, fine, well, what currency do you think would be best? I said, I just said your country's going to fall apart. So it said in eight days, I mean, all based on some ledgerist found,

which had a history of that currency. That's when the Lebanese war began. Eight days later. And I began to realize how does this computer do this? Because we had another client in Saudi Arabia and who was big in the shipping. And he calls me up on the phone. He says, what do you think gold's going to do tomorrow? Iran's going to start, you know, attacking shipping in the Gulf.

I said, you tell me a war is going to start tomorrow? Yeah, yeah. And that was the Iran-Iraq war. Right. Then I began to realize that people have knowledge that something's going to happen or whatever. Maybe the guys in the bank sold what was developing and they knew a war were tipped off. We're going to start a civil war or something. But somebody seems to know.

And that begins to move the capital. Okay. So, for example, if China was really going to invade the United States, you would pick it up, a computer would pick it up, because they sold all the U.S. bonds. So it'll see the money being pulled, withdrawn out of the United States by that. Yeah, so people respond in advance, and that picks it up.

So, I mean, even with 9-11, they started realizing this, really from our model, and started looking at who was buying puts on airlines in advance and stuff like this. I mean, if you know something's going to happen, then you basically do this. And a lot of the terrorists were doing.

So your computer predicted 9-11? Right to the day. Really? So does that mean that 9-11 was planned? I mean, if it, or is it just a natural cycle? It's all accidental, but somehow the computer saw it? I don't know. These things take place on cyclical turning points.

Perhaps it's pressure that builds up in advance that causes that to happen. causes that to happen. But I mean, the computer picks it up, mainly from a capital flow perspective. Why is it always fairly consistent? I think that, for example, right now, you know, every action a government takes has an equal and opposite reaction. So what they've done on anything, like the G5 and manipulative. the currency then they create the 87 crash right the 87 crash comes and that sets in motion some you know each thing is like a domino it just falls over um so uh the ramifications even from what they're they've done with COVID and things of this nature have seriously disrupted the

underlying confidence in government right very quickly just what would be some of the big predictions that computers made over the course of its involvement well you know besides 9-11 and 87. It picked Britain. It predicted Trump would win or predicted that Brexit would win. And these things happen because of the economics. It didn't, wasn't saying Donald Trump is better than this guy. It's he was given an opportunity because the economy was moving in such a direction. So I went to on the Washington after he won and they're like going oh it's a fluke I said no you don't understand they're voting against you you know it's not that Donald Trump was this you know night on shining armor right it was that they're voting against you he was a non-politician and they're fed up with what you guys are doing so it could have been anybody with

Donald Trump happened to be the guy there at the right time got it that's really what goes So I've had several scientists and dots is mostly what we cover on the high wire is health and scientists that make a discovery that is going to change how we see things, you know, or, you know, and they end up, the FBI gets involved and they end up, you know, and so I sort of have this instinct that when people are arrested by the government and, you know, it tends to make me want to look at that story, you end up finding yourself in a similar position. What was the prediction by your computer model that ended up really getting you sort of in the hot water, as you say? I would say that was 1998.

Okay. I did a conference in London at the time, and a guy from the London Financial Times stuck in. I didn't know he was there. Okay. And the computer is tracking capital flows. So we saw like $100 billion going into Russia, but we saw $100 billion going into Russia, but we saw 150 billion coming out. So I stood up and I said, look, I give Russia about 30 days.

That's it. And it's going to crash. And so he then goes out and puts it on the front page of the London. Armstrong says Russia's going to crash or got this country running around with all these nukes and stuff like that. And it crashes. And that ends up being the long-term capital management. So then they blame me because it's in there.

All right. But that's when the CIA basically came and said, at that point, they realized the computer could project the rise and fall countries. And my conflict with them was that they wanted me to go down to Washington to build this for them. I said, look, it took me 16, 17 years to do this. Right. I'm not going to go down and work in some bunker for you. Right. I said, we'll run whatever study you want, we'll run it.

And very arrogantly, they basically said, no, we have to own it. And I said, sorry, I'm not doing that. Right. And I think from their perspective, they didn't want other countries seeing the same forecast. They wanted to leg up. Yeah. And that's, so I just said no. But so they create this contempt.

And civil contempt, maximum, of course, according to statutes 18 months. Right. But they just kept rolling it, rolling it, rolling it, rolling it. And actually, you know, on the Supreme Court's side of my war, but she was in the Second Circuit at the time. And she had written an appeal decision. She dissented, and she says, this guy's entitled to due process of law.

So that probably got me into the Supreme Court. Okay. I would say what the forecaster didn't actually say, why did they finally release me? I got into the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court ordered them to explain what the heck's going on. And so at that point, I'm released, and they go back to... Now, how long had you been in jail at that point? Seven years. Seven years?

This is the problem with our legal system that the judges are all just to whatever the prosecutors tell them. There is no justice in this world. It's all fake. Now, you were being accused of a $3 billion dollar Ponzi scheme, which they were never able to prove another. And so basically, Sotomayor says, show me the evidence of this. And they just basically opened the doors to your jail cell and say, he's out. Yeah, I mean, effectively, I think the problem is these prosecutors are all going to become the next president if they get a big famous case. Okay.

So the bank says, oh, you know, a billion dollars is missing. We have no idea where it is. I mean, a normal person, okay, how is the billion dollars get out of a bank and they don't know? I mean, there had to be a wire. There had to be a check, you know, that I bust in with a tank and take it out of the vault or something. And I even said to them, I said, the bank stole the money. Right. And they go, well, we believe the bank.

And then I think it took them maybe six months to figure out the bank lied. Right. I said, how do you get it out of there? What are you people? Morons or what? Right. So the bank, I told my clients, I said, look, if you don't get over here and sue this bank, you're never going to see a dime because they're going to protect the bank.

Okay. So the clients did what I told them to do. They came over, and the lead counsel came in to see me, and he says, I'm terribly sorry. It looks like you're collateral damage. I said, yes, I know. And we agreed to cooperate. And then the government went and got a lifetime gag order on me to prevent me from helping my clients against the bank.

So the bank ended up having to plead guilty. And so the bankers always get these deals. And this is why people don't understand why banks never go to prison. If they charge the CEO, what are they going to get in a fine? 20 million, 50 million, maybe. if the guy's really rich. Yeah. If they charge the bank,

the bank made a billion, we'll give us 20%. So they charge the bank. Nobody ever goes to jail. The shareholders end up paying. Right. And they get these big fines. Oh, we find, you know,

HSBC, 300 million for money laundering. Right. But nobody goes to jail. Right. The case in, and it's in the forecast, there was Bank in New York. Yeah.

Here you have a $7 billion dollar money laundering. supposed to be the biggest money laundering in history. And what happens? The two people in the bank gets six months house arrest. Wow. And that's it. Now, and there's a weird relationship between governments, especially the government of the United States and banks,

in that you sort of talk about the selling of American debt, which sort of gives them a conflict of interest when it comes to busting these banks. Can you explain that to me? When it actually goes back to the Civil War, when the U.S. had no national debt before the Civil War. So when they needed to borrow money, they went to Jay Cook. It was a real good marketer. He was selling bonds, and he had a network built up, and they said, we need to raise money.

And so he began to sell bonds for the government. So that's kind of once that was done, what happened after that is that the government always went to the bankers to sell their debt. So we call them primary dealers. Okay. So the Treasury didn't sell the debt itself. You wanted to buy a treasury bond, you had to go to a bank to get it. So every time they would blow up the economy, nobody would ever go to prison because they would say, look, you put us away and who's going to sell your debt? Right.

So it was definitely a conflict of interest. So you get these things where they say, okay, fine, well, you made $2 billion on this, give us $400 billion. And, oh, we charged HSBC and we got a big fine. And it's all, you know, a dog and pony show. All right, let's get to the big dog and pony show we're in now. People, if they want to get into, it's a great documentary, sort of on all that you got involved with, the issue of being in prison. But you're out now.

When did you get out officially? 2011. 2011. Okay. So this pandemic hits. You're a financial guy. I saw it coming, was predicting my audience because I, in some ways, was watching the money. I was saying the pharmaceutical industry is putting more money into our government than any other industry there is.

It's outspending oil and gas two to once. The number one financier of our government, you know, putting people in position to power. And I was saying to audiences, we fight wars in the Middle East for the amount of money, oil and gas, is pushing into our government. What do you think Farm is going to get? It seemed to me clear that they wanted ownership in some way of every human body there was. And I was looking and seeing that they're funding other governments all around the world. And so I had predicted there's going to be a pandemic. I believe there's going to be a pandemic.

I was saying this to audiences that will scare. They need everyone. People thought that, you know, well, they're just. trying to change the laws to make sure that that last three to five percent of unvaccinated kids is vaccinated so there's no way there's no money in that it has to be that they want the adult vaccine program they want everybody lining up for aid to become this human ATM machine is what i was saying the audience is there has to be a pandemic to scare us into that that's where this is going folks this is going to you not be able to get on a plane not be able to work they want every human being

on the planet vaccinated so that's what i was worrying about so for me the moment the pandemic hits and we're we have the show the high wire this was something we were sort of expecting i thought it was going to be Ebola or something more deadly than a you know a bad cold but from your perspective not you know you didn't spend like this we were talking just the other night which is why you're here we we had dinner um but i was i was very aware of everything in science around vaccines and that's how i made the prediction how for you did this effect what were the financial things that were going on, and what did you think as soon as this pandemic started? It really began in August 2019.

Okay. The U.S. banks would no longer participate in what's called the repo market. Another bank needs some money, so they post some collateral for the 24-hour market. Suddenly the U.S. banks wouldn't touch anything to do with Europe. Okay. So the Federal Reserve had a step in, and that was August of 2019. It was clear at that point in time that everything was starting to change in the capital flows. And something serious was developing in Europe. The very next month is when Bill Gates bought his stake in the European biotech company. By December, there are rumors running around that, a virus is coming. December? December of 2019.

In your world, rumors are running, there's a virus coming? Yes. By January, I know that, you know, even Klaus Schwab had told people that he knew a virus was coming. Okay. And I was told by reliable sources that besides Bill Gates starting to sell stock off in December, of 19, that the World Economic Forum had Schwab had sold all his stuff out, including stocks and bonds. Now, you wouldn't sell bonds unless you thought the

governments are going to go down. Usually it's what we call flight to quality. We sell the stocks, you buy the bonds. Okay. Back and forth. When you start selling both, something's wrong. Okay. So that was coming up.

So I basically, the computer projected we were going to have what ended up being the COVID crash. Okay. And I think what you're dealing with is that Schwab had a hand in creating Europe, and people don't understand how bad Europe is. And the object is really to get rid of democracy. Okay. in Europe to make people think they still have some sort of a right, you get to vote for an MP for Parliament. But Parliament has no power to write laws or overrule the Commission.

The Commission doesn't stand for election. The head of the EU also is not elected or appointed by the other heads of state. So you have a political system there that has pretended to be a democracy, but has nothing to do with anything. So they've successfully eliminated the power of the people to actually overthrow the government

at the polls. And that's what they would love to do here. At that point in time, Schwab is, some people think that he's just been a front man, and he's not. He's one of

the major brains behind this thing. He is convinced that eliminating democracy and equality is, of course, not for him, but that's the answer. And, you know, this whole Marxist idea is that you can eliminate depressions and things of this nature if the government controlled everything. But the government's corrupt. Right. You know, so you get people paying them one way. We had angels. We had angels in government and somehow, like, you know, they always cared about humanity.

So, I mean, so talking about Schwab and this sort of, so one of the things that when you and I were talking, I was saying that I always get the question of, is it evil? Is it the reducing population with the vaccine program, all of this? And my experience is for the most part that these people involved really believe in this product. They really believe in it. You know, they believe that someday they'll be able to vaccinate for every virus and every bacteria on the planet. It's crazy. To me, it's crazy. Who would want to even get that many injections or whatever?

But they don't believe in God. They have a fear of death. And their job on this planet is to right the wrongs of humanity and make sure that we are never prone to disease ever. And they know they have a journey to get there, but they really believe someday there is this, you know, utopia that they have. built. And I think that that is evil in a way. For me, you know, evil is that when you start thinking your God or there's a lack of God, then you sort of, whether it's benevolent, they think they're benevolent, they think the people I've met, think what they're doing is right. Is Klaus Schwab different or is he similar to that? Is he an evil person setting out to destroy the world?

I don't think so. Not in his mind. I mean, one, he does think that they can create organs and things of this nature. And my concern is that a lot of the people that are involved in this are 80 years old. And are they doing it? The dreaming of a computer that can make a new heart for them because they're going to need it pretty quickly. Yeah, I don't know. It just seems very strange to me. I mean, even Fauci is like 80.

You know, why is he still there? Right. You know, obviously it's somebody like power because, I mean, he's now the highest paid person because he's been there so long. He gets more than the President of the United States. Yes. But why are you still there? You know, and the only thing that would entice somebody is power. And so is it delusional, self-delusion, perhaps?

I'm not so sure that they want, I think there is an effort to depopulate the world. And that comes more from the gate side. but um and is gates is gates a major player or is he just a front man for something we're not seeing because i keep feeling like this is a guy that if there's a you know we all hear about the illuminati and this room full of people that you know we never see that are making the decisions for the world but it sure seems to me that bill gates very intelligently you know he's is being accused of running a monopoly and so all of a sudden he sort of comes out of that whole situation and decides to get into NGOs and nonprofits and starts investing into multiple sectors.

But the biggest one, health. I mean, he is all over health. He's funding WHO. He's like, you know, and vaccine programs and tracking systems. And so it seems to me he's holding a lot of what this future for guys like Klaus Schwab, what they're going to need, the technologies to track people, the drugs and the vaccines to keep them alive or manipulate their health or make them live for. or short in their lives, or cold or herd, as he would.

So it seems to be Bill Gates must be, if there is that room, he's certainly, though, you know, he's not invisible. We see him. Is he a major player in this now? Oh, yes, absolutely. Yeah? The three major players are Soros, Gates, and Schwab. Okay.

They each bring something different to the table. Schwab began his whole World Economic Forum like you attend here and you'll get to meet a head of state and maybe you can get some influence so he was selling that and that's how the World Economic Forum grew for political contacts but Schwab is more on the economic side

he really believes in this Marxist panacea so to speak Soros is with his open society believes in his one world government and the EU I mean I put on a video on our site of the former president of France Holland he stands up and he's sitting next to Merkel in the parliament and he actually says he's the main purpose of the EU was that if we all get together then we create one government and we won't will end war this is their idea And Soros pushes power in the UN, right?

Yes, his idea is the UN would then become the dominant control of the world. These are very... What's the advantage to him? Like, why does that... I mean, there must be personal advantage to that thought system. I don't know if he seems to have been really indoctrinated into this idea from the London School of Economics, which is extremely left. Okay. Why he believes it, I don't know, but, you know, he does.

Maybe because he grew up, you know, basically drew pretending he was a Christian to, I don't know. Okay. Would ever set him in motion on that. Gates, his father was, you know, had a Planned Parenthood, which was basically set up in minority areas to reduce the population. So I think that's his overall idea in programming side. I mean, I knew the way Gates operated. He was always interested really in monopolies. And if you came out like there was a company, Netscape,

and that's what ended up bringing down, you know, Gates out of Microsoft. But they created the Internet browser. And he would then create something, put it in Windows for free to basically put them out of business. It was always this to create this monopoly. So when the feds went after Microsoft, the deal was they didn't break Microsoft up, provided he left. The same deal was done with AIG and over the mortgage debt stuff. And so Bill Gates had to resign from being the, you know, the hands-on at Microsoft. And but when he walked into health, he's exactly the same thing.

Control absolutely every agency, everything, period. And that just gives me concern from the standpoint that I know his character is to monopolize things. Right. To control. Klaus Schwab kind of does the same thing. Schwab set up a youth leaders group, and he's training people to be future heads of state. I mean, the head of state of New Zealand is a graduate from his.

I mean, there's another, a lot of people that you'd be very surprised are graduates from, you know, Klaus Schwab's brainwashing operation, the way I see it. But Schwab had the influence. the ability to bring in world leaders, which Gates and Soros didn't have. Okay. So they're attracted to him, and they bring different pieces to the table. So it was Gates that comes in with the climate change and all this other kind of nonsense,

that climate's always changed. I mean, there's been ice ages, you know, how did we get out of an ice age if there wasn't, you know, soccer moms driving around SUVs, you know. Right. But, I mean, you know, there are cycles to absolutely everything. We have seasonal cycles. That's part of nature. Okay.

So we are hearing in Klaus Schwab, you know, I've talked about him on our show. You've got the World Economic Forum. What was really scary to me was the moment I, you know, saw this slogan build back better. coming from this overall sort of idea dream of the Great Reset. And then the Great Reset, we're going to take this opportunity of this pandemic, which now you're saying was predicted like they somehow knew this virus was coming, and that it was going to be this upheaval. The Great Reset, he's saying, let's use this as an opportunity to rebuild the world.

We're going to build back better. And then I saw Joe Biden giving a speech, one of the few where he came out of his basement to see the world when he was running for, president and on his podium it said build back better. And I thought, this is terrifying. This is the first time I know of where I'm visually watching and have confirmation that a theme or an idea that wasn't born in the United States of America is being presented by a man running for the president of the United States.

I found that to be very, very scary. I know that this is a slogan coming from Klaus Schwab. Klaus Schwab is saying things like, no one will own anything. Everyone will rent, and America will not be a superpower in the future, you know, that this power is going to be consolidated somewhere else. And here I have a man running for president that is quoting, you know, I know that these guys are visiting Klaus Schwab, but now he's using his slogans. And this build back better slogan became an American financial slogan, even though, as you pointed out, had New Zealand's using it, up in Canada, you know, all over the world, they're all using this slogan being written by Klaus Schwabwe. or his people inside of there, it seems. What is this really all about?

The Great Reset. Is it, why now? Like, what is it that needs to be reset? Is there something that's about to happen or is going on that we don't know? Yes, from the economics side. You go back to 1930s when Keynesian economics was launched. The idea was that you could raise interest rates to stop us from borrowing and lower interest rates to make borrow. At least it made sense back then because we were the major, you know, player in the economy.

But over time, what's happened is the politicians distorted Keynesian economics. Keynes also said you can stimulate the economy by lowering taxes, which they don't want to do. Right. So they used Keynes as the excuse from there on out to run deficits every year. So ever since World War II, now the governments are the biggest borrower and debtor in the system. The real crisis came, started in 2014, when the ECB lowered interest rates to negative. And ECB stands for... European Central Bank.

Back then, I mean, I was warning, I said, don't do this. You're going to wipe out your bond markets. And I think I did another documentary probably four years ago, and I warned that, you know, Europe is destroying its bond market, period. So what's happened is it's really like we have dumb and dumber running countries. Okay. You mandate to a pension fund that to be conservative, you have to have government debt. Okay.

Not private. then you lower interest rates to negative. And they don't even put two and two together that within a few years you're going to make all the pension funds in Sullivan. Okay. So in Europe, they're basically all broke. So the pension funds were invested in bonds because that's what they're sort of forced to do. And they take them negative. And they've wiped out the pension funds.

Okay. So that's where it comes back, this guaranteed basic income, this idea, because they know they've wiped out. people's pensions and stuff like this. So how are we going to get out of that? Right. So this whole thing is about when Schwab comes out and says, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.

It's a front. Okay. All right. People think, oh, they're going to take our property. They don't really, it's to pretend that they are doing this for you. You're going to be eliminated, your mortgage payments, your car payments. payments, they'll be all gone. Student loans. Sounds good. But basically it's a front because it's the way government defaults. But they can't default. If they default and what would happen is they wipe out everybody's savings, the pension funds, etc., which is what happened in the Great Depression.

Okay. I suggest reading. It's online. Herbert Hoover's memoirs 1931. From all the history books, they hid the fact that governments defaulted, permanently defaulted on their debt, and that's what made the Great Depression so bad. So we're back at that point. Governments are about to default. Yeah. Europe is completely gone. That's it. I've spoken to bankers in New York. That's what the repo crisis is about. Bankers in New York will no longer even accept European government debt as collateral for a loan.

Wow. I mean, that's how bad this has gotten. So what does that mean for Europe in the, what's about to happen? That's what this great resets about. Okay. Schwab has sold the idea that the only way you're going to come out of this is we need more authoritarian forms so you retain power. I've argued on the opposite side of the table from him is that we can eliminate the debts by creating coupons and then swapping them do a debt to equity swap. So then you would take these coupons and you could only invest it.

So is that a coupon given to citizens or even to people? Yes. If you got a $1,000 bond, you get a coupon. Then you could take it to Klaus Schwab or whatever and say, okay, fine. It's good to buy equities. Okay. So small companies would, you know, have, suddenly the funding would be there for them to actually grow. Most small businesses, 70% of them are turned down for loans.

So, I mean, you could grow the economy tremendously if they're, if, you know, you stop competing against them. So the government is competing against the people. You know, I'm a banker and said, well, why should I lend you money when I can give AAA from the government and I know I don't lose anything? Right. So you've got to give me something more and I have to have confidence in you that you're not going to go rogue. So the government's competing with the private sector and that's why the economic growth has been declining.

So the bigger they get, the more they consume. It's kind of like you make $100,000 or a million dollars a year and that's fine, but now you say, well, let me get a made to do this, then I'll get another one to do that. They don't bring more to your income. They consume it. Right. So next thing you know, okay, fine, I was making a million and I got a staff now I'm paying $500,000 to.

So are you making a million or $500,000? And that's the problem with government. Government doesn't create jobs. I mean, anything that it creates consumes what somebody else produces. It doesn't produce income. So the bigger a government gets, the slower the economic growth. Simple as that. I mean, you can just take this. How bad is this about to get?

I mean, is America in the same position as Europe? Or are we in a better place? We're in a better place because we never went negative. And the Federal Reserve is independent. So the Fed is raising interest rates, which is basically a declaration of war against Europe. The ECB is different. All central banks are not the same. So the ECB would have to go back to Parliament to ask.

for more money to create more and more and more. And then the problem with that is that in Europe, you have to have everybody consent. So it's kind of like, you know, getting a unanimous bill through Congress. I mean, it's never going to happen. Not going to happen. So the ECB is a much different position. So the ECB can actually go bust.

If they all disagree on funding it, then it's actually not there. Whereas the Fed is independent, the Fed, yes, can create money. It has the ability to create elastic money. So it can increase the money supplier, decrease it. It doesn't go back to Congress to say, gee, can we do this? How is Europe going to get out of this? This is what Schwab is sold to them. The only way out of this is to basically do his great reset.

And that you'll get everybody used to the fact that they just lost everything they own. But sell it in a different way. It's kind of like life insurance. If you buy accident insurance, fire insurance, all these things. But when it comes to yourself, do you buy death insurance? No. They can't sell death. So they call it life.

And you know, oh, yeah, I got $5 million worth of life. How much do you have? But they said if it's death insurance, they couldn't sell it because people, oh, I'm not ready to die yet. Okay. So maybe it's bad luck if I buy it. So they just switch the name. Interesting.

And it's a marketing ploy, and that's what they've done with this. So it's what I say, oh, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. It's because they're going to default. And they can't default unless they fool you to make it think that they're doing this for you. Now, if Europe defaults and just gets obliterated, I mean, do we get pulled into that sinkhole? That's why they had to get rid of Trump, because Trump was standing against this climate change. And what you have to understand about the climate change is that that's the agenda of the UN. The UN says no single country can defeat climate change, as if we could really do anything anyhow.

But so their argument is everybody has to be subservient to the UN and the UN will make the rules and regulations. And that's where Schwab's little video, the U.S. will no longer be a superpower. our arsenals will be handed to the UN and UN will become the one world government, which is Soros' dream. So global warming is sort of the headline by which we try to convince the world to all sink the power into a singular space, this being the UN, and create that one world power. So that's the sales pitch. Yes, I mean, look, it's, you can go back and there's front page of Newsweek from 1970.

All the scientists said, oh, no, we're going into an ice age. Then they flip it, all right? I mean, they've never been correct about any of this stuff. And the main reason is, unfortunately, the way most of these analytical ideas progress. Let's say it's 40 degrees this year, 45 next year, 50 degrees. So then they go, oh, it's warming. Then they take it on a linear projection and say, oh, by the year, you know, 2016, we'll all be burning alive.

Things don't work that way. That's like saying, okay, fine, well, the Dow went up 1,000 this year, the next year. It's always going to go up 1,000. That doesn't happen. But this is how they come up with these projections that are really nonsense. You know, global warming, oh, we're all going to, you know, just go back. I mean, you know, warming periods, it was, you know, Rome basically expanded because it got warm. And as soon as it gets cold, you know, civilizations collapse, mainly because people can't, you know, they can't grow food and things of this nature.

That's when disease comes, the black plague and things of this nature, mainly because people are, you know, malnourished. Right. I mean, you can even find letters of John Adams talking in the Civil, you know, in the Revolutionary War that the ground was frozen two feet deep. It was so cold. We couldn't grow any food. So global cooling is far worse for civilization and warming. So now, as we sit, one of the big, probably conversations going on in this pandemic, I don't know on which side, but it feels like a lot of people are thinking, there a civil war coming? And, you know, the pressure is being let off. As we're speaking

right now, COVID looks like maybe this Omicron is going to sweep through and sort of wipe out the need for vaccine, wipe out, certainly show to the world the vaccine was useless. But there's this, there's this real divide in this nation now. So if you're asked, do you think we're on the verge of a civil war? What are your thoughts on this? Yes, I mean, the damage that's been caused with this pandemic, as they have deliberately divided people. I mean, even the race issues they used. And so everything they could do to separate people. And the Nazis, that's how they gain power.

Oh, you know, those, they say you're the, you know, it's like the old prisoner's dilemma. You know, he says you did it. Oh, no, he did it. You know, you separate people. And so they've been, you know, they've, over the years, they've used religion, they've used race, they've used, you know, everything. This time they're also using Vax versus unvaxed and things of this nature. But you have seriously disrupted civilization.

What makes civilization function is that we all come together and everybody benefits. And why countries fall is that when it suddenly begins to flip and well, okay, now the government sees it has power. Well, I'll exploit this group for you. You're starting to divide it. And then you have people that leave. I mean, we have staff in Germany that are fleeing to Dubai because now the definition of being vaccinated is a booster every three months.

and your children must be vaccinated. And it's insane, completely insane. So as that happens, as we have people fleeing to certain areas where there's more freedom, fleeing from places where they feel oppressed, then is that sort of throwing, that throws things out of balance?

I mean, it makes me think of sort of the north and the south, right? Oh, yes. I mean, when we think the north and south and the original civil war, and I've been saying this, I mean, is that, and here's sort of my prediction, to see if I'm anywhere near from where I'm coming from. What I've been saying is, I think, very similar to the north and the south, though slavery was a part of that. It was really about

finance and business, and there seemed to be this disadvantage to the way business was being done in the South compared to the North. And so that sort of lack of balance created a real conflict in war. And I feel like here we have freedoms now landing in the Red States tend to be, you know, the South, again, in an odd way. But Texas, This has been open. We haven't been masked. We've been free. Our governor said, I'm not going to allow a vaccine, forced vaccine mandate. And so, you know, just financially, people are coming to Texas. I mean, we just read this week that U-Haul, there are no U-Hauls in California because they've all come to Texas.

Like everyone's moving Texas. People leave in New York. Going to Florida, Texas, Florida and Texas. Florida is booming. Texas economy is booming. If you're doing a convention, we're going to do the convention. You're not going to go to California anymore to the beaches of California. you're going to go to the beach to Texas or Florida and have your convention.

So all the money, it seems to me, is going to start pouring into what you could call the free states. And it's leaving, you know, sort of the oppressed states. And then I would imagine at some point we could see travel bans if they continue to use disease as a reasoning where you can't leave a red state and go into a blude state. I mean, these are all the type of spaces. But that divide, there's got to be, I think there's a growing, going to be a growing rage as the economies of those, I hate to say political, but right now it seems to be politically divided, you know, blue and red or, you know, Democrat Republicans, but as they starve out and sort of lose the people, they lose the business, it all moves, then there's a need for someone to write that ship. And isn't that where we end up in war? The civil war, yes, there was slavery, but the real bottom line was states' rights. And what most people don't realize in this.

country. When they voted on the Constitution, it was not unanimous. Only 39 out of 70 voted for it. Like Virginia, Patrick Henry, no, because there was no bill of rights. So it was not, you know, there's always been this contention from the beginning of this country about states rights versus federal. Huge conversation just this last, you know, over the Supreme Court, who does Joe Biden have the right to force the vaccine through OSHA, state's rights versus federal rights? Sotomayor saying, Why doesn't the federal government have this, you know, power? But obviously the conservative judges came out in, you know, to the state's rights, saying this is not something. That's the way the Constitution is.

Right. I mean, it's also why the United States has done better than Europe. Macron can shut down all France. Biden can't shut down all the United States. Right. I mean, I live in Florida, and I can tell you the, you know, the traffic has doubled. Yeah. But I was walking the beach and there was a guy there and his two teenage sons were surfing.

And he says, oh, are you from Florida? I said, well, I moved here about six years ago. And he said he just moved down because his sons were, you know, becoming suicidal. And I think it's, it's, and twice I met people like that, that I think maybe for the boys it's worse. Because they think that, you know, if they were into sports, they're going to become the next, you know, NBA player or quarterback or whatever. And whereas more on the academic side, they could maybe do their homework from school

in isolation or virtual, but you know, you don't get that on the sports side. So I bumped into two people that moved to Florida simply because of their children. They couldn't go play sports or anything else. We had our conferences in Orlando. I couldn't have held them anywhere else in the country. Right.

Maybe in Texas, but this is it. But the other part of this is that these politicians never accept responsibility. So the more they have put in these lockdowns and things of this nature, then they realized that they screwed themselves in the sense of their revenues went down, sales tax and things of this nature. So then what do they do? Oh, well, we need to raise taxes more to compensate for what we lost. Instead of does it ever dawn on you to maybe reduce the size of government?

They don't think that way. So ironically, a lot of Wall Street has been moving to Boca Raton, to Miami. I think Miami is going to basically replace Wall Street. I mean, even Goldman Sachs moved. Oh, we're keeping our headquarters here, but the most profitable division is in Florida. All right. I had a friend who was one of the top investment bankers in New York, and he called me, he said, gee, you want to go to dinner?

I said, oh, you're down here in Florida. We went to dinner, and he says, well, no, I just moved here. I said, you moved here? He says, yeah, we will work virtual now, so I moved to Florida. It's interesting. Has your computer looked at, you know, if there is going to be unrest in the United States of America, when we're going to see that? Yes.

I mean, it looks very grim from probably 24 to 27, I would say. Those in power don't see it. So all they're concerned about is keeping power. So they'll get more authoritarian, more draconian, rather than say, you are the problem. And that's why I say in Washington, there are no mirrors. They never look at themselves. When they investigate a financial crisis, does anybody ever look at, did the government cause this?

So 24 to 27 in the United States of America, your computer model, which has been incredibly... Civil unrest, rising dramatically. You're seeing the same thing in Europe. Yeah. You know, even before the pandemic, I went down to Greece and when, you know, Germany was against Greece, you know, getting out of the loans and stuff. you see protests there and they're walking around in Nazi uniforms. I mean, the memories in Europe go back much further than, I was in Yugoslavia years ago and they go, well, you know, they killed 600 of us and they put us, you know, put us in a mass grave. I said, I thought I missed it in the news. I said, you know, when did this happen? Oh, about 500 years ago.

I said, oh, yeah, that one. That one, right. I was in Bavaria and they said, oh, it's holiday today. I said, what's the holiday? Oh, we won the war. I said, which war? Oh, against Prussia. Right. So they remember things from much longer over there. And part of it, why Europe will fail is language. What made America great was actually discrimination. sounds crazy, but whoever was the last off the boat, you didn't get a job unless you spoke English. So when the Italians came, they had to learn English. When everybody came, it was fair, whoever is the last one off the boat, basically. But so then you ask an American, what are you? Oh, well, I'm half Irish, half Italian, whatever. You don't see that in Europe. Very rarely,

you know, well, Scott married somebody from Italy. I mean, they don't speak the same one. So you're not really, you don't see it that often. So that's what keeps Europe actually divided. I mean, if a girl from France brought a German home for dinner, and you know, the father's going to say, you know, you do know what they did to us, you know. Right. The memories just go back a long time.

When Klauswap makes this prediction that America will not be a superpower, do you feel that that's an accurate prediction? Or, I mean, whether they're driving that agenda not do we see a shift towards China which is I think what we're all concerned about well China after 2032 will be the new financial capital of the world the computer's pretty strong on that I but you have to understand that that's because we are committing suicide ourselves okay dividing the country like this like you know Biden saying oh the military you have to be vaccinated

And I think it was like 46% were refusing to get vaccinated, you know, and then, oh, you get dishonored to be, you know, discharged to, you know, this is, what is this? And then you stand up and say, well, U.S. will be there to defend Taiwan. Well, how are you going to do that if you're going to fire half the military? Right. It seems like, you know, defend the police. We're deep. Yeah, it's just, it's completely crazy. That is an agenda that something's different. It's, it's like to eliminate local police and put in federal police. Why is that? There's an old lesson from politics.

It's called the Nika revolt that happened in Byzantine times in the sixth century. The people were revolting against the emperor and the local police sided with the people. Okay. And the emperor was about ready to flee and his wife said, you have a legion outside that would come in and defend you. And they were not Greek. They were, you know, from Italy. And they came in and they defended. and they defended and they basically slaughtered everybody

and killed 40,000 people in the stadium. So that lesson is that if you, Greeks would not do that to people they knew. But bring in a different army and they'll do whatever because they don't like the Greeks to begin with. Right. So that's why they want a defund the police. Get rid of the local police. Because they know each other.

They know people. Exactly. It's their neighborhood. It's my brother's a sister. you, am I going to shoot you? Right. Well, I really have known him. He's been, oh, where are you okay? I'm not going to follow that order. So they'd rather have somebody else come in who doesn't know you. I'm told to shoot you. I follow orders. That's it. That's why. It goes back to the lesson. The local police are important to our stability in future in defending ourselves. Very, very much so.

You know, one of the questions I would have, because I think my audience now, right, we're all, you know, are shocked and fearful that China is going to be a superpower, maybe not the United States of America. We may be on the verge of some sort of civil war, huge deep unrest, you know, 24, you know, in the next few years, 2024 to 2027. Is your model ever wrong or in all the time that you've watched this? certainly have you ever thought man if I could warn people ahead of time and get people to really wake up to what's going on that they could change their fate change this destiny i tried yeah i tried defeating my own model i lost every time um because i think it's just it's too it's it's it's a combination of everything and so you can't just change one simple thing and and it just has to play out its course. That's where I've learned over, you know, 40 years in doing this thing.

It's never been wrong because history does repeat because of humanity makes the same mistakes over and over again. Rome fell basically from corruption internally, as we're seeing again here. All right, and there was a general that, I forget which one, but he sent a letter out and warned that maybe U.S. could go into civil war by 2024, that the military will split. That's how Rome fell. Okay, the military split. So there were civil wars, one, this general against that one, etc. You take sides? They do. They take sides. So there will be people that will say, okay, fine, no, I think, you know, the South is correct, and they would defend against the North. I mean, there was a joke when I think Biden was talking about putting in restrictions of people going to Florida and

and DeSantis came out and said he would call out the National Guard, the defense, we're already against the feds. You know, I mean, I mean, that's how stupid this, you know, everything gets. But, um, so what do we do? I mean, how do we, you know, as, as, I mean, I'm sort of proud of America. We've resisted this vaccine, but still a lot of us got us, got it. I would say that 40% more than really almost every first world nation. We really, there's something inside of us that has a rebellious spirit that sort of stood against this. DeSantis, Abbott, you know, Texas, Florida, you know, other Arizona. There's states that really sort of held strong, states' rights being argued by 27 attorney

generals that pushed back against the Biden administration. So it seems like there's hope. But what do we do? I mean, what do, what is a, what do I have to recognize since there's a computer model I have no control over? I have my world leaders that seem out of, out of our control, you know, grabbing more and more authoritarian in power. What do we do as citizens under these circumstances? Basically, just prepare for being on your own, really. You know, as you know, I mean, I was advising different political agendas in the United States for a long time. So I've worked behind the curtains and seeing how it actually works.

when Reagan was elected, they actually said at that time they were beside themselves. They don't like people from outside of Washington. That's why they didn't like Trump. You take Biden and Harris, both from Washington. They don't want somebody because it's like you're playing in our sandbox. You don't know how this works down here. And I used to basically be part of the vetting process for somebody that went run for president. They would send me in. I would talk about the world economy to see they were told

that's what I was there to advise him on, but it was really me also looking at them and saying, is there a light on here? Do they understand it? Right. And I get back and they go, what do you think, you know, think he could handle it? And that was a real vetting process. Yeah. Then 99, that changed. And that changed with Bush Jr. Okay. They told me to go down to Texas. and they said, this one's different, you know, and I said, what's different? And he said, no, no, you don't have to assess whether he can handle it. You know, we think he's, you know, a little slow. So they thought he was an idiot.

And so they basically, I said, why would you do that? Because it was completely opposite of everything we were doing before. And they said, well, he's got the name. And ever since then, like Obama attended maybe 60% of his morning briefing, They've always wanted somebody who's just a figurehead. That's it. Let us do what we need to do. So the deep state, so to speak, is really what controls things.

So Bush Jr., I mean, I saw that movie. I forget what it was called, but, you know, that, oh, he picked Cheney. No way. They picked Cheney and put Cheney in. You're lucky if Bush knew where Iraq even was. It was all Cheney's deal. And that's the way this is going. So they finally, with Trump, they put in his cabinet, he didn't really understand how Washington worked.

And he thought, okay, fine, you know, putting people to have experience to create stability. Bolton in there, these guys. Everyone stabbed him in the back, every which way they can. Fauci, Berks, like all these people. So that was Trump's biggest mistake because they didn't like him when he's in here saying that he's going to, like it's drained the swamp. Well, the swamp is both sides, you know, not just one side. Right. So they didn't, they, you know, they, they didn't like it. John McCain is the one that took the fake dossier from Hillary, and he's the one that gave it the combing.

So it made it look like it was coming from a Republican. Right. Not political. And even in McCain's funeral, he said, I don't want Trump speaking there. I mean, the resentment and hatred is, is, runs very, very deep. You're still fighting Trump, you know, today. All right. And so they have Biden in there and he'll sign anything they stick in front of them, really. You're lucky if he can read it. You know, it's Kerry, who is the main point man for Schwab in the White House.

John Kerry? Yes. Okay. There's even a YouTube video. Fauci appears in Schwab's videos. Oh, the number one. problem is equality. Why is he in there? You know, the head of New Zealand's in his, I mean, everybody that he has ties to is in there pushing his agenda. And that includes vouchee.

So what do we do to protect ourselves? If it comes down to states' rights, are we going to, do you think there's going to be states that sort of divide from the union or is there? Pretty much, yeah. Yeah. There'll be separatist unions. You're already seeing a lot of separatist actions like in Oregon and California people saying we don't want to support the other side they're crazy when this is why I say we're losing civilization civilization is when everybody benefits not when okay now I've gotten charged I'm gonna oppress you because I want it this way even the you you look at history when the English Civil War took place and Cromwell came in and you know the

the religious right that they were the the Puritans he outlawed sports because that led the cursing he outlawed Christmas because you're supposed to be praying he created people that went around inspired in your house to make sure you didn't weren't you know celebrating Christmas So that's why Cromwell and the English said, wait a minute, this is going too far the other way. And they overthrow him and then went back with the king. You have a similar thing. Biden, oppressed it. Like instead of like right where you should be, you know, getting America to come together, work together.

He's dividing. He's pressuring. I'm going to force him to take away your job. I'm going to force you to lock down. I'm going to force you in a mask. It's, he's the perfect guy because I really question whether he's co-heaval. he's coherent enough to understand what's going on. But I've seen it.

I mean, the judge that I had dementia. You can even Google him Richard Owens, and he was like, you know, how long are these guys on, he was on the bench from 1970 or something, appointed by Nixon. I would go to court. He would forget who I was. Oh, counselor, counselor, you're arguing.

I don't believe you're a client. And the marshals go, oh, you're the lawyer? I said, no, I'm the defendant. Oh, yeah, he's crazy. I mean, but this is what goes on. And Biden's the same way. So I can see it when he says. And then there's a clip like one guy on CNN got vaccinated.

Oh, are you okay? You know, was that a slip? Right. So just to sort of wrap this up, where should we find our hope? I really think eventually you will see the United States split. they have created a divide between blue and red, basically, using the vaccines, and it has tapped into this idea of socialism versus, you know, capitalism. And it's been around for a long time, and this is Marxist ideas. And this is why communism fell.

I can tell you, because I was also called in by China. to help them become capitalistic when they first formed. And I was impressed with the Chinese versus the Russians. The Russians went from communism to an oligarchy. You know, you competed with one of them, and your head was found in the gutter next street. The Chinese were monitoring absolutely everything, but they did not interfere.

So I went there, there were 249 varieties of tea that they were tracking. I had no clue there were that many varieties of tea in China. Right. But it was fascinating because they were talking about, well, why is this tea selling for $5 here but a dollar here? I said, well, where's it come from? Well, here. I said, first you have transportation costs. They go, oh, really?

And I said, people will pay more for something that's better or for someplace else. Under communism, the reason it fell is this equality. Everybody pays the dollar, even it costs $10 to get it there. Right. And that's why it was never efficient and why it collapsed. And these ideas of equality, sorry. I mean, a guy that can be a quarterback and can throw a ball better than I can, I mean, do you going to give me the job?

You're going to give the guy that can really do it. Is China a communist nation? I mean, is it? No, it's not communism. It's a more authoritarian type thing. communism is the government owns everything it's not communism Russia is not communism anymore they moved more to a authoritarian free market type thing where they control things yes but communism you wouldn't even be allowed to own your house

so and that's the real definition between socialism and communism you own your house but to tell you where you can do with it. Communism, they own your house and you tell you you can't leave until we tell you that you can go to another place. So then the hope is that there will be states in this divide that hold strong to capitalism and pulls, we pull through? Pretty much, yeah. I mean, you'll see Europe also divide. This idea of one-size-fits-all, it doesn't work. I mean, throughout history, you have empires rise and they fall, and they rise and they fall. They rise when they, benefit everybody. When you start singling out groups, you fall. You need, you know, everybody's

got a benefit. If we all don't benefit together, then what's the purpose of being together? You leave. And that's... The time to come together with everyone that... Yeah, and they're deliberately dividing the country on race and vaccines and everything they possibly can. And you... You can Google it. This is a political idea and Amazon used it and the papers came out and they were in a union dispute in Alabama, I think it was. And they created a diversity index for their employees. The more diverse the workforce than they would never get together to form a union. If you create it over, all whites or all blacks or whatever, they would then band together and then they demand a union.

So all this came out, and this is a political agenda that's been around for a long time, but Amazon was using it for its own employees. And this is what the government is doing. As long, if you divide everybody, then they will never join together and overthrow you. That's the real objective here. But the problem is in doing that, you also, destroy civilization. I want to really thank you for taking the time. When people want to sort of follow the work that you're doing, the predictions that you're making, what's the best place for them to find that information?

Go to Armstrong Economics.com. You don't have to register, put in emails or anything. We don't even sell advertising to achieve it just as a public service. That's it. Absolutely incredible. One of the sort of more mind-blowing conversations I've had, I really want to thank you for taking the time. I want to thank you for standing your ground and really truly,

representing what it means to be a hero, government, you know, coming after you, end up, you walk out, you're free, you proved to be right, you held on to everything you believed in. Oh, I just believed in Patrick Henry. Give me liberty or give me death. I'm not going to go any other way. Amen. Thanks a lot. Good talking to you. Nice meeting.

All right. Well, obviously, you know, we do these long-form interviews full of a lot of information, but I know you have your friends out there that maybe have short attention spans, and that's why we have put together our get vaccinated campaign. Here's what that's all about. Folks, it's time for you to get vaccinated. The Highwire is launching a brand new campaign to arm you with the facts. In short videos you can share anywhere,

featuring the world's leading experts on COVID-19, vaccines and everything in between. Natural immunity appears to be robust, complete, and durable. These are the drop the mic, fully-sacquely FACTS to help you, the super spreaders of truth, in this real war of misinformation. Share the link, download the short video, and post to your favorite social media platform. All you have to do is go do the highwire.com slash get vaccinated for all of the latest short videos.

And make sure to grab your Get Vaccinated merch at thehighwire.com. Click shop for the latest in Highwire gear. We want you armed with the facts online and on the front lines. Get the facts, lose the fear at the highwire.com. Well, in my journey to the high wire and starting ICANN and where it started with Vax, the documentary that really sort of changed the course of my life in media. I've met a lot of families and a lot of people out there and certainly so many people that have been injured by vaccines, those rates and those numbers are obviously skyrocketing

and going through the roof right now with COVID. And though we don't often get to sort of pay our respects to all those that are lost that succumbed to those injuries by vaccines, there is a loss this week that did affect me directly and profoundly. And I just want to send our condolences and our love and our hearts and our attention out to Tanner Welsh, who passed away. this week. A beautiful individual that moved people and probably even more importantly moved his parents and his father, Tim Welsh, his mother, Sherry. Tim was instrumental in

helping Vaxed get distributed around the world. The work that he did to use Twitter and Facebook, things that we didn't understand, he was actually there behind the scenes, never got paid by Vaxed, never got anything from us. You know him online as Tanner's dad, the legend known as Tanner's dad who is out there selflessly saw the power of acts and wanted people to know the truth like so many of these parents that suffer this incredible tragedy at home it is so difficult that their daily experience trying to take care of their vaccine injured children is is like something I can't even describe yet they find time to go out of their way to learn

how to use the internet to go into state cap to do work, to remind and sort of shout out from the mountaintops to the rest of us. Watch out. These products aren't as safe as you've been told. And so Tanner's loss today is one of those moments that is, you know, represent so many beautiful individuals that should have had a full and powerful life. But oftentimes by their doctors, by our government, just brushed off as, I guess, an accepted casualty. Well, we don't accept it.

I want to celebrate Tanner today. I want to celebrate him as a gift and a gift that empowered his parents to become incredible warriors for this movement. And so because of Tanner's life, he affected his father and his mother, which affected my life and is one of the reasons we are here with the high wire and have the power and strength that we do. And so I don't often get to talk about this. those we lose. But this week, our hearts are with you. Tim and Sherry, we're so sorry for this

tragedy, but know that Tanner will live in our hearts forever. As we close up this show, I want to say that that interview with Martin is incredible. It's powerful, it's terrifying, it's shocking. But as all things, it's one perspective. I mean, one of the things we do here. I didn't fully know what Martin was going to say. I actually happened to just, you know, meet him at dinner just the other night and just thought, if you're still in town, I'd love to interview you because the conversation at dinner was incredible. And I want people to hear, you know, some of the things that I just heard. And so that's what you get here, you know. In the end, is he right? In the end, does this computer or this algorithm or Pi mathematically somehow determine

that China is going to become the leader of the world and we're going to have a, Civil War, you know, between 20, 24 and 27, or, you know, these types of predictions. I want to tell you where I come from on this. I don't believe that there's anything more powerful than God. I mean, to be completely honest about that. And I believe in God, all things can be changed. And we, if we listen to our place on this earth and we listen to what we're being guided to do, anything can be changed. So even though I know he believes in, his algorithms and he believes in what his computers are telling him, I don't. I don't fully believe. I believe that what he is giving us is a warning of what could happen. Should we continue on the

course the way we have? Should we continue to be complacent and allow things to take control of our lives? Allow government officials to work for the industry that we're supposed to be being protected from, all of these things, which, as you can tell, there's an awakening. It's happening. And I want to point out that when I started this journey, back when Tim Welsh was helping me with Twitter and trying to get backed out there, right at that time, everyone around me in Hollywood is saying, Del, you're crazy, your movie's amazing, but there's no way you win this. Farma is everywhere. They own the freaking television set that you're going to have, how are you going to overcome that? They have more money than God. They have more money than anyone in this world. This is a losing battle. My own father said that to me. As I said, I was going to go on this journey. Maybe I'm wired differently, but I never listened to it. And when I stood on that stage in front of the Lincoln Memorial with Lincoln behind me, looking out at 40,000 people, it became so clear to me that we are rewriting history. We are altering the course of our future right now as we speak.

So maybe we take these moments to recognize what could happen if we don't do anything. But if we believe, if we speak out, if we are feelers, if we are courageous, if we stand in who we truly are, in the gifts that have been given to us by our Creator, all things are possible. So use these words by Martin, not as some sort of threat, but as a wake-up call, that we have work to do. We are winning now, but we have not won. I want to hashtag win. And so, therefore, we are going to be here. We're going to continue to bring you the interesting interviews just like Joe Rogan does wants to I'm curious I am incredibly and maybe dangerously curious because I'm going to interview everyone I can find that I think is

speaking the truth that is up against the machine up against the system if you're getting thrown in jail or having your license removed by the government and it appears to be for no reason I'm at least going to start asking the appropriate questions and you're going to get to hear them here on the highwire for all of you following us, help us, donate to us. We are up against a multi-billion, if not trillion dollar machine that is spending your money to buy vaccines instead of keep your hospitals open and protect you, is forcing doctors to use products that don't work over those that do. If you want to see that changed, if you care about your future, then we need your help.

This is the informed consent action network. You're that network. This is the high wire. Go and donate now. Just become a recurring goal. donor. We're asking for $22 for 2022. If you can do more great, if you only can, you know, afford a cup of coffee, $5 a month, whatever it is, get involved. Feel what it's like to be a part of changing the world. The high wire is doing that. We believe we can. You should believe it too. I'll see you next week.